40:
856:
science, sometimes by redefining science to suit their needs. This is rejected by the vast majority of actual science practitioners. Nevertheless, neo-creationists profess to present and conduct valid science which is equal, or superior to, the theory of evolution, but have yet to produce recognized scientific research and testing that supports their claims. Instead, the preponderance of neo-creationist works are publications aimed at the general public and lawmakers and policymakers. Much of that published work is
344:
2692:
600:
915:, accepted the term but opposed the logic of neo-creationism for the very reason that it does not embrace the Bible. The Baptist Center for Ethics calls for "Baptists to recommit themselves to the separation of church and state, which will keep public schools free from coercive pressure to promote sectarian faith, such as state-written school prayers and the teaching of neo-creationism..."
1424:
Johnson has concluded that science must be redefined to include the supernatural if religious challenges to evolution are to get a hearing. (11:8–15 (Forrest); P-429). Additionally, Dembski agrees that science is ruled by methodological naturalism and argues that this rule must be overturned if ID is
1311:
Lawyer
Wendell Bird proposed a new 'scientific alternative' to evolution . His view, which he dubbed 'Abrupt Appearance Theory,' was, however, indistinguishable in content from Creation Science. The phrase 'abrupt appearance' was part of the definition of Creation Science in literature presented by
855:
Neo-creationists generally reject the term "neo-creation", alleging it is a pejorative term. Any linkage of their views to creationism would undermine their goal of being viewed as advocating a new form of science. Instead, they identify themselves to their non-scientific audience as conducting valid
760:
into materialism since science seeks only natural explanations. They believe that the theory of evolution implies that humans have no spiritual nature, no moral purpose, and no intrinsic meaning, and thus that acceptance of evolution devalues human life directly leading to the atrocities committed by
2378:
Phrases like "intelligent design theory," "abrupt appearance theory," "evidence against evolution," and the like, have sprung up, although the content of many of the arguments is familiar. This view can be called "neocreationism." ... Neocreationists are by no means identical to their predecessors,
759:
The neo-creationist movement is motivated by the fear that religion is under attack by the study of evolution. An argument common to neo-creationist justifications is that society has suffered "devastating cultural consequences" from adopting materialism and that science is the cause of this decay
814:
the biological literature (including outdated literature) for minor slips, inconsistencies or polemically promising examples of internal arguments. These internal disagreements, fundamental to the working of all natural science, are then presented dramatically to lay audiences as evidence of the
1404:
Both
Defendants and many of the leading proponents of ID make a bedrock assumption which is utterly false. Their presupposition is that evolutionary theory is antithetical to a belief in the existence of a supreme being and to religion in general. Repeatedly in this trial, Plaintiffs' scientific
825:
argues that intelligent design proponents are "manufacturing dissent" in order to explain the absence of scientific debate of their claims: "The 'scientific' claims of such neo-creationists as
Johnson, Denton, and Behe rely, in part, on the notion that these issues are the subject of suppressed
819:". Critics suggest that neo-creationists routinely employ this method to exploit the technical issues within biology and evolutionary theory to their advantage, relying on a public that is not sufficiently scientifically literate to follow the complex and sometimes difficult details.
1328:
is rarely cited today in creationist literature. it was, and remains, ignored in the scientific literature, and after the mid-1990s virtually disappeared from the political realm as well. it has been supplanted by another 'alternative to evolution' that was evolving parallel to
2393:
826:
debate among biologists.... According to neo-creationists, the apparent absence of this discussion and the nearly universal rejection of neo-creationist claims must be due to the conspiracy among professional biologists instead of a lack of scientific merit."
860:
in nature, disputing and controverting what they see as a "scientific orthodoxy" which shields and protects "Darwinism" while attacking and ridiculing alleged alternatives like intelligent design. Examples of neo-creationist
2045:
A coalition representing more than 70,000 Australian scientists and science teachers has called on all schools not to teach
Intelligent Design (ID) as science, because it fails to qualify on every count as a scientific
1405:
experts testified that the theory of evolution represents good science, is overwhelmingly accepted by the scientific community, and that it in no way conflicts with, nor does it deny, the existence of a divine creator.
751:. A second form, abrupt appearance theory, which claims that the first life and the universe appeared abruptly and that plants and animals appeared abruptly in complex form, has occasionally been postulated.
701:
excludes certain explanations of phenomena, particularly where they point towards supernatural elements, thus effectively excluding religious insight from contributing to understanding the
577:
736:. Neo-creationists have yet to establish a recognized line of legitimate scientific research and as of 2015 lack scientific and academic legitimacy, even among many academics of
924:
520:
2223:
1974:
891:. Research for Weikart's book was funded by the Discovery Institute, and is promoted through the institute. Both Johnson and Weikart are affiliated with the
810:, then making statements about what can and cannot happen in biological systems. Critics of neo-creationism suggest that neo-creationist science consists of
844:
as an alternative to evolution in public school science classes. Scott considers intelligent design, and the various strategies of design proponents like
832:
describes neo-creationism as "a mixed bag of antievolution strategies brought about by legal decisions against equal time laws". Those legal decisions,
2602:
2060:"Voices for evolution. List of statements from scientific professional organizations on the status intelligent design and other forms of creationism"
529:
189:
538:
445:
436:
2289:
1013:
1723:
1148:
2311:
310:
2424:
629:
468:
1660:
675:
that creationism is an inherently religious concept and that advocating it as correct or accurate in public-school curricula violates the
676:
2028:
2612:
194:
179:
1461:
2630:
2113:
2087:"The Scientific Status of Intelligent Design: The Methodological Equivalence of Naturalistic and Non-Naturalistic Origins Theories"
1988:
1438:
1418:
1398:
425:
2004:
2159:
2495:
563:
125:
2227:
1903:
1948:
747:
and other critics regard neo-creationism as the most successful form of irrationalism. The main form of neo-creationism is
1925:
2607:
2270:
993:
1217:
2379:
however.... Neither biblical creationists nor theistic evolutionists.... Most of them are "progressive creationists."
2036:
1819:
1775:
1627:
1297:
1261:
965:
933:
568:
303:
259:
2417:
622:
451:
2248:
1895:
1051:
1581:
1357:
1073:
849:
733:
509:
419:
409:
903:
All of the following names make explicit the connections between traditional creationism, neo-creationism and
2086:
1762:
1577:
956:
514:
296:
164:
2244:
1043:
665:
in non-religious terms and without appeals to scripture. This comes in response to the 1987 ruling by the
2410:
1008:
791:
666:
615:
603:
399:
327:
230:
2467:
1806:
Intelligent Design
Creationism and Its Critics: Philosophical, Theological, and Scientific Perspectives
269:
120:
2624:
2293:
951:
658:
279:
274:
1731:
1159:
1107:
264:
653:
in terms more likely to be well received by the public, by policy makers, by educators and by the
2586:
2576:
2505:
1767:
1682:
Attie, A. D. (2006), "Defending science education against intelligent design: a call to action",
912:
687:
86:
63:
2721:
2472:
2182:
1668:
1619:
1589:
1253:
1247:
364:
254:
47:
1880:
1811:
1289:
1185:
54:
2636:
2571:
939:
845:
683:
343:
199:
71:
2040:
2716:
2695:
2618:
1115:
837:
671:
654:
379:
369:
39:
23:
1469:
8:
2677:
2662:
2652:
2561:
892:
866:
729:
504:
374:
225:
135:
76:
2342:
2312:"Design Yes, Intelligent No: A Critique of Intelligent Design Theory and Neocreationism"
1446:
1119:
2657:
2581:
2556:
2462:
2447:
2363:
2012:
1868:
1700:
1612:
1221:
1127:
904:
880:
833:
787:
748:
478:
473:
348:
335:
246:
169:
105:
2551:
2525:
2307:
2167:
1833:
1825:
1815:
1804:
1799:
1781:
1771:
1705:
1641:
1633:
1623:
1495:
1371:
1363:
1353:
1341:
1293:
1282:
1257:
1213:
981:
971:
961:
929:
822:
740:
718:
698:
2367:
705:. This leads to an open and often hostile opposition to what neo-creationists term "
2541:
2355:
2132:
1695:
1687:
1277:
1249:
The Origin of
Species Revisited: The Theories of Evolution and of Abrupt Appearance
1123:
1018:
1003:
976:
841:
744:
646:
546:
488:
384:
144:
2546:
2482:
2241:
1841:
1753:
1379:
1040:
919:
908:
888:
875:
806:
highlighting gaps in understanding or minor inconsistencies in the literature of
115:
81:
2520:
2397:
1225:
1190:
870:
737:
414:
907:. Not all critics of neo-creationism are on the evolution side of the debate.
2710:
2515:
2500:
2452:
2337:
1933:
1837:
1757:
1345:
1103:
998:
829:
662:
159:
2274:
1853:
1785:
1645:
1375:
2667:
2490:
1845:
1709:
1383:
811:
779:
761:
483:
154:
1849:
802:
Much of the effort of neo-creationists in response to science consists of
2457:
2433:
1288:. Science, religion, education. University of California Press. pp.
943:
768:
714:
682:
One of the principal claims of neo-creationism propounds that ostensibly
650:
589:
31:
2059:
2029:"Intelligent design is not science - Scientists and teachers speak out"
948:
771:
1114:. The Flight from Science and Reason. Vol. 775. pp. 505–22.
2166:. Department of Computer Science, Stanford University. Archived from
2011:. American Association for the Advancement of Science. Archived from
1691:
1425:
to prosper. (Trial Tr. vol. 5, Pennock Test., 32–34, Sept. 28, 2005).
816:
775:
710:
706:
1593:
2672:
2359:
862:
857:
803:
722:
702:
694:
1829:
1521:
1367:
807:
691:
2208:
1637:
1551:
1462:"Scientists battle over anti-Darwin 'Intelligent design' theory"
794:, states the movement's goal is to "affirm the reality of God".
767:
regime, for example. The movement's proponents seek to "defeat
783:
764:
2402:
1439:"TV Producer Defends Documentary Exposing Darwin-Hitler Link"
2273:. National Home Education Research Institute. Archived from
2510:
2160:"Intelligent Design Advocates Seem Unserious And Insincere"
925:
Creationism's Trojan Horse: The Wedge of
Intelligent Design
2287:
1975:
List of scientific societies rejecting intelligent design
1667:. Annals of Science. No. 2005–05–30. Archived from
713:, but which they may extend to include such concepts as
2290:"A Baptist Pastoral Letter Supporting Public Education"
2002:
1896:"Antievolutionism and Creationism in the United States"
895:; Johnson is program advisor, and Weikart is a fellow.
1324:, published in 1987. Although mammoth in its scope ,
2005:"AAAS Board Resolution on Intelligent Design Theory"
2221:
2180:
1493:
2341:
1803:
1618:. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press. pp.
1611:
1281:
728:Notable neo-creationist organizations include the
2271:"Some Baptists Supporting Government-Run Schools"
1686:, vol. 116, no. 5, pp. 1134–1138,
1149:"Darwinism is Materialist Mythology, Not Science"
1102:
2708:
2336:
1437:Martin, Allie; Parker, Jenni (August 25, 2006).
2206:
1661:"Devolution—Why intelligent design isn't"
1245:
1186:"Intelligent Design Might Be Meeting Its Maker"
1570:
1014:Social implications of the theory of evolution
2418:
1955:. Seattle, WA: Discovery Institute. p. 2
1926:"FAQs IDEA Club, University of Texas, Dallas"
1340:
623:
304:
2288:Baptist Center for Ethics (April 21, 2006).
2003:AAAS Board of Directors (October 18, 2002).
1752:
1436:
1035:
1033:
1545:
1543:
1430:
1098:
1096:
1094:
677:Establishment Clause of the First Amendment
2613:Creation and evolution in public education
2425:
2411:
1284:Evolution Vs. Creationism: An Introduction
1112:Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
852:, as leading examples of neo-creationism.
630:
616:
311:
297:
180:Rejection of evolution by religious groups
2306:
2130:
1699:
1212:
1030:
709:", which they generally mean to refer to
2631:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District
2157:
2114:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District
1989:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District
1549:
1540:
1489:
1487:
1419:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District
1399:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District
1091:
2343:"Creationists and the Pope's Statement"
2066:. National Center for Science Education
1949:"Whether Intelligent Design is Science"
1923:
1894:Scott, Eugenie C. (February 13, 2001).
1810:. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. p.
1798:
1576:
1519:
1459:
1146:
815:fraudulence and impending collapse of "
686:orthodox science, with a foundation in
2709:
2496:Allegorical interpretations of Genesis
2085:Meyer, Stephen C. (December 1, 2002).
1746:
1316:case. Bird reworked his brief for the
1184:Laurie, Goodstein (December 4, 2005).
1183:
1071:
778:in favor of "a science consonant with
2406:
2222:Discovery Institute (July 27, 2004).
2084:
1904:National Center for Science Education
1893:
1681:
1484:
1276:
521:International Society for Complexity,
16:Pseudoscientific creationist movement
2026:
1946:
1721:
1614:Defeating Darwinism by Opening Minds
1522:"Does Darwinism Devalue Human Life?"
1147:Johnson, Phillip E. (October 2004).
1108:"Creationism, ideology, and science"
2268:
2158:McCarthy, John (November 5, 2005).
1658:
1072:Safire, William (August 21, 2005).
13:
2240:
1550:Richards, Jay W. (July 25, 1999).
1520:Weikart, Richard (March 1, 2004).
1128:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1996.tb23167.x
1039:
14:
2733:
2387:
2037:The University of New South Wales
1924:Nkangoh, Wilston (May 19, 2005).
1684:Journal of Clinical Investigation
1609:
1246:Wendell R. Bird (December 1992).
578:Scientific bodies that explicitly
2691:
2690:
2269:Ray, Brian D. (April 25, 2006).
2057:
697:. Its proponents argue that the
599:
598:
342:
38:
2432:
2330:
2300:
2281:
2262:
2249:Institute for Creation Research
2234:
2215:
2200:
2174:
2151:
2139:. American Geological Institute
2133:"Creationists Open a New Front"
2124:
2105:
2078:
2051:
2020:
1996:
1980:
1967:
1940:
1917:
1887:
1792:
1715:
1675:
1652:
1603:
1513:
1468:. Times of Oman. Archived from
1460:Handley, Paul (March 7, 2005).
1453:
1410:
1390:
1326:The Origin of Species Revisited
1322:The Origin of Species Revisited
1052:Institute for Creation Research
774:" represented by the theory of
649:movement which aims to restate
523:Information, and Design (ISCID)
2608:Creation–evolution controversy
2131:Applegate, David (July 2000).
1659:Orr, H. Allen (May 23, 2005).
1334:
1270:
1239:
1206:
1177:
1140:
1065:
994:Creation–evolution controversy
850:Critical Analysis of Evolution
754:
734:Center for Science and Culture
510:Center for Science and Culture
1:
1194:. Section 4, Page 1, Column 1
1024:
957:The Republican War on Science
690:, is actually a dogmatically
515:Centre for Intelligent Design
446:Discovery Institute campaigns
2181:Discovery Institute (1998),
1610:Johnson, Phillip E. (1997).
1494:Discovery Institute (1998).
1352:. Tyndale House Publishers.
1312:the creationist side in the
1218:"Design Yes, Intelligent No"
898:
7:
2348:Quarterly Review of Biology
1932:. IDEA Club. Archived from
1552:"Intelligent Design Theory"
1009:Intelligent design movement
987:
792:intelligent design movement
667:United States Supreme Court
539:Physicians and Surgeons for
231:Jainism and non-creationism
10:
2738:
2468:Genesis creation narrative
1763:Creationism's Trojan Horse
1722:Hurd, Gary (May 4, 2005).
797:
532:Evolution Awareness Center
2686:
2645:
2625:Kansas evolution hearings
2595:
2534:
2481:
2440:
2027:UNSW (October 20, 2005).
1947:Behe, Michael J. (2006).
1724:"Back to the Quote Mines"
1558:. IntellectualCapital.com
1252:. Thomas Nelson. p.
840:, doomed the teaching of
580:reject intelligent design
1800:Pennock, Robert T. (ed.)
1597:(Television documentary)
1582:"Darwin's Deadly Legacy"
2587:Young Earth creationism
2577:Progressive creationism
2506:Genesis flood narrative
2245:"Design Is Not Enough!"
2209:"From Darwin to Hitler"
1768:Oxford University Press
1528:. The Human Life Review
1074:"On Language: Neo-Creo"
913:young earth creationist
200:"Teach the Controversy"
165:Creationist cosmologies
2473:History of creationism
2230:on September 30, 2007.
1590:Coral Ridge Ministries
1350:How Now Shall We Live?
1348:(September 20, 1999).
1156:DarwinReconsidered.org
530:Intelligent Design and
365:Irreducible complexity
2637:Teach the Controversy
2572:Old Earth creationism
2207:Discovery Institute.
2170:on November 21, 2005.
2035:. Sydney, Australia:
2015:on November 13, 2002.
1449:on February 12, 2009.
940:Georgetown University
885:From Darwin to Hitler
846:Teach the Controversy
452:Teach the controversy
2696:Category:Creationism
2619:Edwards v. Aguillard
2318:. Skeptical Inquirer
2277:on February 5, 2012.
1936:on February 5, 2012.
1802:(December 1, 2001).
1496:"The Wedge Document"
1314:Edwards v. Aguillard
1278:Scott, Eugenie Carol
838:Edwards v. Aguillard
672:Edwards v. Aguillard
661:the debate over the
655:scientific community
541:Scientific Integrity
380:Intelligent designer
370:Specified complexity
2678:Omphalos hypothesis
2663:Biblical literalism
2653:Anthropic principle
2562:Islamic creationism
2296:on August 10, 2006.
2137:agiweb.org/geotimes
2043:on April 10, 2011.
1850:librarything 827088
1760:(January 8, 2004).
1599:on August 29, 2006.
1580:(August 26, 2006).
1120:1995NYASA.775..505S
893:Discovery Institute
867:Discovery Institute
730:Discovery Institute
505:Discovery Institute
426:Kitzmiller v. Dover
375:Fine-tuned universe
226:Creator in Buddhism
136:Omphalos hypothesis
2658:Biblical inerrancy
2582:Theistic evolution
2557:Intelligent design
2463:Creationist museum
2448:Biblical cosmology
2396:New York Times By
2310:(September 2001).
2308:Pigliucci, Massimo
2184:The Wedge Strategy
1879:has generic name (
1222:Skeptical Inquirer
1216:(September 2001).
1214:Pigliucci, Massimo
1078:The New York Times
905:intelligent design
881:Phillip E. Johnson
834:McLean v. Arkansas
790:, 'father' of the
788:Phillip E. Johnson
749:intelligent design
741:Christian colleges
479:Phillip E. Johnson
474:William A. Dembski
349:Watchmaker analogy
336:Intelligent design
247:Theistic evolution
170:Intelligent design
121:creation narrative
106:Biblical cosmology
2704:
2703:
2552:Hindu creationism
2526:Ussher chronology
2340:(December 1997).
1734:on August 9, 2015
1586:truthinaction.org
1472:on March 10, 2005
1104:Scott, Eugenie C.
982:Robert T. Pennock
972:Massimo Pigliucci
823:Robert T. Pennock
719:stellar evolution
699:scientific method
640:
639:
321:
320:
288:
287:
2729:
2694:
2693:
2542:Creation science
2427:
2420:
2413:
2404:
2403:
2382:
2381:
2375:
2374:
2345:
2338:Eugenie C. Scott
2334:
2328:
2327:
2325:
2323:
2304:
2298:
2297:
2292:. Archived from
2285:
2279:
2278:
2266:
2260:
2259:
2257:
2255:
2242:Morris, Henry M.
2238:
2232:
2231:
2226:. Archived from
2224:"Nota Bene July"
2219:
2213:
2212:
2204:
2198:
2197:
2196:
2194:
2189:
2178:
2172:
2171:
2155:
2149:
2148:
2146:
2144:
2128:
2122:
2121:
2109:
2103:
2102:
2100:
2098:
2093:. Ignatius Press
2082:
2076:
2075:
2073:
2071:
2055:
2049:
2048:
2039:. Archived from
2024:
2018:
2016:
2000:
1994:
1993:
1984:
1978:
1971:
1965:
1964:
1962:
1960:
1944:
1938:
1937:
1921:
1915:
1914:
1912:
1910:
1891:
1885:
1884:
1878:
1874:
1872:
1864:
1862:
1860:
1854:goodreads 567279
1809:
1796:
1790:
1789:
1754:Forrest, Barbara
1750:
1744:
1743:
1741:
1739:
1730:. Archived from
1719:
1713:
1712:
1703:
1692:10.1172/JCI28449
1679:
1673:
1672:
1671:on May 29, 2005.
1656:
1650:
1649:
1617:
1607:
1601:
1600:
1598:
1592:. Archived from
1574:
1568:
1567:
1565:
1563:
1547:
1538:
1537:
1535:
1533:
1517:
1511:
1510:
1508:
1506:
1491:
1482:
1481:
1479:
1477:
1457:
1451:
1450:
1445:. Archived from
1434:
1428:
1427:
1414:
1408:
1407:
1394:
1388:
1387:
1338:
1332:
1331:
1308:
1306:
1287:
1274:
1268:
1267:
1243:
1237:
1236:
1234:
1233:
1224:. Archived from
1210:
1204:
1203:
1201:
1199:
1181:
1175:
1174:
1172:
1170:
1165:on July 25, 2011
1164:
1158:. Archived from
1153:
1144:
1138:
1137:
1135:
1134:
1100:
1089:
1088:
1086:
1084:
1069:
1063:
1062:
1060:
1058:
1044:"Neocreationism"
1041:Morris, Henry M.
1037:
1019:Theistic realism
1004:Creation science
977:Eugenie C. Scott
842:creation science
745:Eugenie C. Scott
647:pseudoscientific
632:
625:
618:
602:
601:
547:Truth in Science
489:Stephen C. Meyer
385:Theistic science
346:
323:
322:
313:
306:
299:
215:
214:
195:Public education
145:Creation science
42:
19:
18:
2737:
2736:
2732:
2731:
2730:
2728:
2727:
2726:
2707:
2706:
2705:
2700:
2682:
2641:
2591:
2567:Neo-creationism
2547:Gap creationism
2530:
2483:Book of Genesis
2477:
2436:
2431:
2390:
2385:
2372:
2370:
2335:
2331:
2321:
2319:
2305:
2301:
2286:
2282:
2267:
2263:
2253:
2251:
2239:
2235:
2220:
2216:
2205:
2201:
2192:
2190:
2187:
2179:
2175:
2156:
2152:
2142:
2140:
2129:
2125:
2111:
2110:
2106:
2096:
2094:
2083:
2079:
2069:
2067:
2056:
2052:
2025:
2021:
2001:
1997:
1986:
1985:
1981:
1972:
1968:
1958:
1956:
1945:
1941:
1922:
1918:
1908:
1906:
1892:
1888:
1876:
1875:
1866:
1865:
1858:
1856:
1822:
1797:
1793:
1778:
1751:
1747:
1737:
1735:
1728:pandasthumb.org
1720:
1716:
1680:
1676:
1657:
1653:
1630:
1608:
1604:
1596:
1575:
1571:
1561:
1559:
1548:
1541:
1531:
1529:
1518:
1514:
1504:
1502:
1492:
1485:
1475:
1473:
1466:timesofoman.com
1458:
1454:
1435:
1431:
1416:
1415:
1411:
1396:
1395:
1391:
1360:
1342:Colson, Charles
1339:
1335:
1304:
1302:
1300:
1275:
1271:
1264:
1244:
1240:
1231:
1229:
1211:
1207:
1197:
1195:
1182:
1178:
1168:
1166:
1162:
1151:
1145:
1141:
1132:
1130:
1101:
1092:
1082:
1080:
1070:
1066:
1056:
1054:
1038:
1031:
1027:
990:
922:, co-author of
920:Barbara Forrest
909:Henry M. Morris
901:
889:Richard Weikart
883:, and the book
876:Darwin on Trial
800:
757:
663:origins of life
643:Neo-creationism
636:
582:
579:
573:
543:
540:
534:
531:
525:
522:
431:
394:
390:Neo-creationism
351:
317:
284:
209:Religious views
204:
174:
132:
116:Book of Genesis
97:Neo-creationism
93:
17:
12:
11:
5:
2735:
2725:
2724:
2719:
2702:
2701:
2699:
2698:
2687:
2684:
2683:
2681:
2680:
2675:
2670:
2665:
2660:
2655:
2649:
2647:
2643:
2642:
2640:
2639:
2634:
2627:
2622:
2615:
2610:
2605:
2599:
2597:
2593:
2592:
2590:
2589:
2584:
2579:
2574:
2569:
2564:
2559:
2554:
2549:
2544:
2538:
2536:
2532:
2531:
2529:
2528:
2523:
2521:Tower of Babel
2518:
2513:
2508:
2503:
2498:
2493:
2487:
2485:
2479:
2478:
2476:
2475:
2470:
2465:
2460:
2455:
2450:
2444:
2442:
2438:
2437:
2430:
2429:
2422:
2415:
2407:
2401:
2400:
2398:William Safire
2389:
2388:External links
2386:
2384:
2383:
2360:10.1086/419952
2329:
2299:
2280:
2261:
2233:
2214:
2199:
2173:
2150:
2123:
2104:
2077:
2050:
2019:
1995:
1979:
1966:
1939:
1916:
1886:
1820:
1791:
1776:
1758:Gross, Paul R.
1745:
1714:
1674:
1665:The New Yorker
1651:
1628:
1602:
1578:Kennedy, James
1569:
1539:
1512:
1483:
1452:
1443:agapepress.org
1429:
1409:
1389:
1358:
1346:Pearcey, Nancy
1333:
1298:
1269:
1262:
1238:
1205:
1191:New York Times
1176:
1139:
1090:
1064:
1028:
1026:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1016:
1011:
1006:
1001:
996:
989:
986:
985:
984:
979:
974:
969:
946:
937:
900:
897:
871:Wedge Document
799:
796:
786:convictions".
756:
753:
638:
637:
635:
634:
627:
620:
612:
609:
608:
607:
606:
593:
592:
586:
585:
584:
583:
576:
572:
571:
569:Roman Catholic
566:
560:
557:
556:
552:
551:
550:
549:
544:
537:
535:
528:
526:
519:
517:
512:
507:
499:
498:
494:
493:
492:
491:
486:
481:
476:
471:
469:Jonathan Wells
463:
462:
458:
457:
456:
455:
448:
440:
439:
433:
432:
430:
429:
422:
417:
415:Wedge strategy
412:
406:
403:
402:
396:
395:
393:
392:
387:
382:
377:
372:
367:
361:
358:
357:
353:
352:
347:
339:
338:
332:
331:
319:
318:
316:
315:
308:
301:
293:
290:
289:
286:
285:
283:
282:
277:
272:
267:
262:
257:
251:
250:
249:
241:
240:
236:
235:
234:
233:
228:
220:
219:
211:
210:
206:
205:
203:
202:
197:
192:
186:
183:
182:
176:
175:
173:
172:
167:
162:
157:
151:
148:
147:
141:
140:
139:
138:
131:
130:
129:
128:
126:as an allegory
123:
112:
109:
108:
102:
101:
100:
99:
92:
91:
90:
89:
84:
79:
68:
67:
66:
58:
57:
51:
50:
44:
43:
35:
34:
28:
27:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2734:
2723:
2722:Pseudoscience
2720:
2718:
2715:
2714:
2712:
2697:
2689:
2688:
2685:
2679:
2676:
2674:
2671:
2669:
2666:
2664:
2661:
2659:
2656:
2654:
2651:
2650:
2648:
2644:
2638:
2635:
2633:
2632:
2628:
2626:
2623:
2621:
2620:
2616:
2614:
2611:
2609:
2606:
2604:
2601:
2600:
2598:
2596:Controversies
2594:
2588:
2585:
2583:
2580:
2578:
2575:
2573:
2570:
2568:
2565:
2563:
2560:
2558:
2555:
2553:
2550:
2548:
2545:
2543:
2540:
2539:
2537:
2533:
2527:
2524:
2522:
2519:
2517:
2514:
2512:
2509:
2507:
2504:
2502:
2501:Flood geology
2499:
2497:
2494:
2492:
2489:
2488:
2486:
2484:
2480:
2474:
2471:
2469:
2466:
2464:
2461:
2459:
2456:
2454:
2453:Creation myth
2451:
2449:
2446:
2445:
2443:
2439:
2435:
2428:
2423:
2421:
2416:
2414:
2409:
2408:
2405:
2399:
2395:
2392:
2391:
2380:
2369:
2365:
2361:
2357:
2353:
2349:
2344:
2339:
2333:
2322:September 30,
2317:
2313:
2309:
2303:
2295:
2291:
2284:
2276:
2272:
2265:
2254:September 30,
2250:
2246:
2243:
2237:
2229:
2225:
2218:
2210:
2203:
2193:September 30,
2186:
2185:
2177:
2169:
2165:
2161:
2154:
2143:September 30,
2138:
2134:
2127:
2120:
2116:
2115:
2108:
2097:September 30,
2092:
2091:discovery.org
2088:
2081:
2070:September 30,
2065:
2061:
2054:
2047:
2042:
2038:
2034:
2030:
2023:
2014:
2010:
2006:
1999:
1991:
1990:
1983:
1976:
1970:
1959:September 30,
1954:
1953:discovery.org
1950:
1943:
1935:
1931:
1927:
1920:
1909:September 30,
1905:
1901:
1897:
1890:
1882:
1870:
1859:September 30,
1855:
1851:
1847:
1843:
1839:
1835:
1831:
1827:
1823:
1821:9780262661249
1817:
1813:
1808:
1807:
1801:
1795:
1787:
1783:
1779:
1777:0-19-515742-7
1773:
1769:
1765:
1764:
1759:
1755:
1749:
1738:September 29,
1733:
1729:
1725:
1718:
1711:
1707:
1702:
1697:
1693:
1689:
1685:
1678:
1670:
1666:
1662:
1655:
1647:
1643:
1639:
1635:
1631:
1629:0-8308-1360-8
1625:
1621:
1616:
1615:
1606:
1595:
1591:
1587:
1583:
1579:
1573:
1562:September 29,
1557:
1556:discovery.org
1553:
1546:
1544:
1532:September 29,
1527:
1526:discovery.org
1523:
1516:
1505:September 29,
1501:
1497:
1490:
1488:
1471:
1467:
1463:
1456:
1448:
1444:
1440:
1433:
1426:
1421:
1420:
1413:
1406:
1401:
1400:
1393:
1385:
1381:
1377:
1373:
1369:
1365:
1361:
1355:
1351:
1347:
1343:
1337:
1330:
1327:
1323:
1319:
1315:
1301:
1299:9780520246508
1295:
1291:
1286:
1285:
1279:
1273:
1265:
1263:0-8407-6848-6
1259:
1255:
1251:
1250:
1242:
1228:on 2009-04-02
1227:
1223:
1219:
1215:
1209:
1198:September 29,
1193:
1192:
1187:
1180:
1169:September 29,
1161:
1157:
1150:
1143:
1129:
1125:
1121:
1117:
1113:
1109:
1105:
1099:
1097:
1095:
1083:September 29,
1079:
1075:
1068:
1057:September 29,
1053:
1049:
1045:
1042:
1036:
1034:
1029:
1020:
1017:
1015:
1012:
1010:
1007:
1005:
1002:
1000:
999:Creation myth
997:
995:
992:
991:
983:
980:
978:
975:
973:
970:
967:
966:0-465-04675-4
963:
959:
958:
953:
950:
947:
945:
941:
938:
935:
934:0-19-515742-7
931:
927:
926:
921:
918:
917:
916:
914:
910:
906:
896:
894:
890:
886:
882:
878:
877:
872:
868:
864:
859:
853:
851:
847:
843:
839:
835:
831:
830:Eugenie Scott
827:
824:
820:
818:
813:
809:
805:
795:
793:
789:
785:
781:
777:
773:
770:
766:
763:
752:
750:
746:
742:
739:
735:
731:
726:
724:
720:
716:
712:
708:
704:
700:
696:
693:
689:
685:
680:
678:
674:
673:
668:
664:
660:
657:. It aims to
656:
652:
648:
644:
633:
628:
626:
621:
619:
614:
613:
611:
610:
605:
597:
596:
595:
594:
591:
588:
587:
581:
575:
574:
570:
567:
565:
562:
561:
559:
558:
554:
553:
548:
545:
542:
536:
533:
527:
524:
518:
516:
513:
511:
508:
506:
503:
502:
501:
500:
497:Organisations
496:
495:
490:
487:
485:
482:
480:
477:
475:
472:
470:
467:
466:
465:
464:
460:
459:
453:
449:
447:
444:
443:
442:
441:
438:
435:
434:
428:
427:
423:
421:
418:
416:
413:
411:
408:
407:
405:
404:
401:
398:
397:
391:
388:
386:
383:
381:
378:
376:
373:
371:
368:
366:
363:
362:
360:
359:
355:
354:
350:
345:
341:
340:
337:
334:
333:
329:
325:
324:
314:
309:
307:
302:
300:
295:
294:
292:
291:
281:
278:
276:
273:
271:
268:
266:
263:
261:
258:
256:
253:
252:
248:
245:
244:
243:
242:
238:
237:
232:
229:
227:
224:
223:
222:
221:
217:
216:
213:
212:
208:
207:
201:
198:
196:
193:
191:
188:
187:
185:
184:
181:
178:
177:
171:
168:
166:
163:
161:
160:Flood geology
158:
156:
153:
152:
150:
149:
146:
143:
142:
137:
134:
133:
127:
124:
122:
119:
118:
117:
114:
113:
111:
110:
107:
104:
103:
98:
95:
94:
88:
85:
83:
80:
78:
75:
74:
73:
70:
69:
65:
62:
61:
60:
59:
56:
53:
52:
49:
46:
45:
41:
37:
36:
33:
30:
29:
25:
21:
20:
2668:Created kind
2629:
2617:
2566:
2491:Adam and Eve
2377:
2371:. Retrieved
2351:
2347:
2332:
2320:. Retrieved
2315:
2302:
2294:the original
2283:
2275:the original
2264:
2252:. Retrieved
2236:
2228:the original
2217:
2202:
2191:, retrieved
2183:
2176:
2168:the original
2164:stanford.edu
2163:
2153:
2141:. Retrieved
2136:
2126:
2118:
2112:
2107:
2095:. Retrieved
2090:
2080:
2068:. Retrieved
2063:
2053:
2044:
2041:the original
2032:
2022:
2013:the original
2008:
1998:
1987:
1982:
1969:
1957:. Retrieved
1952:
1942:
1934:the original
1930:utdallas.edu
1929:
1919:
1907:. Retrieved
1899:
1889:
1877:|first=
1857:. Retrieved
1805:
1794:
1761:
1748:
1736:. Retrieved
1732:the original
1727:
1717:
1683:
1677:
1669:the original
1664:
1654:
1613:
1605:
1594:the original
1585:
1572:
1560:. Retrieved
1555:
1530:. Retrieved
1525:
1515:
1503:. Retrieved
1499:
1474:. Retrieved
1470:the original
1465:
1455:
1447:the original
1442:
1432:
1423:
1417:
1412:
1403:
1397:
1392:
1349:
1336:
1325:
1321:
1317:
1313:
1310:
1303:. Retrieved
1283:
1272:
1248:
1241:
1230:. Retrieved
1226:the original
1208:
1196:. Retrieved
1189:
1179:
1167:. Retrieved
1160:the original
1155:
1142:
1131:. Retrieved
1111:
1081:. Retrieved
1077:
1067:
1055:. Retrieved
1047:
955:
954:, author of
952:Chris Mooney
923:
911:, a notable
902:
884:
874:
865:include the
854:
828:
821:
812:quote-mining
801:
758:
727:
681:
670:
642:
641:
484:Michael Behe
424:
389:
218:Non-creation
155:Created kind
96:
2717:Creationism
2458:Creationism
2434:Creationism
2033:unsw.edu.au
1973:Knowledge.
944:John Haught
942:theologian
873:, the book
769:materialist
755:Motivations
738:evangelical
715:abiogenesis
651:creationism
590:Creationism
87:progressive
64:Young Earth
32:Creationism
2711:Categories
2516:Noah's Ark
2373:2007-10-14
2354:(4): 403.
2316:csicop.org
1830:2001031276
1402:, p. 136,
1368:2001265761
1359:0842336079
1320:case into
1232:2009-04-04
1133:2009-11-12
1025:References
949:Journalist
772:world view
688:naturalism
2117:, p. 88,
1869:cite book
1838:539676227
1476:March 10,
1422:, p. 30,
899:Criticism
858:polemical
817:Darwinism
780:Christian
776:evolution
711:evolution
707:Darwinism
692:atheistic
684:objective
555:Reactions
437:Campaigns
239:Evolution
72:Old Earth
2673:Nephilim
2394:Neo-Creo
2368:85003487
2064:ncse.com
2009:aaas.org
1900:ncse.com
1846:9452268M
1786:50913078
1710:16670753
1646:36621960
1638:97012916
1500:ncse.com
1384:8238567M
1376:42999968
1280:(2005).
1106:(1996).
988:See also
863:polemics
804:polemics
784:theistic
762:Hitler's
732:and its
725:theory.
723:Big Bang
721:and the
703:universe
695:religion
659:re-frame
604:Category
420:Politics
410:Timeline
400:Movement
356:Concepts
328:a series
326:Part of
260:Catholic
255:Buddhist
24:a series
22:Part of
2646:Related
2603:Outline
2441:General
2046:theory.
1992:, p. 83
1701:1451210
1318:Edwards
1305:May 25,
1116:Bibcode
1048:icr.org
808:biology
798:Tactics
461:Authors
270:Islamic
190:History
77:day-age
48:History
2366:
2058:NCSE.
1844:
1836:
1828:
1818:
1784:
1774:
1708:
1698:
1644:
1636:
1626:
1382:
1374:
1366:
1356:
1296:
1292:–115.
1260:
964:
932:
564:Jewish
280:Mormon
275:Jewish
2535:Types
2364:S2CID
2188:(PDF)
1622:–92.
1163:(PDF)
1152:(PDF)
645:is a
265:Hindu
55:Types
2511:Noah
2324:2014
2256:2014
2195:2014
2145:2014
2099:2014
2072:2014
1961:2014
1911:2014
1881:help
1861:2014
1834:OCLC
1826:LCCN
1816:ISBN
1782:OCLC
1772:ISBN
1740:2014
1706:PMID
1642:OCLC
1634:LCCN
1624:ISBN
1564:2014
1534:2014
1507:2014
1478:2005
1372:OCLC
1364:LCCN
1354:ISBN
1307:2015
1294:ISBN
1258:ISBN
1200:2014
1171:2014
1085:2014
1059:2014
962:ISBN
930:ISBN
848:and
836:and
782:and
765:Nazi
2356:doi
1812:322
1696:PMC
1688:doi
1329:it.
1290:114
1124:doi
887:by
879:by
869:'s
669:in
82:gap
2713::
2376:.
2362:.
2352:72
2350:.
2346:.
2314:.
2247:.
2162:.
2135:.
2089:.
2062:.
2031:.
2007:.
1951:.
1928:.
1902:.
1898:.
1873::
1871:}}
1867:{{
1852:.
1848:.
1842:OL
1840:.
1832:.
1824:.
1814:.
1780:.
1770:.
1766:.
1756:;
1726:.
1704:,
1694:,
1663:.
1640:.
1632:.
1620:91
1588:.
1584:.
1554:.
1542:^
1524:.
1498:.
1486:^
1464:.
1441:.
1380:OL
1378:.
1370:.
1362:.
1344:;
1309:.
1256:.
1254:13
1220:.
1188:.
1154:.
1122:.
1110:.
1093:^
1076:.
1050:.
1046:.
1032:^
743:.
717:,
679:.
330:on
26:on
2426:e
2419:t
2412:v
2358::
2326:.
2258:.
2211:.
2147:.
2119:.
2101:.
2074:.
2017:.
1977:.
1963:.
1913:.
1883:)
1863:.
1788:.
1742:.
1690::
1648:.
1566:.
1536:.
1509:.
1480:.
1386:.
1266:.
1235:.
1202:.
1173:.
1136:.
1126::
1118::
1087:.
1061:.
968:)
960:(
936:)
928:(
631:e
624:t
617:v
454:"
450:"
312:e
305:t
298:v
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
