1163:"The Royal Society fully supports questioning and debate in science lessons, as long as it is not designed to undermine young people's confidence in the value of scientific evidence." Some proponents of an alternative explanation for the diversity of life on Earth now claim that their theories are based on scientific evidence. One such view is presented as the theory of intelligent design. This proposes that some species are too complex to have evolved through natural selection and that therefore life on Earth must be the product of a 'designer'. Its supporters make only selective reference to the overwhelming scientific evidence that supports evolution, and treat gaps in current knowledge which, as in all areas of science, certainly exist - as if they were evidence for a 'designer'. In this respect, intelligent design has far more in common with a religious belief in creationism than it has with science, which is based on evidence acquired through experiment and observation. The theory of evolution is supported by the weight of scientific evidence; the theory of intelligent design is not."
631:, Ekklesia's co-director, outlined his critique of intelligent design creationism, and pseudo-scientific explanations for the universe: "Creationism and ID are in no way comparable to scientific theories of origins and have no place in the modern science classroom. They also distort mature Christian understandings of the universe as coming into being through the whole world process, not through reversals or denials of that process. The roots of creationism, whether in its ‘hard’ form, or in attenuated ID ideas, lie not in science but in misinterpretations of the Bible. Claims that such notions can be justified from a ‘literal’ reading of
592:"Neither intelligent design nor creationism are recognised scientific theories and they are not included in the science curriculum, the Truth in Science information pack is therefore not an appropriate resource to support the science curriculum. The national curriculum for science clearly sets down that pupils should be taught: how uncertainties in scientific knowledge and scientific ideas change over time; the role of the scientific community in validating these changes; variation within species can lead to evolutionary changes; and, similarities and differences between species can be measured and classified," --
793:"We, the undersigned Academies of Sciences, have learned that in various parts of the world, within science courses taught in certain public systems of education, scientific evidence, data, and testable theories about the origins and evolution of life on Earth are being concealed, denied, or confused with theories not testable by science. We urge decision makers, teachers, and parents to educate all children about the methods and discoveries of science and to foster an understanding of the science of nature."
40:
913:". Burgess went on to concede "that the Earth has the appearance of great age" on the grounds that "the bible says that God created a mature Earth, and a mature universe, with Adam mature, and trees being mature". The interviewer quizzed Burgess on the matter of a deceptive God. In his response, Burgess explained, "when man came into the universe he would have that fully functioning universe ready to enjoy". In response to further challenges, Burgess said that the
296:
588:, Labour MP for Dorset South, and Minister of State at the Department for Education and Skills, the Minister for Schools, criticised Truth In Science, their information packs, and intelligent design creationism, citing them as unsuitable for the United Kingdom science curriculum. In answer to a question regarding what the Secretary of State for Education and Skills would do in response to the information packs, Knight said:
1002:• National Science Teachers Association, a professional association of 55,000 science teachers and administrators in a 2005 press release: "We stand with the nation's leading scientific organizations and scientists, including Dr. John Marburger, the president's top science advisor, in stating that intelligent design is not science.…It is simply not fair to present pseudoscience to students in the science classroom."
623:, a United Kingdom theological think-tank accused Truth in Science and the advocates of intelligent design of misrepresenting the bible, and that creationism and intelligent design are not on par with accepted scientific theories. According to one Ekklesia contributor, Geologist and Anglican vicar Michael Roberts, the material on the Truth in Science website is carefully packaged to hide its
558:, 59 schools around the United Kingdom used, or planned to use the Truth in Science information packs. The New Scientist article stated that Truth in Science circulated the material with the intention of countering the teaching of evolution in science classes, and that the information packs "promote the notion that life on Earth was created through intelligent design, a
613:, the Dean of Southwark, said: "Everything needs to be explored, so that children can ask sensible questions. Though I see no huge difficulty with exploring intelligent design or creationism or flat Earth, they happen to be misguided, foolish and flying in the face of all evidence. I see no problem with Darwinian theory and Christian faith going hand in hand", --
921:. In his penultimate question, the interviewer, William Crawley, asked Burgess "You're not concerned that you're messing up the minds of young people by giving them the impression that they have to commit scientific suicide in order to be believers?" to which Burgess responded: "My main concern, is that on the day of
904:
Professor Stuart
Burgess appeared on a radio interview with BBC Northern Ireland on 18 April 2004.Burgess stated his position that the Earth "is around 6000 years old, that's what the bible says". In drawing a conjunction between science and religion, Burgess said that one's choice of explanation was
668:
The arguments are presented in the style of an educational film, and are generally presented among needlessly lengthy scientific descriptions and impressive visuals, which help to make creationist arguments sound reasonable to anyone without scientific training in the relevant disciplines. Anyone
651:
stated that "intelligent design has far more in common with a religious belief in creationism than it has with science" and raised concerns that "young people are poorly served by deliberate attempts to withhold, distort or misrepresent scientific knowledge and understanding in order to promote
635:
are nonsensensical. This book has not one, but two ‘creation stories’. They differ widely in detail, are highly figurative, and were written to combat fatalistic
Ancient Near East cosmogonies by stressing the underlying goodness of the world as a gift of God, not to comment on modern scientific
660:, attacked intelligent design, and the ambitions of Truth in Science: "There is just no evidence for intelligent design, it is pure religion and has nothing to do with science. It should be banned from science classes". In October 2006, a science organisation called
1021:"Biologists aren’t alarmed by intelligent design's arrival in Dover and elsewhere because they have all sworn allegiance to atheistic materialism; they’re alarmed because intelligent design is junk science." H. Allen Orr. Annals of Science. New Yorker May 2005.
569:: "Neither creationism nor intelligent design are taught as a subject in schools, and are not specified in the science curriculum. The national curriculum for science clearly sets down that pupils should be taught that the fossil record is evidence for
392:
It should not be confused with a United States organisation, The Center for Truth in
Science, which was founded in 2020 to dispute various legal/scientific issues which had been flooding the nation's judicial system, such as
409:
According to their website, the organisation is headed by Joseph
Annotti (President and CEO), and Peggy Murray (Research Director). It has three subordinate groups, whose roster (as of February 2022) consisted of:
1045:
950:
1388:
546:
in support of the intelligent design hypothesis has been published in peer-reviewed scientific journals and intelligent design has never produced a single scientifically testable theory.
525:
273:
216:
1209:
1189:
929:
946:
813:
1140:"The material on the website is carefully packaged, and its YEC roots, and thus its scientific worthlessness, may not be immediately apparent to the undiscerning."
1082:`Design` attack on school science: Parents are being encouraged to challenge their children`s science teachers over what they are explaining as the origins of life.
797:
554:
In
September 2006, Truth in Science sent resource packs on intelligent design to the heads of science of all United Kingdom secondary schools. According to
566:
701:, Ian Lowe of BCSE, expressed concern that creationism could possibly flourish even in Britain, while Mike Brass, chairman of BCSE, said in a letter to
225:
961:
petition gained 7733 signatories from scientists opposing ID. The AAAS, the largest association of scientists in the U.S., has 120,000 members, and
234:
141:
132:
664:
reviewed the DVD information packs sent by Truth in
Science to the heads of science at all United Kingdom secondary schools in September 2006.
925:, people will not say to God 'my excuse is the theory of evolution', for not believing in God, because God will say that is not an excuse". —
1068:
325:
164:
969:
1398:
1216:, Report, Committee on Culture, Science and Education, Rapporteur: Mr Guy Lengagne, France, Socialist Group, Parliamentary Assembly,
1106:
720:
newspaper highlighting "scientific errors" on the Truth in
Science website, including that the organisation denies the evolution of
121:
733:
259:
1186:
993:
879:
775:
531:
476:
Derek
Linkens, Professor and Dean Emeritus, Department of Automatic Control and Systems Engineering, University of Sheffield.
926:
1393:
989:"for most members of the mainstream scientific community, ID is not a scientific theory, but a creationist pseudoscience."
690:
954:
1204:
958:
755:
264:
794:
479:
318:
147:
1129:
1152:
1141:
760:
750:
697:
sent information packs to every UK secondary school in
September 2006. In a letter to the editor, published in
205:
115:
105:
369:
in school science lessons. The organisation claims that there is scientific controversy about the validity of
423:
210:
1359:
1004:
National
Science Teachers Association Disappointed About Intelligent Design Comments Made by President Bush
770:
765:
386:
311:
299:
95:
23:
693:
has condemned attempts to introduce the teaching of creationism at British schools. BCSE protested when
530:
The majority of scientists do not consider the conclusions of intelligent design to be scientific. The
439:
1300:
657:
1327:
1175:
824:
581:
1012:
Journal of Clinical Investigation 116:1134–1138 American Society for Clinical Investigation, 2006.
724:. In response, Richard Buggs, then of the Truth in Science scientific panel published a letter in
652:
particular religious beliefs". In a Guardian newspaper article, dated 27 November 2006, Professor
1118:
957:
petition begun in 2001 has been signed by "over 600 scientists" as of 20 August 2006. A four-day
674:
624:
464:
460:
867:
1022:
891:
60:
470:
George Curry, Minister of Elswick Parish Church (St Stephen and St Paul), Newcastle upon Tyne.
1229:
354:
39:
966:
565:
The BBC News website reported the reaction to the information packs from the United Kingdom
1239:
75:
65:
1348:
8:
543:
427:
398:
382:
378:
350:
200:
70:
1003:
962:
708:
670:
512:
508:
456:
362:
174:
169:
44:
31:
442:, Minister of the Free Church of Scotland (Continuing) and former teacher of classics.
1281:
1217:
1027:
991:
Trojan Horse or Legitimate Science: Deconstructing the Debate over Intelligent Design
1009:
740:
identifies a single possible intermediate step. This hardly constitutes a pathway."
1271:
1262:
1243:
1080:
1056:
485:
184:
80:
990:
1235:
1213:
1193:
997:
973:
933:
801:
737:
698:
632:
85:
401:
causing health effects, and various plastic products impacting the environment.
389:, following its strategy and circulating the Institute's promotional materials.
918:
711:(ID) is creationism dressed up in a tux to sneak into our science classrooms."
647:
In response to the introduction of intelligent design to European schools, the
370:
342:
110:
459:, has a Diploma in Theology from the London Reformed Baptist Seminary (of the
1382:
1164:
922:
653:
648:
555:
535:
374:
358:
1285:
893:
Answers in Genesis biography of Stuart Burgess, Mechanical Engineering (UK)
703:
678:
669:
familiar with creationists will recognize their standard tactics including
628:
573:, and how variation and selection may lead to evolution or extinction." --
539:
179:
977:
1046:
Ruling, Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District 4: whether ID is science
1033:
910:
346:
285:
1165:
Royal Society statement on evolution, creationism and intelligent design
1010:
Defending science education against intelligent design: a call to action
610:
585:
504:
Paul Garner, lecturer and researcher with Biblical Creation Ministries.
1153:
Ekklesia - UK anti-evolutionists seek to lure parents with new website
1142:
Ekklesia - UK anti-evolutionists seek to lure parents with new website
1107:
House of Commons Hansard Written Answers for 1 November 2006 (pt 0001)
906:
721:
716:
570:
559:
366:
1373:
1276:
1257:
526:
List of scientific societies explicitly rejecting intelligent design
445:
Steve Taylor, Professor of Electromagnetics and Physical Electronics
1006:
National Science Teachers Association Press Release August 3, 2005
914:
1176:
Revealed: rise of creationism in UK schools - Guardian Unlimited.
980:
on the status intelligent design and other forms of creationism.
967:
condemn teaching of intelligent design in school science classes
1349:
Questions for Creationists - The Times - Letters to the Editor.
1036:
Mark Bergin. World Magazine, Vol. 21, No. 8 February 25, 2006.
1094:
1000:
David Mu. Harvard Science Review, Vol. 19, Issue 1, Fall 2005.
846:
714:
On 11 October 2006, a reader, Chris Preedy, wrote a letter to
978:
List of statements from scientific professional organizations
620:
1389:
Conservative political advocacy groups in the United Kingdom
1130:
Ekklesia - Creationism distorts truth in science, says vicar
488:, Pastor Of Trinity Baptist Church, in Montville, New Jersey
482:, Pastor of Grace Community Church in Sun Valley, California
1255:
827:
James Randerson. EducationGuardian.co.uk, 27 November 2006.
394:
1030:
Tower of Babel: The Evidence Against the New Creationism.
1256:
Graebsch, Almut; Schiermeier, Quirin (23 November 2006).
947:
List of scientific societies rejecting intelligent design
905:"faith versus faith", and that "either you have faith in
814:
List of scientific societies rejecting intelligent design
965:. More than 70,000 Australian scientists and educators
433:
Phillip Metcalfe (Vice Chairman), a Christian publisher.
615:
Colin Slee, Dean of Southwark, The Times, December 2006
732:"I do not know of a good evolutionary pathway for the
1119:
Creationism gains foothold in schools - Times Online.
795:
IAP Statement on the Teaching of Evolution (PDF file)
455:Stuart Burgess, Professor of Engineering Design at
381:around the world. The group is affiliated with the
373:evolution, a view rejected by the United Kingdom's
1258:"Anti-evolutionists raise their profile in Europe"
1187:Science, Just Science: Truth in Science materials.
1069:New Scientist - Creationism creeps into UK schools
1380:
1039:
1023:Devolution—Why intelligent design isn't.
594:Jim Knight 1 November 2006 : Column 456W
927:Sunday Sequence - Finding God in the Universe
868:Andrew McIntosh profile on Answers in Genesis
319:
16:United Kingdom-based creationist organisation
1057:BBC News - 'Design' attack on school science
917:is a religious faith, which contradicts the
534:and others have termed intelligent design a
357:" campaign, which it uses to try to get the
473:Dr Russell Healey, teacher of mathematics.
326:
312:
1275:
1301:"Creationism has no place in classrooms"
880:The Sunday Sequence with William Crawley
681:and occasionally blatant falsehoods, --
1206:The dangers of creationism in education
449:
1381:
1095:Jim Knight, MP for Dorset South - Home
1085:, BBC News, Friday, 29 September 2006.
734:development of the bacterial flagellum
501:Nick Cowan, retired chemistry teacher.
1325:
776:National Center for Science Education
584:, on 1 November 2006, The Right Hon.
562:for the biblical story of creation".
532:National Science Teachers Association
426:, Professor of Thermodynamics at the
413:
217:International Society for Complexity,
1298:
691:British Centre for Science Education
1220:, Doc. 11297, 8 June 2007. Para. 69
955:A Scientific Dissent From Darwinism
683:Science, Just Science, October 2006
567:Department for Education and Skills
549:
492:
13:
959:A Scientific Support for Darwinism
689:The UK pro-science advocacy group
14:
1410:
1367:
274:Scientific bodies that explicitly
1399:Intelligent design organizations
1326:Brass, Mike (19 December 2006).
736:. In his latest book, Professor
349:organisation which promotes the
295:
294:
38:
1353:
1342:
1319:
1292:
1249:
1223:
1198:
1180:
1169:
1157:
1146:
1134:
1123:
1112:
1100:
1088:
1074:
1062:
1050:
1015:
983:
953:. 3) The Discovery Institute's
939:
836:Based in Chicago, Illinois, USA
404:
219:Information, and Design (ISCID)
1328:"Creationism in the classroom"
898:
885:
873:
861:
839:
830:
818:
806:
787:
761:Critical Analysis of Evolution
756:Creation–evolution controversy
751:Center for Science and Culture
507:Tim Wells, Senior Lecturer in
430:, a Christian and creationist.
206:Center for Science and Culture
1:
1299:Lowe, Ian (21 October 2006).
781:
365:creationism taught alongside
211:Centre for Intelligent Design
142:Discovery Institute campaigns
771:Evolution as theory and fact
638:Ekklesia, 25 September 2006.
604:
599:
7:
1394:Intelligent design movement
951:Kitzmiller v. Dover page 83
919:first law of thermodynamics
766:Emmanuel Schools Foundation
744:
575:DfES Spokesperson, BBC News
397:blamed for causing cancer,
387:intelligent design movement
235:Physicians and Surgeons for
10:
1415:
642:
538:, and some have termed it
523:
519:
419:Stephen A. Hyde (Chairman)
228:Evolution Awareness Center
825:Who are Truth in Science?
800:27 September 2007 at the
658:University College London
276:reject intelligent design
436:John Perfect, a teacher.
1192:26 October 2006 at the
675:argument from ignorance
625:young Earth creationist
461:Metropolitan Tabernacle
1212:13 August 2007 at the
742:
687:
597:
226:Intelligent Design and
61:Irreducible complexity
730:
666:
662:Science, Just Science
590:
355:Teach the Controversy
148:Teach the controversy
1305:Letter to the Editor
1240:Member of Parliament
996:24 July 2007 at the
972:14 June 2006 at the
450:Council of Reference
379:Academies of Science
237:Scientific Integrity
76:Intelligent designer
66:Specified complexity
722:bacterial flagellum
544:scientific evidence
428:University of Leeds
383:Discovery Institute
351:Discovery Institute
201:Discovery Institute
122:Kitzmiller v. Dover
71:Fine-tuned universe
932:2006-01-17 at the
847:"Truck in Science"
709:intelligent design
671:appeals to emotion
609:In December 2006,
513:Cardiff University
509:Neuroendocrinology
457:Bristol University
414:Board of directors
395:talc-based powders
363:intelligent design
175:Phillip E. Johnson
170:William A. Dembski
45:Watchmaker analogy
32:Intelligent design
1307:. Financial Times
1270:(7118): 406–407.
1231:SCIENCE EDUCATION
1218:Council of Europe
1028:Robert T. Pennock
963:firmly rejects ID
399:Roundup herbicide
385:, the hub of the
336:
335:
1406:
1374:official website
1362:
1360:Truth in Science
1357:
1351:
1346:
1340:
1339:
1337:
1335:
1323:
1317:
1316:
1314:
1312:
1296:
1290:
1289:
1279:
1253:
1247:
1246:2708, 11.10.2006
1244:Early Day Motion
1227:
1221:
1202:
1196:
1184:
1178:
1173:
1167:
1161:
1155:
1150:
1144:
1138:
1132:
1127:
1121:
1116:
1110:
1104:
1098:
1092:
1086:
1078:
1072:
1066:
1060:
1054:
1048:
1043:
1037:
1019:
1013:
987:
981:
943:
937:
902:
896:
889:
883:
877:
871:
865:
859:
858:
856:
854:
843:
837:
834:
828:
822:
816:
810:
804:
791:
695:Truth in Science
582:House of Commons
580:Speaking in the
550:Information pack
493:Scientific Panel
486:Albert N. Martin
359:pseudoscientific
339:Truth in Science
328:
321:
314:
298:
297:
243:Truth in Science
185:Stephen C. Meyer
81:Theistic science
42:
19:
18:
1414:
1413:
1409:
1408:
1407:
1405:
1404:
1403:
1379:
1378:
1370:
1365:
1358:
1354:
1347:
1343:
1333:
1331:
1324:
1320:
1310:
1308:
1297:
1293:
1277:10.1038/444406a
1254:
1250:
1236:Graham Stringer
1228:
1224:
1214:Wayback Machine
1203:
1199:
1194:Wayback Machine
1185:
1181:
1174:
1170:
1162:
1158:
1151:
1147:
1139:
1135:
1128:
1124:
1117:
1113:
1105:
1101:
1093:
1089:
1079:
1075:
1067:
1063:
1055:
1051:
1044:
1040:
1031:
1025:
1020:
1016:
1007:
1001:
998:Wayback Machine
988:
984:
974:Wayback Machine
944:
940:
934:Wayback Machine
903:
899:
890:
886:
878:
874:
866:
862:
852:
850:
845:
844:
840:
835:
831:
823:
819:
811:
807:
802:Wayback Machine
792:
788:
784:
747:
738:Richard Dawkins
699:Financial Times
645:
607:
602:
552:
528:
522:
495:
452:
440:Maurice Roberts
416:
407:
332:
278:
275:
269:
239:
236:
230:
227:
221:
218:
127:
90:
86:Neo-creationism
47:
17:
12:
11:
5:
1412:
1402:
1401:
1396:
1391:
1377:
1376:
1369:
1368:External links
1366:
1364:
1363:
1352:
1341:
1330:. The Guardian
1318:
1291:
1248:
1222:
1197:
1179:
1168:
1156:
1145:
1133:
1122:
1111:
1099:
1087:
1073:
1061:
1049:
1038:
1014:
982:
938:
897:
884:
872:
860:
838:
829:
817:
805:
785:
783:
780:
779:
778:
773:
768:
763:
758:
753:
746:
743:
644:
641:
606:
603:
601:
598:
551:
548:
521:
518:
517:
516:
505:
502:
499:
494:
491:
490:
489:
483:
480:John MacArthur
477:
474:
471:
468:
451:
448:
447:
446:
443:
437:
434:
431:
420:
415:
412:
406:
403:
343:United Kingdom
334:
333:
331:
330:
323:
316:
308:
305:
304:
303:
302:
289:
288:
282:
281:
280:
279:
272:
268:
267:
265:Roman Catholic
262:
256:
253:
252:
248:
247:
246:
245:
240:
233:
231:
224:
222:
215:
213:
208:
203:
195:
194:
190:
189:
188:
187:
182:
177:
172:
167:
165:Jonathan Wells
159:
158:
154:
153:
152:
151:
144:
136:
135:
129:
128:
126:
125:
118:
113:
111:Wedge strategy
108:
102:
99:
98:
92:
91:
89:
88:
83:
78:
73:
68:
63:
57:
54:
53:
49:
48:
43:
35:
34:
28:
27:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1411:
1400:
1397:
1395:
1392:
1390:
1387:
1386:
1384:
1375:
1372:
1371:
1361:
1356:
1350:
1345:
1329:
1322:
1306:
1302:
1295:
1287:
1283:
1278:
1273:
1269:
1265:
1264:
1259:
1252:
1245:
1241:
1237:
1233:
1232:
1226:
1219:
1215:
1211:
1208:
1207:
1201:
1195:
1191:
1188:
1183:
1177:
1172:
1166:
1160:
1154:
1149:
1143:
1137:
1131:
1126:
1120:
1115:
1108:
1103:
1096:
1091:
1084:
1083:
1077:
1070:
1065:
1058:
1053:
1047:
1042:
1035:
1029:
1024:
1018:
1011:
1005:
999:
995:
992:
986:
979:
975:
971:
968:
964:
960:
956:
952:
948:
942:
935:
931:
928:
924:
920:
916:
912:
908:
901:
895:
894:
888:
881:
876:
869:
864:
848:
842:
833:
826:
821:
815:
809:
803:
799:
796:
790:
786:
777:
774:
772:
769:
767:
764:
762:
759:
757:
754:
752:
749:
748:
741:
739:
735:
729:
727:
723:
719:
718:
712:
710:
706:
705:
700:
696:
692:
686:
684:
680:
676:
672:
665:
663:
659:
655:
654:Lewis Wolpert
650:
649:Royal Society
640:
639:
634:
630:
626:
622:
618:
616:
612:
596:
595:
589:
587:
583:
578:
576:
572:
568:
563:
561:
557:
556:New Scientist
547:
545:
541:
537:
536:pseudoscience
533:
527:
514:
510:
506:
503:
500:
498:Geoff Barnard
497:
496:
487:
484:
481:
478:
475:
472:
469:
466:
462:
458:
454:
453:
444:
441:
438:
435:
432:
429:
425:
424:Andy McIntosh
421:
418:
417:
411:
402:
400:
396:
390:
388:
384:
380:
376:
375:Royal Society
372:
368:
364:
360:
356:
352:
348:
344:
340:
329:
324:
322:
317:
315:
310:
309:
307:
306:
301:
293:
292:
291:
290:
287:
284:
283:
277:
271:
270:
266:
263:
261:
258:
257:
255:
254:
250:
249:
244:
241:
238:
232:
229:
223:
220:
214:
212:
209:
207:
204:
202:
199:
198:
197:
196:
193:Organisations
192:
191:
186:
183:
181:
178:
176:
173:
171:
168:
166:
163:
162:
161:
160:
156:
155:
149:
145:
143:
140:
139:
138:
137:
134:
131:
130:
124:
123:
119:
117:
114:
112:
109:
107:
104:
103:
101:
100:
97:
94:
93:
87:
84:
82:
79:
77:
74:
72:
69:
67:
64:
62:
59:
58:
56:
55:
51:
50:
46:
41:
37:
36:
33:
30:
29:
25:
21:
20:
1355:
1344:
1332:. Retrieved
1321:
1309:. Retrieved
1304:
1294:
1267:
1261:
1251:
1230:
1225:
1205:
1200:
1182:
1171:
1159:
1148:
1136:
1125:
1114:
1102:
1090:
1081:
1076:
1064:
1052:
1041:
1034:Junk science
1017:
985:
941:
909:or faith in
900:
892:
887:
875:
863:
851:. Retrieved
841:
832:
820:
808:
789:
731:
725:
715:
713:
704:The Guardian
702:
694:
688:
682:
679:misdirection
667:
661:
646:
637:
636:matters" --
629:Simon Barrow
619:
614:
608:
593:
591:
579:
574:
564:
553:
540:junk science
529:
463:), and is a
408:
405:Organisation
391:
377:and over 50
338:
337:
242:
180:Michael Behe
120:
465:creationist
361:concept of
347:creationist
286:Creationism
1383:Categories
853:1 February
812:See also:
782:References
611:Colin Slee
586:Jim Knight
524:See also:
422:Professor
907:evolution
728:stating:
726:The Times
717:The Times
605:Religious
600:Criticism
571:evolution
560:euphemism
542:. Little
371:Darwinian
367:evolution
251:Reactions
133:Campaigns
1286:17122815
1210:Archived
1190:Archived
1026:• Also,
994:Archived
970:Archived
945:See: 1)
930:Archived
923:Judgment
915:Big Bang
911:creation
798:Archived
745:See also
621:Ekklesia
300:Category
116:Politics
106:Timeline
96:Movement
52:Concepts
24:a series
22:Part of
1334:28 July
1311:28 July
643:Secular
633:Genesis
627:roots.
520:Critics
345:-based
157:Authors
1284:
1263:Nature
849:. 2022
260:Jewish
341:is a
1336:2007
1313:2007
1282:PMID
949:2)
855:2022
353:'s "
1272:doi
1268:444
707:, "
656:of
511:at
1385::
1303:.
1280:.
1266:.
1260:.
1242:,
1238:,
1234:,
1032:•
1008:•
976:.
677:,
673:,
617:.
577:.
26:on
1338:.
1315:.
1288:.
1274::
1109:.
1097:.
1071:.
1059:.
936:.
882:.
870:.
857:.
685:.
515:.
467:.
327:e
320:t
313:v
150:"
146:"
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
