795:. If the community consensus is for an infobox on that specific article, then it should have an infobox, even if the creator does not agree (and likewise in the other direction, of course). Fourth, that particular G7 decline was entirely appropriate. Editors release their work under a free license when they contribute. If they later decide to leave for whatever reason, they don't get to take their ball and go home with it. The good work they did on Knowledge remains. This is explicitly written into the G7 criterion, which specifies that only requests for deletion done in good faith are considered. It is not good faith to request a perfectly good article be deleted because you're annoyed with something that happened on Knowledge. And lastly, this particular arbitration decision changed exactly nothing with respect to content policy on infoboxes. It addressed behavioral problems that may have previously prevented existing policy from being enforced. ~
775:
can get you taken through the mud, when an editor's deletion requests are overruled by the self-appointed Wiki Police who were apparently watching your edits or there likely would have been no knowledge of your G-7, as well as the previous harassment and being a party but not notified there was a case to close, I can find no reason to continue trying to work here. I was here just short of eight years and have never been taken to either ANI or AN for my actions. I can live nicely without
Knowledge; I can't live with it given its present state. There appears to be the matter of a long-standing COI I am aware of but cannot post due to the possibility of outing. If the Committee has interest, I can e-mail the information as I see I will not need to re-open my e-mail to do so.
1004:
756:
If an editor is hounded repeatedly about a box, the editor may decide to say to hell with article X. This editor may stop curating or maintaining these articles, doing necessary work like fixing dead links, etc. Given time and inattention, the article's quality may degrade and in the case of GA and FA works, may lead to their delisting. The editor may opt to end the frustration by leaving
Knowledge. None of these philosophies improve the encyclopedia by any means, but they do keep the peace that appears to be so sought after.
1125:
1420:
1368:
1182:
1069:
791:
why no notification was given. Since you were listed as a party, my understanding is you should have received one. Third, I (and many other arbitrators) see the omission of any exception for articles an individual has personally created/worked on as a feature, not a bug. There has long been a misconception that creating an article gives you some form of additional say in whether it gets an infobox or not. This isn't true; see
849:
1020:
1437:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see
1385:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see
1199:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see
1086:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see
790:
I'll respond to a few key points. First, of course, you're welcome to email us to anything that may be relevant to the case (even after it's been closed). Second, if you didn't receive a notification about the case being opened, that was a key error. I will be asking the clerks what happened here and
154:
participates in a box discussion. The other editor "magically" appears and participates in this way. It's happened more times than coincidence allows. He accuses others of pulling stunts and gaslighting against the opposition, but apparently it's perfectly fine with him to pop up and begin insulting
822:
functionality. As your usertalk is tagged with the opt out template the message was not delivered. I can only apologise for this and advise that we will be looking to modify our procedures to try to ensure this doesn't happen again by either confirmation of the mass-message logs or a better solution
242:
made that you removed part of the content from. I also noted and commented on the responses you made in return. I didn't comment on your follow-up messages to imply that I wasn't going to help you further, but you must understand that when you start responding to personal attacks and incivility with
774:
she began has it overruled by someone else; there is a marathon of moving it back and forth from user space to main space. When a previously non-controversial edit can earn one a talk page template and the constant concern of inadvertently being blocked or banned, your good faith text contributions
755:
All of this can lead to some possible scenarios. One is the idea that if an editor doesn't write or improve articles, no one can then demand a box be placed on them. Many editors have spent considerable time and effort on given articles, especially those which have been taken to FA or GA status.
91:
I actually thought one of my main points was made above? The last time I tried to discuss on your talk page it was pointless, wasn't it? Why is this any likely to be different? Still nothing done regarding the other user? No, I thought not. Thanks but I have content to write, which no doubt after
739:. While there is language providing for the addition of an infobox, there are no provisions to allow the editor to deal with the unwanted addition of an infobox on articles he/she has created/improved/expanded. This holds true for anyone who may be placed under this restriction.
1309:
Hi, as I create more old-movie articles, I notice that you have uploaded press photos from ebay and were able to remove the watermark. I would love to be able to do that, but in the meantime I scrounge around for images that don't have a watermark. However, I came across
572:
The
Arbitration Committee recommends that well-publicized community discussions be held to address whether to adopt a policy or guideline addressing what factors should weigh in favor of or against including an infobox in a given article and how those factors should be
309:
Hi We hope. I noticed your user page. I do not think it conforms with
Knowledge:ARBINFOBOX; I think it is perfectly fine to have reasoned opposition to the universal use of infoboxes but I think this is taking it too far. Would you mind changing it?
1340:
as needing a local copy. I do not see a reason to not have it linked between
Commons and Knowledge. Many other files that are definitely PD in their home country you have also not exported/specifically requested a local copy of to be kept — why?
1164:, thank you for uploading this. As you are experienced here and there, I would like to understand if there is a reason not to upload this file to Commons? If not, I would like to transfer it, or would you prefer to do it yourself? Cheers --
202:. ;) I certainly would have rather spent my time doing something else, but did not like the PAs coming from this editor; they were no surprise given past discussions. I now find that my time is better spent away from Knowledge. Let's see-
586:
268:
has some requests since he/she was called an "attack dog". I was only told I was stalking the editor, "pulling a stunt" to try to "silence the opposition" and "gaslighting", who didn't decide he'd received a PA until
78:: If you want to talk about this and discuss your thoughts and input with me, my door is completely open and I would like to do so and try and help in any way. Just start a new discussion on my talk page - let's talk.
1362:
548:
576:
All editors are reminded to maintain decorum and civility when engaged in discussions about infoboxes, and to not turn discussions about a single article's infobox into a discussion about infoboxes in general.
1414:
214:
of his time in mainspace editing. It can't be the amount of time you spend here or where you spend it that's the deciding factor here. Let's try again for an explanation since you continue to work here.
579:
For canvassing editors to this case, Volvlogia (talk · contribs) is admonished. They are warned that any further instances of canvassing related to arbitration processes will likely result in sanctions.
53:, yet the other user is not even reprimanded let alone expected to apologise. This is simply an encouragement for the user to continue with his behaviour - but I guess that is now the way of Knowledge?
247:
problematic edits and behaviors, not just the ones that the reporting user mentions. I didn't get farther than this due to your reply on my talk page. What would you like to do? What would you like
243:
the same thing back that it only makes the situation worse, never better. I understand that you were frustrated - I really do, but I have to make sure that when looking into issues that I address
399:
I've no idea. I'd prefer if you removed it. If you won't remove it, I will. If I remove it and you restore it, I'll take it to the community and see if there is a consensus for sanctions under
602:
1191:
109:
It's done. I will "apologize" to the editor when Hades freezes over and all his deceased friends and relatives pop up and begin ice skating. I participated in the conversation with him
1409:
1176:
549:
1311:
1461:
566:
Standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for all discussions about infoboxes and to edits adding, deleting, collapsing, or removing verifiable information from infoboxes.
1078:
556:
An arbitration case regarding civility in infobox discussions has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:
1314:
that is very clear and that shows front and back. Would you be able to remove the watermark for me? If you prefer that I do the uploading first, please let me know. Thanks,
1063:
1223:
500:
1110:
1171:
742:
1475:
907:
if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the
725:
with the problem, I realized the solution to this harassment was to leave. I made the edit linked in the previous sentence and signed out on 25 January.
1292:
1249:
780:
390:
362:
334:
282:
223:
160:
1377:
956:). As you uploaded most of them... perhaps you have an advice for me how to do that? Or could help me find the larger copies and move them to Commons?
227:
189:
164:
1296:
1268:
736:
437:
104:
86:
988:
1350:
137:
The discussion stopped being civil when his "attack dog" remarks were made. I am not the one who began the PAs, so there's nothing to apologize for.
1137:
Such a shame we lost you here and externally. Your help with research and images was incredibly valuable to me. I want to remember you for that. ♦
888:
806:
818:. With regards to the notifications not being received for the case; the clerks have looked into this and the notifications were sent using the
286:
259:
129:
that focused on the contributor (me), rather than the substance of my arguments, but you knew that." I responded to this with "BULLSHIT!", When
1429:
1288:
1245:
898:
776:
386:
358:
330:
278:
277:
into this for his thoughts because it seems to me that every time he's discussing infoboxes, he's promptly "joined" by the editor in question.
219:
156:
75:
948:
as possible. But not all of his movies have a freely licensed film poster on
Commons; some are uploaded as fair use on the English Knowledge (
412:
394:
380:
366:
352:
338:
121:. Then I was told replying to him at AN re: an earlier issue was "stalking" him, trying to "pull a stunt" to "silence the opposition" by the
232:
Hi there! I just saw that you pinged me in your response here. How can I help? Also, to briefly try and explain: The edit I looked into was
1153:
975:
I now see you are practically inactive since early this year. Though I still hope you're around a bit (if not: can someone else help me?).
495:
1145:
930:
1032:
969:
170:
42:
233:
169:
I'm sorry to see this has driven you away, We hope, but can understand and share your frustration. It's interesting to note that in
722:
155:
on a regular basis in those discuaaions. I have no further content to create-text or visual because I won't continue working here.
1449:
1397:
1211:
1098:
1328:
728:
The 25 January edit was my last time on site until now. It's surprising to see a case I was never notified about was ended. My
1058:
65:
417:
John, there's nothing wrong with that user page and if you edit it against the wishes of the user, I will revert you myself.
371:
Well of course you are welcome to leave any time. In the meantime though I don't think you can have this on your user page. --
1244:
2+ years ago, "I am happier without that dirt." and only occasionally help friends with non-text projects. How amusing. :-D
177:
is admitting to being selective as to who should be reprimanded - I guess that's again endorsing he feels I can be targeted?
319:
1154:
587:
Knowledge talk:Arbitration
Committee/Noticeboard#Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Civility in infobox discussions closed
1323:
836:
1253:
784:
718:
746:
1433:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a
1381:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a
1195:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a
1082:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a
856:
953:
904:
764:
483:
make me an image of a toolbox and some sort of contest theme all in one as a sort of logo to go in the top right of
1280:
721:
who brought a complaint to the
Committee, I hid my e-mail and asked for an I-Ban. When it appeared I would have no
469:
749:
1284:
1233:
994:
1242:
926:
841:
832:
714:
1438:
1386:
1200:
1087:
210:
of my time here was spent on content creation. The editor who called you an "attack dog" has spent just under
1168:
752:
the templates. Some of the dust seems to have settled with one of the editors becoming inactive thereafter.
711:
541:
474:
122:
732:
shows no notice of the case given, so as a party to the case, I was never notified that there would be one.
935:
708:
1480:
1115:
41:
who was crowing and admitting to it off-wiki. I note that the instruction is that you are expected to be
908:
894:
484:
92:
I've spent a lot of time, money and effort to produce a drive-by will arrive to insist an IB be added.
873:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was
1040:
430:
952:). I'd like to have all of them on Commons, not just those from before 1923 - and that is possible (
1165:
656:
506:
184:
99:
60:
1016:
Wishing you and yours a Merry
Christmas, and a Happy, Glorious, Prosperous New Year! God bless!
1003:
1264:
819:
770:
By no matter of means do the festivities end here. Another editor who requested deletion of a
304:
270:
199:
195:
134:
130:
126:
114:
1234:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:HAL333&diff=974350146&oldid=974344520
729:
1346:
861:
670:
651:
1049:. Given the nature of the edits, I can see no legitimate use outside of evading scrutiny.--
203:
949:
665:
598:
533:
525:
480:
422:
418:
400:
34:
326:
8:
982:
963:
945:
771:
37:
that any attack made on me is acceptable - this was despite it being known the IP was a
1030:
920:
828:
823:
if one presents it's self. Again apologies for any inconvenience this may have caused.
690:
560:
Any uninvolved administrator may apply infobox probation as a discretionary sanction.
265:
178:
93:
71:
54:
1045:
I have blocked the account you were using intermittently over the past few months per
891:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page
207:
1337:
1330:
1319:
1304:
1260:
1238:
113:
his "hypocrisy" and "attack dog against me whilst
Cassianto's on his best behaviour".
745:
have been added; this has brought out the "Wild Wild West" in some people perhaps
1342:
1228:
1138:
646:
636:
610:
488:
357:
Leave after ArbCom is done; not naive enough to put any more work into this place.
24:
211:
1457:
1405:
1219:
1106:
882:
594:
521:
513:
385:
Does this mean that Callenecc was wrong when he protected it in September 2016?
1046:
976:
957:
877:
868:
680:
675:
621:
465:
408:
376:
348:
315:
274:
151:
1124:
1469:
1355:
916:
824:
796:
792:
685:
626:
455:
520:
A very comprehensive article, but rather overladen with unnecessary detail.
1434:
1382:
1315:
1196:
1083:
38:
1363:
Orphaned non-free image File:Australian daybill poster The Next Corner.jpg
460:
You have been blocked for 24 hours, as explained at the WP:AN discussion.
1025:
695:
252:
216:
174:
79:
30:
1453:
1401:
1215:
1102:
1050:
1415:
Orphaned non-free image File:Social Code Australian daybill poster.jpg
735:
The case I was party to but never notified of placed Cassianto under
641:
461:
404:
372:
344:
311:
848:
150:
I went into this trying to stop the abuse and it happens every time
125:. The "attack dog" question brought the following response from him
19:
631:
550:
Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Civility in infobox discussions
760:
941:
940:
Hi We hope. I'm currently writing as much articles about actor
501:
A page you started (Renee Harris (producer)) has been reviewed!
1010:
We wish you a Merry Christmas and a prosperous New Year 2019!
329:, so funny you're concerned about it now. I want it as is.
1177:
Orphaned non-free image File:Kiss me kate stafford 1949.jpg
273:
the removal of his PA and my request for help. Bringing
759:
I also see that Dr. Blofeld has retired as a result of
562:
See the full decision for details of infobox probation.
814:
569:
Cassianto is indefinitely placed on infobox probation.
516:
just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
1064:
Orphaned non-free image File:WMAQ logo 1971-1975.jpg
887:
The nomination discussion and review may be seen at
343:
That's unfortunate. What would you like to do next?
206:+ of your time here is spent in mainspace, Close to
1448:will be deleted after seven days, as described in
1396:will be deleted after seven days, as described in
1378:File:Australian daybill poster The Next Corner.jpg
1210:will be deleted after seven days, as described in
1097:will be deleted after seven days, as described in
883:combined a soft ballad with a loud electric guitar
238:
1467:
889:Template:Did you know nominations/The Carpenters
1450:section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion
1444:Note that any non-free images not used in any
1430:File:Social Code Australian daybill poster.jpg
1398:section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion
1392:Note that any non-free images not used in any
1212:section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion
1206:Note that any non-free images not used in any
1099:section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion
1093:Note that any non-free images not used in any
29:Thanks for trying, We hope. Unfortunately the
767:as "Dr. Blofeld's old copyright violations".
1476:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery
532:To reply, leave a comment on Cwmhiraeth's
865:was updated with a fact from the article
1468:
421:pertains to article space info boxes.
1155:File:Bob Burns with bazooka 1937.jpg
1017:
615:
1259:You follow me closely, it seems. --
1192:File:Kiss me kate stafford 1949.jpg
13:
1418:
1366:
1336:Hi. I am wondering why you marked
1180:
1067:
14:
1492:
1123:
1018:
1002:
881:received hate mail because they
847:
593:For the arbitration committee,
33:you approached has demonstrated
1241:, you are mistaken. As stated
127:The reply was a personal attack
1:
1439:our policy for non-free media
1410:18:24, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
1387:our policy for non-free media
1201:our policy for non-free media
1146:09:21, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
1088:our policy for non-free media
1033:16:48, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
946:movies in which they appeared
325:Yes-it's been that way since
173:while discussing PAs etc the
135:"Merely following your lead."
1351:06:10, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
1111:18:45, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
1079:File:WMAQ logo 1971-1975.jpg
989:23:26, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
970:20:17, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
496:13:56, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
470:14:02, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
438:12:37, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
413:17:26, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
395:13:44, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
381:13:31, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
367:13:25, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
353:13:20, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
339:12:30, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
320:07:33, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
287:17:37, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
260:17:13, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
228:16:44, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
190:06:45, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
165:11:58, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
105:09:15, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
87:09:07, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
66:08:43, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
7:
1462:18:42, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
1324:20:43, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
1297:14:56, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
1269:14:41, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
1254:14:35, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
931:00:02, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
528:) 10:18, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
10:
1497:
1224:17:32, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
1172:03:46, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
603:08:58, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
485:Knowledge:Contests/Toolkit
1419:
1367:
1181:
1131:The Barnstar of Diligence
1122:
1068:
1059:16:38, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
1001:
903:, and it may be added to
837:22:12, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
807:13:32, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
785:12:39, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
403:. See what you think. --
198:saying the help desired
995:Merry Christmas to all!
761:a declined case request
743:Discretionary sanctions
657:User:Premeditated Chaos
507:Renee Harris (producer)
1424:
1372:
1186:
1073:
909:Did you know talk page
842:DYK for The Carpenters
530:
1427:Thanks for uploading
1422:
1375:Thanks for uploading
1370:
1189:Thanks for uploading
1184:
1076:Thanks for uploading
1071:
671:User:Worm That Turned
652:User:Opabinia regalis
518:
475:Contest toolkit image
936:Tom Mix film posters
666:User:RickinBaltimore
505:Thanks for creating
401:Knowledge:ARBINFOBOX
1116:A barnstar for you!
905:the statistics page
194:The admin help was
115:removed attacks on
43:apologizing to him
1481:Former wikipedians
1425:
1373:
1187:
1074:
691:User:KrakatoaKatie
266:user:Sagaciousphil
1435:claim of fair use
1383:claim of fair use
1359:
1338:File:Wolf Dog.jpg
1331:File:Wolf Dog.jpg
1197:claim of fair use
1151:
1150:
1084:claim of fair use
1041:Multiple accounts
1038:
1037:
902:
804:
737:infobox probation
730:talk page history
705:
704:
584:Discuss this at:
545:
540:Learn more about
512:Knowledge editor
1488:
1421:
1369:
1353:
1183:
1143:
1127:
1120:
1119:
1070:
1056:
1028:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1006:
999:
998:
985:
979:
966:
960:
892:
851:
817:
800:
647:User:Newyorkbrad
637:User:Doug Weller
616:
539:
493:
256:
241:
181:
119:asked admin help
96:
83:
57:
45:(the other user)
1496:
1495:
1491:
1490:
1489:
1487:
1486:
1485:
1466:
1465:
1452:. Thank you. --
1417:
1400:. Thank you. --
1365:
1334:
1307:
1231:
1214:. Thank you. --
1179:
1158:
1139:
1118:
1101:. Thank you. --
1066:
1051:
1043:
1026:
1019:
997:
987:
983:
977:
968:
964:
958:
938:
914:
913:
852:
844:
820:WP:Mass message
813:
803:
706:
613:
554:
503:
489:
481:Megalibrarygirl
479:Hi, can you or
477:
458:
307:
275:user: Cassianto
254:
237:
179:
133:, my reply was
94:
81:
55:
27:
22:
12:
11:
5:
1494:
1484:
1483:
1478:
1416:
1413:
1364:
1361:
1333:
1329:Local copy of
1327:
1306:
1303:
1302:
1301:
1300:
1299:
1274:
1272:
1271:
1230:
1227:
1178:
1175:
1157:
1152:
1149:
1148:
1134:
1133:
1128:
1117:
1114:
1065:
1062:
1042:
1039:
1036:
1035:
1013:
1012:
1007:
996:
993:
992:
991:
981:
962:
937:
934:
899:The Carpenters
878:the Carpenters
869:The Carpenters
857:27 August 2018
853:
846:
845:
843:
840:
810:
809:
801:
703:
702:
699:
698:
693:
688:
683:
681:User:DeltaQuad
678:
676:User:Callanecc
673:
668:
661:
660:
659:
654:
649:
644:
639:
634:
629:
624:
622:User:Alex Shih
614:
612:
609:
607:
591:
590:
581:
580:
577:
574:
570:
567:
564:
553:
547:
502:
499:
476:
473:
457:
454:
453:
452:
451:
450:
449:
448:
447:
446:
445:
444:
443:
442:
441:
440:
306:
305:Your user page
303:
302:
301:
300:
299:
298:
297:
296:
295:
294:
293:
292:
291:
290:
289:
152:User:Cassianto
143:
142:
141:
140:
139:
138:
26:
23:
21:
18:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1493:
1482:
1479:
1477:
1474:
1473:
1471:
1464:
1463:
1459:
1455:
1451:
1447:
1442:
1440:
1436:
1432:
1431:
1412:
1411:
1407:
1403:
1399:
1395:
1390:
1388:
1384:
1380:
1379:
1360:
1357:
1352:
1348:
1344:
1339:
1332:
1326:
1325:
1321:
1317:
1313:
1298:
1294:
1290:
1286:
1282:
1279:
1278:
1277:
1276:
1275:
1270:
1266:
1262:
1258:
1257:
1256:
1255:
1251:
1247:
1243:
1240:
1236:
1235:
1226:
1225:
1221:
1217:
1213:
1209:
1204:
1202:
1198:
1194:
1193:
1174:
1173:
1170:
1167:
1163:
1156:
1147:
1144:
1142:
1136:
1135:
1132:
1129:
1126:
1121:
1113:
1112:
1108:
1104:
1100:
1096:
1091:
1089:
1085:
1081:
1080:
1061:
1060:
1057:
1055:
1048:
1034:
1031:
1029:
1015:
1014:
1011:
1008:
1005:
1000:
990:
986:
980:
974:
973:
972:
971:
967:
961:
955:
951:
947:
943:
933:
932:
928:
925:
922:
918:
912:
910:
906:
900:
896:
890:
886:
884:
880:
879:
872:
871:
870:
864:
863:
858:
850:
839:
838:
834:
830:
826:
821:
816:
808:
805:
799:
794:
789:
788:
787:
786:
782:
778:
773:
768:
766:
762:
757:
753:
751:
748:
744:
740:
738:
733:
731:
726:
724:
723:official help
720:
716:
713:
710:
701:
697:
694:
692:
689:
687:
686:User:Euryalus
684:
682:
679:
677:
674:
672:
669:
667:
664:
663:
662:
658:
655:
653:
650:
648:
645:
643:
640:
638:
635:
633:
630:
628:
627:User:BU Rob13
625:
623:
620:
619:
618:
617:
608:
605:
604:
600:
596:
589:
588:
583:
582:
578:
575:
571:
568:
565:
563:
559:
558:
557:
551:
546:
543:
542:page curation
537:
535:
529:
527:
523:
517:
515:
510:
508:
498:
497:
494:
492:
486:
482:
472:
471:
467:
463:
439:
436:
435:
434:
428:
427:
426:
420:
419:WP:ARBINFOBOX
416:
415:
414:
410:
406:
402:
398:
397:
396:
392:
388:
384:
383:
382:
378:
374:
370:
369:
368:
364:
360:
356:
355:
354:
350:
346:
342:
341:
340:
336:
332:
328:
324:
323:
322:
321:
317:
313:
288:
284:
280:
276:
272:
267:
263:
262:
261:
258:
257:
250:
246:
240:
235:
231:
230:
229:
225:
221:
218:
213:
209:
205:
201:
197:
193:
192:
191:
188:
187:
182:
180:SagaciousPhil
176:
172:
168:
167:
166:
162:
158:
153:
149:
148:
147:
146:
145:
144:
136:
132:
128:
124:
120:
118:
112:
108:
107:
106:
103:
102:
97:
95:SagaciousPhil
90:
89:
88:
85:
84:
77:
73:
72:Sagaciousphil
70:
69:
68:
67:
64:
63:
58:
56:SagaciousPhil
52:
50:
46:
40:
39:blocked troll
36:
32:
20:I-Ban request
17:
1445:
1443:
1428:
1426:
1393:
1391:
1376:
1374:
1335:
1308:
1273:
1261:Gerda Arendt
1239:Gerda Arendt
1237:
1232:
1207:
1205:
1190:
1188:
1161:
1159:
1140:
1130:
1094:
1092:
1077:
1075:
1053:
1044:
1009:
939:
923:
915:
876:
874:
867:
866:
862:Did you know
860:
854:
811:
797:
769:
763:which began
758:
754:
741:
734:
727:
707:
700:
606:
592:
585:
561:
555:
538:
531:
519:
511:
504:
490:
478:
459:
432:
431:
424:
423:
308:
253:
248:
244:
200:wasn't noted
185:
171:this comment
116:
110:
100:
80:
61:
48:
44:
28:
15:
1343:DemonDays64
1287:editor TP
1283:Sinatra TP
1141:Dr. Blofeld
747:selectively
696:User:Ks0stm
509:, We hope!
491:Dr. Blofeld
217:user:Oshwah
131:he remarked
123:PA removals
35:in the past
16:{{nobots}}
1470:Categories
1312:this image
1052:Jezebel's
895:here's how
715:harassment
595:GoldenRing
522:Cwmhiraeth
514:Cwmhiraeth
1358:on reply)
1305:Watermark
978:Trijnstel
959:Trijnstel
917:Cas Liber
875:... that
772:user page
642:User:Mkdw
573:weighted.
534:talk page
1446:articles
1394:articles
1354:(please
1229:Mistaken
1208:articles
1095:articles
944:and the
927:contribs
825:Amortias
750:applying
712:repeated
632:User:DGG
611:Comments
264:Perhaps
255:~Oshwah~
234:this one
82:~Oshwah~
51:comments
47:for the
25:Sigh ...
1316:Yoninah
1289:We hope
1246:We hope
1162:We hope
1047:WP:SOCK
954:example
950:example
942:Tom Mix
815:We Hope
777:We hope
387:We hope
359:We hope
331:We hope
279:We hope
251:to do?
220:We hope
157:We hope
76:We hope
1027:Ssven2
793:WP:OWN
719:editor
717:by an
552:closed
433:karate
196:closed
117:OTHERS
49:(your)
1454:B-bot
1402:B-bot
1216:B-bot
1103:B-bot
1054:Ponyo
709:After
456:Block
429:&
271:AFTER
236:that
175:admin
111:AFTER
31:admin
1458:talk
1406:talk
1356:ping
1347:talk
1320:talk
1293:talk
1285:ping
1281:ping
1265:talk
1250:talk
1220:talk
1107:talk
984:talk
965:talk
921:talk
781:talk
765:here
599:talk
526:talk
466:talk
462:Fram
425:fish
409:talk
405:John
391:talk
377:talk
373:John
363:talk
349:talk
345:John
335:talk
327:2016
316:talk
312:John
283:talk
224:talk
186:Chat
161:talk
101:Chat
62:Chat
1441:).
1389:).
1203:).
1160:Hi
1090:).
855:On
812:Hi
798:Rob
487:?♦
245:all
239:Jcc
212:33%
208:80%
204:70%
1472::
1460:)
1408:)
1349:)
1322:)
1295:)
1267:)
1252:)
1222:)
1109:)
1024:—
929:)
911:.
897:,
859:,
835:)
831:)(
802:13
783:)
601:)
536:.
468:)
411:)
393:)
379:)
365:)
351:)
337:)
318:)
310:--
285:)
249:me
226:)
183:-
163:)
98:-
74:,
59:-
1456:(
1423:⚠
1404:(
1371:⚠
1345:(
1318:(
1291:(
1263:(
1248:(
1218:(
1185:⚠
1169:I
1166:S
1105:(
1072:⚠
924:·
919:(
901:)
893:(
885:?
833:C
829:T
827:(
779:(
597:(
544:.
524:(
464:(
407:(
389:(
375:(
361:(
347:(
333:(
314:(
281:(
222:(
159:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.