Knowledge

Premium fare

Source 📝

22: 160:. Premium fares can thus be viewed as socially divisive, although when applied only to short periods of a working-day they can improve levels of safety and comfort through enticing travellers to spread their journey times. That might have multiplier benefits on personal stress, crime levels and pollution incidence if managed with sensitivity to the public good (rather than simply in pursuance of an operator's 130:
is a fare on a public transport service set at least ten percent above the fare normally applying on that route or offered by alternative service - companies or public bodies often using a slower or less commodious vehicle. A premium fare might be levied at times where traffic-levels would otherwise
172:
can also be varied by time of day, day of week, or season with identical motives. These can also be market-led or community-determined and might be accrued to repay loans secured by a firm or transport agency to enable the construction of a bridge, tunnel or high-grade section of road. Again the
167:
Emphasizing the benefits of an off-peak zonal rover ticket at a lower fare than peak-period options over an identical route is one well-tried way of making premium peak-hour fares seem more acceptable, it is an instance of a clever marketing slant. Road tolls as introduced on
135:, or on a clearly identifiable route where a timely arrival is perceived as particularly important (e.g. reaching a ferry terminal or airport for an onward link for which a high price has already been paid). If the fare level deters some passengers this might reduce 143:
required at any intermediate stops between the most popular stops. Many premium fare operations are non-stop (light) railway links and they can therefore abstract considerable capacity from any railway line also used by slower (normally less glamorous) services.
151:
with lower car ownership levels and typically lower traffic speeds, the adverse impact of fast trains upon other passenger train timetables or parking opportunities raises issues of social equity. Political parties differ widely on whether
180:
and can lead to antitrust action where regulators have some authority. It is a tactic used to achieve a more monopolistic position in a local 'marketplace', in plain language to squeeze-out an
156:
operations should meet their costs or be viewed partly as a welfare service supporting broader aims of balancing development, life-chances and job opportunities across a
181: 173:
higher priced option has to be demonstrably better than any alternative route that can be freely driven (excluding running costs of the vehicle).
184:, or possibly a well-established one perceived as rather complacent or vulnerable for other reasons (such as poorly remunerated staff). 94: 66: 113: 73: 51: 47: 80: 43: 62: 238: 208: 32: 36: 87: 8: 140: 177: 243: 153: 203: 232: 161: 176:
Wherever a fare is deliberately pitched lower than the norm, this is termed
213: 198: 157: 193: 169: 136: 132: 21: 218: 148: 131:
be unbearably high, for instance on summer Fridays or during
230: 147:Along congested transport corridors or inner 50:. Unsourced material may be challenged and 114:Learn how and when to remove this message 139:and maintenance costs and minimise the 231: 48:adding citations to reliable sources 15: 13: 14: 255: 20: 1: 224: 7: 187: 10: 260: 209:London Congestion Charge 44:improve this article 178:predatory pricing 124: 123: 116: 98: 251: 239:Public transport 182:upstart operator 154:public transport 119: 112: 108: 105: 99: 97: 56: 24: 16: 259: 258: 254: 253: 252: 250: 249: 248: 229: 228: 227: 204:Niche marketing 190: 120: 109: 103: 100: 57: 55: 41: 25: 12: 11: 5: 257: 247: 246: 241: 226: 223: 222: 221: 216: 211: 206: 201: 196: 189: 186: 122: 121: 63:"Premium fare" 28: 26: 19: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 256: 245: 242: 240: 237: 236: 234: 220: 217: 215: 212: 210: 207: 205: 202: 200: 197: 195: 192: 191: 185: 183: 179: 174: 171: 165: 163: 162:profit motive 159: 155: 150: 145: 142: 138: 134: 129: 118: 115: 107: 104:December 2009 96: 93: 89: 86: 82: 79: 75: 72: 68: 65: –  64: 60: 59:Find sources: 53: 49: 45: 39: 38: 34: 29:This article 27: 23: 18: 17: 214:Road pricing 199:Smart growth 175: 166: 146: 128:premium fare 127: 125: 110: 101: 91: 84: 77: 70: 58: 42:Please help 30: 158:city region 233:Categories 225:References 141:dwell-time 133:rush hours 74:newspapers 194:Commuting 170:turnpikes 137:vandalism 31:does not 188:See also 244:Pricing 219:Pricing 149:suburbs 88:scholar 52:removed 37:sources 90:  83:  76:  69:  61:  95:JSTOR 81:books 67:news 35:any 33:cite 164:). 46:by 235:: 126:A 117:) 111:( 106:) 102:( 92:· 85:· 78:· 71:· 54:. 40:.

Index


cite
sources
improve this article
adding citations to reliable sources
removed
"Premium fare"
news
newspapers
books
scholar
JSTOR
Learn how and when to remove this message
rush hours
vandalism
dwell-time
suburbs
public transport
city region
profit motive
turnpikes
predatory pricing
upstart operator
Commuting
Smart growth
Niche marketing
London Congestion Charge
Road pricing
Pricing
Categories

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.