52:
117:
1321:
1268:
2411:
1966:
1824:
1415:
1305:
377:
2480:
1625:
1196:
1004:
579:
2608:
2561:
2529:
2386:
2348:
2309:
2177:
1782:
1685:
1527:
528:
326:
2437:
2342:
1972:
1631:
2485:
1978:
1579:
1470:
1382:
1311:
591:
295:
269:
246:
2103:
code--it did the trick and is better than going full width and pushing down the discussions. Thanks as well for the fonts in your sandbox--I still have to take the time and learn how to incorporate one into my skin. I think there is a basic skin concept that is eluding me, such as where my skin's css
2073:
pointless, but what it actually does is refresh the article's categories. Your User: page was still listed in a category that it wasn't actually in anymore - but to force everything to update - I 'bumped' the article. Bumping essentially is adding a blank line to the top of an article, which actually
1945:
Hello, I am not sure I am doing this right; please bear with me. I am not sure what a "pipe" is, but if it's the link divided by |, then my reasoning was this: I was merging "Course evaluations" with "Course evaluation," and when I corrected the links to "Course evaluations," I used the | to preserve
2499:
NP for being bold - sorry I didn't research first - I should have - my only defense is that I got that habit on that particular page because of its high profile since it is linked prominently on the main page - but I should have at least looked who did the change first. Sorry also about the footer -
2207:
Oh, the basic concept is fine, but the table design is simple (and ugly?). That's what i meant you could replace (only if ya want). Or it could be moved/merged to the project page, or anything! (I also just meant, that the table is all my work, just unsigned, so noone will argue with you if you hack
1848:
Hi there! That was a reasonable compromise... but let me explain why I put that line there in big honkin' bold letters. Novice users frequently make a proposal and then say, hey let's vote on it. I (and some others) try to put a stop to that unfortunate tendency. A big !! sign on the template seemed
891:
On GUS, I'm winding down a bit on my involvement with it. The flames are cooling down to embers in most places, and an infrastructure for userspace boxes is off the ground. I'm not iterested in nit-picking "shoulds" because wiki is what it is. Jimbo's the Big Cheese and he's letting me play with his
488:
There is practically no limit to the amount of potential contention surrounding what is included or excluded. I'd like to think I've built a reputation for impartial adds, moves, and drops from Cent. This reputation allows me to do a lot of dog work that otherwise might just not get done. I'm hardly
2364:
I was just following your lead on reformatting portal browse, but since there were some objections, we should just leave it the way it was originally, for the time being. We should drop the matter of upgrading that page for now. Quiddity thought we should wait, and I happen to agree. (Quiddity's
2264:
per your suggestion. This breaks the colour scheme on that template and I feel we need a unified "two-level" scheme if we are going to go down that road. Once again, I don't want to change all the templates multiple times, so this needs to be discussed / decided now. If we really create a guideline
753:
of color. I smell a wave of anti-color sentiment masked as concern for the color-blind. I think this POV is foolish; people who truly cannot abide colors can use a skin that, through CSS, controls all colors to white and black, maybe gray. I also know that my personal strength as a designer lies in
260:
I suppose because the footer is two lines high, the "absolute bottom" position hits the "relative bottom" of the header box. I really wanted to keep it located in the background bar. I added the "extra" text area for when someone used the "Start a new discussion" button. Unless there's some way to
480:
Cent is not really my pet project; an editor named
Radiant started it, invested a lot of effort, burned out, and left. I've uncovered more than one place where this editor seems to have overdriven his own opinions, trying to see acceptable outcomes where there were none. I mention this because I'd
1433:
Hey! Is there a scale of any kind to indicate how psychology articles should be assessed? It looks like you've been doing most of the assessing so far. I've been reluctant to do it, but I've gotten involved in a discussion on one article about how it should be rated. I would use the scale for the
522:
instead of running a competing proposal. I don't think you agree and I'm not going to force the issue. Between the current system (reverse chronological) and alphabetical, I don't have much preference. I alphabetized
Conclusions because that's a more or less stable directory; the Cent template is
2253:
using the same colours as the "Guidelines, help and resources" section of the CP. I then changed help related project templates and pages to the same colour scheme (from a mixture of schemes - some very poorly designed). I also changed a number of collaborations and fix-up/to do templates to the
761:
Let's do this: You fiddle with Cent; adjust the colors and assume a one-column layout. Prototype it casually; don't worry about function, let alone content. If you want to take it all the way, that's fine; but I'm willing to take it over at some point and get the functions working and update the
2279:
which uses the same style as the principles template above to make the sub-headings slightly smaller. This provides a better differentiation between the top & sub headings and is something to consider in a debate about two-level headings. I admire what you are doing and look forward to your
572:
work here isn't the way many of the written procedures would have you believe. I've seen more than one "old timer" make comments to that effect, but I couldn't tell you where at the moment. Anyway, thanks for clearing things up, and I apologize for editing the template "out of process". (I even
977:, and built it out. (It's honestly still just a proposed guideline; Urthogie added the "style guideline" template back in April without discussion, but I didnt have the heart to remove it, as it's not a bad page, and might help influence things until it can be properly improved.) There are a
567:
opposed to wikiwars. At least it quieted things down a bit. As far as policymaking goes, the "it's descriptive, not prescriptive" mantra rings true for me. I'm more inclined to call it a distributed, rather than a centralized process. One thing I've learner from GUS is that the way things
2325:
The tip of the day is starting to run low. Just another month left on the buffer. I kept the thing stocked up since April, so I would really appreciate if someone would pick up where I left off. You are my first choice, 'cuz I know you'll keep the quality level high. --Go for it! aka
938:
If some broader page pulls together a cluster of templates, then that certainly takes the pressure off any one of them to stray off focus. If something important still falls through the cracks, it alway could be added to the page through another template. I think the concept has promise.
93:
2114:
You're welcome. I don't use css but you would create one at username/monobook.css if you use the main skin. You also can just use subpages like I do for my header, or just put a div at the top of a page like here. You can see some of the page resources I have at
2254:
schemes of their respective CP sections. I like the tweaks you have made to the CP but was wondering what else you had planned (I am happy to tweak the aforementioned templates, but don't want to then change them again). On a related note, Quiddity has changed
2294:
and the talk page as much as possible. I went with 60 degree hue increments for the most part with shades like at the the talk page. Different layouts forced picking a border so I always went with the darker choice. I've been trying the two-level palettes at
1156:
Establishing some kind of standard look for project/process boxes. We can take a page here from article taxoboxes, which are starting to fall into a loose standard -- but I don't see any need to copy these and it might be well if "ours" were distinct.
625:
I like the palettes more than you know. This recent whinging about the tints chosen to head Cent points up the need for standard color schemes -- to be used right across the board, everywhere, in article mainspace, project space, and templates. This
2193:
be interested in adding a two-level header option. If you happen to find that color blindness test page, I could adjust what I've been using, if needed, and then throw it into to mix. Then we can see what happens with something like that too.
656:
that goes light on function and strong on specifying exactly which colors may be used for which roles in what places. Border thickness, margins, paddings, widths of infoboxes, notice boxes, and tags all need to be defined. One or two standard
1894:
Please keep an eye out, and if you agree it might help to make the point a bit clearer again. Thanks. Regarding consensus polling, I think it might be useful for major policy shifts, but other than that I don't really see the point on-wiki.
1609:. While it is clear some areas do lack citations, I do not agree that the page as a whole lacks references. Would you object to the removal of this template and instead include the indication of which sections or facts need reference work?
2074:
dissapears once saved - thus causing no interferance with the article's appearance :) Normally, categories update themselves properly and a bump isn't needed - however sometimes articles get stuck and need a little encouragement.
2375:
That's fine with me. I've just tried to do minor adjustments here and there where no one objected. Since
Quiddity was the one who opened his mouth on starting another project (what was he thinking! ;-), I'll just follow
2150:
2453:
I restored the prior introduction pages - I didn't see anywhere this was discussed prior to the change - I think it looks good to have the header tied into the tutorial better, but lets get concensus first on
1336:
and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding
1281:
and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding
815:
Notability has simply become too large of a topic to be handled on cent. It has its own directory template and interested parties are thrashing out dozens of issues in their own ways, on at least 40 pages.
2471:
2455:
634:
be grouped but from one to the next there is no consistency. It looks as though someone cobbled together a shelf, one volume at a time, from a dozen different reference works: that is, looks like hell.
648:, you see a primitive, limited effort to standardize presentation. It has caught on some but the creator didn't really seem to know how to go about it. I fooled around with this some, trying to improve
2545:
I have restored your page. When I had deleted it, it was actually listed on the "Speedy
Deletions" page, which is a bit strange if you did not post the template. It must have been a technical error.
407:. This will help us stay all on the same page -- no pun intended. You're also going to want to come up with a more plausible rationale for pushing your pet project than alphabetic sorting. Or sort the
1203:
four or five other "projects" I've been dabbling with. For the most part, I'll make my comments on the respective talk pages, in a feeble attempt to try to keep things straight. Some quick comments.
1240:
P/P boxes: Those types of things seem to have the best success when they're "project-related." I think people would be interested in help in the form of templates, but probably not "requirements."
882:
layouts for different settings. The content gets entered into a "text-only" template and then layout templates format it as needed. I'm willing to work with you on Cent as a stand-along activity,
1654:
1643:
736:
important as a tool for distinguishing one thing from another and more from less important. The current tint, #acf, keys all the
Centralized discussion pages. Under the whinging, I also altered
223:
962:
I totally agree with John's comments that we need an organised color scheme. (Possibly, a standardised color scheme for the
Knowledge/Official/Meta pages & templates, and a set of color
1358:
Sorry about that. I will be sure to do that when I add the template in the future. Thanks for all of your work in creating the template and adding the right ratings to the articles! —
343:
925:
see a somewhat similar discussion-omnibus template that is much more wide open. When the idea works it's way through my mental digestive tract, I'll show you what I think.
2303:. Something like that might be a good way to coordinate groups of pages for color palettes and layouts. I'm open to suggestions too. I'm just "putzing" for the fun of it.
2001:
1736:
549:, too. Within these bounds, hey, it's your wiki too. I'd really rather have you involved in process, making decisions. Then you, too, can sweat your own neutrality.
32:
314:
I tried "margins" and "padding" to no avail. Since they're on different "layers," the footer just moved around and everything else just stayed put. Thanks anyway.
740:
493:. I make dozens of judgement calls and sometimes I'll make the wrong call. I'll be content if my error is corrected and it's not labeled as self-will run riot.
481:
not like to go down the same road. I did adopt this stray neighborhood cat; I saw that it could do a lot of good -- or harm, if not managed with some firmness.
1456:
I just took a look myself! I didn't get very far at "customizing" it, so we just have to play it by ear. If you have some ideas, go ahead and adjust the draft.
2011:
1746:
1989:
1704:
1396:
Sorry again about the class/quality thing! I get these WikiProject templates mixed up sometimes. Fortunately, I only made that mistake on a few articles. —
1376:
get around to adding a "draft importance" subpage table that's specific to psychology, but I'll probably try out some details on a different project first.
1091:
1068:
819:
Many proposals compete in an effort to regulate the creation, format, storage, and display of UBX. This is a failure of the centralized discussion process.
766:
2365:
hands are full with the sidebar project, so I think we should wait until that project is completed). Nice work on the color coordination, by the way. --
2091:
1691:
2108:
918:
discussions. What that actually is, has not been clearly defined and right at the moment I'm still trying to figure out if a clear definition is wise.
1720:
1042:
2592:
Thanks for updating the Rambot FAQ / Rambot Talk Page. I'm sure you did all of that for your own reasons, but it just looks nicer anyway. Later! --
1714:
1233:
1025:
943:
908:
459:
428:
2628:
2232:
2223:
2198:
2132:
2123:
1932:
1919:
1887:
1809:
1253:
1249:: I'm interested in "tweaking" high level page colors for borders, headers, and backgrounds, so they use more-or-less the same set of HSV palettes.
617:
472:
2054:
2029:
1506:
721:. When I took up the Cent mop, the three-column layout was already established; I retained that through the last few minor facelifts. I might well
2579:
2506:
2020:
It's baaaaaack.... :D I tried looking at the code and I can't figure out why it's showing up for CSD? Maybe because something is transcluded?---
1533:
1500:
1476:
1451:
1438:
1421:
1400:
1388:
1642:
1082:
1362:
2249:
Hi. I noticed that you have been working on colour standardisation. Following the redesign of the
Community Portal, I initiated a redesign of
2097:
404:
1613:
128:
of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
2369:
1210:
1183:
1165:
I think I can develop the technical ur-template, you can lend an eye to color selection, and we can work together on the layout appearance.
875:
783:
You came in with your edit just as I finished about 16 straight hours of work on Cent, only to have to deal with the whinging on the tint.
606:
435:
2330:
776:, we can substitute the new version in a few prominent places. If it's accepted there, then we move it directly to the regular template.
1444:
332:
302:
275:
252:
234:
2535:
2491:
2081:
1493:
1637:
1078:
Creating some sort of alternative to Cent, something much more wide open, with less focus, less overhead, broader scope. I'm thinking
2643:
2519:
Thanks, I'm used to being reverted. The footer thing is just a game I play. I realize most people won't see the note until I move it.
2464:
1010:
988:
981:
at the bottom of its talkpage. (I'm just a design novice, who's been poking at that page recently, as it is so obviously a problem)
914:
Cent can't be for everything; perhaps it shouldn't even try to include the most pressing issues of the day. It should be limited to
2443:
2392:
1585:
2354:
2284:
1726:
1353:
1547:
1543:
Yes, i would like some help displaying them in columns...also, i'd like to know how you managed to make your page look so nice?
850:
2315:
1873:
1757:
Now, are you ever going to be pleased with just one userpage design? ;) I think it's a neat idea though; now what shall I add?
1176:
893:
630:
be an encyclopedia but if so, it's one where each volume is bound and illustrated in a different style. Articles and processes
2183:
2157:
1830:
1788:
1770:
190:
185:
2639:
Good point about the namespace. I've fixed that problem, so we can get on with the discussion about merging the pages. --
2567:
691:
You've got an idea with Cent: the vertical, one-column layout. This is how most similar project directory boxes work, e.g,
180:
175:
170:
160:
155:
150:
145:
140:
124:
2007:
Thanks, whatever it was must have been deleted already. I touched it and two other pages to get them out of the category.
2614:
2549:
1984:
1950:
383:
354:
2596:
932:
839:
556:
445:
418:
346:
to be self referential, I didn't put it on the main template to avoid confisuion for casual editors coming across it. —
2146:
1151:
There must be another dozen floating around the project worthy of general interest. I don't really know where to begin.
597:
512:. I will -- generally -- keep on Cent the most viable of a number of competing proposal pages and drop all the rest.
403:. This is quite all right and I encourage you to help keep it current. But please don't forget to log your changes at
51:
1327:
HSV color test: (original "AliceBlue" HSV - H:208 S:6 V:100) (adjusted to "wikified" HSV - H:210 S:4 V:100 - #F5FAFF)
2300:
904:
shouldn't be maginalized simply because it's messy. Maybe
Quiddity's new page could find room for such "hub" pages.
791:
like the way the "Germans" are, ever so politely, marching us along. The most frightening words in any language are
2087:
It didn't always work when I tried just saving without making any changes, even after purging my browser cache. --
813:
Now, I'm leaning toward pulling all UBX discussions right out of Cent, just as I did
Notability. I wrote recently
1100:
Creating some sort of Grand
Central Station for these omnibus templates. Besides Cent, I have 4 on my user page:
1573:
easier too! Let me know if you have any other questions, or need more help with the userbox columns boilerplate.
978:
217:
204:
2258:
2216:
1998:
1733:
892:
toys. If he wants some separation of "neutrality" and "viwepoints" that works for me. There's a category for
874:
like Quiddity's idea about grouping similar "advanced user" templated info on a common page he mentioned at
489:
perfect; I have my own biases. I don't want to do anything on Cent that might suggest I'm pushing my biases
2448:
1139:
787:
I agree with you on this point: The war is bad and almost any solution is probably better than none. But I
994:
Hey! I was just trying to add a comment there when I got a "you've got mail" banner on my page! And no, I
952:
661:
of icon need to be established and all other sizes ruthlessly forced to conform -- to say nothing of icon
1590:
1434:
Biography WikiProject as a guide, but it would be better if we had one for the Psychology WikiProject. --
1219:
610:
199:
21:
821:
Now, I'm thinking that the failure itself just disqualifies UBX-related issues from Cent. Cent is for
2064:
1924:
Okay. Will do. Also, the expectation that "It is only really appropriate when a group of individuals
825:
discussion, not for dispatches from the battlefield. The biggest possible mistake is to link Cent to
434:
I really dislike reverting other editors, even once. I've also spent several hours recently, sorting
69:
2299:. If there's interest, I would add the suggestion to the WP colours page. Also, Quiddity suggested
1995:
1730:
1117:
705:
519:
1558:
2359:
2273:
2116:
1562:
1538:
605:
Actually, the more I think about it, the more I like the template. In fact, I like it so much, I
77:
1628:
It didn't see the references section the first time around, so I just took the tag off. Sorry.
2640:
2366:
2327:
2320:
2296:
1569:) and then "transcluding" them with various subpages. That makes testing and changing things a
1566:
85:
1052:
1946:
the appearance of the page. I apologize if this is not the correct way; I am new to merging.
1599:
455:
pet project, you pick. I'll either revert the original sort or make everything alphabetical.
1729:
but it's too large for me to be able to pick out the item. Perhaps you can find it. Cheers.
1561:
you can try out. I fiddle with my pages by "borrowing" layout designs from other users (see
2244:
1957:
1835:
515:
So, for my preference, drop GUS altogether. If you think this kind of approach is correct,
8:
2140:
1752:
1701:
1610:
1606:
1173:
1022:
929:
836:
553:
442:
415:
2501:
2459:
1169:
I don't know how much time we can devote to all of these but there's no time on a wiki.
1896:
1850:
1803:
1764:
1333:
1278:
563:
Thanks for the history, very interesting. Personally, I'm opposed to GUS too. I'm just
352:
129:
101:
17:
1447:. I should have paid more attention to the talk page of the Psychology WikiProject! --
2634:
2291:
2266:
2025:
1839:
1128:
953:
715:
116:
2540:
2088:
2078:
1160:
2149:
as much as you like or replace it completely. I just hacked it together (based on
1368:
Cool. Don't worry about the ones you already added. I'm going to update them with
1215:
Kite: I'm not at all sure what that would be. I don't even know what "Kite" means.
2281:
1346:
1342:
1291:
1287:
1246:
1226:
974:
642:
500:
and contrary to the nature of a wiki to have more than one competing proposal on
2587:
2228:
Cool. If it holds up for a while, I'll add a two-level palette to the options.
1969:
Sorry for assuming you made the original caps changes and the renaming pipes.
1940:
1672:
1658:
1338:
1283:
1170:
1106:
1019:
926:
878:. I'd like to see your comments there too. :-) Templates like these often have
833:
695:
550:
439:
412:
337:
227:
2625:
2621:
2611:
2564:
2532:
2488:
2440:
2401:
2389:
2351:
2345:
I won't say "yes," but I won't say "no" either. I'll pitch in where I can.
2312:
2250:
2229:
2220:
2195:
2180:
2154:
2129:
2120:
2105:
2051:
2008:
1981:
1947:
1929:
1884:
1827:
1798:
1785:
1759:
1743:
1711:
1688:
1676:
1662:
1634:
1582:
1530:
1473:
1418:
1405:
Well, if you just did more wikiwork, you probably could keep things straight!
1385:
1369:
1314:
1250:
1230:
1039:
1007:
985:
940:
905:
854:
614:
594:
469:
456:
425:
397:
380:
347:
329:
299:
272:
249:
231:
61:
2500:
I use the little + sign and didn't realize I had edited below the footer. --
1619:
Hi Michael, either my browser didn't load the full page or I just spaced it!
749:
I definitely am not wedded to any particular color combination, only to the
2593:
2212:
2021:
388:
1880:
2576:
2546:
1544:
1497:
1448:
1435:
1397:
1359:
1329:
1274:
966:
for the other regions (so that inappropriate choices can be over-ruled))
1243:
Cent on CBB: It's still a possibility, the conversation continues there.
585:
p.s. Being the graphic designer you are, I'm glad you like the palettes.
285:
Hmm, if it can't be hacked with padding, then I'm stumped too. Ah well.
2624:
so I decided to give that group of FAQ pages a similar look and feel.
849:
what I say!. Plus... On palettes, check out this Color project topic,
545:
than in any outcome. I'm sure you'll appreciate that I like things to
1960:
are those verticle lines that let you change how a link is displayed!
732:
ask that you retain the colored background headers. I think color is
1496:
as a basis. Let me know what you think, or make some edits to it. --
438:. This is up to you. But please don't break this thread over pages.
1199:
At this point, I'm going to opt for the "putzing" aproach on these
1018:
Something should be done and we might just be the people to do it.
681:. In other words, some responsibility must be taken to establish a
1975:
In most cases, links are best displayed in their "unpiped" form.
1320:
1267:
2410:
1965:
1823:
1414:
1304:
376:
1349:}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!
1294:}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!
2479:
2219:
template back to your test, and noone has complained yet :) --
1624:
1195:
1003:
578:
2472:
Template talk:Please leave this line alone#Tabs like Tutorial
2336:
Dho! The "real world" has me cutting back on my wikitime too.
1038:
I'm sure we can do something, even if its just suggestions.
2607:
2560:
2528:
2385:
2347:
2308:
2176:
1781:
1684:
1526:
527:
325:
31:
2436:
2341:
1971:
1679:, thanks for the invite, but I think I'll pass on this one.
1630:
1061:
different-though-related initiatives we may both support:
2153:), and the example hues have no specific importance. :) --
1879:
I get it. :-) Just out of curiosity, what do you think of
1928:
that affects them all," often isn't met around here. :-)
772:. When you and I and anyone else who drops in think it's
2484:
2046:
in the place of the offending template. The code itself
1977:
1578:
1469:
1381:
1310:
590:
294:
268:
245:
1073:
I'd like to see what you do there before I get into it.
486:...its usefulness is in inverse proportion to its size.
1796:
A nice featured picture from the Commons, perhaps. :)
1657:. If you want to join, Click on the blue link. Signed
900:
of pages, so I agree Cent has a dilemma. However, the
861:
got a clue on how to try out different palettes with
1492:
I did some work on it using the importance scale at
1261:
2265:for help / project pages it could be documented on
1710:Thanks again, but I've never even seen an episode.
1725:Something on that page is causing it to appear in
1994:It's back in the speedy deletion category again.
261:push up the relative bottom, I'm stumped for now.
1849:like a good idea for that. Just my $ .2. Yours,
1507:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Psychology/Assessment
2301:Portal talk:Browse#Reference pages wikiproject?
817:I also wrote, trying to summarize the UBX war,
652:on the original, but what's really needed is a
573:missed the note in red at the top of the page!)
424:If you have a problem with sorting, revert it.
984:Anyway, that's it, just a plea for input :) --
1700:because MatchPat has already left Knowledge.
1218:GCS: Again, I'm interested in the context of
451:So, since you seem to be the expert guarding
405:Knowledge:Centralized discussion/Template log
1229:. This seems to be the general GCS concept.
1209:Cent: I'll try things out in the context of
436:Knowledge:Centralized discussion/Conclusions
1445:Knowledge:WikiProject Psychology/Assessment
762:content. Let's do this on a workpage, say,
2456:Template talk:Please leave this line alone
1990:User:Rfrisbie/Userboxes/ Non-ISO Languages
1721:User:Rfrisbie/Userboxes/ Non-ISO Languages
1494:Knowledge:WikiProject Biography/Assessment
2290:Hi Gareth Aus, I've been trying to go by
1065:Reworking Cent into a one-column layout.
809:You will have to come with us, thank you.
2050:look any different. I commented it out.
2167:seem to have some momentum. Of course,
1727:Category:Candidates for speedy deletion
1696:Rfrisbie, the WikiProject really needs
805:Sorry, but your papers are not in order
205:
14:
2215:. The contrast is fine, I changed the
1926:desire to collectively solve a problem
1187:
1182:All interesting stuff, not to mention
2128:I think I have it now--thanks again.
2098:Help controlling ubx position | Stuff
1565:), fiddling with color palettes (see
758:may have a better eye for palette.
393:Hello, I see you've recently edited
224:Template:Main Page discussion footer
504:topic. It's definitely contrary to
27:
2042:There's going to be a speedy note
1332:has smiled at you! Smiles promote
1319:
1277:has smiled at you! Smiles promote
1266:
496:My personal opinion is that it is
30:
28:
2660:
979:list of things that might be done
510:keep all players on the same page
2606:
2559:
2527:
2483:
2478:
2435:
2409:
2384:
2346:
2340:
2307:
2175:
1976:
1970:
1964:
1822:
1780:
1683:
1629:
1623:
1577:
1525:
1468:
1413:
1380:
1309:
1303:
1194:
1002:
797:Please forgive the inconvenience
754:form and outline, not in color.
589:
577:
526:
375:
324:
293:
267:
244:
115:
50:
2620:Oh, by the way. It's listed at
2077:Hope that explains things :) --
1354:WikiProject Psychology template
725:a standard one-column layout.
2580:22:30, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
2568:22:32, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
2550:19:20, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
2536:03:45, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
2507:03:41, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
2492:00:54, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
2465:00:43, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
2444:19:27, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
2393:18:57, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
2370:18:22, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
2355:18:45, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
2331:18:22, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
2316:11:51, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
2285:10:49, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
2233:18:42, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
2224:18:36, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
2199:14:25, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
2184:11:29, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
2158:04:51, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
2133:14:24, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
2124:13:29, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
2109:12:40, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
2092:02:45, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
2082:02:28, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
2055:19:45, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
2030:17:28, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
2012:02:21, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
2002:01:45, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
1985:21:43, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
1951:21:29, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
1933:17:13, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
1920:17:06, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
1888:16:45, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
1874:16:39, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
1605:box to the top of the page on
1422:17:25, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
1401:17:21, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
857:on such matters. That's how I
665:, which currently ranges from
613:. I hope you'll add your 2¢.
468:Nevermind. I took care of it.
13:
1:
2171:can change whatever I do too.
1831:04:46, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
1810:03:59, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
1789:00:51, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
1771:00:46, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
1747:14:18, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
1737:12:37, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
1715:00:53, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
1705:11:01, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
1692:14:48, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
1638:22:08, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
1614:21:17, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
1586:20:02, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
1548:19:23, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
1389:17:55, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
1363:17:47, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
1254:20:05, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
1234:02:41, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
1177:14:14, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
1043:03:40, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
1026:03:28, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
1011:03:47, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
989:03:44, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
944:03:40, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
933:03:28, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
909:03:30, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
894:Knowledge userbox discussions
840:01:16, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
618:15:57, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
598:05:59, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
557:05:42, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
473:04:46, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
460:04:34, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
446:04:24, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
429:04:20, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
419:04:17, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
384:03:23, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
355:03:18, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
344:Template talk:User GUS UBX to
2602:Welcome...colors...pretty!!!
2211:And I did find that page :)
2145:You're welcome to alter the
1742:I think I fixed it. Thanks!
1655:WikiProject Little Einsteins
1644:WikiProject Little Einsteins
1505:Looks good! See comments on
801:This will only take a moment
533:I'm much more interested in
364:win the prize for being the
7:
2644:21:18, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
2629:03:41, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
2615:03:37, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
2597:03:32, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
2474:. Sorry for being so bold!
2102:Thanks for the <div: -->
1559:userbox columns boilerplate
1534:23:14, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
1501:22:46, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
1477:19:49, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
1452:19:46, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
1439:19:06, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
793:Step this way, please, Sir.
508:. The driving spirit is to
333:19:53, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
303:19:23, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
276:19:16, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
253:18:37, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
235:18:33, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
226:, as used at the bottom of
10:
2665:
2269:. Finally, I have tweaked
1220:Knowledge:Community Portal
886:as part of a themed group.
795:Next thing you know, it's
559:
222:You may like to check out
2400:*hides under a blanket* -
1653:This is an Invitation to
1372:. Also, this weekend, I
1211:Add Template:Cent to CBB?
1184:Add Template:Cent to CBB?
973:if you both took over at
876:Add Template:Cent to CBB?
685:for the entire project.
2213:colorfilter.wickline.org
959:If I might interject...
42:
2147:Colour generation guide
2117:User:Rfrisbie/Resources
1595:You recently added the
1563:User:Rfrisbie/Resources
1225:I just stumbled across
998:know what color it was!
870:As far as Cent goes, I
853:. I typically defer to
41:
2297:User:Rfrisbie/Palettes
1567:User:Rfrisbie/Palettes
1324:
1271:
543:moving process forward
506:Centralized Discussion
218:T:MP discussion footer
35:
1323:
1270:
638:If you check out old
342:I fixed the links on
34:
2555:Thanks, you're fast!
2449:Introduction changes
2259:Knowledge principles
2217:Knowledge principles
2069:Hello there! Yes it
1776:No....and...hmmm....
654:design working group
2470:Okay, go for it at
2427:where you wikilive!
1996:CambridgeBayWeather
1881:"consensus polling"
1731:CambridgeBayWeather
1702:User talk:Iswatch19
1607:South Bend, Indiana
1591:South Bend, Indiana
1443:Nevermind--I found
1140:villagepumppagesbox
688:Well, that's one.
206:New quote & pic
1325:
1272:
1092:Template talk:Kite
1069:Template:Cent/work
779:Re UBX, GUS, etc:
484:Early on, I noted
370:"Push the footer"!
58:
36:
18:User talk:RichardF
2641:The Transhumanist
2367:The Transhumanist
2328:The Transhumanist
2292:Knowledge:Colours
2267:Knowledge:Colours
2065:Re:Pointless edit
1668:
1667:
1188:Knowledge:Colours
954:Knowledge:Colours
865:wikiness to them.
609:adding it to the
210:
136:
135:
130:current talk page
56:
2656:
2610:
2575:You're welcome.
2563:
2531:
2504:
2487:
2482:
2462:
2439:
2413:
2388:
2350:
2344:
2311:
2278:
2272:
2263:
2257:
2179:
1980:
1974:
1968:
1916:
1914:
1912:
1910:
1908:
1870:
1868:
1866:
1864:
1862:
1844:
1838:
1826:
1806:
1801:
1784:
1767:
1762:
1687:
1650:
1649:
1633:
1627:
1604:
1598:
1581:
1529:
1472:
1417:
1384:
1313:
1307:
1198:
1161:Knowledge:Probox
1144:
1138:
1133:
1127:
1122:
1116:
1111:
1105:
1087:
1081:
1006:
771:
765:
745:
739:
720:
714:
710:
704:
700:
694:
647:
641:
611:Community Portal
593:
581:
530:
402:
396:
379:
350:
328:
297:
271:
248:
209:
207:
198:
119:
112:
111:
107:
99:
91:
83:
75:
67:
54:
2664:
2663:
2659:
2658:
2657:
2655:
2654:
2653:
2652:
2651:
2650:
2649:
2637:
2590:
2543:
2502:
2460:
2451:
2362:
2360:Top level pages
2323:
2276:
2270:
2261:
2255:
2247:
2163:Thanks, but it
2143:
2100:
2067:
1992:
1943:
1906:
1904:
1902:
1900:
1898:
1860:
1858:
1856:
1854:
1852:
1846:
1842:
1836:
1804:
1799:
1765:
1760:
1755:
1723:
1648:
1602:
1596:
1593:
1541:
1539:Userbox display
1356:
1351:
1299:Thanks Michael!
1296:
1264:
1227:Knowledge:Watch
1142:
1136:
1131:
1125:
1120:
1118:notabilityguide
1114:
1109:
1103:
1085:
1079:
1055:
957:
769:
763:
743:
737:
718:
712:
708:
706:notabilityguide
702:
698:
692:
645:
639:
531:
409:entire template
400:
394:
391:
368:editor to play
348:
340:
240:Thanks, I will.
220:
212:
211:
203:
195:
109:
105:
102:
97:
94:
89:
86:
81:
78:
73:
70:
65:
62:
59:
55:
48:
47:
37:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
2662:
2648:
2647:
2636:
2633:
2632:
2631:
2604:
2603:
2589:
2586:
2585:
2584:
2583:
2582:
2557:
2556:
2542:
2539:
2525:
2524:
2523:
2522:
2521:
2520:
2512:
2511:
2510:
2509:
2476:
2475:
2450:
2447:
2433:
2432:
2431:
2430:
2429:
2428:
2407:
2406:
2405:
2404:
2382:
2381:
2361:
2358:
2338:
2337:
2322:
2321:Tip of the day
2319:
2305:
2304:
2274:Writing guides
2246:
2243:
2242:
2241:
2240:
2239:
2238:
2237:
2236:
2235:
2202:
2201:
2189:By the way, I
2173:
2172:
2142:
2139:
2138:
2137:
2136:
2135:
2104:file resides.
2099:
2096:
2095:
2094:
2066:
2063:
2062:
2061:
2060:
2059:
2058:
2057:
2035:
2034:
2033:
2032:
2015:
2014:
1991:
1988:
1962:
1961:
1942:
1939:
1938:
1937:
1936:
1935:
1891:
1890:
1845:
1834:
1820:
1819:
1818:
1817:
1816:
1815:
1778:
1777:
1754:
1751:
1750:
1749:
1722:
1719:
1718:
1717:
1681:
1680:
1666:
1665:
1647:
1641:
1621:
1620:
1592:
1589:
1575:
1574:
1555:
1554:
1540:
1537:
1523:
1522:
1521:
1520:
1519:
1518:
1517:
1516:
1515:
1514:
1513:
1512:
1511:
1510:
1466:
1465:
1464:
1463:
1462:
1461:
1460:
1459:
1458:
1457:
1441:
1411:
1410:
1409:
1408:
1407:
1406:
1378:
1377:
1355:
1352:
1328:
1318:
1301:
1300:
1265:
1263:
1260:
1259:
1258:
1257:
1256:
1244:
1241:
1238:
1237:
1236:
1216:
1213:
1192:
1191:
1167:
1166:
1153:
1152:
1148:
1147:
1146:
1145:
1134:
1123:
1112:
1097:
1096:
1075:
1074:
1054:
1051:
1050:
1049:
1048:
1047:
1046:
1045:
1031:
1030:
1029:
1028:
1000:
999:
956:
951:
949:
947:
946:
912:
911:
888:
887:
867:
866:
832:What say you?
785:I overreacted.
623:
622:
621:
620:
587:
586:
575:
574:
525:
520:Userbox policy
478:
477:
476:
475:
463:
462:
432:
431:
390:
387:
373:
372:
339:
336:
322:
321:
320:
319:
318:
317:
316:
315:
291:
290:
289:
288:
287:
286:
265:
264:
263:
262:
242:
241:
228:Talk:Main Page
219:
216:
214:
197:
196:
194:
193:
188:
183:
178:
173:
168:
163:
158:
153:
148:
143:
137:
134:
133:
120:
110:
103:
95:
87:
79:
71:
63:
60:
49:
40:
39:
38:
29:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2661:
2646:
2645:
2642:
2630:
2627:
2623:
2622:Knowledge:FAQ
2619:
2618:
2617:
2616:
2613:
2609:
2601:
2600:
2599:
2598:
2595:
2581:
2578:
2574:
2573:
2572:
2571:
2570:
2569:
2566:
2562:
2554:
2553:
2552:
2551:
2548:
2538:
2537:
2534:
2530:
2518:
2517:
2516:
2515:
2514:
2513:
2508:
2505:
2498:
2497:
2496:
2495:
2494:
2493:
2490:
2486:
2481:
2473:
2469:
2468:
2467:
2466:
2463:
2457:
2446:
2445:
2442:
2438:
2426:
2425:
2420:
2419:
2418:
2417:
2416:
2415:
2414:
2412:
2403:
2399:
2398:
2397:
2396:
2395:
2394:
2391:
2387:
2380:lead on that.
2379:
2374:
2373:
2372:
2371:
2368:
2357:
2356:
2353:
2349:
2343:
2335:
2334:
2333:
2332:
2329:
2318:
2317:
2314:
2310:
2302:
2298:
2293:
2289:
2288:
2287:
2286:
2283:
2275:
2268:
2260:
2252:
2251:Help:Contents
2234:
2231:
2227:
2226:
2225:
2222:
2218:
2214:
2210:
2209:
2206:
2205:
2204:
2203:
2200:
2197:
2192:
2188:
2187:
2186:
2185:
2182:
2178:
2170:
2166:
2162:
2161:
2160:
2159:
2156:
2152:
2148:
2134:
2131:
2127:
2126:
2125:
2122:
2118:
2113:
2112:
2111:
2110:
2107:
2093:
2090:
2086:
2085:
2084:
2083:
2080:
2075:
2072:
2056:
2053:
2049:
2045:
2041:
2040:
2039:
2038:
2037:
2036:
2031:
2027:
2023:
2019:
2018:
2017:
2016:
2013:
2010:
2006:
2005:
2004:
2003:
2000:
1997:
1987:
1986:
1983:
1979:
1973:
1967:
1959:
1955:
1954:
1953:
1952:
1949:
1934:
1931:
1927:
1923:
1922:
1921:
1918:
1917:
1893:
1892:
1889:
1886:
1882:
1878:
1877:
1876:
1875:
1872:
1871:
1841:
1833:
1832:
1829:
1825:
1814:Cool! Thanks!
1813:
1812:
1811:
1808:
1807:
1802:
1795:
1794:
1793:
1792:
1791:
1790:
1787:
1783:
1775:
1774:
1773:
1772:
1769:
1768:
1763:
1748:
1745:
1741:
1740:
1739:
1738:
1735:
1732:
1728:
1716:
1713:
1709:
1708:
1707:
1706:
1703:
1699:
1694:
1693:
1690:
1686:
1678:
1674:
1670:
1669:
1664:
1660:
1656:
1652:
1651:
1645:
1640:
1639:
1636:
1632:
1626:
1618:
1617:
1616:
1615:
1612:
1608:
1601:
1588:
1587:
1584:
1580:
1572:
1568:
1564:
1560:
1556:
1552:
1551:
1550:
1549:
1546:
1536:
1535:
1532:
1528:
1508:
1504:
1503:
1502:
1499:
1495:
1491:
1490:
1489:
1488:
1487:
1486:
1485:
1484:
1483:
1482:
1481:
1480:
1479:
1478:
1475:
1471:
1455:
1454:
1453:
1450:
1446:
1442:
1440:
1437:
1432:
1431:
1430:
1429:
1428:
1427:
1426:
1425:
1424:
1423:
1420:
1416:
1404:
1403:
1402:
1399:
1395:
1394:
1393:
1392:
1391:
1390:
1387:
1383:
1375:
1371:
1367:
1366:
1365:
1364:
1361:
1350:
1348:
1344:
1340:
1335:
1331:
1322:
1317:
1316:
1312:
1306:
1298:
1297:
1295:
1293:
1289:
1285:
1280:
1276:
1269:
1255:
1252:
1248:
1245:
1242:
1239:
1235:
1232:
1228:
1224:
1223:
1221:
1217:
1214:
1212:
1208:
1207:
1206:
1205:
1204:
1202:
1197:
1189:
1185:
1181:
1180:
1179:
1178:
1175:
1172:
1164:
1162:
1155:
1154:
1150:
1149:
1141:
1135:
1130:
1124:
1119:
1113:
1108:
1102:
1101:
1099:
1098:
1095:
1093:
1084:
1077:
1076:
1072:
1070:
1064:
1063:
1062:
1060:
1057:Okay, that's
1044:
1041:
1037:
1036:
1035:
1034:
1033:
1032:
1027:
1024:
1021:
1017:
1016:
1015:
1014:
1013:
1012:
1009:
1005:
997:
993:
992:
991:
990:
987:
982:
980:
976:
972:
967:
965:
960:
955:
950:
945:
942:
937:
936:
935:
934:
931:
928:
924:
919:
917:
910:
907:
903:
899:
895:
890:
889:
885:
881:
877:
873:
869:
868:
864:
860:
856:
852:
848:
844:
843:
842:
841:
838:
835:
830:
828:
824:
820:
816:
811:
810:
806:
802:
798:
794:
790:
786:
782:
777:
775:
768:
759:
757:
752:
747:
742:
735:
731:
726:
724:
717:
707:
697:
689:
686:
684:
680:
676:
672:
671:naked moderne
668:
664:
660:
655:
651:
644:
636:
633:
629:
619:
616:
612:
608:
604:
603:
602:
601:
600:
599:
596:
592:
584:
583:
582:
580:
571:
566:
562:
561:
560:
558:
555:
552:
548:
544:
540:
536:
529:
524:
521:
518:
513:
511:
507:
503:
499:
494:
492:
487:
482:
474:
471:
467:
466:
465:
464:
461:
458:
454:
450:
449:
448:
447:
444:
441:
437:
430:
427:
423:
422:
421:
420:
417:
414:
411:. Thank you.
410:
406:
399:
386:
385:
382:
378:
371:
367:
363:
359:
358:
357:
356:
353:
351:
345:
335:
334:
331:
327:
313:
312:
311:
310:
309:
308:
307:
306:
305:
304:
301:
296:
284:
283:
282:
281:
280:
279:
278:
277:
274:
270:
259:
258:
257:
256:
255:
254:
251:
247:
239:
238:
237:
236:
233:
229:
225:
215:
208:
201:
192:
189:
187:
184:
182:
179:
177:
174:
172:
169:
167:
164:
162:
159:
157:
154:
152:
149:
147:
144:
142:
139:
138:
131:
127:
126:
121:
118:
114:
113:
108:
100:
92:
84:
76:
68:
53:
46:
45:
33:
23:
19:
2638:
2605:
2591:
2558:
2544:
2526:
2477:
2452:
2434:
2423:
2422:
2408:
2383:
2377:
2363:
2339:
2324:
2306:
2280:thoughts --
2248:
2245:Help colours
2190:
2174:
2168:
2164:
2144:
2101:
2076:
2070:
2068:
2047:
2043:
1993:
1963:
1944:
1925:
1897:
1851:
1847:
1821:
1797:
1779:
1758:
1756:
1724:
1697:
1695:
1682:
1622:
1600:Unreferenced
1594:
1576:
1570:
1542:
1524:
1467:
1412:
1379:
1373:
1357:
1347:subst:smile3
1343:subst:smile2
1326:
1308:Backatcha!
1302:
1292:subst:smile3
1288:subst:smile2
1273:
1200:
1193:
1168:
1158:
1089:
1066:
1058:
1056:
1001:
995:
983:
970:
969:It would be
968:
964:restrictions
963:
961:
958:
948:
922:
921:I certainly
920:
915:
913:
901:
897:
883:
879:
871:
862:
858:
851:WikiPalettes
846:
831:
826:
822:
818:
814:
812:
808:
804:
800:
796:
792:
788:
784:
780:
778:
773:
760:
755:
750:
748:
741:divstyleblue
733:
729:
727:
722:
690:
687:
682:
678:
675:photorealist
674:
670:
667:neoprimitive
666:
662:
658:
653:
650:functionally
649:
637:
631:
627:
624:
588:
576:
569:
564:
546:
542:
538:
534:
532:
516:
514:
509:
505:
501:
497:
495:
490:
485:
483:
479:
452:
433:
408:
392:
374:
369:
365:
361:
360:Thanks. You
341:
323:
292:
266:
243:
221:
213:
165:
123:
43:
2169:anyone else
2141:Color table
2089:Sagaciousuk
2079:Sagaciousuk
1958:piped links
1753:Re: Collage
1339:subst:smile
1284:subst:smile
1053:Lotta stuff
916:centralized
896:that shows
823:Centralized
746:to match.
122:This is an
2282:Gareth Aus
2151:this table
1956:Hi. Yes,
1646:Invitation
1553:Hi Somody,
971:marvellous
845:Whoo-Wee,
827:everything
539:neutrality
2635:Namespace
2458:. thx --
2208:it up :)
2044:displayed
1673:Iswatch19
1659:Iswatch19
1557:Here's a
1222:tie-ins.
767:Cent/work
734:extremely
679:liquid 3D
547:look good
166:Archive 6
2626:Rfrisbie
2612:Rfrisbie
2565:Rfrisbie
2541:Restored
2533:Rfrisbie
2489:Rfrisbie
2441:Rfrisbie
2402:Quiddity
2390:Rfrisbie
2352:Rfrisbie
2313:Rfrisbie
2230:Rfrisbie
2221:Quiddity
2196:Rfrisbie
2181:Rfrisbie
2155:Quiddity
2121:Rfrisbie
2052:Rfrisbie
2009:Rfrisbie
1982:Rfrisbie
1948:Jlittlet
1930:Rfrisbie
1885:Rfrisbie
1840:proposed
1828:Rfrisbie
1786:Rfrisbie
1744:Rfrisbie
1712:Rfrisbie
1689:Rfrisbie
1677:MatchPat
1663:MatchPat
1635:Rfrisbie
1583:Rfrisbie
1531:Rfrisbie
1474:Rfrisbie
1419:Rfrisbie
1386:Rfrisbie
1345:}} or {{
1334:WikiLove
1315:Rfrisbie
1290:}} or {{
1279:WikiLove
1251:Rfrisbie
1247:WP:COLOR
1231:Rfrisbie
1129:MiniAWFP
1040:Rfrisbie
1008:Rfrisbie
986:Quiddity
975:WP:COLOR
941:Rfrisbie
906:Rfrisbie
880:multiple
855:Quiddity
716:MiniAWFP
673:through
615:Rfrisbie
607:proposed
595:Rfrisbie
535:civility
470:Rfrisbie
457:Rfrisbie
426:Rfrisbie
381:Rfrisbie
349:xaosflux
330:Rfrisbie
300:Quiddity
273:Rfrisbie
250:Rfrisbie
232:Quiddity
200:Archives
82:esources
74:serboxes
20: |
2577:Michael
2547:Michael
2022:Deville
1611:Michael
1330:Michael
1275:Michael
859:finally
723:endorse
125:archive
90:alettes
22:Archive
2588:Rambot
2503:Trödel
2461:Trödel
2130:--Eric
2106:--Eric
1999:(Talk)
1941:Pipes?
1734:(Talk)
1545:somody
1498:Cswrye
1449:Cswrye
1436:Cswrye
1398:Cswrye
1370:WP:AWB
1360:Cswrye
1341:}}, {{
1286:}}, {{
847:that's
807:, and
781:Sorry.
643:divbox
570:really
541:, and
523:not.
338:Gus to
66:amples
2191:would
2071:seems
2048:won't
1899:: -->
1853:: -->
1800:Sango
1761:Sango
1374:might
1262:Smile
1171:John
1107:style
1020:John
996:don't
927:John
902:issue
834:John
789:don't
696:style
663:style
659:sizes
551:John
498:wrong
440:John
413:John
366:first
230:;) --
16:<
2424:know
2165:does
2026:Talk
1915:<
1869:<
1675:and
1661:and
1186:and
1174:Reid
1159:See
1090:See
1083:Kite
1067:See
1059:four
1023:Reid
930:Reid
898:lots
872:also
863:some
837:Reid
683:look
669:and
565:more
554:Reid
517:edit
491:here
453:your
443:Reid
416:Reid
398:cent
389:Cent
362:also
98:ssay
57:Talk
2421:We
2378:his
1805:123
1766:123
1698:you
1671:Hi
1571:lot
1201:and
923:can
884:and
829:.
756:You
751:use
677:to
632:may
628:may
502:any
106:alk
2594:RM
2277:}}
2271:{{
2262:}}
2256:{{
2119:.
2028:)
1883:?
1843:}}
1837:{{
1603:}}
1597:{{
1337:{{
1282:{{
1143:}}
1137:{{
1132:}}
1126:{{
1121:}}
1115:{{
1110:}}
1104:{{
1088:.
1086:}}
1080:{{
803:,
799:,
774:go
770:}}
764:{{
744:}}
738:{{
730:do
728:I
719:}}
713:{{
711:,
709:}}
703:{{
701:,
699:}}
693:{{
646:}}
640:{{
537:,
401:}}
395:{{
298:--
202:•
191:11
186:10
132:.
2024:(
1913:t
1911:n
1909:a
1907:i
1905:d
1903:a
1901:R
1867:t
1865:n
1863:a
1861:i
1859:d
1857:a
1855:R
1509:.
1190:!
1163:.
1094:.
1071:.
181:9
176:8
171:7
161:5
156:4
151:3
146:2
141:1
104:T
96:E
88:P
80:R
72:U
64:S
44:↑
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
