444:
their implements until a consensus emerges. Most recently, I suspended all of my activity & discussion with regard to userboxes for a time, to give myself an immersion in editing the encyclopedia, which is what I came here to do. I've even been out stub sorting & copyediting, because, to me, even these mundane activities are so much more valuable than all the energy wasted on userbox discussions. Yet, people keep bringing the war to my doorstep, editing my userpage to subst userboxes or to change userbox links to point to userfied versions of the boxes. Good intentions aside, it's as if my neighbors thought my house needed a fresh coat of paint, then painted it without my consent.
450:
cause partisanship. The technology isn't the problem. Rather, it's the use of the technology. If we applied the same standard to editing, this would no longer be an open Wiki. Behavioral problems are best solved by intervention, not by locking down the tools. As far as moving these userboxes to a subpage of your userpage, I forsee an issue with that. Using you strictly as an example, what happens in the case of a userbox advocating a belief you object to? Since it inhabits your space, others are left to rely on your mercy.
150:
1256:
assessments are tests in the real world. This point is supported by the fact that both of the old, separate articles are about the same idea, that is, testing. I'm going to think about this for a bit, and I might take the article back to "norm-referenced test" with a note that the use of "norm-referenced assessment" is typically the same thing. Perhaps this whole problem would be simpler if we just wrote more extensively on the
454:
the prime movers behind executing userbox TfD's, pledged in his RfA that "I've never deleted a userbox and I don't forsee myself getting involved with that in the future." He went on to say that "I'll leave the userboxes up to other people." It's clear that he didn't keep that committment, and I firmly feel that only strong protections can keep userboxes viable should someone else fail to keep thier commitment.
1775:
1613:
1116:
473:
1292:
1159:
1096:
1080:. Now, Cyde is on his second userbox deletion from this page. I reverted his last one, but I don't want to get into a revert war with him. I had the thought that if other editors reverted his deletions, it wouldn't have the taint of being a me vs. him kind of thing. It's ridiculous that he's trying to game the system this way to get what he wants despite the lack of consensus for it. --
1459:
1450:
1395:
881:
1321:'norm-referenced test' for information on testing that compares students to normative samples." Is there such a thing as a norm-referenced assessment that is not a test? What would the comparison be? If the comparison is some number (e.g., normal curve equivalent or percentile rank), then it would have to be based on a test (as opposed to any assessment in general), right?
1231:), but not "assessment." My preference would be to keep all of the articles. My second choice would be to have a distinct testing section in an assessment article. "Criterion-referenced assessment" is parallel to "norm-referenced assessment." Again, a distinction between testing and assessment is the key. As far as I can tell, "normative assessment" is a derivative
1583:
1204:
780:
506:
352:
1183:). There hasn't been such a conflict with criterion-referenced tests, so I figured it would be okay to leave it as is, even though the name doesn't match the norm-referenced article anymore. Is there a more general term for criterion-referenced tests that would match "normative assessment"? Basically, both topics are about
1415:
Also, another thing, since you are really big into user templates, would you be willing to help me identify those that might work with merging? I am looking at the GMT and Card games ones at the moment, but Dog breeds (if a common color scheme and image naming scheme could be decided upon) could also
1255:
I guess I was working with what I hear in the education field. I hear "normative assessment" a lot, but not so much other terms. I don't really think there is a difference between a test and an assessment in the educational sense. It is not often that an assessment is not a test. In other words, most
457:
This deletion is one of many steps along a road which I firmly believe we shouldn't travel down. The further this goes, the harder it will be to stop. The more the deletionists are appeased, the less ability we will have to halt further deletion. For these reasons, and the ones I spoke of above, I
436:
THanks for your comments in the (now-closed) MfD. I had drafted a reply, but the MfD closed between my writing it & my posting it. So, I'm posting it here, so you'll know foremost how much I appreciate your kind words, words that demonstrate that you "get" what I was saying in my comment on the
908:
I have a proposal for setting up optional userbox archives and directories in userspace. Because of their locations, I assume the only way they will have a chance of surviving deletion attempts is if an involved admin supports them. I’ve outlined the basic steps below with suggestions of who could
502:
more lenient there, the Big Kahuna actually instigated the process, an organically redundant network is forming, and the costs of the ill will that would be caused by attempts to eradicate them from userspace would be debilitating to the fabric of the community. So, yes, you point out real risks to
453:
These are the things I worry about. As these templates get pushed into spaces with fewer procedural safeguards, I worry that we will see an increase in content-based userbox warring. Prominent deletionists have asserted that they will leave userboxes alone if they're in userspace. However, one of
1411:
Hello there...there are three templates that I have created that merge similar ones together...the other two are
Template:User Star Trek series and Template:User Monty Python. I can add them to your listing, and do you think that I could just switch out the ones on the main Userboxes/Media page and
443:
Thank you for acknowledging that my passion is genuine. I've spent considerable time thinking about the (supposed) problems with userboxes. I've devoted time to discussing userboxes in various fora, as well as to actively trying to persuade both userbox deleters & userbox creators to set down
449:
I wanted to address myself to the points you raise in favor of deletion. You state that if userboxes are used to rally
Wikipedians in the name of partisanship, then that is their worst application. I disagree strongly with what has become a main plank of the deletionist movement: that userboxes
1029:
At this time I think that consensus would need to be determined to use these "role accounts" to house this type of informatoin. At this point enough admins don't want to see them around as well. It appears at this time that mirroring the boxes / directories to multiple user pages is their best
559:
on
Knowledge (except for some copyrighted images) "As a tradition, Knowledge offers wide latitude to users to manage their user space as they see fit. However, pages in user space still do belong to the community:" A number at the end of a name usually means it's "version 2" of something, e.g.,
1299:
be able to do. "Performance assessments" (such as of planning, conducting, assessing and reflecting on a series of lessons) are a clear example of something different than a "test," which usually is a measure of a controlled stimulus and response set. I still say have an article for each with
322:
My personal guess is that he decided he wanted less talking about doing it and more doing it. But that is a total guess. It is not like anyone very rational is going to remove Jimbo's prod, so he essentially gave us 5 days to implement it for the
Beliefs subsystem or to decide that we aren't
485:
issue. Jimbo has made his wishes quite clear IMHO and he's just giving us the opportunity to divine a way to implement them. I've written many of the same types of comments at some of the more recent discussions you mentioned above and in the MfD. As a "psychology type" and "organizational
1277:
My doctorate is in
Educational Leadership with a specialty in educational evaluation. I've worked in the field for the past 20+ years. My job title until this month was "teacher education assessment coordinator." I spend most of my time coordinating performace assessments for licensure and
625:
I'm sure there's a good technical reason both for doing this (particularly without telling me) and the fact that the userboxes you've changed don't all actually come out as userboxes, but if you get the chance would you mind fixing the mess so that my userboxes in fact are userboxes and not
1320:
I think I will turn back the article to "norm-referenced test," but I don't think the article "norm-referenced assessment" (NRA) gave any distinct information. I'll make something up for the NRA page that says something like "The term 'assessment' is sometimes used for the term 'test.' See
225:
Just trying to get things better organized around there. Toward that end, I've created a task list template for the project. If all the contributors to the project placed it on their user page, we could all keep in touch more easily (with announcements, alerts, etc.). It, and the latest
1720:, but I cant get it centered. I did colspan=5 and align=center but the userbox still stays on the left side. Anyway, I just thought to ask you since that box is your namespace, but I can understand if your busy, so if you could just point me whom/where I could ask this. Thanks.
1466:
I think the approach you're using works best for a "themed" series like the ones you've already done. Doing "dogs" etc., doesn't make much sense to me because the "diversity" is what makes them special. I would get upset if my "mutt lover" box got changed. Something like the
728:
I do not mind complying with a WP community decision on user boxes, but I do mind you changing my user page. Substitute the controversial template with a redirect, put a note on my discussion page, but please leave it to me to change what's on my user page. --
523:
Some of us on the
Psychology Wikia are using a version of these. We would naturally like to attribute authorship. Most have your name attached. Do you claim authorship or can you point me in the right direction? And what are those with "2" on the end?
679:
Why did you change my user box from "User is a Roman
Catholic" to "User is interested in Roman Catholicism"? There is a BIG difference. If you are going to change userboxes for technical reasons, fine and dandy, but try to at least get them right!
797:
I admit I don't quite understand what userfying is. I am a Wiccan and have no problem with using the user box 'has Wiccan interests' or whatever but can you make sure what you edit are the userboxes on my site and not the written parts?!
738:
Hi Meyer, I apoligize for your being offended by the process I used to help clean up the userbox controversy. I made a change on your page that did not affect the display. The edit summary served as the note to you. And as we both know,
1018:
Even though this will be seen as controversial by some, I believe it’s one of the best ways to establish some long-term userbox stability that the vast majority of parties can live with. Let me know what you think. Regards,
1734:
centered. At first I thought it was on the right until I noticed you have a wider display than I do. If it still doesn't look right to you, try putting it in the third column of the first row of your main table. Regards,
1197:
Hi Chris53516, one of the main reasons I originally created the two testing articles was to establish the historical citation for Glaser coining the terms. I reworked the one sentence to fix the "screw up," so that's
658:. If you don't see what you are looking for, I am willing to help you design one or more boxes and place them as your own subpages, which could be added to the directory, if you choose. Again, my apologies, but some
486:
development type" among others, I enjoy "experimenting" with how to move an issue forward. To me, the risks are relatively small because this is "just a web site." On the other hand, just like a reality show, people
480:
main activities here. :-) We really are birds of a feather of a sort, so it's easy for me to identify with what you say. One of our main distinguishing characterics these days might be my pragmatic approach to the
1840:
my question is where do i share it? it seems that adding it to WP:UBXCO is frowned upon or something nowadays so im kind of stumped as to learn where exactly i should put this to help it get attention. thanx
1300:
cross-references where they apply. They always can be merged later. To me, the undelying problem is the term, "assessment" has multiple meanings in the collection of
Knowledge articles. That's why I added
1665:
bug, Fluxbot's underlying framework. I'll try using regexes instead of the auto find/replace for the next run. Do you think this is serious enough where I should stop repalcing these until this is 100%? —
649:
BigHaz, I apologize for the inconvenience. In the cases of the "ugly-looking code" on your page, it was a matter of separating many "is" from "is interested in" redirects for religion userboxes as part of
1076:. That was the best way to characterize his actions I've seen. Back when he wanted to delete userboxes outright, his reaction to losing that fight was to start nominating userboxes individually to
1680:
OK, just got a clearer POV on this....Not an AWB bug, from your history it looked like I improperly repalced something, not just missed one. I'll look for those type of instances on future runs. —
1954:
900:
1567:
Hello, I noticed that my used box which said I was interested in
Hinduism has made me a Hindu. I dont understand. I am more intereted in Hinduism than to say I am a practising Hindu. Thanks
1468:
1187:, so the titles should say assessment, in my opinion. Or, we could just call them "norm-referenced" and "criterion-referenced." What do you think? Sorry for screwing up your article names.
535:
1851:
844:
1065:
655:
610:
of them, "As a tradition, Knowledge offers wide latitude to users to manage their user space as they see fit. However, pages in user space still do belong to the community:" Regards,
337:
1855:
1500:
Since I'm an inclusionsit, I prefer giving users options. When I see disputes of multiples on the same topic, I prefer to add usage notes on how to choose options, such as {{
925:
1635:
Thanks for bringing that to my attention, I'm checking the code right now, I think the t1| through it off. Luckily this is not in use on most pages. My random checks (e.g.
1073:
552:
to do with "authorship." If you're interest in "editing" of any page, just check the history on each box. However, please keep in mind there's no such thing as individual
285:
1934:
Userbox since migrated to userspace under ] which now has no incomming links, and is a cross namespace redirect or a redirect to a deleted page. (] - housekeeping deletion)
1981:
1023:
249:
124:
977:
309:
1873:
Hey
Rfrisbie. Can you explain what you did on my user page and why you did it? It doesn't seem to be a problem or anything, it's just that I don't understand it. –
476:
I expected your call. And to no surprise, I was in the middle of userfying some boxes at the time. (Tweaking the tip of the day and other Wikignome activities are
513:
1419:
Also, I have a long post on the Userboxes WikiProject talk page about why I am doing this. It is in an effort to keep user templates in the templates name space.
1228:
921:
494:
risks with "trusting" the migration approach. But at the same time, opportunities abound as well. I'll go out on a limb and predict userboxes will become even
462:
431:
341:
1479:
userbox expert!) is parameterized (is that a word?) with a color scheme. The others are thematic but individual color schemes. I would support a template that
1818:
1109:
503:
the emerging process. On the other hand, real opportunites exist as well. The fun of it will be watching it unfold and playing a few hands along the way.
229:
1295:
I don't get around much and I'm in a very specialized area, so I'm really not surprised. Teacher education standards today focus on what they should know
716:
681:
572:
27:
422:
on you page. After I moved that UBX to userspace, I bypassed the redirect. That's why you see the new link on your page, but the box was already there.
1224:
706:
684:
1354:
1895:
1862:
1552:
1535:
1517:
719:
690:
1325:
1264:
1961:
1944:
1701:
1688:
1674:
1191:
1051:
1038:
887:
868:
858:
636:
Further, I'd suggest that marking edits which could (and in this case did) result in major changes to how the page looked is hardly a "minor edit".
614:
1752:
1739:
1487:
showed me how to pass a parameter argument in a Babel box. I'm sure The Thadman would know how to pass more than one, if you don't. Of course, the
327:
1891:. Userboxes have been going over to userspace for a while now. Expect to see more of it. Let me know if you have any other questions. Regards,
1401:
1308:
1247:
666:
238:
1825:
751:
274:
933:
640:
1598:
1568:
733:
630:
747:
our userpages. I know I'll offend some users along the way, but it's a price I'm willing to pay to help get this thing behind us. Regards,
161:
of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
1804:
426:
402:
744:
607:
553:
358:
316:
256:
1811:
836:
Ok. It was the verb I didn't get so thanks. Your apology was appreciated. Ganbatte kudasai (Good luck/Keep at it) with your userfying! --
458:
feel compelled to raise awareness of the potential harm of these actions, and to raise that awareness in the strongest possible voice. --
303:
528:
1577:
Hi RaveenS, someone changed the meaning of the box, so I changed it back with a note to the "Hindu" box. Thanks for pointing that out!
308:
Thanks for the heads-up. That's fine with me. I'd just like to have a smooth transition process to userspace. I'm going to volunteer
768:
1462:) I saw Monty but I hadn't seen Spock. You're welcome to add them to "my" (not really) listings. Go for it at Userboxes/Media too.
1235:
from "norm-referenced testing." I really think the history should be kept straight (back to Glaser). The key to me is to identify "
843:
1992:
1438:
588:
1655:
1495:. That seems to be the way to cut down on the number of templates (even though I really don't see that as a central issue myself).
1530:
how to do the Monty Python ones. Also, you can comment on the current usages I have come up with and maybe give me a few more. -
1170:
1781:
1619:
1589:
787:
289:
1877:
1724:
1571:
620:
220:
213:
1346:
I converted it back. Please check it for any mistakes. If there's any more need for discussion, let's talk about it on it's
1143:
1122:
830:
1527:
1084:
375:
208:
203:
198:
193:
188:
178:
173:
157:
774:
Not at all. That's why I've put so much energy into helping resolve the userbox controversy in whatever small ways I can.
1301:
1220:
1165:
1918:
697:
694:
243:
490:
being themselves. It's a fun way (for me) to study characters' characters. Surely (may I call you Surley? ;-), there
1800:
1786:
1434:
654:. I see you already removed the redirects. You might be interested in looking at other userboxes in the directory at
1748:
Im using Firefox. Should've thought earlier of putting it in 3rd column :) And it does work now in both FF and IE6
1304:
to the evaluation article. Strengthening the assessment article regarding its multiple meanings works for me too.
700:
388:
1836:
Hiya. Ive just created a new (and better, imo) userbox for soulseek and i thought id share it. you can look at it
929:
279:
261:
1888:
1009:
995:
965:
951:
583:
Signing Userboxes is inappropiate, since userboxes are GNU. besides the userbosex belong to ALL WIKIPEDIANS.--
1472:
1243:" and that distingush assessment as a broader term than testing. If you do that, I'm fine with the changes.
1642:
1636:
815:
266:
I am trying to improve Girl Scout articles in the United States. Please help fill in some blanks for Girl
1796:
1240:
981:
1260:
page rather than separate articles. Is there more to say to warrant a separate article for these types?
1180:
336:
I posted my offer at GUS. I think the structure is in place to make a relatively smooth transition to
21:
1645:
1624:
850:
Sure I'll delete this for you if you want, or you can jsut make it a redirect to mine. Let me know. —
1969:
1907:
1639:
1347:
578:
69:
1215:) I'm not a big fan of using the "assessment" term because it tends to be used interchangably with
1837:
1831:
892:
1176:
864:
Thanks, I'm waiting on MiraLuka to make sure no boxes get misplaced. Then I'll ask for a delete.
598:
on Knowledge is inappropriate because of GNU. What I assume you mean by "signing" simply is the
95:
82:
1175:
I couldn't figure out a better way to combine the two pages on norm-referenced test/assessment (
1406:
1211:," with assessment being the more general term. They all also are forms of "quasi-evaluation" (
518:
1428:
1236:
1212:
1140:
765:
416:
363:
525:
271:
267:
806:
Hi Luvlymish, I'm sorry for changing the Wiccan link. That was an oversight on my part.
288:
with a prod reason of "per the emerging consensus that the German solution is best". See
8:
1711:
1562:
819:
759:
1928:
a speedy deletion criteria, but seems like it their change of defeating a TFD is like a
1454:
498:
pervasive and robust as they migrate over to userspace. The standards of acceptability
408:
Hi Bonojohn, The emerging consensus is to migrate userboxes to userspace as part of the
1990:
1942:
1916:
1792:
1699:
1686:
1672:
1653:
1036:
856:
162:
108:
17:
1090:
Hi Ssbohio, maybe I should become the play-by-play comentator for the "Userbox Games"!
299:, the userbox location straw poll, and will also be dropping a message on GTBacchus.
1501:
1059:
792:
149:
1874:
1842:
1531:
1492:
1423:
1137:
807:
394:
1868:
1351:
1322:
1261:
1188:
235:
1974:
1929:
1127:
837:
799:
565:
1985:
1970:
1958:
1937:
1911:
1901:
1892:
1884:
1859:
1822:
1778:
1736:
1694:
1681:
1667:
1662:
1648:
1628:
1616:
1586:
1549:
1514:
1398:
1305:
1244:
1162:
1133:
1119:
1077:
1048:
1047:
Okay, I think I'm about done with trying to move this thing forward for now.
1031:
1020:
1005:
884:
865:
851:
827:
811:
784:
748:
703:
663:
651:
611:
603:
584:
569:
561:
539:
510:
423:
409:
399:
382:
355:
313:
296:
292:
56:
1791:
could somone make userboxes for the main 3rd parties in the United States?
1749:
1721:
1717:
1625:
1081:
961:
459:
324:
300:
1505:
1208:
637:
627:
1513:
Anyway, I appreciate what you're doing and wish you the best. Regards,
764:
Thank you. It may seem unbelievably trivial, but to me it's important.--
44:
1982:
Knowledge:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#German_userbox_solution
1808:
1257:
1184:
999:
985:
969:
955:
941:
730:
253:
1232:
1207:
The way I see things, "testing" and "assessment" both are forms of "
1980:
Please see, and contribute if you would like, to the discussion at
1819:
User talk:GRBerry/German userbox solution#Political party userboxes
915:
893:
437:
MfD. So, without further delay, here is my reply to your comment:
372:
1219:
of these other terms without specifying their distinctions (e.g.,
814:
to the userbox controversy (migrating and redirecting boxes from
1716:
Im trying to make "Sum" userbox center at the top of my table in
1774:
1612:
1115:
472:
662:
inconveniences are inevitable from this controversy. Regards,
1953:
If it's okay with you, I'm just going to keep listing them at
1291:
1278:
accreditation. We must run in different circles because I've
1158:
1095:
40:
1458:
1449:
1394:
1223:). Also, I'm aware of professional standards for "testing" (
1221:
Evaluation#The distinction between evaluation and assessment
880:
123:
934:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject Userboxes# Userfying userboxes
312:
as a place for any orphaned directories and/or archives.
1582:
1203:
1099:
Don't forget that "condoned and enabled" part too. But
779:
505:
351:
1229:
Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation
826:, after some boxes were moved. Once again, I apolgize.
602:
desigination of some boxes I "userfied" as part of the
972:
so the important content and histories are maintained.
901:
Optional userbox archives and directories in userspace
964:
work out the technicalities of how to merge/move (?)
924:. I’ll also move boxes to it that are listed under
822:). What I was trying to do was have your page look
1730:Hi Shinhan, when I look at your page in IE6, "Sum"
1225:
Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing
689:Hi TruthCrusader, I did not change the content of
1302:The distinction between evaluation and assessment
534:Hi Robin Patterson, the MBTI userboxes listed at
873:I just got the okay, blast away! Please delete.
432:Userbox directory MfD result -- lacks consensus
1132:Hi Rfrisbie. Thanks for fixing my error at {{
538:simply are those I "userfied" as part of the
393:Why did you edit my user page? with this {{
340:. Any boxes that need/want moving can go to
284:On July 8, 2006, Jimbo proposed for deletion
140:
1526:To see how to pass multiple parameters, see
990:I’ll move my directories and you move yours.
368:Please just let me know when it's received.
1647:) seem to be accurate for the most part. —
1103:don't forget, "What happens in Knowledge,
1932:'s in hell. I've been deleting them as
1282:heard the term used like that until now!
930:Knowledge talk:Userboxes# GUS move tag?
14:
702:I see you already picked one. Regards
542:. My username simply is a part of the
1603:Click, click, copy-paste, type, type!
1149:You're welcome. That wikimarkup is
699:and display a list of alternatives.
28:User talk:Rfrisbie/Archive/Archive 3
1850:Hi chubbstar, you could link it at
1817:Hi Ted-m, I posted your request at
1469:User:Rfrisbie/Userboxes/Personality
536:User:Rfrisbie/Userboxes/Personality
34:
1068:, you describe Cyde's actions as '
122:
35:
2015:
1852:User:Rfrisbie/Userboxes/Computing
944:as an optional userbox directory:
920:I’ll set up this page similar to
845:User:Rfrisbie/Userboxes/Sexuality
606:. And as we both know, I have no
1908:User_talk:Xaosflux#Deleting_UBXs
1773:
1611:
1581:
1457:
1448:
1393:
1290:
1213:Evaluation#Evaluation approaches
1202:
1157:
1114:
1094:
879:
778:
656:User:Rfrisbie/Userboxes/Religion
594:Hi Atenea26, of course, signing
504:
471:
350:
148:
1883:Hi Morganfitzp, take a look at
1412:not get into too much trouble?
1171:Norm/criterion-referenced tests
918:as an optional userbox archive:
338:User:Rfrisbie/Userboxes/Beliefs
226:announcements can be found at:
1889:User:GRBerry/Userbox migration
1030:chance of growth right now. —
1010:User:UBX/Userboxes/General Nav
996:User:UBX/Userboxes/General Nav
984:directories as subpages under
966:User:GRBerry/Userbox migration
952:User:GRBerry/Userbox migration
13:
1:
1856:User:Rfrisbie/Userboxes/Music
1473:User:The Thadman/Userbox/MBTI
621:Changing userboxes on my page
344:. What else can I do to help?
270:! Thanks, Yours in Scouting,
221:Tip of the day project update
1597:Wow, that was quick. Thanks
926:Category:Templates to userfy
840:18:30, 19 July 2006 (GMT+9)
802:23:46, 18 July 2006 (GMT+9)
248:Check out my comments here,
7:
1074:Knowledge:Userboxes/Beliefs
1066:Beliefs Userboxes talk page
982:User:Xaosflux/UBX/Sexuality
286:Knowledge:Userboxes/Beliefs
10:
2020:
1677:(please reply on my talk)
1181:Norm-referenced assessment
250:Knowledge awards committee
244:Knowledge awards committee
139:
1993:13:56, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
1962:02:28, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
1945:02:20, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
1919:01:21, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
1896:22:24, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
1878:22:20, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
1863:11:53, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
1826:23:59, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
1812:23:46, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
1787:political party userboxes
1782:19:36, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
1753:19:24, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
1740:19:03, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
1725:18:19, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
1702:04:25, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
1689:04:08, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
1675:04:06, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
1656:04:03, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
1620:15:31, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
1590:15:00, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
1572:14:48, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
1553:22:42, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
1536:22:01, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
1518:21:46, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
1439:19:30, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
1402:21:45, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
1355:21:41, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
1326:21:17, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
1309:20:45, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
1265:20:03, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
1248:19:06, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
1192:17:06, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
1166:16:52, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
1144:16:49, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
1123:02:31, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
1085:02:13, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
1052:00:09, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
1039:22:46, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
1024:20:42, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
888:19:55, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
869:19:52, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
859:19:21, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
831:15:03, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
788:22:27, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
769:22:07, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
752:20:31, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
734:20:05, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
720:20:27, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
707:20:13, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
696:What I did was userfy it
685:19:49, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
667:12:40, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
641:07:15, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
631:07:03, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
615:12:38, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
589:14:00, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
573:12:30, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
529:09:18, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
514:03:59, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
463:03:22, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
427:02:19, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
403:00:57, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
376:09:33, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
131:
1072:when he tried to delete
946:You unprotect the page.
389:Atheism userbox question
359:02:57, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
328:02:45, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
317:02:39, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
304:02:31, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
275:02:48, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
257:17:24, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
239:17:34, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
115:
106:
93:
80:
67:
54:
1693:Thanks for the list! —
1471:page is interesting. {{
978:User:Rfrisbie/Userboxes
310:User:Rfrisbie/Userboxes
291:. I've posted this to
280:Jimbo on userboxes news
262:Please adopt your state
230:totd task list template
120:
114:
113:
104:
102:
100:
91:
89:
87:
78:
76:
74:
65:
63:
61:
52:
127:
1483:change the displays.
922:User:Rfrisbie/Userbox
342:User:Rfrisbie/Userbox
126:
1177:Norm-referenced test
546:designation. It has
268:Scouting in Michigan
1906:See my reply here:
1227:) or "evaluation" (
998:as a subpage under
626:ugly-looking code?
1793:Constitution Party
1528:here in my sandbox
816:Template namespace
128:
18:User talk:RichardF
2006:
2005:
2002:
2001:
1955:the cat talk page
1801:Libertarian Party
1502:User:UBX/Religion
812:Userbox migration
604:Userbox migration
579:Signing Userboxes
540:Userbox migration
410:Userbox migration
371:All the best. --
169:
168:
163:current talk page
135:
134:
26:(Redirected from
2011:
1988:
1940:
1914:
1845:
1832:soulseek userbox
1777:
1697:
1684:
1670:
1651:
1615:
1585:
1493:Template:Userbox
1461:
1452:
1437:
1431:
1397:
1294:
1206:
1161:
1118:
1107:in Knowledge" -
1098:
1034:
883:
854:
782:
766:Anthony.bradbury
691:Template:User rc
508:
475:
421:
415:
395:User:UBX/Atheism
381:Got it. Thanks.
354:
152:
145:
144:
141:
111:
98:
85:
72:
59:
45:
41:
31:
2019:
2018:
2014:
2013:
2012:
2010:
2009:
2008:
2007:
1986:
1978:
1938:
1912:
1904:
1871:
1843:
1834:
1789:
1714:
1695:
1682:
1668:
1649:
1633:
1565:
1433:
1427:
1409:
1173:
1130:
1062:
1032:
958:as main layout:
903:
898:
852:
848:
810:is part of the
795:
762:
623:
581:
526:Robin Patterson
521:
434:
419:
413:
391:
366:
282:
264:
246:
223:
218:
129:
118:
107:
94:
81:
68:
55:
33:
32:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
2017:
2004:
2003:
2000:
1999:
1997:
1977:
1968:
1967:
1966:
1965:
1964:
1948:
1947:
1903:
1900:
1899:
1898:
1870:
1867:
1866:
1865:
1833:
1830:
1829:
1828:
1788:
1785:
1771:
1770:
1769:
1768:
1767:
1766:
1758:
1757:
1756:
1755:
1743:
1742:
1713:
1710:
1709:
1708:
1707:
1706:
1705:
1704:
1661:Looks like an
1632:
1623:
1609:
1608:
1607:
1606:
1605:
1604:
1579:
1578:
1564:
1561:
1560:
1559:
1558:
1557:
1556:
1555:
1548:Okay, thanks.
1541:
1540:
1539:
1538:
1521:
1520:
1510:
1509:
1497:
1496:
1455:ParserFunction
1446:
1445:
1420:
1408:
1407:User templates
1405:
1391:
1390:
1389:
1388:
1387:
1386:
1385:
1384:
1383:
1382:
1381:
1380:
1366:
1365:
1364:
1363:
1362:
1361:
1360:
1359:
1358:
1357:
1335:
1334:
1333:
1332:
1331:
1330:
1329:
1328:
1288:
1287:
1286:
1285:
1284:
1283:
1270:
1269:
1268:
1267:
1200:
1199:
1172:
1169:
1155:
1154:
1129:
1126:
1092:
1091:
1070:out of process
1061:
1058:
1057:
1056:
1055:
1054:
1042:
1041:
1016:
1015:
1014:
1013:
991:
973:
937:
902:
899:
897:
891:
877:
876:
875:
874:
847:
842:
834:
833:
820:User namespace
794:
791:
776:
775:
761:
758:
757:
756:
755:
754:
725:
724:
723:
722:
713:
712:
711:
710:
709:
672:
671:
670:
669:
644:
643:
622:
619:
618:
617:
580:
577:
576:
575:
566:User:UBX/INTP2
520:
519:MBTI Userboxes
517:
468:
467:
466:
465:
455:
451:
446:
445:
433:
430:
390:
387:
386:
385:
365:
362:
348:
347:
346:
345:
331:
330:
281:
278:
263:
260:
245:
242:
222:
219:
217:
216:
211:
206:
201:
196:
191:
186:
181:
176:
170:
167:
166:
153:
137:
136:
133:
132:
130:
121:
119:
112:
105:
103:
101:
99:
92:
90:
88:
86:
79:
77:
75:
73:
66:
64:
62:
60:
53:
51:
49:
39:
37:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2016:
1998:
1995:
1994:
1991:
1989:
1983:
1976:
1972:
1963:
1960:
1956:
1952:
1951:
1950:
1949:
1946:
1943:
1941:
1935:
1931:
1927:
1923:
1922:
1921:
1920:
1917:
1915:
1909:
1897:
1894:
1890:
1886:
1882:
1881:
1880:
1879:
1876:
1864:
1861:
1857:
1853:
1849:
1848:
1847:
1846:
1839:
1827:
1824:
1820:
1816:
1815:
1814:
1813:
1810:
1806:
1802:
1798:
1794:
1784:
1783:
1780:
1776:
1764:
1763:
1762:
1761:
1760:
1759:
1754:
1751:
1747:
1746:
1745:
1744:
1741:
1738:
1733:
1729:
1728:
1727:
1726:
1723:
1719:
1703:
1700:
1698:
1692:
1691:
1690:
1687:
1685:
1679:
1678:
1676:
1673:
1671:
1664:
1660:
1659:
1658:
1657:
1654:
1652:
1646:
1643:
1640:
1637:
1630:
1627:
1622:
1621:
1618:
1614:
1602:
1601:
1600:
1596:
1595:
1594:
1593:
1592:
1591:
1588:
1584:
1576:
1575:
1574:
1573:
1570:
1554:
1551:
1547:
1546:
1545:
1544:
1543:
1542:
1537:
1533:
1529:
1525:
1524:
1523:
1522:
1519:
1516:
1512:
1511:
1507:
1503:
1499:
1498:
1494:
1490:
1486:
1482:
1478:
1475:}} (he's the
1474:
1470:
1465:
1464:
1463:
1460:
1456:
1451:
1443:
1442:
1441:
1440:
1436:
1430:
1426:
1425:
1417:
1413:
1404:
1403:
1400:
1396:
1379:Okay, thanks.
1378:
1377:
1376:
1375:
1374:
1373:
1372:
1371:
1370:
1369:
1368:
1367:
1356:
1353:
1349:
1345:
1344:
1343:
1342:
1341:
1340:
1339:
1338:
1337:
1336:
1327:
1324:
1319:
1318:
1317:
1316:
1315:
1314:
1313:
1312:
1311:
1310:
1307:
1303:
1298:
1293:
1281:
1276:
1275:
1274:
1273:
1272:
1271:
1266:
1263:
1259:
1254:
1253:
1252:
1251:
1250:
1249:
1246:
1242:
1238:
1234:
1230:
1226:
1222:
1218:
1214:
1210:
1205:
1196:
1195:
1194:
1193:
1190:
1186:
1182:
1178:
1168:
1167:
1164:
1160:
1152:
1148:
1147:
1146:
1145:
1142:
1139:
1135:
1134:User:UBX/male
1125:
1124:
1121:
1117:
1112:
1111:
1106:
1102:
1097:
1089:
1088:
1087:
1086:
1083:
1079:
1075:
1071:
1067:
1053:
1050:
1046:
1045:
1044:
1043:
1040:
1037:
1035:
1028:
1027:
1026:
1025:
1022:
1011:
1007:
1003:
1001:
997:
992:
989:
987:
983:
979:
974:
971:
967:
963:
959:
957:
953:
948:
947:
945:
943:
938:
935:
931:
927:
923:
919:
917:
912:
911:
910:
906:
905:Hi Xaosflux,
895:
890:
889:
886:
882:
872:
871:
870:
867:
863:
862:
861:
860:
857:
855:
846:
841:
839:
832:
829:
825:
821:
817:
813:
809:
805:
804:
803:
801:
790:
789:
786:
781:
773:
772:
771:
770:
767:
753:
750:
746:
742:
737:
736:
735:
732:
727:
726:
721:
718:
717:TruthCrusader
714:
708:
705:
701:
698:
695:
692:
688:
687:
686:
683:
682:TruthCrusader
678:
677:
676:
675:
674:
673:
668:
665:
661:
657:
653:
648:
647:
646:
645:
642:
639:
635:
634:
633:
632:
629:
616:
613:
609:
605:
601:
597:
593:
592:
591:
590:
586:
585:User:Atenea26
574:
571:
568:}}. Regards,
567:
563:
562:User:UBX/INTP
558:
555:
551:
550:
545:
541:
537:
533:
532:
531:
530:
527:
516:
515:
512:
507:
501:
497:
493:
489:
484:
479:
474:
470:Hi Ssbohio!
464:
461:
456:
452:
448:
447:
442:
441:
440:
439:
438:
429:
428:
425:
418:
411:
406:
404:
401:
396:
384:
380:
379:
378:
377:
374:
369:
364:Email for you
361:
360:
357:
353:
343:
339:
335:
334:
333:
332:
329:
326:
321:
320:
319:
318:
315:
311:
306:
305:
302:
298:
294:
290:
287:
277:
276:
273:
269:
259:
258:
255:
251:
241:
240:
237:
232:
231:
227:
215:
212:
210:
207:
205:
202:
200:
197:
195:
192:
190:
187:
185:
182:
180:
177:
175:
172:
171:
164:
160:
159:
154:
151:
147:
146:
143:
142:
138:
125:
117:
110:
97:
84:
71:
58:
50:
47:
46:
43:
42:
38:
29:
23:
19:
1996:
1979:
1933:
1925:
1905:
1872:
1835:
1805:Reform Party
1790:
1772:
1731:
1718:User:Shinhan
1715:
1634:
1610:
1580:
1566:
1488:
1484:
1480:
1476:
1447:
1422:
1418:
1414:
1410:
1392:
1296:
1289:
1279:
1216:
1201:
1174:
1156:
1150:
1131:
1108:
1104:
1100:
1093:
1069:
1063:
1017:
993:
975:
949:
939:
913:
907:
904:
878:
849:
835:
823:
796:
777:
763:
740:
715:ok thanks!!
693:, Cyde did.
659:
624:
599:
595:
582:
556:
548:
547:
543:
522:
499:
495:
491:
487:
482:
477:
469:
435:
417:User atheist
407:
392:
370:
367:
349:
307:
283:
265:
252:. Thanks! --
247:
233:
228:
224:
183:
156:
48:
36:
1926:technically
1875:Morganfitzp
1858:. Regards,
1844:(chubbstar)
1797:Green Party
1712:Layout help
1563:My user box
1506:User:UBX/RC
1424:Lady Aleena
1209:measurement
1138:Paul August
950:Merge/move
760:Catholicism
412:. You had
155:This is an
1416:use this.
1352:Chris53516
1323:Chris53516
1262:Chris53516
1258:assessment
1189:Chris53516
1185:assessment
1000:User:Boxes
986:User:Boxes
970:User:Boxes
956:User:Boxes
942:User:Boxes
488:can't help
483:categories
481:userboxes/
323:serious.
236:Go for it!
1924:It's nto
1504:}} and {{
1348:talk page
1233:neologism
1153:anyway!!!
1060:Good call
1004:I’ll ask
909:do what.
838:luvlymish
808:Userfying
800:luvlymish
793:Userfying
783:Regards,
608:ownership
564:}} and {{
554:ownership
509:Regards,
184:Archive 3
96:Resources
83:Directory
70:Userboxes
1987:xaosflux
1959:Rfrisbie
1939:xaosflux
1930:snowball
1913:xaosflux
1893:Rfrisbie
1860:Rfrisbie
1823:Rfrisbie
1779:Rfrisbie
1737:Rfrisbie
1696:xaosflux
1683:xaosflux
1669:xaosflux
1650:xaosflux
1617:Rfrisbie
1587:Rfrisbie
1550:Rfrisbie
1515:Rfrisbie
1489:ultimate
1435:contribs
1399:Rfrisbie
1306:Rfrisbie
1245:Rfrisbie
1163:Rfrisbie
1120:Rfrisbie
1049:Rfrisbie
1033:xaosflux
1021:Rfrisbie
1008:to move
1006:MiraLuka
968:over to
960:You and
916:User:Box
896:, et al.
894:User:Box
885:Rfrisbie
866:Rfrisbie
853:xaosflux
828:Rfrisbie
824:the same
785:Rfrisbie
749:Rfrisbie
704:Rfrisbie
664:Rfrisbie
612:Rfrisbie
600:location
596:anything
570:Rfrisbie
557:anywhere
544:location
511:Rfrisbie
424:Rfrisbie
400:Bonojohn
397:}} : -->
383:Rfrisbie
356:Rfrisbie
314:Rfrisbie
20: |
1975:WP:AN/I
1869:Orange?
1750:Shinhan
1722:Shinhan
1626:Fluxbot
1599:RaveenS
1569:RaveenS
1491:box is
1241:methods
1239:" and "
1237:designs
1082:Ssbohio
1064:In the
962:GRBerry
940:Set up
914:Set up
549:nothing
460:Ssbohio
325:GRBerry
301:GRBerry
158:archive
57:Samples
22:Archive
1971:WP:GUS
1885:WP:GUS
1803:, and
1481:didn't
1128:thanks
1101:really
743:of us
652:WP:GUS
638:BigHaz
628:BigHaz
297:WP:GUS
293:WP:JOU
1902:Reply
1838:here.
1809:Ted-m
1765:Cool!
1280:never
1198:done.
1151:goofy
1105:stays
994:Move
976:Move
928:(see
731:Meyer
272:Chris
254:evrik
16:<
1984:. —
1936:. —
1887:and
1854:and
1631:'ing
1477:real
1429:talk
1179:and
1136:}}.
980:and
932:and
741:none
660:more
496:more
109:Talk
1973:on
1663:AWB
1629:GUS
1508:}}.
1485:You
1453:← (
1297:and
1217:all
1113:!
1110:not
1078:TfD
954:to
818:to
745:own
500:are
492:are
373:FT2
1957:.
1910:—
1821:.
1807:--
1799:,
1795:,
1732:is
1644:,
1641:,
1638:,
1534:@
1532:LA
1444:Hi
1350:.
936:).
798:--
587:,
560:{{
478:my
420:}}
414:{{
405:|
295:,
234:--
214:10
165:.
1841:-
1432:/
1421:—
1141:☎
1012:.
1002::
988::
398:|
209:8
204:7
199:6
194:5
189:4
179:2
174:1
116:↑
30:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
