Knowledge:Teahouse

2119:

provided independent, respected sources. Please look at the materials I posted. You seem to be going blindly by very simplistic rules governing what can be written and what is a valid source. But one has to examine each case individually to understand what is going on. Anyone who can read will see that I have presented overwhelming evidence with strong citations showing that the claim that our paper was "discredited" is wrong. Furthermore, the claim that our results are at variance with the results of other studies on passive smoking is also wrong. If editors at Knowledge don't take the time to look at the specific facts of each case, but just go blindly by something sensational and attention-grabbing that has been published, taking it as "the truth," then we are in big trouble. Lots of wrong and distorted things get published. That doesn't mean they are true. This story got published because it made a GOOD STORY. So no one questioned it or looked at all the other relevant evidence.

8035:

radio shows. Those hosts interviewed Alan Watt, which is to say the "covered him", because he is obscure, but worth knowing about. It seems he worked to not be part of mainstream society, such as Knowledge. Now that he died of a heart attack in 2021. His wife is thinking whether she wants to have Knowledge have a page about her deceased husband or not. If she tells me she does. I want to be ready to write it. I never met Alan Watt in person. I only emailed him a few times. I bought two of his books. And I am in email contact with his wife, Melissa. I thank you for, and agree with, your advice to, "Write it forward" (not "BACKWARD"), meaning after finding reliable source coverage of him that is independent of him. He was well known in certain underground Internet networks or large groups. In 2006, Alex Jones interviewed him on PrisonPlanet.com and Infowars.com. I look forward to reading your kind reply. Thanks, Charles (Writing is easy)

8721:. This is probably something you should discuss on the article's talk page. The editor who reverted you has provided a quote from the source in support of the content they restored. The source might be wrong, but that's something to at least first try to resolve through article talk page discussion. Finally, it might be a good idea to consider the reversion of your edit as having been made in good faith, and refrain from referring to the content in question as a "lie". It's not uncommon for reliable sources to provide conflicting information on the same subject. Whether that's the case here is something to figure out through talk page discussion. Using the word "lie" runs the risk of starting the discussion off on the wrong foot and creating an atmosphere not conducive to friendly discussion. -- 1029:. I then read that article and the notion that its "link density" is too low is simply ludicrous. There are plenty of wikilinks in that article. There must be something seriously wrong with your algorithm. I noticed also that some of the other articles near that article on your list are bibliographies. As long as Knowledge allows bibliography articles to contain works that are not themselves the subject of Knowledge articles, then of course bibliographies of prolific authors will have relatively few wikilinks. That's another problem. So, I am sorry to say this, but I think that you have not yet demonstrated that this "link density" concept is useful for improving the encyclopedia. 1281:: While I have no doubt that you are right, the opening of the gender bias article accidentally highlights a fallacy that can sometimes justly discredit arguments it is intended to support. Disparity and bias are not reliably connected to each other, and neither of them can be used to gauge the other. It's easy to think of situations where disparity can persist despite lack of bias, and easy to see bias occurring despite parity, because they are not in a simple cause-and-effect relationship. Parity cannot just be assumed to be a natural or correct state. Certainly there are situations in which parity is good or expected or desirable, but it is not a universal default. 10062:, oh, I just identified the typo. It really did exist. I must have gotten confused because the introduction of the article repeatedly used "He" to refer to Jiankui, and I mixed it up with an incorrectly capitalized personal pronoun ("He" instead of "he"), which led me to think there had been some recent vandalism. It's a misunderstanding I created, but I want to make it clear that it's just an isolated case that I never imagined was still causing issues for another editor. I sincerely apologize and would like to mention this is unrelated to the de Quintal case, which was even blocked here on Knowledge. Best regards, 5425:: I get it, but to fix this the way you want to fix it you're going to have to travel backwards in time and convince long-dead government officials and bureaucrats to un-write their census categories. We aren't free to decide to give false reports of what it said back then; the census stuff is history, and we can't do present-day politics to it. Real people had to answer that question even though it wasn't a good question, and we can't suddenly claim they were answering a different question. They might have answered differently if the question had been better. 2377:, Ebay isn't a reliable source for WP, but I was able to find a review of your first book and have added the book to your page. Thanks for the heads up re: the typo, which I've fixed. I didn't add a line about the Ungar and Bray article but did add it as a reference. Perhaps some subsequent editor will choose to add some text about it. Due to my lack of an appropriate background, I'm not in a position to assess whether the additional Enstrom & Kabat letter does respond to the "comparison group" isssue, so I haven't added it. Take care, 1593:, thank you for your work. The matter of selecting appropriate categories tends to be hard for new editors, a lot easier with even a little experience. Dialogue in writing is a somewhat abstract subject, which will make category selection a lot harder than if the article were instead something "concrete" (?), like a model of car, a painting, or baseball player. I suggest that you skip categorization for this article, practise it on another, and then perhaps return to this article in order to categorize it. -- 2285:

info about the person him/herself, but not to introduce claims about other people (e.g., not about people who criticized the BMJ article). I'll try to doublecheck that, but it may take a bit before I get an answer. Is there something about yourself that you'd like sourced to the Quillette article? I haven't yet thought about how to introduce a line about the Unger and Bray article. Re: the study you mentioned, I don't think that your upcoming Quillette article is an acceptable source for medical info, per

6342:

as fact is that that person wrote that. One of my battles may be that issue; I have letters written by presidents, governors, senators and superintendents etc. that I use as sources, not so much as that what they said is true but that they said it. Then you may say that sounds like original research, but if it can be backed up by published means it simply adds interest to the article. I have seen examples of letters in Wikip. articles, entered with apparent impunity. Another interesting discussion.

10045:, in the specific case linked, I may have made a mistake due to the language barrier, as I am not a native English speaker. It seemed to me that the summary was misleading because I am unable to identify the typo in the previous text. Could it be a case of preferring the surname over the first name? And I don't receive pings because I disabled them in the settings. But even so, you didn't ping me. You could have reached out to me on my talk page, but you didn't. That makes it complicated... 6225:. So, if the edits you made as seen by others as being in accordanc with relevant Knowledge policies and guidelines, they will likely stand the test of time or be used by others as a foundtion for further improving the article. If, on the other hand, others find them to be lacking in some way, they might be reverted (entirely or partially) or otherwise corrected. This is essentially what you're agreeing to everytime you click the "Publish changes" button and acknowledge your acceptance of 8425:, if a living person who is the subject of a Knowledge article writes a reliably published article or book, then there are absolutely no restrictions on use of that reliable non-SPS source, other than normal editorial judgment and our content policies. If a Knowledge article about such a person includes properly cited criticism of them or their work, then, of course, their reliably published rebuttal should be included and summarized with a comparable level of detail as the criticism. 3259:. Once your draft is ready for review, an experienced editor will look it over/give you feedback. Happy volunteering! Welcome to the Teahouse! Creating a new article from scratch is extremely challenging, and new editors are strongly recommended to spend a few months learning how Knowledge works, by making improvements to some of our existing seven million articles before trying it. When you do decide to have a go at a new article, you are highly encouraged to read 830:: you should not just be blindly tagging articles based on the output of a script. The fact that an article is in the lowest 0.5% for link density is not sufficient information to judge whether or not it is underlinked to the point of needing a cleanup tag. It would be much more useful for you to find one article which you think on your own judgement is underlinked, and then add some needed links, than it is for you to blindly tag any number of articles. 28: 12660: 6472: 633: 1285:

the world", Knowledge would be wrong (by its own philosophy) to try to create a false parity inside the encyclopedia. To put it another way, the advice given here in the Teahouse to COI editors, that nothing is admissible without reliable third-party sources, is going to also skew the overall result, because we already know who used to own and operate nearly all the reliable sources (and I'm sure still controls far more than a parity share of them).

12704:; these other articles(what you term "pages") could also be inappropriate and just not yet addressed by a volunteer. We cannot invent sources that do not exist- if government censorship prevents their from being sources, we can do nothing about that- you would need to pressure the UAE to allow a free press/free speech(yes, I know that's not an easy task). You have submitted the draft for review, a volunteer will eventually review it. 8474: 2790: 21: 10769:. I see there that you have had a response, asking you to be clearer and more specific in what edit you seek to have made and why. But you have not responded yet. Please do so there, as the Teahouse is not the place where we intervene in content discussions such as this; instead we advise and help people who need to know more about the practicalities of the editing process. I hope you can achieve the outcome you seek. Regards, 12635:. The plot summary of an a acclaimed film that won many Oscars should be written in the same emotionless "just the facts" style as the plot summary of a clunker that flopped at the box office and was panned by the critics. Concentrate only on the plot when writing plot summaries and ignore reception by fans and critics in that particular section. There are other sections of the article that discuss reception and acclaim. 2083:

scientific papers). SOMEONE AT WIKIPEDIA NEEDS TO TAKE A CAREFUL LOOK AT THIS, TAKE RESPONSIBILITY, AND OUTLINE THE STEPS TO CORRECT THIS ARTICLE. Can you please bring this to the attention of those at Knowledge who are in a position to rectify a violation of Knowledge's own rules/principles? The careful case that I have built should be taken seriously by Knowledge. Editors could learn a lot from this incident.

4391:: I think what you're asking for is your User Sandbox. You can paste the German material in there and work on your English version; feel free to make a complete mess, because sandboxes cannot be found through a normal Knowledge search. (But never place anyone's sensitive personal information in there, nor any personal attacks or potential copyright violations, because the sandbox does belong to Knowledge.) 12246:, in my view. My personal metric is the reading level of a high school senior getting better than average grades. But this "reading level" issue is topic specific. Except for the opening sentence or two, we should not expect the same reading level in an article about a pop culture topic as in articles about advanced topics in subatomic physics, biochemistry or advanced mathematics. To name a few. 75: 12783:. Let's suppose for a moment that there are no copyright concerns (and for reasons other than freedom of panorama). We could infer that your picture of Kenny from South Park would also raise no copyright concerns. Then a question would be: Does en:Knowledge want comic characters to be illustrated by people's imitations of authentic representations of those characters? (I have no idea.) -- 1941:. Please don't make essentially the same request simultaneously, though, on multiple noticeboards because this will just make things confusing and might lead some to believe that you're forum shopping. Read the description for each noticeboard given at the top of its page and decide which one best deals with the problems you're having. In addition, please remember that all Wikipedians are 12732:, that makes experienced Knowledge editors immediately concerned. A Knowledge account is for one person and one person only, and team use of a Knowledge account is forbidden. It could possibly be acceptable if every person on the team had their own separate Knowledge account and openly disclosed their membership in that team. I see no other team accounts editing that draft. And your 7656:

parents". In a sense, it's too easily believable. Why "proud"? A significant and regrettable minority of parents aren't proud of their kids; but can't we assume that, unless we have evidence to the contrary, parents are proud of them? (It looks to me as if "proud" was added for politeness' sake or similar.) Another point: you have external links in the body text, for example

2719:? If you're asking whether it's okay to change links when using the visual editor, the answer is yes. Some editors might find it annoying if the wiki markup isn't perfect because of the use of the visual editor, but the end visual result is the same.After reading the next section, I will say that the above generally applies to wikilinks within Knowledge; 12291:, if the reading level of our articles about our most searched topics was too high, then social media would be flooded with complaints like "Wows thet weekipoudua article were 2 kompleekated!!!", and yet for years, we remain the #7 website in traffic and #1 by far in originally written educational content. We have ten plus billion pageviews each month. 7356:

im trying to hint at? It just doesn't make sense .this website is to display the truth but if your stopping me from telling the truth because i didnt waste another 2 to 10 minutes looking for sources to back the truth up, it just doesn't make sense. Its like they expect us to pull out a sheet of sources out of our bums as if we are a real life Google.

12926:), but even after acceptance, articles are subject to perpetual further improvement, and anyone who reads and edits Knowledge (and about 100,000 different individuals do so every month) can both point out an article's deficiencies and/or actively edit it to improve it. Hope this sheds some light. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 2281:, first an FYI: when you write a reply, if you click on the figure with the "+" sign next to it that appears above the reply box, that allows you to add the name of a participant in the discussion in a way that the person is notified that you've mentioned them. I happened to check back here; otherwise I wouldn't have known about your reply. 8223:

of topics. But we have articles citing significant coverage in minor news outlets with a political bias (bias doesn't mean unreliable), in niche trade publications, in gaming websites, in academic books, in low-circulation scholarly journals, and other things that aren't considered mainstream; just look at the list of reliable sources in

8825:(see "i"). This way, we demonstrate to the reader that various sources themselves are in conflict about the fact, without us having to do any more than simply point this out. With this in mind, I will now continue this discussion at the article's talk page later today, and I invite you to join me in this constructive effort. Thank you. 881:

some other attention, just tag with the other relevant maintenance tags so it gets to the right editors. (Well, hopefully.) By the way, if you find articles that aren't in any wikiprojects, that's often a reason for them being unattended, and adding the relevant wikiprojects can help sort them into the right maintenance queues. --

10425:

up being banned for two weeks because i pointed out a sock puppet. This same approach of reverting and issuing threats seem to come from accounts that have been in existence for a while but have spurts of activity that seem to concentrate on reverting IP edits. Glad someone with some authority was able to take care of the culprit.

1369:, regardless of the obvious disparity among especially the sources further back in history. For centuries, it seems clear that historians intentionally avoided mentioning most of the notable women. And those women are now literally no longer notable, because there's no documentation. For the historic notable women who 9811:

and Wikimedia Commons and Portuguese Knowledge are three separate projects with separate policies and guidelines. Let me advise you that it is a very bad idea to bring disputes and grudges from other projects and in other languages to the English Knowledge and I encourage you to be very cautious in the future.

9756:(ANI), which is the direction where this discussion seems to be heading after the last couple of posts. Those involved in this disagreement can seek further assistance at ANI if they want, but I strongly suggest they carefully read through the instructions given at the top of the ANI page as well as perhaps 10424:

I knew that first edit they reverted as it added up to the same characteristics that i have encountered recently while editing where things such as spelling s were corrected then reverted with threats of blocking if such vandalism continued. What i was concerned with was last time it happened I ended

8735:

Thanks for yours. There is confusion that needs to be cleared up. This has nothing to do with two sources disagreeing with each other. It’s about correctly interpreting what a source says. The quotation from Nolan does not establish that Richard Rodgers went to Stockton. I have posted my reasoning on

8113:

I don't see a way to present some independent source as VALIDATING Alan Watt and his research findings. I see that his might be a similar situation as Galileo's who discovered some shocking facts, but the establishment put him under house arrest. The only light at the end of this tunnel we seem to be

7478:

policy is rubbish, you are welcome to go to the policy talk page and gain consensus for eliminating it. The policies on Knowledge weren't made up one day out of thin air, but evolved over many years through community discussion. In all due respect, if you cannot be bothered to learn the basics of how

6243:

I'm not aware of 'locked' and I don't think I would approve of that. My background is science and peer review is the only way to arrive at 'truth', if there is such a thing, or at least as close as we can get. If someone can 'revert' a page for bureaucratic reasons without giving the author a chance

2467:

That's essentially it, yes. When a person deals with issues in a clearly straightforward and honest way, not giving the appearance of trying to put one over on anybody or "game the system" or anything like that, their path here tends to be much smoother and more successful. If a person's actions seem

789:

while yes I agree the case of Fresnel's article is already pretty well linked, it nonetheless showed up as among some of the lowest that my script has found(in the lowest 5k out of the ~million pages scanned so far), I will note that there are a number of references to "biaxial" of various nature, of

327:

images for living people, so Colin's option 2 is not possible. If you have a good relationship with the individuals and already have permission from them to upload to Commons, you can do that on their behalf and then ask that they email the volunteers at Commons to confirm you have been authorised to

12778:

their own work.) "Common sense" may say that we don't have to worry about such niceties because the photo's hosting at Commons (and its use in articles) demonstrates that its copyright status is OK. Wrong, as files hosted by Commons are often removed because of belatedly realized copyright problems.

11895:

If I say "Einstein was important in his field of study", but Knowledge doesn't believe me, I can show articles in major newspapers saying stuff like "Einstein is one of the major scientists of the 20th century", I can show a lot of books about Einstein's work written by people who never met him, ...

11501:

to AfC rather than move it to mainspace. The AfC backlog is not a queue, so it may be reviewed sooner than your think. If to mainspace, in time the New Pages Patrol could move it back to draft. Also either remove or fill in the now-blank sections. What you have is typical for diseases, but there may

11082:

for new editors looking for a satisfying and meaningful task that doesn't take any extra skills. You don't (or shouldn't) need to do any research to fix these articles - most of them are here because they are tagged with "lead too short". Find one of those, read the article, then rewrite the lead so

10154:

when learning to edit here. So the choice is yours. If, despite Previewing your edit, if you make a mess of an edit, you can always click the 'View History' tab straight afterwards to see that latest addition at the top of the list of edits, and then simply click the 'undo' button to revert it back

9810:

which was deleted on 10 September, that was Portuguese language content harshly criticizing other editors. We do not host extended content in other languages anywhere on the English language Knowledge and we do not host "enemies lists" on the English Knowledge. Please be aware that English Knowledge

9560:

Hello, Theairportmant33531, and welcome to the Teahouse. Column sizes in tables are almost always calculated by the browser you are using, according to the width of the window, and the length of the cell contents in the column. While they can be controlled to some extent, this is usually a bad idea,

8630:

page, but it was met with resistance by two editors. The advice I was given then was to have more info about issues that were not just one school, so I revised for that with the Boston Globe article that I believe led to the sense it was one big section with no structure. I am a former journalist so

8173:

Thinking about the coverage requirement, I wonder if it really means that in order for Knowledge to display any statement, some major mainstream media outlet has had to have covered it. And that reminds me of a quote I read on the window of the Brooklyn College Library around 2007. It said something

8097:

I agree that Knowledge is not and should never start being a "memorial site". It is an excellent and unique encyclopedia. "Getting the word out" is an interesting idea. I do want to make Knowledge's users and Internet searchers aware of his research findings. That is why I am interesed in creating a

7355:

Yeah but i just read wiki there's no other sources. And in all due respect, that policy is flipping rubbish. I mean, an AI, that knows everything in the world as it gets updated every hour, tried to edit wikipedia with out citing sources, you lots would still make it not to be put on there. See what

6185:

IDU - there is no reason I can see that edits cannot be fixed. To me a reversion is a 'start from scratch'. I have already been thru' that phase. Now I would much prefer something more productive, like '3rd paragraph needs more citations' or 'citation #19 doesn't work'. We should be here to help

5994:

and edit. If you have any questions and would like to seek help, you could ask anyone that you think is interested or maybe come here to the Teahouse for specific editing questions. Usually, if someone thinks your edit is not constructive or appropriate they will revert and leave a useful message on

5638:

Chasing down sources is kinda fun to be honest. You find yourself diving through all sorts of rabbit holes, but the most important thing I've recognized as a new editor is to find your limit. If research on a specific claim is taking too long, then I think it's best for me to leave a and flag it on

5524:

Since the term "Asian and Pacific Islander" was retired after 2000, I think one solution would be to only show census data from 2000 onward to avoid this predicament. Or, another answer would be to use the term "Asian", but include a footnote saying "Included Pacific Islanders until 2000". Are these

2238:

The second one will come out this week. This second article reports on a new study from the American Cancer Society analyzing the contribution of a wide range of exposures to cancer incidence and showing that smoking is, by far, the most important risk factor for cancer, and that passive smoking had

2182:

This is enormously helpful. Not only did the BMJ NOT retract the study. The Editor-in-chief and a second editor defended publication of the paper. I have cited their responses in the journal. Ungar and Bray is DEFINITELY relevant. Here is an article published by me, giving a lot of information about

2167:

that criticizes some of Knowledge's policies and notes that expert opinion doesn't always meet the reliable sources rule. That said, the page should point out that the BMJ did not retract the study. The Ungar and Bray article may also have some relevant contents. I have no expertise in this area, so

2082:

I don't think it's appropriate for you to suggest that Knowledge can avoid taking responsibility for this wholesale distortion. I've put in hours of work to explain where the error lies. I've provided credible documentation from respected sources (editors at the British Medical Journal and published

953:

during my 48-hour block, with 5000 pages created from 2005 or before with the lowest "link density", since my personal judgement seems to be in conflict with best practice, so I've taken to documenting my opinions/reviews of these pages, I was waiting till I had made more progress on the matter, but

13372:

That maintenance message or 'tag' has not simply 'popped up'. It was placed by another editor some months ago. As these other helpers have explained, the tag is asking editors to help improve the article by supplying additional references - it currently has a lot of material without footnotes - and

11788:

Thank you for the thoughtful responses and your input about the deletion process. I will stay out of the deletion discussion. I see that there are suddenly a lot of links being shared on my article’s Talk page, more than I can keep up with and many seem insubstantial or don’t even mention me. Under

11482:

mostly an accident, since I just couldn't find all that many sources on it, which is to be expected. Though, before I found some of the other sources, I did add verywellhealth.com for a bit but quickly realized its blocked and considered unreliable, or at least inconsistent. Wouldn't be a good look

9386:

Sometimes administrators need to judge a sort of "wikiscore", and it's hard. Occasionally we need to answer the question "is this editor a net positive or net negative for the Knowledge project?" If negative, then we block the editor, which is difficult to do when the editor is trying to contribute

9229:

If you are referring to the + or - number that displays in the article's History, that is nothing to do with whether an edit is "good" or "bad". It just shows how the SIZE of the article changed: longer or shorter. (If that is not what you meant, then can you please provide a bit more information

8222:

There is no requirement that a media outlet be major or mainstream. We require only that it has a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy, and is independent of the subject it's covering. A media outlet often becomes "mainstream" by virtue of gaining public trust in its coverage of a wide variety

8177:

And all that makes me wonder if some people are being narrow-minded and afraid of new views. Somebody has to be first. It also resembles a Catch-22 situation. It's "almost" like saying: "Hey, we invented the airplane!" And "The New York Times" or "Knowledge's" editors saying, sorry, no major media

8142:

Until you can grasp what "notability" actually means in the context of Knowledge, I do not see a way forward. Please read the pages I lined to earlier if you haven't yet. Notability doesn't mean importance, it doesn't mean value, it doesn't mean validation. It means significant coverage by reliable

7184:

In such a situation (editors being difficult about things that are frankly not important), it's often better to give up for a few months and hope they go away. It's also important in such cases to discuss things on the Talk page, partly because if you end up needing to make a formal complaint, your

6341:

Another interesting issue is the validity of letters as source material. It is frequently stated here that a letter doesn't establish the validity of a statement. True, but if the validity of the letter can be established, like signature or statement of an authority, then what can be established

4555:

isn't obviously impressive. Which would you say are the best three sources about Wiest or her work? Each must treat her or her work in depth, be independent of her -- be disinterested (not one of her publishers) and not based on interviews -- and be independent of each other. The sources don't have

2118:

It doesn't make any sense that editors at Knowledge can be taken in by a politically-motivated hit job against two well-established scientists and publish a totally one-sided and distorted account. And now you tell that there is nothing anyone at Knowledge can do to correct this situation. I have

1288:

Knowledge has essentially committed itself to do no more than hold up a mirror, and has explicitly written non-activism into its most fundamental rules. Aiming for gender parity among the articles on Knowledge falls VERY squarely under the Knowledge prohibition against "righting great wrongs"; it's

880:

get some more attention to the overlooked parts of the article like this, but mostly the editors going through that tag will be looking for easy fixes to do while they dip their toes into wikipedia editing. If your script turns up some article that isn't actually all that underlinked, but could use

10093:

Hello, Historyguy1138. The place to discuss such things is on the Talk page of the article. If there is not much interaction there, there is usually a box at the top of a talk page identifying which WikiProject(s) might be interested in that article - and you can put a note on the talk page of the

8342:

Since you know Knowledge, do you see a way we or I could fulfill that notability requirement? The catch or challenge is that because his research and his conclusions were so esoteric, so different or sometimes opposite the mainstream views, he stayed away from mainstream media. All that presents a

8034:

Good and correct and knowledable advice.I am trying to make people aware of the mountains of data his website makes available. I am endeavoring to, now that he died, having dedicated his life to educating people about the workings of the New World Order. He has been a guest on hundreds of Internet

4098:

The question to be answered is whether the non-free images provides something that can't be represented by a free image. In this case I'd say that the free image currently used on the page represents the subject just as well as the proposed non-free image and so there's no justification to use the

3755:

but the only thing added extra was that section describing his life. After that, nothing on the book changed(except some spelling mistake). The book is about Mizo Ṭawng Upa( roughly translated to Elderly Language, its a bit like idioms and phrases but there is a big difference. They can be somehow

2284:

Re: the substance of what you wrote: I did make a couple of edits to your page, as did someone else, and I also raised a question on the Talk page that might lead to another edit. From what I understand of WP's rules, we can only introduce material written by the subject of a biographical page for

2103:

You have our attention- there is no central authority here to do what you claim- we all do. You've already been told what the next step for you is- get the news to print your claims as a factual report written by an independent reporter supervised and fact checked by an editor in which they state

1284:

I'm not criticizing the thought that parity could be good, I'm criticizing the assumption that bias among Knowledge editors must be what's preventing parity on Knowledge. For example, Knowledge's strict rules on notability mean that we only use outside sources; if there is not parity "out there in

13335:

Knowledge editors with limited experience often decide to show every good thing their subject has ever done, hoping that this will count as "evidence" that the subject should have a Knowledge article. But it doesn't count. Recognition from reliable third-party sources is (nearly) all that counts.

11439:

I can't speak for everyone, but to me, the way you've described your advocacy point of view sounds like it ought to be fine: as long as the article has no elements of advocacy in it, you are who you are. It may be uncomfortable to have to avoid adding things such as advice, treatments that aren't

11031:

Thirdly, even if you can show the novelist meets Knowledge's criterai for notability, writing a new article is a very challenging task for new editors. My earnest advice to new editors is to not even think about trying to create an article until you have spent several weeks - at least - learning

9371:

If there was a "wikiscore" that mattered, I think it might somewhat resemble a "signal-to-noise ratio", which might need tricky sabermetrics-style formulas to calculate properly. But unlike in baseball (where "success" is almost exactly equal to "winning games"), relative edit values on Knowledge

5406:

I agree that "Asian" itself is very broad, but why make it even broader and more diverse by dragging another continent into the label? It's simply too broad. Asia is already the largest continent in the world, larger than both Americas combined, and yet the continent has to be made even larger by

5402:

I understand what you're arguing, but saying "Asian and Pacific Islander also wouldn't be accurate for labeling the newer data, since that isn't the term used now. Also, Cleveland's 2020 census reveals that PIs are 0.0% of Cleveland's population, so even if the 1990 numbers are different, I doubt

1505:

When you put a blockquote, you must later put /blockquote to show where that quotation ends. (They both need the angled signs, you'll know what I mean). Also, it appears you may have fixed up the quotation marks by making them curly. Please "un-fix" those by putting the straight ones back again -

276:

So, if your artist is willing to license their work under such a license, then it can be uploaded to Commons. There are three ways they can do this: they can make a public declaration (eg on their website) that it is so licensed; or they can upload the image to Commons themselves, declaring it as

12169:

My opinion: 8th grade level. Not only because our target audience includes 8th-graders, but because many high school graduates read at (what the "experts" call) 8th grade level. Of course there are web-based tools to tell you the reading level for a body of text, so it's not hard to do. It's our

8181:

Also, some scholar said that even if he does not agree with someone's points of view, he supports their right to express them. Is Knowledge a fact source for facts some entities have already arbitrarily, of course, approved? I do also see that not every whimsical idea and viewpoint would work in

6984:

Hello, Handjiski. Please note that Knowledge has little interest in what the subject of an article says or wants to say about themselves, or what their associates say about them. Knowledge is almost entirely interested in what people who have no connection with the subject, and who have not been

6203:

I'm not sure I understand what you mean by "fixed". Are you asking whether mistakes can be "fixed" or whether pages can be "locked"? If you're asking about the former, then for sure mistakes can be corrected as long as doing so is in accordance with relevant Knowledge policies and guidelines. If

794:

looks to have a redirect of that name, is not linked on Fresnel's article, and in fact does mention Fresnel in the article itself. I'm not sure where exactly this should/would be reference, but that's one of the reason I added these templates, is that they bring eyes to an issue, the underlinked

12085:

After looking closer at that content, there's enough odd writing and plain inaccuracies to game rules that I started wondering if might have been AI generated. I'm gonna try doing a big rewrite, which will be a big enough edit that I'm intimidated. But I'm sure this essay is going to be a great

11351:

Weeks/months tend to be for articles that are less well written (e.g. missing sections), or for topics no one cares about (random tech investor). The better written an article is, the easier (and more interesting) it is to review. Make sure to tag the talk page with relevant wikiproject banners

7050:

In my opinion, it would be nice to revisit quite often for an event that is very recent, and less often as time passes. But this can cause a problem: at the beginning, many people are passionate about the situation, many are trying to say something, and it's hard for them to stay reasonable and

5049:

Considering the good advice you've already received, it would be nice in your situation if the first few times you remove references you did them one at a time (which makes them easier to undo), and in articles that aren't overwhelmingly complicated. (The part about uncomplicated articles isn't

2137:: The evidence you're trying to give is irrelevant to Knowledge. Knowledge is not a court. There is no one here to plead your case in front of. You're doing the equivalent of trying to sell gloves to a fish. When we see the reporters' explanations in the big newspapers, we will act accordingly. 1373:

documented, good! (Though too many famous historic women were noted at the time merely for being connected with men, which is not as good.) Writers and filmmakers are notorious for neglecting women characters. These omissions were unjust to the point of being ridiculous, yet there's very little

10899: 10790:

Since the piece you cite from The Hindu is derived from the press release, it is of no value for establishing notability. Knowledge has little interest in what the subject of an article says or wants to say about themselves, or what their associates say about them. Knowledge is almost entirely

6074:

I recall there is a way to see all the edits that have been made to a topic in the previous few months but I can't recall how I got there. And also if there were any reversions/ deletions that were made. Sadly I keep getting to some great new site but then can't recall how I got there. :-{

2331:

I can't tell how much I appreciate your additions, including my third book. I do think you should cite our (Enstrom & Kabat) response to the charge that "there was no comparison group," since that was the first specific criticism made by Michael Thun, and we responded directly to it in our

7419:

You're fully entitled to your opinion, but it's incompatible with Knowledge. So either (A) suppress your opinion and either (i) find and cite good sources or (ii) realize that whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent; or (B) find some other website that's more compatible with your

5352:

to "Asian" without impacting the accuracy of the data represented throughout that entire row.One possible solution would be to add another row for "Pacific Islander" in every table. For the decades that combine the two, you could combine both rows in that column and display a single, combined

1983:

Thanks for this, Marchjuly. I have been very careful to be civil and to try to explain my issue. Could you possibly take a look at the 2 or 3 most recent posts on the "Talk:Geoffrey Kabat" page and suggest what route would be most appropriate for me to take. It's very hard for an outsider to

13396:

Is it true that reference number 1 is a book that he wrote? A book by the subject of the article is generally a poor reference, except in the little parts of the article where that book is being discussed. How would the article be affected if reference number 1 was removed, and replaced with

11982:

The only people who are referring to this event as the "Trump International Golf Club shooting" are the Far Left. Literally every media organization, every federal and state agency, Trump, his political opponents, and even foreign dignitaries have acknowledged it as an assassination attempt.

7655:

I'm not sure that his biography is necessary here. But now (just to look at one area of your draft), there's a one-paragraph biography. It has no references whatever. Why should the reader believe what it says? Well, it does say for example "Miles Anthony Hall was the first born to his proud

7384:

The lead in a Knowledge article is meant be a succinct summary of the content of the article. You added information that was already covered adequately in the following paragraph. It did not need to be mentioned twice. Nor did it need citing, as it was in the lead and thus a summary of cited

11536:

Your best bet it to likely go to the talk page and point out the errors (with sources backing your point, or pointing out how the current refs don't back the claims made in the article), and that things need to be updated. I've removed the InfluenceWatch link as obvious political nonsense.

5666:

to create and submit a draft. Be advised that writing a new article is the most difficult task to attempt on Knowledge, and it is highly recommended that you first gain experience and knowledge by spending much time editing existing articles in areas that interest you, as well as using the

2863:

Thank you. I have had an account for ~2 years, but this is my first article. I created it in the sandbox a few weeks ago and I believe I did submit it for review at that time. I haven't seen any response to the review. I can easily add more information to the page if that is the issue.

8114:

in might be for some Knowledge judges to read at least one of Alan Watt's articles, or see the video I send you a link to, titled "Reality Check", and thinking for themselves see for themselves that Alan Watt knew things the more intelligent people will be grateful someone told them about.

6285:, but articles are essentially be reviewed by those reading them. So, if someone feels that the content you added isn't an improvement, they are allowed to revert it or correct it. The hope is that they will do so in accordance with relevant Knowledge policies and guidelines, and leave an 567:

You can get the artist to do the email now, without deleting them. You might find that they are removed before the artist's email gets to Commons volunteers but that won't matter as they can be undeleted by the admins there. Make sure the permissions email includes the filenames you used.

12198:

In my opinion, some articles could get away with a lower level, and if they can then they should. There are certainly articles that might require a higher level than you're suggesting, but I think they should do so because they can't get by with less, not because they're free to do more.

10676:

However, in Haryana they are known only as Jat or Jatt or Jutt, a name popularly derived3 from Paninian term Jatta which denotes union or federation or confederation (jana or Sangha) of the Ayudhajivi (warrior tribes) of contemporary Panjab and Sindh, where they are still called Jatta or

8069:

of the subject. Interviews aren't independent of the subject, so those sources don't count toward notability; they can be used only to verify statements he made. And InfoWars fails the reliability requirement; in fact it is blacklisted on Knowledge so you couldn't link to it anyway; see

9372:

aren't clear because there are different interpretations of success; the math might be even harder to do correctly. But "How much good have I done here, minus the sum of (any permanent harm I've caused and any good I've prevented by disruption)" would be interesting if it was possible.

3683:. It is only after the publication of R. Lalrawna that the section describing his life came. How do I know? You may ask. Its because I have the whole book with me. One from 1987 and one from 2018. The newest version was revised a little, with corrections of typing mistakes and such and 11676:

Thank you all for removing InfluenceWatch and nominating the article for deletion. As Anarchonist noted, there is very little existing coverage of me which is why I was so amazed that I had my own Knowledge article. Would it be appropriate for me to comment on the deletion discussion?

6857:

And if nobody happens to review it, the changed version will stay there, and a random reader next year will see the changed version, not your original. If they are clued up on Knowledge, they may notice that it is not sourced, and know to be sceptical. But most users will take what it

10146:

I often shy away from editing tables at times, and I've made some pretty complex tables in the past. So, yes, putting forward your suggested addition via the talk page is a very good solution, with the advantage that someone else can tie themselves in knots getting it sorted for you!

13244:, and thanks for your work on biomedical topics. Generally, yes. If an image is published by a reliable source, and if the image is the best part of the source to cite for a given bit of article content, go for it. I would cite it differently, by specifying the journal article using 2004:

A careful look shows that you are (either mainly or entirely) in the wrong, and need to step back. 1) Knowledge requires independent reliable references without personal testimony; 2) it is ethically wrong to try to clear someone's name regarding something that they did in fact do.

9653:

An interesting undertaking, since I might be just about to create a couple more (as subcategories to existing categories--those are still categories). I doubt if I'm the only one doing things like that. The point is, such a download would probably be out of date within an hour.

11326:: I've thought about submitting it for review, but since I heard it can take some weeks to months for an article to be, and this is still a fairly unknown yet very important topic, I thought it'd be better to put in work to make it ready relatively quickly and publish it directly. 5286:

I know the census did, but I am talking about Knowledge's use of the term API Americans. It's inconsistent across pages and yet when I wish to shorten it to just Asian other users will revert my edits back as if this term must be used. Where on Knowledge should I take this issue?

9007:

More generally: My earnest advice to new editors is to not even think about trying to create an article until you have spent several weeks - at least - learning about how Knowledge works by making improvements to existing articles. Once you have understood core policies such as

12213:

In theory, a "site-wide consensus" could make provisions for sensible variances, without being overly complex or uselessly vague. Speaking more practically, I doubt the community could withstand the shock. And consensus would become hopelessly mired in debate about the sensible

11593:

and should be merged into the Arabella Advisors article, though you'd want to do a more careful search before nominating. (As a general rule, we look for 2-3 reliable independent sources primarily about the subject, and interviews do not count here). The process is described at

9265:- LOL. If you want to see a summary of your edits, click on "Contributions" near the top of the screen. Then from the Contributions page, click on "Edit count" near the bottom. This will give you more stats than you could ever want about all the edits you have made. Enjoy!-- 6248:

is a different issue and that is how we get closer to 'truth'. That is where we come up with the term 'alternate facts' and those discussions are the most interesting. I don't expect that will be an issue in my present case however, but unless someone responds there can be no

5076:

Meaning: "Acacia acquires public and private companies in technology, energy and industrial/manufacturing sectors", I suppose. ("Generate shareholder value" I suppose means "make money". But readers don't need to be told that profit is the motive.) Feel free to cut the junk. --

12597:

has more information (but very dense). Don't forget to tell us the ending! Many editors try to avoid "spoilers", but one of the most helpful things a wikipedia article can provide about a work is its full plot, since most other websites only carry a teaser-style synopsis. --

11892:: All of the best tips are given to you already – the links in the "declined" notices show you a lot of things to read. All of them show something about what went wrong, and all of them show tips for what to do next. But here's an extra example (it's silly, but it's useful): 5809:: It also helps to simply start in, by improving existing articles that interest you and appear to need work. After doing that for a while, you may notice (from their edit summaries and their contributions on Talk pages) that you are often working alongside the same people. 5403:

that the percentages are. It wouldn't really change the percentages for Asians that much. It is what it is, but I don't know why we as a nation focus so much on a group whose population is often low enough to round down to zero and overall nationwide doesn't even cross 0.5%.

4963:, citation 1 could only cover a single sentence, but citation 4 likely covers multiple sentences. Sometimes, you can tell what content the citation covers from the footnote alone. Other times, it will be hard to say without looking at the actual reference. I would also echo 1093:. They're all newbies, summoned by the newcomer module. It's a good task to tag instead of doing it yourself, if you find an article that is underlinked, because it's a task new editors feel able to do. Those of us who know the ropes already can work on the harder stuff. -- 8909:

Hello. If you are referring to your sandbox, it was declined, not rejected. Rejected has a specific meaning in the draft process, that a draft may not be resubmitted. Declined means that it may be resubmitted. Your draft is completely unsourced. All information, especially

5269: 4372:

Thank you. Assuming the article will stick here, is there a way I can duplicate the article with the approved formatting here so it is easier for me to just edit the article, rather than make a completely new page? Or must I make an entirely new page on English Knowledge?

3709:(even if altered a little for the purposes of fixing errors in spelling, grammar, etc.) is still not independent of the subject who wrote it originally, as it has essentially been reprinted. To the best of my knowledge, Knowledge doesn't believe in what I personally call 1811:

reverted me after I posted here, and actually I see what I did wrong. Wow, this feels like getting my car hit three times, but I think I know how to fix it. I'm amazed that I didn't realize the need to cite each change. Duh! Thank you for your patient and thorough reply.

10706:

About twenty-seven miles towards the west-north-west from Bijapur in the Bombay Presidency, there is a town, the chief town of a Native State, the name of which is Jat, or more strictly Jatt. I have been at the town, more than once. And I know that its true name is Jat,

3647:

of the original book. In the book that I cited, the publisher was R. Lalrawna, a stranger not even related to Dr. James Dokhuma. In the book that I cited, he created a section of the life of James so that people who did not know him well could get to know him. So, it is

5462:" – More than likely, the editor that added the newer data (back when it was released) didn't see an easy way to handle this predicament and just combined the two percentages in the table to avoid disturbing the historical data. This is all a moot point now, since the 12305:

You assume that people care to admit publicly that Knowledge is 2 kompleekated for them—even under the "anonymity" of the internet. The stats tell us there is nothing better available for free. They don't tell us how much the average reader is actually comprehending.

2845:, but I will add the information to your sandbox needed to submit it. However, if you were to submit it, it would likely be declined, as it is far too brief. You will need to (assuming the sources you give already do) summarize what the sources say makes this person 1834:

change needs to be cited, only the changes that bring in a new idea. I guess it depends what you consider "a change" – I'm mainly the type of editor who goes around correcting clumsy sentences and removing statements that are very obvious garbage, so I rarely need to

409:

Thank you so much. I have deleted the images for now. I can see if I can get ahold of the artist directly for this, otherwise I guess I will just have to leave off images. Appreciate your help so much! As I'm sure you can tell I'm new to wiki and learning as I go :)

930:

I want to emphasise this point. You aren't really helping improve wikipedia by tagging lots of pages with underlinked template, especially on the basis of a script. I'd recommend using your script to find pages then actually improving the article with wikilinks.

8015:, before you write a single word. If he's obscure, you may not get traction with Wikiquote. I have removed your addition of his name to the disambiguation page because it seems like you're trying to promote his website. What is your association with this person? ~ 5876:

My earnest advice to new editors is to not even think about trying to create an article until you have spent several weeks - at least - learning about how Knowledge works by making improvements to existing articles. Once you have understood core policies such as

5217:

indeed look like similar articles, however if you think they are different which I am not so sure seeing the contents (birth, death and origin of the author) all look similar, perhaps you move the title of your draft to another one not having the same spelling as

6853:

What happens then? If somebody who patrols new changes looks at it, they see that some unreferenced material has been changed, but is still unrefernced. They may very well have no idea themselves about the material - so should they leave it, revert it, or remove

390:

and any others you uploaded, you need to get the artist to email the Commons volunteers from an email address that is obviously personal to them, giving the filenames and your username, saying that they have indeed authorised you to license them for Commons. See

8580:. You need a lead paragraph that summarizes the body text, and the body text needs to discuss the subject of the article, not tell a journalistic story - and it isn't a good story because you are tying together unrelated events into one article. That's called a 4995:

used elsewhere in the article as well as at the sentence you are removing. Make sure that it's not the first instance of that reference or you'll start to get a red error messages like "Cite error: xxxxx was invoked but never defined" in the list of references.

3568:

have said about a subject, nothing less, and not very much more. A selected list of a subject's creations/works may be included, but unless the article explains why they are notable (by summarising what published sources have said about them) there is no point.

2216:

FactOrOpinion (talk). As I said 2 days ago, this was extremely helpful and makes me feel I am being heard. You make several good points as to evidence/facts/citations that can be used. Let me list a small number and then ask a question for you or anyone else to

2250:

Now to my question, can you or anyone else suggest what entity at Knowledge I should approach with this material? Should it be some group in the Knowledge Foundation or some group of Wikipedians who handle such cases? Please give me as specific guidance as you

1838:

The most important places to give excellent citations are the ones where someone is likely to jump down your throat right away saying you're wrong. It doesn't even matter if their complaints are trash, you still have to have an airtight citation in that case.

1407:

If this wording doesn't make sense, in a nutshell, I translated the article about Hitler into Cherokee wikipedia, but the article on Cherokee wikipedia isn't showing up when I click on the other languages tab in the article about Hitler on English Knowledge.

3932:

You need more references that show he is notable, I can only see two references repeatedly used. You can also remove statements you can't find references for, that way the article can stand as a stub. But, generally two citations are not enough for biography

11899:

But if I say "I am an important scientist", and Knowledge doesn't believe me, I might ask my friends to vouch for me ... but that's not useful. Nobody has written reports about me. Nobody has written books about me. Knowledge should not believe my friends.

5126:

that are independent of the company and disinterested. We can take the company's word for it when it says that, say, the CEO is such-and-such a person; but claims for what may be called accomplishments need good sources. Knowledge provides a cornucopia of

6415:

by trying to fix it yourself or by removing it. If someone disagrees, you can try to engage them in discussion on the article's talk page to see whether things can be resolved. If they refuse to engage, you can move to the next step of the DR process and

767:, I think you might want to tweak the script a bit so that it takes the size of the article into consideration? A much longer article, if it's not repeating the same wikilinks over and over, will naturally have a lower link density than a shorter one. -- 12612:

In my opinion, a few overenthusiastic people start tending toward too much detail when explaining plots. I know it's only because they love their topic (or they have a thing for detail), but ... A non-passionate telling of the plot often works better.

11838:

Thank you for the quick reply. His work is definitely “notable”, so I have to understand how to show it. I looked up a few pages that would be comparable and was not able to understand based on what they were notable. Could you please explain it to

6212:

by any one particular editor or group of editors. For this reason, pages aren't protected (i.e. "locked") simply for the sake of preserving one editor's or one group of editors' preferred version of the page. Knowledge gives everyone a chance to be

2311:, turns out that I was wrong about how your Quillette "Dogmatism" article could be used, and I've added a line about it to your page, and another about your third book. I think I've done about all that I can do while adhering to WP's policies. 13062:

marked it with having problems of notability. Maybe they would like to reconsider, after your recent addition of another source. You are correct that in view of your COI, you should not yourself remove the tag. Strictly speaking as a declared

9933:

In 2023, Pórokhov started bothering me. Is it just a coincidence that you requested the deletion of a file honoring one of his sockpuppets? Why do you revert my edits and never explain why? I’ve read somewhere that you have connections with a

9446:

You don't necessarily need to defend anything if you haven't been paid for writing, just state in clear and civil way how you have been contributing out of good will. I will suggest you stick to the page dedicated for the issue as stated by

7970:

Thanks! Not knowing if there is a teahouse for wiki quote, I am wondering if someone in the Knowledge teahouse knows if I can, or if anyone can, or is permitted to, submit a quote by someone whose name appears and Knowledge and red letters.

5085:) 22:50, 16 September 2024 (UTC) And on second thoughts "is focused on acquiring" may mean just "hopes to acquire", without asserting that any have yet been acquired. This article is bad. Unsheathe your editorial machete and get to work. -- 8109:

The conundrum is that author Alan Watt was a mostly a recluse, but his research reveals the inner workings of the ruling elites throughout the ages. Inner workings conscious individuals like you would probably be very happy to become aware

11077:

Congrats and welcome! From here, the world's your oyster. My suggestion is to get involved with some wikiprojects you're interested in, since that's a good way to find some community. You can also "adopt" a particular backlog. I recommend

9760:

before doing so to make sure they understand what's going to be expected of them. Anything not related to editor behavior that others would like to continue discussing can be done on user talk pages, article talk pages, or other relevant

2619: 3411:

I removed all of the subjective and non-encyclopaedic language. Why do you believe he is notable? As an author? Teacher? What justifies him being referred to as "Dr."? Can you find more references for what people have written about him?

1853:

Thank you for this. I read the reverter's talk page, and it is filled with people complaining that he reverted them without discussion. I was also reverted before him by someone who has had a hearing over his hostile reversion behavior.

12035:

Whoever famously said something like "... as simple as possible – but not simpler", I tend to agree with them. I think we should never "dumb down" a TOPIC, but I think, keeping that in mind, we should keep our WORDS reasonably simple.

2492:

There is no literal requirement that something be published in this or that particular source. There are full explanations in the policies of Knowledge, but in this situation the following simplifications might be useful as a starting

11706:

Just so you're aware of the process, a deletion discussion generally lasts for one week, after which the end date is either extended if there has been no participation, or the discussion is closed and the article is kept or deleted.

7632:) once the redirect is already created. I can do so when I am first setting up the redirect, but once made, that category appears blocked from use within visual editor. Does my question now make sense? I apologize if it was unclear. 12992:

Hello, ISAAC CARES, and welcome to the Teahouse. That message is a technical message (nothing to do with the content of what you are writing), and usually means that you have left an editing session open for too long before saving.

8365:

We limit ourselves to quotations which are notable. A quotation can be notable because it has achieved fame due to its enduring relevance to many people, or because it is attributed to a notable individual, or appeared in a notable

7286:

So, you're trying to make two assertions: "The largest settlement is the town of St Neots and the town the district was named after is Huntingdon". And you don't have sources? Then how can you possibly know they are true? Where did

4959:. It depends on the article. If you delete the material covered by a reference, you should also delete that reference. In some articles, nearly every sentence is cited. In others, citations cover whole paragraphs. In the example at 13477:

where promotional concerns are not even mentioned. The current version does not seem excessively promotional to me, except for that section heading. What is lacking is how movie critics assess the film. The concept is fascinating.

1336: 1159: 266:, which allows anybody to reuse or alter the image for any purpose, requiring only that they attribute the source. This licensing by the copyright holder is required, and "permission" of any other sort, from anybody, is irrelevant. 9317:, you don't need to "work it off". There's no negative connotation in having a net reduction in the size of the articles that you edit. In fact, reducing the size of an article can sometimes lead to an improvement in its quality. 12032:: About the article you described, I think there's no need for those words because easier more common ones would be just as good. I would be inclined to edit them out (probably while simplifying a few other things along the way). 11691:

You are certainly allowed to comment, but in general it may be wiser to leave it alone if it is going your way. Wikipedians can react unpredictably to comments from article subjects, particularly on anything related to politics.

2395:

Thanks again for the new additions and the added references. I feel that, thanks to all your work, the page gives a much more complete and balanced account of my career. This is really minor, but reference 22 has "Kabat" spelled

534:

Yes, you did that correctly and the file I linked by the URL is now gone. You need to do the same thing on the files you uploaded to Commons. When deleted, the current blue link to the filename here in this thread will turn red.

387: 8174:

like: For it to be "newsworthy", it has to have been covered by a major media outlet. In order for a major media outlet to cover it, it has to be newsworthy". I am surprised that after so many years I remember a semblance of it.

1770:

and is disallowed), you must write what reliable sources say. In this case, however, you were simply stating what another article already states, so you would be OK reverting it back, with an explanation. In fact, I will do so.

5162:

The biggest problem that I now see with this article is that the references do not include any independent, reliable sources that devote significant coverage to this company. It is all about what the company says about itself.

2661:

It comes from the sources already listed in the article, I read them myself where I added the info. One of them is a thesis on the subject. For example, I put in reference tags for some specific sentences which I found in the

8105:

Do you see of a way his notability requirement could be fulfilled? The challenge is that because his research and his conclusions were so different, sometimes opposite the mainstream views that he stayed away from mainstream

5369:

is still broad, ranging from Pakistani and Indian all the way to Korean and Japanese. One could reasonably present the same argument that each of these groups "have very distinct appearances and culture". The census grouping

1681:

Thanks for all your help. I've left a msg on the talk page as well. The article has been improved, although I'm sure there could be more to add. Should I go ahead and remove the maintenance tag, or leave it to someone else?

1075:, I assumed that the list you asked me to look at was current instead of outdated. That illustrates the proper response to the problem: Add useful wikilinks to articles instead of spending time compiling lists such as this. 8101:

The essence of his notability, of the value of his findings, may ultimately lie in his findings themselves. Anyone who reads some of his findings can rationally decide if they are or are not "notable" and worth sharing on

364:

Yes, you are correct, they are artwork images by an artist. So if the artist themselves have not licenced their images under either wiki commons or creative commons, does that basically mean they cannot be used in my wiki

8645:

Getting there. You don't have to summarize each example in the lead section. The lead section is mainly for a general overview. A reader should be able to read the lead section and have a good idea of the contents of the

6849:

Next month, somebody changes it. Maybe they think you were wrong, maybe they misunderstand what you were saying, maybe they made a mistake, maybe they want to promote something they are associated with, maybe they are a

12771: 10727:

Even today they take pride in being called Jats. The word Jat is the same as Scyth, Zatt, Jatt, Jatt, (a camel- driver) and Gette etc. Everywhere a Jat is an agriculturist. The Sumerians (of the Archaeologists) had two

2962:. Yes, readers could google the former and thereby find the latter, but this shouldn't be necessary. (True, we are in 2024, so most who want to chase up a paper will instead find it via its DOI -- so please investigate 9527: 1573:

Sorry, I missed a couple of things: 1) If you forget to end one of your blockquote sections, the entire rest of the article may be turned into a quotation, as you saw. 2) I don't know anything about categories, sorry.

7976: 13454:

It can be tough to steer an article in a good direction, if there are determined efforts to steer it not-so-good at the same time. Conflict is tricky; fights are bad for Knowledge, even if I'm fighting for the right

11463:

I like the variety of sources that you've used. The one about psychosocial impact would probably be useful for putting something in the ==Society and culture== section (e.g., anything about school and friendship).

5530: 2587: 2458: 13458:

If an editor is really going over the line, bullying and refusing to listen, sometimes something has to be done about it. Very often it turns out that editors on both sides of such an issue are somewhat guilty.

12432:

The copyright law is written so that it is basically impossible for anyone to give up their rights by accident or default. (The law even makes things inconvenient for someone who WANTS to give up their rights!)

8004: 4329: 1374:

legitimate we can do anymore to repair history. "Crashing down", in the context of my comment, is "becoming an irrelevant project because we allowed POV-pushing and forced gender balance to become core values".

10290: 8143:

independent sources, nothing else. I could self-publish a rock-solid plan for achieving world peace, which is undeniably important and has value, but if there is no coverage of my work, then it isn't notable. ~

3426:

I have not gotten ti what made him notable because as I said, it's a work in progress. But however, he is a notable man as he is one of the leaders of the Mizo insurgency and an autjor of many different books.

2344:

I am going to continue to combat the RICO business and the charge of industry funding/involvement by following another editor's suggestion that I get these points discussed in a reputable magazine or newspaper.

11789:

the list of Chicago resources especially, these links include quite a few that are not about me at all and focus on family members, including people who have passed. The whole thing honestly feels unsettling.

9429:

I believe this is a place to ask questions? I am here, asking what proofs/evidence do I need to provide to defend this claim? Please don't tell me, even this is something that I cannot do or it would not help

37: 8077:

Articles on demonstrably notable topics are kept. Articles on non-notable subjects are deleted (or never started). If those outcomes are against his wife's wishes, there's really nothing she can do about it.

6208:, but this is almost always only done in cases of ongoing serious disruption or a long history of repeated disruption. Knowledge is, after all, intended to be a collaborative editing project and pages aren't 911:

concerns about link density – but only when there are too many. Usually these are placed by someone who wants to inflate the importance of their subject, or by someone who is just eager to add links. I have

12133:

for some little quotations like that, that hit on something important. Mostly, there are enough books better than theirs that they hardly merit a look. The way they ignore their own advice is instructive.

5706:, So, get references first - perhaps park in your Sandbox - then only write content that is verified by those references. What you personally know to be true cannot be used unless verified by references. 13234: 8405:

You can cite a SPS for assertions made by the subject as long as those assertions are attributed properly in prose. The two examples you mentioned are fine (although I wouldn't use the word "lamented").

5028:

mentioned above. The way the Visual Editor handles deleting a named reference that has been used multiple times, is that it will only remove the citation when the last usage has been removed. Good luck,

12774:. Its uploader says that it's their "own work", but it's not clear from this whether the painting too is their own work. (I think that we can assume that the comic character the painting is based on is 12505:

Yeah, I understand. I kept it removed as I'm not acquainted entirely with the rules yet, and I haven't read the page you suggested yet. I'll check it out whenever I have enough time. Thanks for the help

8399: 5145:

I just cut out a lot of corporate fluff cited to press releases and added a short section about legal issues. This company appears to be considered a patent troll, based on my brief search for sources.

5073:

Acacia is focused on acquiring public or private businesses across industries including the mature technology, energy and industrials/manufacturing sectors where it believes it can generate shareholder

2931:(which you should declare) but that's no bar to drafting an article for Knowledge. Keep the draft fairly short initially: your main task is to show that Hoyle meets the special notability guidelines at 1111:

i tried doing just that but i got blocked for that, i supposed because i was trying to document all the problems the page has and being declared that i was tagbombing, thus my solution being this list.

4405:

Sorry – I forgot. After making sure you are logged in with your username, you can find your sandbox from one of the menus at the top of your screen. On mine it's in the menu with the icon of a person.

1858:. I wrote him a nicer note that you can see below this, but after briefly defending himself (correctly, because he reverted me twice and I thought he had re-reverted me, my error), he did not respond. 12725: 858:

Basically, I'm not blindly tagging upon the list, but using it as a metric to have people look closer at pages that have been overlooked(this page for example has been mostly unchanged since 2008).

463:

Okay got it! I will delete the file. I'm in touch with her gallery to get in touch with the artist directly so hope to have that all cleared up soon. Thank you for your continued help and support!

3713:, where the provenance of content magically changes when it is reprinted by a third party; as far as I can tell, the book still credits Dokhuma as the author as the bulk of it is still his writing. 3158: 2450:

I appreciate this. You’ve made it much clearer. So, when an article appears in Time magazine or in the WSJ, or some such publication, the bio will be modified to reflect the new story? Thank you.

1766:

This was a valid revert. You made an assertion that cannot be verified because you did not provide a reliable source to verify it. On Knowledge, you cannot write what you know (this is considered

10452:

for a general overview of the subject. Perhaps it will give you the information you need or suggest some some sources which might be helpful. You could also try asking more specific questions at

2542:

I have a serious legal issue that I want resolved. Oh look! A rag-tag group of volunteer librarians with no jurisdiction and no legal qualifications! They have a big placard on their desk saying

11824:: You have not shown that he is notable. (Knowledge uses the word "notable" in a special way.) If this is really all the information you can find, it means you cannot make an article about him. 4225:, it should give you a sense of how to establish that the template applies. (I'm on my phone right now, so I can't check the copyright status myself, but I should be able to help later today.) 2023:: Assuming that your username is authentic, then perhaps the best next step for you to take is to go to major news outlets with this revelation. When they've printed it, Knowledge will follow. 8291:. Not what he, or you, or I would regard as reliable sources, but what Knowledge would. As I gaze at his website, I sense that amassing such coverage would be difficult, if not impossible. -- 2954:, when writing for Knowledge one should try to avoid assuming that readers are already familiar with the area they're reading about. Thus for example one should avoid specifying a journal via 8604:: I think that the most important part of Anachronist's advice is that on Knowledge you can't have a story to tell. All you're permitted to do is prove that others have told a story already. 7895: 6900: 4137:

The point is two things: 1) The image you're suggesting isn't free, AND 2) a good-enough image exists that IS free. Non-free images are all ignored, as soon as a good-enough free one exists.

1723: 5374:

could even be considered more broad by definition. It would probably be best to drop this line of reasoning. The stronger argument is following the change made by the U.S. census report. --

4123:, per the attached licensing details. Since the OMD image is also from a press kit of the same period, I am hoping that someone with expertise can determine whether it too is public domain. 4049:

Hello, Greg. If you need a pattern that is not already available then you'll need to create an image. I don't think there's any particular program required for that. But I suggest asking at

4849:

Knowledge is an encyclopedia while fandom is a fan site. They have entirely different purposes. I can assure you that most Knowledge editors do not contribute to Fandom. I certainly don't.

11615: 10791:

interested in what people who have no connection with the subject, and who have not been prompted or fed information on behalf of the subject, have chosen to publish about the subject in

4035:

It helped alot but the thing i didn't understand after reading the article is when creating the patterns. Do i require any specific applications to create the patterns, is so, which one?

2168:

I have no idea whether there's additional relevant literature out there that could help to balance what's there. Some of the literature is also paywalled, which makes the matter harder.

1945:

and someone might not immediately respond to your post. Nobody posting here has any connection to the Wikimedia Foundation or speaks on their behalf; so, if you're looking for that, see

13311:"Primary sources" means "people with firsthand knowledge". Please try to erase all material that comes from "someone who really knows", and replace it with what third parties have said. 12326:

For clarity, "kompleekated" refers to things like word and sentence length in this context. Has nothing to do with the difficulty of the ideas being conveyed, and everything to do with

5775: 1664:

If you're typing directly to Knowledge, then just use the ordinary quotation mark and apostrophe keys on your keyboard, without doing the special keystrokes required to get fancy marks.

12686:

I hope that people with experience and intelligence better than mine will respond soon with more useful information, and I hope the people governing UAE learn fairness and compassion.

7899: 6297:; the former can help establish a consensus one way or the other whereas the latter only leads to disruption. So, if you edits are reverted for some reason and it doesn't appear to be 6252:

Sadly, the only scholars I know about on the subject seem to die just as I learn about them. To wit; H. Roger Grant. I'm hoping my edits will flush out somebody taking up the torch.

1861:

I'll let it go now, I think I'm just stuck with the reversions. What worries me is that his reversions will count against me as an editor. Don't we get a reversion score of some sort?

1641:

Thanks for this. I'll continue tidying up. I'm not sure about the difference between curly and straight quotation marks - can you show me what they look like so I don't do that again.

10087: 9554: 7780: 7750: 7704: 7243:

TooManyFingers, I will quickly add that this wasn't "difficult editors", this IP was blocked for disruptive editing after several warnings. Anyways, here's the source you requested:

4776:

So yes, if it's justified and the items are independently considered high-quality, you can exclude a limited number of items from the "good articles and featured lists" requirement.

1937:

The Teahouse isn't really set up to deal with requests like yours. You'll probably have a much better chance of getting assistance on one of the more specific noticeboards listed at

9406: 5361:), or perhaps an editor at one of those pages can assist (if not, reach back out here, and I'm sure one of us will be glad to).One quick note about your "too broad concern" due to " 5305:: I think it will probably have to continue being shown, every time someone talks about an old census. The old census says what it says, and we can't pretend it said something else. 1426:, you can do the same for other articles by finding the "Wikidata item" link for an article on the sidebar and adding the article name to the list of Knowledge pages at the bottom. 851:

I'll agree that there isn't a minimum amount of links required for a page, however, I've found that low link density can be a sign of other problems, such as the case of me tagging

11460:

It's possible that dropping a simple sentence in each of the empty sections – though theoretically not required – would reassure the admin that it's really an uncontroversial move.

7850:

Every page on Knowledge also has a "talk" page, where discussions take place about improving the content of the page to which the talk page is attached. If you want to discuss the

6407:. As for the examples you might have seen in other articles, Knowledge has over six million articles and many if not most aren't being constanly monitored or assessed. So, lots of 4729:

I didn't create it myself - it's been around for some time now, I overhauled it from what had previously been a two-sentence stub. The lead was intended to mirror that of similar

262:(either by explicit statement of the copyright holder, or by reason of their age), or images which the copyright holder has specifically released under a copyleft licence such as 12824:

with material about, let's say, some company's eco-friendly, economical, and generally amazing opportunities for electrifying these old cars, you might expect some attention. --

1700:: Have all the things mentioned in it been fully solved, so that the person who noted the problems would really have to admit it's fixed now? If that's done, then yes, go ahead. 12915: 11217: 10373:

edit is the expected best practice, and the other edit is also fine. It's common to get reverted, but it was inappropriate for them to leave a warning about it. Don't sweat it,

10016:

it's simple false that I revert them without explaning why... Fox de Quintal is literally harassing me in three projects simultaneously and is trying to pass as the victim! See

6159:

The edits you made can't be fixed in place per se because that's really how Knowledge works. The best you can hope for is that others also feel your edits were improvements and

3867: 3823: 3797:

in a limited fashion, but it doesn't contribute to the (ideally at least) three independent reliable sources that reviewers want to see in drafts to show Dokhuma is wikinotable.

3774: 3757: 3688: 3652: 3630: 3598: 3584: 3540: 3510: 3494: 3480: 3462: 3442: 3428: 3398: 2436:

And we are very adamant about remaining ONLY a second-hand copy. We refuse on principle to publish original material that people bring, and that's why this has happened to you.

9004:, otherwise there can be no article. What you know (or what I know, or what any random person on hte internet knows) is irrelevant, unless it is backed up by published sources. 5275:

They did split it off to "Native Hawaiian or other Pacific islander" some time ago, so this is a good question, but I'm not sure it is one that can be handled by the Teahouse.

13332:: Maybe the best way to know which of the subject's accomplishments should stay in the article is to only keep the ones that have already been mentioned in third-party source. 10960:? It looks to me as if all the citations in that article are either to works by Lachat, or to sites published by organisations he belongs to; in other words, none of them are 3008: 1661:

If you are using a word processor, it may have an easy-to-use control or preference to turn OFF "Smart quotes". That might be easier than having to correct afterwards by hand.

7830:

Ohh wow, Thank you, I would enjoy reading it all at my comfort. What about the policy discussion thing? where do those happen? creating new policy, proposing changes, etc...

12409:

To clarify, the olympiad doesn't present any license for logo usage, but neither any logo copyright, leaving to assume that the logo can be used freely. Just want to confirm

10426: 7972: 6163:. FWIW, being reverted is part of the Knowledge experience; so, it's not really a reason to feel discouraged. If it happens and the revert is not really a clear-cut case of 3222:. But be aware that Knowledge volunteers are not here to do work for you like that, especially if you tell us nothing about the subject and provide no sources demonstrating 8584:, and isn't allowed. The title of the draft implies that multiple examples would be described in different paragraphs, but instead it's one big section with no structure. ~ 2350:

By the way, since you thought to list the third book, there is a first book: Ideology and Imagination: The Image of Society in Dostoevsky (Columbia University Press, 1978.

13040: 9127: 6093:

To see edits for a certain article, click on the View History tab on the right hand side of the navigation bar (after Read, Edit, Edit Source). To see your own edits, use

4315: 4301: 4119:

Perhaps I wasn't altogether clear in my original post: I am not at all advocating for the use of a non-free image. The Duran, Soft Cell and New Order press kit images are

11998: 10538: 5980: 5861:

Hello, User072364. I'm afraid that, like most editors who try to create an article before they have spent time learning how Knowledge works, you have written your draft

5526: 3140: 2583: 2454: 12940:

Note that Knowledge does not claim to be free of bias, as all sources have biases. Sources are presented to readers so they can evaluate and judge them for themselves.

12463:

That is best, for now. But you might want to explore the rules more carefully, when you have time; there may be reasons why this use is OK and can be put back up. I am

9701:

to make an edit request if you have a specific edit you want made. Note that since you are not extended confirmed and the topic area is under strict sanctions, you are

8178:

has covered it so it is not newsworthy. Newsworthy, and notability, look, at this point, to me, arbitrary, thus closed-minded. Almost like a type of establishment club.

6633:

is a core principle of Knowledge. I could put on anyone's article that they are a space alien from Mars, that doesn't make it true. It need to be verifiable somewhere.

6523:

If there are no sources for sections of the article, then you simply can't write about it for Knowledge. Disclaimers don't help and won't be accepted as we don't allow

7985:

Dear Hoary: I need to create a new Knowledge page for "Alan Watt" (author and radio commentator). Can you help me do that? Thanks, Charles (username: Writing is easy)

7577: 4218: 1961:, others will respond similarly; if, however, you start to get accusatory, then the responses you receive will likely reflect that. Finally, please also remember that 549:

I thought I could have the artist email Wiki Commons - or do I still have to delete them and then have the artist email them if I reupload them? Thanks for clarifying

1893:

I beleve "deleted edits" refers to edits in articles that are now deleted, not reverted edits. Hundreds of editors can contribute to an article that eventually fails

1460:. Basically scroll to the bottom of the page where there is a "Knowledge" box and add the name of the wikipedia (chr) and the article (in this case Ꭰ⁠Ꮩ⁠l⁠f⁠ ⁠Ꭿ⁠Ꮮ⁠r). 876:, the people who will mostly be directed to a page when you use the "underlinked" tag are newcomers using their newcomer homepage suggestions to make easy edits. You 12403: 11763: 11643: 5308:

But if people are continuing to use it for newer census data too, because they mistakenly think it's still official, in those cases I think you're absolutely right.

4258: 3910:, but reviewers are more likely to ask you to use another source as it's far too close in proximity to the author's writing that makes up the majority of the book. — 2768: 2468:

self-serving or suspicious, they tend to face more scrutiny and more roadblocks. You can read Knowledge's main policy on biographies of living persons at this link:

1135: 833:

In general both script-assisted editing and adding maintenance tags are things which are probably better off left to people who have some experience with Knowledge.

13299:

It would help to know which article you are referring to, but that is a standard message and it will contain blue links that will lead you to further explanations.

1965:

applies not only to what's written about you on Knowledge, but also what you might write about others on any Knowledge page and be very careful not to fun afoul of

855:

being far too technical, as well as despite describing a "field of study", makes no mention on who is part of this field(i.e. a history of the field of study), etc.

795:

template is in fact a newcomer task and many of the pages I've put it on has had plenty of productive edits made by other newcomers(I still regard myself as such).

11988: 8817:. In the past, when I came across similar situations while creating articles myself, I opted to write a footnote to indicate that the fact in question is disputed 6281:

for more details, but Knowledge articles aren't peered reviewed in the sense that you'd expect from a peer-reviewed journal or other type of publication; there is

435:

but I'm afraid that is not enough. You must delete them from their storage location on the Knowledge servers as well, as they are copyright infringements. Include

13314:"Like a résumé" means "listing every accomplishment, especially those no one cares about". Please cut back the list of accomplishments to just the essential few. 10246:

an editor, and you could have reverted it (though as it is in the "short description", which doesn't appear in the text of the article, it's a bit hard to find).

9752:

The Teahouse isn't really set up to deal with editor behavioral issues beyond providing some general guidance; moreover, it shouldn't be used as a substitute for

7066: 5581: 5440: 5422: 5408: 5389: 5331: 5302: 5288: 2665:

I would call this vandalism now, as this users has AGAIN deleted a good portion of the article, and reverted all of my changes which I spent hrs. and hrs. on....

9046:

A) no references B) after Declined, do not resubmit to AfC without first addressing the comments in the Declined notice, as that just wastes a reviewer's time.

8182:

Knowledge. But, perhaps I am biased because his findings make sense go me, I do think Knowledge's readers would be glad and grateful they could read them there.

3362:

be too soon to make an article, it might not actually be too long before one can be made. They're definitely moving up in the musical world, having worked with

12931: 12330:

they are conveyed. Most subjects can be conveyed with simple, Trumanesque language, and the rest could be accommodated under "sensible variances". In theory. ―

10116:

has suggested: Pages like that one are described as 'List articles' and every entry in it should be to an existing Knowledge article. So, my first question is

10021: 8344: 8255: 8209: 8160: 8129: 8036: 7986: 7949: 1984:

understand the workings of Knowledge and how get a one-sided and unfair portrayal of my work corrected. This has been up there since 2025 from what I can tell.

10900:

Hi there, I am new here on this english site and wanted to ask how i could translate a german wiki site, that I created myself in english and publish it here?

3615:

independent reliable sources. Right now you have one - one of the sources you have cited is a book written by the biography subject so it is not independent.

2984:

I fixed the Medler ref. I agree with Turnbull that is is more appropriate to use as references the sources for your journal article rather than your article.

13460: 13432: 13398: 13337: 13315: 13216: 13128: 13114: 12805: 12687: 12628: 12614: 12492: 12474: 12434: 12200: 12135: 12105: 12037: 11901: 11871: 11825: 11794: 11682: 11441: 11123: 9669: 9640: 9534: 9373: 8619: 8605: 7186: 7157: 7052: 6602: 5810: 5426: 5309: 5051: 5012: 4988: 4956: 4499: 4406: 4392: 4283: 4170: 4138: 3194: 3060: 2630: 2547: 2503: 2475: 2437: 2138: 2038: 2024: 2006: 1840: 1701: 1668: 1628: 1575: 1556: 1523: 1507: 1375: 1326: 1293: 917: 269:

The second way is that English Knowledge (unlike some other language versions) allows non-free images to be used in certain restricted ways, as specified in

11595: 7887: 7859: 5348:

for the 1990 census does not split the two groups, and its data is being directly compared in a table to other decades. You can't simply rename the row at

4468:

Agree with this point....... the reason that many translated articles get deleted is because other Knowledge's don't have the same higher level of sources.

395:. As we don't allow nonfree images of artwork anywhere except in an article specifically about that artwork, you should not use the files in the meantime. 11589:

You can also nominate the article for deletion - taking a quick look at the available sourcing, it looks like it probably doesn't meet our guidelines for

13113:: I'd like to clarify something, just in case: COI is not because you wrote or updated the article. COI is because of who you know and who you work for. 9561:

as it restricts what the browser can do, and may make the display worse on some screen sizes. (The table looks fine to me on a computer and on my phone).

9133:

I will not advise you publish the page with just one reference, what you added so far has been linking the author to other connecting pages on Knowledge.

7628:

No I know how to edit a redirect, I was saying that I do not know how to make a certain type of edit to the redirect (which is adding a template such as

7385:

information in the body of the article. If you want to be treated like a grown up then please behave like one. Your rants here are doing you no favours.

3846:

because it was published by Weidenfeld & Nicolson in the UK, or Little, Brown and Company in the US, even though the author is the subject herself. —

2290: 1734: 12372:

This is exactly what I was looking for, all of the resources provided as well as the above discussion have been tremendously helpful. Much appreciated.

11859:

I'm not an expert in this subject, but I think the Hagenauer article you linked would probably not be accepted today. Notability standards have gone up.

9347:

My average is probably even more negative. As an administrator, I've deleted entire articles. There isn't an easy way to factor in deletions, however. ~

1310:

a result of editor bias, but it's hard to overlook the fact that such a small proportion of Knowledge editors are female when looking for explanations.

11955: 10262: 8283:

points out that you'd need "reliable source coverage of him that is independent of him". True. It means coverage of him that (i) is independent of him

6305:. Not matter how right you'll might know yourself to be, you won't be given any special consideration if you simply resort to back and forth reverting 1697: 1683: 1642: 1612: 1590: 11329:

Important note: I do want to make it clear that the reason I made this article *is* to raise awareness (so advocacy in a way. I did make sure to read

4582: 11973: 10987: 10923: 10430: 8838:

Thanks for yours. I have figured out that this has nothing to do with two sources disagreeing. I have posted my reasoning on the article’s Talk page.

6902: 6624: 5832: 5786: 2286: 7994: 7891: 2804:

For most links, you can press the "cite" button in the Visual Editor, paste the link into the input box, and it will produce a formatted reference.

1751:

Good question. It would be helpful if you looked at the edit summary of this 'serial reverter'. Looking at your contribution history, it seems that

12652: 11790: 11725: 11678: 9753: 8903: 8191: 5345: 5065: 3132: 3098: 1166: 284:

If they are not so willing, it is possible that a representative work of the artist might be justified as a non-free image - but not more than one.

9106:

I can't find anywhere in your contribution history where you requested a username change. Maybe you started the request and didn't save it? Go to

5685:

If you decide to try this, you should start by assessing if an article about the subject you're thinking of has any chance of being accepted. See

958:, a page that has been written in Spanish since it's 2005 creation; I hope this and my documenting of other pages shows the merit of this metric. 13355: 13329: 11772:

Um, if you read this discussion, it is clear that he prefers deletion of the article about him. Therefore he has no obligation to find sources. ~

11138: 10934:

in case it is relevant to Germany. I am happy to look it over as well, as someone who frequently translates articles from German to English (see

8880: 5703: 2899:

I find it curious, however, that you are attempting to write a Knowledge article that cites your own work as its primary source of information. ~

2511: 2483: 2462: 1263:

These are all interesting reads for me, Thank you for sharing. I was referring to the non-sentimental and principle of neutrality of Knowledge.

523: 6006:, and more. However, if you use these bots, you should check the results and making sure they're correct. I often forget to do that, sometimes. 12695: 12467:

an images expert. I just know that when copyright is the issue, be very cautious, and assume that nothing is OK to use – until you really know.

10390: 10132: 7586:

might be the better location of the redirec that I am trying to add the Fr (french) language ISO code to based on the aforementioned template.

7117: 5733: 4698: 2951: 2916: 2865: 12678: 10486: 10465: 8860:

and will now apply your suggested correction. Thank you for following up on this and please accept my apologies for my part in this confusion.

5617:. I'd say "Yes, baby steps at first: very wise"; except that chasing down sources is hard work. Do please keep chasing them down. Is the page 3502: 3470: 3450: 3406: 12050:

Thank you for the response. When I get time, I'll see about replacing the words to ones simple enough for someone like me to understand haha

11889: 11846: 11821: 10349:

an admin) has been blocked. As long as your contributions don't violate Knowledge policies, no one will have a sanctionable issue with you. —

6058:

Thanks for that. I did put my name and interest under 'trains' but there are hundreds there and no response. So I'm stirring the pot. :-}

4548: 4535: 4517: 4388: 4374: 4336: 2520: 2489: 2426: 2400: 2374: 2360: 2308: 2278: 2264: 2203: 2152: 2134: 2120: 2090: 2059: 2020: 1991: 1932: 503: 11211: 10765:

Hello IP editor, and welcome to the Teahouse. This is a content issue which I see you have already raised (using a different IP address) at

10434: 10415: 10135:. To be frank, these can be extremely difficult for a completely new editor to edit, simply because of the complicated 'markup' used by our 13014:

Hello, Amitprasad, and welcome to the Teahouse. This place is for getting help with editing Knowledge, not for general knowledge questions.

12899:

before being made visible to search engine webcrawlers. In either case, they are checked to confirm that they are properly corroborated by

12683:

I don't have the skill to answer all of this properly, but I can say one thing: EVERY source is biased, and "biased" does not mean "lying".

11657: 11457: 10519:

Your question isn't rude or improper in any other way; but if you have other questions rather like it, you'd be better off posting them at

10364: 10340: 10315: 9705:

allowed to make edit requests, and cannot discuss the subject otherwise anywhere on Knowledge (including the Teahouse). Keep that in mind.

5607: 5552: 5534: 5128: 3059:

If you add people who do not understand Knowledge policy, unfortunately it makes you appear dishonest – even though you really are honest.

3019:

polls or majority votes. They're a collective assessment of whether an article meets Knowledge's policies and standards. If an argument to

2591: 1924: 10532: 10384: 10271:. Most editors use the desktop version and don't see that feature. The description is taken from the target article so it was fixed there. 7980: 12855: 10059: 10042: 7890:, with a large number of editors contributing (and also a comment from the Wikimedia Foundation). The RfC was listed on both the general 3906:

Which is why I said the book might be possibly used to establish wikinotability (in a limited fashion) if you're only using that section

2605: 1807:

Thank you for answering so quickly. It was an earlier reversion, not the two that happened after it. Sorry I wasn't clear! Somebody else

8343:

conundrum. An author who was a mostly a recluse, but whose research reveals the inner workings of the ruling elites throughoutthe ages.

1365:

I have read it, though not recently, and I really understand. "Crashing down" was intended for a if gender parity on Knowledge became a

13211:

Or, you might find a similarly complex citation already done by someone else, and copy their format. I guess there's no guarantee that

12720: 9960: 9611: 9136:

You still need more references to back up your claim about the author and these references needs to be Independent and reliable as per

8305:

That website sure doesn't give you a confident feeling, does it? Lots of promotion of self-published works. Even the website about the

7685:

You're demonstrably able to edit Knowledge. (If you weren't, this request of yours wouldn't appear.) Where's the difficulty in editing

5589: 5539:

The footnote sounds feasible as well. Lots of possibilities I'm sure. Probably best to discuss solutions at a WikiProject like the one

4734: 3340:

to determine if he meets the required criteria, but I suspect that like most artists this early in their careers, it will be a case of

11143:

COMMENT to 2A02: Once a query has been answered by an editor it is wrong to delete the query and answer, so I reverted your deletion.

10120:

If so, it should be easy and non-controversial to add it to that List article. If not, consider creating a new article about that war

9886:, you know very well that this is not an isolated case, furthermore, you have never given any explanations for this behavior of yours. 13261: 11071: 7811: 7370:

and straight after i submit it, the same dude who always does it comes to ruin it. If you need me I'll be rethinking my life choices

4861: 4828: 4092: 13406: 9668:

Sometimes, when people say "download", they just mean "see". (People who don't have a lot of computer knowledge say it more often.)

8053:

and shouldn't be used that way. Nor is it a platform for "getting the word out". Knowledge publishes articles about topics that are

7788: 7774: 6735: 241:

So I just saw my article had been reviewed and I guess everything was okay with the images - do you think I can just add them back?

10128: 9720: 8857: 7943: 6424:, you've done your part. If the other party starts getting really out of line, you can seek administrator assistance at one of the 5585: 5204: 3836:

Incorrect. Lalrawna is credited as the publisher in your citation, not the author. The work is still Dokhuma's. That's like saying

3255:

here. Creating an article yourself, is the most likely way to make it happen. Even without a registered account, you can check out

2686:. I'm sorry! I understand that things like this could be a punch to the head for your experience with this website; I do feel you. 8940:. Also, since you are pretty new (5 day old here) , I will suggest you take things slow and master how to edit on Knowledge first 7717: 7495:

This is a message from Amazon. I'm sorry but the person you are trying to speak to has written a custom status "dead". Thank you.

4748:

citations. Perhaps an overreaction on my part, though such citations were necessary on the GMs list for individual trades/claims.

491: 368:

Should I be deleting the images I added to wikicommons then? Colin above mentioned that it does not matter if I had "permission".

11079: 7728:

to your user page (be sure to read the instructions for this), and (ii) please make requests and suggestions for that article on

6138:

I went bold like you advised but I would be discouraged if it were reverted. I would much rather get it fixed quickly in place.

5656: 3548: 3518: 3488: 3436: 3421: 2496:- Very clearly outside your sphere of influence, as well as that of your publishers, colleagues, employers, employees, and family 2196:

Many thanks. For the first time, I feel like I am getting responses that are specific to my situation. I will keep working this.

1962: 10155:

to how it was before. That tip has saved my bacon a few times when I've mangled making a tiny edit to a complex table! Regards,

8203:

a person or a thing that is chronologically out of place. especially : one from a former age that is incongruous in the present.

7031:

And make sure the source is checked to be correct or otherwise some other people could undo your edits due to incorrect sources

5296: 5281: 3789:

Exactly the point I'm making. It's still his writing, so it's not independent from him to be used as a source that demonstrates

2782: 1227:

I was emphasising on the standard and the guideline of editing on Knowledge. Perhaps you can tell me more about what you meant.

582:

Thanks Mike! The gallery reached out to her and sent me her info to contact her so I plan to be in touch later this afternoon.

13426: 13293: 13102: 13084: 12969:

Some bias is a good thing. It's also a good thing to have an open mind, but not open to the point where your brain falls out. ~

12761: 11870:

made by publishers who are not connected to him (not the ones who publish his work, not his colleagues or his employees, etc).

11117: 10867: 3942: 3606: 3592: 3578: 2835: 483: 278: 258:

The preferred way is to use free images, which can be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. This means either images which are in the

11949: 10663: 9296:

that came from the time I section blanked the Austrian empire. I’m still trying to work that off, I was really dumb back then

7758: 7741: 7712: 7698: 7060: 6704:

is the most relevant. How would a reader know that you had not just made something up if you added it to an article without a

6590: 6576: 6554: 6536: 5416: 4319: 1417: 1292:

Aiming for gender parity among EDITORS, on the other hand, is a worthwhile goal that I support. I wish we were there already.

305:

Thank you for your speedy response! I just want to make sure i'm abiding by the proper rules. I will look into these options.

13195: 13177: 12022: 11922: 11249: 10784: 10750: 10648: 10637: 10625: 10613: 10601: 10589: 10577: 10565: 9844: 9774: 7784: 7754: 7708: 7538:

is the way to tell an administrator that a page's history contains copyright violations. There's a script to make it easier:

7449: 6717: 4711:

with a massive lead section and 29 references. I hate to be unkind, but can't you see that this is a little bit . . . silly?

4575: 4044: 4030: 3925: 3875: 3861: 3831: 3817: 3782: 3765: 3750: 3696: 3674: 3660: 3638: 3624: 2104:

you are exonerated. I'm guessing that you've tried and they won't do that- in which case there is nothing we can do for you.

660: 12572:

You can simply just delete all of the text on your talk page, though archiving is much more preferred as recommended above.

12381: 8217: 7026: 5448: 5434: 5339: 5317: 4305: 4291: 3532: 2944: 655: 591: 577: 558: 544: 472: 458: 419: 404: 341: 8537:

I've semiprotected the article for now. Adding large quantities of unsourced prose to a BLP isn't permitted on Knowledge. ~

8509:: Welcome to the Teahouse. You may wish to let the user in question know on their user talk page that they run the risk of 7629: 5715: 5018: 4741: 4239:

Thanks for this. The image looks to be permissible along the same lines as the Duran one. I think I've managed the upload.

2695: 1422:

To connect different languages you have to edit the entry in Wikidata. In this case I added the entry on chr for Hitler to

867: 842: 702: 693: 97: 13345: 13140: 13122: 12736:

style of username also raises concern. Your username is problematic and you should change it. As for your statement that

11253: 10083:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

9862: 5749: 5694: 5059: 4655:, when the disruption is coming from a single IP, the solution is to block the IP instead of semi-protecting the article. 4414: 4363: 3246: 3056:

When they discuss keeping or deleting, the topic is not "Do we like it?" – the topic is "Does it follow Knowledge policy?"

2046: 2037:

I neglected to add "... under their byline, as a factual report in which they exonerate you, not as an op-ed or a letter"

1319: 1301: 1190: 359: 13468: 12918:(pending satisfactory improvements) drafts that show obvious bias or imbalance (or anything else contrary to Knowledge's 12780: 12581: 12367: 11759: 11639: 11449: 11231: 11188: 10017: 9577: 6610: 5933:

is to a press release service, so does not contribute to confirming Knowledge-notability. 17:28, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

5841: 5244:

makes it clear that Memnun and Memnon are the same person, in different languages and cultures. But this is also true of

4968: 4254: 4151:

You have done all the due diligence and can confirm the OMD image is not free? The Duran, Soft Cell and New Order images

4080: 4066: 4054: 3992: 3304: 3242: 2772: 2764: 2177: 1485: 1471: 1451: 1437: 1401: 1131: 950: 745:

I notice no shortage of internal links. I'm puzzled by the addition of the template and not surprised by its removal. --

154: 13224: 11346: 10852: 10836: 9648: 9381: 9340: 9326: 8696:

You can contact them on their talk page to point this out, perhaps they didn't see the error you are trying to correct.

8263: 8238: 8168: 8154: 8137: 8089: 8044: 8026: 7222: 7208: 7194: 7179: 7165: 5698: 3967: 3353: 3137:

He has lent his magical touch to a plethora of projects . Recently, he astounded audiences with his directorial genius .

2919:

Your published biography has lots of sources and you would be better to cite those directly where possible. For example

738: 13034: 12962: 12707:

If you're working with a team of editors, you will want to make that clear on your user pages, to avoid accusations of

12059: 12045: 11984: 11862:

Also, I did not make a mistake when I said "he" (Cardoso) might not be notable. It is not his work, but his notability

11492: 11473: 11156: 11092: 10935: 10879: 10207: 9706: 9398: 8887: 8466: 8393: 7496: 7371: 7357: 7322: 7308: 7265: 7259: 7228: 7214: 7200: 7171: 7141: 7032: 7018: 6946: 6932: 6876: 6829: 6815: 6801: 6787: 6773: 6759: 6745: 6403:; if, others disagree, you'll have to establish a consensus to the contrary through article talk page discussion or at 5040: 5005: 4913: 4214: 3871: 3827: 3778: 3761: 3692: 3656: 3634: 3602: 3588: 3544: 3514: 3498: 3484: 3466: 3446: 3432: 3402: 3383: 2656: 2160: 1709: 1691: 1676: 1650: 1636: 1583: 1515: 990:

ah! I guess I was indeed hasty, I merely checked the oldest version vs a few of the recent, thanks for the quick work!

13265: 12838:

Fair enough! If that were the case, I definitely wouldn't blame the bot hehe. Thanks for answering my silly question!

12813: 12740:, that idealistic statement indicates that you do not yet understand how Knowledge actually works. Knowledge articles 12622: 12567: 12143: 12124: 11992: 11783: 11767: 11647: 11511: 11300: 11174: 11032:

about how Knowledge works by making improvements to existing articles. Once you have understood core policies such as

10778: 10201: 10181: 10164: 9950: 9895: 9856: 9785:

The first thing to do in case of dispute is to discuss it with the person involved. You do not seem to have posted at

9548: 8640: 8613: 8417: 8117: 7935: 7915: 7379: 7330: 7236: 7040: 6954: 6837: 6823: 6809: 6795: 6781: 6767: 6442:

I avoid that at all costs! What I have seen made perfect sense historically and verifiable as legit. Thanks again.

5519: 5397: 5383: 4382: 4367: 2841:

New accounts cannot directly create articles. You will need to submit it for a review, typically this is done via the

2433:

the record. "I'm going to go over there and set the second-hand copy straight!" just doesn't have the same ring to it.

13487: 13440: 13182:

Dear Mike, this looks great, but i still need a way to give the reference... normally i would write "Amy Antin: Song

12923: 12644: 12537: 12516: 12500: 12482: 12458: 12442: 12068: 12014: 11967: 11520: 11104:

Hello, I have a great knowledge. You can find advice about when to quote directly, and how to present quotations, at

10520: 10327:

There isn't a need to link the word Knowledge in that article. I'm not sure why you received a final warning for it.

10103: 10000: 9834: 9798: 9687: 9677: 9663: 9358: 8498: 7926: 7836: 7504: 7490: 7365: 7350: 7316: 7302: 7273: 6753: 5948: 5782: 5767: 5753: 5737: 5270:

Can Knowledge stop using the term "Asian and Pacific Islander"? on the demographics section for pages on U.S. places?

4498:

notability. There are often references that don't do that. (and are therefore only usable as supplementary, if that)

4222: 4192: 4178: 4164: 4146: 3948: 3345: 3202: 2827: 2813: 1272: 1258: 1236: 1222: 925: 838: 511: 13323: 12980: 12236: 12208: 10893: 10811: 10690: 9982: 9481: 9459: 8957:, the draft was declined, not rejected. If you want to answer Teahouse questions, please try harder to be accurate. 8456: 7873: 7845: 7825: 7394: 7109: 7095: 7005: 5968: 5818: 5231: 4950: 4507: 4262: 4169:

I thought this had already been settled by the previous person's response. Obviously not. Sorry for misleading you.

3308: 3276: 3068: 2677: 2638: 2163:

elaborates on the fact that truth is not what determines an article's content here. You might also be interested in

1870: 1848: 1564: 1549: 1383: 1360: 519: 487:

as a page where the author of the only substantial content has requested deletion or blanked the page in good faith.

250: 13281: 12935: 12927: 12666: 11432: 11399: 11284: 11065: 11001: 9905: 9216: 8745: 8730: 8705: 8678: 8660: 8595: 8562: 8548: 7649: 6917:, it would not merit an article at this time. Knowledge is not a place for organizations to tell about themselves. 6884: 6870: 6367:

types of sources at best and can only be used in certain ways, and any interpretations of them might be considered

6117: 6026: 5601: 4840: 2754: 2740: 1908: 725: 697: 13002: 12607: 12095: 12080: 11909: 11879: 11854: 11833: 11798: 11718: 11686: 11671: 11584: 10995: 10766: 10282: 10255: 10071: 9874: 9305: 9288: 9274: 9253: 9239: 9055: 8434: 8377: 8352: 8300: 7965: 7149: 7135: 6975: 6657: 5924: 5192: 5172: 4982: 4400: 4350:

or your translation will be deleted. Just existing on another WP does not necessarily mean the article will stick

2555: 2528: 2502:- Appearing in publications with reputations such that even an adversary would have to admit they are compelling. 2445: 2263:

I also appreciated the points/feedback from TooManyFingers (talk) jlwoodwa (talk) Mjroots (talk) MarchJuly (talk)

2146: 2032: 2014: 1855: 429: 377: 314: 300: 13008: 12878: 12429:: When they don't clearly say it's free to use, and license information is not posted, that means it is not free. 12192: 11758:

at a college? Most of the top of the search results that I can see are from conservative or Republican websites.

11633: 11037: 10981: 10951: 10230: 10033: 9915: 9910: 9900: 9843:

It's simple false that I "reverted one of edits without providing any justification in the edit history ". Read

9630: 9603: 9511: 9495: 9441: 9424: 9121: 9063: 9013: 8813:" and in aiming to get it right. As Marchjuly suggested, I am happy to work with you in a collaborative way, per 8364: 7804: 7339:? That is why you are being reverted. Also, if something is obvious as you are implying, it need not be stated. ~ 6926: 6147: 6122: 6084: 6031: 5910: 5882: 5800: 5122:. That was pretty easy. What would take a little longer is determining which parts of what's stated are based on 3256: 2705: 2691: 2683: 2408: 2386: 2368: 2320: 2302: 2272: 2211: 1821: 1802: 1782: 1139: 1102: 1038: 13306: 12420: 11020:

Secondly, if you are connected with that novelist, you should read carefully the restrictions on editing with a

10917: 10884:

I'm afraid Knowledge hasn't invented time travel yet. You'll just have to wait 892 years for it to be archived.

9820: 8980: 8966: 8868: 8847: 8192:

https://www.unomaha.edu/office-of-strategic-marketing-and-communications/public-relations/what-is-newsworthy.php

6940: 6642: 6513: 6490: 6451: 6437: 6351: 6332: 6318: 6261: 6238: 6195: 6180: 6053: 5745: 5690: 4682: 4664: 4643: 4621: 4426: 4359: 3979:@jlwoodwa, "Kit" is the standard word for team clothing in sport in Britain: "uniform" is hardly ever used. See 3479:

also, you deleted his works that I have noted down 💀. I haven't completed it so, you will have some questions.

3325: 3106: 3089: 2910: 2183:

the BMJ affair. Also, since we were being attacked, it should be relevant to cite our response to the criticisms

1888: 1204: 940: 436: 13509: 13448: 12949: 12804:

The wind is not a person, so really you're fine. But could there be an error like this? Honestly I don't know.

12554: 12345: 12321: 12300: 12283: 12255: 11609: 11560: 11547: 11386: 11271: 11021: 10512: 10192:. It's a large and very active wikiproject. Wikiprojects are a good way to get involved with the community. -- 9714: 9208: 9199: 9163: 8778: 8570: 8532: 8306: 7883: 7569: 7551: 7465: 7429: 7336: 6691: 6677: 6067: 4873: 4594: 4489: 4463: 4248: 4234: 4132: 4114: 4015: 3049: 2474:

That isn't the only policy that might apply in every case, but for certain it is the primary one in this case.

2155:, unfortunately, Knowledge does not aim to capture the truth of a subject. Rather, it tries to summarize what " 2065: 1746: 1025:, I took a brief look at an article near the top of your list about a topic that interests me. That article is 235: 125: 11701: 11234:

of this discussion to see if anyone has suggestions for improvement. Moving over a redirect merely requires a

9415:

I'd suggest confining this to the COI noticeboard where you have already posted, to avoid duplicating effort.

8897: 8334: 8320: 7603: 7583: 6846:

Hello, IP user. Suppose you put in some information which you absolutely know from your experience is correct.

5261: 5157: 4767: 4720: 3174: 3032: 2993: 1730: 1620: 1602: 1067: 1017: 999: 981: 890: 804: 13257: 13173: 13080: 12847: 12833: 12792: 12779:

Maybe it's OK on Commons (imaginably it's a freedom-of-panorama matter), maybe not; the best place to ask is

12753: 12363: 11945: 11915: 11566: 11416: 10931: 10411: 10360: 10321: 10311: 9152: 8631:

it is tricky getting the Knowledge style down, but I am trying and appreciate anyone's advice on it. Thanks!

8528: 8494: 7703:

It's not really my strength. I tried last time and got a lot of blowback. So I'm asking for someone who can.

7520: 7443: 7156:

It's possible that citing a source for the naming process might be unnecessary because it's uncontroversial.

6731: 6713: 6572: 6567:, which you have already been pointed to in the comments, specifically says you should not use such sources. 6532: 5930: 5648: 5630: 5001: 4813: 4785: 4441: 3921: 3857: 3813: 3746: 3523:

No one is under any obligation to reply quickly. Do you have a particular need for a speedy resolution here?

3120: 2940: 2736: 1999: 1978: 1186: 1121: 1084: 967: 776: 573: 540: 454: 400: 337: 135: 13381: 10054: 9041: 8949: 7614:)". Click on the link within that. You're now at the redirect. Edit it, as you'd edit a regular article. -- 7595: 5856: 5680: 3188: 3152: 2577: 2164: 2159:" (as defined by Knowledge) have said about the topic, recognizing that those sources may get things wrong. 2098: 2077: 12152:, that unreferenced content was written by an editor with little experience who has not edited since 2017. 11925: 11407:

Also, I see I've already heeded your advice! Tagging the talk page with relevant wikiprojects (including {{

11053: 10396:

Welcome to the Teahouse. The user who left the message on your talk page has been indefinitely blocked for

10272: 9094: 9029: 7673: 7607: 5898: 5789:. Anyway check out the visual arts wikiproject page and other pages linked there including the talk page. ~ 5279: 5140: 5108: 5094: 4076: 4040: 3822:

No, its the writing of R. Lalrawna, not Dokhuma. If I am not saying what you mean, please clarify it more.

3337: 3260: 3219: 3074: 2887: 2873: 2858: 2229:

3) Ungar and Bray (2005) give a sociologist's analysis of the storm of criticism in letters to the journal.

1335:? Accounting for external bias isn't a hypothetical, it's been part of a core notability guideline since a 1169:

We don't aim to remove bias, since everyone has some sort of bias. However, as editors it is our policy to

848: 834: 713: 672: 11979:

Additionally, not calling it what it actually is goes against Knowledge's policy about political opinions.

11896:

the Einstein article is easy to support, because there's so much proof that Einstein has major importance.

10477:

Not every Knowledge editor is the world's best writer. Actually, none of them are. Feel free to copyedit.

7641: 7623: 7452:

are over a century old. Perhaps they could be be paraphrased for Knowledge purposes as "if you can't find

5635:

Yup, I'll join the Discord server later when I have some more free time to chat on there. Thanks for that!

4475: 2979: 2242: 2128: 2113: 13504: 12954:

It is unavoidable for there to be bias. Here are a couple of interesting essays about bias on Knowledge:

11144: 9807: 9172:

say about a subject. Knowledge itself is not regarded as a reliable source, because it is user-generated.

8931: 8833: 8822: 8766: 8690: 7679: 7083: 6218: 5824: 5177:

It was worse before. What I cut out was cited to nothing but press releases and other primary sources. I

4821: 4565: 4543: 4529: 1767: 1756: 1752: 754: 11258:

There's that big blue button that says "submit the draft for review". Click that and follow the process.

10720: 1177:. If there are two equally valid opinions, then the article can and should represent them both, without 184: 13208:

look suitable for this situation? (Scroll down to see the details of what's in them and how they work.)

12904: 12896: 12541: 10841:

Yeah. Now it's resolved. in fact, it was appeared for a moment and disappeared then after refreshing. —

10792: 10471: 9825:

But here it is, if I try to send him a message, he will revert, he has already reverted several times!

9387:

in good faith but keeps leaving messes behind for others to clean up, and shows no sign of improving. ~

9137: 8185:

I admit, the situation is not black and white, it is not mathematical. It is subject to interpretation.

7539: 6986: 5671:. These will greatly increase your chances of success compared to diving right in to article creation. 5479:" – You could be correct, but this would be a personal observation and speculative, which is a form of 5444: 5412: 5393: 5335: 5292: 4050: 3561:

in Knowledge's sense, because if they are not, every single moment spent on the draft is wasted effort.

3001: 2687: 2644: 2429:: I'm sure you'd agree that you came here to set the record straight. The problem is that Knowledge is 2156: 1879:. Perhaps you're thinking about the "Deleted edits" figure in the first section of that page of stats? 1481: 1447: 1413: 625: 9168:

Hello, Lagosman, and welcome to the Teahouse. A Knowledge article should be almost 100% based on what

5505:. All of this came from older U.S. census reports, which are still being cited and compared in tables. 4432:

In addition, make sure the references are notable and they are translated with neutral point of view.

3080:

OK, what is the question you want to ask? A reviewer will let you know the status of your draft soon.

1946: 190: 11530: 11261:

Though I will say with empty sections, it's doubtful people will accept it as ready for prime time.

11243: 10848: 8348: 8259: 8213: 8164: 8133: 8040: 7990: 7855: 3793:, regardless of who the publisher is and whatever addenda were added. You may be able to use it as a 2620:

Article is repeatedly getting edited and major content removed within 1 day between my lengthy edits.

2235: 2191: 651: 12268:

way to know. If I had the energy, I'd do a deeper dive into the literature, which no doubt exists. ―

10801:, a limited amount of uncontroversial factual information may be added from non-independent sources. 10741: 9110:. Your username won't change unless you request it, and the response time isn't unreasonably slow. ~ 8098:

Knowledge page for Alan Watt, an author whose main point was to suggest people think for themselves.

6995:, a limited amount of uncontroversial factual information may be added from non-independent sources. 6411:

gets added that probably shouldn't have been added. So, if you come across some content, you can be

2499:- The reporters' voices are primary; not interviewing you, but reporting on developments in the case 742: 13464: 13436: 13402: 13341: 13319: 13253: 13220: 13169: 13136: 13118: 13098: 13090: 13076: 12809: 12691: 12631:

points out, a "passionate" plot summary is inappropriate because of the core content policy of the

12618: 12530: 12496: 12478: 12438: 12359: 12261: 12243: 12204: 12139: 12041: 11941: 11905: 11875: 11829: 11498: 11445: 10860: 10453: 10177: 9946: 9830: 9673: 9644: 9538: 9377: 9322: 9204:

Thanks - I've learnt something I need ideally minimum three good sources independent of Knowledge.

9141: 9074: 8937: 8609: 7190: 7161: 7105: 7056: 6727: 6709: 6606: 6568: 6528: 5814: 5464: 5430: 5313: 5055: 5025: 4997: 4503: 4410: 4396: 4287: 4174: 4142: 3955: 3715:

From what I understand, the only significant addition that is only present in the second book is a

3380: 3198: 3064: 2936: 2823: 2750: 2634: 2551: 2507: 2479: 2441: 2142: 2042: 2028: 2010: 1844: 1760: 1705: 1672: 1632: 1579: 1560: 1511: 1379: 1315: 1297: 1254: 1246: 1242: 1218: 1182: 921: 689: 569: 536: 477:

Okay, I just added the template you gave me - I hope I did it correctly. This message comes up now:

450: 396: 333: 116: 6985:

prompted or fed information on behalf of the subject, have chosen to publish about the subject in

4612:, it looks like the disruptive IP user was blocked instead of adding semi=protection to the page. 386:

Apologies, I misunderstood the type of picture you had uploaded. The principles are the same. For

12957: 12908: 12674: 11488: 11428: 11342: 11337:) but I will try my darnest to respect wikipedia's rules and help make the article encyclopedic. 11170: 11033: 11025: 10136: 9583: 9507: 9477: 9437: 9009: 8452: 7911: 7532: 6586: 6581:

so what i do to publish that article as no source is available on internet besides Raj era books

6550: 6509: 6496: 6226: 6094: 6003: 5944: 5878: 5495:

itself is very broad, but why make it even broader...by dragging another continent into the label

5276: 4919: 4072: 4036: 4026: 3998: 3300: 3238: 3023:

isn't based on a solid understanding of those policies and standards, it won't hold much weight.

2382: 2316: 2298: 2173: 1056: 639: 515: 259: 11569:

and use it to propose changes. However, given the dearth of significant coverage about you, the

8011:. Write it forward. That means, find reliable source coverage of him that is independent of him 7763:

Really dude, this was a trivial edit that you could have done yourself. I just did it for you. ~

7720:

suggests that it's a conflict-of-interest matter. If you have a conflict of interest concerning

7335:

Research of your own? Surely you must have found some sources then. Are you aware of our policy

4001:: I don't know if this entirely answers your question, but it's probably a good start at least: 709: 13474: 13191: 12919: 12885: 11469: 11412: 11366: 10939: 9710: 9336: 9301: 9284: 9249: 8843: 8810: 8741: 7500: 7375: 7361: 7326: 7312: 7269: 7244: 7232: 7218: 7204: 7175: 7145: 7036: 7022: 6950: 6936: 6880: 6833: 6819: 6805: 6791: 6777: 6763: 6749: 6504:

having RAJ Era sources and i also added disclaimer about that, after that it was not accepted.

6478: 6408: 4910: 3038: 3037:

Hello, LuciaS23, and welcome to the Teahouse. In addition to what others have said, please see

1938: 1875:

I'm not aware of any such score. There are lots of nuggets of information about users though -

1499: 1178: 449:

on each file's page. Alternatively, get the artist to approve retention, as I mentioned above.

213: 8626:

I made some changes based on your suggestions. Initially I wanted this to be a section in the

7686: 2759:

Citoid, the citation tool integrated in VisualEditor's visual and wikitext modes, may be what

1160:

How does wikipedia prevent political or religious bias from affecting accuracy of information?

13245: 13186:

in "First Song in the Morning", 2020" - but then the reference to the book is missing still.

13148: 12975: 12577: 12377: 12091: 12055: 12007: 11814: 11778: 11755: 11713: 11666: 11628: 11579: 11507: 11419:) was one of the first things I did after creating the draft, since I saw it recommended in " 11330: 11296: 11152: 11017:

on English Knowledge, you will not succeed and you should not put any further time into this.

10875: 10832: 10817: 10500: 10442: 10278: 9393: 9353: 9116: 9051: 8655: 8590: 8543: 8412: 8315: 8233: 8149: 8084: 8050: 8021: 7930: 7868: 7840: 7820: 7769: 7729: 7485: 7345: 7297: 7252: 6672: 6129:

I just reorganized the Knowledge "Galena and Chicago Union Railroad" history sections titled:

5964: 5920: 5795: 5711: 5187: 5152: 4311: 4297: 4005: 3973: 3417: 3349: 3170: 2989: 2967: 2905: 2652: 2341:

There is a typo in the middle of the para on the BMJ affair (line 7): "on the its conclusion"

1903: 1797: 1777: 1687: 1646: 1616: 1477: 1466: 1443: 1432: 1409: 1332: 972:

Don't be too hasty - I just pulled the English version out of the page history from 2023. --

587: 554: 468: 415: 373: 310: 246: 13067:

editor you should only make very limited changes to the article now it is in mainspace (see

12744:

contribute to notability. Instead, they neutrally describe topics that are already notable.

12109: 11614:

I did a search on Google News and found a few obituaries for people with the same name, and

9541:. I see that you are now discussing this issue with the reverting edtior on your talk page. 8339:

Yes, Hoary, his website is original-looking and unique. Originality and uniqueness are good.

7749:

If you aren't able/willing, I'm sure someone else will assist. It's a pretty simple thing.

6375:

sources, however, can often be cited as long as the secondary sources is considered to be a

2896:

331dot put a submit button at the top of your sandbox draft so you can submit it for review.

1957:

when making your request because either could easily be misconstrued. As long as you remain

13304: 12895:

and submitted for assessment, or created directly and then (nearly always) assessed by the

12843: 12603: 12120: 11963: 11517: 11408: 11356: 11308: 11239: 11202:

You still need to add more independent reliable references for your article to be notable.

11105: 11088: 11045: 10991: 10965: 10842: 10824: 10798: 10774: 10449: 10448:

Hi IP 2600:8800:9E00:D700:2C1C:F56E:3915:5471. You could try reading the Knowledge article

10197: 10160: 10067: 10050: 10029: 9870: 9852: 9786: 9757: 9599: 9546: 9107: 9082: 9078: 9021: 8895: 8674: 8636: 8558: 8391: 7851: 7439: 7390: 7321:

and how could the town Huntingdonshire was named after be any different then Huntingdon?💀

6992: 6282: 6111: 6020: 5936: 5890: 5644: 5354: 5327: 3724: 3252: 1884: 1457: 1098: 1013: 977: 886: 820: 772: 643: 10169:

Thanks Nick. Was having trouble replying to you before. (The reply button was greyed out).

10118:

have you found a Knowledge article about a war involving the US which is not on that list?

9594:. You can adjust the widths of the columns by changing the width number. Happy editing! 7898:. You can also find short but more general discussions about naming rape victims, such as 7479:

an encyclopedia works, then perhaps you should, as you say, rethink your life's choices. ~

7170:

every edit i do without sources gets deleted. Ill even name the people too theres so much

3539:

And also from the Criminal charges, I think one can take a guess to what made him notable

2568:

for anything. I just linked to a help page that I thought you might benefit from reading.

1791:

article, and I cannot see that the sources you cite support the assertion you're making. ~

226: 8: 13483: 13422: 13387: 13162: 13132: 13110: 13094: 13047: 13030: 12998: 12986: 12900: 12821: 12770:, your question actually raises a number of questions. One is of the copyright status of 12749: 12640: 12512: 12454: 12416: 12355: 12296: 12251: 12157: 12076: 11207: 11183: 11133: 11113: 11061: 10977: 10969: 10947: 10807: 10482: 10461: 10251: 10173: 10109: 10099: 9996: 9942: 9826: 9816: 9803: 9794: 9770: 9659: 9573: 9486:

My suggestion was simply that, out a desire to keep things consolidated in one location.

9455: 9408: 9318: 9195: 9176: 9159: 9037: 8993: 8976: 8962: 8945: 8726: 8701: 8430: 8049:

His wife's desire to have a Knowledge article, or not, doesn't matter. We have a policy:

7725: 7563: 7101: 7001: 6866: 6486: 6447: 6433: 6392: 6384: 6380: 6372: 6364: 6347: 6328: 6314: 6301:, then it's probably better to try and sort things out through talk page discussion than 6298: 6257: 6234: 6222: 6191: 6176: 6164: 6143: 6080: 6063: 5906: 5862: 5723: 5668: 5439:

Okay, but why is it more preferable to use the old, outdated term over the current term?

5227: 5168: 4938: 4869: 4854: 4716: 4678: 4660: 4639: 4617: 4485: 4437: 4244: 4207: 4188: 4160: 4128: 4062: 3988: 3938: 3771: 3574: 3371: 3272: 3212: 3184: 3102: 3085: 3045: 2819: 2809: 2760: 2746: 2712: 2232:

4) There are two articles by me in Quillette giving a detailed account of the BMJ affair.

1974: 1942: 1742: 1311: 1278: 1268: 1250: 1232: 1214: 1200: 1080: 1034: 936: 679: 355: 296: 12820:

If you were instead "Scirocco745", and you were spotted augmenting/debasing the article

12491:: Just hoping you see this; I don't want you to think removing it was the final answer. 6217:, and disagreements over article content are expected to be resolved in accordance with 4740:

As for the refs, I added (probably too many) citations after feedback at the FL nom for

13362: 12873: 12670: 12587: 12550: 12340: 12316: 12278: 12231: 12187: 11605: 11543: 11484: 11424: 11404:

Ah I see. I'll try to work on fleshing out the placeholder sections, which should help.

11382: 11338: 11334: 11267: 11238:, but a page mover may hesitate to fufill such a request if the draft appears unready. 11225: 11182:, it doesn't reek of self-promo/autobio to me. Just a poorly put together filmography. 11166: 10913: 10889: 10508: 10380: 10226: 9978: 9618: 9503: 9473: 9433: 9270: 9235: 8814: 8712: 8581: 8448: 8422: 8071: 8008: 7907: 7547: 7129: 7091: 6971: 6582: 6560: 6546: 6520: 6505: 6417: 6388: 6049: 5686: 5548: 5515: 5379: 5104: 5050:

necessarily the most practical advice, just would be a more comfortable introduction.)

5036: 4978: 4946: 4836: 4781: 4590: 4459: 4230: 4107: 4022: 3963: 3341: 3313: 3291: 3264: 3229: 3028: 2878:

Your account is old enough, but you need 10 edits to create articles, you only have 5.

2673: 2573: 2392: 2378: 2333: 2326: 2312: 2294: 2186: 2169: 2073: 1950: 1876: 1866: 1817: 1545: 1356: 668: 498:

If this file does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, please remove this notice.

263: 55: 47: 8936:

The article was declined for lack of reliable independent sources. You can go through

8649:

The "Press coverage" section seems out of place in the middle of a list of examples. ~

7017:

I'd recommend keeping note of sources that they show on tv about that specific report

5592:

might seem better, but responses to suggestions etc posted there are rare indeed.) --

3336:

From googling, he's a 22-y-o musician with one full album released. You need to study

346:

Oh, right. Without looking at the article, I assumed this was about pictures of works

62: 13201: 13187: 13155: 12627:

The guideline calling for a plot summary of 400 to 700 words is excellent advice. As

11697: 11465: 11162: 11014: 10827:. I don't see issues now or in the version at the time so I guess it's resolved now. 10747: 10698: 10407: 10397: 10356: 10334: 10307: 10189: 10151: 9636: 9626: 9332: 9312: 9297: 9280: 9260: 9245: 9224: 8853: 8839: 8788: 8754: 8737: 8718: 8524: 8510: 8490: 7903: 7637: 7591: 7461: 7076: 6360: 6302: 6294: 6205: 6160: 5999: 5991: 5618: 5257: 4894: 4802: 4756: 3917: 3853: 3809: 3794: 3742: 3670: 3620: 3558: 3391: 3367: 3193:

You meant weasel words. Weevil words would be quite different, but maybe funnier. :)

3162: 2869: 2732: 2715:: Welcome to the Teahouse. Your use of terminology is confusing; what do you mean by 1897:

and gets deleted, and that increases the deleted edit count for all those editors.. ~

324: 150: 5995:

your talk page. There, you could discuss the matter with the editor about your edit.

4102: 181: 13373:

by changing the writing style, as it currently reads too much like a CV or resume.

12970: 12945: 12892: 12716: 12573: 12562: 12373: 12351: 12177:. Wouldn't it be great if there was a site-wide consensus on this? One can dream. ― 12149: 12112: 12087: 12064: 12051: 12029: 12002: 11850: 11773: 11708: 11661: 11623: 11574: 11555: 11516:

I've nominated the redirect for deletion and can review the AFC once that happens.

11503: 11394: 11316: 11292: 11279: 11148: 11083:

it summarizes it accurately. Now you can remove the "lead too short" tag. Done! --

10927: 10906: 10871: 10828: 10297: 10274: 9698: 9564:

You can centre the data, but I think you have to do so in each row separately. See

9491: 9420: 9388: 9348: 9111: 9047: 8927: 8666: 8650: 8623: 8585: 8577: 8538: 8440: 8407: 8310: 8280: 8228: 8144: 8118:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vhrYRzvVssM&list=PL0273C286EBCA0464&index=1

8079: 8016: 7922: 7863: 7832: 7815: 7764: 7721: 7480: 7340: 7292: 7247: 7011: 6922: 6687: 6667: 6653: 6638: 6306: 6278: 5960: 5940: 5916: 5790: 5707: 5676: 5663: 5182: 5147: 4891: 4552: 4539: 4378: 4355: 3843: 3528: 3413: 3166: 3116: 2985: 2924: 2900: 2883: 2854: 2842: 2648: 2601: 2524: 2404: 2364: 2268: 2207: 2124: 2109: 2094: 1995: 1966: 1898: 1792: 1772: 1528:

If you want to mention an HTML tag (rather than use it), there's a handy template:

1461: 1427: 1289:

exactly the kind of thing that, if it started, could bring Knowledge crashing down.

1117: 1063: 995: 963: 863: 800: 721: 583: 564: 550: 531: 507: 464: 425: 411: 383: 369: 320: 306: 242: 12221:(Moral: We are limited by our model of decision-making—this is but one example.) ― 12219:

variances. Before you could sneeze, it would be overly complex or uselessly vague.

11376:

might have more), so they get notified when the article is submitted for review.

10495:

English, which uses prepositions with verbs far more than AmEng does. Bare appeal

5483:. We couldn't use this in any way on Knowledge unless it was directly backed by a 5349: 3665:

It is very clearly not independent, the biography subject wrote the book himself.

255:

Hello, CrissCollab. There are two ways for images to be used in English Knowledge.

224: 13300: 13205: 13068: 13059: 12839: 12829: 12798: 12788: 12767: 12738:

this page would contribute to his notability, free of the influence of government

12599: 12470: 12116: 11959: 11084: 10957: 10770: 10528: 10218: 10193: 10156: 10063: 10046: 10025: 9928: 9881: 9866: 9848: 9722: 9595: 9542: 9528:

Clarification on Link Removal and Tone of Feedback Regarding Demidov Contribution

9148: 9090: 8891: 8774: 8670: 8632: 8627: 8601: 8554: 8506: 8387: 8373: 8330: 8325:

But the formatting/design has a certain period charm. (1996 or so, perhaps?). --

8296: 7961: 7737: 7694: 7669: 7619: 7522: 7435: 7425: 7386: 6421: 6396: 6244:

to correct it , I think we would both agree that is wrong. Disagreement on the '

6098: 6007: 5763: 5640: 5626: 5614: 5597: 5502: 5136: 5090: 5082: 5021: 4992: 4960: 4887: 4561: 4525: 4276: 3612: 3321: 3148: 2975: 2932: 2596:

Make sure you log in when posting, so your posts are properly attributed to you.

2226:

2) 2 editors defended their publication of the article and responded to criticism

1958: 1880: 1608: 1598: 1506:

Knowledge only uses the straight type of quotation marks, for technical reasons.

1442:

Can you provide a bit more detail as to how to use the Wikidata item link thing?

1344: 1108: 1094: 1009: 987: 973: 882: 852: 791: 786: 768: 750: 432: 10369:

Yeah, those edits are not disruptive and no admin would block you for them. The

9991:. Make sure you read the notes at the top of the page carefully before posting. 8769:. It's been 16 years since anyone discussed a proposed or actual edit there. -- 7952:, I think you may be mistaking Knowledge (which is where we find ourselves) for 3705:

is trying to make is that the bulk of the content remains autobiographical. The

954:

I feel the need to bring it up because in my review of the pages, I came across

828:

there is no consensus on what constitutes "too few" links. Use editor discretion

13479: 13418: 13064: 13026: 12994: 12745: 12708: 12636: 12632: 12558: 12508: 12488: 12473:

is one important place to look. It may have much better news than what I gave.

12450: 12426: 12412: 12292: 12247: 12153: 12072: 11551: 11390: 11275: 11203: 11130: 11109: 11057: 10973: 10943: 10803: 10478: 10457: 10247: 10236: 10214: 10113: 10095: 10011: 9992: 9970: 9812: 9790: 9766: 9655: 9569: 9465: 9451: 9191: 9155: 9033: 8972: 8958: 8954: 8941: 8919: 8798: 8794: 8762: 8722: 8697: 8444: 8426: 7902:, on the BLP talk page. The policy most relevant to this situation is probably 7557: 6997: 6963: 6862: 6482: 6443: 6429: 6412: 6400: 6371:

if written in Knowledge's voice; personal letters which have been discussed in

6356: 6343: 6324: 6310: 6268: 6253: 6230: 6214: 6200: 6187: 6172: 6154: 6139: 6090: 6076: 6059: 5987: 5956: 5902: 5852: 5741: 5223: 5164: 5115: 4865: 4850: 4726: 4712: 4674: 4670: 4656: 4652: 4635: 4627: 4613: 4609: 4603: 4481: 4433: 4240: 4184: 4156: 4124: 4058: 3984: 3934: 3570: 3283: 3268: 3180: 3081: 3041: 2920: 2805: 1970: 1738: 1264: 1228: 1210: 1196: 1170: 1090: 1076: 1044: 1030: 955: 946: 932: 664: 443: 392: 351: 329: 292: 270: 8513:, and that persisting in such an endeavour may bring their actions before the 8382:

I would just add that redlinks are not permitted on disambiguation pages, per

6700:

IP editor. Knowledge is, by consensus based on a number of policies. Of these

3866:

but that section was not created by Dokhuma, so it cannot be an autobiography

222: 179: 13498: 13366: 13365:, where, at least, you gave the additional context that you are asking about 13072: 13055: 13022: 12864: 12733: 12701: 12546: 12331: 12307: 12288: 12269: 12222: 12178: 11619: 11599: 11590: 11539: 11378: 11373: 11323: 11312: 11263: 11235: 11179: 11049: 10909: 10885: 10701: 10504: 10222: 10007: 9988: 9974: 9762: 9266: 9231: 9205: 9187: 9101: 9070: 9025: 8911: 8517:. Please read the relevant information on those pages for more information. — 8514: 8383: 8252: 8224: 7543: 7453: 7124: 7087: 6967: 6914: 6564: 6404: 6274: 6209: 6168: 6045: 5894: 5806: 5544: 5511: 5469: 5388:

I'm trying to follow your advice on combining two rows but I'm stuck. Sorry.

5375: 5249: 5119: 5100: 4964: 4942: 4832: 4791: 4777: 4631: 4586: 4455: 4347: 4330:

Can I Duplicate An Existing Article on German Knowledge to English Knowledge?

4226: 3959: 3363: 3024: 2928: 2846: 2669: 2626: 2569: 2469: 2069: 1954: 1894: 1862: 1856:

Here is the kind of notice I found that made me think he is a serial reverter

1827: 1813: 1541: 1352: 731: 11999:

Talk:Trump_International_Golf_Club_shooting#Requested_move_15_September_2024

10664:"Social Environment, Dresses and Food of Two Main Communities before Exodus" 10499:

used in BrEng in legal language, but it isn't common usage. Please see e.g.

7047:

You won't find objectivity, but at least you can be thoughtful and diligent.

6931:

i agree. It primarily depends on how famous it really is to be on wikipedia

2923:

is very useful in showing notability, since it was a review by Usherwood in

1755:

is the edit that was reverted. The reasoning is given in the revert summary

11935: 11929: 11735: 11731: 11693: 11570: 11098: 11041: 10961: 10401: 10350: 10328: 10301: 10140: 9622: 9169: 9017: 9001: 8915: 8518: 8484: 8288: 7633: 7587: 7475: 7457: 6910: 6705: 6541:

There are no other sources present on the internet or in any books besides

6524: 6425: 6387:. So, if you're considered to clearly be an established content expert per 6376: 6368: 6290: 6286: 6041: 5886: 5484: 5480: 5253: 5241: 5214: 5123: 4795: 4749: 4730: 4704: 4451: 3911: 3847: 3803: 3736: 3702: 3666: 3649: 3616: 3565: 2963: 2726: 1531: 1343:

achievable or desirable, but I don't think efforts in that direction (like

1174: 1052: 1026: 439:

you uploaded to en:Knowledge. Deletion is achieved by placing the template

277:

their own work, and releasing it; or they can email the WMF as detailed at

11596:

Knowledge:Articles_for_deletion#How_to_nominate_a_single_page_for_deletion

11456:

This type of situation requires admin help, which can be requested here:

10188:

By the way, if you're interested in military history, I recommend joining

10094:

corresponding WikiProject(s) pointing to the discussion you have started.

7662:

police officers from the Walnut Creek California Police Department{{Efn|}}

7307:

Huntingdon shire wikipedia, research of my own, and i live in st neots 🙂

6293:

is to encourage discussion as a way to resolve content disputes and avoid

13414: 13375: 13235:

Can I include a hyperlink to the copyrighted image as an inline citation?

12941: 12712: 12447:

Got it. I'll remove the logo to prevent any problems. Thanks for the info

11010:

You are welcome to contribute, but I would give you a couple of cautions:

10374: 9487: 9469: 9448: 9416: 8923: 8865: 8830: 8758: 8208:

Respectfully, may I ask if you are you more into the past or the future?

6959: 6918: 6723: 6701: 6683: 6649: 6634: 6630: 6395:, then you could possibly add citations to your own work if there are no 5672: 5030: 4972: 4447: 4343: 4253:

the photo has no copyright notice , does that make it public domain?....

3838: 3790: 3524: 3223: 3112: 2879: 2850: 2597: 2105: 1195:

Bias has been eliminated by the principle of Neutral Point of View (NPV)

1113: 1072: 1059: 1022: 991: 959: 873: 859: 811: 796: 764: 717: 676: 288: 12659: 11502:

not be available refs for those sections. Otherwise, interesting topic.

11291:

It's certainly a viable topic with some decent sourcing available/used.

11147:

has been Declined five times, so it may be time to abandon your effort.

7660:. That's not permissible. (If you must have a link there, then perhaps: 7213:

They need to realise the actual truth that we're currently pointing out

6814:

Youll endlessly be scrolling youtube when you search st neots skatepark

6471: 6135:"The 1864 Great Consolidation of the Chicago & NorthWestern Railway" 5785:. It still has sub-pages under the old contemporary arts title, such as 5477:

even if the 1990 numbers are different, I doubt that the percentages are

2351: 632: 13241: 13058:

on 13 September, so I find it a bit odd that another new page reviewer

13051: 12825: 12784: 12358:

which is the established guidance that answers your original question.

10524: 9694: 9565: 9086: 8802: 8770: 8576:

The reviewer is correct, it's an essay, not an article. Have a look at

8369: 8326: 8292: 7957: 7733: 7690: 7665: 7615: 7421: 6289:

explaining why. This, however, isn't already the case. The idea behind

6169:

you should try and sort things out through article talk page discussion

5915:

Having an infobox or images has no impact on getting a draft approved.

5759: 5730: 5622: 5593: 5540: 5132: 5099:

Thank you for confirming. And wow, thanks all for the edits already! --

5086: 5078: 4991:

One other pitfall you need to beware of is that the reference may be a

4557: 4521: 3317: 3144: 2971: 2629:: This information you've been adding, what sources does it come from? 2243:

https://acsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.3322/caac.21858

1594: 1423: 782: 746: 11048:, and experienced how we handle disagreements with other editors (the 11024:(If you are actually that novelist yourself, please don't try it: see 11013:

First, unless you can show that the novelist meets the conditions for

10345:

Welcome to the Teahouse. It appears that the user who warned you (and

9024:, and experienced how we handle disagreements with other editors (the 8400:

using non-SPS written by a BLP's subject for claim about third parties

5893:, and experienced how we handle disagreements with other editors (the 1607:

Thanks for this - the article I want to put categories on is this one

1126:

can you look for the opposite? the nearly orphan articles, such that

13089:

Sincere thanks to you for the clarification and for the observation @

13018: 9935: 7953: 7051:

civil. Compromise can be necessary, in terms of how quickly you act.

5848: 5323: 4925:

Sometimes, but not always. For example, if the article currently has

4480:

I was referring to a strong independent reference, so yes! Reliable.

4470: 1788: 195: 12129:

Yes, I can see why. To me, Strunk and White is valuable (if at all)

6800:

For clarification they are both good known skateparks across the uk

6527:. See also the comments others have addded to the top of the draft. 4933:, and you delete the second sentence, you should keep the citation: 3802:

No; I am not an AFC reviewer and I have no intention of being one. —

2338:

Also, do you see how to incorporate a sentence about Ungar and Bray?

227: 92:

Your go-to place for friendly help with using and editing Knowledge.

12594: 10456:

or simply just Googling whatever specific information you need. --

9586:: In that table, the width of each column is defined with the code 9085:. (Or so I believe. I may be making one or more mistakes here.) -- 7454:

significant coverage in reliable, third-party sources about a topic

6758:

check the page about "list of skateparks" and go to united kingdom

5734:

Wikipedia_talk:Notability#RfC:_Notability_and_British_Rail_stations

5639:

the talk page along with the other claims I find in the same vein.

4744:, where one user critiqued an already-detailed lead for not having 3597:

btw, what do you think should be the minimum number of references?

3012: 1724:

A serial reverter just reverted me. How do I address it graciously?

763:

why I've had so many watchlist notifications about this category. @

10956:

Hello, Lester1960, and welcome to the Teahouse. I presume this is

10797:

If enough material is cited from independent sources to establish

6991:

If enough material is cited from independent sources to establish

6861:

That is we we prefer (and in many cases required) citing sources.

3980: 2236:

https://quillette.com/2023/09/15/dogmatism-data-and-public-health/

2192:

https://quillette.com/2023/09/15/dogmatism-data-and-public-health/

1655:" ' (The ones we want, whether for quotation marks or apostrophes) 281:. But you cannot do it (though you could be the one to upload it). 10695:

Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland

10235:

Hello, Waldohammer. Thank you for pointing out this vandalism to

7123:

What type of "largest" is it meant to be? Area? Population? 🇺🇦

6726:

They were blocked on 7 September but are currently not, I think.

4827:

This used to be common on Knowledge, but is now discouraged. See

3679:

no. The the person Dr James, wrote the book Ṭawng Un Hrilhfiahna

3316:, it was unthinking use of the "Reply" function, most likely. -- 2725:

offers great advice for dealing with citing and external links. —

2223:

1) page should point out that the BMJ did not retract the article

1209:

I don't think it's true to say that Knowledge is free from bias,

27: 10291:

Why can't you just delete an article instead of "cleaning it up"

8227:. As for my username, see the second sentence on my user page. ~ 5781:

The contemporary art wikiproject has apparently been renamed to

5776:

How to Connect with Fellow Wikipedians for Collaborative Writing

1949:. If you do decide to post on a noticeboard, I suggest avoiding 10668:

International Journal of Multidisciplinary and Current Research

10370: 10088:

Wanting to add to the List of wars involving the United States.

9555:

Orlando International Airport - Annual traffic table adjustment

9537:

You added bare url with no explanation whatsoever. Please read

7100:

Thank you for your help! This was just what I was looking for.

5998:

You can use a variety of bots to clean up citations, including

5219: 5210: 5181:

citations to independent sources in the legal issues section. ~

4446:

I think that's slightly incorrect. References don't need to be

4282:

Where on Knowledge did you try? Which CNN article do you mean?

12242:

As for the 8th grade reading level, that style belongs on the

12001:, where there is a lengthy discussion about exactly that. :) 11866:

that they are talking about. Knowledge is looking for reports

10268: 8159:

Thank you. I will be studying your quick and kind reply, Sir.

7860:

Talk:2024 Kolkata rape and murder incident#RfC: Name of victim

6501: 3009:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Fabio Mancini (2nd nomination)

228: 196: 11483:

for the article to use it instead of higher quality sources.

11007:

Hello, IP user, and welcome to the Teahouse and to Knowledge.

10866:

This is the encyclopedia Knowledge. We have an article about

4219:

c:File:Soft Cell (1983 Sire publicity photo) 02.jpg § Summary

3687:. If you are still not clear, just ask it very specifically. 13282:"This figure illustrates dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease" 11440:

well recognized yet, or unofficial symptoms to the article.

11218:

How should I move Draft:Childhood dementia to the mainspace?

9151:

was written for further sample on how to edit yours to meet

7245:

http://abcounties.com/huntingdonshire/about-huntingdonshire/

11843: 11742:

that have biographical information about you? For example

9621:

is a list of all categories on English-language Knowledge.

5245: 4634:: Turns out another user will have to protect the article. 74: 10139:, or the limitations of our alternative editing tool, the 7082:

or a similar template, then the procedure is described at

6828:

And adrenaline alley is Europe's largest indoor skatepark

5468:

above should solve that concern, assuming you can achieve

13393:

I doubt if a submission button is really needed today ...

13041:

Adding more citations and removing a maintenance template

11739: 10540: 10491:

Please bear in mind that "appeal against" is standard in

9966: 9639:. It has several options for seeing where everything is. 9128:

This article needs additional citations for verification.

8477: 8253:

https://reasonator.toolforge.org/?lang=es&q=Q90023730

7199:

Nah they need to accept not everything had to be sourced

6913:

have written about your organization and shown how it is

6744:

while they were doing that i was just learning it myself

5758:

Thanks! I have also posted this at the Wikiproject page.

5222:. This is the main issue as pointed out by the reviewer. 5071:

Yes, it's soporific corporate advertising speak. Sample:

3015:'s closing statement? In short, deletion discussions are 2793: 2721: 1057:

the state of the article when I had initially assessed it

10972:

are a bit different, and I don't fully understand them.

9081:

in some Knowledge. With that accomplished, you become a

9077:

in some Knowledge. With that accomplished, you become a

5981:

Editing and creating content re Iowa railroads 1850-1880

5736:

may be of interest to you. Consider asking for input at

3731:

for citations will be limited due to its proximity with

3218:

You can create an account. Or you can leave an entry at

12086:

starting point to help me out. Thank you so much!!! ❤️

10523:: there'd be a greater appetite for answering them. -- 10267:"Related Articles" is a feature of the mobile version: 7578:

Adding a template to a redirect using the visual editor

6945:

and also as how wikipedia defines it, as you mentioned

4971:. Good luck, and feel free to ask follow-up questions, 4890:

and does not add any understanding for the reader. See

3557:

with the references that establish that the subject is

663:, If it's a simple and uncontroversial change, you can 388:

File:Prosia DeAnn L Oasis LineEtching 12x12 in 2022.jpg

13361:

You also asked this question under a help template on

12404:

Inquiry about images (logos from student competitions)

9464:

Alright. Noted with thanks. Appreciate the direction @

9230:

about where you are seeing a number go up or down?) --

8247: 8007:

and submit it for review, but don't write the article

3770:

Also, can you please review my draft pls? the link is

2647:

need to discuss this on the Talk page of the article.

2566:

suggest that Knowledge can avoid taking responsibility

185: 10624:

harvnb error: no target: CITEREFEhsan_Yarshater2015 (

9987:

Fox de Quintal: the place to request such actions is

9244:

Oh ok. I thought there was some kind of point system

7456:, don't start a Knowledge article about that topic". 5955:

Do you work for The Destination Channel? If so, then

5740:. You can perhaps pick a few bad ones (3-4 perhaps), 5460:

also wouldn't be accurate for labeling the newer data

1787:

Actually, I may have acted too soon. You created the

328:

do the uploads on their behalf. This is explained at

191: 13215:

done it right, but it would be better than nothing.

10968:

in English Knowledge - though the requirements for

9738:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

8888:

Knowledge:Orphan#Step 1: Finding an orphaned article

7067:

Editing references to provide Internet archive links

3553:

Hello, I have a great knowledge. Writing an article

3441:

also, I forgot to add why he was notable. sorry. 😅

2334:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC188404/

2187:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC188404/

1667:

I hope that makes sense and actually works for you.

13431:Sorry – I didn't think to check for more articles. 9293:

lol my average edit change number is -432.4 bytes.

6915:

notable as Knowledge defines a notable organization

5847:. (Click on the link to see the available fields.) 5326:page will say Asian and Pacific Islander, but it's 13093:. I will consider the addition via the Talk Page. 11124:I do not understand why my draft is being rejected 7610:. Near the top of this, you see "(Redirected from 6204:you're asking about the latter, then pages can be 5353:percentage just as the sources do. Have a look at 3842:is a source that can establish wikinotability for 2356:Once again, I really appreciate your work on this. 1735:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring 1339:. I agree in principle that absolute parity isn't 737:I looked at your list of contributions and picked 13473:The best place by far to discuss these issues is 12354:I don't think that anyone has yet pointed you to 12260:I think you're relegating half of our readers to 8992:Like most beginners, you have written your draft 6903:Draft:Macedonian Student Organization in Slovenia 6038:you could ask anyone that you think is interested 5787:Knowledge:WikiProject Contemporary Art/Notability 5129:templates to warn of sourcing problems/inadequacy 2239:a small-to-negligible effect on cancer incidence. 2199:Any more suggestions will be greatly appreciated. 171:Completed questions are archived within 2-3 days. 13496: 11165:be writing about oneself in the first place. -- 8856:; I have replied to your entry at the article's 8765:suggests, you and Pdebee should discuss this on 6323:That does sound ugly, and unproductive. Thanks. 5503:Knowledge is not a publisher of original thought 5322:Yes, newer census data split the AA and PI. The 3157:IF you intend to try again, title your draft as 11956:c:Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Ethiopia 11656:I have nominated the article for deletion. See 11573:article could also be nominated for deletion. ~ 10964:. This is not normally sufficient to establish 10619: 10588:harvnb error: no target: CITEREFʿAthamina1998 ( 9754:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 3344:. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 3179:A lot of weavil words and exaggeration sighted 13017:Unless you can find the answer in our article 12175:skills, and not to show how smart Knowledge is 11974:Second Attempted assassination of Donald Trump 11954:We have information on Ethiopian copyright at 10647:harvnb error: no target: CITEREFBosworth2012 ( 8005:Draft:Alan Watt (author and radio commentator) 6625:Why is it so vital to cite stuff and source it 5330:for the 2020 statistic splits the two groups. 4969:Knowledge:Citing sources#Text–source integrity 4155:free, and they too are from 1980s press kits. 3723:could be used as a source if it satisfies the 667:, otherwise you should discuss changes on the 12653:Help with validity of sources and notability? 12111:. I was surprised - I expected to find it in 10612:harvnb error: no target: CITEREFAnthony2011 ( 10564:harvnb error: no target: CITEREFMaclean1984 ( 9741:A summary of the conclusions reached follows. 8904:Hia, i would like to know why it was rejected 5869:find the (independent reliable) sources, and 5066:Does this read like an ad / promotional copy? 4296:You can delete this.. it was an issue wthe u 13413:Please link the draft you're asking about. 11658:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Eric Kessler 11458:Knowledge:Requested moves/Technical requests 10576:harvnb error: no target: CITEREFNizami1994 ( 8881:Where do I help for linking orphan articles? 7185:own behaviour is up for discussion as well. 5501:isn't being "made" by Wikipedians. In fact, 20: 11618:, but that's all. I think it qualifies for 10636:harvnb error: no target: CITEREFMalik2020 ( 10503:, which lists British usage first. cheers, 10391:Vandalism and Eliminating redundant phrases 9697:, if a talk page is protected, you can use 8368:" Perhaps not a good fit for Alan Watt. -- 7858:. And for that Kolkata discussion, it's at 7118:I need someone to help me back up this page 6040:, another place to find such people is the 4699:Featured lists and inclusion in good topics 2847:a notable person as Knowledge uses the term 12264:(to their embarrassment), but there is no 12170:mission to inform, not to improve reading 11844:https://en.wikipedia.org/Joachim_Hagenauer 10600:harvnb error: no target: CITEREFWink2002 ( 10269:https://en.m.wikipedia.org/Connor_Stalions 9407:Targeted for COI for creation of the page 8989:Hello, Kaul7, and welcome to the Teahouse. 8289:what Knowledge regards as reliable sources 7718:User talk:Christopher from Brinkhaven#Name 5590:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Asian Americans 4735:List of Detroit Red Wings general managers 3643:oh, no, no. The one that I am citing is a 3267:; it's a lot of fun! Happy editing! ~ 🦝 2818:thank you and I appreciate your support. 2582:Thanks, your explanation is very helpful. 2220:Relevant evidence/facts/citations include: 206: 13204:: Does one of the templates mentioned at 10767:the appropriate talk page for the article 10583: 9617:I don't know about downloading them. But 8669:Thanks for the feedback! Will work on it. 7812:Knowledge:List of policies and guidelines 5608:How to start engaging with the community? 5357:on how this can be accomplished (example 4862:Knowledge:Manual of Style/Trivia sections 4829:Knowledge:Manual of Style/Trivia sections 3799:Also, can you please review my draft pls? 2763:needs. every template has a grammar. ... 2539:Another way of explaining the same thing: 2254:Any guidance will be greatly appreciated. 1627:I did the "Example" section to show you. 25: 13252:parameter to specify the figure number. 13023:Humanities section of the Reference Desk 12856:Who governs the censorship in Knowledge? 11997:Hey there! See the active discussion at 11052:cycle), then you might be ready to read 11028:for why this is hardly ever successful.) 10643: 10543:article narration Possible COI Influence 10129:List of wars involving the United States 9028:cycle), then you might be ready to read 6666:blocked, 10 days ago. Not blocked now. ~ 6132:"Looking at Iowa and the Missouri River" 6044:relevant to whatever you're working on. 5897:cycle), then you might be ready to read 5586:Knowledge talk:WikiProject United States 3263:. If you haven't already also check out 273:. Permission from anybody is irrelevant. 11660:. Anyone is welcome to comment there. ~ 11080:Category:Knowledge introduction cleanup 10607: 10559: 10427:2603:8000:D300:3650:1847:225A:5EE0:EECA 10398:not being here to build an encyclopedia 9969:: Yes, the English Knowledge does have 9941:You have NEVER given any explanations! 9612:How do you download all the catergories 7973:2600:1017:B8C0:CF4A:3D87:1ED5:A326:20E9 6772:I added st neot and corby, with citing 6307:absent any real serious policy problems 4203:The relevant public domain template is 3685:the addition of the section of his life 3159:Draft:Sumit Kumar Singh (film director) 3007:Have you read the notice at the top of 2544:"Absolutely no self-published material" 1963:Knowledge:Biographies of living persons 1241:I had in mind the issues documented in 712:. I suggest 122.176.122.147 discuss on 13497: 12239:Edited 08:29, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12195:Edited 07:24, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 11754:? So, were you involved trying to ban 11421:Improving your odds of a speedy review 11072:Learned basics of editing - What next? 10868:National Television Company of Ukraine 10661: 10571: 9183:with the reliable independent sources. 7227:But in case, i still need the sources 5584:, how about bringing up the matter at 5363:very distinct appearances and cultures 4093:Requesting help with band photo upload 4011:. (That template, in turn, is used in 3629:Can you please review my draft again? 2546:. Surely they will solve this for me. 708:The key number, 1.62 m/s, agrees with 18: 11056:carefully, and try creating a draft. 10739: 10718: 10688: 10631: 9032:carefully, and try creating a draft. 7944:Alan Watt (author, radio commentator) 5901:carefully, and try creating a draft. 5527:2601:248:601:A010:F0F3:40DE:7D21:1E74 5205:Expert Advice about an Esoteric topic 4939:this section on text–source integrity 4342:. en-WP articles must be inline with 4215:c:File:Duran Duran 1983.jpg § Summary 3717:publisher's(?) note on who Dokhuma is 2584:2601:41:4300:F4E0:11D5:6264:BDA7:87C0 2455:2601:41:4300:F4E0:11D5:6264:BDA7:87C0 2352:https://www.ebay.com/itm/256380837675 2347:I will look into the BLP noticeboard. 2289:. Re: your question, you can try the 16:Community Q&A hub for new editors 12772:the Homer Simpson photo you point to 12536:Best practice is to archive things. 10930:as Lectonar suggested and check out 10595: 10555: 10553: 9861:And one of Commons's administrators 9732:The following discussion is closed. 8914:, must bs sourced to an independent 7630:Template:R from alternative language 5657:How do I submit a Knowledge article? 4794:Much appreciated, and good to know. 4742:List of Vegas Golden Knights players 4223:c:File:New Order, 1985.jpg § Summary 3097:Draft:Sumit Kumar Singh - Knowledge 916:heard a complaint of too few links. 163:Note: Newer questions appear at the 13294:Not sure what they are looking for. 12762:Question about copyright and images 12726:UndergradSolidarity4AcademicFreedom 11129:IMDB is not a reliable source, per 10936:Deutsche Wohnen & Co. enteignen 10746:. Anthropological Survey of India. 10150:That said, we do encourage folk to 8971:Now, this will gear me up. Cheers! 7854:policy, for example, you would use 7084:Template:Cite web/doc § archive-url 5118:and I have cut some of the waffle, 4494:Probably meant to say they need to 2836:Publishing new article from sandbox 1611:, but I don't know how to do that. 13: 13131:, that is helpful and understood. 12963:User:Guy Macon/Yes. We are biased. 12023:Reading complexity within articles 11423:" on the AfC submission template. 10870:but are not affiliated with them. 10785:Seeking feedback about a reference 9500:Yes, i understand. Thanks a bunch. 8248:https://www.wikidata.org/Q90023730 7886:about this issue on the article's 7882:There is an extensive and ongoing 5613:Thank you for your contributions, 5344:But therein lies the problem. The 4576:Requesting articles for protection 2745:Thank you for your kind response. 1306:Sure, disparity in coverage isn't 1089:But look at who added the links, @ 1006:(that I also make all the time...) 671:of the relevant article, which is 430:deleted the files from the article 35: 32: 14: 13521: 13071:), and add most new material via 12538:Help:Archiving (plain and simple) 12069:Knowledge:Writing better articles 11638:there are a lot of Eric Kesslers 11598:, or I can do it on your behalf. 10550: 10521:Knowledge:Reference desk/Language 6545:books regarding "Bagri Kumhars." 6420:. As long as you remain cool and 5783:Knowledge:WikiProject Visual arts 5738:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Trains 4886:Because usually its inclusion is 155:introduction to contributing page 95: 13417:has been submitted for review. 12781:c:Commons:Village pump/Copyright 12667:Draft:Nasser Bin Ghaith Al Marri 12658: 12593:Full is great, outline is fine. 10079:The discussion above is closed. 8809:Thank you for your interest in " 8472: 8447:, thank you both for your help! 8196:What is the meaning of the word 8051:Knowledge is not a memorial site 6470: 4585:yet? Someone's responded there. 4358:carefully, it goes into detail. 3564:An article is a summary of what 3397:Btw its still a work in progess 3111:Are you writing about yourself? 2788: 2668:How do I get an admin involved. 1658:“ ” ‘ ’ (The ones we don't want) 1402:Issues with translating articles 1051:a sufficient amount of links on 631: 323:Just to say that we don't allow 73: 26: 19: 13397:references from third parties? 13249: 10719:Sumra, Mahar Abdul Haq (1992). 10208:Editing ‘Related Articles’ text 8821:, as I did in the first entry, 8467:Lucy R. Lippard unsourced edits 7661: 7657: 6379:, the source is used in proper 4927:The sun is big. The sun is hot. 3719:. Theoretically, whoever wrote 3681:without the section of his life 3257:Knowledge:Articles for creation 3251:Welcome to Teahouse! We're all 2516:Okay, thanks. I see your point! 2247:I'll leave it at that, for now. 1925:"Geoffrey Kabat" Knowledge page 482:This file may meet Knowledge's 81: 13488:17:40, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 13469:17:08, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 13441:16:43, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 13427:16:33, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 13407:16:32, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 13382:16:05, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 13346:17:59, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 13324:15:38, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 13307:15:19, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 13274: 13266:14:45, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 13225:16:53, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 13196:13:34, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 13178:13:18, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 13141:17:24, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 13123:16:38, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 13103:17:21, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 13085:13:29, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 13035:10:37, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 13003:10:35, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12981:16:24, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12950:15:48, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12936:10:07, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12879:09:55, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12848:07:46, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12834:07:32, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12814:07:08, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12793:07:23, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12754:08:36, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12721:07:12, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12696:07:05, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12679:06:20, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12645:08:10, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12623:03:39, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12608:03:14, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12582:01:50, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12568:00:23, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12517:16:20, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12501:15:44, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12483:22:51, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 12459:22:11, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 12443:22:06, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 12421:21:16, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 12382:14:09, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12368:13:44, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12346:08:58, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12322:08:18, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12301:07:54, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12284:07:44, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12256:07:34, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12237:07:14, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12209:06:30, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12193:06:24, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12144:06:23, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12125:03:16, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12096:02:19, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12081:01:52, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12060:20:25, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 12046:20:09, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 12015:20:06, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 11993:20:04, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 11968:03:21, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 11950:23:59, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 11910:22:38, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 11880:20:20, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 11855:20:07, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 11834:19:59, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 11799:20:15, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 11784:17:18, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 11768:17:08, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 11719:16:17, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 11702:21:00, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 11687:20:55, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 11672:19:26, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 11648:18:25, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 11634:19:17, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 11610:19:15, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 11585:19:15, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 11561:18:41, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 11521:18:59, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 11512:06:17, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 11493:20:26, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 11474:20:16, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 11450:19:24, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 11433:20:22, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 11400:19:05, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 11347:18:59, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 11301:18:38, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 11285:18:35, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 11254:18:35, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 11212:07:26, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 11189:18:12, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 11175:18:09, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 11157:17:34, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 11139:16:59, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 11118:16:35, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 11093:15:54, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 11066:14:56, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 10996:14:16, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 10982:14:51, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 10952:14:45, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 10918:14:39, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 10894:20:04, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 10880:12:16, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 10853:13:43, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 10844:𝐏𝐞𝐫𝐟𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐝𝐞𝐟𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐨 10837:12:17, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 10812:09:52, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 10779:09:20, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 10733: 10712: 10682: 10655: 10533:07:22, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 10513:07:08, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 10487:06:30, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 10466:01:46, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 10435:06:34, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 10416:01:18, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 10385:04:11, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 10365:01:17, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 10341:01:15, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 10316:01:15, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 10283:22:14, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 10256:21:50, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 10231:21:48, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 10213:I'm not seeing anything about 10202:05:13, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 10182:13:34, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 10172:Great tips. You guys Rock. (: 10165:00:16, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 10104:21:43, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 10072:00:58, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 10055:00:51, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 10034:21:44, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 10001:21:41, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9983:21:41, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9951:20:33, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9911:(I ask him to forget about me) 9875:18:34, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9857:18:30, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9835:19:37, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9821:17:22, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9799:16:53, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9775:00:59, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 9715:14:27, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 9688:Exploding pagers article image 9678:03:05, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 9664:21:07, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9649:17:42, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9631:15:33, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9604:14:21, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 9578:14:50, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9549:12:10, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9512:11:42, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9496:11:40, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9482:10:24, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9460:10:22, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9442:10:19, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9425:10:02, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9399:19:33, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9382:18:11, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9359:14:18, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9341:11:45, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9327:11:44, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9306:11:38, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9289:11:29, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9275:11:27, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9254:10:37, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9240:09:55, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9209:17:59, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9200:10:44, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9164:10:18, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9122:14:23, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9095:10:36, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9056:12:59, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9042:09:41, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 8981:09:54, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 8967:09:31, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 8950:09:12, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 8932:09:10, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 8898:08:35, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 8869:07:53, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 8848:19:37, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 8834:11:37, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 8779:08:07, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 8746:19:41, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 8731:07:03, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 8706:06:55, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 8679:02:29, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 8661:01:38, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 8641:00:13, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 8614:17:18, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 8596:05:54, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 8563:10:47, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 8549:01:35, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 8533:01:10, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 8499:01:06, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 8457:13:20, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 8435:04:23, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 8418:01:37, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 8394:08:44, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 8378:02:12, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 8353:15:14, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 8335:02:12, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 8321:02:06, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 8307:Pacific Northwest tree octopus 8301:01:55, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 8264:16:44, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 8239:16:47, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 8218:16:34, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 8169:16:14, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 8155:16:13, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 8138:15:47, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 8090:19:09, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 8045:17:13, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 8027:01:30, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 7995:16:40, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 7981:00:05, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 7966:23:57, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7936:02:08, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 7916:02:06, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 7874:02:45, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 7846:02:06, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 7826:23:46, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7789:23:50, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7775:23:50, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7759:23:22, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7742:23:16, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7713:22:23, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7699:22:21, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7674:22:16, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7642:15:42, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 7624:21:50, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7596:21:19, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7570:20:46, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7552:20:41, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7505:06:35, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 7491:23:44, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7466:11:18, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 7444:21:52, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7430:21:45, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7395:21:52, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7380:21:37, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7366:21:16, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7351:20:44, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7337:Knowledge:No original research 7331:20:00, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7317:19:59, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7303:19:57, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7274:21:17, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7260:19:54, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7237:19:49, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7223:19:49, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7209:19:48, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7195:19:35, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7180:19:29, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7166:19:28, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7150:19:27, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7136:19:21, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7110:12:25, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 7096:19:04, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7061:19:18, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7041:18:34, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7027:18:31, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7006:09:39, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 6976:19:02, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 6955:18:30, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 6941:18:29, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 6927:18:24, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 6885:18:14, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 6871:18:13, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 6838:18:14, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 6824:18:13, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 6810:18:12, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 6796:17:42, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 6782:17:41, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 6768:17:41, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 6754:17:40, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 6736:17:18, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 6718:17:17, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 6692:17:44, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 6678:17:19, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 6658:17:16, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 6648:Looks like they were blocked. 6643:17:16, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 6611:17:50, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 6591:17:34, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 6577:17:30, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 6555:17:26, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 6537:17:23, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 6514:16:45, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 6491:15:34, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 6452:03:25, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 6438:03:12, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 6399:issues and you can do so in a 6352:04:08, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 6333:03:21, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 6319:02:52, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 6262:03:53, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 6239:00:44, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 6196:22:37, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 6181:21:48, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 6148:21:34, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 6123:21:38, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 6085:21:35, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 6068:23:40, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 6054:16:24, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 6032:15:33, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 5969:17:29, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 5925:17:24, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 5911:15:32, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 5857:14:47, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 5819:18:32, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 5801:14:38, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 5768:08:32, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 5754:08:25, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 5716:17:23, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 5699:07:51, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 5681:06:24, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 5649:06:22, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 5631:05:23, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 5602:05:29, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 5553:16:03, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 5535:14:23, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 5520:08:41, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 5449:20:26, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 5435:17:33, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 5417:14:49, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 5398:03:11, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 5384:22:44, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 5355:HELP:TABLE#Colspan and rowspan 5340:19:20, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 5318:19:03, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 5297:03:37, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 5282:00:54, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 5262:07:23, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 5252:, who have separate articles. 5232:07:01, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 5193:04:31, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 5173:02:23, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 5158:02:11, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 5141:02:00, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 5109:14:06, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 5095:23:13, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 5060:18:04, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 5041:04:05, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 5006:13:35, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 4983:04:30, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 4951:22:43, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4929:, where the citation supports 4914:22:18, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4874:22:15, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4841:22:12, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4814:22:13, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4786:22:10, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4768:22:12, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4721:22:07, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4683:22:03, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4665:22:01, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4644:21:57, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4622:21:56, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4595:21:55, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4566:23:53, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 4544:13:06, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 4530:22:02, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4508:21:10, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4490:20:02, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4476:19:59, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4464:19:56, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4442:19:45, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4415:18:54, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 4401:18:48, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 4383:13:09, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 4368:19:32, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4320:19:10, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4306:19:10, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4292:18:05, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4263:20:30, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 4249:18:27, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4235:18:12, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4193:21:46, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4179:21:15, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4165:18:09, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4147:18:02, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4133:17:32, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4115:17:12, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4081:06:07, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 4067:16:42, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4045:16:30, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4031:15:56, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3993:15:46, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3968:14:53, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3954:Does "kit" mean uniform, e.g. 3949:Association Football Club Kits 3943:18:28, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3926:16:29, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 3876:16:16, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 3862:16:13, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 3832:15:53, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 3818:15:20, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 3783:14:21, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 3766:14:15, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 3751:01:41, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 3697:16:46, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 3675:15:41, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 3661:15:36, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 3639:16:06, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 3625:14:28, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 3607:14:19, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 3593:14:10, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 3579:15:43, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3549:15:34, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3533:15:33, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3519:15:29, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3503:15:36, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3489:15:14, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3471:15:11, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3451:15:10, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3437:15:08, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3422:14:50, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3407:14:14, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3384:13:20, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3354:13:10, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3326:22:00, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3309:13:50, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3277:11:23, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3247:10:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3203:21:19, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3189:18:15, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3175:12:24, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3153:07:16, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3121:08:17, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3107:08:08, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3090:06:17, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3069:06:53, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3050:09:21, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3033:06:22, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 2994:02:56, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 2980:23:19, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 2945:17:40, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 2911:16:46, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 2888:15:45, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 2874:13:41, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 2859:13:38, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 2828:00:29, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 2814:13:48, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 2773:20:24, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 2755:00:28, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 2741:13:57, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 2696:20:07, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 2678:11:18, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 2657:11:10, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 2639:00:39, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 2606:07:36, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 2592:21:46, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 2578:18:59, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 2556:21:40, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 2529:12:46, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 2512:06:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 2484:05:10, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 2463:21:44, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 2446:20:50, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 2409:00:07, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 2387:23:55, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 2369:20:16, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 2321:19:13, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 2303:00:13, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 2273:17:15, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 2212:23:23, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 2178:21:55, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 2147:20:32, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 2129:13:44, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 2114:12:03, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 2099:11:57, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 2078:06:09, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 2066:Knowledge:FAQ/Article subjects 2047:02:11, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 2033:02:06, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 2015:00:34, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 2000:23:04, 14 September 2024 (UTC) 1979:22:26, 14 September 2024 (UTC) 1909:14:07, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 1889:10:33, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 1871:20:23, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 1849:18:20, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 1822:01:18, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 1803:20:52, 14 September 2024 (UTC) 1783:20:49, 14 September 2024 (UTC) 1747:20:41, 14 September 2024 (UTC) 1710:20:17, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 1692:06:31, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 1677:00:53, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 1651:22:17, 14 September 2024 (UTC) 1637:07:41, 14 September 2024 (UTC) 1621:22:18, 14 September 2024 (UTC) 1603:07:09, 14 September 2024 (UTC) 1584:06:57, 14 September 2024 (UTC) 1565:21:53, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 1550:18:16, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 1516:06:50, 14 September 2024 (UTC) 1486:19:56, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 1472:19:38, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 1452:19:26, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 1438:18:50, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 1418:18:17, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 1384:16:57, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 1361:05:35, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 1320:07:21, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 1302:22:57, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 1273:06:16, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 1259:08:12, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 1237:21:54, 14 September 2024 (UTC) 1223:19:48, 14 September 2024 (UTC) 1205:09:53, 14 September 2024 (UTC) 1191:17:18, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 1140:20:17, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 1122:04:39, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 1103:04:37, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 1085:04:31, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 1068:04:25, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 1039:04:08, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 1018:03:55, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 1000:03:48, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 982:03:41, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 968:03:28, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 941:05:53, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 926:19:36, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 891:19:17, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 868:16:12, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 843:15:37, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 805:13:12, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 777:12:18, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 755:11:45, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 726:18:12, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 703:04:00, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 656:03:32, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 592:19:32, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 578:17:12, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 559:17:08, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 545:17:33, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 520:14:13, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 473:14:12, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 459:10:22, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 420:17:18, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 405:14:14, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 378:21:45, 11 September 2024 (UTC) 360:21:14, 11 September 2024 (UTC) 342:17:23, 11 September 2024 (UTC) 315:17:11, 11 September 2024 (UTC) 301:17:04, 11 September 2024 (UTC) 251:16:41, 11 September 2024 (UTC) 205:To read the newest questions, 1: 11842:Like this one for instance : 11567:Knowledge:Edit Request Wizard 11042:reliable, independent sources 11002:Add an entry on an individual 10296:Welcome to the Teahouse. See 10131:is structured entirely using 9217:How do I check my edit score? 9018:reliable, independent sources 8057:, with notability defined as 7650:Help editing to get published 6303:though dueling edit summaries 6299:a clear-cut case of vandalism 5931:Draft:The Destination Channel 5887:reliable, independent sources 4967:'s advice above to check out 4707:, you have created a list of 3288:Why are you telling me this? 2960:Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1349:bring Knowledge crashing down 13358:and welcome to the Teahouse. 13009:number of lakes in bangalore 10926:! In short, absolutely. See 9175:You have written your draft 9170:independent reliable sources 9064:Regarding a username change… 9002:indpendent published sources 7805:Help, not related to editing 7779:Thanks. That's all I asked. 7608:Notes on the Cinematographer 5837:It looks as though you need 5744:them and see what happens. 3566:independent reliable sources 3338:Knowledge:Notability (music) 2706:Link converter for Knowledge 1947:foundationsite:About/Contact 714:Talk:Gravitation of the Moon 673:Talk:Gravitation of the Moon 484:criteria for speedy deletion 279:donating copyright materials 219: 176: 7: 13449:Child Star 2024 Demi Lovato 12862:Ut oh. <covers head: --> 12730:Myself and a team of others 12540:explains the simplest way. 12108:it was Einstein, probably: 11145:Draft:Aggelina Papadopoulou 9865:. And now, Mr. do Quintal? 9808:User:Fox de Quintal/sandbox 9073:. You start by becoming an 8571:Feedback on a draft article 7781:Christopher from Brinkhaven 7751:Christopher from Brinkhaven 7705:Christopher from Brinkhaven 7612:Notes sur le cinématographe 7604:Notes sur le cinématographe 7584:Notes sur le cinématographe 6383:and the source is properly 5873:write your draft from them. 3733:Dokhuma's reprinted content 3370:on a song early this year. 1731:handling edit war guideline 236:Adding images to an article 164: 10: 13526: 13158:I think that the template 13021:, I suggest asking at the 12542:Help:Archiving a talk page 12071:to be well worth reading. 11916:Ethiopian Government Works 11478:Haha. I think the variety 10322:I don’t want to be blocked 8827:With kind regards for now; 8767:Talk:There's a Small Hotel 8470: 7687:Knox County, Ohio#Villages 7540:User:Enterprisey/cv-revdel 7072:If the reference is using 6426:administrator noticeboards 5990:I think it's okay to just 5842:Infobox television channel 5458:Asian and Pacific Islander 4733:FLs, specifically that of 4608:According to the reply at 4051:Template talk:Football kit 2799:Merging with above section 2786: 1173:the opinions expressed in 149:New to Knowledge? See our 45: 9748:Non-administrator comment 9331:Yea but section blanking 9147:On a final note, see how 8920:Referencing for beginners 8483:Adjusted heading level. — 7856:Knowledge talk:Notability 7658:police officers from the 6909:Hello. If no independent 5929:Your one 'reference' for 4581:Have you checked back on 3707:content from the original 3075:regarding a page approval 2332:response to the critics: 12914:The assessors will also 12262:Simple English Knowledge 12244:Simple English Knowledge 11499:Draft:Childhood dementia 10454:Knowledge:Reference desk 10239:, which I have reverted. 10081:Please do not modify it. 9806:, as for the version of 9735:Please do not modify it. 9140:. You should also check 8736:the article’s Talk page. 8691:Factual errors in citing 8515:edit warring noticeboard 7680:Updating linking article 6962:isn't quite the same as 5825:About section right side 4822:No Trivia like on FANDOM 3956:File:WHL-Uniform-VIC.png 3868:I have a great knowledge 3824:I have a great knowledge 3775:I have a great knowledge 3758:I have a great knowledge 3721:the biographical section 3689:I have a great knowledge 3653:I have a great knowledge 3631:I have a great knowledge 3599:I have a great knowledge 3585:I have a great knowledge 3541:I have a great knowledge 3511:I have a great knowledge 3495:I have a great knowledge 3481:I have a great knowledge 3463:I have a great knowledge 3443:I have a great knowledge 3429:I have a great knowledge 3399:I have a great knowledge 3161:as there is an existing 1456:There is a help page on 1247:Racial bias on Knowledge 1243:Gender bias on Knowledge 151:tutorial for new editors 86:Welcome to the Teahouse! 12958:Knowledge:Systemic bias 12911:the facts they contain. 11734:, can you show us some 11497:I recommend you submit 10970:notability of academics 10725:. Beacon Books. p. 78. 10472:Redundant words removal 10127:However, I notice that 9901:(Sandbox, Maria Marçal) 9069:Here's the easier way, 7291:get this information? ~ 6227:foundation:Terms of Use 6095:Special:MyContributions 6004:User:InternetArchiveBot 5662:Hello. You may use the 4055:WT:WikiProject Football 3002:Fabio Mancini wiki page 2927:. You obviously have a 2717:required grammar format 2064:You might want to read 1458:wikidata:Help:Sitelinks 1130:is nearly zero?.... 849:Caeciliusinhorto-public 835:Caeciliusinhorto-public 640:Gravitation of the Moon 626:Gravitation of The Moon 13475:Talk:Child Star (film) 13127:Thanks for the input @ 11531:Question about my page 11236:technical move request 10940:Works Constitution Act 10932:WP:Wikiproject Germany 10674:(May-June-2016): 543. 9721:Recurring Issues with 8309:was more convincing. ~ 6479:User:MarkWHowe/sandbox 5497:" – To be clear, this 5350:Cleveland#Demographics 5240:The first sentence of 4937:For more details, see 4775: 4673:Oh! That explains it. 3788: 3727:, but I suspect using 3358:Although I'd agree it 3094:Approval of this draft 1939:Knowledge:Noticeboards 40: 13510:Knowledge help forums 13246:Template:Cite journal 13056:artciles for creation 13054:was accepted through 12633:Neutral point of view 12531:Clearing my talk page 12148:For what it's worth, 11928:a few months ago, by 11756:Coors Brewing Company 11518:Sincerely, Dilettante 11050:Bold, Revert, Discuss 11038:neutral point of view 10986:Thank you very much! 10922:Welcome to Teahouse @ 10861:Copy of a documentary 10740:Singh, K. S. (1994). 10689:Fleet, J. F. (1901). 10662:Pushpa (2018-06-02). 9635:You can also look at 9179:, in that you didn't 9026:Bold, Revert, Discuss 9014:neutral point of view 8996:: writing an article 8912:about a living person 8811:There's a Small Hotel 7730:Talk:Brinkhaven, Ohio 6359:Personal letters are 5895:Bold, Revert, Discuss 5883:neutral point of view 4774: 4556:to be in English. -- 4450:, but they should be 4016:Infobox football club 3974:Template:Football kit 3787: 3261:WP:Your first article 3220:WP:Requested articles 2968:Template:Cite journal 2783:Inquiry for reference 2688:WhyIsNameSoHardOmg- - 2645:WhyIsNameSoHardOmg- - 2431:a second-hand copy of 949:I bring to attention 816:The instructions for 39: 13168:does what you want. 12891:Articles are either 11926:Template:PD-Ethiopia 11232:WikiProject Medicine 11022:conflict of interest 10620:Ehsan Yarshater 2015 10501:Cambridge dictionary 10450:Age of Enlightenment 10112:Just adding to what 9961:Prohibit interaction 9787:User talk:RodRabelo7 9758:Knowledge:ANI advice 9409:Hassan & Roshaan 8757:, your "someone" is 8188:Thanks, Anachronist. 8059:significant coverage 8031:Thanks, Anachronist. 7852:Knowledge:Notability 6497:Regarding an Article 6219:WP:DISPUTERESOLUTION 5543:suggested below. -- 5525:solutions feasible? 5020:The reference was a 4920:Deleting a reference 4516:Who is this author, 4346:and, if it applies, 3772:Draft:James Dokhuma# 3493:pls ignore this one 3165:who is in politics. 2929:conflict of interest 1768:WP:Original research 1538:</blockquote: --> 710:this NASA Fact Sheet 13363:your user talk page 13254:Firefangledfeathers 13091:Michael D. Turnbull 12822:Volkswagen Scirocco 12544:has more details. 9847:: "wrong section". 9592:style="width:100px" 7726:Template:UserboxCOI 6598:- find good sources 5407:including Oceania. 3645:republished version 1737:if it continues. -- 1500:Dialogue in writing 1171:represent neutrally 127:Articles to improve 13505:Knowledge Teahouse 13149:to formate a quote 13075:on its Talk Page. 12734:Right great wrongs 12702:other stuff exists 11815:Help with my draft 11054:your first article 10818:Error in Reference 10443:Direct information 9588:style="width:75px" 9584:Theairportman33531 9153:WP:Notable(people) 9030:your first article 8862:With kind regards; 8819:across the sources 8128:"Writing is Easy" 6901:Lack of refrences 6595:Your only choices: 5899:your first article 5746:Gråbergs Gråa Sång 5691:Gråbergs Gråa Sång 5465:earlier suggestion 5277:Just Step Sideways 5017:This edit worked: 4427:Gråbergs Gråa Sång 4360:Gråbergs Gråa Sång 4183:Ah no worries. :) 3999:Soccerking.greg127 3756:grouped together) 3701:I think the point 2958:and instead write 1987:Thanks in advance, 1004:A rookie mistake! 951:a wikitable i made 214:About the Teahouse 41: 12979: 12728:, when you write 12013: 11940:can you explain? 11782: 11717: 11670: 11632: 11583: 11229: 11161:Also, one really 10802: 10752:978-81-7304-091-7 9916:(Commons in 2024) 9751: 9539:WP:External links 9397: 9357: 9120: 9000:by finding solid 8716: 8659: 8594: 8547: 8416: 8319: 8237: 8153: 8094:Dear Anachronist: 8088: 8025: 7872: 7824: 7773: 7489: 7474:If you think the 7349: 7301: 7258: 6996: 6676: 6525:original research 6121: 6030: 6000:User:Citation bot 5952: 5939:comment added by 5799: 5669:new user tutorial 5619:Knowledge:Discord 5481:original research 5191: 5156: 4811: 4765: 4213:. If you look at 4099:non-free image. 3972:Hello, Greg. See 3711:source laundering 3163:Sumit Kumar Singh 2909: 1969:when posting. -- 1955:legal terminology 1907: 1877:this, for example 1801: 1781: 1761:WP:RELIABLESOURCE 1007: 701: 646:The Lonely Pather 527: 193: 187: 13517: 13388:Draft submission 13378: 13286: 13285: 13278: 13251: 13167: 13161: 12987:No Stash Content 12973: 12905:Reliable sources 12897:New Pages Patrol 12881: 12876: 12871: 12662: 12566: 12343: 12338: 12319: 12314: 12281: 12276: 12234: 12229: 12190: 12185: 12113:Strunk and White 12012: 12010: 12005: 11939: 11776: 11738:and third party 11730:as an expert on 11729: 11711: 11664: 11626: 11602: 11577: 11559: 11398: 11371: 11365: 11361: 11355: 11283: 11223: 11186: 11185:Babysharkboss2!! 11136: 11135:Babysharkboss2!! 10928:Help:Translation 10907:Help:Translation 10845: 10796: 10793:reliable sources 10757: 10756: 10737: 10731: 10730: 10716: 10710: 10709: 10686: 10680: 10679: 10659: 10653: 10652: 10641: 10629: 10617: 10605: 10593: 10581: 10569: 10557: 10404: 10377: 10353: 10337: 10331: 10304: 10266: 10137:WP:Source Editor 10015: 9971:interaction bans 9932: 9885: 9863:do agree with me 9749: 9745: 9737: 9593: 9589: 9391: 9351: 9316: 9264: 9228: 9138:reliable sources 9114: 9105: 8710: 8653: 8588: 8541: 8521: 8501: 8487: 8476: 8475: 8410: 8363:Wikiquote says " 8313: 8231: 8147: 8082: 8063:reliable sources 8019: 8003:Create the page 7934: 7923:`~ᴀɴᴋʀᴀᴊ ɢɪʀɪ🎇✨ 7866: 7844: 7833:`~ᴀɴᴋʀᴀᴊ ɢɪʀɪ🎇✨ 7818: 7767: 7722:Brinkhaven, Ohio 7663: 7659: 7606:. You arrive at 7566: 7560: 7537: 7531: 7483: 7343: 7295: 7257: 7255: 7250: 7132: 7127: 7081: 7075: 6990: 6987:reliable sources 6911:reliable sources 6670: 6563:Yes, indeed and 6474: 6272: 6158: 6116: 6107: 6104: 6101: 6025: 6016: 6013: 6010: 5934: 5846: 5840: 5836: 5793: 5724:Railway stations 5582:JohnIllinois1827 5467: 5441:JohnIllinois1827 5423:JohnIllinois1827 5409:JohnIllinois1827 5390:JohnIllinois1827 5332:JohnIllinois1827 5303:JohnIllinois1827 5289:JohnIllinois1827 5185: 5150: 5124:reliable sources 5075: 5033: 5016: 4975: 4907: 4904: 4901: 4898: 4812: 4810: 4807: 4800: 4766: 4764: 4761: 4754: 4607: 4553:de:Brianna Wiest 4473: 4356:Help:Translation 4312:SeashellPirate22 4298:SeashellPirate22 4212: 4206: 4110: 4105: 4020: 4014: 4010: 4004: 3914: 3908:and nothing else 3850: 3844:Malala Yousafzai 3806: 3739: 3734: 3730: 3722: 3718: 3708: 3611:You should have 3509:pls reply quick 3307: 3298: 3294: 3287: 3245: 3236: 3232: 3213:Declan J Donovan 3138: 2903: 2800: 2792: 2791: 2729: 2724: 2157:reliable sources 2063: 1953:and any kind of 1936: 1901: 1795: 1775: 1552: 1539: 1535: 1527: 1478:RedactedHumanoid 1469: 1464: 1444:RedactedHumanoid 1435: 1430: 1410:RedactedHumanoid 1330: 1249:, for instance. 1175:reliable sources 1005: 825: 819: 815: 705: 683: 648: 635: 501: 448: 442: 229: 209: 197: 194: 188: 172: 168: 158: 142: 141: 140: 138: 131: 130: 128: 122: 121: 119: 113: 112: 110: 102: 100: 90: 89: 77: 65: 58: 38: 30: 23: 13525: 13524: 13520: 13519: 13518: 13516: 13515: 13514: 13495: 13494: 13451: 13390: 13376: 13296: 13291: 13290: 13289: 13280: 13279: 13275: 13237: 13165: 13159: 13151: 13060:User:MaxnaCarta 13043: 13011: 12989: 12886:WP:Not censored 12874: 12865: 12861: 12858: 12801: 12764: 12655: 12590: 12588:Plot for movies 12545: 12533: 12406: 12341: 12332: 12317: 12308: 12279: 12270: 12232: 12223: 12220: 12217: 12188: 12179: 12176: 12173: 12067:, you may find 12025: 12008: 12003: 11976: 11933: 11918: 11817: 11723: 11600: 11538: 11533: 11377: 11369: 11363: 11359: 11353: 11309:Rotideypoc41352 11262: 11240:Rotideypoc41352 11220: 11184: 11134: 11126: 11101: 11074: 11004: 10958:de:Mario Lachat 10902: 10863: 10843: 10825:Perfectodefecto 10820: 10787: 10762: 10761: 10760: 10753: 10738: 10734: 10717: 10713: 10687: 10683: 10660: 10656: 10646: 10635: 10623: 10611: 10599: 10587: 10575: 10563: 10558: 10551: 10545: 10474: 10445: 10402: 10393: 10375: 10351: 10335: 10329: 10324: 10302: 10293: 10260: 10219:Connor Stalions 10210: 10090: 10085: 10084: 10020:and better yet 10005: 9963: 9938:of of Pórokhov. 9926: 9896:(Commons, 2023) 9879: 9782: 9747: 9733: 9726: 9723:User:RodRabelo7 9690: 9614: 9591: 9587: 9557: 9530: 9412: 9310: 9258: 9222: 9219: 9149:M. Visvesvaraya 9130: 9099: 9066: 8916:reliable source 8906: 8886:Have you tried 8883: 8807:Dear Colleague, 8693: 8628:private schools 8573: 8519: 8502: 8485: 8482: 8480: 8473: 8469: 8402: 8345:Writing is easy 8256:Writing is easy 8210:Writing is easy 8161:Writing is easy 8130:Writing is easy 8037:Writing is easy 7987:Writing is easy 7950:Writing is easy 7946: 7921: 7920:Thanks!! <3 7896:BLP Noticeboard 7831: 7807: 7724:, then (i) add 7682: 7652: 7580: 7564: 7558: 7535: 7529: 7526: 7523:Plummer Terrier 7253: 7248: 7130: 7125: 7120: 7079: 7073: 7069: 7014: 6906: 6706:reliable source 6627: 6516: 6499: 6409:WP:OTHERCONTENT 6266: 6152: 6114: 6105: 6102: 6099: 6023: 6014: 6011: 6008: 5983: 5844: 5838: 5830: 5827: 5778: 5726: 5659: 5610: 5485:reliable source 5463: 5272: 5207: 5072: 5068: 5031: 5022:named reference 5010: 4993:named reference 4973: 4961:User:Rjjiii/TSI 4935:The sun is big. 4922: 4905: 4902: 4899: 4896: 4824: 4809: 4803: 4796: 4763: 4757: 4750: 4701: 4601: 4578: 4534:Brianna Wiest. 4469: 4332: 4279: 4210: 4204: 4108: 4103: 4095: 4018: 4012: 4008: 4002: 3951: 3912: 3848: 3804: 3737: 3732: 3728: 3720: 3716: 3706: 3394: 3296: 3290: 3289: 3281: 3234: 3228: 3227: 3215: 3136: 3077: 3039:WP:NOTDEMOCRACY 3004: 2956:Behav Brain Sci 2838: 2801: 2798: 2796: 2789: 2785: 2727: 2720: 2708: 2622: 2519:Geoffrey Kabat 2453:Geoffrey Kabat 2359:Geoffrey Kabat 2291:BLP Noticeboard 2202:Geoffrey Kabat 2089:Geoffrey Kabat 2057: 1990:Geoffrey Kabat 1930: 1927: 1733:and proceed to 1726: 1609:Katherine Heiny 1537: 1534:|blockquote|c}} 1529: 1521: 1520: 1502: 1467: 1462: 1433: 1428: 1404: 1324: 1162: 1128:What links here 853:Acoustic theory 823: 817: 809: 792:Index ellipsoid 741:. As I look at 734: 661:122.176.122.147 644: 628: 446: 440: 433:DeAnn L. Prosia 238: 233: 232: 231: 230: 225: 218: 207: 201: 200: 199: 198: 189: 183: 182: 170: 167:of the Teahouse 162: 148: 145: 144: 143: 136: 134: 133: 132: 126: 124: 123: 118:Meet your hosts 117: 115: 114: 108: 106: 105: 103: 98: 96: 93: 83: 82: 80: 79: 78: 70: 69: 68: 61: 54: 50: 42: 36: 31: 24: 17: 12: 11: 5: 13523: 13513: 13512: 13507: 13493: 13492: 13491: 13490: 13461:TooManyFingers 13456: 13450: 13447: 13446: 13445: 13444: 13443: 13433:TooManyFingers 13410: 13409: 13399:TooManyFingers 13394: 13389: 13386: 13385: 13384: 13370: 13359: 13351: 13350: 13349: 13348: 13338:TooManyFingers 13333: 13316:TooManyFingers 13312: 13309: 13295: 13292: 13288: 13287: 13272: 13271: 13270: 13269: 13268: 13248:and using the 13236: 13233: 13232: 13231: 13230: 13229: 13228: 13227: 13217:TooManyFingers 13209: 13150: 13147: 13146: 13145: 13144: 13143: 13133:MotionMogul123 13129:TooManyFingers 13115:TooManyFingers 13111:MotionMogul123 13107: 13106: 13105: 13095:MotionMogul123 13048:MotionMogul123 13042: 13039: 13038: 13037: 13015: 13010: 13007: 13006: 13005: 12988: 12985: 12984: 12983: 12967: 12966: 12965: 12960: 12952: 12938: 12912: 12889: 12882: 12857: 12854: 12853: 12852: 12851: 12850: 12817: 12816: 12806:TooManyFingers 12800: 12797: 12796: 12795: 12763: 12760: 12759: 12758: 12757: 12756: 12705: 12698: 12688:TooManyFingers 12684: 12681: 12664:Courtesy link: 12654: 12651: 12650: 12649: 12648: 12647: 12629:TooManyFingers 12615:TooManyFingers 12610: 12589: 12586: 12585: 12584: 12570: 12532: 12529: 12528: 12527: 12526: 12525: 12524: 12523: 12522: 12521: 12520: 12519: 12506: 12493:TooManyFingers 12485: 12475:TooManyFingers 12468: 12448: 12435:TooManyFingers 12430: 12410: 12405: 12402: 12401: 12400: 12399: 12398: 12397: 12396: 12395: 12394: 12393: 12392: 12391: 12390: 12389: 12388: 12387: 12386: 12385: 12384: 12324: 12218: 12215: 12201:TooManyFingers 12174: 12171: 12167: 12166: 12165: 12164: 12163: 12162: 12161: 12136:TooManyFingers 12106:TooManyFingers 12102: 12101: 12100: 12099: 12098: 12038:TooManyFingers 12033: 12024: 12021: 12020: 12019: 12018: 12017: 11980: 11975: 11972: 11971: 11970: 11952: 11917: 11914: 11913: 11912: 11902:TooManyFingers 11897: 11893: 11886: 11885: 11884: 11883: 11882: 11872:TooManyFingers 11860: 11840: 11826:TooManyFingers 11816: 11813: 11812: 11811: 11810: 11809: 11808: 11807: 11806: 11805: 11804: 11803: 11802: 11801: 11704: 11654: 11653: 11652: 11651: 11650: 11587: 11563: 11532: 11529: 11528: 11527: 11526: 11525: 11524: 11523: 11514: 11461: 11454: 11453: 11452: 11442:TooManyFingers 11437: 11436: 11435: 11405: 11372:come to mind, 11331:WP:NOTADVOCACY 11327: 11320: 11307:Ah, thank you 11304: 11303: 11288: 11287: 11259: 11256: 11230:I've notified 11219: 11216: 11215: 11214: 11200: 11197: 11196: 11195: 11194: 11193: 11192: 11191: 11125: 11122: 11121: 11120: 11100: 11097: 11096: 11095: 11073: 11070: 11069: 11068: 11029: 11018: 11011: 11008: 11003: 11000: 10999: 10998: 10984: 10954: 10920: 10901: 10898: 10897: 10896: 10882: 10862: 10859: 10858: 10857: 10856: 10855: 10819: 10816: 10815: 10814: 10786: 10783: 10782: 10781: 10759: 10758: 10751: 10732: 10711: 10681: 10654: 10584:ʿAthamina 1998 10548: 10547: 10546: 10544: 10537: 10536: 10535: 10517: 10516: 10515: 10473: 10470: 10469: 10468: 10444: 10441: 10440: 10439: 10438: 10437: 10419: 10418: 10392: 10389: 10388: 10387: 10367: 10343: 10323: 10320: 10319: 10318: 10292: 10289: 10288: 10287: 10286: 10285: 10240: 10237:Sherrone Moore 10233: 10215:Sherrone Moore 10209: 10206: 10205: 10204: 10186: 10185: 10184: 10174:Historyguy1138 10170: 10148: 10144: 10125: 10110:Historyguy1138 10106: 10089: 10086: 10078: 10077: 10076: 10075: 10074: 10039: 10038: 10037: 10036: 9985: 9962: 9959: 9958: 9957: 9956: 9955: 9954: 9953: 9943:Fox de Quintal 9939: 9919: 9918: 9913: 9908: 9906:(DARIO SEVERI) 9903: 9898: 9892: 9891: 9890: 9889: 9888: 9887: 9841: 9840: 9839: 9838: 9837: 9827:Fox de Quintal 9804:Fox de Quintal 9781: 9780: 9779: 9778: 9777: 9728: 9727: 9725: 9719: 9718: 9717: 9689: 9686: 9685: 9684: 9683: 9682: 9681: 9680: 9670:TooManyFingers 9641:TooManyFingers 9633: 9613: 9610: 9609: 9608: 9607: 9606: 9562: 9556: 9553: 9552: 9551: 9535:Kimon fioretos 9529: 9526: 9525: 9524: 9523: 9522: 9521: 9520: 9519: 9518: 9517: 9516: 9515: 9514: 9501: 9431: 9411: 9405: 9404: 9403: 9402: 9401: 9374:TooManyFingers 9369: 9368: 9367: 9366: 9365: 9364: 9363: 9362: 9361: 9345: 9344: 9343: 9319:Mike Marchmont 9294: 9291: 9218: 9215: 9214: 9213: 9212: 9211: 9184: 9173: 9166: 9145: 9142:citing sources 9134: 9129: 9126: 9125: 9124: 9097: 9083:global renamer 9065: 9062: 9061: 9060: 9059: 9058: 9005: 8990: 8987: 8986: 8985: 8984: 8983: 8938:citing sources 8934: 8905: 8902: 8901: 8900: 8882: 8879: 8878: 8877: 8876: 8875: 8874: 8873: 8872: 8871: 8863: 8861: 8828: 8826: 8808: 8805: 8791: 8782: 8781: 8751: 8750: 8749: 8748: 8708: 8692: 8689: 8688: 8687: 8686: 8685: 8684: 8683: 8682: 8681: 8647: 8620:TooManyFingers 8606:TooManyFingers 8598: 8572: 8569: 8568: 8567: 8566: 8565: 8535: 8471: 8468: 8465: 8464: 8463: 8462: 8461: 8460: 8459: 8401: 8398: 8397: 8396: 8380: 8361: 8360: 8359: 8358: 8357: 8356: 8355: 8340: 8277: 8276: 8275: 8274: 8273: 8272: 8271: 8270: 8269: 8268: 8267: 8266: 8250: 8245: 8244: 8243: 8242: 8241: 8206: 8205: 8204: 8194: 8189: 8186: 8183: 8179: 8175: 8126: 8123: 8120: 8115: 8111: 8107: 8103: 8099: 8095: 8075: 8032: 8001: 8000: 7999: 7998: 7997: 7945: 7942: 7941: 7940: 7939: 7938: 7880: 7879: 7878: 7877: 7876: 7806: 7803: 7802: 7801: 7800: 7799: 7798: 7797: 7796: 7795: 7794: 7793: 7792: 7791: 7747: 7681: 7678: 7677: 7676: 7651: 7648: 7647: 7646: 7645: 7644: 7599: 7598: 7579: 7576: 7575: 7574: 7573: 7572: 7533:copyvio-revdel 7525: 7519: 7518: 7517: 7516: 7515: 7514: 7513: 7512: 7511: 7510: 7509: 7508: 7507: 7472: 7471: 7470: 7469: 7468: 7408: 7407: 7406: 7405: 7404: 7403: 7402: 7401: 7400: 7399: 7398: 7397: 7333: 7284: 7283: 7282: 7281: 7280: 7279: 7278: 7277: 7276: 7264:Thanks legend 7241: 7240: 7239: 7211: 7187:TooManyFingers 7158:TooManyFingers 7154: 7153: 7152: 7119: 7116: 7115: 7114: 7113: 7112: 7102:HelenaBertrand 7068: 7065: 7064: 7063: 7053:TooManyFingers 7048: 7045: 7044: 7043: 7013: 7010: 7009: 7008: 6982: 6981: 6980: 6979: 6978: 6957: 6905: 6899: 6898: 6897: 6896: 6895: 6894: 6893: 6892: 6891: 6890: 6889: 6888: 6887: 6875:Thanks Colin. 6859: 6855: 6851: 6847: 6844: 6843: 6842: 6841: 6840: 6741: 6740: 6739: 6738: 6698: 6697: 6696: 6695: 6694: 6645: 6626: 6623: 6622: 6621: 6620: 6619: 6618: 6617: 6616: 6615: 6614: 6613: 6603:TooManyFingers 6599: 6596: 6500: 6498: 6495: 6494: 6493: 6476:Courtesy link: 6468: 6467: 6466: 6465: 6464: 6463: 6462: 6461: 6460: 6459: 6458: 6457: 6456: 6455: 6454: 6339: 6338: 6337: 6336: 6335: 6250: 6136: 6133: 6130: 6127: 6126: 6125: 6109: 6072: 6071: 6070: 6018: 5996: 5982: 5979: 5978: 5977: 5976: 5975: 5974: 5973: 5972: 5971: 5874: 5859: 5826: 5823: 5822: 5821: 5811:TooManyFingers 5803: 5777: 5774: 5773: 5772: 5771: 5770: 5725: 5722: 5721: 5720: 5719: 5718: 5683: 5664:Article Wizard 5658: 5655: 5654: 5653: 5652: 5651: 5636: 5609: 5606: 5605: 5604: 5578: 5577: 5576: 5575: 5574: 5573: 5572: 5571: 5570: 5569: 5568: 5567: 5566: 5565: 5564: 5563: 5562: 5561: 5560: 5559: 5558: 5557: 5556: 5555: 5508: 5507: 5506: 5488: 5473: 5427:TooManyFingers 5404: 5310:TooManyFingers 5306: 5271: 5268: 5267: 5266: 5265: 5264: 5235: 5234: 5206: 5203: 5202: 5201: 5200: 5199: 5198: 5197: 5196: 5195: 5113: 5112: 5111: 5067: 5064: 5063: 5062: 5052:TooManyFingers 5047: 5046: 5045: 5044: 5043: 5013:Cherie.phoenix 4989:Cherie.phoenix 4957:cherie.phoenix 4953: 4931:both sentences 4921: 4918: 4917: 4916: 4884: 4883: 4882: 4881: 4880: 4879: 4878: 4877: 4876: 4823: 4820: 4819: 4818: 4817: 4816: 4772: 4771: 4770: 4738: 4700: 4697: 4696: 4695: 4694: 4693: 4692: 4691: 4690: 4689: 4688: 4687: 4686: 4685: 4598: 4597: 4577: 4574: 4573: 4572: 4571: 4570: 4569: 4568: 4551:, the article 4514: 4513: 4512: 4511: 4510: 4500:TooManyFingers 4492: 4478: 4430: 4425:I agree with @ 4423: 4422: 4421: 4420: 4419: 4418: 4417: 4407:TooManyFingers 4393:TooManyFingers 4331: 4328: 4327: 4326: 4325: 4324: 4323: 4322: 4284:TooManyFingers 4278: 4275: 4274: 4273: 4272: 4271: 4270: 4269: 4268: 4267: 4266: 4265: 4201: 4200: 4199: 4198: 4197: 4196: 4195: 4171:TooManyFingers 4139:TooManyFingers 4094: 4091: 4090: 4089: 4088: 4087: 4086: 4085: 4084: 4083: 3995: 3977: 3970: 3950: 3947: 3946: 3945: 3930: 3929: 3928: 3904: 3903: 3902: 3901: 3900: 3899: 3898: 3897: 3896: 3895: 3894: 3893: 3892: 3891: 3890: 3889: 3888: 3887: 3886: 3885: 3884: 3883: 3882: 3881: 3880: 3879: 3878: 3801: 3795:primary source 3791:wikinotability 3768: 3714: 3641: 3613:at least three 3595: 3562: 3537: 3536: 3535: 3507: 3506: 3505: 3477: 3476: 3475: 3474: 3473: 3460: 3459: 3458: 3393: 3392:Draft checking 3390: 3389: 3388: 3387: 3386: 3334: 3333: 3332: 3331: 3330: 3329: 3328: 3214: 3211: 3210: 3209: 3208: 3207: 3206: 3205: 3195:TooManyFingers 3177: 3143:, I think. -- 3131:Let me quote, 3128: 3127: 3126: 3125: 3124: 3123: 3095: 3076: 3073: 3072: 3071: 3061:TooManyFingers 3057: 3054: 3053: 3052: 3003: 3000: 2999: 2998: 2997: 2996: 2966:; or, better, 2949: 2948: 2947: 2897: 2894: 2893: 2892: 2891: 2890: 2843:article wizard 2837: 2834: 2833: 2832: 2831: 2830: 2820:Goodtiming8871 2787: 2784: 2781: 2780: 2779: 2778: 2777: 2776: 2775: 2761:Goodtiming8871 2747:Goodtiming8871 2713:Goodtiming8871 2707: 2704: 2703: 2702: 2701: 2700: 2699: 2698: 2666: 2663: 2659: 2631:TooManyFingers 2621: 2618: 2617: 2616: 2615: 2614: 2613: 2612: 2611: 2610: 2609: 2608: 2562: 2561: 2560: 2559: 2558: 2548:TooManyFingers 2540: 2537: 2536: 2535: 2534: 2533: 2532: 2531: 2517: 2504:TooManyFingers 2500: 2497: 2494: 2486: 2476:TooManyFingers 2472: 2451: 2438:TooManyFingers 2434: 2423: 2422: 2421: 2420: 2419: 2418: 2417: 2416: 2415: 2414: 2413: 2412: 2411: 2397: 2357: 2354: 2348: 2345: 2342: 2339: 2336: 2329: 2305: 2287:this guideline 2282: 2261: 2260:Geoffrey Kabat 2258: 2255: 2252: 2248: 2245: 2240: 2233: 2230: 2227: 2224: 2221: 2218: 2214: 2200: 2197: 2194: 2189: 2184: 2139:TooManyFingers 2087: 2084: 2055: 2054: 2053: 2052: 2051: 2050: 2049: 2039:TooManyFingers 2025:TooManyFingers 2017: 2007:TooManyFingers 1988: 1985: 1926: 1923: 1922: 1921: 1920: 1919: 1918: 1917: 1916: 1915: 1914: 1913: 1912: 1911: 1859: 1841:TooManyFingers 1836: 1785: 1764: 1749: 1725: 1722: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1715: 1714: 1713: 1712: 1702:TooManyFingers 1669:TooManyFingers 1665: 1662: 1659: 1656: 1629:TooManyFingers 1625: 1624: 1623: 1587: 1586: 1576:TooManyFingers 1571: 1570: 1569: 1568: 1567: 1557:TooManyFingers 1524:TooManyFingers 1508:TooManyFingers 1501: 1498: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1494: 1493: 1492: 1491: 1490: 1489: 1488: 1403: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1393: 1392: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1387: 1386: 1376:TooManyFingers 1333:WP:MULTSOURCES 1331:Have you seen 1327:TooManyFingers 1322: 1312:Cordless Larry 1294:TooManyFingers 1290: 1286: 1282: 1279:Cordless Larry 1275: 1251:Cordless Larry 1215:Cordless Larry 1193: 1161: 1158: 1157: 1156: 1155: 1154: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1148: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1144: 1143: 1142: 1105: 1041: 956:Colegio Tarbut 943: 928: 918:TooManyFingers 904: 903: 902: 901: 900: 899: 898: 897: 896: 895: 894: 893: 856: 831: 733: 730: 729: 728: 706: 680:ClaudineChionh 665:do it yourself 658: 637:Courtesy link: 627: 624: 623: 622: 621: 620: 619: 618: 617: 616: 615: 614: 613: 612: 611: 610: 609: 608: 607: 606: 605: 604: 603: 602: 601: 600: 599: 598: 597: 596: 595: 594: 502:This page was 499: 496: 478: 366: 285: 282: 274: 267: 256: 237: 234: 223: 221: 220: 217: 216: 211: 208:skip to bottom 202: 180: 178: 177: 175: 174: 160: 146: 109:Question forum 104: 99:Ask a question 94: 91: 72: 71: 67: 66: 59: 51: 46: 44: 43: 34: 33: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 13522: 13511: 13508: 13506: 13503: 13502: 13500: 13489: 13485: 13481: 13476: 13472: 13471: 13470: 13466: 13462: 13457: 13453: 13452: 13442: 13438: 13434: 13430: 13429: 13428: 13424: 13420: 13416: 13412: 13411: 13408: 13404: 13400: 13395: 13392: 13391: 13383: 13380: 13379: 13371: 13368: 13367:Chuck Douglas 13364: 13360: 13357: 13353: 13352: 13347: 13343: 13339: 13334: 13331: 13327: 13326: 13325: 13321: 13317: 13313: 13310: 13308: 13305: 13302: 13298: 13297: 13283: 13277: 13273: 13267: 13263: 13259: 13255: 13247: 13243: 13239: 13238: 13226: 13222: 13218: 13214: 13210: 13207: 13203: 13199: 13198: 13197: 13193: 13189: 13185: 13181: 13180: 13179: 13175: 13171: 13170:Mike Turnbull 13164: 13157: 13153: 13152: 13142: 13138: 13134: 13130: 13126: 13125: 13124: 13120: 13116: 13112: 13108: 13104: 13100: 13096: 13092: 13088: 13087: 13086: 13082: 13078: 13077:Mike Turnbull 13074: 13073:edit requests 13070: 13066: 13061: 13057: 13053: 13049: 13045: 13044: 13036: 13032: 13028: 13024: 13020: 13016: 13013: 13012: 13004: 13000: 12996: 12991: 12990: 12982: 12977: 12972: 12968: 12964: 12961: 12959: 12956: 12955: 12953: 12951: 12947: 12943: 12939: 12937: 12933: 12929: 12925: 12921: 12917: 12913: 12910: 12906: 12902: 12898: 12894: 12890: 12887: 12884:Firstly, see 12883: 12880: 12877: 12872: 12870: 12869: 12860: 12859: 12849: 12845: 12841: 12837: 12836: 12835: 12831: 12827: 12823: 12819: 12818: 12815: 12811: 12807: 12803: 12802: 12794: 12790: 12786: 12782: 12777: 12773: 12769: 12766: 12765: 12755: 12751: 12747: 12743: 12739: 12735: 12731: 12727: 12724: 12723: 12722: 12718: 12714: 12710: 12709:sock puppetry 12706: 12703: 12699: 12697: 12693: 12689: 12685: 12682: 12680: 12676: 12672: 12671:DoubleGrazing 12668: 12665: 12661: 12657: 12656: 12646: 12642: 12638: 12634: 12630: 12626: 12625: 12624: 12620: 12616: 12611: 12609: 12605: 12601: 12596: 12592: 12591: 12583: 12579: 12575: 12571: 12569: 12564: 12560: 12556: 12552: 12548: 12543: 12539: 12535: 12534: 12518: 12514: 12510: 12507: 12504: 12503: 12502: 12498: 12494: 12490: 12486: 12484: 12480: 12476: 12472: 12469: 12466: 12462: 12461: 12460: 12456: 12452: 12449: 12446: 12445: 12444: 12440: 12436: 12431: 12428: 12424: 12423: 12422: 12418: 12414: 12411: 12408: 12407: 12383: 12379: 12375: 12371: 12370: 12369: 12365: 12361: 12360:Mike Turnbull 12357: 12353: 12349: 12348: 12347: 12344: 12339: 12337: 12336: 12329: 12325: 12323: 12320: 12315: 12313: 12312: 12304: 12303: 12302: 12298: 12294: 12290: 12287: 12286: 12285: 12282: 12277: 12275: 12274: 12267: 12263: 12259: 12258: 12257: 12253: 12249: 12245: 12241: 12240: 12238: 12235: 12230: 12228: 12227: 12212: 12211: 12210: 12206: 12202: 12197: 12196: 12194: 12191: 12186: 12184: 12183: 12168: 12159: 12155: 12151: 12147: 12146: 12145: 12141: 12137: 12132: 12128: 12127: 12126: 12122: 12118: 12114: 12110: 12107: 12103: 12097: 12093: 12089: 12084: 12083: 12082: 12078: 12074: 12070: 12066: 12063: 12062: 12061: 12057: 12053: 12049: 12048: 12047: 12043: 12039: 12034: 12031: 12027: 12026: 12016: 12011: 12006: 12000: 11996: 11995: 11994: 11990: 11986: 11981: 11978: 11977: 11969: 11965: 11961: 11957: 11953: 11951: 11947: 11943: 11937: 11931: 11927: 11924: 11920: 11919: 11911: 11907: 11903: 11898: 11894: 11891: 11887: 11881: 11877: 11873: 11869: 11868:about Cardoso 11865: 11861: 11858: 11857: 11856: 11852: 11848: 11845: 11841: 11837: 11836: 11835: 11831: 11827: 11823: 11819: 11818: 11800: 11796: 11792: 11787: 11786: 11785: 11780: 11775: 11771: 11770: 11769: 11765: 11761: 11760:69.181.17.113 11757: 11753: 11749: 11745: 11741: 11737: 11733: 11727: 11722: 11721: 11720: 11715: 11710: 11705: 11703: 11699: 11695: 11690: 11689: 11688: 11684: 11680: 11675: 11674: 11673: 11668: 11663: 11659: 11655: 11649: 11645: 11641: 11640:69.181.17.113 11637: 11636: 11635: 11630: 11625: 11621: 11617: 11613: 11612: 11611: 11607: 11603: 11597: 11592: 11588: 11586: 11581: 11576: 11572: 11568: 11564: 11562: 11557: 11553: 11549: 11545: 11541: 11535: 11534: 11522: 11519: 11515: 11513: 11509: 11505: 11500: 11496: 11495: 11494: 11490: 11486: 11485:Irina Rainbow 11481: 11477: 11476: 11475: 11471: 11467: 11462: 11459: 11455: 11451: 11447: 11443: 11438: 11434: 11430: 11426: 11425:Irina Rainbow 11422: 11418: 11414: 11413:WP Disability 11410: 11406: 11403: 11402: 11401: 11396: 11392: 11388: 11384: 11380: 11375: 11374:Talk:Dementia 11368: 11367:WP Disability 11358: 11350: 11349: 11348: 11344: 11340: 11339:Irina Rainbow 11336: 11332: 11328: 11325: 11321: 11318: 11314: 11310: 11306: 11305: 11302: 11298: 11294: 11290: 11289: 11286: 11281: 11277: 11273: 11269: 11265: 11260: 11257: 11255: 11251: 11248: 11245: 11241: 11237: 11233: 11227: 11226:edit conflict 11222: 11221: 11213: 11209: 11205: 11201: 11198: 11190: 11187: 11181: 11178: 11177: 11176: 11172: 11168: 11167:DoubleGrazing 11164: 11160: 11159: 11158: 11154: 11150: 11146: 11142: 11141: 11140: 11137: 11132: 11128: 11127: 11119: 11115: 11111: 11107: 11106:WP:Quotations 11103: 11102: 11094: 11090: 11086: 11081: 11076: 11075: 11067: 11063: 11059: 11055: 11051: 11047: 11043: 11039: 11035: 11034:verifiability 11030: 11027: 11026:autobiography 11023: 11019: 11016: 11012: 11009: 11006: 11005: 10997: 10993: 10989: 10985: 10983: 10979: 10975: 10971: 10967: 10963: 10959: 10955: 10953: 10949: 10945: 10942:) etc.. ~ 🦝 10941: 10937: 10933: 10929: 10925: 10921: 10919: 10915: 10911: 10908: 10904: 10903: 10895: 10891: 10887: 10883: 10881: 10877: 10873: 10869: 10865: 10864: 10854: 10850: 10846: 10840: 10839: 10838: 10834: 10830: 10826: 10822: 10821: 10813: 10809: 10805: 10800: 10794: 10789: 10788: 10780: 10776: 10772: 10768: 10764: 10763: 10754: 10749: 10745: 10744: 10736: 10729: 10724: 10723: 10715: 10708: 10703: 10700: 10696: 10692: 10691:"Tagara; Tēr" 10685: 10678: 10673: 10669: 10665: 10658: 10650: 10645: 10644:Bosworth 2012 10639: 10633: 10627: 10621: 10615: 10609: 10603: 10597: 10591: 10585: 10579: 10573: 10567: 10561: 10556: 10554: 10549: 10542: 10534: 10530: 10526: 10522: 10518: 10514: 10510: 10506: 10502: 10498: 10494: 10490: 10489: 10488: 10484: 10480: 10476: 10475: 10467: 10463: 10459: 10455: 10451: 10447: 10446: 10436: 10432: 10428: 10423: 10422: 10421: 10420: 10417: 10413: 10409: 10405: 10399: 10395: 10394: 10386: 10382: 10378: 10372: 10368: 10366: 10362: 10358: 10354: 10348: 10344: 10342: 10338: 10332: 10326: 10325: 10317: 10313: 10309: 10305: 10299: 10295: 10294: 10284: 10280: 10276: 10273: 10270: 10264: 10259: 10258: 10257: 10253: 10249: 10245: 10241: 10238: 10234: 10232: 10228: 10224: 10220: 10216: 10212: 10211: 10203: 10199: 10195: 10191: 10187: 10183: 10179: 10175: 10171: 10168: 10167: 10166: 10162: 10158: 10153: 10149: 10145: 10142: 10141:Viusal Editor 10138: 10134: 10130: 10126: 10123: 10119: 10115: 10111: 10107: 10105: 10101: 10097: 10092: 10091: 10082: 10073: 10069: 10065: 10061: 10058: 10057: 10056: 10052: 10048: 10044: 10041: 10040: 10035: 10031: 10027: 10023: 10019: 10013: 10009: 10004: 10003: 10002: 9998: 9994: 9990: 9986: 9984: 9980: 9976: 9972: 9968: 9965: 9964: 9952: 9948: 9944: 9940: 9937: 9930: 9925: 9924: 9923: 9922: 9921: 9920: 9917: 9914: 9912: 9909: 9907: 9904: 9902: 9899: 9897: 9894: 9893: 9883: 9878: 9877: 9876: 9872: 9868: 9864: 9860: 9859: 9858: 9854: 9850: 9846: 9842: 9836: 9832: 9828: 9824: 9823: 9822: 9818: 9814: 9809: 9805: 9802: 9801: 9800: 9796: 9792: 9788: 9784: 9783: 9776: 9772: 9768: 9764: 9759: 9755: 9744: 9743: 9742: 9739: 9736: 9730: 9729: 9724: 9716: 9712: 9708: 9704: 9700: 9696: 9692: 9691: 9679: 9675: 9671: 9667: 9666: 9665: 9661: 9657: 9652: 9651: 9650: 9646: 9642: 9638: 9634: 9632: 9628: 9624: 9620: 9616: 9615: 9605: 9601: 9597: 9585: 9581: 9580: 9579: 9575: 9571: 9567: 9563: 9559: 9558: 9550: 9547: 9544: 9540: 9536: 9532: 9531: 9513: 9509: 9505: 9504:WikiProCreate 9502: 9499: 9498: 9497: 9493: 9489: 9485: 9484: 9483: 9479: 9475: 9474:WikiProCreate 9471: 9467: 9463: 9462: 9461: 9457: 9453: 9450: 9445: 9444: 9443: 9439: 9435: 9434:WikiProCreate 9432: 9428: 9427: 9426: 9422: 9418: 9414: 9413: 9410: 9400: 9395: 9390: 9385: 9384: 9383: 9379: 9375: 9370: 9360: 9355: 9350: 9346: 9342: 9338: 9334: 9330: 9329: 9328: 9324: 9320: 9314: 9309: 9308: 9307: 9303: 9299: 9295: 9292: 9290: 9286: 9282: 9278: 9277: 9276: 9272: 9268: 9262: 9257: 9256: 9255: 9251: 9247: 9243: 9242: 9241: 9237: 9233: 9226: 9221: 9220: 9210: 9207: 9203: 9202: 9201: 9197: 9193: 9189: 9185: 9182: 9178: 9174: 9171: 9167: 9165: 9161: 9157: 9154: 9150: 9146: 9143: 9139: 9135: 9132: 9131: 9123: 9118: 9113: 9109: 9108:WP:CHU/Simple 9103: 9098: 9096: 9092: 9088: 9084: 9080: 9076: 9075:administrator 9072: 9068: 9067: 9057: 9053: 9049: 9045: 9044: 9043: 9039: 9035: 9031: 9027: 9023: 9019: 9015: 9011: 9010:verifiability 9006: 9003: 8999: 8995: 8991: 8988: 8982: 8978: 8974: 8970: 8969: 8968: 8964: 8960: 8956: 8953: 8952: 8951: 8947: 8943: 8939: 8935: 8933: 8929: 8925: 8921: 8918:. Please see 8917: 8913: 8908: 8907: 8899: 8896: 8893: 8889: 8885: 8884: 8870: 8867: 8859: 8855: 8851: 8850: 8849: 8845: 8841: 8837: 8836: 8835: 8832: 8824: 8820: 8816: 8812: 8806: 8804: 8800: 8796: 8792: 8790: 8786: 8785: 8784: 8783: 8780: 8776: 8772: 8768: 8764: 8760: 8756: 8753: 8752: 8747: 8743: 8739: 8734: 8733: 8732: 8728: 8724: 8720: 8714: 8713:edit conflict 8709: 8707: 8703: 8699: 8695: 8694: 8680: 8676: 8672: 8668: 8664: 8663: 8662: 8657: 8652: 8648: 8644: 8643: 8642: 8638: 8634: 8629: 8625: 8621: 8617: 8616: 8615: 8611: 8607: 8603: 8599: 8597: 8592: 8587: 8583: 8579: 8575: 8574: 8564: 8560: 8556: 8552: 8551: 8550: 8545: 8540: 8536: 8534: 8530: 8526: 8522: 8516: 8512: 8508: 8504: 8503: 8500: 8496: 8492: 8488: 8479: 8458: 8454: 8450: 8449:FactOrOpinion 8446: 8442: 8438: 8437: 8436: 8432: 8428: 8424: 8423:FactOrOpinion 8421: 8420: 8419: 8414: 8409: 8404: 8403: 8395: 8392: 8389: 8385: 8381: 8379: 8375: 8371: 8367: 8362: 8354: 8350: 8346: 8341: 8338: 8337: 8336: 8332: 8328: 8324: 8323: 8322: 8317: 8312: 8308: 8304: 8303: 8302: 8298: 8294: 8290: 8287:(ii) is from 8286: 8282: 8279: 8278: 8265: 8261: 8257: 8254: 8251: 8249: 8246: 8240: 8235: 8230: 8226: 8221: 8220: 8219: 8215: 8211: 8207: 8202: 8201: 8199: 8195: 8193: 8190: 8187: 8184: 8180: 8176: 8172: 8171: 8170: 8166: 8162: 8158: 8157: 8156: 8151: 8146: 8141: 8140: 8139: 8135: 8131: 8127: 8124: 8122:All the best, 8121: 8119: 8116: 8112: 8108: 8104: 8100: 8096: 8093: 8092: 8091: 8086: 8081: 8076: 8073: 8068: 8064: 8060: 8056: 8052: 8048: 8047: 8046: 8042: 8038: 8033: 8030: 8029: 8028: 8023: 8018: 8014: 8010: 8006: 8002: 7996: 7992: 7988: 7984: 7983: 7982: 7978: 7974: 7969: 7968: 7967: 7963: 7959: 7955: 7951: 7948: 7947: 7937: 7932: 7928: 7924: 7919: 7918: 7917: 7913: 7909: 7908:FactOrOpinion 7905: 7901: 7897: 7893: 7889: 7885: 7881: 7875: 7870: 7865: 7861: 7857: 7853: 7849: 7848: 7847: 7842: 7838: 7834: 7829: 7828: 7827: 7822: 7817: 7813: 7809: 7808: 7790: 7786: 7782: 7778: 7777: 7776: 7771: 7766: 7762: 7761: 7760: 7756: 7752: 7748: 7746:Really, dude? 7745: 7744: 7743: 7739: 7735: 7731: 7727: 7723: 7719: 7716: 7715: 7714: 7710: 7706: 7702: 7701: 7700: 7696: 7692: 7688: 7684: 7683: 7675: 7671: 7667: 7654: 7653: 7643: 7639: 7635: 7631: 7627: 7626: 7625: 7621: 7617: 7613: 7609: 7605: 7601: 7600: 7597: 7593: 7589: 7585: 7582: 7581: 7571: 7567: 7561: 7555: 7554: 7553: 7549: 7545: 7541: 7534: 7528: 7527: 7524: 7506: 7502: 7498: 7494: 7493: 7492: 7487: 7482: 7477: 7473: 7467: 7463: 7459: 7455: 7451: 7447: 7446: 7445: 7441: 7437: 7433: 7432: 7431: 7427: 7423: 7418: 7417: 7416: 7415: 7414: 7413: 7412: 7411: 7410: 7409: 7396: 7392: 7388: 7383: 7382: 7381: 7377: 7373: 7369: 7368: 7367: 7363: 7359: 7354: 7353: 7352: 7347: 7342: 7338: 7334: 7332: 7328: 7324: 7320: 7319: 7318: 7314: 7310: 7306: 7305: 7304: 7299: 7294: 7290: 7285: 7275: 7271: 7267: 7263: 7262: 7261: 7256: 7251: 7246: 7242: 7238: 7234: 7230: 7226: 7225: 7224: 7220: 7216: 7212: 7210: 7206: 7202: 7198: 7197: 7196: 7192: 7188: 7183: 7182: 7181: 7177: 7173: 7169: 7168: 7167: 7163: 7159: 7155: 7151: 7147: 7143: 7139: 7138: 7137: 7133: 7128: 7122: 7121: 7111: 7107: 7103: 7099: 7098: 7097: 7093: 7089: 7085: 7078: 7071: 7070: 7062: 7058: 7054: 7049: 7046: 7042: 7038: 7034: 7030: 7029: 7028: 7024: 7020: 7016: 7015: 7012:Breaking News 7007: 7003: 6999: 6994: 6988: 6983: 6977: 6973: 6969: 6965: 6961: 6958: 6956: 6952: 6948: 6944: 6943: 6942: 6938: 6934: 6930: 6929: 6928: 6924: 6920: 6916: 6912: 6908: 6907: 6904: 6886: 6882: 6878: 6874: 6873: 6872: 6868: 6864: 6860: 6856: 6852: 6848: 6845: 6839: 6835: 6831: 6827: 6826: 6825: 6821: 6817: 6813: 6812: 6811: 6807: 6803: 6799: 6798: 6797: 6793: 6789: 6785: 6784: 6783: 6779: 6775: 6771: 6770: 6769: 6765: 6761: 6757: 6756: 6755: 6751: 6747: 6743: 6742: 6737: 6733: 6729: 6728:Mike Turnbull 6725: 6721: 6720: 6719: 6715: 6711: 6710:Mike Turnbull 6707: 6703: 6699: 6693: 6689: 6685: 6681: 6680: 6679: 6674: 6669: 6665: 6662: 6661: 6660: 6659: 6655: 6651: 6646: 6644: 6640: 6636: 6632: 6631:Verifiability 6629: 6628: 6612: 6608: 6604: 6600: 6597: 6594: 6593: 6592: 6588: 6584: 6583:Tizzythewhale 6580: 6579: 6578: 6574: 6570: 6569:Mike Turnbull 6566: 6562: 6561:Tizzythewhale 6558: 6557: 6556: 6552: 6548: 6547:Tizzythewhale 6544: 6540: 6539: 6538: 6534: 6530: 6529:Mike Turnbull 6526: 6522: 6521:Tizzythewhale 6518: 6517: 6515: 6511: 6507: 6506:Tizzythewhale 6503: 6492: 6488: 6484: 6480: 6477: 6473: 6469: 6453: 6449: 6445: 6441: 6440: 6439: 6435: 6431: 6427: 6423: 6419: 6414: 6410: 6406: 6402: 6398: 6394: 6390: 6386: 6385:WP:ATTRIBUTEd 6382: 6378: 6374: 6370: 6366: 6362: 6358: 6355: 6354: 6353: 6349: 6345: 6340: 6334: 6330: 6326: 6322: 6321: 6320: 6316: 6312: 6308: 6304: 6300: 6296: 6292: 6288: 6284: 6283:WP:PEERREVIEW 6280: 6276: 6270: 6265: 6264: 6263: 6259: 6255: 6251: 6247: 6242: 6241: 6240: 6236: 6232: 6228: 6224: 6220: 6216: 6211: 6207: 6202: 6199: 6198: 6197: 6193: 6189: 6184: 6183: 6182: 6178: 6174: 6170: 6166: 6162: 6156: 6151: 6150: 6149: 6145: 6141: 6137: 6134: 6131: 6128: 6124: 6119: 6113: 6108: 6096: 6092: 6088: 6087: 6086: 6082: 6078: 6073: 6069: 6065: 6061: 6057: 6056: 6055: 6051: 6047: 6043: 6039: 6035: 6034: 6033: 6028: 6022: 6017: 6005: 6001: 5997: 5993: 5989: 5985: 5984: 5970: 5966: 5962: 5958: 5954: 5953: 5950: 5946: 5942: 5938: 5932: 5928: 5927: 5926: 5922: 5918: 5914: 5913: 5912: 5908: 5904: 5900: 5896: 5892: 5888: 5884: 5880: 5879:verifiability 5875: 5872: 5868: 5864: 5860: 5858: 5854: 5850: 5843: 5834: 5829: 5828: 5820: 5816: 5812: 5808: 5804: 5802: 5797: 5792: 5788: 5784: 5780: 5779: 5769: 5765: 5761: 5757: 5756: 5755: 5751: 5747: 5743: 5739: 5735: 5732: 5728: 5727: 5717: 5713: 5709: 5705: 5702: 5701: 5700: 5696: 5692: 5688: 5684: 5682: 5678: 5674: 5670: 5665: 5661: 5660: 5650: 5646: 5642: 5637: 5634: 5633: 5632: 5628: 5624: 5620: 5616: 5612: 5611: 5603: 5599: 5595: 5591: 5587: 5583: 5580: 5579: 5554: 5550: 5546: 5542: 5538: 5537: 5536: 5532: 5528: 5523: 5522: 5521: 5517: 5513: 5509: 5504: 5500: 5496: 5494: 5489: 5486: 5482: 5478: 5474: 5471: 5466: 5461: 5459: 5454: 5453: 5452: 5451: 5450: 5446: 5442: 5438: 5437: 5436: 5432: 5428: 5424: 5420: 5419: 5418: 5414: 5410: 5405: 5401: 5400: 5399: 5395: 5391: 5387: 5386: 5385: 5381: 5377: 5373: 5368: 5364: 5360: 5356: 5351: 5347: 5343: 5342: 5341: 5337: 5333: 5329: 5325: 5321: 5320: 5319: 5315: 5311: 5307: 5304: 5300: 5299: 5298: 5294: 5290: 5285: 5284: 5283: 5280: 5278: 5274: 5273: 5263: 5259: 5255: 5251: 5247: 5243: 5239: 5238: 5237: 5236: 5233: 5229: 5225: 5221: 5216: 5212: 5209: 5208: 5194: 5189: 5184: 5180: 5176: 5175: 5174: 5170: 5166: 5161: 5160: 5159: 5154: 5149: 5144: 5143: 5142: 5138: 5134: 5130: 5125: 5121: 5117: 5114: 5110: 5106: 5102: 5098: 5097: 5096: 5092: 5088: 5084: 5080: 5070: 5069: 5061: 5057: 5053: 5048: 5042: 5038: 5034: 5027: 5026:Mike Turnbull 5023: 5019: 5014: 5009: 5008: 5007: 5003: 4999: 4998:Mike Turnbull 4994: 4990: 4986: 4985: 4984: 4980: 4976: 4970: 4966: 4962: 4958: 4954: 4952: 4948: 4944: 4940: 4936: 4932: 4928: 4924: 4923: 4915: 4912: 4909: 4908: 4893: 4889: 4885: 4875: 4871: 4867: 4863: 4859: 4858: 4856: 4852: 4848: 4847: 4846: 4845: 4844: 4843: 4842: 4838: 4834: 4831:for details. 4830: 4826: 4825: 4815: 4808: 4806: 4801: 4799: 4793: 4789: 4788: 4787: 4783: 4779: 4773: 4769: 4762: 4760: 4755: 4753: 4747: 4743: 4739: 4736: 4732: 4728: 4724: 4723: 4722: 4718: 4714: 4710: 4706: 4703: 4702: 4684: 4680: 4676: 4672: 4668: 4667: 4666: 4662: 4658: 4654: 4651: 4650: 4649: 4648: 4647: 4646: 4645: 4641: 4637: 4633: 4629: 4625: 4624: 4623: 4619: 4615: 4611: 4605: 4600: 4599: 4596: 4592: 4588: 4584: 4580: 4579: 4567: 4563: 4559: 4554: 4550: 4547: 4546: 4545: 4541: 4537: 4533: 4532: 4531: 4527: 4523: 4519: 4515: 4509: 4505: 4501: 4497: 4493: 4491: 4487: 4483: 4479: 4477: 4472: 4467: 4466: 4465: 4461: 4457: 4453: 4449: 4445: 4444: 4443: 4439: 4435: 4431: 4428: 4424: 4416: 4412: 4408: 4404: 4403: 4402: 4398: 4394: 4390: 4386: 4385: 4384: 4380: 4376: 4371: 4370: 4369: 4365: 4361: 4357: 4353: 4349: 4345: 4341: 4338: 4334: 4333: 4321: 4317: 4313: 4309: 4308: 4307: 4303: 4299: 4295: 4294: 4293: 4289: 4285: 4281: 4280: 4264: 4260: 4256: 4255:69.181.17.113 4252: 4251: 4250: 4246: 4242: 4238: 4237: 4236: 4232: 4228: 4224: 4220: 4216: 4209: 4202: 4194: 4190: 4186: 4182: 4181: 4180: 4176: 4172: 4168: 4167: 4166: 4162: 4158: 4154: 4150: 4149: 4148: 4144: 4140: 4136: 4135: 4134: 4130: 4126: 4122: 4118: 4117: 4116: 4113: 4112: 4111: 4106: 4097: 4096: 4082: 4078: 4074: 4070: 4069: 4068: 4064: 4060: 4056: 4052: 4048: 4047: 4046: 4042: 4038: 4034: 4033: 4032: 4028: 4024: 4023:DoubleGrazing 4017: 4007: 4000: 3996: 3994: 3990: 3986: 3982: 3978: 3975: 3971: 3969: 3965: 3961: 3957: 3953: 3952: 3944: 3940: 3936: 3931: 3927: 3923: 3919: 3915: 3909: 3905: 3877: 3873: 3869: 3865: 3864: 3863: 3859: 3855: 3851: 3845: 3841: 3840: 3835: 3834: 3833: 3829: 3825: 3821: 3820: 3819: 3815: 3811: 3807: 3800: 3796: 3792: 3786: 3785: 3784: 3780: 3776: 3773: 3769: 3767: 3763: 3759: 3754: 3753: 3752: 3748: 3744: 3740: 3726: 3712: 3704: 3700: 3699: 3698: 3694: 3690: 3686: 3682: 3678: 3677: 3676: 3672: 3668: 3664: 3663: 3662: 3658: 3654: 3651: 3648:independent.@ 3646: 3642: 3640: 3636: 3632: 3628: 3627: 3626: 3622: 3618: 3614: 3610: 3609: 3608: 3604: 3600: 3596: 3594: 3590: 3586: 3582: 3581: 3580: 3576: 3572: 3567: 3563: 3560: 3556: 3552: 3551: 3550: 3546: 3542: 3538: 3534: 3530: 3526: 3522: 3521: 3520: 3516: 3512: 3508: 3504: 3500: 3496: 3492: 3491: 3490: 3486: 3482: 3478: 3472: 3468: 3464: 3461: 3456: 3455: 3454: 3453: 3452: 3448: 3444: 3440: 3439: 3438: 3434: 3430: 3425: 3424: 3423: 3419: 3415: 3410: 3409: 3408: 3404: 3400: 3396: 3395: 3385: 3382: 3381: 3378: 3377: 3374: 3369: 3365: 3364:Martin Garrix 3361: 3357: 3356: 3355: 3351: 3347: 3343: 3339: 3335: 3327: 3323: 3319: 3315: 3312: 3311: 3310: 3306: 3302: 3297:Pigsonthewing 3293: 3285: 3280: 3279: 3278: 3274: 3270: 3266: 3262: 3258: 3254: 3253:WP:Volunteers 3250: 3249: 3248: 3244: 3240: 3235:Pigsonthewing 3231: 3225: 3221: 3217: 3216: 3204: 3200: 3196: 3192: 3191: 3190: 3186: 3182: 3178: 3176: 3172: 3168: 3164: 3160: 3156: 3155: 3154: 3150: 3146: 3142: 3134: 3130: 3129: 3122: 3118: 3114: 3110: 3109: 3108: 3104: 3100: 3096: 3093: 3092: 3091: 3087: 3083: 3079: 3078: 3070: 3066: 3062: 3058: 3055: 3051: 3047: 3043: 3040: 3036: 3035: 3034: 3030: 3026: 3022: 3018: 3014: 3010: 3006: 3005: 2995: 2991: 2987: 2983: 2982: 2981: 2977: 2973: 2969: 2965: 2961: 2957: 2953: 2950: 2946: 2942: 2938: 2937:Mike Turnbull 2934: 2930: 2926: 2922: 2918: 2914: 2913: 2912: 2907: 2902: 2898: 2895: 2889: 2885: 2881: 2877: 2876: 2875: 2871: 2867: 2862: 2861: 2860: 2856: 2852: 2848: 2844: 2840: 2839: 2829: 2825: 2821: 2817: 2816: 2815: 2811: 2807: 2803: 2802: 2795: 2774: 2770: 2766: 2765:69.181.17.113 2762: 2758: 2757: 2756: 2752: 2748: 2744: 2743: 2742: 2738: 2734: 2730: 2723: 2718: 2714: 2710: 2709: 2697: 2693: 2689: 2685: 2681: 2680: 2679: 2675: 2671: 2667: 2664: 2660: 2658: 2654: 2650: 2646: 2642: 2641: 2640: 2636: 2632: 2628: 2624: 2623: 2607: 2603: 2599: 2595: 2594: 2593: 2589: 2585: 2581: 2580: 2579: 2575: 2571: 2567: 2563: 2557: 2553: 2549: 2545: 2541: 2538: 2530: 2526: 2522: 2518: 2515: 2514: 2513: 2509: 2505: 2501: 2498: 2495: 2491: 2487: 2485: 2481: 2477: 2473: 2471: 2466: 2465: 2464: 2460: 2456: 2452: 2449: 2448: 2447: 2443: 2439: 2435: 2432: 2428: 2424: 2410: 2406: 2402: 2399:Best wishes. 2398: 2394: 2393:FactOrOpinion 2390: 2389: 2388: 2384: 2380: 2379:FactOrOpinion 2376: 2372: 2371: 2370: 2366: 2362: 2358: 2355: 2353: 2349: 2346: 2343: 2340: 2337: 2335: 2330: 2328: 2327:FactOrOpinion 2324: 2323: 2322: 2318: 2314: 2313:FactOrOpinion 2310: 2306: 2304: 2300: 2296: 2295:FactOrOpinion 2292: 2288: 2283: 2280: 2276: 2275: 2274: 2270: 2266: 2262: 2259: 2257:Thanks again! 2256: 2253: 2249: 2246: 2244: 2241: 2237: 2234: 2231: 2228: 2225: 2222: 2219: 2215: 2213: 2209: 2205: 2201: 2198: 2195: 2193: 2190: 2188: 2185: 2181: 2180: 2179: 2175: 2171: 2170:FactOrOpinion 2166: 2162: 2158: 2154: 2150: 2149: 2148: 2144: 2140: 2136: 2132: 2131: 2130: 2126: 2122: 2117: 2116: 2115: 2111: 2107: 2102: 2101: 2100: 2096: 2092: 2088: 2085: 2081: 2080: 2079: 2075: 2071: 2067: 2061: 2056: 2048: 2044: 2040: 2036: 2035: 2034: 2030: 2026: 2022: 2018: 2016: 2012: 2008: 2003: 2002: 2001: 1997: 1993: 1989: 1986: 1982: 1981: 1980: 1976: 1972: 1968: 1964: 1960: 1956: 1952: 1948: 1944: 1943:WP:VOLUNTEERs 1940: 1934: 1929: 1928: 1910: 1905: 1900: 1896: 1892: 1891: 1890: 1886: 1882: 1878: 1874: 1873: 1872: 1868: 1864: 1860: 1857: 1852: 1851: 1850: 1846: 1842: 1837: 1833: 1829: 1825: 1824: 1823: 1819: 1815: 1810: 1806: 1805: 1804: 1799: 1794: 1790: 1786: 1784: 1779: 1774: 1769: 1765: 1762: 1758: 1754: 1750: 1748: 1744: 1740: 1736: 1732: 1728: 1727: 1711: 1707: 1703: 1699: 1695: 1694: 1693: 1689: 1685: 1680: 1679: 1678: 1674: 1670: 1666: 1663: 1660: 1657: 1654: 1653: 1652: 1648: 1644: 1640: 1639: 1638: 1634: 1630: 1626: 1622: 1618: 1614: 1610: 1606: 1605: 1604: 1600: 1596: 1592: 1589: 1588: 1585: 1581: 1577: 1572: 1566: 1562: 1558: 1554: 1553: 1551: 1547: 1543: 1533: 1525: 1519: 1518: 1517: 1513: 1509: 1504: 1503: 1487: 1483: 1479: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1470: 1465: 1459: 1455: 1454: 1453: 1449: 1445: 1441: 1440: 1439: 1436: 1431: 1425: 1424:wikidata:Q352 1421: 1420: 1419: 1415: 1411: 1406: 1405: 1385: 1381: 1377: 1372: 1368: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1358: 1354: 1350: 1346: 1342: 1338: 1334: 1328: 1323: 1321: 1317: 1313: 1309: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1299: 1295: 1291: 1287: 1283: 1280: 1276: 1274: 1270: 1266: 1262: 1261: 1260: 1256: 1252: 1248: 1244: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1234: 1230: 1226: 1225: 1224: 1220: 1216: 1212: 1208: 1207: 1206: 1202: 1198: 1194: 1192: 1188: 1184: 1183:Mike Turnbull 1180: 1179:false balance 1176: 1172: 1168: 1164: 1163: 1141: 1137: 1133: 1132:69.181.17.113 1129: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1119: 1115: 1110: 1106: 1104: 1100: 1096: 1092: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1082: 1078: 1074: 1071: 1070: 1069: 1065: 1061: 1058: 1054: 1050: 1046: 1042: 1040: 1036: 1032: 1028: 1024: 1021: 1020: 1019: 1015: 1011: 1003: 1002: 1001: 997: 993: 989: 985: 984: 983: 979: 975: 971: 970: 969: 965: 961: 957: 952: 948: 944: 942: 938: 934: 929: 927: 923: 919: 915: 910: 907:I have heard 906: 905: 892: 888: 884: 879: 875: 871: 870: 869: 865: 861: 857: 854: 850: 846: 845: 844: 840: 836: 832: 829: 822: 813: 808: 807: 806: 802: 798: 793: 788: 784: 780: 779: 778: 774: 770: 766: 762: 758: 757: 756: 752: 748: 744: 740: 736: 735: 727: 723: 719: 715: 711: 707: 704: 699: 695: 691: 687: 682: 681: 674: 670: 666: 662: 659: 657: 653: 649: 647: 641: 638: 634: 630: 629: 593: 589: 585: 581: 580: 579: 575: 571: 570:Mike Turnbull 566: 562: 561: 560: 556: 552: 548: 547: 546: 542: 538: 537:Mike Turnbull 533: 529: 528: 525: 524:0 seconds ago 521: 517: 513: 509: 505: 500: 497: 495: 493: 488: 486: 485: 479: 476: 475: 474: 470: 466: 462: 461: 460: 456: 452: 451:Mike Turnbull 445: 438: 434: 431: 427: 423: 422: 421: 417: 413: 408: 407: 406: 402: 398: 397:Mike Turnbull 394: 389: 385: 381: 380: 379: 375: 371: 367: 363: 362: 361: 357: 353: 349: 345: 344: 343: 339: 335: 334:Mike Turnbull 331: 326: 322: 318: 317: 316: 312: 308: 304: 303: 302: 298: 294: 290: 286: 283: 280: 275: 272: 268: 265: 261: 260:public domain 257: 254: 253: 252: 248: 244: 240: 239: 215: 212: 210: 204: 203: 173: 166: 159: 156: 152: 139: 137:Become a host 129: 120: 111: 101: 88: 87: 76: 64: 60: 57: 53: 52: 49: 29: 22: 13374: 13276: 13212: 13202:Naomi Hennig 13188:Naomi Hennig 13183: 13156:Naomi Hennig 13050:The article 12903:referencing 12867: 12866: 12799:Username COI 12775: 12741: 12737: 12729: 12663: 12464: 12356:WP:TECHNICAL 12334: 12333: 12327: 12310: 12309: 12272: 12271: 12265: 12225: 12224: 12181: 12180: 12130: 11985:72.218.87.16 11867: 11863: 11751: 11747: 11743: 11732:Eric Kessler 11616:this article 11571:Eric Kessler 11479: 11466:WhatamIdoing 11420: 11246: 10742: 10735: 10726: 10721: 10714: 10705: 10694: 10684: 10675: 10671: 10667: 10657: 10608:Anthony 2011 10560:Maclean 1984 10496: 10492: 10346: 10243: 10217:on the page 10121: 10117: 10080: 10022:this comment 9763:noticeboards 9740: 9734: 9731: 9707:57.140.16.35 9702: 9656:Uporządnicki 9333:Cornishrom20 9313:Cornishrom20 9298:Cornishrom20 9281:Cornishrom20 9261:Cornishrom20 9246:Cornishrom20 9225:Cornishrom20 9180: 8997: 8840:Roryjohnston 8818: 8789:Roryjohnston 8755:Roryjohnston 8738:Roryjohnston 8719:Roryjohnston 8511:edit warring 8284: 8197: 8066: 8062: 8058: 8054: 8012: 7611: 7497:94.192.32.22 7420:opinion. -- 7372:94.192.32.22 7358:94.192.32.22 7323:94.192.32.22 7309:94.192.32.22 7288: 7266:94.192.32.22 7229:94.192.32.22 7215:94.192.32.22 7201:94.192.32.22 7172:94.192.32.22 7142:94.192.32.22 7033:94.192.32.22 7019:94.192.32.22 6947:94.192.32.22 6933:94.192.32.22 6877:94.192.32.22 6830:94.192.32.22 6816:94.192.32.22 6802:94.192.32.22 6788:94.192.32.22 6774:94.192.32.22 6760:94.192.32.22 6746:94.192.32.22 6702:verification 6663: 6647: 6542: 6502:Bagri Kumhar 6475: 6393:WP:EXPERTSPS 6381:WP:RSCONTEXT 6373:WP:SECONDARY 6365:WP:ABOUTSELF 6245: 6223:WP:CONSENSUS 6206:WP:PROTECTed 6186:each other. 6165:WP:VANDALISM 6037: 5935:— Preceding 5870: 5866: 5621:helpful? -- 5498: 5492: 5491: 5476: 5457: 5456: 5371: 5366: 5362: 5358: 5242:Draft:Memnun 5215:Draft:Memnun 5178: 4934: 4930: 4926: 4895: 4860:Please read 4804: 4797: 4758: 4751: 4745: 4708: 4583:your request 4495: 4351: 4339: 4277:Cnn blocked? 4152: 4120: 4101: 4100: 4006:Football kit 3907: 3837: 3798: 3729:that section 3710: 3684: 3680: 3644: 3554: 3457:in the draft 3379: 3375: 3372: 3359: 3314:Andy Mabbett 3305:Andy's edits 3301:Talk to Andy 3292:Andy Mabbett 3243:Andy's edits 3239:Talk to Andy 3230:Andy Mabbett 3020: 3016: 2964:Template:DOI 2959: 2955: 2716: 2565: 2543: 2430: 2165:this article 1831: 1809:legitimately 1808: 1476:Ok, thanks. 1370: 1366: 1348: 1345:Women in Red 1340: 1307: 1127: 1053:Display size 1048: 1027:Display size 913: 908: 877: 827: 760: 685: 678: 645: 636: 489: 481: 480: 347: 161: 147: 107: 85: 84: 13415:Draft:Lusei 12971:Anachronist 12700:Please see 12574:TheWikiToby 12374:LaffyTaffer 12352:LaffyTaffer 12150:LaffyTaffer 12088:LaffyTaffer 12065:LaffyTaffer 12052:LaffyTaffer 12030:LaffyTaffer 11864:as a person 11774:Anachronist 11709:Anachronist 11662:Anachronist 11624:Anachronist 11575:Anachronist 11504:David notMD 11409:WP Medicine 11357:WP Medicine 11335:WP:ADVOCACY 11317:Bon courage 11293:Bon courage 11149:David notMD 10872:PrimeHunter 10829:PrimeHunter 10728:traditions: 10722:The Soomras 10572:Nizami 1994 10539:Comment on 10275:PrimeHunter 10263:Waldohammer 9389:Anachronist 9349:Anachronist 9186:Please see 9112:Anachronist 9048:David notMD 8864:Patrick. ツ 8829:Patrick. ツ 8815:WP:DISPUTED 8667:Anachronist 8651:Anachronist 8624:Anachronist 8586:Anachronist 8582:WP:COATRACK 8553:Thank you! 8539:Anachronist 8441:Anachronist 8408:Anachronist 8311:Anachronist 8281:Anachronist 8229:Anachronist 8198:anachronist 8145:Anachronist 8080:Anachronist 8072:WP:INFOWARS 8067:independent 8017:Anachronist 8009:WP:BACKWARD 7864:Anachronist 7816:Anachronist 7765:Anachronist 7556:Thank you. 7521:COPYVIO on 7481:Anachronist 7434:Wise words 7341:Anachronist 7293:Anachronist 7140:Population 6668:Anachronist 6418:WP:SEEKHELP 6389:WP:CITESELF 6295:WP:EDITWARs 6042:WikiProject 5961:David notMD 5941:David notMD 5917:David notMD 5791:Anachronist 5708:David notMD 5687:WP:BACKWARD 5183:Anachronist 5148:Anachronist 4496:demonstrate 4021:.) HTH, -- 3983:, sense 6. 3839:I Am Malala 3725:golden rule 3414:David notMD 3368:Third Party 3346:94.6.83.137 3342:WP:Too soon 3265:WP:TUTORIAL 3167:David notMD 2986:David notMD 2901:Anachronist 2649:David notMD 1951:WP:SHOUTING 1899:Anachronist 1793:Anachronist 1773:Anachronist 1698:Blackballnz 1684:Blackballnz 1643:Blackballnz 1613:Blackballnz 1591:Blackballnz 1367:requirement 1341:necessarily 1308:necessarily 821:underlinked 743:the article 584:CrissCollab 565:CrissCollab 551:CrissCollab 532:CrissCollab 508:CrissCollab 504:last edited 465:CrissCollab 426:CrissCollab 412:CrissCollab 384:CrissCollab 370:CrissCollab 350:an artist. 321:CrissCollab 307:CrissCollab 289:Help:Upload 243:CrissCollab 13499:Categories 13301:Shantavira 13163:Poem quote 13052:Eurospares 12928:94.1.171.3 12920:principles 12840:Sirocco745 12768:WeInTheUSA 12600:asilvering 12216:variances. 12117:asilvering 11960:asilvering 11744:Early life 11591:notability 11417:and others 11085:asilvering 11046:notability 11015:notability 10988:Lester1960 10966:notability 10962:indepedent 10946:(he/him • 10924:Lester1960 10799:notability 10771:Nick Moyes 10632:Malik 2020 10403:Tenryuu 🐲 10352:Tenryuu 🐲 10303:Tenryuu 🐲 10194:asilvering 10190:WP:MILHIST 10157:Nick Moyes 10152:WP:BE BOLD 10064:RodRabelo7 10047:RodRabelo7 10026:RodRabelo7 9929:RodRabelo7 9882:RodRabelo7 9867:RodRabelo7 9849:RodRabelo7 9637:WP:EXPLORE 9596:GoingBatty 9566:Help:Table 9543:Shantavira 9279:Ok thanks 9079:bureaucrat 9022:notability 8892:Shantavira 8852:Thank you 8671:Angel94117 8633:Angel94117 8602:Angel94117 8555:Curiocurio 8520:Tenryuu 🐲 8507:Curiocurio 8486:Tenryuu 🐲 8388:Shantavira 8102:Knowledge. 7904:WP:BLPNAME 7450:wise words 7436:10mmsocket 7387:10mmsocket 6993:notability 6960:Notability 6786:st neots* 6601:- give up 6361:WP:PRIMARY 6161:WP:SILENCE 5992:WP:be bold 5891:notability 5833:User972364 5641:Sirocco745 5615:Sirocco745 4709:two people 4208:PD-US-1989 4071:Thank you 3913:Tenryuu 🐲 3849:Tenryuu 🐲 3805:Tenryuu 🐲 3738:Tenryuu 🐲 3271:(he/him • 3224:notability 2728:Tenryuu 🐲 2722:Creamastra 2161:This essay 2086:Thank you. 1881:10mmsocket 1109:Asilvering 1095:asilvering 1047:there are 1010:asilvering 988:Asilvering 974:asilvering 883:asilvering 787:Asilvering 769:asilvering 732:On tagging 642:Cheers, -- 325:WP:NONFREE 291:for more. 13480:Cullen328 13419:RudolfRed 13184:Ivo Ringe 13027:ColinFine 13019:Bangalore 12995:ColinFine 12901:citations 12746:Cullen328 12637:Cullen328 12509:G4B-XD-3l 12489:G4B-XD-3l 12451:G4B-XD-3l 12427:G4B-XD-3l 12413:G4B-XD-3l 12293:Cullen328 12248:Cullen328 12154:Cullen328 12073:Cullen328 11921:That was 11791:EJKessler 11748:Education 11726:EJKessler 11679:EJKessler 11204:Tesleemah 11163:shouldn't 11110:ColinFine 11099:Citations 11058:ColinFine 10974:ColinFine 10944:Shushugah 10804:ColinFine 10702:0035-869X 10596:Wink 2002 10479:Cullen328 10458:Marchjuly 10298:WP:BEFORE 10248:ColinFine 10114:ColinFine 10096:ColinFine 10012:ColinFine 9993:ColinFine 9813:Cullen328 9791:ColinFine 9767:Marchjuly 9699:WP:RFPP/E 9570:ColinFine 9466:Tesleemah 9452:Tesleemah 9192:ColinFine 9177:BACKWARDS 9156:Tesleemah 9034:ColinFine 8994:BACKWARDS 8973:Tesleemah 8959:Cullen328 8955:Tesleemah 8942:Tesleemah 8858:talk page 8799:Marchjuly 8795:Tesleemah 8763:Marchjuly 8723:Marchjuly 8698:Tesleemah 8578:WP:LAYOUT 8445:Cullen328 8427:Cullen328 8065:that are 7954:Wikiquote 7888:talk page 7602:Click on 7559:Svampesky 6998:ColinFine 6863:ColinFine 6483:ColinFine 6444:MarkWHowe 6430:Marchjuly 6344:MarkWHowe 6325:MarkWHowe 6311:Marchjuly 6279:WP:EXPERT 6269:MarkWHowe 6254:MarkWHowe 6231:Marchjuly 6188:MarkWHowe 6173:Marchjuly 6155:MarkWHowe 6140:MarkWHowe 6091:MarkWHowe 6077:MarkWHowe 6060:MarkWHowe 5988:MarkWHowe 5959:applies. 5903:ColinFine 5863:BACKWARDS 5499:broadness 5472:to do so. 5470:consensus 5324:Cleveland 5224:Tesleemah 5165:Cullen328 5116:Cullen328 4892:WP:TRIVIA 4866:Cullen328 4851:Cullen328 4727:Cullen328 4713:Cullen328 4675:Sparkbean 4671:Cullen328 4657:Cullen328 4653:Sparkbean 4636:Sparkbean 4628:RudolfRed 4614:RudolfRed 4604:Sparkbean 4482:Tesleemah 4434:Tesleemah 4241:Paulie302 4185:Paulie302 4157:Paulie302 4125:Paulie302 4059:ColinFine 3985:ColinFine 3935:Tesleemah 3571:ColinFine 3373:Commissar 3284:Shushugah 3269:Shushugah 3181:Tesleemah 3139:Ripe for 3133:Sumitfilm 3099:Sumitfilm 3082:Tesleemah 3042:ColinFine 2921:this .pdf 2806:Cremastra 2684:Talk page 2682:Check my 2564:I didn't 1971:Marchjuly 1967:WP:OUTING 1789:Lagenlook 1739:Ratekreel 1265:Tesleemah 1229:Tesleemah 1211:Tesleemah 1197:Tesleemah 1167:Tomsinsky 1091:Cullen328 1077:Cullen328 1045:Cullen328 1031:Cullen328 947:Cullen328 933:Newystats 669:talk page 352:ColinFine 293:ColinFine 192:Knowledge 48:Shortcuts 13377:— jmcgnh 13356:Dehmling 13330:Dehmling 13262:contribs 13206:WP:CITET 13069:WP:ASFAQ 12924:policies 12868:Mandruss 12595:MOS:PLOT 12547:Headbomb 12471:WP:LOGOS 12335:Mandruss 12311:Mandruss 12289:Mandruss 12273:Mandruss 12226:Mandruss 12182:Mandruss 11923:added to 11601:Rusalkii 11540:Headbomb 11379:Headbomb 11324:Headbomb 11313:Headbomb 11264:Headbomb 11250:contribs 10910:Lectonar 10886:jlwoodwa 10849:𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔 10610:, p. 178 10598:, p. 156 10586:, p. 355 10505:Struway2 10223:jlwoodwa 10008:Jlwoodwa 9975:jlwoodwa 9789:at all. 9267:Gronk Oz 9232:Gronk Oz 9206:Lagosman 9102:Alexysun 9071:Alexysun 8646:article. 7900:this one 7894:and the 7892:RfC page 7544:jlwoodwa 7088:jlwoodwa 7077:cite web 6968:jlwoodwa 6422:WP:CIVIL 6397:WP:UNDUE 6210:WP:OWNed 6046:jlwoodwa 5949:contribs 5937:unsigned 5807:IlEssere 5704:Boys4tam 5545:GoneIn60 5512:GoneIn60 5376:GoneIn60 5120:Colinstu 5101:Colinstu 4965:jlwoodwa 4943:jlwoodwa 4888:WP:UNDUE 4833:jlwoodwa 4792:Jlwoodwa 4778:jlwoodwa 4632:Jlwoodwa 4587:jlwoodwa 4456:jlwoodwa 4452:reliable 4227:jlwoodwa 4053:, or at 3981:wikt:kit 3960:jlwoodwa 3141:deletion 3025:jlwoodwa 2933:WP:NPROF 2670:Jjamulla 2643:You and 2627:Jjamulla 2570:jlwoodwa 2396:"Rabat." 2070:jlwoodwa 1959:WP:CIVIL 1863:Fortunaa 1828:Fortunaa 1814:Fortunaa 1555:Thanks! 1542:jlwoodwa 1353:jlwoodwa 1337:2018 RfC 694:contribs 512:contribs 437:this one 365:article? 264:CC-BY-SA 13455:things. 13213:they've 13065:WP:PAID 12916:decline 12893:Drafted 12009:MemeGod 11936:CtasACT 11930:CtasACT 11694:MrOllie 11352:(here, 11131:WP:IMDB 10743:Haryana 10697:: 543. 10634:, p. 42 10574:, p. 57 10562:, p. 45 10493:British 10330:Knitsey 9623:Maproom 8866:Pdebee. 8831:Pdebee. 8125:Charles 8055:notable 7634:Iljhgtn 7588:Iljhgtn 7458:Shirt58 7254:MemeGod 6850:vandal. 6682:Thanks 6543:RAJ Era 6413:WP:BOLD 6401:WP:NPOV 6249:review. 6215:WP:BOLD 5957:WP:PAID 5742:WP:PROD 5254:Maproom 5250:Jupiter 4955:Hello, 4705:The Kip 4610:WP:RFPP 4448:notable 4354:. Read 3703:MrOllie 3667:MrOllie 3650:MrOllie 3617:MrOllie 3559:notable 2952:Smedler 2917:Smedler 2866:Smedler 2662:thesis. 2217:answer. 1763:needed. 1347:) will 686:she/her 393:WP:IOWN 330:WP:IOWN 13354:Hello 12942:331dot 12909:verify 12742:do not 12713:331dot 12172:skills 11890:Strlbr 11847:Strlbr 11822:Strlbr 11752:Family 11620:WP:AFD 11565:Go to 11411:}}, {{ 11315:, and 11044:, and 10622:, p. 7 10371:turnip 10133:TABLES 9989:WP:ANI 9936:friend 9488:331dot 9470:331dot 9449:331dot 9417:331dot 9188:WP:YFA 9020:, and 8998:begins 8924:331dot 8793:Copy: 8759:Pdebee 8384:WP:DDD 8225:WP:RSP 8106:media. 7884:WP:RfC 7664:.) -- 7448:Those 7131:Faddle 7126:Fiddle 6919:331dot 6724:331dot 6684:331dot 6650:331dot 6635:331dot 6565:WP:RAJ 6405:WP:RSN 6275:WP:VNT 6246:facts' 6118:✏️cons 6112:💬pros 6027:✏️cons 6021:💬pros 5889:, and 5673:331dot 5346:source 5328:source 5220:Memnon 5211:Memnon 5074:value. 4911:(talk) 4746:enough 4549:Sa2840 4536:Sa2840 4518:Sa2840 4389:Sa2840 4375:Sa2840 4348:WP:BLP 4337:Sa2840 4221:, and 3555:starts 3525:331dot 3113:331dot 3011:, and 2970:.) -- 2925:Nature 2880:331dot 2851:331dot 2598:331dot 2521:Gkabat 2493:point: 2490:Gkabat 2470:WP:BLP 2427:Gkabat 2401:Gkabat 2375:Gkabat 2361:Gkabat 2309:Gkabat 2279:Gkabat 2265:Gkabat 2204:Gkabat 2153:Gkabat 2135:Gkabat 2121:Gkabat 2106:331dot 2091:Gkabat 2060:Gkabat 2021:Gkabat 1992:Gkabat 1933:Gkabat 1895:WP:AFD 1830:: Not 1536:gives 1468:rabbit 1434:rabbit 1114:Akaibu 1073:Akaibu 1060:Akaibu 1055:, see 1023:Akaibu 992:Akaibu 960:Akaibu 874:Akaibu 860:Akaibu 812:Akaibu 797:Akaibu 790:which 765:Akaibu 759:Oh is 718:Jc3s5h 492:CSD G7 165:bottom 56:WP:TEA 13242:PecMo 12907:that 12826:Hoary 12785:Hoary 12115:. -- 11958:. -- 11736:WP:RS 10707:Jatt. 10677:Jutt. 10525:Hoary 10347:isn't 10122:first 9765:. -- 9695:OGWFP 9468:and @ 9181:start 9087:Hoary 8803:Hoary 8771:Hoary 8761:. As 8622:and @ 8370:Hoary 8366:work. 8327:Hoary 8293:Hoary 8013:first 7958:Hoary 7956:. -- 7734:Hoary 7732:. -- 7691:Hoary 7689:? -- 7666:Hoary 7616:Hoary 7476:WP:OR 7464:) 🦘 7422:Hoary 7134:🇺🇦 6858:says. 6428:. -- 6377:WP:RS 6369:WP:OR 6309:. -- 6291:WP:DR 6287:WP:ES 6229:. -- 6171:. -- 5867:first 5760:Pygos 5731:Pygos 5623:Hoary 5594:Hoary 5541:Hoary 5493:Asian 5372:Black 5367:Asian 5179:added 5133:Hoary 5131:. -- 5087:Hoary 5079:Hoary 5024:like 4731:WP:IH 4630:and @ 4558:Hoary 4522:Hoary 4520:? -- 4340:Maybe 4104:fr33k 3376:Doggo 3318:Hoary 3145:Hoary 2972:Hoary 1835:cite. 1832:every 1595:Hoary 1463:Recon 1429:Recon 914:never 878:might 783:Hoary 747:Hoary 698:email 518:) at 444:Db-g7 63:WP:TH 13484:talk 13465:talk 13437:talk 13423:talk 13403:talk 13342:talk 13320:talk 13258:talk 13221:talk 13192:talk 13174:talk 13137:talk 13119:talk 13099:talk 13081:talk 13031:talk 12999:talk 12976:talk 12946:talk 12932:talk 12922:and 12844:talk 12830:talk 12810:talk 12789:talk 12750:talk 12717:talk 12692:talk 12675:talk 12641:talk 12619:talk 12604:talk 12578:talk 12513:talk 12497:talk 12479:talk 12455:talk 12439:talk 12417:talk 12378:talk 12364:talk 12297:talk 12266:easy 12252:talk 12205:talk 12158:talk 12140:talk 12131:only 12121:talk 12092:talk 12077:talk 12056:talk 12042:talk 11989:talk 11964:talk 11946:talk 11906:talk 11876:talk 11851:talk 11830:talk 11795:talk 11779:talk 11764:talk 11740:URLs 11714:talk 11698:talk 11683:talk 11667:talk 11644:talk 11629:talk 11606:talk 11580:talk 11508:talk 11489:talk 11470:talk 11446:talk 11429:talk 11362:and 11343:talk 11333:and 11297:talk 11244:talk 11208:talk 11171:talk 11153:talk 11114:talk 11089:talk 11062:talk 10992:talk 10978:talk 10948:talk 10914:talk 10905:See 10890:talk 10876:talk 10833:talk 10808:talk 10775:talk 10748:ISBN 10699:ISSN 10649:help 10638:help 10626:help 10614:help 10602:help 10590:help 10578:help 10566:help 10541:Jats 10529:talk 10509:talk 10483:talk 10462:talk 10431:talk 10381:talk 10336:talk 10279:talk 10252:talk 10242:You 10227:talk 10198:talk 10178:talk 10161:talk 10147:LOL. 10100:talk 10068:talk 10060:Hftf 10051:talk 10043:Hftf 10030:talk 10024:... 10018:here 10010:and 9997:talk 9979:talk 9947:talk 9871:talk 9853:talk 9831:talk 9817:talk 9795:talk 9771:talk 9711:talk 9703:only 9674:talk 9660:talk 9645:talk 9627:talk 9619:here 9600:talk 9574:talk 9508:talk 9492:talk 9478:talk 9456:talk 9438:talk 9421:talk 9394:talk 9378:talk 9354:talk 9337:talk 9323:talk 9302:talk 9285:talk 9271:talk 9250:talk 9236:talk 9196:talk 9160:talk 9117:talk 9091:talk 9052:talk 9038:talk 8977:talk 8963:talk 8946:talk 8928:talk 8854:Rory 8844:talk 8823:here 8787:To: 8775:talk 8742:talk 8727:talk 8702:talk 8675:talk 8656:talk 8637:talk 8610:talk 8591:talk 8559:talk 8544:talk 8453:talk 8431:talk 8413:talk 8374:talk 8349:talk 8331:talk 8316:talk 8297:talk 8260:talk 8234:talk 8214:talk 8165:talk 8150:talk 8134:talk 8085:talk 8041:talk 8022:talk 7991:talk 7977:talk 7962:talk 7931:Talk 7912:talk 7869:talk 7841:Talk 7821:talk 7810:See 7785:talk 7770:talk 7755:talk 7738:talk 7709:talk 7695:talk 7670:talk 7638:talk 7620:talk 7592:talk 7565:talk 7548:talk 7501:talk 7486:talk 7462:talk 7440:talk 7426:talk 7391:talk 7376:talk 7362:talk 7346:talk 7327:talk 7313:talk 7298:talk 7270:talk 7233:talk 7219:talk 7205:talk 7191:talk 7176:talk 7162:talk 7146:talk 7106:talk 7092:talk 7057:talk 7037:talk 7023:talk 7002:talk 6972:talk 6964:fame 6951:talk 6937:talk 6923:talk 6881:talk 6867:talk 6834:talk 6820:talk 6806:talk 6792:talk 6778:talk 6764:talk 6750:talk 6732:talk 6714:talk 6688:talk 6673:talk 6664:Were 6654:talk 6639:talk 6607:talk 6587:talk 6573:talk 6551:talk 6533:talk 6510:talk 6487:talk 6448:talk 6434:talk 6391:and 6363:and 6348:talk 6329:talk 6315:talk 6277:and 6273:See 6258:talk 6235:talk 6221:and 6192:talk 6177:talk 6144:talk 6106:namm 6103:real 6081:talk 6064:talk 6050:talk 6036:For 6015:namm 6012:real 5965:talk 5945:talk 5921:talk 5907:talk 5871:then 5853:talk 5849:Deor 5815:talk 5796:talk 5764:talk 5750:talk 5712:talk 5695:talk 5677:talk 5645:talk 5627:talk 5598:talk 5549:talk 5531:talk 5516:talk 5445:talk 5431:talk 5413:talk 5394:talk 5380:talk 5365:"... 5336:talk 5314:talk 5293:talk 5258:talk 5248:and 5246:Zeus 5228:talk 5213:and 5188:talk 5169:talk 5153:talk 5137:talk 5105:talk 5091:talk 5083:talk 5056:talk 5037:talk 5002:talk 4979:talk 4947:talk 4870:talk 4855:talk 4837:talk 4782:talk 4717:talk 4679:talk 4661:talk 4640:talk 4618:talk 4591:talk 4562:talk 4540:talk 4526:talk 4504:talk 4486:talk 4471:Moxy 4460:talk 4438:talk 4411:talk 4397:talk 4379:talk 4364:talk 4352:here 4344:WP:N 4316:talk 4310:Url 4302:talk 4288:talk 4259:talk 4245:talk 4231:talk 4189:talk 4175:talk 4161:talk 4143:talk 4129:talk 4121:free 4077:talk 4073:Greg 4063:talk 4041:talk 4037:Greg 4027:talk 3989:talk 3964:talk 3939:talk 3872:talk 3828:talk 3779:talk 3762:talk 3693:talk 3671:talk 3657:talk 3635:talk 3621:talk 3603:talk 3589:talk 3575:talk 3545:talk 3529:talk 3515:talk 3499:talk 3485:talk 3467:talk 3447:talk 3433:talk 3418:talk 3403:talk 3366:and 3360:may 3350:talk 3322:talk 3273:talk 3199:talk 3185:talk 3171:talk 3149:talk 3117:talk 3103:talk 3086:talk 3065:talk 3046:talk 3029:talk 3021:keep 2990:talk 2976:talk 2941:talk 2906:talk 2884:talk 2870:talk 2855:talk 2824:talk 2810:talk 2769:talk 2751:talk 2692:talk 2674:talk 2653:talk 2635:talk 2602:talk 2588:talk 2574:talk 2552:talk 2525:talk 2508:talk 2480:talk 2459:talk 2442:talk 2405:talk 2383:talk 2365:talk 2317:talk 2299:talk 2269:talk 2251:can. 2208:talk 2174:talk 2143:talk 2125:talk 2110:talk 2095:talk 2074:talk 2043:talk 2029:talk 2011:talk 1996:talk 1975:talk 1904:talk 1885:talk 1867:talk 1845:talk 1818:talk 1798:talk 1778:talk 1757:here 1753:this 1743:talk 1729:See 1706:talk 1688:talk 1673:talk 1647:talk 1633:talk 1617:talk 1599:talk 1580:talk 1561:talk 1546:talk 1512:talk 1482:talk 1448:talk 1414:talk 1380:talk 1371:were 1357:talk 1316:talk 1298:talk 1269:talk 1255:talk 1245:and 1233:talk 1219:talk 1201:talk 1187:talk 1136:talk 1118:talk 1099:talk 1081:talk 1064:talk 1035:talk 1014:talk 996:talk 978:talk 964:talk 937:talk 922:talk 909:many 887:talk 864:talk 839:talk 826:say 801:talk 773:talk 761:that 751:talk 739:this 722:talk 690:talk 652:talk 588:talk 574:talk 555:talk 541:talk 516:logs 490:See 469:talk 455:talk 428:You 416:talk 401:talk 374:talk 356:talk 338:talk 311:talk 297:talk 287:See 271:NFCC 247:talk 186:Help 13250:at= 13240:Hi 12776:not 12669:-- 12465:not 12328:how 12004:Sir 11839:me? 11622:. ~ 11415:}} 11322:To 11199:Hi! 11180:IDK 10823:Ho 10400:. — 10376:Rjj 10300:. — 10244:are 9967:FYI 9590:or 9430:me? 8717:Hi 8478:FYI 8443:, @ 8285:and 8110:of. 8061:in 7862:. ~ 7814:. ~ 7289:you 7249:Sir 6854:it? 5588:? ( 5510:-- 5359:BBB 5032:Rjj 4974:Rjj 4906:Fir 4903:een 4900:rgr 4897:Eve 4805:Kip 4798:The 4759:Kip 4752:The 4474:🍁 4153:are 4109:man 3735:. — 3583:kk 3299:); 3237:); 3017:not 3013:Liz 2794:FYI 1532:tag 1049:now 1008:-- 506:by 153:or 13501:: 13486:) 13467:) 13439:) 13425:) 13405:) 13344:) 13322:) 13264:) 13260:/ 13223:) 13194:) 13176:) 13166:}} 13160:{{ 13139:) 13121:) 13101:) 13083:) 13033:) 13025:. 13001:) 12948:) 12934:) 12846:) 12832:) 12812:) 12791:) 12752:) 12719:) 12711:. 12694:) 12677:) 12643:) 12621:) 12606:) 12580:) 12561:· 12557:· 12553:· 12515:) 12499:) 12481:) 12457:) 12441:) 12419:) 12380:) 12366:) 12299:) 12254:) 12207:) 12142:) 12123:) 12094:) 12079:) 12058:) 12044:) 11991:) 11966:) 11948:) 11942:DS 11932:. 11908:) 11878:) 11853:) 11832:) 11797:) 11766:) 11750:, 11746:, 11700:) 11685:) 11646:) 11608:) 11554:· 11550:· 11546:· 11510:) 11491:) 11480:is 11472:) 11448:) 11431:) 11393:· 11389:· 11385:· 11370:}} 11364:{{ 11360:}} 11354:{{ 11345:) 11311:, 11299:) 11278:· 11274:· 11270:· 11252:) 11210:) 11173:) 11155:) 11116:) 11108:. 11091:) 11064:) 11040:, 11036:, 10994:) 10980:) 10950:) 10938:, 10916:) 10892:) 10878:) 10851:) 10835:) 10810:) 10795:. 10777:) 10704:. 10693:. 10670:. 10666:. 10642:; 10630:; 10618:; 10606:; 10594:; 10582:; 10570:; 10552:^ 10531:) 10511:) 10497:is 10485:) 10464:) 10433:) 10414:) 10412:📝 10410:• 10408:💬 10406:( 10383:) 10363:) 10361:📝 10359:• 10357:💬 10355:( 10339:) 10314:) 10312:📝 10310:• 10308:💬 10306:( 10281:) 10254:) 10229:) 10221:. 10200:) 10180:) 10163:) 10102:) 10070:) 10053:) 10032:) 9999:) 9981:) 9973:. 9949:) 9873:) 9855:) 9845:it 9833:) 9819:) 9797:) 9773:) 9713:) 9676:) 9662:) 9647:) 9629:) 9602:) 9576:) 9568:. 9510:) 9494:) 9480:) 9472:. 9458:) 9440:) 9423:) 9380:) 9339:) 9325:) 9304:) 9287:) 9273:) 9252:) 9238:) 9198:) 9190:. 9162:) 9093:) 9054:) 9040:) 9016:, 9012:, 8979:) 8965:) 8948:) 8930:) 8922:. 8890:? 8846:) 8801:, 8797:, 8777:) 8744:) 8729:) 8704:) 8677:) 8639:) 8612:) 8561:) 8531:) 8529:📝 8527:• 8525:💬 8523:( 8497:) 8495:📝 8493:• 8491:💬 8489:( 8481:– 8455:) 8433:) 8386:. 8376:) 8351:) 8333:) 8299:) 8262:) 8216:) 8200:? 8167:) 8136:) 8043:) 7993:) 7979:) 7964:) 7929:• 7925:( 7914:) 7906:. 7839:• 7835:( 7787:) 7757:) 7740:) 7711:) 7697:) 7672:) 7640:) 7622:) 7594:) 7568:) 7550:) 7542:. 7536:}} 7530:{{ 7503:) 7442:) 7428:) 7393:) 7378:) 7364:) 7329:) 7315:) 7272:) 7235:) 7221:) 7207:) 7193:) 7178:) 7164:) 7148:) 7108:) 7094:) 7086:. 7080:}} 7074:{{ 7059:) 7039:) 7025:) 7004:) 6989:. 6974:) 6966:. 6953:) 6939:) 6925:) 6883:) 6869:) 6836:) 6822:) 6808:) 6794:) 6780:) 6766:) 6752:) 6734:) 6716:) 6708:? 6690:) 6656:) 6641:) 6609:) 6589:) 6575:) 6553:) 6535:) 6512:) 6489:) 6481:-- 6450:) 6436:) 6350:) 6331:) 6317:) 6260:) 6237:) 6194:) 6179:) 6167:, 6146:) 6115:· 6100:My 6097:. 6083:) 6066:) 6052:) 6024:· 6009:My 6002:, 5967:) 5951:) 5947:• 5923:) 5909:) 5885:, 5881:, 5865:: 5855:) 5845:}} 5839:{{ 5817:) 5766:) 5752:) 5714:) 5697:) 5689:. 5679:) 5647:) 5629:) 5600:) 5551:) 5533:) 5518:) 5447:) 5433:) 5415:) 5396:) 5382:) 5338:) 5316:) 5295:) 5260:) 5230:) 5171:) 5139:) 5107:) 5093:) 5058:) 5039:) 5004:) 4981:) 4949:) 4941:. 4872:) 4864:. 4857:) 4839:) 4784:) 4719:) 4681:) 4663:) 4642:) 4620:) 4593:) 4564:) 4542:) 4528:) 4506:) 4488:) 4462:) 4454:. 4440:) 4413:) 4399:) 4381:) 4366:) 4318:) 4304:) 4290:) 4261:) 4247:) 4233:) 4217:, 4211:}} 4205:{{ 4191:) 4177:) 4163:) 4145:) 4131:) 4079:) 4065:) 4057:. 4043:) 4029:) 4019:}} 4013:{{ 4009:}} 4003:{{ 3991:) 3966:) 3958:? 3941:) 3924:) 3922:📝 3920:• 3918:💬 3916:( 3874:) 3860:) 3858:📝 3856:• 3854:💬 3852:( 3830:) 3816:) 3814:📝 3812:• 3810:💬 3808:( 3781:) 3764:) 3749:) 3747:📝 3745:• 3743:💬 3741:( 3695:) 3673:) 3659:) 3637:) 3623:) 3605:) 3591:) 3577:) 3547:) 3531:) 3517:) 3501:) 3487:) 3469:) 3449:) 3435:) 3420:) 3405:) 3352:) 3324:) 3303:; 3275:) 3241:; 3226:. 3201:) 3187:) 3173:) 3151:) 3135:: 3119:) 3105:) 3088:) 3067:) 3048:) 3031:) 2992:) 2978:) 2943:) 2935:. 2886:) 2872:) 2857:) 2849:. 2826:) 2812:) 2797:– 2771:) 2753:) 2739:) 2737:📝 2735:• 2733:💬 2731:( 2694:) 2676:) 2655:) 2637:) 2604:) 2590:) 2576:) 2554:) 2527:) 2510:) 2482:) 2461:) 2444:) 2407:) 2385:) 2367:) 2319:) 2301:) 2293:. 2271:) 2210:) 2176:) 2145:) 2127:) 2112:) 2097:) 2076:) 2068:. 2045:) 2031:) 2013:) 1998:) 1977:) 1887:) 1869:) 1847:) 1820:) 1759:: 1745:) 1708:) 1690:) 1675:) 1649:) 1635:) 1619:) 1601:) 1582:) 1563:) 1548:) 1540:. 1530:{{ 1514:) 1484:) 1450:) 1416:) 1382:) 1359:) 1351:. 1318:) 1300:) 1271:) 1257:) 1235:) 1221:) 1213:. 1203:) 1189:) 1181:. 1138:) 1120:) 1101:) 1083:) 1066:) 1037:) 1016:) 998:) 980:) 966:) 939:) 924:) 889:) 866:) 841:) 824:}} 818:{{ 803:) 775:) 753:) 724:) 716:. 696:· 692:· 688:· 677:— 654:) 590:) 576:) 557:) 543:) 514:| 471:) 457:) 447:}} 441:{{ 418:) 403:) 376:) 358:) 348:by 340:) 332:. 313:) 299:) 249:) 169:. 13482:( 13463:( 13435:( 13421:( 13401:( 13369:. 13340:( 13328:@ 13318:( 13303:| 13284:. 13256:( 13219:( 13200:@ 13190:( 13172:( 13154:@ 13135:( 13117:( 13109:@ 13097:( 13079:( 13046:@ 13029:( 12997:( 12978:) 12974:( 12944:( 12930:( 12888:. 12875:☎ 12863:― 12842:( 12828:( 12808:( 12787:( 12748:( 12715:( 12690:( 12673:( 12639:( 12617:( 12602:( 12576:( 12565:} 12563:b 12559:p 12555:c 12551:t 12549:{ 12511:( 12495:( 12487:@ 12477:( 12453:( 12437:( 12425:@ 12415:( 12376:( 12362:( 12350:@ 12342:☎ 12318:☎ 12306:― 12295:( 12280:☎ 12250:( 12233:☎ 12203:( 12189:☎ 12160:) 12156:( 12138:( 12119:( 12104:@ 12090:( 12075:( 12054:( 12040:( 12028:@ 11987:( 11962:( 11944:( 11938:: 11934:@ 11904:( 11888:@ 11874:( 11849:( 11828:( 11820:@ 11793:( 11781:) 11777:( 11762:( 11728:: 11724:@ 11716:) 11712:( 11707:~ 11696:( 11681:( 11669:) 11665:( 11642:( 11631:) 11627:( 11604:( 11582:) 11578:( 11558:} 11556:b 11552:p 11548:c 11544:t 11542:{ 11506:( 11487:( 11468:( 11444:( 11427:( 11397:} 11395:b 11391:p 11387:c 11383:t 11381:{ 11341:( 11319:. 11295:( 11282:} 11280:b 11276:p 11272:c 11268:t 11266:{ 11247:· 11242:( 11228:) 11224:( 11206:( 11169:( 11151:( 11112:( 11087:( 11060:( 10990:( 10976:( 10912:( 10888:( 10874:( 10847:( 10831:( 10806:( 10773:( 10755:. 10672:4 10651:) 10640:) 10628:) 10616:) 10604:) 10592:) 10580:) 10568:) 10527:( 10507:( 10481:( 10460:( 10429:( 10379:( 10333:( 10277:( 10265:: 10261:@ 10250:( 10225:( 10196:( 10176:( 10159:( 10143:. 10124:. 10108:@ 10098:( 10066:( 10049:( 10028:( 10014:: 10006:@ 9995:( 9977:( 9945:( 9931:: 9927:@ 9884:: 9880:@ 9869:( 9851:( 9829:( 9815:( 9793:( 9769:( 9750:) 9746:( 9709:( 9693:@ 9672:( 9658:( 9643:( 9625:( 9598:( 9582:@ 9572:( 9545:| 9533:@ 9506:( 9490:( 9476:( 9454:( 9447:@ 9436:( 9419:( 9396:) 9392:( 9376:( 9356:) 9352:( 9335:( 9321:( 9315:: 9311:@ 9300:( 9283:( 9269:( 9263:: 9259:@ 9248:( 9234:( 9227:: 9223:@ 9194:( 9158:( 9144:. 9119:) 9115:( 9104:: 9100:@ 9089:( 9050:( 9036:( 8975:( 8961:( 8944:( 8926:( 8894:| 8842:( 8773:( 8740:( 8725:( 8715:) 8711:( 8700:( 8673:( 8665:@ 8658:) 8654:( 8635:( 8618:@ 8608:( 8600:@ 8593:) 8589:( 8557:( 8546:) 8542:( 8505:@ 8451:( 8439:@ 8429:( 8415:) 8411:( 8406:~ 8390:| 8372:( 8347:( 8329:( 8318:) 8314:( 8295:( 8258:( 8236:) 8232:( 8212:( 8163:( 8152:) 8148:( 8132:( 8087:) 8083:( 8078:~ 8074:. 8039:( 8024:) 8020:( 7989:( 7975:( 7960:( 7933:) 7927:C 7910:( 7871:) 7867:( 7843:) 7837:C 7823:) 7819:( 7783:( 7772:) 7768:( 7753:( 7736:( 7707:( 7693:( 7668:( 7636:( 7618:( 7590:( 7562:( 7546:( 7499:( 7488:) 7484:( 7460:( 7438:( 7424:( 7389:( 7374:( 7360:( 7348:) 7344:( 7325:( 7311:( 7300:) 7296:( 7268:( 7231:( 7217:( 7203:( 7189:( 7174:( 7160:( 7144:( 7104:( 7090:( 7055:( 7035:( 7021:( 7000:( 6970:( 6949:( 6935:( 6921:( 6879:( 6865:( 6832:( 6818:( 6804:( 6790:( 6776:( 6762:( 6748:( 6730:( 6722:@ 6712:( 6686:( 6675:) 6671:( 6652:( 6637:( 6605:( 6585:( 6571:( 6559:@ 6549:( 6531:( 6519:@ 6508:( 6485:( 6446:( 6432:( 6357: 6346:( 6327:( 6313:( 6271:: 6267:@ 6256:( 6233:( 6201: 6190:( 6175:( 6157:: 6153:@ 6142:( 6120:) 6110:( 6089:@ 6079:( 6062:( 6048:( 6029:) 6019:( 5986:@ 5963:( 5943:( 5919:( 5905:( 5851:( 5835:: 5831:@ 5813:( 5805:@ 5798:) 5794:( 5762:( 5748:( 5729:@ 5710:( 5693:( 5675:( 5643:( 5625:( 5596:( 5547:( 5529:( 5514:( 5490:" 5487:. 5475:" 5455:" 5443:( 5429:( 5421:@ 5411:( 5392:( 5378:( 5334:( 5312:( 5301:@ 5291:( 5256:( 5226:( 5190:) 5186:( 5167:( 5155:) 5151:( 5146:~ 5135:( 5103:( 5089:( 5081:( 5054:( 5035:( 5015:: 5011:@ 5000:( 4987:@ 4977:( 4945:( 4868:( 4853:( 4835:( 4790:@ 4780:( 4737:. 4725:@ 4715:( 4677:( 4669:@ 4659:( 4638:( 4626:@ 4616:( 4606:: 4602:@ 4589:( 4560:( 4538:( 4524:( 4502:( 4484:( 4458:( 4436:( 4429:. 4409:( 4395:( 4387:@ 4377:( 4362:( 4335:@ 4314:( 4300:( 4286:( 4257:( 4243:( 4229:( 4187:( 4173:( 4159:( 4141:( 4127:( 4075:( 4061:( 4039:( 4025:( 3997:@ 3987:( 3976:. 3962:( 3937:( 3870:( 3826:( 3777:( 3760:( 3691:( 3669:( 3655:( 3633:( 3619:( 3601:( 3587:( 3573:( 3543:( 3527:( 3513:( 3497:( 3483:( 3465:( 3445:( 3431:( 3416:( 3401:( 3348:( 3320:( 3295:( 3286:: 3282:@ 3233:( 3197:( 3183:( 3169:( 3147:( 3115:( 3101:( 3084:( 3063:( 3044:( 3027:( 2988:( 2974:( 2939:( 2915:@ 2908:) 2904:( 2882:( 2868:( 2853:( 2822:( 2808:( 2767:( 2749:( 2711:@ 2690:( 2672:( 2651:( 2633:( 2625:@ 2600:( 2586:( 2572:( 2550:( 2523:( 2506:( 2488:@ 2478:( 2457:( 2440:( 2425:@ 2403:( 2391:@ 2381:( 2373:@ 2363:( 2325:@ 2315:( 2307:@ 2297:( 2277:@ 2267:( 2206:( 2172:( 2151:@ 2141:( 2133:@ 2123:( 2108:( 2093:( 2072:( 2062:: 2058:@ 2041:( 2027:( 2019:@ 2009:( 1994:( 1973:( 1935:: 1931:@ 1906:) 1902:( 1883:( 1865:( 1843:( 1826:@ 1816:( 1800:) 1796:( 1780:) 1776:( 1771:~ 1741:( 1704:( 1696:@ 1686:( 1671:( 1645:( 1631:( 1615:( 1597:( 1578:( 1559:( 1544:( 1526:: 1522:@ 1510:( 1480:( 1446:( 1412:( 1378:( 1355:( 1329:: 1325:@ 1314:( 1296:( 1277:@ 1267:( 1253:( 1231:( 1217:( 1199:( 1185:( 1165:@ 1134:( 1116:( 1107:@ 1097:( 1079:( 1062:( 1043:@ 1033:( 1012:( 994:( 986:@ 976:( 962:( 945:@ 935:( 920:( 885:( 872:@ 862:( 847:@ 837:( 814:: 810:@ 799:( 785:@ 781:@ 771:( 749:( 720:( 700:) 684:( 675:. 650:( 586:( 572:( 563:@ 553:( 539:( 530:@ 526:) 522:( 510:( 494:. 467:( 453:( 424:@ 414:( 399:( 382:@ 372:( 354:( 336:( 319:@ 309:( 295:( 245:( 157:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.