632:. Knowledge articles are generally written based on in-depth, independent, reliable sourcing with some subject-specific exceptions. The subject-specific notability guidelines generally include verifiable criteria about a topic which show that appropriate sourcing likely exists for that topic. Therefore, topics which pass an SNG are presumed to merit an article, though articles which pass an SNG or the GNG may still be deleted or merged into another article, especially if adequate sourcing or significant coverage cannot be found, or if the topic is not suitable for an encyclopedia.
1425:. Editors may decide that it is better for readers to present a narrow subject as part of a broader one. For example, editors normally prefer to merge information about translations of books into the larger subject of the original book, because in their editorial judgment, the merged article is more informative and more balanced for readers and reduces redundant information in the encyclopedia. (For ideas on how to deal with material that may be best handled by placing it in another article, see
921:, and an article's subject can be notable if such sources exist, even if they have not been named yet. If it is likely that significant coverage in independent sources can be found for a topic, deletion due to lack of notability is inappropriate. However, once an article's notability has been challenged, merely asserting that unspecified sources exist is seldom persuasive, especially if time passes and actual proof does not surface.
56:
1018:
1007:
989:
978:
960:
949:
114:
1208:
of a larger page about a broader topic, with more context (and doing so in no way disparages the importance of the topic). Editorial judgment goes into each decision about whether or not to create a separate page, but the decision should always be based upon specific considerations about how to make the topic understandable, and not merely upon personal
2058:
Several journals simultaneously publishing different articles does not always constitute multiple works, especially when the authors are relying on the same sources, and merely restating the same information. Similarly, a series of publications by the same author or in the same periodical is normally counted as one source.
1262:). Other times, when many similar notable topics exist, it is impractical to collect them into a single page, because the resulting article would be too unwieldy. In that case, a viable option is creating a new list or category for the broader topic and linking to the individual articles from it (as with
2057:
Lack of multiple sources suggests that the topic may be more suitable for inclusion in an article on a broader topic. It is common for multiple newspapers or journals to publish the same story, sometimes with minor alterations or different headlines, but one story does not constitute multiple works.
1508:
are not valid routes to an encyclopedia article. The barometer of notability is whether people independent of the topic itself (or of its manufacturer, creator, author, inventor, or vendor) have actually considered the topic worth writing and publishing non-trivial works of their own that focus upon
1207:
When creating new content about a notable topic, editors should consider how best to help readers understand it. Often, understanding is best achieved by presenting the topic on a dedicated standalone page, but it is not required that we do so; at times it is better to cover a notable topic as part
888:
The absence of sources or citations in a
Knowledge article (as distinct from the non-existence of independent, published reliable sources in libraries, bookstores, and the internet) does not indicate that a subject is not notable. Notability requires only that suitable independent, reliable sources
2128:
may be merged into a "list of minor characters in..."; articles on schools may be merged into articles on the towns or regions where schools are located; relatives of a famous person may be merged into the article on the person; articles on persons only notable for being associated with a certain
2047:
newspapers, books and e-books, magazines, television and radio documentaries, reports by government agencies, and academic journals. In the absence of multiple sources, it must be possible to verify that the source reflects a neutral point of view, is credible and provides sufficient detail for a
2008:
constitutes evidence of notability for the purposes of article creation; for example, directories and databases, advertisements, announcements columns, and minor news stories are all examples of coverage that may not actually support notability when examined, despite their existence as
1353:
Editors apply notability standards to all subjects to determine whether the
English language Knowledge should have a separate, stand-alone article on that subject. The primary purpose of these standards is to ensure that editors create articles that comply with major content policies.
858:
2138:
Knowledge editors have been known to reject nominations for deletion that have been inadequately researched. Research should include attempts to find sources which might demonstrate notability, and/or information which would demonstrate notability in another
1614:
Notability guidelines also apply to the creation of stand-alone lists and tables. Notability of lists (whether titled as "List of Xs" or "Xs") is based on the group. One accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable is if it has been discussed
2110:
Sometimes contacting the subject of a biography or the representative of a subject organization will yield independent source material. Of course we have to be careful to observe and evaluate independence. You might also see if there is an active
627:
In some topic areas, subject-specific notability guidelines (SNGs) have been written to help clarify when a standalone article can or should be written. The currently accepted subject guidelines are listed in the box at the top of this page and at
647:, provide topic-related guidance when articles should not be created. SNGs can also provide examples of sources and types of coverage considered significant for the purposes of determining notability, such as the treatment of book reviews for our
1735:, and that all majority and significant-minority views published in reliable sources should be represented fairly and proportionately. Should any inconsistency arise between this guideline and the content policies, the policies take precedence.
1603:
897:
in an article. Editors evaluating notability should consider not only any sources currently named in an article, but also the possibility or existence of notability-indicating sources that are not currently named in the article. Thus, before
1069:, or new evidence may arise for articles previously deemed unsuitable. Thus, an article may be proposed for deletion months or even years after its creation, or recreated whenever new evidence supports its existence as a standalone article.
1418:, rather than representing only one author's point of view. This is also why multiple publications by the same person or organization are considered to be a single source for the purpose of complying with the "multiple" requirement.
1634:
There is no present consensus for how to assess the notability of more complex and cross-categorization lists (such as "Lists of X of Y") or what other criteria may justify the notability of stand-alone lists, although
571:, as those provide the most objective evidence of notability. There is no fixed number of sources required since sources vary in quality and depth of coverage, but multiple sources are generally expected. Sources do
1556:: it takes more than just routine news reports about a single event or topic to constitute significant coverage. For example, routine news coverage such as press releases, public announcements, sports coverage, and
1852:
tag for articles which do not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, but are uncontroversial deletion candidates. This allows the article to be deleted after seven days if nobody objects. For more information, see
1520:
can be written. Even non-promotional self-published sources, like technical manuals that accompany a product, are still not evidence of notability as they are not a measure of the attention a subject has received.
1253:
Sometimes, several related topics, each of them similarly notable, can be collected into a single page, where the relationships between them can be better appreciated than if they were each a separate page (as at
470:
creates an assumption, not a guarantee, that a subject merits its own article. A more in-depth discussion might conclude that the topic actually should not have a stand-alone article—perhaps because it violates
1074:
1276:. On the other hand, an article may be a stub even though many sources exist, but simply have not been included yet. Such a short page is better expanded than merged into a larger page (see also the essays
843:
No subject is automatically or inherently notable merely because it exists: the evidence must show the topic has gained significant independent coverage or recognition, and that this was not a mere
590:" excludes works produced by the article's subject or someone affiliated with it. For example, advertising, press releases, autobiographies, and the subject's website are not considered independent.
1705:
2179:
1122:
indicates what the economy was doing in the past, a topic is "notable" in
Knowledge terms only if the outside world has already "taken notice of it". Once established, notability is not
1062:
Notability is not temporary; once a topic has been the subject of "significant coverage" in accordance with the general notability guideline, it does not need to have ongoing coverage.
681:
2326:
1958:
674:
and do not establish new notability standards, lacking the weight of broad consensus of the general and subject-specific notability guidelines in various discussions (such as at
1860:
For cases where you are unsure about deletion, believe others might object, or another editor has already objected to a previous proposed deletion, nominate the article for the
1065:
While notability itself is not temporary, from time to time a reassessment of the evidence of notability or suitability of existing articles may be requested by any user via a
1560:
is not significant coverage. Even a large number of news reports that provide no critical analysis of the event is not considered significant coverage. The
Wikimedia project
1272:
Sometimes, when a subject is notable, but it is unlikely that there ever will be a lot to write about it, editors should weigh the advantages and disadvantages of creating a
1928:
1404:
1362:
of that topic. If only a few sentences could be written and supported by sources about the subject, that subject does not qualify for a separate page, but should instead be
1647:
often are kept regardless of any demonstrated notability. Editors are still urged to demonstrate list notability via the grouping itself before creating stand-alone lists.
718:
The criteria applied to the creation or retention of an article are not the same as those applied to the content inside it. The notability guideline does not apply to the
670:
have provided additional guidance on notability of topics within their field. Editors are cautioned that these WikiProject notability guidance pages should be treated as
2573:
2166:
1696:
There are numerous reasons for these requirements. Knowledge is not and must not become the validating source for non-significant subjects, and it is not a forum for
1300:
only if reliable sources confirm that principal photography for the film has commenced, as completion of the film is generally seen out to the end from this point on.
855:. Sources of evidence include recognized peer-reviewed publications, credible and authoritative books, reputable media sources, and other reliable sources generally.
1109:
2488:
1145:
If reliable sources cover a person only in the context of a single event, and if that person otherwise remains, and is likely to remain, a low-profile individual,
1227:
Sometimes, a notable topic can be covered better as part of a larger article, where there can be more complete context that would be lost on a separate page (
338:
depend on things such as fame, importance, or popularity—although those may enhance the acceptability of a subject that meets the guidelines explained below.
2820:
1689:. If discussed in an article about a mainstream idea, a theory that is not broadly supported by scholarship in its field must not be given undue weight, and
1678:, a Knowledge article should not make a fringe theory appear more notable or more widely accepted than it is. Statements about the truth of a theory must be
1774:
Topics that do not meet this criterion are not retained as separate articles. Non-notable topics with closely related notable articles or lists are often
508:
is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material.
1636:
1126:. Brief bursts of news coverage may not sufficiently demonstrate notability. However, sustained coverage is an indicator of notability, as described by
652:
566:
221:
2319:
1623:. The entirety of the list does not need to be documented in sources for notability, only that the grouping or set in general has been. Because the
330:
sources can be found on a topic, then it should not have a separate article. Knowledge's concept of notability applies this basic standard to avoid
2746:
1609:
1228:
1232:
138:
to gauge this attention. The notability guideline does not determine the content of articles, but only whether the topic may have its own article.
2159:
1292:). However, before creating such an article, make sure that the likelihood of the future event occurring is reasonably assured. For example, the
583:. Multiple publications from the same author or organization are usually regarded as a single source for the purposes of establishing notability.
267:
1284:). Sometimes, when information about a future event is scarce, coverage may instead be better suited to a larger encompassing article (see also
272:
1640:
1922:
1604:
Knowledge:Categories, lists, and navigation templates § Overlapping categories, lists and navigation templates are not considered duplicative
1751:
349:
It meets either the general notability guideline (GNG) below, or the criteria outlined in a subject-specific notability guideline (SNG); and
1311:
may provide information on how to make these editorial decisions in particular subject areas. When a standalone page is created, it can be
298:
2779:
1743:
1557:
178:
2503:
2152:
1916:
1358:
We require "significant coverage" in reliable sources so that we can actually write a whole article, rather than half a paragraph or a
660:
202:
2085:
2067:
Works produced by the subject, or those with a strong connection to them, are unlikely to be strong evidence of notability. See also:
594:
If a topic does not meet these criteria but still has some verifiable facts, it might be useful to discuss it within another article.
360:
This is not a guarantee that a topic will necessarily be handled as a separate, stand-alone page. Editors may use their discretion to
2979:
1912:
1433:
Because these requirements are based on major content policies, they apply to all articles, not solely articles justified under the
840:, objective evidence that the subject has received significant attention from independent sources to support a claim of notability.
761:
3040:
1894:
1627:
is notable, the individual entries in the list do not need to be independently notable, although editors may, at their discretion,
1304:
629:
621:
63:
914:
for the subject in question and consider the possibility that sources may still exist even if their search failed to uncover any.
2774:
2513:
2255:
1359:
408:
2794:
2580:
2449:
1836:
635:
SNGs also serve additional and varying purposes depending on the topic. Some SNGs, for example the ones in the topic areas of
1263:
1255:
1781:
If an article fails to cite sufficient sources to demonstrate the notability of its subject, look for sources yourself, or:
1693:
must be cited that affirm the relationship of the marginal idea to the mainstream idea in a serious and substantial manner.
1599:
1564:
may cover topics of present news coverage. In some cases, notability of a controversial entity (such as a book) could arise
1421:
We require editors to use their judgment about how to organize subjects so that we have neither long, bloated articles nor
1288:). Other times, a future event may clearly be suitable for a standalone page before it happens (such as the next upcoming
2877:
1905:
1277:
2956:
806:
2767:
1739:
1453:
1323:
can be used to direct readers searching for such topics to the appropriate articles and sections within them (see also
2068:
1872:
not notable, then deletion is usually the most appropriate response, although other options may help the community to
597:
2799:
2176:
126:—those that have gained sufficiently significant attention by the world at large and over a period of time, and are
2789:
2784:
656:
291:
171:
2804:
2741:
2250:
2245:
2081:
1861:
1701:
1415:
1389:
1066:
907:
903:
675:
472:
404:
392:
353:
127:
24:
803:, even very poor writing and referencing within a Knowledge article will not decrease the subject's notability.
257:
2518:
2478:
2419:
2336:
2264:
2240:
1948:
1697:
1408:
1236:
747:
505:
400:
214:
1152:
2414:
1898:
1683:
1548:
1385:
1324:
640:
453:
327:
233:
228:
190:
135:
2951:
1953:
3009:
2830:
2508:
2483:
2429:
1938:
1933:
648:
636:
334:
of topics. Article and list topics must be notable, or "worthy of notice". Determining notability does not
209:
195:
185:
20:
2366:
2872:
2648:
2595:
2568:
2498:
2473:
1854:
899:
727:
284:
262:
1377:
so that we can be confident that we're not passing along random gossip, perpetuating hoaxes, or posting
364:
or group two or more related topics into a single article. These guidelines only outline how suitable a
2994:
2444:
2439:
2409:
2314:
2270:
2198:
2005:
1816:
1374:
1247:, for example, may merit standalone pages but have undue weight on a page about the mainstream concept.
1220:, and so the amount of content and details should not be limited by concerns about space availability.
1119:
547:
467:
447:
323:
240:
71:
2212:
1674:
in its particular field. Because
Knowledge aims to summarize significant opinions with representation
1330:
2762:
2643:
2563:
2346:
2341:
1670:
is used in a broad sense to describe an idea that departs significantly from the prevailing views or
1657:
1619:
by independent reliable sources, per the above guidelines; notable list topics are appropriate for a
1281:
1244:
1187:
79:
859:
Notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article
2825:
2731:
2686:
2638:
2633:
2351:
2309:
2275:
1831:
the article's verifiable content into a broader article providing context. Otherwise, if deleting:
1438:
1393:
1320:
1239:
as well as standalone biographies of every individual
President). One should particularly consider
894:
522:
476:
1414:
We require multiple sources so that we can write a reasonably balanced article that complies with
414:
2719:
2540:
2304:
2235:
1805:
1575:
1397:
1183:
837:
543:
396:
1053:
1032:
2714:
2434:
2424:
2191:
1976:
1675:
1505:
1308:
1191:
1139:
1135:
731:
576:
36:
2961:
1785:
Ask the article's creator or an expert on the subject for advice on where to look for sources.
1166:
1088:
709:
2585:
2112:
1966:
1812:
1778:
into those pages, while non-notable topics without such merge targets are generally deleted.
1213:
1095:
879:
702:
667:
2144:
3018:
2884:
2523:
2399:
2331:
2260:
1876:. As deletion of an article are often heavily contested, editors are advised to thoroughly
1679:
1671:
644:
2941:
1173:
872:
795:
and not of a
Knowledge article. If the subject has not been covered outside of Knowledge,
492:
8:
2889:
2590:
2493:
2404:
2394:
2125:
2024:
1943:
1792:
1765:
1650:
1589:
1477:
1422:
1273:
1201:
1046:
918:
890:
782:
551:
530:
1700:. For writers and editors of Knowledge articles to write about controversial ideas in a
1538:
1467:
1344:
827:
775:
2901:
2896:
2389:
1873:
1757:
1644:
1581:
1530:
1459:
1336:
1316:
1217:
1158:
1080:
1038:
864:
820:
812:
796:
767:
695:
687:
611:
603:
558:. Availability of secondary sources covering the subject is a good test for notability.
484:
428:
420:
88:
75:
1711:
The governing policies regarding fringe theories are the three core content policies:
1075:
Notable topics have attracted attention over a sufficiently significant period of time
2736:
2726:
2610:
1828:
1629:
choose to limit large lists by only including entries for independently notable items
1553:
1489:
1437:. They do not, however, apply to pages whose primary purpose is navigation (e.g. all
1363:
1315:
from a broader page. Conversely, when notable topics are not given standalone pages,
1312:
1285:
1209:
1195:
1127:
361:
96:
2918:
1925:, an essay on the difference between first-person, first-party, and primary sources.
799:
to the
Knowledge content will suddenly make the subject notable. Conversely, if the
315:
is a test used by editors to decide whether a given topic warrants its own article.
1877:
1728:
934:
911:
800:
743:
738:
enough to be mentioned within the article or list) is governed by the principle of
671:
580:
555:
385:
2946:
1982:, two templates used to present an assessment of the sources present in an article
1448:
844:
1732:
1704:, it is of vital importance that they simply restate what is said by independent
1620:
1426:
1378:
1367:
1289:
1146:
331:
2663:
1712:
1517:
1481:
1293:
3034:
2098:
1846:
1724:
1716:
1666:
1628:
1493:
1485:
1442:
1434:
1297:
1240:
1131:
1110:
Knowledge:Biographies of living persons § Subjects notable only for one event
852:
755:
739:
734:. Content coverage within a given article or list (i.e. whether something is
381:
1476:
Publication in a reliable source is not always good evidence of notability.
651:
and the strict significant coverage requirements spelled out in the SNG for
2029:
2010:
1690:
1686:
1524:
526:
516:
131:
2129:
group or event may be merged into the main article on that group or event.
1815:
to attract editors knowledgeable about that field, who may have access to
1235:, for example). Other times, standalone pages are well justified (as with
1147:
we should generally avoid having a biographical article on that individual
1864:
process, where the merits will be debated and deliberated for seven days.
1720:
1561:
1513:, promotion, or other influence by people connected to the topic matter.
1501:
906:
an article for deletion, or offering an opinion based on notability in a
342:
319:
1572:
because the controversy was notable as an event—both need considering.
1738:
Fringe theories and related articles have been the subject of several
682:
Notability guidelines do not apply to content within articles or lists
441:
to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list when it has received
1510:
1839:, one can use a criterion-specific deletion tag listed on that page.
1388:
so that we can write a fair and balanced article that complies with
836:
The common theme in the notability guidelines is that there must be
1985:
1610:
Knowledge:Manual of Style/Lists § Adding individual items to a list
655:. Some SNGs have specialized functions: for example, the SNG for
1400:
for discussion of neutrality concerns of self-published sources.
1411:'s requirement that all articles be based on secondary sources.
925:
The current state of the article does not determine notability
620:
For a full list of subject-specific notability guidelines, see
1988:: Manual of Style on "Instructional and presumptuous language"
1641:
Knowledge:What
Knowledge is not § Knowledge is not a directory
2174:
1929:
Knowledge:Identifying and using primary and secondary sources
1645:
recognized informational, navigation, or development purposes
1497:
1366:
into an article about a larger topic or relevant list. (See
477:
Knowledge is not an indiscriminate collection of information
2849:
1233:
Mitt Romney 2012 presidential campaign § International trip
1229:
Barack Obama 2012 presidential campaign § Other initiatives
161:
1897:, with subject specific essays and proposed guidelines at
1883:
1200:
For the guideline on red-linked articles in hatnotes, see
663:
operate according to principles that differ from the GNG.
529:, that "In high school, he was part of a jazz band called
1723:. Jointly these say that articles should not contain any
1423:
articles so narrow that they cannot be properly developed
512:
74:
may apply. Substantive edits to this page should reflect
2099:
Synthesis of published material that advances a position
730:, unless editors agree to use notability as part of the
19:"WP:N" and "WP:NOTE" redirect here. For other uses, see
542:" means that sources need editorial integrity to allow
2086:
Knowledge:Neutral point of view § Due and undue weight
1959:
No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability
750:. For additional information about list articles, see
504:" addresses the topic directly and in detail, so that
1911:
For commentary and discussion of this guideline, see
1801:
If the article is about a specialized field, use the
42:
1992:
1893:
for different aspects of notability can be found at
1878:
follow several recommended steps prior to nomination
1516:Independent sources are also needed to guarantee a
893:; it does not require their immediate presence or
1752:Articles not satisfying the notability guidelines
1130:. New organizations and future events might pass
382:commonly used as an inclusion criterion for lists
154:
3032:
2327:Do not include copies of lengthy primary sources
1600:Knowledge:Stand-alone lists § Selection criteria
1123:
910:, editors are strongly encouraged to attempt to
849:promotional activity or indiscriminate publicity
1384:We require that all articles rely primarily on
388:). For Knowledge's policies regarding content,
2489:Do not disrupt Knowledge to illustrate a point
2069:Knowledge:Verifiability § Questionable sources
1298:a standalone article for a new film be created
1225:Does other information provide needed context?
955:No or few suitable sources that could be cited
2160:
2115:related to the topic, and ask for help there.
2022:
1923:Knowledge:Secondary does not mean independent
1827:after a good-faith search for them, consider
1013:Multiple suitable sources that could be cited
984:Multiple suitable sources that could be cited
762:Article content does not determine notability
292:
2915:
722:of articles. It also does not apply to the
533:" is plainly a trivial mention of that band.
380:of an article or list, though notability is
2821:Categories, lists, and navigation templates
1744:Knowledge:Fringe theories/Arbitration cases
525:'s statement, in a newspaper article about
70:Editors should generally follow it, though
2167:
2153:
1917:Category:Knowledge essays about notability
1798:tag on the article to alert other editors.
1134:, but lack sufficient coverage to satisfy
299:
285:
1913:Knowledge:Essays in a nutshell/Notability
1403:We require the existence of at least one
1396:a product, service, or organization. See
1379:indiscriminate collections of information
1251:Do related topics provide needed context?
62:This page documents an English Knowledge
1895:Category:Knowledge notability guidelines
1390:Knowledge's neutral point of view policy
630:Category:Knowledge notability guidelines
622:Category:Knowledge notability guidelines
16:Article inclusion criteria for Knowledge
1708:of reasonable reliability and quality.
1568:because the entity itself was notable,
807:Notability requires verifiable evidence
519:is plainly non-trivial coverage of IBM.
3033:
1637:non-encyclopedic cross-categorizations
1386:"third-party" or "independent sources"
1305:Subject-specific notability guidelines
751:
598:Subject-specific notability guidelines
2148:
1478:Knowledge is not a promotional medium
1264:Category:Restaurants in New York City
466:" means that significant coverage in
1407:so that the article can comply with
1138:, and these must still also satisfy
108:
50:
2980:List of all policies and guidelines
1954:Knowledge:Categorization § Defining
1906:Notability in the English Knowledge
1278:Knowledge:Every snowflake is unique
13:
3019:Summaries of values and principles
2860:
2698:
2461:
2287:
1868:For articles on subjects that are
1631:or those with Knowledge articles.
1153:Whether to create standalone pages
851:, nor is the topic unsuitable for
554:works in all forms and media, and
128:not outside the scope of Knowledge
78:. When in doubt, discuss first on
14:
3052:
1676:in proportion to their prominence
386:for listing out a school's alumni
318:Information on Knowledge must be
2929:
2926:
2857:
2674:
2621:
2618:
2551:
2548:
2504:Please do not bite the newcomers
2377:
2223:
2124:For instance, articles on minor
2071:for handling of such situations.
1891:subject-specific guideline pages
1664:In Knowledge parlance, the term
1656:This section is an excerpt from
1392:and to ensure that articles are
1016:
1005:
1002:No or few suitable sources cited
987:
976:
958:
947:
944:No or few suitable sources cited
112:
54:
3041:Knowledge notability guidelines
2132:
2126:characters in a work of fiction
2082:Knowledge:Neutral point of view
1416:Knowledge:Neutral point of view
1270:What sourcing is available now?
1116:lagging indicator of notability
973:Multiple suitable sources cited
676:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
2118:
2104:
2091:
2074:
2061:
2051:
2037:
2016:
2004:Moreover, not all coverage in
1998:
1949:Knowledge:Relevance of content
1554:Knowledge is not a news source
1409:Knowledge:No original research
1331:Why we have these requirements
1237:President of the United States
791:Notability is a property of a
546:evaluation of notability, per
1:
2514:Responding to threats of harm
2256:Biographies of living persons
2025:"Tough love child of Kennedy"
1899:Category:Knowledge notability
1549:Knowledge:Notability (events)
1325:Knowledge:Redirects are cheap
1106:Knowledge:Notability § Events
548:the reliable source guideline
475:, particularly the rule that
409:Biographies of living persons
352:It is not excluded under the
2581:Criteria for speedy deletion
2450:Paid-contribution disclosure
2023:Martin Walker (1992-01-06).
1939:Knowledge:Search engine test
1934:Knowledge:Viability of lists
1874:preserve any useful material
1837:criteria for speedy deletion
1454:Self-promotion and publicity
1373:We require the existence of
930:Current state of the article
415:General notability guideline
155:General notability guideline
130:. We consider evidence from
7:
1855:Knowledge:Proposed deletion
1725:novel analysis or synthesis
1435:general notability criteria
1105:
1033:Notability is not temporary
935:available in the real world
653:organizations and companies
511:The book-length history of
273:Why was my article deleted?
222:Organizations and companies
162:Subject-specific guidelines
10:
3057:
1755:
1655:
1607:
1597:
1579:
1546:
1528:
1457:
1334:
1199:
1181:
1156:
1120:lagging economic indicator
1103:
1078:
1036:
862:
810:
765:
685:
619:
601:
588:Independent of the subject
482:
418:
86:
80:this guideline's talk page
31:
18:
2974:
2914:
2847:
2813:
2755:
2710:
2695:
2671:
2661:
2608:
2538:
2458:
2374:
2364:
2284:
2220:
2210:
2186:
1835:If the article meets our
1658:Knowledge:Fringe theories
1296:strongly recommends that
1282:Knowledge:Run-of-the-mill
1188:Knowledge:Content forking
848:
122:Knowledge articles cover
1309:WikiProject advice pages
797:no amount of improvement
657:academics and professors
550:. Sources may encompass
345:to merit an article if:
332:indiscriminate inclusion
268:Common deletion outcomes
120:This page in a nutshell:
25:WP:NOTE (disambiguation)
2957:Licensing and copyright
2177:policies and guidelines
1904:Knowledge's article on
1823:If appropriate sources
1729:likely to be challenged
1398:Knowledge:Autobiography
1184:Knowledge:Summary style
917:Knowledge articles are
891:exist in the real world
756:List selection criteria
732:list selection criteria
370:its own article or list
2048:comprehensive article.
1192:Knowledge:Article size
801:source material exists
2952:Friendly space policy
2742:Broad-concept article
2251:What Knowledge is not
2246:Neutral point of view
1862:articles for deletion
1819:not available online.
1713:Neutral point of view
1643:. Lists that fulfill
1598:Further information:
1182:Further information:
649:literature guidelines
473:what Knowledge is not
405:What Knowledge is not
393:Neutral point of view
354:What Knowledge is not
21:WP:N (disambiguation)
2519:Talk page guidelines
2479:Conflict of interest
2420:Ownership of content
2265:Copyright violations
2241:No original research
1889:An extensive set of
1811:tag with a specific
1717:No original research
1639:are touched upon in
1449:Common circumstances
1241:due and undue weight
1218:digital encyclopedia
1128:notability of events
506:no original research
502:Significant coverage
443:significant coverage
401:No original research
179:Astronomical objects
64:notability guideline
2415:No personal attacks
2337:Don't create hoaxes
2097:See in particular "
1944:Knowledge:Recentism
1067:deletion discussion
926:
908:deletion discussion
845:short-term interest
752:Notability of lists
661:geographic features
234:Sports and athletes
203:Geographic features
136:independent sources
3010:List of guidelines
2831:Template namespace
2509:Courtesy vanishing
2484:Disruptive editing
2430:Dispute resolution
2045:but not limited to
1558:tabloid journalism
1498:branding campaigns
1375:"reliable sources"
967:Likely not notable
924:
847:, nor a result of
581:written in English
3028:
3027:
2970:
2969:
2910:
2909:
2873:Project namespace
2843:
2842:
2839:
2838:
2780:Dates and numbers
2747:Understandability
2657:
2656:
2604:
2603:
2596:Revision deletion
2569:Proposed deletion
2534:
2533:
2499:Gaming the system
2474:Assume good faith
2360:
2359:
1740:arbitration cases
1706:secondary sources
1698:original research
1617:as a group or set
1576:Stand-alone lists
1490:product placement
1317:redirection pages
1286:Knowledge:CRYSTAL
1258:Final Fantasy VII
1216:. Knowledge is a
1196:Knowledge:Merging
1030:
1029:
919:not a final draft
728:stand-alone lists
568:secondary sources
309:
308:
263:Guide to deletion
258:Notability essays
142:
141:
107:
106:
3048:
3005:
3004:
2995:List of policies
2990:
2989:
2947:List of policies
2934:
2933:
2932:
2924:
2923:
2920:
2917:
2865:
2864:
2863:
2855:
2854:
2851:
2848:Project content
2708:
2707:
2703:
2702:
2701:
2679:
2678:
2677:
2669:
2668:
2665:
2626:
2625:
2624:
2616:
2615:
2612:
2556:
2555:
2554:
2546:
2545:
2542:
2466:
2465:
2464:
2445:Child protection
2440:No legal threats
2410:Ignore all rules
2382:
2381:
2380:
2372:
2371:
2368:
2315:Reliable sources
2292:
2291:
2290:
2228:
2227:
2226:
2218:
2217:
2214:
2199:Ignore all rules
2181:
2169:
2162:
2155:
2146:
2145:
2140:
2136:
2130:
2122:
2116:
2108:
2102:
2095:
2089:
2084:, in particular
2078:
2072:
2065:
2059:
2055:
2049:
2041:
2035:
2034:
2020:
2014:
2011:reliable sources
2006:reliable sources
2002:
1981:
1975:
1971:
1965:
1851:
1845:
1817:reliable sources
1810:
1804:
1797:
1791:
1768:
1727:, that material
1691:reliable sources
1687:reliable sources
1672:mainstream views
1621:stand-alone list
1592:
1541:
1470:
1405:secondary source
1368:the advice below
1347:
1294:WikiProject Film
1176:
1169:
1098:
1091:
1056:
1049:
1023:
1020:
1019:
1012:
1009:
1008:
994:
991:
990:
983:
980:
979:
965:
962:
961:
954:
951:
950:
927:
923:
882:
875:
853:any other reason
830:
823:
785:
778:
748:content policies
712:
705:
698:
659:and the SNG for
614:
577:available online
531:Three Blind Mice
495:
468:reliable sources
448:reliable sources
431:
301:
294:
287:
144:
143:
116:
115:
109:
99:
58:
57:
51:
45:
3056:
3055:
3051:
3050:
3049:
3047:
3046:
3045:
3031:
3030:
3029:
3024:
3002:
3001:
2987:
2986:
2966:
2930:
2928:
2906:
2861:
2859:
2835:
2809:
2763:Manual of Style
2751:
2699:
2697:
2691:
2675:
2673:
2653:
2649:Page protection
2622:
2620:
2600:
2564:Deletion policy
2552:
2550:
2530:
2462:
2460:
2454:
2378:
2376:
2356:
2347:Patent nonsense
2342:Fringe theories
2288:
2286:
2280:
2224:
2222:
2206:
2182:
2173:
2143:
2137:
2133:
2123:
2119:
2109:
2105:
2096:
2092:
2079:
2075:
2066:
2062:
2056:
2052:
2042:
2038:
2021:
2017:
2003:
1999:
1995:
1979:
1973:
1969:
1963:
1886:
1849:
1843:
1825:cannot be found
1808:
1802:
1795:
1789:
1772:
1771:
1764:
1760:
1754:
1749:
1748:
1733:reliable source
1661:
1653:
1612:
1606:
1596:
1595:
1588:
1584:
1578:
1551:
1545:
1544:
1537:
1533:
1527:
1518:neutral article
1474:
1473:
1466:
1462:
1456:
1451:
1394:not advertising
1351:
1350:
1343:
1339:
1333:
1290:Summer Olympics
1245:Fringe theories
1205:
1198:
1180:
1179:
1172:
1165:
1161:
1155:
1140:WP:NOTPROMOTION
1136:WP:NOTNEWSPAPER
1114:Knowledge is a
1112:
1102:
1101:
1094:
1087:
1083:
1077:
1060:
1059:
1054:WP:NOTTEMPORARY
1052:
1045:
1041:
1035:
1021:
1017:
1010:
1006:
992:
988:
981:
977:
963:
959:
952:
948:
886:
885:
878:
871:
867:
861:
834:
833:
826:
819:
815:
809:
789:
788:
781:
774:
770:
764:
716:
715:
708:
701:
694:
690:
684:
625:
618:
617:
610:
606:
600:
556:in any language
499:
498:
491:
487:
435:
434:
427:
423:
417:
305:
245:
113:
103:
102:
95:
91:
83:
55:
49:
48:
41:
39:
28:
17:
12:
11:
5:
3054:
3044:
3043:
3026:
3025:
3023:
3022:
3015:
3014:
3013:
2998:
2975:
2972:
2971:
2968:
2967:
2965:
2964:
2962:Privacy policy
2959:
2954:
2949:
2944:
2938:
2936:
2921:
2912:
2911:
2908:
2907:
2905:
2904:
2899:
2894:
2893:
2892:
2882:
2881:
2880:
2869:
2867:
2852:
2845:
2844:
2841:
2840:
2837:
2836:
2834:
2833:
2828:
2826:Categorization
2823:
2817:
2815:
2814:Classification
2811:
2810:
2808:
2807:
2802:
2797:
2792:
2787:
2782:
2777:
2772:
2771:
2770:
2759:
2757:
2753:
2752:
2750:
2749:
2744:
2739:
2734:
2732:Disambiguation
2729:
2724:
2723:
2722:
2711:
2705:
2693:
2692:
2690:
2689:
2687:Editing policy
2683:
2681:
2666:
2659:
2658:
2655:
2654:
2652:
2651:
2646:
2641:
2636:
2634:Administrators
2630:
2628:
2613:
2606:
2605:
2602:
2601:
2599:
2598:
2593:
2588:
2583:
2578:
2577:
2576:
2566:
2560:
2558:
2543:
2536:
2535:
2532:
2531:
2529:
2528:
2527:
2526:
2516:
2511:
2506:
2501:
2496:
2491:
2486:
2481:
2476:
2470:
2468:
2456:
2455:
2453:
2452:
2447:
2442:
2437:
2432:
2427:
2422:
2417:
2412:
2407:
2402:
2397:
2392:
2386:
2384:
2369:
2362:
2361:
2358:
2357:
2355:
2354:
2352:External links
2349:
2344:
2339:
2334:
2329:
2324:
2323:
2322:
2312:
2310:Citing sources
2307:
2302:
2296:
2294:
2282:
2281:
2279:
2278:
2276:Article titles
2273:
2268:
2258:
2253:
2248:
2243:
2238:
2232:
2230:
2215:
2208:
2207:
2205:
2204:
2203:
2202:
2187:
2184:
2183:
2175:Knowledge key
2172:
2171:
2164:
2157:
2149:
2142:
2141:
2131:
2117:
2103:
2090:
2073:
2060:
2050:
2036:
2015:
1996:
1994:
1991:
1990:
1989:
1983:
1961:
1956:
1951:
1946:
1941:
1936:
1931:
1926:
1920:
1909:
1902:
1885:
1882:
1866:
1865:
1858:
1840:
1821:
1820:
1806:expert-subject
1799:
1786:
1770:
1769:
1761:
1756:
1753:
1750:
1702:neutral manner
1662:
1654:
1652:
1649:
1626:
1618:
1594:
1593:
1585:
1580:
1577:
1574:
1571:
1567:
1543:
1542:
1534:
1529:
1526:
1523:
1502:advertisements
1494:press releases
1482:Self-promotion
1472:
1471:
1463:
1458:
1455:
1452:
1450:
1447:
1439:disambiguation
1431:
1430:
1419:
1412:
1401:
1382:
1371:
1349:
1348:
1340:
1335:
1332:
1329:
1321:disambiguation
1302:
1301:
1274:permanent stub
1267:
1248:
1178:
1177:
1170:
1162:
1157:
1154:
1151:
1117:
1100:
1099:
1092:
1084:
1079:
1076:
1073:
1058:
1057:
1050:
1042:
1037:
1034:
1031:
1028:
1027:
1025:Likely notable
1014:
1003:
999:
998:
996:Likely notable
985:
974:
970:
969:
956:
945:
941:
940:
937:
931:
884:
883:
876:
868:
863:
860:
857:
832:
831:
824:
816:
811:
808:
805:
794:
787:
786:
779:
771:
766:
763:
760:
737:
714:
713:
706:
699:
691:
686:
683:
680:
616:
615:
607:
602:
599:
596:
592:
591:
584:
574:
559:
536:
535:
534:
520:
497:
496:
488:
483:
480:
457:
456:of the subject
450:
444:
440:
433:
432:
424:
419:
416:
413:
379:
375:
371:
367:
358:
357:
350:
337:
311:On Knowledge,
307:
306:
304:
303:
296:
289:
281:
278:
277:
276:
275:
270:
265:
260:
252:
251:
247:
246:
244:
243:
237:
236:
231:
225:
224:
218:
217:
212:
206:
205:
199:
198:
193:
188:
182:
181:
175:
174:
168:
165:
164:
158:
157:
151:
150:
140:
139:
124:notable topics
117:
105:
104:
101:
100:
92:
87:
84:
69:
68:
59:
47:
46:
40:
35:
32:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3053:
3042:
3039:
3038:
3036:
3021:
3020:
3016:
3012:
3011:
3006:
2999:
2997:
2996:
2991:
2984:
2983:
2982:
2981:
2977:
2976:
2973:
2963:
2960:
2958:
2955:
2953:
2950:
2948:
2945:
2943:
2940:
2939:
2937:
2935:
2925:
2922:
2913:
2903:
2900:
2898:
2895:
2891:
2888:
2887:
2886:
2883:
2879:
2876:
2875:
2874:
2871:
2870:
2868:
2866:
2856:
2853:
2846:
2832:
2829:
2827:
2824:
2822:
2819:
2818:
2816:
2812:
2806:
2803:
2801:
2798:
2796:
2793:
2791:
2788:
2786:
2783:
2781:
2778:
2776:
2775:Accessibility
2773:
2769:
2766:
2765:
2764:
2761:
2760:
2758:
2754:
2748:
2745:
2743:
2740:
2738:
2735:
2733:
2730:
2728:
2725:
2721:
2720:Summary style
2718:
2717:
2716:
2713:
2712:
2709:
2706:
2704:
2694:
2688:
2685:
2684:
2682:
2680:
2670:
2667:
2660:
2650:
2647:
2645:
2642:
2640:
2637:
2635:
2632:
2631:
2629:
2627:
2617:
2614:
2607:
2597:
2594:
2592:
2589:
2587:
2584:
2582:
2579:
2575:
2572:
2571:
2570:
2567:
2565:
2562:
2561:
2559:
2557:
2547:
2544:
2537:
2525:
2522:
2521:
2520:
2517:
2515:
2512:
2510:
2507:
2505:
2502:
2500:
2497:
2495:
2492:
2490:
2487:
2485:
2482:
2480:
2477:
2475:
2472:
2471:
2469:
2467:
2457:
2451:
2448:
2446:
2443:
2441:
2438:
2436:
2433:
2431:
2428:
2426:
2423:
2421:
2418:
2416:
2413:
2411:
2408:
2406:
2403:
2401:
2398:
2396:
2393:
2391:
2388:
2387:
2385:
2383:
2373:
2370:
2363:
2353:
2350:
2348:
2345:
2343:
2340:
2338:
2335:
2333:
2330:
2328:
2325:
2321:
2318:
2317:
2316:
2313:
2311:
2308:
2306:
2305:Autobiography
2303:
2301:
2298:
2297:
2295:
2293:
2283:
2277:
2274:
2272:
2269:
2266:
2262:
2259:
2257:
2254:
2252:
2249:
2247:
2244:
2242:
2239:
2237:
2236:Verifiability
2234:
2233:
2231:
2229:
2219:
2216:
2209:
2201:
2200:
2196:
2195:
2194:
2193:
2189:
2188:
2185:
2178:
2170:
2165:
2163:
2158:
2156:
2151:
2150:
2147:
2135:
2127:
2121:
2114:
2107:
2100:
2094:
2087:
2083:
2077:
2070:
2064:
2054:
2046:
2040:
2032:
2031:
2026:
2019:
2012:
2007:
2001:
1997:
1987:
1984:
1978:
1977:source assess
1968:
1962:
1960:
1957:
1955:
1952:
1950:
1947:
1945:
1942:
1940:
1937:
1935:
1932:
1930:
1927:
1924:
1921:
1918:
1914:
1910:
1907:
1903:
1900:
1896:
1892:
1888:
1887:
1881:
1879:
1875:
1871:
1863:
1859:
1856:
1848:
1841:
1838:
1834:
1833:
1832:
1830:
1826:
1818:
1814:
1807:
1800:
1794:
1787:
1784:
1783:
1782:
1779:
1777:
1767:
1763:
1762:
1759:
1747:
1745:
1741:
1736:
1734:
1730:
1726:
1722:
1721:Verifiability
1718:
1714:
1709:
1707:
1703:
1699:
1694:
1692:
1688:
1685:
1681:
1677:
1673:
1669:
1668:
1667:fringe theory
1659:
1651:Fringe topics
1648:
1646:
1642:
1638:
1632:
1630:
1624:
1622:
1616:
1611:
1605:
1601:
1591:
1587:
1586:
1583:
1573:
1569:
1565:
1563:
1559:
1555:
1550:
1540:
1536:
1535:
1532:
1522:
1519:
1514:
1512:
1507:
1506:paid material
1503:
1499:
1495:
1491:
1487:
1486:autobiography
1483:
1479:
1469:
1465:
1464:
1461:
1446:
1444:
1440:
1436:
1428:
1424:
1420:
1417:
1413:
1410:
1406:
1402:
1399:
1395:
1391:
1387:
1383:
1380:
1376:
1372:
1369:
1365:
1361:
1357:
1356:
1355:
1346:
1342:
1341:
1338:
1328:
1326:
1322:
1318:
1314:
1310:
1306:
1299:
1295:
1291:
1287:
1283:
1279:
1275:
1271:
1268:
1265:
1261:
1259:
1256:Music of the
1252:
1249:
1246:
1242:
1238:
1234:
1230:
1226:
1223:
1222:
1221:
1219:
1215:
1211:
1203:
1197:
1193:
1189:
1185:
1175:
1171:
1168:
1167:WP:PAGEDECIDE
1164:
1163:
1160:
1150:
1148:
1143:
1141:
1137:
1133:
1129:
1125:
1121:
1115:
1111:
1107:
1097:
1093:
1090:
1089:WP:NSUSTAINED
1086:
1085:
1082:
1072:
1070:
1068:
1063:
1055:
1051:
1048:
1044:
1043:
1040:
1026:
1015:
1004:
1001:
1000:
997:
986:
975:
972:
971:
968:
957:
946:
943:
942:
938:
936:
932:
929:
928:
922:
920:
915:
913:
909:
905:
901:
896:
892:
881:
877:
874:
870:
869:
866:
856:
854:
850:
846:
841:
839:
829:
825:
822:
818:
817:
814:
804:
802:
798:
792:
784:
780:
777:
773:
772:
769:
759:
757:
753:
749:
745:
741:
735:
733:
729:
725:
721:
711:
710:WP:NOTEWORTHY
707:
704:
700:
697:
693:
692:
689:
679:
677:
673:
669:
664:
662:
658:
654:
650:
646:
642:
638:
633:
631:
623:
613:
609:
608:
605:
595:
589:
585:
582:
578:
572:
570:
569:
564:
560:
557:
553:
549:
545:
541:
537:
532:
528:
524:
523:Martin Walker
521:
518:
514:
510:
509:
507:
503:
494:
490:
489:
486:
481:
478:
474:
469:
465:
461:
460:
459:
455:
452:
449:
446:
442:
438:
430:
426:
425:
422:
412:
410:
406:
402:
398:
397:Verifiability
394:
391:
387:
384:(for example
383:
377:
373:
369:
365:
363:
355:
351:
348:
347:
346:
344:
339:
335:
333:
329:
325:
321:
316:
314:
302:
297:
295:
290:
288:
283:
282:
280:
279:
274:
271:
269:
266:
264:
261:
259:
256:
255:
254:
253:
249:
248:
242:
239:
238:
235:
232:
230:
227:
226:
223:
220:
219:
216:
213:
211:
208:
207:
204:
201:
200:
197:
194:
192:
189:
187:
184:
183:
180:
177:
176:
173:
170:
169:
167:
166:
163:
160:
159:
156:
153:
152:
149:
146:
145:
137:
133:
129:
125:
121:
118:
111:
110:
98:
94:
93:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
67:
65:
60:
53:
52:
44:
38:
34:
33:
30:
26:
22:
3017:
3008:
3000:
2993:
2985:
2978:
2942:Terms of Use
2927:
2878:WikiProjects
2858:
2795:Lead section
2715:Article size
2696:
2672:
2619:
2609:Enforcement
2549:
2459:
2435:Sockpuppetry
2425:Edit warring
2375:
2299:
2285:
2221:
2197:
2192:Five pillars
2190:
2134:
2120:
2106:
2093:
2076:
2063:
2053:
2044:
2039:
2030:The Guardian
2028:
2018:
2000:
1967:assess table
1890:
1869:
1867:
1824:
1822:
1780:
1775:
1773:
1737:
1710:
1695:
1665:
1663:
1633:
1625:group or set
1613:
1552:
1515:
1475:
1432:
1352:
1303:
1269:
1257:
1250:
1224:
1206:
1202:WP:NOARTICLE
1144:
1118:. Just as a
1113:
1096:WP:SUSTAINED
1071:
1064:
1061:
1024:
995:
966:
916:
912:find sources
887:
880:WP:NPOSSIBLE
842:
835:
790:
746:, and other
723:
719:
717:
703:WP:NLISTITEM
668:WikiProjects
665:
634:
626:
593:
587:
567:
565:" should be
562:
539:
527:Bill Clinton
517:Robert Sobel
501:
463:
436:
389:
359:
340:
317:
312:
310:
147:
123:
119:
61:
29:
2586:Attack page
2574:Biographies
2113:WikiProject
1813:WikiProject
1684:independent
1547:Main page:
1509:it—without
645:politicians
641:biographies
575:have to be
454:independent
437:A topic is
341:A topic is
336:necessarily
328:independent
241:Web content
2890:User boxes
2885:User pages
2524:Signatures
2400:Harassment
2332:Plagiarism
2300:Notability
2043:Including
1793:notability
1608:See also:
1443:some lists
1441:pages and
1360:definition
1104:See also:
904:nominating
838:verifiable
740:due weight
736:noteworthy
544:verifiable
376:limit the
320:verifiable
313:notability
148:Notability
72:exceptions
43:w.wiki/3qq
2897:Shortcuts
2591:Oversight
2539:Deletion
2494:Etiquette
2405:Vandalism
2395:Consensus
2271:Image use
2261:Copyright
1511:incentive
1174:WP:NOPAGE
1159:Shortcuts
1124:temporary
1081:Shortcuts
1039:Shortcuts
900:proposing
873:WP:NEXIST
865:Shortcuts
813:Shortcuts
768:Shortcuts
688:Shortcuts
552:published
493:WP:SIGCOV
451:that are
172:Academics
76:consensus
37:Short URL
3035:Category
2902:Subpages
2768:Contents
2737:Hatnotes
2662:Editing
2644:Blocking
2390:Civility
2365:Conduct
2320:Medicine
2211:Content
1986:MOS:NOTE
1884:See also
1842:Use the
1788:Place a
1766:WP:FAILN
1758:Shortcut
1731:needs a
1590:WP:NLIST
1582:Shortcut
1562:Wikinews
1531:Shortcut
1460:Shortcut
1427:WP:FAILN
1337:Shortcut
1313:spun off
1214:dislikes
1047:WP:NTEMP
933:Sources
895:citation
783:WP:CONTN
724:contents
720:contents
604:Shortcut
540:Reliable
485:Shortcut
464:Presumed
439:presumed
421:Shortcut
343:presumed
324:reliable
322:; if no
250:See also
132:reliable
89:Shortcut
2800:Linking
2727:Be bold
2639:Banning
2139:manner.
1870:clearly
1829:merging
1539:WP:SBST
1468:WP:SPIP
1345:WP:WHYN
939:Result
828:WP:NRVE
793:subject
776:WP:ARTN
744:balance
563:Sources
378:content
372:. They
368:is for
356:policy.
215:Numbers
2790:Layout
2785:Images
1776:merged
1742:. See
1719:, and
1602:; and
1566:either
1525:Events
1504:, and
1364:merged
1260:series
1194:, and
1132:WP:GNG
1108:, and
821:WP:NRV
696:WP:NNC
672:essays
643:, and
612:WP:SNG
429:WP:GNG
407:, and
374:do not
229:People
191:Events
2805:Lists
2756:Style
1993:Notes
1682:upon
1680:based
1210:likes
666:Some
637:films
366:topic
362:merge
210:Music
196:Films
186:Books
2080:See
1972:and
1915:and
1847:prod
1319:and
1307:and
1280:and
1231:and
754:and
134:and
97:WP:N
23:and
2919:(?)
2916:WMF
2850:(?)
2664:(?)
2611:(?)
2541:(?)
2367:(?)
2213:(?)
2180:(?)
1445:).
1327:).
1212:or
902:or
726:of
678:).
579:or
573:not
515:by
513:IBM
445:in
390:see
3037::
3007::
2992::
2101:".
2027:.
1980:}}
1974:{{
1970:}}
1964:{{
1880:.
1850:}}
1844:{{
1809:}}
1803:{{
1796:}}
1790:{{
1746:.
1715:,
1570:or
1500:,
1496:,
1492:,
1488:,
1484:,
1480:.
1429:.)
1370:.)
1266:).
1243:.
1190:,
1186:,
1149:.
1142:.
758:.
742:,
639:,
458:.
411:.
403:,
399:,
395:,
326:,
3003:G
2988:P
2931:P
2862:G
2700:G
2676:P
2623:P
2553:P
2463:G
2379:P
2289:G
2267:)
2263:(
2225:P
2168:e
2161:t
2154:v
2088:.
2033:.
2013:.
1919:.
1908:.
1901:.
1857:.
1660:.
1381:.
1204:.
1022:Y
1011:Y
993:Y
982:Y
964:N
953:N
624:.
586:"
561:"
538:"
500:"
479:.
462:"
300:e
293:t
286:v
82:.
66:.
27:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.