User talk:Jayjg/Archive 21

2380:. Christians like to call him the "Messiah" (in a more or less lukewarm fashion) because they feel it gives them some amount of Biblical precedent, but in reality their view of him is almost diametrically opposite the Jewish view. I quote: "The Christian ‘christ’ is depicted as one who abolishes the practices of God’s Torah, while the Jewish Mashiach will be sent by HaShem to bring Israel back to the Torah. The Christian ‘christ’ brings the destruction of the Temple and hates the offerings connected with it, while the Jewish Mashiach loves the Temple and will eventually oversee its rebuilding. The Christian ‘christ’ is viewed as a ‘god-man’ who demands the worship of his devotees, while the Jewish Mashiach is a human who demands the worship of HaShem alone, as is required by the Torah. The Christian ‘christ’ is sent to destroy Israel and the Jewish people, while the Jewish Mashiach is sent to redeem them and restore Israel to her proper place before God. These comparisons could be made for another several pages, but for now the idea is obvious. The ‘messiah’ that is being expected by Christianity is the opposite of the true Mashiach being anticipated by Judaism." The difference is clear, then, that Messianic Judaism very clearly associates him with Jewish Messiahship and not with the near-inversion of him presented by Christianity. Believing that any Tzaddiq Jew of the tribe of Judah with plausible lineage to David Ha-Melekh ("Jesus" happens to be the only Messianic claimant in history with which this has even been shown plausible) is the Jewish Messiah, even one as misrepresented as the Jew Yeshua of Nazareth, is entirely and natively within the realm of Judaism. 4522:"Last warning" huh? And what happens next time I question and/or expose your (often times) unethical/biased 'editing tactics'? Too terse, too brief, often rude, unworthy, unexplained, and pathetically unsubstantiated "responses" (either in the edit summary, but mostly on talk pages) does indeed seem to be a 'tactic' that you and others use in order to silence debate on a particular edit/topic/issue (trust me though: you're not the only admin. that uses this 'tactic,' though you are among the worst offenders). I'm just stating the facts, Sir -- I can't help but tell the truth, especially when it comes to the wrongdoings/shortcomings (and clear bias) of people in 'positions of authority' (is an administrator position on a 2nd-rate internet encyclopedia even considered a real 'position of authority'?). Sometimes the truth hurts a little bit (though I obviously didn't intend the "User:Jayjg tactic" comment to be a personal insult, it was more like constructive criticism). After all you've been through here on Knowledge, surely you can handle a non-issue as minor as this? -- 2384:

scholarship on the matter can attribute that most (if not all) NT works were set to parchment by Pharisaic Jews. I would say that acceptance of NT is in continuity or outside of continuity with legitimate Judaism to the extent with which the Apostolic texts used match the earliest reconstructible versions that exist (which, various scholars agree, lacked a "christology" in any form) absent of any later gentile additions/weasel wordings. One good example is the work "Netzarim Reconstruction of Hebrew Matityahu", which traces Matthew back very accurately as originally a Hebrew text using every pre-Constantinian source available, and that today's form has had its share of token changes from the earliest versions. If a version of a NT text is proven (by reliable scholarship) to be inconsistent with the earliest reconstructible version of that text and a particular group chooses to keep their version regardless, then yes that particular group has a Christian theology. The group in question would

2814:"Indeed, it does seem transparent. However, it remains to be seen if the French people will rally behind the miscreant and Muslim-baiter Nicolas Sarkozy or like-minded individuals who have signed on to the “Clash of Civilizations” demagoguery. The French government may go over to the dark side. But the French people (and in fact most people in Europe) are steadfastly against the neocon plan for total war and “reshaping” of the Muslim Middle East. Of course, it would not be a historical milestone for the people of France and Germany to be dragged kicking and screaming into the deadly machinations of the neocon master plan. In fact, it was only 70 years ago the German people embraced fascism and there was very little kicking and screaming, save by those carted off into the night to the torture chambers and death camps by the Gestapo." 3023:" It is a bit more nuanced than that. Original research is encouraged by editors so they can make correct editorial decisions including removing material known to be out of date (or other reasons a reliable source might be wrong) due to original research such as an example I brought up early in the ATT discussions about a covered bridge that has three "reliable sources" and two said it was unused but it could be seen from a nearby highway (it was now on private land) that it was used and thus while "being used" could not be added, "being unused" was properly deleted as it now appeared due to a users comment that that data was probably out of date. And no I don't want to argue about it. 4230:

reference to his page is called for. (Alternatively a one-line summary and the link). I think we want to provide pathways between articles like this, for I think someone might possibly want to find the work and remember the subject but not the name. It's pretty minimal, and I think it does not violate "undue"--there is a tendency to think what one doesn't approve of to be unimportant, and I think its better to err on the side of making the reference. As for his actual work, I haven't read the book yet, but from published reports I am unclear if he has changed his mind about his theory, or just about the wisdom of publishing.

2884:

that her user name may be a Sockpuppet. We find this strange, as the problem arose with her making 4 edits on the Greer website and I did not make any edits. So clearly we made no attempt to collude on this site. I believe Greer fans did not my daughter's view and took inappropriate revenge. We both have made edits from our home computer. Indeed my wife has an account as well, but she rarely usees it. My wife has not checked, but she may be affected as well. My daughter asks that you unblock her. Doesn't Knowledge take into account that there may be a family which together enjoys editing separately.

2299:. It seems to me that you delete recent additions that, in your opinion, are poorly sourced, but let stand language that is tagged "fact", "who?", or unsourced altogether. Sometimes you delete language that has been in the article for months or years without a reference, but you delete it only when an editor adds a reference that, in your opinion, isn't reliable. (I understand that they show up as "recent changes", but why can't you leave them with "fact" tags?) 5423: 2139:, although doubtless not in as much detail). I want to be helpful to these people and if they have value to add and can reliably source it, I want to them to get their content in and they're welcome to cite any acceptable publication. However, I feel that simply adding a paragraph about the existence and virtues of an unpublished paper without meaningfully describing what it says on the article topic is not appropriate encyclopedia content and is possibly 3004:

beliefs to other edits, probably as a matter of intention (quote: "Christian Fundamentalist", whereas I actively deny Christianity, defend the concept of Messiahship exclusively within the Jewish context, demand non-selective Torah observance, and promote worship inexcusably within the Pharisee=Orthodox Beit Din system that Ribi Yehoshua and the 1st century Netzarim lived and taught within). Please resolve this to the best of your ability. Thank you, Jay.

3977: 3723:, but this appears slightly implausible: Frogsprog normally vandalises Korea-related content, while this guy is fixated on the Middle East. He says he's using some sort of IP masker to leech BBC videos, which according to him has caused the checkuser to be positive. Now I guess MiddleEastern would have eventually wound up blocked anyway for his generally disruptive attitude, but... could you comment on why you think this is Frogsprog? Thank you, 5550:, who also publishes books with the overt appearance of history books but actually full of unreliable claims with a clear political purpose. Neither Katz nor Blankfort are Knowledge Reliable Sources, so they should only be cited in matters related to themselves, or if there is a need to illustrate the extremes of popular political opinion on something. Certainly they should never be cited on issues of fact. That's my opinion. -- 2089:

trying to bias these two articles to reflect his viewpoint. I have begun to discuss my edits on the talk pages and instead of debating me and arguing his viewpoint Isarig runs to the wikipedia administration and to ban me from editing to shut me out of the debate. I think I should be allowed to express my viewpoint. Please give me the chance to make my point and I promise I will try to keep the edit waring to a minimal.

5129:

alterations. I will of course move on to provide the citations. However, I would merely comment that in such situations it is prudent to allow people to see text needs citation and give them an opp to fix, especially when the text isn't just a mischievous POV stunt. When I put the citations feel free to fix them if I don't comply with the article format completely. Any comments just leave a messae for me on

2393:

prerequisite for properly meriting the label "Hebrew Christian". And as far as JfJ is concerned, all it's comprised of is some leaders and a number of individual missionaries affiliated with a larger network of Christian missionary organizations. Some of its members may adopt the term "Messianic" in passing but no major Messianic organization is in acceptance of them adopting that descriptor.

4935:

should have been merged or not. Now you say you want other options, completely unrelated to that (and, in fact diametrically opposed to that), otherwise Wikipedians aren't being "given a choice". Whether you realize it or not, whether in good faith or not, you've crossed over the line from honest discussion to disruption. Step back a little, please, and think about this.

1443:

has not been any action or comment since. Meanwhile, edit warring is heating up again at the Srebrenica article. If those who have been put on parole can violate the limits put upon them with little or no consequence, it puts us at risk of the article falling back into a free-for-all. Could you either respond to this or contact the appropriate administrator? Thank you.

3183:. I suspect that there may be a little more to the story here. Looking at the edit histories of the two accounts, I don't see anything in common - though I may have missed something. What's more MiddleEastern is claiming to be using an IP anonymizing service to edit with and it may well be that Frogsprog used the same service. 2010:. We have references that show it is minority tradition. Hence a picture near the bottom of the page will fix undue weight problem. The reason we are not having solution is that many people are assuming using bad faith that we are doing censorship and working for our religion. Well I have no objection in having pictures in 628:. You say "per talk." I don't remember reaching consensus on that Easter Egg issue. The other guy who undid the EE recently was Beit Or, who claimed it was a "correction" in his edit summary (correction of what?). I hope you will reach consensus with the other editors before acting, especially upon a "per talk" basis. 2560:

the version he want's. I feel that is unfair and we should both be allowed to edit and then discuss our edits and reach a consensus. As long as we don't violate 3RR there is no reason to block this article. If we do go ahead and block it, but as long as we don't give us a chance to work it out on our own.

5039:

What am I presupposing? You accused me of causing disruption (and defying Jimbo's wishes) by unilaterally arguing in favor of including such a compromise option in the poll. I've pointed out that numerous other editors have advocated this format and that Jimbo himself first suggested such an option

4057:

I frankly don't want to know all the Knowledge policies and procedures. I want to write. I've been doing so for about a year, and so far, I've been very happy with it. I've asked him to back away. I asked him to come back and edit the article later in the day, or in the evening. I've offered for

3859:

I have commented before that I feel it's unfair to block the article with Isarig's version of the article intact because it puts Isarig in the position of power. He can keep arguing with me until I submit to what he wants the article to be. If I try and stand firm on something he can just say that we

3833:

I have asked you 4 times now to remove the ban on Kurt Nimmo. This article as it stands contains inaccurate information in it. Nowhere in the Blog entry cited does Kurt Nimmmo deny the Holocaust or endorse David Irving. If one wishes to cirticize Nimmo for statements he makes in the blog fine, but it

3449:

When someone says the Holocaust is "alleged", then it's hardly clear that he doesn't also consider it a "political epithet", even when he encloses it in quotation marks. His subsequent refusals to clarify his views did nothing for his (or your) case. Now, why don't you sweep through that Talk: page,

2972:

Anyway, you clearly had a look at his contributions to the article when you made your smaller revert. Could you look over it again and let me know if I'm missing something? I don't doubt that I am, but this is the sort of situation that should be handled very carefully, to be sure that members of the

2540:

This same categorization for the "Netzarim, Ra'anana" site, however, does not hold a single drop of water. The group (centralized ultimately in a Teimani synagogue) has hundreds of people formally affiliated or in their "khavruta" (home study), in over 40 countries, and is near-universally recognized

2335:

has three or four "fact" and "who?" tags, but you deleted the phrase "mainly by " as "unsourced". It isn't any more unsourced than the other items so tagged in the article, but you deleted it because I tried to provide a source for it, thereby bringing attention to it. I can't understand the logic in

1442:

Jayjg, in the Kosovo arbitration case, you voted to put Osli73 on revert parole. I wish to bring to your attention that he has been violating his parole with impunity for some time now. On February 24, this behavior was brought to the attention of the arb enforcement board (see link below), but there

4061:

Knowledge needs contributors who are writers, who know a subject well, who do careful research work in the subject and write well balanced and thoroughly sourced articles. I am such a person. I don't claim authority in any field, like an advanced degree. (I do have an advanced degree, I just don't

3884:

I can't come to consensus because Isarig won't accept any of my proposals. All I'm asking for is a little window of time where the block can be lifted and we can work on it by ourselves. If the edit waring gets too bad or I violate the 3rr rule feel free to put the block back up. Please just give me

3558:

about me and the blanket revert that took place. I have no problem when people revert some of my edits because the content may be questionable, but not when the user that reverted thinks that anything Judaism-related that I touch with a ten-foot pole is bound to spontaneously combust. You simply may

3003:

movement = assimilation (rightly, in my opinion, but forgive me for my lack of NPOV in that situation), and questioned Humanistic Judaism being included as a Jewish movement because of its rejection of a pretty basic Jewish concept (belief in G-d). Furthermore, he actively misrepresents my religious

1927:

I have a question and hope that you can help because you were the arbitration community member. I am asking from you because you are the only one I know who was arbitrator. I hope you will not delete it thinking a personal attack (I never do personal attacks). The question is that if the arbitration

566:

page. I consider Cochran's theory to be an attempt to justify a genetic interpretation of race and IQ differences in general. Better material has been written about "Jewish Intelligence" and there is no agreement on the environmentalism versus genetics issue. I don't like to see the baby thrown out

474:

Back again, haunting and raising hackles on his pet topics of Roman/Italian history and football. Judging from the last edit, he may already have dropped this account for another sock. Since you're familiar with the case, I'll keep notifying you about any socks I happen upon (unless you ask me not

4696:

There is little doubt in my mind that you are staunchly pro-Israel and have yet to provide any real reasoning for your guarding of the Hamas and PNA articles. Myself and a colleague with our judicial profiling service have serious doubts over your motivations here. Whilst it is beyond me to request

4352:

I looked at the discussion, didn't agree with most of it, and took into account who was making it as well, and for what purpose. The poll needs to see who agrees with the move in principle first. Claiming that that question is in some way "vague" only serves to discredit the person who says it, not

4216:

For the first time ever, I disagreed with you to the extent of reverting one of your edits. A single link to the article on Toaff is not undue weight. I discussed the rationale on the article talk page. We all are disgusted that it happened, but he has made himself prominent. Even as one critic,

4131:

I can't be active on Knowledge when I am being followed by a stalker. My stalker has an amazing knowledge of wikipedia policies and procedures for someone who, according to edit logs, has been active for just over a month. He has been here before, with other identities, and he has other identities.

4032:

I have no idea how to to file the right kind of request for comment or mediation or arbitration, or whatever. I have a determined troll following me around "proceduring" me to death. He has been following me around through a series of articles that I have been working on, constantly editing things

3865:

I have said before that I will make a solemn vow to not violate the 3rr rule and try to keep the edit waring to a minimum. If I do either of these things you can fill free to reinstall the block. However, as long as I stick to these standards I feel it would be better to let me a isarig work it out

3853:

We've come to a kind of compromise. We've agreed to include the entry, but have it say what the entry actually say's. We have a disagreement about exactly where in the article to place it. I want it in the External links section because I feel it isn't relevant to main article. Isarig disagrees and

3292:

in the Title of his message. So we can see this is his normal way of talking to people. If he is abusive and uncivil again, I hope he will be blocked for some time. I think he will fix his behavior now that I have highlighted his abuses, but he may return to his old self later. Just to let you know

2968:

I'm a bit troubled by this - I'm regularly involved in preventing MJ/christian views from being inserted into articles on Judaism, and have clashed with Noogster and Inigmatus in the past over it. This seems like it's going too far, however, and that he's being reverted due to his personal theology

2341:

I also think that selective deletions of this type may unintentionally introduce a POV to articles. If I were to provide a reference for the sentence "Some Zionists describe a Jew who supports most forms of anti-Zionism as self-hating", and you find that source lacking, will you delete the sentence

2124:

Recently in the JOFA 10th Anniversary International Conference on Feminism & Orthodoxy, three members of these minyanim (Elitzur Bar-Asher, Michal Bar-Asher Siegal and Alanna Copper), in a session under the title: "Beyond Women Issue: Partnership Minyanim Engages Orthodoxy," articulated for the

2098:

By the way Isarig recently lied when he said on the talk page that the listing of the similarities between Dershowitz and peters books was my own original research. That section has been in the article for some time now and was only recently deleted by NYScholar. I feel the information was relevant

1485:

I maintain that what I said a year ago in my arbitration case remain true: If wikiepdia is unable over 3-4 years now) to get to an NPOV article on such subject the best thing is to delete the article all together. Knowledge can not be the host for such blant propeganda. This is an important issue.

1125:

3. Most of us don't believe in the Trinity. We do not promote and are actively against the "trinity" and the "worship" (G-d forbid it) of Jesus (anglicized from Greek Iesous, translation of Aramaic Yeshua, Aramaic of Hebrew Yehoshua). The single source cited may not know what it's talking about and

31:

I HAVE put the information of when his term would end, numerous times. No matter where I put it, someone like you delete's it. It is amazing that such a basic piece of information has no place in the article. Frankly, if you delete it, YOU have the responsibility to put it in the place you think

5516:

All of those attributes, both positive and negative, apply to Ilan Pappe and also to (say) Ephraim Karsh. There is no doubt that both of them pass the requirements to be a Knowledge Reliable Source. On the other hand, I would not personally cite either of them when a less-controversial source is

4229:

I agree "undue" is relevant, and is sufficient to justify not discussing his work in detail in the blood libel article--it is probably also sufficient for not even mentioning what it is in that article. But as the latest person to publish a widely noticed book on the subject, I think a bare cross

4099:

He knows nothing about the topics that I am trying to write about. I would welcome a collaborator or two who does, but this fellow isn't that collaborator. He simply creates endless headaches. Each time, he cites the wikipedia policy under which he is of course "right," but if I then try the same

3788:

I'd like to call to your attention that it appears you have protected the article in the form that is disputed by virtually all editors except Jon Awbrey and his sockpuppets. Perhaps it would be sensible to revert to the last version by SlimVirgin or the last version you were at when you tried to

3186:

Now, I'm not a big fan of MiddleEastern (see that user's recently failed RfA for example), but this story rings true to me. I think it might be in order to give the user another chance. That said, obviously we couldn't allow MiddleEastern back while they are using the anonymizer. In fact we should

3119:

It seems to me that the rewording is just a way to sort of bypass what isn't allowed. I think it's quite obvious for anyone to see the common denominator of these people and although it's doing this indirectly, it is, in a way, saying, "Zionism is bad. Look at all these horrible Zionist people and

2559:

Could you please unblock this article. We are moving towards a consensus, but one of the issues of contention is that the article is blocked. I feel that it gives Isarig and unfair advantage because no matter what I say, his version of the article is perserved and he can ware me down until he gets

2275:

I have been looking over the various policy docs, and as far as I can surmise, all ArbCom decisions are supposed to be publically posted. I'm not trying to be a jerk here Jay, all I'm asking for is a clear and concise description of the notes "you know what you did" and "the latest attack page" be

2232:

don't know why, nor would anyone else coming to the page. There is some evidence of the 1 December issue with Anomicene, and the tie-in to Tuttovenuto, but no evidence of this link is presented in the talk page, it's only mentioned as being "out there". The ArbCom case is earlier, and I can't find

2130:

I don't have any problem with the reliability of the media source, which contains excerpts from the JOFA paper which could legitimately added to the article. The paper itself, if it were published, could be cited and its content excerpted. But it doesn't seem to me that the mere presentation of an

2088:

Could you please remove the blocks from these two articles. After each edit I post on the discussion page my reason for making the edits. When you block the articles it sends the message that no matter what I say on the talk page, my viewpoint will pretty much be shut out. I believe that Isarig is

874:

article where I have been contacted by a researcher from the German Wiki with lots of genuine and historical material about Rabbi Dr. Joseph Carlebach, the last Chief Rabbi of Hamburg Altona who was killed by the Nazis with his flock during the Holocaust. Rabbi Joseph Carlebach was probably one of

3960:

in an effort to clean up the main Judaism and Evolution page first of all, so that it can be turned into a page that is not dominated by issues (such as the Slifkin affair) that would have undue weight. ZayZayEM has simply made it impossible for me to work. He has followed me from one article to

2883:

My name is Alan Davidson. You blocked my daughter (Comment1), so she cannot make this contribution to your site. She has asked me to. She was blocked for making 4 edits which were regarded as reverts in 24 hours. I know of this rule. She assures me she did not know. It has also been claimed

2515:

Guys, I know there's a reasonable answer to this but I don't know it. And that is, why are Kosher symbols appearing on non-food items like aluminum foil and household cleaning products? Does it have something to do with the concern as to whether these products have touched dairy or meat products?

2383:

Your position on acceptance of the "New Testament" (neutral language, Apostolic Writings) being an exclusively Christian theological idea is a very subjective and touchy matter. In Messianic Judaism, it all depends on the factor of the practices of the original community. The best Orthodox Jewish

2224:

I have had several "dealings" with Gnetwerker in the past, where he basically said I was a know-nothing noob. I came across another example in the i860 article, only because it popped into my watchlist after a recent post by an unrelated user on an unrelated topic. So I went to his talk page, and

1905:

be misreading your posts, true, but they really do not read as if they are new top-level discussions on the topic. (At least one reply to your post seems to have indented back up to an appropriate level, which indicates to me that I'm not the only one reading you this way.) Everyone else on the

1643:

and so probably does deserve a block (but one with a duration)...but indefinite seems harsh to me, unless this is part of a bigger pattern I'm not aware of: the user claims they have to use proxies because of their connection type. I'm sure you can tell more about the situation than me, though.

329:

Thanks. I understand what you mean by "easter egg," but I cannot figure out what exactly is wrong with the easter egg. I know that if it was taken too far, the lead would become a chunk of links and it would be really messy, but this didn't appear to be the case. It may be argued that it is not

4617:

I would like your feedback on this effort; particularly on ways that such an effort might be prohibited under Knowledge policy. What I'm proposing could be perceived as "mob justice," but my response to that would be that any volunteers are assisting in the enforcement of an existing ban. We're

4470:

The existence of the English wikipedia category allows for links to be made to the commons category of the same name. So English wikipedia editors then know of the additional commons media available to them. Those images are sometimes better, as explained previously. Oftentimes there is a larger

4369:

2. As noted on the talk page, the question currently labeled "3" asks exactly the same thing without without forcing respondents to select one of the extreme outcomes. The question that you restored is 100% redundant, discourages compromise, and needlessly complicates an otherwise simple poll.

2852:

I saw that you had removed a few of his additions. His material is basically fundamentalist Christian POV, and not Jewish material. He is a "Messianic" who has been trying to work on Jewish issues all over English Knowledge. I backed up the evolution article to February 25th to remove Noogster's

2809:

The article as it stands contains inaccurate information in it. Nimmo did not denie the holocaust or endorse David Irving. He said in a blog entry criticizing the convicton of Irving that the gas chambers were discredited. Nimmo himself has stated on the talk page that he meant dicredited in the

2264:

I find it disconcerting that a user was indef blocked with no evidence being presented that I can find. You have twice suggested that "this is not public information", but I really don't know what you are referring to. All I'm asking for is what mechanism was used in this case? ArbCom? RfC? RfM?

4934:

Maybe you're doing this in good faith, David, but at some point it crosses a line. WP:ATT was conceived of as a way of reducing 3 pages to 1. It became policy after many months of discussion. Then Jimbo raised concerns, and said he would like to gauge Knowledge opinion as to whether the 3 pages

4053:

One of the big problems, frankly, is that the topics I am working on require some knowledge of Hebrew and a lot of knowledge of Jewish philosophy and theology. This editor, who knows nothing about these matters, is simply creating one stumbling block after another, always citing some wikipedia

5197:

In reply to your question, I expect you to not misuse your admin privileges like that again - I will be uploading a new compromise version of the map which I hope will satisfy the objections that have been raised, and I don't want to find that it's been "disappeared" in the middle of the night

3929:

Jay, I really need your help here. ZayZayEM is engaging in troll-like behavior, such as making edits on the very materials I am editing, removing materials immediately after I add them, and so forth. It is a harassment pattern that extends across multiple articles. The main articles involved

4065:

What I can do is easy to see from what I have done. I have started dozens of articles, and never had one deleted, working some of them through to completion. Many of them are on serious scholarly topics. I enjoy writing. I don't claim to "own" these articles. If I wanted that, I would write

5128:

Hi there. I saw your edit immediately after mine, on this article. You removed text that I had tagged as citation needed. I had also commented in discussion that a quick search suggested that the text wasn't untrue in it's entirety; in fact it was primarily correct but needing just moderate

2392:

I'm not sure if your reference to the three groups having "overlapping memberships", especially in the modern day, has much (verifiable) truth within it. Virtually no Messianic Jews worship in a Gentile church, and I am pretty sure that living within that environment is a pretty significant

2157:

Hello, Jay, I wonder if you could delet an image, or non-image as the case may be, that I uploaded within this past hour. It is Image:Deerslayer.gif. It is problematic for two reasons: 1) it didn't upload properly and 2) the copyright issue is not clear. If I can delete it, please tell

1694:

in which PinchasC did not let me write an article on Chabad Messianism even after an AfD implied consensus for such an article I was advised to write such an article in my user space. I have now done so and would be grateful for any feedback from you before I put it up. Happy Purim.

4955:

2. Why are you claiming that I'm unilaterally causing "disruption"? Have you read the entire talk page? Numerous other editors have expressed this opinion, and a version of the poll containing these compromise options garnered significant support (and opposition) in the pre-poll

1087:

4. I've made it clear that I only respond to questions about article content on article Talk: pages, and that I will remove harassment (e.g. claiming I am "stalking", or that I am "not strong enough in my case", "evading", etc.) from my Talk: page - that's what the Big Yellow Box

3995:

to your fellow editors; instead, assume that they are here to improve Knowledge. The image caption was not meant as an expression of POV, and your assertion of POV-pushing is both misplaced and offensive. Please leave out the snarky remarks in future - they're not helpful. --

1600:

Any chance, if you get a second, you could pop over to RFCU and clear out the 27-strong backlog? Recent events - two of them - have led to this, and due to the latter of the two I can't see it going anywhere without your intevention. Any help would be much appreciated. Cheers,

4254:

for latest RFCU results). Is there anything that you or anyone else can do to faciliate a permanent block on the serial sockpuppetry from his known IP addresses? I haven't been able to identify the proper channels for dealing with users like this in a post-block context.

901:

Chabad Messianism is one of the major controversies in Judaism in the past 50 years with numerous books on the subject yet PinchasC (and co) have ensured that there can only be 1 paragraph in all wikipedia about it - which is followed by endless of the point Berger-bashing.

5642:

It's actually kinda insulting... You implied that she was being paid to edit articles. Her statement didn't state that. I'm not illiterate, and you really don't need to treat me as such. You don't see me using really big words or typing really short words for you, do you?

1526:

It is part of the conflicting narrative on this big issue. Why is wikipedia allowing Zero to turn the article to support only one side claims (the whole division in "stages" is already POV) instead of simply saying: There are two views. here is ione and here is the other.

567:

with the bath water. I would rather see a much better article written that would be balanced and inclusive. Barring that, I would like to see the Cochran material moved onto the page about Gregory Cochran himself, not back onto the Ashkenazi Jews page. Unfortunately, the

5098:? Urthogie is trying to defend the pro-Israel viewpoint, and is generally making a lot of unwarranted edits. Apreciate if you could please take a look. You will see a section on the talk page where I had to disagree with him. Appreciate if you could pitch in. Thanks. -- 4480:

As many others have done I put some of the English-language commons images in the English wikipedia categories. This saves editors time in finding images. Because they don't have to click many commons images to open them up and see what language is used on the image.

2365:

I'm going to post this here because I have been having some personal thoughts that I'd like to share that probably do not belong in the discussion page of an article. I will concede with you, an administrator, about the article. But here are some opinions about it:

4613:

intended to help organize volunteers to monitor Panairjdde's sockpuppetry, with my thinking being that his ban has been ineffective as a means of preventing him from editing. Several of his socks have enabled him to enjoy editing privileges for weeks at a time.

1883:

Certainly, there are multiple standards, but some are more helpful than others. Inserting your own (differing) style in the midst of an ongoing conversation that is already using a different style is not very...neighborly, for want of a better term. Thanks. ⇔

2302:

Why do you let stand some unsourced sentences and delete others? Why do you delete long-standing sentences whose only "crime" is that an editor has tried to provide references for them? If unsourced material is inappropriate, why don't you delete all of it? —

2131:

unpublished paper in a conference -- with nothing about the content, just the presentation of a paper and a claim the paper is a first -- is appropriate encyclopedia content for this article. (I'm also skeptical of the claim of first publication. For example,

1673:

talk page. A certain user has accused me of making it personal, and I feel the same way about the user (please see my talk page as well). I'm going to check out of the whole debate for a while, but I'd appreciate if other cooler heads would weigh in. Thanks.

2951:

article when you get a chance? Noogster made some significant edits there that as far as I can tell were almost completely straightforward, uncontroversial stuff that even as an Orthodox Jew I wouldn't have any problem with (though it was poorly sourced).

2049:. I agree that the conspiracy/cabal stuff should be limited, but it seems that there is an effort to not include Libby's ethnicity in the bio? I would love to remove ethnicity from most bios but it seems that it has been included in most. Anyways, thanks -- 5616:

Just thought I'd answer this here, since it isn't entirely related to the incident itself (and I have a tendency to go off on too many tangents in AN/I). First, being an employee of the government (controlled by Hamas), and being a volunteer for Hamas do

4341:

Now you've joined her in appearing out of nowhere and reverting hours of cooperative work with nothing more than a "this is how it should be"-style post (and without any indication that you familiarized yourself with the reasoning behind these changes).

155:

Ah ok, thanks for the response. Obviously Kgeza67 is hoping to benefit in some small way from his latest sock if we look at his sock's talk page. I hate to say this but if history on this is any indicator I suspect you'll be hearing a bit more still. :-/

3955:

It is bizarre behavior, because I can see no reason why he is even interested in this material. As you and I both know, it is material you have to really understand well to edit. Over the last week, I have substantially rearranged all the materials on

2388:

have a Christian-type theology if they believed there was something sacred about the NT order of canon itself, which we are today familiar with (it was not compiled until the 4th century by Roman gentile Christians of the most quintessential order!).

5249:

It should be noted that this guideline is not meant to apply to formal good faith reports on a user's conduct or pattern of behavior made in accord with policy. For example, a request for comment filed in good faith would not be considered an attack

1299:

without providing a block rationale. They have now requested to be unblocked, asking "Why have I been blocked with no explanation?". Unless I'm missing something very obvious, that would seem to be a fair question. Would you like to comment? Thanks,

4090:

If I'm supposed to go to some kind of arbitration panel and write some kind of elaborate defense or request, I'm outta here. I'm not interested in spending time doing that. I've never bothered to figure out how to cite logs, and I don't want to.

5621:

necessarily add up to being an employee of Hamas. (Anymore than a person who's pro-Conservative and currently employed by the canadian government is an employee of the Conservative party of canada) Not that that part really matters very much. :)

1045:

4. Do not delete comments from your talk page. If you're not strong enough in your case to directly respond to me and others rather than evading behind the endless fences you've erected for yourself, then you are not adding much to this website.

319:. I consider it good overall, but I can't figure out what is wrong with "easter egg" link. Aren't all wikilinks like that? In this case, it just happened to link to a relevant section of the article. I don't see what is wrong with that link. 4076:

I'm not interested in arguing about Knowledge policy X or Y. I am interested in writing. I am not interested in going thourgh some kind of elaborate Knowledge arbitration determination procedure, in which we somehow determine who was right.

3920:

I feel the articles are extremely well sourced and balanced. I'd like somebody else to remove the tags. Please look at my last versions, because I have run up against somebody from the evolution/creation universe who wants to troll around for

1091:

5. You were basically taking every single person mentioned in the Bible and including them in a Category of "People important in Messianic Judaism." Aside from being unsourced POV, it was ridiculous; the category should contain people who are

4462:

Sometimes better images are uploaded that can replace lesser-quality images. Without the list of English-language wikipedia pages it would be very difficult to find and replace a particular image on multiple English-language wikipedia pages.

2483:

as white. Some things was posted that used some evidence of Middle Eastern genetic ties as 'proof' that they shouldn't be considered white at all (or "barely"). Now I am not sure about the matter. Your input would be appreciated, thanks.

2994:

Metzenberg is getting a rather bad impression of me, and seems to discriminate actively on the basis of personal background. I have had a single encounter with him. I admit, I was POV. Do you want to know how? In the article discussion for

1976:. I have right now started a vote to ask with other people that if they all think that mediation has failed or not. I am sure that many (may be all) will agree with me on this point and I will move forward with at least that consensus. --- 780:

Hello! Could you remember to put a block notice on the Talk page when you've blocked someone? It means that others don't have to go through the initial stages of the blocking process only to find that they're wasting their time. Thanks.

681:

directed toward Kosiński by some of his Polish readers. I do not see the need to go any further than that and do not wish to engage in a dispute over this matter. I want the article to look ballanced and on the subject. Please try to help.

4466:

There are images in English wikipedia categories that would not be accepted in the commons. Gif images, fair use images, etc.. So the link to the commons category allows for more public-domain images to be used in English wikipedia pages.

3115:

Hey, I figured you could tell me if I'm overly-sensitive or over-reacting to his user page. I contacted him regarding his list of zionist leaders a while ago and that was when he changed it from a "list" to a "list of articles i watch."

2443:

article of late but he has also done a bit of editing on politician related articles. Other than the similarities in POV on this one article and this editor's newness I'm not seeing a decent match for puppetry. Thanks for your response.

1872:

Hi, Jayjg. Please use proper indentation when replying on talk pages. It's the only way to keep threads of conversation intact so they can be followed by readers. Always use one more colon (:) than what you're replying to. Thanks. ⇔

4124:

I have attracted the attention of a Knowledge stalker, so I have decided that I am finished with this. Knowledge needs a policy on stalking, which is where some person obsessively follows you around, trying to disrupt your activities.

3252:

Seeing as none of this is true, what's the score on having these allegations removed once the checkip comes back with nothing? This user has added this allegation to a half-dozen pages now, and I'm not keen on having it stick around.

1713:

and I wish to invite you to do an online survey about Knowledge. To compensate you for your time, I am offering a reward of USD$ 10, either to you or as a donation to the Wikimedia Foundation. For more information, please go to the

4106:

If your answer is that I'm supposed to file wiki-dot-colon-xxxcite-procedure and wait for a wiki-xxxxarb-med-committee to volunteer to handle the case, my answer is no. That's his game, not mine. I'm sure he is good at it too.

4143:. It won't be me, because I don't file lawsuits, but I now realize that this community is susceptible to such tampering. So I am recommending that Knowledge look carefully at its policies, and also at its own administrators. 5624:

However, "she is employed as part of her PR duties to edit Knowledge" certainly looks like an accusation that she is being paid to edit articles. Of course, it may not have been your intent to suggest that, but it very much

2478:

that I think that you may have good knowledge about. Am I right in considering Ashkenazi Jews white? There has been a lot of dispute over pictures on the talk page, and for some reason, I've met resistance towards treating

2213:

article talk page. I went from there to the talk page, and found a perm block for sock. I cannot find the evidence for this, however, and see a suggestion that you e-mailed it to another admin. Can you e-mail it to me too?

4967:

has (because it seems as though everyone is citing his remarks to support their arguments), so I've asked him to clarify. I agree to abide by whatever he says (even if it directly contradicts my preferences). Do you?

2236:

I want to make this point clear: I am not disputing the block, and given my past dealings, I can't even say I find it surprising. But what I'm concerned about is that all that's on the page are the accusations, not the

5471:

Itayb is futzing with the article and re-adding the misinformation you corrected. He and Abu Ali are ganging up on me on the talk page, calling me a Jewish fundamentalist, etc., so I'm pulling out of the article per

4095:

has presented an endless series of procedural hurdles, and such a process would be more of the same, and a complete waste of time. I'm sure that once the process was finished, he would be back to more of the same.

4580:

I would like to thank you for your support in my recent RFA. As you may or may not be aware, it passed with approximately 99% support. I ensure you that I will use the tools well, and if I ever disappoint you, I am

4924:...is to accuse any of my opponents in this debate of acting in bad faith. As strongly as I disagree with you, I trust that you're doing what you feel is best for the community. I only ask the same in return. — 1516:

appeared in the village one day in late 1947 with dire news. "They asked people in Salameh to leave, because a war was going to happen there," he said. "They said, 'Go for a week, or a month -- then come back.'

3573:

I'm starting to feel a bit beaten down in the whole "let's only mention religion if it's relevant" debate, but if you're feeling bored you might want to add your thoughts to a silly discussion I'm having on the

2396:

So those are just some non-article thoughts of mine that don't violate that yellow box at the top; I just thought to share them with you in taking a break from the rigors of WP editing. Thanks for reading it.

804:

Is there any evidence for sock puppte use, as you claim in the protection log for this page? There were a few edits on the page but nothing like a revert war: I'm slightly baffeled as to why it was protected?

2818:

This is from an entry entitled "Sarko and the French Strategy of Tension" it is therefore libelous to call him a holocaust denier. Just go to Nimmo's blog "Another Day in Empire" you can see it for yourself.

2528: 1129:

4. Alright, I'll do that, but you must stop, and promptly, your endless pursuit and reversion of my articles without any notification of the fact to me. Because I feel it does get ridiculous at some point.

561:

The article was proposed for deletion. I am the one who created the article. I did so not as some kind of fan of Gregory Cochran's work, but rather to get the material (which I find distasteful) off the

4135:

I have asked for an administrator to lock and close my user page and hide my contributions log. I naively had such information as my real identity available on my user page. I don't want to be stalked.

2058:

Hey, you reverted my Apartionalism link in the Colonialism page. I'm a new user so I hope I am not messing things up. But I believe that Apartionalism deserves to be put in the link. What do you think?

1787: 1075:

Because you said you're not feeling well, and said please, I'll answer you here, but please don't post any more questions on my Talk: page about article content, and please don't order me to do things.

814: 2181: 1042:

3. The intro incorrectly states that Messianics "worship" Jesus. If you ask the vast majority of Messianics if they worship him, they'll say NO and claim idolatry as the reason. This is not accurate.

4339:

I attempted to discuss this with SlimVirgin, and I waited more than two hours for her to respond. She completely ignored my reply (while continuing to edit both the project page and the talk page).

4456:

Commons media are for the use of all wikipedia sites worldwide. The English wikipedia category pages for those commons media list the English wikipedia pages on which those commons media are used.

4073:

has been following me around through a group of articles that I have been working on, creating a long series of procedural problems. Each time, he cites some Knowledge policy for why he is right.

4202:

Discussion of the Middle-East conflicts always degrades into a semantic debate, largely because far-left and far-right arguments rely on the pathologization of otherwise uncontroversial words?--

4318:

You know there have been users, including myself, who have been blocked just because Panairjdde had game the system. Is there any chance all the blocks he has caused being wiped off the record?

3450:

gather up the dozens of personal attacks made against me on it, and go warn the various people who made them about it? Otherwise one might think that your focus on me was singular and personal.

1802:

I made a reply in the discussion for the template. Your POV attacks must end. The very fact that the Tanakh shows up in the Judaism template and it's kept shows that you are definitely biased.

2902:

My daughter would like an account back. Could you please respond. I would like to encourage her use of Knowledge. If it will help, we will ensure we do not contribute to the same articles.

4018:

There is some confusion over whether BhaiSaab really did sock, and whether or not he deserves the indefinite ban he is now under. (There is no such confusion over His Excellency, however). -

589:

I'm astonished that you won't understand that on it.wiki we have a different behabiour, and asking politely to a user to remove something from one of his subpages should be the first step. --

2189:

I didn't realize this had been deleted; it just came up on some page, and I thought, "A list I can populate, and thus contribute to the Great Project!" Thanks for putting a protect on it. --

4337:

A great deal of collaboration went into this revision, and then SlimVirgin showed up and undid it without any effort to participate (and apparently without reading the relevant discussion).

3839:

Your continued refusal to respond to my post's makes the suspicious parts of my nature tingle. It makes me think that you and Isarig are in a conspiracy too defame Nimmo. Please respond.

1309: 875:

the top rabbis in Germany prior to the Holocaust and was held in high regard by famous rabbinical peers in Europe. Developing this article would be a great thing. Please help. Thank you.

553: 816: 3404:

You know perfectly well that your "summary" of Kirbytime's remarks was a distortion. It's almost unbelieveable to me that you'd try to shield yourself in this manner, after the fact.

1972:

If you read the mediation page then you will find that many members think that it is failed. Each voting has resulted with no consensus and it has been filed since many many months now

3961:

another, demanding arbitrary changes. many of his edits, and his changes, show that he knows very little about the subject, which as you and I both know, is quite abstruse at times. --

4989:

when he added the compromise option "The current version of ATT is acceptable, RS/NOR/V should be explanatory" to the poll? Do you agree to adopt whichever format Jimbo sanctions? —

3032: 969: 4783:

I'm possibly too pedantic here, but the 'L' in the name has a Polish accent on it: 'ł'. Should it be moved to 'Chełmno extermination camp', which is where most incoming links go to?

4010:

Since you seem to have been involved on the technical side regarding BhaiSaab and His Excellency's sockpuppets (or alleged sockpuppets), you may want to comment on this thread here:

3041:

article? It seems like the article does a good job of fleshing of the sorrid details of his discrimination ect. I even suggestted some mention of this in the lead? Anyways, thanks --

2099:

and if you ask me it is Isarig who should be banned for reverting my edits, but because Isarig apparently has some powerful admirers on the administrative board I got banned instead.

4087:

Looking at his recent logs, his last RfC was a few days ago. I've never had one. I didn't even know what an RfC was until a few days ago. This user is simply looking for fights.

3559:

have not gotten around to it yet and I need to give you more time, or you have a reason for not responding that I am not aware of. Please let me know if possible. Shabat shalom.

2008:"Note that undue weight can be given in several ways, including, but not limited to, depth of detail, quantity of text, prominence of placement, and juxtaposition of statements." 826: 2494:

Thank you. It's sort of my mistake not linking you correctly; the active discussion is way at the bottom. I don't know if anyone looks at the "More whites" section anymore.

1154:

If it is not inconvenient, please answer these queries either here, in my talk page, or in the talk pages for the respective articles (if you do that, please notify it to me).

822:

If you could submit a detailed accounting for how you ascertained that two of voters on the article's Afd page were sockpuppets, that would be very helpful. Thanks in advance.

4555: 3738: 3440:, where you selectively quoted an obviously facetious statement (or did you miss the quotation marks in the original?) as though it represented the poster's actual opinions? 2787:

but I feel the second works better. So why don't you like it? I've already asked for your input above but you haven't bothered replying either to that or to my comments under

2548: 1792:

I have responded to your false comment in the discussion page for the template. I'm tired about having my religion repeatedly lied about and misunderstood as a misunderstood.

1572:

Jayjg, Hi. You left a warning on my user page about "stalking". I have responded to you on my page, and would appreciate your taking a look and leaving a response. Thank you,

330:

necessary anymore since the wording itself is now neutral, but I guess we will just see how the main editors behind the neutrality dispute will react. Anyway, I am wondering

3811:

OK, my mistake. It's now back at a fairly reasonable version of somewhat reasonable length and without the obscure technical table and such (the 62kB version). Thanks. ...

4711:...for expressing your support on my Talk page. I think it's going to take us a little while to get organized, but I'm cautiously optimistic about our chances for success. 4103:

I've read that Knowledge is interested in the product, not the process. Well this user is obsessed with the process, and presents endless hurdles to improving the product.

3293:

that I had experienced the same kind of hostility as you probably did while dealing with him. This is definitely an abusive and intimidating user just waiting for a block.--

2228:

But try as I might, I cannot find any of the evidence for the most recent block, the one on 23 December. One of the last posts was "you know why". Perhaps that is true, but

1319: 1796: 4875: 2296: 2195: 2182: 1660: 3045: 1910:

promote clarity. Again, I may be reading you wrong. I'm just trying to be helpful (not everyone knows the conventions), not to start a flame-fest on threading style. ⇔

291:

24.28.143.218 as a sock. I suspect this is another one. I'm happy to file an RFCU, but this seems a fairly obvious case of abusive sockpuppetry. Can you confirm? Thanks,

4697:

you to justify yourself, and the PNA has no jurisdiction in cyberspace, I would however indicate that you may be violating the Knowledge policies. I await your reply --

3021:

It is prohibited to remove relevant material sourced to reliable sources because you have done some original research and decided the reliable source is actually wrong.

4415:

2. The question was removed by Jossi (who was its strongest proponent until being persuaded to reconsider the situation). Where is the consensus for its inclusion? —

3235:] - check out the coincidental intrest in "Cunningham" in recent days by "both" users. This is ironic since I was trying to reason with him about how to describe the 2537:

Upon further examination, and careful deliberation, I have decided that both the "INJS" and "Nazarite site" links are I proposed are, more or less, personal websites.

579: 2823:

If you unblock this article I give you my word I will not violate the 3RR rule and will try my best to keep the edit warring to a minimum. Please unblock the article.

2316:

PS - I'm asking you here, and not on the Talk pages of those articles, because this is a "meta" question that isn't specifically about the content of your deletions.

2847: 490: 2026:. The reason mediation fail is because many people assume bad faith towards other that we are censoring for Islam and are even not listening to our arguments. --- 1906:

topic is using reply-indented-one-level-deeper style for replies. If you don't also follow that convention (in discussions where it's already established) you do

1587: 1326: 898:

Every time I try he pulls another deceitful slight of hand, reverting endlessly, nominating good articles for AfD just to confuse people and so on and so forth.

555: 3492:

No, he has not "clarified his position". You are well aware of what he said and what he meant. Your defence of Kirbytime is very disturbing. You should really

1678: 1052:

P.S. What have I violated in the yellow box? I'm not harassing you at all. Please, I'm not at all feeling well right now, answer me promptly rather than evading.

5490:

I have almost no time for WP. You asked about Katz and Pappe. They are hard to compare directly so I'll add two more villains. One can note about Pappe that:

2418:

article I think you might be a bit more knowledgeable of this individual's editing habits. Did he make a point of editing much on political/politician articles?

1463:

The use of wikipedia as a place fopr propeganda continue with the aid of edit wars and the fact that honorable people like you don't want to get into this mess.

4484:

It is common for a map or media to be in several categories. There are many examples of this. Maps, for example, often show several nations, territories, etc..

2331:

material that an editor has tried, in good faith, to source. Why not revert it to the way it was (unsourced), or replace the "bad" reference with a "fact" tag?

2699:

The problem is when I insert "]" to the senator's article, it appears to be a football field, I want to put the commons photo on the article, how can I do it?

2613: 2599: 710: 86: 5517:

available, except maybe to illustrate what the range of professional opinion is. In the latter case it would usually require "according to ..." or similar.

5169:

I think his action of deleting a seriously 'POV pushing' image (and image title) was very justifiable and that your reaction is an interesting/puzzling one.

4451: 3208: 2067: 1492:

is a VALID POV just like the other. Either both POV have an equal standing in the article (this is far far from what we have now) or tscrap the whole thing.

528:

to remove that material from his archive page, explaining why you wish it removed. I'm sure he won't have any problem in fulfilling your request. Regards. --

5536:

Has been actively employed as a propagandist most of his life (not just that he writes propagandistically, but that "propagandist" was his job description).

2857: 2838:

While I don't agree with anything you put on my talk page, I am glad "we" don't have a problem. I am done talking about this with you. Have a good night.

2541:

as being within Orthodox Judaism (the exception: a minor number of antimissionaries). I will publish my case with the appropriate citations after tomorrow.

5506:

Many, though not all, of the citations in the peer-reviewed literature from the mainstream (those from the political extremes can be ignored) are negative.

5434: 5240:

Jayjg, as much as you want to support your friends, there is nothing in this page that constitutes speedy deletion, or even deletion. I ask you to review:

2347: 2304: 3332: 643: 4491: 2658:, but he seemed inactive. I decided to ask you since you had replied to previous queries. Should I ask this question to some other checkuser instead? 1119:

1. We wear tefillin and kippas too and run services according to a siddur. You either mention most/all of it (too long for an intro) or you leave it out.

774: 3191:

I could persuade MiddleEastern to stop using the anonymizer, would you be prepared to lift the indef block? I'll undertake to keep an eye on this user.

2280: 2256: 2243: 861: 519: 244: 3467:

statements on the Allegations of Israeli Apartheid page, which were obviously intended to portray Kirbytime's statements as something they were not.

3344: 2659: 2641: 2623: 2609: 2595: 2495: 2485: 989: 629: 361: 335: 320: 4985:

I would sincerely appreciate a response. Do you honestly not see the comments from other editors who share my opinion? Was Jimbo trying to make a

2030: 1989: 1980: 1963: 1950: 1914: 1888: 1846: 2103: 2093: 2083: 1699: 5603: 3789:

protect earlier, since there appears to be no talk-page resolution to the issues involved that would satisfy all of Jon Awbrey's sockpuppets. ...

532: 4570: 4549: 4319: 3889: 3878: 3843: 3316: 3246: 1683: 1178: 1170: 1084:

3. The reliable source cited specifically states that, and it is quoted. Moreover, belief in the Trinity by definition involves worship of Jesus.

4892: 4506: 3257: 2827: 1828: 295: 4532: 3827: 3816: 3812: 3803: 3790: 3100: 3083: 1859: 913:

article I un-redirected it. He then redirected back again, without any debate and falsely claimed that all the info was in the other article.

879: 177: 5647: 5403: 5382: 5341: 5073: 4993: 4748:. If you agree, could you revert the move? As I understand it, I shouldn't do it by cutting and pasting to preserve the page history. Cheers, 3965: 3860:

haven't reached a consensus and the block remains with his version of the article intact and he can wait until I agree with his version of it.

2958:) one of his unverifiable statements on the 8th of March, but otherwise left the rest. On the 12th, all of his changes were blanket reverted ( 2662: 2640:

about its nuclear program (except Scenebadly, who vandalized a userpage in a related way). My question is: which code does this fall under?

2544:

I will post the information in that article's discussion page after tomorrow ends. This is just to inform you that I will be doing it. Thanks

2498: 2276:

posted to the bottom of talk page in question. If anything, it will likely be very effective in ending Gnetwerker's apparent e-mail spamming.

2162: 2147: 338: 5199: 5185: 5160: 4013: 3997: 3755: 3533: 3500: 3324: 3224: 2803: 2792: 2738: 2015: 1078:

1. Those little bits of detail make it clear exactly what kinds of "Jewish customs" MJ's follow, otherwise the lead is confusing and obscure.

397: 4928: 4913: 4745: 4526: 4184: 3727: 3563: 5565: 4680: 4667: 3597: 2354: 2311: 1733: 479: 5396: 5198:

without any explanation. If you have a view, please express it on the talk page and not through arbitrary use of the deletion command. --

4822: 4725: 4322: 4307: 4289: 4273: 3008: 2459: 1806: 1777: 1761: 1627: 1066: 731:. I encouraged that a neutral admin simply evaluate the situation, as I don't think blocking in this case would really benefit anything. 236: 171: 5044: 5018: 4972: 4939: 4864: 4419: 4391: 4374: 4357: 3549: 2716:

You accused me of "acting dumb" and blocked me for 24 hours because of it. I would like you to discuss this matter in a civilized way on

2644: 1590: 1573: 1404: 5173: 4793: 4774: 3903: 3819: 3806: 3219: 2488: 1877: 713:. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. 614: 603: 4387:

David, I say what I mean. Please don't put words in my mouth. As for you, SMcCandlish, there was no consensus to remove that question.

3637: 3614: 3471: 3454: 3444: 3431: 3418: 3398: 2810:

sense of "cause to be doubted" not "didn't happen". Nimmo in his blog has on many occasions acknowledged the Holocaust. See this entry:

2152: 1812: 1158: 1139: 1106: 749: 599:

A wiki is a wiki, defamation is defamation, and "ask politely first" is "ask politely first"! I'm sure the foundation would approve. --

459: 5202: 5188: 3526: 3460: 3437: 2523: 1396: 1387: 626: 288: 5533:

Is almost never cited in the peer-reviewed literature, and the few citations that exist are negative (to the extent of my knowledge).

4919: 4812: 4346: 3060: 2999:, I got a little too excited and said that Orthodox Judaism is the only unbroken continuation of the Rabbinic system and equated the 2369:

Know that I am a Messianic Gentile (in favor of conversions) that accepts only Halakhic and Torah-observant streams of the movement.

2108: 649: 637: 5163: 4649: 4477:

Not all commons images are suitable for placement in English wikipedia categories. Images captioned in other languages for example.

4206: 4054:

procedure. He appears to be going to my contributions file to see what I am working on, and then going there to mess something up.

2433: 1132:

5. Moses is important in Messianic Judaism. You removed him to make us look like supersessionist Christian fundies, please admit it.

305: 5180:

Jay, please revert your deletion. The overwhelming view on AN/I is that it was well outside the boundaries of what is permitted by

4516: 3327: 3297: 1467: 4758: 4446: 4080:

It's very simple. There are 1,697,000 articles on Knowledge that this person could be working on, and most of them do need work.

1430: 4633: 4474:

The existence of the English wikipedia category also allows a logical location for links to the English wikipedia subcategories.

2053: 1956: 1684: 1614: 1450: 1414: 454: 98: 5306: 5102: 4236: 4069:

What happened to me over the last few days was an incident of procedural harassment. I have never experienced anything like it.

3414:

I know no such thing, and I didn't "summarize" his remarks. It's almost unbelievable to me that you would make that accusation.

3163: 3066: 1932:

has failed to reach any solution. Hence I wish to find other options available. I will be thankful with your reply. regards. --

1655: 1304: 5585: 4582: 4259: 4037: 3936: 3909: 3793: 3778: 3687: 2575: 1359: 61: 5457: 4153: 2988: 1722: 1509:"Saleh recounts what he was told happened to the house, his family and the other villagers during the first Arab-Israeli war. 5150: 4845: 4496: 3894: 3079: 2465: 2286: 1757:

It seems to be BhaiSaab again. His IP is similar and can't be traced, the style is the same, the subject matter is the same.

1263: 1039:

2. I seriously question those estimates for the number of Messianic Jews in the intro. Other estimates are more like 30,000.

922: 5579: 2509:

Jayjg, I knew you would be the best person to which to ask this question so I posted it here and at the Kosher Tax article.

1576: 1555:

You wrote "the linked terms are there because of the name "Messianic Judaism" - the word "Christianity" is not in the name"

792: 4801: 4111: 3302: 3263: 3120:

what they did, zionists=criminals." at least IMHO. I don't like any of these people myself, by the way. Thanks in advance,

3103: 3086: 3027: 2591: 2504: 2075: 1562: 1545: 1531: 1496: 1232: 1056: 194: 5554: 4899: 4185:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement#Edit_this_section_for_new_requests

4000: 3198: 2673:

Administrator, I just ran into a problem regarding image use. In WikiCommons I uploaded a portrait of former U.S. Senator

2401: 2269: 2218: 1342: 706: 632: 5218: 5156: 4663:

It seems that there is no consensus on unblocking the page. If there is no disagreements over my suggested addition here

4197: 3631: 3586: 2406: 809: 497: 5145: 4882: 4878:

for replacing the Praise, Criticism and Accusations sections with a short summary. Your opinion is much valued. Thanks.

4664: 2963:

Noogster's additions do not represent Jewish views on evolution. Noogster is a Messianic and a Christian Fundamentalist.

1936: 856: 5633: 4853: 4731: 4701: 4330: 3203: 1867: 1609: 1373: 768: 717: 5262: 4683: 4670: 4171: 4164: 4139:

I am asking Knowledge to take these measures to protect my identity. I must warn that, while I hate the idea of this,

3381: 2959: 2956: 2723: 1337: 936: 695: 40: 5576: 5116: 5112:

What would you say if I dismissed some organization on the grounds that it was "staffed almost entirely by Jews"? --

5089: 4952:

was conceived of as a way of reducing three pages to one. I dispute the idea that its authors' intent is sacrosanct.

4906: 4459:

The commons page for a particular image does not list the English wikipedia pages on which that image is being used.

3133: 3052:

contributions. He has added ethnicity to most Jewish baseball players in a way that doesn't read well, imho. Cheers.

2932: 2915: 2906: 2897: 2888: 2569: 1751: 906: 149: 4412:

you mean by the above remarks? I'm not trying to put words in your mouth, so please provide the needed elucidation.

4192: 3424: 3315:

you consider it to be "sensible". It would be helpful if you could give your reasons for undoing an edit - I'm sure

842: 593: 5095: 4622: 4100:

thing back, or try to suggest something else, there is some other Knowledge policy under which he is also right.

3358: 3340:

I'm not going to do the template thing, but you've reverted three times now. Maybe we should let others weigh in?--

3281: 2689: 2633: 2619: 2605: 1710: 1648: 1487: 1481: 1476: 1473: 1470: 514: 344: 323: 92: 4715: 4163:

Since you have participated decision making about anthroposophy, I have to ask you to read through my comments in

4022: 3408: 3388: 3375: 1893:

Your replies read, to me, as if they are in response to what is directly above them. However, the indentation is

1447: 960: 659:

Although Provan has many odd ideas, he is not truly a "holocaust denier." He has been criticized by the latter.--

548: 5546:

There is only a small intersection with Pappe. Someone similar on the left would be the anti-Zionist journalist

4595: 3783: 3681: 3273: 2873: 2342:

and thereby impose a POV on the article? Why throw the baby out with the bathwater? Instead, why not restore the

1615: 1581: 1567: 1537: 1490: 1455: 502: 268: 5573: 5230: 2795: 2741: 2125:

first time the methodology of the halachic decision process and the ideology behind these minyanim. <ref: -->

1736: 663: 5629:

that way. (You can reply here or on my own talk page, or simply delete this if you aren't terribly interested)

5480: 4645:

I would strongly suggest that you (Jayjg) leave this article alone. I follow my own guidance there aswell... --

4431: 4242: 4223: 4042: 3942: 3914: 3815:

14:11, 19 March 2007 (UTC) And, thanks very much for your many efforts both here and throughout the wiki. ...

3138: 3125: 3055: 1942:

Thanks. But now mediation failed and we think some policies are not applied correctly on that page. Espacially

1451:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement#.5B.5BUser:Osli73.5D.5D

1257: 1237: 1188: 317: 35: 4959:

3. The idea originated in comments made by Jimbo himself. If I'm not mistaken, he was the one who originally

3239:

Sock-puppetry scandal (covered in the MSM) only gaining a promise that he would "delete on sight due to BLP".

1521: 1049:

5. You took out everything out of the categories article I made. I consider that blatant, textbook vandalism.

673:

I'd like to stay away from the controversy surrounding the Polish lecturer Ratajczak, however, his opinion on

5559: 5512:

He has come to be known as a political activist with a position that many, though not all, regard as extreme.

5268: 4744:, which is a far less well-known name for the same place. I think it should be moved back as I explain here: 3661: 3117: 2937: 2842: 2439:

Ok, its just that a rather new editor who is demonstrating a Kgeza67 pattern of editing has showed up on the

1985:

Having said above, I do not know what should be my next step and still looking for some answer from you. ---

1632: 1426: 994:, and for helping to solve an important dispute efficiently and sucessfully - and making my Mediation easier 845:? I agree with the editor's point, but am nervous that this is needlessly inflammatory, and might constitute 277: 256: 188: 4737: 4639: 4217:

it cant be ignored. One 18th c. critic, sure. but not a contemporary one with worldwide newspaper coverage.

3609: 2983: 2176: 735: 3649: 3242:

I find the homophobic remarks by this user particularly offensive. How should I deal with this situation?

2703: 1208: 407: 5159:. Your actions are completely unnecessary and unjustifiable, and your personal attack is unacceptable. -- 4247:

Hello, Jayjg. I mentioned him to you a week or two ago, but there is no longer much remaining doubt that

3733:

Hi Jayjg, there is a growing debate on the certainty that MiddleEastern is a sock of Frogspog, both in on

3554:

If I am not mistaken, it seems like you did not get around to resolving the discussion that took place in

334:

Easter eggs are bad. Is it policy & guideline based, or just your personal preference in this case?

128: 5453: 5442: 4860:

This article and attendant talk page discussion could use really use your imput, if you have a moment. --

4828: 4566:

I will withdraw this request for arbitration, and we can consider this resolved. I have informed them. --

4116: 3971: 3717: 3655: 3371:

arguments in order to suggest that the opponent is a Holocaust denier. Have I misunderstood something?

3071: 1331: 852:

For future reference, what page do I go to when I am looking for input from an uninvolved admin? Thanks

484: 427: 367: 4606:

Panairjdde crossed a line with me this evening when he began vandalizing my userpage. Now I'm annoyed.

4252: 2973:

Judaism project are spotless when the MJ proponents falsely accuse us of unencyclopedic discrimination.

2746:

Jay, what is it about the following sentence that you find so objectionable that you have to revert it:

1293: 387: 116: 4960: 4869: 4854: 4741: 4721:

And yes, I did notice his new sock decoration of choice. You know what they say about imitation... ;)

4331: 3705: 3555: 3168: 2372:

Acceptance of Jesus as the Jewish Messiah, I believe, is in no way outside the Jewish tradition if and

1168: 1031: 946:

I don't know where you heard this from, but you don't need consensus to add a POV check tag to a page.

212: 1281: 5485: 5219:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Mohammad_Amin_al-Husayni&diff=119551860&oldid=119525594

5011: 3761: 3643: 3014: 2996: 2685:, depicting a soccer (football) field, is there any way to rename an image or get around it? Thanks! 2360: 2040: 1704: 1550: 1347: 927: 895:

who will not let me add a single word or link about Michichism, let alone create a separate article.

884: 831: 773: 5599:

waste so much time on this guy... oh, and please consider archiving your talk page, thankee muchly.

5539:

Even sources on his side of the political spectrum (JVL and Irgun web site) call him a propagandist.

2143:. I'd appreciate a second opinion on this issue as well as your input about how to proceed. Best, -- 73:

Hello again Jayjg, based upon your prompt message archival the last time I left you a message about

5121: 4963:

such a compromise option to the poll. But perhaps I've misinterpreted Jimbo's wishes. Certainly,

4887: 4655: 4027: 3666:, and they have asked to be unblocked. You have indicated that he is a checkuser-confirmed sock of 2585: 2071: 909:

for AfD to create a smokescreen, when there was a clear consensus expressed that there should be a

755: 489:

Jay, just to let you know, I've reported Woodstock2010 for continued evasion and abusive behaviour

200: 122: 3771: 2045:

Hi Jay, why is so important to list ethnicity in some articles and omitt it in others. Please see

1839: 1633: 642:

There is some confusion with regard to an Arbitration Case you handled. Would you please comment.

5299: 5235: 4688: 3734: 3711: 3625: 2711: 2351: 2308: 1929: 797: 700: 620: 104: 26: 4540: 867: 134:

is his latest one. If you'd prefer I stop contacting you about this please let me know. Thanks.

5449: 5241: 4439: 4432: 3693: 3269: 3078:

I wonder if you'd care to put in an administrative comment regarding the current discussion at

1586:

Just curious, but why did you append the J.G. Ballard's initials to the end of your username?--

1538:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2007-02-19_Inayat_Bunglawala#Discussion

1287: 1202: 949: 572: 110: 5226:

what should be the next logical step to deal with this issue ? can you help re-ward it better

4366:

1. Are you saying that you possess the authority to overrule opinions with which you disagree?

4141:

Knowledge could be sued by someone in the future who suffers from harassment by another member

4585:. If you ever need anything, don't hesitate to leave me a note on my talkpage. Thanks again, 4181:

Since Osli's block ended March 14, he has resumed reverting the same sentence in the intro.

4158: 3957: 3770:? He seems to be yet another Panairjdde sockpuppet, at least for the contibutions he made at 3699: 3144: 2948: 2938: 2668: 2011: 1928:

can also handle content dispute when mediation fails? I am asking it because mediation about

1269: 891:

Hi there, could you please help me out I don't know what to do. I am being chased around by

761: 678: 206: 4058:

both of us to leave and come back in a week, to allow some other writer a chance to work.

2023: 2003: 1943: 1194: 5609: 5600: 5413: 5210: 5107: 3802:, another of Jon's sockpuppets, caught it just a few minutes before you protected it. ... 3750: 3367: 3148: 3108: 3042: 2717: 2627: 2277: 2266: 2253: 2240: 2215: 2063: 2050: 1821: 1817: 1741: 1625: 1275: 786: 686: 584: 537: 464: 421: 66: 4487:

Tewfik today added categories to some maps. So he left those maps in several categories.--

3871:

I would also like the banned lifted on Dershowitz-Finkelstein Affair for the same reasons.

3211:

needs your input, pending if it is a behavioural case or one involving checkuser. Cheers,

3194:

If there's more to this case than I am seeing, let me know. Thanks for the consideration,

413: 8: 4910: 4896: 4861: 4248: 4211: 4146:

Would a high level administrator please lock my user page and hide my contributions log.

3767: 3675: 3568: 3311:

was a straight reversion with the summary "restore sensible version", without explaining

3072: 2581: 1852: 1835: 668: 381: 373: 271: 259: 5572:

along with some IP talk page messages that he reverted, perhaps they were used by him?:

4033:

while I am in the process of editing them too, demending changes, moving things around.

1409: 77:

I'm not entirely sure if you want me to continue notifying you about his socks but user

5547: 4601: 4575: 4523: 4005: 3992: 3775: 3620: 3605: 3583: 3578:

page. And this is even after I made their case for them! Keep up the good fight on the

3575: 3334: 3213: 3179:

case? You indef blocked this user earlier today as a checkuser-confirmed sockpuppet of

3176: 3169: 3156: 3129: 3092: 2980: 2911:

Sir, again, I would like to encourage the use of Knowledge. Could you please respond.

2788: 2750:

original - "The term was coined with the publication of a short 2005 documentary video

2734: 2553: 2480: 2447: 2421: 2200: 2117: 2110: 2027: 1986: 1977: 1960: 1947: 1933: 1922: 1911: 1885: 1874: 1843: 1825: 1732:

I have asked a question regarding your edit on the Islam and Antisemitism talk page. --

1727: 1675: 1603: 1322:

to discuss your reversions of properly sourced additions to those articles. Thank you.

1315: 1251: 1225: 1182: 823: 447: 280: 224: 159: 137: 51: 4679:. I added what I found to be the main argument of Laquer in the other side as well. -- 3307:

Jay, could I ask you to be more forthcoming in your edit summaries? Your last edit to

3277: 5141: 5130: 4788: 4769: 4753: 4706: 4610: 3349: 3341: 2929: 2925: 2912: 2903: 2894: 2885: 2772: 2759: 2728: 2475: 2144: 1719: 1595: 1422: 1336:

On the issue of Palestinian indigeneity, you are welcome to post your thoughts here:

1081:

2. If you have better numbers, please provide them. I question those numbers as well.

1036:

1. The "hebrew prayers, tallitot" part in the intro is already getting too specific.

954: 910: 885: 832: 182: 5569: 5181: 5122: 4627: 4488: 4443: 4189: 4176: 4128:

I have e-mail enabled, which allows you to contact me through sending me an email.

3497: 3254: 3243: 3230: 2878: 2862: 2440: 2415: 2159: 1696: 1691: 1558:

Thanks for clarifying. I just wanted you to know that I support this reasoning. :)

1444: 1019: 999: 985: 919: 871: 401: 311: 218: 4442:, should you find the time, for an example of what we are dealing with these days. 2324:

of unsourced or improperly sourced material, but I don't understand your approach

610:

And "ask politely first" does not mean that if the answer is no you can't edit. --

5644: 5630: 5400: 5379: 5338: 5303: 5184:. I will take it to DRV to be overturned if you don't sort this out yourself. -- 5070: 5041: 4990: 4986: 4969: 4925: 4567: 4546: 4502: 4416: 4371: 4343: 4150: 4108: 3962: 3900: 3886: 3875: 3840: 3742: 3463:). To your second point, you should be aware that I came across this matter via 3236: 3096: 3049: 2854: 2824: 2682: 2566: 2332: 2292: 2190: 2100: 2090: 1645: 1622: 1355: 981: 846: 798: 782: 683: 576: 568: 17: 1536:

well ? and while you are ponderi8ng the answer please see failed mediation at:

32:

is better, not me. Otherwise, you are not editing in good faith. -- Paulgaham

5582: 5473: 5466: 4842: 4838: 4806: 4563: 4300: 4282: 3799: 3724: 3320: 3289: 3180: 3160: 3152: 3063: 3038: 3024: 3000: 2839: 2768: 2755: 2520: 2376:

if he is viewed as the Jewish Messiah (Mashiakh) within the context of Judaism

2140: 1559: 1437: 1380: 1366: 1301: 806: 660: 654: 563: 525: 5258:

mediation is considered valid and helpful, then why wouldn't this page fit? --

4541:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#Metzenberg-ZayZayEM

2921:

Jay, I can see by your log you have been quite busy. Could you please respond.

1768: 1746: 544:

Please remember to add templates denoting protection to articles in future. --

5551: 5497:

He holds an academic position in the right field at a prestigious university.

5477: 5359:

You were blocked by Jayjg for the following reason (see our blocking policy):

5321:

You were blocked by Jayjg for the following reason (see our blocking policy):

5283:

You were blocked by Jayjg for the following reason (see our blocking policy):

5170: 5113: 4949: 4834: 4819: 4809: 4722: 4712: 4619: 4559: 4304: 4286: 4270: 4256: 4203: 4168: 4092: 4084:

could be working on any one of them, but instead, he chooses to harass me.

4081: 4070: 4047: 3984: 3948: 3602: 3560: 3530: 3468: 3441: 3405: 3385: 3372: 3362: 3121: 3005: 2974: 2928:

13:12, 20 March 2007 (UTC) Jay, Could you please respond to the last email.

2870: 2694: 2655: 2651: 2545: 2452: 2426: 2398: 2167: 1856: 1820:

seems to be a sockpuppet of Panairjdde and his various derivatives, of which

1803: 1793: 1774: 1758: 1748: 1715: 1218: 1155: 1136: 1063: 1053: 941: 892: 742: 732: 476: 440: 229: 164: 142: 44: 3272:. He has made personal attacks on me and other users before. He said "GTFO" 2868: 2002:

We are ready to have the picture on that page. But it should not be against

1771: 1362:. According to his user page, he's blocked indefinitely, but evidently not. 507: 5337:

Please change these to a soft block, or tell me where to take this issue. —

5137: 4784: 4765: 4749: 4698: 4646: 4589: 4019: 3195: 3109: 3082:? It appears some explaining may need to be done about WP policy. Thanks, 2674: 2471: 2408: 1502: 1418: 1384: 728: 714: 611: 600: 590: 538: 529: 263: 74: 67: 3323:

of why you find his edits unacceptable. I'd be interested to know too. --

3268:

I saw you had some interactions with Kirbytime of which he made a mention

5259: 5099: 4266: 3591: 3579: 3294: 2833: 2720: 2173: 2046: 1670: 1662: 1640: 1339: 1323: 1009: 853: 765: 722: 5422: 4677: 4167:, please. I'm sorry that I was at first unaware what an arbitration is. 3976: 5015: 4936: 4879: 4513: 4388: 4354: 3451: 3428: 3415: 3395: 2700: 2686: 2210: 2132: 1639:

This user is requesting unblocking. I see that he/she violated 3RR on

1393: 1370: 1103: 1004: 746: 545: 511: 494: 357: 302: 292: 5509:

He often writes in a polemic fashion, especially in the past 10 years.

841:

as an uninvolved admin, could you take a look at the link included in

4618:

trying to provide extra eyes for the administrator corps. Thoughts?

3988: 3308: 2530: 1096:

in Messianic Judaism, not just a lengthy list of biblical characters.

933: 876: 644:

Knowledge:Requests for arbitration#Clarification on Parole violations

5040:

and added it to the poll. I'm asking you to address these facts. —

3143:

Is there anything that can be done about this? You blocked his sock

2733:

Please read (and if possible respond to) my comments on the lead at

1410:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Special:Log&user=The_Blend

1135:

6. Oh, trust me, I was doing fine until I logged on to my computer.

968: 5227: 4636: 4232: 4219: 2320:

Thank you for your response. I understand your attitude toward the

2019: 1788:

Your comment in the discussion page for Template: Messianic Judaism

1542: 1528: 1493: 646: 287:

Last time Woodstock2010 was editing (roughly Jan 7), I was able to

4132:

He is likely an administrator, perhaps under some other identity.

3380:

On a related matter, could you please address the concerns raised

3155:

as usual. (Note the similarity to his already blocked sockpuppet

2678: 352:

Currently we have two editors in good standing being autoblocked:

5503:

He is cited regularly and widely in the peer-reviewed literature.

4666:, I'll go ahead and ask some admin to add this to the article. -- 3459:

Kirbytime has clarified his views, more than once (for instance,

2519:

Would you please leave a response on my Talk page? Thanks again.

2233:

anything in the logs for a mid-december ArbCom, RfC or checkuser.

1959:

and will provide many references before moving to next step. ---

3187:

block the underlying IP as an open proxy whatever happens. But

1838:. His first contribution was a revert of a vandalism of his to 5494:

He has a PhD in the right field from a prestigious university.

2654:

but he said that a checkuser would know better. I then asked

1842:. P.S. This is getting very annoying, don't you think so?!? -- 5500:

He has published extensively in the peer-reviewed literature.

2580:

I have reason to believe that these users are sockpuppets of

760:

Could you add your thoughts to the ongoing discussion on the

3885:

chance. If I screw it up feel free to put the block back on.

3866:

on our own honestly where one of us isn't at a disadvantage.

2636:). They have had a hand in introducing some POV pushing to 2297:

List of massacres committed during the 1948 Arab-Israeli war

1369:

is a sock of Woodstock2010 aka ShitakiMan. Can you confirm?

1314:

You should write something in the talk. Please come back to

849:. Editor was hostile when I suggested that it went too far. 4014:

Knowledge:Community_noticeboard#BhaiSaab_and_His_excellency

3319:

would appreciate it if you could provide an explanation on

2637: 5397:

Knowledge talk:Blocking policy # Softblock for Tor proxies

4746:

Talk:Kulmhof extermination camp#Chełmno extermination camp

3987:

in your dealings with other editors, which you did not on

3925:(Aramaic word, you might be able to guess what it means). 3899:

Could you have a look at these articles and their talk? --

3033:

Hi Jayjg, does Jewish-American belong in the lead sentence

2209:

thread and found Gnetwerker's name in an "odd" place, the

5399:. I strongly disagree, but that can be discussed there. — 5378:

Please change these blocks so signed-in users can edit. —

5354:

This account or IP address has been blocked from editing.

5316:

This account or IP address has been blocked from editing.

5278:

This account or IP address has been blocked from editing.

3276:

which means "Get the Fuck out", as I discovered from the

3147:

a couple hours ago, and now he is back with another one,

1621:

Would you be willing to help write this proposed policy?

932:

Ok - I'd love to have seen the doctor's prescription :).

80: 5273:

I live in China and have to use Tor. You've blocked me:

3669: 2681:, but in Knowledge there is an image with the same name 2018:

or even do not have any objection in having pictures in

510:

seems an unusual first edit, and is vaguely familiar...

3080:

Talk:Charles_Peirce#Franks_Valli_Has_Born_False_Witness

1245: 221:(and the editing style there) and the username itself. 3175:

Hi Jayjg. Could I ask you to take another look at the

3095:? This user has an approach that appears identical to 2775:

originated the term in a short 2005 documentary video

5542:

Well known as a politician of the political extremes.

5441:. If there's anything I can help with, then you know 4545:

Please review the record and feel free to comment. --

764:

talk page instead of simply reverting edits? Thanks.

437:

Can you please take another look at this. Thanks. --

4509: 1770:

is currently blocked, and as soon as he was blocked

571:

page is one of those "admiration pages". Please see

4501:I've warned you about these kinds of violations of 1690:Following a recent wheel-war over Controversies of 1310:When you fill out an edit line to read, "per talk" 217:this based upon the first and only edits being to 5157:WP:AN/I#Blatant abuse of speedy deletion by Jayjg 4554:I have also entered proposal for a compromise on 4165:Talk:Anthroposophy#About anthroposophical sources 2848:Watch out for Noogster on Jews and Evolution page 2291:I have a question about your recent deletions in 5530:Never published in the peer-reviewed literature. 1946:. What you suggest should be our next step? --- 727:Please note that I have reported you for 3RR on 677:was brought in to illustrate the accusations of 5639:Uh... the giant text really wasn't necessary... 3496:about what kind of people you want to defend. 2533:(Netzarim) article and the question of validity 1834:Update: he re-registered under a new username, 1669:Things have gotten a little out of hand on the 252:Could you have a look at the following please? 5395:OK, I saw you've just posted a comment here: 4452:Commons media in English wikipedia categories 2474:article. I've had something of a dispute on 2016:Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy 817:Anti-globalization and antisemitism talk page 5566:User:Diverting Internet Gossip Dress Up Game 5215:Ian refused mediation and just edit waring: 3741:. Your input would be most welcome. Thanks. 2893:Could you let me know your response please. 1855:after the block of the sock reported above. 741:It has already been rejected; please review 4556:Talk:Jewish reactions to intelligent design 4062:claim that it matters here on Knowledge.) 2448: 2422: 1709:Hi there, I am a research student from the 349:You also forgot to provide a block reason. 225: 160: 138: 5094:Hi Jayjg. Could you please keep an eye on 4895:He also nominated content for deletion. - 3834:is slander to call him a Holocaust Denier. 2453: 2427: 2135:wrote about these topics in her 2004 book 1365:Based upon edits, I strongly suspect that 1176:FYI: You left out the blocking reason for 862:Help needed with Joseph Carlebach article. 520:Removed material from user page on it.wiki 245:Troublesome POV pusher & probable sock 230: 165: 143: 5298:Please change this to a soft block. (See 1122:2. I already tried that; it got reverted. 4736:Hi Jayjg. Someone has moved the article 4512:above). This will be your last warning. 2961:) by Metzenberg, with the edit summary " 2084:Kurt Nimmo/Dershowitz Finkelstein affair 5427: 5375:Would you care to react to my requests? 5069:I still await a meaningful response. — 2737:before reverting it again - thanks. -- 2565:I ask again please unblock this article 1957:User:ALM_scientist/arbitration_Muhammad 1897:one level deeper than that. This does 1685:User talk:David Spart/Chabad Messianism 1480:this has been going on for long time: 14: 5476:. Perhaps you can fix things up. -- 4537:You are allowed to make a statement. 4533:I have filed a request for arbitration 4038:Jewish reactions to intelligent design 3937:Jewish reactions to intelligent design 3910:Jewish reactions to intelligent design 3828:So your going to continue to ignore me 2969:rather than the content of his edits. 2022:. However, it should not be violating 554:See debate on deletion of the article 5437:, which passed with a final tally of 4265:Ah well. I guess we'll keep playing 3427:. Is Quadell "unbelievable" as well? 3225:I see you have your own cranks but... 2804:Kurt Nimmo-Please Unblock the article 2185:- didn't know this was a prior delete 1955:See I have started writing basics at 1215:and now he's appealing his block. -- 1099:6. I'm sorry you're not feeling well. 575:and add your opinion if you wish. -- 4635:as NPOV as possible is appriciated. 4471:selection of images at the commons. 3229:My user page has been vandalised by 3550:The discussion from a few days back 3286:"you dont own the fucking template" 1379:I indefblocked Shitaki and filed a 23: 5364:TOR proxy being used for vandalism 5293:Your IP address is 204.13.236.244. 4948:1. I do not dispute the fact that 4285:is the latest. Filing a RFCU now. 3975: 3615:Your recent block of MiddleEastern 2172:What is your specific objection!? 2153:Help in deleting an uploaded image 2126:,''The Jewish State''</ref: --> 1813:One more probable Panairjdde socks 1486:The part that Zero keeps deleting 967: 460:Yet more probable Panairjdde socks 176:Another likely Kgeza67 candidate: 24: 5659: 5369:Your IP address is 128.197.11.30. 5331:Your IP address is 87.230.18.148. 4920:One thing that I have not done... 4676:I have suggested a proposal here 4558:. If my proposal is accepted by 2754:, produced by American historian 907:Controversies of Chabad-Lubavitch 638:Clarification on Arbitration Case 5527:Never held an academic position. 5520:On the other hand, Shmuel Katz: 5421: 5096:Allegations of Israeli Apartheid 2650:Hmm, I originally asked this to 2516:Please let me know. Thank you. 2225:that's when I noticed the block. 2120:adding the following paragraph: 1711:National University of Singapore 1661:Could you weigh in again on the 5595:life? Jayjg, I am so sorry you 4066:somewhere under my own name. 1851:I have a hunch that he created 1616:Knowledge:BLP courtesy deletion 868:User talk:IZAK#Joseph Carlebach 4043:Jewish opposition to evolution 3943:Jewish opposition to evolution 3915:Jewish opposition to evolution 3365:to misrepresent an opponent's 2576:Question about Checkuser codes 2116:Hi Jayjg! an edit was made to 1501:here is a quote from a recent 13: 1: 5151:Your abuse of speedy deletion 4303:as well. Added to the RFCU. 3895:Jay, I really need your help! 3854:wants it in the main article. 3361:, I believe it constitutes a 3357:With regard to your comments 3288:, while leaving a heading of 2947:Could you have a look at the 2767:revised version - "Professor 2466:Question about Ashkenazi Jews 2287:Question about your deletions 2137:Expanding the Palace of Torah 1431:22:49, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 1397:19:17, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 1392:Ah yes, so I see. Thanks. :) 1388:18:08, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 1374:17:30, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 1343:03:57, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 1327:02:14, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 1305:20:23, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 1233:20:09, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 1159:23:14, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 1140:23:06, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 1107:22:56, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 1067:22:53, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 1057:22:48, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 961:13:12, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 952:, your friendly neighborhood 937:04:25, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 923:21:46, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 880:08:53, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 857:18:48, 24 February 2007 (UTC) 827:14:51, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 810:10:49, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 793:22:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 769:21:11, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 750:20:35, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 736:20:31, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 718:10:14, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 696:21:45, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 664:19:16, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 650:16:29, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 633:00:17, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 615:17:01, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 604:16:58, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 594:20:45, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 580:11:38, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 549:12:39, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 533:16:31, 17 February 2007 (UTC) 515:13:27, 17 February 2007 (UTC) 498:11:04, 16 February 2007 (UTC) 480:06:19, 16 February 2007 (UTC) 455:03:16, 16 February 2007 (UTC) 339:23:51, 14 February 2007 (UTC) 324:23:37, 14 February 2007 (UTC) 306:10:17, 15 February 2007 (UTC) 296:21:37, 14 February 2007 (UTC) 237:13:22, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 172:16:38, 14 February 2007 (UTC) 150:14:56, 14 February 2007 (UTC) 62:03:36, 14 February 2007 (UTC) 5447: 5420: 4818:Now confirmed by CheckUser. 4802:Latest known Panairjdde sock 3619:Hello. You recently blocked 3596:Would you mind checking out 3436:How else should I interpret 3303:Uninformative edit summaries 3264:Behavior from User:Kirbytime 3048:ps would you also check out 1242:Hello. You recently blocked 647:Torturous Devastating Cudgel 7: 4198:have you ever notice how... 3556:Talk: Judaism and evolution 3091:Can we get a check-user on 3062:Say it ain't so buddy!! -- 1320:Lists of Indigenous peoples 916:How can this be resolved? 283:makes almost identical edit 10: 5664: 5300:WP:TOR#Request a softblock 5117:11:53, 31 March 2007 (UTC) 5103:13:43, 29 March 2007 (UTC) 5045:19:17, 29 March 2007 (UTC) 5019:19:09, 29 March 2007 (UTC) 4994:04:37, 29 March 2007 (UTC) 4973:02:32, 29 March 2007 (UTC) 4940:02:10, 29 March 2007 (UTC) 4929:01:50, 29 March 2007 (UTC) 4914:22:43, 28 March 2007 (UTC) 4900:22:42, 28 March 2007 (UTC) 4883:22:38, 28 March 2007 (UTC) 4865:19:58, 28 March 2007 (UTC) 4855:2004 Madrid train bombings 4846:16:05, 28 March 2007 (UTC) 4837:, and once again expanded 4823:17:39, 30 March 2007 (UTC) 4813:02:05, 28 March 2007 (UTC) 4794:22:24, 28 March 2007 (UTC) 4775:22:15, 28 March 2007 (UTC) 4759:10:57, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 4742:Kulmhof extermination camp 4738:Chełmno extermination camp 4732:Chełmno extermination camp 4726:04:06, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 4716:03:49, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 4702:15:43, 26 March 2007 (UTC) 4684:07:51, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 4671:09:46, 26 March 2007 (UTC) 4650:15:44, 26 March 2007 (UTC) 4640:06:26, 26 March 2007 (UTC) 4632:Yourhelp in making this: 4623:02:01, 26 March 2007 (UTC) 4596:20:43, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 4571:01:59, 26 March 2007 (UTC) 4550:16:28, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 4527:14:26, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 4517:01:57, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 4492:09:14, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 4447:06:19, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 4420:06:35, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 4392:06:22, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 4375:06:18, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 4358:06:12, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 4347:06:08, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 4332:Knowledge:Attribution/Poll 4323:13:55, 26 March 2007 (UTC) 4308:18:02, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 4290:15:06, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 4274:02:22, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 4260:18:02, 24 March 2007 (UTC) 4251:is a Panairjdde sock (See 4237:02:02, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 4224:10:11, 24 March 2007 (UTC) 4207:17:52, 23 March 2007 (UTC) 4193:17:44, 22 March 2007 (UTC) 4172:14:32, 21 March 2007 (UTC) 4154:17:57, 21 March 2007 (UTC) 4149:Thank you! and goodbye. -- 4112:04:39, 21 March 2007 (UTC) 4023:03:37, 21 March 2007 (UTC) 4001:20:16, 20 March 2007 (UTC) 3966:16:14, 20 March 2007 (UTC) 3904:03:10, 20 March 2007 (UTC) 3890:00:26, 20 March 2007 (UTC) 3879:00:17, 20 March 2007 (UTC) 3844:23:53, 19 March 2007 (UTC) 3820:14:12, 19 March 2007 (UTC) 3807:14:07, 19 March 2007 (UTC) 3794:13:45, 19 March 2007 (UTC) 3779:09:25, 19 March 2007 (UTC) 3766:May you please check this 3756:00:02, 19 March 2007 (UTC) 3728:20:26, 17 March 2007 (UTC) 3610:05:13, 17 March 2007 (UTC) 3587:23:39, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 3564:22:50, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 3534:01:00, 17 March 2007 (UTC) 3501:23:16, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 3472:22:29, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 3455:22:19, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 3445:22:15, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 3432:22:14, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 3419:22:12, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 3409:22:08, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 3399:22:05, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 3389:21:59, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 3376:21:52, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 3345:21:50, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 3328:21:33, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 3298:17:55, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 3258:19:45, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 3247:16:11, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 3220:09:26, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 3204:Sockpuppet block to review 3199:21:22, 15 March 2007 (UTC) 3164:20:23, 15 March 2007 (UTC) 3134:13:46, 14 March 2007 (UTC) 3104:17:14, 13 March 2007 (UTC) 3087:14:36, 13 March 2007 (UTC) 3067:04:32, 13 March 2007 (UTC) 3046:03:33, 13 March 2007 (UTC) 3028:02:41, 13 March 2007 (UTC) 3009:03:34, 13 March 2007 (UTC) 2989:16:30, 12 March 2007 (UTC) 2933:10:33, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 2916:00:23, 19 March 2007 (UTC) 2907:03:03, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 2898:00:14, 14 March 2007 (UTC) 2889:11:29, 12 March 2007 (UTC) 2874:06:10, 12 March 2007 (UTC) 2867:He is edit-warring again: 2858:05:14, 12 March 2007 (UTC) 2843:01:45, 12 March 2007 (UTC) 2828:22:26, 11 March 2007 (UTC) 2796:21:21, 11 March 2007 (UTC) 2742:11:53, 11 March 2007 (UTC) 2724:10:23, 11 March 2007 (UTC) 2704:02:17, 11 March 2007 (UTC) 2690:02:12, 11 March 2007 (UTC) 2663:01:49, 12 March 2007 (UTC) 2645:21:33, 10 March 2007 (UTC) 2549:00:11, 10 March 2007 (UTC) 2470:I just noticed you at the 2183:List of political epithets 1868:indentation/thread sorting 1860:04:23, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 1405:Is this considered a sock? 705:An editor has asked for a 274:blocked for 48h (trolling) 5648:03:43, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 5634:20:14, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 5604:23:21, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 5586:18:11, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 5555:10:05, 4 April 2007 (UTC) 5481:21:25, 3 April 2007 (UTC) 5458:07:13, 3 April 2007 (UTC) 5404:07:38, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 5383:06:29, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 5342:01:49, 4 April 2007 (UTC) 5307:06:42, 3 April 2007 (UTC) 5263:11:46, 2 April 2007 (UTC) 5231:20:23, 1 April 2007 (UTC) 5203:19:29, 1 April 2007 (UTC) 5189:18:58, 1 April 2007 (UTC) 5174:09:10, 1 April 2007 (UTC) 5164:08:35, 1 April 2007 (UTC) 5146:07:59, 1 April 2007 (UTC) 5090:Israeli Apartheid article 5074:02:06, 2 April 2007 (UTC) 5012:fallacy of many questions 2779:, in which he argued ..." 2762:, in which he argued ..." 2570:06:17, 9 March 2007 (UTC) 2524:17:29, 9 March 2007 (UTC) 2499:02:37, 9 March 2007 (UTC) 2489:02:25, 9 March 2007 (UTC) 2460:01:56, 9 March 2007 (UTC) 2434:01:51, 9 March 2007 (UTC) 2402:01:24, 9 March 2007 (UTC) 2355:19:45, 8 March 2007 (UTC) 2312:18:49, 8 March 2007 (UTC) 2281:23:35, 9 March 2007 (UTC) 2270:23:44, 8 March 2007 (UTC) 2257:23:02, 8 March 2007 (UTC) 2244:15:41, 8 March 2007 (UTC) 2219:13:13, 8 March 2007 (UTC) 2196:01:31, 8 March 2007 (UTC) 2177:00:34, 8 March 2007 (UTC) 2163:19:40, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 2148:19:07, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 2104:05:22, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 2094:04:55, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 2054:21:20, 5 March 2007 (UTC) 2031:09:16, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 1990:20:14, 5 March 2007 (UTC) 1981:20:08, 5 March 2007 (UTC) 1964:20:01, 5 March 2007 (UTC) 1951:19:59, 5 March 2007 (UTC) 1937:19:50, 5 March 2007 (UTC) 1915:04:41, 5 March 2007 (UTC) 1889:04:32, 5 March 2007 (UTC) 1878:04:17, 5 March 2007 (UTC) 1847:23:45, 7 March 2007 (UTC) 1829:02:12, 5 March 2007 (UTC) 1807:03:33, 5 March 2007 (UTC) 1797:00:34, 5 March 2007 (UTC) 1778:05:17, 5 March 2007 (UTC) 1762:04:45, 5 March 2007 (UTC) 1752:00:17, 5 March 2007 (UTC) 1737:21:06, 4 March 2007 (UTC) 1723:01:08, 4 March 2007 (UTC) 1700:00:35, 4 March 2007 (UTC) 1679:23:50, 3 March 2007 (UTC) 1656:05:27, 3 March 2007 (UTC) 1628:03:58, 3 March 2007 (UTC) 1610:02:55, 3 March 2007 (UTC) 1591:14:24, 2 March 2007 (UTC) 1577:01:50, 2 March 2007 (UTC) 1563:20:52, 1 March 2007 (UTC) 1546:05:51, 2 March 2007 (UTC) 1532:08:13, 1 March 2007 (UTC) 1497:07:59, 1 March 2007 (UTC) 1448:01:42, 1 March 2007 (UTC) 27:Ahmadinejad's end of term 5564:Here are a couple more: 5435:nomination for adminship 4893:Is this more Jon Awbrey? 1126:only be guessing things. 345:81.182.0.0/16 collateral 278:12:34, February 13, 2007 269:03:10, February 13, 2007 257:02:43, February 13, 2007 3784:Charles Peirce (-again) 3333:you're close to 3rr on 1568:Warning on my user page 1456:Zero/ Palestinin exodus 5242:Knowledge:Attack_pages 4510:#"User Jayjg's policy" 4433:Faisal of Saudi Arabia 4243:Panairjdde, once again 3980: 3774:and others. Thanks. -- 3151:restoring his text to 3139:Banned user Jon Awbrey 3056:Are your ears burning? 2955:You rightly reverted ( 2789:Talk:Pallywood#By some 2735:Talk:Pallywood#By some 2414:Jayjg, outside of the 2205:I was looking over an 1824:was the latest one. -- 1519: 1475:, help from the gang: 1238:Your block of Tube Guy 972: 815:Please comment in the 573:Ashkenazi intelligence 556:Ashkenazi Intelligence 36:someone misplaced this 5560:More Jon Awbrey socks 5524:Has no higher degree. 5269:Tor softblock request 4833:JA is now editing as 4353:the question itself. 3979: 3958:Judaism and evolution 3772:U.S. Città di Palermo 3233:using a certain sock 3145:User:And Dedicated To 3099:. Thanks again. ... 2949:Judaism and evolution 2939:Judaism and evolution 2012:Depiction of Muhammad 1840:U.S. Città di Palermo 1634:User talk:Buenos días 1507: 1417:comment was added by 991:WP:RfM/Jews for Jesus 976:The Original Barnstar 971: 762:Template:Palestinians 679:anti-Polish sentiment 524:Hi Jayjg, please ask 5445:to find me. Cheers. 3991:. Please stop being 3368:reductio ad absurdum 3149:User:Zelda Zilwaukee 2997:Jewish denominations 2783:Disclaimer: I wrote 2718:talk:Gillian McKeith 2512:Here's my question: 2024:WP:NPOV#Undue_weight 2004:WP:NPOV#Undue_weight 1944:WP:NPOV#undue_weight 1901:promote clarity. I 1822:User:Ustranimii Uyet 1818:User:Uyet Ustranimii 870:about the Rabbi Dr. 711:Antisemite (epithet) 465:User:Ustranimii_Uyet 5591:Does that man have 5429:Thank you for your 5350:I'm blocked again: 5312:Same for this one: 4829:New Jon Awbrey sock 4497:"User:Jayjg tactic" 4249:User:Francis_Escort 4117:I am being stalked! 3972:Assuming good faith 3768:User:Francis Escort 3525:Perhaps you missed 3394:Um, I already did. 3209:User talk:Keeppower 3073:Talk:Charles Peirce 1853:User:Francis_Escort 1836:User:Uyet Ustranimi 1332:Request for Comment 866:Hi Jay: Please see 485:Woodstock2010 again 272:User:24.167.107.118 260:User:24.167.107.118 5450:Michael Billington 5010:Please review the 4870:Israel Shahak poll 4438:Jayjg, please see 3981: 3576:talk:Joshua Bolten 3335:Kevin B. MacDonald 3177:User:MiddleEastern 3170:User:MiddleEastern 3157:User:Amy Zilwaukee 3093:User:Created Equal 2505:Kosher "Tax" issue 2481:Benjamin Netanyahu 2118:Partnership minyan 2111:Partnership minyan 1716:research home page 1316:Indigenous peoples 1094:uniquely important 1032:No stalking please 986:Mediation Committe 973: 281:User:Woodstock2010 5486:Katz versus Pappe 5464: 5463: 4791: 4772: 4756: 4609:I have created a 3985:assume good faith 3762:Panairjdde again? 3015:Original research 2987: 2773:Boston University 2760:Boston University 2476:Talk:White people 2361:Personal Thoughts 2080: 2066:comment added by 2041:Ethnicity in bios 1930:Muhammad pictures 1705:Survey Invitation 1588:John H. Dillinger 1551:christianity link 1434: 1383:on the blend. -- 1348:Woodstock2010 etc 1231: 928:David and Abishag 911:Chabad Messianism 886:Chabad Messianism 833:Talk:Black People 775:User talk:Binghum 693: 453: 316:I saw this diff: 5655: 5570:User:Semi Virgil 5425: 5418: 5417: 5244:, most notably: 5123:Holocaust denial 4888:More Jon Awbrey? 4789: 4770: 4754: 4656:New Antisemitism 4592: 4588: 4028:Heeeeelp me Jay! 3753: 3749: 3745: 3722: 3721: 3688:deleted contribs 3672: 3665: 3638:deleted contribs 3608: 3255:Chris Cunningham 3231:User:Thumperward 3216: 2977: 2683:image:semple.jpg 2455: 2450: 2441:Michael Richards 2429: 2424: 2416:Michael Richards 2193: 2079: 2060: 1692:Chabad-Lubavitch 1653: 1606: 1412: 1298: 1297: 1264:deleted contribs 1248: 1230: 1228: 1222: 1216: 1214: 1211: 1197: 1025: 1022: 997: 959: 872:Joseph Carlebach 789: 756:Talk page please 692: 691: 687: 675:The Painted Bird 452: 450: 444: 438: 433: 430: 416: 393: 390: 376: 232: 227: 219:Michael Richards 216: 195:deleted contribs 167: 162: 145: 140: 133: 132: 99:deleted contribs 83: 58: 54: 48: 5663: 5662: 5658: 5657: 5656: 5654: 5653: 5652: 5612: 5601:KillerChihuahua 5562: 5488: 5469: 5460: 5416: 5271: 5238: 5236:Speedy deletion 5223:can you help ? 5213: 5153: 5126: 5110: 5092: 4922: 4890: 4874:Please vote in 4872: 4858: 4831: 4804: 4734: 4709: 4691: 4689:Your standpoint 4658: 4630: 4604: 4590: 4586: 4578: 4535: 4499: 4454: 4436: 4335: 4245: 4214: 4200: 4179: 4161: 4119: 4030: 4008: 3974: 3897: 3830: 3786: 3764: 3751: 3747: 3743: 3673: 3668: 3667: 3623: 3617: 3601: 3594: 3571: 3552: 3384:? Thank you. 3363:personal attack 3352: 3338: 3305: 3266: 3237:Glenn Greenwald 3227: 3214: 3206: 3173: 3141: 3113: 3097:User:Jon Awbrey 3076: 3058: 3050:user:Epeefleche 3035: 3017: 2986: 2942: 2881: 2865: 2850: 2836: 2806: 2731: 2714: 2712:Block of Jooler 2697: 2671: 2578: 2556: 2535: 2507: 2468: 2412: 2407:Question about 2363: 2344:status quo ante 2333:Self-hating Jew 2293:Self-hating Jew 2289: 2203: 2191: 2187: 2170: 2155: 2114: 2109:Recent edit to 2086: 2061: 2043: 1974:(November 2006) 1925: 1870: 1815: 1790: 1744: 1730: 1718:. Thank you. -- 1707: 1688: 1667: 1649: 1637: 1619: 1604: 1598: 1584: 1570: 1553: 1472:, "anon" edit: 1458: 1440: 1413:—The preceding 1407: 1356:User:ShitakiMan 1350: 1334: 1312: 1249: 1244: 1243: 1240: 1226: 1220: 1217: 1209: 1195: 1177: 1174: 1034: 1029: 1028: 1027: 1023: 1020: 995: 978: 947: 944: 930: 889: 864: 836: 820: 802: 799:Patrick Holford 787: 778: 758: 725: 707:deletion review 703: 701:Deletion review 689: 688: 671: 657: 640: 625:I noticed this 623: 621:Doc Ahmadinejad 587: 569:Gregory Cochran 559: 542: 522: 505: 487: 462: 448: 442: 439: 428: 414: 396: 388: 374: 356: 347: 314: 247: 180: 84: 79: 78: 71: 56: 52: 46: 41:in your archive 38: 29: 22: 21: 20: 18:User talk:Jayjg 12: 11: 5: 5661: 5651: 5650: 5640: 5623: 5615: 5611: 5608: 5607: 5606: 5561: 5558: 5548:Jeff Blankfort 5544: 5543: 5540: 5537: 5534: 5531: 5528: 5525: 5514: 5513: 5510: 5507: 5504: 5501: 5498: 5495: 5487: 5484: 5468: 5465: 5462: 5461: 5426: 5415: 5412: 5411: 5410: 5409: 5408: 5407: 5406: 5388: 5387: 5386: 5385: 5376: 5373: 5372: 5371: 5366: 5361: 5356: 5345: 5344: 5335: 5334: 5333: 5328: 5323: 5318: 5296: 5295: 5290: 5285: 5280: 5270: 5267: 5266: 5265: 5254:Surely, since 5252: 5237: 5234: 5212: 5209: 5208: 5207: 5206: 5205: 5192: 5191: 5177: 5176: 5152: 5149: 5133:Thanks. ---*- 5125: 5120: 5109: 5106: 5091: 5088: 5087: 5086: 5085: 5084: 5083: 5082: 5081: 5080: 5079: 5078: 5077: 5076: 5056: 5055: 5054: 5053: 5052: 5051: 5050: 5049: 5048: 5047: 5028: 5027: 5026: 5025: 5024: 5023: 5022: 5021: 5001: 5000: 4999: 4998: 4997: 4996: 4978: 4977: 4976: 4975: 4957: 4953: 4943: 4942: 4921: 4918: 4917: 4916: 4889: 4886: 4871: 4868: 4862:Mantanmoreland 4857: 4852: 4850: 4839:Charles Peirce 4830: 4827: 4826: 4825: 4807:User:GuideEggs 4803: 4800: 4799: 4798: 4797: 4796: 4778: 4777: 4733: 4730: 4729: 4728: 4708: 4705: 4690: 4687: 4675: 4657: 4654: 4653: 4652: 4629: 4626: 4603: 4600: 4598: 4583:open to recall 4577: 4574: 4564:User:Guettarda 4534: 4531: 4530: 4529: 4498: 4495: 4453: 4450: 4435: 4430: 4429: 4428: 4427: 4426: 4425: 4424: 4423: 4422: 4413: 4408:1. Okay, what 4399: 4398: 4397: 4396: 4395: 4394: 4380: 4379: 4378: 4377: 4367: 4361: 4360: 4340: 4338: 4334: 4329: 4328: 4327: 4326: 4325: 4313: 4312: 4311: 4310: 4301:User:TermsThey 4295: 4294: 4293: 4292: 4283:User:GrayToday 4277: 4276: 4244: 4241: 4240: 4239: 4213: 4210: 4199: 4196: 4178: 4175: 4160: 4157: 4118: 4115: 4051: 4050: 4045: 4040: 4029: 4026: 4007: 4004: 3973: 3970: 3969: 3968: 3952: 3951: 3945: 3939: 3932: 3931: 3918: 3917: 3912: 3896: 3893: 3883: 3873: 3872: 3868: 3867: 3862: 3861: 3856: 3855: 3849: 3847: 3846: 3836: 3835: 3829: 3826: 3825: 3824: 3823: 3822: 3800:User:And Seven 3785: 3782: 3763: 3760: 3759: 3758: 3616: 3613: 3593: 3590: 3570: 3567: 3551: 3548: 3547: 3546: 3545: 3544: 3543: 3542: 3541: 3540: 3539: 3538: 3537: 3536: 3512: 3511: 3510: 3509: 3508: 3507: 3506: 3505: 3504: 3503: 3481: 3480: 3479: 3478: 3477: 3476: 3475: 3474: 3421: 3402: 3401: 3351: 3348: 3337: 3331: 3321:Talk:Pallywood 3304: 3301: 3265: 3262: 3261: 3260: 3226: 3223: 3205: 3202: 3181:User:Frogsprog 3172: 3167: 3153:Charles Peirce 3140: 3137: 3112: 3107: 3075: 3070: 3057: 3054: 3039:Marty Glickman 3034: 3031: 3016: 3013: 3012: 3011: 3001:Reform Judaism 2979: 2941: 2936: 2923: 2922: 2880: 2877: 2864: 2861: 2849: 2846: 2835: 2832: 2831: 2830: 2820: 2819: 2812: 2811: 2805: 2802: 2800: 2781: 2780: 2769:Richard Landes 2764: 2763: 2756:Richard Landes 2730: 2727: 2713: 2710: 2708: 2696: 2693: 2670: 2667: 2666: 2665: 2582:Usergreatpower 2577: 2574: 2573: 2572: 2562: 2561: 2555: 2552: 2534: 2527: 2506: 2503: 2502: 2501: 2467: 2464: 2463: 2462: 2411: 2405: 2362: 2359: 2358: 2357: 2338: 2337: 2288: 2285: 2284: 2283: 2262: 2261: 2260: 2259: 2247: 2246: 2238: 2234: 2226: 2202: 2199: 2186: 2180: 2169: 2166: 2154: 2151: 2128: 2127: 2113: 2107: 2085: 2082: 2068:Stanfordwolf99 2042: 2039: 2038: 2037: 2036: 2035: 2034: 2033: 1995: 1994: 1993: 1992: 1983: 1967: 1966: 1953: 1924: 1921: 1920: 1919: 1918: 1917: 1869: 1866: 1865: 1864: 1863: 1862: 1814: 1811: 1810: 1809: 1789: 1786: 1785: 1784: 1783: 1782: 1781: 1780: 1743: 1740: 1729: 1726: 1706: 1703: 1687: 1682: 1666: 1659: 1636: 1631: 1618: 1613: 1597: 1594: 1583: 1580: 1569: 1566: 1552: 1549: 1457: 1454: 1439: 1436: 1406: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1400: 1399: 1367:User:The Blend 1349: 1346: 1333: 1330: 1311: 1308: 1239: 1236: 1173: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1144: 1143: 1142: 1133: 1130: 1127: 1123: 1120: 1112: 1111: 1110: 1109: 1100: 1097: 1089: 1085: 1082: 1079: 1076: 1070: 1069: 1033: 1030: 1018: 1013: 979: 974: 966: 965: 964: 943: 940: 929: 926: 888: 883: 863: 860: 835: 830: 819: 813: 801: 796: 777: 772: 757: 754: 753: 752: 724: 721: 702: 699: 670: 667: 656: 653: 639: 636: 622: 619: 618: 617: 607: 606: 586: 583: 564:Ashkenazi Jews 558: 552: 541: 536: 521: 518: 504: 501: 486: 483: 461: 458: 435: 434: 394: 346: 343: 342: 341: 313: 310: 309: 308: 301:Thank you. :) 285: 284: 275: 266: 246: 243: 242: 241: 240: 239: 70: 65: 37: 34: 28: 25: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5660: 5649: 5646: 5641: 5638: 5637: 5636: 5635: 5632: 5628: 5620: 5605: 5602: 5598: 5594: 5590: 5589: 5588: 5587: 5584: 5580: 5577: 5574: 5571: 5567: 5557: 5556: 5553: 5549: 5541: 5538: 5535: 5532: 5529: 5526: 5523: 5522: 5521: 5518: 5511: 5508: 5505: 5502: 5499: 5496: 5493: 5492: 5491: 5483: 5482: 5479: 5475: 5459: 5455: 5451: 5446: 5444: 5440: 5436: 5433:on my recent 5432: 5424: 5419: 5405: 5402: 5398: 5394: 5393: 5392: 5391: 5390: 5389: 5384: 5381: 5377: 5374: 5370: 5367: 5365: 5362: 5360: 5357: 5355: 5352: 5351: 5349: 5348: 5347: 5346: 5343: 5340: 5336: 5332: 5329: 5327: 5324: 5322: 5319: 5317: 5314: 5313: 5311: 5310: 5309: 5308: 5305: 5301: 5294: 5291: 5289: 5286: 5284: 5281: 5279: 5276: 5275: 5274: 5264: 5261: 5257: 5253: 5251: 5247: 5246: 5245: 5243: 5233: 5232: 5229: 5224: 5221: 5220: 5216: 5204: 5201: 5196: 5195: 5194: 5193: 5190: 5187: 5183: 5179: 5178: 5175: 5172: 5168: 5167: 5166: 5165: 5162: 5158: 5148: 5147: 5143: 5139: 5136: 5132: 5131:my talk page. 5124: 5119: 5118: 5115: 5105: 5104: 5101: 5097: 5075: 5072: 5068: 5067: 5066: 5065: 5064: 5063: 5062: 5061: 5060: 5059: 5058: 5057: 5046: 5043: 5038: 5037: 5036: 5035: 5034: 5033: 5032: 5031: 5030: 5029: 5020: 5017: 5013: 5009: 5008: 5007: 5006: 5005: 5004: 5003: 5002: 4995: 4992: 4988: 4984: 4983: 4982: 4981: 4980: 4979: 4974: 4971: 4966: 4962: 4958: 4954: 4951: 4947: 4946: 4945: 4944: 4941: 4938: 4933: 4932: 4931: 4930: 4927: 4915: 4912: 4908: 4904: 4903: 4902: 4901: 4898: 4894: 4885: 4884: 4881: 4877: 4867: 4866: 4863: 4856: 4851: 4848: 4847: 4844: 4840: 4836: 4835:User:Samboner 4824: 4821: 4817: 4816: 4815: 4814: 4811: 4808: 4795: 4792: 4790:(squirt ink?) 4786: 4782: 4781: 4780: 4779: 4776: 4773: 4771:(squirt ink?) 4767: 4763: 4762: 4761: 4760: 4757: 4755:(squirt ink?) 4751: 4747: 4743: 4739: 4727: 4724: 4720: 4719: 4718: 4717: 4714: 4704: 4703: 4700: 4694: 4686: 4685: 4682: 4678: 4673: 4672: 4669: 4665: 4661: 4651: 4648: 4644: 4643: 4642: 4641: 4638: 4634: 4625: 4624: 4621: 4615: 4612: 4607: 4599: 4597: 4594: 4593: 4584: 4573: 4572: 4569: 4565: 4561: 4560:User:ZayZayEM 4557: 4552: 4551: 4548: 4543: 4542: 4538: 4528: 4525: 4524:WassermannNYC 4521: 4520: 4519: 4518: 4515: 4511: 4507: 4504: 4494: 4493: 4490: 4485: 4482: 4478: 4475: 4472: 4468: 4464: 4460: 4457: 4449: 4448: 4445: 4441: 4434: 4421: 4418: 4414: 4411: 4407: 4406: 4405: 4404: 4403: 4402: 4401: 4400: 4393: 4390: 4386: 4385: 4384: 4383: 4382: 4381: 4376: 4373: 4368: 4365: 4364: 4363: 4362: 4359: 4356: 4351: 4350: 4349: 4348: 4345: 4333: 4324: 4321: 4317: 4316: 4315: 4314: 4309: 4306: 4302: 4299: 4298: 4297: 4296: 4291: 4288: 4284: 4281: 4280: 4279: 4278: 4275: 4272: 4268: 4264: 4263: 4262: 4261: 4258: 4253: 4250: 4238: 4235: 4234: 4228: 4227: 4226: 4225: 4222: 4221: 4209: 4208: 4205: 4195: 4194: 4191: 4187: 4186: 4182: 4174: 4173: 4170: 4166: 4159:Anthroposophy 4156: 4155: 4152: 4147: 4144: 4142: 4137: 4133: 4129: 4126: 4122: 4114: 4113: 4110: 4104: 4101: 4097: 4094: 4093:User:ZayZayEM 4088: 4085: 4083: 4082:User:ZayZayEM 4078: 4074: 4072: 4071:User:ZayZayEM 4067: 4063: 4059: 4055: 4049: 4048:Natan Slifkin 4046: 4044: 4041: 4039: 4036: 4035: 4034: 4025: 4024: 4021: 4016: 4015: 4011: 4003: 4002: 3999: 3994: 3990: 3986: 3978: 3967: 3964: 3959: 3954: 3953: 3950: 3949:Natan Slifkin 3946: 3944: 3940: 3938: 3934: 3933: 3928: 3927: 3926: 3924: 3916: 3913: 3911: 3908: 3907: 3906: 3905: 3902: 3892: 3891: 3888: 3881: 3880: 3877: 3870: 3869: 3864: 3863: 3858: 3857: 3852: 3851: 3850: 3845: 3842: 3838: 3837: 3832: 3831: 3821: 3818: 3814: 3810: 3809: 3808: 3805: 3801: 3798: 3797: 3796: 3795: 3792: 3781: 3780: 3777: 3773: 3769: 3757: 3754: 3746: 3740: 3736: 3732: 3731: 3730: 3729: 3726: 3719: 3716: 3713: 3710: 3707: 3704: 3701: 3698: 3695: 3694:nuke contribs 3692: 3689: 3686: 3683: 3680: 3677: 3671: 3663: 3660: 3657: 3654: 3651: 3648: 3645: 3642: 3639: 3636: 3633: 3630: 3627: 3622: 3621:MiddleEastern 3612: 3611: 3607: 3604: 3599: 3589: 3588: 3585: 3584:Notmyrealname 3581: 3577: 3566: 3565: 3562: 3557: 3535: 3532: 3528: 3524: 3523: 3522: 3521: 3520: 3519: 3518: 3517: 3516: 3515: 3514: 3513: 3502: 3499: 3495: 3491: 3490: 3489: 3488: 3487: 3486: 3485: 3484: 3483: 3482: 3473: 3470: 3466: 3462: 3458: 3457: 3456: 3453: 3448: 3447: 3446: 3443: 3439: 3435: 3434: 3433: 3430: 3426: 3422: 3420: 3417: 3413: 3412: 3411: 3410: 3407: 3400: 3397: 3393: 3392: 3391: 3390: 3387: 3383: 3378: 3377: 3374: 3370: 3369: 3364: 3360: 3355: 3347: 3346: 3343: 3336: 3330: 3329: 3326: 3322: 3318: 3314: 3310: 3300: 3299: 3296: 3291: 3287: 3283: 3279: 3275: 3271: 3259: 3256: 3251: 3250: 3249: 3248: 3245: 3240: 3238: 3234: 3232: 3222: 3221: 3218: 3217: 3215:Daniel Bryant 3210: 3201: 3200: 3197: 3192: 3190: 3184: 3182: 3178: 3171: 3166: 3165: 3162: 3158: 3154: 3150: 3146: 3136: 3135: 3131: 3127: 3123: 3118: 3111: 3106: 3105: 3102: 3098: 3094: 3089: 3088: 3085: 3081: 3074: 3069: 3068: 3065: 3061: 3053: 3051: 3047: 3044: 3040: 3030: 3029: 3026: 3022: 3010: 3007: 3002: 2998: 2993: 2992: 2991: 2990: 2985: 2982: 2976: 2970: 2966: 2964: 2960: 2957: 2953: 2950: 2945: 2940: 2935: 2934: 2931: 2930:Alan Davidson 2927: 2926:Alan Davidson 2920: 2919: 2918: 2917: 2914: 2913:Alan Davidson 2909: 2908: 2905: 2904:Alan Davidson 2900: 2899: 2896: 2895:Alan Davidson 2891: 2890: 2887: 2886:Alan Davidson 2876: 2875: 2872: 2869: 2860: 2859: 2856: 2853:additions. -- 2845: 2844: 2841: 2829: 2826: 2822: 2821: 2817: 2816: 2815: 2808: 2807: 2801: 2798: 2797: 2794: 2790: 2786: 2785:both versions 2778: 2774: 2770: 2766: 2765: 2761: 2757: 2753: 2749: 2748: 2747: 2744: 2743: 2740: 2736: 2726: 2725: 2722: 2719: 2709: 2706: 2705: 2702: 2692: 2691: 2688: 2684: 2680: 2676: 2669:Image problem 2664: 2661: 2657: 2656:User:Dmcdevit 2653: 2652:User:Khoikhoi 2649: 2648: 2647: 2646: 2643: 2639: 2635: 2632: 2629: 2625: 2621: 2618: 2615: 2611: 2607: 2604: 2601: 2597: 2593: 2590: 2587: 2583: 2571: 2568: 2564: 2563: 2558: 2557: 2551: 2550: 2547: 2542: 2538: 2532: 2529:Links in the 2526: 2525: 2522: 2517: 2513: 2510: 2500: 2497: 2493: 2492: 2491: 2490: 2487: 2482: 2477: 2473: 2461: 2458: 2456: 2451: 2442: 2438: 2437: 2436: 2435: 2432: 2430: 2425: 2417: 2410: 2404: 2403: 2400: 2394: 2390: 2387: 2381: 2379: 2375: 2370: 2367: 2356: 2353: 2349: 2348:Malik Shabazz 2345: 2340: 2339: 2334: 2330: 2327: 2323: 2319: 2318: 2317: 2314: 2313: 2310: 2306: 2305:Malik Shabazz 2300: 2298: 2294: 2282: 2279: 2274: 2273: 2272: 2271: 2268: 2258: 2255: 2251: 2250: 2249: 2248: 2245: 2242: 2239: 2235: 2231: 2227: 2223: 2222: 2221: 2220: 2217: 2212: 2208: 2198: 2197: 2194: 2184: 2179: 2178: 2175: 2165: 2164: 2161: 2150: 2149: 2146: 2142: 2138: 2134: 2123: 2122: 2121: 2119: 2112: 2106: 2105: 2102: 2096: 2095: 2092: 2081: 2077: 2073: 2069: 2065: 2056: 2055: 2052: 2048: 2032: 2029: 2025: 2021: 2017: 2013: 2009: 2005: 2001: 2000: 1999: 1998: 1997: 1996: 1991: 1988: 1984: 1982: 1979: 1975: 1971: 1970: 1969: 1968: 1965: 1962: 1958: 1954: 1952: 1949: 1945: 1941: 1940: 1939: 1938: 1935: 1931: 1916: 1913: 1912:ChristTrekker 1909: 1904: 1900: 1896: 1892: 1891: 1890: 1887: 1886:ChristTrekker 1882: 1881: 1880: 1879: 1876: 1875:ChristTrekker 1861: 1858: 1854: 1850: 1849: 1848: 1845: 1841: 1837: 1833: 1832: 1831: 1830: 1827: 1823: 1819: 1808: 1805: 1801: 1800: 1799: 1798: 1795: 1779: 1776: 1772: 1769: 1767: 1766: 1765: 1764: 1763: 1760: 1756: 1755: 1754: 1753: 1750: 1747: 1739: 1738: 1735: 1725: 1724: 1721: 1717: 1712: 1702: 1701: 1698: 1693: 1686: 1681: 1680: 1677: 1676:Notmyrealname 1672: 1664: 1658: 1657: 1654: 1652: 1647: 1642: 1635: 1630: 1629: 1626: 1624: 1617: 1612: 1611: 1608: 1607: 1605:Daniel Bryant 1593: 1592: 1589: 1582:"Jayjg," huh? 1579: 1578: 1575: 1565: 1564: 1561: 1556: 1548: 1547: 1544: 1540: 1539: 1534: 1533: 1530: 1524: 1522: 1518: 1515: 1513: 1506: 1504: 1499: 1498: 1495: 1491: 1488: 1483: 1482: 1478: 1477: 1474: 1471: 1468: 1464: 1461: 1453: 1452: 1449: 1446: 1435: 1432: 1428: 1424: 1420: 1416: 1411: 1398: 1395: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1386: 1382: 1378: 1377: 1376: 1375: 1372: 1368: 1363: 1361: 1357: 1353: 1345: 1344: 1341: 1338: 1329: 1328: 1325: 1321: 1317: 1307: 1306: 1303: 1295: 1292: 1289: 1286: 1283: 1280: 1277: 1274: 1271: 1270:nuke contribs 1268: 1265: 1262: 1259: 1256: 1253: 1247: 1235: 1234: 1229: 1224: 1223: 1212: 1207: 1204: 1201: 1198: 1193: 1190: 1187: 1184: 1180: 1172: 1160: 1157: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1148: 1141: 1138: 1134: 1131: 1128: 1124: 1121: 1118: 1117: 1116: 1115: 1114: 1113: 1108: 1105: 1101: 1098: 1095: 1090: 1086: 1083: 1080: 1077: 1074: 1073: 1072: 1071: 1068: 1065: 1061: 1060: 1059: 1058: 1055: 1050: 1047: 1043: 1040: 1037: 1026: 1016: 1011: 1008:the Original 1007: 1006: 1001: 993: 992: 987: 983: 977: 970: 963: 962: 957: 956: 951: 939: 938: 935: 925: 924: 921: 917: 914: 912: 908: 905:He nominated 903: 899: 896: 894: 893:User:PinchasC 887: 882: 881: 878: 873: 869: 859: 858: 855: 850: 848: 844: 839: 834: 829: 828: 825: 824:J.R. Hercules 818: 812: 811: 808: 800: 795: 794: 790: 784: 776: 771: 770: 767: 763: 751: 748: 744: 740: 739: 738: 737: 734: 730: 720: 719: 716: 712: 708: 698: 697: 694: 685: 680: 676: 666: 665: 662: 652: 651: 648: 645: 635: 634: 631: 627: 616: 613: 609: 608: 605: 602: 598: 597: 596: 595: 592: 582: 581: 578: 574: 570: 565: 557: 551: 550: 547: 540: 535: 534: 531: 527: 517: 516: 513: 509: 503:...and again? 500: 499: 496: 492: 482: 481: 478: 472: 470: 467: 466: 457: 456: 451: 446: 445: 431: 426: 423: 420: 417: 412: 409: 406: 403: 399: 395: 391: 386: 383: 380: 377: 372: 369: 366: 363: 359: 355: 354: 353: 350: 340: 337: 333: 328: 327: 326: 325: 322: 318: 307: 304: 300: 299: 298: 297: 294: 290: 282: 279: 276: 273: 270: 267: 265: 261: 258: 255: 254: 253: 250: 238: 235: 233: 228: 220: 214: 211: 208: 205: 202: 199: 196: 193: 190: 187: 184: 179: 175: 174: 173: 170: 168: 163: 154: 153: 152: 151: 148: 146: 141: 130: 127: 124: 121: 118: 115: 112: 109: 106: 105:nuke contribs 103: 100: 97: 94: 91: 88: 82: 76: 69: 64: 63: 59: 50: 42: 33: 19: 5626: 5618: 5613: 5610:Quick answer 5596: 5592: 5563: 5545: 5519: 5515: 5489: 5470: 5438: 5430: 5428: 5368: 5363: 5358: 5353: 5330: 5325: 5320: 5315: 5297: 5292: 5287: 5282: 5277: 5272: 5255: 5248: 5239: 5225: 5222: 5217: 5214: 5211:Can you help 5154: 5134: 5127: 5111: 5093: 4964: 4923: 4891: 4873: 4859: 4849: 4832: 4805: 4735: 4710: 4695: 4693:Dear Jayjg, 4692: 4674: 4662: 4659: 4631: 4616: 4608: 4605: 4579: 4553: 4544: 4539: 4536: 4500: 4486: 4483: 4479: 4476: 4473: 4469: 4465: 4461: 4458: 4455: 4440:this article 4437: 4409: 4336: 4246: 4231: 4218: 4215: 4201: 4188: 4183: 4180: 4162: 4148: 4145: 4140: 4138: 4134: 4130: 4127: 4123: 4120: 4105: 4102: 4098: 4089: 4086: 4079: 4075: 4068: 4064: 4060: 4056: 4052: 4031: 4017: 4012: 4009: 3982: 3922: 3919: 3898: 3882: 3874: 3848: 3787: 3765: 3735:her talkpage 3714: 3708: 3702: 3696: 3690: 3684: 3678: 3658: 3652: 3646: 3640: 3634: 3628: 3618: 3595: 3572: 3553: 3493: 3464: 3403: 3379: 3366: 3356: 3353: 3342:Media anthro 3339: 3312: 3306: 3285: 3284:to Noogster 3267: 3241: 3228: 3212: 3207: 3193: 3188: 3185: 3174: 3142: 3114: 3110:User:Abu ali 3090: 3077: 3059: 3036: 3020: 3018: 2971: 2967: 2962: 2954: 2946: 2943: 2924: 2910: 2901: 2892: 2882: 2866: 2851: 2837: 2813: 2799: 2784: 2782: 2776: 2751: 2745: 2732: 2715: 2707: 2698: 2675:James Semple 2672: 2630: 2616: 2602: 2588: 2579: 2543: 2539: 2536: 2518: 2514: 2511: 2508: 2472:White people 2469: 2445: 2419: 2413: 2409:User:Kgeza67 2395: 2391: 2385: 2382: 2377: 2373: 2371: 2368: 2364: 2343: 2329:pre-existing 2328: 2325: 2321: 2315: 2301: 2290: 2263: 2229: 2206: 2204: 2188: 2171: 2156: 2145:Shirahadasha 2136: 2129: 2115: 2097: 2087: 2057: 2044: 2007: 1973: 1926: 1907: 1902: 1898: 1894: 1871: 1816: 1791: 1773:stepped in. 1745: 1742:Banned user? 1731: 1720:WikiInquirer 1708: 1689: 1668: 1650: 1638: 1620: 1602: 1599: 1585: 1571: 1557: 1554: 1541: 1535: 1525: 1520: 1511: 1510: 1508: 1500: 1484: 1479: 1465: 1462: 1459: 1441: 1408: 1364: 1354: 1351: 1335: 1313: 1290: 1284: 1278: 1272: 1266: 1260: 1254: 1241: 1219: 1205: 1199: 1191: 1185: 1175: 1093: 1051: 1048: 1044: 1041: 1038: 1035: 1015:Kind regards 1014: 1012:. Well done! 1003: 990: 975: 955:MessedRocker 953: 945: 931: 918: 915: 904: 900: 897: 890: 865: 851: 840: 837: 821: 803: 779: 759: 729:Anti-Zionism 726: 704: 674: 672: 658: 641: 624: 588: 585:Astonishment 560: 543: 539:Circumcision 523: 506: 488: 473: 471: 468: 463: 441: 436: 424: 418: 410: 404: 384: 378: 370: 364: 351: 348: 331: 315: 286: 264:circumcision 251: 248: 222: 209: 203: 197: 191: 185: 157: 135: 125: 119: 113: 107: 101: 95: 89: 75:User:Kgeza67 72: 68:User:Kgeza67 39: 30: 5155:Please see 4841:by 32k. -- 4489:Timeshifter 4444:Proabivouac 4267:Whac-A-Mole 4212:blood libel 4190:Fairview360 3580:Lewis Libby 3569:Another one 3498:David Spart 3280:. Also, he 3244:David Spart 2265:Checkuser? 2192:Orange Mike 2160:Drboisclair 2062:—Preceding 2047:Lewis Libby 1697:David Spart 1671:Lewis Libby 1663:Lewis Libby 1466:see this: 1445:Fairview360 920:David Spart 669:Controversy 5645:Bladestorm 5631:Bladestorm 5414:RfA thanks 5401:Babelfisch 5380:Babelfisch 5339:Babelfisch 5304:Babelfisch 5108:a question 5071:David Levy 5042:David Levy 4991:David Levy 4970:David Levy 4926:David Levy 4660:Hi Jayjg, 4576:RFA Thanks 4568:Metzenberg 4547:Metzenberg 4417:David Levy 4372:David Levy 4344:David Levy 4151:Metzenberg 4109:Metzenberg 3963:Metzenberg 3923:lehakholis 3901:Metzenberg 3887:annoynmous 3876:annoynmous 3841:annoynmous 3712:block user 3706:filter log 3656:block user 3650:filter log 3019:You said " 2855:Metzenberg 2825:annoynmous 2660:The Behnam 2642:The Behnam 2624:Scenebadly 2610:Givenoften 2596:Cloudcheck 2567:annoynmous 2554:Kurt Nimmo 2496:The Behnam 2486:The Behnam 2386:definitely 2211:Intel i860 2201:Gnetwerker 2133:Tamar Ross 2101:annoynmous 2091:annoynmous 2006:. It says 1728:A question 1623:SlimVirgin 1358:just made 1288:block user 1282:filter log 1203:block user 1169:Regarding 783:Mel Etitis 684:Poeticbent 630:The Behnam 577:Metzenberg 422:block user 382:block user 336:The Behnam 321:The Behnam 207:block user 201:page moves 123:block user 117:filter log 81:Kadlietgsd 5583:Blainster 5326:TOR proxy 5288:TOR proxy 5182:WP:SPEEDY 4843:Blainster 4707:Thank you 3989:Palestine 3725:Sandstein 3718:block log 3670:Frogsprog 3662:block log 3350:Kirbytime 3309:Pallywood 3161:Blainster 3064:Kendrick7 3025:WAS 4.250 2840:MetsFan76 2777:Pallywood 2752:Pallywood 2729:Pallywood 2531:Nazarenes 2521:Jtpaladin 2326:vis-à-vis 2237:evidence. 1596:Checkuser 1560:inigmatus 1360:this edit 1302:Sandstein 1294:block log 1221:Netsnipe 1210:block log 980:For your 843:this edit 807:Robdurbar 661:John Foxe 443:Netsnipe 429:block log 389:block log 213:block log 129:block log 5256:informal 5171:Jaakobou 4876:the poll 4820:Dppowell 4810:Dppowell 4764:Thanks. 4723:Dppowell 4713:Dppowell 4628:Yourhelp 4620:Dppowell 4602:Question 4505:before: 4503:WP:CIVIL 4320:Kingjeff 4305:Dppowell 4287:Dppowell 4271:Dppowell 4269:, then! 4257:Dppowell 4204:Urthogie 4169:Erdanion 4006:BhaiSaab 3744:Rockpock 3682:contribs 3632:contribs 3561:Noogster 3531:CJCurrie 3469:CJCurrie 3442:CJCurrie 3406:CJCurrie 3386:CJCurrie 3373:CJCurrie 3317:Coroebus 3278:Internet 3126:contribs 3006:Noogster 2944:Hi Jay, 2879:Comment1 2871:Arrow740 2863:BhaiSaab 2634:contribs 2620:contribs 2606:contribs 2592:contribs 2546:Noogster 2454:Netscott 2428:Netscott 2399:Noogster 2322:addition 2076:contribs 2064:unsigned 2020:Muhammad 1923:Question 1857:Dppowell 1804:Noogster 1794:Noogster 1775:Arrow740 1759:Arrow740 1749:Arrow740 1665:dispute? 1514:soldiers 1505:source: 1427:contribs 1415:unsigned 1352:Hi Jay, 1258:contribs 1246:Tube Guy 1189:contribs 1179:Tube Guy 1171:Tube Guy 1156:Noogster 1137:Noogster 1064:Noogster 1054:Noogster 1010:Barnstar 1002:, award 982:civility 847:WP:Point 733:Mackan79 477:Dppowell 408:contribs 368:contribs 312:Question 289:identify 249:Hi Jay, 231:Netscott 189:contribs 166:Netscott 144:Netscott 93:contribs 5614:Hello. 5474:WP:CALM 5431:Support 5142:contact 4965:someone 4785:Squiddy 4766:Squiddy 4750:Squiddy 4699:Asucena 4647:Asucena 4020:Merzbow 3993:uncivil 3983:Please 3817:Kenosis 3813:Kenosis 3804:Kenosis 3791:Kenosis 3737:and at 3582:thing. 3290:WP:DICK 3196:Gwernol 3122:Yonatan 3101:Kenosis 3084:Kenosis 3037:Of the 2141:WP:SOAP 1419:Avraham 1381:WP:RFCU 1062:Reply. 1021:Anthony 1000:Anthony 984:in the 715:Liftarn 612:Snowdog 601:Snowdog 591:Snowdog 530:Snowdog 178:Konsti4 5627:looked 5467:Shahak 5439:89/1/1 5260:Otheus 5200:ChrisO 5186:ChrisO 5161:ChrisO 5100:Sm8900 5016:Jayjg 4950:WP:ATT 4937:Jayjg 4514:Jayjg 4389:Jayjg 4355:Jayjg 4177:Osli73 3998:ChrisO 3776:Angelo 3452:Jayjg 3429:Jayjg 3416:Jayjg 3396:Jayjg 3325:ChrisO 3295:Matt57 2975:Daniel 2793:ChrisO 2739:ChrisO 2721:Jooler 2252:ping! 2174:Jooler 1844:Angelo 1826:Angelo 1438:Osli73 1340:Tiamut 1324:Tiamut 1104:Jayjg 988:case, 950:Signed 854:Jd2718 766:Tiamut 747:Jayjg 743:WP:3RR 655:Provan 398:TopAce 262:edits 5597:spend 5581:. -- 5443:where 5250:page. 5138:Chazz 4987:point 4961:added 4956:poll. 4911:Denny 4897:Denny 4880:Itayb 4681:Aminz 4668:Aminz 4591:demon 4508:(see 4121:Jay, 3494:think 3423:Read 3354:Jay, 3159:). -- 2791:. -- 2701:Wooyi 2695:Image 2687:Wooyi 2336:that. 2278:Maury 2267:Maury 2254:Maury 2241:Maury 2216:Maury 2168:What? 2158:me.-- 1734:Aminz 1651:juice 1646:Mango 1503:WP:RS 1460:Jay: 1394:Jakew 1371:Jakew 1088:says. 1005:Jayjg 998:- I, 942:Hamas 690:talk 546:AdamM 512:Jakew 495:Jakew 475:to). 469:also 358:Mst06 303:Jakew 293:Jakew 16:< 5568:and 5552:Zero 5454:talk 5302:.) — 5144:/t: 5114:Zero 4909:. - 4907:here 4905:And 4611:page 4562:and 3930:are: 3739:AN/I 3700:logs 3676:talk 3644:logs 3626:talk 3606:khoi 3603:Khoi 3598:this 3527:this 3465:your 3461:here 3438:this 3425:this 3382:here 3359:here 3282:said 3274:here 3270:here 3130:talk 2679:here 2638:Iran 2628:talk 2614:talk 2600:talk 2586:talk 2378:only 2374:only 2352:Talk 2346:? — 2309:Talk 2295:and 2072:talk 1641:WP:V 1574:Jgui 1512:Arab 1423:talk 1318:and 1276:logs 1252:talk 1196:logs 1183:talk 934:PiCo 877:IZAK 838:Hi, 788:Talk 526:Cloj 508:This 491:here 415:logs 402:talk 375:logs 362:talk 183:talk 111:logs 87:talk 49:acan 5619:not 5478:THF 5228:Zeq 4740:to 4637:Zeq 4410:did 4233:DGG 4220:DGG 3592:Hey 3529:. 3313:why 3043:Tom 2834:??? 2771:of 2758:of 2622:), 2608:), 2594:): 2207:old 2051:Tom 2028:ALM 1987:ALM 1978:ALM 1961:ALM 1948:ALM 1934:ALM 1908:not 1903:may 1899:not 1895:not 1543:Zeq 1529:Zeq 1494:Zeq 1385:Avi 1102:-- 1024:cfc 723:3RR 709:of 332:why 45:coe 5593:no 5578:, 5575:, 5456:) 5448:- 5135:u: 5014:. 4787:| 4768:| 4752:| 4107:-- 3947:* 3941:* 3935:* 3600:? 3189:if 3132:) 2965:" 2677:, 2350:| 2307:| 2078:) 2074:• 2014:, 1523:. 1469:, 1429:) 1425:• 1227:► 996::) 805:-- 791:) 781:-- 745:. 682:-- 493:. 449:► 60:— 57:lk 43:— 5452:( 5140:/ 4968:— 4587:^ 4370:— 4342:— 3752:t 3748:e 3720:) 3715:· 3709:· 3703:· 3697:· 3691:· 3685:· 3679:· 3674:( 3664:) 3659:· 3653:· 3647:· 3641:· 3635:· 3629:· 3624:( 3128:/ 3124:( 2984:+ 2981:T 2978:/ 2631:· 2626:( 2617:· 2612:( 2603:· 2598:( 2589:· 2584:( 2457:) 2449:→ 2446:( 2431:) 2423:→ 2420:( 2230:I 2070:( 1489:, 1433:. 1421:( 1296:) 1291:· 1285:· 1279:· 1273:· 1267:· 1261:· 1255:· 1250:( 1213:) 1206:· 1200:· 1192:· 1186:· 1181:( 1017:, 958:. 948:— 785:( 432:) 425:· 419:· 411:· 405:· 400:( 392:) 385:· 379:· 371:· 365:· 360:( 234:) 226:→ 223:( 215:) 210:· 204:· 198:· 192:· 186:· 181:( 169:) 161:→ 158:( 147:) 139:→ 136:( 131:) 126:· 120:· 114:· 108:· 102:· 96:· 90:· 85:( 55:a 53:t 47:l

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index