User talk:ProfGray

4848:. I think that's true in a WP:OR sense, but getting outside his Knowledge article arguing it, I'm genuinely not sure it's Peter Baker's main infamy. I went hunting for info on this guy, and I first found him as lord mayor, then I asked archivists and they dug up articles on the capture of the Carnatic, and Carnatic Hall. Even the modern articles of "famous in Liverpool tied to slave trade" have two-three other significant views they lay out first: i) the capture of Carnatic to explain ii) Carnatic Hall, which together is an impact extending into the modern day (noteworthy because it has pathos attached to it), then iii) the lord mayor part, i.e. "big deal guy", and finally iv) the slave trader part, which is the sobering fact of those articles once you know the rest. These historical persons rarely make the "famous in Liverpool history" status without having other significant views. So to frame not just the article (good), but even the DAB itself (messy), around one significant view systematically depresses the idea that these figures have other significant views. Best -- 4647:. I could find further book sources backing up various points, and database primary sources that I cited to confirm evidence of transitioning names of companies and approximate dates of activity, but these do still rely on Phillips (1953) to more easily make sense of them, and so keeping both references would be better. There are also a fair few minor date disagreements among ship registers, ship register websites, Phillips (1953), etc... that don't affect the substance of the content, but just the precise timings of when shipbuilding-relevant things happened (when ships were built/launched, when companies were active). In places where I was unable to find a clear reference, but which felt like content that was fair to remain, I added a tag and explained the CN, and provided a reasoning behind keeping the sentence (e.g. Barton likely to be Thomas Barton). -- 4673:

continue to have a cautionary tag (Primary or otherwise) as long as Phillips is used or in-depth details are added that alter the article's Proportions. If you are willing, then address the use of Phillips in the Talk section "Primary source," which he appropriately created to back up the tag. Do not argue about primary vs secondary. Do not address the user (e.g., by "you" or username) only discuss the use of the source. Concede that other sources are needed for nearly everything in Phillips 1953. Ask if and when it is acceptable to retain the Phillips citation, for instance, while searching for an RS corroboration or (as you say above) to enable readers to more easily make sense of the information. In other words, propose a very small number of uses and see if you can get consensus (buy-in) on those uses.

2389:, the article is Macht, David I. "A scientific appreciation of Leviticus 12: 1-5." Journal of Biblical Literature (1933): 253-260. http://www.jstor.org.proxy.lib.miamioh.edu/stable/3259207. The other is: Milgrom, Jacob. "The rationale for biblical impurity." Journal of the Ancient Near Eastern Society 22, no. 1 (1993), which can currently be obtained at: https://janes.scholasticahq.com/article/2391.pdf. Other texts to consider include: Philip, Tarja S. Menstruation and childbirth in the Bible: fertility and impurity. Vol. 88. Peter Lang, 2006. Thiessen, Matthew. "Luke 2: 22, Leviticus 12, and Parturient Impurity 1." Novum Testamentum 54, no. 1 (2012): 16-29. Thanks! 4750:

on this. But as it stands, it's one user that's unilaterally created this precedent and spread it across many of their own articles. And I do think if that DAB obscures other significant views, or creates confusion (e.g. there are "two John Dawsons" that were both slave traders (died 1812) and (died 1824)), then it's just a bad DAB. Articles will have their content regardless of DAB. But DABs should be neutral to represent all significant views. Making DABs non-neutral, focusing on only one of multiple significant views, and so systematically depressing other significant views, is rightgreatwrongs. It makes Knowledge less objective and more confusing. My take. --

1571:(just kidding), here to enthusiastically offer you my assistance, as promised in the extra-Wiki world. I perused your talk page, and see that you have received guidance already. It is good guidance, especially regarding tracking student edits, and I can't think of anything further to add at this time. Try to avoid Wizards if possible, as the sitting and spinning problem is one I've had too. Since you are a returnee, I recommend using the regular editor rather than the new Visual Editor, unless you like it, of course. I have a few ideas as far as motivation for your students. Certain bells and whistles are effective for people of all ages, myself included! 1994:. That right enabled you to create a course page through the EducationProgram MediaWiki extension. Starting in fall 2015, the Wiki Education Foundation has discontinued its use of this extension. Going forward, users should create course pages through the Wiki Education Foundation website. That application is more user-friendly, and any content is automatically mirrored to Knowledge. To prevent confusion, we'll be removing your "course instructor" user right, as it is not needed with the new system. This is simply a notification of the technical change to your account. No action is needed from you at this time. 4566:

concern, casting inaccurate aspersions about sources, and making repeated personal attacks. I view the Baker article as an opportunity for referendum on Desertarun articles, which aren't wrong per se, but should clearly be subject to more than a piecemeal review for NPOV. I'd genuinely welcome the DAB "(slave trader)" being used more broadly because "(merchant)" or "(sailor)" is kind of offensive TBH. But if it's not, then it's not vey Wiki-like to let one arguably biased editor colour the perceptions of readers for an entire slew of biographical articles.

4584:

clear POV bias to think that "slave trader" is an encyclopedic DAB, and it is inappropriate to modify (or discuss) a single article as a "referendum" on a single editor's editing. For sure, I know it can be bothersome and upsetting when somebody adds tags and cites WP policies against my editing, but I'm not sure their position on an editorial question (such as DAB) is properly characterized as a "POV" -- usually a POV is like taking sides on a contentious issue, not an editorial decision like this. Best wishes, hang in there,

4348:- were written with a greatly-researched depth on the slave trade aspects, but a broad indifference, or even combative tone, to acknowledging any other aspects of these people's other WP:significant views. It's a controversial topic that deserves care, and I'm saddened that I am spending half of my comments attempting to dispel aspersions about my character, or the type of source Phillips (1953) is (i.e. it is not self-published/unpublished (it is published by National Museums Liverpool), not primary, etc...). 1749:, it's a reasonable idea. If I were confident that these students were motivated to develop social media skills (the course description does not mention WP) or if this weren't my first foray with WP assignments, I'd consider it. But my concern is not only for my students (perhaps they'd learn valuable lessons) it's also to protect my own time and energy from potentially being drained by wiki drama. Do you see my concern? Of course, I'm not going to sanction any student who uses their real name. Thanks! 1153:, thanks for the explanations. Let me clarify a question. I don't want to track their grades (agreed, offline) -- I would want a centralized way to track all their WP contributions, such as the sentences & refs they add to articles, ideally to know if they did ok with exercises like posting on Talk pages. Like a special search log. Otherwise, what methods are used by various profs? Do they have to go into each student's contributions and look for diffs? Sounds like it could be laborious. Thanks! 3483: 1819: 3704: 4972: 5021: 3277: 2572: 2428: 2293: 2220: 488:]. Wow, from your user page, I see you've done an incredible amount of editing of Bible articles. I'll be teaching a course in Hebrew Bible next semester, ~14 students, at a public university. Though I might try to give them Knowledge assignments. So I'm looking for some suitable opportunities -- where they can start small, engage in Talk with experienced editors, and paraphrase & cite some academic literature. I'm planning to work with the 1701:, thanks! I'm not sure if students will work on that specific article (I only quickly pulled the citations together for the AfD) but your suggestions and encouragement are spot on. I want to start them off on small editing steps based on the few chapters of our (Coogan OUP) textbook. Then maybe work on aspects of Covenant. Any chance you'd be willing to serve as a Online Ambassador for our course? Here's info on this and the application: 1857: 2161: 1652: 4210: 4050: 3951: 3865: 3187: 3645: 2523: 882:

Or is there are more flexible template where I can input subsets/subtotals and both % and points per assignment? Also, what's a best practice for posting an assignment (e.g., subpage of course page?) and tracking their contributions on that specific assignment? E.g., where do I describe an early assignment to insert a sentence with a ref, and where can I collect all these sentences together to grade them?

5049:! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least 2002: 3738:. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Knowledge’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Knowledge administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project. 1960:

Convincing them of your good intentions is the hardest part - we get used to drive-bys, vandals, and crazy people. Caring about your subject then involves you in defending relevant articles from the vandals and crazy people (and the occasional drive-by "improvement" by well-meaning twits who read the wrong books). Soooo.... Your pupils are becoming involved in a community that improves

40: 1945:, thanks, good suggestions. Maybe I shouldn't admit this to experienced editors, but I am focused on basic writing, such as learning to paraphrase an academic study and cite the source (in any format). This group of students tends to be shy about writing in articles, so I'm encouraging them just to do that. Thanks for the encouragement, maybe you could be an Education Prg ambassador? 4522:

pushing exactly in line with your COI. If you persist, I suspect you will get some admin reaction, like a bann on editing the pages altogeiher. As it stands now, you can edit some useful sections of Peter Baker and this will help improve his biography here. I know this advice is not easy to take, but even so, I mean it for your own sake. I wish you the best.

3095:

undue weight and compromise the encyclopedic tone. Also avoid external links to advocacy groups. Instead, incorporate relevant groups into prose and give a link to them in some citation. Finally, I suggest being more focused on transgender-specific issues; a lot of the raised points apply to LGBT folks in general. Thanks again.

4475:(and one I'd prefer a user like yourself to add if you are convinced by my argument): because WP:OR concerns would apply to this seeming discovery of John Dawson vs. James Dawson, and because there is a genuine second notable John Dawson slave trader (Pope, 2007), could we at least DAB two different John Dawson articles? 4384:. If you actually found an error with, say, John vs James, you could give the info to one of the published historians and maybe they would publish a research note or correction that could then be used in Knowledge. Or they might question the validity of James on the cover page alone. Anyway, does that make sense? 937:? I believe that's the standard header for courses generated with the course extension. The intent is to give Wiki Ed staff and community volunteers a clear picture of a class that's in the program (activity, schedule, users, articles, etc.) at a glance. As for updating the grading rubric, I'll point ping 4945:(Also: Please look at the definition of Original Research, because it isn't relevant to the DAB at stake, or to accusations about any editor's choice for that DAB.) Yes, article titles matter and they should be recognizable, precise, and consistent with similar articles (be they slave traders or mayors). 4909:

If that's not direct enough: lord mayor is a significant view suppressed by the DAB "(slave trader)". The author, with their own narrative, may feel "(slave trader)" is a more notable DAB. But that's WP:OR, and prior to the slew of articles Desertarun wrote, it was a very uncommon DAB. One would have

4734:

How is it tendentious to write about the slave trade? How is (slave trader) a "politically-charged" phrase when everybody agrees that it's wrong, there's no opposing POV, it's not a contentious issue. And for our culture, it's the most significant aspect of people like Peter Baker, as I think you've

4700:

At the core, I really believe Desertarun has a vested interest in rightgreatwrongs here. They wrote a dozen-plus articles in 2020 with politically-charged DABs that weighted heavily on a sole significant view, built them up, then nominated them for front page highlighting. If that's not an attempt to

4436:

I appreciate seeming a bit hysterical does me no favours, but there is a seriousness to Desertarun's conduct that I genuinely believe deserves AN/I. When someone casts aspersions, it is not merely the indignance, but the lasting damage that it causes to the framing of the debate. If someone starts by

3094:

between them for readability; make sure that the archive URL is an actual, distinct URL on an archive website, rather than the same website. A few content points: Be careful putting too much weight on individual cases of abuse. Although they may be compelling, unless they are widely covered it may be

2883:

With respect, I still think that the text of the article is a POVFORK. We could remediate that in a number of ways, such as by examining the sources that cover the topic of gendered violence against transgender people and seeing how they tend to characterize it, and then writing the article that way.

1724:

As an editor who does use my real name, and has spent a considerable time looking at both gender on Knowledge, and various forms of Internet/Real Life harassment, I would suggest that rather than advise your students to conceal or make public their identities, you invite them to think carefully about

842:

Thanks for setting up Miami Univ as an institution! Well, I got my global account SUL, thanks for help there, too. Then I just entered the entire course into Wizard -- and it hung up, spun for 15 minutes. Sigh. Don't I need to create the course via wizard, before requesting course user rights? If so,

4749:

The near-invention of the DAB, and widespread use, created a circular precedent on Knowledge which itself did not have that precedent prior. As a result, a major consistency concern was created. As I've noted, I'd be happy to change others from (merchant) to (slave trader) if there had been some RFC

4711:

this is something I'd seen done for other ship articles. Citing of ship registers (which are just lists) is similarly a primary source, and Loyd's register is used all over these pages. Phillips (1953) explains the sequential order of company inheritance, and these are cited solely for the existence

4627:

Citation needed -- useful idea, if we think some corroborating evidence might be found. I made a few edits and used that at least once. But I'd prefer that you either remove all text that relies on Phillips 1953, else let me know what you think can be kept. It's too hard to figure out what you added

4351:

I appreciate that you are taking the care to assess the statements for their merit independently, even if this source (Phillips, 1953) is not a fully independent source of the subject matter. In some instances, that is probably of benefit! I certainly won't take Phillips' word that "the Dawsons were

2706:

as having a genocidal aspect" and list two articles. Do you know how to get copies of these? If not, I can email them to you. The sources are difficult to read, so if they are too hard, let me know. The key would be to paraphrase key points that are related to an arguably genocidal approach to trans

4826:

I think we just have a healthy disagreement on neutral/due weight. I believe the ideal of Wiki articles is that all significant views are covered in length and organisation according to their significance. If you have info primarily related to one significant view, that's fine to create an article.

4539:

If I do make any future contributions, it will be solely to add references that help reinforce claims relying somewhat heavily on Phillips (1953), even if Liverpool Echo (1961) currently substantiates many pertinent ones, and already-existing Wikis validate the importance/significant view aspect of

2868:

or similar request? You're not required to say, I suppose, but it'd be a courtesy because otherwise I'm putting energy into trying to reach consensus with you (and other editors) and to improve the article, bringing it up to WP standards. You are also clearly putting considerable thought and effort

1125:

As for the grading template, the current one basically just takes arbitrary text input and adds some style around it. You can edit the parameters to changes the % to both % and points. If you need something more complex than that, maybe just removing the grading template and describing your grading

881:

Hope you got rest and ended your semester well. Yes, the wizard worked but I edited it extensively and got instructor approval. Did you look it over? Feedback welcome. Three questions: how to remove that big block at the top of my (user page) course page? How to redo the grading template at bottom?

4696:

My tendency as an academic is to cite and explain fully, and this is appreciated by some, but not others. That said, I'm also just recusing myself from these Wiki pages any further, unless someone specifically requests me to come in for comment. I am happy to let the pages sort themselves out from

4565:

was DAB'd like this by TheAnome in 2013. But beyond this one example, all these DABs pre-2021 come from Desertarun, and then user Leutha wrote a couple more. To my point, Desertarun made these pages with a very clear and arguably biased POV, and is now doing things like adding incorrect notices of

4482:

Dawson" from Williams 1897 who was captain of Mentor. Heck... the DABs could be "John Dawson (-1812)" and "Captain J. Dawson (1752-1824)" to avoid commiting to either, which honestly seems appropriate given the honourific "Captain" seems to be used throughout. The purpose of a DAB isn't to judge a

2929:

If a minority of sources have a viewpoint on topic X, should that minority view never have its own article? For example, most scholars think The Talmud should be analyzed as legal discourse, a minority think as a narrative. Or: majority think Talmudic law is influenced by Roman law, minority think

2186:

and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion

710:

Greetings. I teach at Miami Univ (Oxford OH) and I'm thinking about adding WP assignments to one of my courses next semester. Have you had experience in helping college teachers in setting up and implement a WP-related course? Would you be open to working with me or perhaps referring me to another

4865:

You feel there's something inappropriate. But what is wrong with anyone creating new articles on a topic? And, really, why this feeling about the DYKs? After all, we have entire WikiProjects to get people to create new articles -- and hence DYKs -- on topics that would benefit from more coverage.

2771:

Thanks. I had to go thru a series of edits yesterday because they were problematic, some vandalism and others just tendentious. Some had to be reverted by hand, which is tedious. Just now seeing deletion of sourced content for what I'd consider spurious reasons. Have you looked over some of their

1638:

Then where should your article go next? It needs an analysis of the Book of Joshua itself - composition history and theological purpose. JEDP won't help on this - Joshua's from the Deuteronomistic history, so your students need to understand that. So look at Joshua (the conquest narrative) in the

4672:

My two cents: Although I realize you felt deeply offended by Desertarun, I would kindly suggest that you re-imagine him as an ally and collaborator in the writing of the Baker bio and related articles. He cares about the topic and wants it to be encyclopedic. Without his buy-in, the article will

4583:

Hi again. I can remove the Primary tag, but I would do that after there's no more info that relies solely on Phillips 1953 (due to RS concerns). FWIW, I disagree about Desertarun -- for example, it isn't "casting aspersions" to downgrade or criticize a source (as opposed to a person), it isn't a

1276:

Ah, I see what you want now - AFAIK, there's no easy way to track edits under individual assignments. As you've noted, the activity page just tracks the most recent edits by a course's students. Though in the past, I've found that the activity page is pretty easy to follow as students make their

4521:

Third, I advise you to stop writing, even in Talk pages, about DAB and Renames for Baker, Dawson, and any other slave trader articles. I feel that you have a fine scholarly enthusiasm for getting things right, but every time you talk about DAB (and article names) you are going to come across as

1914:

Hi. I think it's wonderful that contribution to Knowledge should be part of your course. You might want to check that all your students got the Welcome pack further up this page - some new editors still fall through the net. It's worth at least skim-reading some of the best-practice notes, aka

4891:

I felt I did. I think we don't see eye-to-eye on how a title shapes a perception. A page title is the most impactful, most important part of any article. The reason I come back to DAB is because before you know any of the text, your view is already influenced towards one significant view. For

1959:

I've only been here since 2012 myself, so finding my feet is still fresh in my memory. WP isn't like writing a book or a paper. The whole peer review thing usually means doing your own thing within a small team who are similarly attempting to improve the group of articles you are working on.

721:

Hi. Glad to hear, I'd be happy to help! I haven't helped set up a course yet, but I served as a resource for a couple courses this last semester - I can point you in the right direction and would be happy to provide guidance along the way. I'm not sure how much you've looked into Knowledge's

1131:

As far as describing the specific assignments in more detail, you can do that by editing the course page. (A subpage would also work.) For tracking grades of those assignments, that is something that instructors usually don't do on-wiki (although you're welcome to do so on a subpage, if you

2805:

hi, I've also gathered more coverage in the media (various quality levels) with ppl debating whether something is trans genocide, and against applying the concept. I'd welcome guidance on what's merely primary source research and what's relevant for inclusion in terms of public controversy

2305:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

744:

for an example of what one of Ohio State's instructors did for their class this last semester. Once you've got the basics of your course set up, you'll submit a request for course instructor rights, which will give you the tools you need to run a course here on Knowledge. I have set up

4554:), could you please remove the "Primary" tag on Peter Baker (slave trader) that Desertarun added to the main page? It's another example of how their conduct attempts to bias the incoming reader to a POV, and is part of the numerous examples of conduct violations relevant to my concern. 1831:

Thanks for your helpful comments on the Education Noticeboard! I think it's really good to have some public discussion about the details of what works and doesn't from an instructor's perspective — especially with people who also understand Knowledge well from an editor's perspective!

4606:" be more appropriate then? The concern is WP:RS, not WP:PRIMARY. The COI concern per WP:RS is a very different one from WP:Primary. COI concerns occur often for historical documents, or for biographical pages/corporations. Primary concerns are much more disqualifying, as they imply 2440:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

3841:

has been reviewed and approved. There are still some issues that you may want to address about one of the hooks and the short lead section. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there if you like. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!

1886:

or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our

1363: 740: 506:. So you might ask the students to add in something about genre, structure and theme. The key difference between this and the usual sort of assignment is the lack of student's opinion or evaluation - they would be strictly citing scholarly authorities in a non-neutral way: " 1543:

is no longer required. Normally editors have to be here for about 4 days and 10 edits to avoid things like Captcha's and do certain other actions, I had previously fast-tracked you based on the education program noticeboard. You can review your current account flags at:

577:

What I'd like to do soon is email the registered students to sound out whether they'd like this at all -- because it the Knowledge training would displace part of what'd they otherwise learn in the course. Let me know, too, whether you'd like to give me feedback here, or

4379:

Yeah, I love the Phillips manuscript and I wish we had more from my family. As a scholar (though in a different field than you), it took me some time to adjust to WP standards. We aren't looking for good scholarship, at least not in the sense that it would cross into

4827:

Those are stub/start class, and they can be updated by the community to fill gaps. But ideally you don't create a DAB for that article that makes it hard or confusing to later connect it to other significant views you may be unaware of. You also really shouldn't

2076:

Don't click on the one above, I corrected mine. As you can see in this page's edit history, the original link had https: instead of http: and it didn't work properly for me, tried in two browsers. Better to ask a techie minded person, maybe I'm wrong. Cheers,

535:, since so many showed up as stubs (I think in the WP:Judaism project). However, I'm reluctant to go there because I personally know so little about the scholarship on Psalms, plus the Coogan textbook doesn't address the Psalms until late in this intro course. 2786:

Would you like access to my Zotero references that may pertain transgender genocide? I've approx 30 currently. To be sure, some arguably are more about anti-LGBT violence than the more narrow topic. For access, I'd need to add you as a Zotero user, I think.

4179:

On WP left hand menu-bar there is tool called related changes. I click that time to time to find out the users expanding articles in related topic areas, and reach out to them as I reached you out. That's how long see also section at draft stage helps

2232:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

4924:

Hi, your comments refer to two types of "views" — there are the views reflected in sources and central to NPOV and POV — and then there are editorial choices, like DAB, which is not a "view" (POV) in Wiki policy discourse. (Or the views of readers,

4892:

articles where multiple significant views may be possible, and where the writing may not provide complete coverage, providing DABs off only the significant view the author knows of unduly influences the fate of the article. You see what I mean?

4810:

Hi. Your concern is about the (slave trader) DAB "systematically depressing other significant views." This sounds like some other view is consistently, repeatedly, being left out. What significant views are "systematically" being suppressed?

4454:

policy. I will continue to do so in the future if it is relevant, but it seems a double standard that a user like Desertarun that practically invents a DAB and writes multiple articles using it is somehow given a free pass for any concern of

1280:

What I've seen in the past is students emailing links (diffs) of their contributions for each assignment to the instructor, in order to submit them. Alternatively, you could create a subpage for students to post links to their edits on (e.g.

3150:

Oh not at all - The only option in the DYKHelper script I use for nominations is a “created by” field, but if you want to edit it to clarify the labor differential that’s totally fine! Whatever makes sure you get the credit you deserve :)

4363:

I am genuinely just trying to be a good scholar here, and it's greatly appreciated to be treated with a belief that I am acting in good faith given the knee-jerk responses of most others, and the increasing libel of some... Cheers --

2751:

is usually fine. If you think that there's a serious issue aside from simple vandalism regarding that user's behavior in a topic area with discretionary sanctions, the way to request that they be used is generally to make a report at

2943:

vs trans (or LGBT). Q2 because you said ("not seem to be embraced by the majority of sources that talk about violence against transgender people," which to me is not quite the right criterion; also "broad academic support"). Thanks,

2820:

I don't have a Zotero account, but I appreciate the offer to share the citations. I've added a comment on the page regarding defining the core article subject, and I'm going to read through your responses to my comments shortly. —

1878:

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

5053:(or broader international articles) by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts. 4550:

I believe it is a matter of subversive conduct at heart. But your view is noted, I appreciate it, and I'll consider it going forward. If I can make one last request, if you agree that Phillips (1953) is not a primary source

510:

regards this as a psalm of lament." But even then, it would take a bit of research to know whether that is Brueggemann's idiosyncratic view or the general consensus among scholars. Anyway, I hope this helps - keep in touch.

501:

Yes, I'm interested in talking about this - it's something I've thought about off and on for a few years. The obvious place to start would be the Psalms - there is an article on every Psalm, but most are very short. E.g.

4876:

Again, my basic suggestion is to assume good faith with Desertarun, collaborate on Baker or other articles, and deal with each concern on a case-by-case basis without assuming some kind of systematic bias on their part.

1634:

you'll find a section outlining the Joshua-narrative's story, and the first subsection deals with the early conquest. It's more complete than yours and could copy/paste it to serve as the introduction to your article.

4296:

ProfGray, the closure of this review as a failed GAN looks good to me. I thought it was best to post directly to your talk page, rather than to the review page after you'd completed the closure. Thank you very much.

2191:. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request 1642:

Only last go to the archaeology. What's the current archaeological status of the settlement of the Palestinian highlands and the emergence of state-level entities? Go for the most recent stuff, after about 2000.

4668:

I cut down the Phillips citations to 7, you've now increased it to 12. This is a mistake, in my view, because it is not a reliable source and it's usage should be cut down as much as possible, if not completely

2884:

My current understanding of the literature right now is that there's broad academic support that certain historical events against third-gender indigenous people of the Americas constitute specific instances of

2115:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 3134:

Thanks very much for submitting. Would it make more sense for me to be listed for "created by" and you as improving it? But I don't know the criteria and also hope you're not offended by my mentioning this.

4544:. I feel like I've now discovered far more than can be digested in one cursory read of a Talk page, so further additions are not productive. It needs someone to second (and third) the desire for corrections. 4065: 1484: 1416: 1221:

Hmm...I'm not sure if the page looks different for instructors vs. ambassadors, hopefully someone else can expand on that. But if there aren't any students making edits, I imagine the page would be blank.

2892:

as "Transgender genocide" or "Trans genocide" generally does not seem to be embraced by the majority of sources that talk about violence against transgender people. I don't anticipate submitting an AfD;

4642:

I have found numerous external references that source almost everything I added previously from Phillips. It appears some of the colour/extended detail from Phillips' accounts was likely from the book:

3457: 2707:

persons. Does that goal make sense? We're only looking for about 2-4 sentences that give the gist of the articles. The first is more important I think. I give a little start next to each citation, see?

2926:(in general)? For instance, would you classify as a subset of "violence" a prohibition on marriage, moving children away from their communities, banning a language, or reducing access to medical care? 3306:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2599:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2452:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2317:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2244:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 4423:, I hope the page will see more reasoned debate without stakes behind it. Regardless, I leave my detailed notes (ramblings) that someone two years down the line could take on board if they choose. 4557:

I mean, I was shocked to see just how pervasive their edits with this DAB go, with some 13+ articles written by Desertarun just on 1800s slave traders alone in defiance of more common DABs. See:

4500:

on pg16 regarding the accounts of Capt. J. Dawson. So HS Phillips was well aware of Williams (1897), and yet titled this collection with "James Dawson" on the title page pretty unambiguously. --

4478:

At a minimum, two "John Dawson" pages would disambiguate "merchant" slave trader John Dawson (?-1812) father of Frederik and someone who commissioned 50 vessels of slaves (Pope 2007), and "John

4730:. Don't forget the ending of that section: "If, however, the wrong that you want to address has already been sorted in the real world, and if you have the reliable sources to support it, then 705: 4483:

character, it's to make it easier to find the right article. "Capt J. Dawson" would be the most consistent with how each of these texts reference Dawson, and avoid the John vs. James debate

2699: 1224:

Alternatively, if you go to your course's page, you should see a 'View activity' tab at the top, next to the editing and history buttons. This should also provide you with students' edits.

4966: 2747:

a bit on the talk page of another user. I'm pretty sure she's asleep right now, so it might take a while for her to get back to you. For plain vandalism, pinging an admin or reporting to

747: 4910:

expected "(lord mayor)" for someone like Baker, as there was a long-running precedent. And the same comment applies to all lord mayors now DAB'd by Desertarun with "(slave trader)". --

4413:

If that were true, we'd discount Williams (1897), and ignore the legitimate concern of citogenesis that seemingly stems from Williams as the oldest source being cited in these circles.

809:. You could technically avoid using the Wizard by skipping it and creating your course page from scratch, with inspiration from other course pages or by stealing from my test course at 4712:

of those companies. If you think they're not helpful, please remove them. Again, thanks for volunteering to mediate, the constructive feedback, and for engaging respectfully. Best --

3776:

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics

3322: 2615: 2468: 2333: 2260: 3441: 3409: 2149: 3429: 1596:

Hey Professor Gray - just wanted to wish you a very merry New Years Eve as we head into 2015 :) Looking forward to helping out with your course when school starts back up. Cheers!

3291: 2585: 1037:

template works is that if it's in user space, it has the big box of instructions at the top. If it's transcluded onto a course page, then it instead inserts that standard header.

3399: 3389: 4265: 4014: 3920: 2183: 2168: 2154: 1725:

what is involved, and reach a thoughtful decision over what should be public, and what private. Note that it is always possible to abandon an account and create a new one.

4540:

others. Those wikis likely have references that would be useful, and if there's a concern of content accuracy, I'd like to address it. I'll stay off talk pages from hereon

4268:

after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

4155:

who has the background and skills to give you feedback and information. For the See Also section (which is way too long, IMO) you might look at related concept in Judaism,

4017:

after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

3923:

after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

3222: 3118: 481: 3526: 2901:. But the article needs to be substantially re-written in order to comply with NPOV (and perhaps a title change). I'll explain more in detail on the article talk page. — 2772:

edits on that page? It'd be great to have your opinion or intervention, since I'm just not involved enough to understand the levels of tolerance for this kind of thing.

852:

Sorry for the late reply, had my math final last night and sleeping was a big priority :) I see you have a course page - did you ultimately have success with the wizard?

967: 4764:

To clarify: no it's not contentious that slave trading is abhorrent, and one of the most significant views of these people. But it's not the only significant view. --

4110:, On Knowledge I engage in, finding information and knowledge gap areas in Knowledge and promoting expansion of related drafts and articles. Came across your edit at 3904: 3658: 2371:

article, please specify the source you had in mind with "Macht". By the way, the Milgrom source above it has become unavailable. Can it be replaced with another link?

4458:

All that said, thanks again for your patience and interest. You're the best kind of Wiki editor: able to balance being nice and also being neutral. It's a skill! --

1314:

Thanks, that might work nicely, or maybe it's more extra steps to try to get students to do. Email might be easiest. I guess I have to think about this more. Thanks!

1352: 1119: 806: 4873:

It seems like you come back to arguing about the DAB for Peter Baker, rather than any systematic suppression of a non-slavery primary topic(s) as the disambiguator.

1968:, choose a target, and make it happen? If they can find the sources, it will probably give your pupils the experience you want them to extract from this exercise. 4518:. First of all, thank you for appreciating my efforts to be both NPOV and kind. Second, thanks for withdrawing the RM for James, I think that's the best approach. 4445:, etc... The true damage that Desertarun has done here is, by continuously attacking me, they've made it impossible to consider the merits of the content at hand. 2204: 1764: 724: 4942:

Is "Lord Mayor" of greatest significance to readers of this biography? If so, how many years did Baker serve and what were his significant accomplishments were?

2930:

it's by Sassanian. Or: majority think Sassanian influence on Talmud is due to economic factors, minority think Sassanian influence is due to aesthetic factors.

1076: 715: 538:

So far, I've come up with a few angles that mesh with my syllabus from last year. Students could work in pairs maybe on #1 and then teams split up the others?

3117:

Hello - Long time no see (on my watchlist, at least). I did some copy-editing and expansion of the transgender asylum seekers article and got it nominated at

3785: 758:. Either I'll be able to answer your questions or point you to someone who can. I'll also be happy to review your course page once that gets going. Finally, 2864:

article? If so, what timeframe do you have in mind, or can I ask somebody to close out that discussion? If it isn't merged, do you anticipate submitting an

1478: 1104:

The assignments on Joan Strassman's course page that you linked were not created by a wizard or selected from a menu; those were things she added herself.

617:

How hard would it be to scope out the notability of specific verses? Or maybe choose a Pentateuch passage that hasn't been covered much if at all? Thanks!

4552: 2278: 1370: 1260: 4288: 1435:. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Knowledge works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and 3232: 2358: 1406: 49: 5009: 3914: 2642: 3164:

Thanks. The DYK just passed conditional review, provided you change the hook from "more" to "particularly." (Seems they expect you to edit it) .Yay!

2486: 2351: 1488: 525: 496: 2526:

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Knowledge. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to

2043: 970:. Where is there a menu of these boilerplates? Is there a wizard or something that creates the series automatically? (Or did I skip it by accident?) 4352:

a well-respected family" etc... but I think I can believe him when he says "many sources confuse this, but it was Baker and Co. up until after the

3583: 3237:, and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to 1415: 1343:

We're working on better tools for keeping track of course activity, which I expect to start rolling out during the upcoming term in a basic form.--

1259:

it isn't grouped by assignments. It's just a list of edits… and not a very long one, it's truncated for some reason. In the page I looked at, here

4895:

It's ok if we disagree here. But I'm not intending to dodge questions. I just give a very high value to a title as an influence on the reader. --

4679:

I hope this advice is useful. It's based on my WP collaboration skills and some research I've read about disputes (e.g., don't address the user).

4249: 3998: 3830: 3194: 3109: 2971: 2209: 2144: 5014: 3020: 1804: 574:

Anyway, I suppose we could come up with various alternatives to #2-4 that combine academic articles and plausible options on WP. Your thoughts?

176: 4437:

saying a source is "primary", it takes me repeating myself umpteen times before someone goes "oh... wait yeah no having a COI doesn't make it

4409:

can be raised to help make sense of conflicting info like found in Williams, Behrendt, Pope, Postigo, and Phillips. I'm not sure I agree that

1141: 5038: 3638: 2024: 631: 4359:

It's much appreciated that someone else actually looked at this document and considered it, rather than just attacking it as illegitimate -

3349: 3158: 3128: 2380: 4259: 4008: 3872: 2086: 1506: 627: 4306: 1468: 4496:. I originally misread this as "Gomez." But Phillips, knowing of Williams 1897, nonetheless titled it "James Dawson" and wrote elsewhere 2562: 738:

has links to a few resources you might find helpful, including an outline for what a 12-week course might look like. You might check out

4419:

I kinda got sucked into Desertarun's style without realizing there is a better classifier for what I was hoping to achieve. So now with

4217: 4121:(still a draft in my userspace) and help expand the topic areas if you find topic interesting. Wish you very happy Knowledge editing. 3671: 1207:, don't think that's right. Well, I only have myself as a student now. But it doesn't list any edits, just the article to be worked on. 1162: 1000: 986: 950: 928: 78:

on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~), which will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please always fill in the

4185:

I look forward to your contributions too whenever you come across any suitable reference at any point of time in future. Happy editing.

2420: 2285: 1977: 1954: 734: 1323: 1309: 1271: 1248: 1216: 1195: 914: 891: 876: 847: 837: 800: 793:

Hi, thanks for the prompt reply. I went thru the orientation since my initial message and I've looked at some courses and assignments.

788: 5045:

Running from October 1 to 31, 2024, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme

4939:, as determined by us editors. Maybe the slave trade was not a big deal to 18th sources, but how important is it to readers nowadays? 4838: 4356:, at which point it became Baker and Dawson" - which tracks with other sources as well beyond being completely sensible within-text. 4095: 3037:, if you want to follow along. I have a feeling the discussion will be very short. Thanks for your attention at the article. Cheers, 2995: 1784: 3958: 2065: 4702: 4289: 3612: 2692: 2412: 2398: 1923:. The quickest shortcut for a newcomer, when you can't get the code to do what you want, is to find an article that does it, click 1892: 1559: 3076:! I've cleaned up the article a bit and marked it as reviewed. A few style points: Replace curly quotes with straight quotes, per 3046: 3015: 2544:

submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on

1586: 691: 648: 621: 615: 609: 586: 224: 5066: 3241:. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the 1524: 4387:

FWIW, I'd encourage you to withdraw the RM and the AN/I stuff. It's just not worth it and it detracts from how you come across

3984: 3269: 2150: 2094: 1936: 3819: 3378:, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge. 1713: 1167:

Hey Professor - at the top right of the page, by your username, you should see a 'Courses' link. Clicking it will take you to

3696: 3179: 2991: 1780: 1777:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 591:

If you were thinking about creating articles for individual verses, be aware that they might not be regarded as individually

489: 4450:

It is depressing that self-declaring a COI at Knowledge makes one untrustable, which is not Knowledge's intent behind their

2835:

Hi. If you click on this link, I think you'll be able to see the citations. You would need an account to download the pdfs.

5031: 4928:

The article should reflect all significant views POVs and info in the reliable sources, and write them up in a neutral way.

4133: 3345: 3030: 2691:

Well, grim history angle. Anyway, welcome! Let me suggest that you put your draft writing at the top of this sandbox page:

2638: 2482: 2347: 2274: 2140: 2020: 310: 3857: 3264: 4487:

altogether. Then the page itself could just mention the John vs. James thing, where I feel there's credible uncertainty.

4176:

My long See also sections are only for draft stage, I use it to invite diverse set of users for article expansion. How?

2666: 1702: 1401: 4726:

To offer a diff perspective on Desertarun, look at the rightgreatwrongs examples, which are specific, tendentious, and

4624:

Hi. In terms of disqualifying, not RS is a severe problem and disqualifies most of the info from Phillips. Nonetheless,

3938: 3561: 3543: 3173: 3144: 2127:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

1985: 1616: 1305: 1244: 1191: 872: 833: 784: 1554: 3690: 3238: 2364: 1909: 2839:

Btw, I started a draft article on transgender asylum seekers, an unfortunate distraction but hopefully educational.

2511: 1904: 1841: 1620: 977:. Who's the course coordinator? That person can add an ambassador, or the ambassador can do it, but I can't. Thanks 813:(which is the result of me trying out the Wizard myself). This would, of course, take a lot longer than the Wizard… 4082: 3578: 974: 2676:

Hi, Ro from TikTok (saddest_strong). Thank you for inviting me to help document the Trans community's history! 💜

4329: 3520: 3498: 3433: 3421: 3341: 2865: 2634: 2493: 2478: 2343: 2270: 2136: 2016: 1357: 760: 436: 220: 194: 4773: 4509: 2557: 1646:

Finally bring it together - what were the three theories on the emergence of Israel, where do they stand today?

4954: 4919: 4904: 4886: 4857: 4841:. That's the bias concern, even if it's a bias written from the right side of history and edited in good faith. 4759: 4744: 4721: 4688: 4656: 4637: 4619: 4593: 4578: 4531: 4467: 4396: 4381: 4036: 3850: 3461: 3260: 2730: 2716: 755: 658: 640: 601: 517: 274: 198: 57: 4090: 3061: 2878: 2815: 1891:

for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see

919:

Hi, ProfGray! I believe you may add them to the course. I'll take a look at the templates on the course page.

3627: 3589: 2953: 2910: 2848: 2830: 2796: 2781: 2721:

Makes sense. I'll get going on that and once I have one of the summaries finished, I'll send it over to you.

1769:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1530: 810: 614:

Yes, I realize that. I already started a WP:N conversation here and looked at some old debates about verses.

375: 328: 306: 4344:. I started out just being passingly interested in this. Then upon finding this series of Wiki pages that - 4283: 4252:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 4194: 4168: 4040: 4001:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 3907:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 3225:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 4562: 3898: 3315: 2861: 2608: 2461: 2326: 2253: 1168: 392: 371: 236: 127: 119: 4931:

The DAB and title do not need to reflect these views. They should refer to the "primary topic" — (1) what

4665:

to extract (and interpret) data and cite them? I noticed their use on some other articles about the ships.

2836: 2700:

Talk:Violence against LGBT people#Proposed merge of Transgender genocide into Violence against LGBT people

754:

If you run into anything or have any questions at any point, feel free to ask. You can contact me here or

3574: 3557: 3515: 3327: 2620: 2473: 2338: 2265: 2132: 2061: 2012: 1809: 1758: 1691: 1373:. I'd welcome suggestions of Users/editors who might like to support me and the students in the course. 450: 354: 240: 132: 3852: 4820: 4645:

History of the Royal and Ancient Toxteth Park, Robert Griffiths with information from G. H. Parry. 1907

4405:

concept down, thus why I'm restricting many of these discussions to Talk pages. That's precisely where

4269: 4255: 4018: 4004: 3924: 3910: 3242: 3228: 3215: 3206: 3111: 3073: 2869:

into the content, and I think it'd be to your benefit as well to know the where the article is headed.

2188: 1282: 966:

For the assignments, I saw that Joan Strassman had a series of boilerplate assignments (I think) here:

432: 422: 384: 379: 336: 253: 249: 232: 207: 4234:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 3975:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 3211:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 2056:

Actually, no. What issue is there with the link? I just clicked on it, and it seemed to work. Thanks.

4147:, thanks for thinking of me as a potential resource for your article. Let me refer you to my friend, 3713: 3667: 3656:

has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at

2976:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

2897:

is a thing and generally I don't like deleting articles on the basis of their content unless they're

2662: 2553: 2545: 2532: 2368: 2200: 1916: 1770: 1733: 492:. So, might you be interested in helping me think about the course assignments and so on? Take care, 257: 4569:

Will unfollow the pages to avoid temptation. Keeping notifications here. Best, and thanks again. --

4979: 4202: 3943: 3893: 3884: 3649: 2652: 1900: 1675: 1446: 1348: 1137: 1115: 946: 924: 661:, I've moved the conversation here for reasons that will be apparent (or we can discuss via email). 323: 319: 262: 211: 4992:

subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by

4805: 4676:

Also -- be short and simple. Start with 3-4 sentences, NOT longer. Avoid linking and policy terms.

4361:

and this after I was invited by said person to contribute to the article based on this document...

634:, etc. I'm sure you could come up with fifteen of them - or get the students to choose their own. 4150: 3445: 2499: 1973: 1965: 1932: 1883: 1591: 1031: 531:

Yes, I completely agree about asking for a neutral report from academic sources. I thought about

278: 203: 171: 4862:

Hi. You didn't answer my question: What significant views are "systematically" being suppressed?

4373: 2765: 1630:

Hello ProfGray. I'm not quite sure what you're trying to do, but I'll try to help. If you go to

4839:

I'm not the first to raise a concern that Desertarun's articles are full of original narratives

4111: 3792: 3570: 3553: 3511: 3402: 3375: 3153: 3123: 2073: 2057: 2031: 2008: 1613: 1302: 1241: 1188: 869: 830: 781: 729: 458: 396: 388: 113: 105: 2685: 4302: 4222: 4118: 3963: 3877: 3773:, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic. 3662:

and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!

3303: 3199: 2894: 2596: 2449: 2314: 2241: 1990:

Your Knowledge account was previously granted a user right called "course instructor" by the

1849: 445: 441: 332: 4830:

go on a campaign to pump your articles to the front page through "DYK" (see July 2021 trail)

4603: 3901:

for not backing down after receiving death threats for speaking out against book censorship?

3534:

thanks (though I've been an editor for a long time) and I'm very glad to be in your course,

4078: 3824: 3678: 3663: 3482: 3477: 3456: 3368: 3356: 3314:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3104: 3026: 2985: 2977: 2658: 2607:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2549: 2460:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2325:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2252:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2196: 2123:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1888: 1746: 1730: 1625: 592: 244: 215: 75: 3633: 2007:

wikiedu.org) for instructions how to create your next course page using our new system. --

8: 4915: 4900: 4853: 4769: 4755: 4717: 4652: 4615: 4574: 4505: 4463: 4369: 3781: 3681:. I emailed the editor who wrote that text, perhaps they have a source that was omitted. 2726: 2681: 2527: 2408: 2376: 2128: 1896: 1864: 1582: 1545: 1344: 1150: 1133: 1111: 1064: 1024: 955: 942: 938: 920: 896: 796:

However, the system didn't let me request Course rights (needed to create a course) ...

418: 414: 367: 362: 270: 163: 159: 4558: 2988:, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. 5062: 4705:", I don't know what is. It's regrettable my conduct distracted from that core concern. 4280: 4030: 3935: 3848: 3804: 3593: 3412: 3254: 3042: 2890:

the elevated level of systematic discrimination and violence against transgender people

1997:

If you plan on teaching with Knowledge for the fall 2015 term, please email me (helaine

1969: 1942: 1928: 1837: 1662: 1453: 1428: 1067:, I've moved that template from my user page to the course page. Better there, thanks. 644: 605: 521: 507: 358: 167: 109: 82:

field to describe your edits. Below are some useful links to help you get started. ~~~~

905:

to the course "online volunteers" (assuming SH will continue :) -- you, or SH, or me?

722:

Education Program, but I'll provide some preliminary information. If you head over to

3834: 3653: 3608: 3487: 3392: 3285: 3011: 3002:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

2906: 2826: 2761: 2744: 2579: 2436: 2301: 2228: 2210: 2104: 2095: 1800: 1791:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

1606: 1600: 1464: 1379: 1295: 1289: 1254: 1234: 1228: 1202: 1181: 1175: 1107: 900: 862: 856: 823: 817: 774: 768: 560: 428: 302: 79: 3084: 5005: 4298: 4190: 4129: 3788:. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the 3334: 3299: 3100: 2627: 2592: 2537: 2516: 2445: 2310: 2237: 2124: 2108: 1920: 1719: 1496: 463: 123: 68: 4661:

thanks. I'm curious about ship registers. Aren't these primary sources? Isn't it

4243: 4173:

Many thanks for your inputs. I invited @ 'Bari' bin Farangi' per your suggestion.

4074: 3719: 3361: 1548:(member of groups section). If you need anything, let me know! Happy editing, — 554: 454: 53: 3734:

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as

2187:

tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

2172: 2171:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under

899:, see above 3 questions. I probably asked you the 2nd elsewhere. Also, who adds 5001: 4911: 4896: 4849: 4765: 4751: 4713: 4648: 4611: 4570: 4515: 4501: 4459: 4365: 3311: 2915:

Thanks for replying. A few questions to help clarify our different approaches.

2722: 2677: 2604: 2507: 2457: 2404: 2386: 2372: 2322: 2249: 2192: 2120: 2112: 1687: 1631: 1578: 728:, that'll get you on your way to set everything up. What you'll do is create a 315: 266: 154: 4846:"for our culture, it's the most significant aspect of people like Peter Baker" 4561:. Roman Spinner brought this up. There's a slight precedent for this DAB: ex. 1364:

Education Program:Miami University/Religions of the Hebrew Bible (Spring 2015)

5058: 4993: 4989: 4946: 4878: 4812: 4736: 4680: 4629: 4607: 4585: 4523: 4451: 4442: 4420: 4388: 4341: 4321: 4313: 4277: 4238: 4229: 4160: 4101: 4026: 3979: 3970: 3932: 3843: 3838: 3770: 3682: 3619: 3549: 3535: 3307: 3250: 3165: 3136: 3053: 3038: 3034: 2945: 2898: 2870: 2840: 2807: 2788: 2773: 2748: 2738: 2708: 2600: 2541: 2453: 2390: 2318: 2245: 2116: 2078: 2051: 2035: 1946: 1872: 1868: 1850: 1833: 1750: 1705: 1549: 1516: 1393: 1383: 1315: 1263: 1208: 1154: 1068: 1020: 992: 978: 906: 883: 844: 797: 712: 683: 653: 635: 618: 596: 583: 579: 512: 493: 150: 3121:. Fingers crossed it goes better than the last time we nominated something! 805:

Well, you've got a few options. You... only need a unified login to use the

4867: 4662: 4599: 4406: 4402: 4086: 3762:

comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and

3604: 3600: 3007: 3003: 2902: 2855: 2822: 2802: 2757: 2753: 2034:. I suppose others told you about the link problem to wikiedu.org. Cheers, 1796: 1792: 1460: 1362:

Just posted my first draft of the course syllabus and WP assignments plan:

566: 1818: 4335: 4186: 4156: 4142: 4125: 4107: 3096: 2175:, because it is an unambiguous misrepresentation of established policy. 1512: 1492: 1427:! Thanks for contributing to Knowledge. Come join experienced editors at 4829: 4064:

Your hook reached 51,665 views (2,152.7 per hour), making it one of the

3703: 3318:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2611:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2464:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2329:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2256:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

4988:

You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of

3440: 3295:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

3091: 2981: 2837:

https://www.zotero.org/groups/4738771/transgender_genocide_and_violence

2589:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

5020: 4428:

Would you suggest to Desertarun that he uses RFC for Peter Baker also?

3408: 2178:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may

3502: 3428: 3276: 3077: 3067: 2671: 2571: 2503: 2427: 2292: 2219: 1698: 1683: 1387: 933:

When you say the big block at the top of the course page do you mean

4242:

designed their Red/Blue political depolarization workshops based on

4209: 4049: 3950: 3864: 3186: 1262:, it continues to track edits from users outside the college afaik. 626:

I think it would be fine if you restricted it to "key" verses. Like

563:, improve the Biblical section, add comparison of Klawans and Hayes. 4833:, which is basically using Wiki to advertise that significant view 3988: 3398: 2923: 2919: 503: 3644: 3388: 74:

on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to

4967:

Feedback request: Philosophy and religion Good Article nomination

2860:

Hi. Are you still seeking to merge Transgender genocide into the

2698:

You might start with two sources that can be found on this page:

2111:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge

934: 764:

also serves as a forum for questions or issues. Looking forward,

3588:

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

3331:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 2624:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 3321:

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

3289:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All

2614:

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review

2467:

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review

2332:

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review

2259:

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review

1964:

curates articles. It might be an idea to find out what makes a

1459:

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend,

532: 2583:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All

2522: 1431:! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from 706:

Getting support for new WP assignments in a Spring 2015 course

3497:

at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your

3491: 3219:

are more likely to be subjected to physical and mental abuse?

1774: 1682:

Not sure all that can be covered in a week, but good luck :)

582:

where I can record our ideas, or by email. Thanks very much!

544: 289: 92: 33: 3223:

Template:Did you know nominations/Transgender asylum seekers

3119:

Template:Did you know nominations/Transgender asylum seekers

1171:, which lists all the recent edits your students have done. 4491:

I've also just realized one more striking note in Phillips:

3080:; when you have a single quote next to a double quote, use 1441: 968:

Knowledge:USEP/Courses/Behavioral Ecology (Joan Strassmann)

732:

for your class (basic description, course timeline, etc.).

548: 60:

to the encyclopedia. If you need assistance, check out the

4935:

will care about and (2) what's of long term significance,

3905:

Template:Did you know nominations/Amanda Jones (librarian)

1871:, and it appears to include material copied directly from 1253:

Thanks, I can see the Activity tab on another course. But

39: 25: 3723:. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and 3480:

on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the

1991: 464:

Awards that registered contributors can achieve and award

3991:, performed art with 100 pounds (45 kg) of rotten fruit 569:, the synopsis and historical / archaeological analysis. 3592:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 3302: