User talk:MrOllie/Archive 4

4042:

you will consider restoring all of the entries that you removed rather than require me to go one by one and explain them all. Every entry is an article written by Donald Kochan a law professor. The material was meant to add helpful information even though it is also the product of one author. The links are to 30 distinct articles and only posted where directly on topic -- so sometimes 1-4 relevant sites where it will be unique and helpful. As I was restoring things I tried to explain why they were uniquely qualified for inclusion. Many have been recognized in the legal community -- in total the articles have been cited and/or quoted in over 225 other law review articles. Some of these are quite prominent. For example, 6 amicus briefs in Kelo discussing public use and eminent domain (as you can see that means this article is relevant to at least 3 of the pages) cited the Kochan work on "Public Use and the Independent Judiciary." Another example, the Kochan work on the Arab Spring was the subject of questioning of Secretary Hillary Clinton in Senate Appropriations Committee hearings. And the examples of acceptedness could go on. In addition these are well thought out, lengthy law review articles all in reputable academic journals. I do hope that you might restore all of the entries and that you might allow a few more to be added as well. The articles in the entries provide supplemental information not found elsewhere and are well-regarded in the legal community. Will you restore them? Or if not then if I “undo” them will you block me? Thank you for any response.

4132:

user deleting it acknowledges it as relevant (and when the material is actually far more than that, as it is detailed scholarly analysis tailored to the specific topics where it was posted). I will look into registering as a WP editor and if so will review and follow what COI guidance is appropriate (although it does not seem like that will address MrOllie's concerns); I fear that MrOllie will delete those too (as MrOllie has decided to even delete at least one reference to Donald Kochan made years ago by persons unknown and not at all associated with the recent posted material -- see, for example, the deletion of the discussion and citation inside of the narrative description of Alperin v. Vatican Bank which was written by whoever wrote that article for Knowledge (recently only a link to the already-cited article was added).) This, of course, makes me reluctant to put things on a Talk page as suggested by MrOllie because if someone adds it because they see that the citation is indeed relevant and helpful, will MrOllie just delete it again? The example of the Alperin v. Vatican Bank citation makes me believe so, which makes it seem pointless to pursue even his/her suggested channels of posting if he will just look for and delete anything associated with this author.

2977:. Information related to virtual token forms of multifactor does not promote any particular company or product, and it is no more sourced nor unsourced than the "software token" and "hardware token" forms of authentication discussed on these pages. The cited sections do not reference any particular company nor product. They describe an emerging type of authentication referred to within the industry as "virtual" token, which is fundamentally different from software token MFA in that, while software token MFA requires the user to deploy software, virtual token MFA does not. There are a number of different companies promoting this type of multi-factor authentication, none of which are cited within the article. Also, I am not a single source editor, having contributed content to several Knowledge pages. Finally, I did not insert just "this stuff" since November 2011. I am the original author of the majority of these page's content, including the "stuff" related to hardware tokens and software tokens. Please cease removing information from these articles. 944:

external links anytime someone had added a series of links to the same site to a number of articles? That isn't prohibited if the site linked to is a legitimate informative resource that supplements what we can offer on Knowledge. This is not the first time I've seen you delete stuff like this when it isn't apparent that you've made an informed decision about the content of the site. I would strongly advise you to slow down when you're dealing with scholarly material that may be outside your area of expertise, and gather some informed opinions on article or project talk pages before deleting. Otherwise it just seems like you're shooting for fun.

749:. RE: substantial number of editors, past discussions on the talk page of the external linking policy indicate they're looking for something in the hundreds at a minimum. There's also the issue that a genealogy wiki is at best indirectly related to an article about the town. You seem to be an expert on genealogy, you are no doubt familiar with lots of sources. I suggest that you improve articles themselves with citations to material that you haven't personally written, rather than adding external links by rote, it would be much more helpful. - 764:

because we see the shared value -- sort of the discussion on one of Knowledge's how-to pages I read yesterday said that sometimes it is best to break our (i.e. Knowledge's) rules when a new opportunity comes along that was unforeseen). Genealogy is history, history is a part of Knowledge, and Knowledge's historical content is generally weak. There is rarely a single thing I have found on Knowledge to help my pages. One wiki talks about the town now and the other about it "then." Both talk about the town to give a complete picture.

2399:, even though that site also carries a number of user blogs and comment sections. That is a fairly narrow exeception that will not apply to most blog postings, and does not apply to the sites you have referenced. There is a very important sentence from the section you link that you appear to have missed: 'Self-published material may be acceptable when produced by an established expert on the topic of the article whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable third-party publications. ' - 3267:

you really have not been helpful in ensuring the accuracy of the encyclopedia. So I will make the changes as described but omit the link, since that seems to be your hangup. I'm not trying to be rude here, but you make it really frustrating for knowledgeable individuals with access to information to update outdated material. It would be good for everyone involved if you, instead of being heavy-handed with your editing power, worked with individuals to make improvements to this collective resource.

31: 3044: 3359:

more accurate than what is currently on the wikipedia page and leave the data alone as I am about to update it now? I'm happy to change my citation so that it meets the community criteria for an accurate and non-spammy citation, but your insistence on what currently exists being accurate is damaging for anyone looking this information up in the encyclopedia. I would appreciate your guidance in re-doing my citation if I have not composed it correctly. Thanks!

2890: 4220:

other products which have much less content about DDD, then those two products. The issue here is that Sculptor guys were trying to create a wikipedia page about Sculptor, but were shut down and now you've removed them from this link. So my question is, should we remove also other wiki pages and thus can remove that section entirely, leave external links or let other products have their own wiki pages?

2223:. It is not appropriate to systematically add books you have written to Knowledge articles. It creates the impression that you are here to promote your books and/or work. As a subject matter expert, I'm sure you know a great deal about these topics and are familiar with lots of other scholar's work - I suggest that you focus on adding content which would be references to people apart from yourself. - 3439: 3233:

you have issue with my providing a citation for the information from the source that supplied and created it, then don't delete all the informaiton, delete the citation. Just note that if you decide to delete the citation, I will appeal your action and note your previous attempts to block me from correcting outdated and innacurate information on the encyclopedia.

767:

second time -- doubling the work. Linking them was the perfect marriage. You mentioned several times that this is material I have personally written. If I added it to Knowledge, it would be no different. The bulk of it is just facts and figures (like Knowledge), not essays or analysis (except for what to include or not as it would be on Knowledge).

3756:

like that. If you can find sources, we can then use those to fill out the details of the article instead of what we have now - what you have written so far 'practical tool' 'useful solution' etc, all sounds like advertising copy. But first priority is the sources, the article will not survive without them. - 15:54, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

3169:, adding links to a site you are affiliated with is strongly discouraged and in this case is spamming. Please do not continue - if you do (particularly since you are using multiple accounts) there is the possibility that your link will be added to Knowledge's spam blacklist, which may be used by other sites and/or search engines. - 2572:. Not an article about the 'manosphere' in general, not an article about a concept or a term, even if that term is commonly used by the 'manosphere'. My useful, topical feedback is this: If you don't support your text with citations to independently published and fact checked sources, your text will continue to be removed. - 4219:

where various products would like to call themselves DDD, but are really not. In the last cleanup you've removed Sculptor and DSL Platform, which are really unique in that space being text based because they were externally linked. If you follow the other links, most of them are almost empty pages to

4041:

Mr. Ollie. First, I appreciate your patience with someone new to Knowledge. I noticed that you removed most of the links to the works of Donald Kochan on various pages. I have begun to respond and restore several of these pages. I was wondering whether after you read a few of the explanations that

3755:

It's sources that is the biggest problem. The websites you have listed (Softpedia, Software.informer, etc) are indiscriminate - they list and review pretty much every piece of software that exists. We need multiple sources that are selective in what they publish - the New York Times, Wired, something

3358:

Sorry, I had thoght putting your name into the post had the effect of notifying you that I posted on the administrator's board. I read plenty of information about how to post there and it looks like I still did it wrong. Can you please accept that fact that the information I'm trying to update is far

2997:

Also, I am not a single source editor, having contributed content to several Knowledge pages. Finally, I did not insert just "this stuff" since November 2011. I am the original author of the majority of these page's content, including the "stuff" related to hardware tokens and software tokens. While

2320:

I'm going to leave it for now and see what happens. Maybe I am missreading the guidelines, but a large number of software library pages on wikipedia don't meet those requirements since they cite the project itself, only. As I mentioned in the talk page and in the last message, it is cited by papers

2239:

Responsible authors should not promote themselves, because Knowledge policy forbids it. You seem to have a fundamental misunderstanding of Knowledge and its processes. I strongly suggest that you try editing articles that are unrelated to yourself or your professional interests for a while to gain an

1685:

I really tried to be as neutral as possible and to avoid promotional language. However it is important to mention in the article that the ePages business scenario is to resell their software (as a service) through providers like La Poste in France or BT in the UK (in contrast to Shopify selling their

960:

It's a hobbyist site that's been systematically spammed across dozens of articles by a single person. So, 4, 11, 13. It's also been duplicitive of a more reliable link on every page I've seen it on. I'll also note that this is the second time you've come on my talk page and told me what I 'can't do'

3926:

for more details. There is not a single 'opposing party' here - your material has been removed by four different editors. It is possible to ask for an article to be protected from editing, but in a 4 vs 1 case like this, it is far more likely that your account would be blocked, so it is in your best

3247:

We generally do not use self published primary sources, which you seem to be indicating your site is. We definitely do not use them because someone with a conflict of interest is edit warring to get links to their site. I again ask you not to insert links to organizations you are affiliated with. If

2178:

I expanded your statement in the header to clarify what is being listed and why. Maybe that will reduce "unnotable" links from being added. Created an external reference section on the bottom. Looking for good external lists to add there now. Will move further comments about that page to its talk

1536:

Re: the conflict of interest - are you suggesting that you're not the Mitchel Haas who created Work Time Studio? Re: the other articles you've listed, they are not written in the same heavily promotional tone that the Work Time Studio article was written in. They also have citations to independently

1472:

I'm sorry that the speedy tagging was hurtful to you, but it is a routine process here at Knowledge that was entirely justified in this case, as was acknowledged in the deletion review discussion you linked. Many of the problems referenced in that discussion are still present in the article as well,

702:

My reason for adding the link here is because they add to data I could not find on Knowledge that is online and in more detail -- and most of all neutral. I must admit I am confused by the deletion of my link while a link to a town's police department would be deemed more appropriate. Regarding your

566:

Very wide optical transmission band from UV to near-infrared, (0.15-5.5µm) Significantly stronger than other optical materials/standard glass windows Hardest natural substance next to diamond. Highly resistant to scratching and abrasion (9 Mohs scale) Extremely high melt temperature (2030°C) Totally

4896:

As they say, 'It's not what you know, it's what you can prove.' It's not necessary that all citations be on the web - print citations are fine. However, neither of the magazine scans you linked seem to cite what was in the article - that Apple bought this from you or that you were the originator of

4558:

is the name of a tool that's used for article maintenance. A 'reference' as Knowledge defines it is a citation that supports information in the article. What you added was just a pointer to a web tool people can use - that is an 'external link' in Knowledge jargon and is controlled by the guideline

3896:

has weakish sourcing as articles go, but it does have several independent sources: Pacific Coast Business Times, Pando Daily, the Wall Street Journal article, etc. I don't think that Mr. Drake is a 'PR Hack', but we do require that sources used to establish notability be fully independent, and that

3266:

I have already asked about removing the link and you complained about the fact (after what was clearly very little research) that you didn't think we were citing appropriately. Well we are first-hand sources and we want to information to be accurate. I've maintained that throughout this process and

3232:

We are the original source; we call state legislatures and work with them directly in the course of our business. You didn't seem to object to the single-source citation you keep restoring. I am restoring the information once again after notifying you that your corrective measures are misplaced. If

3183:

None of those rules cover this case, but I'll cede the fact that you're in some kind of authority position with Knowledge and you can make arbitrary decisions and threats, even though I've expressed my inexperience with editing Knowledge pages. Are you going to revert the page to having the correct

4824:

I declined the speedy tag per reasons stated here, but have also stressed the article may still wind up at AfD for the reasons MrOllie just gave. I won't nominate it myself at the moment, but if I can't find any better sources, I might. Remember that declining a CSD is not a "get out of jail free"

3841:

added no value to the page. Knowledge is not a place to place website links for promotion. I suggest you take the fruits of your research into the computer security industry and find something to write about on Knowledge without inserting external links to the same company website over and over. -

3024:

I see now the link I think you are objecting to. The link to Sestus was included simply because they were the first commercial company to introduce the concept of virtual token MFA. it was included as a historical reference. However, I have removed it. Please cease removing information from these

1410:

You have a good point about hairmail, thank you for removing it. 2010 was a few years ago, now I think the previous listing of ELs was excessive. External links are meant to be a very limited list of only the best links. In a case like mail art where there are apparently a lot of good links, it is

763:

There will be hundreds of thousands of these pages on the genealogy wiki, not just the pages I have done, but this will be reported back up and none will be linked to Knowledge. It is sad to think that these two wikis will not be linked together (actually the genealogy wiki will be linked to yours

5115:

You are perfectly right about that. Please understand that I am quite new here and trying to learn. His comment is on my text, like my comment was on his text. We both accused the other party of attacking the other. That is why I asked. All the other examples you have listed here are my mistakes.

4921:

for the Commodore had drag and drop in 1986, well before System 7 came out. We would need a source that clearly uses the word 'invented', which I cannot find in the Macworld source. I'm afraid that if you want credit and you have some kind of NDA with Apple Computer, you are going to need to take

4131:

Thank you for the comments. I misunderstood how things work on Knowledge while simply trying to provide helpful, substantive additional relevant and targeted readings to interested readers. I am surprised that this is how things work here on Knowledge -- where material is deleted even while the

2415:

As I quoted for you above, authoritative authors are those that have previously been published by reliable third-party publications. There is really no getting around this - if all you have to cite are self published blogs, your content will not meet Knowledge's guidelines. You need independently

2335:

Knowledge is a big site and there is a lot to do. Those other articles probably haven't been reviewed yet - sometimes these things can sit around under the radar for a long time, sometimes someone on new pages patrol notices right away. If you have the publication details of those books handy, it

3620:

At one time that list mainly of search services where the name was the mobile url - that hasn't been the case for a while, and you indicated earlier that you felt the column title meant that you should add a live link to your website - there should not be any such external links in that table. -

2620:

I would hope that you would simply desist and follow the recommendations of the conflict of interest guidelines, which would be to propose references to yourself or your work on the article talk pages instead of repetitively making them yourself. I have no issues at all when multiple other users

1763:

and already have a Knowledge article, as was noted in the edit notice you saw when you went to edit the list. If this magazine is the 'fastest growing fashion source' and the 'leading fashion source for the west coast region' it should be easy for you to employ the independent references that no

766:

I am saddened I could not convince you of the mutual benefit, but so be it. I am not sure why you would think I (and others like me) would put in all our time on the genealogy wiki where it is encouraged and then turn around and do the same thing on Knowledge (where it seems to be discouraged) a

4352:

The site link to contains neutral, accurate information that is most definitely relevant to an encyclopedic understanding of the topic, but should not be part of the wikipedia article itself as it aims to be more directly helpful, rather that just the facts. It is complementary to the wikipedia

4100:

here, but that occurs in limited situations. In Kochan's case, he's written about a variety of topics so its not unusual for him to have material, worthwhile material, relevant to a lot of topics. And his stuff is in high-quality RS. (To User:98.154.102.53, Mr. Ollie is not an administrator and

4063:

I don't doubt that these articles are relevant, but nonetheless, by repetitively adding links to the works of a single author you are spamming. It would be best if you would mention these papers as possible sources on the article talk pages, and wait (you may need to be quite patient) for other

3198:

Also, there is no conflict of interest when updating numerical information. The numbers of state legislators does not somehow include our opinion. We would like to see the information accurate, and would like to reflect our displeasure with the inaccurate interpretation of the rules and their

943:

I see that you've made a whole string of deletions that linked to individual transcriptions on that site. I don't know whether you considered the transcription redundant (that is, adequate or superior transcriptions may have already been offered in the EL section), or what. Do you just delete

3417:

is in 'full compliance with Wiki Guidelines'. Your repeated attempts to promote your website / campaign are not neutral, and are completely unsourced. Kindly do not mention this campaign of yours again on Knowledge - it is not ready yet. Knowledge will list it when you have gotten some press

5094:

Also, some free advice: You should slow down and respect Knowledge community norms, particularly the ones about offsite canvassing and editing other people's talk entries. The article looks like it's heading for a keep result, but you run the risk of reversing that trend if you continue to

107: 699:

Thank you for your clarification. My user page does say who I am, but I have tried to understand who you are that has deleted my edits. Your user page leaves you anonymous. It is true I was the main contributor to the pages I linked to, but since it is a wiki it may not remain that

1304:

we will probably write an article about their usage. If they are not written about in such sources, we will delete the article again. Knowledge is not a place to protect your intellectual property. If you are concerned about that, you should contact your local trademark office. -

1082: 708:

Point 4 - The is a slippery slope statement. Any link to anything can be argued as promoting it, so to extend that thought, there could not be any external links. The site itself does not sell anything except facts on various subjects just like Knowledge (in fact, including

4626:

to use your promotional version instead, which is also against policy here. It would be a very good idea for you to go to the talk page and list factual corrections (with sources, please) there for editors unrelated to your company to consider and merge into the article. -

4368:

The link is not intended to promote the website (Knowledge links are nofollow, as such, having a link here does not benefit the site linked to in the search engine rankings, and really only does provide a resource to those that read the page and are looking for where to go

3007:

There are many different companies promoting virtual token forms of multi-factor authentication, none of which are cited within the body of these articles. If you can show me any particular company or product name referenced in the section, I will be happy to remove it.

2998:

I appreciate that you may wish to promote specific forms of authentication on wikipedia, promoting specific types of authentication by censoring information related to other forms of authentication is a violation of Knowledge's policy. It is "promotion-by-censorship".

3213:

You folks obviously gathered this data from somewhere - since you have no conflict of interest and aren't here to promote your business, why don't we cite your original sources instead of your website? If you would like to register a complaint instead, I suggest the

2145:

Do you feel it would be appropriate to put a comment to the top of the page stating the only internal links are provided and as such this list is incomplete, then provide an external link at the bottom to see dmoz.org (or some other site) for a more complete list?

705:

Point 12 -Links to open wikis, except ... this is the point that can be debated on both sides, but the point further says "except those with a substantial history of stability and a substantial number of editors." I would strongly argue this wiki falls under that

1640:

I have considered such issues carefully, and I fully believe I am doing the right thing. I'm sure you think you're doing the right thing as well, but I believe you are connected to the link you'd like to add and are therefore a little too close to the issue. -

4722: 1287:. To be very clear - if an article on this same concept is recreated after the AFD closes at the same or another page title, it's going to be summarily deleted without going through another debate. If you have these sources, you need to provide them now. - 1248:

Yes, in the sense that we have lots of articles about completely different subjects that don't have such problems. No, in the sense that renaming or slightly modifying the article about Phyllotaxy towers will not result in a policy compliant article. -

4958: 4005:

Spamming ia a behavior - all of these Kochan articles are being added by a small set of rotating IPs - almost certianly the work of a single anonymous editor who is interested in adding as many references to this person to Knowledge as possible. -

1847:. Are you in any way employed or associated with this hotel? Either way, try omitting words and phrases such as 'historic', 'forties style glamour', 'quiet seclusion', 'perfect co-conspirator', etc. Use simple, factual description without all the 4192:

I'm not sure what DDD article you're talking about - please use full article titles so people can look up what you're referring to. If it was like most of the article cleanups I do, I imagine I removed a bunch of software external links per our

332:

No. The Eurasia review is website operating in Spain. The Jamestown Foundation is an unrelated entity in DC that used to publish a similarly named publication. Either way, a partner profile on the site is neither a review nor is it independent.

5051: 4166:

Yes, an open source web application. Either way it is sourced only to a rarely updated blog and has been previously deleted at AFD, so if the reviewing admin doesn't agree with my speedy deletion nomination it will certainly be taken to

715:

Mr. Ollie, is there a way to link to a site that does not promote it by the very link itself? Regarding Point 12, how do you define "substantial history of stability and a substantial number of editors"? I look forward to your insight.

986:. I removed the information along with the link because if I had not, it would have been unreferenced. If no 'more reliable site' exists, as you imply above, that sadly means that wikipedia should not contain the information at all. - 3097: 809: 1851:. It would also be a very good idea to find sources other than the 'Hollywood Handbook', claims such as these that could be considered to be exceptional or self-serving should not be cited to a book written by the hotel owner. - 1143: 4793: 3812:. Where we must have vendors mentioned, it is important that we limit those mentions to those vendors with established (through independent sources and/or a wikipedia article) notability, not just theoretical notability. See 2321:

in the literature. The "significant coverage" requirement is the only one I'm not sure about. OpenCV and LAPACK have numerious books written about them, on the other hand Jama does not and doesn't seem to be underquestion.

5169:. As a subject matter expert, I'm sure you are familiar with a range of material published by many people. Please employ that familiarity to source material to articles that you are not personally associated with. Thanks. - 3551: 3136:

p.s. you left these original messages on our talkpages, but said to respond on your talk page. You don't seem to be consistent with the instructions you left earlier, which is not helpful for novice editors like myself.

2926: 2375:. If this community is truly 'ABSOLUTELY INVISIBLE in the mainstream media' as you say, then there may be no reliable sources to summarize and coverage of this topic may need to be omitted from Knowledge. This is OK, 1662:

The German wikipedia has separate standards. Things which are appropriate there may not be so here, and vice versa. I do not have the privileges needed to undelete your article. You can try asking the deleting admin,

976: 4215:. While I see that that someone thinks that article has issues, I'm not really sure what's wrong with it, since to me it looks just fine as an introduction to DDD. I agree with the link farm issue for the 3475: 2532:, and no where else. Similarly, we could use avoiceformen.com on an article about that site, should one ever be created, but not anywhere else. If you have further questions you can get wider input at the 4425:

I didn't delete it, I was the one who flagged it for speedy deletion. The way it was written, it have the impression of promoting the company, and the reviewing admin agreed. Articles on Knowledge also

4802:

I think you've added enough to pass the speedy deletion process. I would like to see some national sources - with only local coverage, there is a chance that the article could be deleted at the formal

2859: 2552:

Excellent. Now that you know not use these sorts of self published sources on articles that are not specifically about that source (as you were previously), you should not have any further problems. -

2013: 1365:

Allow me to quote the edit notice on the article, which you no doubt have read the several times you've performed edits there : 'STOP: Please do NOT add entries to this list that do not have their own

4533:, for example) or, more likely, it's because no one has noticed the blog link and removed it yet. Knowledge is a big place and there is a lot of work to do, sometimes these things can take a while. - 4461:

Examples are generally unhelpful to the reader, particularly when they are to obscure entities that the reader has not heard of, and that have no Knowledge article to go to for further information. -

5099:

and generally act counter to the community's established way of doing business. That has a way of attracting editors with no patience for messing about and will rebound back on the instigator. -

5091:. You should really just leave other people's comments alone entirely. If a truly egregious personal attack shows up, someone who is not a party to the argument will deal with it, I assure you. 4286:

to make the same point. Generally a speaking, a journalist, an academic, in some contexts a doctor, etc. Online forums or facebook pages don't meet the sourcing guidelines. On Knowledge we are

2097:

please feel free to write an article. But the kind of mentions that Knowledge has seen so far (bare external links and promotional mentions) are not appropriate and will tend to be removed. -

520:

You have your anwser, and two different people have removed your link. If you want to debate the merits of the link the place is the article talk page - see if anyone there agrees with you. -

4445: 2937: 561: 3524: 3583:

Lists such as the one you added your site to are generally used as navigation aids on Knowledge, so they generally require that the list entry link to a preexisting Knowledge article, see

2302:

available, you can correct that by putting {{db-author}} at the top of the page, an admin will come by and delete it for you. Otherwise, someone will probably take the article through the

3724:

which hasn't been cited by anyone else that I could find. Knowledge prefers secondary sources. Was your article written about by the mainstream press or perhaps in a review article? -

1892:. What you have is a primary source, preliminary findings of a pilot study. We should use secondary sources, such as systematic reviews that analyze the results of multiple studies. - 4917:

The article says that you were writing this software for the Mac, not that you invented it or even that you were first to market on the Mac. We also have to consider other platforms:

3922:

and make a case for the material that you want to add there. You will not be able to force it in without arriving at a consensus that includes the other editors. See our page on the

3575: 2844:, where you said that this wouldn't happen again. Please read over the guidelines that you were linked to last time, and please do not add links to your own website again. Thanks. - 2355: 1753: 2920: 3433: 2087: 490: 4592:, so we're usually better off removing them. Implementation examples really don't help to build the reader's understanding of the underlying topic, which should be our focus. - 4647: 4078:

Calling the behavior spamming, and then removing the links is problematic. Compare, as stubs about motion pictures are created and developed a lot of people are adding links to

2051: 2003: 1001: 685:

points 12, 4, 10, and 11. You've added nearly 30 links to this site, and on your user page you identify the pages on that site as your work: kindly stop adding these links. -

1611:

is a common list criteria. The edit notice on this list, which you no doubt saw when you edited the list, specifies that this list follows that criteria. Your reading of the

1793:. I think that most readers of Knowledge understand that it is not a link directory, so they will not draw the inference you are suggesting. We don't include such a list on 814: 3184:

information with a textual citation? If not, I'm going to escalate this and note your poor interpretation of the rule "common sense is what is best for the encyclopedia."

3092: 1686:

product under their own brand). If that is what you meant by "promotional language" how can I clarify this business scenario without referring to these providers directly?

316:

No, that is not a review. That looks more like a blog aggregator reposting a self written profile - it is a barely rephrased version of newcivilization's own about page. -

4728:

No. You are linking from article space (where articles should be) to talk space (where discussion between editors should go). Articles must link only to other articles. -

3595:

before you start any article, though. Also, do you have any relation to the Joe Persh who wrote the press release you linked above? If so, please review our guidelines on

3152: 2387:. As a subculture with little or no exposure to the mainstream, they form a fringe. The editorial staff exemption you are referencing is for sites that otherwise meet the 3248:

you continue to do so, I'll enter a spam report on your site and/or move for link blacklisting as appropriate. Again, if you want to lodge a complaint, please do use the

2782:, usually listed on a Knowledge article about the entry. Knowledge is not a place for you to place external links to promote your software. Please read our guidelines on 1219: 4430:. You referenced no sources. The Article on Babeland has a reference to NBC news, and has won an award from Zagat, both of which help it meet the inclusion criteria. - 2727: 4335: 2964: 2925: 1634: 646:

points 1, 4, 5, and 11. The 'different website' that you are linking is an escort service, I assume one represented by your SEO company. We're not going to link it. -

1473:

because I have been giving DGG a chance to address them, but some of the remaining content will have to be removed sooner or later. I suggest you prepare yourself. -

4455: 4231: 3481:

I entirely disagree with your request, and I had already used the article talk page before you reverted me. Let's keep the conversation there, where it should be. -

1326:. Knowledge is here to summarize what other people have written about new developments. That is the crucial second step that is missing here: Inventor invents -: --> 2723: 141: 4160: 1882: 5062:

It's very clear - we don't link to blogs. We especially do not link to blogs with objectionable amounts of advertising, with somebody's referal tag in the URL. -

2127:. I suggest that you go to a site that is supposed to be a link directory and curate your list there: dmoz.org is a popular site that is used for this purpose. - 5083:

It's his comment, he can write whatever he wants and rephrase templates in any way that he wants. It's not up to you to change it for him, it's not up to you to

3942: 3802: 2689: 2117: 2112: 794:

List of articles are navigation aids to Knowledge articles. If there is no Knowledge article, there should be no list entry. The list is incomplete by design. -

529: 4654: 1369:

articles (and thus, are notable).' If you find other inappropriate list entries, please remove them, but their existance is not a reason to add more. Also, see

5077: 4865: 4419: 4249:

for inclusion (I don't know, I haven't checked them yet), we would probably delete those pages as well. If other products can meet the requirements, we should

3138: 3130: 2932: 2642:

I removed it because vendor lists of that sort don't add to reader's encyclopedic understanding of the topic, and because such lists generally end up being

1734:. A blog does not qualify. A newspaper article or something like that would be much better. If this topic really has not been raised anywhere else, then it 2663: 2416:

published material with a reputation for fact checking - newspapers, peer reviewed journals, etc. That a website has been mentioned is not sufficient: the

5116:

Some of them, (editing above another user's signature) is an accident. Thanks again for helping me. Will avoid such mistakes in the future. Good evening.

1482: 1225: 1096:

For your hard work and efforts in keeping article clear of spam and other nonsense. Knowledge is a better quality project because of editors like you!--

4984:

retelling of the original story in which everything a dying Victor Frankenstein tells Captain Walton is a lie and the monster now tells the true story.

4677:

I'm not exceptionally happy about the iPhone version's treatment, but it is an officially licensed product, so I think it has a place in the article. -

5135: 4884: 3360: 3268: 3234: 3200: 3185: 3146: 1687: 5096: 1463: 471:

No. As I told your other account, an author profile doesn't mean anything. FYI, this will be my last reply on this subject unless/until you decide on

4845: 4470: 1284: 130: 4505: 5125: 5108: 3545: 3294: 3292: 3124: 2834: 1907: 484: 464: 206: 4931: 4910: 4147: 4057: 2909: 555: 5084: 4711: 3936: 2766: 1926: 1747: 5012: 4439: 3178: 2286: 890: 866: 655: 630: 4853: 4601: 4266: 4235: 4073: 3837:

Every single one of your edits served to promote Secureworks - a domain that we have had spamming problems from before. The particular link on

3761:

The software is referenced in an article published on the AICPA’s 125th birthday presenting 125 technology quick tips and best practices (#66)

3208: 2951:

products by particular companies. Readers of the article will not benefit from unsourced promotional information. Knowledge is not a place for

2630: 2322: 2187: 2147: 1398: 1382: 1358: 1241: 1162: 1066: 382: 358: 121:. As a commercial site which requires external software to be functional, listing this link on Knowledge does not agree with our guidelines. - 5045: 4952: 4844:

Thank you Ritchie and Ollie. I've added nationally-focused sources citing Community Funded (Forbes, Variety, Hypebot, and The Denver Post). -

4206: 3825: 3733: 3388: 3368: 2253: 2232: 2071: 1992: 1968: 1818:

It's not a problem with your English skills, it's a problem with your sources. We need better, independently written and published sources. -

1777: 1436: 1420: 1337: 1314: 1275: 1258: 609: 437: 411: 5088: 4743: 4329: 3984:

The list you're attempting to add to is limited to articles with existing Knowledge articles, as is discussed on that article's talk page. -

3906: 3464: 3276: 3261: 3242: 3227: 3193: 2259: 2036: 1827: 1718: 1695: 1680: 1349:

If I just removed the links, we would still have a nonnotable entry in the list. All list entries should have existing Knowledge articles. -

1213: 1016: 540: 4837: 4819: 4665: 4542: 4114: 4034: 4015: 1876: 1860: 1137: 3796: 3516: 3034: 3013: 2986: 2683: 2062:

By now you should realise, after three separate editors have removed your contributions, that it simply isn't going to work. Give it up. --

1947: 1806: 1656: 1628: 1596: 1550: 1499: 995: 953: 803: 403: 4774:

No, I call them as I see them, and it is quite clear based on your contribution history. Stop adding links to haephrati's sites, they are

4737: 4636: 4216: 3993: 3897:

doesn't seem to be the case here, even if he's promoting Crowd Valley for friendship or networking purposes rather than financial ones. -

3851: 3697: 3679: 3427: 2581: 2561: 2545: 2429: 2408: 1901: 1149:

Unfortunately 'useful' is not a criteria for inclusion on Knowledge. There are lots of categories of useful information that wikipedia is

970: 780: 758: 736: 694: 546:

We're very particular about sources on Knowledge. Links to sales websites for self published books such as that one do not belong here. -

342: 325: 309: 283: 254: 234: 4943:

I don't really have anything to add to what you said on your talkpage - you shouldn't be placing links or writing about your software. -

4787: 4767: 3876: 3344: 3331: 2345: 2330: 2315: 2199: 2173: 2155: 2136: 2106: 1833: 1650: 1183: 837: 108:

link to Segreg: a practical Computer Assisted Instruction (CAI) of Mendelism and Classical Genetics by means of Multimedia Based Learning

4686: 4408: 4180: 3652: 3630: 3608: 3490: 3310: 2853: 2655: 2028: 1571: 580: 513: 5178: 5150: 5071: 4890: 4576: 4548: 3399: 2661: 2241: 2044: 1914: 1783: 1577: 1427:

I would suggest you propose any particular links you want on the article talk page. Other folks (Hu12, maybe) might want to comment. -

1411:

our standard practice to remove them and instead publish a link to DMoz, where they are set up to manage large directories of links. -

919: 671: 185: 169: 4395:

for the purpose of promoting Anholt. I'm no longer impressed by those cherry-picked sources - I can find something similar that calls

2568:

No, as I said, the self published source exceptions are narrower than that. A website in the 'manosphere' should be used as a source

2213: 2077: 1201: 4807: 3744: 2876: 2799: 2292: 1998: 843: 197:

My reason (as mentioned in the edit summary) is that it was unsourced. So yes, source it properly and I would have no objection. -

146: 3536:

on a Knowledge article, please remove them. But do not take their presence as a reason to add more inappropriate links. Thanks. -

2828: 4414: 3882: 3831: 3749: 3710: 2636: 369: 4303: 3771: 2123:

As you correctly say, maintaining such a list of external links on any page on Knowledge is going to present a problem, because

1057:

If there are inappropriate links on the article, that is a reason to remove those links, not to add more inappropriate links. -

2754: 212: 2703: 4988: 3445: 2365: 2008: 1045: 745:

RE: promotion, it generally helps if the person adding the link has nothing to do with the site linked, and if there isn't a

4618:

You added a bunch of promotional language that sounded like you copied it from a sales brochure. Knowledge articles must be

3451:

It's standard for lists on Knowledge to consist of entries that either link to an existing Knowledge article or that have a

4588:

A lot of technical articles accumulate these laundry lists of libaries or implementations. Knowledge's role is not to be a

4314: 2864: 387: 374: 4359:

The linked to site certainly does provide a unique resource beyond what is in the wikipedia article, as discussed already.

2699: 2597: 5056: 4486: 4227: 4139: 4049: 3912: 3857: 3080: 896: 1844: 5018: 4937: 3947: 2772: 2614: 2019:

No, that is a list of software that already has a Knowledge article. You should not add external links to that list. -

1105: 1051: 3813: 3584: 2810: 2269:

software as demonstrated by a preexisting Knowledge article. It's probably not the best idea to write about software

592:

I did remove them. They broke formatting on the page, which caused other text to become undisplayed. They also added

289: 3867:

the claim. 2) You called the Rector a 'visionary' which is obviously not a neutral description, but your opinion. -

1839:

There is not a 'higher authority', but the articles do have to be compliant with policy, including the policies on

711:

Point 10 - This does not apply as the site is not a social networking site, chat group, twitter feed, or news group.

4835: 4717: 2897: 2742: 2056: 937: 4481: 4276: 2805: 1959:

The see also section only has links to other Knowledge articles. There are no links to usenet providers there. -

1343: 1232:

As was said on the AFD (where this question belongs) the references do not properly support the article topic. -

4999:

and refrain from writing about yourself or your work on Knowledge, as you seem to have some difficultly writing

910:, that would be a different story, but I looked and could find none. Forums and blog posts are inappropriate. - 3614: 1703: 1323: 732: 586: 1615:

policy is incorrect. That policy requires us to represent things in proportion to how they are represented by

4253:

and then list those pages. We definitely should not have a list of external links to software suppliers, per

3971: 3767:

It is also recommended as a free and user-friendly software for creating multimedia projects on Examiner.com.

3705: 2195: 1953: 1189: 364: 2528:

Self published sources should be used only on articles about that source - we can use the time cube cite on

4529:

to the rule on self published blogs (It's acceptable to cite something to a very well known expert such as

3571: 3394: 2878: 2747: 1389:

I think the merge was a good call, and a link to Mongel and/or Mongrel 2 definately belong on that list. -

1022: 676: 535: 392: 102: 94: 3863:

1), you need an independent source that calls them the first. You provided no source at all, so we cannot

902:

That article is about the original progamming language, not about people's reimplmentantations. If we had

5121: 4582: 3064: 1724: 1488: 86: 81: 69: 64: 59: 5161:, along with the material sourced to those links. I did that because in my view they are not acceptable 4378:

The site is not a blog or personal website, it is a community resource of helpful, accurate information.

828:, the bar for listing 'traditional remedies' on medical pages is quite high: you have not met it yet. - 4806:

process in the future. There are some resources for events such as the one your library has planned at

4723:

Please reinstate word coinage cross-referencing Aspies usages of words, like Mundane for "Neurotypical"

3964: 2588: 2035:

Sorry, I did not realised of that. I've added the proper WiseMapping article. Thanks for all the help.

1194: 1174:

It is entirely unnecessary to post on my user talk page every time you post on an article talk page. -

961:

or that I 'need to start explaining myself'. Please try to moderate your tone in the future. Thanks. -

746: 38: 4563:. We generally do not add external links to calculators such as that one because that sort of tool is 3688:

If the articles are wrong, the proper course of action is to fix them, not to add an external link. -

2606: 4959:

why did you remove my addition Monster: A Novel of Frankenstein from Frankenstein in Popular Culture?

4340: 3051: 2719: 1224: 1072: 4698:

Knowledge is not a place for you to post your marketing efforts. Please read over the guidelines on

2420:

has been mentioned in reliable sources, but that does not mean we cite it on on Physics articles. -

2336:

would be very helpful if you would add them, either as citations or in a further reading section. -

4692: 4612: 3762: 3142: 1493: 1118: 433: 378: 4385: 4143: 4083: 4053: 4023: 3501:, and will end up blocked if you don't stop. Please -- both of you -- follow the advice given in 2240:

understanding of how this project operates. In particular reading some of the discussions at the

1790: 1619:. If a given product is not mentioned by sources, then Knowledge should not mention it either. - 1113: 930: 661: 636: 425: 5117: 4450: 4309: 3660: 3088: 3060: 925: 713:

Point 11 - This does not apply either as the site is not a blog, personal web page, or fansite.

260: 3770:

Found a lot of references regarding support for the community by publishing infographics. See

5191: 4320:

I removed the other two web store links as well, thanks for bringing them to my attention. -

3978: 3972: 3772:

http://www.today.com/tech/equivalent-2-782-years-spent-watching-harlem-shake-videos-1C8760003

3364: 3272: 3238: 3204: 3189: 3030: 2982: 2904: 2067: 1691: 294: 191: 4849: 4833: 4511: 4476: 4242: 4223: 4212: 4135: 4110: 4045: 3999: 3959: 3889: 3559: 2841: 2183: 2082: 1556: 788: 720: 472: 4702:

and please refrain from linking websites you are affiliated with in the future. Thanks! -

1028:

We typically do not mention new organizations such as this one without some indication of

982:

You are welcome to return the information if you can do it while referencing sources that

571:

I suggest you add the information you'd like without referencing any specific vendors. -

8: 5174: 5146: 5104: 5067: 5041: 5008: 4948: 4927: 4918: 4906: 4880: 4815: 4783: 4763: 4733: 4707: 4682: 4632: 4597: 4572: 4538: 4501: 4466: 4435: 4404: 4325: 4299: 4262: 4202: 4186: 4176: 4069: 4011: 3989: 3932: 3902: 3872: 3847: 3821: 3792: 3729: 3693: 3675: 3648: 3626: 3604: 3541: 3512: 3486: 3460: 3423: 3384: 3327: 3306: 3257: 3223: 3174: 3120: 2960: 2849: 2824: 2795: 2762: 2679: 2651: 2626: 2577: 2557: 2541: 2425: 2404: 2341: 2311: 2282: 2249: 2228: 2169: 2132: 2102: 2024: 1988: 1964: 1943: 1922: 1897: 1872: 1856: 1823: 1802: 1773: 1743: 1714: 1676: 1646: 1624: 1592: 1567: 1546: 1478: 1432: 1416: 1394: 1378: 1354: 1333: 1310: 1292: 1271: 1254: 1237: 1209: 1179: 1158: 1133: 1062: 1041: 1012: 991: 966: 915: 886: 862: 833: 799: 754: 690: 651: 626: 615: 605: 576: 551: 525: 509: 480: 460: 429: 354: 338: 321: 305: 279: 250: 230: 202: 181: 165: 126: 810:

Quantum Entanglement - Concept - Effects travel at thousands of times the speed of light

4564: 4101:

cannot block you. But I do encourage you to register as a WP editor. Also, if there is

4097: 3965: 3919: 3352: 3098:

Please discuss the AIR Module redirects/reverts/deletions you seem to be hell-bent upon

2840:

This was explained to you / your company at the talk page of the last account you had,

2787: 2643: 2392: 1932: 1812: 1168: 949: 776: 728: 596:

and were grammatically incorrect in several places. I suggest you try out edits on the

5026:

independently written articles about your software in sources that meet our guidlines

4985: 4642: 4555: 4090: 3952: 3838: 3784: 3721: 3084: 2360: 2326: 2191: 2151: 2124: 1848: 597: 47: 17: 398:

In addition to Parmen, MrOllie has also removed the link to the software version of

5203: 4794: 4607: 3567: 3070: 2869: 2164:

to the list header, in line with what is commonly stated on other list articles. -

2063: 2040: 1404: 821: 349:

You, above, 'these are their partners' followed by a link to a list new civ is on.

4346:

The link does not link to material that violates copyright, or a blacklisted page.

1797:, and no one assumes that is because people don't write software in Visual C++. - 1671:

is not) so I do not think it is very likely that your article will be restored. -

4965: 4826: 4748: 4658: 4106: 3717: 3316: 2790:, and kindly refrain from adding links to your employer in the future. Thanks. - 2396: 2380: 1889: 1735: 1612: 1442: 1283:

Provide sources that directly address the idea of Phyllotaxis in architecture at

1153:

supposed to host. One of those categories is lists of vendors and/or products. -

1033: 931: 907: 825: 445: 407: 271: 157: 2757:. Blogs and article aggregation sites like hrlabs do not qualify, I'm afraid. - 1144:

You removed a section that was part of the article since it was created in 2008!

504:

points 10 and 11. Please refrain from adding links to your own sites. Thanks. -

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

5000: 4619: 4522: 4493: 4254: 4250: 3667: 3533: 3525: 3508: 3410: 3166: 3159: 3112: 3026: 3009: 2978: 2974: 2948: 2816: 2671: 2533: 1840: 1765: 1664: 1101: 682: 643: 593: 501: 218: 4349:

The site linked to is both accessible, in context, and the link is functional.

5158: 5036:

and refrain from writing about your company or your products on Knowledge. -

5033: 5029: 4996: 4803: 4699: 4589: 4530: 4526: 4427: 4392: 4290:

from adding things that we personally know to be true - everything should be

4246: 4168: 4102: 3923: 3809: 3739: 3596: 3592: 3503: 3301:

Thanks, but it wasn't my tag, I was just restoring one the author blanked. -

3249: 3215: 3162: 3108: 2952: 2783: 2779: 2376: 2303: 2299: 2274: 2270: 2220: 2094: 1976: 1760: 1608: 1604: 1584: 1459: 1370: 1150: 1125: 945: 878: 854: 772: 724: 666: 497: 421: 399: 242: 222: 118: 4810:- they are focused on coursework there, but it is similar enough I think. - 4754:

OK. Would you mind telling me what brought you back to Knowledge and to the

2391:

but also have a user generated content section - for example, we might cite

5170: 5166: 5162: 5142: 5100: 5063: 5052:

Removing of CS-Cart from the "Comparison of shopping cart software" article

5037: 5025: 5004: 4944: 4923: 4902: 4876: 4872: 4811: 4779: 4775: 4759: 4729: 4703: 4678: 4671: 4628: 4623: 4593: 4568: 4560: 4534: 4518: 4497: 4462: 4431: 4400: 4321: 4295: 4287: 4283: 4258: 4198: 4194: 4172: 4065: 4027: 4007: 3985: 3928: 3918:

It's time to stop making the same edit over and over. You should go to the

3898: 3868: 3843: 3817: 3788: 3725: 3689: 3671: 3644: 3640: 3622: 3600: 3588: 3537: 3497: 3482: 3470: 3456: 3452: 3419: 3418:

attention, from for example a newspaper or an industry magazine. Thanks. -

3414: 3380: 3376: 3338: 3323: 3302: 3253: 3219: 3170: 3116: 3104: 3063:. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may 2956: 2944: 2845: 2820: 2791: 2758: 2675: 2647: 2622: 2573: 2553: 2537: 2421: 2400: 2388: 2372: 2337: 2307: 2278: 2245: 2224: 2165: 2128: 2098: 2020: 1984: 1980: 1960: 1939: 1918: 1893: 1868: 1852: 1819: 1798: 1794: 1769: 1739: 1731: 1710: 1672: 1642: 1620: 1616: 1588: 1563: 1542: 1538: 1474: 1428: 1412: 1390: 1374: 1350: 1329: 1306: 1301: 1288: 1267: 1250: 1233: 1205: 1175: 1154: 1129: 1058: 1037: 1029: 1008: 987: 983: 962: 911: 903: 882: 874: 858: 850: 829: 795: 750: 686: 647: 622: 601: 572: 547: 521: 505: 476: 456: 350: 334: 317: 301: 275: 267: 246: 226: 198: 177: 161: 153: 136: 122: 114: 2819:

point 10 disallows social media groups such as the one you are linking. -

2275:

coverage in multiple sources that are independent of you and your software

1938:

Knowledge is not here to advertise particular tools, sanctioned or not. -

1867:

Do we have citations for this stuff, aside from the Hollywood handbook? -

977:

Thank you for deleting information that protects people from being scammed

4898: 4496:, we don't include external links to people's blogs or personal sites. - 4396: 4291: 3864: 3783:

We need in depth sources, those articles don't strike me as being fairly

3563: 3406: 2384: 2266: 2161: 1524: 820:

You need to get agreement from other editors on the talk page first. Per

4525:. Other blogs you see used as sources might fall under the very limited 1913:

OK, but you should not notify me here, you should write about it on the

1200:

I agree on your points about 'outdated' and 'redundant' - that is why I

4901:, we would need sources for those things to put this in the article. - 3893: 2589:

A website can be linked as an external source for articles about itself

1514: 4875:

or their own supporting Knowledge article that in turn has sources. -

4375:

The site does not require payment or registration to view its content.

4897:

the concept, unless I'm missing something. Per Knowledge's policy on

3953: 3808:

Vendor lists are especially prone to promotional listings and we are

3476:

Please stop removing entries from Comparison of file hosting services

2529: 2417: 1097: 853:

as defined by Knowledge's guidelines. I'll be sending the article to

5089:

change spelling or insert commentary before someone else's signature

3552:

Seemingly random removal of legitimate edit to topic "Mobile search"

3322:

Self published sources, all. Nothing that establishes notability. -

2753:

You can read about the kinds of sources that are acceptable here at

2674:, not the consulting company's preferred collection of buzzwords. - 245:

and that article should not be used to host a list of publishers. -

225:

specify that such lists of links are inappropriate for Knowledge. -

4973: 3252:, I welcome additional involvement from the Knowledge community. - 2921:

How to upload image when account is not verified yet for uploading?

2889: 2870: 2860:

How to upload image when account is not verified yet for uploading?

2014:

WiseMapping removed from List of concept- and mind-mapping software

1509: 1504: 1454: 3059:

for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to

5087:, especially when the report concerns you. It's not up to you to 4755: 4353:

article, and just what should be considered for an external link.

3775: 3774:. The same infographic is already referenced on wikipedia here: 2734: 1668: 1667:, but the article was loaded with promotional language (In a way 1529: 1443: 3888:

Yes, Knowledge is a big place and there is a lot of work to do.

3763:

http://www.journalofaccountancy.com/Issues/2012/Jun/20114845.htm

2377:

Knowledge is not intended to be a complete archive of every fact

4981: 4655:

Knowledge:Sockpuppet_investigations/Morning277#16_August_2013_3

4245:. If those other articles on specific software packages do not 3107:. I would suggest that you read and consider the guidelines on 1562:

If you continue to edit war, you will just be blocked again. -

176:

Thanks for pointing out Parmen, I have removed that as well. -

5141:

Ok, I took that back out again, thanks for pointing it out. -

4980:

for their favorite novels of 2012, and is a thematically rich

4797:

Updated w/ Valid Citations : Response to Speedy Delete Request

2938:

Please cease removing information related to virtual token MFA

2298:

If you've mistakenly created an article that doesn't have the

881:

of the article subject. Magazines, newspaper articles, etc. -

562:/* Common applications */ Section about sapphire windows added 4381:

The site's content is directly related to the articles topic.

3526:

http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Electroschematics#July_2013

2883: 2277:, or your separate article will likely be deleted. Thanks. - 1519: 475:

to post your newcivilization stuff from and stick with it. -

3438: 1081: 567:

unaffected by all chemicals except some very hot caustics."

4977: 4079: 2695: 4064:

editors to evaluate them and post them on the article. -

2710: 2356:

Conflict of interest and deleting contributions by others

1754:

Recent deletion of the LA Fashion magazine from Knowledge

4372:

The site does not sell anything, nor advertise anything.

3434:

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

2646:

quite rapidly, even if they don't start out that way. -

600:

page before carrying out more edits on live articles. -

491:

I did an undo to the link you undid (Monty Hall Problem)

4648:

Neutral point of view and opinion on Crittenden article

156:

that establish that discussion the software version is

2778:

We generally restrict such lists to entries that have

2088:

Deletion of VirtualGeo information in several articles

2004:

Deletion of VirtualGeo information in several articles

1002:

Comparison of Business Process Modeling Notation tools

4356:

The page linked to is not very large, nor media rich.

2955:

to promote the companies they are associated with. -

2273:

on Knowledge, but if you do, make sure that you have

2095:

reliable, independently written and published sources

1977:

multiple significant, independently written citations

1888:

Please take a few moments to read our guidelines for

815:

Herpes Simplex - Ayurveda - A valid medical tradition

4446:

Deletion of "pencil" software in diagramming article

3153:

List of United States state legislatures page part 2

2901:

the project, just add your name to the member list.

2371:

Knowledge's purpose is to summarize what is said in

4022:Discussion of Kochan-related edits is happening at 1220:

Uniontown, Pennsylvania - Birthplace of the Big Mac

4336:link eliminated on list of open hardware resources 4086:, etc. (In fact, there is a citation template for 3892:, they will be reviewed and discussed eventually. 3890:We have lots of articles up that should be deleted 2927:The following has gone unanswered since September. 2219:This kind of situation is exactly why we have the 1635:Deleting every new external link is not spam fight 1007:The other BPMN tools have independent sourcing. - 4456:edit to REIT of 8 Aug 2013 by jerseybusinesswatch 4391:And I removed again, because you are operating a 2052:Mail art – References to 'Hairmail' and Astroturf 1285:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Phyllotaxy towers 621:Please stop adding links to your own web site. - 4976:for their 2013 list of top 10 horror novels and 4161:Speedy deletion nomination of Codendi (software) 2570:only on an article about that particular website 2125:Knowledge is not supposed to be a link directory 1883:Regarding Auscultation and Doppler fetal monitor 3803:Document Automation Article - red link deletion 3776:http://en.wikipedia.org/Harlem_Shake_%28meme%29 2690:Disambiguation link notification for December 8 2118:List of Libraries and Algorithm Implementations 2113:Deletion information about Free Photo Slideshow 1983:, it would be possible to create an article. - 769:I am sorry to have bothered you on this matter. 4866:Edit on Insurance has been reverted by MrOllie 4420:You Deleted My Entry, No Explanation Was Given 1030:independent sourcing that meets our guidelines 142:Can you address Dragons flight's point that... 4622:. You also removed content that was cited to 3943:Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion 3131:List of United States state legislatures page 2933:Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion 2598:The subject's website can be used as a source 2373:reliable sources as defined by our guidelines 1759:That list is for fashion magazines that have 1583:The ones that are still in the list meet our 908:relative importance of these reimplmentations 5032:, but I would strongly suggest you read our 5157:I removed many external links you added to 3453:independently written third party reference 2160:Yes. I went ahead and added a reference to 5136:Reinstatement of obviously wrong statement 5078:Rephrasing the 'personal attack' template 4517:Blogs aren't considered to be acceptable 1079: 1032:. It's an important way to keep articles 453:User_talk:MrOllie/Archive_4#Globalization 4871:The types listed should all have either 4808:Knowledge:School_and_university_projects 4282:We need some third party that meets our 3720:on that particular paper, since it is a 3587:. Please be sure that you have multiple 3455:such as a newspaper or trade journal. - 2835:Addition of External Link reference site 1908:Regarding on deletion of DEVS Award page 1324:is not the place to publish new thoughts 300:Which third party reference was that? - 272:relative prominence of those viewpoints. 4105:, you should follow that guidance.) – 3375:No, that would not be appropriate. See 1327:Newspapermen report on invention -: --> 14: 4995:I would strongly suggest you read our 2755:Knowledge:Identifying reliable sources 1266:No, you should not write a new one. - 266:You have not provided any third party 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 5003:about yourself, as many people do. - 4776:not appropriate for this encyclopedia 4744:Nomination of an article for deletion 4362:The site does not mislead the reader. 3810:not supposed to maintain vendor lists 3158:Per our rules, which you can read at 3067:by adding below this notice the text 2260:What was wrong with finaquant protos? 541:why did you remove the links I added? 5097:argue against long standing policies 3716:It looked to me like it was putting 1657:Speedy deletion nomination of Epages 1034:covering things in proper proportion 703:citations to the points for removal: 25: 4758:page after a five month absence? - 4700:editing with a conflict of interest 3670:points 4, 11, and especially #1. - 2621:agree, I will respect consensus. - 1834:Chateau Marmont Knowledge revisions 1537:written and published sources that 1328:Knowledge summarizes newspapers. - 747:pattern of repetitive link addition 113:Please read over our guidelines on 23: 5034:guidelines on conflict of interest 4997:guidelines on conflict of interest 4891:Martijn Scheffer and Drag and Drop 4549:Washing machines reference removed 4292:able to be verified by the readers 3927:interest to start a discussion. - 3437: 3400:Removing Changes to eTools Article 3103:The proper place to ask is at the 3042: 2888: 2381:our policy on Due and undue weight 1784:Lazarus IDE package links deletion 1578:Deletion of Web Service Frameworks 672:Name dropping and promotional tone 452: 24: 5218: 4082:, AllRovie, Rotten Tomatoes, the 3814:Knowledge:Write the article first 3585:Knowledge:Write the article first 2078:Urban Planning: Planning Theories 1789:Lists of such external links are 4970:Monster: a novel of Frankenstein 4590:howto guilde or a link directory 3745:Edit on Crowdfunding comparaison 2644:promotional commercial listsings 2293:Question regarding issues on MTJ 2242:conflict of interest noticeboard 1999:3D MindMapper (computer program) 1617:sources that meet our guidelines 1080: 875:sources that meet our guidelines 844:PH7 Engine (Embedded PHP Engine) 147:The Star Game (computer version) 29: 5085:reformat other people's reports 4415:Tangram - external link removal 4251:add Knowledge articles for them 3883:clarifying notability criterion 3832:Computer Security Edit Removals 3750:Article considered for deletion 3711:Soap Bubbles and Electrowetting 3641:the guideline on external links 3377:the policy on original research 2637:car sharing table of companies? 1761:multiple independent references 1322:That's true, because Knowledge 370:Pascal Triangle nuclear sources 5197: 5185: 3415:reputable, third party sources 2943:Knowledge is not here to host 2221:conflict of interest guideline 1791:outside the scope of Knowledge 877:that establish some degree of 873:We need independently written 213:list of Open Access Publishers 13: 1: 5030:meet our inclusion guidelines 4365:The site contains no malware. 4247:meet our minimum requirements 3446:List of Optimization Software 3413:content that is supported by 3055:from editing for a period of 2910:22:45, 20 December 2012 (UTC) 2854:15:26, 14 December 2012 (UTC) 2829:16:12, 13 December 2012 (UTC) 2800:16:05, 11 December 2012 (UTC) 2670:We need the definition to be 2366:Re: Your reversal of my edits 2346:18:11, 30 November 2012 (UTC) 2331:17:41, 30 November 2012 (UTC) 2316:17:23, 30 November 2012 (UTC) 2287:17:28, 29 November 2012 (UTC) 2244:should prove illuminating. - 2233:15:52, 28 November 2012 (UTC) 2200:20:15, 29 November 2012 (UTC) 2174:17:28, 29 November 2012 (UTC) 2156:17:11, 29 November 2012 (UTC) 2137:17:02, 29 November 2012 (UTC) 2107:15:53, 28 November 2012 (UTC) 2072:06:28, 27 November 2012 (UTC) 2045:12:35, 23 November 2012 (UTC) 2029:15:36, 26 November 2012 (UTC) 1993:18:23, 21 November 2012 (UTC) 1969:18:11, 21 November 2012 (UTC) 1948:18:12, 21 November 2012 (UTC) 1927:17:33, 21 November 2012 (UTC) 1902:21:42, 20 November 2012 (UTC) 1877:20:33, 20 November 2012 (UTC) 1861:18:19, 20 November 2012 (UTC) 1828:16:12, 20 November 2012 (UTC) 1807:16:11, 20 November 2012 (UTC) 1778:21:11, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 1748:19:12, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 1719:19:09, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 1696:16:04, 20 November 2012 (UTC) 1681:17:29, 16 November 2012 (UTC) 1651:22:15, 18 November 2012 (UTC) 1629:22:13, 18 November 2012 (UTC) 1597:21:39, 17 November 2012 (UTC) 1572:11:52, 15 November 2012 (UTC) 1551:01:14, 13 November 2012 (UTC) 1483:15:55, 14 November 2012 (UTC) 1464:22:46, 11 November 2012 (UTC) 1452:I'm working on this one now. 1437:21:17, 13 November 2012 (UTC) 1421:19:20, 10 November 2012 (UTC) 1399:21:02, 10 November 2012 (UTC) 1383:19:11, 10 November 2012 (UTC) 1359:14:40, 10 November 2012 (UTC) 1338:21:04, 10 November 2012 (UTC) 1315:19:14, 10 November 2012 (UTC) 1302:independent, reliable sources 1300:If they are written about in 904:credible, independent sources 849:The freecode entry is not an 428:(even as a "See also" item). 4565:off topic for an encylopedia 4494:Links normally to be avoided 4315:New and trying to understand 3668:Links normally to be avoided 2865:Your message on my talk page 2780:multiple third party sources 2767:21:24, 8 December 2012 (UTC) 2684:15:28, 7 December 2012 (UTC) 2656:15:28, 7 December 2012 (UTC) 2631:15:28, 7 December 2012 (UTC) 2582:16:17, 5 December 2012 (UTC) 2562:15:04, 5 December 2012 (UTC) 2546:04:14, 5 December 2012 (UTC) 2430:19:28, 4 December 2012 (UTC) 2409:18:34, 4 December 2012 (UTC) 2254:16:33, 1 December 2012 (UTC) 1732:meets Knowledge's guidelines 1609:general notability guideline 1276:15:22, 9 November 2012 (UTC) 1259:20:47, 8 November 2012 (UTC) 1242:14:45, 7 November 2012 (UTC) 1214:17:42, 9 November 2012 (UTC) 1184:20:36, 8 November 2012 (UTC) 1163:21:35, 7 November 2012 (UTC) 1138:20:03, 7 November 2012 (UTC) 1106:01:27, 7 November 2012 (UTC) 1067:14:41, 7 November 2012 (UTC) 1046:18:49, 6 November 2012 (UTC) 1017:14:46, 7 November 2012 (UTC) 996:19:11, 3 November 2012 (UTC) 971:17:30, 2 November 2012 (UTC) 954:17:28, 2 November 2012 (UTC) 920:15:12, 31 October 2012 (UTC) 891:14:36, 1 November 2012 (UTC) 867:14:14, 1 November 2012 (UTC) 838:15:12, 31 October 2012 (UTC) 804:17:33, 29 October 2012 (UTC) 781:14:25, 25 October 2012 (UTC) 759:20:42, 24 October 2012 (UTC) 737:20:28, 24 October 2012 (UTC) 695:19:01, 24 October 2012 (UTC) 656:13:26, 24 October 2012 (UTC) 631:18:34, 23 October 2012 (UTC) 610:14:32, 23 October 2012 (UTC) 581:14:32, 23 October 2012 (UTC) 556:16:20, 22 October 2012 (UTC) 530:18:00, 22 October 2012 (UTC) 514:11:19, 22 October 2012 (UTC) 485:19:35, 22 October 2012 (UTC) 465:18:45, 21 October 2012 (UTC) 438:04:12, 21 October 2012 (UTC) 412:03:41, 21 October 2012 (UTC) 388:Inappropriate External Links 383:04:57, 17 October 2012 (UTC) 359:01:10, 17 October 2012 (UTC) 343:23:56, 16 October 2012 (UTC) 326:20:02, 16 October 2012 (UTC) 310:17:44, 16 October 2012 (UTC) 284:17:09, 16 October 2012 (UTC) 255:15:39, 16 October 2012 (UTC) 243:Knowledge is not a directory 235:15:20, 16 October 2012 (UTC) 223:Knowledge is not a directory 219:Links normally to be avoided 207:15:19, 16 October 2012 (UTC) 186:14:03, 16 October 2012 (UTC) 170:10:56, 15 October 2012 (UTC) 131:19:02, 14 October 2012 (UTC) 7: 5179:11:11, 28 August 2013 (UTC) 5151:10:47, 28 August 2013 (UTC) 5126:22:01, 27 August 2013 (UTC) 5109:20:07, 27 August 2013 (UTC) 5072:15:10, 27 August 2013 (UTC) 5057:Specify which ELNO you mean 5046:13:49, 26 August 2013 (UTC) 5013:13:49, 26 August 2013 (UTC) 4953:13:49, 26 August 2013 (UTC) 4932:16:45, 23 August 2013 (UTC) 4911:16:28, 23 August 2013 (UTC) 4885:02:11, 23 August 2013 (UTC) 4854:20:45, 21 August 2013 (UTC) 4838:20:11, 21 August 2013 (UTC) 4820:18:43, 21 August 2013 (UTC) 4788:13:17, 22 August 2013 (UTC) 4768:16:35, 21 August 2013 (UTC) 4738:16:34, 21 August 2013 (UTC) 4712:14:43, 20 August 2013 (UTC) 4687:13:57, 19 August 2013 (UTC) 4666:23:27, 16 August 2013 (UTC) 4637:14:47, 14 August 2013 (UTC) 4602:10:48, 14 August 2013 (UTC) 4577:19:17, 13 August 2013 (UTC) 4543:22:14, 12 August 2013 (UTC) 4506:14:23, 12 August 2013 (UTC) 4487:My contribution was deleted 4428:require independent sources 4195:guideline on external links 4169:the formal deletion process 3924:Bold, revert, discuss cycle 3913:revert war on breastfeeding 3858:Not a neutral point of view 3250:Administrator's noticeboard 3216:Administrator's noticeboard 3105:administrator's noticeboard 2306:process sooner or later. - 2009:AMOS (programming language) 1736:doesn't belong on Knowledge 1709:Looks better, thank you. - 1126:administrator's noticeboard 984:meet Knowledge's guidelines 897:AMOS (programming language) 158:due weight for the article? 10: 5223: 5194:2013 Top 10 Horror Fiction 5019:Removing of optiSLang link 4938:ANTz external link removal 4471:19:15, 8 August 2013 (UTC) 4440:20:49, 5 August 2013 (UTC) 4409:10:38, 4 August 2013 (UTC) 4330:16:10, 2 August 2013 (UTC) 4304:19:13, 1 August 2013 (UTC) 4267:20:10, 1 August 2013 (UTC) 4236:20:03, 1 August 2013 (UTC) 4207:19:10, 1 August 2013 (UTC) 4181:19:10, 1 August 2013 (UTC) 4148:23:11, 1 August 2013 (UTC) 4115:14:56, 1 August 2013 (UTC) 4074:12:41, 1 August 2013 (UTC) 4058:06:50, 1 August 2013 (UTC) 4035:06:21, 1 August 2013 (UTC) 4016:12:41, 1 August 2013 (UTC) 3994:19:18, 1 August 2013 (UTC) 3948:Document Assembly revision 3593:requirements for inclusion 3369:17:53, 30 April 2013 (UTC) 3311:13:48, 27 March 2013 (UTC) 3293:Speedy deletion declined: 3228:13:34, 25 March 2013 (UTC) 3209:12:43, 25 March 2013 (UTC) 3199:heavy-handed application. 3194:12:43, 25 March 2013 (UTC) 3179:16:53, 22 March 2013 (UTC) 3147:16:48, 22 March 2013 (UTC) 3093:17:07, 13 March 2013 (UTC) 3079:, but you should read the 3035:16:53, 13 March 2013 (UTC) 3014:16:33, 13 March 2013 (UTC) 2987:15:40, 13 March 2013 (UTC) 2965:15:30, 13 March 2013 (UTC) 2773:Unnecessary Cleaning Lists 2615:Warning of abusive editing 2389:reliable sources guideline 1052:Links on Internal Medicine 152:Are there any third party 3937:22:44, 27 July 2013 (UTC) 3907:10:41, 26 July 2013 (UTC) 3877:20:02, 25 July 2013 (UTC) 3852:15:36, 25 July 2013 (UTC) 3826:14:49, 25 July 2013 (UTC) 3797:14:52, 25 July 2013 (UTC) 3734:22:37, 22 July 2013 (UTC) 3698:22:37, 22 July 2013 (UTC) 3680:13:41, 21 July 2013 (UTC) 3653:12:35, 22 July 2013 (UTC) 3631:12:21, 22 July 2013 (UTC) 3609:11:14, 22 July 2013 (UTC) 3599:and proceed carefully. - 3576:20:03, 21 July 2013 (UTC) 3546:13:37, 21 July 2013 (UTC) 3517:18:22, 18 July 2013 (UTC) 3491:16:30, 18 July 2013 (UTC) 3465:14:52, 11 July 2013 (UTC) 3428:20:58, 10 July 2013 (UTC) 3345:13:12, 1 April 2013 (UTC) 3332:12:44, 1 April 2013 (UTC) 3277:18:23, 9 April 2013 (UTC) 3262:22:25, 1 April 2013 (UTC) 3243:16:56, 1 April 2013 (UTC) 3125:20:51, 8 March 2013 (UTC) 3081:guide to appealing blocks 3061:make useful contributions 2811:Removal of linkedin group 2733:added a link pointing to 2720:Two-factor authentication 2709:added a link pointing to 2607:The manosphere is notable 1890:sources on medical claims 1613:the neutral point of view 1086: 290:Regarding removal of link 5159:your consulting business 4718:Removal of external link 3389:17:46, 9 June 2013 (UTC) 2743:Optimize Capital Markets 2057:Mobile device management 1915:deletion discussion page 1124:Allow me to suggest the 938:Insufficient explanation 4482:Cancelled modifications 4277:Breastfeeding page edit 4241:Thanks for the link to 4084:American Film Institute 4024:User talk:98.154.102.53 2806:Removal of contribution 2214:"conflicts of interest" 1344:improve instead of undo 496:I removed it again per 426:Three-dimensional chess 424:. It doesn't belong in 5206:Favorite Books of 2012 4922:that up with Apple. - 4624:reliable third parties 4393:single purpose account 4217:Software tools section 3615:There was no confusion 3442: 3047: 2953:single purpose editors 2893: 2788:external link spamming 2612: 2603: 2594: 1730:We need a source that 1704:Deletion of my article 587:critical thinking page 4804:articles for deletion 4096:.) At most there is 3973:Business Intelligence 3706:Adding External Links 3441: 3115:before escalating. - 3075:Your reason here ~~~~ 3046: 2892: 2611: 2602: 2593: 2304:articles for deletion 1954:Deleting of our links 1849:puffery by adjectives 1841:neutral point of view 1603:See the guideline on 1585:notability guidelines 1190:You deleted my entry. 1090:The Spamstar of Glory 906:that established the 365:Business Model Canvas 42:of past discussions. 5028:your software might 4243:Domain-driven design 4211:I was talking about 3816:for more details. - 3785:superficial mentions 3597:conflict of interest 3395:Removed link to site 3109:conflict of interest 2842:User talk:Legination 2784:conflict of interest 2748:Removal of citations 2265:No. The list is for 1023:Deletion of revision 677:Norwell, Mass., page 536:Chateau Marmont page 393:Parmen EL @ 3D Chess 119:conflict of interest 103:Square root revision 4873:appropriate sources 4583:About WebGL changes 4284:sourcing guidelines 3534:inappropriate links 2895:Hello, MrOllie. To 2817:Links to be avoided 2728:fix with Dab solver 2704:fix with Dab solver 2534:sources noticeboard 2395:'s articles on the 1981:sourcing guidelines 1975:If you can turn up 1725:A barnstar for you! 1539:meet our guidelines 1489:Big Data definition 1202:removed those words 420:That game is not a 3966:Data visualization 3532:If you have found 3443: 3048: 2947:information about 2894: 2879:WikiProject Brands 2664:Category:Synectics 2393:Arianna Huffington 1195:Why the deletions? 5192:Booklist Magazine 5118:Michael Haephrati 4989:978-1-5902-0860-1 4341:The IVF Informant 4226:comment added by 4138:comment added by 4048:comment added by 3920:article talk page 3839:Computer Security 3579: 3562:comment added by 3113:multiple accounts 3065:appeal this block 2918: 2917: 2908: 2203: 2186:comment added by 1607:. Satisfying the 1605:stand alone lists 1226:Phyllotaxy Towers 1111: 1110: 1073:Spamstar of Glory 851:acceptable source 740: 723:comment added by 268:reliable sourcing 100: 99: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 18:User talk:MrOllie 5214: 5207: 5201: 5195: 5189: 4972:was selected by 4831: 4795:Community Funded 4693:Removal of pages 4663: 4662: 4613:Deletion of Text 4238: 4150: 4095: 4089: 4060: 3578: 3556: 3341: 3078: 3045: 2907: 2905:Northamerica1000 2902: 2884: 2724:check to confirm 2700:check to confirm 2662:Text moved from 2300:required sources 2271:you have written 2202: 2180: 1766:write an article 1764:doubt exist and 1494:Work Time Studio 1119:panamintcity.com 1084: 1077: 1076: 739: 717: 154:reliable sources 115:external linking 78: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 5222: 5221: 5217: 5216: 5215: 5213: 5212: 5211: 5210: 5202: 5198: 5190: 5186: 5138: 5080: 5059: 5054: 5021: 4966:Dave Zeltserman 4961: 4940: 4893: 4868: 4827: 4799: 4751: 4746: 4725: 4720: 4695: 4674: 4660: 4659: 4650: 4645: 4615: 4610: 4585: 4551: 4514: 4489: 4484: 4479: 4458: 4453: 4448: 4422: 4417: 4399:the founder. - 4388: 4386:Nation Branding 4343: 4338: 4317: 4312: 4279: 4221: 4189: 4163: 4133: 4093: 4087: 4043: 4002: 3981: 3976: 3969: 3962: 3957: 3950: 3945: 3915: 3885: 3860: 3834: 3805: 3752: 3747: 3742: 3713: 3708: 3663: 3617: 3580: 3557: 3554: 3529: 3478: 3473: 3448: 3436: 3402: 3397: 3355: 3339: 3319: 3298: 3155: 3133: 3100: 3095: 3068: 3043: 2940: 2935: 2930: 2923: 2914: 2903: 2882: 2874: 2867: 2862: 2837: 2813: 2808: 2775: 2750: 2745: 2692: 2667: 2639: 2617: 2397:Huffington Post 2368: 2363: 2358: 2295: 2262: 2216: 2181: 2120: 2115: 2090: 2085: 2080: 2059: 2054: 2016: 2011: 2006: 2001: 1956: 1935: 1910: 1885: 1836: 1815: 1786: 1756: 1727: 1706: 1659: 1637: 1580: 1559: 1496: 1491: 1447: 1407: 1346: 1229: 1222: 1197: 1192: 1171: 1146: 1121: 1116: 1114:Good Faith Edit 1075: 1054: 1025: 1004: 979: 940: 935: 932:Cloud computing 928: 899: 846: 817: 812: 791: 718: 679: 674: 669: 664: 662:Username Change 639: 637:Nevada Brothels 618: 589: 568: 564: 543: 538: 493: 448: 395: 390: 385: 372: 367: 297: 292: 263: 215: 194: 149: 144: 139: 110: 105: 74: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 5220: 5209: 5208: 5196: 5183: 5182: 5181: 5154: 5153: 5137: 5134: 5133: 5132: 5131: 5130: 5129: 5128: 5092: 5079: 5076: 5075: 5074: 5058: 5055: 5053: 5050: 5049: 5048: 5020: 5017: 5016: 5015: 4992: 4991: 4960: 4957: 4956: 4955: 4939: 4936: 4935: 4934: 4914: 4913: 4892: 4889: 4888: 4887: 4867: 4864: 4863: 4862: 4861: 4860: 4859: 4858: 4857: 4856: 4798: 4792: 4791: 4790: 4771: 4770: 4750: 4747: 4745: 4742: 4741: 4740: 4724: 4721: 4719: 4716: 4715: 4714: 4694: 4691: 4690: 4689: 4673: 4670: 4669: 4668: 4649: 4646: 4644: 4641: 4640: 4639: 4614: 4611: 4609: 4606: 4605: 4604: 4584: 4581: 4580: 4579: 4561:external links 4550: 4547: 4546: 4545: 4523:external links 4513: 4510: 4509: 4508: 4488: 4485: 4483: 4480: 4478: 4475: 4474: 4473: 4457: 4454: 4452: 4451:Please Respond 4449: 4447: 4444: 4443: 4442: 4421: 4418: 4416: 4413: 4412: 4411: 4387: 4384: 4383: 4382: 4379: 4376: 4373: 4370: 4366: 4363: 4360: 4357: 4354: 4350: 4347: 4342: 4339: 4337: 4334: 4333: 4332: 4316: 4313: 4311: 4308: 4307: 4306: 4278: 4275: 4274: 4273: 4272: 4271: 4270: 4269: 4255:links to avoid 4188: 4185: 4184: 4183: 4162: 4159: 4158: 4157: 4156: 4155: 4154: 4153: 4152: 4151: 4122: 4121: 4120: 4119: 4118: 4117: 4038: 4037: 4019: 4018: 4001: 3998: 3997: 3996: 3980: 3977: 3975: 3970: 3968: 3963: 3961: 3958: 3956: 3951: 3949: 3946: 3944: 3941: 3940: 3939: 3914: 3911: 3910: 3909: 3884: 3881: 3880: 3879: 3859: 3856: 3855: 3854: 3833: 3830: 3829: 3828: 3804: 3801: 3800: 3799: 3780: 3779: 3768: 3765: 3758: 3757: 3751: 3748: 3746: 3743: 3741: 3738: 3737: 3736: 3722:primary source 3712: 3709: 3707: 3704: 3703: 3702: 3701: 3700: 3683: 3682: 3662: 3661:Literary links 3659: 3658: 3657: 3656: 3655: 3634: 3633: 3616: 3613: 3612: 3611: 3591:and study the 3555: 3553: 3550: 3549: 3548: 3528: 3523: 3522: 3521: 3520: 3519: 3477: 3474: 3472: 3469: 3468: 3467: 3447: 3444: 3435: 3432: 3431: 3430: 3401: 3398: 3396: 3393: 3392: 3391: 3372: 3371: 3354: 3351: 3350: 3349: 3348: 3347: 3318: 3315: 3314: 3313: 3297: 3295:Iperius Backup 3291: 3290: 3289: 3288: 3287: 3286: 3285: 3284: 3283: 3282: 3281: 3280: 3279: 3196: 3154: 3151: 3150: 3149: 3139:Statesideassoc 3132: 3129: 3128: 3127: 3099: 3096: 3049:You have been 3041: 3040: 3039: 3038: 3037: 3019: 3018: 3017: 3016: 3002: 3001: 3000: 2999: 2992: 2991: 2990: 2989: 2968: 2967: 2939: 2936: 2934: 2931: 2929: 2924: 2922: 2919: 2916: 2915: 2913: 2912: 2887: 2881: 2877:Invitation to 2875: 2873: 2868: 2866: 2863: 2861: 2858: 2857: 2856: 2836: 2833: 2832: 2831: 2812: 2809: 2807: 2804: 2803: 2802: 2774: 2771: 2770: 2769: 2749: 2746: 2744: 2741: 2740: 2739: 2738: 2737: 2716: 2715: 2714: 2713: 2691: 2688: 2687: 2686: 2666: 2660: 2659: 2658: 2638: 2635: 2634: 2633: 2616: 2613: 2610: 2609: 2601: 2600: 2592: 2591: 2585: 2584: 2565: 2564: 2549: 2548: 2525: 2524: 2523: 2522: 2521: 2520: 2519: 2518: 2517: 2516: 2515: 2514: 2513: 2512: 2511: 2510: 2509: 2508: 2507: 2506: 2505: 2504: 2503: 2502: 2501: 2500: 2499: 2498: 2497: 2496: 2495: 2494: 2493: 2492: 2491: 2490: 2489: 2488: 2487: 2486: 2485: 2484: 2483: 2482: 2481: 2480: 2433: 2432: 2412: 2411: 2367: 2364: 2362: 2359: 2357: 2354: 2353: 2352: 2351: 2350: 2349: 2348: 2294: 2291: 2290: 2289: 2261: 2258: 2257: 2256: 2236: 2235: 2215: 2212: 2211: 2210: 2209: 2208: 2207: 2206: 2205: 2204: 2140: 2139: 2119: 2116: 2114: 2111: 2110: 2109: 2089: 2086: 2084: 2081: 2079: 2076: 2075: 2074: 2058: 2055: 2053: 2050: 2049: 2048: 2032: 2031: 2015: 2012: 2010: 2007: 2005: 2002: 2000: 1997: 1996: 1995: 1979:that meet our 1972: 1971: 1955: 1952: 1951: 1950: 1934: 1931: 1930: 1929: 1909: 1906: 1905: 1904: 1884: 1881: 1880: 1879: 1864: 1863: 1835: 1832: 1831: 1830: 1814: 1811: 1810: 1809: 1785: 1782: 1781: 1780: 1755: 1752: 1751: 1750: 1726: 1723: 1722: 1721: 1705: 1702: 1701: 1700: 1699: 1698: 1665:User:Jimfbleak 1658: 1655: 1654: 1653: 1636: 1633: 1632: 1631: 1600: 1599: 1579: 1576: 1575: 1574: 1558: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1533: 1532: 1527: 1522: 1517: 1512: 1507: 1502: 1495: 1492: 1490: 1487: 1486: 1485: 1469: 1468: 1467: 1466: 1446: 1441: 1440: 1439: 1424: 1423: 1406: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1386: 1385: 1362: 1361: 1345: 1342: 1341: 1340: 1319: 1318: 1317: 1297: 1296: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1263: 1262: 1261: 1245: 1244: 1228: 1223: 1221: 1218: 1217: 1216: 1196: 1193: 1191: 1188: 1187: 1186: 1170: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1145: 1142: 1141: 1140: 1120: 1117: 1115: 1112: 1109: 1108: 1093: 1092: 1087: 1085: 1074: 1071: 1070: 1069: 1053: 1050: 1049: 1048: 1024: 1021: 1020: 1019: 1003: 1000: 999: 998: 978: 975: 974: 973: 957: 956: 939: 936: 934: 929: 927: 926:Social Anxiety 924: 923: 922: 898: 895: 894: 893: 870: 869: 845: 842: 841: 840: 816: 813: 811: 808: 807: 806: 790: 787: 786: 785: 784: 783: 770: 768: 765: 743: 742: 741: 714: 712: 710: 707: 704: 701: 678: 675: 673: 670: 668: 665: 663: 660: 659: 658: 638: 635: 634: 633: 617: 614: 613: 612: 588: 585: 584: 583: 565: 563: 560: 559: 558: 542: 539: 537: 534: 533: 532: 517: 516: 492: 489: 488: 487: 468: 467: 447: 444: 443: 442: 441: 440: 430:Ihardlythinkso 415: 414: 394: 391: 389: 386: 375:69.121.117.192 373: 371: 368: 366: 363: 362: 361: 346: 345: 329: 328: 313: 312: 296: 293: 291: 288: 287: 286: 262: 261:disabled links 259: 258: 257: 238: 237: 214: 211: 210: 209: 193: 190: 189: 188: 173: 172: 148: 145: 143: 140: 138: 135: 134: 133: 109: 106: 104: 101: 98: 97: 92: 89: 84: 79: 72: 67: 62: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5219: 5205: 5200: 5193: 5188: 5184: 5180: 5176: 5172: 5168: 5164: 5160: 5156: 5155: 5152: 5148: 5144: 5140: 5139: 5127: 5123: 5119: 5114: 5113: 5112: 5111: 5110: 5106: 5102: 5098: 5093: 5090: 5086: 5082: 5081: 5073: 5069: 5065: 5061: 5060: 5047: 5043: 5039: 5035: 5031: 5027: 5023: 5022: 5014: 5010: 5006: 5002: 4998: 4994: 4993: 4990: 4987: 4983: 4979: 4975: 4971: 4967: 4963: 4962: 4954: 4950: 4946: 4942: 4941: 4933: 4929: 4925: 4920: 4916: 4915: 4912: 4908: 4904: 4900: 4899:verifiability 4895: 4894: 4886: 4882: 4878: 4874: 4870: 4869: 4855: 4851: 4847: 4843: 4842: 4841: 4840: 4839: 4836: 4834: 4832: 4830: 4823: 4822: 4821: 4817: 4813: 4809: 4805: 4801: 4800: 4796: 4789: 4785: 4781: 4777: 4773: 4772: 4769: 4765: 4761: 4757: 4753: 4752: 4739: 4735: 4731: 4727: 4726: 4713: 4709: 4705: 4701: 4697: 4696: 4688: 4684: 4680: 4676: 4675: 4667: 4664: 4656: 4652: 4651: 4638: 4634: 4630: 4625: 4621: 4617: 4616: 4603: 4599: 4595: 4591: 4587: 4586: 4578: 4574: 4570: 4566: 4562: 4557: 4553: 4552: 4544: 4540: 4536: 4532: 4531:Eugene Volokh 4528: 4524: 4520: 4516: 4515: 4507: 4503: 4499: 4495: 4491: 4490: 4472: 4468: 4464: 4460: 4459: 4441: 4437: 4433: 4429: 4424: 4423: 4410: 4406: 4402: 4398: 4394: 4390: 4389: 4380: 4377: 4374: 4371: 4367: 4364: 4361: 4358: 4355: 4351: 4348: 4345: 4344: 4331: 4327: 4323: 4319: 4318: 4305: 4301: 4297: 4293: 4289: 4285: 4281: 4280: 4268: 4264: 4260: 4256: 4252: 4248: 4244: 4240: 4239: 4237: 4233: 4229: 4228:109.60.101.95 4225: 4218: 4214: 4210: 4209: 4208: 4204: 4200: 4196: 4191: 4190: 4182: 4178: 4174: 4170: 4165: 4164: 4149: 4145: 4141: 4140:98.154.102.53 4137: 4130: 4129: 4128: 4127: 4126: 4125: 4124: 4123: 4116: 4112: 4108: 4104: 4099: 4092: 4085: 4081: 4077: 4076: 4075: 4071: 4067: 4062: 4061: 4059: 4055: 4051: 4050:98.154.102.53 4047: 4040: 4039: 4036: 4033: 4032: 4031: 4025: 4021: 4020: 4017: 4013: 4009: 4004: 4003: 3995: 3991: 3987: 3983: 3982: 3979:Deleted Entry 3974: 3967: 3955: 3938: 3934: 3930: 3925: 3921: 3917: 3916: 3908: 3904: 3900: 3895: 3891: 3887: 3886: 3878: 3874: 3870: 3866: 3862: 3861: 3853: 3849: 3845: 3840: 3836: 3835: 3827: 3823: 3819: 3815: 3811: 3807: 3806: 3798: 3794: 3790: 3786: 3782: 3781: 3777: 3773: 3769: 3766: 3764: 3760: 3759: 3754: 3753: 3735: 3731: 3727: 3723: 3719: 3715: 3714: 3699: 3695: 3691: 3687: 3686: 3685: 3684: 3681: 3677: 3673: 3669: 3665: 3664: 3654: 3650: 3646: 3642: 3638: 3637: 3636: 3635: 3632: 3628: 3624: 3619: 3618: 3610: 3606: 3602: 3598: 3594: 3590: 3586: 3582: 3581: 3577: 3573: 3569: 3565: 3561: 3547: 3543: 3539: 3535: 3531: 3530: 3527: 3518: 3514: 3510: 3506: 3505: 3500: 3499: 3495:You are both 3494: 3493: 3492: 3488: 3484: 3480: 3479: 3466: 3462: 3458: 3454: 3450: 3449: 3440: 3429: 3425: 3421: 3416: 3412: 3408: 3404: 3403: 3390: 3386: 3382: 3378: 3374: 3373: 3370: 3366: 3362: 3357: 3356: 3346: 3343: 3342: 3335: 3334: 3333: 3329: 3325: 3321: 3320: 3312: 3308: 3304: 3300: 3299: 3296: 3278: 3274: 3270: 3265: 3264: 3263: 3259: 3255: 3251: 3246: 3245: 3244: 3240: 3236: 3231: 3230: 3229: 3225: 3221: 3217: 3212: 3211: 3210: 3206: 3202: 3197: 3195: 3191: 3187: 3182: 3181: 3180: 3176: 3172: 3168: 3164: 3161: 3157: 3156: 3148: 3144: 3140: 3135: 3134: 3126: 3122: 3118: 3114: 3110: 3106: 3102: 3101: 3094: 3090: 3086: 3082: 3076: 3072: 3066: 3062: 3058: 3054: 3053: 3036: 3032: 3028: 3023: 3022: 3021: 3020: 3015: 3011: 3006: 3005: 3004: 3003: 2996: 2995: 2994: 2993: 2988: 2984: 2980: 2976: 2972: 2971: 2970: 2969: 2966: 2962: 2958: 2954: 2950: 2946: 2942: 2941: 2928: 2911: 2906: 2900: 2899: 2891: 2886: 2885: 2880: 2872: 2855: 2851: 2847: 2843: 2839: 2838: 2830: 2826: 2822: 2818: 2815: 2814: 2801: 2797: 2793: 2789: 2785: 2781: 2777: 2776: 2768: 2764: 2760: 2756: 2752: 2751: 2736: 2732: 2731: 2729: 2725: 2721: 2718: 2717: 2712: 2708: 2707: 2705: 2701: 2697: 2694: 2693: 2685: 2681: 2677: 2673: 2669: 2668: 2665: 2657: 2653: 2649: 2645: 2641: 2640: 2632: 2628: 2624: 2619: 2618: 2608: 2605: 2604: 2599: 2596: 2595: 2590: 2587: 2586: 2583: 2579: 2575: 2571: 2567: 2566: 2563: 2559: 2555: 2551: 2550: 2547: 2543: 2539: 2535: 2531: 2527: 2526: 2479: 2478: 2477: 2476: 2475: 2474: 2473: 2472: 2471: 2470: 2469: 2468: 2467: 2466: 2465: 2464: 2463: 2462: 2461: 2460: 2459: 2458: 2457: 2456: 2455: 2454: 2453: 2452: 2451: 2450: 2449: 2448: 2447: 2446: 2445: 2444: 2443: 2442: 2441: 2440: 2439: 2438: 2437: 2436: 2435: 2434: 2431: 2427: 2423: 2419: 2414: 2413: 2410: 2406: 2402: 2398: 2394: 2390: 2386: 2385:verifiability 2382: 2378: 2374: 2370: 2369: 2347: 2343: 2339: 2334: 2333: 2332: 2328: 2324: 2319: 2318: 2317: 2313: 2309: 2305: 2301: 2297: 2296: 2288: 2284: 2280: 2276: 2272: 2268: 2264: 2263: 2255: 2251: 2247: 2243: 2238: 2237: 2234: 2230: 2226: 2222: 2218: 2217: 2201: 2197: 2193: 2189: 2185: 2177: 2176: 2175: 2171: 2167: 2163: 2159: 2158: 2157: 2153: 2149: 2144: 2143: 2142: 2141: 2138: 2134: 2130: 2126: 2122: 2121: 2108: 2104: 2100: 2096: 2092: 2091: 2073: 2069: 2065: 2061: 2060: 2046: 2042: 2038: 2034: 2033: 2030: 2026: 2022: 2018: 2017: 1994: 1990: 1986: 1982: 1978: 1974: 1973: 1970: 1966: 1962: 1958: 1957: 1949: 1945: 1941: 1937: 1936: 1928: 1924: 1920: 1916: 1912: 1911: 1903: 1899: 1895: 1891: 1887: 1886: 1878: 1874: 1870: 1866: 1865: 1862: 1858: 1854: 1850: 1846: 1842: 1838: 1837: 1829: 1825: 1821: 1817: 1816: 1808: 1804: 1800: 1796: 1792: 1788: 1787: 1779: 1775: 1771: 1767: 1762: 1758: 1757: 1749: 1745: 1741: 1737: 1733: 1729: 1728: 1720: 1716: 1712: 1708: 1707: 1697: 1693: 1689: 1684: 1683: 1682: 1678: 1674: 1670: 1666: 1661: 1660: 1652: 1648: 1644: 1639: 1638: 1630: 1626: 1622: 1618: 1614: 1610: 1606: 1602: 1601: 1598: 1594: 1590: 1586: 1582: 1581: 1573: 1569: 1565: 1561: 1560: 1552: 1548: 1544: 1540: 1535: 1534: 1531: 1528: 1526: 1523: 1521: 1518: 1516: 1513: 1511: 1508: 1506: 1503: 1501: 1498: 1497: 1484: 1480: 1476: 1471: 1470: 1465: 1461: 1457: 1456: 1451: 1450: 1449: 1448: 1445: 1438: 1434: 1430: 1426: 1425: 1422: 1418: 1414: 1409: 1408: 1400: 1396: 1392: 1388: 1387: 1384: 1380: 1376: 1372: 1368: 1364: 1363: 1360: 1356: 1352: 1348: 1347: 1339: 1335: 1331: 1325: 1321: 1320: 1316: 1312: 1308: 1303: 1299: 1298: 1294: 1290: 1286: 1282: 1281: 1277: 1273: 1269: 1265: 1264: 1260: 1256: 1252: 1247: 1246: 1243: 1239: 1235: 1231: 1230: 1227: 1215: 1211: 1207: 1203: 1199: 1198: 1185: 1181: 1177: 1173: 1172: 1164: 1160: 1156: 1152: 1148: 1147: 1139: 1135: 1131: 1127: 1123: 1122: 1107: 1103: 1099: 1095: 1094: 1091: 1088: 1083: 1078: 1068: 1064: 1060: 1056: 1055: 1047: 1043: 1039: 1035: 1031: 1027: 1026: 1018: 1014: 1010: 1006: 1005: 997: 993: 989: 985: 981: 980: 972: 968: 964: 959: 958: 955: 951: 947: 942: 941: 933: 921: 917: 913: 909: 905: 901: 900: 892: 888: 884: 880: 876: 872: 871: 868: 864: 860: 856: 852: 848: 847: 839: 835: 831: 827: 823: 819: 818: 805: 801: 797: 793: 792: 782: 778: 774: 771: 762: 761: 760: 756: 752: 748: 744: 738: 734: 730: 726: 722: 698: 697: 696: 692: 688: 684: 681: 680: 657: 653: 649: 645: 641: 640: 632: 628: 624: 620: 619: 611: 607: 603: 599: 595: 591: 590: 582: 578: 574: 570: 569: 557: 553: 549: 545: 544: 531: 527: 523: 519: 518: 515: 511: 507: 503: 499: 495: 494: 486: 482: 478: 474: 470: 469: 466: 462: 458: 454: 450: 449: 439: 435: 431: 427: 423: 422:chess variant 419: 418: 417: 416: 413: 409: 405: 401: 400:The Star Game 397: 396: 384: 380: 376: 360: 356: 352: 348: 347: 344: 340: 336: 331: 330: 327: 323: 319: 315: 314: 311: 307: 303: 299: 298: 295:Globalization 285: 281: 277: 273: 269: 265: 264: 256: 252: 248: 244: 240: 239: 236: 232: 228: 224: 220: 217: 216: 208: 204: 200: 196: 195: 192:Cyber-mobbing 187: 183: 179: 175: 174: 171: 167: 163: 159: 155: 151: 150: 132: 128: 124: 120: 116: 112: 111: 96: 93: 90: 88: 85: 83: 80: 77: 73: 71: 68: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 5199: 5187: 5024:If you have 4969: 4828: 4653:reported at 4512:Link Removal 4477:Unbiasedness 4310:Link removed 4222:— Preceding 4134:— Preceding 4044:— Preceding 4029: 4028: 4000:Kochan Spam? 3960:Link removed 3718:undue weight 3589:good sources 3558:— Preceding 3502: 3498:edit warring 3496: 3337: 3085:JamesBWatson 3074: 3056: 3050: 2973:Response by 2896: 2569: 2182:— Preceding 2093:If you have 1557:edit warring 1453: 1373:. Thanks. - 1366: 1089: 789:PDF creators 719:— Preceding 270:showing the 75: 43: 37: 4397:Wally Olins 4288:discouraged 4187:DDD cleanup 4098:WP:CITESPAM 3361:Gcrackers82 3336:Thank you! 3269:Gcrackers82 3235:Gcrackers82 3201:Gcrackers82 3186:Gcrackers82 2949:trademarked 2383:as well as 2379:. Also see 2064:Biker Biker 1845:advertising 1688:Andreas.Hpt 1525:Xpert-Timer 709:Knowledge). 616:Phyllotaxis 473:one account 451:Covered at 36:This is an 4846:NickInFoCo 4829:Ritchie333 3894:InvestedIn 3353:ANI thread 3025:articles. 2179:section. 2162:notability 2083:PMML Tools 1933:PMML Tools 1813:Philosophy 1795:Visual C++ 1515:Grindstone 1500:AceProject 1169:proxy list 879:notability 95:Archive 10 5001:neutrally 4643:Thank You 4527:exception 3954:Gauloises 3509:Guy Macon 3405:No. Only 3027:MesaBoy77 3010:MesaBoy77 2979:MesaBoy77 2975:MesaBoy77 2945:unsourced 2530:Time Cube 2418:Time Cube 2361:Deletions 822:WP:FRINGE 706:category. 87:Archive 6 82:Archive 5 76:Archive 4 70:Archive 3 65:Archive 2 60:Archive 1 4974:Booklist 4608:Recently 4224:unsigned 4136:unsigned 4091:AFI film 4046:unsigned 3572:contribs 3560:unsigned 3407:veriable 3083:first. 3073:|reason= 2871:FINE MEP 2196:contribs 2184:unsigned 1510:Chrometa 1505:Clarizen 1405:Mail art 1367:separate 946:Cynwolfe 826:WP:MEDRS 773:WRoxDrew 733:contribs 725:WRoxDrew 721:unsigned 594:POV text 5171:MrOllie 5163:sources 5143:MrOllie 5101:MrOllie 5064:MrOllie 5038:MrOllie 5005:MrOllie 4945:MrOllie 4924:MrOllie 4903:MrOllie 4877:MrOllie 4812:MrOllie 4780:MrOllie 4760:MrOllie 4756:Spyware 4749:Yuvalg9 4730:MrOllie 4704:MrOllie 4679:MrOllie 4629:MrOllie 4620:neutral 4594:MrOllie 4569:MrOllie 4535:MrOllie 4519:sources 4498:MrOllie 4463:MrOllie 4432:MrOllie 4401:MrOllie 4369:next.). 4322:MrOllie 4296:MrOllie 4259:MrOllie 4199:MrOllie 4173:MrOllie 4107:S. Rich 4066:MrOllie 4030:TheFeds 4008:MrOllie 3986:MrOllie 3929:MrOllie 3899:MrOllie 3869:MrOllie 3844:MrOllie 3818:MrOllie 3789:MrOllie 3726:MrOllie 3690:MrOllie 3672:MrOllie 3645:MrOllie 3623:MrOllie 3601:MrOllie 3538:MrOllie 3483:MrOllie 3457:MrOllie 3420:MrOllie 3411:neutral 3381:MrOllie 3340:MBisanz 3324:MrOllie 3317:Inquiry 3303:MrOllie 3254:MrOllie 3220:MrOllie 3171:MrOllie 3167:WP:SPAM 3160:WP:ELNO 3117:MrOllie 3071:unblock 3052:blocked 2957:MrOllie 2846:MrOllie 2821:MrOllie 2792:MrOllie 2759:MrOllie 2735:Android 2676:MrOllie 2672:neutral 2648:MrOllie 2623:MrOllie 2574:MrOllie 2554:MrOllie 2538:MrOllie 2422:MrOllie 2401:MrOllie 2338:MrOllie 2323:Pabeles 2308:MrOllie 2279:MrOllie 2267:notable 2246:MrOllie 2225:MrOllie 2188:Pabeles 2166:MrOllie 2148:Pabeles 2129:MrOllie 2099:MrOllie 2021:MrOllie 1985:MrOllie 1961:MrOllie 1940:MrOllie 1919:MrOllie 1894:MrOllie 1869:MrOllie 1853:MrOllie 1820:MrOllie 1799:MrOllie 1770:MrOllie 1740:MrOllie 1711:MrOllie 1673:MrOllie 1669:Shopify 1643:MrOllie 1621:MrOllie 1589:MrOllie 1564:MrOllie 1543:MrOllie 1530:Fanurio 1475:MrOllie 1444:Mimi So 1429:MrOllie 1413:MrOllie 1391:MrOllie 1375:MrOllie 1351:MrOllie 1330:MrOllie 1307:MrOllie 1289:MrOllie 1268:MrOllie 1251:MrOllie 1234:MrOllie 1206:MrOllie 1176:MrOllie 1155:MrOllie 1130:MrOllie 1059:MrOllie 1038:MrOllie 1009:MrOllie 988:MrOllie 963:MrOllie 912:MrOllie 883:MrOllie 859:MrOllie 857:now. - 830:MrOllie 796:MrOllie 751:MrOllie 687:MrOllie 683:WP:ELNO 648:MrOllie 644:WP:ELNO 623:MrOllie 602:MrOllie 598:sandbox 573:MrOllie 548:MrOllie 522:MrOllie 506:MrOllie 502:WP:ELNO 477:MrOllie 457:MrOllie 446:Torture 351:MrOllie 335:MrOllie 318:MrOllie 302:MrOllie 276:MrOllie 247:MrOllie 227:MrOllie 199:MrOllie 178:MrOllie 162:MrOllie 123:MrOllie 39:archive 4982:gothic 4964:2012: 4825:card! 4103:WP:COI 3865:verify 3564:MPersh 3504:WP:BRD 3165:, and 3163:WP:COI 3057:3 days 2047:pveiga 2037:Pveiga 1371:WP:NPA 1151:WP:NOT 855:WP:AFD 500:, and 498:WP:COI 5167:links 4661:rybec 3778:(#52) 3740:reply 1520:Wrike 1460:talk 667:Pixar 404:Mequa 16:< 5204:WBUR 5175:talk 5147:talk 5122:talk 5105:talk 5068:talk 5042:talk 5009:talk 4986:ISBN 4978:WBUR 4949:talk 4928:talk 4919:GEOS 4907:talk 4881:talk 4850:talk 4816:talk 4784:talk 4778:. - 4764:talk 4734:talk 4708:talk 4683:talk 4672:Risk 4633:talk 4598:talk 4573:talk 4567:. - 4554:No, 4539:talk 4502:talk 4492:per 4467:talk 4436:talk 4405:talk 4326:talk 4300:talk 4294:. - 4263:talk 4257:. - 4232:talk 4203:talk 4197:. - 4177:talk 4171:. - 4144:talk 4111:talk 4080:IMDb 4070:talk 4054:talk 4012:talk 3990:talk 3933:talk 3903:talk 3873:talk 3848:talk 3822:talk 3793:talk 3787:. - 3730:talk 3694:talk 3676:talk 3666:See 3649:talk 3643:. - 3639:See 3627:talk 3605:talk 3568:talk 3542:talk 3513:talk 3507:. -- 3487:talk 3471:WPEL 3461:talk 3424:talk 3409:and 3385:talk 3379:. - 3365:talk 3328:talk 3307:talk 3273:talk 3258:talk 3239:talk 3224:talk 3205:talk 3190:talk 3175:talk 3143:talk 3121:talk 3111:and 3089:talk 3031:talk 2983:talk 2961:talk 2898:join 2850:talk 2825:talk 2796:talk 2786:and 2763:talk 2696:.com 2680:talk 2652:talk 2627:talk 2578:talk 2558:talk 2542:talk 2536:. - 2426:talk 2405:talk 2342:talk 2327:talk 2312:talk 2283:talk 2250:talk 2229:talk 2192:talk 2170:talk 2152:talk 2133:talk 2103:talk 2068:talk 2041:talk 2025:talk 1989:talk 1965:talk 1944:talk 1923:talk 1917:. - 1898:talk 1873:talk 1857:talk 1843:and 1824:talk 1803:talk 1774:talk 1768:. - 1744:talk 1738:. - 1715:talk 1692:talk 1677:talk 1647:talk 1625:talk 1593:talk 1587:. - 1568:talk 1547:talk 1541:. - 1479:talk 1433:talk 1417:talk 1395:talk 1379:talk 1355:talk 1334:talk 1311:talk 1293:talk 1272:talk 1255:talk 1238:talk 1210:talk 1204:. - 1180:talk 1159:talk 1134:talk 1128:. - 1102:talk 1098:Hu12 1063:talk 1042:talk 1036:. - 1013:talk 992:talk 967:talk 950:talk 916:talk 887:talk 863:talk 834:talk 824:and 800:talk 777:talk 755:talk 729:talk 700:way. 691:talk 652:talk 642:See 627:talk 606:talk 577:talk 552:talk 526:talk 510:talk 481:talk 461:talk 434:talk 408:talk 379:talk 355:talk 339:talk 322:talk 306:talk 280:talk 251:talk 241:No. 231:talk 221:and 203:talk 182:talk 166:talk 137:why? 127:talk 117:and 5165:or 4968:'s 4559:on 4521:or 4213:DDD 2711:TRW 1455:DGG 5177:) 5149:) 5124:) 5107:) 5070:) 5044:) 5011:) 4951:) 4930:) 4909:) 4883:) 4852:) 4818:) 4786:) 4766:) 4736:) 4710:) 4685:) 4635:) 4600:) 4575:) 4556:TW 4541:) 4504:) 4469:) 4438:) 4407:) 4328:) 4302:) 4265:) 4234:) 4205:) 4179:) 4146:) 4113:) 4094:}} 4088:{{ 4072:) 4056:) 4026:. 4014:) 3992:) 3935:) 3905:) 3875:) 3850:) 3824:) 3795:) 3732:) 3696:) 3678:) 3651:) 3629:) 3607:) 3574:) 3570:• 3544:) 3515:) 3489:) 3463:) 3426:) 3387:) 3367:) 3330:) 3309:) 3275:) 3260:) 3241:) 3226:) 3218:- 3207:) 3192:) 3177:) 3145:) 3123:) 3091:) 3077:}} 3069:{{ 3033:) 3012:) 2985:) 2963:) 2852:) 2827:) 2798:) 2765:) 2730:) 2726:| 2706:) 2702:| 2682:) 2654:) 2629:) 2580:) 2560:) 2544:) 2428:) 2407:) 2344:) 2329:) 2314:) 2285:) 2252:) 2231:) 2198:) 2194:• 2172:) 2154:) 2135:) 2105:) 2070:) 2043:) 2027:) 1991:) 1967:) 1946:) 1925:) 1900:) 1875:) 1859:) 1826:) 1805:) 1776:) 1746:) 1717:) 1694:) 1679:) 1649:) 1627:) 1595:) 1570:) 1549:) 1481:) 1462:) 1435:) 1419:) 1397:) 1381:) 1357:) 1336:) 1313:) 1274:) 1257:) 1240:) 1212:) 1182:) 1161:) 1136:) 1104:) 1065:) 1044:) 1015:) 994:) 969:) 952:) 918:) 889:) 865:) 836:) 802:) 779:) 757:) 735:) 731:• 693:) 654:) 629:) 608:) 579:) 554:) 528:) 512:) 483:) 463:) 455:- 436:) 410:) 402:. 381:) 357:) 341:) 324:) 308:) 282:) 274:- 253:) 233:) 205:) 184:) 168:) 160:- 129:) 91:→ 5173:( 5145:( 5120:( 5103:( 5066:( 5040:( 5007:( 4947:( 4926:( 4905:( 4879:( 4848:( 4814:( 4782:( 4762:( 4732:( 4706:( 4681:( 4657:— 4631:( 4596:( 4571:( 4537:( 4500:( 4465:( 4434:( 4403:( 4324:( 4298:( 4261:( 4230:( 4201:( 4175:( 4142:( 4109:( 4068:( 4052:( 4010:( 3988:( 3931:( 3901:( 3871:( 3846:( 3820:( 3791:( 3728:( 3692:( 3674:( 3647:( 3625:( 3603:( 3566:( 3540:( 3511:( 3485:( 3459:( 3422:( 3383:( 3363:( 3326:( 3305:( 3271:( 3256:( 3237:( 3222:( 3203:( 3188:( 3173:( 3141:( 3119:( 3087:( 3029:( 3008:( 2981:( 2959:( 2848:( 2823:( 2794:( 2761:( 2722:( 2698:( 2678:( 2650:( 2625:( 2576:( 2556:( 2540:( 2424:( 2403:( 2340:( 2325:( 2310:( 2281:( 2248:( 2227:( 2190:( 2168:( 2150:( 2131:( 2101:( 2066:( 2039:( 2023:( 1987:( 1963:( 1942:( 1921:( 1896:( 1871:( 1855:( 1822:( 1801:( 1772:( 1742:( 1713:( 1690:( 1675:( 1645:( 1623:( 1591:( 1566:( 1545:( 1477:( 1458:( 1431:( 1415:( 1393:( 1377:( 1353:( 1332:( 1309:( 1295:) 1291:( 1270:( 1253:( 1236:( 1208:( 1178:( 1157:( 1132:( 1100:( 1061:( 1040:( 1011:( 990:( 965:( 948:( 914:( 885:( 861:( 832:( 798:( 775:( 753:( 727:( 689:( 650:( 625:( 604:( 575:( 550:( 524:( 508:( 479:( 459:( 432:( 406:( 377:( 353:( 337:( 320:( 304:( 278:( 249:( 229:( 201:( 180:( 164:( 125:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index