User talk:Mikenorton/Archive 5

5227:

always), the u p p e r hand always represents the direction, how the outcrop of strata moves on one side of the fault. Once away from the person, the hand down ( ~ to the North ...), once towards the person, the hand upwards (~ to the South...). The u p p e r hand represents always the u p p e r part of the fault (subsequently eroded of course) and in such way you have the result if it is a normal or reverse fault. (Not a scientific invention but it maybe helpful in time efforts during analysis.) I found it useful during sitting at a computer game for analysing faults (outcrops) of the Open University some years ago. Kind regards Andreas Schuetzler from Germany ( I am today reading "Structural geology" by M. King Hubbert, ofcourse that's a totally different "class".) <Schuetzler 62: -->

4871:

east is the Bowmore group (also probably part of the Grampian Group) in tectonic contact (the Loch Skerrols Thrust or shear zone) with other younger Dalradian rocks of the Appin and Argyll Groups (including the Islay Sub-Group that contains the Port Askaig Tillite - the regional marker in the Dalradian sequence). As far as I can make out there are no Cambrian or younger rocks on Islay (apart from some Paleocene intrusions). What I can't provide yet is a set a complete set of sources for all that - I'm still looking (and unfortunately I shall be turning in fairly soon). I'll try to spend some time on this tomorrow evening.

2894: 5627:

and I am watching your edits. The article was surprisingly bad for a geology article on Knowledge, but looking over other basin and structural articles, I see major issues in many articles. The volcanoes and national park FAs are usually so excellent, I was surprised by this article. Thanks for taking time to work on a major article that needs so much done to it. Also, you seem to have the background to be able to do the editing, although I may pick at some points, and I appreciate it when I see people with real knowledge taking time to improve Knowledge articles. -

2851: 1955: 1603: 31: 4475:

political bits to it, but most of that is restricted to the intro, but I have been hooked on the story since starting this and, as I mentioned last time, I think the tectonic setting sections really are the icing on the cake for these articles, especially the articles that have other diverse elements of the story included. I won't be posting it till at least Sunday the 23rd as I have a handful of story lines and sources that are yet untold or used.

4322: 4233: 4144: 3916: 3379: 3195: 3105: 3007: 2648: 2500: 2408: 2222: 1775: 1675: 1229: 1099: 934: 728: 597: 438: 342: 5448:, "By submitting to the IMA a priority date was established for the Unst material, however, two months after that date another submission was received for pure Ni(OH)z from Greece, by Th. Marcopoulos and M. Economou. In the vote the Unst material and name were narrowly defeated in favour of the Greek Ni(OH)2, which is now known as theophrastite.". I added something about this to the article, which has the full ref. 3733: 3466: 1634: 1016: 195: 99: 261:

understand the language (same reason I don't try to mess with images any more). I do not know what is meant by "toolbox". Do they mean the one on my browser? I don't think so. It says "after find redirects" I do not see anything anywhere that says that. I think I will stick with my java counter as the problem I had today was not the counter, but the time zone. Thanks for your help and understanding.--

3568: 5318:

bit odd about the second accommodation zone further to the back. I wonder if the overlap of the footwalls in this zone is confusing? I would see the footwall and the hanging wall, the two sides of the fault, changing roles in this accommodation zone, so you would not see both faces at the same time, if that makes any sense. This is being way too picky - I think the diagram is excellent.

1900:. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. - 1551:

records that confirmed that such ruptures could occur and might be particularly damaging. Part of my procrastination over the Fort Tejon article was me digging into the references on supershear. There's more sources out there now and I aim to expand it, and DYK it if there turns out to be sufficient material for a 5x expansion.

5151:, now assessed as GA, is worth of this effort. However, I am not sure what should be done with this article as I reached to the edge of my knowledge about geology. Maybe you good asiist with this article or may recommend somebody who may know more about the topic of oil shale geology? Thank you in advance. 5296:

At least, Mike, maybe the following pictures, I have recently loaded up, are helpful for visualizing the proportions at anticlines and synclines: Syncline cut off by a fault plane in normal direction.JPG Anticline cut off by a fault plane in normal direction.JPG Syncline cut off by a fault plane in

5263:

Hi, Mike, as I think you are the supervisor for geological topics here, I would like to inform you, that I have not further interest in publishing "Offset of outcrop pattern...". Mainly because it is a little bit to complicated at Knowledge ( 2 pictures did not opened also after renaming and I do not

5243:

Ah OK Andreas, you're referring to the apparent offset of dipping beds on a map as a result of dip-slip faulting - although this assumes that you know the slip direction of course. I will give this some thought as I couldn't work that out from the images. I realised that I failed to finish my comment

4114:

is that the term is now obsolete, because mountains can't be simply subdivided into 'fault' and 'fold' mountains, as both processes are generally involved and faulting is normally the most important. The highest part of the Himalayas is formed by a slab that is being extruded between the Main Central

4087:

dear mikenorton how can you forget to put the great himalayan range in your examples of the fold mountains page, as they are also fold mountains and has the world's highest peak mt. everest. also i would recommend to use animations and graphics for explaining the formation of fold mountains.this page

3879:

article, and was wondering if you could take a look at what I've done, what I've screwed up (hopefully not much!), and what I'm missing or have too much of. I've been thinking of adding perhaps a bit on more advanced mineral ID (e.g. optical mineralogy, XRF, electron or ion microprobes, spectroscopy,

3311:

That's OK, I don't want to produce too many maps like that, but the BGS online mapping website makes it feasible at least, although their colour schemes are terrible and they don't emphasise boundaries with a solid line - I guess that's deliberate. I was thinking about the article, because so much of

279:

Thanks, apparently I had done everything correctly, I just did not know where the toolbox was, duh! That does look pretty handy. Your article is already in prep. Mine has been on there for 5 days and no one has touched it. And I have done a couple dozen reviews while I have been waiting. Tomorrow

5533:

Intriguing. I don't spend a lot of time categorising but this seems worthy of a little more research. All the more surprising that no-one seems to have thought of doing so before in other geographical contexts - is Scotland especially fecund in this respect or are there now so many fossil finds that

5317:

This is a difficult thing to depict. The diagram gets all the main ideas across, and would be fine exactly as it to illustrate articles that refer to the subject, like the half-graben one. The front and back are extremely clear, as is the accommodation zone in the foreground. There is something a

4848:

along with some other extra bits and pieces. The problem is that the only text I have that gives any kind of overview is Haswell-Smith, who is not a geologist. If you could take two mins to look at the geology sub-section there and let me know if I am missing anything crucial I'd much appreciate it.

4762:

bookshop when I was going that way a few nights ago and done some comparisons. The user hasn't responded to anybody as far as I know, which makes it very difficult - it would be great if the BGS were to change there policy and allow all the there stuff to be public domain, but that seems unlikely to

4519:

Hi, sorry not to respond, I took a look and didn't think that there was much for me to add without some substantial digging, which I don't seem to have the energy for right now. However, I'm still editing a bit and there will be articles that just demand to be written in the future, so hopefully we

1998:

Hi there Mike. Wanted your input in this: see, I added the peak ground accelleration of the 2010 Pichilemu earthquake to its table. the strongest was in Curicó (according to the coordinates). however, is it possible that the earthquake could have reached 8.6 g ? I'm not sure, I may not be using well

1484:

I've expanded the article with a DYK in mind. It's at 5.7X right now and I have a proposed hook though I haven't posted the DYK nomination yet. Are you busy these days? The article is missing the technical aspect and a tectonic setting section could round it out nicely. This one's been in my sandbox

5642:

I work on rifts nearly every day of my professional life, but that brings with it several potential dangers; I may not give a balanced view of the topic, I may use way too much terminology (some of my contributions have been given 'too technical' tags) and I may not be clear enough, because I can't

5626:

Yes, I will help by checking out the article and illustrations. I have an upcoming show (my art work), so my schedule is frantic until after the opening in early December, but I will try to read as I find time. Please ask specific questions on the article talk page, also, as I have it watch listed,

5726:

Anyway, I think the deletion is correct: the Nihongo template is there for glossing Japanese expressions, including for example the standard Japanese name for this earthquake disaster. But the bit in question is in no sense a Japanese expression. (Logically, if this were correct, every word in the

5210:

Hi, as I commented at your talk page, I checked the originals on the German Knowledge, but didn't think that they were that helpful. Can you explain to me exactly what you were trying to show with those diagrams? The problem with the images was that you used the word 'datei' rather than 'file' and

5186:

Hi, Mike. I am a student of the Open University, UK, but from Germany. Some time ago I wrote the last part of "Verwerfung (Geologie)", "Aufschluß von Verwerfungen..." in Knowledge german. I am not sure, if this part is appropriate in English for "Faults (Geology)". I tried to edit it last evening,

5015:

article. The sedimentation diagram was one that I produced earlier for an internal wiki for a major oil company (although completely redrawn for this purpose, at least I new what it would look like) so I'll need to do some thinking here - give me a ping if nothing turns up within a couple of weeks

1531:

Lunchtime here & just checking in. Will probably do the DYK tomorrow after work. Haven't touched the article since last weekend, and not finished with the sources that I have. Any you know, that's true for the 1979 Imperial Valley article too. I've really liked working on that one, and there's

260:

I cannot tell you how sorry I am about that mistake. I am on a new computer, that might be my excuse. Anyway, I followed the directions you gave me for DYK check. But I am an old dog and this new trick is beyond me. I do not use any of the wikipedia tools. I have tried before and I just don't

4870:

The geology of Islay can be summarised as two blocks either side of the Loch Gruinart Fault- to the west the Paleoproterozoic Rhinns complex and its Neoproterozoic sedimentary cover the Colonsay Group (which may correlate with the Grampian Group, the lowermost part of the Dalradian), while to the

4504:

I posted the article & it should be easy to come up with a hook (There's so many angles to the story & I have a few in mind). If you're already on a break away from WP, no worries. There's always next time. With the pace I've been setting these last few months I'll probably be needing the

3350:

I don't have access to Ensom's book so I'll make no comment on that. Dorset is a classic area for structural geology, so I'll see what I can come up with - I'll work on a section in one of my sandboxes until it's about ready so that we don't get confused - I'll also see if I can come up with some

5280:

OK Andreas and thank you for trying to improve the visualisation of the effects of faulting - I will try to come up with some figures based on your idea - perhaps involving the offset of folds, so that the two dip directions can be demonstrated at once. The problems with your two remaining image

1550:

rupture propagation relating to the 1979 Imperial Valley earthquake. For nearly 20 years it was the only example of propagation at such high speeds and most seismologists didn't take it too seriously, but then from 1999 to 2002 there were three big strike-slip earthquakes with good instrumental

5226:

Hi Mike, in summary it is a simple trick to differentiate between a normal and a reverse fault only from the direction of dip and the outcrop pattern to the left and right of a fault. If you held your hands in the direction of dip of the strata ( younger strata crop out in the direction of dip

4474:

that I've been working on for a while and that is at 6x, although I really didn't know that I'd be able to expand it to meet the DYK requirements. The more I looked at the sources, the more I realized how many aspects of the story there are so I just kept writing. There's some relatively heavy

2118:

The earthquake while not having a great magnitude has produced extensive damage due to the sandy bottom. the area was not considered high seismicity and the earthquakes recorded only phenomenon of Ferrara in 1570! For this reason many people have found themselves unprepared and very shocked.

5333:

Not too picky, the problem is that I'm trying to illustrate these overlapping transfer zones - one looks like a horst, the other like a graben - they're pretty common in rifts. I can't think how to improve it, so I'll add it to the half-graben and rift articles - thanks for the feedback.

4064:

from the real thing. When I began this I didn't even know the word orogeny! You and VSmith kept me from making some massive (massif!) blunders and for that I'm grateful. It would be nice for someone to have a look at the sub-articles - most of them are unsourced. Thanks again!

5422:

OK and thanks. I realise that a problem with the cat is that quite often the location article fails to mention the issue and the geological article is a bit vague about the type locality itself. Categories don't need references as such but it would be good to get it right.

2737:

Mike, with your review's caveats in mind, I took a look at the article today with a view toward finally failing it, but upon further investigation I think perhaps it ought to be passed. Can you please take a look at what I wrote, and register any further thoughts? Thanks.

4984:

The second. I was thinking a simplified version of one of these diagrams would help show the idea of two half-grabens on opposite sides of a fault with an accommodation zone between them. I like the style of the diagram you added, but don't think I can reproduce it.

4735:

Do you have access to the BGS publication (Bedrock Geology UK North) that appears to be the source of this? I don't have a copy to verify it (have one oredered, but it may take a few days to arrive). Seems this is also a copyvio. The user seems reluctant to discuss.

5297:

reverse direction.JPG Anticline cut off by a fault plane in reverse direction.JPG But I think they are not appropriately for publishing and the shown effect of outcrop pattern changes maybe known for nearly everybody. Kind regards and bye. <Schuetzler 62: -->

2919:

How cool is that? Well-deserved bit of recognition. Well this might as well be as good as any to speak up with my own thank you. Still following your lead in the earthquake area. The introduction into the DYK area of WP this last winter was appreciated. There are

1188:

it was changed to Kucchcch which is not the term used today. Even the wiki articles use Rann of Kutch. Sure the old sources for the day may name it as such, but WP is not published 100 years ago. The contemporary and proper name is Kutch for the location where it

298:

will be nominated tomorrow I think). I've had to wait for nine or more days to have a nom reviewed on several occasions in the past, so don't get too concerned yet. I would review yours, but that would look a little too much like an arrangement :-).

3604:

Hey thanks Laura, I still find the number of articles that need writing or greatly expanding almost overwhelming and the DYK requirements are a good stimulus to produce at least a start class article, so I guess that I may produce a few more yet.

3507:

has been looked over and since the reviewer suggested a hook, ONLY THE HOOK needs to be looked over by another new reviewer. The rest of the article has been surely taken care of. If you have the time to just check it out, please do so. Thanks.

4119:) - the dominant mechanism of mountain formation here is faulting, any folding is secondary. You will struggle to find any geological descriptions of the Himalayas written in the last 30-40 years that describe this as a fold mountain belt. 1515:

Just finished a licensing round (UK offshore), so things easing off a bit right now. I'll take a look at the article tomorrow as it's late here and I've just returned from taking my daughter back up to Uni after the Easter break. Cheers,

4686: 1580:

Looks good, and there are many alternative hooks if that one doesn't get approval. I'll aim to take a thorough look at the article and see what I can add, in an attempt to justify your inclusion of my name in the nomination.

874:

That bit had to do with the fact that hydraulic fracturing can occur naturally, or it can be induced in order to achieve some goal like gas extraction. Induced would be a better word that accelerated. I'm not messin' with it

4826:, a task that I've been putting off for months. It occurs to me that a geological map of Islay would be more than useful - I'll see if I get the time to do that (it will allow me to put off the Dalradian for another while). 2374:

Hi Mike, I appreciate that evolution is not your thing, but I noticed you made a contribution to the Darwin page so I thought you might be interested in the latest development in evolutionary thought from Eugene McCarthy

3620: 3351:

cross-sections, Underhill and Paterson have a few that I could modify and I have one that I did for a client nearly 14 years ago along the seismic line down Portland Bill (B92-40 - you can see it on the UKOGL website

5042:

Thanks. If you check the latest version you will see my crude attempt to show the difference between graben and half-graben. I don't like it at all. I just don't have the skills to make diagrams that look good.

3295:

has been working on a complete rewrite of the article, which is nearly ready for pasting up and is radically different to the page as exists now. And thanks again for the map - you've been fantastically helpful!

3738: 4822:, because I hate leaving redlinks behind - I really should come up with a plan rather than just wandering off in new directions all the time, but that's unlikely to happen. This all of course leads back to the 3648:

Hi Mike, I was just about to leave a message to let you know I had replaced the Geology of Dorset article and ask you whether you wanted to add your structure section...But I see you've already done it. :)--

3626: 5126:

Hi JJ, I've been keeping an eye on that without commenting as yet. I'm on a short break at the moment with only intermittent computer access - but if I get the chance I'll try to contribute my thoughts.

5515:

Once you start adding in the fossil type localities, you'll probably end up including most of Scotland in the category - there's the fish fossils and arthropods of the Old Red Sandstone, Rhynie for

3838:

Hi, thanks for your comments. I've rewritten/reworked trying to keep it somewhat simple but I'm not sure about how successful I've been. I have this book as well which is also very technical:

3663:

It came up on my watch list - it means that I can clear another sandbox. I still need to produce a cross-section, because It think that it would help people to understand. I haven't forgotten.

4947:

I have been struggling to first understand the concepts, and then to put them into clear language with introducing hopeless inaccuracies. I think I am failing on both counts. You might find

5473:(be they type localities, sections or areas) are included in the information from the BGS lexicon of rock units, so I now know that the Eday Group has the island of Eday as its 'type area' 5374:- there doesn't appear to be a generic category. It is a bit of an oddity and I may take some advice about the category name before adding new names, but I thought you might be interested. 4006: 3335:

that I have misunderstood or misinterpreted parts of Ensom's book. Any corrections or alterations you wish to make to the article in my sandbox, I'm sure will be an improvement. Regards--

4548:

The land under St Merryn is a shallow clay and shale 'dish' which accounts for the high water table despite the elevated position of St Merryn village, hence the success of local farming

3638: 3856:

I think that for a summary what I have now is better and might do in the main article - although it still needs a bit of tweaking. Feedback is welcome. I'm taking a break for a while.

1896: 1532:

more detail that can be added; I keep finding new sources. I did think that maybe the content is getting too detailed, but the really detailed stuff only amounts to a few paragraphs.

1179: 1137: 1029: 5748: 5244:

about getting your pictures to appear on the english wikipedia, so I've added that to my reply above. King Hubbert was a remarkable geologist - I still go back to him to understand

1058:

it is not my area of expertise and your edits really helped. If you would be kind enough to keep it on your watch list (to watch for vandalism etc), I will remove it from mine. --

1894:

article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so,

2442: 1915:

Mikenorton, as RockMagnetist invited Ceranthor too, as WikiProject Earthquakes is a daughter of Wikiproject Geology, as you are a member of WikiProject Geology, as you edited

1439: 3954: 3479: 2730: 1717: 380: 208: 1435: 4466:

Hey, hope you're doing fine. I can tell you it's been a busy and exiting year for me here in Portland. I'm stopping by to see if you're interested in doing a DYK on the

4099: 5166:

Hi Beagel, I'm not very knowledgeable about oil shale, although if you have specific geological problems with any FA review, let me know and I'll try to help. Cheers,

2872: 1009: 894:

Hi, I've added some historical earthquakes from the Spanish Knowledge page to the list. If you find them not suitable to be included, please feel free to delete them.

5232: 5200: 5192: 4885:

OK and thanks. I feared that H-Smith was either a little on the glib side and/or that understandings have changed in the recent past. There is more I could use from

4408: 3504: 2189: 2167: 1198: 2747: 5269: 4360: 3143: 2792: 2682: 2542: 2136: 972: 635: 2603: 675:

FYI, if you pay attention to the hits that DYKs get, you'll need to check two pages: I've moved it to the standard title of "AD 17", so you'll need to check both

552: 5771: 5658: 5568: 1387:

I've not c ehcked talk, but I can guess what the complaint will be. As a compromise, want to put the stuff onto the Texas article instead of the frackin one?? ~

909:

I personally think that it's fine to include redlinks in lists like this - it just gives us all something to aim at. The list is looking much more complete now.

3880:

and so on), and maybe more on mineral environments and associations; however, in a general article like this, perhaps the advanced stuff would go better in to

3778: 2051: 2004: 1813: 1647: 1546:

I'm working on the tectonic setting section 'as we speak (?type)' (did that sound a little guilty?). I also found (that should be rediscovered) a reference on

1042: 4818:

was a mention of the Rhinns complex and that caused me to look for sources and then I realised there was plenty to make an article and now I'm working on the

2599: 1979:

I have already removed the template warning and explained to the User what happened, on his Talk page. Thank you for taking the trouble. I appreciate it. --

548: 4784:, I was wondering if I might need your assistance as the matter is apparently "complex" according to Haswell-Smith. Then I noticed the magical appearance of 4456: 3591: 3417: 2260: 1421: 816: 530: 4966:

Were you referring specifically to more diagrams on sedimentation or perhaps more general conceptual diagrams on rift segmentation and accommodation zones?

5819: 5706: 5616: 3459: 2940: 2731: 2585: 188: 3826: 3493: 2311:

about the prototype fault table. I would like to try some variations, preferably there to better compare the results. Would you be agreeable to that? ~

221: 4489:

Yes fine thanks, just going through a phase of not doing so much at WP. I'll take a look at your draft over the weekend and see what I can come up with.

1469: 864: 582: 3321: 2992: 2633: 1660: 1376: 1352:

article - not only clarification of terms, but an extra reference and info too (how much did you have to search to find that, I wonder?). Thanks again!

1174: 4128: 1316: 774: 4529: 4498: 4426: 3991: 3595: 2932: 1590: 1560: 1525: 5765: 5257: 5220: 4074: 4051: 2206: 2047: 2000: 294:

Well thanks to you for doing the reviews of my last two nominations. I still need to do one for the Orcadian Basin nom, but keep getting distracted (

5290: 4668: 4644: 4614: 4590: 2910: 3587: 3558: 3484: 1415: 1089: 482: 112: 5550: 5528: 5510: 5485: 5464: 5439: 5417: 5136: 4926: 4905: 4880: 4865: 4835: 4728: 4422: 3180: 2831: 2809: 2786: 2335: 2055: 2041: 2023: 5367: 3614: 2485: 1972: 1942: 1928: 1620: 308: 5789: 5343: 5082: 5052: 5025: 4994: 4975: 3796: 3773: 3548: 1850: 326: 289: 243: 143: 5469:

Well at least it keeps the geoscientists off the streets. I have now realised that all stratigraphic units formally recognised by the BGS with

5355: 4841: 4103: 3454: 2777:

I've replied there - there's still a lot to add on the damage and the aftermath - the area had no building regulations, but that soon changed.

2297: 2112: 1760: 1627: 712: 423: 5175: 4772: 4745: 4307: 4218: 3714: 3700: 3686: 3672: 3534: 3363: 2580: 1335: 1213: 160: 125: 5652: 5306: 5236: 5204: 3237: 2898: 1961: 1954: 1574: 1540: 1509: 1320: 1312: 918: 5785: 5273: 5264:

see any changes in the article). Furthermore I do not know any opinion regarding the issue. It s enough. Kind regards <Schuetzler 62: -->

3792: 3517: 1308: 5741: 5628: 4403: 2725: 2398: 1367:

It didn't take that long - the time consuming bit is working out whether you've got a fair representation of views on something like this.

692: 5494:, which I would not necessarily call an RS but its an interesting pointer. It could eventually become a larger cat than I was expecting. 1396: 1004: 183: 3906: 3274: 3053: 2364: 2350: 2320: 1988: 1909: 1665: 1302: 332: 5396:

I took a look at the articles that you had added to the topic, which is why I ended up adding something to the geology section of the

3539:

It means 'Assume Good Faith', in this case that the hook is supported by the cited source (ref#1), because I don't have access to it.

3305: 2962: 2393: 834: 5799: 5686: 5596: 5327: 4814:

Not so magical, the only thing that was in the Bedrock Geology UK etc. Archaean and Proterozoic article (now defunct) and not in the

4436: 3806: 2972: 2613: 1968: 1449: 844: 562: 5120: 3747: 3090: 2176: 525: 92: 4754:

Sorry, my copy of that map is a genuine antique (from the 60s I think) and hopelessly out of date. I should have dropped into the

4575: 4116: 2958: 830: 3884:, and environments and associations might be veering too much into describing geology as opposed to discussing minerals. Thanks, 3498: 903: 5747:

OK, but the Japanese name of the earthquake appears to be 東北地方太平洋沖地震 (as in the ja wiki article) and the appropriate MOS page (

4312: 4223: 4134: 3657: 3629:

needs approval after proposing over 7 alternatives for the hook. Please check it out when you have a chance. Thanks in advance.

3230:

in central Sweden, has been the site for two attempts at commercial exploitation of natural gas and oil based on the theory of

3095: 2638: 2490: 1083: 924: 587: 5792:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 5679:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 5676: 5589:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 5586: 5390: 4429:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 4033: 3799:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2965:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2606:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1442:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 837:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 811: 555:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 5795: 5682: 5592: 4808: 4705: 4432: 4379: