User talk:Human3015/Archive 1

3705:, on which basis you are charging me of "Hounding"? My area of editing includes most of India-Pakistan related articles, and I have nearly all of them on my watchlist. Your expectation from me is that I should not edit or touch any article that you are editing, otherwise you will charge me of "hounding". You have more than 52,000 edits, tell me how many of them I reverted if I'm "following you"?. You really can't direct me that which articles should I edit. And regarding Doval article I have self-reverted my work until consensus achieved on talk page, and you should write this on Doval's talk page where I already started discussion, because your work already reverted by another editor too recently, so everyone should know that why that category is important. It is not my personal matter to tell only me. -- 1909:, dear friend, you were writing only one side of the story, that article is full of only one side only, I just added one line of other side that too with proper reference. See, you said you are from kashmir and you declared yourself anti-India, so how one can expect non-biased writing from you?. As a wikipedia editor, we should not pro-India or anti-India, pro-America or anti-America, we just have to write truth with proper references. Anyway, consensus has been made on that page and thats good. But its better you talk via talk page instead of edit summaries. Thank you. -- 1872:. it seems you are trying to hide the real facts published in its space. Well your bio reads that you dont discriminate but you do it well. If you are from kashmir territory , you must know ashura procession is banned and it is an open challenge to human rights activists working here and I am one among them. So, don't try to shape encyclopedia when you dont have a concept. I request you as wikipedian and suggest you as friend, try to expand these kind of articles conforming Knowledge guidelines, and put your efforts forward to protects human rights anywhere you willing. 4431:"Idealist!" It has been a long time since anybody called me that. I just try to be a good Hindu, having been taught Ramayana since age 4. Was Rama an idealist? Knowledge is the best tool we have for bringing the "truth" to the people. When there are conflicts all around, religious, nationalistic and ideological, Knowledge policies allow us to cut through all of them and find the right information that should be shown to the world. It is a tool of immense power and an equal amount of responsibility. We better be idealists to make the right use of it. Cheers, 4217: 3586: 1231: 4377:, well thanks, I think attacking personally someone either in long message or in 4-5 lines should not be allowed, I have not attacked anyone in my message rather I explained my point in detail, that discussion is going so long so it deserves one long comment to explain that term properly. And that comment is "coherent" or "incoherent" is personal perception and opinions can change personwise, I will not comment on that. Still I can sign that comment twice to make them look like two comments. -- 31: 4173: 3362: 1206: 2789: 2488: 4411:, actually I was blocked for 3 days and in those days many things came into my mind to talk about that issue, it could have been very long comment but I restricted it to current version though still its a long message and I still have many things to say about that topic. And thanks for your appreciation, me too want to be a good editor or sensible editor. And you are a good editor and you are good in maintaining NPOV, but many times you became very much 4036: 3275: 3128: 2536: 1129: 740: 658: 917: 1045: 3038: 1343: 857: 2045:, yes, thanks for your suggestions and appreciation. I'm relatively new at Knowledge, joined 2-3 months ago. I have some problem in attaching references so I attach it bare. I don't know how to create that template automatically that you sent me, i do it mannually many times which takes too long time so many time i attach bare source to save time. Anyway I will research more in it. And you too do have watch on 1935: 1469: 2965: 4470: 4011:, thanks for your suggestion, Discussion gone on some off topic issues, but religion does matters, Term "Bihari" doesn't suggests us that they are muslims, urdu speaking and stateless. "Bihari" can be Hindu or Muslim or Christian, Hindi speaking or Urdu Speaking or Bhojpuri Speaking, statless or citizen or NRI. Anyway, you opposed move but didn't signed it. Thank you. -- 2679:, you were not even ready to discuss it on talk, earlier biggest version was edited by some editors but recent smaller version was only edited by you repeatedly, that too without discussing. Anyway, I just made smallest version of it, that first version of very very big section now ended up in one single line. Hope so this matter is resolved now. Thank you. -- 2891:, Ok, my apology for that, I will quote only what other leaders said about his "sahab" remarks. I will also provide sources where they exclusively uses word "controversy" over his "sahab" remark. Moreover his latest "sahab" remark came just yesterday and it became matter of debate in national media. It is important enough information to mention in article. 3791:

is my area of interest and was on watchlist so I took part in discussion. And about doval, I didn't reverted him directly, I was reading article and I felt that category is not needed so I just edited it giving edit summary, later when I get to know that it was added by Mar4d so I self-reverted it to

3560:

Yeah, it is our system that is mostly to blame. When a new user comes, they make mistakes, and we end up reverting them. Once they get a hang of things, they start reverting others. If they butt heads with somebody else who is in the same state, an edit war ensues. We need to find ways of breaking in

1794:

Not to annoy you or anything but you indented your post here wrong. Just one colon for that post and if you reply to me here again then it will be 3 colons. I have left your post so you can fix it. You'll get the hang of it. It's not the most important thing on Knowledge. :) About references. Doing a

1728:

helpful (it was for me!). It is pretty much a tutorial on how to indent properly. I noticed that your post above and your reply to me at the Teahouse weren't indented properly. :D Also you should do your best to fill in the edit summary field for every edit you make. Others appreciate it and it looks

4352:

Hi Humanist, welcome back. Unfortunately, the last message you wrote on the Stranded Pakistanis talk page was quite long and incoherent. You might want to replace it with a shorter and clearer message. The standard talk page post is generally 3-4 lines long. Longer messages are acceptable only if it

4087:

on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit

3330:

3183:

2591:

2461:

from its infobox which was wrong. Anyway if you are deleting local language stuff from intro or lead then please make sure that infobox has local language name and if infobox doesn't has then add it. And it was mistake by me about Kanchipuram. And you idea of Sahitya is nice, but uploading photos to

2212:

This is an english wikipedia, why dont you understand, Indic scripts r limited to infoboxes only, If you start with your local language indication policy then more than half of the content would be full of transliterations and translations, and i have not removed any native name from any infobox, on

1180:

886:

template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons

795:

713:

3752:

is a bit over the top in accusing you of hounding. However, I would agree that regularly reverting somebody's edits gets a bit tiresome. When dealing with editors that you know well, it is better to adopt 0RR, i.e., don't revert at all. Open a talk discussion instead. This applies to Mar4d as well.

1803:. Just to remind you, I myself am not the most experienced editor here at Knowledge and the best place to ask questions is the Teahouse. (I'm still learning myself :D. It took me 30 minute to type all this because of coding issues!!!) I am happy to answer your questions though. :) Hope that helps. — 1583:

you were satisfied with our discussion, but still its strange that category got deleted. In past it has been happened two times when other users created such category nearly 2 years ago. I 'wonder' why people are so much against this category but not against page with same name and content? anyway

3887:

I edit that article on the 24th and exactly two days later, you turn up at that article. Your behaviour is clearly becoming tedious. Under what pretext can I not believe that this is yet another instance where you've followed me? How simple is it to ask to lay off and stop hounding wherever I go?

3840:

Having seen your comment at ARC. Main problem with Bgwhite was, that he protected the page where he was working as an editor, it is considered as misuse of admin tools. Then he had blocked me for 24 hours in 29 April, something he couldn't because there was no prior warning or need to block, and

1096:

and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the

1010:

3989:

Hi Humanist, my debate proceeds in a precise policy-bound manner, which is the only way to get a resolution. If you butt in the middle with extraneous arguments, you will divert attention from the thrust of my point. So, please refrain from doing that. (Religion is not at issue here. Neither is

4393:

No, I didn't mean that you were making personal attacks. I clarified above. I think you are valuable for Knowledge. You have certainly brought up issues that I didn't know of before. If you calm down and follow the advice of the experienced editors, you will have a long and productive life at

3544:

Don't be too hard on yourself. We all make mistakes, particularly when we're new and don't know how to do everything yet. While I admire you a bit for going there to take the blame, which is something a lot of people wouldn't do, don't hold it against yourself, and if you ever want any help,

2862:

Digvijay is repeatedly criticized for calling terrorist or anti-national persons with respectful names. "Sahab" and "ji" are respectful words used as suffix after name of respectful person in Hindi language. Following is the list of terrorist or anti-national persons to whom he referred with

1372: 1378: 2146:, with whom you made consensus? There should be local name in initial text too. And I'm seeing you are removing indic text from infobox too. Please stop your edits or better you revert it. Its policy of wikipedia to write local language name of each article. Thank you. -- 1508: 2457:, I don't know what people have problem for addition of just one local language word which is also official language of that area. I'm not talking only about Indian languages but I'm talking about all non-English languages. Like you deleted Arabic language motto of 2830:

I have added sources, I will even add more sources when media and other leaders criticized Digvijaya for his "sahab" remarks. Just wait for sources to add. In front of each name source was given. I will rewrite that section with more and more sources. Thank you.

2069:

I do references manually too. Once you do it a couple of times, you will get the hang of it. Note that I didn't use any template in the above, it is just and a bunch of text. Using a proper citation template is a bit harder, but you can get to it later. Cheers,

2433:, We can provide inline citations and proper references, even a one step ahead, we can upload high resolution images of any linguistic and notable personality of that city or of any linguistic oriented cultural events by first uploading it to wikimedia commons. 1974: 3674:

He is eligible for that category because he lived there previously, and the article says 7 years. You don't have to be a current resident. See all other expatriate categories and the way thousands of articles are categorised. Also, you really need to stop

2930:, that case not going to be taken because it was a content dispute and the filer is now blocked indefinately, it has been so many days, I don't think that he would come back. There are no chances that anything will happen there, it is a declined case. 1986: 1520: 3423:

referral you currently have, your best bet is to self-revert the last edit you have made and apologise for not knowing the correct procedure. Otherwise, you will get a punitive block and you would have damaged your reputation. All the best.

1077:, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the 3080:, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Knowledge is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a 3786:

and no question of reverting. I have edits only on Kargil war talk page. I took part on Admins notice board regarding Kargil war then too he had problem, that page was on my watchlist because Mar4d nominated me on that same page and

2310:, please don't make new section each time, anyway, i have read that link, its 3 year old matter. Just tell me why you deleted non-English matter from some of infoboxes? You yourself saying that you don't delete it from infobox. -- 3418:

describes what to do when somebody reverts your edit. You need to open a discussion on the talk page and come to a consensus before you do the edit again. Repeatedly reinstating your edit constitutes edit warring. For the other

957:. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of 3753:

Both of you know that reverting an edit won't achieve anything because the other editor will re-revert. You will have to go to the talk page sooner or later. So, what is the point of a needless fight? My two cents. Cheers,

1504: 1101:. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request 2428:

Dear Human3015, instead of writing the local language initial text, we can describe how the native language is nourished, flourished by the residents, any literature or cultural related program of that city, Any

2121:

Im removing indic scripts from the initial sentence from the articles as per the consensus reached in WP:INDIC SCRIPTS, this is an english wikipedia, the indication of indic script should be limited to infoboxes

839:

for how/where to place your signature (essentially, per wikipedia convention you need to only place it at the end of your talk-page message and not in the section heading or the beginning of the post). Cheers.

3652: 2097:, just got it, while editing, just click on option "cite" then choose "news" from the "templates", there you can add publisher, news title, date in that format. It is better than doing it manually. Cheers. -- 1033: 3398:

I have taken it to talk page, understand BRD. Making a comment in the edit summary of taking it to talk and never doing it yourself is not really correct. Please explain there why this comment is required.

4185: 1385:

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

1218: 1970: 120: 905: 3918:, instead of harassing me and talking out of focus like new editor, better you write on article talk page and give valid reasons for your unexplained move of the page. What sources you have?? -- 3724:, You will write "Kashmiri militants" as "freedom fighters" and you expect that no one should revert your such vandalism, otherwise you "might need to consider some form of intervention". -- 1549: 2902:

there which itself uses these words in their articles. And I used word "criticized" because individual sources which I provided do said that "Digvijaya 'slammed' for Sahab remarks" etc.

4318: 4310: 2697:

the editor responds to you and explicitly states that you should not presume that their spelling correction of a word means anything more than they corrected the spelling of a word

225: 2868:

Even if you provide sources for each of those sentences, unless a source discusses in its entirety the "'Sahab' controversy" (as you dub it), you cannot add it to the article. —

1118: 4305:

You were recently listed as a party to a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at

1547:, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at 1543: 1028: 208:. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Knowledge. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place 4560: 4454: 1860: 4552: 1404: 2797: 228:

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Knowledge, you might want to consider being "

1082: 4415:. And I'm still learning, day by day I'm learning new things from Knowledge. You have some info and pages linked on your user page, that too helping me. Thank you. -- 1759:, Thanks for your tips, can you tell me how to attach references to given info? Whenever I add something to article I just copy n paste ref link between <ref: --> 979:

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Knowledge to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you

4306: 1892: 4166: 3539: 3355: 4588: 2674: 1796: 3554: 1605: 2721:

Pakistani and Chinese citizens have hatred towards India, then can Anti-Indian Sentiment article be published by me, even i will provide relevant sources??

2623:

Hi Human3015, You have received several edit-warring notices already. If you don't slow down and discuss things, you are liable to get blocked. Please read

4205: 4200: 4046:. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's 3934:

I'm not harrassing you. Repeatedly following another editor around to articles you've never edited before, and confronting their edits is a habit known as

3289:. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's 3142:. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's 2886: 2869: 2825: 2809: 2550:. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's 2343: 1139:. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's 754:. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's 672:. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's 4177: 3366: 2666: 1210: 139:. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Knowledge works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and 110: 4568: 3388: 1645: 2430: 2387: 1347: 3433: 2238:

page you deleted their motto in arabic language from infobox, In many city names you deleted local names from infobox. See you history of editing. --

173: 2708: 2690: 1812: 3061:, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a 3057:

another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Knowledge this is usually seen as obstructing the

2234:, i have seen many your deletions from infoboxes, i undid many such deletions, even other people are undoing your local language deletions. Like in 1595: 3486: 2878: 119: 3258:, yes, I will not revert it anymore, but it is sourced and relevant material written with neutral POV. Anyway, thanks both of you for guidance. -- 1850: 1836: 1781: 4189: 3664: 3570: 3533: 3445: 3002: 2956: 2195: 4121:. You have to self-revert. Please use the talk page to discuss the existing issues. Content can be modified subject to consensus there. Thanks, 3500: 3026: 1920: 1711: 4440: 4426: 4403: 4388: 4022: 3825: 3762: 2760: 2641: 2473: 2321: 2278: 2175: 2157: 2108: 2079: 2060: 1964: 1566: 1498: 1438: 1419: 1323: 849: 348: 1738: 3239: 1454: 4601: 4353:

is a very deep question and you write it very carefully and clearly. Even if it is clear, people will complain about "walls of text" if you

3846: 3679:

me to articles. This is becoming a troubling pattern and if there is more of this, then I might need to consider some form of intervention.

1532: 4158: 3999: 3976: 3953: 3929: 3803: 3735: 3716: 3076:. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the 2187: 1998: 872:

does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Knowledge, this is supplied at minimum in an

876:

at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted

4496: 4456: 3576: 2921: 2852:, which says: "Do not combine material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any of the sources." 1700:, yes, good work by you, all these are surely sock puppets, that puppet is really crazy. Hope admin will take some action against it. -- 1078: 4322: 2032: 1959: 1493: 2749:

article already exists and I have even added anti-India sentiments in Bangladesh after recent World cup cricket match controversy. --

2367: 2267:, and what you are talking about half content will be transliterated? Its just matter of one word in local language. Nothing else. -- 1625: 1417:. It adds a bunch of handy functions, such as nominating a page for deletion. At the top-right of any page, goto Preferences -: --> 988: 2927: 1427: 1199: 4342: 4241: 2894:

And in my earlier version I used words like "terrorist" and "anti national persons" without sources just because I linked pages of

2496: 2013: 984: 1074: 3474: 2653:. Since you started adding it, it has been removed by multiple editors indicating that there is no consensus to include it. That 1685: 392: 237: 2805: 2500: 1719: 1093: 1070: 1038: 1034: 1007: 942: 910: 906: 370: 333: 3903: 105: 4055: 3298: 3151: 2818: 2559: 2363: 2360:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1621: 1618:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1537: 1148: 900: 763: 729: 681: 262: 4366: 1398: 4596: 2777: 2730: 2442: 1462: 400: 3792:

avoid possible fights, but even after self reverting he came to my talk page to harass me, and to stop me from editing. --

3408: 2338: 2295: 2249: 2207: 2131: 1194: 817: 4253: 3614: 3269: 2916: 2874: 2842: 2814: 1928: 1554: 1271: 287: 4294: 2613: 4515: 2657:

person has said "we can include a brief summary" does not equate to a "consensus" for including extravagant detail. --

2003: 1869: 1861: 888: 632: 379: 4107: 3350: 3197: 3122: 4237: 4080: 3323: 3176: 3077: 2696: 2584: 1403: 1331: 1173: 992: 788: 720:

I am giving you this notice early because you seemed reluctant to engage in the discussion on the article talk page.

706: 404: 2636: 2418: 2329:

Kanchipuram, in case of this city, i had added the local name and u removed it by giving an exactly opposite reason

93: 3866: 3524: 3465: 3230: 2993: 2947: 2530: 1888: 1676: 1377: 1371: 1311: 224: 2905:

Anyway, Thanks for your help, I will improve the article. And I do accept that I'm relatively new at wikipedia. --

4592: 3875: 2508: 1777: 1485: 861: 584: 388: 366: 205: 4271: 4047: 3632: 3290: 3143: 2793: 2599:

You are at 3 reverts - any more reverts in the 24 hour period will result in sending it to the 3RR noticeboard.

2551: 1277: 1140: 1114: 1024: 755: 673: 443: 383: 3694: 4147:, that section already has consensus of everyone, except people from your group. Widely discussed already. -- 3880: 2348:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1610:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

548: 493: 79: 71: 66: 4136: 1800: 4279: 4063: 3640: 3306: 3159: 2567: 2512: 1285: 1156: 1054: 926: 771: 689: 561: 520: 497: 300: 4058:

for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant

3653:

Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Human3015 reported by User:Mar4d (Result: Blocked)

3301:

for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant

3154:

for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant

2562:

for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant

1151:

for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant

766:

for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant

684:

for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant

4249: 4067: 3610: 3439: 3414:

Hi Humanist, since you are new and are still figuring out how things work here, please take this advice.

3310: 3163: 3015:

Well thanks, I already said there I'm relatively new. I just wanted to express my views. Thanks again. --

2647: 2571: 1799:. It details how to do a full reference. I recommend doing references the easy way because it's easy. :) 1659:. It describes that why I view this article to have been affected by long term sock puppetry. Thank you. 1650: 1255: 1160: 775: 693: 624: 480: 255: 3545:

preferably not on Monday-Wednesday US time when I'm at work, drop me a note and I'll see what I can do.

3404: 2213:

the contrary i have extracted the native names from the 'read in another language' such as in case of '

1098: 1012: 580: 471: 417: 413: 310: 38: 4186:

Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Human3015 reported by User:Lukeno94 (Result: )

4176:

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at

3845:

with me, he should have asked other admin to block. Further details of similar incidents can be found

3365:

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at

1319: 1219:

Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:TCKTKtool reported by User:Padenton (Result: )

1209:

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at

4338: 4330: 4283: 4224: 4075: 3644: 3593: 3318: 3171: 3081: 3073: 2700: 2658: 2579: 2458: 2235: 1729:

professional. Your edit summaries don't have to be long paragraphs though, just a few words. Cheers,

1336: 1289: 1238: 1168: 987:. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see 972: 783: 701: 439: 4300: 3816:

Ok, thanks for explaining. My recommendation of 0RR still stands. That is the easiest way! Cheers,

3058: 1562: 1354:

and Knowledge pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to

1061: 933: 650: 606: 602: 422: 150: 4347: 4309:. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at 3213:

know that you are not going to revert anymore, it is important to have you unblocked on en.wiki.

1656: 515: 434: 375: 87: 1097:

speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

1011:

speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

4245: 4233: 4181: 4059: 4043: 3870: 3862: 3606: 3602: 3528: 3520: 3469: 3461: 3370: 3302: 3286: 3234: 3226: 3155: 3139: 3046: 3042: 2997: 2989: 2951: 2943: 2716: 2563: 2547: 2423: 1994: 1951: 1846: 1808: 1761:. But when i see others give ref they write properly about date of issue etc. How to do that?? 1734: 1680: 1672: 1528: 1251: 1247: 1214: 1152: 1136: 896: 767: 751: 685: 669: 506: 475: 292: 245: 229: 199: 3938:. It is not productive behaviour. I'm afraid I formally need to think about intervention now. 4600: 3881: 3550: 3400: 2899: 2746: 2163: 2116: 1725: 1123: 734: 619: 570: 566: 557: 553: 233: 215: 101: 240:

for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the

4334: 4326: 4210: 4030: 3660: 3112:

also as the article in question has been the target of a fair few disruptive edits. Thanks.

3066: 3031: 2782: 2607: 1946:

that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

1884: 1876: 1765: 1480:

that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

1355: 950: 869: 868:

into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Knowledge's content, here or elsewhere,

615: 447: 409: 219: 8: 4584: 4436: 4399: 4362: 4275: 4051: 3995: 3821: 3758: 3636: 3578: 3566: 3429: 3294: 3282: 3147: 3062: 2773: 2726: 2632: 2555: 2504: 2438: 2414: 2334: 2291: 2203: 2171: 2127: 2075: 2028: 2022:

Also when you cite the same item multiple times, you can write <ref name=KEYWORD/: -->

1773: 1578: 1558: 1351: 1281: 1190: 1144: 996: 865: 845: 828: 813: 759: 725: 677: 502: 488: 430: 339: 47: 17: 2695:

It is getting harder and harder to assume good faith about your editing when even after

4535: 4505: 4291: 3935: 3842: 2973: 2481: 1224: 1110: 1020: 484: 343: 296: 157: 132: 2023:, so that you don't generate multiple copies of it in the References section. Cheers, 1369:

With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (

236:

to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click

3105: 2383: 2374:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

1990: 1939: 1842: 1820: 1804: 1754: 1730: 1641: 1632:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

1524: 1473: 1423: 1414: 1394: 1327: 892: 873: 576: 543: 251: 241: 169: 4259: 4100: 3620: 3546: 3343: 3193: 3118: 2649:. The "consensus" on the topic of "sectors" since the article has begun is to have 2406: 2191: 2046: 2009: 1261: 832: 665: 651: 184: 97: 4315:

Please add your evidence by May 15, 2015, which is when the evidence phase closes.

4130: 4092:—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 3947: 3897: 3850: 3688: 3676: 3656: 3508: 3482: 3449: 3382: 3335:—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 3253: 3214: 3188:—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 3135: 3072:

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose

3050: 3010: 2977: 2931: 2895: 2856: 2849: 2801: 2618: 2601: 2524: 2392: 1904: 1880: 1695: 1660: 1309: 1185:—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 946: 880: 628: 94:

http://castlesandforts.blogspot.in/2011/12/what-is-difference-between-castle.html

4054: