User talk:Dawnseeker2000

6958:

username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy. If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must follow all these steps: Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and Provide a new username. To do this, insert the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can search to see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is still available. Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. ".

5447:. And if you are saying that Google (specifically) shouldn't be named but should be the assumed default of all booklinks, then in addition to a vast backlog of correction needed, across the whole encyclopedia, you are also working in the opposite direction to the Internet Archive Bot, which (very annoyingly) went about (and may still be going about) substituting IA booklinks for Google booklinks, often inaccurately or incompletely, and generally mucking things up. When I write a freetext (analogue) reference with a pagelink, I always check that it "works", that the page-views accessed are clear and readable, and that the information hierarchy in the ref itself is in proper conformity and as complete as I can make it: and so, because I know it works properly, I try to make sure it stays that way! It's that golden rule of "always verify your references". But I don't want to be on a collision course with anybody. 7361:. Just as a reminder, aside from that small portion of changes from DMY to MDY, my goal isn't to go around and "fix" or change from one style to another. I'm actually just solely working on DMY articles by ensuring that the ones that are tagged really truly are. So yeah, I changed the way I am doing things based on that conversation.Actually, I recall in the last month or so editing a couple of articles that weren't tagged as DMY or MDY, but I did let the scripts at least unify the article to DMY because I noticed that both styles were in use. I wonder if you stumbled across one of those. 3264: 3257: 2398: 708: 685: 2651: 6498: 6326: 5575: 5241: 3682: 2865: 1959: 1839: 6063: 4045: 3135: 5685: 4314: 3193: 2517: 77: 4105: 5810: 3848: 1327: 544: 6808: 4181: 754: 1270: 1160: 1126: 476: 1351: 584: 731: 6257: 6188: 6121: 5745: 3071: 1094: 1070: 4098: 1555: 3935: 450: 5992: 5168: 4971: 4900: 4825: 4754: 2308: 177: 1781: 5113:

even was a print version – newspaper websites publish articles that didn't appear in print, or in a version different from the print version, or in an updated or corrected version, (ideally with date of update/correction supplied). News websites, such as Sky News or BBC News, have no print version: the BBC in particular are notorious for changing their content over time

5342:

Online)", etc., after references which link to one of those pages, so that the reader knows what they are being invited to click on, and "(Google)" is just in the same category. Unless there is a very good reason, therefore, please don't delete them, as they will otherwise all need putting back in manually. Probably this is a flaw in a robot script? Thanks,

6080:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 4062:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 3152:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 3286:. If you're interested check out the link to the drive and the project page. Right now everything is in the planning stages, trying to find people interested, articles to focus on, etc. So if you know anyone who would like to help out feel free to invite them! If you no longer interested in this project that's a-ok just remove yourself from 6040: 6985:: Done, but you're still probably not going to be able to edit from this IP address. It's hard blocked as a proxy. If you're running any p2p proxy software, VPNs, or privacy enhancing software, you should disable them. If you're not doing any of that, and you've scanned your PC for malware, you may wish to request 7207:

several hundred thousand edits in this specific area (ref formatting and italics, publisher vs work, etc.) I am not yet ready to challenge these inconsistencies in the MoS.One of the reasons why I'm not immediately considering making a challenge is because even the two competing ref formatting tools (Ohconfucius's

5047:, and goes on to clarify that access-date "is not required for links to copies of published research papers accessed via DOI or a published book, but should be used for links to news articles on commercial websites (these can change from time to time, even if they are also published in a physical medium)." cheers, 2189:, which has many of the functions in common with AWB (or maybe AWB writers have updated their codes to do some of the things my scripts do?). The script is more reliable than my AWB code because it employs a more elaborate system of protections that limits false positives that I could not prevent when using AWB. 7186:, as one example, and changed its citation many times, despite this being incorrect. I've fixed some, but I'm guessing there are many more errors out there. Please first check the parent articles for these music-related sites to see how they should be formatted. I understand your reasoning for changing 6679:

I've been working on ensuring that date formatting is consistent in our articles by using the tools that are available. I'm working on articles from August 2013 right now and that's why you saw my change. It's kind of a niche thing to do, but you're welcome to use any of the tools that are available.

5341:

Hi, thanks for your recent edits to this page. The only thing I don't understand is why you have deleted the bracketed word "(Google)" from the end of all the references which make links to pages in googlebooks. It's quite normal to put "(Hathi Trust)" or "(Internet Archive)", or (Early English Books

2212:

Well it seems that something is happening, so that's good, but it didn't tag the article with any date format template. There's a lot of moving parts with these sets of scripts (whether it's the browser or AWB version), but the AWB modules are truly like the old west because they haven't been updated

4499:

Yeah, of course. I ran some lines of code in AWB for that change that checks for consistency of date formats (DMY in this case, but there's also MDY for US topics) and those templates are used as an indicator of the last time a consistency check was performed. The intent and purpose of the templates

3794:

Hi Dawnseeker, I hope you will be interested in editing film related wiki pages. I want you to take part in an AFD discussion of the Karthi's new movie Japan. I think AFD is being created by some foreigners who don't know much about Indian Films. Being an Indian I feel that you will understand more

2247:

I'm a bit confused on your date formatting changes. I was under the impression that when we institute a dmy or mdy format on an article, and we date that format, that the date should remain so we all know when it was instituted. The date should never change unless the format itself changes. That way

1719:

should have capital letters, please look at the Knowledge articles on them and related articles to satisfy yourself that this is the correct form. I reverted all the AWB changes you made because the only substantial changes were incorrect, and the others were trivial. Once you have checked this out

5112:

clarifies that access-dates should be used for links to news articles on commercial websites, because they can change. There's no practical difference between such pages and non-news articles on any other non-static website. Whether the online article mirrors the print version or not, whether there

4512:

is that when a page is checked for consistency, the date in the template is changed to the current month and year, and since there are typically thousands of articles in each month since early 2011 (1.57 million total articles), I've been going through them for date formatting and ref improvements,

3701:

justification for sample usage not well illustrated in the song article. sample unnecessary to help readers contextualize and understand the whole song. the sample's role similar to the article's: promoting (awareness of) and marketing the song just by song title and artist's name, both searchable.

6957:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Drug Reenactment". The reason given for Drug Reenactment's block is: " Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because it has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Knowledge. Also, your

3968:

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Knowledge articles are

7206:

Hi, thanks for your thoughts. There are competing philosophies regarding the use of italics for websites and the manual of style is no exception with regard to the lack of clarity. The MoS includes contradictory instructions regarding how italics are to be applied. An an experienced editor, with

7024:

standard yyyy-mm-dd as the most appropriate, but I couldn't find the correct tag; neither "Use ymd dates" nor "Use y-m-d dates" worked (they gave red no valid template notes), so I added "Use dmy dates" as the only European option I could find. Is there a tag for ISO 8601 dates, and if there is,

4261:

Hi, I just moved to a new physical residence and have found that my current connection method has me on a blocked IP. "The IP address or range ‪2600:100F:B100:0:0:0:0:0/40‬ has been blocked (disabled) by ‪Materialscientist‬ for the following reason(s): This block will expire on 18:06, 22 January

2279:

Strange but I see it does say the date of the template should change when an editor checks for inconsistent dates throughout the article. Are you checking for date errors when you update the dates? Because a date change will tell me that the article is correct and proper on the new date. Thanks.

7229:

Thanks for your reply. I'll grant you that working in academia has made me a complete cynic about the fetishization of citation styles. Regular editors at the WP album project have long lamented that WP renders AllMusic in italics with the proper website usage. I think, to use the above example

5371:

Thanks for replying. Whatever the shortcomings of "cite book" (which is not a compulsory reference format in wikipedia, and which often contains poorly-entered data), I believe the host-identifier in a properly-ordered free-text reference containing an external link remains very useful to the

7215:

cannot agree on the most basic of ideas.I'm glad that you mentioned looking at the parent article as a means to gauge whether italics should be applied; I do this very often. The problem is that {{italic title}} has been applied to hundreds of articles where it probably should not have.

5200: 5442:

in Internet Archive, or in Hathi Trust, or in various national library readers such as Persee or Munich Digitizierungzentrum, etc etc, and so one has to link to these other sites as well, depending on where the source is available and readable, and one still has to host-identify

2087:

Hi, yes of course. There's this editor called Ohconfucius and he's the caretaker of several groups of scripts that can be run. There's a set for use directly in the browser and there's some that can be used as modules in AWB. The modules for dates are set up specifically for

7377:

The ones I find confusing/conflicting are the Canadian ones, which I try to make sure they all have unified dates. I thought Canadian English used the MDY style (and assumed Canadian French was DMY), but apparently they can go either way. Anyway, have a good night!

5003: 2184:

Alternatively, the MOSNUM dates script that you have loaded into your commons.js file is more sophisticated, and won't go changing dates within title strings, for example. You will access both dmy and mdy alignments by the choice of a sidebar script button. I wrote

5100:

Purely from personal experience, I've spent a fair amount of my time on here adding archive-urls to dead links (manually, including checking the thing that bots can't – that the archive copy actually includes the content cited), and the presence of an access-date

5602:, and is entirely sourced by trivial government sources and 2 academic publications, so notability is difficult to determine. To me, this has 2 actual sources for notability, and an earthquake in 1999 (modern history), should have more sources to show notability. 2180:

depending on which target date format you want. I stopped using AWB, so it's no longer supported. I'm not sure how the code will work in the current version, but I know that there were some false positives, and using it was quite clumsy compared with running the

7338:

We have. I am trying to remember what it was, but you had said (I am paraphrasing) that there was no “use mdy dates” in an article that you saw fit to change it to DMY, except it was an article about something American & non-military, to which I pointed out

7251: 6444:

Hello, there's a couple different philosophies around Knowledge when dealing with website vs publisher. Ask someone else and you'll probably get a very different answer, but the reasons that I do things the way that I do are based on what I've learned from the

5709:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

4338:

3217:

6028: 4932: 3044:

Hi and thanks for bringing this up! I restored the text as it was prior to my change in 2020 and it's much better now, though maybe not exactly as intended. I'm thoroughly unfamiliar with those templates and usage of the parameters may have changed. Cheers!

1117: 4861: 2545: 127: 5212: 5015: 4944: 4873: 4798: 5713:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

4342:

3221:

2755: 4786: 3144: 6464:. Websites are not always shown with italics. One thing you can do to help make a decision is to check our own article on a subject to see whether it should be italicized or not. Check whether "italic title" has been applied to the article. 7190:

from website to publisher--also technically incorrect--although most regular music editors have stopped "caring" about the resulting italics in the citation, preferring to use the correct citation format instead. Thank you. Cheers.

2911: 2005: 3112:

and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.

2838:

What the hell is wrong with you? Rather than simply deleting the reference to the missing file, you actually think it more productive to add a new "category:Articles with missing files, totally useless. There is no missing file.

5420:

Yes, this is true. I'm very familiar. Communication by text has its shortcomings. I don't think you're arguing for or against, but I should add that I think that Google Books links are ubiquitous now and are no longer a novelty.

5069:

I agree with you; it's not right. Only stuff that cannot be changed, e.g. printed newspapers, magazines, books etc., doesn't need to have an access-date. Everything else that can be changed after publishing needs an access-date.

5357:

Hi, the reason I remove those when I see them is because it's information that doesn't help the reader find the information that's cited. If you look at cite book for example, there's no parameter for host or something similar.

5196: 557: 3129: 5531:

states in the edit note "please observe the inclusion criteria". I tried looking but could not definitively locate the criteria you seem to be referring to. Could you please let me know where I can find this information?

2872: 2858: 1966: 1952: 6072: 5276: 6742:

I don't work on English variety formatting. I only work on date formatting by using groups of scripts that help semi-automate the process. The date is changed whenever they are checked to be consistent as described at

5944:

Before getting the official version replaced, would you be so good as to give my version a final shakedown? If you see it doing anything badly wrong, please let me know. To use it, in your common.js on line 5, replace

3321: 3444:

Hi, I will be re-nominating three EQ articles which you had done so previously. I will resolve the issues raised in the previous nominations and probably add on my own before nominating. Thanks for working on them.

5195:" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. ( 4998:" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. ( 4928: 4927:" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. ( 4781:" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. ( 3729: 1947: 4999: 6295: 6264: 6250: 5248: 5234: 7274:

No worries. There are literally thousands of things to know about this website. The date is a way to track when date formats have been checked for compliance and uniformity. I run the semi-automated browser

6245: 4782: 6024: 6057: 27: 5120:

The cite-web template family documentation did for a time say that access-dates were "not required for links to published research papers, published books, or news articles with publication dates", but

4857: 5783: 5752: 5738: 3689: 3675: 2853: 5839:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 5733: 3877:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 571: 1381: 4744: 2427: 6429:

and that you'd replaced some instances of the website= parameter to publisher=. I know we seldom use both in the same reference, but I am unclear why publisher would be preferred over website?

5128:

I'm aware that there's quite a variety of opinion as to the usefulness of access-dates, which rather backs up my general belief that there are no guidelines/instructions/whatever that override

3958: 3003: 1342: 6372: 6226: 6195: 6181: 6159: 6128: 6114: 633: 5037:

Hello. I noticed your script was now removing access-dates from news articles on the grounds they were not required if the news article has a publication date, but I'm not sure that's right.

6544: 6176: 6109: 5229: 5141:

Please don't take this the wrong way. I admire the work you do with keeping formatting up to current standards. I just think that this is a step too far and in the wrong direction. cheers,

5372:

readers, as it enables them to click with confidence knowing that they are not crossing into an unsafe or unreliable webspace. This seems still to be a matter of subjective preference. I

274: 3109: 3078: 3064: 7268: 5705: 5032: 3059: 1107: 99: 5855: 3893: 3214: 2813: 6333: 6319: 4054: 3670: 1889: 2322: 1205: 6505: 6491: 5824: 3862: 3497: 3181: 2532: 7358: 1801:

to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

5376:

see that, over 1 million articles, 200 bytes per article (to name hosts for 15 refs p/art) could add up to a lot of page-space! Is that also the motivating factor? Good wishes,

2058: 1177: 2480:

I was aware of that issue, and have changed my code to avoid it in the future, but it was all my doing and had no relationship to Ohconfucius's script. Thanks for the message.

3820: 1796: 3812: 1113: 1303: 5673: 1846: 1832: 1775: 1386: 3961:, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the 3176: 3251: 6876: 4810: 4240: 4039: 3813: 2964: 1191: 296: 5084:

I think there's a fair amount to be said about this and I'm wondering if either of you have an account on Discord. We can use a voice channel there to talk this out.

463: 308: 6104: 7099: 7085: 6309: 5522: 5407: 4770: 4746: 4667: 3942:, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Knowledge has readers from all over the world, our policy is to 3038: 2494: 2474: 1606: 1337: 6314: 5329: 1827: 1085: 23: 7016:! The page had been improperly changed from UK English to American some time back between 2009 and 2018, and I was restoring the original English spellings per 6171: 1313: 6486: 5797: 5563: 553: 5056: 3782: 3605: 3603: 3309: 1822: 3520: 2213:

since the mid-2010s. I sent you a modified version of the one that I use for dmy. It's got the current date in it so the date will be updated as it should.

5728: 5158: 3609: 2354: 1261: 1247: 6240: 2721: 1594: 157: 7020:. Back then, it didn't have any date settings specification, references weren't generally dated that long ago. I had wanted to add a tag to specify the 5543: 3246: 3124: 2248:

we can tell editors "look, it's been this format for 7 years so please don't change it." If you start changing them to todays date that become useless.

1942: 5890: 4361: 3835: 3823: 3569: 3283: 2690:"Here's a seismogram of the 3.8ML quake in #Shropshire earlier, and a map which shows the historic seismicity in the area in relation to today's event" 2665:

Here's a seismogram of the 3.8ML quake in #Shropshire earlier, and a map which shows the historic seismicity in the area in relation to today's event.

1675: 1219: 292: 263: 6023:" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( 4856:" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( 3298: 5668: 2566: 1701: 1570: 42: 5224: 3628: 7138: 3503: 3477: 3287: 2289: 2274: 1582: 1450: 1434: 1418: 1402: 637: 6413: 5882: 3920: 2383: 6585: 4584: 4335: 4086: 3015: 2969: 2750: 2615: 2454: 2263:

We can simply go back in the article's history if a dispute occurs regarding the format. The date format templates are used for maintenance. See

1541: 1482: 6998: 266:. For now the newsletter only covers general project news and is run by only one editor. If you wish to help or to become a columnist, please 6764: 6613: 6453:

style. Some of the main points that I consider are described here an an overly-simplistic way (if you'd like further clarification, just ask):

5071: 4481: 3439: 2716: 2488: 1299: 2827: 1283: 6283:, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under 6276: 6272: 6214:, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under 6207: 6203: 6147:, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under 6140: 6136: 5771:, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under 5764: 5760: 4302: 3097:, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under 3090: 3086: 2633: 1767: 1753: 1666: 267: 7374:

I may have. The latest one was from April, which I saw today (Love on the Spectrum U.S.). 2020 sounds about right, as it seems a while back.

4568:... I probably should've checked it more thoroughly when you made it! Just letting you know in case that can help prevent it in the future. 2597: 5919: 4390: 3598: 2235: 2221: 2165: 2131: 2118: 7167: 7124:

I was having trouble using reFill (was introducing errors), and didn't know where to ask to get someone to run it. Still learning. Best,

6910: 6852: 5314: 4292: 4216: 3767: 2949: 2043: 1927: 1807: 4633: 4356: 2998: 2349: 7065: 6801: 6642: 6345:

Portion/Sample not an improvement to understanding the whole song. Also, words not hard to summarize in free text. In other words, not

4270: 2575: 2206: 1498: 567: 4174: 7357:

Oh, I recall now, and I found our conversation on your talk page from March 2020. I modified the way I do things around that time as

5694: 4325: 3491: 3204: 3026:

table of player names. I have tried to fix it but I'm not knowledgeable enough with the relevant template. Could you give it a look?

2768:

Hello, and thank you for all your cleanup work. You probably aren't aware that the English football/soccer competitions now known as

951: 935: 871: 855: 223: 5027: 1715:

as an entity and AWB users sometimes exchange capital letters for small in these articles. If you are not sure that Convention and

6480: 5625: 5429: 5415: 4689: 3943: 2104: 1477: 919: 231: 56: 6880: 6092: 5941:. It doesn't (yet) move the template if it is already there in the source, so it will only make a difference with new insertions. 4074: 3164: 1293: 6681: 5930: 5192: 4995: 4924: 4778: 1729: 1377: 1257: 1243: 1173: 903: 227: 115: 6052: 5557: 4956: 2797: 2419: 7306:

I’ve noticed you are still changing non-military American articles to the DMY date format instead of MDY, which is contrary to

6565: 6438: 6393: 6246: 6177: 6110: 5802: 5734: 5646: 5297: 3840: 3750: 3395: 3391: 3380: 3316:

parameter to display the article name with an ndash on the Knowledge page. Please fix you script not to alter templates with a

3060: 2975: 2932: 2026: 1910: 1201: 1187: 807: 601: 503: 377: 270:. If you have an idea which you believe would improve the newsletter, please share it; suggestions are welcome and encouraged. 219: 3543:

That dawned on me soon after I made that comment. The image file seems misnamed, but I'll not pursue that. I'll mention it at

619: 125:

You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive.

6608: 5976: 5133: 4738: 4564:

surprised me a bit ... I thought that page wouldn't have basic problems like that. It turns out that the hyphen was added in

4033: 995: 887: 839: 823: 7387: 7369: 7352: 7333: 5514: 5502: 4885: 4539: 4521: 3561: 3538: 3433: 3053: 2543:

You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives.

255: 7257: 6904: 6847: 5878: 5184: 5160: 4961: 4211: 4169: 3916: 3527: 2621: 2360: 2343: 2313: 1697: 1445: 1429: 1413: 1397: 1370: 164: 149: 7243: 7224: 5456: 5385: 5366: 5150: 5092: 4579: 4447: 3312:

you broke the link to a Wikisource article. DNB articles on Wikisource use a dash not an ndash in dab extensions. Use the

6754: 6737: 6692: 6280: 6211: 6144: 5962: 5768: 5690: 5675: 5582: 5568: 4675: 4142: 3544: 3353: 3279: 3094: 2297: 1978:

Any sample can be used to promote the whole song, which is familiar to many. However, unconvinced that the whole portion

1706: 1466: 1239: 966: 759: 713: 690: 215: 153: 7295: 7111: 7093: 4890: 4493: 2257: 6673: 6268: 6199: 6132: 6020: 5756: 4853: 4091: 4019: 3459: 3400:

Probably AWB ought not modify a direct quotation here, so I've reverted it. I can't actually check the quote - because

3199: 3183: 3082: 2503: 791: 775: 736: 593: 65: 6076:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 4058:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 3148:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 7319: 7280: 5528: 4720: 4395: 4153: 3645: 3361: 2449: 1546: 1537: 1530: 1514: 31: 7283:) that accomplishes this task. So when I run the scripts it changes the date to let everyone else know that that is 6870: 4234: 3419: 2792:

etc. Either is fine as the target of a piped link, but if the full name of the competition is visible to the reader

2459: 2096:

dates so there's one for each. I only run the DMY module because there are many more articles that use that format.

7144: 6972: 6835: 5982: 5079: 4547: 4203: 2780:

and similar were renamed to those names as part of a rebranding exercise in 2016. Before that, they were named the

2603:

Hi, I'm much more familiar with earthquakes in California because I lived there for a long time, but you might ask

2177: 2173: 2093: 2089: 1525: 4467: 3807: 7208: 6831: 6450: 5874: 5650: 4199: 3912: 3665: 2439: 1693: 1233: 1197: 145: 3644:. An editor has decided to split the article (yet again). I would like to know your view on the new edit....see 6861: 6647: 6569: 6397: 5301: 4225: 4005: 3754: 2936: 2137: 2081: 2030: 1914: 1792: 1788: 1002: 611: 211: 192: 6940: 6843: 6081: 4063: 3153: 6016: 4849: 3473: 1309: 986: 958: 942: 878: 862: 517: 499: 372: 354: 7200: 7077:

and overwrites YYYY-MM-DD dates in cs1|2 templates, but cs1|2 will still display the dates as instructed by

6928: 5351: 3990: 926: 6986: 6934: 6866: 6418: 5924: 5848: 4815: 4473: 4230: 3886: 3019: 3005: 2848: 2781: 2757: 2555: 1028: 910: 6857: 4244: 4221: 814: 7133: 7089: 6916: 6604: 6557: 6509: 6487: 6434: 6385: 6337: 6315: 5860: 5638: 5586: 5564: 5411: 5289: 5252: 5230: 5040: 4671: 3898: 3742: 3693: 3671: 3454: 3333: 2924: 2876: 2854: 2388: 2136:

Many thanks, but I can't get it to work. Am I right in saying that you just copy and paste the code into

2018: 1970: 1948: 1902: 1850: 1828: 1441: 1425: 1409: 1393: 1141: 894: 846: 830: 629: 51: 7258:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=The_Hunting_of_the_Snark&diff=1239791809&oldid=1227359739

6521:

to the whole song. No proof yet that omitting this sample would detriment the understanding of the song.

6472:

There's a ton more to say about this, of course, but those are just a few of the things that I work on.

5488: 4004:. I have blocked the entire range 204.14.12.0/22 (which contains that IP address). The range belongs to 2444: 2141: 250:

After over a decade of silence, the WikiProject Aviation newsletter is making a comeback under the name

6994: 6922: 6839: 6590: 6561: 6467:

Then there's the "human readable" component. I replace "www.cia.gov" with "Central Intelligence Agency"

6389: 6077: 5896: 5642: 5293: 4288: 4207: 4059: 3995: 3746: 3149: 2928: 2584:. The British Geological Survey apparently said the tremor happened at a depth of 8km near the town of 2068:

Hi, I'm new to AWB and was wondering if you could share with me how you use AWB to audit date formats (

2022: 1906: 1716: 1509: 1473: 1169: 972: 766: 720: 697: 7256:

Probably you are right, I am curious to know why "September 2013" has been replaced by "August 2024"?

798: 782: 743: 282: 7301: 7276: 5698: 5481:, and let me know which errors you notice in hindsight. What will you do differently moving forward? 5434:

Well, your last point is rather the problem, because there are plenty of books which, at page level,

4474: 4329: 3970: 3357: 3208: 1289: 1103: 531: 331: 3949:

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use

7034: 7012: 6048: 5538: 5220: 5023: 4952: 4881: 4806: 4695: 4371: 4188: 3939: 3579: 3467: 3386: 2731: 2415: 2338: 6004: 5725: 5665: 5474: 5400: 5180: 5122: 4983: 4912: 4837: 4766: 4644: 4553: 4454: 4419: 4405: 3624: 3449: 2285: 2253: 2186: 2145: 2099: 2069: 1211: 684: 4008:, which operates online learning programs for local schools. It now has a 3-year school block. ~ 7284: 7055: 6744: 6600: 6430: 4638: 4565: 4505: 4501: 3803: 3338: 2264: 1601: 1711:

Hi AWB is a menace on articles relating to the French Revolution as it does not recognise the

707: 6990: 6596: 6425: 6167: 5958: 5836: 4716: 4606: 4437:

Could I ask you please to check your scripts and process, so as to avoid recurrence? Thanks.

4284: 4014: 3874: 3662: 2593: 2318: 2204: 1493: 1489: 1461: 7180:

Hi, Dawnseeker. Please take more care with your editing--you have un-italicized the name of

5097:

I prefer to keep any Knowledge discussions public and on-wiki. Think my view comes down to:

1982:

the whole song and that the sample is needed to illustrate what the text can already convey.

7383: 7348: 7315: 7129: 5847:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 5511: 5485: 5325: 4987: 4963: 4535: 4489: 4367: 3986: 3974: 3885:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3796: 3787: 3778: 3633: 3551: 3510: 3415: 3349: 3303: 3034: 2960: 2693: 2629: 2063: 2054: 1938: 1818: 1151: 513: 349: 19: 7252:

Link to Mike Batts Snark musical: Why has "September 2013" been replaced by "August 2024"?

4916: 4892: 2410:

Thank you for your many edits on your AWB editing across the multitude of station pages!!

2321:

you may be interested in or an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is

8: 7362: 7326: 7288: 7217: 7182: 7061: 6826: 6815: 6770: 6747: 6698: 6685: 6653: 6581: 6573: 6473: 6409: 6401: 6044: 5996: 5969: 5654: 5550: 5533: 5495: 5422: 5359: 5305: 5216: 5172: 5085: 5019: 4975: 4948: 4904: 4877: 4829: 4802: 4758: 4731: 4682: 4589:

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

4514: 4352: 4263: 4194: 4026: 3978: 3758: 3531: 3484: 3426: 3373: 3046: 2940: 2820: 2789: 2785: 2709: 2689: 2608: 2481: 2470: 2411: 2326: 2267: 2214: 2124: 2111: 2034: 1918: 1746: 1712: 1673:

page. To opt in/out of receiving this news letter, add or remove your username from the

730: 134: 7325:

Hi, have we spoke before and could you please add some diffs so we can talk about them?

7239: 7196: 7172: 7043: 6661:

Please can you tell me the reason for your update.? Is it something I should be doing?

5720: 5660: 5478: 5452: 5381: 5347: 5334: 5146: 5052: 4658: 4574: 3831: 3620: 3526:

Your change broke the file name and I restored it after seeing that the article was in

3023: 2833: 2809: 2281: 2249: 1521: 1229: 1183: 1136: 489: 5313:

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the

3766:

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the

2948:

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the

2042:

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the

1926:

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the

1806:

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the

1016: 7212: 7163: 6797: 6733: 6669: 6638: 6540: 6446: 6368: 5915: 5818: 5621: 5272: 5075: 4629: 4465: 4445: 4386: 3856: 3799: 3788: 3725: 3641: 3634: 3594: 3263: 3256: 3130:

Orphaned non-free image File:George Thorogood - One Bourbon, One Scotch, One Beer.ogg

2994: 2907: 2844: 2746: 2727: 2379: 2001: 1885: 1763: 1725: 1646: 1589: 615: 597: 91:

On New Year's Day, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.

6527: 6355: 5608: 5259: 5136:. Absent any such, I'm pretty sure a little private chat won't override them either. 3795:

and point out your genuine opininion whatever it be in the AFD . Here is the link -

3712: 2894: 2432:

I have come across several articles that have had errors introduced by these fixes.

1988: 1872: 7264: 6008: 5984: 5954: 5867: 5832: 4712: 4557: 4427: 4009: 3954: 3928: 3905: 3870: 3650: 2769: 2761: 2589: 2551: 2231: 2195: 2161: 2151: 2077: 527: 326: 37: 7102:- thanks! Sounds too complex for me :-)) I'll just leave it as dmy in that case - 4655:(2×). It should not do that. Italics for newspapers is handled automatically by 2148:. I am probably just being an idiot, any help would be appreciated. (also pinging 130:

and remove your username from the mailing list to opt out of any future messages.

7379: 7344: 7311: 7125: 6623: 6518: 6346: 6100: 5508: 5482: 5335: 5321: 4561: 4531: 4485: 4320: 4304: 4082: 3982: 3950: 3774: 3703: 3548: 3507: 3411: 3172: 3030: 2956: 2885: 2625: 2604: 2050: 1979: 1934: 1863: 1814: 1565: 1365: 1361: 1279: 1225: 6526:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, pages may be

6354:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, pages may be

6284: 6215: 6148: 5772: 5607:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, pages may be

5258:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, pages may be

3711:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, pages may be

3098: 2893:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, pages may be

1987:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, pages may be

1871:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, pages may be

7005: 6703:

I'm still not clear with this, and I find MOS topics don't explain what I need.

6577: 6405: 6163: 6036: 5844: 5208: 5011: 4940: 4869: 4794: 4727: 4348: 3882: 3292: 3272: 2773: 2466: 1577: 1457: 1215: 6035:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

5207:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

5010:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

4939:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

4868:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

4793:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

3324:

which shows broken the links to the Wikisource articles caused by such edits.

2397: 7235: 7192: 7119: 7107: 7030: 6968: 5840: 5595: 5448: 5377: 5343: 5142: 5064: 5048: 4570: 4001: 3878: 3827: 3329: 2884:

Sample inadequate to help readers understand the song (as a whole). May fail

2805: 2800:, it should be left chronologically accurate. There was no such thing as the 2524:

On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.

2299: 7340: 7307: 7159: 7155: 6793: 6789: 6729: 6665: 6634: 6630: 6619: 5911: 5907: 5599: 5468: 4841: 4817: 4625: 4621: 4459: 4439: 4382: 4378: 3590: 3586: 3575: 3369: 2990: 2986: 2840: 2742: 2738: 2527:

Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed.

2375: 2371: 1759: 1739: 1721: 1505: 1080: 94:

Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed.

6058:

Orphaned non-free image File:The Cranberries - I Just Shot John Lennon.ogg

5631:

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing

4663:

so extraneous italic markup is an error condition and is flagged as such.

3797:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Japan_(2023_film)

254:. This first issue was sent to all active members of the project and its 7260: 4703: 4593: 3616: 3404: 3238: 3226: 2560: 1147: 5851:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

3889:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

1641: 7017: 6822:

lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

6819: 6096: 5900: 5828:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

4164: 4137: 4097: 4078: 3866:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

3168: 2581: 2516: 1859: 1636: 459: 303: 76: 4484:

I can't think of any reason for that, so please educate me. Thanks. --

4262:

2023." Please consider setting me up for IP address block exemption.

3346:

They rebranded their website and released a tv ad with the new logo.

2226:

Hi, Dawnseeker. The modified version you sent me works. Many thanks!

1125: 475: 6461: 6457: 6290:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may

6221:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may

6154:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may

5938: 5809: 5778:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may

5255:. The proposed deletion notice added to the file should explain why. 3847: 3104:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may

2227: 2157: 2073: 1866:

to the whole song. Lyrics heard in sample possibly easy to summarize.

1326: 543: 485: 5598:

as the text portion of the article is unsourced, and article has no

4104: 1269: 1159: 7187: 7103: 7026: 7021: 6963: 6517:

Second bridge and partial second chorus heard in sample not proven

6300: 6231: 5788: 5129: 5109: 4129: 4114: 3325: 3115: 1350: 583: 3953:. For something related to the United States in the same way, use 3826:

because the content of a quote should not be reformatted. Cheers,

3619:

too! I'd love some input on these articles if you had some time.

3215:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/2008 Vancouver, Washington tornado

1554: 7343:. I want to say that the article was about a television station. 4612: 4599: 2777: 2697: 2650: 1093: 1069: 46: 7143: