1569:, who signed both lists, that "The Discovery Institute may like to trumpet his expertise in neurosurgery as an indicator of the significance of his dissent from evolutionary biology, but I think I'd rather trumpet his ignorance of evolutionary biology as an indicator of the uselessness of the Discovery Institute's list." Myers continued to state that the signer "is not only wrong, but he's pretty damn arrogant about it – how else to explain someone who is proud of the fact that he knows nothing about a subject, and is proud of his inability to find sources that would correct his ignorance, even when they're pointed out to him directly? He's like
1219:, author of the text comparison program that was partly responsible for the decision in the case, indicated that only 38% of the complete ruling by Judge Jones actually incorporated the findings of fact and conclusions of law that the plaintiffs proposed that he incorporate, and only 66% of the section (on whether intelligent design was science) incorporated the proposals, not the 90.9% the Discovery Institute claimed was copied in that section. Significantly, Judge Jones adopted only 48% of the plaintiffs's proposed findings of fact for that section, and rejected 52%, clearly showing that he did not accept the section verbatim.
609:. In an attempt to avoid repeating this violation, the Institute today avoids directly advocating for intelligent design in high school curricula. Instead, it advocates teaching methods that introduce intelligent design ideas (and textbooks) indirectly through a campaign to "Teach the Controversy" by portraying evolution as "a theory in crisis" and "presenting all the evidence, both for and against, evolution" and teaching "Critical Analysis of Evolution" (the name of the Institute's model lesson plans on the subject). The Discovery Institute describes their approach as:
1212:, legal director for the ACLU of Pennsylvania and the ACLU's lead attorney on the case called the Institute's report a stunt: "They're getting no traction in the scientific world so they're trying to do something ... as a PR stunt to get attention, ... That's not how scientists work, ... Discovery Institute is trying to litigate a year-old case in the media." He also said the Discovery Institute staff is not, as it claims, interested in finding scientific truths; it is more interested in a "cultural war," pushing for intelligent design and publicly criticizing a judge.
663:: "ID's backers have sought to avoid the scientific scrutiny which we have now determined that it cannot withstand by advocating that the controversy, but not ID itself, should be taught in science class. This tactic is at best disingenuous, and at worst a canard. The goal of the IDM is not to encourage critical thought, but to foment a revolution which would supplant evolutionary theory with ID." The slogan "teach the controversy" has been increasingly superseded by the more oblique "Critical Analysis of Evolution".
25:
778:. The lab was shut down and its website was deleted because Baylor's administration considered that it violated university policy forbidding professors from creating the impression that their personal views represent Baylor as an institution. Baylor however permitted Marks to resume work in the informatics lab on his own time and maintain his website, provided a disclaimer accompany any intelligent design-advancing research makes clear that the work does not represent the university's position.
76:
332:
574:"Discovery Institute opposes mandating the teaching of intelligent design, but it supports requiring students to know about scientific criticisms of Darwin's theory, which is the approach adopted by the science standards in Ohio, Minnesota, New Mexico, and currently under discussion in Kansas. Discovery Institute also supports the right of teachers to voluntarily discuss the scientific debate over intelligent design free from persecution or intimidation."
1758:, who once provided grants for conferences and courses to debate intelligent design has since rejected the Discovery Institute's entreaties for more funding, Foundation senior vice president Charles L. Harper Jr. said "They're political – that for us is problematic," and that while Discovery has "always claimed to be focused on the science," "what I see is much more focused on public policy, on public persuasion, on educational advocacy and so forth."
1096:, and assisted suicide--that many believing Christians and Jews would reject. And 'Darwinism' is equated with a hodgepodge of ideas about race, politics, and social issues. If all these ideas were to fall into well-deserved obsolescence, this would in no way detract from the validity of Darwin's contributions to modern biological science. Neither religion nor science is well served by this oversimplified view of their complex history.
815:"Across America, the freedom of scientists, teachers, and students to question Darwin is coming under increasing attack by what can only be called Darwinian fundamentalists. These self-appointed defenders of the theory of evolution are waging a malicious campaign to demonize and blacklist anyone who disagrees with them."
1007:
discriminated against for objectively presenting the scientific strengths and weaknesses of
Darwinian theory. Students should be protected from being harassed, intimidated, or discriminated against for expressing their views about the scientific strengths and weaknesses of Darwinian theory in an appropriate manner.
614:
taught that evolutionary theory, like any scientific theory, continues to be open to analysis and critical scrutiny. According to opinion polls, this approach is favored by the overwhelming majority of the
American public, and it has also been endorsed by the U.S. Congress in report language attached to the
1679:
website where one could sign the petition were prominent features of the campaign. During the period leading up to the Kansas evolution hearings the
Institute ran a number radio and print ads across Kansas incorporating many of its slogans, such as "Teach the Controversy", "Free Speech on Evolution",
1237:
strategy is to separate intelligent design from previous, more explicitly religious, forms of creationism, and the legal defeats that prohibit them from public school science classrooms. For this reason, the
Discovery Institute (and its supporters) make frequent and vehement denials of any connection
1006:
We, the undersigned
American citizens, urge the adoption of policies by our nation's academic institutions to ensure teacher and student academic freedom to discuss the scientific strengths and weaknesses of Darwinian evolution. Teachers should be protected from being fired, harassed, intimidated, or
1684:
website. As the Kansas debate over the teaching of evolution wound down in Fall 2006 after the conservative
Republicans who approved the Critical Analysis of Evolution classroom standards lost their majority in a primary election and the moderate Republicans and Democrats vowed to overturn Discovery
1374:
The document itself has been the subject of controversy and extensive criticism from a variety of sources. The statement in the document has been branded as poorly worded, misleading and vague. This campaign, like the rest of the
Discovery Institute anti-evolution campaigns, has come under criticism
706:
frequently find themselves the subjects of unflattering articles on the
Institute's blog which ignores or downplays the responses of large scientific and academic organizations rejecting intelligent design while portraying opponents as members of an academic and scientific fringe and minority. Other
565:
The
Institute's approach has been to position itself as opposed to any required teaching intelligent design, while campaigns such as Teach the Controversy and Critical Analysis of Evolution introduce high school students to design arguments through the Discovery Institute-drafted lesson plans. Teach
528:
and hidebound, but rather are focused on swaying the opinions of the public and public policy makers, which, if effective, it is hoped will respond by forcing the academic institutions supporting the scientific community to accept the
Discovery Institute's redefinition of science. Public high school
649:
rely, in part, on the notion that these issues are the subject of suppressed debate among biologists. ... according to neo-creationists, the apparent absence of this discussion and the nearly universal rejection of neo-creationist claims must be due to the conspiracy among professional biologists
1561:
writes, "Not only is the number that they cite pathetically small, but they rely on getting scientists whose expertise isn't relevant." In analogy, it can be argued that the 'Physicians' list represents an insignificant fraction of the total medical profession. Addressing a specific example, Myers
1204:
Within a day, the president of the York County Bar Association wrote that parties are required by the courts to submit findings of fact and "a judge can adopt some, all or none of the proposed findings." She added that in the final ruling, a judge's decision "is the judge's findings and it doesn't
1057:
Darwinism by itself did not produce the Holocaust, but without Darwinism, especially in its social Darwinist and eugenics permutations, neither Hitler nor his Nazi followers would have had the necessary scientific underpinnings to convince themselves and their collaborators that one of the world's
613:
As a general approach, Discovery Institute favors teaching students more about evolution, not less. We think students deserve to know not only about the strengths of modern evolutionary theory, but also about some of the theory's weaknesses and unresolved issues. In other words, students should be
1170:
and Casey Luskin, senior fellows or officers of the Discovery Institute, argued that intelligent design is a valid scientific theory, that the Jones court should not have addressed the question of whether it was a scientific theory, and that the decision will have no effect on the development and
544:
Yet the Discovery Institute as an organization did not get involved in the issue in order to solve the mysteries of the universe. Chapman is up front about having a social and political agenda. He sees design intelligence as a way to combat the growing reliance on genetic explanations for human
1576:
The compiled list of medical professionals is available on the Internet, where each signatory is listed three times: by last name, by country and by specialty. Most of the doctors who signed the statement are from the United States. As of May 22, 2007 there were 224 signatories from the United
997:
They purport that teachers, students, and college professors face intimidation and retaliation when discussing scientific criticisms of evolution, and therefore require protection. Critics of the bills point out that there are no credible scientific critiques of evolution. Investigation of the
548:
Others associated with the institute take a bigger leap of logic to argue that welfare, as currently dispensed, is a misguided consequence of the Darwinian outlook. "If you see human beings as nothing but matter and motion, than all you do is treat them like mouths to feed," says Jay Richards,
743:
chemist Nancy Bryson, who was removed as head of the science and mathematics division, purportedly for giving a presentation entitled "Critical Thinking on Evolution", which claimed evidence for intelligent design in nature. After protests, the university decided Bryson could keep the job and
1268:
found that "the overwhelming evidence at trial established that intelligent design is a religious view, a mere re-labeling of creationism, and not a scientific theory." Numerous books have been written by prominent academics documenting intelligent design as a form of creationism, e.g.:
694:. As part of a long term strategy the Institute actively promotes an image of intelligent design proponents suffering professional setbacks or failing to advance as victims of "Darwinist inquisitions" conducted by "Thought Police". Critics of intelligent design and the Institute such as
1777:
The intelligent design (ID) movement has long labored to inculcate two mutually exclusive falsehoods in the minds of the public: A) that ID is a purely scientific theory that has nothing to do with religion; and B) that any objection to ID is evidence of bias and discrimination against
1201:'s proposed 'Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law' submitted to Judge Jones nearly a month before his ruling." The study, though making no specific allegations of wrongdoing, implies that Judge Jones relied upon the plaintiff's submissions in writing his own conclusions of law.
1419:"We are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and natural selection to account for the origination and complexity of life and we therefore dissent from Darwinian macroevolution as a viable theory. This does not imply the endorsement of any alternative theory."
1443:, as well as other mechanisms. Therefore, the PSSI statement is overly vague and worded in a misleading fashion, since few real evolutionary biologists would subscribe to the version of evolution presented by the statement. Evolution does not include the study of the
1577:
States, two signatories from Australia, four signatories from Canada, eight signatories from the United Kingdom and another 14 from nine other countries. However, this figure should be expected to rise, based on a poll of 1472 US physicians conducted by the "
711:, "Personal Assistance"; described as "providing assistance in locating free legal representation from a network of concerned lawyers across the nation" and "investigations" and lobbying of officials by the Institute, "Legal Defense" and "Grassroots Action".
549:
program director for the institute's Center for Science and Culture. "If they're more than that, you treat the whole person," he argues, which would mean looking at such things as family structure and the role of moral and religious values in their lives.
1685:
Institute-influenced 2005 school science standards and adopt those recommended by a State Board Science Hearing Committee that were rejected by the previous board, the Institute shifted the focus of The Stand Up For Science campaign from Kansas to Texas.
1001:
In February 2008, the Discovery Institute announced the Academic Freedom Petition campaign, which it is conducting with assistance from Brian Gage Design who provides the Discovery Institute graphic design professional services. The petition states:
843:
The campaign has found traction with the Discovery Institute's constituency, conservative Christians, but has failed to produce gains with a wider audience. Critics of the Institute and intelligent design have alleged that the campaign is founded on
824:
responded with a statement framing the issue as a matter of free speech: "President Bush is to be commended for defending free speech on evolution, and supporting the right of students to hear about different scientific views about evolution."
1753:
campaign. One common criticism is that the rhetoric employed by the Institute in its campaigns is intentionally vague and misleading and that the campaigns mask a near total absence of scientific support and productive research programs. The
681:
The claim that "scientists, teachers, and students are under attack for questioning evolution" and have been discriminated against, is the centerpiece of a number of campaigns conducted by the Institute. Notable among these campaigns is the
1171:
adoption of intelligent design as an alternative to standard evolutionary theory. Peter Irons responded to the DeWolf et al. article, arguing that the decision was extremely well reasoned, and that it marks the end to legal efforts by the
552:
Do you really have to attack a whole branch of science in order to counter liberal views on welfare? The Discovery Institute folk think they do. "Unless you get the science right," Chapman says, "it's very hard to contend with the other
1326:
The Discovery Institute has created a number of petitions to give the impression that there are widespread doubts about the Theory of Evolution among scientists and scientifically-literate professionals. These petitions include
819:
The term gained exposure when the Institute was widely quoted in the press in 2005 after president Bush publicly spoke in favor of teaching intelligent design alongside evolution as a competing theory and Institute fellow
856:
says 'Free Speech on Evolution' is a "catchphrase" describing false compromises offered by Institute Fellows that introduce intelligent design into science classes indirectly by having teachers "teach the controversy."
545:
behavior and what he sees as an undermining of personal responsibility. As an example of this phenomenon, Chapman cites the infamous "Twinkie defense" used by a murder defendant claiming his sugar high made him do it.
1476:
petition had 34 signatories. There were 100 signatories on July 30, 2006. By December 2006, 167 had signed the statement. By May 22, 2007, 252 appeared on the list. As of July 30, 2007, the list included 264 names.
790:) have upheld school districts' and universities' right to restrict teaching to a specified curriculum. None of these purported cases of discrimination have been subjected to formal legal or congressional scrutiny.
940:' 'Evolutionary Informatics Lab' web-site as "Banned Item of the Year", after it was deleted from the Baylor University server. However, the site is still accessible, now being hosted on a third party server.
1527:
We are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and natural selection to account for the complexity of life. Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged.
3832:
3820:
2256:
2000:
1068:
Ann Taylor Allen giving the opinion that Weikart's talk about "Darwinism" is not based on any careful reading of Darwin himself but on vague ideas by a variety of people who presented themselves as "
626:
interpreted this tactic as: "the 'more' they want to teach, of course, is what they see as evolution's shortcomings, leaving an ecological niche that will then be filled by intelligent design."
2701:
2315:
3909:
2764:
707:
methods employed by the Institute include what they term "Public Education"; described as exposing 'bigotry and intolerance' to 'public disapproval' often through the Institute's blog
3649:
309:
3337:
922:'s Office for Intellectual Freedom who does not consider the book banned. The Discovery Institute continued to misrepresent the book as banned in 2007, with the statement that:
1011:
Casey Luskin, program officer for public policy and legal affairs at Discovery Institute, is the contact person for the campaign's Model Academic Freedom Statute on Evolution.
592:
529:
science curricula has been the most common and visible target of the campaigns, with the Institute publishing its own model lesson plan, the Critical Analysis of Evolution.
420:
are needed to protect academics' and teachers' ability to criticise evolution, and that the development of evolutionary theory was historically linked to ideologies such as
252:
633:
wrote that intelligent design proponents are "manufacturing dissent" in order to explain the absence of scientific debate of their claims: "The 'scientific' claims of such
3870:"ID supporters present fallacious arguments, use dishonest rhetoric, and often present non-contemptuous responses as evidence that their theories are gaining acceptance."
1520:
which has come under extensive criticism from a variety of sources as misleading, poorly phrased and containing only a tiny fraction of professionals in relevant fields.
1659:
petition is at least 1,111,500. That is, the 224 US signatories of the statement represent approximately 0.02% of the total number of US professionals in these fields.
3415:
1246:] still can't understand the obvious differences between creationism and intelligent design, continually conflating the two and looking like an ill-informed crank.
1058:
greatest atrocities was really morally praiseworthy. Darwinism – or at least some naturalistic interpretation of darwinism – succeeded in turning morality on its head.
3831:"Not a single expert witness over the course of the six-week trial identified one major scientific association, society or organization that endorsed ID as science."
2931:
2493:
1734:
Every leading scientific professional organization has through position statements unequivocally endorsed evolution as a widely accepted and well-proven theory.
521:
enterprise and thus the source of many of society's ills, and that "Design theory promises to reverse the stifling dominance of the materialist worldview."
2723:
2008:
3570:
3537:
3350:
Understanding the Intelligent Design Creationist Movement: Its True Nature and Goals: A Position Paper from the Center for Inquiry, Office of Public Policy
3096:
2531:
1816:
Understanding the Intelligent Design Creationist Movement: Its True Nature and Goals. A Position Paper from the Center for Inquiry, Office of Public Policy
2822:
1189:
The Discovery Institute and its fellows published several articles describing a "study" performed by the Discovery Institute criticizing the judge in the
3924:
3793:
3353:
2512:
748:
2967:
2300:
3893:
2312:
606:
261:
1818:
1469:
1352:
1332:
1321:
270:
894:
that the ALA claims others have banned or attempted to ban from various venues. In 2006, Discovery Institute Fellow John West nominated the book
1375:
for being misleading and anti-science. The list of signatories represents an insignificant fraction of medical professionals (about 0.02%). The
3786:
2226:
1084:
This picture of the Holocaust as the outcome of a 'culture war' between religion and science leads to serious distortions on both sides. The '
755:
from teaching a Cell Biology class over her introduction of intelligent design into it, and whose contract at that university was not renewed;
566:
the Controversy and Free Speech on Evolution both require that "competing" or "alternative" "theories" to evolution to be presented while the
3708:
3502:
3491:
2593:
2105:
1864:
361:
200:
2778:
428:, claims based on misrepresentation which have been ridiculed by topic experts. These three claims are all publicized in the pro-ID movie
3012:
3168:
3808:
1839:
3850:
3644:
2666:
1667:
The Stand Up For Science campaign originated in July 2006 leading up to the showdown in the Kansas Board of Education that began with
570:
model lesson plan fills that requirement by listing intelligent design books by Institute Fellows as such alternatives for students.
3988:
3386:
2277:
2175:
767:
3126:
1655:
Therefore, the total number of US professionals in the fields represented by the "Physicians and Surgeons for Scientific Integrity"
2411:
1261:
1190:
1161:
902:
659:
157:
3144:
2344:
3768:
3983:
3440:
3239:
A Comparison of Judge Jones' Opinion in Kitzmiller v. Dover with Plaintiffs' "Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law"
1582:
295:
3874:
2686:
2368:
2056:
1146:
mainstream appeared apathetic, acquiescent, or at times downright supportive of the eugenics movement" between 1900 and 1940.
412:' and to allow 'Critical Analysis of Evolution'. Other campaigns have claimed that intelligent design advocates (most notably
3603:
3423:
2157:
2127:
2030:"Dissent From Darwinism "Goes Global" as Over 600 Scientists Around the World Express Their Doubts About Darwinian Evolution"
3729:
3410:
3238:
3993:
1028:
783:
3466:
3265:
1948:
3198:
1549:
1513:
1456:
1328:
1317:
443:
2627:
1359:, and is intended to support the Discovery Institute's campaign to portray intelligent design as a scientifically valid
3077:
3047:
2928:
1652:
estimated that in May 2003 the US had 97,090 dentists, 63,780 opticians, 22,740 optometrists and 43,890 veterinarians.
3218:
2490:
1205:
matter who submitted them". A partner in a York law firm said that "Any attempt to make a stink out of it is absurd."
3665:
3284:
2554:
1769:
959:
795:
683:
676:
672:
430:
300:
1367:
lacks broad scientific support. It is similar to the Discovery Institute intelligent design campaigns to discredit
1208:
Several commentators described a number of critical flaws in the study from both a numerical and legal standpoint.
740:
354:
183:
2196:
President Bush's Support for Free Speech on Evolution and Intelligent Design Draws Praise From Discovery Institute
2801:
2720:
1573:, in that we can plop mountains of information in front of him, and he'll just blithely claim it doesn't exist."
1424:
687:
3565:
3532:
3093:
2528:
524:
None of the campaigns are aimed at directly influencing the scientific community, which the Institute considers
2826:
2355:
2288:
1797:
1700:-meter-busting". In response to the campaign Kansas biology teacher Jeremy Mohn founded the competing website,
1384:
1198:
461:. Intelligent design has been rejected, both by the vast majority of scientists and by court findings, such as
241:
151:
141:
3921:
3678:
May 2003 National Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates Healthcare Practitioner and Technical Occupations
3620:
481:
The overarching goal of the Institute in conducting the intelligent design campaigns is religious; to replace
3858:
3348:
2509:
2207:
1986:
1274:
734:
246:
1379:
is not determined by petitions or polls, but by scientific consensus. This is the reason that the theory of
1175:
to introduce creationism in public schools. DeWolf et al. responded to the Irons article in the same issue.
540:
when she wrote that behind all Discovery Institute programs there is an underlying hidden religious agenda:
3753:
3693:
3657:
3514:
3322:
2971:
2951:
2854:
2746:
2651:
2580:
2565:
1645:
919:
914:, rendering the basis for considering it to be "banned" highly tenuous, and the assertion was dismissed by
883:
3890:
2992:
2550:
1712:
On May 26, 2009, the Discovery Institute announced a new website, FaithandEvolution.Org. The site attacks
3716:
3694:
New Public Education Effort on Evolution Encourages Citizens to Stand Up For Science, Stand Up For Kansas
2790:
2734:
2419:
1238:
between intelligent design and creationism. These denials are at times bitter and abrasive, for example:
1209:
1172:
398:
347:
335:
131:
59:
2392:
1815:
852:
describes the "free speech on evolution campaign" as promoting intolerance, lies and distortions, while
3682:
3300:
2242:
Intelligent Design Creationism and Its Critics: Philosophical, Theological, and Scientific Perspectives
1649:
1648:
estimates that in 2006, there were more than 884,000 physicians in the United States. In addition, the
1589:, from May 13–15, 2005. This study showed that 34% of physician respondents felt more comfortable with
1116:
this movement came to prominence during the 'eclipse' of Darwinian evolution in the early 20th century;
402:
3959:
2566:
William Dembski Addresses Forthcoming Intelligent Design Research that Advances ID and Answers Critics
828:
A notable characteristic of this campaign is the Institute's framing of the issues as a confluence of
3968:
1668:
1493:
654:
601:
into public high school science curricula had been derailed when this was found to have violated the
588:
3783:
2029:
2775:
2219:
1065:
3705:
2149:
793:
In August 2007, an upcoming movie publicising a number of these incidents was announced, entitled
3944:
3488:
3059:
2915:
2604:
2110:
1763:
1554:
1410:", which are both misleading terms. The statement that the organization subscribes to is titled "
845:
775:
752:
510:
3250:
1335:, Physicians and Surgeons who Dissent from Darwinism, and the now-defunct Stand Up For Science.
2061:
2004:
1586:
1395:
The medical doctors and comparable professionals are signatories to a statement which disputes
949:
915:
435:
417:
96:
3805:
3009:
1593:
than evolution. include doctors trained or working in a wide range of disciplines, including,
1547:
and other signatories of this petition is not clear. Referring to the number of people on the
1255:, Is It Really Intelligent Design that has the Great Derb Worried?, Evolution News & Views
1150:
926:
In 2005, a federal judge banned Pandas outright from science classrooms in Dover, Pennsylvania
3226:
3194:
3176:
3163:
3119:
1688:
The scientific and science education communities reacted to campaign by saying that it was a
1376:
584:
409:
75:
2074:
3847:
2839:
2663:
2447:
2070:
1755:
1594:
1126:
1119:
the popular support for eugenics was matched with popular opposition to teaching evolution;
1088:' worldview is unproblematically associated here with many beliefs – such as opposition to
896:
866:
714:
Other purported instances of discrimination publicised by the Discovery Institute include:
602:
458:
387:
111:
101:
3381:
2274:
2172:
1132:
West quoted Darwin out of context in order to misrepresent him as supporting eugenics; and
1080:
cannot be attributed to Darwinism since it predates evolutionary theory. Allen concluded:
657:
in 2005, but were the subject of judicial criticism later in that year in the decision in
8:
3835:
3757:
3520:
3326:
3024:
2954:
2858:
2843:
2753:
2569:
2396:
2351:
2284:
2082:
1681:
1672:
1638:
1517:
1451:
1356:
1252:
1184:
1046:
991:
955:
719:
463:
375:
236:
106:
2451:
2408:
1122:"while many biologists did support eugenic policies, many important biologists did not";
38:
Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.
3449:
3364:
3306:
3141:
3055:
2805:
2730:
2473:
2372:
2341:
2086:
1713:
1590:
1481:
1344:
937:
870:
853:
763:
638:
615:
383:
210:
205:
80:
67:
3940:
3806:
Science and Creationism: A View from the National Academy of Sciences, Second Edition
3661:
3582:
3549:
3435:
3123:
3108:
2708:
2539:
2465:
2326:
2244:
2153:
1959:
1735:
1578:
1436:
1305:
1265:
1194:
1136:
887:
875:
759:
727:
630:
450:
413:
3454:
2910:
2090:
3871:
3621:"Data from HCD and Finkelstein Institute study of physician attitudes to evolution"
3472:
2682:
2477:
2455:
2438:
2145:
2078:
1290:
998:
allegations of intimidation and retaliation have found no evidence that it occurs.
833:
787:
494:
379:
278:
220:
116:
3598:
3253:, Rick Lee, The York Daily Record, December 12, 2006. Access requires registration
2140:
Barbara Forrest; Paul R. Gross (2004). "The Wedge Document: A Design for Design".
3928:
3897:
3878:
3854:
3790:
3712:
3653:
3607:
3574:
3541:
3498:
3495:
3444:
3419:
3390:
3360:
3357:
3288:
3269:
3222:
3202:
3172:
3148:
3130:
3100:
3081:
3051:
3016:
2935:
2782:
2727:
2690:
2670:
2535:
2516:
2497:
2415:
2348:
2319:
2281:
2241:
2230:
2179:
1825:
1822:
1723:
1680:
and "Critical Analysis of Evolution", and directing readers and listeners to the
1622:
1280:
1243:
1234:
1228:
1216:
1085:
1038:
1020:
771:
703:
121:
2652:
Holocaust Denier Led the Charge Against Academic Freedom on Evolution in Alabama
3676:
3516:
Medical Doctors a Fast Growing Segment of Darwin Doubting Science Professionals
3310:
3262:
3241:(pdf) John G. West and David K. DeWolf. Discovery Institute, December 12, 2006.
2939:
2809:
2183:
1750:
1689:
1403:
1400:
1296:
1143:
1042:
837:
642:
634:
506:
498:
476:
146:
3188:
1892:
3977:
3772:
3733:
3476:
3020:
2551:
Baylor U. Removes a Web Page Associated With Intelligent Design From Its Site
1963:
1718:
1614:
1566:
1540:
1440:
1347:. It consists of a list of people agreeing with a statement casting doubt on
1284:
1089:
1077:
699:
537:
509:
in 1999. The Discovery Institute argues that science, due to its reliance on
395:
3074:
3044:
2510:
One Long Article: Washington Post Highlights Persecution of Caroline Crocker
1435:
leads to inherited traits that become more or less common due to non-random
733:
biology teacher Roger DeHart's reassignment at, and later resignation from,
3586:
3553:
3398:
3213:
2855:
Banned Item of the Year: Dr. Robert Marks' Evolutionary Informatics Website
2469:
1944:
1739:
1610:
1570:
1563:
1544:
1343:
Physicians and Surgeons who Dissent from Darwinism is a petition promoting
1167:
1151:
Campaign to discredit the Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District decision
1101:
1064:
This conclusion is however controversial, with professor of history at the
1024:
821:
646:
497:
campaigns. The governing strategy of these various campaigns is called the
486:
215:
3282:
Text Comparison source documents, Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District
3281:
1197:' on intelligent design as science was taken virtually verbatim from the
1035:
From Darwin to Hitler, Evolutionary Ethics, Eugenics and Racism in Germany
2786:
2702:
While we're at it, let's also fire the math teachers who can't do algebra
2313:
While we're at it, let's also fire the math teachers who can't do algebra
1726:' recent launch of the BioLogos Institute to promote theistic evolution.
1693:
1606:
1460:", which has been widely criticized for being inaccurate and misleading.
1444:
829:
598:
514:
493:
convictions." To accomplish this the Institute has conducted a number of
321:
3600:
Majority of Physicians Give the Nod to Evolution Over Intelligent Design
2639:
3754:
Faith and Evolution: Friends or Foes? Find out at FaithandEvolution.Org
1626:
1598:
1532:
1260:
However this assertion has been refuted both in court and academia. In
3190:
Disaster in Dover: The Trials (and Tribulations) of Intelligent Design
2893:
2301:
Thought Police Try To Stifle Academic Freedom at Iowa State University
1100:
Discovery Institute Center for Science and Culture Associate Director
758:
The closure of the short-lived Evolutionary Informatics Lab formed by
442:
was outrageous. Other campaigns have included petitions, most notably
3394:
2460:
2433:
2223:
1630:
1618:
1602:
1428:
1407:
1396:
1380:
1368:
1364:
1348:
1338:
1155:
1069:
1014:
979:
879:
800:
623:
525:
454:
439:
391:
1450:
The wording of this statement is very similar to the wording of the
1222:
954:
Between 2004 and 2008 a number of anti-evolution 'Academic Freedom'
3964:
3624:
3578:
3545:
3453:, February 21, 2006 (paid subscription required, text available at
3104:
2704:
2673:
Jim Brown. AgapePress, American Family Association, August 5, 2005.
2322:
1917:
1558:
1536:
1432:
1109:
1093:
987:
983:
971:
967:
849:
695:
425:
2195:
994:. As of May 2008, none of them were successfully passed into law.
3437:
Few Biologists But Many Evangelicals Sign Anti-Evolution Petition
2765:
Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District/6:Curriculum, Conclusion
2664:
Bush Praised for Defending Free Speech on Theory of Life's Origin
1634:
975:
963:
860:
518:
482:
3323:
Is It Really Intelligent Design that has the Great Derb Worried?
2106:"New Mexico Doesn't Want Your Kids to Know How Old the Earth Is"
578:
2683:
President Bush calls for teaching Intelligent Design in schools
1497:
1489:
1360:
1073:
1050:
723:
691:
490:
421:
2938:, The Professional Staff of the Education Pre-K–12 Committee,
2434:"Intelligent design: Who has designs on your students' minds?"
593:
Explore Evolution: The Arguments For and Against Neo-Darwinism
16:
Campaigns which seek to promote intelligent design creationism
2642:
Garry Wills. The New York Review of Books, November 16, 2006.
1697:
931:
Casey Luskin, Evolution News & Views, Discovery Institute
653:
These teaching methods were promoted by the Institute at the
536:
article, Nina Shapiro quoted Institute founder and president
2139:
1233:
One of the principal rationales behind intelligent design's
1178:
3881:
Jason Rosenhouse. BioScience, Vol. 53 No. 1, January 2003.
2870:
2630:
Peter Baker, Peter Slevin. Washington Post, August 3, 2005.
2142:
Creationism's Trojan Horse: The Wedge of Intelligent Design
2057:"The Fact of Evolution: Implications for Science Education"
1485:
891:
3646:
Physician Characteristics and Distribution in the US, 2006
1918:"Senior Fellow Richard Weikart responds to Sander Gliboff"
1749:
Critics say that the Institute is conducting a deliberate
3272:
Christina Kauffman. The York Dispatch, December 12, 2006.
2776:
The silliest thing I've heard all week: ACLU book banning
1743:
3872:
Leaders and Followers in the Intelligent Design Movement
1302:
Tower of Babel: The Evidence Against the New Creationism
744:
insisted her removal had nothing to do with the lecture.
3094:
How the West was 'Won': with spin and rewriting history
2628:
Bush Remarks On 'Intelligent Design' Theory Fuel Debate
2500:, Henry G. Brinton, Washington Post, September 18, 2005
1840:"Leading Cardinal Redefines Church's View on Evolution"
438:
said the film's attempt to blame science for the Nazi
2654:
Casey Luskin. Discovery Institute, Evolutionnews.org.
1958:. Stuttgart: Georg von Holtzbrinck Publishing Group.
1108:
and in lectures, has attempted to link Darwin to the
3960:
Discovery Institute – Center for Science and Culture
3706:
Kansas Primary Election, August 1 – Online Resources
3696:
EvolutionNews.org, Discovery Institute. July 7, 2006
2968:"WHOIS information for: academicfreedompetition.com"
2055:
Hofmann, James R.; Weber, Bruce H. (November 2003).
1746:
that "99.9 percent of scientists accept evolution".
1581:
Institute for Social and Religious Research" at the
1523:
Statement of "A Scientific Dissent from Darwinism":
806:
666:
3912:
Jodi Wilgoren. The New York Times, August 21, 2005.
3910:
Politicized Scholars Put Evolution on the Defensive
3794:
American Association for the Advancement of Science
3225:, David K. DeWolf, John G. West, and Casey Luskin,
3175:, David K. DeWolf, John G. West, and Casey Luskin,
3165:
Intelligent Design Will Survive Kitzmiller v. Dover
2823:"The "banning" of Pandas – A final (I hope) update"
2001:"Anti-Evolution Film Misappropriates the Holocaust"
1293:, From Scientific Creationism to Intelligent Design
2208:Key Resources for Parents and School Board Members
1412:Physicians and Surgeons who Dissent from Darwinism
1339:Physicians and Surgeons who Dissent from Darwinism
1156:For deciding whether intelligent design is science
1015:Campaigns to link evolution to Nazism and eugenics
3263:New criticism for Dover intelligent design ruling
3197:Law Review, Volume 68, Number 1, April 27, 2007.
3084:, Jim Curtsinger, Minnesota Citizens for Science
2519:, Evolution News & Views, Discovery Institute
1838:Dean, Cornelia; Goodstein, Laurie (9 July 2005).
1696:described the campaign's support for science as "
607:First Amendment to the United States Constitution
416:) have been discriminated against, and thus that
3975:
3967:A Discovery Institute campaign to influence the
3229:Law Review, Volume 68, Number 1, April 27, 2007.
3142:Evangelical Engagements With Eugenics, 1900-1940
2922:
2337:
2335:
2166:
1470:Physicians and Surgeons for Scientific Integrity
1353:Physicians and Surgeons for Scientific Integrity
1333:Physicians and Surgeons for Scientific Integrity
1322:Physicians and Surgeons for Scientific Integrity
501:and was first made public when the Institute's "
3900:Kevin Drum. Washington Monthly, March 24, 2004.
3325:, Robert Crowther, Evolution News & Views,
2953:, Robert Crowther, Evolution News & Views,
1355:(PSSI), a nonprofit organization formed by the
2911:Evolution's Critics Shift Tactics With Schools
1865:"The Role of Darwinism in Nazi Racial Thought"
1215:A subsequent review of the study performed by
861:Campaigns portraying books and sites as banned
3756:, Robert Crowther, Evolution News and Views,
3519:, Robert Crowther, Evolution News and Views,
3503:American Association of University Professors
3179:Law Review, Volume 68, Number 1, May 4, 2007.
3070:
3068:
2721:Letter to the St. Petersburg Times on ID Poll
2332:
2257:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, p89
1837:
1472:was formed in 2006. By May 8, 2006, the PSSI
1129:that provided information debunking eugenics;
990:, based largely upon language drafted by the
900:, on the basis of it being "at the heart of"
467:, as being a religious view and not science.
355:
3769:Christians battle each other over evolution
3338:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District p43
3054:, Mark Borrello, assistant professor of the
2888:
2886:
2884:
2123:
2121:
2054:
1942:
943:
408:Prominent Institute campaigns have been to '
3412:Doubting Darwinism through Creative License
3040:
3038:
3036:
3034:
3032:
2529:Baylor episode is getting wider circulation
2369:"Science in the classroom, or creationism?"
2275:Free Speech on Evolution Campaign Main Page
2097:
1993:
1953:That Ben Stein Doesn't Want You to Know..."
1512:The statement is similar to the one of the
1135:prominent evolutionary biologists, such as
1112:movement. However, critics point out that:
936:In 2007, the Discovery Institute nominated
3610:, HCD Research press release, May 23, 2005
3065:
1981:
1979:
616:No Child Left Behind Act Conference Report
362:
348:
2929:Bill Analysis and Fiscal Impact Statement
2881:
2752:, John West, Evolution News & Views,
2459:
2150:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195157420.003.0003
2118:
1936:
811:The primary message of the campaign was:
768:Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary
3903:
3460:
3377:
3375:
3373:
3029:
2431:
2342:Free Speech on Evolution Campaign Page 2
2210:Discovery Institute, September 21, 2005.
1262:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District
1191:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District
1162:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District
903:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District
660:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District
650:instead of a lack of scientific merit."
470:
394:". The Discovery Institute promotes the
3482:
3468:The Evolution Wars Visit Eye on Science
2409:Professor Dumped Over Evolution Beliefs
2303:Discovery Institute. September 1, 2005.
2270:
2268:
2266:
2264:
2048:
1976:
1662:
1223:"Intelligent design is not creationism"
3976:
3784:Statement on the Teaching of Evolution
3567:Egnor responds, falls flat on his face
3534:Dr Michael Egnor challenges evolution!
2361:
1742:states in an article published by the
1675:. The Institute's online petition and
3424:National Center for Science Education
3404:
3370:
3367:, Office of Public Policy, May, 2007.
2103:
1707:
1311:
1072:." Moreover, fundamental elements of
253:International Society for Complexity,
3891:Political Animal, Intelligent Design
3489:Wedging Creationism into the Academy
2993:"Brian Gage Design | Portfolio"
2261:
1029:Social effect of evolutionary theory
784:Webster v. New Lenox School District
18:
3861:, Vol. LVIII, No. 15, July 28, 2006
3821:Ruling, Kitzmiller v. Dover page 83
2904:
1722:suggests that it is in response to
1514:A Scientific Dissent from Darwinism
1457:A Scientific Dissent from Darwinism
1414:" and contains the following text:
1351:. The petition was produced by the
1329:A Scientific Dissent From Darwinism
1318:A Scientific Dissent From Darwinism
579:Campaign to "teach the controversy"
444:A Scientific Dissent From Darwinism
13:
2871:"The Evolutionary Informatics Lab"
2104:Kroll, Andy (September 15, 2017).
2083:10.1023/B:SCED.0000004556.80802.3a
1761:In one of a series of articles in
1553:list and their claimed relevance,
597:Previously, attempts to introduce
558:Nina Shapiro, The New Creationists
378:has conducted a series of related
14:
4005:
3953:
3848:Finding the Evolution in Medicine
3062:. Minnesota Citizens for Science
2555:The Chronicle of Higher Education
2432:Brumfiel, Geoff (27 April 2005).
1770:Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed
1550:Scientific Dissent from Darwinism
1500:, or similar degrees to sign the
1277:– The Wedge of Intelligent Design
1139:have spoken out against eugenics.
807:Free Speech on Evolution campaign
796:Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed
770:research professor in philosophy
684:Sternberg peer review controversy
677:Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed
673:Sternberg peer review controversy
667:Campaigns claiming discrimination
431:Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed
310:Scientific bodies that explicitly
3989:Intelligent design controversies
3501:, Glenn Branch, Academe Online,
3151:, Dennis L. Durst, Volume 18:2,
3045:Dancing with the Disco Institute
2802:FTE and Jon Buell's Day in Court
2198:– press release, August 2, 2005.
2007:. April 29, 2008. Archived from
1480:The PSSI invites holders of the
1363:by creating the impression that
1193:trial. It claims that "90.9% of
741:Mississippi University for Women
737:for teaching intelligent design;
382:campaigns which seek to promote
331:
330:
74:
23:
3934:
3915:
3884:
3864:
3857:, Cynthia Delgado, NIH Record,
3841:
3825:
3814:
3799:
3777:
3762:
3747:
3722:
3699:
3687:
3670:
3638:
3613:
3592:
3559:
3526:
3508:
3429:
3342:
3331:
3316:
3294:
3275:
3256:
3244:
3232:
3207:
3182:
3157:
3135:
3113:
3087:
3003:
2985:
2960:
2945:
2863:
2848:
2833:
2815:
2795:
2769:
2758:
2740:
2714:
2695:
2676:
2657:
2645:
2633:
2621:
2586:
2574:
2559:
2544:
2522:
2503:
2484:
2425:
2418:, Jim Brown and Ed Vitagliano,
2402:
2386:
2306:
2294:
2250:
2235:
2213:
2201:
2189:
2133:
1671:, which was also driven by the
1179:"Study" criticizing Judge Jones
686:and in the more recent case of
485:with "a science consonant with
255:Information, and Design (ISCID)
3771:, Amanda Gefter, 28 May 2009,
3251:Judges' wording often borrowed
3075:Should Dr. West Be Sterilized?
3023:, Evolution News & Views,
2857:, Evolution News & Views,
2842:, Evolution News & Views,
2568:, Evolution News & Views,
2356:Center for Science and Culture
2289:Center for Science and Culture
2022:
1910:
1885:
1857:
1831:
1809:
1798:Intelligent design in politics
1773:, ID critic Ed Brayton noted:
1601:(i.e., weight loss medicine),
882:campaign, led annually by the
568:Critical Analysis of Evolution
386:while attempting to discredit
242:Center for Science and Culture
1:
3984:Discovery Institute campaigns
3859:National Institutes of Health
3683:US Bureau of Labor Statistics
3589:, February 24, 2007 10:38 am.
2583:, Mark Bergin, World Magazine
1987:The Journal of Modern History
1803:
1650:US Bureau of Labor Statistics
1531:The value of the opinions of
1037:, Discovery Institute fellow
735:Burlington-Edison High School
390:, which the Institute terms "
247:Centre for Intelligent Design
178:Discovery Institute campaigns
3941:The Richard Sternberg Affair
3809:National Academy of Sciences
3658:American Medical Association
2220:The evolution of creationism
1785:The Richard Sternberg Affair
1729:
1646:American Medical Association
1447:, as the statement implies.
1390:
920:American Library Association
884:American Library Association
457:is accepted by overwhelming
7:
3994:Intelligent design movement
3730:"Stand Up for REAL Science"
3556:, February 18, 2007 9:44 am
3494:September 27, 2007, at the
2894:"Academic Freedom Petition"
2144:. Oxford University Press.
2003:(Press release). New York:
1791:
1583:Jewish Theological Seminary
1507:
1173:intelligent design movement
886:, in an attempt to protect
722:'s initial failure to gain
405:, a public relations firm.
399:intelligent design movement
271:Physicians and Surgeons for
10:
4010:
3931:John Templeton Foundation.
3927:December 12, 2005, at the
3789:February 21, 2006, at the
3287:December 15, 2012, at the
3099:December 14, 2007, at the
2247:. MIT Press, 2001. p. 322.
2130:Discovery Institute, 1999.
1463:
1399:, which they refer to as "
1315:
1275:Creationism's Trojan Horse
1226:
1182:
1159:
1018:
947:
906:. However the decision in
864:
670:
582:
474:
403:Creative Response Concepts
264:Evolution Awareness Center
3969:Kansas evolution hearings
3479:-Blog, February 21, 2007.
3221:December 1, 2007, at the
3201:December 1, 2007, at the
3015:December 7, 2007, at the
2747:Banned Book of the Year:
1702:Stand Up for REAL Science
1669:Kansas evolution hearings
944:Academic freedom campaign
918:, Deputy Director of the
655:Kansas evolution hearings
589:Kansas evolution hearings
312:reject intelligent design
32:This article needs to be
2640:A Country Ruled by Faith
1066:University of Louisville
910:made no order regarding
3302:Jones, Luskin, and Text
3060:University of Minnesota
2997:www.briangagedesign.com
2916:The Wall Street Journal
2075:2003Sc&Ed..12..729H
2062:Science & Education
1893:"From Darwin to Hitler"
1738:Professor of Education
1555:University of Minnesota
1385:overwhelmingly accepted
846:intellectual dishonesty
776:postdoctoral researcher
753:George Mason University
3120:Carrie Buck's Daughter
2005:Anti-Defamation League
1821:June 30, 2007, at the
1789:
1587:Flemington, New Jersey
1529:
1425:Evolutionary synthesis
1422:
1258:
1098:
1060:
1009:
950:Academic Freedom bills
934:
916:Deborah Caldwell-Stone
817:
762:engineering professor
620:
576:
561:
436:Anti-Defamation League
418:Academic Freedom bills
401:and is represented by
262:Intelligent Design and
97:Irreducible complexity
3227:University of Montana
3195:University of Montana
3177:University of Montana
3153:Ethics & Medicine
2829:on February 10, 2012.
2491:Darwin Goes to Church
2318:May 21, 2006, at the
1775:
1525:
1416:
1377:evidence of evolution
1240:
1106:Darwin Day in America
1082:
1055:
1004:
924:
813:
782:Court cases (such as
611:
585:Teach the Controversy
572:
542:
471:Goal of the campaigns
410:Teach the Controversy
184:Teach the controversy
3965:Stand Up For Science
2812:, November 21, 2007.
2749:Of Pandas and People
2685:Good News Magazine.
2173:The New Creationists
1756:Templeton Foundation
1677:Stand Up For Science
1663:Stand Up For Science
1585:and HCD Research in
1127:evolutionary biology
897:Of Pandas and People
867:Of Pandas and People
751:, who was barred by
603:Establishment Clause
505:" was leaked on the
459:scientific consensus
388:evolutionary biology
273:Scientific Integrity
112:Intelligent designer
102:Specified complexity
3836:Kitzmiller v. Dover
3758:Discovery Institute
3521:Discovery Institute
3327:Discovery Institute
3025:Discovery Institute
2955:Discovery Institute
2913:, Stephanie Simon,
2859:Discovery Institute
2844:Discovery Institute
2754:Discovery Institute
2570:Discovery Institute
2452:2005Natur.434.1062B
2446:(7037): 1062–1065.
2397:The Oakland Tribune
2352:Discovery Institute
2285:Discovery Institute
1956:Scientific American
1922:Discovery Institute
1682:Discovery Institute
1673:Discovery Institute
1639:veterinary medicine
1518:Discovery Institute
1452:Discovery Institute
1357:Discovery Institute
1253:Discovery Institute
1185:Discovery Institute
1104:, in both his book
1047:Theory of Evolution
992:Discovery Institute
958:were introduced in
720:Francis J. Beckwith
513:, is an inherently
464:Kitzmiller v. Dover
376:Discovery Institute
237:Discovery Institute
158:Kitzmiller v. Dover
107:Fine-tuned universe
3896:2014-03-27 at the
3877:2007-06-12 at the
3853:2011-07-18 at the
3711:2008-11-20 at the
3652:2011-05-20 at the
3606:2011-07-23 at the
3573:2011-06-05 at the
3540:2009-05-31 at the
3475:, Eye on Science,
3450:The New York Times
3443:2008-03-06 at the
3426:, 29 November 2001
3418:2008-10-19 at the
3389:2011-06-05 at the
3365:Center for Inquiry
3356:2011-05-19 at the
3307:Wesley R. Elsberry
3268:2013-12-17 at the
3171:2007-12-01 at the
3147:2007-12-08 at the
3129:2017-03-19 at the
3080:2007-12-17 at the
3056:history of science
3050:2007-12-17 at the
3010:West Wins In Minn.
2957:, February 7, 2008
2934:2008-09-10 at the
2806:Wesley R. Elsberry
2781:2008-07-25 at the
2737:. January 1, 2006.
2731:Wesley R. Elsberry
2726:2007-09-30 at the
2711:. August 01, 2005.
2689:2007-09-27 at the
2669:2007-09-28 at the
2534:2007-12-30 at the
2515:2007-10-04 at the
2496:2007-10-08 at the
2414:2007-01-22 at the
2393:Science chief back
2347:2007-06-25 at the
2280:2006-08-06 at the
2229:2010-03-05 at the
2178:2006-12-30 at the
1947:(April 16, 2008).
1844:The New York Times
1714:theistic evolution
1708:Theistic evolution
1591:intelligent design
1557:biology professor
1431:state that random
1427:and the theory of
1345:intelligent design
1312:Petition campaigns
1142:"on the whole the
960:State legislatures
871:Robert J. Marks II
854:Wesley R. Elsberry
764:Robert J. Marks II
688:Guillermo Gonzalez
384:intelligent design
211:Phillip E. Johnson
206:William A. Dembski
81:Watchmaker analogy
68:Intelligent design
3922:Anti-Evolutionism
3717:The Panda's Thumb
3447:, Kenneth Chang,
3393:, Tara C. Smith,
3215:Rebuttal to Irons
3124:Stephen Jay Gould
2791:The Panda's Thumb
2735:The Panda's Thumb
2709:Pharyngula (blog)
2540:Pharyngula (blog)
2329:, August 1, 2005.
2327:Pharyngula (blog)
2245:Robert T. Pennock
2159:978-0-19-515742-0
1924:. 10 October 2004
1736:McGill University
1579:Louis Finkelstein
1437:natural selection
1306:Robert T. Pennock
1266:John E. Jones III
1251:Robert Crowther,
1166:David K. DeWolf,
1137:Stephen Jay Gould
1033:In his 2004 book
888:freedom of speech
876:Banned Books Week
766:, which included
760:Baylor University
728:Baylor University
709:Evolutionnews.org
631:Robert T. Pennock
414:Richard Sternberg
372:
371:
53:
52:
4001:
3948:
3945:Skeptic magazine
3938:
3932:
3919:
3913:
3907:
3901:
3888:
3882:
3868:
3862:
3845:
3839:
3829:
3823:
3818:
3812:
3803:
3797:
3781:
3775:
3766:
3760:
3751:
3745:
3744:
3742:
3741:
3732:. Archived from
3726:
3720:
3719:, July 16, 2006.
3703:
3697:
3691:
3685:
3674:
3668:
3642:
3636:
3635:
3633:
3632:
3623:. Archived from
3617:
3611:
3596:
3590:
3563:
3557:
3530:
3524:
3523:, July 30, 2007.
3512:
3506:
3486:
3480:
3473:Michael Lemonick
3464:
3458:
3433:
3427:
3408:
3402:
3379:
3368:
3346:
3340:
3335:
3329:
3320:
3314:
3298:
3292:
3291:Wesley Elsberry.
3279:
3273:
3260:
3254:
3248:
3242:
3236:
3230:
3211:
3205:
3186:
3180:
3161:
3155:
3139:
3133:
3117:
3111:
3091:
3085:
3072:
3063:
3042:
3027:
3007:
3001:
3000:
2989:
2983:
2982:
2980:
2979:
2970:. Archived from
2964:
2958:
2949:
2943:
2942:, March 26, 2008
2926:
2920:
2908:
2902:
2901:
2890:
2879:
2878:
2867:
2861:
2852:
2846:
2837:
2831:
2830:
2825:. Archived from
2819:
2813:
2799:
2793:
2773:
2767:
2762:
2756:
2744:
2738:
2718:
2712:
2699:
2693:
2680:
2674:
2661:
2655:
2649:
2643:
2637:
2631:
2625:
2619:
2618:
2616:
2615:
2609:
2603:. Archived from
2602:
2590:
2584:
2578:
2572:
2563:
2557:
2548:
2542:
2526:
2520:
2507:
2501:
2488:
2482:
2481:
2463:
2461:10.1038/4341062a
2429:
2423:
2422:, March 11, 2003
2406:
2400:
2390:
2384:
2383:
2381:
2380:
2371:. Archived from
2365:
2359:
2339:
2330:
2310:
2304:
2298:
2292:
2272:
2259:
2254:
2248:
2239:
2233:
2217:
2211:
2205:
2199:
2193:
2187:
2186:, April 18, 2001
2182:, Nina Shapiro,
2170:
2164:
2163:
2137:
2131:
2125:
2116:
2115:
2101:
2095:
2094:
2052:
2046:
2045:
2043:
2041:
2026:
2020:
2019:
2017:
2016:
1997:
1991:
1983:
1974:
1973:
1971:
1970:
1940:
1934:
1933:
1931:
1929:
1914:
1908:
1907:
1905:
1903:
1889:
1883:
1882:
1880:
1878:
1869:
1861:
1855:
1854:
1852:
1850:
1835:
1829:
1813:
1787:
1291:The Creationists
1256:
932:
834:academic freedom
788:Bishop v. Aronov
749:Caroline Crocker
635:neo-creationists
559:
495:public relations
396:pseudoscientific
380:public relations
364:
357:
350:
334:
333:
279:Truth in Science
221:Stephen C. Meyer
117:Theistic science
78:
55:
54:
48:
45:
39:
27:
26:
19:
4009:
4008:
4004:
4003:
4002:
4000:
3999:
3998:
3974:
3973:
3956:
3951:
3947:, April 17 2008
3939:
3935:
3929:Wayback Machine
3920:
3916:
3908:
3904:
3898:Wayback Machine
3889:
3885:
3879:Wayback Machine
3869:
3865:
3855:Wayback Machine
3846:
3842:
3833:Ruling, page 70
3830:
3826:
3819:
3815:
3804:
3800:
3791:Wayback Machine
3782:
3778:
3767:
3763:
3752:
3748:
3739:
3737:
3728:
3727:
3723:
3713:Wayback Machine
3704:
3700:
3692:
3688:
3675:
3671:
3654:Wayback Machine
3643:
3639:
3630:
3628:
3619:
3618:
3614:
3608:Wayback Machine
3597:
3593:
3575:Wayback Machine
3564:
3560:
3542:Wayback Machine
3531:
3527:
3513:
3509:
3499:Barbara Forrest
3496:Wayback Machine
3487:
3483:
3465:
3461:
3445:Wayback Machine
3434:
3430:
3420:Wayback Machine
3409:
3405:
3391:Wayback Machine
3380:
3371:
3361:Barbara Forrest
3358:Wayback Machine
3347:
3343:
3336:
3332:
3321:
3317:
3299:
3295:
3289:Wayback Machine
3280:
3276:
3270:Wayback Machine
3261:
3257:
3249:
3245:
3237:
3233:
3223:Wayback Machine
3212:
3208:
3203:Wayback Machine
3193:, Peter Irons,
3187:
3183:
3173:Wayback Machine
3162:
3158:
3149:Wayback Machine
3140:
3136:
3131:Wayback Machine
3118:
3114:
3101:Wayback Machine
3092:
3088:
3082:Wayback Machine
3073:
3066:
3052:Wayback Machine
3043:
3030:
3017:Wayback Machine
3008:
3004:
2991:
2990:
2986:
2977:
2975:
2966:
2965:
2961:
2950:
2946:
2936:Wayback Machine
2927:
2923:
2909:
2905:
2892:
2891:
2882:
2875:www.EvoInfo.org
2869:
2868:
2864:
2853:
2849:
2838:
2834:
2821:
2820:
2816:
2800:
2796:
2783:Wayback Machine
2774:
2770:
2763:
2759:
2745:
2741:
2728:Wayback Machine
2719:
2715:
2700:
2696:
2691:Wayback Machine
2681:
2677:
2671:Wayback Machine
2662:
2658:
2650:
2646:
2638:
2634:
2626:
2622:
2613:
2611:
2607:
2600:
2592:
2591:
2587:
2579:
2575:
2564:
2560:
2549:
2545:
2536:Wayback Machine
2527:
2523:
2517:Wayback Machine
2508:
2504:
2498:Wayback Machine
2489:
2485:
2430:
2426:
2416:Wayback Machine
2407:
2403:
2399:, Mar 28, 2003
2391:
2387:
2378:
2376:
2367:
2366:
2362:
2349:Wayback Machine
2340:
2333:
2320:Wayback Machine
2311:
2307:
2299:
2295:
2282:Wayback Machine
2273:
2262:
2255:
2251:
2240:
2236:
2231:Wayback Machine
2222:, Gordy Slack,
2218:
2214:
2206:
2202:
2194:
2190:
2180:Wayback Machine
2171:
2167:
2160:
2138:
2134:
2126:
2119:
2102:
2098:
2053:
2049:
2039:
2037:
2028:
2027:
2023:
2014:
2012:
1999:
1998:
1994:
1984:
1977:
1968:
1966:
1949:"Six Things in
1941:
1937:
1927:
1925:
1916:
1915:
1911:
1901:
1899:
1897:Richard Weikart
1891:
1890:
1886:
1876:
1874:
1867:
1863:
1862:
1858:
1848:
1846:
1836:
1832:
1826:Barbara Forrest
1823:Wayback Machine
1814:
1810:
1806:
1794:
1788:
1782:
1732:
1724:Francis Collins
1710:
1665:
1623:plastic surgery
1510:
1466:
1393:
1341:
1324:
1314:
1281:Barbara Forrest
1257:
1250:
1244:John Derbyshire
1235:neo-creationist
1231:
1229:Neo-creationism
1225:
1217:Wesley Elsberry
1187:
1181:
1164:
1158:
1153:
1086:Judeo-Christian
1039:Richard Weikart
1031:
1021:Richard Weikart
1017:
952:
946:
938:Robert J. Marks
933:
930:
890:by celebrating
873:
863:
809:
772:William Dembski
704:Barbara Forrest
679:
669:
622:Gordy Slack of
595:
581:
560:
557:
479:
473:
368:
314:
311:
305:
275:
272:
266:
263:
257:
254:
163:
126:
122:Neo-creationism
83:
49:
43:
40:
37:
28:
24:
17:
12:
11:
5:
4007:
3997:
3996:
3991:
3986:
3972:
3971:
3962:
3955:
3954:External links
3952:
3950:
3949:
3943:, Ed Brayton,
3933:
3914:
3902:
3883:
3863:
3840:
3824:
3813:
3798:
3776:
3761:
3746:
3721:
3698:
3686:
3669:
3637:
3612:
3591:
3558:
3525:
3507:
3481:
3459:
3455:Skeptical News
3428:
3422:, Skip Evans,
3403:
3401:, May 8, 2006.
3369:
3341:
3330:
3315:
3311:The Austringer
3293:
3274:
3255:
3243:
3231:
3206:
3181:
3156:
3134:
3112:
3086:
3064:
3028:
3002:
2984:
2959:
2944:
2940:Florida Senate
2921:
2903:
2880:
2862:
2847:
2840:Design of Life
2832:
2814:
2810:The Austringer
2794:
2768:
2757:
2739:
2713:
2694:
2675:
2656:
2644:
2632:
2620:
2598:Press Release"
2585:
2581:Crisis averted
2573:
2558:
2543:
2521:
2502:
2483:
2424:
2401:
2385:
2360:
2331:
2305:
2293:
2260:
2249:
2234:
2212:
2200:
2188:
2184:Seattle Weekly
2165:
2158:
2132:
2128:Wedge Document
2117:
2096:
2069:(8): 729–760.
2047:
2036:. 21 June 2006
2034:evolution news
2021:
1992:
1975:
1943:Rennie, John;
1935:
1909:
1884:
1856:
1830:
1807:
1805:
1802:
1801:
1800:
1793:
1790:
1780:
1751:disinformation
1731:
1728:
1709:
1706:
1690:misinformation
1664:
1661:
1509:
1506:
1465:
1462:
1454:'s petition, "
1445:origin of life
1404:macroevolution
1392:
1389:
1340:
1337:
1313:
1310:
1309:
1308:
1299:
1297:Ronald Numbers
1287:
1248:
1224:
1221:
1210:Witold Walczak
1180:
1177:
1157:
1154:
1152:
1149:
1148:
1147:
1140:
1133:
1130:
1123:
1120:
1117:
1053:, concluding:
1043:Charles Darwin
1016:
1013:
948:Main article:
945:
942:
928:
862:
859:
838:discrimination
808:
805:
780:
779:
756:
745:
738:
731:
668:
665:
580:
577:
555:
534:Seattle Weekly
507:World Wide Web
503:Wedge Document
499:Wedge strategy
477:Wedge strategy
472:
469:
370:
369:
367:
366:
359:
352:
344:
341:
340:
339:
338:
325:
324:
318:
317:
316:
315:
308:
304:
303:
301:Roman Catholic
298:
292:
289:
288:
284:
283:
282:
281:
276:
269:
267:
260:
258:
251:
249:
244:
239:
231:
230:
226:
225:
224:
223:
218:
213:
208:
203:
201:Jonathan Wells
195:
194:
190:
189:
188:
187:
180:
172:
171:
165:
164:
162:
161:
154:
149:
147:Wedge strategy
144:
138:
135:
134:
128:
127:
125:
124:
119:
114:
109:
104:
99:
93:
90:
89:
85:
84:
79:
71:
70:
64:
63:
51:
50:
31:
29:
22:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
4006:
3995:
3992:
3990:
3987:
3985:
3982:
3981:
3979:
3970:
3966:
3963:
3961:
3958:
3957:
3946:
3942:
3937:
3930:
3926:
3923:
3918:
3911:
3906:
3899:
3895:
3892:
3887:
3880:
3876:
3873:
3867:
3860:
3856:
3852:
3849:
3844:
3837:
3834:
3828:
3822:
3817:
3810:
3807:
3802:
3795:
3792:
3788:
3785:
3780:
3774:
3773:New Scientist
3770:
3765:
3759:
3755:
3750:
3736:on 2010-08-06
3735:
3731:
3725:
3718:
3715:Nick Matzke.
3714:
3710:
3707:
3702:
3695:
3690:
3684:
3680:
3679:
3673:
3667:
3666:1-57947-682-1
3663:
3659:
3655:
3651:
3648:
3647:
3641:
3627:on 2008-05-17
3626:
3622:
3616:
3609:
3605:
3602:
3601:
3595:
3588:
3584:
3580:
3576:
3572:
3569:
3568:
3562:
3555:
3551:
3547:
3543:
3539:
3536:
3535:
3529:
3522:
3518:
3517:
3511:
3504:
3500:
3497:
3493:
3490:
3485:
3478:
3474:
3470:
3469:
3463:
3456:
3452:
3451:
3446:
3442:
3439:
3438:
3432:
3425:
3421:
3417:
3414:
3413:
3407:
3400:
3396:
3392:
3388:
3385:
3384:
3378:
3376:
3374:
3366:
3362:
3359:
3355:
3352:
3351:
3345:
3339:
3334:
3328:
3324:
3319:
3313:, 31 Jan 2007
3312:
3308:
3304:
3303:
3297:
3290:
3286:
3283:
3278:
3271:
3267:
3264:
3259:
3252:
3247:
3240:
3235:
3228:
3224:
3220:
3217:
3216:
3210:
3204:
3200:
3196:
3192:
3191:
3185:
3178:
3174:
3170:
3167:
3166:
3160:
3154:
3150:
3146:
3143:
3138:
3132:
3128:
3125:
3121:
3116:
3110:
3106:
3102:
3098:
3095:
3090:
3083:
3079:
3076:
3071:
3069:
3061:
3057:
3053:
3049:
3046:
3041:
3039:
3037:
3035:
3033:
3026:
3022:
3021:Bruce Chapman
3018:
3014:
3011:
3006:
2998:
2994:
2988:
2974:on 2011-05-18
2973:
2969:
2963:
2956:
2952:
2948:
2941:
2937:
2933:
2930:
2925:
2919:, May 2, 2008
2918:
2917:
2912:
2907:
2899:
2895:
2889:
2887:
2885:
2876:
2872:
2866:
2860:
2856:
2851:
2845:
2841:
2836:
2828:
2824:
2818:
2811:
2807:
2803:
2798:
2792:
2788:
2784:
2780:
2777:
2772:
2766:
2761:
2755:
2751:
2750:
2743:
2736:
2732:
2729:
2725:
2722:
2717:
2710:
2706:
2703:
2698:
2692:
2688:
2684:
2679:
2672:
2668:
2665:
2660:
2653:
2648:
2641:
2636:
2629:
2624:
2610:on 2009-03-25
2606:
2599:
2597:
2589:
2582:
2577:
2571:
2567:
2562:
2556:
2552:
2547:
2541:
2537:
2533:
2530:
2525:
2518:
2514:
2511:
2506:
2499:
2495:
2492:
2487:
2479:
2475:
2471:
2467:
2462:
2457:
2453:
2449:
2445:
2441:
2440:
2435:
2428:
2421:
2417:
2413:
2410:
2405:
2398:
2394:
2389:
2375:on 2013-10-18
2374:
2370:
2364:
2357:
2353:
2350:
2346:
2343:
2338:
2336:
2328:
2324:
2321:
2317:
2314:
2309:
2302:
2297:
2290:
2286:
2283:
2279:
2276:
2271:
2269:
2267:
2265:
2258:
2253:
2246:
2243:
2238:
2232:
2228:
2225:
2221:
2216:
2209:
2204:
2197:
2192:
2185:
2181:
2177:
2174:
2169:
2161:
2155:
2151:
2147:
2143:
2136:
2129:
2124:
2122:
2113:
2112:
2107:
2100:
2092:
2088:
2084:
2080:
2076:
2072:
2068:
2064:
2063:
2058:
2051:
2035:
2031:
2025:
2011:on 2016-03-03
2010:
2006:
2002:
1996:
1989:
1988:
1982:
1980:
1965:
1961:
1957:
1954:
1952:
1946:
1945:Mirsky, Steve
1939:
1923:
1919:
1913:
1898:
1894:
1888:
1873:
1866:
1860:
1845:
1841:
1834:
1827:
1824:
1820:
1817:
1812:
1808:
1799:
1796:
1795:
1786:
1779:
1774:
1772:
1771:
1767:on the movie
1766:
1765:
1759:
1757:
1752:
1747:
1745:
1741:
1737:
1727:
1725:
1721:
1720:
1719:New Scientist
1715:
1705:
1703:
1699:
1695:
1691:
1686:
1683:
1678:
1674:
1670:
1660:
1658:
1653:
1651:
1647:
1642:
1640:
1636:
1632:
1628:
1624:
1620:
1616:
1615:ophthalmology
1612:
1608:
1604:
1600:
1596:
1592:
1588:
1584:
1580:
1574:
1572:
1568:
1567:Michael Egnor
1565:
1560:
1556:
1552:
1551:
1546:
1542:
1541:veterinarians
1538:
1534:
1528:
1524:
1521:
1519:
1515:
1505:
1503:
1499:
1495:
1491:
1487:
1483:
1478:
1475:
1471:
1461:
1459:
1458:
1453:
1448:
1446:
1442:
1441:genetic drift
1438:
1434:
1430:
1426:
1421:
1420:
1415:
1413:
1409:
1405:
1402:
1398:
1388:
1386:
1382:
1378:
1372:
1370:
1366:
1362:
1358:
1354:
1350:
1346:
1336:
1334:
1330:
1323:
1319:
1307:
1303:
1300:
1298:
1294:
1292:
1288:
1286:
1285:Paul R. Gross
1282:
1278:
1276:
1272:
1271:
1270:
1267:
1263:
1254:
1247:
1245:
1239:
1236:
1230:
1220:
1218:
1213:
1211:
1206:
1202:
1200:
1196:
1192:
1186:
1176:
1174:
1169:
1163:
1145:
1141:
1138:
1134:
1131:
1128:
1124:
1121:
1118:
1115:
1114:
1113:
1111:
1107:
1103:
1097:
1095:
1091:
1090:birth control
1087:
1081:
1079:
1078:anti-Semitism
1075:
1071:
1067:
1062:
1059:
1054:
1052:
1048:
1044:
1040:
1036:
1030:
1026:
1022:
1012:
1008:
1003:
999:
995:
993:
989:
985:
981:
977:
973:
969:
965:
961:
957:
951:
941:
939:
927:
923:
921:
917:
913:
909:
905:
904:
899:
898:
893:
889:
885:
881:
877:
872:
868:
858:
855:
851:
847:
841:
839:
835:
831:
826:
823:
816:
812:
804:
802:
799:and starring
798:
797:
791:
789:
785:
777:
773:
769:
765:
761:
757:
754:
750:
746:
742:
739:
736:
732:
729:
725:
721:
717:
716:
715:
712:
710:
705:
701:
700:Eugenie Scott
697:
693:
690:'s denial of
689:
685:
678:
674:
664:
662:
661:
656:
651:
648:
644:
640:
636:
632:
627:
625:
619:
617:
610:
608:
604:
600:
594:
590:
586:
575:
571:
569:
563:
554:
550:
546:
541:
539:
538:Bruce Chapman
535:
530:
527:
522:
520:
516:
515:materialistic
512:
508:
504:
500:
496:
492:
488:
484:
478:
468:
466:
465:
460:
456:
452:
447:
445:
441:
437:
433:
432:
427:
423:
419:
415:
411:
406:
404:
400:
397:
393:
389:
385:
381:
377:
365:
360:
358:
353:
351:
346:
345:
343:
342:
337:
329:
328:
327:
326:
323:
320:
319:
313:
307:
306:
302:
299:
297:
294:
293:
291:
290:
286:
285:
280:
277:
274:
268:
265:
259:
256:
250:
248:
245:
243:
240:
238:
235:
234:
233:
232:
229:Organisations
228:
227:
222:
219:
217:
214:
212:
209:
207:
204:
202:
199:
198:
197:
196:
192:
191:
185:
181:
179:
176:
175:
174:
173:
170:
167:
166:
160:
159:
155:
153:
150:
148:
145:
143:
140:
139:
137:
136:
133:
130:
129:
123:
120:
118:
115:
113:
110:
108:
105:
103:
100:
98:
95:
94:
92:
91:
87:
86:
82:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
65:
61:
57:
56:
47:
44:November 2020
35:
30:
21:
20:
3936:
3917:
3905:
3886:
3866:
3843:
3827:
3816:
3801:
3779:
3764:
3749:
3738:. Retrieved
3734:the original
3724:
3701:
3689:
3677:
3672:
3645:
3640:
3629:. Retrieved
3625:the original
3615:
3599:
3594:
3587:Scienceblogs
3566:
3561:
3554:Scienceblogs
3533:
3528:
3515:
3510:
3505:, May, 2005.
3484:
3467:
3462:
3448:
3436:
3431:
3411:
3406:
3399:Scienceblogs
3382:
3349:
3344:
3333:
3318:
3301:
3296:
3277:
3258:
3246:
3234:
3214:
3209:
3189:
3184:
3164:
3159:
3152:
3137:
3115:
3089:
3005:
2996:
2987:
2976:. Retrieved
2972:the original
2962:
2947:
2924:
2914:
2906:
2898:Free Science
2897:
2874:
2865:
2850:
2835:
2827:the original
2817:
2797:
2771:
2760:
2748:
2742:
2716:
2697:
2678:
2659:
2647:
2635:
2623:
2612:. Retrieved
2605:the original
2595:
2588:
2576:
2561:
2546:
2524:
2505:
2486:
2443:
2437:
2427:
2404:
2388:
2377:. Retrieved
2373:the original
2363:
2308:
2296:
2252:
2237:
2215:
2203:
2191:
2168:
2141:
2135:
2111:Mother Jones
2109:
2099:
2066:
2060:
2050:
2038:. Retrieved
2033:
2024:
2013:. Retrieved
2009:the original
1995:
1990:(March 2006)
1985:
1967:. Retrieved
1955:
1950:
1938:
1926:. Retrieved
1921:
1912:
1900:. Retrieved
1896:
1887:
1875:. Retrieved
1871:
1859:
1847:. Retrieved
1843:
1833:
1828:. May, 2007.
1811:
1784:
1783:Ed Brayton,
1776:
1768:
1762:
1760:
1748:
1740:Brian Alters
1733:
1717:
1711:
1701:
1687:
1676:
1666:
1656:
1654:
1643:
1611:hospice care
1575:
1571:Michael Behe
1564:neurosurgeon
1548:
1545:optometrists
1530:
1526:
1522:
1511:
1501:
1479:
1473:
1467:
1455:
1449:
1423:
1418:
1417:
1411:
1394:
1373:
1342:
1325:
1301:
1289:
1273:
1259:
1241:
1232:
1214:
1207:
1203:
1188:
1168:John G. West
1165:
1105:
1102:John G. West
1099:
1092:, legalized
1083:
1063:
1061:
1056:
1034:
1032:
1025:John G. West
1010:
1005:
1000:
996:
953:
935:
925:
911:
907:
901:
895:
874:
842:
827:
822:John G. West
818:
814:
810:
794:
792:
781:
718:philosopher
713:
708:
680:
658:
652:
628:
621:
612:
596:
573:
567:
564:
562:
551:
547:
543:
533:
531:
523:
502:
480:
462:
448:
429:
407:
373:
216:Michael Behe
177:
168:
156:
41:
33:
2787:Nick Matzke
1872:csustan.edu
1694:Nick Matzke
1607:dermatology
1439:and random
1195:Judge Jones
1144:evangelical
830:free speech
599:creationism
553:arguments."
322:Creationism
3978:Categories
3740:2009-01-22
3631:2011-06-10
3583:Pharyngula
3550:Pharyngula
3109:Pharyngula
2978:2008-02-09
2614:2014-05-14
2420:AgapePress
2379:2008-03-16
2015:2016-01-08
1969:2016-01-05
1804:References
1692:campaign.
1627:psychiatry
1599:bariatrics
1597:medicine,
1533:physicians
1504:petition.
1316:See also:
1227:See also:
1183:See also:
1160:See also:
1019:See also:
908:Kitzmiller
865:See also:
747:biologist
671:See also:
583:See also:
511:naturalism
475:See also:
3395:Aetiology
3383:Poor Orac
1964:0036-8733
1778:religion.
1730:Criticism
1631:radiology
1619:optometry
1603:dentistry
1595:addiction
1429:evolution
1408:Darwinism
1401:Darwinian
1397:evolution
1391:Statement
1381:evolution
1369:evolution
1365:evolution
1349:evolution
1070:Darwinian
980:Louisiana
880:awareness
801:Ben Stein
519:atheistic
487:Christian
455:evolution
440:Holocaust
392:Darwinism
287:Reactions
169:Campaigns
3925:Archived
3894:Archived
3875:Archived
3851:Archived
3787:Archived
3709:Archived
3650:Archived
3604:Archived
3579:PZ Myers
3571:Archived
3546:PZ Myers
3538:Archived
3492:Archived
3441:Archived
3416:Archived
3387:Archived
3354:Archived
3285:Archived
3266:Archived
3219:Archived
3199:Archived
3169:Archived
3145:Archived
3127:Archived
3105:PZ Myers
3097:Archived
3078:Archived
3048:Archived
3013:Archived
2932:Archived
2779:Archived
2724:Archived
2705:PZ Myers
2687:Archived
2667:Archived
2596:Expelled
2532:Archived
2513:Archived
2494:Archived
2470:15858545
2412:Archived
2345:Archived
2323:PZ Myers
2316:Archived
2278:Archived
2227:Archived
2176:Archived
2091:31403131
1951:Expelled
1819:Archived
1792:See also
1781:—
1562:says of
1559:PZ Myers
1537:surgeons
1508:Analysis
1433:mutation
1249:—
1110:eugenics
1094:abortion
988:Michigan
984:Missouri
972:Maryland
968:Oklahoma
929:—
850:PZ Myers
696:PZ Myers
629:In 2001
556:—
526:dogmatic
491:theistic
426:eugenics
336:Category
152:Politics
142:Timeline
132:Movement
88:Concepts
60:a series
58:Part of
3811:, 1999.
3796:, 2006.
2478:4390405
2448:Bibcode
2071:Bibcode
2040:25 July
1928:25 July
1902:25 July
1877:25 July
1849:25 July
1764:Skeptic
1657:Dissent
1635:urology
1516:of the
1502:Dissent
1474:Dissent
1464:History
1125:it was
976:Florida
964:Alabama
639:Johnson
605:of the
483:science
193:Authors
34:updated
3664:
2476:
2468:
2439:Nature
2156:
2089:
1962:
1716:, and
1498:D.V.M.
1494:D.M.D.
1490:D.D.S.
1406:" or "
1361:theory
1264:Judge
1074:Nazism
1051:Nazism
1041:links
1027:, and
912:Pandas
878:is an
724:tenure
692:tenure
645:, and
643:Denton
591:, and
451:theory
434:; the
422:Nazism
296:Jewish
2608:(PDF)
2601:(PDF)
2474:S2CID
2224:Salon
2087:S2CID
1868:(PDF)
1698:irony
1242:[
1076:like
956:bills
892:books
774:as a
726:from
624:Salon
532:In a
3662:ISBN
3477:Time
2466:PMID
2154:ISBN
2042:2018
1960:ISSN
1930:2018
1904:2018
1879:2018
1851:2018
1644:The
1637:and
1486:D.O.
1482:M.D.
1468:The
1320:and
1283:and
1199:ACLU
986:and
869:and
836:and
786:and
702:and
675:and
647:Behe
517:and
489:and
449:The
424:and
374:The
2456:doi
2444:434
2146:doi
2079:doi
1744:NIH
1383:is
1304:by
1295:by
1279:by
1049:to
1045:'s
962:in
637:as
453:of
3980::
3681:,
3660:,
3656:,
3585:,
3581:,
3577:,
3552:,
3548:,
3544:,
3471:,
3397:,
3372:^
3363:,
3309:,
3305:,
3122:,
3107:,
3103:,
3067:^
3058:,
3031:^
3019:,
2995:.
2896:.
2883:^
2873:.
2808:,
2804:,
2789:,
2785:,
2733:.
2707:.
2553:,
2538:,
2472:.
2464:.
2454:.
2442:.
2436:.
2395:,
2354:,
2334:^
2325:.
2287:,
2263:^
2152:.
2120:^
2108:.
2085:.
2077:.
2067:12
2065:.
2059:.
2032:.
1978:^
1920:.
1895:.
1870:.
1842:.
1704:.
1641:.
1633:,
1629:,
1625:,
1621:,
1617:,
1613:,
1609:,
1605:,
1543:,
1539:,
1535:,
1496:,
1492:,
1488:,
1484:,
1387:.
1371:.
1331:,
1023:,
982:,
978:,
974:,
970:,
966:,
848:.
840:.
832:,
803:.
698:,
641:,
587:,
446:.
62:on
3838:.
3743:.
3634:.
3457:)
2999:.
2981:.
2900:.
2877:.
2617:.
2594:"
2480:.
2458::
2450::
2382:.
2358:.
2291:.
2162:.
2148::
2114:.
2093:.
2081::
2073::
2044:.
2018:.
1972:.
1932:.
1906:.
1881:.
1853:.
730:;
618:.
363:e
356:t
349:v
186:"
182:"
46:)
42:(
36:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
