User talk:PerpetuityGrat

3770:

sources. You included it without even attempting to add a source. You went back and removed factual information again, this time choosing to create major structural and grammatical errors in the article, because of semantics (which if you felt were wrong, would have taken less time to simply change the wording). This 'information' you added has resulted in several users getting muted, you can view the edit history to see how many people have been blocked from editing because they would not stop inserting the same incorrect information you attempted to add. Its simply not true. I have already had a moderate manually review the information and they have confirmed the legitimacy of my sources. At this point, re-adding this information or removing factual details without even attempting to add a citation would be considered hounding. The information is not even debatable. No sources back up your claims.

1819:; warning, it's a bit of a "Brothers Grimm"-roll). I must admit, I got actually rickrolled elsewhere a few weeks ago and in the moment it was not funny (it infuriated me), but later on it became more humorous (or it grew on me). My understanding of USERPAGE is that the space is pretty much yours to create so long as it doesn't violate policy or clearly offend. Being within policy doesn't insulate a contributor if another editor is "triggered" (my word choice) by user page content choices. One can, of course, change the channel, but judgemental (and unwise) comments often accompany being triggered (again, so to speak). This is the risk of all humor in all formats, BTW. Some people just refuse to get the freakin' joke. It is also entirely possible one could underestimate the unexpected and visceral power of Rick Springfield. 121:"The system forcibly separated children from their families for extended periods of time and forbade them to acknowledge their Indigenous heritage and culture or to speak their own languages. Children were severely punished if these, among other, strict rules were broken. Former students of residential schools have spoken of horrendous abuse at the hands of residential school staff: physical, sexual, emotional, and psychological. Residential schools provided Indigenous students with inappropriate education, often only up to lower grades, that focused mainly on prayer and manual labour in agriculture, light industry such as woodworking, and domestic work such as laundry work and sewing." 4082: 3627:. You said "I'm not sure how this inclusion is necessarily encyclopedic ". How so? The definition of an encyclopaedia is "a comprehensive reference work containing articles on a wide range of subjects or on numerous aspects of a particular field, usually arranged alphabetically". This definition is very broad and I definitely think this edit can fit within it and is justifiable. Claiming expenses is a key power of MPs, which is her job and one of the main things she is known for. The topic of MPs claiming expenses even has its own Knowledge page itself relating to the 1841:

I returned, it had all blown over and everyone had moved on. None of those folks are even still editing any more! I'm not saying that you have to take a WikiBreak that long but breaks can help you return with energy and enthusiasm for editing. Unfortunately, conflicts do happen on Knowledge and it can help to have a thick skin. But the other editor should have also been told they were out-of-line, that didn't happen and I'm sorry about that. Those slurs were completely inappropriate and unnecessary to a discussion about your User page.

359: 2033: 255:

skewing it directly, violates a NPOV. TLDR, you can't just say "it's racist." There is no pillar that you're referring to that says we have to endorse/agree with the content. If the sources say one thing, go with the sources. In this case, the sources do not support what you are trying to allege. Many sources agree that DRS works have racist imagery, I am not disputing that at all, but to say that DRS withdrew their books because of racist imagery is just not factually accurate.

2551: 2068: 3943: 308:

fine, that is why I have not changed anything about the content specifically. I have only added templates, which are displayed at the top of the article. These templates describe issues with the article. The most recent template I added was a request for the page to be deleted. I am totally happy to help you out here, as Knowledge can be very confusing and technical. If you believe that the subject of the article is indeed notable, you can reply on the

4246: 4111: 2724: 3680: 758: 1987: 1947:, which dates back to September 2008, refers to Nori being 43 years old at that time, thus making 1964 his birth year. Excuse me if I'm writing it here instead of providing it as a citation in the corresponding article, but like I've said earlier, I'm not sure whether the provided source could be considered reliable, so I thought it would be wise to consult with you first on that matter. 867: 3600:

wikipedia in general feels like it's in a bit of a weird state with all of that anyway. I might make a sort of local politician template based on some of the GAs (like the one above) just to make my own life easier, but if you have the time/interest in looking it over at any point and providing feedback (I could drop by with a message), I'd really appreciate that!

3095:. In most cases the source is just a primary source saying who voted for what. Even in cases where the source is something like AP News, if the source doesn't say why the politician's vote was significant vs just one of the many it's not DUE. PerpetuityGrat, it may be worth raising these as examples at same NPOVN discussion since it isn't closed. 2880:. It's horribly sloppy editing to keep these. Make these paragraphs personal to each subject and include sources about the subject. On many of these articles, one of the two duplicative paragraphs have already been deleted anyway, because they didn't mention the subject at all. If you have more sources to personalize the content, please go ahead. 3220: 2368:. Not too difficult to explain. Second, I have never heard of that kind of "organized ring" lol. I hardly ever edit congressional BLP pages (can't even remember the last time I did tbh). Can I ask what edits I've even made recently that would give you that impression, since you came to my talk page and started asking questions. -- 3522:. However, I have deleted the page where you pasted a copy of the original page, and removed the original page back out of archive. That is the correct way to deal with inappropriate moves, because copy-pasting over the redirect and then deleting the moved page loses the editing history, which must be kept for copyright reasons. 1383:

available on the Internet Archive. But additionaly I have now linked that information together with another document from the University, 1917's "General Alumni Catalogue Of The University Of Pennsylvania", where it confirms Alfred Christian Fleckenstein, who graduated in 1893, is also the writer of "The Prince of Gravas".

1801:

so pointless makes me question editing here. I thanked them for one edit of theirs I found, and then they write that... it's honestly beyond frustrating, discouraging, and infuriating. I'm just taking a small break. Thanks for the concern Blaze; you typing this indicates you care a little bit and I appreciate that. --

3561:) with a comment about "Fixing lots of errors...". Since I plan on continuing to expand and destub a lot of biographies, including some more local politicians, could you point me towards any templates, guidelines, or good articles to refer to? That would be helpful, especially since Good Articles like 3697:

Your entire talk page is filled with people warning you for vandalism and abusive behavior. Please stop making biased edits and removing factual information-- especially that with several sources. Based on the timing of you editing the page for Molossia after I edited a blocked user's talk page, I am

1840:

I'm sorry that you are feeling discouraged. Someone should have stepped into that discussion and brought it to a close. When I was a new editor, I got in the middle of a dispute between editors and suddenly I felt like I was being assaulted and completely misunderstood. I left for six months and when

617:

Oh no, it is okay. I should have just clarified that in the articles. With regard to who should be counted, if they are described as Trump Loyalist or America First (policy) type than they should be counted as nationalist type because that is what the America First Policy is right. I am not trying to

583:

I'm glad we agree on the populism front. Regarding the nationalism.. a tweet, a vote, or an affiliation with a group does not definitively mean that such individual is a nationalist, socialist, or any other title for that fact. Unless it is cited by a credible source, and the source actually uses the

3584:

No problem at all, and I appreciate your justification for your edits—trying to destub articles. Not criticizing here at all, but I can easily tell that you don't edit a lot of political BLP articles. There are just some minor errors that aren't typical for a political BLP, like adding the political

3162:

will be productive. My suggestion is make the edits, state your reasons in the edit summaries and talk pages if needed. If the content is newly added, then consensus says keep it out until a consensus for inclusion is clear. If the content is older (and some of this stuff is), leave it be and open

2875:

I really don't think that we should be copy/pasting paragraphs across several BLP articles. That is literally the most lazy form of editing, and is the opposite of what we should strive to do here on Knowledge. Second, sure there is one source of those duplicative paragraphs that mentions a name, in

2265:

I definitely respect the aspect of balance, but there's both WaPo and PolitiFact giving it their maximum false claim, and he's said it multiple times. They even say he should know better. If this was once, I'd totally agree with you, politicians say false things all the time. But how do you not see

1026:

Since it seems that the three of us are trying to repair the articles that User:Kendalandrew has been editing, I thought I would call us here to discuss. The edits by User:Kendalandrew violate so many guidelines and policies, I decided to removed all the recent content. I really hate to do that, but

813:

on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit

639:

Not so sure about that... and I say that because there are some folks who support Medicare for All, which by many is described as a socialist policy. I wouldn't say that supporting that policy automatically marks them as a socialist. You can be associated with a policy, but that doesn't mark someone

444:

Ok fair about the populism category, but in general, BLP articles ought to only include categories about the subject themselves, not some ideology they may identify with. Now, in terms of assigning the "nationalist" title to several politicians... repeatedly you are citing a source that doesn't even

333:

Thank you for that explanation - sorry to ask here but what constitutes a "reliable" source? I cited articles / interviews in art magazines - is that not considered a reliable source? I don't really know how to edit or have time to learn right now (hence deleting the "template" over and over - sorry

302:

welcome, and I was actually about to leave you a note on your talk page. I don't think you are doing anything wrong, per se. It seems like the subject of the article (presumably you), lacks notability. What I mean by that is that the notability of the subject of the article does not meet Knowledge's

3769:

I am aware of how the leveling system works. I chose a level 4 based on your previous behavior towards other users, past investigation, and yes- adding false information. There is no verifiable source for Molossia being a comedy project. In order to add that information, you had to erase 4 reliable

3476:

What are some reports comparing and reporting missing information or conflicting information for infoboxes? I've notice similar inconsistencies in infobox field use where when displayed the district is written as part of the office, but doesn't necessarily make it easily extracted if it were in the

2840:

I see you removed " was among 126 House Republicans to sign an amicus brief in support of Texas v. Pennsylvania" for numerous people, on the basis that the provided sources didn't specifically mention . It took me five seconds to find a reference that did mention them in each case. I have restored

1892:

to an IPv6 range. Basically, a disruptive user was creating problems on those articles, and was changing IP addresses so rapidly that blocking individual IPs would not have helped stop the disruption. Since there were other constructive edits from the IP range, presumably from other users, I didn't

1800:

by an experienced editor is extremely off-putting. Perplexingly, an experience editor confused my userpage contribution history with my contributions list. Such hostility stemmed from something so trivial. Apologies are nice, but to just see such unfriendly behavior literally based off of something

1382:

Oh, if you mean a link to him having written "The Prince of Gravas" beyond the same name, middle initial and titles earned through the University of Pennsylvania, then all the biographical information on him is confirmed in two separate editions of class records from The University of Pennsylvania

710:

okay, that was just an example I mustered up. Regardless, if sources do not say that an individual is X, you cannot mention that that individual is X. Association of or with Y does not mean X. If something hints at X, that does not mean that you can mention that that individual is X. It's all about

307:

for more details). In layman's terms, every individual who has published works or had their work featured is not necessarily notable or encyclopedia worthy. It looks like the article was deleted previously (back in 2011?) but someone re-created the page. Your edits to the content of the article are

3599:

All good, and haha I really don't! I'm a biologist and usually focus on related subjects, but there's such a dearth in easily notable local politician articles (I'm sure you've noticed) that it's easier to destub there. It would be nice to have guidelines but I know wikiprojects are deprecated and

1753:

who is an admin on English Knowledge said this, "This is a collaborative project, and that means cooperating with other users if they ask you something." If someone asks you to remove something that you find funny because they don't then you should comply or try and compromise with the other user.

1449:

ok, I think I need to explain that you still need in-line citations for every, single, sentence, on Knowledge. Just because it's used in one place in the article doesn't mean you can not include the reference when it is used. How would anyone be able to track down that biographical information? If

458:

Fair enough on the populist category, I didn't know any better because it was already like that but back to the nationalist category. And sorry If I didn't clarify what I am about to say above. I was in the middle of typing what is below. It doesn't inherently have to say the word nationalism, but

2955:

I was incorrect about "no reason to believe it's cut/paste," as Perry is on my watchlist and that was the first one I saw before all the other edits you made. I will restore them with the source if you don't, regardless of whether you consider it lazy form. A reasonable person might consider your

1490:

for sure, happy to help. If you edit source, you can add a reference with the template tool (very easy to use). Simply click "Templates," then click "cite web," then insert any name in the "ref name" box. Once you refresh the page, you can click "Named references" and insert the citation wherever

1421:

Uh no. That information is all in "The Class of '93, The University of Pennsylvania, Record to 1930", the very first refference I put in there. I even linked to the specific page. Edit: The Mount Vernon location comes from the excerpt of the 1940 US census, the 2nd refference in the list. Edit: I

312:. You can edit the information freely on the page, as long as it abides by Knowledge standards - keep doing that. But I do believe that the subject of the article is not notable, which is why I have recommended that the page be deleted. I desperately hope this makes sense! Feel free to reach out! 254:

I understand where you are coming from, but to skew the direct quote from DRS is not appropriate. Another sentence to talk about the reception of their decision would be appropriate. Also, there is no WP "pillar violation" while trying to maintain an NPOV. Agreeing or disagreeing with content, or

190:

Now, I don't object if you insist on "hurtful and wrong" being quoted (but note it wasn't cited on the Mulberry article before either) but that these books "portray people in ways that are hurtful and wrong" is not an objective fact, especially not equally for all six books. Your insertion of or

117:

The death of at least 3200 children is not a random event that occurs every day, it's not even comparable to school shootings, which are not governed by the same organization. These residential schools were governed by the Catholic Church, systemically seeking to erase the culture of indigenous

3749:

that I was "deliberately adding false information with no sources. 4th time they've been corrected". I did not add false information, and it was not the fourth time I was corrected, though I am assuming you saw my four other edits and that's why you added this warning. I would recommend you see

232:

For example, we can write: "Many Americans were proud of Neil Armstrong walking on the moon" (that he walked is a fact) or "Many Americans were proud of Neil Armstrong walking on the moon because to them this showed that the US was superior to the USSR, overcoming the Sputnik shock." (that they

3497:

Thanks for the shoutout! Yeah, it's especially difficult to find the district numbers when it comes to non-incumbents obviously. Never used OpenStates for the purpose of checking WP, but honestly not a terrible idea. I just reeally hope that as we enter the redistricting process, states don't

3353:

might be able to help you out in this regard. I am more than happy to chat with you to help make the Payne article better, but I have to undo the copy/paste content you added. At the bottom of the website gohatters.com, you can see that the content is copyrighted to Stetson Univ. I would also

147:

Okay, I had not seen that commission report and am totally unfamiliar with that commission or its mission. That is a very large figure. Take it to the page, but don't create a new section named "Criminal history," but rather something like "Native American schools," and maybe a subsection to

2970:

Okay, well you haven't given me a clear reason to undo my edits, and having the subject's name listed in a source (in list form only) barely constitutes a source. I'll check out what you add, but solely having the name of the subject in a list is not appropriate sourcing... The content was

3461:

and could highlight maintenance tasks or gaps. I'm not sure what will need to changes would be needed to make this work with the members of a state house of representatives or senators, probably need to have legislative session and district info as part of the position held for a person.

1525:. The only reason I'm adding this to your talk page is because I read the section and it recommends I try to deal with you directly before I take it to an administrator. So, this is your only warning, and it is a courtesy only. My next step is a report to an admin. No reply is necessary. 1468:

Ah, thanks and thanks for adding the citations in the meanwhile. I was trying to just include the whole section from the end of one citation into the next one, so as not to do it on every line. Since I didn't want to add seven citations for six lines of text, but I see what you mean now.

1688:

However, if someone removes those links, don't add them back. Saying you created articles only for them to link to not the article it shows up as isn't really all that funny to most people. I understand that you're trying to make a joke, however somethings are better to not joke about.

3313:, but the source you cited is questionably reliable (and is dated back to 2016!). His official profile on the NFL's website does not have his weight listed as what you suggested. Further, you changed his weight to "228" while the source you added indicates his weight is/was "223." -- 2890:

Like, no... why are we going to include two copy/paste full paragraphs, the sources of which don't even mention the subject? Fix that, don't just revert and say you found a source. And the list reference you included above, if you use that you're still explaining the controversy.

772:; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the 3481:

I'm not advocating use of Wikidata in mainspace (though I'm in favor of figuring out how to work with Wikidata as a complement), but I think we can agree, consistency of infobox data may benefit the community and additional tools could help with finding gaps and errors.

3874:

I was going to partially revert my undo, but looks like you scratched everything. I did not originally insert "controversial" to her remarks, somebody else did. And based on the widespread call for her apology and widespread coverage, it is indeed controversial. Per WTW:

3134:

That one is very simple. It isn't sourced to a wp:RS (it's a primary source) and it's a recent addition thus it is reasonable to remove it. If editors object then point to the NPOVN discussion. You can also raise a NPOVN discussion if the same edit spans many pages.

963:

I might also add that these portals were added by one user who is no longer active on WP. It's possible that they had a consensus when they mass added these portals, but I doubt that since half of their added portals to actors' pages were deleted. Half of them were not.

3785:

You have twenty edits... are you sure? Those edits I made to the channel previously were not even in April. You clearly do not understand the multi-warning system works, and your warning is inappropriate, bottom line. This warning is only made for severe cases of

214:

just means adding content without editorial bias. When we are specifically talking about Dr. Seuss Enterprise's decision, we need to avoid editorial bias. Stating their decision plain and simple is neutral in nature. To add any editorializing deviates from that.

3348:

I understand that you are trying to improve the Payne article, but on Knowledge we do not plagiarize. I would encourage you to digest the information from the gohatters.com, reword and pick and choose information about Payne. Does that make sense? The article

1547:

take your threats elsewhere dude. I have posted on your talk page more than once about civility. Checking your edits once in a blue moon, given your history, is not a form of harassment yo. I am sorry if this caused you distress of any kind. My recent edit to

124:

These are not *horrible incidents that happen every day*, this was a system of oppression and harm enabled by the Canadian Catholic Church, as articles cite. This was present accross ALL residential schools, and thus a much bigger story than one school page.

2657: 3855:. And secondly, if despite reading the clear guidelines, you still wanted to include the word, you should have just added the word back, and not undone the rest of my edit. To trash what I did entirely as you did can only have been intentionally disruptive. 2396:

I'm not obligated to inform you of that. I retired the account that was never under sanction, and the last edit was in 2019. Please don't post on my talk page insinuating that I'm part of some political machine and then not provide any evidence. Thanks.

1422:

added that refference again just so both year and location would be reffered to, even though that information is in the same refference already, I just gave it lower down because there it was also used to reffer to the name of his wife and date of death.

3870:

Undoing one edit is "disruptive behavior"? The rest of your edit? I didn't see your "UK press regulator" inclusion in your edit, that is my bad. But to assume that I'm trying to "trash what did entirely" is flat out wrong. Take your attitude elsewhere

3585:

affiliation (R) or (D) after a politician's name. Sorry looking back at the edits I made, there were not "lots" of errors, just a few minor ones to be honest. I really did not mean to be offensive with my edit summary and hope you continue your work! --

3467: 4025:

excluded from that ban). The user was accused and it was established that they are on WP for one sole purpose via some thread I'm too lazy to find. I edited the TSLAQ page to remove a LOT of bias, they objected. They considered it disruptive, oh well.

1345:

oops, I added the wrong template. You need to add sources to everything you post on WP. I noticed that you included a lot of information that is not sourced. That's why I let you know on your talk page. And calm down, my gosh! The article you created,

591:

In terms of those names listed above, there are many other WP users who watch those pages, and I am not here to revolutionize Knowledge. Making small edits on regular articles is all I come here for. I don't want to poke the beast and edit the "hot"

233:

thought that is a fact) We cannot write "Many Americans were proud of Neil Armstrong walking on the moon because this showed that the US was superior to the USSR, overcoming the Sputnik shock." (that it really showed that is an opinion, not a fact).

1918:

Was curious about that, thanks for explaining that. I noticed that a user improperly flagged an article for speedy deletion, but also noticed they were blocked from editing articles that they hadn't edited before. I appreciate you explaining that.

1406:

can't believe I really have to spell this out for you: When he was born, where he was born, where was he educated, what degree did he receive, what did he do for a living? There are sentences in the lead that are unsourced that need sources. :/

1216:

You created this account about four months ago. Your first edit was to create a blank userpage. Your next edits had wikilinks to policies and guidelines in the edit summaries. You were not a new user. Were you this difficult with your previous

1748:

Saying you created articles when 1. You really didn't make those articles and 2. The links not even linking to the article names that are being displayed, isn't funny. People make those sections as a sign of some accomplishments they've made.

2341:

Did you edit Knowledge with other accounts prior to the creation of this one in February 2021? Your first day edits cited policies such as WP:NPOV, WP:RS, WP:TOOMUCH and WP:BLOATED, which suggests a veteran-level familiarity with Knowledge

1315:

What are you talking about ? You mean the official records from Universities and US censuses (sic) ? Hell why are you talking about medical things, I've never posted anything about medicine, period. What articles are you talking about ?

2507:

I realized after I made that edit that the Bachelor of Science article notes that BSc can be used, but I've never seen an American BLP article with the abbreviation "BSc" to denote a Bachelor of Science; poor checking on my part.

2887:. All sources: the AP source, the New York Times source, the Supreme Court primary document, the CNN article, the Guardian article, Pelosi's press release (primary doc), and the Hill article, none of those mention Murphy at all. 3653:

Because we are talking about a £1,548 charge. And that scandal is not relevant in this discussion at all; that scandal was about charges during the 2000s, and Truss isn't mentioned there at all (she wasn't even in office yet).

279:

Hi PerpetuityGrat I'm new to wikipedia and I'm trying to slowly fix a page that was made about me and is full of information that is irrelevant or no longer has online references outside of an archive - what am I doing wrong?

3404:

alright please do! Knowledge really is not a place to copy/paste content from other websites or books. It's an encyclopedia (believe it or not!). Again I'm totally here to answer questions if you are unsure how to proceed.

334:- I just noticed your messages in the comment section) and would rather the page be deleted than have info that isn't relevant anymore (people's art practices change and it was embarrassing to have that stuff on there). 1180:

Oh, don't be silly. I've seen you do this before. It doesn't impress me. Is it so hard to answer some reasonable questions? This is a collaborative project, and that means cooperating with other users if they ask you

71: 941:

because the article is a BLP, I would love to see that. I noticed more than a few pages had those bars deleted, and others had not. To me they are nothing more than a See also section, where we might as well include

3286:

Hi, I understand I need sources and citations for the Donald Payne artcile. I put the inline citations after every edit. I will do so again though and they are all reliable sources when you click on them. Thank

3058:

please see the discussion below. Since you have claimed that it is difficult to assume good faith based on my edits. What's difficult to AGF is when content like this is blindly added to several political BLPs.

1491:

necessary, that way you're only adding the reference once but with multiple citations. Also, in most cases, you only need to add the citation at the end of a paragraph if the entire paragraph uses the source. --

2202:, guess I was confused as to why you placed this on my talk page without explanation. Hadn't seen this type of template before, and assumed it was a sanction or something of the sort. Sorry for the mixup. -- 134: 2852:

but I see there are several more of your removals remaining. Please would you consider restoring the rest with that source? Five seconds to seek a source might have been the preferable approach. Thank you.

3163:

a RfC at NPOVN if there are multiple examples of the same thing or at the article talk page if this is just one article. This is an inherently sensitive area so it's best to be totally on the up and up.

3192: 2626: 1585:

If I see you being rude as heck to users who are honestly trying to better WP, you know I will intervene. I won't stand for biting... But if you are so distressed, go ahead and call an admin's attention.

2815:“There’s no basis in our constitution to use the right to privacy to murder a baby,” Skees said. “The courts have humongously failed and we need to throw out Montana’s socialist rag of a constitution.” 3754:

and read how multi-level warnings work. This warning is for vandalism only. In the case of actual vandalism, you need to use warnings incrementally. Let me know if you have any questions about this. --

4275:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 4140:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2751:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2312:

detailing a Democratic senator voting for it in addition to the others I documented. I hope you or someone else corrects it because it's not just Republicans who voted for it. It's misleading as is.

3498:

arbitrarily change district numbers... which is a real pain in the rear when it comes to infoboxes lol. I am 100% in favor of you working to help refine political BLP infoboxes. I say go for it! --

3831:

Please take this to the appropriate talk page. The changes you made were not reflective of the citations. Stop edit warring with the other user and just discuss it on the talk page, thanks. --

236:

And it doesn't matter one bit whether we share that opinion or not - I happen to agree with that moon landing sentiment, at least to an extent, but I would still oppose such language on WP.

1035:

everyone involved with this apparent controversy. I know nothing about whatever is being alleged in the sources, but it really looks like to me that they are not here to improve Knowledge.

82:

Like you said, Kamloops is but one school. Events occur every day. Some horrific, some very positive. But that doesn't mean that they should go into an overarching article. Looking at the

3442: 2818:

And what was removed from the page: In 2021 Skees, upset with a preliminary injunction to anti-abortion bills, suggested “we need to throw out Montana’s socialist rag of a constitution.”

128:

The Catholic Church ran most of Canada's residential schools, remains silent about their devestating legacy. (and we are helping them by omitting this history from their wikipedia page.

2116: 2040: 4291: 4156: 3215: 2767: 2587: 2108: 1655:

Hey! Someone on Teahouse let me know about your userpage (They said that you had any and all of your links as a Rickroll which isn't true), I would advise you to add the template {{

4260: 4125: 3513: 2737: 2580: 2101: 2845: 3327:

Got it. The weight will be left alone. The new edit shows exactly what the Stetson University football website says with the citations from the website for his college career.

1578:

to be civil and to focus on the edits... you've since deleted both talk sections with an edit summary of "so done with this" "remove vandalism." Just act better dude, like huh?

1347: 94:

page, there is one sentence that mentions it. Not conflating anything here, but every notable event is not worth mentioning in overarching articles. Probably best to keep it to

1797: 2567:

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called

711:

the source. As I said above, if you can find a source that says that an individual is X, go ahead and include that. But we're not seeing that here with the nationalist title.

2088:

and to edits adding, deleting, collapsing, or removing verifiable information from infoboxes. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called

3751: 111: 67: 445:

mention the word "nationalist," yet you are using that as your citation. Why are you doing this? You are misleading WP users completely and inserting incorrect information.

2572: 2093: 229:

But it is "editorial bias" if we word it in such a way to appear that DSE withdrew the books because of some indisputable fact. They withdrew it because of their judgment.

901:

Hi PG, can I just check whether you had a consensus for the mass removal of portal bars from biographical articles. A query's been raised at the Portal project. Cheers.

3093: 1031:. I saw one of your edits in recent changes and honestly did not know what can of worms I would find. Wow. To me it seems as if the user is hell-bent on vilifying (via 3428: 2183:

There is no sanction. The message says "It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date." I'm not sure why you think this is a sanction. ―

1928: 2348:, which systematically edits the pages of congressional candidates state-by-state (sometimes with no editing overlap between accounts) and appears to do so for pay? 390:

yes, quite amazing, the level of proficiency achieved in that time. Indeed, within mere hours of account creation, this editor appears to have reached expert level.

1864:

The user not being notified of the slurs was partially my fault as I was too focused on the thing involved in the question that I hadn't even realized the slurs. ―

2823: 1575: 1561: 274: 1771: 191:

reversion to "because they portray people in ways that are hurtful and wrong" however claims that they are indeed. And that goes against Knowledge's NPOV policy.

2595: 2568: 2089: 309: 3995:

Please stop attempting a drawn-out edit war on TSLAQ. I opened a Talk page discussion prior to your latest undo and that is where we should discuss the issue.

3893: 3860: 3491: 142: 3790:, in succession. Please learn how to use warnings before issuing them. I know you are passionate about micronations, but you doing this is inappropriate. -- 2794: 2266:

multiple credible news outlets covering it as not relevant? This surely meets the standard of inclusion. Would you be able to rephrase it for balance then?

1485: 1470: 1444: 1426: 1401: 1384: 1369: 1340: 1325: 1317: 1131: 1110: 4054:

Great comment—I'm not going to delete your warning, but it serves to inform others who check this page as to why you added this unfounded edit warning. --

3531: 1787: 3926: 3905: 1705:

I have decided to remove the links myself as people don't really find it funny. Please don't do this in the future unless it's obvious that it's a joke.

1261: 1005: 289: 2812:

Directly from the cited source: Rep. Derek Skees, R-Kalispell, was also unhappy with the court’s decision to grant an injunction, calling it a failure.

3731:

Is there a reason why you gave me a level four warning for a single revert, of which you included content that wasn't from the sources you provided? --

3537:

Thanks for drawing my attention to that. Haven't dealt with that sort of vandalism before, wasn't sure how to address that. Thanks for the guidance! --

1604: 2406: 2391: 3457:

Building out Wikidata, keeping the data in sync, and linking with External IDs enable tools for finding gaps, errors, or conflicts in positions like

335: 297: 281: 3799: 3763: 3740: 3068: 2950: 2466: 2445: 2178: 1810: 1763: 1736: 1698: 1641: 1616: 991: 973: 955: 75: 3978: 3856: 3648: 3632: 3438: 3191: 2625: 2303: 2289: 2275: 2260: 1500: 1478: 1463: 1434: 1416: 837: 819: 54:

This was one school, but we know there are children's bodies at most if not all other residential schools operated by the Canadian catholic church

4318: 4183: 3971: 3840: 3610: 3594: 3507: 2321: 1971: 1553: 734: 720: 680: 649: 627: 410:

By the way, the right-wing populism category as been used for people long before I started editing with pages like Donald Trump and Josh Hawley.

2877: 2533: 2517: 1815:

Excuse my butting in--There is much wisdom in stepping back, even when you are not in the wrong. I wrote an essay on the subject many years ago (

1595: 1579: 1305: 1521:

You've now reverted or partially reverted my edits on multiple articles that you've never touched before I edited them. This is a clear case of

928: 698: 321: 3888: 3667: 3578: 3399: 3379: 3343: 3328: 3304: 3288: 3046: 3032: 3018: 2997: 2980: 2965: 2900: 2211: 2193: 2156: 851: 3172: 3144: 3129: 2652: 2598:. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. 2119:. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. 1776:

Hey! I noticed that you added the feeling discouraged thing on your userpage and I want to help. I'm just wanting to know what's the issue. ―

1144:

Why do you have that section of "Articles I've created"? I removed them, and you reverted with an edit summary of "Ok"; what does that mean?--

3628: 3414: 3391: 3367: 3336: 3322: 2251:

because the election is coming up. Doesn't mean we should add whatever. For the record, I've removed that sort of content from both pages. --

1828: 1564:. Most notably, you were excessively rude and straight up lied about the credibility of my edits and my character previously to win arguments 1076: 399: 264: 242: 224: 343: 3552: 1906: 1247: 1226: 1211: 1190: 1175: 2884: 1912: 172: 3546: 3104: 2714: 1875: 1852: 1901:

the whole IP range from editing those specific articles. The linked policy pages explain how range blocks work far better than I could.

3779: 3717: 3266: 1091: 3851:

You reverted an edit of mine in its entirety, apparently because you disagreed with the removal of one word. Firstly you should read

3825: 2699: 2147:

can you please alert me as to why I have deserved this sanction? Can you point to the specific policy I have purportedly violated? --

1659:}} to your userpage so people don't take your "articles I've created" section seriously as every link in that section either goes to 1285: 180:

The only difference I can see is that my version makes it clear that this is the publisher's judgment, not Knowledge's. According to

4035: 2228:

How is not noting a false claim that has been fact-checked multiple times not relevant? Multiple organizations have called him out.

1534: 1324:) 14:28, 8 September 2021 (UTC) "Please include sources when adding content to Knowledge" ? I AM. What are you even talking about ? 3977:

If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Knowledge's

3811:

what do azerbaycan refugee conditions have to do with artsakh? they have their own page on internal displaced people in azerbaycan

3441:, I couldn't agree more. Your fixes have been very helpful! I've started working on checking Wikidata Items for the US as part of 2827: 2166: 4213: 3182: 2243:

Because Knowledge is not a place to put endless amounts of quotes. Users are adding all sorts of "gotcha" quotes to the pages of

1363: 2918: 1714: 1676: 1392: 1377: 1333: 57:

This is not a matter of opinion, its factual that the church oversaw schools where children died. Kamloops is but one school.

4238: 4191: 4103: 3434: 3445:. I've gone through all 50 state current senate persons based on the current lists and checked information against Wikidata. 2022: 946:

if it existed. If I am totally in the wrong I am happy to revert those changes. But I haven't seen anything indicating that. -

2616: 2357: 2013:, which really should be a category instead of a list. Thank you for nominating that for deletion. Cheers, and thanks lol. -- 1902: 1281: 781: 177:

May I ask you about the difference between your "citing racist imagery" and my "imagery they deemed racist and insensitive"?

3864: 3296: 2922: 2611: 1556:

in effort to bolster your edit arguments. I was in agreement with you in that discussion, but you were absurdly so horribly

381: 4314: 4232: 4179: 3713: 2906: 2790: 2424: 2377: 1572: 1565: 910: 157: 4063: 4049: 2001: 2313: 2295: 2267: 2229: 2010: 1549: 2134: 2054: 1956: 604: 187:

Neither is quoting the exact words used by Dr. Seuss Enterprises ("portray people in ways that are hurtful and wrong").

118:

people in Canada (the proposed edit is for Canadian Catholic WIkipedia page, not the entire Catholic School Knowledge).

3746: 3673: 2862: 2819: 1948: 1516: 999: 979: 95: 51:

That would be like removing the reference to holocost from the page about Nazi Germany, to just be on a specific camp.

48:) is appropriate, and is in fact the type of systemetic racism that resulted in this story being hidden for so long. 22: 3640: 570: 431: 2938: 2237: 806: 2169:, and only after that you added this sanction. Can you elaborate how I breached a WP policy or guideline? Thanks. -- 3310: 2804: 530:

Examples that are not Trump Republican types include (Doesn't inherently equal anti Trump): Libertarian Types like

4098: 2494: 888: 4310: 4175: 2786: 2591: 2112: 1153: 1106: 4005: 2415:

Side note, I am actually very flattered you consider me to have veteran-level familiarity with WP guidelines. --

2165:, we did not agree. I did not make any subsequent edits on the Jeff Hewitt article, and started a discussion at 1450:

there is no reference at the end of a sentence, it is presumed to be unsourced, that's how WP works. Please see

3355: 3281: 2809:

What part of Skees suggesting to throw out the “socialist rag of a constitution” was not what the source said?

1796:

I don't think that I have to elaborate that being called "mentally impaired" and pretty much publicly insulted

773: 3821: 1238:

you came to my userpage and deleted content. Is there a guideline or policy as to why you did that? Thanks. --

3901: 3387: 3117: 2162: 829: 3624: 2846:"List: The 126 House members, 19 states and 2 imaginary states that backed Texas' challenge to Trump defeat" 2346: 30: 4284: 4149: 4086: 3967: 3947: 3846: 2930: 2914: 2760: 1310: 919:

no I did not. If there is a consensus indicating why they should be included, I'll happily reinsert them. -

789: 197: 3160: 784:

for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant

471:

which is the American Nationalism of Trump. But sorry for not being clear enough, Knowledge itself counts

4296: 4161: 3453:

to check incumbent and current legislator lists. This is what brought my attention to the district error.

2910: 2772: 1649: 1629: 793: 584:

word "nationalist," it probably isn't worth mentioning in the article - it can't be mentioned since it's

349: 99: 3037:

You total quoted something, I'm just asking if it was a policy. If you want to disengage that's fine. --

2309: 3709: 2934: 2576: 2543: 2387: 2353: 2097: 1759: 1710: 1694: 1672: 1117: 1102: 1012: 896: 2926: 1101:; hopefully admin action will be taken. The articles will still need trimming as appropriate, though. 3990: 3685: 2345:

Do you have an affiliation with the organized ring of accounts associated with Buzzards-Watch Me Work

1977: 1944: 1451: 1266:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

884: 801: 3817: 3808:

my edits are not un sourced, but they are removing sources that have nothing to do with the article

4075: 3955: 3912: 3897: 3775: 2060: 1870: 1782: 765: 499: 3877:

advice in this guideline is not limited to the examples provided and should not be applied rigidly

3565:

also include vote statistics in the text, so I'm not sure why that addition was removed entirely.

1557: 1552:

was a simple edit. My last interaction with you before that was over three weeks ago and was when

2832: 2317: 2299: 2271: 2233: 2027: 1474: 1430: 1388: 1373: 1329: 1321: 664: 3473:

What External ID's would be useful for lookup or queries help in filling in or identifying gaps?

463:

is a form of nationalism. Not every Republican though is an embrace of this policy and rhetoric.

3618: 3487: 2335: 1952: 1898: 785: 769: 730: 694: 686: 676: 668: 623: 566: 558: 554: 489: 472: 468: 460: 427: 35: 26: 2280:

Upon reflection, maybe it is worth including, I won't remove it if you re-add that content. --

4272: 4204:? Do you have the source that the author copied from? I wasn't able to find anything online. 4137: 2876:

list form, and that's it. How does that justify all the other content? At that point, you're

2748: 2608: 2530: 2491: 2452: 2431: 2383: 2349: 1934: 1530: 1139: 395: 4197: 2971:

copy/pasted in several articles. I'm surprised it's been on all these BLPs for this long. --

2909:

Here is a fraction of the list of articles that received nearly identical copy/paste edits:

2557:

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.

2074:

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.

725:

Sorry, I did misread the one for Mo Brooks, but I did find some on Miller that confirms it.

4283:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 4148:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3701: 3450: 3375: 3350: 3092:, these were reasonable removals. The content was UNDUE, see recent NPOVN discussion here 2759:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2365: 2050: 1997: 1889: 1275: 937:

because a subject is involved with an aspect of American culture, or include a link to the

934: 906: 880: 824: 377: 339: 285: 90:

or any other mass shooting; there's no mention of any mass shooting there. However, in the

63: 60:

I agree it was placed in the wrong section (population) but it could be moved up, or down.

419:

Admittedly, not every Republican is nationalist (most probably aren't), but some are like

8: 4224: 4209: 4201: 4055: 4027: 3963: 3918: 3880: 3832: 3791: 3771: 3755: 3732: 3726: 3705: 3691: 3659: 3636: 3586: 3538: 3499: 3406: 3383: 3359: 3314: 3262: 3121: 3060: 3038: 3028: 3010: 2993: 2972: 2961: 2942: 2892: 2858: 2695: 2509: 2482: 2458: 2437: 2416: 2398: 2369: 2281: 2252: 2203: 2170: 2148: 2014: 1963: 1920: 1883: 1865: 1802: 1793: 1777: 1755: 1743: 1728: 1722: 1706: 1690: 1668: 1633: 1608: 1587: 1492: 1455: 1408: 1355: 1239: 1203: 1167: 1123: 1083: 1041: 983: 965: 947: 920: 843: 777: 712: 658: 641: 612: 596: 585: 453: 405: 328: 313: 256: 216: 149: 103: 1278:, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. 671:

however is a variant of Nationalism popularized by Trump where even Knowledge says that.

4094: 4045: 4001: 3458: 3204: 3168: 3140: 3100: 2638: 1660: 1522: 557:) 16:41, 16 April 2021 (UTC) Note not every Republican who objected to the results are 3879:. Take it to the talk page, I was restoring the version that was before your edits. -- 3698:

assuming this is a socketpuppet. You already have multiple accusations of being one.

4254: 4119: 3936: 3601: 3569: 3483: 3332: 3292: 3230: 2731: 2646: 2223: 1824: 1301: 1292:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

1066: 726: 705: 690: 672: 634: 619: 578: 562: 550: 439: 423: 240: 195: 87: 2294:

I appreciate you reconsidering it. I'm glad you're keeping a neutral eye on them :)

1425:

So I'm really re-using the same refference inbetween another, different refference.

416:

She has a track record of being one of the Republicans with a nationalist rehtoric.

4303: 4268: 4168: 4133: 3958:

with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the

2779: 2744: 2603: 2525: 2502: 2486: 2476: 1992:

Thank you for bringing the likely non-notable water parks article to my attention!

1623: 1601: 1542: 1526: 1061: 1056: 1046: 938: 391: 3466:

Right now we can easily create tables for current legislators or any session like

2248: 2046: 1993: 1222: 1186: 1149: 1032: 960: 916: 902: 818:—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 547: 413:

But Either way, Ideologically, Mary Miller is among the Nationalist Republicans.

372: 171:

I asked "How can it be incorrect when it is basically saying the same thing?" on

1582:... like I said before, drop your weapons at the keyboard and assume good faith. 780:

among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See

4280: 4205: 4145: 3655: 3519: 3470:

which highlights some information gaps and would give a table to check against.

3258: 3089: 3053: 3024: 3004: 2989: 2957: 2870: 2854: 2756: 2691: 2244: 2199: 2184: 2142: 2125: 1816: 1656: 810: 539: 494: 304: 211: 181: 16: 3449:

Currently I'm working to resolve external IDs to Wikidata via Mix-N-Match for

358: 4276: 4220: 4141: 4090: 4041: 4014: 3997: 3852: 3527: 3252: 3246: 3164: 3136: 3111: 3096: 2752: 2685: 2679: 1351: 1098: 1071: 1051: 1028: 752: 689:

as nationalism, but does not describe single payer health care as socialism.

535: 509: 163: 83: 45: 1820: 1297: 1293: 1020: 943: 857: 420: 249: 237: 205: 192: 44:) residential school murder of children to the page about Kamloops school ( 3558: 2032: 1560:

I had to say something, especially since you were also being rude to him

1350:, doesn't include sources for the most important portion of the article. 1267: 519: 4287:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

4152:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2763:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2550: 2067: 1368:

And what do you mean by " the most important portion of the article." ?

933:

Legitimately, if there is a valid consensus as to include a link to the

4264:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

4129:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

3959: 3562: 2741:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2524:

No problem. The key is to go by the sources, not one's own experience.

1940: 1750: 1233: 1218: 1197: 1182: 1161: 1145: 543: 514: 504: 484: 3631:. Given those facts I think this is more than adequate for inclusion. 4245: 4110: 4018: 3752:

Knowledge:WikiProject_User_warnings/Design_guidelines#Severity_levels

3235: 2723: 2668: 1271: 531: 479: 148:

elaborate on what the schools did, and talk about the murders there.

3211:, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. 1986: 3679: 3523: 2041:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of oldest living state leaders

1859: 1843: 1664: 757: 524: 41: 3745:

I notice that you are more of a novice editor. You stated in your

2655:

to read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions,

475:

as American Nationalism. (Sources not included if already listed)

4013:

Just clarifying this for those who peruse my talk page. The user

2085: 91: 4300:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 4165:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 3917:

thanks for the notification. Glad to see another sock banned. --

2776:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 2563:

imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

2080:

imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

4290:

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

4258:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All

4155:

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

4123:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All

3372:

Okay, I will read those articles and learn a little bit more.

2905:

Sorry, I should have provided this earlier since you said that

2766:

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review

809:, which states that an editor must not perform more than three 3443:

Wikidata:WikiProject_every_politician/United_States_of_America

2735:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All

4022: 3986: 3518:

Thanks for calling attention to the unnecessary archiving of

842:

thanks, we've addressed that in the immediate section above.

40:

I disagree that moving the section on the Catholic church's (

2941:, etc. This is not how we should be editing on Knowledge. -- 2848:. The Mercury News. Bay Area News Group. December 15, 2020. 1888:

Hi, that's a fair question. The answer is that I applied a

1554:

you were purposefully trying to debase and discredit a user

46:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Kamloops_Indian_Residential_School

3557:

Hi, I noticed you cleaned up my expansions on an article (

866: 3514:

Restoring a talk page which had been moved to an archive

3241: 2674: 4271:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

4136:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

2747:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

1756:

Blaze The Wolf | Proud Furry | Discord: Blaze Wolf#0001

1707:

Blaze The Wolf | Proud Furry | Discord: Blaze Wolf#0001

1691:

Blaze The Wolf | Proud Furry | Discord: Blaze Wolf#0001

1669:

Blaze The Wolf | Proud Furry | Discord: Blaze Wolf#0001

1270:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 3009:

can you show me what you are quoting there? Thanks. --

800:

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being

618:

revolutionize anything. It is just simple information.

4017:

created the page and was banned from editing certain

3249:. You can opt out of future notifications by placing 2682:. You can opt out of future notifications by placing 3985:

If you continue to disrupt Knowledge, as you did at

3437:(thank you back!) and your discussion on issue with 2308:

I wrote on that page's talk that there's a specific

1027:

the content is unencyclopedic in nature and... well

1943:, I'm not sure if this is the reliable source, but 792:. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary 3966:with them. Alternatively you can read Knowledge's 3658:, not everything verifiable deserves inclusion. -- 3429:District fixes thanks to Mix-N-Match to OpenStates 3257:on top of the current page (your user talk page). 2690:on top of the current page (your user talk page). 1628:I just realized you did what you accused me of at 42:https://en.wikipedia.org/Catholic_Church_in_Canada 3970:page, and ask for independent help at one of the 3209:Odd infobox duplication while using visual editor 2649:because there was no discussion for a few days. 2039:Thank you for being the most clearheaded one at 1122:I completely agree. Thank you for doing that. -- 816:even if you do not violate the three-revert rule 776:to work toward making a version that represents 275:Editing page about me containing irrelevant info 3219: 2656: 184:Knowledge should not endorse such judgements. 1962:Thanks, I added that source to the article. -- 21:Sent request for third opinion on the article 3629:United Kingdom parliamentary expenses scandal 2084:You have shown interest in discussions about 1772:You're feeling discouraged and I want to help 3309:you did add inline citations to the article 1354:articles need to have everything sourced. -- 210:I understand where you are coming from, but 2586:For additional information, please see the 2571:is in effect. Any administrator may impose 2107:For additional information, please see the 2092:is in effect. Any administrator may impose 1897:of the edits coming from it, so decided to 1262:Disambiguation link notification for July 7 768:shows that you are currently engaged in an 4085:You are invited to join the discussion at 3623:Here to discuss the revert you made on my 3218:. If you have follow-up questions, please 3116:so, if you were me, how would you address 2988:is perfectly acceptable for this purpose. 2956:edits to be considerably worse than that. 2583:, when making edits related to the topic. 2104:, when making edits related to the topic. 3239:, and this notification was delivered by 2672:, and this notification was delivered by 663:, But the Knowledge article doesn't mark 467:All of these Republicans are known to be 3484:Wolfgang8741 says: If not you, then who? 3358:. Let me know how I can further help. -- 2986:having the name of the subject in a list 2841:six of those removals with this source: 2167:Knowledge talk:Manual of Style/Infoboxes 1939:Hello. Regarding the birth year edit of 3023:It's self-evident. I think we're done. 1872: 1784: 561:Nationalist type, but some of them are 135:2604:3D08:187F:2600:89C4:9164:1B41:5DEE 68:2604:3D08:187F:2600:89C4:9164:1B41:5DEE 2575:on editors who do not strictly follow 2457:are you going to follow up on this? -- 2096:on editors who do not strictly follow 1571:Let us not forget when I asked you on 879:great Idea making the page 2028 ahead 3979:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 3231:help page about the archival process. 1004:Hoping to start a discussion here on 4255:2023 Arbitration Committee elections 4120:2022 Arbitration Committee elections 3433:I noticed your thanks on the fix to 2907:no reason to believe it's cut/paste. 2732:2021 Arbitration Committee elections 4239:ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message 4192:Copypaste tag on Nerodimë e Poshtme 4104:ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message 2715:ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message 2588:guidance on discretionary sanctions 2109:guidance on discretionary sanctions 2011:List of water parks in the Americas 1727:How on earth is this not a joke? -- 1607:against me, which was dismissed. -- 1550:True North Centre for Public Policy 173:this difference, which you reverted 13: 2031: 980:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Portals 756: 546:, and Mainstream Republicans like 96:Kamloops Indian Residential School 14: 4332: 3954:If you are engaged in an article 3159:I don't think further dialog here 4244: 4109: 4080: 3941: 3678: 3311:Donald Payne (American football) 3203:! The thread you created at the 3190: 2722: 2637:! The thread you created at the 2624: 2549: 2066: 1985: 1903:The Blade of the Northern Lights 865: 357: 4294:and submit your choices on the 4159:and submit your choices on the 4087:Talk:Dorothy Moon § "Far-right" 2770:and submit your choices on the 1580:Knowledge is not a battleground 805:—especially if you violate the 782:the bold, revert, discuss cycle 764:Your recent editing history at 459:embrace a form of nationalism. 3356:Knowledge:Copyright violations 1929:02:00, 20 September 2021 (UTC) 1913:01:40, 20 September 2021 (UTC) 1876:14:47, 19 September 2021 (UTC) 1853:02:56, 19 September 2021 (UTC) 1829:20:00, 17 September 2021 (UTC) 1811:18:28, 17 September 2021 (UTC) 1788:14:25, 17 September 2021 (UTC) 1764:20:04, 16 September 2021 (UTC) 1737:20:00, 16 September 2021 (UTC) 1715:19:59, 16 September 2021 (UTC) 1699:19:53, 16 September 2021 (UTC) 1677:19:51, 16 September 2021 (UTC) 1617:15:05, 28 September 2021 (UTC) 1596:00:24, 16 September 2021 (UTC) 1535:23:24, 15 September 2021 (UTC) 1: 4319:00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC) 4273:Knowledge arbitration process 4184:01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC) 4138:Knowledge arbitration process 4099:18:27, 10 November 2022 (UTC) 4050:18:26, 6 September 2022 (UTC) 4036:16:20, 6 September 2022 (UTC) 3547:21:26, 23 February 2022 (UTC) 3532:15:38, 23 February 2022 (UTC) 3508:02:39, 13 February 2022 (UTC) 3492:17:07, 11 February 2022 (UTC) 3183:Your thread has been archived 2828:01:26, 30 November 2021 (UTC) 2795:01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC) 2749:Knowledge arbitration process 2700:19:03, 17 November 2021 (UTC) 2617:Your thread has been archived 2612:15:15, 17 November 2021 (UTC) 2534:16:22, 17 November 2021 (UTC) 2518:15:22, 17 November 2021 (UTC) 2495:15:13, 17 November 2021 (UTC) 2163:Talk:Jeff Hewitt (politician) 1501:18:24, 8 September 2021 (UTC) 1479:18:21, 8 September 2021 (UTC) 1464:15:43, 8 September 2021 (UTC) 1435:14:59, 8 September 2021 (UTC) 1417:14:56, 8 September 2021 (UTC) 1393:14:54, 8 September 2021 (UTC) 1378:14:44, 8 September 2021 (UTC) 1364:14:43, 8 September 2021 (UTC) 1348:Alfred Christian Fleckenstein 1334:14:39, 8 September 2021 (UTC) 588:. Hope this clears things up! 4233:20:48, 31 October 2023 (UTC) 4214:02:28, 13 October 2023 (UTC) 3415:20:18, 1 February 2022 (UTC) 3392:20:12, 1 February 2022 (UTC) 3368:19:55, 1 February 2022 (UTC) 3337:19:48, 1 February 2022 (UTC) 3323:19:29, 1 February 2022 (UTC) 3297:19:26, 1 February 2022 (UTC) 3267:19:03, 24 January 2022 (UTC) 3216:read the archived discussion 3173:22:18, 26 January 2022 (UTC) 3145:03:46, 26 January 2022 (UTC) 3130:03:40, 26 January 2022 (UTC) 3105:21:52, 23 January 2022 (UTC) 3069:04:18, 26 January 2022 (UTC) 3047:17:54, 23 January 2022 (UTC) 3033:17:50, 23 January 2022 (UTC) 3019:17:48, 23 January 2022 (UTC) 2998:17:45, 23 January 2022 (UTC) 2981:17:38, 23 January 2022 (UTC) 2966:17:14, 23 January 2022 (UTC) 2951:17:04, 23 January 2022 (UTC) 2901:16:55, 23 January 2022 (UTC) 2863:15:57, 23 January 2022 (UTC) 2485:says "BS, BSc, SB, or ScB". 2467:15:41, 28 October 2021 (UTC) 2446:23:19, 26 October 2021 (UTC) 2425:06:11, 26 October 2021 (UTC) 2407:14:04, 30 October 2021 (UTC) 2392:14:01, 30 October 2021 (UTC) 2378:05:54, 26 October 2021 (UTC) 2358:02:41, 26 October 2021 (UTC) 2322:03:36, 29 October 2021 (UTC) 2304:15:52, 24 October 2021 (UTC) 2290:13:33, 24 October 2021 (UTC) 2276:05:52, 24 October 2021 (UTC) 2261:05:47, 24 October 2021 (UTC) 2238:05:43, 24 October 2021 (UTC) 2212:16:01, 23 October 2021 (UTC) 2194:19:19, 22 October 2021 (UTC) 2179:13:57, 22 October 2021 (UTC) 2157:13:52, 22 October 2021 (UTC) 2135:04:42, 22 October 2021 (UTC) 2055:19:49, 17 October 2021 (UTC) 2023:20:01, 14 October 2021 (UTC) 2002:19:33, 14 October 2021 (UTC) 1642:17:48, 11 October 2021 (UTC) 371:Already a pro 4 weeks in :) 7: 4064:20:52, 5 October 2022 (UTC) 3468:Ohio Senate Current Members 2658:you can create a new thread 2382:What was your old account? 1972:18:26, 6 October 2021 (UTC) 1957:19:46, 1 October 2021 (UTC) 1630:Danielle Elizabeth Tumminio 100:Diocese of British Columbia 10: 4337: 4311:MediaWiki message delivery 4176:MediaWiki message delivery 3927:23:48, 30 April 2022 (UTC) 3906:22:24, 30 April 2022 (UTC) 3889:18:28, 25 April 2022 (UTC) 3865:18:21, 25 April 2022 (UTC) 3841:20:10, 20 April 2022 (UTC) 3826:19:11, 20 April 2022 (UTC) 3800:22:27, 14 April 2022 (UTC) 3780:13:55, 14 April 2022 (UTC) 3764:04:44, 14 April 2022 (UTC) 3741:04:30, 14 April 2022 (UTC) 3718:00:08, 14 April 2022 (UTC) 3674:April 2022 Level 4 Warning 3668:15:47, 11 April 2022 (UTC) 3641:09:14, 11 April 2022 (UTC) 3553:"Fixing lots of errors..." 3188: 2787:MediaWiki message delivery 2622: 2581:page-specific restrictions 2102:page-specific restrictions 2009:I'm assuming I referenced 1517:WP:HOUNDING September 2021 1000:Edits by User:Kendalandrew 889:01:00, 19 April 2021 (UTC) 852:22:20, 18 April 2021 (UTC) 830:22:10, 18 April 2021 (UTC) 735:17:53, 16 April 2021 (UTC) 721:17:11, 16 April 2021 (UTC) 699:17:06, 16 April 2021 (UTC) 681:17:05, 16 April 2021 (UTC) 650:17:01, 16 April 2021 (UTC) 628:16:57, 16 April 2021 (UTC) 605:16:51, 16 April 2021 (UTC) 571:16:49, 16 April 2021 (UTC) 432:16:16, 16 April 2021 (UTC) 382:15:01, 26 March 2021 (UTC) 344:19:19, 23 March 2021 (UTC) 322:19:57, 22 March 2021 (UTC) 290:19:45, 22 March 2021 (UTC) 265:19:13, 13 March 2021 (UTC) 243:18:48, 13 March 2021 (UTC) 225:18:40, 13 March 2021 (UTC) 198:18:35, 13 March 2021 (UTC) 102:, or something like that. 31:23:41, 18 March 2024 (UTC) 3611:22:14, 7 March 2022 (UTC) 3595:21:41, 7 March 2022 (UTC) 3579:20:41, 7 March 2022 (UTC) 3233:The archival was done by 2666:The archival was done by 1452:Knowledge:Inline citation 1248:03:52, 20 June 2021 (UTC) 1227:02:06, 20 June 2021 (UTC) 1212:01:01, 20 June 2021 (UTC) 1191:00:59, 20 June 2021 (UTC) 1176:00:55, 20 June 2021 (UTC) 1154:00:00, 20 June 2021 (UTC) 1132:20:19, 19 June 2021 (UTC) 1111:20:18, 19 June 2021 (UTC) 1092:20:17, 19 June 2021 (UTC) 864: 365:The Barnstar of Diligence 356: 86:here in reference to the 4308:to your user talk page. 4228: 4173:to your user talk page. 4059: 4031: 4006:03:16, 1 June 2022 (UTC) 3922: 3884: 3836: 3795: 3759: 3736: 3663: 3590: 3542: 3503: 3410: 3363: 3354:recommend you check out 3318: 3125: 3064: 3042: 3014: 2976: 2946: 2896: 2878:teaching the controversy 2805:Edit on Derek Skees page 2784:to your user talk page. 2513: 2462: 2441: 2420: 2402: 2373: 2285: 2256: 2207: 2174: 2152: 2018: 1967: 1924: 1806: 1732: 1637: 1612: 1591: 1496: 1459: 1412: 1359: 1306:06:01, 7 July 2021 (UTC) 1243: 1207: 1171: 1127: 1087: 992:12:59, 9 June 2021 (UTC) 987: 974:22:20, 8 June 2021 (UTC) 969: 956:22:00, 8 June 2021 (UTC) 951: 929:21:50, 8 June 2021 (UTC) 924: 911:21:12, 8 June 2021 (UTC) 847: 766:Mary Miller (politician) 716: 645: 600: 317: 260: 220: 158:21:04, 7 June 2021 (UTC) 153: 112:19:56, 7 June 2021 (UTC) 107: 76:19:44, 7 June 2021 (UTC) 3688:without further warning 2592:Arbitration Committee's 2569:discretionary sanctions 2113:Arbitration Committee's 2090:discretionary sanctions 667:as a socialist policy. 665:Single-payer healthcare 400:19:23, 4 May 2021 (UTC) 168:Hello PerpetuallyGrat, 3282:Citiations were given. 3236:Lowercase sigmabot III 2669:Lowercase sigmabot III 2161:Per the discussion at 2036: 1837:Hello, PerpetuityGrat, 761: 687:America First (Policy) 685:Knowledge categorizes 669:America First (policy) 559:America First (Policy) 490:Marjorie Taylor Greene 473:America First (Policy) 469:America First (Policy) 461:America First (Policy) 4269:Arbitration Committee 4252:Hello! Voting in the 4196:How do you know that 4134:Arbitration Committee 4117:Hello! Voting in the 4076:Discussion invitation 3972:relevant noticeboards 2745:Arbitration Committee 2729:Hello! Voting in the 2035: 1118:ProcrastinatingReader 1103:ProcrastinatingReader 1013:ProcrastinatingReader 760: 538:, Trump Critics like 4040:I wonder who cares. 3991:blocked from editing 3847:Disruptive behaviour 3686:blocked from editing 3351:Knowledge:Plagiarism 2577:Knowledge's policies 2098:Knowledge's policies 1311:Unreliable sources ? 1294:opt-out instructions 1166:Guideline/policy? -- 935:United States Portal 802:blocked from editing 4200:is in violation of 4021:-related articles ( 3960:article's talk page 3913:Suffusion of Yellow 3898:Suffusion of Yellow 3459:California Governor 3439:infobox consistency 3221:create a new thread 2483:Bachelor of Science 2481:Source says B.S., 1650:About your userpage 1454:for more info... -- 1042:Vladimir Chernukhin 1037:Articles affected: 978:For reference, see 350:A barnstar for you! 4285:arbitration policy 4198:Nerodimë e Poshtme 4150:arbitration policy 3968:dispute resolution 3948:disruptive editing 3690:the next time you 3247:automated accounts 3205:Knowledge:Teahouse 2761:arbitration policy 2680:automated accounts 2639:Knowledge:Teahouse 2037: 1576:separate occasions 1284:• Join us at the 897:Portal bar removal 790:dispute resolution 762: 4321: 4186: 3946:Please stop your 3704:comment added by 3378:comment added by 3279: 3278: 3273: 3269: 3255:|deny=Muninnbot}} 2802: 2801: 2797: 2712: 2711: 2706: 2702: 2688:|deny=Muninnbot}} 2007: 2006: 1978:A cookie for you! 1289: 1276:usually incorrect 1274:. Such links are 1067:Alexander Temerko 1006:User:Kendalandrew 894: 893: 873:ahead of the curb 807:three-revert rule 387: 386: 379: 88:Parkland shooting 78: 66:comment added by 4328: 4309: 4307: 4248: 4174: 4172: 4113: 4084: 4083: 3945: 3944: 3916: 3730: 3720: 3682: 3652: 3608: 3607: 3576: 3575: 3403: 3394: 3347: 3308: 3272: 3256: 3244: 3238: 3228: 3223: 3194: 3187: 3186: 3115: 3057: 3008: 2874: 2849: 2785: 2783: 2726: 2719: 2718: 2705: 2689: 2677: 2671: 2665: 2660: 2628: 2621: 2620: 2606: 2553: 2544:Important Notice 2528: 2506: 2489: 2456: 2453:Snooganssnoogans 2435: 2432:Snooganssnoogans 2384:Snooganssnoogans 2350:Snooganssnoogans 2191: 2146: 2132: 2070: 2061:Important Notice 1989: 1982: 1981: 1909: 1863: 1851: 1747: 1726: 1632:back in July. -- 1627: 1602:User:Benicio2020 1546: 1489: 1448: 1405: 1344: 1279: 1237: 1201: 1165: 1121: 1062:Suleyman Kerimov 1057:Theresa Villiers 1047:Lubov Chernukhin 1024: 1016: 939:Biography Portal 869: 862: 861: 841: 709: 662: 640:as a socialist. 638: 616: 582: 457: 443: 378: 375: 361: 354: 353: 332: 301: 253: 209: 146: 138: 61: 4336: 4335: 4331: 4330: 4329: 4327: 4326: 4325: 4324: 4323: 4301: 4249: 4241: 4194: 4189: 4188: 4166: 4114: 4106: 4081: 4078: 3956:content dispute 3942: 3939: 3910: 3849: 3724: 3699: 3676: 3646: 3621: 3603: 3602: 3571: 3570: 3555: 3516: 3477:district field. 3431: 3397: 3373: 3341: 3302: 3284: 3275: 3274: 3250: 3240: 3234: 3185: 3109: 3051: 3002: 2883:Take a look at 2868: 2844: 2835: 2833:126 Republicans 2807: 2777: 2717: 2708: 2707: 2683: 2673: 2667: 2653:Click this link 2619: 2604: 2601: 2600: 2554: 2546: 2526: 2500: 2487: 2479: 2450: 2429: 2338: 2249:Terry McAuliffe 2226: 2185: 2140: 2126: 2122: 2121: 2071: 2063: 2030: 2028:A goat for you! 1980: 1937: 1907: 1899:partially block 1886: 1874: 1873:Blaze Wolf#0001 1857: 1842: 1798:in the Teahouse 1786: 1785:Blaze Wolf#0001 1774: 1741: 1720: 1652: 1621: 1600:For reference, 1540: 1519: 1483: 1442: 1399: 1338: 1313: 1286:DPL WikiProject 1264: 1231: 1195: 1159: 1142: 1115: 1018: 1010: 1002: 899: 881:PbesartBekteshi 860: 835: 794:page protection 755: 703: 656: 632: 610: 576: 548:Mitch McConnell 451: 437: 408: 373: 352: 326: 295: 277: 247: 203: 166: 140: 132: 38: 19: 12: 11: 5: 4334: 4292:the candidates 4261:eligible users 4250: 4243: 4242: 4240: 4237: 4236: 4235: 4225:PerpetuityGrat 4193: 4190: 4157:the candidates 4126:eligible users 4115: 4108: 4107: 4105: 4102: 4077: 4074: 4073: 4072: 4071: 4070: 4069: 4068: 4067: 4066: 4056:PerpetuityGrat 4028:PerpetuityGrat 3983: 3982: 3975: 3938: 3935: 3934: 3933: 3932: 3931: 3930: 3929: 3919:PerpetuityGrat 3881:PerpetuityGrat 3872: 3848: 3845: 3844: 3843: 3833:PerpetuityGrat 3803: 3802: 3792:PerpetuityGrat 3772:CherriGasoline 3767: 3766: 3756:PerpetuityGrat 3743: 3733:PerpetuityGrat 3727:CherriGasoline 3706:CherriGasoline 3675: 3672: 3671: 3670: 3660:PerpetuityGrat 3625:Liz Truss edit 3620: 3619:Liz Truss edit 3617: 3616: 3615: 3614: 3613: 3587:PerpetuityGrat 3554: 3551: 3550: 3549: 3539:PerpetuityGrat 3520:Talk:Koukourou 3515: 3512: 3511: 3510: 3500:PerpetuityGrat 3479: 3478: 3474: 3471: 3455: 3454: 3435:Katie Zolnikov 3430: 3427: 3426: 3425: 3424: 3423: 3422: 3421: 3420: 3419: 3418: 3417: 3407:PerpetuityGrat 3360:PerpetuityGrat 3315:PerpetuityGrat 3283: 3280: 3277: 3276: 3271: 3227: 3214:You can still 3201:PerpetuityGrat 3197: 3195: 3184: 3181: 3180: 3179: 3178: 3177: 3176: 3175: 3152: 3151: 3150: 3149: 3148: 3147: 3122:PerpetuityGrat 3087: 3086: 3085: 3084: 3083: 3082: 3081: 3080: 3079: 3078: 3077: 3076: 3075: 3074: 3073: 3072: 3071: 3061:PerpetuityGrat 3039:PerpetuityGrat 3011:PerpetuityGrat 2973:PerpetuityGrat 2943:PerpetuityGrat 2893:PerpetuityGrat 2888: 2881: 2834: 2831: 2806: 2803: 2800: 2799: 2768:the candidates 2738:eligible users 2727: 2716: 2713: 2710: 2709: 2704: 2664: 2635:PerpetuityGrat 2631: 2629: 2618: 2615: 2555: 2548: 2547: 2545: 2542: 2541: 2540: 2539: 2538: 2537: 2536: 2510:PerpetuityGrat 2478: 2475: 2474: 2473: 2472: 2471: 2470: 2469: 2459:PerpetuityGrat 2438:PerpetuityGrat 2417:PerpetuityGrat 2413: 2412: 2411: 2410: 2409: 2399:PerpetuityGrat 2370:PerpetuityGrat 2361: 2360: 2343: 2337: 2336:Past accounts? 2334: 2333: 2332: 2331: 2330: 2329: 2328: 2327: 2326: 2325: 2324: 2282:PerpetuityGrat 2253:PerpetuityGrat 2245:Glenn Youngkin 2225: 2222: 2221: 2220: 2219: 2218: 2217: 2216: 2215: 2214: 2204:PerpetuityGrat 2171:PerpetuityGrat 2149:PerpetuityGrat 2072: 2065: 2064: 2062: 2059: 2057: 2029: 2026: 2015:PerpetuityGrat 2005: 2004: 1990: 1979: 1976: 1975: 1974: 1964:PerpetuityGrat 1936: 1933: 1932: 1931: 1921:PerpetuityGrat 1893:want to block 1885: 1882: 1881: 1880: 1879: 1878: 1867:Blaze The Wolf 1838: 1834: 1833: 1832: 1831: 1803:PerpetuityGrat 1794:Blaze The Wolf 1779:Blaze The Wolf 1773: 1770: 1769: 1768: 1767: 1766: 1744:PerpetuityGrat 1729:PerpetuityGrat 1723:Blaze The Wolf 1703: 1702: 1651: 1648: 1647: 1646: 1645: 1644: 1634:PerpetuityGrat 1619: 1609:PerpetuityGrat 1588:PerpetuityGrat 1583: 1569: 1518: 1515: 1514: 1513: 1512: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1506: 1505: 1504: 1503: 1493:PerpetuityGrat 1456:PerpetuityGrat 1423: 1409:PerpetuityGrat 1356:PerpetuityGrat 1312: 1309: 1263: 1260: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1255: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1240:PerpetuityGrat 1204:PerpetuityGrat 1168:PerpetuityGrat 1141: 1138: 1137: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1124:PerpetuityGrat 1084:PerpetuityGrat 1080: 1079: 1074: 1069: 1064: 1059: 1054: 1049: 1044: 1036: 1025: 1017: 1009: 1001: 998: 997: 996: 995: 994: 984:PerpetuityGrat 976: 966:PerpetuityGrat 958: 948:PerpetuityGrat 921:PerpetuityGrat 898: 895: 892: 891: 876: 875: 870: 859: 856: 855: 854: 844:PerpetuityGrat 754: 751: 750: 749: 748: 747: 746: 745: 744: 743: 742: 741: 740: 739: 738: 737: 713:PerpetuityGrat 659:PerpetuityGrat 642:PerpetuityGrat 613:PerpetuityGrat 597:PerpetuityGrat 594: 593: 589: 540:Adam Kinzinger 528: 527: 522: 517: 512: 507: 502: 497: 495:Lauren Boebert 492: 487: 482: 465: 464: 454:PerpetuityGrat 448: 447: 446: 407: 404: 403: 402: 385: 384: 368: 367: 362: 351: 348: 347: 346: 329:PerpetuityGrat 324: 314:PerpetuityGrat 303:standard (see 276: 273: 272: 271: 270: 269: 268: 267: 257:PerpetuityGrat 234: 230: 217:PerpetuityGrat 165: 162: 161: 160: 150:PerpetuityGrat 143:Sunnydeveloper 115: 114: 104:PerpetuityGrat 37: 36:sunnydeveloper 34: 18: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4333: 4322: 4320: 4316: 4312: 4305: 4299: 4298: 4293: 4288: 4286: 4282: 4278: 4274: 4270: 4265: 4263: 4262: 4257: 4256: 4247: 4234: 4230: 4226: 4222: 4218: 4217: 4216: 4215: 4211: 4207: 4203: 4199: 4187: 4185: 4181: 4177: 4170: 4164: 4163: 4158: 4153: 4151: 4147: 4143: 4139: 4135: 4130: 4128: 4127: 4122: 4121: 4112: 4101: 4100: 4096: 4092: 4088: 4065: 4061: 4057: 4053: 4052: 4051: 4047: 4043: 4039: 4038: 4037: 4033: 4029: 4024: 4020: 4016: 4012: 4011: 4010: 4009: 4008: 4007: 4003: 3999: 3996: 3992: 3989:, you may be 3988: 3980: 3976: 3973: 3969: 3965: 3961: 3957: 3953: 3952: 3951: 3949: 3928: 3924: 3920: 3914: 3909: 3908: 3907: 3903: 3899: 3895: 3892: 3891: 3890: 3886: 3882: 3878: 3873: 3869: 3868: 3867: 3866: 3862: 3858: 3854: 3842: 3838: 3834: 3830: 3829: 3828: 3827: 3823: 3819: 3815: 3812: 3809: 3806: 3801: 3797: 3793: 3789: 3784: 3783: 3782: 3781: 3777: 3773: 3765: 3761: 3757: 3753: 3748: 3744: 3742: 3738: 3734: 3728: 3723: 3722: 3721: 3719: 3715: 3711: 3707: 3703: 3695: 3693: 3689: 3687: 3681: 3669: 3665: 3661: 3657: 3650: 3645: 3644: 3643: 3642: 3638: 3634: 3630: 3626: 3612: 3609: 3606: 3598: 3597: 3596: 3592: 3588: 3583: 3582: 3581: 3580: 3577: 3574: 3566: 3564: 3560: 3548: 3544: 3540: 3536: 3535: 3534: 3533: 3529: 3525: 3521: 3509: 3505: 3501: 3496: 3495: 3494: 3493: 3489: 3485: 3475: 3472: 3469: 3465: 3464: 3463: 3460: 3452: 3448: 3447: 3446: 3444: 3440: 3436: 3416: 3412: 3408: 3401: 3396: 3395: 3393: 3389: 3385: 3381: 3377: 3371: 3370: 3369: 3365: 3361: 3357: 3352: 3345: 3340: 3339: 3338: 3334: 3330: 3326: 3325: 3324: 3320: 3316: 3312: 3306: 3301: 3300: 3299: 3298: 3294: 3290: 3270: 3268: 3264: 3260: 3254: 3248: 3243: 3237: 3232: 3229:See also the 3225: 3222: 3217: 3212: 3210: 3206: 3202: 3196: 3193: 3189: 3174: 3170: 3166: 3161: 3158: 3157: 3156: 3155: 3154: 3153: 3146: 3142: 3138: 3133: 3132: 3131: 3127: 3123: 3119: 3113: 3108: 3107: 3106: 3102: 3098: 3094: 3091: 3088: 3070: 3066: 3062: 3055: 3050: 3049: 3048: 3044: 3040: 3036: 3035: 3034: 3030: 3026: 3022: 3021: 3020: 3016: 3012: 3006: 3001: 3000: 2999: 2995: 2991: 2987: 2984: 2983: 2982: 2978: 2974: 2969: 2968: 2967: 2963: 2959: 2954: 2953: 2952: 2948: 2944: 2940: 2936: 2932: 2928: 2924: 2920: 2916: 2912: 2908: 2904: 2903: 2902: 2898: 2894: 2889: 2886: 2882: 2879: 2872: 2867: 2866: 2865: 2864: 2860: 2856: 2850: 2847: 2842: 2838: 2830: 2829: 2825: 2821: 2816: 2813: 2810: 2798: 2796: 2792: 2788: 2781: 2775: 2774: 2769: 2764: 2762: 2758: 2754: 2750: 2746: 2740: 2739: 2734: 2733: 2728: 2725: 2721: 2720: 2703: 2701: 2697: 2693: 2687: 2681: 2676: 2670: 2662: 2659: 2654: 2650: 2648: 2644: 2640: 2636: 2630: 2627: 2623: 2614: 2613: 2610: 2607: 2599: 2597: 2593: 2589: 2584: 2582: 2578: 2574: 2570: 2565: 2564: 2562: 2552: 2535: 2532: 2529: 2523: 2522: 2521: 2520: 2519: 2515: 2511: 2504: 2499: 2498: 2497: 2496: 2493: 2490: 2484: 2468: 2464: 2460: 2454: 2449: 2448: 2447: 2443: 2439: 2433: 2428: 2427: 2426: 2422: 2418: 2414: 2408: 2404: 2400: 2395: 2394: 2393: 2389: 2385: 2381: 2380: 2379: 2375: 2371: 2367: 2366:WP:FRESHSTART 2363: 2362: 2359: 2355: 2351: 2347: 2344: 2340: 2339: 2323: 2319: 2315: 2314:70.191.130.23 2311: 2307: 2306: 2305: 2301: 2297: 2296:70.191.130.23 2293: 2292: 2291: 2287: 2283: 2279: 2278: 2277: 2273: 2269: 2268:70.191.130.23 2264: 2263: 2262: 2258: 2254: 2250: 2246: 2242: 2241: 2240: 2239: 2235: 2231: 2230:70.191.130.23 2213: 2209: 2205: 2201: 2197: 2196: 2195: 2192: 2190: 2189: 2182: 2181: 2180: 2176: 2172: 2168: 2164: 2160: 2159: 2158: 2154: 2150: 2144: 2139: 2138: 2137: 2136: 2133: 2131: 2130: 2120: 2118: 2114: 2110: 2105: 2103: 2099: 2095: 2091: 2087: 2082: 2081: 2079: 2069: 2058: 2056: 2052: 2048: 2044: 2042: 2034: 2025: 2024: 2020: 2016: 2012: 2003: 1999: 1995: 1991: 1988: 1984: 1983: 1973: 1969: 1965: 1961: 1960: 1959: 1958: 1954: 1950: 1946: 1942: 1935:Re:Greig Nori 1930: 1926: 1922: 1917: 1916: 1915: 1914: 1910: 1904: 1900: 1896: 1891: 1877: 1871: 1869: 1868: 1861: 1856: 1855: 1854: 1850: 1848: 1847: 1839: 1836: 1835: 1830: 1826: 1822: 1818: 1814: 1813: 1812: 1808: 1804: 1799: 1795: 1792: 1791: 1790: 1789: 1783: 1781: 1780: 1765: 1761: 1757: 1752: 1745: 1740: 1739: 1738: 1734: 1730: 1724: 1719: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1712: 1708: 1701: 1700: 1696: 1692: 1686: 1685: 1683: 1682: 1680: 1679: 1678: 1674: 1670: 1666: 1662: 1658: 1643: 1639: 1635: 1631: 1625: 1620: 1618: 1614: 1610: 1606: 1603: 1599: 1598: 1597: 1593: 1589: 1584: 1581: 1577: 1574: 1570: 1567: 1563: 1559: 1555: 1551: 1544: 1539: 1538: 1537: 1536: 1532: 1528: 1524: 1502: 1498: 1494: 1487: 1486:Ummunmutamnag 1482: 1481: 1480: 1476: 1472: 1471:Ummunmutamnag 1467: 1466: 1465: 1461: 1457: 1453: 1446: 1445:Ummunmutamnag 1441: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1436: 1432: 1428: 1427:Ummunmutamnag 1424: 1420: 1419: 1418: 1414: 1410: 1403: 1402:Ummunmutamnag 1398: 1397: 1396: 1394: 1390: 1386: 1385:Ummunmutamnag 1380: 1379: 1375: 1371: 1370:Ummunmutamnag 1366: 1365: 1361: 1357: 1353: 1349: 1342: 1341:Ummunmutamnag 1336: 1335: 1331: 1327: 1326:Ummunmutamnag 1323: 1319: 1318:Ummunmutamnag 1308: 1307: 1303: 1299: 1295: 1290: 1287: 1283: 1277: 1273: 1269: 1249: 1245: 1241: 1235: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1224: 1220: 1215: 1214: 1213: 1209: 1205: 1199: 1194: 1193: 1192: 1188: 1184: 1179: 1178: 1177: 1173: 1169: 1163: 1158: 1157: 1156: 1155: 1151: 1147: 1140:Your userpage 1133: 1129: 1125: 1119: 1114: 1113: 1112: 1108: 1104: 1100: 1096: 1095: 1094: 1093: 1089: 1085: 1078: 1075: 1073: 1072:Brandon Lewis 1070: 1068: 1065: 1063: 1060: 1058: 1055: 1053: 1052:Robert Courts 1050: 1048: 1045: 1043: 1040: 1039: 1038: 1034: 1030: 1022: 1014: 1007: 993: 989: 985: 981: 977: 975: 971: 967: 962: 959: 957: 953: 949: 945: 940: 936: 932: 931: 930: 926: 922: 918: 915: 914: 913: 912: 908: 904: 890: 886: 882: 878: 877: 874: 871: 868: 863: 853: 849: 845: 839: 834: 833: 832: 831: 828: 827: 823: 822: 817: 812: 808: 804: 803: 797: 795: 791: 787: 783: 779: 775: 771: 767: 759: 736: 732: 728: 724: 723: 722: 718: 714: 707: 702: 701: 700: 696: 692: 688: 684: 683: 682: 678: 674: 670: 666: 660: 655: 654: 653: 652: 651: 647: 643: 636: 631: 630: 629: 625: 621: 614: 609: 608: 607: 606: 602: 598: 590: 587: 580: 575: 574: 573: 572: 568: 564: 560: 556: 552: 549: 545: 541: 537: 536:Thomas Massie 533: 526: 523: 521: 518: 516: 513: 511: 510:Louie Gohmert 508: 506: 503: 501: 498: 496: 493: 491: 488: 486: 483: 481: 478: 477: 476: 474: 470: 462: 455: 450: 449: 441: 436: 435: 434: 433: 429: 425: 422: 417: 414: 411: 401: 397: 393: 389: 388: 383: 380: 376: 370: 369: 366: 363: 360: 355: 345: 341: 337: 330: 325: 323: 319: 315: 311: 306: 299: 294: 293: 292: 291: 287: 283: 266: 262: 258: 251: 246: 245: 244: 241: 239: 235: 231: 228: 227: 226: 222: 218: 213: 207: 202: 201: 200: 199: 196: 194: 188: 185: 183: 178: 175: 174: 169: 159: 155: 151: 144: 136: 131: 130: 129: 126: 122: 119: 113: 109: 105: 101: 97: 93: 89: 85: 84:United States 81: 80: 79: 77: 73: 69: 65: 58: 55: 52: 49: 47: 43: 33: 32: 28: 24: 4295: 4289: 4266: 4259: 4253: 4251: 4202:WP:COPYPASTE 4195: 4160: 4154: 4131: 4124: 4118: 4116: 4079: 3994: 3984: 3940: 3876: 3850: 3818:Əfşar Əliyev 3816: 3813: 3810: 3807: 3804: 3787: 3768: 3747:edit summary 3700:— Preceding 3696: 3694:Knowledge. 3684: 3677: 3622: 3605:originalmess 3604: 3573:originalmess 3572: 3567: 3556: 3517: 3480: 3456: 3432: 3374:— Preceding 3285: 3226: 3213: 3208: 3200: 3198: 2985: 2851: 2843: 2839: 2836: 2820:69.145.41.25 2817: 2814: 2811: 2808: 2771: 2765: 2742: 2736: 2730: 2663: 2651: 2642: 2634: 2632: 2602: 2585: 2566: 2560: 2558: 2556: 2480: 2364:Yeah I did, 2310:news article 2227: 2187: 2186: 2128: 2127: 2123: 2106: 2083: 2077: 2075: 2073: 2045: 2038: 2008: 1949:92.43.167.68 1945:this article 1938: 1894: 1887: 1866: 1845: 1844: 1778: 1775: 1704: 1687: 1684: 1681: 1654: 1653: 1605:filed an SPI 1520: 1381: 1367: 1337: 1314: 1291: 1265: 1181:something.-- 1143: 1081: 1003: 944:Portal:Earth 900: 872: 825: 820: 815: 799: 798: 763: 727:Fenetrejones 706:Fenetrejones 691:Fenetrejones 673:Fenetrejones 635:Fenetrejones 620:Fenetrejones 595: 579:Fenetrejones 563:Fenetrejones 551:Fenetrejones 529: 466: 440:Fenetrejones 424:Fenetrejones 421:Donald Trump 418: 415: 412: 409: 364: 278: 189: 186: 179: 176: 170: 167: 127: 123: 120: 116: 62:— Preceding 59: 56: 53: 50: 39: 23:74.80.182.73 20: 4297:voting page 4162:voting page 3962:, and seek 3814:thank you. 3683:You may be 3559:Moffie Funk 2773:voting page 2645:, has been 2605:Doug Weller 2527:Doug Weller 2503:Doug Weller 2488:Doug Weller 2342:guidelines. 1890:range block 1884:Re blocking 1661:WP:RICKROLL 1624:Benicio2020 1543:Benicio2020 1527:Benicio2020 1523:WP:HOUNDING 1268:Toe walking 1217:accounts?-- 1097:I opened a 1077:Lev Mikheev 786:noticeboard 520:Josh Hawley 500:Mary Miller 406:Mary Miller 392:Benicio2020 17:Re:Landwehr 4281:topic bans 4146:topic bans 4091:~ ToBeFree 3563:Ann Rivers 3451:OpenStates 2757:topic bans 2047:Dronebogus 1994:Dronebogus 1941:Greig Nori 1751:User:Bbb23 1667:. Thanks! 1296:. Thanks, 1280:(Read the 961:Bermicourt 917:Bermicourt 903:Bermicourt 544:Liz Cheney 515:Andy Biggs 505:Matt Gaetz 485:Paul Gosar 374:Hillelfrei 336:YuulaBuula 298:YuulaBuula 282:YuulaBuula 4277:site bans 4206:Dazzling4 4142:site bans 4019:Elon Musk 3964:consensus 3937:June 2022 3857:Hiralious 3788:vandalism 3692:vandalize 3649:Helper201 3633:Helper201 3259:Muninnbot 3242:Muninnbot 3090:Soibangla 3054:Soibangla 3025:soibangla 3005:Soibangla 2990:soibangla 2958:soibangla 2885:this edit 2871:Soibangla 2855:soibangla 2753:site bans 2692:Muninnbot 2675:Muninnbot 2594:decision 2579:, or the 2573:sanctions 2436:hello? -- 2224:McAuliffe 2200:Tartan357 2188:Tartan357 2143:Tartan357 2129:Tartan357 2115:decision 2100:, or the 2094:sanctions 2086:infoboxes 1272:Bilateral 838:Bacondrum 778:consensus 774:talk page 592:articles. 586:unsourced 532:Rand Paul 480:Mo Brooks 310:talk page 4221:citation 4219:See the 4042:QRep2020 4015:QRep2020 3998:QRep2020 3714:contribs 3702:unsigned 3568:Thanks, 3388:contribs 3376:unsigned 3165:Springee 3137:Springee 3112:Springee 3097:Springee 2647:archived 2643:WP Essay 2590:and the 2559:It does 2477:Youngkin 2111:and the 2076:It does 1665:Rickroll 1202:When? -- 1033:WP:UNDUE 814:warring— 788:or seek 770:edit war 525:Ted Cruz 64:unsigned 4304:NoACEMM 4169:NoACEMM 3871:please. 3656:WP:ONUS 3400:DonMan7 3380:DonMan7 3344:DonMan7 3329:DonMan7 3305:DonMan7 3289:DonMan7 3245:, both 2837:Hello, 2780:NoACEMM 2678:, both 2198:Got it 1821:BusterD 1817:WP:PACE 1558:uncivil 1298:DPL bot 1021:Edwardx 811:reverts 305:WP:NOTE 250:Str1977 238:Str1977 212:WP:NPOV 206:Str1977 193:Str1977 182:WP:NPOV 92:Florida 3853:WP:WTW 3805:hello 1908:話して下さい 1352:WP:BLP 1099:WP:ANI 1029:WP:NOW 4023:TSLAQ 3987:TSLAQ 1657:humor 1234:Bbb23 1219:Bbb23 1198:Bbb23 1183:Bbb23 1162:Bbb23 1146:Bbb23 821:Bacon 753:April 164:Seuss 4315:talk 4267:The 4229:talk 4223:. -- 4210:talk 4180:talk 4132:The 4095:talk 4060:talk 4046:talk 4032:talk 4002:talk 3923:talk 3902:talk 3885:talk 3861:talk 3837:talk 3822:talk 3796:talk 3776:talk 3760:talk 3737:talk 3710:talk 3664:talk 3637:talk 3591:talk 3543:talk 3528:talk 3504:talk 3488:talk 3411:talk 3384:talk 3364:talk 3333:talk 3319:talk 3293:talk 3263:talk 3253:bots 3169:talk 3141:talk 3126:talk 3120:? -- 3118:this 3101:talk 3065:talk 3043:talk 3029:talk 3015:talk 2994:talk 2977:talk 2962:talk 2947:talk 2897:talk 2859:talk 2824:talk 2791:talk 2743:The 2696:talk 2686:bots 2609:talk 2596:here 2531:talk 2514:talk 2492:talk 2463:talk 2442:talk 2421:talk 2403:talk 2388:talk 2374:talk 2354:talk 2318:talk 2300:talk 2286:talk 2272:talk 2257:talk 2247:and 2234:talk 2208:talk 2175:talk 2153:talk 2117:here 2051:talk 2019:talk 1998:talk 1968:talk 1953:talk 1925:talk 1825:talk 1807:talk 1760:talk 1733:talk 1711:talk 1695:talk 1673:talk 1638:talk 1613:talk 1592:talk 1566:here 1562:here 1531:talk 1497:talk 1475:talk 1460:talk 1431:talk 1413:talk 1389:talk 1374:talk 1360:talk 1330:talk 1322:talk 1302:talk 1244:talk 1223:talk 1208:talk 1187:talk 1172:talk 1150:talk 1128:talk 1107:talk 1088:talk 988:talk 970:talk 952:talk 925:talk 907:talk 885:talk 858:2028 848:talk 826:drum 731:talk 717:talk 695:talk 677:talk 646:talk 624:talk 601:talk 567:talk 555:talk 542:and 534:and 428:talk 396:talk 340:talk 318:talk 286:talk 261:talk 221:talk 154:talk 108:talk 72:talk 27:talk 4089:. 3894:FYI 3524:JBW 3287:you 3199:Hi 2633:Hi 2561:not 2078:not 1895:all 1860:Liz 1663:or 1573:two 1282:FAQ 982:. - 796:. 4317:) 4306:}} 4302:{{ 4279:, 4231:) 4212:) 4182:) 4171:}} 4167:{{ 4144:, 4097:) 4062:) 4048:) 4034:) 4026:-- 4004:) 3993:. 3950:. 3925:) 3904:) 3896:. 3887:) 3863:) 3839:) 3824:) 3798:) 3778:) 3762:) 3739:) 3716:) 3712:• 3666:) 3639:) 3593:) 3545:) 3530:) 3506:) 3490:) 3413:) 3405:-- 3390:) 3386:• 3366:) 3335:) 3321:) 3295:) 3265:) 3251:{{ 3224:. 3207:, 3171:) 3143:) 3128:) 3103:) 3067:) 3059:-- 3045:) 3031:) 3017:) 2996:) 2979:) 2964:) 2949:) 2937:, 2933:, 2929:, 2925:, 2921:, 2917:, 2913:, 2899:) 2891:-- 2861:) 2826:) 2793:) 2782:}} 2778:{{ 2755:, 2698:) 2684:{{ 2661:. 2641:, 2516:) 2508:-- 2465:) 2444:) 2423:) 2405:) 2397:-- 2390:) 2376:) 2356:) 2320:) 2302:) 2288:) 2274:) 2259:) 2236:) 2210:) 2177:) 2155:) 2124:― 2053:) 2043:! 2021:) 2000:) 1970:) 1955:) 1927:) 1919:-- 1911:) 1849:iz 1827:) 1809:) 1762:) 1735:) 1713:) 1697:) 1675:) 1640:) 1615:) 1594:) 1586:-- 1533:) 1499:) 1477:) 1462:) 1437:. 1433:) 1415:) 1407:-- 1395:. 1391:) 1376:) 1362:) 1332:) 1304:) 1288:.) 1246:) 1225:) 1210:) 1189:) 1174:) 1152:) 1130:) 1109:) 1090:) 1082:-- 990:) 972:) 954:) 927:) 909:) 887:) 850:) 733:) 719:) 697:) 679:) 648:) 626:) 603:) 569:) 430:) 398:) 342:) 320:) 288:) 263:) 223:) 156:) 110:) 98:, 74:) 29:) 4313:( 4227:( 4208:( 4178:( 4093:( 4058:( 4044:( 4030:( 4000:( 3981:. 3974:. 3921:( 3915:: 3911:@ 3900:( 3883:( 3859:( 3835:( 3820:( 3794:( 3774:( 3758:( 3735:( 3729:: 3725:@ 3708:( 3662:( 3651:: 3647:@ 3635:( 3589:( 3541:( 3526:( 3502:( 3486:( 3409:( 3402:: 3398:@ 3382:( 3362:( 3346:: 3342:@ 3331:( 3317:( 3307:: 3303:@ 3291:( 3261:( 3167:( 3139:( 3124:( 3114:: 3110:@ 3099:( 3063:( 3056:: 3052:@ 3041:( 3027:( 3013:( 3007:: 3003:@ 2992:( 2975:( 2960:( 2945:( 2939:8 2935:7 2931:6 2927:5 2923:4 2919:3 2915:2 2911:1 2895:( 2873:: 2869:@ 2857:( 2822:( 2789:( 2694:( 2512:( 2505:: 2501:@ 2461:( 2455:: 2451:@ 2440:( 2434:: 2430:@ 2419:( 2401:( 2386:( 2372:( 2352:( 2316:( 2298:( 2284:( 2270:( 2255:( 2232:( 2206:( 2173:( 2151:( 2145:: 2141:@ 2049:( 2017:( 1996:( 1966:( 1951:( 1923:( 1905:( 1862:: 1858:@ 1846:L 1823:( 1805:( 1758:( 1746:: 1742:@ 1731:( 1725:: 1721:@ 1709:( 1693:( 1671:( 1636:( 1626:: 1622:@ 1611:( 1590:( 1568:. 1545:: 1541:@ 1529:( 1495:( 1488:: 1484:@ 1473:( 1458:( 1447:: 1443:@ 1429:( 1411:( 1404:: 1400:@ 1387:( 1372:( 1358:( 1343:: 1339:@ 1328:( 1320:( 1300:( 1242:( 1236:: 1232:@ 1221:( 1206:( 1200:: 1196:@ 1185:( 1170:( 1164:: 1160:@ 1148:( 1126:( 1120:: 1116:@ 1105:( 1086:( 1023:: 1019:@ 1015:: 1011:@ 1008:. 986:( 968:( 964:- 950:( 923:( 905:( 883:( 846:( 840:: 836:@ 729:( 715:( 708:: 704:@ 693:( 675:( 661:: 657:@ 644:( 637:: 633:@ 622:( 615:: 611:@ 599:( 581:: 577:@ 565:( 553:( 456:: 452:@ 442:: 438:@ 426:( 394:( 338:( 331:: 327:@ 316:( 300:: 296:@ 284:( 259:( 252:: 248:@ 219:( 208:: 204:@ 152:( 145:: 141:@ 139:/ 137:: 133:@ 106:( 70:( 25:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index