User talk:LittleBenW

1329:. I have also explained there (in my post) why I think the rammed-through decision to use foreign names in article titles in English Knowledge looks very dumb to me. I agree that French is not Japanese—and Spanish and Vietnamese are also not French. I think that the best way to handle international naming issues is to defer to the regional MoS, and to reach out to involve local people in decision making, rather than arbitrarily imposing naming rules on all languages without involving people with local knowledge. I would leave decisions on minor issues, e.g. whether to link foreign and English-version names at the head of articles (like the tennis articles)—to the people involved in creating and maintaining them. But no "absolutely required" or "absolutely forbidden" universally, please—I don't see why everything has to be hammered down to the same level. I don't see any problem in handling the naming of sports figures, who are known by nicknames, differently from the way presidents, or historical figures (from an era with different style "rules") are handled. I would not want policy decisions to be imposed on and interfere with creation of useful new content—so I'd really have wished that you had involved others (working on tennis articles) in the diacritics-in-titles issue rather than upsetting them by ramming it through and then presenting it as a fait accompli. The objective of Knowledge is not to upset as many other editors and users as possible by sneaking through or forcing through one's own viewpoint and disregarding other people's opinions. Regardless of a person's knowledge, if that person cannot create (or 7950:

box that displays search results and ads (corresponding to AdWords for Search) and/or (2) to display one or more preset-sized boxes containing advertising links, graphic ads or video ads. (corresponding to AdWords for the Display Network). In the case of search (1), the advertiser specifies which search keywords trigger which advertisements (exact match, phrase match, or fuzzy "broad match" conditions must also be specified, as well as how much the advertiser is willing to pay in an auction against other advertisers). If the advertiser is advertising security-related services on the page that is the target of an ad click, then the most frequent names that appear in combination with such security services in the news media etc. that Google indexes are likely to trigger the ads. Google can also take into account the viewer's browsing history and show the viewer what it "thinks" the viewer really wants to see—particularly if the viewer is logged in to Google. So the "biases" that the viewer is likely to see reflect the names and context of e.g. crimes in the media (and reported in the hosting web site), as well as (possibly) the previous search history of the viewer. I understand that the way AdWords for Search works is exactly the same for a Google Search (on the Google web site) as for a

1495:

Manuel Sanchez, and it gets between 4 and 8 daily pageviews, I wouldn't see any point in erasing their pride in their contribution by edit warring about style trivia, by trying to impose my POV on style, or by spending weeks and months discussing the wording of related style rules, because so few people look at such articles that it makes no difference to Knowledge's perceived quality. I wouldn't delete stub pages about subjects that I know little about, or without waiting a sufficient time for their creators or other interested people to improve them, either. This sort of behavior is very destructive to motivation and morale. There are more productive ways to spend time—like creating or improving more searched-for articles—that do make a real difference to Knowledge. I don't feel any need to show off my knowledge of Japanese by insisting that articles on Japan have Japanese in the article title, either. Many or most of the editors on Japan-related topics have quite limited Japanese reading ability, and anyone with the ability to read Japanese, French, Vietnamese, Spanish or whatever, is going to prefer native-language sources to English Knowledge.

8612:, the issue of your completely stripping out the majority English version of names has not been settled: MOS says NPOV, present both foreign and English versions fairly (at least once)—this is not "Warring against the d-word"—but you seem to be repeatedly asserting that your small RfC among tennis users entitles you to ignore MOS NPOV and accessibility and completely strip out majority English version of names right across the whole of WP (including articles about Vietnam and Japan). The reason given for first blocking me then shutting down the RfC was that "the issue" (of NPOV) "had already been decided" (by your RfC) in favor of stripping out every single instance of what you seem to regard as "feelthy English". But you admit in your above-linked post to SMC that this is not the case. The reason given for shutting down the RfC was totally bogus. And you continue trying to extrapolate your tennis RfC (which surely cannot override MOS requirements) and export your 5697:) is surely not "encyclopedic". Virtually all major entertainment stars who are successful do not use their real names. "Pope John Paul" is not the real name. I don't think there is anything evil about this—or about making difficult technical concepts and difficult-to-read words understandable and memorable to as many people as possible. Surely that is the purpose of an encyclopedia and the purpose of books in general—if they are not read (because they are too much hassle or too difficult to read) then they are irrelevant. If ivory-tower linguists tell you otherwise—if they tell you that "being encyclopedic" means showing off their superior linguistic skills, and rubbing it in that everybody else is just plain ignorant—then tell them that "this is an encyclopedia that is intended to be accessible to virtually everybody, the primary intention is not to satisfy the big egos of linguists or grammar specialists". Knowledge is not a 7214:

House, then Australian sites come out on top: Google "knows" that Australian sites are the most reliable for Australia. Thus there is no excuse for not doing real-world research in reliable and neutral sources; I believe that this is preferable to warring, and preferable to doing "original research" to find one or two minor and dated sources that support one's POV—out of zillions than don't—and claiming that only those that support one's own utopian viewpoint are reliable. Or trying to decide things based on who can canvass and bring the biggest mob to an RfC—　rather than based on up-to-date, verifiable, and objective real-world facts. These template results are repeatable, whereas individuals who are logged in to Google and doing the same searches independently can get different results based on their browsing history (Google shows them what it thinks they are looking for).

5385:

think that Big Hag (it was a registered trademark) is the same as Big Hug. I'd like to see Knowledge editors show that they are doing adequate research as to real-world usage (but I'm glad that some Japanese companies aren't, because it is so funny). I can understand now why people would want to write their name as Shin'ichi, even tho' the government doesn't appear to permit this in passports. The majority version of a person's name, and significant alternative versions, surely should be noted as such. Shin'ichi vs. Shinichi doesn't have to be an either-or decision applied across all Japanese articles in Knowledge. Styles change: Korea and Vietnam officially stopped using kanji, for example. Real-world change doesn't require everything to be fixed right away, Knowledge is maintained by volunteers.

8311:

problem with it. Then we are told that this has nothing to do with an ANI (that most certainly seems like a reasonable question based on the nature of the ANI) and then we are told by Boing! said Zebedee that they blocked indefinitely when it appears King of Hearts actually was the one doing the blocking. This case couldn't be more confusing and convaluted if we wanted it too. Certainly the ANI set the stage for this and I find it extremely unlikley that Arbcom will do anything with it. If the user was already under a topic ban they already view the editor as a Wikiconvict so its unlikely to say the least that they are going to overturn an action. Based on this it is somewhat disengenuous to refer the editor to Arbcom knowing that its a complete waste of time and won't have any result.

722:

for editors who have been around for five years, repeated reverting — by people who admit that they don't understand the content but are reverting solely because there was no edit summary or discussion that they could understand — is very disconcerting. A Dilbert-office environment where you have to devote a large part of your time to watching your back is not a welcoming or productive environment. Vindictive, obstructive people who keep hit lists and who brag that their opinion will never be changed — that they can argue the legs off a table — are surely not an asset to Knowledge, regardless of their English grammar skills. The survival of Knowledge surely depends on maintaining a welcoming and civil environment, free from hit squads.

1987:

open source analytics. But they (and the tech. people in WMF) are surely not empowered to do anything without WMF support and direction. The outward reason for such research can be "usability testing". Likewise arguments about naming—Burma or Myanmar, for example—can be solved easily, fairly, and neutrally by numbers: which of these choices do users show that they prefer? Any search-engine search for these terms that lands on Knowledge carries the term that was used to search for it. Analytics makes it so easy to know what the users want (did somebody use the word "sweet" about analytics?) Just a few high-traffic articles can provide statistically-valid data. Costly, large-scale testing is not necessary.

1796: 2020:

the system (adding diacritics to Swedish and Czech articles even though he admits that people in those countries generally do not use diacritics in English) on his talk page, and bragged that he is going to do the same to Vietnamese, whether it is justified or not. He also says that the guidelines should be changed to fit his fait accompli. People who argue that the guidelines should either be followed or changed democratically by an RfC get threatened and intimidated by cronies. At least three or four really capable and dedicated people have been bullied out. It only takes a little drop of poison in the well...

6632:

disruptive activity as clearly explained in the SPI case about him. This last round of sockpuppetry and harassment is the last straw. I therefore would like to propose an indefinite community ban on JoshuSasori. Support as nominator. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 20:59, 2 March 2013 (UTC)" , as far as I can see you were the person to initiate accusations against the User Lord Sjones23 mentioned as harassed, which means you should at least have checked the Talk page of the person who you were making accusations against. You still haven't done so even now. But whatever, someone should so I will.

1480:

undeleted in late Jan./early Feb. such that it peaked up to 1800 page views a day in June and (with no new content) 1650 in July. Not bad for an article that had been deleted a few months previously as "not notable". To put that into perspective: it got 35,762 pageviews in 201206, and 34,011 in 201207, compared with 38,186 pageviews in 201206, and 35,595 in 201207 for WP:MoS (which ranked #3,120 on Knowledge). Readers seem to like the writing and the (brief but relevant) content and links so much that there haven't been any edit wars. Other people seem to be protecting the article from spam links.

5085:

different opinions eliminated—particularly in spaces like Japan-related or Vietnam-related coverage: there are too few local people working in these spaces, so every person counts. Personal attacks should not be tolerated, we should not attack people—we should discuss ideas and attack silly ideas with facts, but not attack people: everybody was a beginner once, nobody is perfect all the time. Forgive and forget JoshuSasori having a bad day. Everybody has bad days. Don't carry grudges. Be prepared to walk away from an argument and come back with fresh eyes and ears.

5643:

diplomatic and state policy statements) is maybe "a simplified subset, close to accepted English usage". Tokyo Metropolitan Gov't seems to be tightening up on variations that it will accept/approve on passports. General Knowledge practice is for the article title to be majority English and the lede to carry significant alternative versions. But there are POV pushers who try to sneak around the rules or wear out other people with bulk moves of unrelated articles without giving any fair and objective justification for the moves.

8909: 7852: 2591: 1648: 1123: 1015: 343: 6512:, "comment on content, not on the contributor. Personal attacks do not help make a point; they only hurt the Knowledge community and deter users from helping to create a good encyclopedia. Derogatory comments about other contributors may be removed by any editor. Repeated or egregious personal attacks may lead to blocks." If you continue to communicate in this vein, you may be made subject to additional sanctions, including under arbitral authority if related to the manual of style (see 2690:

either/or proposition that is tough to fight. Content however is totally different and consensus is not simply who wins 75% to 25% in a poll... it tries to take into account all sides (even the 25%) and make a compromise that all can live with. hense the reason I have tried to compromise as opposed to the alternative of censoring wikipedia by allowing the banning of all English spellings even if the English sourcing is overwhelming. Heck I'm have trouble just trying to maintain it at

3998: 3433: 1981:

test interval (say one month)—the cookie is given a life of one month in this case. The cookie is also to make sure that the people who get version A the first time they visit also get version A if they come back. Ditto for version B. Anonymous cookies (with a short life of say one week or one month) are also used for (random) opt-in questionnaires, because you don't want the same user to be repeatedly shown the opt-in questionnaire after saying no the first time.

8533:. That is it. There has been no "off-wiki canvassing and mob organizing that is acknowledged here" - I sent no email to Alan as you can clearly see from the time stamp, in fact I have never sent a single email to anyone all the time I have been on wikipedia (a statement which a sysop can confirm to be true). I trust that you will now go round all the places you have spread this accusation, which is easily shown to be false by Talk page history and make use of 7973:(making sure to specify that by "Online Ad Delivery" it's talking about AdWords for Search, not Display), but if you insist on putting it in AdSense (because maybe? the writer of the paper doesn't understand that AdSense is irrelevant, it's really AdWords for Search) then it should clearly specify AdSense for Search (and maybe link to the Google Custom Search Engine article to explain what this is—maybe the AdSense article doesn't explain this clearly). 5427:'s name appeared in roman letters on any officially published documents before he died, and to determine whether or not the stylistic representation of his name may or may not have represented his personal preference. I'd much rather just write the darn article. And I'd rather not have some guy who dug up an English-language newspaper article that appeared before he died, and claim that this was his personal preference and so the page should be moved. 8822: 6704: 700:

start a conversation first. At least they gave a explanation (inadequate perhaps) for their deletion. Perhaps you can also understand that complaining to a general audience about specific poor treatment does little to improve cooperation and communication. I suggest you start a calm and polite conversation wherever the edits were made and see if you can come to an agreement about the issue. You also might review guidance on the

3648:, the following ban is enacted: You are "indefinitely prohibited from making any edits concerning diacritics, or participating in any discussions about the same, anywhere on the English Knowledge. This includes converting any diacritical mark to its basic glyph on any article or other page, broadly construed, and any edit that adds an unaccented variation of a name or other word as an alternate form to one with diacritics." -- 8383: 8364: 4624:, so I assume that this post on my talk page is just to insult, harass, and intimidate me. It seems to me that your main purpose in being on Knowledge is to bully people, to trash—in a wild rage—what they write, rather than to engage in polite and rational discussion. I believe that Knowledge contents should be based on NPOV, which means adequately researching real-world usage rather than deciding issues based on who can 5278:

advice about something (even if you already know the answer). I heard a story about Ben Franklin: as a politician, he found that one person strongly opposed everything that he proposed. Ben found that this person was obsessive about history, and owned a priceless history book. Ben mentioned this, and asked to borrow it—and returned it later with lots of praise. From that time on, the person was Ben's strongest supporter.

2899:, I think, but it's one of many related multilingual templates. Many or most of these are so poorly documented that you need to know that how-to-use-them is only described in the related Manual of Style (regional). Because few editors on Knowledge have heard about accessibility and multilingual templates, or Manual of Style (regional), linking to these is perhaps the only way that people will become aware of them. HTH. 7558:

who wrote the vague ruling that anything can be justified as automation (is the 4 ~'s used in the signature automation or does he have to type out my signature each time? Is he allowed to use the special characters selection in the edit tool? Etc.) Is it simply enough that he be accused or does it require some kindn of reasonable proof, the recent evidence seems to indicate a simple alegation is enough.

5035:

finally end the ambiguity. I am more bothered by style issues in cases where the MOS is obviously broken (the poorly worded "Pseudonyms" section that seems to be saying the opposite of what it means, the shrine point where it goes against common sense and reliable sources, etc.) but both you and Ryulong seem to be unwilling to help me address these concerns as long as the macron issue is still live.

7275: 7249: 660: 631: 5859: 5713: 5557: 5484: 7066:, nobody would think to look in the Windows NT article for multilingual information that applies only to Windows XP and later (and—except for IMEs—doesn't apply to Windows NT). In general, few Knowledge users will be looking for information about obsolete, no-longer-used operating systems like Windows NT (and most people would expect that an article titled Windows NT is about Windows NT, and 5024:

have started hounding you, and making personal threats against you. JoshuSasori spent has spent the last two months following me around and reverting a huge chunk of my edits (good, bad and ugly) solely because I am the one who made them. Even if you think content is more important (and I would usually agree with you there), you must agree that it is impossible to work with people like that.

4181:, but nonetheless seems to practice himself. If I've understood things correctly, he has put together a toolbox to facilitate locating reliable sources on the internet, which in all fairness might be useful, even if the motivation behind the effort probably is, or was, to prove that diacriticless spellings are more common than diacriticized spellings of names of people that spell their names 53: 5592: 5519: 6112:-- are you saying that if a Wikipedian creates 100 good articles and intimidates/harasses other users and removes 100 articles' worth of content in the process of reverting those users' edits, that Wikipedian is better than the user who creates 99 good articles and does so in a peaceful, respectful manner? I really don't understand why you continue to defend JoshuSasori's harassing me... 5866: 5756: 5237:(in the first of my many peace offerings to him): I have been a fan of Japanese cinema since I was sixteen. I made numerous edits related to Japanese cinema and many other areas between 2005 and 2008, before going into effective Wiki-retirement until last August. Between August and December, I mostly edited articles relating to classical Japanese poetry (my main interest), but then 1334:

EXCEPTIONS", and all the productive contributors and editors get fed up and quit Knowledge... As I have said repeatedly, maintaining Knowledge as a respected and trustworthy resource depends more on verifiability (ability to research the optimum title and category, and get facts right) than on minor points of style (en-dash vs. hyphen, capitalization of emperors and presidents) and

5639:

proof that proposed moves are justified. Some politicians take a "facts are irrelevant, I have a bigger army of voters" view, but unless decisions are seen as fair, inclusive of all viewpoints, and objective—based on independently-verifiable facts—then they create only bitterness and burnout. The politicians may win such battles, but Knowledge loses good people because of them.

3952:;-). China, Korea, and Vietnam seem to be a similar story. Because of a few people who insist on imposing their POV globally and bullying out local experts (as mentioned above), I think that Knowledge is likely to lose most if not all locally-based English speakers with local language proficiency and local knowledge in Asia. There have been several attempts to bully out 5635:: look at "What links here" and you'll see that the article is virtually an orphan. If you search for Yūkichi Takeda you'll find many articles that mention him. Unless you link from those articles to yours then few people will find your article. People will only expand your articles if they can find them, and orphans are liable to be abruptly deleted. 6057:

himself to constructive editing, that's fine, but he would only be able to get away with that by never admitting to be the same person. Therefore, we don't really need to worry about proper attribution anymore, and the pages are not going to be any good to us rotting in the userspace of an indeffed user. How about moving what you like to your space?

1956:, which is something the Foundation is (rightly) skittish about touching too closely. You could make a case, but you'd also have to come up with a way of collecting results and defining relative "success" - the reader is likely to read the page we serve up to them regardless of what the title is, after all! I really recommend you talk to the 4526:

that is the section you were agreeing with), or "it is not to be trumped by some arcane MOS guidance", or simply "I also agree - (see discussions...". Just a suggestion. A lot of WP editors have gotten into be bad habit of referring to the other editors instead of discussing the content, but it is not what I would call best practices.

5097:

and don't let yourself be manipulated by any of them. Enjoy Knowledge, and let other people enjoy Knowledge too. Because if it's not a friendly, fun place to be, then few good people will stay. Picture me in my Kansai famous-brand men's pyjamas (the brand name is Big Hag—sounds the same as Big Hug, right?) and laugh a bit.

1600:

title policy, it's wrong to think of such reverts as getting "whacked" or "even blocked". You've been around WP long enough that by now you should have some idea how it works. So why are you trying to turn everything into a battleground? You keep on complaining about how you were unable to get your search how-to into

1692:

2011-July 2012 the only ones left with Vietnamese titles are very small village geo-stubs and a few minor bios, around 400 minor articles, plus 500 didn't have Vietnamese titles anyway. From 80% to about 15%. These numbers are approximate but being reasonably familiar with the them, they are are near enough correct.

8766:

should ignore as best as possible... don't egg them on. I find the survivors at wikipedia have skin as thick as an elephant and do well in ignoring the bullying or harassment if/when it happens. It's what keeps me sane around here when it happens to me. I'm guessing you aren't built that way, but good luck to you.

6073:

Schreiber—are arguably more notable, so it could be considered unfair to publish a Schilling article without doing a Schreiber article first, and I don't have a lot of free time. I haven't heard of the other Japanese article subjects, but maybe those articles should be advertised to see if somebody will adopt them.

3884:, so past questions and answers just drop into a black hole and are unlikely to be found again. All that effort was wasted. Such a shambles would be funny if it were not for the pain of wasted effort. (People who ask a question and then come back to read the answer are also not going to be able to find it). ;-) 8468:

I suggest you think long and hard about what you have recently written on my page and delete all comment the can not be substantiated or are direct attacks on other editors. Your comments such as "Obviously it was just to keep me blocked and prevent me from defending myself at ANI." is out of line as

7981:

It's certainly true that a disproportionate number of non-white young people are from poor families and are reported (from news reports and court cases) as being involved in crime. The report writer suggests that maybe Google could warp its results in the name of social justice. But maybe affirmative

7917:

You said that "Any racial bias in Ads surely reflects the bias of people who pay to place & target them at certain search keywords". However, Sweeney's study used 2,184 different personal names. It strikes me as unlikely that the organizations who paid to place the keywords specifically entered

7905:

articles. I really appreciate that you left comments explaining why you undid my revisions, and I do agree that the Web Search Engine article might not have been the best place for citing Dr. Sweeney's research, but I do think that it is important to include this research in the AdSense article. As

7820:

discussion above concluded that using Encyclopedias like Britannica, magazines like the Economist, newspapers like the New York Times, broadcast sites like the BBC is not POV pushing. If you think that these are not reliable sources, and should always be disregarded, then you should argue this at the

7213:

The advantage of using templates is that the work involved in researching is trivial, simply paste in the term and you can search up to 32 major sites simultaneously—and Google ranks these sites by their perceived reliability for the search term. So if you use Google RS to search for the Sydney Opera

5799:

Of course both versions should appear in the article (as they do), but I think that Knowledge guidelines say that (ideally) articles should be at the version that is most widely recognizable in reliable English sources. I have mentioned elsewhere the connection between Asahi and IHT and the NYT; it's

5384:

I like Ryulong's view that arguing too long about relatively minor stylistic issues creates bitterness and gets in the way of doing useful work. Maybe there are Japanese who prefer to write their name with macrons, though macrons are not permitted in passports—just as there are Japanese companies who

5277:

with other people, don't obsess too much about differences in individual style. Make positive comments about things that you both like, interests that you both share, things he did that you liked, rather than focus on the negative. One of the best ways of making friends is to ask a small favor or ask

5122:

Well if you don't like seeing Japan-based users plot to eliminate other Japan-based users, then you should have immediately opposed JoshuSasori's reverting every one of my edits. He continues to do this now through his sockpuppets, and it is quite disruptive. I have made enough Japan-related edits in

4730:

I am sorry, but I have found that if one gives in to bullies, they just escalate their bullying. Threats and continuously attempting to intimidate and block people are nothing to do with "conversation" or "compromise"—and to keep knowledgeable editors, Knowledge has to be based on rational discussion

2548:

and on the talk pages of each of the other articles. When it is first subst'd it places a list of the articles to be moved on the talk page. I am guessing that was done twice, creating a duplicate list. I found the multi-move template confusing myself at first, but it seems to work okay. Note, though

1980:

effect on the bounce rate. For A/B testing and for bounce rate testing you normally have to set an anonymous cookie—because that seems to be the only practicable way of measuring whether visitors immediately quit the page, or how long they stay on the page, and whether they come back again within the

1968:

is more about usability and presentation than content: whether to make the user feel stupid by presenting something that he or she can't read. Content (inside the book or article) is a completely different issue, because both diacritic and non-diacritic versions can be presented, and the reader has a

1467:

Precisely because they are not written—or edited—just by one person, the rules need to be as simple as possible. For example: a sports person might not be considered "significant" until he or she becomes active enough for them to "acquire" a (usually non-accented) two-word shortened name or nickname:

991:

I haven't quite got my head around your search engines edit yet as its not an area I'm familiar with - but the same Talk first then edit will work wonders. And Jolazzo is giving reasonable advice above, to make what I'm sure will be useful contributions more welcome. Feel free to leave links to where

8847:

on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit

8520:

LittleBenW, you have been unblocked only a few hours and you are immediately on the attack again. Despite the fact that I did not even comment on your latest ANI outing you see fit to accuse me of "off-wiki canvassing and mob organizing that is acknowledged here" - when all I did was (i) notice your

7949:

article explains that AdSense is several quite different products—corresponding to (1) Pay-Per-Click (PPC) AdWords for Search or (2) (e.g.) Cost-Per-thousand-impressions (CPM) AdWords for the Display Network. AdSense is simply a way of using a web site that you own or control to display (1) a search

7266:

PS: I wouldn't for a moment suggest that all those mass moves were wrong, as obsessives who believe that they will go to heaven if they strip enough "feelthy English" names out of Knowledge would not be pleased to hear that. Personally, I am not interested in "fixing" stuff by moving everything back

6982:

For your information after an RfC is closed those who participated in the RfC are allowed to talk to the User who proposed the RfC - particularly if the result of the RfC was overwhelming as in this case. This is why we have RfCs, in order to verify consensus and guide future edits. You may not like

6733:

6215:

No, I agree that he's angry at being banned, and striking out blindly at those he thinks responsible. But it appears that what originally started all this and made him angry was another user moving—without discussion—articles that he had created, without contributing in any way to the articles. Like

5680:

I believe that passport data is almost universally embedded in IC chips nowdays—probably soon it will not be necessary to type in names from passports, if it is still necessary now. Airline tickets too are all electronic, using bar codes. Of course, for international accessibility, the international

5241:

caused me to have to branch out a bit. Japanese cinema seemed like the obvious choice for me. As soon as I did so JoshuSasori started reverting/undermining me on every single article I came to. He would need to have been quite insane not to realize that even if his assumption of my being a hound had

5063:

Finally, I must stress a second time that I am presenting you this peace offering because I genuinely believe you are a good editor, and I think we can work together in harmony if we can get over these few really petty issues. If you have anything to add to the above terms, respond either here or on

5023:

If he was really interested in building an encyclopedia collaboratively, the above would have probably gone differently. You must also understand that, had it been you and not me that disagreed with JoshuSasori over the (ultimately insignificant) problem of diacritics, or over something else, he may

4231:

You didn't check the link I provided very thouroughly. The link leads to an edit of yours to Fyunck's talkpage, where you're inserting the word "canvassing" in a link to an edit of mine (now archived) to IIO's talkpage. Had you used a diff instead if a wikilink (like I did above), it would have been

2971:

In that case, I'd suggest you make a list of all of the Accessibility sections in regional MOS pages - as you seem to know the ones that exist - then put the list of links (directly to those sections) into WP:ACCESS in the section we are looking at. I'm sure that would be much more useful than links

2795:

As a librarian, I do indeed value research and analysis. However, before we can have productive use of any research, we need to have an intelligent and collaborative environment to discuss it in, and the way that the diacritics dispute is being constantly escalated every time it is brought up causes

2689:

While I agree that we should have article names placed at the common English version if sources so state, I think wiki in general is in favor of names at placed at whatever spelling their home country uses. That doesn't make it right, but since we can only have one name for an article it makes it an

2019:

The problem is that there is absolutely no good faith being shown on his part. He has surreptitiously added diacritics to the titles of European articles without exception—despite knowing that this is against Knowledge policy—and he has even jeeringly bragged about being able to get away with gaming

1986:

Diacritics/foreign languages in titles is not a trivial issue, because there are many thousands of articles with foreign-language titles on English-language Knowledge. Only WPF can show whether doing this is user-friendly or not. The research community on meta surely already know about public domain

1479:

The most recent article that I've put a lot of work into was deleted by a drive-by deletionist (with obviously no subject knowledge) for a reason like "it's a stub article, and the topic is not important". (Somebody else created the stub, and it was deleted). I've expanded it greatly since having it

1333:

destroys) a friendly, inclusive atmosphere where everybody feels that they can contribute, then that person is a huge liability to a diverse community like Knowledge, and Knowledge would benefit from his removal. If he insists on winning every time on hyphens versus en-dashes, or capitalization, "NO

983:

I had a look at the 28 June links from Knowledge:Manual_of_Style#Foreign_terms to Regional MOS guides, and saw where self-evident edits were reverted by User:Noetica for lack of edit summaries. Noetica is a good chap and I can understand his reverting for lack of edit summaries - remember WP:MOS is

8499:

I do not know the user's identity and so cannot have "outed" him. I can accept that an Admin. would in good faith give Konjakupoet the benefit of the doubt, and block me for "possible outing", but I don't think that Konjakupoet's making such bogus claims to prevent me from participating at ANI (and

7958:

AdSense is irrelevant, it's the AdWords advertiser who decides which search terms trigger the advertisements, and which words appear on the advertiser's ad target page. It's this combination, as well as Google's "knowledge" of which names tend to go more frequently with which terms in the media, or

7913:

I fail to see how an arXiv article by a Harvard Computer Science professor is not a "reliable reference". This is pretty typical for academic articles in Computer Science, and is loads better than most of the citations currently in the AdSense article, many of which are primary sources from Google

7796:

there doesn't seem to be a reason to add that link where you have added it. As for the giggle giggle conversation above, that also seems to be another violation of your topic ban. As indeed are 19 March 2013 (UTC) edits above. I suppose giggles on Talk page are one thing. But please leave guideline

7557:

Greetings, I just wanted to let you know that I didn't mean to disuade you from the submission. I just think that a different venue like AN or ANI is better. Not that many people watch the AE page so the majority of the people who would vote there would be the ones who want to block him or the ones

6080:

The measure of a good manager's success is not the number of people he (or she) fails, but rather the number of people he (or she) can help succeed. A team of good people with complementary skills and a cooperative attitude can often create things that a single genius could never do on his (or her)

5999:

What I'm doing, Ben, what I'm doing. I edit Knowledge in the gaps between those memories, though. I'm trying to synch it up so I can learn about the topics I'm editing and grow as a person along with growing Knowledge. By the way, you're free to write talk page comments as you like, but I prefer to

5267:

Try to put yourself in his shoes: it is feasible that he is also a film fan, and he may have been annoyed that you didn't understand that macrons are no longer officially endorsed as "OK" in English versions of Japanese names (as per the passport and "do adequate research" discussions); macrons are

4710:

You are not being "accused" of doing anything, per say; nor is it my goal or that of anyone else to harass you or launch an offensive against you. Your name is indeed mentioned several times during the course of the discussion, usually in connection to those of Apteva, Wikid77, and Enric Naval, as

4639:

but contain very little useful information. The reason why very few knowledgeable geeks, who can write well, persist in trying to improve important technical articles is probably that a single encounter with somebody like you persuades them that they are wasting their time—trying to contribute in a

4408:

So why do you canvass? And why do you think that telling Fyunck that, "Threats and attempting to intimidate you are nothing to do with "conversation" or "compromise". Knowledge should have zero tolerance for bullying"—or warning him about your canvassing—are canvassing on my part? What do you think

2726:

Ben, I'm not sure why you tried to tell me about "developments" in this discussion (which I have never participated in or heard of), but on looking at your remarks, I think I need to reiterate my note from last time we conversed: this combative approach, calling those you disagree with "zombies" or

2027:

A British friend visited India, and came back really shocked. "You pay a bribe to get a job". A traffic cop gets his bribe money back by stopping people at random and extorting money—"if you want to avoid a ticket, you will have to buy some (very expensive) bananas at that street vendor"... "How do

1680:

You are a new arrival to this subject, so you may not realise that en.wp has 4 million articles, of, which, in discussion I've seen it estimated that at least 10%, 400,000 articles, relate to non-English European Latin-alphabet subjects. Of these 400,000 all carry European accents in title and text

740:

I find this a bit indirect and obtuse, I think you're attempting to say something specific is happening but instead presenting it as a general problem. Are you describing your own or someone else's experience, something you've heard about, seen happen or experienced first hand? As I understand it,

290:

There was a Japanese Knowledge 10th Anniversary get-together in Kyoto!? Damn. Wish I'd known. Organizing a similar event in Tokyo would be a great idea, and I'd consider making the trek up there to attend it. I'll be in Tokyo on the 11th of February if you care to discuss things in person. Shoot me

8411:

The Arbitration Committee has reviewed the circumstances leading to your indefinite block and has concluded that no outing occurred: the block, while made in good faith, was not warranted. For that reason, I have just lifted it. Please note that ArbCom has not examined the allegations of topic ban

8290:

I should have made it clear that I was referring to my extension to indefinite, and that was based partly on private information that I hold and you do not (and which is not about canvassing). I mean no disrespect towards your personal experience, but Knowledge's rules (and my own ethics regarding

8017:

PPS: You've probably guessed that I think the research is just "proving" the obvious: if you compared the contents of search results for "non-white" names with those for "white" then you'd almost certainly find the same disproportionate number of crime-related reports. Google is just reporting the

7965:

The writer of the report doesn't seem to understand any of the above (that Google "bias" just reflects the "bias" of the news media—if you can call it bias—in associating names with events and crimes, the "bias" of the contents of the web site containing the Custom Search Engine, and the "bias" of

7092:

Like you, I don't like the numbered-section format (of the Multilingual Windows section), but changing it to eliminate the numbers would surely make it much longer and much more confusing (but of course I'd welcome suggestions as to how it could be improved); I've tried to summarize the subject as

7086:

The reason for being CJK centric is that I'm thinking of English Knowledge readership: the number of readers of English Knowledge who are in the US or UK and want to (1) use an IME to write in their own language on English Windows, (2) display Office menus in their own language on English Windows,

6794:

and saw (1) you appear to have followed me there 9 March 2013 (2) you left 3 links 2 of which seem to be about the exact area from which you are topic banned. I suggest you contact BlackKite or Jayron32 or whoever is implementing your topic ban and clarify with them whether it is in breach or not.

6343:

JoshuSasori got blocked partly because he was afraid to provide any diffs, knowing as he did that the evidence was all on my side. Therefore, you must have gone through the history to find those articles. Why not try looking at the evidence I presented that he was following me? What about the fact

5638:

And of course I agree that, in an ideal world, people who aren't involved in creating articles should not be pushing around people who aren't (there was a recent implosion at the main MOS stemming from this). You have the right to demand that other editors provide adequate independently-verifiable

5096:

There are a few vindictive and manipulative POV-pushing politicians on Knowledge who leave a long trail of misery and destruction. They organize mobs, try to win every battle and show that they can push around or trip up long-time contributors, to prove their own superiority. Don't be one of them,

5084:

All that really annoys me is (1) seeing people trying to make big changes that will create a lot of unnecessary work—and/or are likely to result in a lot of edit warring in future—without adequately researching their proposals, and (2) seeing some editors vindictively plotting to have editors with

5014:

You are entitled to agree with JoshuSasori's opinion about diacritics, and you are entitled to be disappointed about his getting indef-blocked. However, it would be a mistake for you to believe that his getting blocked was "my fault". He got blocked because, after enduring a month-long campaign on

4525:

it is essential to focus on content, not on the participants. Basically I have no clue what is being talked about if I have to look at everything that editor said and try to figure out which part of what they said is what you were agreeing with. How about instead "we should reflect RS's in WP" (if

3805:

English and foreign language versions of words and names), user-friendliness, and accessibility. As I mentioned on Jimbo's page, I don't believe that cronyism and intimidation should be used to block dialog and sensible adherence to guidelines on Knowledge. I honestly don't believe that people who

3255:

editor's page to say that is probably not helpful. LittleBenW's edits have been brought to the community's attention; the community will act however the community thinks best; let's leave it at that. We need less drama, not more. If either of you want to shout at somebody, feel free to shout at me

2050:

I am sorry, but I am going to step away from this discussion now. If you would like to carry out research on this, then by all means do go and talk to the research group about it - I don't have the ability to make this happen, though if conducted well I'd be interested to see the results. However,

1691:

be treated as we treat Czech and Turkish bio/geo articles. 13 months ago these were 100% with Vietnamese in body text, and 80% with Vietnamese titles (i.e. 2,000 with, 500 without) - and had broadly been that way since the fonts were enabled in 2006. Now following 1,600 undiscussed moves from July

721:

Thanks for the BRD link. Most new editors don't know about watchlists. When a new editor finds that somebody has been following them around and reverting all their work without saying a word, he or she will — in many cases — conclude that any attempt to contribute to Knowledge is wasted time. Even

8428:

Many thanks. The continuing vicious attacks on users who ask that WP rules on properly researching (in reliable sources) and neutrally reporting (NPOV) BLP names and place names indicate that this is an issue that cannot be solved by the community. Organized lynchings at ANI are not the answer, I

7391:

I believe that I left off VGP News because it does not seem to be possible to search only the English-language articles. The same seems true for Nguoi Viet. Journal of Vietnamese Studies does not appear to be free. The results of aggregator Baomoi.com appear to include only Vietnam Net, which is

6107:

before I even asked an administrator about it. I never "pushed" any "good editors" out -- JoshuSasori and his sock(s) harassed me, threatened me, called me names for over a month, all in a ridiculous attempt to push me out of Japanese cinema articles and eventually Knowledge in general. Knowledge

5317:

I tried to focus on shared interests. But no matter how much evidence (the dozens of edits before JoshuSasori registered, etc.) I presented him with he still refused to admit that my interest in Japanese cinema was genuine, and he continued to revert me constantly. As a matter of fact most of the

5272:

to show foreigners how to pronounce Japanese names. This may be the "minor stylistic issue" that really upset him: he may have thought that you were an ignorant POV pusher. Don't take it personally, you can now see it from other people's viewpoint. Don't pigeonhole people, even if they seem to be

2791:

Ben, you seem to be trying to drag me into the latest incarnation of a long-running dispute by selectively presenting information about how everyone who disagrees with you is "destructive" (or far worse epithets). However, when I follow these links all I see is you ceaselessly jumping into fights

2058:

inappropriate to take what is fundamentally an on-wiki content dispute about writing style and explicitly compare those you disagree with to Hitler! I am sure you have good intentions, but this sort of combative and malicious approach is guaranteed to act as, as you say, the "poison in the well";

1494:

PS: I'm an engineer, so I'm pragmatic. If a page gets 1,000 or more daily page views, then it should look good and be accurate and trustworthy, or Knowledge's perceived quality might be affected. However, if a group of enthusiasts create a tennis stub page about a relatively-unknown player called

8765:

Just noticed what was going on here. It's tough to go up against city hall. Remember that some (surely most) of these editors are well meaning and really trying to help you. You should listen and let them. A very few I wouldn't trust they were telling the truth under any circumstances. Those you

8310:

So let me see if I got this right. The user was blocked for canvassing (which I don't agree with frankly and after looking at it seems to be a very weak case). Then the user "hints" at outing, the edits are deleted and then the user is blocked indefinitely and told to Email Arbcom if they have a

7171:

templates? What about these particular sources makes them reliable to the exclusion of others? The choices seem arbitrary. I want to assume good faith here, but based on the examples, especially the Vietnamese ones, they seem rather POV. I'm inclined to list them at TfD, but I thought I'd try to

6324:

moves that were made without discussion, and you surely were aware from discussions on his page and his discussions on the WikiProject talk page that such moves would be controversial. Polite interference with somebody else's work hurts just as much as insults. Blaming and punishing other people

5030:

To the best of my knowledge, JoshuSasori has never edited a single article related to Shinto shrines, and never expressed any opinion as to whether the romanized forms of 天満宮 and 東照宮 (and 八幡宮) should be hyphenated or not, so to see his name invoked in that discussion was at best confusing and at

3366:

Are you claiming that these guidelines do not exist or are irrelevant? Are there are RfCs and guidelines that say that English-language usage is irrelevant, and that English titles are not permitted on English Knowledge? Are you claiming that you are justified in insulting and intimidating other

2921:

will certainly help rectify that gap in MOS:ACCESS, and I can see now why you wanted to point readers to Manual of Style (regional). I would think though, that the link to regional MOS would be best made from the Category:Multilingual support templates page itself, rather than on every page that

2140:

You are welcome to make contributions to Europe/LatAm-related article space - history, BLPs, geography whatever - rather than ranting against en.wp's article space contributor community, but when you do, you'll come across 1000s of editors who won't want you to e.g. remove accents Latin-alphabet

1599:

that "People who arbitrarily decide naming conventions without following MoS guidelines are likely to get their edits reverted, and be whacked or even blocked by the MoS thought police." While its true that such edits may be reverted, by people who want to help improve conformance to MOS and/or

699:

Lack of an edit summary can be a good reason for reverting an edit. As you say, "the spirit of Knowledge is to cooperate and communicate with other editors" and I hope you can see how someone might view an unexplained edit as uncooperative and uncommunicative and delete it rather than attempt to

7221:

about excluding foreign names from Knowledge. There are local-language and English versions of most Government travel sites, for example, (the English version is usually a translation of the local language version), so if it's shown in English then the local language version will also be there.

5951:

anonymous stalkers who JoshuSasori/Mysterious Island still claims are separate people. And it wasn't a nice thing about the anonymous editor either: it was pointing out that while the editor blatantly violated 3RR, the information he/she was posting was sourced. I still don't think it's sourced

5034:

Additionally, I have now expressed my distaste for arguing over macron-usage numerous times. I'm not really concerned with style issues so much, and have said on WP:J that I would be happy to accept a "no-macrons" amendment to the MOS if other members of the project would accept it and it would

4345:

I don't see what any of that has to do with your canvassing. I also don't see how begging the question of "NPOV is better way ..." has to do with anything, or with the dispute of diacritics. Obviously any editor would agree with that. And nobody was trying to "lynch" Fyunck, if that is what you

3944:, in the process obscuring the actual template contents and where the template docs. are transcluded from. I haven't had time to sort this out with him, and now will not bother. After we discussed the lack of explanation and examples in the template docs., he has made some marginal improvements. 2989:

Change of subject, hope you don't mind me asking, but I noticed on your talk page that you use a screen reader. Do you have problems with pages that use foreign languages—such as words with diacritics or Asian characters—that are not properly marked up with language templates? There seems to be

7954:

search on somebody's web site (the only difference being that in the latter case the web site operator gets a cut of the Ad. revenue—and also, if the Custom Search Engine is searching Reuters, then the names that trigger ads are likely to be the names reported in similar contexts on Reuters).

6056:

You want all of them? JoshuSasori apparently has no interest in coming back, as he has been blocked for a month now, and without appealing his block once he created a sock account that then went on a cursing-spree and got itself blocked too. If he creates anoth sock account and actually limits

5019:

for him to be blocked. I merely wanted him to be told off and encouraged to stop his campaign of harassment and personal attacks. One other admin commented that he should be indeffed for making a real-world threat, I made a final peace offering, he made another personal attack, and then he got

4089:

Hi, thanks for your comments. The best place to discuss changes to a page in Knowledge is on the talk page attached to that page, so that other users who are watching the page will be notified and can give their opinion. Also if you want to stake a claim that Reactive Web Design is the same as

2709:

Quote:I think wiki in general is in favor of names at placed at whatever spelling their home country uses. Reply: I think that most people avoid warring with diacritics zombies, because they (most reasonable people) have better things to do with their lives. But if you concede a little to some

2023:

There will always be politicians like Hitler who want to own all the marbles and make all the final decisions (or let cronies make them) without any regard for whether the decisions are sensible or best for the majority. There will always be cronies who dip their fingers in the cookie jar too.

1425:

example that I cited illustrates both the problem and the solution. You cannot use the real name in the article title, because almost nobody would recognize it, much less remember it, and the article would probably not be found in a Google search. Although it makes sense to avoid accents where

7100:

article is rather boring, I think it would be useful to add links to the Security and Emulation sections of the Windows article—I have just done this, and added info. about other interesting/useful features to this otherwise bland and boring article ;-). HTH (Hope This Helps), =Best Regards,

5642:

One distinction that may not have come across: "Does the Japanese government support a modified Hepburn?" My take on this is: probably the Mombusho does for the JLPT and the like, but the answer for passports, names or people and places in official documents (like passports, for example, also

5010:

I think we may have got off on the wrong foot, and I apologize for not nipping our little disagreement in the bud. Unlike JoshuSasori, you seem like a reasonable, good faith editor, and so I have no intention of getting involved in an extended dispute with you over minor stylistic variations.

2031:

For WMF to do the ostrich act and say, "we only collect the money and take all the credit—we don't accept any responsibility" is surely not a workable long-term strategy. To be perceived as fair, well-informed, transparent, honest, neutral—and accountable—is surely pretty much a necessity for

6631:

Hmm - the main victim of the sock's continued harassment was mentioned in passing - "his block for disruptive editing and harassment of Hijiri88 (talk · contribs) (formerly the user Elvenscout742) back in February 2013. He has used numerous IPs and four confirmed sockpuppets to continue this

6072:

I only mentioned Mark Schilling because I'm familiar with his work, and I hate to see such article creation work wasted, just as I hate to see potentially good editors pushed out. But—as I say on the WikiProject—I'm now regretting having volunteered: other writers in the same space—like Mark

5959:

Yunshui has already said I can be met down the middle on whether the bizarre fringe theory that the word "jigai" refers to Japanese female suicide culture can be discussed on English Knowledge. The kind words a couple of other users had for MI on his talk page are just those users practicing

5950:

Maybe. I'm not going anywhere for the time being, though. And when I do go it won't be because I was harassing people, swearing or making personal attacks/threats. You're also wrong in assuming Yunshui said anything nice about Mysterious Island on my talk page. That was with reference to the

5100:

I'm not here to pick fights with anyone, and I'm glad to let other people take the initiative in the many fields that I'm far from an expert in—like film, popular music, anime and everything else (I'm the shy geek hiding away in the corner with the computer—or occasionally hiking or enjoying

8581:—and properly sourcing BLP names and place names—and to recommend that people follow Knowledge guidelines on accessibility and NPOV in ensuring that both English majority usage and foreign versions of names appear at least once in articles. It is extremely bad faith to repeatedly attempt to 1255:

I'm sorry, but I don't think Knowledge is a good place for starting pointless political wars, crusades about creeds or (honorary / job title or article) capitalization. Wars turn friendly, fertile and productive countryside into barren wastelands. I think that Knowledge should be more about

1976:. By measuring the percentage of people who "bounce"—take one look at the title and immediately leave the page—and by A/B testing with and without complex diacritics in the title, it should be very easy to show in a very short time that the title (like the title and cover of a book) has a 4749:

I understand your situation. However, I want to reiterate that no one (to the best of my knowledge) is out to bully or intimidate you. I am only suggesting that it would be beneficial to all of us if we take a step aside from the MoS disputes, as they have spiraled out of control quite

8275:

the block was for "canvassing" and I daresay I can very well know as much as you about LBW's edits and CANVASS applicability. So what sort of sekrit stuff do you know which makes my 30+ years of experience, most of which were in charge of up to 200 sysops at a time, invalid? Cheers.

6488:

Hi, this is in reply to your query on my talk page. You ask how to appeal a topic ban. However, it's not clear from your message who issued the ban, and in what forum. Consequently, I can't give specific advice. Generally, any ban can be appealed to whoever placed it, as well as to

4995:

Hello, I'm not sure how your answer relates to my comment. I've no idea what's trivial or not to fix, but I'm pretty sure the WMF won't do it anyway. However, it's their job to provide the data in a way that can be more easily be used to make such tools (and working ones!). Regards,

7141:

of them I believe suggest that removal to institutional care is to be considered as "forced adoption". Forced adoption refers only to the removal of babies from parents (often in a hospital or other care setting) and placement with other parents on a permanent, legal basis. Thanks,

1415:

We surely CAN'T assume that people who edit articles about France, Mexico/Spain, Vietnam, Japan or China are necessarily fluent in the language and conversant with the customs. If this—or the use of diacritics—is a requirement, then that greatly shrinks an already-too-small pool of

6897:

I'm still getting a "This user is currently blocked" notice when I edit my talk page. When I attempt to edit I get a notice that my IP is blocked, but that I should still be able to edit if logged in, but that is not the case. But that (IP) block is due to expire in half an hour.

4791:

I don't think that I am involved in any MOS disputes. MOS is so long, rambling, and poorly organized (fragmented and splattered all over the WP namespace) that it is surely of very little use to the majority of Knowledge editors (if they can even find it), as evidenced by the

262:

Sorry LittleBenW but that was a long time ago and I can't remember my reason for removing the link. Looking at the site again I can't see any obvious problem (has the site changed since then?)... It has more advertising than most good external links but looks permissible per

1430:), it's probably unavoidable to use the accent in this case—because maybe the name looks stupid, even unrecognizable, without it. So people are forced to research the COMMONNAME, and use COMMONSENSE ;-) How dreadful that there isn't one rule that can be forced on everyone ;-) 7191:

on the web, e.g. Encyclopedias like Britannica, magazines like the Economist, newspapers like the New York Times, broadcast sites like the BBC. If you're aware of any better sites then they can easily be added (Google permits 32 max. to be searched). The Vietnamese template

7088:

So I'm hoping that CJK users (e.g. students who are potential WP contributors) studying in the US, UK, Australia etc. will learn how to convert English Windows to speak their language, and this will allow them to contribute to WP in both English and their own language while

2318:

As mentioned above, it is a good idea to use an RfC or the like to discuss proposed moves that people might disagree with, and also a good idea to request the help of an admin. when making moves if you are not sure of the procedure. There's currently a bit of discussion at

1300:

Hi. I was welcoming to you when you appeared and supported some of your suggestions re search engines, so I am somewhat surprised with you going into a forum and saying "caught" when there have been a whole series of RMs on French names, on whether or not we should follow

671:, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the 5050:

you refrain from presenting a revisionist history regarding JoshuSasori's activities just because he agreed with you on macron-usage; :#you refrain from bringing up content issues in response to me expressing my concerns over sockpuppetry/harassment on other users' talk

6344:

that half the articles he edited in December-January were articles he followed me to? And also, it might be a good idea to stop implying that I don't make worthwhile edits to articles when about 3/7 of your edits were in the article namespace, compared to 4/6 of mine.

3359:

WP:EN: "The title of an article should generally use the version of the name of the subject which is most common in the English language, as you would find it in reliable sources (for example other encyclopedias and reference works, scholarly journals and major news

8193:, I will not state it openly. Because of that, I have upped the block to indef. That might seem excessive, but there are things that need to be stopped for personal reasons - I haven't decided how best to pursue it but will probably pass the details to ArbCom. -- 1384:

using diacritics in English Knowledge article titles. This is why I think that knowledge of Internet research techniques should be a critical part of making verifiable, neutral POV, commonsense decisions—about which article title is most appropriate, for example.

2141:

names, and you'll understand why we don't give Mexican people ASCII or Japanese romaji names. In the meantime while you (a) don't contribute to the relevant Europe/LatAm article space and (b) make disturbance against it on MOS Talk pages etc, you're heading into

1604:, but you never responded the least bit sensibly to the suggestions that were made explaining why it wasn't OK where you put it. Grow up; please; and stop wikihounding my efforts to improve WP. Also please stop cross-posting the same rants to three talk pages ( 7081:

As the "Multilingual Windows" information applies to Windows XP, Vista, and Windows 7, I think that it would be useful to link to it from those articles rather than repeating it three times in the three articles. Maybe I'll do that now, before I forget (getting

4804:. The self-appointed "preservers of the MOS" seem to be there just to prove their superiority, and they ensure that it is virtually always a waste of time trying to improve it in any way. Anyway, thanks for your contributions and a happy New Year back to you. 4363:

Surely the above timestamps establish who started the canvassing, and who was warning Fyunck. Quoting my post: "Threats and attempting to intimidate you are nothing to do with "conversation" or "compromise". Knowledge should have zero tolerance for bullying."

3785:" is very good; it should be promoted to essay status rather than left hidden away in an archive. People are not aware of language tags and are not using them—but they are poorly-documented, and I have been systematically improving the template documentation. 741:

you haven't been editing Knowledge for long. If you've made enemies already, I suggest you consider your own approach to the project as well as that of others. That said, harassment as you describe is unacceptable whether you mis-stepped or not and there are

7336:

seems to focus more on tabloid-fodder stuff—and it has excerpts from a Chinese English-language newspaper whose content is not independently verifiable, and possibly not NPOV, on its top page. Newsweek too focuses more on photo-worthy stuff than on writing.

2477:

Appreciate all the work you did to justify the name change. I think it's probably better to be flexible and get one of the first two fixed than for neither of them to be fixed. The (XXXX support) suggestions are only there because RA said back in June (at a

1468:

such a COMMONNAME or nickname is necessary because sports writers can't repeat long formal names many times in news articles and broadcasts. If they become really famous, like Pelé, they will often get a one-word nickname, and people will search on that. (

8662:

Please apologize for calling me a troll, for ordering a perfectly civil (before SMcC came along and repeatedly trashed it) RfC on NPOV to be shut down and hatted off, and for so stridently opposing proper NPOV sourcing of names. You are continuing to be

207:, I downloaded two images, the company logo and the corporate slogan, from the official site and converted them to SVG with Inkscape. Can we upload them to Wikimedia Commons? I'm worried about copyright issues because both of them are TEL's trademarks. 1204:) that they have a long-standing interest in. And if you care about such things, you might consider making comments relative to existing policy or guidelines, or data in evidence, instead of just pure opinions that are out of step with consensus. 6076:

The "respect for others" thing—that should be part of the Knowledge ethic—comes from showing people that you believe they have potential, and that you are willing to help them achieve it, even if they may need education about personal attacks or

7087:

and (3) display Windows menus and messages in their own language (switch English Windows to another language version of Windows) is far far greater for CJK than for Indian, African, or Middle East languages/dialects, for example.<unquote: -->

2944:

Another reason for linking directly from MOS/Accessibility to MOS:Regional was that some people who are not interested in learning about templates will still learn accessibility information (that applies to several Asian character sets) such as

431:

Reformat the lead sections of the regional (country, state) outlines (the leads in the non-country outlines have already been reformatted). Country outline lead paragraphs need to be trimmed or condensed down to a single paragraph of one or two

8640:

However in answer to your question, because a few years back I was asked to set up an email so someone could send a pdf to me. The rest of the tirade above, if anyone is watching they can easily check diffs before and after. I choose to ignore

988:- the header on talk page says so, I wish the page itself also said so. But Noetica is a good chap who quite probably would agree with that edit once you tee it up on the talk page and then do it slowly. As I said it looks like one I'd support. 595:

button. By using this to check our work before saving the page, we can save a lot of space on the Wikimedia database servers, and other editors a lot of bother trying to keep track of the page history. Please try to get into the habit of using

5205:

while making general edits (believe me, they're mostly just minor stylistic changes) under his new main account. When IPs were insufficient for the purposes of harassing me, he used his main account, and this is how I found out what he was up

8152:

I was contacting the same people who protested the lack of due process in my topic ban, and who are mentioned in the links that I provided. I have prepared an Arbcom submission re. the topic ban, and would like to be unblocked to submit it.

6921: 5661:

The problem with Japanese government guidelines for passports etc is that they are designed to be easy to produce (diacritics are a no-no) and replicate by people without having to figure out how to add macrons. They were not designed to be

2132:

Look, LittleBen, the WP:RM process isn't anyone's "private army" any more than the article space contributors who created/expanded 1000s of foreign BLPs for the London 2012 Olympics are "fanatical and compulsive" - they're merely following

2000:, you will find people a lot more willing to take the question seriously if you don't keep treating it as a matter of to "diacritics pushers" and "mob rule"... this is, first and foremost, a content dispute, and the first rule there is to 8601: 3818: 3871:

I wrote a couple of detailed articles about interlanguage linking and language templates on Teahouse, but it appears that an inexperienced editor pasted one of them over the other, wiping out one of them: there are now two instances of

271:

point 4. If I made a bad call then I apologise, and I don't object to you re-introducing the link. You might consider removing some of the dated links, being sure to state why in the edit summary and not marking the edit as minor.

7825:

Talk Page. Likewise, if you think that Knowledge's "Verifiability in Reliable Sources" criteria is irrelevant—and should be replaced by, "Truth depends on how many people you can bring to an RfC", then this could be discussed at the

6983:

the result of the RfC, but the effect was to reduce, very markedly, edit-warring. You need to compare edits to tennis BLPs the month before the RfC with edits to tennis BLPs the month after the RfC to see the good that the RfC did.

6126:

I can't comment on that, because I haven't read up on the history, and don't have time. My comments apply to everyone, I'm not talking about you specifically. Hopefully others are reading this, and will learn something from it. ;-)

3782: 3753: 2233:

The inconsistency doesn't annoy me enough for me to feel compelled to spend a lot of time fixing it myself, and the others involved in the discussion also seem to feel the same way (which is probably why the discussion ground to a

923:

seems to be essentially, "Why should lack of an edit summary waste your time? The existence of an edit summary doesn't guarantee that the edit is correct, appropriate, or not malicious. The only way to evaluate an edit is to read

445:

When the quality rises, repeat visits and word-of-mouth communication about the outlines will increase. Speaking of quality, the main enhancement lacking in most of the outlines is annotations. For outlines with annotations, see

6646:

Oh okay I see there is actually a non-linked mention from Lord Sjones23 there. Nevertheless your accusation against Elvenscout needs linking, we can't have people making accusations against Users on ANI and not letting them know.

6539: 2461:

Quote: "I didn't realize that you meant to move on this yourself". It looked like too much work to fix all the problems, and I didn't want to do it all myself. Then when you moved a couple of articles it encouraged me to fix the

918:

and others is that "lack of an edit summary wastes my precious time, which is far more valuable than that of any mere Knowledge contributor. Why should I treat contributors kindly? They deserve to be reverted". The position of

5334:

from the opening sentence and accused me of claiming the explanation was an "official English title"; conversely, he reverted my attempt to remove the open claim that similar translations were "official English titles" from

4574:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. In particular, I have suggested that you be included in the topic bad that will most likely be applied to Apteva, because you exhibit precisely the same

1305:

or not, do you want the links to the French RMs? French is not Japanese, and François Hollande is not 野田佳彦. Can I ask, who told you "caught", did you get that in an email from someone or is that your own personal wording?

8740:? POV-pushing vengence on another experienced and dedicated NPOV editor who was forced off WP by insults and POV-pushing? It was fortunate for Kauffner (from the Vietnam space) that Br'er Rabbit was caught out when you 1713:

You have been asked before to cease making personal attacks. I understand your very strong sentiment against foreign names, but this is not a license to make personal attacks on other editors who do not share your views.

8741: 3953: 3511:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. The admin who blocked you warned you to stay away from editwarring about diacritics, but you have done nothing but that since your block expired. —

7070:

about "the Windows NT family"): the Windows NT "family" includes everything from Windows 2000 onwards, but even Windows 2000 is obsolete and no longer supported—I believe that support for Windows XP is scheduled to end

5229:

bored) you would likely see JoshuSasori constantly accusing me of "hounding" him. This is not the case. He apparently believed I had no genuine interest in Japanese cinema, and was only editing these articles to troll

2353:

the discussion you're talking about? Very strange. (Have you really heard the term used outside of Knowledge?) Nevertheless, the procedure seems straightforward, so I'll give it a go. Thanks for your help, LittleBenW.

7206:. The European template includes major Government sites for most of the major countries in Europe (but Google limits searches to a maximum of 32 sites simultaneously, and I couldn't find official Government political 3756:(along with the link at the top of that thread). In short, these issues aren't a high priority for me, and certainly don't represent a "big barrier to using Knowledge with a screen reader". Also, you've had plenty of 2230:; if enough people agree, and what needs to be done is stated clearly, then an administrator will do it (or can be asked to do it). However, a non-admin closed it with "no consensus" after discussion ground to a halt. 1433:

I'd really like to get some stats on the "cost" of redirects, as I'm sure that such stats would prove that redirects of much-searched common terms are very costly. Knowledge seems to have been on its knees many times

5688:

above you'll see that I'm pragmatic. The language that the Japanese government uses in important official documents is history—it's worthy of being in an encyclopedia. The language that the Japanese government uses

4387:

2) Citation needed. Who has been threatening whom? This line of argumentation is only too typical for editors who refuse to accept consensus. Instead they portray themselves as victims of "bullying", "threats" and

2762: 2549:

that the page with the discussion normally needs to be listed first (current1). When I tried otherwise I got a warning. I swapped current1 and current2 to keep the bot from adding a link notice in the wrong place.

4072:. I added this alternative name as it is how I've seen responsive web design referred to on a number of other websites, as well as within my office. Please could you explain why you thought my edit was vandalism? 7438:

Something else I should mention is that Vietnam is of course a Communist state. This means that the government news site is not in fact the most authoritative official source, as you might assume. That would be

5980:

What I meant was: live your life in such a way that when you're gone (when you die) you will leave behind many good memories about your kindness, helpfulness, and thoughtfulness—about fun times and shared joys.

3829:) that should be used to eliminate this endless intimidation and move warring. It's sad that the only place where a civil discussion about such issues can be held, without intimidation by POV-pushing Admins, is 2875:

and ((tl|see also2}} templates are only for related links, it is redundant to use the word 'related' in the pipe. In fact, the pipe is a bad idea as it disguises the fact that the link is taking the reader to a

8980:

A super-majority is not a consensus, and a visit to a Quaker meeting discussing a contentious issue is recommended to to understand the distinction---drink coffee beforehand, and visit a masseuse afterwards....

3947:

Apart from a few people in projects like the Japanese train system, the number of people who can read Japanese and are involved in Project Japan seems very small (maybe there are many more users who can speak

3122: 7590:

I would but I have pissed off so many people if I said stop signs are red someone would argue they are orange and only appear red because I am colorblind. It would be better if someone other than me does it.

5200: 1575:

Apart from that - your personal attacks on other Users have to stop. I, and the others you've been attacking, have been pretty generous up to now, but if it continues people will start keeping a log of them.

5015:

his part to undo every single edit I make, I finally took him to ANI upon him starting to call me names, make real-world professional threats, and refer to my talk page posts as "troll droppings". I did not

2761:. The whole objective of my pointing you to the discussion was to show how facts gleaned by using basic Internet research skills can help shut down utterly stupid, destructive, and long-running wars—just as 8432:

As you can see from the cautions on his talk page: since returning to Knowledge, Konjakupoet has continued the same pattern of repeated vicious attacks on other users that he showed under his previous user

8256:

This has got nothing to do with Kumi (or, in fact, the atual ANI complaint itself), and I am in possession of information that you are not. So, meaning no disrespect, you are not in a position to judge. --

3963:

virtually from zilch at the end of January, and it now gets over 60,000 pageviews—twice as many as WP:MOS. While there are a few dedicated and IT-savvy contributors, more and more people seem to be getting

941:

She is not going to listen. She is going to continue to punish anyone who doesn't leave an edit summary. And she is going to continue to keep a hit list of such people that she is going to get even with.

7979:

it may be that the search engines are reflecting society's own prejudices—as the advertising results Google serves up are often based on the most popular links previous users have clicked on.<UnQuote:

3673:

Sorry to hear about your ban. I had work to do yesterday and I put off commenting to today, and its already over. I always assumed I would be banned first. I don't if it will cheer you up, but I redid my

8637:

I do not lie, certainly not for something as trivial as a volunteer encyclopedia. This may be an unusual concept in the modern world, but in this case it is a truth that can be easily checked by a sysop.

1870: 8054:

Hello LittleBen. We appear to have gotten off on the wrong foot, and I apologize if I seemed confrontational yesterday. However, this was not an excuse for you to follow me to an unrelated article and

3796:

As to why I didn't contact you until now: I'm mainly interested in Asian languages, but I also feel strongly about the systematic intimidation of fair, rational, dedicated, and neutral editors (such as

3502: 8000:

PS: The BBC report says that, "The study analysed the type of advertisements that appeared on Google when certain names were searched for". "It looked at Google.com's core search engine", <Note: -->

2483: 7242: 1876: 2769:): Research skills and facts can help conquer prejudices. I thought that this concept might interest you, as a librarian, but maybe I misjudged you. Sorry about that, I guess you're not interested. 2486:

by accident while googling something completely different. I took me quite some time to figure out what it was about — and when I did it took me some time again to figure out how it got that title".

33: 6583:

violated this ban; however it may have not been clear to you that this includes discussions on talk pages. However, any further infractions of your ban will result in an extended block. Thank you,

3314:

applies to newbies, not users like LittleBenW who know full well they are being disruptive and appear to revel in it. PS: I was not "provoking" LittleBenW, I was dropping off the formally required

1437:

One of the keys to good SEO is "fine-tuning" article titles and section headings so that—as far as possible—they are an exact match or near-match to phrases used in the majority of search queries.

7096:

The Platform support, Security, and Emulation sections of the Windows article are also quite specialized, but that's because—like "making Windows multilingual"—they are specialized subjects. (The

2145:

territory. I'm sorry to say that, because I'm sure your opposition to foreigners names is sincere, but we all of us have to learn to respect the majority when a majority consensus is established.

9015: 8725:

Even though I have edited only a few BLP articles, I'm not one to stand by and let other editors be insulted and intimidated for trying to keep WP fair, NPOV, and properly researched and sourced.

2990:

almost zero awareness of language-related accessibility issues on English Knowledge, and I would like to help raise awareness and make pages with embedded foreign-language words more accessible.

5874: 5149:

Well if you don't like seeing Japan-based users plot to eliminate other Japan-based users, then you should have immediately opposed JoshuSasori's reverting every one of my edits.<Unquote: -->

5040:

I don't care about macrons. It is not my "POV" that we should use macrons. I think we should have a consistent style one way or the other, but my preference for one way over the other is SLIGHT.

3203: 1694:

Irrespective, you may not realise this but RM results are usually upheld right or wrong. Even if RMs have results we do not agree with it is not okay to make undiscussed moves contrary to them.

5423:

I agree entirely that fighting over minor issues like these prevents us from making significant contributions. My only caveat is that I shouldn't be expected to go out and check whether or not

5189:

When I presented my issues there, the admins quickly moved to indef-block JoshuSasori, who made no serious attempt to defend himself, but rather insisted that the blocking administrator should

3213: 4346:

referred to. Being heavily outnumbered by editors with other opinions is not the same as being lynched, even figuratively. I think you may have to look closer in the wictionary on that word.

8126:

discussion, especially when your messages are loaded with bias and personal attacks. I can unblock to let you participate in the ANI discussion again if you agree not to canvass anymore. --

1681:

where appropriate. The only significant exception were 100 tennis BLPs and 300 ice-hockey BLPs which have now been moved by RM over the last 4 months. Finishing with the last large batch at

1952:

a) A/B testing of different page appearances is something that's been done in the past, and is less intrusive than (eg) tracking read time of individuals, but this is A/B testing different

955: 783: 6185: 584:

Are you aware that you can see a preview of the work you're doing (to check everything looks good, and check spellings and punctuation etc.) before submitting the work as a finished draft?

4327:

I was trying to establish that encouraging people to research facts from a NPOV is a better way to ensure the future of Knowledge than organizing lynching mobs, but you seem to disagree.

7822: 7312:? I'd be more comfortable with such a template if its sources were chosen by community consensus. I didn't think there would be much interest in such a venture, since we purposely don't 5810:

be annoyed if somebody tried to completely strip out the majority English usage. Surely people rely on Knowledge to report the preferred form used in reliable real-world English sources.

4676:, and consider doing what's mentioned at the very bottom. If you're interested, giving an explicit statement that says you'll abstain from the dispute for a time might be a good idea. 1224: 1847: 16: 8796: 5154:, or a notice on the WikiProject, may be good ways to bring in other people and create a conversation, rather than letting disagreements escalate. Remember that it takes two to tango. 3807: 2803:

the case. Please take this advice in the spirit in which it is meant; there is no "correct" side in this dispute, and neither side is winning any external supporters by its behaviour.

1322: 962:, but when (on 28 June) I tried to remedy this by adding links, my edits were all reverted by Noetica. My latest edits have not yet been reverted. I won't try to fix the problems with 9009: 8059:

my edit. Instead of blankly reverting your edit, I decided to properly format the reference. However, I don't presently have access to the source that was cited, so I looked the word

6242:(EDIT CONFLICT) By the way: would you like me to give you a list of articles JoshuSasori moved without having contributed anything else to them? The most recent one would probably be 1219:

I simply notified him of the discussion. I didn't threaten to have him blocked if he didn't see things my way. I didn't make his life miserable by rigid and inflexible application of

6617:

I believe that the two people mentioned in the ANI, Sasori and elvenscout, should have been notified by the person who initiated the ANI, except that Sasori was surely not notified.

8241:

So much for "blocks are not punitive" I suppose -- perhaps you failed to note Kumi's apology directly above? IOW. the entire ANI complaint was based on a misapprehension. Cheers.

8003:

This is AdWords for Search, displayed on a Custom Search Engine on Reuter's site: Reuter's gets a cut on revenue from Ads clicked; AdSense applies only in this case.<EndNote: -->

5481:

people, at least (for historical figures, it's better to consult books)—trivially easy, and so I'd hope that knowledge of it would help eliminate a lot of the silliness and warring.

2248:

which seems totally unnecessary, because (1) surely there are no layout engines that are not software, so it is unnecessary to disambiguate it, and (2) it looks like there is now a

1789: 8713:

article has gone from about 300,000 page views per month in Nov. 2012 to nearly 500,000 page views per month now as a result, and that's a just a single article that I have edited.

1733:

of people who absolutely have to own all the marbles and make all the final decisions, regardless of the cost to Knowledge and to editor morale, but I never make personal attacks.

9028:

to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

2880:. I took me some time to work out what you were trying to do, so don't you think that supplying descriptive edit summaries would be a courtesy worth extending to other editors? -- 2710:

obsessive, unreasonable people they will just escalate the war/the stupidity. Just be careful not to be bitten by a diacritics zombie, or to be baited into edit warring with one.

3808:

keeping and settling scores, needlessly moving hundreds of articles, contrary to established Knowledge guidelines (and bragging repeatedly about it), and organizing lynching mobs

2368:

Yes, that's the discussion page. As you can see, a number of moves were proposed in June and then again in September, but a non-admin. closed the discussion with "no consensus".

6272:

Umm, actually he has no right to complain about that: I was making good-faith moves to articles on Knowledge. He doesn't own the articles he has created. When he pointed out on

5134:

Anyway, let's drop the hatchet. "Knowledge not being a fun place to edit will just cause people stop editing" has been my way of thinking about this from the beginning. Cheers!

3008:

No problem asking, but I don't use a screen reader, although I know several people who do. The best person to ask for a direct answer to how any particular character is read is

1785: 9023: 6358:

I don't know if your 3/7 and 4/6 refers to number or length (as a tech. professional, I'm a very terse writer). I don't think it's constructive to criticize, sorry about that.

3899:. (The Chinese MOS contains quite good info. on using language templates, and also cautions about on-screen readability of bold/italic Asian characters). I have added similar 2684: 8578: 8442: 1972:

Quote: "the reader is likely to read the page we serve up to them regardless of what the title is, after all!" That's not the case at all, if you read the short explanation

1335: 8593: 2188: 1992:"Redirects are cheap" they say, but this is yet another issue the WMF should be able to provide numbers for. Knowledgeable web people never say that "redirects are cheap". 543:

Now in Google title searches of Knowledge, it shows up 122nd. In a normal site-specific Google search of Knowledge, it shows up 130th. It didn't used to show up at all.

6200:

accusing me of somehow being in the wrong and setting the great and wonderful JoshuSasori up as some sort of martyr for your anti-diacritic/accurate romanization cause??

7241:(that don't support custom search engines). Strangely enough, one of the WP projects that seems most serious about objectively determining and using reliable sources is 6818:

approach in violation of a topic ban you are under. I have not blocked your talkpage access, so any replies to the AN/I thread in this matter can be posted here with a

5932:—by Yunshui, who is an awesome guy. Think about this: Will people say such nice things about you when you're gone? Play nicely, be kind—leave some good memories behind. 1888: 1854: 5027:

You must also agree that it is difficult to assume good faith other users bring up JoshuSasori and how great he was when discussing completely unrelated issues with me.

3535: 3298:

Actually, they aren't. The only source of drama on the issue has been LittleBenW, just like the only source of drama on en dashes is Apteva (about to be subject to a

2203:. The article should be moved back to its well-known name, even if it's not as "general and descriptive of its purpose" as the neologism. Any idea how to go about it? 2447:

Sorry, LittleBen, I was on a job in the bush. I misunderstood your intent; I didn't realize that you meant to move on this yourself. I'll catch up now as best I can.

937:

Noetica implies that she is going to continue to revert even simple and self-evident edits that lack edit summaries, and she even tries to intimidate Darkfrog24 with

8436:

It's pretty obvious that the attacks on my repeated advocating of following Knowledge rules on properly researching and neutrally sourcing BLP names and place names

7363:. They once used diacritics, but dropped them about a year ago. It's still IIO's favorite Vietnamese RS. Anyway, there was some technical problem with including it. 4640:

constructive and NPOV way is likely to get them insulted, blocked, or banned. What about yourself, have you ever contributed to any significant articles? Apart from

2986:

Thanks for the suggestion, RexxS. I have been trying to find time to clean up template documentation and provide examples, but haven't been able to do very much yet.

870: 8733: 5964:-- something I did too when I didn't go after MI for the obvious sockpuppetry/block-evasion until he had gone out of his way to harass me on two separate articles. 1751:

Have you asked a 3rd party to confirm this? For example you could try asking Steven Zhang (below) to have a look at your postings and give you a 3rd party opinion.

1544:

RfC. I'm sorry but this view is out of the ballpark here. If you object to Spanish names, you are not, I'm sorry, going to add value to a discussion on Vietnamese.

1472:, famous for web usability, has published on his useit.com website that the average user takes only about 15 sec. to decide whether a landing page is relevant. His 7574:

I agree that it's probably best to do it at AN or ANI, and possibly also advertise it widely as an RfC. I don't mind if anyone uses or modifies my draft to do so.

7009:

are/were famous tennis players. Or that MOS specifically does not apply to tennis players. Good Grief, Charlie Brown, I'm even beginning to doubt the existence of

6325:

generally does not improve the WP environment; seeing senseless disagreements spiral out of control makes me feel miserable and fatalistic about the future of WP.

3881: 3245: 7217:

Of course Knowledge NPOV and accessibility policies say to cite both English and foreign name equivalents together, so researching reliable sources in English is

6209: 1768: 1197: 6250:(often employing sockpuppets to double-vote) but the Knowledge community rejected his move. But really, there is nothing wrong with performing moves by oneself. 4937: 4884: 2946: 2792:

over a very trivial issue, and badgering third parties to try and get them to intervene on your behalf; the "prejudices" exposed are very apparent on both sides.

7918:

each (or even most) of these 2,184 personal names. Sweeney offers a number of hypotheses about why these results occur -- would it be helpful to include these?

5892: 2085:. He was doing a lot of bullying the last few days he was on Wiki, like he knew his time was up. He's obviously been a full time Wiki addict for quite a while. 40: 8386: 7962:

AdSense for the Display Network is quite different—the ad. displayed depends on the contents of the web page and (possibly) on the viewer's browsing history.

7703: 7196: 7137:

Can you please discuss your insertion of the Rabbit Proof Fence link on the talk page? i am familiar with almost all the reliable sources on this subject, and

3873: 2766: 2393:

Yes, an English major from Boise, Idaho. I'm going to give it a try anyway, LittleBen. (Oh, and two different bots just swooped in to fix two double-redirects

6711: 4308: 2950: 2817:

I'm sorry that you don't think that objectively researching facts—and Socratic-style discussion—are relevant to Knowledge. I misjudged you, sorry about that.

2703: 1380:. Since articles are unlikely to be read if people don't find them when they search, this is surely one of the strongest WP:COMMONSENSE reasons for generally 8351: 6469: 5172:

I did: I contacted Boneyard first, and they requested to be allowed mediate, but JoshuSasori rejected the offer and then continued to revert all my edits to

4304:

It was the organizing of a mob of "good sportsmen" to bully and intimidate Fyunck that led me to write the BLP RfC. This is easy to see from the time stamps:

3112: 2223: 8781:

Here in Japan, the English "City Hall" (spoken in Japanese phonetics) sounds quite similar to "Sh_tty Hall". I don't think that WP should be "Sh_tty Hall".

7355:

The Vietnamese engine was put together based on my recommendations. Is it POV because it doesn't include any sources with diacritics? You can compare it to

7115:

PS: The W7 article would surely be greatly improved by moving outdated/ancient history stuff—like Development, Antitrust, & Reception—to the end. Done!

6508:

Please be advised also that the tone of your message, in which you ascribe nefarious motives and various misconduct to other editors, is inappropriate. Per

4479:

Happy New Year! And don't let yourself be intimidated by my talk-page stalkers or by people who threaten you (or other nice people) with bitey cesspits ;-)

3399:

Please be more specific about what you are talking about. I do not ignore these guidelines, and intimidate people who believe that they should be followed.

8367: 8356: 8032: 7693: 7165: 7033:

I was looking at "Multilingual support: IMEs and LIPs" and noticed that this section only applies to Windows NT family and is too specialized to match our

5474: 5339:; etc. etc. He was well aware of NPA and the other relevant policies and guidelines, because I and numerous others had pointed these out to him. And since 4152: 1476:

seminars typically cost about $ 1,000 per day.) If a search for Pelé lands the user on a page titled Edson... or Edison... the searcher is likely to leave.

9036: 8983:

Nonetheless, a break from editing is advisable, as I tried to suggest that on my page earlier. Just take a month off, and enjoy the other aspects of life.

8216: 7910:

First of all, I'm sorry that my edit did not make this clear, but Dr. Sweeney's study specifically looked at AdSense as displayed on Reuters, not AdWords.

1154: 8887:

but they are currently busy. The other user insists that he owns the article, and is repeatedly reverting without commenting on a draft that I prepared.

8585:

and argue that people who attempt to talk about fair play, NPOV, and properly researching and sourcing names are "being disruptive" and should be banned.

7238: 6228:, and others. To repeat again: it takes two to tango; nobody should claim that they are a saint and the other person a demon without pretty good reason. 4059: 3118: 1373: 8953: 8555:

Why would you advertise your email address so prominently on your talk page if you did not want to be able to quickly canvass people off-Wiki by email?

7203: 6386:

JoshuSasori's accounts have now been indef-blocked seven times. I just want to forget about him. Please stop bringing him up MOS discussions that have

5281:

It is also likely that—regardless of his possibly-extensive film experience—JoshuSasori is a relative newbie to Knowledge, and didn't learn stuff like

3464:

include a continuation of this editing pattern on the subject of diacritics, either at this page or any other not directly related to the subject (per

862: 122: 3761: 3645: 1377: 8608:—calling me a troll, and asking for an Admin. to immediately shut down and hat off the discussion. WP is supposed to be about fair play and NPOV. As 8234: 8202: 4830:

hope you will take it to heart that your behaviour is pretty close to disruption already, and that you will step away from the precipice. Regards, --

2394: 7959:

on the web site containing the Custom Search Engine, that determine which ads are displayed. (I have passed the AdWords exams., that's how I know).

5912: 5898: 110: 8810: 8096: 7524:

Hi, thanks for your proposal re Rich Farmbrough: there's a trivial typo ('punative' for 'punitive') which I thought I shouldn't just alter myself.

7010: 6667: 6442: 5020:

blocked. Instead of formally appealing his block, he made more personal attacks against me, and demanded that the blocking admin apologize to him.

4155:? It is useful because—for each search—Google ranks the sources in order in the search results, with the more widely respected results at the top. 3900: 3508: 3209: 3198: 1426:

possible, and people are going to search for Pele without the accent (Google Insights for Search data for searches for Pele just in Brazil is very

6286:

move was performed by an administrator in accordance with a consensus among the Knowledge community after a month-long RM. And tell me: how was I

4902: 4083: 8180: 7608: 5347: 5207: 5028: 4985: 4932: 3385:

Please read, and abide by, the many, many rules, policies and guidelines that you hav en directed to by others before presuming to preach to us.

2865:. I agree that the former may be useful to those reading the Accessibility MOS, but I don't see that the latter has any value to them. Since the 2024:

Honesty, transparency, fairness, and accountability are the only way for an organization like Knowledge to survive long term. To illustrate this:

8693:, if known (including middle names, if known, or middle initials)". I believe that it's fair to say that nobody bothered to research and source 8546: 6290:

to make any significant contributions to articles on Japanese cinema when he blankly reverted virtually all of my edits? Check the histories of

2694:

where an editor is trying to censor the English spelling, even when I added sources to confirm it. It's a wacky encyclopedia these days. Later.

2396: 8345: 7600: 7567: 3793:

at my suggestion. But I don't think anybody will use it, there seems to be little or no education of users about semantic markup and usability.

1654: 1647: 1201: 915: 808: 8401: 8376: 8300: 8285: 8266: 7316:, hence my inclination toward TfD. But if it's being used honestly, and with its potential shortcomings in mind, I suppose there's no harm. -- 6656: 6403: 6311: 6267: 5359: 4898: 4299: 2512: 2479: 2424: 2350: 1462: 1410: 438:

Place the links from "general concepts" into the rest of the outline, and remove the general concepts section. (It's a temporary holding bin).

56:

Welcome to Knowledge. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page

8469:

the administrator may well have blocked your account for other reasons and so it is not obvious. Two points to ponder: from the TV character

8459: 5318:

edits that he was reverting had nothing whatsoever to do with the macron. He tagged my inclusion of obviously factually, well-researched and

5238: 5187: 3896: 3749: 2862: 959: 897:

felt that edits should be judged on their merits, not automatically reverted for lack of edit summaries and lengthy discussions. But finally

804: 8395:

11:02, 21 April 2013 (UTC) You're welcome to email me comments about the templates (only) and I'll tranpose them to the discussion page(s).

8162: 2740: 1427: 330: 8790: 8753: 8676: 8657: 8625: 8330:

and some facts that I provided in an emailed unblock appeal to Arbcom, I have been unblocked—Arbcom concluded that the claim of outing was

7839: 7124: 7110: 6992: 6949: 6641: 6626: 6367: 6353: 6334: 6237: 6156: 6136: 6121: 6090: 6017: 5990: 5973: 5941: 5821: 5675: 5652: 5440: 5394: 5294: 5262: 5163: 5143: 5113: 4506: 4440: 4422: 4401: 4373: 4355: 4336: 4281: 4245: 4194: 2731:

inappropriate for a collaborative project. Please reconsider this behaviour; it does not help anyone take your arguments seriously at all.

2719: 2676: 2646: 2168: 2154: 1760: 1742: 1504: 1489: 1446: 1394: 1367: 1347: 1326: 1001: 6925: 4107: 3825:, which was an attempt to start a civil dialog and suggest that there are fair and neutral ways to research real-world usage (such as the 3408: 3394: 9003: 8604:

to politely suggest that people follow Knowledge guidelines on NPOV, and properly research real-world majority English usage, you posted

8530: 8526: 8429:

believe. I think that the best way to solve this issue would be for ArbCom to consider guidelines. May I submit a case on this to ArbCom?

7789: 7359:. Baomoi aggregates a broader range of English-language news on Vietnam, but pretty much all diacritics-free as well. I also recommended 7151: 6592: 4842: 4657: 4472: 4164: 3702: 3550: 3376: 3106: 2826: 2812: 2778: 2495: 2456: 2436: 2407: 2384: 2363: 2340: 2068: 2041: 8737: 7668: 7583: 7346: 6973: 4488: 4360:

Consensus that is going to last surely has to be based on neutrally-assessed facts rather than on the number of cronies one can canvass.

4265: 4222: 3852: 3345: 3265: 3041: 2962: 2216: 1283: 1184: 1099:

My account is set to "watch" the Gmail article, so I will notice if you post something even if you don't send me a heads up, thanks ;-)

1055: 469:

Another thing we can do is place links to the outlines wherever they are relevant. There are plenty of places to put links to outlines:

280: 76:

tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the

6907: 5131:

has no right to block me out of pre-modern Japanese history and literature, an area he himself never appeared to have much interest in.

4990: 4133: 3566: 3557:

I got your link to that long discussion, which I don't care to read. I don't understand your purpose in sending it to me. Best wishes,

3293: 3284:

Then I apologise. Sorry. However, I would stand by the point that diacritics are dramatic enough already without provoking people. :-)

3279: 2482:

he originally proposed) that he couldn't understand the meaning of the ECMAScript one without extra explanation, quote: "I came across

2349:

I moved the page back again. My intent was to move the target page out of the way temporarily to make way for the move, but no joy. Is

2178: 1108: 975: 756: 731: 8044: 8027: 8012: 7995: 7940: 7505: 7472: 7454: 7433: 7401: 4955: 3981: 3914:

had Japanese and Korean under "Altaic languages" and Chinese was also hidden. I have added category links to make them easier to find.

3866: 3842: 3732: 3723:

I voted with the voter guides, aside from RegentsPark. No one recommended him, but he's written encouraging things from time to time.

3718: 2117: 1269: 1250: 1236: 1094: 1021: 1014: 7889: 7776: 7754: 7736: 7722: 7634: 7313: 7130: 6567:

Per that discussion, I do need to ensure that you understand the terms of your topic ban. You are not allowed to edit or comment on

6066: 5554:

Results for both the above: nothing. Google books' romanization is Yukichi Takeda, but they write Shinryō Ikenaga for another author.

5000: 4965: 4912: 4813: 4786: 4764: 4740: 4725: 4705: 3629: 3620:

And a GoodDay to you too. It would be nice if everybody on English Knowledge could wish each other GoodDay and mean it. Best wishes.

2507: 1687:

WP:Vietnam is the exception to this consensus. It has a total article stock of around 2,500 articles in the bio/geo categories which

8609: 7906:

you are clearly the more experienced Wikipedian, I have some questions for you about how I can incorporate this study in that page.

6957: 4625: 4556: 4315: 4253: 3764:? (Of course, if anybody else has questions about this issue that aren't answered in the above links, I'd be happy to answer them). 3592: 2576: 2539: 1784:(DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are 1172: 8710: 7548: 7463:

Can't see any English there. Change of subject: Where does one apply for a JSTOR trial? Do you recommend others, such as Highbeam?

6599: 6054: 5177: 4521:

At WP:Titles, you wrote: "I have to agree with (see discussions about Presidents etc. below)." I would like to point out that per

3025: 2999: 2981: 2937: 2908: 2372: 311: 6540:

Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#LittleBenW and diacritics-related topic ban violation yet again, and NPA violation

6048: 5979:

Will people say such nice things about you when you're gone? Play nicely, be kind—leave some good memories behind.<Unquote: -->

4951: 3121:

regarding your 3RR violations, effective vandalism, and disruptive editing (including censorship of other editors). The thread is

2524: 229: 8509: 8494: 7325: 7287: 7261: 6924:

diacritics again. as "attempts to use even one instance of majority English versions of names on English Knowledge" - Please see

6888: 2918: 2858: 2844: 2101: 1401:

Montemayor is a maternal name. es.wp shows them in titles sometimes. We would expect editors editing Spanish names to know that.

349: 342: 165: 8108: 6454: 5627:

Again, virtually no modern-day interest. I'm pragmatic, I wouldn't lose any sleep over stub articles on historical figures that

2558: 1677:

We have been through this before. As before the á in Sánchez and 賽珍珠 are not the same thing. As before WP:OPENPARA is the norm.

168:

on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out

8582: 7382: 7054: 4621: 4571: 3579:

on ANI? I was pretty prepared to block first and ask questions later, but I'll give you a chance to rethink your way forward (

3167:

will encourage you to pay attention to other editors' concerns and attempt to collaborate with them, instead of just trying to

513: 285: 4958:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 4905:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 4822:

By all means denigrate the MOS. It may be all those things you accuse it of, but under the circumstances, it just looks like "

3775: 3302:

for similarly disruptive campaigning), and so on. For any style nitpick, there tends to be a single editor who just will not

887: 620:

This helps other editors tell at a glance what you have done. Sometimes, without an edit summary, your work may be considered

8926: 7869: 6528: 5956: 5218:

He continues to make few positive contributions, thousands of indifferent contributions, and harass me when he feels like it.

4961: 4908: 3855:, there is already a section about this issue in the accessibility guideline. Also, I can't "see" any of your contributions. 2608: 1665: 1338:

is where I tried to add links to make the importance of research and the "how" (process) clear, but was repeatedly reverted.

1166: 1140: 1028: 360: 257: 8915: 8908: 8728:

The Japan and Vietnam article ecosystem is very fragile, with only a few editors active. Why did you insist on bullying—and

7424:. The journals didn't start using Vietnamese diacritics until 2006, and only in the last year or two in any consistent way. 7411: 6478: 5431:

people should demonstrate their good faith by actually contributing something significant to the article before making RMs.

3139:

like characterizing everyone who disagrees with you as "vandals"; several times by myself and others about various habitual

1044: 401: 320: 8140: 7202:

includes all the major sources about Vietnam in English in Vietnam, including major Vietnam Government sites, as discussed

5929: 5921:

Like I said, you should remember that Knowledge is not about score keeping,score settling—or grave dancing for that matter.

4095: 4017:, even after being warned about them related to the recent ANI discussion. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to 2750: 1469: 1213: 552: 5231: 4544:

I mentioned Born2Cycle because—although I posted after you—I was specifically referring to his brief comments above yours.

3663: 769:

I've been around for a couple of months more than you, it seems, but almost certainly your contributions are more awesome.

28:

has been filed about the use of anonymous sources in reliable publications. The RFC can be found by the article's name in

4038: 3740: 3485: 2672: 2623: 2082: 1973: 1596: 8521:

addition to WP:RS of a link to your Lech Walesa search template, (ii) ask a question of Alan Tiefling about his reverts

7659:

I agree. And people who refuse to accept consensus, and go on whining for months and years, are also a pain-in-the-xxx.

7485: 7093:

briefly as possible, with a minimum of detail, and provided links to MS sites where interested people can find out more.

5234: 4233: 4136:

about the Google RS template; I appreciate the thought, but am a bit mystified why. Have we discussd the matter before?

3746: 2953:, for example. People may not notice the tiny text at the top of Category:Multilingual support templates. Best regards. 2013: 1723: 1073: 8567: 8352: 8225:

As this page has been misused, I have revoked talk page access. Arbcom now has the details, so please contact them. --

8090: 6917: 6190: 3876:. The person who apparently wiped out one of the answers appears to be the same person who removed the search box from 2059:

treating the dispute in this way will do nothing but ensure people dismiss your arguments, regardless of their merits.

441:

Place the links from "lists" into the rest of the outline and remove the lists section. (It's a temporary holding bin).

8320: 5203: 715: 65: 7533: 7414:. That gives you only the abstract and the first page of the article. The other major journal that covers Vietnam is 7131: 6961: 6828:

template. It appears that you're becoming quite familiar with the block procedures, but if you're in question about

6804: 6688: 6556: 6483: 5340: 4609: 3530: 3340: 3240: 3193: 3086: 1608:

seems to be on 6 now); just because it doesn't get refuted in all three places doesn't mean you've scored points.

191: 92: 18: 8896: 7884: 5681:

language—English—is the basis for all this. English Knowledge guidelines, for the same reason, say to "use English".

4690: 4663: 4145: 3745:

Hi Ben, for what it's worth, I've said pretty much all I've ever wanted to say about languages and accessibility in

2159:

Surely "get the article right" means respecting majority usage in widely-respected English newspapers and the like?

1939: 8422: 8146: 7858: 7851: 6436: 4879: 4875: 4178: 3811: 2660: 2597: 2590: 1585: 1553: 1315: 1147: 800: 664: 648: 307: 186: 126: 8613: 8559: 8522: 7865: 7742: 6611: 4614: 4413:" if they participate in an RfC? Or who try to intimidate people into not participating in any way in my BLP RfC? 4410: 3959:

It's the same sad story on the tech. side of Knowledge. Internet-related projects are essentially dead. I created

3497: 2627: 2105: 1636: 1540:

LittleBenW, you may not realise this but you are advancing a version of the view which was thoroughly rejected at

546:

Let's see what more we can do to improve its rank. Then the same methods can be used on the rest of the outlines.

8775: 7806: 7792:, partly because it is violation of your diacritics topic ban, partly because even without what you have done to 7025: 6884: 5197: 5194: 5127:

times before he went and got himself blocked. He doesn't "own" Japanese cinema articles and he never did, and he

3930: 3687: 3635: 3091: 845: 745:

for dealing with it that will be much more effective and constructive than bringing it up on a policy talk page.

253:

Sorry I'm not an expert on such issues. I recommend that you as about this somewhere like User talk:QwerpQwertus

8974: 8336:. Obviously this bogus claim of outing was just to keep me blocked and prevent me from defending myself at ANI. 6693: 6561: 6243: 4054: 2751:

every single reference to the widely-used plain English version of the name Walesa was stripped out of Knowledge

2515:

seems to have somehow gotten a duplicated list of files to be moved. Please check and see if it looks okay now?

2192: 2094: 1605: 8001:

This is AdWords for Search, Google gets all the revenue from Ads clicked on its own search site<EndNote: -->

7222:

Clones of the templates could easily be modified to search only the corresponding non-English Government sites.

6217: 5918:

Admins are unpaid. Some do stupid things, but everybody makes mistakes. Personal insults are counterproductive.

4673: 4050: 3941: 3826: 3588: 1703: 832:

reverted my edits. So I clarified my edits, to make it obvious that I was just creating a logical link between

7644:

Always remember LBW. There's nothing wrong with English Knowledge. It's the PoV-pushers, who are the problem.

6277: 5078: 4541:

Thanks for your comments. I don't believe in cronyism or "me too" comments (without any added reasons) either.

34:

Talk:National_Union_of_General_Workers#Request_for_Comment_-_Use_of_anonymous_sources_in_reliable_publications

8942: 8296: 8262: 8230: 8212: 8198: 8176: 7519: 7373:, the news site for overseas Vietnamese, doesn't use diacritics, but they should certainly be added as well. 6775: 5180: 4942:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

4889:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

4091: 3693:

Ditto in my condolences. It seemed to close mighty quickly, like they were in a rush to deal out punishment.

3310:

principle that being civil does not mean being sweet or pretending that harmful behaviors are not happening.

2889: 2758: 1661: 686: 379: 153: 8250: 8168: 6832:

then I can get the formal blocking template and post it here for you as well. You should also read through

6791: 6780: 6316:

It's generally not productive to review past history, and I don't have a lot of free time. I did notice the

1136: 9019: 8996: 8922: 8872: 7683: 7653: 6758: 6513: 6459: 5887: 5209: 3449: 2320: 1049: 356: 143: 8271:

Aha -- the fact that I have more than 3 decades of online experience is for naught? Wow -- sorry -- KofH

7969:

So what's the best way to handle this reference, if you insist on adding it? I think it really belongs in

6920:. You get unblocked on 02:24, 19 March 2013 and then on 07:44, 19 March 2013 (UTC) go to Fyunck to defend 2604: 1627:

Please use preview before posting on talk pages; otherwise your minor edits fill up the screen. thanks. --

1617: 8876: 8437: 8316: 8085: 7951: 7596: 7563: 7489: 6762: 6379: 5925: 4022: 3921:

to the Regional MOS category were repeatedly reverted, so I gave up on it. I was also going to link from

3801:) who believe in civil dialog and in following Knowledge guidelines as to neutrality (e.g. mentioning of 3469: 1908:, I think you have it right. You can see by testing examples like the following in a sandbox or preview: 547: 396: 8500:

to encourage people to vote to ban me) can in any way be considered to be "acceptable" or "good faith".

8056: 7421: 5803:

In any case, I wouldn't lose any sleep or fight over it (as I said, both version appear in the article).

4535: 2857:

templates, so I found your edit summary misleading and unhelpful. You inserted links to two categories:

2081:

For months, I could count on two or three IIO denunciations every day. No IIO activity since Oct 1, see

1964:

I have already explained repeatedly that the title of a book is not considered "content" by publishers.

244:

from the official site and converted them to SVG with Inkscape. Can we upload them to Wikimedia Commons?

8002:"as well as the search function of Reuters.com—which also displays Google's advertising". <Note: --> 7181: 6299: 6280: 5331: 4431:

Again, citation needed. I see no "threats", all I see is self-perceived victims talking about threats.

3969: 3709:

Be sure to vote in the ArbCom elections. The discussions on Jimbo's talk page may also be of interest.

3614: 2265: 2249: 1944: 691: 667:. Please remember to mark your edits as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with 7983: 7237:"), but exactly the same inside-WP template technique should also work with other search engines like 6871: 6374:

Well, I italicized the titles of about 40 JLit articles yesterday. But I also created the articles on

6254:

if they are to pages to which one has made no prior contribution. I hadn't contributed a whole lot to

4068:

article, saying that my edit was "apparent vandalism". I merely added that RWD is also referred to as

3353:

WP:DIACRITICS: "follow the general usage in reliable sources that are written in the English language"

8682: 8420: 7617:

include the use of bullet points, except within "consensus polls or requests for comment". In fact,

6602:

requires you to notify the User against whom you have made accusations at ANI that you have done so.

6247: 5903:

is a user whose presence on Knowledge is a good thing and/or something that I was wrong to question?

4005: 3790: 3440: 2292: 2272: 2126:

Oh, this is an interesting thing to find. Probably explains the moves while I was on a business trip.

1893: 1685:

two weeks ago. There is no "diacritics war", or if there was, you arrived after it had already ended.

1040: 158: 3363:

MOS:FOREIGN: "adopt the spellings most commonly used in English-language references for the article"

8947: 8701: 8292: 8258: 8226: 8208: 8194: 8172: 8135: 6103:

of respect for others. MI was obviously a sockpuppet and I knew he was working to undermine me for

5196:

His last edit, in which he made slight tweaks to the apology request, was on 22 January, 00:53 UST.

3918: 3892: 2257: 2245: 1708: 866: 825: 384: 326: 225: 129:. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: 61: 417:

The search engine blindness issue will probably have to be dealt with at the search engine level (

29: 8816: 8771: 8729: 8653: 8542: 7880: 7816:(like "Madonna of the Rocks") from similar but much more popular search results ("Madonna"). The 7802: 7664: 7147: 7050: 7034: 6988: 6945: 6800: 6652: 6637: 6607: 6473: 6450: 6399: 6349: 6321: 6307: 6263: 6205: 6117: 6062: 6013: 5969: 5908: 5671: 5436: 5355: 5258: 5139: 5074: 4579:

pattern on this issue. You have clearly simply substituted dashes for diacritics as something to

4502: 4436: 4397: 4351: 4295: 4277: 4241: 4190: 3760:

since being told of my existence; why did you send me a message as soon as you were about to get

3698: 2699: 2668: 2619: 2463: 2328: 2150: 1756: 1719: 1699: 1581: 1549: 1458: 1406: 1363: 1311: 997: 455: 406: 3356:

WP:UE: "The choice between anglicized and local spellings should follow English-language usage";

3251:

SMcCandlish, I think you have some good points to make on the diacritics issue, but coming to a

1682: 8868: 8312: 7592: 7559: 6754: 6671: 6426: 6225: 6175: 6038: 4858: 4645: 4580: 4151:

It's a very useful tool for Googling multiple reliable sources simultaneously, did you see the

4125: 4079: 4018: 3934: 3668: 3457: 3390: 3156: 2222:

The usual process for making multiple moves that other people might disagree with is described

1632: 576: 566: 138: 133: 7416: 6246:

would probably be the most recent one, but there are probably dozens. And plenty more that he

3541:

You are talking rubbish. I have not been edit warring about diacritics, that's a blatant lie.

1957: 1795: 8989: 8719: 8597: 8104: 8081: 6785: 6682: 6550: 4797: 4603: 4468: 4141: 4065: 3991: 3965: 3960: 3830: 3798: 3520: 3426: 3330: 3230: 3183: 3076: 2838: 2808: 2757:

the non-diacritic version is used in English—or notice the continuing attempts to intimidate

2736: 2452: 2403: 2359: 2212: 2076: 2064: 2009: 1541: 1355: 1260:, inclusiveness and diversity than about imposing complex rules. Just my opinion, of course. 683: 459: 273: 179: 103: 85: 7493: 7410:

JVS is part of JSTOR. There isn't a whole a lot online, but you can search what there is at

6505:

authority is described there, although it is also subject to an open clarification request.

5093:

is a good way to stop IPs who won't discuss issues and who persist in spamming or reverting.

72:

or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Knowledge uses

8415: 8167:

You don't need to be unblocked to contact ArbCom - you can find an email address to use at

7936: 7812:

Search Engine Test (and the templates that are a small part of it) is about techniques for

7268: 7230: 7075: 6588: 4872: 4793: 4562: 3493: 3275: 3013: 2271:

If an admin agrees to fix the problem, I believe that he or she will (a) create a list of "

1279: 1193: 1180: 1162: 1036: 303: 295: 7356: 5176:

even when Boneyard told him to stop. Then I posted on WikiProject Japan and asked for help

4321:

My post to warn Fyunck was at 15:12, 17 November 2012 (UTC)|15:12, 17 November 2012 (UTC).

3256:(I'm quite used to it); this is better than triggering more drama elsewhere on wikipedia. 2417: 2237:

The category naming also should be fixed; I'm not sure how that is done, but I should ask.

1372:

It is often easy to find which rendering of a word or name is most searched for, by using

8: 8860: 8664: 8130: 8127: 7710: 7625:, item "fixing format errors". It would also be helpful if you would use edit summaries. 6746: 5698: 3465: 3289: 3261: 3055: 2796:

me to believe that such an environment is unlikely to emerge any time in the near future.

1930:

Note that the fonts used are somewhat different to reflect the styles of each country. --

1898:

Regarding your question on my talk page regarding the remark in the /doc to the template

1729:

You are talking nonsense. I attack stupid ideas with neutral logic, I complain about the

1622: 1295: 1086: 1065: 751: 710: 676: 451: 322: 221: 169: 7813: 4570:

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at

3972:., crony politics (mob rule), and the increasing lack of civility and community spirit. 3929:'s new foreign title template, but now will not bother. I also added hatnote links from 3851:

For the record, it's not my essay; check the signature at the end of it. And as you are

8902: 8767: 8649: 8538: 8482: 8447: 8113: 7876: 7845: 7798: 7660: 7501: 7450: 7429: 7378: 7143: 7046: 6984: 6941: 6796: 6698: 6648: 6633: 6603: 6533: 6446: 6418: 6395: 6345: 6303: 6295: 6259: 6201: 6167: 6113: 6058: 6030: 6009: 5965: 5904: 5667: 5432: 5351: 5336: 5254: 5135: 5070: 4801: 4498: 4432: 4393: 4347: 4291: 4290:

what you've accused others of doing in the past. Do intend to continue down that path?

4273: 4237: 4210: 4206: 4205:

The link you gave does not show me accusing you of canvassing—unless you are a sock of

4186: 4042: 3877: 3861: 3770: 3728: 3694: 3683: 3656: 3580: 3562: 3453: 3097:

Your hate speech, intimidation, and vandalism are way off topic and way over the line.

3061: 2695: 2664: 2615: 2584: 2308: 2296: 2284: 2261: 2196: 2180: 2146: 2090: 1935: 1752: 1715: 1695: 1641: 1613: 1577: 1545: 1454: 1402: 1359: 1307: 1246: 1209: 1116: 993: 601:

Also, it's good practice to always leave a short comment about what work we did in the

372: 45: 7621:

even supports the editing of others' comments to remove such superfluous bullets; see

5054:

I refrain from doing whatever it was that made you angry at me in the first place; and

2028:

you get rid of corruption and cronyism once it has dug its roots that deep?" he asked.

939:

I can talk the legs off a chair if called upon to do so. Do not call upon me to do so.

476:

See also sections of the articles corresponding to outline subheadings (section links)

8829: 8531:

revert your second addition in violation of Topic Ban to WP:RS on 02:56, 7 April 2013

8406: 8281: 8246: 8119: 7898: 7772: 7732: 7709:

may be useful for finding stuff in reliable sources. But maybe these templates can't

7679: 7649: 7639: 7156: 6829: 6769: 6715: 6317: 5628: 4981: 4972:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

4928: 4919:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

4759: 4720: 4685: 4584: 4174: 4075: 3610: 3386: 3303: 3172: 3168: 3160: 2869: 2851: 1902: 1628: 1227:. Knowledge needs fewer Grammar Gods and more Tolerant and Cooperative Contributors. 1129: 1122: 653: 602: 463: 427:

First and foremost is to finish their initial development phase by cleaning them up.

268: 81: 7085:

I partially explained my motives in the earlier talk page discussion: <quote: -->

5693:

to explain to ignorant foreigners how to read and pronounce difficult Japanese (and

5424: 2763:

analytics data can help shut down utterly stupid, destructive, and long-running wars

2691: 8959: 8938: 8844: 8527:

revert your addition to WP:RS that was in violation of your topic ban 15:44 4 April

8470: 8397: 8391: 8372: 8100: 8077: 7187:

The sources for the templates are all listed; they are widely considered to be the

6937: 6936:"-type leads. These leads are disruptive and counter WP:TENNISNAMES RfC result and 6856: 6815: 6730: 6677: 6545: 6490: 6430: 6375: 6179: 6042: 4833: 4598: 4531: 4464: 4137: 4028: 3515: 3475: 3325: 3319: 3225: 3219: 3178: 3132: 3071: 2804: 2732: 2554: 2520: 2448: 2399: 2355: 2208: 2060: 2005: 1788:, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to 447: 336: 116: 6670:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.. See also

6465: 5199:

Roughly 24 hours later, at 01:01, 23 January, JoshuSasori created another account.

4672:

and, prior to that, at the RfC. I would suggest you review my comments to Apteva

4587:, but simply engage in trolling and sport argument to entertain yourself. That is 696:

Hi, Ben. This is in response to a post you left on the article titles talk page.

536: 8970: 8888: 8855:

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's

8852:—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 8835: 8782: 8745: 8668: 8617: 8501: 8451: 8337: 8190: 8154: 8036: 8019: 8004: 7987: 7932: 7925:) includes a statement from Google. Would it be helpful to include this as well? 7922: 7831: 7746: 7714: 7575: 7540: 7529: 7464: 7393: 7338: 7279: 7253: 7225:

When Google is the search engine then it's possible to do exactly the same thing

7116: 7102: 6965: 6899: 6863: 6833: 6822: 6809: 6741:

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's

6738:—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 6721: 6618: 6584: 6359: 6326: 6229: 6148: 6128: 6082: 5982: 5933: 5879: 5813: 5644: 5386: 5286: 5243: 5155: 5105: 4869: 4864: 4805: 4778: 4750:

dramatically. At any rate, thanks for your contributions and a happy New Year.

4732: 4697: 4649: 4548: 4516: 4480: 4414: 4365: 4328: 4257: 4214: 4156: 4099: 3973: 3834: 3710: 3621: 3542: 3489: 3400: 3368: 3307: 3299: 3271: 3098: 3033: 3021: 2991: 2977: 2954: 2933: 2900: 2885: 2818: 2770: 2711: 2638: 2568: 2531: 2487: 2428: 2376: 2332: 2160: 2142: 2109: 2051:

with this sort of approach to discussion, it does not seem likely to go very far.

2033: 1880: 1734: 1672: 1601: 1590: 1496: 1481: 1438: 1386: 1339: 1302: 1275: 1261: 1228: 1176: 1158: 1100: 967: 920: 894: 871:

Knowledge:Village pump (idea lab)#Research guidelines.2Ftutorials for new editors

723: 668: 634: 559: 391: 299: 264: 37: 5179:

and NihonJoe closed the discussion and told me to go through dispute resolution.

4636: 8856: 8744:

on him (Kauffner) the last time, wasn't it? Same old faces at that venue too.

8681:

Please explain why (for all the tennis articles that you had moved) you ignore

8537:(not delete since editors will already have read it) to retract it. Thank you. 8446:

were the result of off-wiki canvassing and mob organizing that is acknowledged

7622: 7618: 6998: 6878: 6845: 6742: 6519: 6498: 5005: 4890: 4632: 3315: 3311: 3285: 3257: 2847:

today with a single edit summary: "Wikilinked". The edits were actually adding

2634: 1960:

if you're looking to design some kind of testing which will get valid results.

1915: 1912: 1453:

Articles aren't written by one person. Have you ever created an en.wp article?

1081: 1079:

Heads up again! At least one new message has been posted in the same thread! --

1060: 746: 705: 680: 672: 524: 237: 204: 69: 8474: 7365: 7267:

and forwards at six month intervals; lots of things in life are more fun than

4583:

about, after being topic-banned from diacritis and are behaving as if you are

4497:

Why on earth would Moonraker be intimidated, or threatened, by anything here?

3350:

As you should be well aware, there are several guidelines covering diacritics:

2924: 1925: 1922: 1200:, especially from people to whom I have already advertised the RM via a page ( 211: 8864: 8840: 8802: 8722:

in Jan. 2012, and it's up to about 120,000 page views per month in Mar. 2013.

8563: 8490: 8123: 7793: 7630: 7497: 7446: 7425: 7374: 7321: 7177: 7006: 6750: 6726: 6580: 6509: 6422: 6171: 6034: 5961: 5872:(This template searches several encyclopedias). I mentioned this issue back 5851: 5478: 5282: 5090: 4997: 4588: 4522: 4046: 4014: 3904: 3857: 3815: 3766: 3724: 3679: 3675: 3649: 3641: 3600: 3584: 3576: 3558: 3367:

Knowledge users like Fyunck who repeatedly point out such guidelines to you?

3152: 3144: 3136: 3128: 3065: 3012:. Graham is an admin and a very experienced Wikipedian who is blind and uses 3009: 2896: 2467: 2312: 2304: 2288: 2280: 2276: 2253: 2241: 2227: 2204: 2200: 2134: 2086: 2001: 1931: 1609: 1242: 1205: 829: 742: 701: 501:

The placement in Knowledge's search engine's results varies. For geography,

491: 367: 248:

I'm worried about copyright issues because both of them are TEL's trademarks.

148: 25: 7210:

travel sites that are searchable exclusively in English for some countries).

6382:-- should I complain about how JoshuSasori "followed me" to those articles? 3468:). If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may 8884: 8798: 8478: 8327: 8277: 8242: 7976:

The BBC report is quite good, I'd certainly quote it—it says <Quote: -->

7768: 7728: 7675: 7645: 6877:

About an hour or two ago you were automatically unblocked by the software.

6766: 6576: 6502: 6494: 6464:

I have blocked you for 24 hours for violating your diacritics topic ban at

5216: 5151: 5123:

the last eight years to prove my good faith, and I pointed this out to him

5086: 4977: 4973: 4924: 4920: 4751: 4712: 4677: 4669: 4641: 4576: 4563: 4021:. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may 3922: 3606: 3164: 3148: 3140: 2545: 1781: 1056:

Talk:Gmail#Renewed_Official_Help_Center_and_Official_Product_Support_Forums

6542:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. —

5285:

before he was blocked. Don't be a score-keeper or score-settler yourself.

3789:

is one of the most knowledgeable people about MediaWiki internals, and he

2315:). I'm not sure if admins. have automated tools to help with this process. 2100:

Things are looking really bad for him if he can't manipulate a proxy into

8933: 8291:

information given in confidence) prevent me from sharing it with you. --

8049: 7827: 7234: 4823: 4774: 4527: 3888: 2550: 2516: 898: 424:

In the meantime, there is a lot we can do to improve access to outlines.

8828:

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an

8813:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

8099:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

7370: 6445:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

5193:

to him for not believing his lies that I was the one doing the hounding.

4867:). While you are not a party yet, your comments would be appreciated. -- 3956:; it was fortunate that Bre'r Rabbit was caught out during the last one. 3212:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is

9029: 8966: 8700:

I edit mainly in Geek space—like the most popular Geek articles on the

8644:

Now, you have heard what I have said, and I have said it twice. Please

8525:, (iii) receive Alan's reply on my Talk page 11:32, 4 April 2013, (iv) 7525: 7061: 7038: 6394:, and bringing up how I was supposedly "harassing" him on various RMs. 4947: 4894: 3926: 3786: 3017: 3016:- he's very approachable and would be very interested in your ideas. -- 2973: 2929: 2881: 2656: 863:

Knowledge talk:Article titles#Deciding on an article title: Consistency

479:

Navigation footers, which can in turn be placed where they are relevant

6255: 5057:

we both refrain from bringing up unrelated issues on MOSJ's talk page.

4113: 2972:

to categories that can only point to the top level of pages. Cheers --

7441: 7097: 6840: 2530:

Thanks, still not sure exactly how the template is supposed to work.

2324: 534:

But, the same day links were placed leading to the outline of chess,

519:

There are still a few hundred chess articles that don't yet have the

240:, I downloaded two images, the company logo and the corporate slogan, 77: 8867:

for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant

7897:

I just noticed that you undid two revisions I added recently to the

7037:

way of work. So, do you think it would be a good idea to move it to

6753:

for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant

6712:

Knowledge:Administrators'_noticeboard#Hijiri88_hounded_off_Wikipedia

6575:

on Knowledge, except for appealing your ban which should be done at

5477:—it makes neutral research in many of the most reliable sources—for 5089:

may be a good way to cool off revert wars and start a civil dialog.

3783:

Argument for a Consistent & Realistic @lang policy for Wikimedia

2895:

Thanks for the comments, RexxS. The MoS/Accessibility mentions only

1871:

Impartial study of the effects of using diacritics in article titles

8486: 8207:

I have now passed the reasons for my block escalation to ArbCom --

7977:

Google searches may expose "racial bias in society"<UnQuote: -->

7764: 7626: 7360: 7317: 7173: 6298:

for two good examples, but by no means the only examples, of this.

6291: 5346:

By the way, what do you think of my proposal regarding macrons now?

5323: 5173: 4943: 1780:. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in 844:

section, and he again reverted my edits. I made similar edits to

418: 73: 36:

in case you wish to participate. Thank you for your contributions.

8648:(not delete) the accusation you have made where you have made it. 8412:

violation and, so, you might be blocked again in the near future.

8063:

up in a few dictionaries and found that it is in fact the same as

3791:

kindly wrote a language template to handle foreign-language titles

1473: 505:

comes in second (right after "Geography"). For the United States,

84:

to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

8068: 7970: 7946: 7902: 6283: 6221: 5242:

initially been in good faith, he had now indisputably become the

4826:". I'm not supporting a proposal to topic ban you for now, but I 3503:

Notice of Administrator's noticeboard of incidents discussion (2)

176:

on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

7814:

separating and extracting search results for less-popular topics

7539:

Thanks, I wouldn't have minded you fixing it, nobody's perfect.

5225:

feel like going back and checking the history (you'd need to be

3222:

because it's American Thanksgiving, you're in for a surprise. —

2917:

Thanks for the clarification, Ben. Your addition of the link to

1834:: How the newest DR forum has progressed between May and August 1421: 8952:

I have indefinitely blocked you per the community consensus at

8843:, which states that an editor must not perform more than three 7002: 6729:, which states that an editor must not perform more than three 6273: 5233:

This was simply not the case, as I explained to him thoroughly

5202:

He continued to harass me through near-untraceable shifting IPs

4592: 3949: 3917:

My recollection is that my repeated attempts to add links from

414:

Thank you for your interest in improving outline availability.

197: 2295:" for that page), then fix the broken links (at least for the 840:

section and the criteria for Recognizability in the following

52: 3204:

Notice of Administrator's noticeboard of incidents discussion

395:. Your enthusiasm and initiative are greatly needed there. 8929:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

8475:

You might very well think that; I couldn't possibly comment.

7872:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

6218:

cover of the DVD in the article clearly shows the name Taboo

5273:

pigeonholing you. Focus on the interests—like film—that you

4668:

I'm assuming you've followed the commotion that's ensued at

2611:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

1668:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

1143:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

1031:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

363:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

7966:

the advertiser in writing the text in the ad target page.

7189:

most trustworthy and politically neutral sources in English

7065:

are not branded using the name "Windows NT"<unquote: -->

4773:

I think your efforts in trying to spread the ideals of the

4272:

Where did he do that? Also, the point is that you did too.

3151:, etc.; several times by myself and others about continual 992:

you're editing/talk on my talk, I'm very happy to look. :)

57: 9010:

File:WP BasicSearchBoxesScreenshot.jpg listed for deletion

8529:(v) inform you on your Talk page 15:49, 4 April 2013 (vi) 7986:

to see what I mean. Best regards, HTH (Hope This Helps)

5253:

be all the clarification that's necessary. Happy editing!

1520:

LittleBenW, I'll paste here what I've just said on WP:VN:

8691:

subject's full name should be given in the lead paragraph

7064:

article explains, Windows XP and Windows 7 <quote: -->

1848:

Geopolitical, ethnic, and religious conflicts noticeboard

8732:—two of the most dedicated contributors in Japan space, 8189:

I was about to issue a block for another reason. As per

7492:

is a page about how to log into JSTOR. You can register

7229:

Knowledge by setting up (on an individual's web site) a

5343:, we can be certain that he has read your comment above. 540:, and it has remained at an increased level ever since. 8067:, so really there should never have been two articles. 7488:. Perhaps there is some technical problem at the site. 6720:

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being

4946:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 4893:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 4711:

you all appear to be in support of reforming the MoS.

3123:

User:LittleBenW reported by User:SMcCandlish (Result: )

1840:: Checking up on the Wikiquette Assistance close debate 473:

See also sections of the corresponding subject articles

8834:

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being

8018:

state of real-world media, this is not Google "bias".

7392:

already searched directly with the existing template.

6108:

doesn't need users like that. Your manager analogy is

5326:

article as OR, and removing it even when I showed him

3937:

from several places, in an attempt to raise awareness.

3907:

to the Regional MOS category were repeatedly reverted.

2685:

Thanks for the input at Talk:Facundo Argüello (tennis)

1828:: Where DR happened, broken down by the top DR forums 1054:

At least one new reply has been posted in this thread

8562:

that you canvassed Alex to encourage him to trash my

7613:

Please use standard talk page formatting, which does

6470:

Knowledge talk:Manual of Style/Japan-related articles

6053:

Hey, are you still interested in salvaging JS's work?

4644:, surely you could contribute to other articles like 3942:

moved several of the language templates to new titles

3903:

in other places. Previous attempts to add links from

2513:

Talk:Comparison of web browser engines#Requested move

8875:. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary 8687:

the name by which the subject is most commonly known

6956:

Why not enter this example of your edit warring and

6761:. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary 5211:

He also apparently created a single-purpose account

4635:

one that I have been working on recently—that get a

4324:

The BLP RfC was dated 06:49, 19 November 2012 (UTC).

4286:

That was then. It's interesting that you keep doing

3173:

abusing WP as a gaming platform for "sport argument"

2633:

Thanks! Now I have to work out how to switch to the

2207:

has an edit history, so clicking "Move" won't work.

8579:

provide methods for researching in reliable sources

679:and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. 6814:I have blocked your account for one week for your 5044:Now that that is out of the way, here's the deal: 4863:I've mentioned you in an ArbCom case request (see 4185:one or more diacritic(s) – i.e. to prove a point. 3827:templates that I developed and proposed in the RfC 3456:. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to 3119:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring 1822:: Highlights from Steven Zhang's April 2012 survey 7929:I'm looking forward to hearing your suggestions. 7161:Hi LittleBen, what's going on with your suite of 5038:Therefore I will say this here once and for all: 291:an email via my talk page if you're interested. 80:before reinserting it. Please take a look at the 8859:to work toward making a version that represents 7982:action is the best solution. Take a look at the 7763:Giggle giggle. BTW, I wonder how buisness is at 6745:to work toward making a version that represents 6186:Re: "but I've seen a lot of other things too..." 4800:that I wrote at the beginning of last year gets 4620:Hello, I cannot find any discussion about me at 4209:, is that the case? Surely I have never accused 4090:Responsive Web Design then you should provide a 3575:Are you sure you want to include a violation of 3131:; twice by me about edits that were essentially 2799:I am sorry this has come to be the case, but it 2753:, even though just a little research shows that 2398:, so they don't seem to be a problem for long.) 2195:. It's surprising and bizarre to be directed to 1196:. You don't need to recruit votes like you did 1173:Talk:List of Presidents of Brazil#Requested move 886:I then discovered that I was being discussed at 509:is not in the first couple of thousand results. 214:is a good source of information on the company. 8850:even if you don't violate the three-revert rule 8811:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 8685:: "While the article title should generally be 8097:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 7797:and policy pages alone on this matter, thanks. 7412:"Ho Chi Minh" site:www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525 6736:even if you don't violate the three-revert rule 6668:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 6443:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 6279:) that I was wrong I apologized and gave it up. 4938:Disambiguation link notification for January 27 4885:Disambiguation link notification for January 20 3509:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 3210:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 3135:; once by me and several times by others about 3060:Your editwarring and attempts at censorship at 3032:Many thanks. When I get some free time then... 1358:was not accepted by all tennis editors either. 966:again until Dicklyon has had time to cool off. 865:and he jeered at me for not being able to find 435:Remove redlinks that are unlikely to turn blue. 7945:Hi, Sandbergja, thanks for your comments. The 7767:these days? I hope the company is doing well. 7369:uses diacritics. Perhaps that could be added. 5064:my talk page and I would be happy to discuss. 4631:There are a lot of geeky articles—such as the 4096:Talk:Responsive web design#Reactive Web Design 3823:researching reliable sources for names in BLPs 1202:Knowledge talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters 8914:Hello, LittleBenW. You have new messages at 8797:Regarding your continued TBAN violation (and 7923:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-21322183 7857:Hello, LittleBenW. You have new messages at 7296:The selection still seems arbitrary. Why the 6862:Surely I am supposed to be unblocked by now. 6258:before I RMed it: did I do something wrong?? 6008:text when quoting. It's easier to recognize. 5593:Google reliable sources for "Shinryo Ikenaga" 5558:Google reliable sources for "Shinryō Ikenaga" 4547:All the best for the New Year! Best regards. 3897:Category:Knowledge Manual of Style (regional) 3814:you can see that I spent a lot of time on my 3270:To be fair, he posted that before I blocked. 3113:Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion 2863:Category:Knowledge Manual of Style (regional) 2596:Hello, LittleBenW. You have new messages at 1653:Hello, LittleBenW. You have new messages at 1128:Hello, LittleBenW. You have new messages at 1020:Hello, LittleBenW. You have new messages at 888:Knowledge talk:Manual of Style#Edit summaries 807:, but my self-evident edits were reverted by 348:Hello, LittleBenW. You have new messages at 6493:. Community-imposed bans can be appealed at 5893:Not to appear like I'm grave-dancing, but... 5520:Google reliable sources for "Yukichi Takeda" 5485:Google reliable sources for "Yūkichi Takeda" 4094:that backs this up. I'll leave a comment at 3163:; among others. Enough is enough. Maybe a 1772:: A Dispute Resolution Newsletter (Issue #1) 32:, and the actual discussion can be found on 8596:and bully Fyunck, and this was right after 6714:shows that you are currently engaged in an 5867:Google reliable sources for "Tokyo Station" 5860:Google reliable sources for "Tōkyō Station" 5150:I'm unaware of the details, but—like I say— 4060:Responsive web design (reactive web design) 3833:. Maybe Knowledge is irretrievably broken? 8809:Hello. There is currently a discussion at 8600:had been bullied off Knowledge. Then when 8095:Hello. There is currently a discussion at 6666:Hello. There is currently a discussion at 6538:Hello. There is currently a discussion at 6441:Hello. There is currently a discussion at 5924:I see a lot of nice words for MI not only 4798:very short, narrowly-focused geeky article 3640:Based on the results of the discussion at 3507:Hello. There is currently a discussion at 3208:Hello. There is currently a discussion at 3117:Hello. There is currently a discussion at 68:; nor should it be used as a platform for 8169:Knowledge:Arbcom#Contacting the Committee 7484:does publish in English, or at least did 5757:Google reliable sources for "Yuzo Kayama" 5714:Google reliable sources for "Yūzō Kayama" 5268:(or have been) used by language teachers 4409:of people who threaten other users with " 4256:at the same time about the same subject. 3901:Asian text on-screen readability cautions 3220:think you can just get away with anything 2928:, and we can see if it sticks. Cheers. -- 2484:Comparison of layout engines (ECMAScript) 8616:to Vietnamese names and Japanese names. 3460:, which I would strongly suggest should 1794: 8667:about your POV pushing at many venues. 7674:BTW, thanks for the Britannica source. 7609:Talk page formatting and edit summaries 6501:. The process for appealing bans under 4777:, and cool things down, are admirable. 4064:Hi. You undid a revision I made to the 3931:Knowledge:Accessibility#Other languages 2922:links to it - wouldn't you agree? I've 2919:Category:Multilingual support templates 2859:Category:Multilingual support templates 2845:Knowledge:Manual of Style/Accessibility 2299:page. (I think that an admin's help is 1810:: A brief overview of the DR ecosystem. 801:Knowledge:Manual_of_Style#Foreign_terms 196:Thank you for your contribution to the 9016:File:WP BasicSearchBoxesScreenshot.jpg 8575:surely not a violation of my topic ban 5330:sources; he removed an explanation of 2199:when you're expecting to read about a 1274:LittleBen, you're completely right. -- 514:Special:WhatLinksHere/Outline_of_chess 66:Knowledge is not a collection of links 9014:A file that you uploaded or altered, 7172:discuss the matter with you first. -- 6384:PLEASE STOP TALKING TO ME ABOUT THIS. 5957:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Jigai 5800:not as if NYT people are ignoramuses. 4622:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard 4572:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard 4236:. And no, we're not the same editor. 4025:by adding below this notice the text 3472:by adding below this notice the text 2544:It notifies a bot to put a notice at 2371:Category naming issues are discussed 2240:I've just noticed that you moved the 2004:of the people who disagree with you. 607:(the text entry field just above the 8610:you yourself admitted to SMcCandlish 7272: 7246: 7245:;-) Maybe they want to avoid wars. 6792:User talk:Moonraker12#Town in Bosnia 5215:to revert numerous edits I had made. 4802:almost twice the number of pageviews 4628:and bring the biggest mob to an RfC. 2727:"obsessive, unreasonable people" is 2307:redirect page in order to allow the 1374:Google Insights for Search like this 958:suggest that few people are finding 628:Whatever you choose, happy editing! 512:For another example, take a look at 8589: 8558:Thank you for confirming with your 8483:When you are in a hole stop digging 5695:doesn't even teach its own citizens 5246:. This continued for about a month. 4731:and fair compromise, not mob rule. 4173:It seems to be an ordinary case of 3127:You were warned: twice by me about 2083:Special:Contributions/In_ictu_oculi 1799:Steven Zhang's Fellowship Slideshow 1258:ease of use / ease of participation 954:The Pageview numbers that I cited 537:its traffic increased significantly 172:, ask me on my talk page, or place 13: 8907: 8820: 8389:has been nominated for deletion. 8370:has been nominated for deletion. 8118:I have blocked you for repeatedly 7850: 7417:Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 6702: 6425:, and appears to have returned as 6174:, and appears to have returned as 6037:, and appears to have returned as 5473:That's essentially the reason for 4991:Re: Knowledge Pageviews stats tool 3996: 3810:are an asset to Knowledge. If you 3757: 3431: 2589: 2464:template at the bottom of the page 2226:. This is a similar process to an 1646: 1121: 1013: 341: 14: 9047: 8730:overriding the expert opinions of 7890:Question about edits you reverted 7132:Talk:forced adoption in Australia 6926:Tennis editor Jevansen's comments 6514:WP:ARBATC#Discretionary sanctions 6390:ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH HIM 6226:title that is no longer available 6143: 5703: 4585:not here to write an encyclopedia 4314:IIO's post to SMcCandlish was at 4252:Interesting that IIO appeared to 2508:Comparison of web browser engines 1855:Read the entire first edition of 901:chipped in to support Darkfrog24. 579:required a great number of edits. 19:National Union of General Workers 8683:Knowledge:OPENPARA#First mention 8583:stifle discussion of such issues 8381: 8362: 7273: 7247: 2264:. We are not supposed to create 1920:{{Linktext|雲|緑|lang=zh}} yields 1910:{{Linktext|雲|緑|lang=ja}} yields 1776:Welcome to the first edition of 658: 629: 200:article. Keep up the good work! 51: 8955:. I assume you know how to use 8839:—especially if you violate the 8523:on his Talk page 17:07, 1 April 6725:—especially if you violate the 6710:Your recent editing history at 5341:we know he's still following me 5239:other matters beyond my control 3882:she is not going to put it back 1354:You seem to be forgetting that 846:Knowledge:Categorization/Naming 799:On 28 June, I added links from 8332: 8326:Thanks to the kind support of 7817: 7332:Thanks for your comments. The 6141:Did you see my comment about " 5332:a Japanese-language film title 3306:. I'm a firm believer in the 3064:are arguably already over the 2749:You obviously didn't read how 2279:redirect page, (b) delete the 2135:WP:BLP "get the article right" 2069:12:30, 25 September 2012 (UTC) 2042:11:00, 25 September 2012 (UTC) 2014:09:02, 25 September 2012 (UTC) 1940:07:07, 14 September 2012 (UTC) 1867:19:08, 4 September 2012 (UTC) 848:and he reverted those as well. 389:Hi. I invite you to join the 319:I agree. Please contact me at 286:Re: Knowledge 10th Anniversary 1: 8594:come to the tennis discussion 8568:talk about bullying me at ANI 7366:Journal of Vietnamese Studies 6836:before continuing to edit. — 6529:07:31, 28 February 2013 (UTC) 6479:04:57, 24 February 2013 (UTC) 6455:04:43, 24 February 2013 (UTC) 6404:17:13, 23 February 2013 (UTC) 6368:17:03, 23 February 2013 (UTC) 6354:16:58, 23 February 2013 (UTC) 6335:16:49, 23 February 2013 (UTC) 6312:16:18, 23 February 2013 (UTC) 6268:16:18, 23 February 2013 (UTC) 6238:16:08, 23 February 2013 (UTC) 6210:15:50, 23 February 2013 (UTC) 6157:14:41, 22 February 2013 (UTC) 6137:05:07, 22 February 2013 (UTC) 6122:05:01, 22 February 2013 (UTC) 6099:Please stop it. I have shown 6091:04:01, 22 February 2013 (UTC) 6067:03:36, 22 February 2013 (UTC) 6049:Re:JoshuSasori's workplace... 6018:15:11, 21 February 2013 (UTC) 5991:14:34, 21 February 2013 (UTC) 5974:14:08, 21 February 2013 (UTC) 5942:13:33, 21 February 2013 (UTC) 5913:12:45, 21 February 2013 (UTC) 5888:14:41, 21 February 2013 (UTC) 5822:07:59, 21 February 2013 (UTC) 5686:promote your good work better 5676:07:31, 21 February 2013 (UTC) 5653:07:17, 21 February 2013 (UTC) 5633:promote your good work better 5631:. But I'd recommend that you 5441:06:06, 21 February 2013 (UTC) 5395:05:36, 21 February 2013 (UTC) 5360:05:07, 21 February 2013 (UTC) 5295:04:47, 21 February 2013 (UTC) 5263:01:36, 21 February 2013 (UTC) 5164:15:27, 20 February 2013 (UTC) 5144:15:19, 20 February 2013 (UTC) 5114:14:54, 20 February 2013 (UTC) 5079:13:59, 20 February 2013 (UTC) 5001:14:41, 11 February 2013 (UTC) 4316:10:36, 12 November 2012 (UTC) 4309:17:51, 11 November 2012 (UTC) 4108:11:35, 10 December 2012 (UTC) 4084:10:01, 10 December 2012 (UTC) 4009:from editing for a period of 3895:, which I have expanded, and 3536:11:15, 30 November 2012 (UTC) 3498:12:25, 22 November 2012 (UTC) 3444:from editing for a period of 3395:19:29, 30 November 2012 (UTC) 3377:11:24, 30 November 2012 (UTC) 3346:10:54, 30 November 2012 (UTC) 3294:22:46, 22 November 2012 (UTC) 3280:16:59, 22 November 2012 (UTC) 3266:13:17, 22 November 2012 (UTC) 3246:11:14, 22 November 2012 (UTC) 3199:09:20, 22 November 2012 (UTC) 3107:04:30, 22 November 2012 (UTC) 3092:04:28, 22 November 2012 (UTC) 3042:15:29, 21 November 2012 (UTC) 3026:15:22, 21 November 2012 (UTC) 3000:05:34, 21 November 2012 (UTC) 2982:01:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC) 2963:01:08, 20 November 2012 (UTC) 2938:23:26, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 2909:18:21, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 2890:18:07, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 2827:16:35, 18 November 2012 (UTC) 2813:15:25, 18 November 2012 (UTC) 2779:14:36, 18 November 2012 (UTC) 2741:14:30, 18 November 2012 (UTC) 2720:05:52, 15 November 2012 (UTC) 2704:01:33, 15 November 2012 (UTC) 2496:13:34, 12 November 2012 (UTC) 2457:00:22, 12 November 2012 (UTC) 1761:04:34, 7 September 2012 (UTC) 1743:04:22, 7 September 2012 (UTC) 1724:04:16, 7 September 2012 (UTC) 1704:11:24, 6 September 2012 (UTC) 1325:where you were discussed was 1241:?? what's with the tantrum? 258:Re: HTML e-mail link deletion 139:The five pillars of Knowledge 100:Doesn't look so bad on review 62:guidelines for external links 9020:Knowledge:Files for deletion 8588:You are well aware that you 7788:LittleBenW, I have reverted 6276:(in a not-so-friendly manner 5221:For the record, in case you 5104:Cheers, and happy editing! 4986:11:47, 27 January 2013 (UTC) 4933:11:26, 20 January 2013 (UTC) 4880:08:07, 13 January 2013 (UTC) 4055:13:06, 2 December 2012 (UTC) 3982:11:10, 2 December 2012 (UTC) 3970:dictatorial and petty admins 3887:Back on about 3 July, under 3867:08:27, 2 December 2012 (UTC) 3843:04:37, 2 December 2012 (UTC) 3776:03:08, 2 December 2012 (UTC) 3741:Re: Knowledge accessibility 3733:10:07, 2 December 2012 (UTC) 3719:02:19, 2 December 2012 (UTC) 3703:07:10, 2 December 2012 (UTC) 3688:02:17, 2 December 2012 (UTC) 3664:20:00, 1 December 2012 (UTC) 3630:10:41, 1 December 2012 (UTC) 3615:06:28, 1 December 2012 (UTC) 3593:12:58, 1 December 2012 (UTC) 3567:04:21, 1 December 2012 (UTC) 3551:02:10, 1 December 2012 (UTC) 3409:02:13, 1 December 2012 (UTC) 2677:08:58, 3 November 2012 (UTC) 2647:08:40, 3 November 2012 (UTC) 2628:04:20, 3 November 2012 (UTC) 2605:04:20, 3 November 2012 (UTC) 2577:12:59, 4 November 2012 (UTC) 2559:18:07, 3 November 2012 (UTC) 2540:01:29, 3 November 2012 (UTC) 2525:23:21, 2 November 2012 (UTC) 2437:15:08, 2 November 2012 (UTC) 2412:You can see an example of a 2408:07:39, 2 November 2012 (UTC) 2385:07:22, 2 November 2012 (UTC) 2364:07:13, 2 November 2012 (UTC) 2341:05:59, 2 November 2012 (UTC) 2321:Knowledge talk:Moving a page 2311:article to be moved back to 2283:redirect page, (c) move the 2217:05:29, 2 November 2012 (UTC) 2187:I agree with what you wrote 2169:07:06, 2 November 2012 (UTC) 2155:02:04, 13 October 2012 (UTC) 2108:, and has to do it himself. 838:Deciding on an article title 649:19:05, 20 January 2012 (UTC) 553:19:31, 20 October 2011 (UTC) 507:Outline of the United States 402:19:31, 20 October 2011 (UTC) 380:16:12, 12 October 2011 (UTC) 357:16:12, 12 October 2011 (UTC) 331:12:33, 1 February 2011 (UTC) 312:15:34, 25 January 2011 (UTC) 154:How to write a great article 7: 9037:12:48, 2 October 2015 (UTC) 7952:Google Custom Search Engine 6852:01:25, 12 March 2013 (UTC) 6598:LittleBenW. I believe that 6380:Ukare Gitsune Senbon Zakura 5855:(moved, back on 25 Oct.): 5067:Cheers, and happy editing! 4843:02:00, 7 January 2013 (UTC) 4814:01:02, 6 January 2013 (UTC) 4787:01:41, 6 January 2013 (UTC) 4765:00:52, 6 January 2013 (UTC) 4741:00:54, 6 January 2013 (UTC) 4726:00:45, 6 January 2013 (UTC) 4706:00:35, 6 January 2013 (UTC) 4691:21:03, 5 January 2013 (UTC) 4658:00:34, 6 January 2013 (UTC) 4615:20:06, 5 January 2013 (UTC) 4557:04:32, 4 January 2013 (UTC) 4536:03:42, 4 January 2013 (UTC) 4507:11:39, 4 January 2013 (UTC) 4489:11:00, 4 January 2013 (UTC) 4473:10:50, 4 January 2013 (UTC) 4441:11:39, 4 January 2013 (UTC) 4423:17:39, 3 January 2013 (UTC) 4402:15:52, 3 January 2013 (UTC) 4374:15:11, 3 January 2013 (UTC) 4356:14:49, 3 January 2013 (UTC) 4337:14:28, 3 January 2013 (UTC) 4300:11:42, 3 January 2013 (UTC) 4282:10:38, 3 January 2013 (UTC) 4266:10:34, 3 January 2013 (UTC) 4246:08:53, 3 January 2013 (UTC) 4223:23:47, 2 January 2013 (UTC) 4195:16:39, 2 January 2013 (UTC) 4165:00:12, 3 January 2013 (UTC) 4146:15:35, 2 January 2013 (UTC) 3935:Template:Lang/doc#Rationale 3891:, I added hatnote links to 3762:banned from that topic area 3605:Just wanted to say, hello. 3322:issue, which I stand by. — 2470:, leaving only the RMs. ;-) 2118:01:09, 6 October 2012 (UTC) 2095:15:21, 5 October 2012 (UTC) 1889:11:46, 5 January 2013 (UTC) 1662:15:34, 27 August 2012 (UTC) 1586:17:03, 15 August 2012 (UTC) 1554:16:43, 15 August 2012 (UTC) 1376:(note: sports category) or 1022:John of Reading's talk page 811:for lack of edit summaries. 281:13:56, 31 August 2010 (UTC) 111:13:56, 31 August 2010 (UTC) 10: 9052: 9004:18:06, 28 April 2013 (UTC) 8975:16:36, 28 April 2013 (UTC) 8943:20:47, 27 April 2013 (UTC) 8923:20:47, 27 April 2013 (UTC) 8897:18:02, 27 April 2013 (UTC) 8791:10:04, 24 April 2013 (UTC) 8776:05:39, 24 April 2013 (UTC) 8754:02:32, 24 April 2013 (UTC) 8677:01:39, 24 April 2013 (UTC) 8658:01:28, 24 April 2013 (UTC) 8626:01:17, 24 April 2013 (UTC) 8547:00:19, 24 April 2013 (UTC) 8510:23:42, 23 April 2013 (UTC) 8495:23:30, 23 April 2013 (UTC) 8460:22:28, 23 April 2013 (UTC) 8423:20:15, 23 April 2013 (UTC) 8402:11:26, 21 April 2013 (UTC) 8377:11:01, 21 April 2013 (UTC) 8346:22:17, 23 April 2013 (UTC) 8321:21:52, 21 April 2013 (UTC) 8301:13:18, 21 April 2013 (UTC) 8286:13:04, 21 April 2013 (UTC) 8267:12:33, 21 April 2013 (UTC) 8251:11:52, 21 April 2013 (UTC) 8235:10:40, 21 April 2013 (UTC) 8217:10:13, 21 April 2013 (UTC) 8203:09:18, 21 April 2013 (UTC) 8181:10:13, 21 April 2013 (UTC) 8163:10:09, 21 April 2013 (UTC) 8147:09:00, 21 April 2013 (UTC) 8122:other users regarding the 8109:07:05, 21 April 2013 (UTC) 8091:TBAN violations ANI notice 8086:02:50, 21 April 2013 (UTC) 7984:TED video by Majora Carter 7777:01:14, 31 March 2013 (UTC) 7755:08:22, 30 March 2013 (UTC) 7737:02:47, 29 March 2013 (UTC) 7723:02:30, 29 March 2013 (UTC) 7684:01:36, 29 March 2013 (UTC) 7669:23:44, 28 March 2013 (UTC) 7654:22:16, 28 March 2013 (UTC) 7635:18:42, 28 March 2013 (UTC) 7601:14:14, 29 March 2013 (UTC) 7584:02:34, 29 March 2013 (UTC) 7568:18:45, 28 March 2013 (UTC) 7549:15:45, 28 March 2013 (UTC) 7534:15:34, 28 March 2013 (UTC) 7506:01:27, 29 March 2013 (UTC) 7473:00:58, 29 March 2013 (UTC) 7455:16:15, 28 March 2013 (UTC) 7434:11:14, 28 March 2013 (UTC) 7402:06:11, 28 March 2013 (UTC) 7383:06:01, 28 March 2013 (UTC) 7347:02:30, 27 March 2013 (UTC) 7326:15:18, 26 March 2013 (UTC) 7288:06:54, 26 March 2013 (UTC) 7262:02:24, 26 March 2013 (UTC) 7243:WP:Wikiproject Video games 7182:17:35, 25 March 2013 (UTC) 7152:09:35, 24 March 2013 (UTC) 7125:19:38, 24 March 2013 (UTC) 7111:14:16, 24 March 2013 (UTC) 7055:09:04, 24 March 2013 (UTC) 6993:06:08, 24 March 2013 (UTC) 6974:05:37, 24 March 2013 (UTC) 6950:03:06, 23 March 2013 (UTC) 6908:02:30, 19 March 2013 (UTC) 6889:02:24, 19 March 2013 (UTC) 6872:01:54, 19 March 2013 (UTC) 6805:08:54, 11 March 2013 (UTC) 6694:00:18, 12 March 2013 (UTC) 6300:Double Suicide of Sonezaki 4696:Please see comment above. 4232:easier to locate. Anyway, 4037:, but you should read the 3484:, but you should read the 3214:Legal threat by LittleBenW 1958:research community on meta 1323:Admin. Noticeboard archive 861:I explained my reasons on 558:P.S.: I hope you join the 41:06:59, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 17:RFC/discussion of article 8606:Better use of WT:BLP time 8074:Anyway, have a nice day. 8045:23:00, 7 April 2013 (UTC) 8028:03:07, 5 April 2013 (UTC) 8013:17:39, 4 April 2013 (UTC) 7996:16:55, 4 April 2013 (UTC) 7941:14:42, 4 April 2013 (UTC) 7885:11:48, 4 April 2013 (UTC) 7866:11:48, 4 April 2013 (UTC) 7859:Codename Lisa's talk page 7840:17:57, 4 April 2013 (UTC) 7807:15:49, 4 April 2013 (UTC) 6781:13:16, 8 March 2013 (UTC) 6657:10:46, 4 March 2013 (UTC) 6642:10:43, 4 March 2013 (UTC) 6627:09:46, 4 March 2013 (UTC) 6612:05:00, 4 March 2013 (UTC) 6593:15:07, 2 March 2013 (UTC) 6562:11:56, 2 March 2013 (UTC) 6484:Your query regarding bans 5684:If you look at my bolded 4589:not what Knowledge is for 4384:1) So why do you canvass? 4039:guide to appealing blocks 4019:make useful contributions 3486:guide to appealing blocks 3458:make useful contributions 1921: 1911: 1846:: It's time to close the 1832:DR Noticeboard comparison 1816:: The most recent DR data 1637:17:01, 30 July 2012 (UTC) 1618:04:35, 29 July 2012 (UTC) 1505:04:43, 30 July 2012 (UTC) 1490:02:00, 30 July 2012 (UTC) 1463:15:59, 29 July 2012 (UTC) 1447:14:46, 29 July 2012 (UTC) 1411:11:45, 29 July 2012 (UTC) 1395:02:01, 29 July 2012 (UTC) 1368:17:12, 28 July 2012 (UTC) 1348:14:31, 28 July 2012 (UTC) 1316:06:30, 28 July 2012 (UTC) 1284:09:55, 25 July 2012 (UTC) 1270:05:52, 24 July 2012 (UTC) 1251:05:04, 24 July 2012 (UTC) 1237:04:37, 24 July 2012 (UTC) 1214:04:13, 24 July 2012 (UTC) 1185:09:53, 25 July 2012 (UTC) 1167:10:40, 23 July 2012 (UTC) 1137:02:50, 23 July 2012 (UTC) 1109:07:09, 22 July 2012 (UTC) 1095:05:45, 22 July 2012 (UTC) 1074:17:18, 21 July 2012 (UTC) 687:22:29, 26 June 2012 (UTC) 587:Just to the right of the 230:08:17, 20 June 2010 (UTC) 192:Tokyo Electron and Horiba 187:04:25, 2 April 2010 (UTC) 93:04:10, 2 April 2010 (UTC) 8892: 8883:This has been posted at 8786: 8749: 8672: 8621: 8505: 8455: 8341: 8158: 8040: 8023: 8008: 7991: 7835: 7750: 7741:You might like to quote 7718: 7579: 7544: 7468: 7397: 7342: 7283: 7257: 7120: 7106: 6969: 6932:professionally known as 6903: 6867: 6622: 6437:Re: Topic ban violations 6363: 6330: 6233: 6196:?? Don't tell me you're 6152: 6132: 6086: 5986: 5937: 5883: 5817: 5710:PS FYI: Re. Yuzo Kayama: 5648: 5390: 5290: 5159: 5109: 4809: 4782: 4736: 4701: 4653: 4637:huge number of pageviews 4552: 4484: 4463:Ben: I'm sorry I asked! 4418: 4369: 4332: 4261: 4218: 4160: 4103: 3977: 3893:Help:Interlanguage links 3838: 3812:look at my contributions 3714: 3625: 3546: 3404: 3372: 3102: 3037: 2995: 2958: 2904: 2822: 2774: 2715: 2642: 2572: 2535: 2491: 2432: 2423:I added the RM template 2380: 2336: 2258:Layout engine (software) 2246:Layout engine (software) 2164: 2113: 2037: 1966:Diacritic version or not 1884: 1738: 1500: 1485: 1442: 1390: 1343: 1265: 1232: 1148:Capitalization of titles 1104: 1045:16:40, 3 July 2012 (UTC) 1002:12:00, 5 July 2012 (UTC) 976:05:19, 4 July 2012 (UTC) 971: 964:Knowledge:Article titles 867:Knowledge:Article titles 826:Knowledge:Article naming 757:20:24, 3 July 2012 (UTC) 732:17:46, 3 July 2012 (UTC) 727: 716:16:36, 3 July 2012 (UTC) 575:I noticed your work on 8353:Nomination for deletion 7445:, the party newspaper. 7314:define reliable sources 7035:Knowledge:Summary style 7026:Content too specialized 6322:Talk:Kindai Eiga Kyokai 5322:historical data in the 3636:Notice of ban enactment 3133:vandalism-by-negligence 2655:Please see my reply at 2329:Knowledge:Moving a page 980:Hi, thanks for message. 591:button, you'll see the 456:Outline of cell biology 121:Hello, LittleBenW, and 64:and have been removed. 60:do not comply with our 8912: 8825: 8665:obsessively disruptive 8566:contributions, and to 7855: 6916:Honestly, LittleBenW, 6707: 5182:Two days later I went 4001: 3436: 3318:notice, and raising a 2594: 1800: 1651: 1126: 1018: 577:Cascading style sheets 346: 9018:, has been listed at 8911: 8824: 8720:Responsive Web Design 8590:canvassed SMcCandlish 7854: 7520:Typo in your proposal 7233:engine (also called " 6706: 5849:", I've just noticed 4307:Your post to IIO was 4179:he has accused me for 4066:responsive web design 4033:Your reason here ~~~~ 4000: 3961:Responsive web design 3933:, and added links to 3806:spend all their time 3480:Your reason here ~~~~ 3435: 2593: 1850:. Agree or disagree? 1798: 1650: 1125: 1017: 460:Outline of basketball 345: 123:welcome to Knowledge! 8836:blocked from editing 8560:added talk-page link 8387:Template:Google RGSE 8035:may be of interest. 7231:Google custom search 6997:I wasn't aware that 6722:blocked from editing 6475:SarekOfVulcan (talk) 6460:Topic ban violations 4974:opt-out instructions 4921:opt-out instructions 3940:One editor recently 3143:problems, including 2843:You made 6 edits to 2416:discussion template 1683:Talk:Dominik Halmoši 1655:Czarkoff's talk page 1321:Hi. The link to the 1050:Heads Up! New Reply! 986:not a normal article 824:On 1 July, I edited 503:Outline of geography 350:Monty845's talk page 26:request for comments 8863:among editors. See 8293:Boing! said Zebedee 8259:Boing! said Zebedee 8227:Boing! said Zebedee 8209:Boing! said Zebedee 8195:Boing! said Zebedee 8173:Boing! said Zebedee 8071:is now a redirect. 6749:among editors. See 6571:diacritics-related 5897:Do you still think 4956:fix with Dab solver 4903:fix with Dab solver 4794:number of pageviews 4577:tendentious editing 4254:canvass SMcCandlish 4070:reactive web design 2102:threatening admins. 1130:Kudpung's talk page 960:Regional MOS guides 805:Regional MOS guides 560:Outline WikiProject 531:navigation footer. 452:Outline of forestry 392:Outline Wikiproject 210:I think that TEL's 170:Knowledge:Questions 78:article's talk page 8927:remove this notice 8916:Wer900's talk page 8913: 8873:dispute resolution 8826: 8368:Template:Google RS 8357:Template:Google RS 7978:and <Quote: --> 7870:remove this notice 7856: 7013:here on Knowledge! 6759:dispute resolution 6708: 6419:User:Elvenscout742 6296:Dreams (1990 film) 6216:moving Taboo (the 6168:User:Elvenscout742 6031:User:Elvenscout742 5475:Template:Google RS 5337:Dreams (1990 film) 4964:• Join us at the 4911:• Join us at the 4664:Recent occurrences 4211:User:HandsomeFella 4092:reliable reference 4013:for violations of 4002: 3450:disruptive editing 3437: 3155:issues, including 2609:remove this notice 2595: 2309:Web browser engine 2297:Web browser engine 2285:Web browser engine 2262:Web browser engine 2197:Web browser engine 2181:Web browser engine 1945:Diacritics testing 1801: 1782:dispute resolution 1666:remove this notice 1652: 1141:remove this notice 1127: 1029:remove this notice 1019: 869:, as mentioned in 784:Does anybody care? 782:The reason for my 692:Does anybody care? 665:your contributions 361:remove this notice 347: 212:Annual Report 2009 144:How to edit a page 127:your contributions 9022:. Please see the 9002: 8965:if you wish to.-- 8941: 8841:three-revert rule 8742:tried the ANI gig 8400: 8394: 8375: 7899:Web search engine 7593:KumiokoCleanStart 7560:KumiokoCleanStart 7420:. That's also on 6851: 6727:three-revert rule 6691: 6579:. Your edit at 6559: 6527: 6427:User:Konjakupoet2 6318:Talk:Ryoko Nakano 6176:User:Konjakupoet2 6144:More encyclopedic 6039:User:Konjakupoet2 5847:More encyclopedic 5707:" comments below. 5704:More encyclopedic 5031:worst offensive. 4969: 4916: 4841: 4612: 4177:, something that 4023:appeal this block 3919:WP:Article titles 3910:The Regional MOS 3831:Jimbo's talk page 3533: 3470:appeal this block 3343: 3243: 3196: 3089: 2598:TheDJ's talk page 2002:assume good faith 1894:Template:Linktext 1838:Discussion update 1826:Activity analysis 1803:In this issue: 1419:I think that the 893:In the end, only 549:The Transhumanist 464:Outline of tennis 398:The Transhumanist 377: 315: 298:comment added by 9043: 9034: 9001: 8999: 8994: 8987: 8964: 8958: 8948:Indefinite block 8937: 8930: 8823: 8602:I started an RfC 8598:User:MakeSense64 8471:Francis Urquhart 8419: 8396: 8390: 8385: 8384: 8371: 8366: 8365: 8143: 8138: 8133: 7873: 7713:or POV-pushers. 7711:screw lightbulbs 7708: 7702: 7698: 7692: 7278: 7277: 7276: 7252: 7251: 7250: 7201: 7195: 7170: 7164: 6934:Facundo Arguello 6930:Facundo Argüello 6881: 6861: 6855: 6850: 6848: 6837: 6827: 6821: 6778: 6772: 6705: 6692: 6687: 6686: 6560: 6555: 6554: 6526: 6524: 6517: 6476: 6431:User:Konjakupoet 6376:Twenty-Four Eyes 6180:User:Konjakupoet 6043:User:Konjakupoet 5701:. See also the " 5629:few people visit 4959: 4952:check to confirm 4906: 4899:check to confirm 4840: 4837: 4831: 4796:that it gets. A 4762: 4756: 4723: 4717: 4688: 4682: 4613: 4608: 4607: 4121: 4120:Merry Christmas! 4036: 3999: 3864: 3773: 3659: 3652: 3534: 3529: 3528: 3526: 3483: 3452:, as you did at 3434: 3344: 3339: 3338: 3336: 3244: 3239: 3238: 3236: 3197: 3192: 3191: 3189: 3137:personal attacks 3090: 3085: 3084: 3082: 2927: 2874: 2868: 2856: 2850: 2612: 2266:double redirects 1928: 1918: 1907: 1901: 1875:Please refer to 1865:The Olive Branch 1857:The Olive Branch 1778:The Olive Branch 1770:The Olive Branch 1709:Personal attacks 1669: 1153:Please also see 1144: 1093: 1091: 1084: 1072: 1070: 1063: 1032: 914:The position of 754: 749: 713: 708: 662: 661: 645: 633: 632: 624:, and be undone. 529: 523: 496: 490: 448:Outline of chess 385:An invitation... 373: 370: 364: 314: 292: 175: 55: 9051: 9050: 9046: 9045: 9044: 9042: 9041: 9040: 9030: 9012: 8997: 8990: 8988: 8962: 8956: 8950: 8931: 8920: 8905: 8877:page protection 8821: 8819: 8817:3RR possibility 8807: 8413: 8409: 8382: 8363: 8360: 8141: 8136: 8131: 8116: 8093: 8052: 7921:A BBC article ( 7894:Hi LittleBenW, 7892: 7874: 7863: 7848: 7727:Giggle giggle. 7706: 7700: 7696: 7690: 7642: 7611: 7522: 7334:Washington Post 7302:Washington Post 7274: 7248: 7199: 7193: 7168: 7162: 7159: 7135: 7074: 7028: 6887: 6879: 6859: 6853: 6846: 6838: 6825: 6819: 6812: 6788: 6776: 6770: 6763:page protection 6703: 6701: 6681: 6675: 6672:WP:ICANTHEARYOU 6549: 6543: 6536: 6520: 6518: 6486: 6474: 6462: 6439: 6302:was the first. 6188: 6051: 5895: 5699:glass bead game 5008: 4993: 4966:DPL WikiProject 4940: 4913:DPL WikiProject 4887: 4861: 4835: 4832: 4760: 4752: 4721: 4713: 4686: 4678: 4666: 4602: 4596: 4581:WP:BATTLEGROUND 4568: 4519: 4213:of canvassing? 4128: 4122: 4119: 4116: 4062: 4057: 4026: 3997: 3994: 3862: 3771: 3743: 3671: 3657: 3650: 3638: 3603: 3524: 3519: 3513: 3505: 3500: 3473: 3448:for persistent 3432: 3429: 3334: 3329: 3323: 3234: 3229: 3223: 3206: 3187: 3182: 3176: 3157:WP:BATTLEGROUND 3115: 3080: 3075: 3069: 3058: 2923: 2872: 2866: 2854: 2848: 2841: 2687: 2613: 2602: 2587: 2510: 2293:What links here 2273:What links here 2250:double redirect 2185: 2079: 1947: 1905: 1899: 1896: 1873: 1861: 1774: 1731:behavior issues 1711: 1675: 1670: 1659: 1644: 1625: 1593: 1298: 1171:See this too - 1150: 1145: 1134: 1119: 1090: 1087: 1082: 1080: 1069: 1066: 1061: 1059: 1052: 1037:John of Reading 1033: 1026: 921:User:Darkfrog24 895:User:Darkfrog24 834:Recognizability 752: 747: 711: 706: 694: 669:Help:Minor edit 659: 656: 636: 630: 614: 610: 594: 590: 569: 527: 521: 494: 488: 409: 407:Outline traffic 387: 376: 368: 365: 354: 339: 323:Bryan MacKinnon 293: 288: 260: 194: 173: 159:Manual of Style 119: 48: 22: 12: 11: 5: 9049: 9011: 9008: 9007: 9006: 8984: 8981: 8949: 8946: 8921:Message added 8919: 8906: 8904: 8901: 8900: 8899: 8818: 8815: 8806: 8805:, if you like) 8795: 8794: 8793: 8763: 8762: 8761: 8760: 8759: 8758: 8757: 8756: 8726: 8723: 8715: 8714: 8711:Computer virus 8706: 8705: 8698: 8679: 8642: 8638: 8635: 8629: 8628: 8586: 8571: 8556: 8550: 8549: 8517: 8516: 8515: 8514: 8513: 8512: 8463: 8462: 8434: 8430: 8408: 8405: 8359: 8350: 8349: 8348: 8308: 8307: 8306: 8305: 8304: 8303: 8240: 8238: 8237: 8222: 8221: 8220: 8219: 8186: 8185: 8184: 8183: 8115: 8112: 8092: 8089: 8051: 8048: 7927: 7926: 7919: 7915: 7911: 7891: 7888: 7864:Message added 7862: 7849: 7847: 7844: 7843: 7842: 7786: 7785: 7784: 7783: 7782: 7781: 7780: 7779: 7758: 7757: 7689:The templates 7672: 7671: 7641: 7638: 7610: 7607: 7606: 7605: 7604: 7603: 7587: 7586: 7571: 7570: 7552: 7551: 7521: 7518: 7517: 7516: 7515: 7514: 7513: 7512: 7511: 7510: 7509: 7508: 7476: 7475: 7458: 7457: 7436: 7405: 7404: 7386: 7385: 7352: 7351: 7350: 7349: 7329: 7328: 7298:New York Times 7291: 7290: 7264: 7223: 7215: 7211: 7158: 7155: 7134: 7129: 7128: 7127: 7113: 7094: 7090: 7083: 7079: 7072: 7045: 7027: 7024: 7023: 7022: 7021: 7020: 7019: 7018: 7017: 7016: 7015: 7014: 7011:Samantha Claus 6977: 6976: 6953: 6952: 6922:WP:TENNISNAMES 6918:please drop it 6911: 6910: 6892: 6891: 6883: 6811: 6808: 6790:I was just at 6787: 6784: 6700: 6697: 6664: 6663: 6662: 6661: 6660: 6659: 6596: 6595: 6535: 6532: 6485: 6482: 6461: 6458: 6438: 6435: 6415: 6414: 6413: 6412: 6411: 6410: 6409: 6408: 6407: 6406: 6371: 6370: 6338: 6337: 6240: 6187: 6184: 6164: 6163: 6162: 6161: 6160: 6159: 6139: 6094: 6093: 6078: 6074: 6050: 6047: 6027: 6026: 6025: 6024: 6023: 6022: 6021: 6020: 5994: 5993: 5978:<Quote: --> 5945: 5944: 5922: 5919: 5894: 5891: 5870: 5869: 5863: 5862: 5843: 5842: 5841: 5840: 5839: 5838: 5837: 5836: 5835: 5834: 5833: 5832: 5831: 5830: 5829: 5828: 5827: 5826: 5825: 5824: 5811: 5804: 5801: 5778: 5777: 5776: 5775: 5774: 5773: 5772: 5771: 5770: 5769: 5768: 5767: 5766: 5765: 5764: 5763: 5762: 5761: 5760: 5759: 5735: 5734: 5733: 5732: 5731: 5730: 5729: 5728: 5727: 5726: 5725: 5724: 5723: 5722: 5721: 5720: 5719: 5718: 5717: 5716: 5711: 5708: 5682: 5656: 5655: 5640: 5636: 5610: 5609: 5608: 5607: 5606: 5605: 5604: 5603: 5602: 5601: 5600: 5599: 5598: 5597: 5596: 5595: 5575: 5574: 5573: 5572: 5571: 5570: 5569: 5568: 5567: 5566: 5565: 5564: 5563: 5562: 5561: 5560: 5555: 5537: 5536: 5535: 5534: 5533: 5532: 5531: 5530: 5529: 5528: 5527: 5526: 5525: 5524: 5523: 5522: 5502: 5501: 5500: 5499: 5498: 5497: 5496: 5495: 5494: 5493: 5492: 5491: 5490: 5489: 5488: 5487: 5482: 5456: 5455: 5454: 5453: 5452: 5451: 5450: 5449: 5448: 5447: 5446: 5445: 5444: 5443: 5425:Yūkichi Takeda 5408: 5407: 5406: 5405: 5404: 5403: 5402: 5401: 5400: 5399: 5398: 5397: 5371: 5370: 5369: 5368: 5367: 5366: 5365: 5364: 5363: 5362: 5349: 5344: 5306: 5305: 5304: 5303: 5302: 5301: 5300: 5299: 5298: 5297: 5279: 5247: 5219: 5167: 5166: 5148:<Quote: --> 5132: 5117: 5116: 5102: 5098: 5094: 5061: 5060: 5059: 5058: 5055: 5052: 5007: 5004: 4992: 4989: 4939: 4936: 4891:Computer virus 4886: 4883: 4860: 4859:ArbCom request 4857: 4856: 4855: 4854: 4853: 4852: 4851: 4850: 4849: 4848: 4847: 4846: 4845: 4817: 4816: 4789: 4768: 4767: 4744: 4743: 4665: 4662: 4661: 4660: 4646:your specialty 4633:Computer virus 4629: 4595:newsgroups. — 4567: 4561: 4560: 4559: 4545: 4542: 4518: 4515: 4514: 4513: 4512: 4511: 4510: 4509: 4492: 4491: 4476: 4475: 4461: 4460: 4459: 4458: 4457: 4456: 4455: 4454: 4453: 4452: 4451: 4450: 4449: 4448: 4447: 4446: 4445: 4444: 4443: 4426: 4425: 4411:bitey cesspits 4391: 4390: 4389: 4385: 4377: 4376: 4361: 4340: 4339: 4325: 4322: 4319: 4312: 4305: 4269: 4268: 4249: 4248: 4226: 4225: 4200: 4199: 4198: 4197: 4168: 4167: 4134:sent me a note 4131: 4127: 4126:Template reply 4124: 4118: 4115: 4114:Merry Chistmas 4112: 4111: 4110: 4061: 4058: 4003:You have been 3995: 3993: 3990: 3989: 3988: 3987: 3986: 3985: 3984: 3957: 3945: 3938: 3915: 3908: 3885: 3846: 3845: 3794: 3742: 3739: 3738: 3737: 3736: 3735: 3706: 3705: 3670: 3669:My condolences 3667: 3637: 3634: 3633: 3632: 3602: 3599: 3598: 3597: 3596: 3595: 3570: 3569: 3554: 3553: 3504: 3501: 3438:You have been 3430: 3428: 3425: 3424: 3423: 3422: 3421: 3420: 3419: 3418: 3417: 3416: 3415: 3414: 3413: 3412: 3411: 3380: 3379: 3364: 3361: 3357: 3354: 3351: 3217: 3216:. Thank you. 3205: 3202: 3126: 3125:. Thank you. 3114: 3111: 3110: 3109: 3057: 3054: 3053: 3052: 3051: 3050: 3049: 3048: 3047: 3046: 3045: 3044: 3029: 3028: 3003: 3002: 2987: 2966: 2965: 2941: 2940: 2925:done just that 2912: 2911: 2840: 2837: 2836: 2835: 2834: 2833: 2832: 2831: 2830: 2829: 2797: 2793: 2784: 2783: 2782: 2781: 2744: 2743: 2723: 2722: 2692:Jörgen Windahl 2686: 2683: 2682: 2681: 2680: 2679: 2650: 2649: 2603:Message added 2601: 2588: 2586: 2583: 2582: 2581: 2580: 2579: 2562: 2561: 2542: 2509: 2506: 2505: 2504: 2503: 2502: 2501: 2500: 2499: 2498: 2472: 2471: 2445: 2444: 2443: 2442: 2441: 2440: 2439: 2421: 2414:Requested move 2388: 2387: 2369: 2344: 2343: 2316: 2303:to delete the 2269: 2238: 2235: 2231: 2184: 2177: 2176: 2175: 2174: 2173: 2172: 2171: 2138: 2130: 2127: 2121: 2120: 2078: 2075: 2074: 2073: 2072: 2071: 2052: 2045: 2044: 2029: 2025: 2021: 1994: 1993: 1989: 1988: 1983: 1982: 1970: 1946: 1943: 1929: 1919: 1909: 1895: 1892: 1872: 1869: 1853: 1852: 1851: 1841: 1835: 1829: 1823: 1820:Survey results 1817: 1811: 1773: 1767: 1766: 1765: 1764: 1763: 1746: 1745: 1710: 1707: 1693: 1686: 1674: 1671: 1660:Message added 1658: 1645: 1643: 1640: 1629:Obi-Wan Kenobi 1624: 1621: 1592: 1589: 1573: 1572: 1571: 1570: 1569: 1568: 1567: 1566: 1565: 1564: 1563: 1562: 1561: 1560: 1559: 1558: 1557: 1556: 1542:WP:TENNISNAMES 1518: 1517: 1516: 1515: 1514: 1513: 1512: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1492: 1477: 1450: 1449: 1435: 1431: 1417: 1398: 1397: 1356:WP:TENNISNAMES 1297: 1294: 1293: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1286: 1225:quit Knowledge 1190: 1189: 1188: 1187: 1149: 1146: 1135:Message added 1133: 1120: 1118: 1115: 1114: 1113: 1112: 1111: 1088: 1067: 1051: 1048: 1025: 1012: 1011: 1010: 1009: 1008: 1007: 1006: 1005: 1004: 989: 981: 947: 946: 945: 944: 943: 942: 930: 929: 928: 927: 926: 925: 907: 906: 905: 904: 903: 902: 891: 879: 878: 877: 876: 875: 874: 854: 853: 852: 851: 850: 849: 817: 816: 815: 814: 813: 812: 792: 791: 790: 789: 788: 787: 775: 774: 773: 772: 771: 770: 762: 761: 760: 759: 735: 734: 693: 690: 663:Thank you for 655: 652: 626: 625: 617: 616: 612: 608: 598: 597: 592: 588: 585: 581: 580: 568: 567:Preview button 565: 564: 563: 499: 498: 486: 483: 480: 477: 474: 443: 442: 439: 436: 433: 408: 405: 386: 383: 374: 355:Message added 353: 340: 338: 335: 334: 333: 287: 284: 259: 256: 255: 254: 250: 249: 245: 241: 238:Tokyo Electron 222:Shinkansen Fan 205:Tokyo Electron 193: 190: 166:sign your name 162: 161: 156: 151: 146: 141: 136: 125:Thank you for 118: 115: 114: 113: 47: 44: 21: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 9048: 9039: 9038: 9035: 9033: 9027: 9026: 9021: 9017: 9005: 9000: 8995: 8993: 8985: 8982: 8979: 8978: 8977: 8976: 8972: 8968: 8961: 8954: 8945: 8944: 8940: 8935: 8928: 8924: 8917: 8910: 8898: 8894: 8890: 8886: 8882: 8881: 8880: 8878: 8874: 8870: 8866: 8862: 8858: 8853: 8851: 8846: 8842: 8838: 8837: 8831: 8814: 8812: 8804: 8800: 8792: 8788: 8784: 8780: 8779: 8778: 8777: 8773: 8769: 8768:Fyunck(click) 8755: 8751: 8747: 8743: 8739: 8735: 8731: 8727: 8724: 8721: 8717: 8716: 8712: 8708: 8707: 8703: 8699: 8696: 8692: 8688: 8684: 8680: 8678: 8674: 8670: 8666: 8661: 8660: 8659: 8655: 8651: 8650:In ictu oculi 8647: 8646:strikethrough 8643: 8639: 8636: 8633: 8632: 8631: 8630: 8627: 8623: 8619: 8615: 8611: 8607: 8603: 8599: 8595: 8591: 8587: 8584: 8580: 8576: 8572: 8569: 8565: 8561: 8557: 8554: 8553: 8552: 8551: 8548: 8544: 8540: 8539:In ictu oculi 8536: 8535:strikethrough 8532: 8528: 8524: 8519: 8518: 8511: 8507: 8503: 8498: 8497: 8496: 8492: 8488: 8484: 8480: 8476: 8472: 8467: 8466: 8465: 8464: 8461: 8457: 8453: 8449: 8445: 8444: 8439: 8435: 8431: 8427: 8426: 8425: 8424: 8421: 8418: 8417: 8404: 8403: 8399: 8393: 8388: 8379: 8378: 8374: 8369: 8358: 8354: 8347: 8343: 8339: 8335: 8334: 8329: 8325: 8324: 8323: 8322: 8318: 8314: 8302: 8298: 8294: 8289: 8288: 8287: 8283: 8279: 8274: 8270: 8269: 8268: 8264: 8260: 8255: 8254: 8253: 8252: 8248: 8244: 8236: 8232: 8228: 8224: 8223: 8218: 8214: 8210: 8206: 8205: 8204: 8200: 8196: 8192: 8188: 8187: 8182: 8178: 8174: 8170: 8166: 8165: 8164: 8160: 8156: 8151: 8150: 8149: 8148: 8144: 8139: 8134: 8129: 8125: 8121: 8111: 8110: 8106: 8102: 8098: 8088: 8087: 8083: 8079: 8075: 8072: 8070: 8066: 8062: 8058: 8047: 8046: 8042: 8038: 8034: 8030: 8029: 8025: 8021: 8015: 8014: 8010: 8006: 7998: 7997: 7993: 7989: 7985: 7974: 7972: 7967: 7963: 7960: 7956: 7953: 7948: 7943: 7942: 7938: 7934: 7930: 7924: 7920: 7916: 7912: 7909: 7908: 7907: 7904: 7900: 7895: 7887: 7886: 7882: 7878: 7877:Codename Lisa 7871: 7867: 7860: 7853: 7841: 7837: 7833: 7829: 7824: 7819: 7815: 7811: 7810: 7809: 7808: 7804: 7800: 7799:In ictu oculi 7795: 7791: 7778: 7774: 7770: 7766: 7762: 7761: 7760: 7759: 7756: 7752: 7748: 7744: 7740: 7739: 7738: 7734: 7730: 7726: 7725: 7724: 7720: 7716: 7712: 7705: 7695: 7688: 7687: 7686: 7685: 7681: 7677: 7670: 7666: 7662: 7661:HandsomeFella 7658: 7657: 7656: 7655: 7651: 7647: 7637: 7636: 7632: 7628: 7624: 7620: 7616: 7602: 7598: 7594: 7589: 7588: 7585: 7581: 7577: 7573: 7572: 7569: 7565: 7561: 7556: 7555: 7554: 7553: 7550: 7546: 7542: 7538: 7537: 7536: 7535: 7531: 7527: 7507: 7503: 7499: 7495: 7491: 7487: 7486:two weeks ago 7483: 7480: 7479: 7478: 7477: 7474: 7470: 7466: 7462: 7461: 7460: 7459: 7456: 7452: 7448: 7444: 7443: 7437: 7435: 7431: 7427: 7423: 7419: 7418: 7413: 7409: 7408: 7407: 7406: 7403: 7399: 7395: 7390: 7389: 7388: 7387: 7384: 7380: 7376: 7372: 7368: 7367: 7362: 7358: 7354: 7353: 7348: 7344: 7340: 7335: 7331: 7330: 7327: 7323: 7319: 7315: 7311: 7307: 7303: 7299: 7295: 7294: 7293: 7292: 7289: 7285: 7281: 7270: 7265: 7263: 7259: 7255: 7244: 7240: 7236: 7232: 7228: 7224: 7220: 7216: 7212: 7209: 7205: 7198: 7190: 7186: 7185: 7184: 7183: 7179: 7175: 7167: 7154: 7153: 7149: 7145: 7144:hamiltonstone 7140: 7133: 7126: 7122: 7118: 7114: 7112: 7108: 7104: 7099: 7095: 7091: 7084: 7080: 7077: 7069: 7063: 7059: 7058: 7057: 7056: 7052: 7048: 7047:Codename Lisa 7044:Best regards, 7042: 7040: 7036: 7031: 7012: 7008: 7007:Osaka Station 7004: 7000: 6996: 6995: 6994: 6990: 6986: 6985:In ictu oculi 6981: 6980: 6979: 6978: 6975: 6971: 6967: 6963: 6962:WP:HALLOFLAME 6959: 6955: 6954: 6951: 6947: 6943: 6942:In ictu oculi 6939: 6935: 6931: 6927: 6923: 6919: 6915: 6914: 6913: 6912: 6909: 6905: 6901: 6896: 6895: 6894: 6893: 6890: 6886: 6882: 6876: 6875: 6874: 6873: 6869: 6865: 6858: 6849: 6843: 6842: 6835: 6831: 6824: 6817: 6807: 6806: 6802: 6798: 6797:In ictu oculi 6793: 6786:What is this? 6783: 6782: 6779: 6773: 6768: 6764: 6760: 6756: 6752: 6748: 6744: 6739: 6737: 6732: 6728: 6724: 6723: 6717: 6713: 6696: 6695: 6690: 6684: 6680: 6679: 6673: 6669: 6658: 6654: 6650: 6649:In ictu oculi 6645: 6644: 6643: 6639: 6635: 6634:In ictu oculi 6630: 6629: 6628: 6624: 6620: 6616: 6615: 6614: 6613: 6609: 6605: 6604:In ictu oculi 6601: 6594: 6590: 6586: 6582: 6581:User_talk:PBS 6578: 6574: 6570: 6566: 6565: 6564: 6563: 6558: 6552: 6548: 6547: 6541: 6531: 6530: 6525: 6523: 6515: 6511: 6506: 6504: 6500: 6496: 6492: 6481: 6480: 6477: 6471: 6467: 6466:Talk:Yūji Oda 6457: 6456: 6452: 6448: 6447:elvenscout742 6444: 6434: 6432: 6428: 6424: 6423:User:Hijiri88 6420: 6405: 6401: 6397: 6396:elvenscout742 6393: 6392: 6391: 6385: 6381: 6377: 6373: 6372: 6369: 6365: 6361: 6357: 6356: 6355: 6351: 6347: 6346:elvenscout742 6342: 6341: 6340: 6339: 6336: 6332: 6328: 6323: 6319: 6315: 6314: 6313: 6309: 6305: 6304:elvenscout742 6301: 6297: 6293: 6289: 6285: 6281: 6278: 6275: 6271: 6270: 6269: 6265: 6261: 6260:elvenscout742 6257: 6253: 6249: 6248:tried to move 6245: 6241: 6239: 6235: 6231: 6227: 6223: 6219: 6214: 6213: 6212: 6211: 6207: 6203: 6202:elvenscout742 6199: 6195: 6191: 6183: 6181: 6177: 6173: 6172:User:Hijiri88 6169: 6158: 6154: 6150: 6146: 6145: 6140: 6138: 6134: 6130: 6125: 6124: 6123: 6119: 6115: 6114:elvenscout742 6111: 6106: 6102: 6098: 6097: 6096: 6095: 6092: 6088: 6084: 6079: 6075: 6071: 6070: 6069: 6068: 6064: 6060: 6059:elvenscout742 6055: 6046: 6044: 6040: 6036: 6035:User:Hijiri88 6032: 6019: 6015: 6011: 6010:elvenscout742 6007: 6003: 5998: 5997: 5996: 5995: 5992: 5988: 5984: 5977: 5976: 5975: 5971: 5967: 5966:elvenscout742 5963: 5958: 5954: 5949: 5948: 5947: 5946: 5943: 5939: 5935: 5931: 5927: 5923: 5920: 5917: 5916: 5915: 5914: 5910: 5906: 5905:elvenscout742 5902: 5901: 5890: 5889: 5885: 5881: 5877: 5876: 5868: 5865: 5864: 5861: 5858: 5857: 5856: 5854: 5853: 5848: 5823: 5819: 5815: 5812: 5809: 5805: 5802: 5798: 5797: 5796: 5795: 5794: 5793: 5792: 5791: 5790: 5789: 5788: 5787: 5786: 5785: 5784: 5783: 5782: 5781: 5780: 5779: 5758: 5755: 5754: 5753: 5752: 5751: 5750: 5749: 5748: 5747: 5746: 5745: 5744: 5743: 5742: 5741: 5740: 5739: 5738: 5737: 5736: 5715: 5712: 5709: 5706: 5705: 5700: 5696: 5692: 5687: 5683: 5679: 5678: 5677: 5673: 5669: 5668:elvenscout742 5665: 5660: 5659: 5658: 5657: 5654: 5650: 5646: 5641: 5637: 5634: 5630: 5626: 5625: 5624: 5623: 5622: 5621: 5620: 5619: 5618: 5617: 5616: 5615: 5614: 5613: 5612: 5611: 5594: 5591: 5590: 5589: 5588: 5587: 5586: 5585: 5584: 5583: 5582: 5581: 5580: 5579: 5578: 5577: 5576: 5559: 5556: 5553: 5552: 5551: 5550: 5549: 5548: 5547: 5546: 5545: 5544: 5543: 5542: 5541: 5540: 5539: 5538: 5521: 5518: 5517: 5516: 5515: 5514: 5513: 5512: 5511: 5510: 5509: 5508: 5507: 5506: 5505: 5504: 5503: 5486: 5483: 5480: 5476: 5472: 5471: 5470: 5469: 5468: 5467: 5466: 5465: 5464: 5463: 5462: 5461: 5460: 5459: 5458: 5457: 5442: 5438: 5434: 5433:elvenscout742 5430: 5426: 5422: 5421: 5420: 5419: 5418: 5417: 5416: 5415: 5414: 5413: 5412: 5411: 5410: 5409: 5396: 5392: 5388: 5383: 5382: 5381: 5380: 5379: 5378: 5377: 5376: 5375: 5374: 5373: 5372: 5361: 5357: 5353: 5352:elvenscout742 5350: 5348: 5345: 5342: 5338: 5333: 5329: 5325: 5321: 5316: 5315: 5314: 5313: 5312: 5311: 5310: 5309: 5308: 5307: 5296: 5292: 5288: 5284: 5280: 5276: 5271: 5266: 5265: 5264: 5260: 5256: 5255:elvenscout742 5252: 5249:Anyway, that 5248: 5245: 5240: 5236: 5232: 5228: 5224: 5220: 5217: 5214: 5210: 5208: 5204: 5201: 5198: 5195: 5192: 5188: 5185: 5181: 5178: 5175: 5171: 5170: 5169: 5168: 5165: 5161: 5157: 5153: 5147: 5146: 5145: 5141: 5137: 5136:elvenscout742 5133: 5130: 5126: 5121: 5120: 5119: 5118: 5115: 5111: 5107: 5103: 5099: 5095: 5092: 5088: 5083: 5082: 5081: 5080: 5076: 5072: 5071:elvenscout742 5068: 5065: 5056: 5053: 5049: 5048: 5047: 5046: 5045: 5042: 5041: 5036: 5032: 5029: 5025: 5021: 5018: 5012: 5003: 5002: 4999: 4988: 4987: 4983: 4979: 4975: 4970: 4967: 4963: 4957: 4953: 4949: 4945: 4935: 4934: 4930: 4926: 4922: 4917: 4914: 4910: 4904: 4900: 4896: 4892: 4882: 4881: 4878: 4877: 4874: 4871: 4866: 4844: 4839: 4838: 4829: 4825: 4821: 4820: 4819: 4818: 4815: 4811: 4807: 4803: 4799: 4795: 4790: 4788: 4784: 4780: 4776: 4772: 4771: 4770: 4769: 4766: 4763: 4757: 4755: 4748: 4747: 4746: 4745: 4742: 4738: 4734: 4729: 4728: 4727: 4724: 4718: 4716: 4709: 4708: 4707: 4703: 4699: 4695: 4694: 4693: 4692: 4689: 4683: 4681: 4675: 4671: 4659: 4655: 4651: 4647: 4643: 4638: 4634: 4630: 4627: 4623: 4619: 4618: 4617: 4616: 4611: 4605: 4601: 4600: 4594: 4590: 4586: 4582: 4578: 4573: 4565: 4558: 4554: 4550: 4546: 4543: 4540: 4539: 4538: 4537: 4533: 4529: 4524: 4508: 4504: 4500: 4499:HandsomeFella 4496: 4495: 4494: 4493: 4490: 4486: 4482: 4478: 4477: 4474: 4470: 4466: 4462: 4442: 4438: 4434: 4433:HandsomeFella 4430: 4429: 4428: 4427: 4424: 4420: 4416: 4412: 4407: 4406: 4405: 4404: 4403: 4399: 4395: 4394:HandsomeFella 4392: 4386: 4383: 4382: 4381: 4380: 4379: 4378: 4375: 4371: 4367: 4362: 4359: 4358: 4357: 4353: 4349: 4348:HandsomeFella 4344: 4343: 4342: 4341: 4338: 4334: 4330: 4326: 4323: 4320: 4317: 4313: 4310: 4306: 4303: 4302: 4301: 4297: 4293: 4292:HandsomeFella 4289: 4285: 4284: 4283: 4279: 4275: 4274:HandsomeFella 4271: 4270: 4267: 4263: 4259: 4255: 4251: 4250: 4247: 4243: 4239: 4238:HandsomeFella 4235: 4230: 4229: 4228: 4227: 4224: 4220: 4216: 4212: 4208: 4204: 4203: 4202: 4201: 4196: 4192: 4188: 4187:HandsomeFella 4184: 4180: 4176: 4172: 4171: 4170: 4169: 4166: 4162: 4158: 4154: 4153:documentation 4150: 4149: 4148: 4147: 4143: 4139: 4135: 4123: 4109: 4105: 4101: 4097: 4093: 4088: 4087: 4086: 4085: 4081: 4077: 4076:Dom Stapleton 4073: 4071: 4067: 4056: 4052: 4049: 4048: 4044: 4040: 4034: 4030: 4024: 4020: 4016: 4012: 4008: 4007: 3992:December 2012 3983: 3979: 3975: 3971: 3967: 3962: 3958: 3955: 3951: 3946: 3943: 3939: 3936: 3932: 3928: 3924: 3920: 3916: 3913: 3909: 3906: 3902: 3898: 3894: 3890: 3886: 3883: 3879: 3875: 3870: 3869: 3868: 3865: 3860: 3859: 3854: 3850: 3849: 3848: 3847: 3844: 3840: 3836: 3832: 3828: 3824: 3820: 3817: 3813: 3809: 3804: 3800: 3795: 3792: 3788: 3784: 3780: 3779: 3778: 3777: 3774: 3769: 3768: 3763: 3759: 3755: 3751: 3748: 3734: 3730: 3726: 3722: 3721: 3720: 3716: 3712: 3708: 3707: 3704: 3700: 3696: 3695:Fyunck(click) 3692: 3691: 3690: 3689: 3685: 3681: 3677: 3666: 3665: 3662: 3661: 3660: 3653: 3647: 3643: 3631: 3627: 3623: 3619: 3618: 3617: 3616: 3612: 3608: 3594: 3590: 3587: 3586: 3582: 3578: 3574: 3573: 3572: 3571: 3568: 3564: 3560: 3556: 3555: 3552: 3548: 3544: 3540: 3539: 3538: 3537: 3532: 3522: 3518: 3517: 3510: 3499: 3495: 3491: 3487: 3481: 3477: 3471: 3467: 3463: 3459: 3455: 3451: 3447: 3443: 3442: 3427:November 2012 3410: 3406: 3402: 3398: 3397: 3396: 3392: 3388: 3384: 3383: 3382: 3381: 3378: 3374: 3370: 3365: 3362: 3358: 3355: 3352: 3349: 3348: 3347: 3342: 3332: 3328: 3327: 3321: 3317: 3313: 3309: 3305: 3301: 3297: 3296: 3295: 3291: 3287: 3283: 3282: 3281: 3277: 3273: 3269: 3268: 3267: 3263: 3259: 3254: 3250: 3249: 3248: 3247: 3242: 3232: 3228: 3227: 3221: 3215: 3211: 3201: 3200: 3195: 3185: 3181: 3180: 3174: 3170: 3166: 3162: 3158: 3154: 3150: 3146: 3142: 3138: 3134: 3130: 3124: 3120: 3108: 3104: 3100: 3096: 3095: 3094: 3093: 3088: 3078: 3074: 3073: 3067: 3063: 3043: 3039: 3035: 3031: 3030: 3027: 3023: 3019: 3015: 3011: 3007: 3006: 3005: 3004: 3001: 2997: 2993: 2988: 2985: 2984: 2983: 2979: 2975: 2970: 2969: 2968: 2967: 2964: 2960: 2956: 2952: 2948: 2943: 2942: 2939: 2935: 2931: 2926: 2920: 2916: 2915: 2914: 2913: 2910: 2906: 2902: 2898: 2897:Template:Lang 2894: 2893: 2892: 2891: 2887: 2883: 2879: 2871: 2864: 2860: 2853: 2846: 2839:Accessibility 2828: 2824: 2820: 2816: 2815: 2814: 2810: 2806: 2802: 2798: 2794: 2790: 2789: 2788: 2787: 2786: 2785: 2780: 2776: 2772: 2768: 2764: 2760: 2756: 2752: 2748: 2747: 2746: 2745: 2742: 2738: 2734: 2730: 2725: 2724: 2721: 2717: 2713: 2708: 2707: 2706: 2705: 2701: 2697: 2696:Fyunck(click) 2693: 2678: 2674: 2670: 2666: 2665:Anonymouse321 2662: 2658: 2654: 2653: 2652: 2651: 2648: 2644: 2640: 2636: 2632: 2631: 2630: 2629: 2625: 2621: 2617: 2616:Anonymouse321 2610: 2606: 2599: 2592: 2578: 2574: 2570: 2566: 2565: 2564: 2563: 2560: 2556: 2552: 2547: 2543: 2541: 2537: 2533: 2529: 2528: 2527: 2526: 2522: 2518: 2514: 2497: 2493: 2489: 2485: 2481: 2476: 2475: 2474: 2473: 2469: 2465: 2460: 2459: 2458: 2454: 2450: 2446: 2438: 2434: 2430: 2426: 2422: 2419: 2415: 2411: 2410: 2409: 2405: 2401: 2397: 2395: 2392: 2391: 2390: 2389: 2386: 2382: 2378: 2374: 2370: 2367: 2366: 2365: 2361: 2357: 2352: 2348: 2347: 2346: 2345: 2342: 2338: 2334: 2330: 2326: 2322: 2317: 2314: 2313:Layout engine 2310: 2306: 2305:Layout engine 2302: 2298: 2294: 2290: 2289:Layout engine 2286: 2282: 2281:Layout engine 2278: 2277:Layout engine 2274: 2270: 2267: 2263: 2259: 2255: 2254:Layout engine 2251: 2247: 2243: 2242:Layout engine 2239: 2236: 2232: 2229: 2225: 2221: 2220: 2219: 2218: 2214: 2210: 2206: 2205:Layout engine 2202: 2201:Layout engine 2198: 2194: 2190: 2182: 2170: 2166: 2162: 2158: 2157: 2156: 2152: 2148: 2147:In ictu oculi 2144: 2139: 2136: 2131: 2128: 2125: 2124: 2123: 2122: 2119: 2115: 2111: 2107: 2103: 2099: 2098: 2097: 2096: 2092: 2088: 2084: 2077:IIO gone poof 2070: 2066: 2062: 2057: 2053: 2049: 2048: 2047: 2046: 2043: 2039: 2035: 2030: 2026: 2022: 2018: 2017: 2016: 2015: 2011: 2007: 2003: 1999: 1991: 1990: 1985: 1984: 1979: 1975: 1971: 1967: 1963: 1962: 1961: 1959: 1955: 1950: 1942: 1941: 1937: 1933: 1927: 1924: 1917: 1914: 1904: 1891: 1890: 1886: 1882: 1878: 1868: 1866: 1860: 1858: 1849: 1845: 1842: 1839: 1836: 1833: 1830: 1827: 1824: 1821: 1818: 1815: 1812: 1809: 1806: 1805: 1804: 1797: 1793: 1791: 1787: 1783: 1779: 1771: 1762: 1758: 1754: 1753:In ictu oculi 1750: 1749: 1748: 1747: 1744: 1740: 1736: 1732: 1728: 1727: 1726: 1725: 1721: 1717: 1716:In ictu oculi 1706: 1705: 1701: 1697: 1696:In ictu oculi 1690: 1684: 1678: 1667: 1663: 1656: 1649: 1639: 1638: 1634: 1630: 1620: 1619: 1615: 1611: 1607: 1603: 1598: 1588: 1587: 1583: 1579: 1578:In ictu oculi 1555: 1551: 1547: 1546:In ictu oculi 1543: 1539: 1538: 1537: 1536: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1529: 1528: 1527: 1526: 1525: 1524: 1523: 1522: 1521: 1506: 1502: 1498: 1493: 1491: 1487: 1483: 1478: 1475: 1471: 1470:Jakob Nielsen 1466: 1465: 1464: 1460: 1456: 1455:In ictu oculi 1452: 1451: 1448: 1444: 1440: 1436: 1432: 1429: 1424: 1423: 1418: 1414: 1413: 1412: 1408: 1404: 1403:In ictu oculi 1400: 1399: 1396: 1392: 1388: 1383: 1379: 1375: 1371: 1370: 1369: 1365: 1361: 1360:In ictu oculi 1357: 1353: 1352: 1351: 1350: 1349: 1345: 1341: 1337: 1332: 1328: 1324: 1320: 1319: 1318: 1317: 1313: 1309: 1308:In ictu oculi 1304: 1285: 1281: 1277: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1267: 1263: 1259: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1248: 1244: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1234: 1230: 1226: 1223:such that he 1222: 1218: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1211: 1207: 1203: 1199: 1195: 1194:WP:CANVASSING 1186: 1182: 1178: 1174: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1164: 1160: 1156: 1152: 1151: 1142: 1138: 1131: 1124: 1110: 1106: 1102: 1098: 1097: 1096: 1092: 1085: 1078: 1077: 1076: 1075: 1071: 1064: 1057: 1047: 1046: 1042: 1038: 1030: 1023: 1016: 1003: 999: 995: 994:In ictu oculi 990: 987: 982: 979: 978: 977: 973: 969: 965: 961: 957: 953: 952: 951: 950: 949: 948: 940: 936: 935: 934: 933: 932: 931: 922: 917: 913: 912: 911: 910: 909: 908: 900: 896: 892: 889: 885: 884: 883: 882: 881: 880: 872: 868: 864: 860: 859: 858: 857: 856: 855: 847: 843: 839: 835: 831: 830:User:Dicklyon 827: 823: 822: 821: 820: 819: 818: 810: 806: 802: 798: 797: 796: 795: 794: 793: 785: 781: 780: 779: 778: 777: 776: 768: 767: 766: 765: 764: 763: 758: 755: 750: 744: 739: 738: 737: 736: 733: 729: 725: 720: 719: 718: 717: 714: 709: 703: 697: 689: 688: 685: 682: 678: 675:of clear-cut 674: 670: 666: 651: 650: 647: 646: 644: 640: 623: 619: 618: 606: 605: 600: 599: 586: 583: 582: 578: 574: 573: 572: 561: 557: 556: 555: 554: 551: 550: 544: 541: 539: 538: 532: 530: 526: 517: 515: 510: 508: 504: 493: 487: 484: 481: 478: 475: 472: 471: 470: 467: 465: 461: 457: 453: 449: 440: 437: 434: 430: 429: 428: 425: 422: 420: 415: 412: 404: 403: 400: 399: 394: 393: 382: 381: 378: 371: 362: 358: 351: 344: 332: 328: 324: 321: 318: 317: 316: 313: 309: 305: 301: 297: 283: 282: 279: 277: 270: 266: 252: 251: 246: 242: 239: 234: 233: 232: 231: 227: 223: 218: 215: 213: 208: 206: 201: 199: 189: 188: 185: 183: 177: 171: 167: 160: 157: 155: 152: 150: 147: 145: 142: 140: 137: 135: 132: 131: 130: 128: 124: 112: 109: 107: 101: 98: 97: 96: 95: 94: 91: 89: 83: 79: 75: 71: 67: 63: 59: 54: 43: 42: 39: 35: 31: 27: 20: 9031: 9024: 9013: 8991: 8951: 8932: 8854: 8849: 8833: 8827: 8808: 8764: 8694: 8690: 8686: 8645: 8614:intimidation 8605: 8574: 8534: 8479:Denis Healey 8441: 8414: 8410: 8380: 8361: 8331: 8328:User:Collect 8309: 8272: 8239: 8117: 8094: 8076: 8073: 8064: 8060: 8053: 8031: 8016: 7999: 7975: 7968: 7964: 7961: 7957: 7944: 7931: 7928: 7896: 7893: 7875: 7787: 7673: 7643: 7614: 7612: 7523: 7481: 7440: 7415: 7364: 7333: 7309: 7305: 7301: 7300:and not the 7297: 7226: 7218: 7207: 7188: 7160: 7138: 7136: 7089:overseas ;-) 7067: 7043: 7032: 7029: 6933: 6929: 6839: 6813: 6789: 6740: 6735: 6719: 6709: 6676: 6665: 6597: 6572: 6568: 6544: 6537: 6521: 6507: 6487: 6463: 6440: 6416: 6389: 6388: 6387: 6383: 6287: 6251: 6197: 6193: 6189: 6165: 6142: 6109: 6104: 6100: 6077:POV-pushing. 6052: 6028: 6005: 6001: 5952: 5899: 5896: 5873: 5871: 5850: 5846: 5844: 5807: 5702: 5694: 5690: 5685: 5664:encyclopedic 5663: 5632: 5428: 5327: 5319: 5274: 5269: 5250: 5226: 5222: 5212: 5190: 5183: 5128: 5124: 5069: 5066: 5062: 5043: 5039: 5037: 5033: 5026: 5022: 5016: 5013: 5009: 4994: 4971: 4941: 4918: 4888: 4868: 4862: 4836:Ohconfucius 4834: 4827: 4753: 4714: 4679: 4667: 4642:martial arts 4597: 4569: 4520: 4287: 4182: 4129: 4117: 4074: 4069: 4063: 4045: 4032: 4010: 4004: 3911: 3856: 3822: 3802: 3781:Your essay " 3765: 3750:conversation 3744: 3672: 3655: 3654: 3639: 3604: 3583: 3514: 3506: 3479: 3466:WP:FORUMSHOP 3461: 3445: 3439: 3387:AlexTiefling 3324: 3252: 3224: 3207: 3177: 3116: 3070: 3059: 2877: 2842: 2800: 2754: 2728: 2688: 2614: 2511: 2413: 2300: 2244:redirect to 2186: 2080: 2055: 1997: 1995: 1977: 1965: 1953: 1951: 1949:Two things: 1948: 1897: 1874: 1864: 1862: 1856: 1843: 1837: 1831: 1825: 1819: 1813: 1807: 1802: 1786:active in DR 1777: 1775: 1769: 1730: 1712: 1688: 1679: 1676: 1626: 1594: 1574: 1519: 1420: 1381: 1330: 1299: 1257: 1220: 1191: 1053: 1034: 985: 963: 938: 916:User:Noetica 842:Common names 841: 837: 833: 809:User:Noetica 698: 695: 657: 642: 638: 635: 627: 621: 613:Show preview 604:edit summary 603: 593:Show preview 570: 548: 545: 542: 535: 533: 520: 518: 511: 506: 502: 500: 485:Series boxes 468: 444: 426: 423: 416: 413: 410: 397: 390: 388: 366: 294:— Preceding 289: 275: 261: 219: 216: 209: 202: 195: 181: 178: 163: 134:Introduction 120: 105: 99: 87: 82:welcome page 50: 49: 23: 8986:Good luck! 8869:noticeboard 8101:Konjakupoet 8078:Konjakupoet 7830:talk page. 7704:Google RGSE 7197:Google RSVP 6928:about the " 6755:noticeboard 6678:SMcCandlish 6546:SMcCandlish 6274:one of them 5928:, but also 4824:sour grapes 4775:Golden Rule 4599:SMcCandlish 4465:Moonraker12 4388:"lynching". 4138:Moonraker12 3889:MOS:FOREIGN 3878:WP:Teahouse 3799:MakeSense64 3516:SMcCandlish 3326:SMcCandlish 3226:SMcCandlish 3179:SMcCandlish 3072:SMcCandlish 3056:3RR warning 2805:Andrew Gray 2733:Andrew Gray 2635:vector skin 2480:previous RM 2449:Yappy2bhere 2400:Yappy2bhere 2356:Yappy2bhere 2209:Yappy2bhere 2061:Andrew Gray 2006:Andrew Gray 1623:Use preview 1428:informative 1296:French bios 899:User:AlanM1 702:BRD process 622:thoughtless 411:LittleBen, 267:point 3 or 70:advertising 9025:discussion 8998:.Wolfowitz 8925:. You can 8718:I created 8697:BLP names. 8634:LittleBenW 8120:canvassing 8114:Canvassing 7933:Sandbergja 7868:. You can 7743:Marco Polo 7371:Nguoi Viet 7357:Baomoi.com 7235:Google CSE 7062:Windows NT 7039:Windows NT 7030:Hello Ben 6958:canvassing 6830:WP:UNBLOCK 6816:disruptive 6699:March 2013 6585:Black Kite 6534:ANI notice 6522:Sandstein 6244:Yōko Ogawa 5808:definitely 4976:. Thanks, 4948:Ransomware 4923:. Thanks, 4895:Ransomware 4234:here it is 4175:canvassing 4041:first. - ( 3853:well aware 3787:User:TheDJ 3490:Black Kite 3304:WP:LETITGO 3272:Black Kite 3161:WP:SOAPBOX 2657:User:TheDJ 2607:. You can 2468:categories 2275:" for the 2056:completely 2032:survival. 1808:Background 1664:. You can 1597:complained 1327:in my post 1276:Sundostund 1177:Sundostund 1159:Sundostund 1139:. You can 1083:Tito Dutta 1062:Tito Dutta 743:procedures 432:sentences. 359:. You can 300:BrianAdler 269:WP:ELMAYBE 174:{{helpme}} 46:April 2010 38:Sparkzilla 8889:LittleBen 8861:consensus 8857:talk page 8783:LittleBen 8746:LittleBen 8669:LittleBen 8618:LittleBen 8502:LittleBen 8452:LittleBen 8407:Unblocked 8338:LittleBen 8155:LittleBen 8037:LittleBen 8020:LittleBen 8005:LittleBen 7988:LittleBen 7832:LittleBen 7818:Google RS 7747:LittleBen 7715:LittleBen 7694:Google RS 7640:Howdy (2) 7576:LittleBen 7541:LittleBen 7465:LittleBen 7394:LittleBen 7339:LittleBen 7280:LittleBen 7254:LittleBen 7166:Google RS 7157:Google RS 7117:LittleBen 7103:LittleBen 7098:Windows 7 7076:next year 7041:article? 6966:LittleBen 6938:WP:MOSBIO 6900:LittleBen 6880:gwickwire 6864:LittleBen 6747:consensus 6743:talk page 6619:LittleBen 6600:this edit 6491:WP:ARBCOM 6360:LittleBen 6327:LittleBen 6230:LittleBen 6149:LittleBen 6147:" above? 6129:LittleBen 6105:two weeks 6083:LittleBen 5983:LittleBen 5955:, and on 5934:LittleBen 5880:LittleBen 5814:LittleBen 5645:LittleBen 5387:LittleBen 5287:LittleBen 5191:apologize 5156:LittleBen 5129:certainly 5106:LittleBen 4960:Read the 4907:Read the 4806:LittleBen 4779:LittleBen 4733:LittleBen 4698:LittleBen 4650:LittleBen 4549:LittleBen 4481:LittleBen 4415:LittleBen 4366:LittleBen 4329:LittleBen 4258:LittleBen 4215:LittleBen 4157:LittleBen 4100:LittleBen 3974:LittleBen 3835:LittleBen 3758:free time 3711:LittleBen 3676:user page 3622:LittleBen 3543:LittleBen 3401:LittleBen 3369:LittleBen 3360:sources). 3320:WP:GAMING 3286:bobrayner 3258:bobrayner 3099:LittleBen 3034:LittleBen 2992:LittleBen 2955:LittleBen 2901:LittleBen 2819:LittleBen 2771:LittleBen 2712:LittleBen 2661:talk page 2639:LittleBen 2569:LittleBen 2532:LittleBen 2488:LittleBen 2429:LittleBen 2377:LittleBen 2333:LittleBen 2325:Help:Move 2291:(noting " 2161:LittleBen 2129:Whatever. 2110:LittleBen 2034:LittleBen 1881:LittleBen 1790:this page 1735:LittleBen 1497:LittleBen 1482:LittleBen 1474:company's 1439:LittleBen 1434:recently. 1387:LittleBen 1378:like this 1340:LittleBen 1262:LittleBen 1229:LittleBen 1192:Also see 1101:LittleBen 968:LittleBen 786:rant was: 724:LittleBen 677:vandalism 673:reversion 654:June 2012 615:buttons.) 609:Save page 589:Save page 482:Infoboxes 421:, etc.). 217:Regards, 30:this list 8903:Talkback 8871:or seek 8848:warring— 8830:edit war 8702:top 5000 8191:WP:BEANS 7846:Talkback 7765:Quebecor 7498:Kauffner 7482:Nhan Dan 7447:Kauffner 7442:Nhan Dan 7426:Kauffner 7375:Kauffner 7361:VGP News 7310:Newsweek 7308:and not 7082:old ;-). 6834:WP:STICK 6757:or seek 6734:warring— 6716:edit war 6689:Contrib. 6573:anywhere 6569:anything 6557:Contrib. 6292:Kuroneko 6288:supposed 6110:horrible 5806:I would 5324:Kuroneko 5244:WP:HOUND 5174:Kuroneko 5125:numerous 4944:Phishing 4865:WP:A/R/C 4610:Contrib. 4047:BWilkins 4031:|reason= 4011:48 hours 3954:Kauffner 3912:category 3754:that one 3725:Kauffner 3680:Kauffner 3644:located 3585:BWilkins 3559:Yopienso 3531:Contrib. 3478:|reason= 3446:48 hours 3341:Contrib. 3308:WP:SPADE 3300:WP:RFC/U 3241:Contrib. 3194:Contrib. 3087:Contrib. 3068:line. — 3010:Graham87 2878:category 2870:see also 2852:see also 2729:entirely 2673:contribs 2624:contribs 2585:Talkback 2466:and the 2301:required 2287:page to 2143:WP:TROLL 2106:John Doe 2087:Kauffner 1932:Kiyoweap 1903:Linktext 1844:Proposal 1814:Research 1642:Talkback 1610:Dicklyon 1606:this bit 1602:WP:TITLE 1595:Ben you 1416:editors. 1303:WP:FRMOS 1243:Dicklyon 1221:my rules 1206:Dicklyon 1117:Talkback 1027:You can 419:bugzilla 337:Talkback 308:contribs 296:unsigned 265:WP:ELYES 117:Welcome! 74:nofollow 8960:unblock 8845:reverts 8734:Ryulong 8477:"; and 8313:Kumioko 8278:Collect 8243:Collect 8128:King of 8069:Nodachi 8061:nodachi 7971:AdWords 7947:AdSense 7914:itself. 7903:AdSense 7769:GoodDay 7729:GoodDay 7676:GoodDay 7646:GoodDay 7623:WP:TPOC 7619:WP:TALK 7227:outside 7060:As the 6999:Tudjman 6960:in the 6885:editing 6857:Help me 6810:Blocked 6767:Yunshui 6731:reverts 6499:WP:BASC 6421:is now 6284:Gohatto 6256:Ōkagami 6222:Gohatto 6170:is now 6033:is now 5320:sourced 5186:to ANI. 5101:onsen). 4978:DPL bot 4925:DPL bot 4626:canvass 4517:Clarity 4029:unblock 4006:blocked 3607:GoodDay 3488:first. 3476:unblock 3441:blocked 3316:WP:AN/I 3312:WP:BITE 3253:blocked 3218:If you 2567:Thanks 1998:however 1969:choice. 1954:content 1859:--: --> 1673:Sánchez 1591:Whacked 836:in the 274:Adrian 236:As for 203:As for 180:Adrian 164:Please 104:Adrian 86:Adrian 8992:Kiefer 8934:Wer900 8803:WP:ABF 8689:, the 8573:It is 8564:WP:SET 8485:". -- 8416:Salvio 8398:NE Ent 8392:NE Ent 8373:NE Ent 8124:WP:ANI 8065:ōdachi 7794:WP:SET 7304:? Why 7005:, and 7003:Walesa 6823:helpme 6510:WP:NPA 6417:Note: 6166:Note: 6101:plenty 6029:Note: 6006:italic 5962:WP:AGF 5479:WP:BLP 5283:WP:NPA 5251:should 5213:solely 5091:WP:AIV 5051:pages; 5006:Peace? 4593:Usenet 4591:; try 4566:notice 4528:Apteva 4523:WP:FOC 4015:WP:NPA 3950:Strine 3905:WP:MOS 3880:, and 3858:Graham 3816:WP:BLP 3767:Graham 3651:Jayron 3642:WP:ANI 3577:WP:NPA 3454:WT:BLP 3153:WP:NOT 3145:WP:OWN 3129:WP:3RR 3066:WP:3RR 3062:WT:BLP 2759:Fyunck 2637:. ;-) 2551:Apteva 2517:Apteva 2234:halt). 2054:It is 1331:always 828:, and 462:, and 278:Hunter 198:Horiba 184:Hunter 108:Hunter 90:Hunter 9032:Kelly 8967:Bbb23 8885:WP:3O 8799:WP:PA 8333:bogus 7823:WP:RS 7526:Dsp13 7422:JSTOR 7239:Yahoo 6683:Talk⇒ 6577:WP:AN 6551:Talk⇒ 6503:WP:AE 6495:WP:AN 6220:) to 6198:still 6081:own. 5845:Re: " 5429:Those 5275:share 5152:WP:3O 5087:WP:3O 4761:TALK 4722:TALK 4687:TALK 4670:WP:AN 4604:Talk⇒ 4564:WP:AN 4130:Hello 3927:TheDJ 3923:WP:AT 3601:Howdy 3521:Talk⇒ 3331:Talk⇒ 3231:Talk⇒ 3184:Talk⇒ 3169:"win" 3165:block 3149:WP:TE 3141:WP:DE 3077:Talk⇒ 3018:RexxS 2974:RexxS 2930:RexxS 2882:RexxS 2546:WP:RM 2252:from 2179:re: " 2104:like 1689:could 753:lozzo 712:lozzo 684:Ghost 525:chess 497:links 369:Monty 247:: --> 243:: --> 235:: --> 8971:talk 8939:talk 8893:talk 8787:talk 8772:talk 8750:talk 8738:DAJF 8736:and 8709:The 8695:full 8673:talk 8654:talk 8622:talk 8543:talk 8506:talk 8491:talk 8456:talk 8448:here 8443:here 8440:and 8438:here 8433:IDs. 8342:talk 8317:talk 8297:talk 8282:talk 8273:said 8263:talk 8247:talk 8231:talk 8213:talk 8199:talk 8177:talk 8159:talk 8105:talk 8082:talk 8057:undo 8041:talk 8033:This 8024:talk 8009:talk 7992:talk 7937:talk 7901:and 7881:talk 7836:talk 7828:WP:V 7803:talk 7790:this 7773:talk 7751:talk 7733:talk 7719:talk 7699:and 7680:talk 7665:talk 7650:talk 7631:talk 7597:talk 7580:talk 7564:talk 7545:talk 7530:talk 7502:talk 7494:here 7490:Here 7469:talk 7451:talk 7430:talk 7398:talk 7379:talk 7343:talk 7322:talk 7306:Time 7284:talk 7269:that 7258:talk 7204:here 7178:talk 7148:talk 7139:none 7121:talk 7107:talk 7073:this 7051:talk 6989:talk 6970:talk 6946:talk 6904:talk 6868:talk 6841:Ched 6801:talk 6685:ɖכþ 6674:. — 6653:talk 6638:talk 6623:talk 6608:talk 6589:talk 6553:ɖכþ 6497:and 6472:. -- 6468:and 6451:talk 6429:and 6400:talk 6378:and 6364:talk 6350:talk 6331:talk 6320:and 6308:talk 6294:and 6282:The 6264:talk 6252:Even 6234:talk 6224:, a 6206:talk 6194:like 6178:and 6153:talk 6133:talk 6118:talk 6087:talk 6063:talk 6041:and 6014:talk 6002:bold 6000:use 5987:talk 5970:talk 5953:well 5938:talk 5930:here 5926:here 5909:talk 5900:this 5884:talk 5875:here 5852:this 5818:talk 5691:only 5672:talk 5649:talk 5437:talk 5391:talk 5356:talk 5328:more 5291:talk 5270:just 5259:talk 5235:here 5230:him. 5227:very 5184:back 5160:talk 5140:talk 5110:talk 5075:talk 4998:Nemo 4982:talk 4929:talk 4876:7754 4873:chen 4810:talk 4783:talk 4737:talk 4702:talk 4674:here 4654:talk 4606:ɖכþ 4553:talk 4532:talk 4503:talk 4485:talk 4469:talk 4437:talk 4419:talk 4398:talk 4370:talk 4352:talk 4333:talk 4296:talk 4278:talk 4262:talk 4242:talk 4219:talk 4191:talk 4183:with 4161:talk 4142:talk 4132:You 4104:talk 4080:talk 3978:talk 3966:sick 3874:this 3839:talk 3803:both 3752:and 3747:this 3729:talk 3715:talk 3699:talk 3684:talk 3646:here 3626:talk 3611:talk 3563:talk 3547:talk 3494:talk 3405:talk 3391:talk 3373:talk 3290:talk 3276:talk 3262:talk 3175:. — 3171:and 3159:and 3103:talk 3038:talk 3022:talk 3014:JAWS 2996:talk 2978:talk 2959:talk 2951:here 2949:and 2947:here 2934:talk 2905:talk 2886:talk 2861:and 2823:talk 2809:talk 2775:talk 2767:link 2755:only 2737:talk 2716:talk 2700:talk 2669:talk 2643:talk 2620:talk 2573:talk 2555:talk 2536:talk 2521:talk 2492:talk 2453:talk 2433:talk 2425:here 2418:here 2404:talk 2381:talk 2373:here 2360:talk 2351:this 2337:talk 2327:and 2224:here 2213:talk 2193:here 2191:and 2189:here 2165:talk 2151:talk 2114:talk 2091:talk 2065:talk 2038:talk 2010:talk 1978:huge 1974:here 1936:talk 1885:talk 1877:this 1757:talk 1739:talk 1720:talk 1700:talk 1633:talk 1614:talk 1582:talk 1550:talk 1501:talk 1486:talk 1459:talk 1443:talk 1422:Pelé 1407:talk 1391:talk 1364:talk 1344:talk 1336:here 1312:talk 1280:talk 1266:talk 1247:talk 1233:talk 1210:talk 1198:here 1181:talk 1175:. -- 1163:talk 1157:. -- 1155:here 1105:talk 1041:talk 998:talk 972:talk 956:here 924:it". 748:Joja 728:talk 707:Joja 681:Sudo 643:andt 611:and 571:Hi! 492:Main 327:talk 304:talk 226:talk 149:Help 58:HTML 8879:. 8865:BRD 8641:it. 8592:to 8577:to 8487:PBS 8355:of 8171:-- 8050:Hi! 7980:--> 7627:Jeh 7615:not 7318:BDD 7219:not 7208:and 7174:BDD 7068:not 6964:? 6765:. 6751:BRD 6516:). 6192:-- 6004:or 5206:to. 5017:ask 4962:FAQ 4909:FAQ 4754:dci 4715:dci 4680:dci 4288:now 4207:IIO 3968:of 3925:to 3821:on 3819:RfC 3523:ɖ∘¿ 3462:not 3333:ɖ∘¿ 3233:ɖ∘¿ 3186:ɖ∘¿ 3079:ɖ∘¿ 2659:'s 2331:. 2323:on 2260:to 2256:to 2228:RfC 1996:b) 1382:not 1035:-- 803:to 639:red 596:it. 375:845 8973:) 8963:}} 8957:{{ 8936:• 8895:) 8832:. 8789:) 8774:) 8752:) 8675:) 8656:) 8624:) 8545:) 8508:) 8493:) 8458:) 8450:. 8344:) 8319:) 8299:) 8284:) 8265:) 8249:) 8233:) 8215:) 8201:) 8179:) 8161:) 8145:♠ 8107:) 8084:) 8043:) 8026:) 8011:) 7994:) 7939:) 7883:) 7838:) 7805:) 7775:) 7753:) 7745:. 7735:) 7721:) 7707:}} 7701:{{ 7697:}} 7691:{{ 7682:) 7667:) 7652:) 7633:) 7599:) 7582:) 7566:) 7547:) 7532:) 7504:) 7496:. 7471:) 7453:) 7432:) 7400:) 7381:) 7345:) 7324:) 7286:) 7271:. 7260:) 7200:}} 7194:{{ 7180:) 7169:}} 7163:{{ 7150:) 7123:) 7109:) 7053:) 7001:, 6991:) 6972:) 6948:) 6940:. 6906:) 6870:) 6860:}} 6854:{{ 6847:? 6844:: 6826:}} 6820:{{ 6803:) 6718:. 6655:) 6640:) 6625:) 6610:) 6591:) 6453:) 6433:. 6402:) 6366:) 6352:) 6333:) 6310:) 6266:) 6236:) 6208:) 6182:. 6155:) 6135:) 6120:) 6089:) 6065:) 6045:. 6016:) 5989:) 5972:) 5940:) 5911:) 5886:) 5878:. 5820:) 5674:) 5666:. 5651:) 5439:) 5393:) 5358:) 5293:) 5261:) 5223:do 5162:) 5142:) 5112:) 5077:) 4984:) 4954:| 4931:) 4901:| 4870:Rs 4828:do 4812:) 4785:) 4758:| 4739:) 4719:| 4704:) 4684:| 4656:) 4648:. 4555:) 4534:) 4505:) 4487:) 4471:) 4439:) 4421:) 4400:) 4372:) 4354:) 4335:) 4298:) 4280:) 4264:) 4244:) 4221:) 4193:) 4163:) 4144:) 4106:) 4098:. 4082:) 4053:) 4051:←✎ 4043:✉→ 4035:}} 4027:{{ 3980:) 3863:87 3841:) 3772:87 3731:) 3717:) 3701:) 3686:) 3678:. 3658:32 3628:) 3613:) 3591:) 3589:←✎ 3581:✉→ 3565:) 3549:) 3527:þ 3496:) 3482:}} 3474:{{ 3407:) 3393:) 3375:) 3337:þ 3292:) 3278:) 3264:) 3237:þ 3190:þ 3147:, 3105:) 3083:þ 3040:) 3024:) 2998:) 2980:) 2961:) 2936:) 2907:) 2888:) 2873:}} 2867:{{ 2855:}} 2849:{{ 2825:) 2811:) 2801:is 2777:) 2739:) 2718:) 2702:) 2675:) 2671:• 2663:. 2645:) 2626:) 2622:• 2575:) 2557:) 2538:) 2523:) 2494:) 2455:) 2435:) 2427:. 2406:) 2383:) 2375:. 2362:) 2339:) 2215:) 2167:) 2153:) 2116:) 2093:) 2067:) 2040:) 2012:) 1938:) 1906:}} 1900:{{ 1887:) 1879:. 1863:-- 1792:. 1759:) 1741:) 1722:) 1702:) 1635:) 1616:) 1584:) 1552:) 1503:) 1488:) 1461:) 1445:) 1409:) 1393:) 1366:) 1346:) 1314:) 1282:) 1268:) 1249:) 1235:) 1212:) 1183:) 1165:) 1107:) 1058:-- 1043:) 1000:) 974:) 730:) 704:. 528:}} 522:{{ 516:. 495:}} 489:{{ 466:. 458:, 454:, 450:, 329:) 310:) 306:• 276:J. 228:) 220:-- 182:J. 106:J. 102:. 88:J. 24:A 8969:( 8918:. 8891:( 8801:/ 8785:( 8770:( 8748:( 8704:. 8671:( 8652:( 8620:( 8570:. 8541:( 8504:( 8489:( 8481:" 8473:" 8454:( 8340:( 8315:( 8295:( 8280:( 8261:( 8245:( 8229:( 8211:( 8197:( 8175:( 8157:( 8142:♣ 8137:♦ 8132:♥ 8103:( 8080:( 8039:( 8022:( 8007:( 7990:( 7935:( 7879:( 7861:. 7834:( 7801:( 7771:( 7749:( 7731:( 7717:( 7678:( 7663:( 7648:( 7629:( 7595:( 7578:( 7562:( 7543:( 7528:( 7500:( 7467:( 7449:( 7428:( 7396:( 7377:( 7341:( 7320:( 7282:( 7256:( 7176:( 7146:( 7119:( 7105:( 7078:. 7049:( 6987:( 6968:( 6944:( 6902:( 6866:( 6799:( 6777:水 6774:‍ 6771:雲 6651:( 6636:( 6621:( 6606:( 6587:( 6449:( 6398:( 6362:( 6348:( 6329:( 6306:( 6262:( 6232:( 6204:( 6151:( 6131:( 6116:( 6085:( 6061:( 6012:( 5985:( 5968:( 5936:( 5907:( 5882:( 5816:( 5670:( 5647:( 5435:( 5389:( 5354:( 5289:( 5257:( 5158:( 5138:( 5108:( 5073:( 4980:( 4968:. 4950:( 4927:( 4915:. 4897:( 4808:( 4781:( 4735:( 4700:( 4652:( 4551:( 4530:( 4501:( 4483:( 4467:( 4435:( 4417:( 4396:( 4368:( 4350:( 4331:( 4318:. 4311:. 4294:( 4276:( 4260:( 4240:( 4217:( 4189:( 4159:( 4140:( 4102:( 4078:( 3976:( 3837:( 3727:( 3713:( 3697:( 3682:( 3624:( 3609:( 3561:( 3545:( 3525:¤ 3492:( 3403:( 3389:( 3371:( 3335:¤ 3288:( 3274:( 3260:( 3235:¤ 3188:¤ 3101:( 3081:¤ 3036:( 3020:( 2994:( 2976:( 2957:( 2932:( 2903:( 2884:( 2821:( 2807:( 2773:( 2765:( 2735:( 2714:( 2698:( 2667:( 2641:( 2618:( 2600:. 2571:( 2553:( 2534:( 2519:( 2490:( 2451:( 2431:( 2420:. 2402:( 2379:( 2358:( 2335:( 2268:. 2211:( 2183:" 2163:( 2149:( 2137:. 2112:( 2089:( 2063:( 2036:( 2008:( 1934:( 1926:緑 1923:雲 1916:緑 1913:雲 1883:( 1755:( 1737:( 1718:( 1698:( 1657:. 1631:( 1612:( 1580:( 1548:( 1499:( 1484:( 1457:( 1441:( 1405:( 1389:( 1362:( 1342:( 1310:( 1278:( 1264:( 1245:( 1231:( 1208:( 1179:( 1161:( 1132:. 1103:( 1089:✉ 1068:✉ 1039:( 1024:. 996:( 970:( 890:. 873:. 726:( 641:g 637:f 562:. 352:. 325:( 302:( 224:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index