276:"artistic", but there wasn't a lot to work with. I suspect the view of Baring from Barclay Lake would be quite stunning in the early morning or perhaps near sunset. Anyway, you wrote about the "Flickr upload bot" is broken right and how it uploads with correct provenance. Is the Flickr upload bot the Commons upload tool you get when choosing "image from Flickr"? (I haven't used it before, being a little shy about asking people, esp if their photo is copyrighted and I'd have to ask them to change that...) Anyway, all good I hope. I even used the Commons geocode "location" template for the first time. Fun fun..
678:. I just noticed the change yesterday when I came up with several empty external links sections in articles I looked at. It seems we're in agreement that having the links at the bottom is a good thing. I'm not an expert on coordinates like those who are proposing the changes, but I agree with you that having the minimalist links is a service to our readers. Is there someplace we can take this to a larger venue? I dread having to clean up all this sections if this change sticks, and it seems only a few people are aware that this is happening. I'd hate to see this great tool go away.
31:
853:. Afterwards I created my experimental page, a new proposal was set forth to do a featured list that is strikingly similar to my own which is to do a user page experimental featured list, but no format has been confirmed and mechanism set in place. I continue to be willing to do the experiment myself and with this posting it commences. Please submit any list that you would like to have considered for list of the day in the month of January 2008 by the end of this month to
976:
1144:
719:
689:
bring it up are good. I mentioned it at WikiProject Oregon because I know a lot of us use
Geolinks. You might mention it at the mountains project too, though I know you have mountain templates with coords in them also. The casual reader may not know that s/he can click on the coordinates and find maps. I don't see why having a few in external links is such a bad thing. And it saves a click.
562:
108:
an article to become GA or FA class, why not do it early on in an article's life cycle to save a lot of work later in the article's life? I can tell you that a lack on inline citations will generally keep me from updating an article because of all the extra work it would entail to upgrade its class.
568:
Hello, this message is sent to you because you've shown some interest in the Geobox templates in past. There is now a new version (aka Geobox 2) which supersedes all older
Geoboxes (aka Geobox 1). The major difference is there are no feature specific templates (Settlement, River, Mountain range etc.)
206:
I have added the information to the image page and removed the deletion tag. If you find any images without source, please could you do the same to avoid them being tagged for deletion. I could not find the original image on
Commons, so I have tagged it as a move candidate. If you know where it is
830:
The Sierra didn't become a mountain range until about 4-5 million years ago. Components such as the batholith at its core, and various associated volcanic mountains pre-dated the Sierra, but the range itself is very young. I thought the language referring to Sierra origins in the
Jurassic was very
688:
Yeah, I was going through removing "a few" empty section headers today and realized that there are probably hundreds for Oregon alone. I have a feeling they won't budge on this, and I was ready to just grudgingly accept it (and unfortunately not use the tl anymore). But your suggestions of where to
572:
The switch to
Geoboxes 2.0 is highly recommended as the new template has a much more effective code, which renders faster than the old one (with much smaller pre-expand size, it can be one third to one fourth of the pre-expand size of Geoboxes 1). To convert aa page from Geobox 1 to Geobox 2, there
107:
I've been trying to follow the procedure followed within many of our meteorology and tropical cyclone articles. After re-reading the Manual of style, it appears several variations are possible, but that it needs to remain consistent within that article. If a certain type of citation is needed for
1031:
Sorry if I changed elevations derived from NGS data. I did not intend to do that. If you can remember which articles are involved I do the leg work and get them changed back. I only became momentarily disenchanted with their data just before I wrote the comment on project told page I went back and
435:
ya, definitely not a spam link. it is a community website... similar to Yelp, where people can rate and review businesses in the area. there does happen to be forums, but that is not the main purpose of the website.. the ratings and reviews are. there is also a real estate section. i made the site
363:
and since the Middle and South forks kinda go around Twin
Sisters (and I had time to kill) I figured I'd make the page. But as I did I realized it's one of those cases where the "mountain" has multiple summits, but is not really a whole "range". I figured North Twin and South Twin probably don't
275:
page (oop, just realized I called it "Baring
Mountain" in the caption). I'll see if I have any other flickr photos that could be useful for mountains and whatnot. That Baring photo is all full of glare from the sun, which was in exactly the wrong place for a good photo. I tried to make the glare
569:
but just one master template which can handle all type of data. There are a couple of new features and many new fields making the template much more versatile so now it can be used for virtually any geography related feature without the need to create a specific template.
227:
Yes, it's all OK now. When I tagged the image yesterday, there was no source specified at all. I found the source and added it to the image a few minutes ago - that was the piped link you just unpiped! Either way, it's fine! -
635:. Could you add some citations or anything that proves the encyclopedic value of this list? The can of worms is that there may be dozens more of these lists. Could you enlighten me as to the relevance herein? Thanks. –
493:
Based upon your username, I assume you live near HWY 395. In case you live in the vicinity of HWY 2, let me invite you to join a party of
Wikipedians that's forming to climb a little 3rd-class peak some time this fall.
1117:
Yeah probably right. While researching after giving you this message I read that the sugar which trees create must be burnt up for energy... and that is essentially an aerobic process that requires oxygen. Cheers!
135:
270:
I was going to offer to do it myself, but as I wrote the above comment there was a minor baby-crisis so I cut it short. But reading your reply just now, I have some time, so I uploaded the photo and added to the
381:
and Twin
Sisters -- I was just going off info from the book "Geology of the Pacific Northwest". But I imagine the USGS is a better source. Personally I'm almost completely ignorant of geologic stuff like this.
260:
Yes, feel free to upload any flickr pic I have. Sometimes I browse through them looking for ones of possible use on wikipedia, but I have trouble keeping track of all the photos! So yea, go for it!
512:
136:
408:
I have no problem with it, but you may have jumped the gun. I just hadn't seen too many others say anything about it. The WF Project members are occasionally pretty slow to respond to anything.
990:. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "
957:? I just go random articles and just make stylistic suggestions if I know nothing about the subject. It would take me much longer than you lol hope you don't think this is too cheeky.
146:
997:
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at
675:
436:
because the current "business association" website (which for some reason is not being counted as spam), is terrible and unmodern. this town is hip and they need a hip website.
845:
There have been a series of proposals to initiate a
Featured List of the Day on the main page. Numerous proposals have been put forth. After the third one failed, I audited all
732:
1063:
and the vandalism issues. I wholeheartedly agree, and have placed the article under indefinite semi-protection. Thanks for the report, and, as always, happy editing! :)
530:
164:
158:
246:
Thanks! I was really surprised when I searched for the article and a similar picture wasn't already there! I always heard it was the most photographed mountain. Hmph. --
1135:
359:
I'm not sure, ..maybe. They seem to be the highest peaks west of Baker, except Black Buttes and Seward Peak, which appear to be subpeaks of Baker. I had just expanded
422:
Can you not remove the link to Belmont Shore Now from the Belmont Shore page? It is not spam, but it is a resource for users! Just like the business association! ---
1127:
1214:
601:
609:
1158:, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Knowledge's
175:
156:
518:
123:
759:. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
232:
1189:
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
399:
Has there been an official decision about the waterfall infobox vs. template? I noticed you'd already changed a couple of North Carolina waterfalls.
983:
912:. If you have any particular date preferences please contact me by January 24th. Note that since it finished in the top six will appear twice as a
820:
185:
998:
880:
775:
to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add
473:
443:
423:
364:
warrant their own pages, so might as well put them both on one page. Not sure how well worded the page is-- time to kill rapidly running out.
168:
130:
663:
331:
646:
117:
1092:
and it got me wondering. How can it be that high levels of CO2 can kill trees? I thought trees would benefit from high levels of CO2. The
840:
1021:
835:
693:
112:
799:
970:
652:
No way, I don't touch agreed-upon conventions. I was just hoping this wasn't a bad precedent that could be avoided. Happy editing. –
626:
1109:
805:
386:
368:
280:
585:
Although some field names have been changed in order to be unified, the old names are accepted too. For any settlement Geobox use
305:
Hike, since you have a good relationship with Hmains, can you help settle a disagreement we are having? Please see the bottom of
789:
1194:
825:
764:
196:
250:
544:. I couldn't figure out how to do it. I'm adding it to British peaks at the moment (which are the only ones I'm sure about.)
831:
unclear on this distinction. No Sierras in the Jurassic, but certainly a batholith was forming. (see discussion w/article)
412:
403:
348:
1036:
some more. I would be interested in your opinion. I really don't like the appearance of the coordinates in the infobox. --
221:
1183:
713:
102:
122:
Hi Hike395, I would value your input in a discussion about merging some articles into Mount Rainier National Park. See:
926:
867:
507:
417:
199:
was tagged for deletion because there was no source information. Sure, there's a copyright tag saying it's UGSG, but
1045:
943:
890:
Hi. I just wondered if you'd consider letting me nominate you for adminship, as you seem experienced enough. Thanks.
632:
498:
541:
1159:
965:
930:
905:
871:
813:
806:
756:
740:
317:
264:
1198:
1163:
1123:
1105:
849:'s in order to begin an experiment in my own user space that will hopefully get it going. Today, it commences at
768:
744:
708:
704:
How do we get the geo project folks to move on this? Is an RFC the next step? It's not quite an "incident" yet.
682:
621:
551:
1155:
1137:
1079:
894:
295:
481:
451:
337:
238:
1069:
94:
86:
1151:
736:
323:
FYI, I support the compromise offer you initiated as it represents the easiest solution to the problem. —
81:
69:
64:
59:
1119:
1101:
987:
612:, please add your comments and of course any other ideas you might come with as well as bug reports. –
38:
795:
Oops, I shouldn't have put the temp page in the Main space, moved to talk, requested speedy deletion.
1210:
1167:
748:
394:
1033:
817:
1182:
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
755:
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
604:
which reorders the field names in the Geobox 2 style and also renames the few changed field names.
1012:
template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you.
631:
Hi Hike395. I don't want to open a can of worms here, but I don't see the notability in having a
1026:
922:
863:
540:
Just like to say thanks for filling in the document at Infobox Mountain with the definition of
699:
1084:
954:
504:
338:
1008:
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the
1206:
469:
439:
428:
306:
255:
8:
1202:
1175:
772:
739:
process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Knowledge's
658:
641:
328:
314:
229:
218:
779:
526:
488:
191:
182:
172:
934:
917:
858:
477:
461:
447:
47:
17:
1093:
1074:
669:
617:
556:
535:
501:
344:
Wow, fast on the draw adding that photo, less than one minute after page creation!
1041:
1017:
958:
953:
This is an old one for you lol, but please could you add sections to the article
948:
899:
300:
167:
has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
143:
109:
1100:
article prove beyond doubt that high levels of CO2 kill plantlife... but why? --
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
1190:
1056:
1050:
938:
913:
909:
875:
854:
850:
760:
653:
636:
360:
355:(Are the Twin Sisters the two bumps to the left of Baker as seen from Seattle?)
324:
310:
286:
1009:
1002:
991:
885:
832:
727:
522:
409:
400:
378:
239:
200:
127:
676:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject Geographical coordinates#Currently used templates
597:
will work as well but it's not the recommended way (from technical reasons).
151:
891:
846:
796:
272:
247:
211:
1064:
705:
690:
679:
613:
548:
292:
137:
Knowledge:Featured article candidates/Geology of the Lassen volcanic area
975:
1143:
1037:
1013:
718:
495:
1097:
786:
383:
365:
345:
277:
261:
124:
Talk:Mount Rainier National Park#Merge Longmire, Paradise and Sunrise
857:
and its subpages. You may submit multiple lists for consideration.--
462:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Belmont_Heights%2C_Long_Beach%2C_California
201:
all images on Knowledge need to explicitly say where they came from
513:
Higher res version of your Carbon Glacier pic uploaded to Commons
1060:
986:, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for
589:
and set the settlement type (city, borough, town, village) in
1193:, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
1090:
763:, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
142:
I was wondering if you could take a look and comment. :) --
1170:). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
751:). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the
217:
tag the wikipedia copy, or let me know and I'll do it. -
1162:, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
561:
169:
the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page
431:
comment was added at 21:36:59, August 19, 2007 (UTC).
743:, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "
466:same thing. you should just let them all be lol.
735:, suggesting that it be deleted according to the
291:I thank you very much. I appreciate this award.
999:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Hirofumi Nohara
608:There are several unresolved issues at the
1154:template has been added to the article
731:template has been added to the article
197:Image:Schematic long valley caldera.gif
181:Thanks for supporting speedy deletion.
14:
418:External link on Belmont Shore article
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
118:Merge Longmire, Paradise and Sunrise
25:
908:has been selected to be a February
841:Featured List of the Day Experiment
23:
1142:
974:
717:
560:
207:on commons, please can you either
24:
1225:
971:AfD nomination of Hirofumi Nohara
633:List of peaks named Bear Mountain
627:List of peaks named Bear Mountain
577:By changing the template header:
906:List of U.S. states by elevation
814:Talk:Mount Pinatubo/new material
807:Talk:Mount Pinatubo/new material
29:
1156:White Mountains (Middle-earth)
1138:White Mountains (Middle-earth)
826:Modern Sierra Origins, clarity
816:by mistake, I've restored it.
664:02:31, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
647:20:31, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
622:09:18, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
552:09:41, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
484:) 05:37, August 28, 2007 (UTC)
13:
1:
1201:, where it may be deleted if
1022:17:00, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
881:17:37, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
836:23:48, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
771:, where it may be deleted if
531:05:45, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
966:23:31, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
944:16:19, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
895:10:02, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
821:02:26, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
800:01:24, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
790:20:29, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
709:16:36, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
694:03:17, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
683:17:12, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
674:Hi, I see you weighed in at
7:
1168:Knowledge's deletion policy
1005:with four tildes (~~~~).
749:Knowledge's deletion policy
733:Mount Pinatubo/new material
714:Mount Pinatubo/new material
508:09:44, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
103:Citations within an article
10:
1230:
1110:09:15, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
521:that I don't mind at all,
413:09:51, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
404:01:07, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
165:Template:Coor dms mountain
159:Template:Coor dms mountain
1215:18:41, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
1191:proposed deletion process
1080:05:23, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
1046:01:33, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
785:to the top of the page.
761:proposed deletion process
387:06:47, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
369:23:22, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
349:22:55, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
332:22:38, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
318:12:04, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
296:03:07, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
281:19:01, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
265:07:32, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
251:05:21, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
233:07:22, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
222:07:01, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
186:19:48, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
176:22:30, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
147:14:07, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
1195:speedy deletion criteria
1089:I just saw your picture
1034:Mount Jefferson (Oregon)
982:An editor has nominated
765:speedy deletion criteria
458:check out the links on:
131:20:05, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
113:03:24, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
1128:08:13, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
1205:to delete is reached.
1160:criteria for inclusion
1147:
1055:I saw your request at
1001:and please be sure to
979:
741:criteria for inclusion
722:
565:
1199:Articles for Deletion
1197:or it can be sent to
1164:What Knowledge is not
1146:
1136:Proposed deletion of
1120:One Salient Oversight
1102:One Salient Oversight
1010:articles for deletion
992:What Knowledge is not
978:
955:Ecology of California
769:Articles for Deletion
767:or it can be sent to
745:What Knowledge is not
721:
564:
442:comment was added by
377:wrt geology stuff on
339:Twin Sisters Mountain
42:of past discussions.
904:Congratulations!!!
593:field. Calling e.g.
307:Talk:Natural history
916:during the month.--
818:Resurgent insurgent
602:semi-automated tool
587:{{Geobox|Settlement
583:{{Geobox|Settlement
579:{{Geobox Settlement
1148:
1003:sign your comments
980:
723:
566:
429:signed but undated
157:TfD nomination of
1152:proposed deletion
942:
879:
737:proposed deletion
728:proposed deletion
661:
644:
485:
472:comment added by
455:
432:
395:Waterfall Infobox
152:Coor dms mountain
100:
99:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
18:User talk:Hike395
1221:
1181:
1180:
1174:
1094:Mammoth Mountain
1077:
1072:
1067:
962:
920:
861:
812:Sorry I deleted
784:
778:
754:
657:
640:
610:Geobox talk page
467:
437:
427:—The preceding
426:
216:
210:
78:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
1229:
1228:
1224:
1223:
1222:
1220:
1219:
1218:
1207:Judgesurreal777
1178:
1172:
1171:
1141:
1087:
1075:
1070:
1065:
1053:
1029:
984:Hirofumi Nohara
973:
960:
951:
902:
888:
843:
828:
810:
782:
776:
752:
716:
702:
672:
629:
584:
580:
559:
538:
517:I just said on
515:
491:
438:—The preceding
420:
397:
342:
303:
289:
258:
244:
230:Papa November 1
219:Papa November 1
214:
208:
194:
171:. Thank you. —
162:
154:
140:
120:
105:
74:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1227:
1140:
1134:
1133:
1132:
1131:
1130:
1086:
1083:
1052:
1049:
1028:
1027:NGS elevations
1025:
972:
969:
950:
947:
901:
898:
887:
884:
842:
839:
827:
824:
809:
804:
803:
802:
753:{{dated prod}}
715:
712:
701:
698:
697:
696:
671:
668:
667:
666:
628:
625:
606:
605:
598:
582:
578:
573:are two ways:
558:
555:
537:
534:
514:
511:
490:
487:
419:
416:
396:
393:
392:
391:
390:
389:
372:
371:
361:Nooksack River
357:
341:
336:
335:
334:
309:. Thank you. —
302:
299:
288:
285:
284:
283:
257:
254:
243:
237:
236:
235:
193:
190:
189:
188:
161:
155:
153:
150:
139:
134:
119:
116:
104:
101:
98:
97:
92:
89:
84:
79:
72:
67:
62:
52:
51:
34:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1226:
1217:
1216:
1212:
1208:
1204:
1200:
1196:
1192:
1187:
1185:
1184:its talk page
1177:
1169:
1165:
1161:
1157:
1153:
1145:
1139:
1129:
1125:
1121:
1116:
1115:
1114:
1113:
1112:
1111:
1107:
1103:
1099:
1095:
1091:
1085:Dumb Question
1082:
1081:
1078:
1073:
1068:
1062:
1058:
1048:
1047:
1043:
1039:
1035:
1024:
1023:
1019:
1015:
1011:
1006:
1004:
1000:
995:
993:
989:
985:
977:
968:
967:
964:
963:
956:
946:
945:
940:
936:
932:
928:
924:
919:
915:
911:
907:
897:
896:
893:
883:
882:
877:
873:
869:
865:
860:
856:
852:
848:
838:
837:
834:
823:
822:
819:
815:
808:
801:
798:
794:
793:
792:
791:
788:
781:
774:
770:
766:
762:
758:
757:its talk page
750:
746:
742:
738:
734:
730:
729:
720:
711:
710:
707:
695:
692:
687:
686:
685:
684:
681:
677:
665:
660:
655:
651:
650:
649:
648:
643:
638:
634:
624:
623:
619:
615:
611:
603:
599:
596:
595:{{Geobox|City
592:
588:
576:
575:
574:
570:
563:
554:
553:
550:
545:
543:
533:
532:
528:
524:
520:
510:
509:
506:
503:
500:
497:
486:
483:
479:
475:
471:
464:
463:
459:
456:
453:
449:
445:
441:
433:
430:
425:
415:
414:
411:
406:
405:
402:
388:
385:
380:
379:Mount Shuksan
376:
375:
374:
373:
370:
367:
362:
358:
356:
353:
352:
351:
350:
347:
340:
333:
330:
326:
322:
321:
320:
319:
316:
312:
308:
298:
297:
294:
282:
279:
274:
269:
268:
267:
266:
263:
253:
252:
249:
241:
240:Mount Shuksan
234:
231:
226:
225:
224:
223:
220:
213:
204:
202:
198:
187:
184:
180:
179:
178:
177:
174:
170:
166:
160:
149:
148:
145:
138:
133:
132:
129:
125:
115:
114:
111:
96:
93:
90:
88:
85:
83:
80:
77:
73:
71:
68:
66:
63:
61:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
1188:
1149:
1088:
1054:
1030:
1007:
996:
981:
959:
952:
918:TonyTheTiger
903:
889:
859:TonyTheTiger
844:
829:
811:
726:
724:
703:
673:
630:
607:
594:
590:
586:
571:
567:
546:
539:
519:my talk page
516:
492:
465:
460:
457:
434:
421:
407:
398:
354:
343:
304:
290:
273:Mount Baring
259:
256:Mount Baring
245:
205:
195:
183:Andy Mabbett
173:Andy Mabbett
163:
141:
121:
106:
75:
43:
37:
542:parent peak
502:Will Beback
468:—Preceding
36:This is an
1176:dated prod
1059:regarding
1032:worked on
961:Merkinsmum
935:WP:CHICAGO
489:Wikiclimb?
192:Speedy tag
110:Thegreatdr
95:Archive 15
87:Archive 10
1203:consensus
1098:Lake Nyos
780:db-author
773:consensus
700:Now what?
654:Freechild
637:Freechild
547:Cheers -
325:Viriditas
311:Viriditas
126:. Thanks
82:Archive 9
76:Archive 8
70:Archive 7
65:Archive 6
60:Archive 5
988:deletion
833:Tmangray
670:Geolinks
591:category
557:Geobox 2
523:PatLeahy
482:contribs
470:unsigned
452:contribs
440:unsigned
410:5minutes
401:5minutes
128:Patleahy
949:deja vu
939:WP:LOTD
914:WP:LOTD
910:WP:LOTD
900:WP:LOTD
892:Epbr123
876:WP:LOTD
855:WP:LOTD
851:WP:LOTD
797:hike395
659:¡!¡!¡!¡
642:¡!¡!¡!¡
581:becomes
474:Thopunk
444:Thopunk
424:Thopunk
301:Dispute
248:Siradia
242:picture
39:archive
1166:" and
1061:Tundra
1051:Tundra
994:").
747:" and
706:Katr67
691:Katr67
680:Katr67
614:Caroig
549:Mark J
536:Thanks
293:Hmains
287:thanks
1038:DRoll
1014:BJBot
886:Admin
847:WP:FL
600:By a
16:<
1211:talk
1124:talk
1106:talk
1096:and
1066:Jmlk
1057:RFPP
1042:talk
1018:talk
787:Whpq
618:talk
527:talk
499:·:·
496:RSVP
478:talk
448:talk
384:Pfly
366:Pfly
346:Pfly
329:Talk
315:Talk
278:Pfly
262:Pfly
931:bio
872:bio
505:·:·
212:ncd
144:mav
1213:)
1186:.
1179:}}
1173:{{
1150:A
1126:)
1118:--
1108:)
1044:)
1020:)
941:)
878:)
783:}}
777:{{
725:A
662:)
645:)
620:)
529:)
480:•
454:).
450:•
327:|
313:|
215:}}
209:{{
203:.
91:→
1209:(
1122:(
1104:(
1076:7
1071:1
1040:(
1016:(
937:/
933:/
929:/
927:c
925:/
923:t
921:(
874:/
870:/
868:c
866:/
864:t
862:(
656:(
639:(
616:(
525:(
476:(
446:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
