User:R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine)

982:(among other things, something about intentionally sabotaging AN/I through technical expertise, which I assure you I am incapable of knowing how to do). Also, I was reflexively against the council selected by some of the arbcom members, based on personal experience, but it seems you are for it. Is this because you know and trust the members? I think there are people in high places, including arbcom, that should not be there. But, as I said, I am going on personal experience and do not know about the corruption of any. I just see some very poor judgement and collusion. Are you pessimistic about the future? Regards, — 68: 492: 376: 52: 437: 371: 381: 366: 21: 1832:, and even if you wanted to make the label a metaphor or better yet, transform it into a simile, this website allows near complete mobility, users to argue things that are patently wrong, throw mud at the super powered staff, post long rants like the one immediately above, we have no secret admins that I'm aware of (and the existence of secret police is never all that secret, that would be how they operate, it is 1539: 386: 271: 2383: 1310:

my article!) are being accused of issuing more than 1 vote, which to me is preposterous. Apparently if there is ANY factionalism at all, it is those who all know each other on here for some time, and ban together to fight against an article that has, like you said, more notability than quite a number of the already-approved articles. So here's that

391: 1940:

need them to be. As it happens, I generally agree that blocks and bans are poor tools, cudgels when scalpels are needed, but when something appears time sensitive, one acts with the tools available. In the end though, why complain? Your questions got asked and answered, your block is gone, and you've found a receptive audience off-site?--

2286:

Well ya know, the powers that-be still need a-fightin...since they refuse the honor of unconditional surrender and all. I saw you mentioned over on our mutual Cas' page that you were bored...damn must have been super bored to come back to this depressing place. You see how long it has been since I've

2273:

Hey RDH. It's your long lost buddy Spawn Man. Been a long time right? I see some things never change (IE you battling with the powers that be). ; ) Drop me an email some time. Just thought I'd come back to see how everyone was - most of my old wikibuddies are all decommissioned. Shame. Well hope

1327:

Well as a diabetic I really should refrain from cookies, but I still love em so thanks regardless! I've always said that there are two basic groups on WP-those who want to add or improve content and those who want to control it. The deletionistas tend to fall into the latter category. What better way

1309:

I don't know how to give cookies or any of that stuff yet, but I have a high five here for you :) Just starting to learn about this deletionist sect, and now it appears as though editors (I may be wrong by presuming the reference is to me, but I'm probably taking it way too personally as this IS

1005:

sign from off the top of this page. Remember, Knowledge is more than Jimbo, or the cabals or the ArbCom or all the drama llamas. The overwhelming majority of visitors come here seeking fast information. Most of them neither know nor care how poorly this place is governed. That is why, ultimately, the

955:

It is often difficult for us proles down in the trenches to know what's going on within the hallowed bowels of Olympus (and, make no mistake, they LIKE it that way). I'm fortunate to have some well-placed sources I've cultivated over the years, who have proven invaluable in helping me to separate the

1927:

I certainly have my faults...sarcasm, stubbornness and ill-temper amongst them. But at day's end, I like to think I'm reasonable. For future reference for all you Wiki admins and wanna-be's reading this; It is not best practice to make threats, cajoling and bans your first recourse when dealing with

1025:

That being said, I must also confess to you that I do know certain key members of the ACDP, a few for years in fact. They are all good, hard working types whose judgment I've come to trust implicitly and whose characters I will gladly attest to. I believe you would too if you gave them a chance, but

1019:

who fear the light. What truly frustrates and disheartens me, though, is when the quality contributors are under-appreciated, harassed, abused and even persecuted. Or when these talented, yet often temperamental, individuals start warring with one another over some trivial matter or misunderstanding

2322:

Yeah well I was thinking of coming back eventually. It does seem to be a more depressing place looking around but now that I'm at university doing my photography degree I think I might be able to add something to the photography articles here to help students and young photographers like I once was

1794:

I'm still mulling my options...is it really worth it, to come back to WP? It is certainly no longer a very fun, welcoming, warm place...what police state is?! Maybe being unbanned yet still IP banned is the ideal state for me on WP. I have now joined the Review...and my first post there may contain

1790:

Tznkai, you have checkuser powahs, baby. You can look up my lil ol IP anytime you fancy. But I shall leave that up to you. IF I really wish an unblock, I'll mail the request along with my IP on to an admin of whom I have, shall we say, a more favorable opinion. However, my promise to behave here is

981:

Thanks! I did notice your reply and read the articles you suggested. Wikipolitics overwhelm me and I tend to get a little depressed if I read too much about them. Recently I was accused of being devious in ways that I could not even fathom, so now I have a glimmer of what I was supposed to be doing

869:

Thank you, I'll have a look. Glad to see someone else believes that an ENWiki Constitution is an overdue idea whose time is coming. As for the talkpage-some use their talkpages as userpages, I chose to do the opposite. Sorry for the minor inconvenience, but I like my lil hybrid page; it's 50% more

1939:

Out of curiosity, if I were to describe someone as sarcastic, stubborn, and ill-tempered, would you put them in the "likley to be reasonable" or "unlikley to be reasonable" categories? I happen to be of the belief that all people are reasonable over all, but are often not when you'd like, or even

1903:

I don't know who unblocked your IP, since I don't know what your IP is. If I did however, I'd be able to look it up in the publicly open unblock log. I see that you've rephrased the questions more artfully, even if there is a a lot amount of question begging, it falls neatly within the amount of

916:

Why thank you! It is always nice to get unexpected appreciation, especially from an unexpected source! Unfortunately, the one I targeted it at did not appreciate it as much. I admit, like all histories, it reflects the biases of its author. And it does simplify for the sake of summary. So by all

1839:

Yes, I did just mix a reference to one of the greatest minds in all of social science to Star Wars. Why? Because Weber proves talked about weighty things, which is what you are trying to make a block on editing a website sound like. Star Wars is not a weighty thing, it is entertainment, and yet

961:

While the power of the secret mailing lists and IRC channels has diminished, they still exert an undue and unsavory influence, as exemplified by their effective killing of the nascent ACPD. I'm glad to see another working editor has now taken an active interest in Wiki-governance. It has become

1819:

except in very particular circumstances, but thanks for the invitation anyway. (The tool is in fact, not awesome or amazing or stupendous, but it does violate privacy). What you do on WR or anywhere else not here is really outside of my concern, care, or ability to do anything about. I do feel

742:

Writers it seems to me should be thoroughly ashamed of nonsensical errors...They should therefore strive above all to become masters of the whole craft of history, for to do so is good; but if this be out of their own power, they should give the closest attention to what is most necessary and

1273:

I just wanted to thank you for your helping to support the notability of the Boba Phat article. It is clear that there IS quite a bit of significant sourcing; I am fully appreciative of your adding your 2¢ to help support this from an objective standpoint.... not to mention your Sonny Lester

1717:." I think it needs to be clarified if that subject is off limits regarding questioning; otherwise, some other unfortunate is going to fall into the same hole as RDH. If that is the case, perhaps Fred should be asked to remove references to real life, especially those he finds sensitive. 899:

but don't know what to make of it. After a year or so, I did begin to understand that there were secret mailing lists and IRC channels; I don't know whether they continue or not. Anyway, thanks for the insight into some past history that may drive current opinion and behavior. Regards,

846:

would be of particular interest. As a side note, would you consider using a talkpage again? Talkpages have built-in links for creating new sections. With this setup, one runs the risk of edit conflicts as one must edit an extant section or the whole page in order to leave a new message.

1957:, and employs such blunt tools as a first resort, even though he, admittedly, knows better. But you are right...it all ended pretty well. I have found a new haunt where I'm having much fun and making many new friends. And I have you to thank for it...thank you;)-- 1392: 2435:

I truly appreciate it seeing as it's been eons since I've gotten anything so nice on here. Tis good to see our MHP, instead of dispatching its old warhorses to the glue factory, allows them to graze freely and even throws them an occasional sugar cookie in

938:. I learned a tremendous amount from them about Wiki's dysfunctionalities. I'm also grateful to them for all the many laughs they have served up, because, well the truth can hurt. Although their site is no longer active, I can't recommend them enough. The 2250:

Also note that, although the RfC is in 'poll format' (Support, Oppose, and Neutral, with Comments underneath), this RfC is still essentially a 'Request for Comment'. Currently, similar comments on CDA's value are being made under all three polls.

1795:

der verboden question that dare not speak its name here. A whole lotta eyeballs would see it then...maybe even more than here. Or I may agree to a compromise and, with your excellency's kind permission, still pose my second (actually second and third)

889: 1877:

with a legal system only half as elegant and refined. And indeed sir, you are not a policeman but a janitor, who has been given police powers due to a flawed and underdeveloped system of governance. And while there may not be a secret police Per Se,

1618:

It seems he asked Fred Bauder a question, which was oversighted and he was indeffed. From what I saw of it at the time, it was nothing not in the public domain and widely known on Knowledge anyway, I did not see any lies. Nasty old things politics.

821:(such as it is) does a terrible job at both and, as you point out, simply staying out of their way. Part of the reason for this is it is so easy to create new red-tape policies and bureaucratic fiefdoms, but it is very difficult to dismantle them.-- 1289:

You're most welcome M'dear! I truly believe that Boba Phat has as much place here as Mr. Lester. Our opponents seem to think that including Mr. Phat somehow lessens Knowledge's encyclopedic tone. I don't see how it does any more than promoting

1464:

If and when the block evasion stops and there is some sort of assurance the repeated asking of the clearly indicated as innapporpriate question will stop, we can talk about the second one which seems to fall rather neatly in "irritating, but

581:

Lol, I see you're more active than I am these days, even with your retired banner. Just thought I'd stop by and say hi to an old friend. I'm over at WikiHow now. It's much more relaxing for me - anything to keep the mind occupied eh? Cheers,

796:"1. It is the hard working editors who most need to take a more active role in Wiki-politics. Otherwise it will continue to be dominated by bureaucrats, process wonks, wiki-lawyers, zealots, Jimbots, IRC fairies and, yes, worst of all, 455:

Thank you very much for your support in the recent Military history Wikiproject elections. I went into it expecting to just keep my seat and was astonished to end up with the lead role. I anticipate a rather busy six months :)

2477:

Well, as the section header says, it just refuses to! I just wanted to say that I hope all is well, Ghost! I appear to have missed a tremendous amount of...er...acrimony. Your return would be much welcomed! Those were good days...

817:(Well I'm sure there are some groups I left out ;) Indeed, and try to represent their best interests as best we can, while trying also to raise their awareness of what's going on, especially if it effects them. The current 1791:

still good. I will only abide by it, please note, because I made it to Cas and Giacomo. My word to them, and appreciation for their coming to my defense, is what will enforce my behavior, not any threats from you or yours.

2246:

was started on the 22nd Feb, and it runs for 28 days. Please note that the existing CDA proposal was (in the end) run as something of a working compromise, so CDA is still largely being floated as an idea.

1558: 1416: 887:

Although I have been on Knowledge since May 2006, I have never understood what was going on relative to the behind-the-scenes stuff. For a long time, I did not even know there was a behind-the-scenes. Your post

946:, so you really have to wade through a lot of muck to find the good nuggets. You may not see the forrest, but you will bump into many trees while trying to there. Finally, I humbly submit for your consideration 2172:

After tolling up the votes in the revision proposals, it emerged that 5.4 had the most support, but elements of that support remained unclear, and various comments throughout the polls needed consideration.

1802:

Us ghosts have many options and all this drama is givin me teh vapors! I do appreciate the official unblock...though now posting from an IP is not as much fun, since it is no longer evasion. Ghost posting

1020:

which could be very easily shrugged off. We should be on the same side-fighting to improve the encyclopedia and the way it is run! But getting Wikipedians to agree on that is tantamount to herding cats:).

2178: 253:

As with any ghost I will vanish and reappear at will. If you wish to contact this spirit, please do so via this hybrid user/talkpage by simply leaving your message below at the bottom. There is also

1680:

before as far as I can tell, unless there is a goof with summertime. I was asleep at 5-6 am my time (Sydney). If I were not going to work in a minute I'd flip these user and user:talk pages myself.

2507:

PS Apologies for my late response. Part of the reason was that accursed, buggy failure of a visual editor that was thrust down the community's throat by the usual band of misguided apparatchiks.

541:, that didn't quite make it and ended at 120/47/13. There was a ton of great advice there, that I'm going to go on. Maybe someday. If not, there are articles to write! Thanks for your support. 757:

Oh, come with old Khayyam, and leave the Wise / To talk; one thing is certain, that Life flies; / One thing is certain, and the Rest is Lies; / The Flower that once has blown for ever dies.

1892:

I'm pretty sure ol Max Weber, like most esteemed scholars and academics, would view Knowledge with disdain...or bemoan it, as do I, as a great idea brought down by flawed implementation.--

1245:

Tis indeed a nice arty, but it's not really mine, I'm just adding some minor details to help it cruise safely through Class-A Review. It is nearly done now, bot thanks for the offer:)--

1026:

perhaps I'm being too optimistic there;). There are also one or two sitting Arbs (and a whole slew of former ones) I would not mind see standing before the AC as defendants either.

1647:

He is unable to post on this page because this is a userpage. He is perfectly able to post on his User Talk page, which is currently a redirect here. He has elected not to do so.

1904:

political silliness that we tolerate on Knowledge as well as in life. So, thank you for that, even though I know you did it in spite of your opinion of me, not because of it. --

1151:

This is not a game! This is serious fucking business! We are assembling all the world's knowledge for that poor starving kid in Africa! And you are so heartless as to call it a

1220:. Besides, every time I've tried to help out on the Commons, some admin with limited English capabilities has threatened to punch my ticket. Wish it were otherwise. Cheers,-- 1820:

however, that its important that I point out a few things, not to you, but to anyone else who is reading and is interested in the civics aspect of this: I'm not part of the

300: 622: 2125:

Well he is rather bureaucratic and officious...but he's far too considerate and thoughtful to be considered a member of that species. Besides, the thought of him doing

1662:? I mean, I don't mind increasing WR's membership at all, its more the lack of any coherent understanding of what was problematic. As long as he gets that this isn't 1808: 214: 1736:. I'm not sure about the other editors who spoke out against the content RDH posted, but I have not heard from or seen the opinions of Fred Bauder on this issue. 1332:, right? It takes hours or even days. But it only takes minutes, or even seconds, to nominate something for deletion. And maybe a few minutes more lobbying one's 805:

I would've phrased this differently, but I think you have the right idea here. Alternatively, those of us who are active can find a way to work better for them.--

565:

I see that you've mentioned contacting you via Gmail or Ouijaboard. But I don't have a Ouijaboard and I didn't see an e-mail address. Are you out there? Neo?

1442:

No those are highly relevant questions. Sorry but I don't see how they are inappropriate at all. Mr. Bauder does not have to answer them if he does not wish.--

2536: 510:

Thank you very much for your support in the recent Military history Wikiproject election. I'm more than happy to serve the project for another six months! --

2531: 950:. It contains many select links to the above-mentioned sites and many others, along with my own rantings, ravings and poor attempts at insight with humor. 1983: 1884:

I'm glad you brought up Star Wars, though...I'm a big fan boy (literally), plus it gives me the perfect opportunity to paraphrase one of its best lines;

1336:

to join the party and bring some kerosene. So now we have this firmly entrenched culture of deletion...with cliques, bureaucracy and a mega bong load of

1380: 1202:

Well, I'm doing a bit of work over at Commons at the moment which is rather useful. Would you like to help? We could always use more participants! –

1031:

Awake still? If so congrats;) One major reason I changed my major from History, is something my mentor, Dr. Conradt; a Poli-Sci prof, once told me-

566: 2191:

ascertain whether there is support for a 'two-phase' poll at the eventual RfC (not far off now), where CDA will finally be put to the community.

2153: 538: 136: 1045:. But we must take care as to which battles we chose to fight, namely the important ones and the ones we know we can win:). With best regards,-- 661:

Why no, of course not! Perish the thought dear sir! Besides, given your trigger happy record with your block button, I'd be foolish to do so.--

97: 1598:

R.D.H just emailed me to promise he will be good and not cause any more unnecessary fuss. He tells me he is unable to post on the page (??).

719: 695:

Within your circles, sir, I'm quite sure my reputation is beyond repair. But in others, I would gladly place it up against yours any day.--

1476:

You mean if I promise to be a good boy and STFU? Very well...but how am I supposed to do that without committing block evasion. Catch 22.

676:

It was a serious question. Apparently, you're happy to fling insults and then retreat into jocularity. This does your reputation no good

51: 1829: 35:. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. 1514:

As an election clerk and administrator I have deleted your addition of the questions and your repost after warning, on the grounds of

1557:, specifically by using the 2009 arbitration elections as a vehicle for personally directed attacks that far exceed Knowledge norms. 1354:

to take things personally here...and yet we do. Such is the nature of us beasts known as humans:) High five back at ya along with a

942:

occasionally gets some good scoops and heads-ups (most notably on Essjay) but at day's end it is only another web forum with a low

2516: 2441: 2296: 2231: 2134: 2102: 2015: 1962: 1933: 1897: 1447: 1363: 1299: 1250: 1225: 1196: 1160: 1119: 1083: 1050: 971: 875: 826: 700: 666: 343: 2156:

re: a 'Motion to close', which would dissolve Cda as a proposal. The motion includes an !vote. You have previously commented at

625:

in the partial support section up to your first comment in the support section to avoid double counting. I hope you don't mind.

2497:

Good times indeed were those...and far too brief. But we still have our enduring friendships and fond memories, along with the

1928:

reasonable people. When we are all banished or driven away guess what, asides from yourselves, Knowledge will be left with...--

283: 43: 1294:

to featured status and displaying it on the mainpage. Plus, as I stated, deletionistas really got no soul ;)...Rock on!--

1584:

We allow a stupendous amount of crap to go on in elections, but this was too far, and you were told so by multiple parties.--

251:

I'm keeping my account - as long as WP exists, I reserve the right to participate. Just don't mistake me for a true believer.

2324: 2275: 2243: 1515: 552: 2157: 1578: 647: 2511:

So maybe you should try improving the culture and editing environment instead? But, as I said, that's a Forlorn hope. --

1886: 1804: 939: 119: 90: 1346:

of inclusion. So damn right there's factionalism here alright....out the yin yang in fact. Even though There isn't

1231:

Looks like a nice article. If you need any help with copyediting, feel free to ping me on my talk page. Regards, –

891:

was most enlightening. I think I better understand now (a little bit). The only part I already knew about was the

1659: 1217: 1036: 1001:

Pessimistic? A bit, yes. But not as much as I was...in fact I'm optimistic enough to remove that ominous-looking

2316: 2119: 2088: 2055: 2032: 1999: 1733: 1694: 1609: 1384: 763: 726: 681: 654: 609: 1015:

I do confess to taking a certain perverse pleasure at the scandals which expose those worms...those sad, pale

2044:

PS: The word does encapsulate rather well what goes on here in some cool collaborations, esp. at FAC :)

1095:

There's an instruction not to include a comment with one's vote on oversighters. I share your opposition to

843: 27: 1767:

OK, I have posted there. I had hoped such a delicate matter could be handled here a little more discretely.

1328:

to control something than to have it destroyed. Besides, creating quality, non-cut & pasted articles is

1666:

my power trip, but also because of his conduct, that would assuage me that the indef is no longer needed.--

1132: 2147: 1562: 956:

real from the rumor, though at times even they, themselves, have had difficulty telling the difference.

515: 1546: 759: 722: 677: 650: 80: 2345: 2328: 2279: 927: 917:

means, I encourage you to do your own research and reach your own conclusions (that's what I did:).

896: 548: 84: 76: 2182:(intended, if possible, to be one last poll before finalising the CDA proposal) has been run to; 1388: 1291: 135: 1341: 1240: 1211: 1185: 839: 101: 2186:

gather opinion on the 'consensus margin' (what percentages, if any, have the most support) and

1879: 2021:

Aah, good ol' Heinlein, bless him for some seriously deeply-grody-to-the-max verbage :)

943: 511: 2010:

well my brother! Of course us Military History types tend to have both...it doesn't hurt;)--

2262: 2196: 1770: 1720: 1700:

Unblocked, but still a bit wary. RDH will have to tell me what IP blocks to undo as well.--

1622: 1453:

However relevant you may feel them, the first question is considerably far out of bounds.--

1432: 1042: 206: 8: 2466: 2421: 1745: 1527: 1321: 1282: 1140: 1105: 934:. In fact, I highly recommend all of his articles on Knowledge. Of course there are also 587: 570: 544: 171: 167: 2310: 2113: 2082: 2049: 2026: 1993: 1688: 1649: 1603: 1419:

is really, really inappropriate. Please consider redacting it yourself. —

1067: 991: 909: 892: 603: 2148:

Notification: Proposed 'Motion to Close' at Knowledge:Community de-adminship/Draft RfC

1713:

Good, I think that is fair. However, in his candidate statement Fred Bauder does say "

1173: 2483: 2409: 2400: 1887:

The more you tighten your grip, Tznkai, the more users will slip through your fingers

1833: 1233: 1204: 1178: 457: 491: 2348: 1945: 1909: 1849: 1705: 1671: 1639: 1589: 1568: 1554: 1495: 1484: 1470: 1458: 1404: 810: 307: 246: 2346:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Boba_Phat_(2nd_nomination)

2167: 935: 44: 2258: 2192: 1428: 633: 414: 239: 175: 2509:

The fault, dear Jimbo, lies not in our software but in ourselves- the HUMANWARE.

1658:@Casliber was his promise to be good, whatever that means, come before or after 1374: 375: 2462: 2417: 2412:

reviews during the period July-December 2009, I am delighted to award you this

2405: 1739: 1521: 1317: 1278: 1136: 1100: 856: 802:

navel gazers.--R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) (talk) 09:06, 14 July 2009 (UTC)"

583: 155: 1874: 1355: 1075: 595: 229: 2525: 2306: 2161: 2109: 2078: 2045: 2022: 1989: 1684: 1599: 1561:. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may 1096: 1063: 983: 901: 599: 159: 138:

You say you'll change the Constitution, well ya know, why don't you go ahead!

1062:

I like the idea of speaking truth to...(sudden darkness). Please carry on...

1057: 1035:

Whether power wants to hear it or not...especially if not. As reformers and

947: 436: 221: 2498: 2494:

Thanks for dropping by my cemetery to say hi Sol (and you too Spawn bro;)!

2479: 2238: 2126: 1941: 1905: 1845: 1701: 1667: 1635: 1585: 1491: 1480: 1466: 1454: 1400: 806: 797: 370: 321: 225: 2066: 1870: 1834:"fear will keep the local systems in line. Fear of this battle station" 1420: 626: 325: 187: 179: 1815:

I don't use my amazing and stupendous, and awesome, and did I mention

1099:, but ask you to remove the comment in order to conform to protocol. — 380: 365: 1882:

seems quite capable of performing that function when the need arises.

1391:

for elections on this project, you are invited to participate in the

1311: 848: 781: 245:

For those inquiring minds who wonder about my continued status here,

163: 1715:

As I have in the past, I will use my legal training and experience..

335:

Encyclopedias are written with brains and pens, not mops and brooms.

747: 199: 191: 183: 147: 1975: 306:

This user has made more mainspace contributions to Knowledge than

20: 1131:

Given that you've been around since 2005, I'm sure you know that

1006:

contributors of quality content will always matter more than any

649:

was aimed at me. I don't understand why. Can you explain please?

2373: 842:

would be of interest to you I think, and based on what you said

2287:

checked in. Still at least we've found other, more fun ways to

2168:

Community de-Adminship - finalization poll for the CDA proposal

1821: 385: 2344:

An AFD you participated in 6 months ago, is being done again.

598:

and I cheer up...especially with 100 emails a day at times...

1825: 1375:

Invitation to participate in SecurePoll feedback and workshop

258: 254: 236:

in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility

1732:

That does need to be clarified, and we should discuss it in

299: 220:

But of course all this is really just an elaborate ruse...a

2007: 210: 1955:

We allow a stupendous amount of crap to go on in elections

1395:. Your comments, suggestions and observations are welcome. 270: 2239:

The RfC on the Community de-Adminship proposal has begun

2097:

We need more groking and fewer Vogons on here dammit!;)--

1172:

Hi RDH. It might be best to tone it down a bit in future

1058:

From a possum that has somehow survived the info autobahn

195: 31:. R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) has not edited Knowledge 132:

Remember kidz; REAL encyclopedias don't need footnotes!

1953:

Just as reasonable as someone who uses phrases such as

838:

In case you're not still watching the Governance page,

2382: 1490:(On your user talk page. Just override the redirect)-- 390: 2226:

How can I resist a request from one so insightful:)--

2108:

NYB does poetry so he can play the Vogon (?) :)

2077:.....who really knew where his towel was at :) 1479:

You log into your account and request an unblock.--

1427:It's been removed. Please don't try to replace it. 2244:The RfC on the Community de-Adminship proposal 2523: 1861:amazing and stupendous, and awesome supah powahs 355: 89:but its sources remain unclear because it lacks 2154:Knowledge talk:Community de-adminship/Draft RfC 1977:I'll take the penismightier for $ 100, Trebeck! 1840:people get really worked up about it, which is 1176:New editors might get the wrong idea. Cheers, – 1863:has unzapped my IP. If not you, I wonder who? 2404:, for your devoted work on the WikiProject's 2374:Milhist A-class and Peer Reviews Jun-Dec 2009 1516:inappropriate posting of personal information 2537:Wikipedians who opt out of template messages 1274:reference made me laugh out loud. You rock! 882: 718:You care about your accuracy to this extent 224:if you will, to protect my true identity as 2532:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery 2472: 2254:Whatever you vote, your vote is welcome! 1340:concerning what makes something or someone 2489: 2210:Written by the unwell, read by the unwise. 2152:You are invited to join the discussion at 2401:Military history WikiProject coordinators 2339: 2274:to see you around dude! : ) Cheers, 1987:(that's what you were getting at, right?) 1573:Your reason here ~~~~ 966:too important for us to ignore anymore!-- 489: 434: 120:Learn how and when to remove this message 2431:This must be a mistake! But nonetheless 1865:I admit I was wrong to call Knowledge a 1191:Thank you, now go do something useful.-- 351: 2524: 2380: 261:, whichever you find most convenient. 1565:by adding below this notice the text 1423: 16:42, 23 November 2009 (UTC) 1135:is prohibited. Let's not play games. 936:my dear old friends over at WikiTruth 471: 13:26, 29 February 2008 (UTC) 1682:(bangs head on keyboard a few times) 1270:Hi R.D.H. (Ghost in the Machine) - 61: 15: 2158:Knowledge:WikiProject Administrator 2069: 17:13, 1 December 2009 (UTC) 1216:Sorry but I'm currently working on 1033:Our job is to speak truth to power. 616: 150:'s largest truckstop restroom wall! 13: 2456:How are you? Long time no see. :D 1984:the pen is mightier than the sword 1537: 1379:As you participated in the recent 1090: 1074:Will do, and welcome to the party 778:Oh my, I think I'm becoming a god! 474:Haut-Koeningsbourg castle, Alsace. 14: 2548: 2486:) 23:24, 11 September 2013 (UTC) 2391:The Content Review Medal of Merit 1785: 1555:Using Knowledge as a battleground 1167: 743:important (Accuracy and clarity). 594:I just listen to nice songs like 560: 146:Welcome to my ex-userpage on the 40: 28:This user may have left Knowledge 2424:) 01:47, 1 September 2010 (UTC) 2381: 2291:spend our time eh:) Cheers M8,-- 2220:Do I look like a fortune teller? 1936:) 17:47, 28 November 2009 (UTC) 1900:) 12:02, 25 November 2009 (UTC) 1811:) 12:48, 24 November 2009 (UTC) 1708:) 20:18, 23 November 2009 (UTC) 1697:) 20:13, 23 November 2009 (UTC) 1674:) 20:08, 23 November 2009 (UTC) 1612:) 19:43, 23 November 2009 (UTC) 1592:) 17:26, 23 November 2009 (UTC) 1487:) 18:08, 23 November 2009 (UTC) 1473:) 17:40, 23 November 2009 (UTC) 1461:) 17:14, 23 November 2009 (UTC) 1450:) 17:13, 23 November 2009 (UTC) 1410: 1407:) 08:31, 12 November 2009 (UTC) 1393:SecurePoll feedback and workshop 1228:) 04:00, 8 September 2009 (UTC) 1199:) 03:47, 8 September 2009 (UTC) 924:L'affair De La Durova Et !! 518:) 15:29, 29 February 2008 (UTC) 490: 435: 389: 384: 379: 374: 369: 364: 298: 294: 269: 264: 66: 50: 19: 2519:) 15:10, 16 October 2013 (UTC) 2444:) 16:34, 3 September 2010 (UTC) 2122:) 19:37, 2 December 2009 (UTC) 2105:) 16:44, 2 December 2009 (UTC) 2091:) 19:58, 1 December 2009 (UTC) 2058:) 14:01, 1 December 2009 (UTC) 2018:) 13:35, 1 December 2009 (UTC) 2002:) 13:22, 1 December 2009 (UTC) 1912:) 20:42, 25 November 2009 (UTC) 1852:) 20:03, 24 November 2009 (UTC) 1642:) 20:02, 23 November 2009 (UTC) 1498:) 18:11, 23 November 2009 (UTC) 1435:) 17:01, 23 November 2009 (UTC) 1398:For the Arbitration Committee, 1324:) 09:29, 15 October 2009 (UTC) 1285:) 12:16, 14 October 2009 (UTC) 1253:) 08:24, 8 September 2009 (UTC) 1218:North Carolina class battleship 1041:, that is our lot too, and our 864: 17:58, 17 July 2009 (UTC) 833: 641: 573:) 22:09, 3 November 2008 (UTC) 346:) 13:03, 1 December 2009 (UTC) 2323:with their projects. ; ) 2234:) 14:47, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 2199:) 01:21, 18 January 2010 (UTC) 2164:22:19, 22 December 2009 (UTC) 2137:) 20:23, 2 December 2009 (UTC) 2035:) 13:59, 1 December 2009 (UTC) 1965:) 01:50, 9 December 2009 (UTC) 1948:) 18:13, 1 December 2009 (UTC) 1729:20:51, 23 November 2009 (UTC) 1655:19:59, 23 November 2009 (UTC) 1631:19:49, 23 November 2009 (UTC) 1534:17:24, 23 November 2009 (UTC) 1366:) 11:24, 15 October 2009 (UTC) 1302:) 09:06, 15 October 2009 (UTC) 1242:04:04, 8 September 2009 (UTC) 1213:03:53, 8 September 2009 (UTC) 1187:03:21, 8 September 2009 (UTC) 1143:) 12:56, 19 August 2009 (UTC) 791: 537:Thanks for your support in my 1: 2513:R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) 2438:R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) 2331:) 11:36, 6 January 2011 (UTC) 2319:) 12:02, 20 April 2010 (UTC) 2299:) 08:13, 20 April 2010 (UTC) 2293:R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) 2282:) 05:35, 12 March 2010 (UTC) 2228:R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) 2131:R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) 2099:R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) 2061:Yes, Heinlein is a seriously 2012:R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) 1959:R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) 1930:R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) 1894:R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) 1779:21:05, 23 November 2009 (UTC) 1752:20:54, 23 November 2009 (UTC) 1444:R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) 1360:R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) 1296:R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) 1247:R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) 1222:R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) 1193:R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) 1163:) 13:16, 19 August 2009 (UTC) 1157:R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) 1126: 1122:) 01:39, 11 August 2009 (UTC) 1116:R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) 1080:R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) 1047:R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) 968:R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) 872:R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) 823:R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) 697:R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) 663:R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) 532: 448:Milhist Coordinator elections 340:R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) 2501:here of better times ahead. 2469:) 12:53, 23 July 2012 (UTC) 2265:) 11:18, 4 March 2010 (UTC) 1844:what goes on at Knowledge.-- 1265: 1070:) 19:12, 23 July 2009 (UTC) 1008:Convocation of Politic Worms 912:) 14:52, 21 July 2009 (UTC) 813:) 02:01, 16 July 2009 (UTC) 657:) 14:34, 13 July 2009 (UTC) 590:) 12:32, 6 April 2009 (UTC) 503:Milhist Coordinator election 427: 284:Military history WikiProject 7: 2370:08:27, 27 April 2010 (UTC) 1634:Not oversighted, deleted.-- 1383:election, or in one of two 1350:to be...just as we are not 1133:disruption to prove a point 1110:12:17, 9 August 2009 (UTC) 1086:) 14:34, 24 July 2009 (UTC) 1053:) 16:28, 23 July 2009 (UTC) 994:) 16:26, 22 July 2009 (UTC) 974:) 11:19, 22 July 2009 (UTC) 878:) 10:29, 18 July 2009 (UTC) 829:) 09:38, 16 July 2009 (UTC) 766:) 21:37, 13 July 2009 (UTC) 729:) 16:05, 13 July 2009 (UTC) 703:) 15:58, 13 July 2009 (UTC) 684:) 15:35, 13 July 2009 (UTC) 669:) 15:28, 13 July 2009 (UTC) 557:18:04, 12 April 2008 (UTC) 10: 2553: 1869:. It is more like unto an 1577:, but you should read the 1559:diff (admin viewable only) 1387:that relate to the use of 612:) 09:28, 2 July 2009 (UTC) 2387: 2268: 1982:Heh, RDH, just remember, 1799:question to Mr. Bauder. 1579:guide to appealing blocks 1415:Hey there. The first of 948:my own Wiki-critical blog 883:Thank you for the insight 638:05:51, 6 July 2009 (UTC) 623:moved your second comment 496: 482: 441: 363: 358: 287:since 12 September 2005. 2504:Best to you m8's, Ghost 2473:Curiosity will not abate 2302:My ears were burning.... 926:I suggest starting with 897:Durova's Sekret Evidence 75:This article includes a 2490:Replying to old friends 2205:Knowledge at its worse: 1817:privacy violating tools 1292:Super Smash Bros. Brawl 576: 205:In my spare time I'm a 104:more precise citations. 2448: 2340:Boba Phat at AFD again 2223: 2215:Knowledge at its best: 1830:Max Weber's definition 1542: 751: 521:Russian-Circassian War 215:costumed crime fighter 2202: 1541: 944:Signal-to-noise ratio 738: 2414:Content Review Medal 2065:dude. — 1824:, Knowledge isn't a 1385:requests for comment 760:William M. Connolley 723:William M. Connolley 678:William M. Connolley 651:William M. Connolley 318:Official Wikimotto: 249:put it quite well; 172:Harlem Globetrotter 168:Bare-knuckle boxing 1859:Well someone with 1543: 1381:Audit Subcommittee 1239: | 1210: | 1184: | 893:Essjay controversy 77:list of references 45: 2428: 2427: 2179:finalisation poll 1778: 1773: Giano 1728: 1723: Giano 1630: 1625: Giano 1563:appeal this block 1553:from editing for 928:this fine article 895:. I read through 870:fool efficient!-- 865: 527: 526: 522: 480: 479: 475: 467: 463: 425: 424: 421: 420: 314: 313: 291: 290: 174:. I hold PHDs in 130: 129: 122: 39: 38: 33:since 22 May 2017 2544: 2398:By order of the 2385: 2378: 2377: 2367: 2364: 2361: 2358: 2355: 2352: 2129:is hysterical.-- 1777: 1775: 1768: 1751: 1750: 1748: 1742: 1727: 1725: 1718: 1654: 1629: 1627: 1620: 1576: 1540: 1533: 1532: 1530: 1524: 1236: 1207: 1181: 1108: 988: 940:Knowledge Review 930:by Cade Metz of 906: 863: 861: 853: 721:so that is good 636: 631: 617:Wales/ArbCom RFC 556: 555: 520: 505: 494: 487: 486: 473: 469: 465: 461: 450: 439: 432: 431: 393: 388: 383: 378: 373: 368: 356: 352: 302: 295: 273: 265: 247:User:Snickersnee 198:and, of course, 125: 118: 114: 111: 105: 100:this article by 91:inline citations 70: 69: 62: 54: 46: 23: 16: 2552: 2551: 2547: 2546: 2545: 2543: 2542: 2541: 2522: 2521: 2492: 2475: 2451: 2436:appreciation.-- 2376: 2365: 2362: 2359: 2356: 2353: 2350: 2342: 2271: 2241: 2170: 2150: 1980: 1891: 1883: 1864: 1788: 1771: 1769: 1747:barbarian 1746: 1741: Skomorokh 1740: 1738: 1737: 1721: 1719: 1648: 1623: 1621: 1582: 1566: 1538: 1529:barbarian 1528: 1523: Skomorokh 1522: 1520: 1519: 1413: 1399: 1397: 1396: 1377: 1330:hard damn labor 1268: 1234: 1205: 1179: 1174:edit summaries. 1170: 1129: 1109: 1104: 1093: 1091:Comment at Vote 1060: 1017:mushroom people 984: 902: 885: 857: 849: 836: 794: 644: 634: 627: 619: 579: 563: 543: 542: 535: 529: 501: 500: 499: 485: 458: 446: 445: 444: 430: 413:older than the 359:Salad'o'meter™ 349: 315: 292: 277:This user is a 244: 240:Joseph Goebbels 176:nuclear physics 142: 126: 115: 109: 106: 95: 81:related reading 71: 67: 59: 57: 56: 55: 48: 12: 11: 5: 2550: 2540: 2539: 2534: 2491: 2488: 2474: 2471: 2450: 2447: 2446: 2445: 2426: 2425: 2395: 2394: 2388: 2386: 2375: 2372: 2341: 2338: 2337: 2336: 2335: 2334: 2333: 2332: 2325:124.197.16.150 2276:130.123.192.23 2270: 2267: 2240: 2237: 2236: 2235: 2201: 2200: 2188: 2187: 2169: 2166: 2149: 2146: 2145: 2144: 2143: 2142: 2141: 2140: 2139: 2138: 2075: 2074: 2073: 2072: 2071: 2070: 2039: 2038: 2037: 2036: 1979: 1974: 1973: 1972: 1971: 1970: 1969: 1968: 1967: 1966: 1951: 1950: 1949: 1918: 1917: 1916: 1915: 1914: 1913: 1854: 1853: 1837: 1787: 1786:Ghost Responds 1784: 1783: 1782: 1781: 1780: 1765: 1764: 1763: 1762: 1761: 1760: 1759: 1758: 1757: 1756: 1755: 1754: 1753: 1645: 1644: 1643: 1544:You have been 1536: 1512: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1506: 1505: 1504: 1503: 1502: 1501: 1500: 1499: 1465:acceptable."-- 1437: 1436: 1412: 1409: 1376: 1373: 1372: 1371: 1370: 1369: 1368: 1367: 1315: 1304: 1303: 1267: 1264: 1263: 1262: 1261: 1260: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1255: 1254: 1169: 1168:Edit summaries 1166: 1165: 1164: 1155:! For shame!-- 1128: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1103: 1092: 1089: 1088: 1087: 1059: 1056: 1055: 1054: 1028: 1027: 1022: 1021: 1012: 1011: 998: 997: 996: 995: 976: 975: 958: 957: 952: 951: 919: 918: 884: 881: 880: 879: 835: 832: 831: 830: 793: 790: 789: 788: 787: 786: 785: 784: 770: 769: 768: 767: 737: 736: 735: 734: 733: 732: 731: 730: 709: 708: 707: 706: 705: 704: 688: 687: 686: 685: 671: 670: 646:I assune this 643: 640: 618: 615: 614: 613: 578: 575: 562: 561:Contacting you 559: 534: 531: 525: 524: 507: 506: 497: 495: 484: 481: 478: 477: 452: 451: 442: 440: 429: 426: 423: 422: 419: 418: 411: 408: 405: 402: 399: 395: 394: 361: 360: 332:Alternatively: 312: 311: 303: 293: 289: 288: 281:member of the 275: 263: 156:field marshall 154:I'm a retired 141: 134: 128: 127: 85:external links 74: 72: 65: 49: 42: 41: 37: 36: 24: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2549: 2538: 2535: 2533: 2530: 2529: 2527: 2520: 2518: 2514: 2510: 2505: 2502: 2500: 2495: 2487: 2485: 2481: 2470: 2468: 2464: 2460: 2457: 2454: 2443: 2439: 2434: 2430: 2429: 2423: 2419: 2415: 2411: 2407: 2403: 2402: 2397: 2396: 2393: 2392: 2389: 2384: 2379: 2371: 2369: 2368: 2347: 2330: 2326: 2321: 2320: 2318: 2315: 2312: 2308: 2305: 2301: 2300: 2298: 2294: 2290: 2285: 2284: 2283: 2281: 2277: 2266: 2264: 2260: 2255: 2252: 2248: 2245: 2233: 2229: 2225: 2224: 2222: 2221: 2217: 2216: 2212: 2211: 2207: 2206: 2198: 2194: 2190: 2189: 2185: 2184: 2183: 2181: 2180: 2174: 2165: 2163: 2159: 2155: 2136: 2132: 2128: 2124: 2123: 2121: 2118: 2115: 2111: 2107: 2106: 2104: 2100: 2096: 2095: 2094: 2093: 2092: 2090: 2087: 2084: 2080: 2068: 2064: 2060: 2059: 2057: 2054: 2051: 2047: 2043: 2042: 2041: 2040: 2034: 2031: 2028: 2024: 2020: 2019: 2017: 2013: 2009: 2005: 2004: 2003: 2001: 1998: 1995: 1991: 1988: 1985: 1978: 1964: 1960: 1956: 1952: 1947: 1943: 1938: 1937: 1935: 1931: 1926: 1925: 1924: 1923: 1922: 1921: 1920: 1919: 1911: 1907: 1902: 1901: 1899: 1895: 1889: 1888: 1881: 1876: 1872: 1868: 1862: 1858: 1857: 1856: 1855: 1851: 1847: 1843: 1838: 1835: 1831: 1827: 1823: 1818: 1814: 1813: 1812: 1810: 1806: 1800: 1798: 1792: 1776: 1774: 1766: 1749: 1743: 1735: 1731: 1730: 1726: 1724: 1716: 1712: 1711: 1710: 1709: 1707: 1703: 1699: 1698: 1696: 1693: 1690: 1686: 1683: 1679: 1676: 1675: 1673: 1669: 1665: 1661: 1657: 1656: 1653: 1652: 1651:The Wordsmith 1646: 1641: 1637: 1633: 1632: 1628: 1626: 1617: 1616: 1615: 1614: 1613: 1611: 1608: 1605: 1601: 1597: 1593: 1591: 1587: 1580: 1574: 1571:|reason= 1570: 1564: 1560: 1556: 1552: 1549: 1548: 1535: 1531: 1525: 1517: 1497: 1493: 1489: 1488: 1486: 1482: 1478: 1477: 1475: 1474: 1472: 1468: 1463: 1462: 1460: 1456: 1452: 1451: 1449: 1445: 1441: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1434: 1430: 1426: 1425: 1424: 1422: 1418: 1411:Please redact 1408: 1406: 1402: 1394: 1390: 1386: 1382: 1365: 1361: 1357: 1353: 1349: 1345: 1344: 1339: 1335: 1331: 1326: 1325: 1323: 1319: 1316: 1313: 1308: 1307: 1306: 1305: 1301: 1297: 1293: 1288: 1287: 1286: 1284: 1280: 1275: 1271: 1252: 1248: 1244: 1243: 1241: 1238: 1237: 1230: 1229: 1227: 1223: 1219: 1215: 1214: 1212: 1209: 1208: 1201: 1200: 1198: 1194: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1186: 1183: 1182: 1175: 1162: 1158: 1154: 1150: 1146: 1145: 1144: 1142: 1138: 1134: 1121: 1117: 1113: 1112: 1111: 1107: 1102: 1098: 1085: 1081: 1077: 1073: 1072: 1071: 1069: 1065: 1052: 1048: 1044: 1040: 1039: 1034: 1030: 1029: 1024: 1023: 1018: 1014: 1013: 1009: 1004: 1000: 999: 993: 989: 987: 980: 979: 978: 977: 973: 969: 965: 960: 959: 954: 953: 949: 945: 941: 937: 933: 929: 925: 921: 920: 915: 914: 913: 911: 907: 905: 898: 894: 890: 877: 873: 868: 867: 866: 862: 860: 854: 852: 845: 841: 828: 824: 820: 816: 815: 814: 812: 808: 803: 801: 800: 799:naval geezers 783: 779: 776: 775: 774: 773: 772: 771: 765: 761: 758: 755: 754: 753: 752: 750: 749: 745: 744: 728: 724: 720: 717: 716: 715: 714: 713: 712: 711: 710: 702: 698: 694: 693: 692: 691: 690: 689: 683: 679: 675: 674: 673: 672: 668: 664: 660: 659: 658: 656: 652: 648: 639: 637: 632: 630: 624: 611: 608: 605: 601: 597: 593: 592: 591: 589: 585: 574: 572: 568: 558: 554: 550: 546: 540: 530: 523: 517: 513: 509: 508: 504: 498: 493: 488: 476: 470: 468: 454: 453: 449: 443: 438: 433: 416: 412: 409: 406: 403: 400: 397: 396: 392: 387: 382: 377: 372: 367: 362: 357: 354: 353: 350: 347: 345: 341: 337: 336: 330: 329: 327: 323: 319: 310: 309: 304: 301: 297: 296: 286: 285: 280: 276: 274: 272: 267: 266: 262: 260: 256: 252: 248: 242: 241: 237: 233: 231: 227: 223: 218: 216: 212: 208: 203: 201: 197: 193: 189: 185: 181: 177: 173: 169: 165: 161: 160:grand admiral 157: 152: 151: 149: 140: 139: 133: 124: 121: 113: 103: 99: 93: 92: 86: 82: 78: 73: 64: 63: 60: 53: 47: 34: 30: 29: 25: 22: 18: 17: 2512: 2508: 2506: 2503: 2499:Forlorn hope 2496: 2493: 2476: 2461: 2458: 2455: 2452: 2437: 2432: 2413: 2399: 2390: 2349: 2343: 2313: 2303: 2292: 2288: 2272: 2256: 2253: 2249: 2242: 2227: 2219: 2218: 2214: 2213: 2209: 2208: 2204: 2203: 2177: 2175: 2171: 2151: 2130: 2116: 2098: 2085: 2076: 2062: 2052: 2029: 2011: 1996: 1986: 1981: 1976: 1958: 1954: 1929: 1893: 1885: 1866: 1860: 1841: 1816: 1805:4.100.68.115 1801: 1796: 1793: 1789: 1772: 1722: 1714: 1691: 1681: 1677: 1663: 1650: 1624: 1606: 1595: 1594: 1583: 1575:}} 1572: 1567:{{ 1551:indefinitely 1550: 1545: 1513: 1443: 1414: 1378: 1359: 1351: 1347: 1342: 1337: 1333: 1329: 1295: 1276: 1272: 1269: 1246: 1235:Juliancolton 1232: 1221: 1206:Juliancolton 1203: 1192: 1180:Juliancolton 1177: 1171: 1156: 1152: 1148: 1130: 1115: 1094: 1079: 1061: 1046: 1037: 1032: 1016: 1007: 1002: 985: 967: 963: 932:The Register 931: 923: 922:For more on 903: 886: 871: 858: 850: 837: 834:Constitution 822: 818: 804: 798: 795: 777: 756: 741: 740: 739: 696: 662: 645: 642:Aimed at me? 628: 620: 606: 580: 564: 536: 528: 519: 502: 472: 459: 447: 410:seen it all 404:been around 348: 339: 334: 333: 331: 326:Póg Mo Thóin 320: 317: 316: 308:Jimbo Wales. 305: 282: 278: 268: 250: 243: 235: 234: 219: 204: 153: 145: 143: 137: 131: 116: 107: 96:Please help 88: 58: 32: 26: 2433:thanks Tom! 2127:Beat poetry 1734:this thread 1114:Too late.-- 792:Good notion 322:Sapere Aude 230:Keyser Söze 226:Jimmy Hoffa 102:introducing 2526:Categories 2259:Matt Lewis 2193:Matt Lewis 1875:Bartertown 1871:Ochlocracy 1828:(I prefer 1429:Dougweller 1389:SecurePoll 1356:'Bama Bump 1338:guidelines 1277:Very Best 1127:Hindenburg 1076:Speedbump! 964:a big deal 621:RDH, I've 533:RFA thanks 512:Eurocopter 259:Ouijaboard 188:philosophy 180:Phrenology 170:Champ and 110:April 2011 2463:Spawn Man 2459:Regards, 2453:Hey bro, 2418:TomStar81 2257:Regards, 1318:SheighZam 1312:High five 1279:SheighZam 1266:Boba Phat 1137:Parsecboy 1101:SlamDiego 782:Vespasian 584:Spawn Man 567:BobDysart 428:Thank you 401:involved 257:and/or a 164:Astronaut 2317:contribs 2307:Casliber 2162:Jusdafax 2120:contribs 2110:Casliber 2089:contribs 2079:Casliber 2056:contribs 2046:Casliber 2033:contribs 2023:Casliber 2000:contribs 1990:Casliber 1842:actually 1797:annoying 1695:contribs 1685:Casliber 1610:contribs 1600:Casliber 1352:supposed 1348:supposed 1147:Games?! 1106:←T 1097:Mr.Z-man 1064:Novickas 1038:agitants 986:Mattisse 904:Mattisse 748:Polybius 610:contribs 600:Casliber 545:Lawrence 407:veteran 207:rockstar 200:theology 192:medicine 184:business 148:Infobahn 2480:SoLando 2410:A-Class 1581:first. 1569:unblock 1547:blocked 1334:friends 1149:Games?! 1003:Retired 900:— 847:→ 464: D 417:itself 98:improve 2063:froody 1942:Tznkai 1906:Tznkai 1846:Tznkai 1822:police 1803:from-- 1702:Tznkai 1678:(sigh) 1668:Tznkai 1636:Tznkai 1596:(Sigh) 1586:Tznkai 1492:Tznkai 1481:Tznkai 1467:Tznkai 1455:Tznkai 1401:Risker 1343:worthy 855: 819:system 807:Tznkai 635:(talk) 483:Thanks 213:and a 209:, the 2366:Focus 2289:waste 2067:Coren 1873:, or 1867:state 1826:state 1421:Coren 1417:these 1078:;-)-- 466:AVIES 415:Cabal 398:n00b 279:PROUD 255:Gmail 222:fnord 83:, or 2517:talk 2484:Talk 2467:talk 2442:talk 2422:Talk 2408:and 2406:Peer 2329:talk 2311:talk 2304:ouch 2297:talk 2280:talk 2269:Hey! 2263:talk 2232:talk 2197:talk 2135:talk 2114:talk 2103:talk 2083:talk 2050:talk 2027:talk 2016:talk 2008:Grok 2006:You 1994:talk 1963:talk 1946:talk 1934:talk 1910:talk 1898:talk 1880:ORTS 1850:talk 1809:talk 1706:talk 1689:talk 1672:talk 1664:just 1660:this 1640:talk 1604:talk 1590:talk 1496:talk 1485:talk 1471:talk 1459:talk 1448:talk 1433:talk 1405:talk 1364:talk 1322:talk 1300:talk 1283:talk 1251:talk 1226:talk 1197:talk 1161:talk 1153:game 1141:talk 1120:talk 1084:talk 1068:talk 1051:talk 1043:rock 992:Talk 972:talk 910:Talk 876:talk 851:ROUX 844:this 840:this 827:talk 811:talk 764:talk 727:talk 701:talk 682:talk 667:talk 655:talk 629:Tony 604:talk 596:this 588:talk 577:Hey! 571:talk 516:talk 462:OGER 344:talk 228:and 211:pope 144:Hi, 2449:Hi! 539:RFA 324:or 196:law 2528:: 2416:. 2176:A 2160:. 1836:). 1744:, 1526:, 1518:. 1358:-- 780:-- 746:-- 547:§ 456:-- 338:-- 238:-- 232:. 217:. 202:. 194:, 190:, 186:, 182:, 178:, 166:, 162:, 158:, 87:, 79:, 2515:( 2482:( 2465:( 2440:( 2420:( 2363:m 2360:a 2357:e 2354:r 2351:D 2327:( 2314:· 2309:( 2295:( 2278:( 2261:( 2230:( 2195:( 2133:( 2117:· 2112:( 2101:( 2086:· 2081:( 2053:· 2048:( 2030:· 2025:( 2014:( 1997:· 1992:( 1961:( 1944:( 1932:( 1908:( 1896:( 1890:. 1848:( 1807:( 1704:( 1692:· 1687:( 1670:( 1638:( 1607:· 1602:( 1588:( 1494:( 1483:( 1469:( 1457:( 1446:( 1431:( 1403:( 1362:( 1320:( 1314:! 1298:( 1281:( 1249:( 1224:( 1195:( 1159:( 1139:( 1118:( 1082:( 1066:( 1049:( 1010:. 990:( 970:( 908:( 874:( 859:₪ 825:( 809:( 762:( 725:( 699:( 680:( 665:( 653:( 607:· 602:( 586:( 569:( 553:e 551:/ 549:t 514:( 460:R 342:( 328:! 123:) 117:( 112:) 108:( 94:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index