Knowledge

Intelligent design in politics

Source 📝

935:
adding the phrase "all students will explain the competing theories of evolution and natural selection based on random mutation and the theory that life is the result of the purposeful, intelligent design of a creator." The bill also directed that in the science standards for middle and high school, all references to "evolution" and "natural selection" would be modified to indicate that these are unproven theories, by adding the phrase "describe how life may be the result of the purposeful, intelligent design of a creator." And in the science standards for middle and high school, the bill directed all references to "evolution" and "natural selection" would be modified to indicate that these are unproven theories, by adding the phrase "explain the competing theories of evolution and natural selection based on random mutation and the theory that life is the result of the purposeful, intelligent design of a creator." The bill also would have required that the recommended model core academic curriculum content standards that are developed and periodically updated by the state board comply with these provisions. Also under the bill the State Board would have been required to make these revisions as soon as practicable after the effective date of the bill, if it had been enacted. Text of
1046:
not presented. A group of parents represented by the American Civil Liberties Union sued the school board, claiming the stickers violate the separation of church and state. The trial was resolved in January 2005 when U.S. District Judge Clarence Cooper ruled the sticker was unconstitutional. In the verdict he wrote, "By denigrating evolution, the school board appears to be endorsing the well-known prevailing alternative theory, creationism or variations thereof, even though the sticker does not specifically reference any alternative theories." In December 2005 the federal appeal court panel made comments sharply criticising the lower court ruling in advance of releasing their decision. Judge Ed Carnes said that the words on the sticker are "technically accurate," and that "From nonlife to life is the greatest gap in scientific theory. There is less evidence supporting it than there is for other theories. It sounds to me like evolution is more vulnerable and deserves more critical thinking," suggesting that he did not understand the distinction between
1108:
1949. That new section would allow school boards to add "intelligent design" to any curriculum containing evolution and allow teachers to use, subject to the approval of the board, "supporting evidence deemed necessary for instruction on the theory of intelligent design." The term "intelligent design" is not defined in the bill. Presumably attempting to prevent a challenge to its constitutionality, HB 1007 explicitly states, "When providing supporting evidence on the theory of intelligent design, no teacher in a public school may stress any particular denominational, sectarian or religious belief."
1295:
of creationism or intelligent design in the schools within the district. However, if the theory of evolution is required to be taught as part of the school district's science curriculum, in order to provide students with a comprehensive education in science, the school board also must include the teaching of creationism or intelligent design in the science curriculum". Similar bills to include the teaching of creationism and intelligent design in public classrooms were submitted in 2002, 2003, 2004, and 2005. None were adopted.
1090:
West, Vice President and Senior Fellow of the Discovery Institute and Associate Director of the Institute's Center for Science & Culture who wrote, "The first misunderstanding is the belief that intelligent design is based on religion rather than science. Intelligent design is a scientific inference based on empirical evidence, not on religious texts." Despite West's clear rejection of Sternberg's claim, Republican representatives, other Discovery Institute affiliates and intelligent design advocates
146: 2021: 1222:(FTE), filed a motion seeking to intervene in the case. FTE argued that a ruling that "intelligent design" was religious would have severe financial consequences, citing possible losses in the neighborhood of half a million dollars. By intervening, FTE would have become a co-defendant with the Dover Area School Board, and able to bring its own lawyers and expert witnesses to the case. FTE's president Jon Buell implied that if allowed to intervene, FTE would bring 402: 25: 1286:
state’s science standards. The group's executive director, Rev. Barry W. Lynn, urged the Ohio board to reject any effort to reopen the dispute over science education, noting "Public school students in Ohio deserve sound science education, not religious dogma masquerading as science. It’s time for Religious Right allies on the board to drop their unwise agenda and focus on policies that will benefit all of Ohio’s students."
1376:"Basically, what we have is a page that deals with the misconceptions and challenges to the teaching of evolution, and we provided resources to teachers to answer them," said Roy Caldwell. "One of those questions is, 'Aren't religion and evolution incompatible?' and we say, 'no,' and point to a number of sites by clerics and others who make that point." 1249:, struck down the school board's policy requiring a statement be read endorsing intelligent design as an alternative to evolution in 9th grade high school biology classes. In his ruling Jones wrote that intelligent design is not science and is essentially religious in nature. In response the Discovery Institute accused Judge Jones of being an " 1054:. In December 2006 Cobb County School Board agreed to settle the long-running legal case. The county will not order the placement of "any stickers, labels, stamps, inscriptions, or other warnings or disclaimers bearing language substantially similar to that used on the sticker that is the subject of this action." 1366:. The Caldwells argued that University of California was "taking a position on evolution and attempting to persuade minor students to accept that position." Michael R. Smith, the assistant chancellor for legal affairs at Berkeley, said that the university would defend the lawsuit "with vigor and enthusiasm." 2183:
I'd like to say to the good citizens of Dover. If there is a disaster in your area, don’t turn to God, you just rejected Him from your city. And don’t wonder why He hasn't helped you when problems begin, if they begin. I'm not saying they will, but if they do, just remember, you just voted God out of
1210:
and the National Association of Biology Teachers contend that his statement is not just ironic, but hypocritical, considering that the Discovery Institute not only tries to tell scientists and academics what is legitimate scientific inquiry and what is not (in disputing philosophical naturalism), but
1174:
as an alternative. Three of the school board members in the minority of the vote resigned in protest, and science teachers in the district refused to read the statement to their ninth-grade students, citing the Pennsylvania code of education, which states that teachers cannot present information they
1115:
and Seth Cooper of the Discovery Institute wrote a letter to Pennsylvania Representative Jess M. Stairs urging Stairs and the Pennsylvania legislature not to pass HB1007. This reflects a shift in the strategy of the intelligent design proponents. Anticipating legal challenges to the constitutionality
1107:
On March 16, 2005, a bill, HB 1007, promoting "intelligent design" creationism was introduced in the Pennsylvania House of Representatives and referred to the Education Committee. If enacted, HB 1007 would add a section ("Teaching Theories on the Origin of Man and Earth") to the Public School Code of
831:
Kansas Policy Institute director, Bob Corkins, was sealed by the ouster of the anti-evolutionists in 2006. He was an appointee of the board's creationists and endured strong criticism for his lack of previous educational leadership experience. Republican state Sen. John Vratil, characterized Corkins'
769:
Elections in 2004 gave religious conservatives a contentious 6-4 majority. The board in 2005 was finalizing new science standards which would have guided teachers about how and what to teach students. A proposal advanced by conservatives and intelligent design proponents, with support from the Center
1294:
Representative Mike Lott (R-District 104) introduced House Bill 625 on January 9, 2007. If enacted the bill would "authorize local school boards to allow for the teaching of creationism or intelligent design." Lott was quoted as saying, "The school board of a school district may allow the teaching
1277:
approach. However, in noting that the purpose of the template is to "open up these topics to different points of view, to different lines of evidence, to different interpretations of the evidence, to give students a more objective approach to science education," and given that outside of creationism
1045:
In 2002 the Cobb County school board required stickers placed in a science textbook. Stating that evolution was "a theory, not a fact," the sticker was placed in the ninth-grade biology text after parents complained to the Cobb County school board that alternative ideas about the origin of life were
1009:
In July 2001 the Pennsylvania Board of Education gave final approval to revised science standards. Language in early versions of the standards sought to raise questions about the status of evolution as science and a theory. Science educators and other Pennsylvania citizens expressed concern that the
982:
proposed a bill in the Arkansas legislature that would make it illegal for the state or any of its agencies to use state funds to purchase materials that contained false or fraudulent claims. A list of such claims was provided in the text of House Bill 2548 (HB2548). Much of the text of the examples
718:
convictions". According to the Center for Science and Culture's weblog, at least 10 state legislatures are now considering legislation reconsidering how evolution is taught. Many of these initiatives benefit from significant legal assistance from a number of conservative legal foundations including
623:
A number of specific political strategies and tactics have been employed by intelligent design proponents. These range from attempts at the state level to undermine or remove altogether the presence of evolutionary theory from the public school classroom, to having the federal government mandate the
474:
Though creationism and intelligent design are not supported by many mainstream scientists, there are significant minorities in the general public in most developed countries that say they doubt or reject the theory of evolution, likely because of their religious beliefs. In underdeveloped countries
1268:
Grady's proposal was widely regarded as an attempt to circumvent the board's February 2006 vote to retract a controversial model lesson plan and to remove the indicator on which it was based from the standards; the indicator, which called for students to be able to "describe how scientists continue
1150:
On the 13th of February, 2007, the Kansas State Board of Education approved a new curriculum which removed any reference to Intelligent Design as part of science. In the words of Dr Bill Wagnon, the board chairman, "Today the Kansas Board of Education returned its curriculum standards to mainstream
1146:
lesson plan and adopted the institute's Teach the Controversy approach. In August 2006 conservative Republicans lost their majority on the board in a primary election. The moderate Republican and Democrats gaining seats vowed to overturn the 2005 school science standards and adopt those recommended
1030:
In February 2006, the Ohio Board of Education voted 11-4 to delete the science standard and correlating lesson plan adopted in 2002. The board also rejected a competing plan from intelligent design proponents to request a legal opinion from the state attorney general on the constitutionality of the
754:
In 1999 the Kansas Board of Education voted to delete references to evolution from Kansas science standards. This had the net effect of removing the teaching of evolution from the state's science curriculum. The move angered the mainstream science community which predicted a resulting loss of rigor
614:
which allows parents to pull their children out of public school classrooms if they disagree with the controversial subject matter being discussed (such as evolution or homosexuality). Later amendments to the bill clarified that parents could choose to pull their children from religion classes, but
1285:
In fact, on July 11, Americans United for Separation of Church and State filed a request under the Ohio open records law asking for copies of the Grady proposal as well as all documents and correspondence by the Board of Education and the Department of Education relating to proposed changes to the
1169:
Board of Education passed a resolution requiring 9th grade biology teachers to read a statement that the Pennsylvania Academic Standards require the teaching of evolution, but then the statement proceeds to seed doubts about evolution's validity and directs students to study intelligent design and
1062:
In 2003 The Texas State Board of Education was considering 11 different textbooks for inclusion in the 2004-2005 school year. Fellows of the Discovery Institute testified to the Board that whatever textbooks are adopted should introduce statements on the "weaknesses of the theory of evolution" and
917:, along with Santorum, have signed letters supporting the Discovery Institute's interpretation of the Santorum amendment. One of those letters was sent to the president and vice-president of the Ohio Board of Education in 2002; the other was sent to the Texas Board of Education in 2003, see below. 883:
It was not the victory intelligent design proponents had hoped for. Conference reports do not carry the weight of law and are merely explanatory in nature, and, in any case, the amendment failed. Nonetheless, an email newsletter by the Discovery Institute contained the sentence "Undoubtedly this
805:
professor, Paul Mirecki, proposed to teach a class called "Special Topics in Religion: intelligent design, Creationism and other Religious Mythologies." The class was cancelled and the professor was forced to resign as chairman of the university's religious studies department. Mirecki had alleged
1189:
The school board claims there are "gaps" in evolution, which it emphasizes is a theory rather than established fact, and that students have a right to consider other views on the origins of life. The school board claims it does not teach intelligent design but simply makes students aware of its
1089:
In the course of his defense Sternberg claimed he was the subject of religious discrimination due to his belief in intelligent design by the Smithsonian Institution's National Museum of Natural History, where he served as an unpaid research associate. Sternberg's claim is contradicted by John G.
965:
In February 2001 a parent filed a complaint with the Kanawha County Board of Education claiming that science textbooks used there contain "false and fraudulent" information about evolution. The parent and 30 cosigners opposed to evolution asserted that the textbooks are in violation of state law
879:
of 2001. The inclusion of the amendment in the Act was heavily lobbied for by the Discovery Institute, which also participated in the drafting of the original language of the amendment. Although only a modified form of the amendment appeared in the conference report, the amendment itself was not
1098:
authored a report supporting Sternberg's claim of discrimination. The report was commissioned by Souder in his capacity as subcommittee chairman of the House of Representatives Committee on Government Reform but published by Souder as an individual representative without it gaining any official
934:
A bill proposed by Rep. Gosselin (House Bill 4382) which sought to amend 1976 PA 451, "The revised school code". The bill directed that In the science standards, all references to "evolution" and "how species change through time" would be modified to indicate that this is an unproven theory, by
793:
Critics of the new Kansas standards noted that they promoted the teaching of intelligent design. Kansas standards previously supported evolutionary theory, which held that all life had a common origin. Creationists claimed that theory had been challenged by their interpretation of fossils and
1234:
ruled that FTE was not entitled to intervene in the case because its motion to intervene was not timely, describing FTE's excuses for not trying to become involved earlier as "both unavailing and disingenuous." Judge Jones also held that FTE failed to demonstrate that it has "a significantly
1026:
that featured intelligent design prominently in its curricula. Concurrently, a factitious redefinition of science to include God was proposed to the Ohio legislature, so that the legislature would then be able to get behind the set of standards that included intelligent design. The Discovery
567:
is the constitutional responsibility of the provinces. No province has taught creationism in its official public school curriculum in modern times, however, there are various different approaches to the teaching of evolution and religion across the country, as well as various exceptions for
1362:’s Museum of Paleontology were sued by intelligent design proponents for running a website for school teachers called 'Understanding Evolution'. The lawsuit was brought by Jeanne Caldwell and Larry Caldwell, the husband and wife founders of the anti-evolution, pro-intelligent design group 1027:
Institute's model lesson plan was adopted in part by the state for Ohio science teachers in October 2002, though the Board advised that the science standards do "not mandate the teaching or testing of intelligent design". This was touted as a significant victory by the Discovery Institute.
1116:
of laws that mandate teaching of intelligent design, proponents feel including intelligent design content in science curricula under the guise of "scientific criticisms" or "evidence against evolution," within the pretense of "teaching the controversy" is a more defensible strategy.
1142:, and views expressed represented largely those of intelligent design advocates. The result of the hearings was the adoption of new science standards by the fundamentalist-dominated board in defiance of the State Board Science Hearing Committee that relied upon the institute's 1272:
Critics have noted that Grady's proposal will allow for the introduction of intelligent design in public schools, although the executive director of the Intelligent Design Network of Ohio, Roddy Bullock, says that the template would merely permit criticism of evolution, via a
1063:
include "competing theories, such as intelligent design." The DI had strong interest in the Texas debate because the state is the second largest purchaser of textbooks in the country. Thus any changes publishers make to cater to the state would likely be seen elsewhere.
588:, and so on. In most provincial curricula (excluding Quebec, where it has been mandatory in elementary schools since 2004) evolutionary theory is only required in Grade 11 or 12; however, it can be taught earlier at the discretion of local school boards and teachers. 1342:. In his ruling, the judge found that intelligent design is not science and is essentially religious in nature and that "ID’s backers have sought to avoid the scientific scrutiny, which we have now determined that it cannot withstand, by advocating that the 1000:
House Bill 588 by Rep. Joe Balyeat, R-Bozeman, was presented as an "objectivity in science education" measure, and would have directed the approval of evolution and creationism materials by an appointed six-member committee. The bill failed in committee.
832:
hiring as education commissioner as "sort of like making Saddam Hussein president of the United States." The executive director of the American Association of School Administrators, Paul Houston, had written a letter referring to Corkins as an "amateur."
884:
will change the face of the debate over the theories of evolution and intelligent design in America.  ... It also seems that the Darwinian monopoly on public science education, and perhaps the biological sciences in general, is ending" and Senator
42: 1346:, but not ID itself, should be taught in science class. This tactic is at best disingenuous, and at worst a canard. The goal of the IDM is not to encourage critical thought, but to foment a revolution which would supplant evolutionary theory with ID." 628:
has been driving force in most cases, providing a range of support from material assistance to federal, state and regional elected representatives in the drafting of bills to supporting and advising individual parents confronting their school boards.
956:
An "equal-time" bill, described in its title as "Providing for the teaching of creation science and evolution science on an equal basis in the public schools." HB2554 was introduced in the state legislature in February 2001, and died in committee.
947:
This bill directed teachers to distinguish between "philosophical materialism" and "authentic science", and extended to teachers the "right" to present and critique any scientific theory of the origins or life or species. Failed in committee.
1010:
proposed standards might open the way to teaching creationism in science classes because of ambiguous or unclear wording. However, the final standards do not contain the contested language and the standards were approved by the legislature.
591:
Around 63,000 Canadian children attend "Christian" (primarily evangelical) schools outside of the provincial systems (which include both the public and Catholic schools), where they are generally taught creationism rather than evolution.
925:
This bill directs that the state shall not print or distribute any material containing claims known to be false or fraudulent. It also specifically provides for any citizen to be able to sue the state using the provisions of this bill.
774:
plan for which the Center lobbied the Ohio Board of Education in 2002. It would not have eliminated evolution entirely from instruction, nor would it require intelligent design to be presented as an alternative to evolution, but the
852:
was (and continues to be) one of intelligent design's most vocal supporters. One result of this briefing was that Sen. Santorum inserted pro-intelligent design language into the No Child Left Behind bill calling for students to be
896:
its inclusion in the conference report on the failed amendment continues to be incorrectly cited by the Discovery Institute and other intelligent design supporters as providing federal sanction for intelligent design. Reps.
991:
to testify before a committee of the Arkansas Legislature in support of the bill. In April 2001 a motion was passed to postpone HB 2548 indefinitely for study during the interim by the Joint Interim Committee on Education.
503:
said that the aim of the report was to anchor evolution in school curricula, and warned that there was still resistance in many European countries. She provided the following examples in an interview with German newspaper
1203:
It's a disturbing prospect that the outcome of this lawsuit could be that the court will try to tell scientists what is legitimate scientific inquiry and what is not," West said. "That is a flagrant assault on free
1077:
The Sternberg peer review controversy arose over whether an article published in a scientific journal that supported the controversial concept of intelligent design was properly peer reviewed. The journal's editor,
1330:, the "Dover trial." There plaintiffs successfully argued that intelligent design is a form of creationism, and that the school board policy requiring the presentation of intelligent design as an alternative to 1614: 2382: 1086:, is an official of the Discovery Institute. The journal's publisher ultimately withdrew Meyer's article saying Sternberg published it outside of the normal review process, a statement Sternberg disputes. 496: 766:, then known as the "Center for the Renewal of Science and Culture" (CRSC). Subsequent elections altered the membership of the school board and led to renewed backing for evolution instruction in 2001. 2095: 987:. Critics of the bill alleged that many of the "examples" selected were themselves either false or misleading. March 21, 2001, Representative Holt invited his friend and controversial anti-evolutionist 483:
In Europe, religion generally has much less influence on politics than in the United States or the developing world. Despite this, there are pockets of creationist and intelligent design activity.
2366: 983:
given was either quoted verbatim from anti-evolutionary sources or was a close paraphrase of such materials. The sources cited in the bill included the cartoon tract, "Big Daddy?" published by
1138:
May 2005 by the Kansas State Board of Education to review changes how the origin of life would be taught in the state's public high school science classes. The hearings were boycotted by the
2040: 817:. Another slot which until then was held by a retiring conservative whose son-in-law from Idaho, Brad Patzer, ran for her office, was won by Jana Shaver, a pro-evolution Republican from 1269:
to investigate and critically analyze aspects of evolutionary theory," was generally criticized as providing a pretext for instilling scientifically unwarranted doubts about evolution.
379: 1326:
In 2005, the constitutionality of presenting intelligent design in public high school science classes as a valid scientific alternative to evolution was considered by the court in
1151:
science". The new curriculum, as well as a document outlining the differences with the previous curriculum, has been posted on the Kansas State Department of Education's website.
1369:
The suit alleged that a university-maintained webpage that contains statements from 17 religious organizations endorsing the teaching of evolution and in so doing violated the
790:. The Discovery Institute was key in the drafting and adoption of the new standards which were approved by 6 to 4, reflecting the makeup of religious conservatives on the board. 2076: 322: 1201:
The Discovery Institute's John West said the case displayed the ACLU's "Orwellian" effort to stifle scientific discourse and objected to the issue being decided in court. "
585: 1521: 547:
The publishing house "Studiengemeinschaft Wort und Wissen" is now publishing the sixth edition of a grade school textbook that includes the theory of intelligent design.
1892: 1261:
A 2006 proposal before the Ohio Board of Education drafted by Conservative Board member Colleen Grady, would create a "template" based on the Discovery Institute's
966:
because they are outdated or inaccurate. As evidence that textbooks which include evolution are flawed, they cited Jonathan Well's of the Discovery Institute book
892:
cited the amendment as vindicating the 1999 Kansas school board decision (since overturned) to eliminate evolution questions from State tests. Consistent with the
2092: 1387:. The suit was dismissed 13 March 2006 when judge granted the University of California's motion to dismiss the case on the grounds that the plaintiffs lacked 596: 2271: 2048: 1279: 1207: 824:
Morris had described evolution in a taxpayer-funded constituent newsletter as "an age-old fairy tale" and "a nice bedtime story" unsupported by science.
2342: 1577: 1465: 1235:
protectable interest in the litigation warranting intervention as a party" and that its interests will not be adequately represented by the defendants.
561:
Unlike in the United States the issue has never been the subject of a major Supreme Court case, nor does it figure prominently in the national media.
1384: 1370: 1339: 1179: 809:
In primary election held on August 1, 2006, pro-creationist conservative Republicans lost their 6-4 board majority when incumbent Connie Morris from
677: 581: 331: 2419: 633: 340: 247: 238: 1307:
announced that he was sponsoring plans to introduce a bill requiring teachers who teach evolution to also discuss the idea of intelligent design.
1430: 607: 46: 2238: 2037: 699:, the hub of the intelligent design movement. These strategies are seen as another iteration of the Discovery Institute's campaign to "defeat 2114: 1811: 1859: 93: 1190:
existence as an alternative to evolution. It denies intelligent design is "religion in disguise," despite being represented in court by the
2133: 1829: 431: 270: 65: 1380: 673: 2201: 1265:
lesson plan for use by 10th-grade science teachers for classroom discussions evolution, global warming, stem-cell research and cloning.
1551: 1405: 72: 611: 2320: 1873: 1178:
The American Civil Liberties Union filed a lawsuit on behalf of eleven parents contending that the school board policy violates the
2370: 2209: 1604: 1327: 1321: 1246: 1183: 1160: 665: 227: 2073: 1948: 603:, otherwise the schools would be closed. In Ontario, private schools are not required to teach either evolution or sex education. 1641: 1373:. The Caldwells objected specifically to one web page that says it's a misconception that science and religion are incompatible. 624:
teaching of intelligent design, to 'stacking' municipal, county and state school boards with intelligent design proponents. The
79: 1793: 936: 365: 1531: 2427: 2306: 2290: 2253: 2010: 1889: 1778: 1040: 2472: 2159: 1379:
The plaintiffs alleged that these statements constituted a preference for certain religious viewpoints in violation of the
61: 640:
campaigns conducted on behalf of intelligent design proponents in order to overcome professional setbacks such as that of
1198:
nonprofit which says it uses litigation to promote "the religious freedom of Christians and time-honored family values."
2151: 1359: 1424: 1363: 1219: 1072: 728: 370: 112: 424: 253: 1672: 755:
and quality in science education. The Board's decision was in part influenced by the presence of recently elected
2268: 641: 1933: 1082:, was an active proponent of intelligent design with ties to the Discovery Institute, and the article's author, 499:
released a report in June 2007 entitled "The Dangers of Creationism in Education". One of the council members,
2477: 2302: 1797: 1262: 1143: 1023: 979: 801:
After the board of education decided to include more criticism of evolution in its school science standards, a
771: 763: 696: 688: 660: 469: 311: 211: 50: 1706: 672:
ruled that teaching intelligent design or presenting it as an alternative to evolution was a violation of the
2346: 316: 86: 2482: 2220: 1736: 2454: 1355: 445: 417: 405: 201: 129: 2416: 2286: 2239:
Ohio School Board Members Are Considering New Assault On Teaching Of Evolution, Charges Americans United
1694: 1613:, pp 136–138 (United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania December 20, 2005). available at 1450: 1400: 1238:
In a November 2005 election the citizens of Dover voted out their pro-intelligent design schoolboard.
1125: 749: 1610: 1018:
In March 2002 Ohio held hearings on revising the state science standards. The Discovery Institute's
2111: 1808: 794:
molecular biology. They had also echoed the standard intelligent design argument that there is a
810: 35: 2170: 2130: 1826: 599:
ordered unlicensed private evangelical Christian schools to start teaching evolution and sexual
1501: 1191: 779:
plan treated evolution as a flawed theory, a position that defied mainstream scientific views.
720: 166: 1768: 2198: 1741: 1274: 1031:
science standards. Intelligent design proponents pledged to force another vote on the issue.
854: 795: 724: 684: 654: 475:
where rates of religious belief are much higher, support of evolution is consequently lower.
145: 2221:
Dover Intelligent Design Decision Criticized as a Futile Attempt to Censor Science Education
1175:
believe to be false. Instead, the statement was read to students by a school administrator.
806:
that he was also assaulted and beaten by creationists who opposed his teaching of the class
1915: 1335: 1215: 1171: 1139: 876: 818: 802: 181: 171: 2404: 2006: 1496: 680:
because intelligent design is not legitimate science but essentially religious in nature.
8: 2224: 1989: 1904: 1870: 1166: 1131: 841: 760: 692: 625: 577: 564: 306: 176: 2184:
your city. And if that’s the case, don’t ask for His help because he might not be there.
1844: 1223: 872: 866: 457: 456:
religious agenda calling for broad social, academic and political changes centering on
280: 275: 150: 137: 1278:
and intelligent design there are no alternatives to evolution, various groups such as
2102:
United States House of Representatives Committee on Government Reform, December 2006.
2083:
United States House of Representatives Committee on Government Reform, December 2006.
2025: 1976: 1774: 1626: 1444: 1242: 1231: 1147:
by a State Board Science Hearing Committee that were rejected by the previous board.
1079: 669: 645: 492: 2181:
broadcast to announce that the people of Dover had lost their protection from God: "
1794:
Congress Urges Teaching of Diverse Views on Evolution, but Darwinists Try to Deny It
1900: 1227: 1083: 1019: 845: 649: 637: 569: 449: 348: 290: 186: 2250: 514:
A former deputy education minister of Poland called the theory of evolution a lie.
2423: 2275: 2257: 2205: 2155: 2137: 2118: 2099: 2080: 2044: 2038:
Americans United Applauds Settlement Of Georgia Lawsuit Over Evolution Disclaimer
1937: 1896: 1877: 1833: 1815: 1760: 1304: 1195: 828: 814: 756: 573: 524: 453: 448:
has conducted an organized campaign largely in the United States that promotes a
191: 1952: 1919: 1673:
https://www.usatoday.com/tech/science/2005-11-08-kansas-science-standards_x.htm
1526: 1470: 1388: 1135: 893: 216: 2466: 2174: 2148: 1764: 1211:
as a matter of policy seeks to redefine what constitutes legitimate science.
1095: 914: 885: 849: 500: 2093:
Appendix to Intolerance and the Politicization of Science at the Smithsonian
1057: 2439: 1112: 902: 898: 783: 782:
On 8 November 2005, the Kansas Board of Education, chaired by veterinarian
711: 517:
Activism against teaching evolution in grade school by some Russian parents
285: 798:
as to whether changes over time in one species can lead to a new species.
1091: 1051: 988: 840:
In 2000, the leading intelligent design proponents operating through the
743: 700: 534: 506: 391: 1578:"Proposed Alberta law doesn't make evolution classes optional: minister" 1848: 984: 910: 732: 703: 2321:"Wise to introduce bill on intelligent design | Jacksonville.com" 2430:
The University of California Museum of Paleontology, Berkeley webpage
1930: 1676: 1331: 1047: 707: 600: 533:
The publication and free distribution of the "Atlas of Creation" by
24: 2178: 1582: 1556: 1522:"Teach sex and evolution or close, Quebec evangelical schools told" 1250: 1154: 2241:
Americans United for Separation of Church and State, July 12, 2006
2060: 1256: 880:
included in the legislation that President George W. Bush signed.
2393: 1349: 523:
A proposed "Genesis-Land" theme park in Switzerland based on the
855:
taught why evolution "generates so much continuing controversy,"
1661: 889: 715: 1186:) in Federal District Court was scheduled for September 2005. 1745:, Justin Kendall, December 1, 2005. Retrieved 25 August 2016. 1099:
standing by the Committee, which never formally accepted it.
541: 2074:
Intolerance and Politicization of Science at the Smithsonian
1466:"Contesting Evolution: European Creationists Take On Darwin" 1334:
as an "explanation of the origin of life" thus violated the
786:, approved new science teaching standards that included the 544:
allowing the teaching of theory of creation in biology class
906: 1770:
Creationisms Trojan Horse: The Wedge of Intelligent Design
1230:
as expert witnesses. In his decision on the motion, Judge
875:
was a failed proposed amendment to the 2001 education act
857:
an assertion heavily promoted by the Discovery Institute.
2417:
Misconception: "Evolution and religion are incompatible."
2383:
Ruling, Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, page 89
2187: 1995: 1725: 1711: 1058:
2003 Texas State Board of Education, textbook controversy
1022:
proposed to the Ohio Board of Education the Institute's
572:(publicly funded religious school, primarily Catholic), 2121:
Reed A. Cartwright. PandasThumb.org, December 15, 2006
1552:"Evolution classes optional under proposed Alberta law" 1004: 813:, was defeated by moderate Republican Sally Cauble, of 664:
campaigns. These campaigns gained prominence after the
530:
Creationist lectures and symposia in the United Kingdom
2061:"Intelligent Design is Based on Science, Not Religion" 951: 744:
1999 & 2005 creationist Kansas Boards of Education
1102: 960: 1860:
Internet Archive version of Arkansas House Bill 2548
1707:"Anti-creationism professor: Resignation was forced" 2455:
Court dismisses lawsuit targeting evolution website
2049:
Americans United for Separation of Church and State
1755: 1753: 1751: 1289: 1280:
Americans United for Separation of Church and State
1208:
American Association for the Advancement of Science
848:, to promote intelligent design to lawmakers. Sen. 53:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. 1642:"US scientists battle over challenge to Darwinism" 920: 540:The Ministry of Education for the German state of 2450: 2448: 1385:First Amendment to the United States Constitution 1340:First Amendment to the United States Constitution 1119: 973: 929: 2464: 2171:Intelligent Design Candidates Voted Out in Penn. 1871:Critical Analysis of Evolution model lesson plan 1748: 1490: 1488: 1486: 1155:2005/2004 Dover, Pennsylvania Board of Education 691:strategies and resources for them come from the 652:. These efforts are focused on two efforts: the 634:Discovery Institute intelligent design campaigns 2223:, Robert Crowther, Evolution News & Views, 2086: 1931:Resolution of intent to adopt science standards 1431:Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe 1257:2006 Ohio - Proposed Template for Ohio Teachers 1184:Kitzmiller et al. v. Dover Area School District 1013: 995: 942: 608:Progressive Conservative Association of Alberta 2457:Robert Sanders. UCBerkeley News March 15, 2006 2445: 2303:Antievolution legislation in Mississippi House 1350:2005 University of California at Berkeley suit 1310: 1066: 835: 827:The fate of Education Commissioner and former 1949:Good News from Ohio: Teaching the Controversy 1483: 425: 2318: 1759: 1034: 770:for Science and Culture, was similar to the 2340: 1690: 1688: 1686: 1684: 1298: 497:Committee on Culture, Science and Education 2334: 2105: 1406:Creation and evolution in public education 1241:On December 20, 2005, U.S. District Judge 860: 432: 418: 2022:Appeals Panel Criticizes Evolution Ruling 1494: 113:Learn how and when to remove this message 2371:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District 2312: 2234: 2232: 2210:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District 1681: 1605:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District 1463: 1328:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District 1322:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District 1247:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District 1161:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District 678:First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution 666:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District 520:A 2004 proposed decree against evolution 463: 41:Relevant discussion may be found on the 2440:Statements from Religious Organizations 1615:Ruling, Kitzmiller v. Dover, Conclusion 1426:The dangers of creationism in education 1130:A series of hearings instigated by the 759:to the board and heavy lobbying by the 735:extensively on behalf of the movement. 2465: 2373:, Case No. 04cv2688. December 20, 2005 710:in favor of "a science consonant with 2442:National Center for Science Education 2428:National Center for Science Education 2343:"WMNF 88.5 FM Community Radio, Tampa" 2307:National Center for Science Education 2291:National Center for Science Education 2229: 2011:Selman v. Cobb County School District 1429:(Report), Rapporteur: Anne Brasseur, 1041:Selman v. Cobb County School District 323:International Society for Complexity, 2160:Kansas State Department of Education 1464:Lubbadeh, Jens (February 25, 2009), 1005:2001 Pennsylvania Board of Education 486: 51:adding citations to reliable sources 18: 1282:are in opposition to the proposal. 952:2001 West Virginia, House Bill 2554 13: 2407:Inside Higher Ed, October 18, 2005 1530:, October 24, 2006, archived from 1495:Halfnight, Drew (September 2008), 1360:University of California, Berkeley 1315: 1103:2005 Pennsylvania, House Bill 1007 961:2001 Kanawha County, West Virginia 606:In 2009, the government under the 14: 2494: 2319:Matt Soergel (February 8, 2009). 2287:Antievolution bill in Mississippi 1364:Quality Science Education for All 1220:Foundation for Thought and Ethics 1073:Sternberg peer review controversy 844:held a congressional briefing in 738: 729:Quality Science Education for All 380:Scientific bodies that explicitly 1433:, September 17, 2007, Doc. 11375 1290:2007 Mississippi, House Bill 625 1206:" Opponents, represented by the 1170:the intelligent design textbook 970:. The board rejected the claim. 636:has been extensive lobbying and 618: 551: 401: 400: 144: 62:"Intelligent design in politics" 23: 2433: 2410: 2398: 2387: 2376: 2360: 2296: 2280: 2262: 2244: 2214: 2192: 2164: 2142: 2124: 2067: 2053: 2031: 2015: 2000: 1957: 1942: 1924: 1909: 1883: 1864: 1853: 1838: 1820: 1802: 1787: 1730: 1699: 1666: 1214:In May, 2005, the publisher of 921:2001 Louisiana, House Bill 1286 706:" represented by the theory of 597:ministry of education in Quebec 325:Information, and Design (ISCID) 34:needs additional citations for 1916:The Crusade Against Evolution 1798:Center for Science and Culture 1655: 1619: 1596: 1570: 1544: 1514: 1457: 1417: 1371:separation of church and state 1263:Critical Analysis of Evolution 1144:Critical Analysis of Evolution 1120:2005 Kansas evolution hearings 1024:Critical Analysis of Evolution 974:2001 Arkansas, House Bill 2548 930:2001 Michigan, House Bill 4382 788:Critical Analysis of Evolution 777:Critical Analysis of Evolution 772:Critical Analysis of Evolution 764:Center for Science and Culture 697:Center for Science and Culture 689:Critical Analysis of Evolution 661:Critical Analysis of Evolution 470:Level of support for evolution 312:Center for Science and Culture 1: 1411: 317:Centre for Intelligent Design 248:Discovery Institute campaigns 2149:Science Curricular Standards 2131:Pennsylvania House Bill 1007 1245:, in his 139-page ruling on 1014:2002 Ohio Board of Education 996:2001 Montana, House Bill 588 943:2001 Georgia, House Bill 391 7: 2473:Intelligent design movement 2405:Another Attack on Evolution 1773:. Oxford University Press. 1394: 1356:National Science Foundation 1311:Intelligent design lawsuits 1067:2004/2005 Richard Sternberg 836:2000 Congressional briefing 446:intelligent design movement 341:Physicians and Surgeons for 10: 2499: 2341:Seán Kinane (2009-02-23). 2269:Mississippi House Bill 625 1809:Louisiana, House Bill 1286 1737:He Don't Need No Education 1401:Anti-evolution legislation 1319: 1158: 1123: 1070: 1038: 864: 747: 615:not from science classes. 467: 334:Evolution Awareness Center 2323:. The Florida Times-Union 1611:400 F.Supp.2d 707 1303:In February 2009 Senator 1126:Kansas evolution hearings 1035:2002 Cobb County, Georgia 750:Kansas evolution hearings 556: 478: 382:reject intelligent design 1662:Evolution News and Views 1299:2009 Florida Senate Bill 2394:Understanding Evolution 978:In 2001 Representative 861:2001 Santorum Amendment 811:Cheyenne County, Kansas 757:conservative Christians 2173:. This event prompted 1827:Georgia House Bill 391 1502:United Church Observer 1449:: CS1 maint: others ( 1196:conservative Christian 1192:Thomas More Law Center 721:Thomas More Law Center 332:Intelligent Design and 167:Irreducible complexity 2478:Religion and politics 1890:Teach the Controversy 1354:In October 2005, the 1275:Teach the Controversy 761:Discovery Institute's 725:Alliance Defense Fund 685:Teach the Controversy 655:Teach the Controversy 464:International context 254:Teach the controversy 16:Aspect of creationism 1880:Discovery Institute. 1381:Establishment Clause 1336:Establishment Clause 1216:Of Pandas and People 1172:Of Pandas and People 1140:scientific community 877:No Child Left Behind 819:Independence, Kansas 803:University of Kansas 674:Establishment Clause 565:In Canada, education 343:Scientific Integrity 182:Intelligent designer 172:Specified complexity 47:improve this article 2483:Politics of science 2309:, January 9th, 2009 2225:Discovery Institute 2112:Lame Ducks Weigh In 2063:. 4 September 2005. 2028:, December 16, 2005 1905:Cincinnati Enquirer 1644:. AFP. 5 March 2005 1167:Dover, Pennsylvania 1132:Discovery Institute 842:Discovery Institute 693:Discovery Institute 626:Discovery Institute 578:alternative schools 307:Discovery Institute 228:Kitzmiller v. Dover 177:Fine-tuned universe 2422:2006-08-13 at the 2274:2014-08-10 at the 2256:2006-08-07 at the 2204:2005-12-21 at the 2154:2007-04-30 at the 2136:2005-12-24 at the 2117:2007-03-30 at the 2098:2007-01-11 at the 2079:2007-04-25 at the 2043:2007-05-31 at the 1936:2005-11-18 at the 1895:2006-05-29 at the 1876:2015-11-06 at the 1832:2006-07-14 at the 1814:2005-12-19 at the 1767:(April 18, 2007). 1631:, October 14, 2008 1628:The Wedge Document 1224:William A. Dembski 968:Icons of Evolution 873:Santorum Amendment 867:Santorum Amendment 668:trial where Judge 642:Guillermo Gonzalez 458:intelligent design 281:Phillip E. Johnson 276:William A. Dembski 151:Watchmaker analogy 138:Intelligent design 2026:Los Angeles Times 1780:978-0-19-803578-7 1497:"Where's Darwin?" 1243:John E. Jones III 1232:John E. Jones III 1080:Richard Sternberg 731:(QSEA). All have 670:John E. Jones III 646:Richard Sternberg 632:A feature of the 493:Council of Europe 487:Council of Europe 442: 441: 123: 122: 115: 97: 2490: 2458: 2452: 2443: 2437: 2431: 2414: 2408: 2402: 2396: 2391: 2385: 2380: 2374: 2364: 2358: 2357: 2355: 2354: 2345:. Archived from 2338: 2332: 2331: 2329: 2328: 2316: 2310: 2300: 2294: 2284: 2278: 2266: 2260: 2248: 2242: 2236: 2227: 2218: 2212: 2196: 2190: 2168: 2162: 2146: 2140: 2128: 2122: 2109: 2103: 2090: 2084: 2071: 2065: 2064: 2057: 2051: 2035: 2029: 2019: 2013: 2004: 1998: 1993: 1987: 1982: 1980: 1972: 1970: 1968: 1961: 1955: 1946: 1940: 1928: 1922: 1918:, Evan Ratliff, 1913: 1907: 1901:Stephen C. Meyer 1887: 1881: 1868: 1862: 1857: 1851: 1842: 1836: 1824: 1818: 1806: 1800: 1791: 1785: 1784: 1761:Forrest, Barbara 1757: 1746: 1734: 1728: 1723: 1721: 1719: 1703: 1697: 1692: 1679: 1670: 1664: 1659: 1653: 1652: 1650: 1649: 1638: 1637: 1636: 1623: 1617: 1608: 1600: 1594: 1593: 1592: 1591: 1574: 1568: 1567: 1566: 1565: 1560:, April 30, 2009 1548: 1542: 1541: 1540: 1539: 1534:on March 4, 2016 1518: 1512: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1492: 1481: 1480: 1479: 1478: 1461: 1455: 1454: 1448: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1421: 1228:Stephen C. Meyer 1084:Stephen C. Meyer 1020:Stephen C. Meyer 846:Washington, D.C. 650:Francis Beckwith 638:public relations 570:separate schools 450:pseudoscientific 434: 427: 420: 404: 403: 349:Truth in Science 291:Stephen C. Meyer 187:Theistic science 148: 125: 124: 118: 111: 107: 104: 98: 96: 55: 27: 19: 2498: 2497: 2493: 2492: 2491: 2489: 2488: 2487: 2463: 2462: 2461: 2453: 2446: 2438: 2434: 2424:Wayback Machine 2415: 2411: 2403: 2399: 2392: 2388: 2381: 2377: 2365: 2361: 2352: 2350: 2339: 2335: 2326: 2324: 2317: 2313: 2301: 2297: 2285: 2281: 2276:Wayback Machine 2267: 2263: 2258:Wayback Machine 2249: 2245: 2237: 2230: 2219: 2215: 2206:Wayback Machine 2197: 2193: 2169: 2165: 2156:Wayback Machine 2147: 2143: 2138:Wayback Machine 2129: 2125: 2119:Wayback Machine 2110: 2106: 2100:Wayback Machine 2091: 2087: 2081:Wayback Machine 2072: 2068: 2059: 2058: 2054: 2045:Wayback Machine 2036: 2032: 2024:, Ellen Barry, 2020: 2016: 2005: 2001: 1985: 1983: 1974: 1973: 1966: 1964: 1963: 1962: 1958: 1947: 1943: 1938:Wayback Machine 1929: 1925: 1914: 1910: 1897:Wayback Machine 1888: 1884: 1878:Wayback Machine 1869: 1865: 1858: 1854: 1843: 1839: 1834:Wayback Machine 1825: 1821: 1816:Wayback Machine 1807: 1803: 1792: 1788: 1781: 1758: 1749: 1735: 1731: 1717: 1715: 1705: 1704: 1700: 1693: 1682: 1671: 1667: 1660: 1656: 1647: 1645: 1640: 1634: 1632: 1625: 1624: 1620: 1602: 1601: 1597: 1589: 1587: 1576: 1575: 1571: 1563: 1561: 1550: 1549: 1545: 1537: 1535: 1520: 1519: 1515: 1507: 1505: 1493: 1484: 1476: 1474: 1462: 1458: 1442: 1441: 1436: 1434: 1423: 1422: 1418: 1414: 1397: 1352: 1324: 1318: 1316:The Dover trial 1313: 1305:Stephen R. Wise 1301: 1292: 1259: 1180:First Amendment 1163: 1157: 1128: 1122: 1105: 1075: 1069: 1060: 1043: 1037: 1016: 1007: 998: 976: 963: 954: 945: 932: 923: 869: 863: 838: 815:Liberal, Kansas 752: 746: 741: 621: 586:charter schools 582:Reserve schools 574:private schools 559: 554: 525:Creation Museum 489: 481: 472: 466: 454:neo-creationist 438: 384: 381: 375: 345: 342: 336: 333: 327: 324: 233: 196: 192:Neo-creationism 153: 119: 108: 102: 99: 56: 54: 40: 28: 17: 12: 11: 5: 2496: 2486: 2485: 2480: 2475: 2460: 2459: 2444: 2432: 2409: 2397: 2386: 2375: 2359: 2333: 2311: 2295: 2279: 2261: 2243: 2228: 2213: 2191: 2163: 2141: 2123: 2104: 2085: 2066: 2052: 2030: 2014: 1999: 1956: 1953:Charles Colson 1941: 1923: 1920:Wired Magazine 1908: 1882: 1863: 1852: 1837: 1819: 1801: 1786: 1779: 1765:Gross, Paul R. 1747: 1729: 1698: 1680: 1675:, Greg Toppo, 1665: 1654: 1618: 1595: 1569: 1543: 1527:Ottawa Citizen 1513: 1482: 1471:Spiegel Online 1456: 1415: 1413: 1410: 1409: 1408: 1403: 1396: 1393: 1351: 1348: 1320:Main article: 1317: 1314: 1312: 1309: 1300: 1297: 1291: 1288: 1258: 1255: 1159:Main article: 1156: 1153: 1136:Topeka, Kansas 1124:Main article: 1121: 1118: 1104: 1101: 1071:Main article: 1068: 1065: 1059: 1056: 1039:Main article: 1036: 1033: 1015: 1012: 1006: 1003: 997: 994: 975: 972: 962: 959: 953: 950: 944: 941: 931: 928: 922: 919: 894:Wedge strategy 865:Main article: 862: 859: 837: 834: 748:Main article: 745: 742: 740: 739:Specific cases 737: 620: 617: 558: 555: 553: 550: 549: 548: 545: 538: 531: 528: 521: 518: 515: 488: 485: 480: 477: 468:Main article: 465: 462: 440: 439: 437: 436: 429: 422: 414: 411: 410: 409: 408: 395: 394: 388: 387: 386: 385: 378: 374: 373: 371:Roman Catholic 368: 362: 359: 358: 354: 353: 352: 351: 346: 339: 337: 330: 328: 321: 319: 314: 309: 301: 300: 296: 295: 294: 293: 288: 283: 278: 273: 271:Jonathan Wells 265: 264: 260: 259: 258: 257: 250: 242: 241: 235: 234: 232: 231: 224: 219: 217:Wedge strategy 214: 208: 205: 204: 198: 197: 195: 194: 189: 184: 179: 174: 169: 163: 160: 159: 155: 154: 149: 141: 140: 134: 133: 121: 120: 45:. Please help 31: 29: 22: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2495: 2484: 2481: 2479: 2476: 2474: 2471: 2470: 2468: 2456: 2451: 2449: 2441: 2436: 2429: 2425: 2421: 2418: 2413: 2406: 2401: 2395: 2390: 2384: 2379: 2372: 2368: 2363: 2349:on 2009-08-08 2348: 2344: 2337: 2322: 2315: 2308: 2304: 2299: 2292: 2288: 2283: 2277: 2273: 2270: 2265: 2259: 2255: 2252: 2247: 2240: 2235: 2233: 2226: 2222: 2217: 2211: 2207: 2203: 2200: 2195: 2189: 2185: 2180: 2176: 2175:Pat Robertson 2172: 2167: 2161: 2157: 2153: 2150: 2145: 2139: 2135: 2132: 2127: 2120: 2116: 2113: 2108: 2101: 2097: 2094: 2089: 2082: 2078: 2075: 2070: 2062: 2056: 2050: 2046: 2042: 2039: 2034: 2027: 2023: 2018: 2012: 2008: 2003: 1997: 1991: 1978: 1960: 1954: 1950: 1945: 1939: 1935: 1932: 1927: 1921: 1917: 1912: 1906: 1902: 1898: 1894: 1891: 1886: 1879: 1875: 1872: 1867: 1861: 1856: 1850: 1846: 1841: 1835: 1831: 1828: 1823: 1817: 1813: 1810: 1805: 1799: 1795: 1790: 1782: 1776: 1772: 1771: 1766: 1762: 1756: 1754: 1752: 1744: 1743: 1738: 1733: 1727: 1714: 1713: 1708: 1702: 1696: 1691: 1689: 1687: 1685: 1678: 1674: 1669: 1663: 1658: 1643: 1630: 1629: 1622: 1616: 1612: 1607: 1606: 1599: 1586:, May 4, 2009 1585: 1584: 1579: 1573: 1559: 1558: 1553: 1547: 1533: 1529: 1528: 1523: 1517: 1504: 1503: 1498: 1491: 1489: 1487: 1473: 1472: 1467: 1460: 1452: 1446: 1432: 1428: 1427: 1420: 1416: 1407: 1404: 1402: 1399: 1398: 1392: 1390: 1386: 1382: 1377: 1374: 1372: 1367: 1365: 1361: 1357: 1347: 1345: 1341: 1337: 1333: 1329: 1323: 1308: 1306: 1296: 1287: 1283: 1281: 1276: 1270: 1266: 1264: 1254: 1252: 1248: 1244: 1239: 1236: 1233: 1229: 1225: 1221: 1217: 1212: 1209: 1205: 1199: 1197: 1193: 1187: 1185: 1182:. A hearing ( 1181: 1176: 1173: 1168: 1162: 1152: 1148: 1145: 1141: 1137: 1133: 1127: 1117: 1114: 1111:In June 2005 1109: 1100: 1097: 1096:Rick Santorum 1093: 1087: 1085: 1081: 1074: 1064: 1055: 1053: 1049: 1042: 1032: 1028: 1025: 1021: 1011: 1002: 993: 990: 986: 981: 971: 969: 958: 949: 940: 938: 927: 918: 916: 915:New Hampshire 912: 908: 904: 900: 895: 891: 887: 886:Sam Brownback 881: 878: 874: 868: 858: 856: 851: 850:Rick Santorum 847: 843: 833: 830: 829:Koch brothers 825: 822: 820: 816: 812: 807: 804: 799: 797: 791: 789: 785: 780: 778: 773: 767: 765: 762: 758: 751: 736: 734: 730: 726: 722: 717: 713: 709: 705: 702: 698: 694: 690: 686: 681: 679: 675: 671: 667: 663: 662: 657: 656: 651: 647: 643: 639: 635: 630: 627: 619:United States 616: 613: 609: 604: 602: 598: 595:In 2006, the 593: 589: 587: 583: 579: 575: 571: 566: 562: 552:North America 546: 543: 539: 536: 532: 529: 526: 522: 519: 516: 513: 512: 511: 509: 508: 502: 501:Anne Brasseur 498: 494: 484: 476: 471: 461: 459: 455: 451: 447: 435: 430: 428: 423: 421: 416: 415: 413: 412: 407: 399: 398: 397: 396: 393: 390: 389: 383: 377: 376: 372: 369: 367: 364: 363: 361: 360: 356: 355: 350: 347: 344: 338: 335: 329: 326: 320: 318: 315: 313: 310: 308: 305: 304: 303: 302: 299:Organisations 298: 297: 292: 289: 287: 284: 282: 279: 277: 274: 272: 269: 268: 267: 266: 262: 261: 255: 251: 249: 246: 245: 244: 243: 240: 237: 236: 230: 229: 225: 223: 220: 218: 215: 213: 210: 209: 207: 206: 203: 200: 199: 193: 190: 188: 185: 183: 180: 178: 175: 173: 170: 168: 165: 164: 162: 161: 157: 156: 152: 147: 143: 142: 139: 136: 135: 131: 127: 126: 117: 114: 106: 103:February 2016 95: 92: 88: 85: 81: 78: 74: 71: 67: 64: –  63: 59: 58:Find sources: 52: 48: 44: 38: 37: 32:This article 30: 26: 21: 20: 2435: 2426:points to a 2412: 2400: 2389: 2378: 2362: 2351:. Retrieved 2347:the original 2336: 2325:. Retrieved 2314: 2298: 2282: 2264: 2246: 2216: 2194: 2182: 2166: 2144: 2126: 2107: 2088: 2069: 2055: 2033: 2017: 2002: 1965:. Retrieved 1959: 1944: 1926: 1911: 1885: 1866: 1855: 1840: 1822: 1804: 1789: 1769: 1740: 1732: 1716:. Retrieved 1710: 1701: 1695:Mercury News 1668: 1657: 1646:. Retrieved 1633:, retrieved 1627: 1621: 1603: 1598: 1588:, retrieved 1581: 1572: 1562:, retrieved 1555: 1546: 1536:, retrieved 1532:the original 1525: 1516: 1506:, retrieved 1500: 1475:, retrieved 1469: 1459: 1435:, retrieved 1425: 1419: 1378: 1375: 1368: 1353: 1343: 1325: 1302: 1293: 1284: 1271: 1267: 1260: 1240: 1237: 1213: 1202: 1200: 1188: 1177: 1165:In 2004 the 1164: 1149: 1129: 1113:John G. West 1110: 1106: 1088: 1076: 1061: 1044: 1029: 1017: 1008: 999: 977: 967: 964: 955: 946: 933: 924: 903:Steve Chabot 899:John Boehner 882: 870: 839: 826: 823: 808: 800: 792: 787: 784:Steve Abrams 781: 776: 768: 753: 682: 659: 653: 631: 622: 605: 594: 590: 563: 560: 527:in Kentucky. 505: 490: 482: 473: 443: 286:Michael Behe 226: 221: 109: 100: 90: 83: 76: 69: 57: 36:verification 33: 1639:. Cited in 1344:controversy 1092:Mark Souder 1052:abiogenesis 989:Kent Hovind 796:controversy 701:materialist 610:introduced 535:Harun Yahya 507:Der Spiegel 392:Creationism 2467:Categories 2353:2009-02-26 2327:2009-02-26 1986:|url= 1849:Jack Chick 1845:Big Daddy? 1648:2016-02-23 1635:2016-02-23 1590:2016-02-11 1564:2016-02-11 1538:2016-02-11 1508:2016-02-11 1477:2016-02-10 1437:2016-02-10 1412:References 985:Jack Chick 911:Judd Gregg 704:world view 73:newspapers 2251:WDC Media 1967:April 30, 1742:The Pitch 1718:April 30, 1677:USA Today 1332:evolution 1048:evolution 909:and Sen. 733:litigated 712:Christian 708:evolution 683:Both the 601:education 537:in Turkey 357:Reactions 239:Campaigns 43:talk page 2420:Archived 2272:Archived 2254:Archived 2202:Archived 2179:700 Club 2152:Archived 2134:Archived 2115:Archived 2096:Archived 2077:Archived 2041:Archived 1977:cite web 1934:Archived 1893:Archived 1874:Archived 1830:Archived 1812:Archived 1583:CBC News 1557:CBC News 1445:citation 1395:See also 1389:standing 1358:and the 1253:judge". 1251:activist 1134:held in 980:Jim Holt 716:theistic 695:and its 406:Category 222:Politics 212:Timeline 202:Movement 158:Concepts 130:a series 128:Part of 2199:Opinion 2177:on his 1988:value ( 1383:of the 1338:of the 1204:speech. 676:of the 612:Bill 44 263:Authors 87:scholar 2367:Ruling 2293:, 2007 1984:Check 1777:  1609:, 1218:, the 939:(PDF) 937:HB4382 890:Kansas 727:, and 723:, the 557:Canada 479:Europe 366:Jewish 89:  82:  75:  68:  60:  2007:Order 687:and 542:Hesse 94:JSTOR 80:books 1990:help 1969:2017 1775:ISBN 1720:2017 1451:link 1226:and 1194:, a 1094:and 1050:and 907:Ohio 901:and 871:The 719:the 714:and 658:and 648:and 491:The 444:The 66:news 2188:CNN 2186:", 1996:CNN 1726:CNN 1712:CNN 913:of 905:of 888:of 495:'s 49:by 2469:: 2447:^ 2369:, 2305:, 2289:, 2231:^ 2208:, 2158:, 2047:, 2009:, 1994:, 1981:: 1979:}} 1975:{{ 1951:, 1903:, 1899:, 1847:, 1796:, 1763:; 1750:^ 1739:, 1724:, 1709:. 1683:^ 1580:, 1554:, 1524:, 1499:, 1485:^ 1468:, 1447:}} 1443:{{ 1391:. 821:. 644:, 584:, 580:, 576:, 510:: 460:. 452:, 132:on 2356:. 2330:. 1992:) 1971:. 1783:. 1722:. 1651:. 1453:) 433:e 426:t 419:v 256:" 252:" 116:) 110:( 105:) 101:( 91:· 84:· 77:· 70:· 39:.

Index


verification
talk page
improve this article
adding citations to reliable sources
"Intelligent design in politics"
news
newspapers
books
scholar
JSTOR
Learn how and when to remove this message
a series
Intelligent design
Clockwork
Watchmaker analogy
Irreducible complexity
Specified complexity
Fine-tuned universe
Intelligent designer
Theistic science
Neo-creationism
Movement
Timeline
Wedge strategy
Politics
Kitzmiller v. Dover
Campaigns
Discovery Institute campaigns
Teach the controversy

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.