Knowledge

User talk:PhilKnight/Archive23

Source đź“ť

1086:, they were plain and simple deletions of the speedy tag from the article. As you say, it isn't the same as vandalism, but I have to ask what you think we should do where a user is attempting to subvert due process? Should we ignore it, and just let people remove speedy tags if they want to? Should we revert them, but not warn them? (and probably get 3RR clobbered in the process). Should we issue every warning level twice to give them more chances? If somebody has been repeatedly warned about their actions, and has been warned right through all the levels, which progressively make it clear that if they carry on action will be taken, the next step must be admin action. In a case like this, I would suggest that admin action ought to be rather more limited than the action which was actually taken by another admin at the same time as you removed the report (indef block), and that a 1-2 hour block would have been an appropriate action to ensure that the user was aware that warnings are not idle threats, but will happen if people break the rules. 87: 1163:, the article to which it had previously been attached. Apparently there's a very heated argument/edit war going on over whether that particular article should have any images at all, and the result is that until next Monday the article is locked down in its most recent state, which happened to be the "no photos" version. I'm not getting into the argument, but I hope this photo won't be deleted before a decision is rendered one way or the other?-- 952:, but ultimately was deemed a successful declaration of consensus, and I am now an admin. I definitely paid close attention to everything that was said in the debate, and, where possible, I will try to incorporate the (constructive) criticism towards being a better administrator. I'm taking things slowly for now, partially because of the holidays and all the off-wiki distractions. I'm working my way through the 108:. Although I am now wielding the keys to my very own Bitchin' Meatcar, I promise to uphold the laws of the land, martini in hand, in a way that would make Saint Sneaky Pete proud. I will do my best to be a Jack of Several Trades (although I may be a Master of Nuns). I promise to Heart Canadia. And I will make it my goal to Make War, Not ... er, Wait, Never Mind. 956:, carefully double-checking the relevant policies, and will gradually phase into the use of the new tools, with my main goals being to help out with various backlogs. I sincerely doubt you'll see anything controversial coming from my new access level. :) I also fully intend to keep on writing articles, as there are a few more that I definitely want to get to 807: 781: 984:
I have special request for you. Can we please take down the ECi site just for a while until we're able to verify all the information in there? I just found out that I made a few serious errors in coming up with the text, and we'd like to get it straightened out before we continue. Would you please
385:
Addhoc, you deleted a page entitled "National Socialist Party of Great Britain" and now we wish to rebuild it, but with neutrality being paramount - however, we do not have the all the material that was written on the page at the last known version at our disposal - so we would appreciate it, so that
157:
Hi. i'm really sorry to bother you. i am not trying to be confrontaional in any way. i would simply be interested in any thoughts which you might have on this matter. However, i would really apprecaite any inoput or thought which you might care to provide on this. If the answer is simply that people
290:
Hi, on my first day, I was blocked, and the blocking admin said he thought it was probable that I was a sock of somebody who had founded a new religious movement. I wasn't indefinitely blocked, and kept the same account with the block log. In this context, I would suggest you don't worry about the
196:
the resolution efforts going through me, so once the WP:3O one came through, i figured i'd delete the other one. I figure that anyone else is always free to resubmit it themselves. So I really appreciate your help and your reply. your thinking sounds very logical. it's quite possible we may be in
172:
Sorry, I should have replied earlier. I was thinking of taking the case myself, but wasn't sure if I would be considered impartial, because I have given Tiamut a barnstar. Regarding your very reasonable question about why nobody else has responded, I guess it's because of the holiday period -
187:
Hi. that sounds totally fine. i really appreciate your answer. i totally understand. By the way, i posted a note at the article talk page as to why i deleted my own request. Briefly though, my only reason was that we were already getting some new input from an editor from
272:. This is the only reason that I can think of that someone would think that I am Hkelkar. Picaroon (or the editor who asked him to do this) thinks that every Hindu editor who says something positive about Jews must be a Hkelkar sock (Hkelkar was a Hindu/Jewish editor). 1013:
to report a user to AIV when they have repeatedly deleted a speedy tag. This guy had gone right though the range of warnings for removing the template (two different users issued him with warnings), yet he took a decision to ignore these warnings and do it again.
31:
the reason why there are two covers is because the mixtape is yet to be released and the artwork for the cover is yet to be confirmed, its either one of the two, i will remove one of them when the mixtape comes out or when the cover has been confirmed. thanks
1018:
is all about treating new users properly (for example, by going through the full range of warnings rather than going straight for a level-4im, it isn't about giving every new user a free pass to break every rule in the book for a couple of weeks.
111:
I am glad to serve my guild, the League of Wikipedians. If I can be of any assistance, or you have any questions, suggestions, or criticisms in the future, please let me know. And if you are at a loss for what any of the above actually means, see
436: 158:
were busy, and just that no one had gotten around to it, but they would have eventually, i can totally accept that. i just wanted to ask. thank you, and i really apprreciate any help which you could provide. thanks. --
723: 709: 702: 222: 430: 852:
page, i can't get the first bullet under subsidiaries to display correctly. the bullet by "Advantage" appears as an asterix, not a good-lookin aqua square as it should. what am i doing wrong?
291:
previous account, and create a new account with a completely different user name. From there, I would advise you avoid conflict, and concentrate on improving articles. I found joining the
657:
I checked the link, and the New York Times brief doesn't refer to our headquarters or Fort Worth, TX. Let me know what your reasoning is, or there's a better reference for this fact.
1133: 1178:
Yep, I added an orphan tag, and for the reasons you have explained this was reverted. I also don't want to get dragged into a heated debate, so I'm not going to reintroduce the tag.
192:, and it created a further discussion. I wasn't sure that we would want to have two third-paty processes at once, so i deleted the medcab one. besides, i also didn;'t want to have 229:
as suggested by Mike33 in the discussion if I were to close the action as 'delete'? If yes or no, could you indicate that in your opinion summary please? Thanks --User:Ceyockey (
878:
I had a look, and I don't know either. You could replace all the bullet points with a copy and paste character such as • however beyond that I don't have any suggestions. Sorry.
266:) has blocked me indefinitely, claiming I was a Hkelkar sock without any evidence at all. He has done this witout even leaving a message or explanation somewhere. If you look at 651:
Hi. I'm working on the page for eCommerce Industries, and I appreciate your help in cleaning up the formatting. But I do have a question about a reference that you included:
942: 1198:
Greetings, I would really appreciate it if you could give me more detailed advice on how to edit my article in a way that it doesn't look as an advertisment. Thank you!
1156: 249: 1136:. I was the one that said "Your quoting WP:NPA?" but I was refering to Mayalld quoting it to you after having just accused me of playing "Silly games" sorry about that. 893: 708:
Just a quick note - I've had a look and have removed the tag, as I don't think the template falls under the speedy category you cite. My reasonings are set out on the
48: 1245: 913: 532: 1070: 909: 849: 490: 1262: 1223: 716: 216: 574: 348: 322: 304: 727: 713: 238: 451: 701: 528: 387: 105: 1034:
Yup, we have different views about this. In my humble opinion removing a speedy delete tag isn't the same as vandalism. Also, if you just restore the
730: 418: 934: 905: 486: 974: 101:. The Council would check it out, but they have important Councily-type things. But never fear: brave adventurers known as "sysops" roam the lands! 588: 395: 476: 928: 494: 887: 695: 765: 128: 1187: 1145: 1117: 1095: 1057: 412: 267: 206: 182: 167: 1172: 641: 252:, who sent you a message some days ago. I had disputes mainly with two editors (Administrator Dbachmann, and Hornplease). Now the admin 1217: 543:
I didn't know that an invisible comment edit would matter, especially on a page that hadn't been edited recently. I won't do it again.
52: 679: 408: 935: 375: 1127: 380: 871: 1045: 458: 901: 284: 787: 1150: 614: 566: 544: 510:
Can you tell me why you deleted the foreign language equivalents section on Rufous-tailed_Rock_Thrush without discussion?
848:
i've got one technical question for you and then i'll try not to bother you for a good long while. in the infobox on the
558: 1270: 895: 151: 424: 76: 44: 1028: 602: 1213: 364: 831: 97:! The Council has identified a number of strange occurrences (such as "vandals" and "articles for deletion") in the 26: 750: 646: 318: 280: 998: 960:
status. If you do ever have any concerns about my activities as an administrator, I encourage you to let me know.
482: 1193: 867: 675: 358: 726:. Off to bed, so I won't be able to respond until the morning if you wish to continue the discussion. Regards. 263: 81: 1160: 270: 971: 843: 527:
If you have a suggestion for an alternate place to put that information, I am happy to put it there. TIA.
802:. I appreciate your support! I promise I will wield the mop wisely, and do my best to improve Knowledge. 619: 336: 314: 276: 1241: 953: 637: 610: 485:
with the appropriate authorities, so does it not meet criteria for speedy as non-notable organisation?
1266: 520:
People looking for the Japanese and Mandarin equivalents of this English bird have no other resource.
1066:
Most of the removals (particularly the later ones) were not the classic newbie mistake of replacing
502: 570: 548: 189: 269:, I don't edit the same articles. In my last edit I was writing something (positive) about Jews 948:
Thank you for your participation in my RfA. It was definitely a dramatic debate that landed on
173:
Knowledge slows down in August and late December. Again, sorry for not replying more promptly.
123: 1237: 1229: 1209: 633: 606: 391: 133: 1258: 1201: 855: 663: 554: 40: 17: 113: 8: 863: 671: 372: 94: 72: 1250: 1183: 1113: 1053: 1004: 994: 924: 883: 771: 761: 746: 691: 584: 472: 344: 300: 257: 232: 178: 139: 741:
I am back to a solid activity level and will be resuming my work with MedCab. Cheers!
386:
we may retain the information, and strip away the advertisement. Thankyou in advance.
1168: 1091: 1024: 58: 34: 1205: 1141: 968: 961: 629: 202: 163: 147: 985:- for all intents - delete the page for just a few days until we get our answers? 444: 1233: 1080: 1048:. I personally don't think we should encourage high speed revert wars over tags. 1038: 979: 827: 538: 313:
But I liked my Username, and I had some discussions open that weren't finished.
1015: 1010: 859: 736: 667: 596: 368: 226: 68: 949: 742: 292: 253: 243: 1164: 1087: 1020: 957: 86: 565:
I reverted lots of vandals, I think. Does that make me a good user again?
1179: 1137: 1109: 1049: 990: 965: 920: 879: 757: 687: 625: 580: 468: 340: 296: 223:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Manchester Cathedral Gardens Subculture 2
198: 174: 159: 143: 823: 138:
Hi. could you please tell me why no one took on the mediation case for
652: 98: 1134:
Knowledge:Articles_for_deletion/International_PEN_(2nd_nomination)
601:
I'm starting a list of administrators that volunteer to help at
517:
There is nowhere else on Knowledge to provide that information.
941: 806: 780: 90:
KoL images are copyrighted, so I'll use this PD one instead.
295:
useful for advice on resolving disputes through consensus.
64: 63:
Thank you for the help with the copyright on this image:
523:
It is important information that adds value to the page.
481:
Sorry to jump in, but this article is now at AFD. But
443: 1132:
Sorry mate, I think there was a little confusion on
653:
http://en.wikipedia.org/ECommerce_Industries#_note-1
1108:Thanks for your thoughtful and measured response. 1155:Hi. Got a note on my talk page that you'd marked 603:User: ScienceApologist#Administrative helpmates 457: 365:Wikipedia_talk:MEDCAB#Mediator_help_requested 1224:A dispute with which you may be able to help 217:AFD: Manchester Cathedral Gardens Subculture 703:Template:User Wikipedians against monarchy 936:Knowledge:Requests for adminship/Elonka 3 786:Dear PhilKnight, Thank you for voting in 65:http://en.wikipedia.org/Image:Rlowell.jpg 85: 1232:and also the second-to-last section of 14: 513:Reasons why I added that information: 467:Apparently, the party doesn't exist. 483:it is not even registered as a party 275:This is a grave Adminstrator abuse. 225:— would you agree to application of 197:touch about this again. see you. -- 23: 940: 24: 1284: 1044:tag, the page is still listed at 902:Knowledge:Wikiquette alerts#User: 894:Knowledge:Wikiquette alerts#User: 790:, which closed successfully with 1255:Thanks, i will create a account 900:FYI and input if you have time. 805: 779: 381:Requesting old version of a page 1228:Check the last two sections of 1046:candidates for speedy deletion 124: 104:Thank you for your support in 67:. I really appreciate it. :-) 13: 1: 1161:Minor Harry Potter characters 1151:Orphaned Madam Rosmerta Image 503:Request information on delete 477:12:59, 31 December 2007 (UTC) 396:01:15, 31 December 2007 (UTC) 376:20:40, 30 December 2007 (UTC) 349:18:34, 30 December 2007 (UTC) 323:17:51, 30 December 2007 (UTC) 305:17:11, 30 December 2007 (UTC) 285:15:39, 30 December 2007 (UTC) 239:04:32, 28 December 2007 (UTC) 207:16:24, 28 December 2007 (UTC) 183:16:19, 28 December 2007 (UTC) 168:14:44, 28 December 2007 (UTC) 152:01:42, 28 December 2007 (UTC) 129:22:06, 27 December 2007 (UTC) 77:22:03, 27 December 2007 (UTC) 1159:as an orphan. I checked out 785: 7: 1246:20:52, 8 January 2008 (UTC) 1218:15:23, 8 January 2008 (UTC) 1188:12:40, 8 January 2008 (UTC) 1173:07:11, 8 January 2008 (UTC) 1157:Image:Madam_rosmerta_hp.jpg 1146:15:50, 7 January 2008 (UTC) 1118:16:26, 7 January 2008 (UTC) 1096:16:20, 7 January 2008 (UTC) 1058:14:49, 7 January 2008 (UTC) 1029:14:43, 7 January 2008 (UTC) 999:14:36, 7 January 2008 (UTC) 975:01:48, 7 January 2008 (UTC) 929:13:15, 6 January 2008 (UTC) 914:08:18, 6 January 2008 (UTC) 888:13:15, 6 January 2008 (UTC) 872:16:08, 4 January 2008 (UTC) 832:15:21, 4 January 2008 (UTC) 804: 766:12:33, 4 January 2008 (UTC) 751:09:34, 4 January 2008 (UTC) 731:23:02, 3 January 2008 (UTC) 717:21:26, 3 January 2008 (UTC) 696:20:25, 3 January 2008 (UTC) 680:20:20, 3 January 2008 (UTC) 642:23:05, 2 January 2008 (UTC) 615:22:39, 2 January 2008 (UTC) 589:20:19, 2 January 2008 (UTC) 575:20:17, 2 January 2008 (UTC) 559:19:53, 2 January 2008 (UTC) 495:18:05, 1 January 2008 (UTC) 337:Knowledge:Appealing a block 53:13:11, 5 January 2008 (UTC) 10: 1289: 964:. Have a good new year, -- 954:Knowledge:New admin school 778: 686:I've moved the reference. 250:User:Librorum Prohibitorum 106:my quest to become a sysop 122:An Encyclopedia is We! - 722:Hi there - I've replied 647:New York Times reference 1275:16:05, January 8, 2008 1251:Thanks for the un-block 1194:UK Fulbright Commission 624:See what's going on at 359:Mediator help requested 293:Harmonious Editing Club 190:Knowledge:Third opinion 1128:"Your quoting WP:NPA?" 962:My door is always open 945: 632:. Maybe you can help? 315:Librorum Prohibitorum2 277:Librorum Prohibitorum2 99:surrounding wilderness 91: 82:An Administrator is I! 27:lil' kim mixtape cover 1230:User talk:PeterStJohn 944: 89: 850:ecommerce industries 844:a technical question 248:Hello Addhoc. I was 18:User talk:PhilKnight 628:and its associated 620:Welcome to my world 535:) 31 December 2007 335:Ok, have a look at 1009:In what way is it 946: 140:Palestinian people 92: 1274: 1261:comment added by 1220: 1204:comment added by 874: 858:comment added by 813: 812: 682: 666:comment added by 561: 236: 125:Revolving Bugbear 55: 43:comment added by 1280: 1256: 1238:ScienceApologist 1199: 1085: 1079: 1075: 1069: 1043: 1037: 853: 809: 783: 776: 775: 661: 634:ScienceApologist 607:ScienceApologist 552: 462: 461: 447: 401:Have a look at: 230: 126: 38: 35:User:Lil' kim187 1288: 1287: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1279: 1278: 1277: 1253: 1234:Talk:Quackwatch 1226: 1196: 1153: 1130: 1083: 1077: 1073: 1067: 1041: 1035: 1007: 982: 939: 898: 846: 774: 739: 706: 649: 622: 599: 541: 505: 404: 383: 361: 246: 219: 136: 84: 61: 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1286: 1252: 1249: 1225: 1222: 1195: 1192: 1191: 1190: 1152: 1149: 1129: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1120: 1101: 1100: 1099: 1098: 1061: 1060: 1006: 1003: 1002: 1001: 981: 978: 938: 933: 932: 931: 897: 892: 891: 890: 845: 842: 841: 840: 839: 838: 837: 836: 835: 834: 811: 810: 803: 784: 773: 770: 769: 768: 738: 735: 734: 733: 705: 700: 699: 698: 648: 645: 621: 618: 598: 595: 594: 593: 592: 591: 567:216.83.145.130 545:216.83.145.130 540: 537: 525: 524: 521: 518: 504: 501: 500: 499: 498: 497: 465: 464: 463: 382: 379: 360: 357: 356: 355: 354: 353: 352: 351: 328: 327: 326: 325: 308: 307: 245: 242: 218: 215: 214: 213: 212: 211: 210: 209: 135: 132: 119:Thanks again. 83: 80: 60: 57: 28: 25: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1285: 1276: 1272: 1268: 1264: 1263:159.191.12.24 1260: 1248: 1247: 1243: 1239: 1235: 1231: 1221: 1219: 1215: 1211: 1207: 1203: 1189: 1185: 1181: 1177: 1176: 1175: 1174: 1170: 1166: 1162: 1158: 1148: 1147: 1143: 1139: 1135: 1119: 1115: 1111: 1107: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1103: 1102: 1097: 1093: 1089: 1082: 1072: 1065: 1064: 1063: 1062: 1059: 1055: 1051: 1047: 1040: 1033: 1032: 1031: 1030: 1026: 1022: 1017: 1012: 1000: 996: 992: 988: 987: 986: 977: 976: 973: 970: 967: 963: 959: 955: 951: 943: 937: 930: 926: 922: 918: 917: 916: 915: 911: 907: 903: 896: 889: 885: 881: 877: 876: 875: 873: 869: 865: 861: 857: 851: 833: 829: 825: 821: 820: 819: 818: 817: 816: 815: 814: 808: 801: 797: 793: 789: 782: 777: 767: 763: 759: 755: 754: 753: 752: 748: 744: 732: 729: 728:Giles Bennett 725: 721: 720: 719: 718: 715: 714:Giles Bennett 711: 704: 697: 693: 689: 685: 684: 683: 681: 677: 673: 669: 665: 658: 655: 654: 644: 643: 639: 635: 631: 627: 617: 616: 612: 608: 604: 590: 586: 582: 578: 577: 576: 572: 568: 564: 563: 562: 560: 557:was added at 556: 550: 546: 536: 534: 530: 522: 519: 516: 515: 514: 511: 508: 496: 492: 488: 484: 480: 479: 478: 474: 470: 466: 460: 456: 453: 450: 446: 442: 438: 435: 432: 429: 426: 423: 420: 417: 414: 410: 407: 406:Find sources: 403: 402: 400: 399: 398: 397: 393: 389: 378: 377: 374: 370: 366: 350: 346: 342: 338: 334: 333: 332: 331: 330: 329: 324: 320: 316: 312: 311: 310: 309: 306: 302: 298: 294: 289: 288: 287: 286: 282: 278: 273: 271: 268: 265: 262: 259: 255: 251: 241: 240: 235: 234: 228: 224: 208: 204: 200: 199:Steve, Sm8900 195: 191: 186: 185: 184: 180: 176: 171: 170: 169: 165: 161: 160:Steve, Sm8900 156: 155: 154: 153: 149: 145: 144:Steve, Sm8900 141: 134:case question 131: 130: 127: 120: 117: 115: 109: 107: 102: 100: 96: 88: 79: 78: 74: 70: 66: 56: 54: 50: 46: 42: 37: 36: 19: 1257:— Preceding 1254: 1227: 1197: 1154: 1131: 1008: 983: 947: 899: 847: 799: 795: 791: 740: 707: 659: 656: 650: 623: 600: 542: 526: 512: 509: 506: 454: 448: 440: 433: 427: 421: 415: 405: 384: 363:Please see: 362: 274: 260: 247: 231: 220: 193: 142:? thanks. -- 137: 121: 118: 114:this website 110: 103: 93: 62: 45:61.68.26.144 33: 30: 1206:Faithportis 1200:—Preceding 1071:db-whatever 989:Of course. 854:—Preceding 662:—Preceding 626:Cold fusion 553:—Preceding 529:Wakablogger 431:free images 388:Bellringer1 367:. Thanks. — 39:—Preceding 1005:BITEy ???? 906:Fireproeng 792:34 support 772:RfA Thanks 756:Splendid! 605:. Thanks. 507:Hi Adhoc, 487:Whitstable 233:talk to me 221:Regarding 95:Adventurer 860:Markinget 800:0 neutral 710:talk page 668:Markinget 660:Cheers. 630:talk page 369:Viriditas 69:BBhounder 59:Thank you 1271:contribs 1259:unsigned 1214:contribs 1202:unsigned 1011:WP:BITEy 919:Thanks! 868:contribs 856:unsigned 796:2 oppose 743:Vassyana 676:contribs 664:unsigned 264:contribs 254:Picaroon 41:unsigned 1165:Zequist 1088:Mayalld 1021:Mayalld 1016:WP:BITE 980:Request 555:comment 539:Sorries 437:WP refs 425:scholar 227:WP:SALT 1180:Addhoc 1138:Fosnez 1110:Addhoc 1081:hangon 1050:Addhoc 1039:hangon 991:Addhoc 950:WP:100 921:Addhoc 880:Addhoc 798:, and 788:my RfA 758:Addhoc 737:MedCab 688:Addhoc 597:Thanks 581:Addhoc 469:Addhoc 409:Google 341:Addhoc 297:Addhoc 175:Addhoc 1076:with 958:WP:FA 824:AKeen 579:Yup. 452:JSTOR 413:books 244:Hello 16:< 1267:talk 1242:talk 1210:talk 1184:talk 1169:talk 1142:talk 1114:talk 1092:talk 1054:talk 1025:talk 995:talk 925:talk 910:talk 884:talk 864:talk 828:talk 762:talk 747:talk 724:here 692:talk 672:talk 638:talk 611:talk 585:talk 571:talk 549:talk 533:talk 491:talk 473:talk 445:FENS 419:news 392:talk 373:Talk 345:talk 319:talk 301:talk 281:talk 258:talk 203:talk 179:talk 164:talk 148:talk 73:talk 49:talk 822:-- 551:) 459:TWL 339:.-- 194:all 1273:) 1269:• 1244:) 1236:. 1216:) 1212:• 1186:) 1171:) 1144:) 1116:) 1094:) 1084:}} 1078:{{ 1074:}} 1068:{{ 1056:) 1042:}} 1036:{{ 1027:) 997:) 972:ka 969:on 966:El 927:) 912:) 904:. 886:) 870:) 866:• 830:) 794:, 764:) 749:) 712:. 694:) 678:) 674:• 640:) 613:) 587:) 573:) 493:) 475:) 439:) 394:) 371:| 347:) 321:) 303:) 283:) 237:) 205:) 181:) 166:) 150:) 116:. 75:) 51:) 1265:( 1240:( 1208:( 1182:( 1167:( 1140:( 1112:( 1090:( 1052:( 1023:( 993:( 923:( 908:( 882:( 862:( 826:( 760:( 745:( 690:( 670:( 636:( 609:( 583:( 569:( 547:( 531:( 489:( 471:( 455:· 449:· 441:· 434:· 428:· 422:· 416:· 411:( 390:( 343:( 317:( 299:( 279:( 261:· 256:( 201:( 177:( 162:( 146:( 71:( 47:(

Index

User talk:PhilKnight
User:Lil' kim187
unsigned
61.68.26.144
talk
13:11, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/Image:Rlowell.jpg
BBhounder
talk
22:03, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Adventurer
surrounding wilderness
my quest to become a sysop
this website
Revolving Bugbear
22:06, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
Palestinian people
Steve, Sm8900
talk
01:42, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Steve, Sm8900
talk
14:44, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Addhoc
talk
16:19, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Knowledge:Third opinion
Steve, Sm8900
talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑