Knowledge

Nuclear Freeze campaign

Source 📝

292: 94:
organizations that they combine their efforts in support of a US-Soviet agreement to halt the testing, production, and deployment of nuclear weapons.  When the peace groups, enthusiastic about her idea, urged her to write up a proposal along those lines, she produced the "Call to Halt the Nuclear Arms Race” in 1980. That Nuclear Freeze proposal emphasized that the freeze would retain the existing nuclear parity between the United States and the Soviet Union, thereby opening the way for deep reductions in nuclear weapons or their elimination in the future. In April of that year, having secured the support of the
216:, and other local activists, voters passed the resolution in 59 out of the 62 towns. In general, Freeze activism was stronger in Northern and Western states than in the more conservative South. Nevertheless, by mid-1982 it had taken root in three-quarters of the nation's Congressional districts. In March 1982, 88 percent of the 180 Vermont town meetings voted to support a bilateral nuclear weapons freeze between the United States and the Soviet Union. Furthermore, by November 1983, the Freeze had been endorsed by more than 370 city councils, 71 county councils, and by one or both houses of 23 state legislatures. 315:(in West Germany), and No to Nuclear Weapons (in Norway and Denmark) mushroomed into mass movements that held vast demonstrations. Antinuclear movements staged the largest protest rallies in the history of Japan, Australia, and New Zealand, while other Pacific Island nations drew together into a Nuclear Free and Independent Pacific Movement. In the fall of 1983, an estimated five million people took part in antinuclear demonstrations. Even in Communist nations, smaller-scale antinuclear movements and demonstrations began to appear, despite harassment and repression by the authorities. 323:
representative of the American campaign. The International Task Force first focused on lobbying for passage of a Freeze resolution at the United Nations. Two somewhat different Freeze resolutions came before the UN General Assembly―one sponsored by Mexico and Sweden and the other by India. Despite opposition by the U.S. government, the General Assembly passed both resolutions by significant margins. Naturally, the UN votes contributed to the mounting political pressure on the United States and Soviet Union to halt the nuclear arms race.
57:, to be jettisoned and each embarked on dangerous nuclear expansion programs. The Soviet government began to replace its older nuclear weapons with more accurate, intermediate-range SS-20 missiles, directly threatening Western Europe. For its part, the US government announced plans for a NATO nuclear buildup with an enhanced radiation weapon (the neutron bomb) and, after that venture collapsed thanks to public protest, with a new generation of intermediate-range nuclear weapons: cruise and Pershing II missiles. 106:
and pointed out that the United States and the Soviet Union already possessed more than 50,000 nuclear weapons and had plans to build 20,000 more. The memorandum also argued against the idea of deterrence by contending that adding more nuclear weapons to the world would only increase the chance of nuclear war. Additionally, Forsberg maintained that a nuclear weapons Freeze would result in substantial fiscal savings and detailed the social and economic benefits of various alternative domestic spending options.
406:, and more than 70 other newspapers, assailing “the `freeze-niks,’ `ultra-libs,’ and `unilateral disarmers’” and exhorting “patriotic, God-fearing Americans to speak up” for military defense.  He also aired a one-hour, prime-time TV special attacking the Freeze and used his weekly Sunday morning sermons, broadcast over 400 television stations around the country, to condemn the antinuclear campaign. The Nuclear Freeze, he said, led to “slavery for our children.” 110:
Colby, Averell Harriman, and George Kennan, spoke out in favor of the idea. Support for the proposal also came from leading scientists, including Linus Pauling, Jerome Wiesner, Bernard Feld, and Carl Sagan. In March 1981, riding a wave of growing public concern about the nuclear arms race, the first national conference of the Freeze movement convened at the Center for Peace Studies at Georgetown University.
386:. “Blood shall flow in the streets up to the bridles of the horses,” he assured an interviewer in 1981. Of course, this did not pose a problem for the faithful, for “if you are saved, you will never go through one hour, not one moment of the Tribulation.” As fundamentalism grew more political in the 1980s, its proponents saw in Reagan's nuclear buildup the working out of God's alleged plan. Groups like the 307:(END), geared up to oppose the deployment of the new generation of devastating Euromissiles: the cruise and Pershing II missiles from NATO and the SS-20s from the Soviet Union. This revival skyrocketed into mass protest after 1980, largely thanks to the advent of the Reagan administration and its hawkish pronouncements. END was soon coordinating a huge antinuclear campaign in Europe. Groups like the 64:, who had opposed every nuclear arms control agreement negotiated by his Democratic and Republican predecessors, had denounced the SALT II treaty as “an act of appeasement.” While scornful of previous attempts at arms limitations, and championing a massive US nuclear weapons buildup, he nevertheless proposed and commenced negotiations for the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty, ( 480:, the 1984 Democratic presidential candidate (and supporter of the Freeze), lost to Reagan in a landslide. With the Freeze campaign's momentum blunted by these events, as well as by a rapid falloff in mass media attention after 1983, the movement declined and began to revise its approach and activities. In 1987, the Nuclear Freeze campaign merged with an allied group, the 279:, one of the nation's leading pollsters, reported in October 1983 that the Freeze campaign was "the most significant citizens' movement of the last century... In sheer numbers the freeze movement is awesome," for there existed "no comparable national cause or combination of causes ... that can match ... the legions that have been activated." 45:
government, which feared that such a freeze would leave the Soviet Union in a position of strategic inferiority. In 1970, the US Senate passed a non-binding resolution calling for both superpowers to suspend further development of strategic nuclear weapons systems, both offensive and defensive, during negotiations for the
318:
Although the U.S. and overseas movements usually overlapped in their anxieties, methods, and goals, the American movement, at least on the surface, was more moderate. A Nuclear Freeze, after all, centered on a bilateral agreement that would merely halt the nuclear arms race. By contrast, many of
52:
Behind a surge of support for the Freeze idea in the 1980s lay growing public concerns about the outbreak of nuclear war. In the late 1970s, Soviet-American détente unraveled and the Cold War began to revive, with new conflicts emerging in Africa, Central America, and Afghanistan. That caused nuclear
471:
as his advisors recalled, was strongly affected by the Western nuclear disarmament campaign. As Gorbachev himself declared:  “The new thinking took into account and absorbed the conclusions and demands of . . . the public and the scientific community . . . and of various antiwar organizations.”
422:
After Senators Kennedy and Hatfield introduced the Freeze resolution into Congress in March 1982, administration officials met and laid plans for what McFarlane called “a huge effort” to counter the Freeze movement. It soon involved the dispatch of officials from numerous government agencies to wage
369:
distributed a “Backgrounder” on “Moscow and the Peace Offensive” that called for a massive campaign to block the growth of the antinuclear movement in the United States and abroad. Meanwhile, the College Republicans distributed posters that, across a picture of Soviet troops in Red Square, plastered
272:
In 1982, when the Freeze campaign delivered its antinuclear petitions to the U.S. and Soviet missions to the United Nations, they contained the signatures of more than 2,300,000 Americans. Moreover, that fall, when Freeze referendums appeared on the ballot in 10 states, the District of Columbia, and
450:
Meanwhile, Reagan began to search, initially without success, for a Soviet leader with whom he could negotiate nuclear disarmament agreements. After three Soviet leaders died in the first four years of his Presidency, Reagan quipped: "How am I supposed to get anyplace with the Russians if they keep
282:
In March 1982, a plan to introduce a Freeze resolution in Congress was announced by Senators Kennedy and Hatfield. The following May, the Democratically controlled House of Representatives passed a Freeze resolution by a vote of 278 to 149. In 1984, the Freeze was backed by all the major candidates
195:
Initial efforts to advance the movement focused on alerting and educating the public at the local level. Activists distributed vast quantities of literature about the nuclear arms race and brought Freeze resolutions before a variety of organizations while securing signatures on Freeze petitions and
44:
in the mid-1950s, called for a freeze on fissionable material. Concrete policy proposals began in the 1960s, with a formal proposal from the United States to the Soviet Union for a partial freeze on the number of offensive and defensive nuclear vehicles. However, the idea was rejected by the Soviet
442:
In April 1982, shortly after the Freeze resolution was introduced in Congress, Reagan began declaring publicly and repeatedly that “a nuclear war cannot be won and must never be fought.” On that first occasion, he added: “To those who protest against nuclear war, I can only say: ‘I'm with you.’”
118:
From the late 1970s to the mid-1980s, growing public anxieties about nuclear war coincided with a boom in anti-nuclear publications and media. Literature calling attention to nuclear dangers, which had previously commanded a modest market, became abundant as authors worked to galvanize the Nuclear
109:
After publication of the "Call to Halt the Nuclear Arms Race," the Nuclear Freeze not only garnered the support of most American peace organizations but also was endorsed by numerous public leaders, intellectuals, and activists. Former public officials, such as George Ball, Clark Clifford, William
105:
The accessible goal set forth in the “Call” quickly became a popular rallying point. Its simplicity and moderation appealed to both peace activists and ordinary people concerned about the threats posed the nuclear arms race and nuclear war. Forsberg framed a Nuclear Freeze as a logical choice
93:
and, then, returned to the United States to become the executive director of the Institute for Defense and Disarmament Studies, a think tank that she had founded with the aim of reducing the risk of war and minimizing the burden of U.S. military spending. In 1979, she suggested to leading US peace
397:
Falwell's Moral Majority movement frequently denounced the Freeze movement. In a lengthy fundraising letter of June 17, 1982, Falwell promised “a major campaign’ against “the `freeze-niks.’”  They were “hysterically singing Russia's favorite song,” he maintained, “and the Russians are loving
475:
In the United States, the Reagan administration managed to stave off the challenge posed by the Freeze campaign and other critics of its nuclear policies. In 1983, the Republicans used their control of the U.S. Senate to block passage of a Freeze resolution in that legislative body and, thus, by
433:
articles and a report by the House Intelligence Committee. However, the committee chair declared that according to FBI and CIA officials, there was “no evidence that the Soviets direct, manage, or manipulate the Nuclear Freeze movement,” a contention that was confirmed when FBI material was made
414:
To the Reagan administration, the rise of the Nuclear Freeze movement represented a political challenge. As the White House communications director recalled:  “There was a widespread view in the administration that the Freeze was a dagger pointed at the heart of the administration's defense
426:
That fall, with the Freeze increasingly likely to emerge victorious at the polls and in Congress, Reagan grew more strident. Addressing a gathering of veterans groups in October, he insisted that the Freeze was “inspired by not the sincere, honest people who want peace, but by some who want the
228:
was held concurrently with the Second United Nations Special Session on Disarmament, with approximately a million participants. Many major U.S. religious bodies, such as the National Council of Churches, the Roman Catholic Church, the United Presbyterian Church, the United Methodist Church, the
322:
Leaders of these movements recognized that, if their campaigns were to be successful, collaboration among the world's antinuclear organizations was a necessity. When Forsberg officially launched the Nuclear Freeze campaign, an International Task Force was formed to serve as the overseas
423:
a public relations campaign against the Freeze propositions on the ballot that fall. Participating in the effort, Reagan appeared that July in his home state of California, where he charged that the Freeze “would make this country desperately vulnerable to nuclear blackmail.”
419:, Reagan's national security adviser, observed that “we took it as a serious movement that could undermine congressional support” for the administration's nuclear weapons buildup and potentially “a serious partisan political threat that could affect the election in '84.” 336:
A key argument against the nuclear freeze movement was that it was an action that would leave the Soviet Union in a state of superiority. Polls show that while a majority of the public supported the freeze, they "did not support freezing a Soviet advantage in place".
133:. Becoming a cornerstone of the Nuclear Freeze campaign, it asserted in plain, direct language that nuclear war was more an extinction event than a proper war. Schell rejected the notion of surviving a nuclear war, providing visceral depictions of its grim aftermath. 446:
Reagan personally feared a nuclear apocalypse and his strategy of a nuclear build-up was rooted in a belief that the economy of the Soviet Union could not sustain itself in a arms race with the United States. Ergo, a build-up would force negotiations for reduction.
273:
37 cities and counties around the nation, voters produced a victory to the Freeze campaign in nine of the states and in all but three localities. Covering about one-third of the U.S. electorate, this was the largest referendum on a single issue in U.S. history.
229:
Episcopalians, the Lutherans, and the Synagogue Council of America, endorsed the campaign. Hundreds of national organizations, many of which had never before taken a stand on national defense issues, came out in favor of the Freeze. They included the
427:
weakening of America and so are manipulating honest people.” In November, he told a press conference that “foreign agents” had helped “instigate” the Freeze campaign. Challenged to produce evidence for those accusations, Reagan pointed to two
373:
The Christian Right also fiercely opposed the antinuclear campaign. Having long associated nuclear war with the Last Judgment, Biblical prophecy enthusiasts had no intention of interfering with what they considered the divine will.  The
207:
Through its efforts at the local level, the Nuclear Freeze movement attained considerable success. A Freeze resolution was first placed on the November 1980 election ballot in the towns of western Massachusetts. Thanks to the leadership of
319:
the overseas movements called for unilateral disarmament initiatives by the nuclear powers. Nevertheless, in practice, both focused their efforts on opposing nuclear weapons buildups and shared the goal of a nuclear weapons-free world.
503:
Treaties. By the early 1990s, the United States and the Soviet Union had ceased the testing, and development and deployment of nuclear weapons. Moreover, they had substantially reduced their nuclear arsenals, and ended the Cold War.
394:, the pre-millennialist television preacher who delivered an invocation at the 1984 GOP national convention, warned:  “Any teaching of peace prior to return is heresy. . . . It's against the Word of God; it's Antichrist.” 365:, which billed itself as “the national conservative weekly,” published numerous attacks upon antinuclear activists, including:  “How Far Left Is Manipulating U.S. Nuclear `Freeze’ Movement.” In May 1982, the 145:
It followed a fictional family after a hypothetical but possible nuclear war and explored the history of contemporary concerns regarding nuclear destruction. Both books were intentionally published at low prices.
200:" served as a motto of the campaign. The movement placed a strong emphasis on grassroots education, thereby expanding the number of people supporting the campaign. On Veterans Day in 1981, the 463:
to the apex of Soviet leadership in March 1985, Reagan found his negotiating partner. Indeed, Gorbachev was a sincere and committed advocate of nuclear disarmament. In 1955, Gorbachev met
204:
held teach-ins in 150 schools, and in April of that year, Ground Zero mobilized a million Americans in high schools and colleges to circulate petitions, listen to debates, or watch films.
20:
was a mass movement in the United States during the 1980s to secure an agreement between the U.S. and Soviet governments to halt the testing, production, and deployment of
511:, consider the movement's influence to have been groundbreaking and long-lasting, playing an important role in curbing the nuclear arms race and preventing a nuclear war. 169: 359:
published an article claiming that there was “not the slightest doubt that this motley crowd is manipulated by a handful of scoundrels instructed directly from Moscow.”
345:(a critic of the Reagan administration) said "the issues were far too complicated to be resolved by a bilateral freeze, which was a dubious notion in any case". 1215: 1319: 167:, a prominent member of the Freeze movement, was the subject of two documentaries in the early 1980s: films tackling this theme included Oscar nominated 291: 1329: 1038: 719: 667: 90: 303:
During these same years, anti-nuclear activism also swept through most other parts of the world. West European groups, pulled together by an
230: 99: 873:. Smith, Jackie, 1968-, Chatfield, Charles, 1934-2015., Pagnucco, Ron. (1st ed.). Syracuse, N.Y.: Syracuse University Press. 1997. 225: 492: 234: 416: 72:, also came to the fore. Soviet leadership relied increasingly on nuclear weapons to implement its vision of Soviet security. 1268:"Institutionalizing Dissent: The United States Structure of Political Opportunity and the End of the Nuclear Freeze Movement" 1196: 378:, the nation's most popular evangelical preacher and a confidant of President Reagan, confidently described the approaching 68:), which his successor, George H. W. Bush, signed in 1991. In other nations, stridently hawkish leaders, such as Britain's 1324: 507:
Many consider the Freeze campaign to have largely "fizzled" and lost momentum after Reagan's reelection. Others, such as
341:
said the movement was "understandable, but in the view of many nuclear experts, the solution is impractical and unwise".
1242: 1164: 1139: 1111: 1061: 1014: 878: 774: 695: 262: 246: 95: 849: 816: 750: 643: 283:
for the Democratic presidential nomination and became part of the Democratic Party's presidential campaign platform.
540: 308: 102:, her Institute and these groups jointly published the “Call” and invited other peace organizations to endorse it. 60:
Along with their escalation of the nuclear arms race, national leaders employed a particularly hardline rhetoric.
54: 46: 1086: 258: 391: 201: 390:
began distributing “moral report cards,” rating members of Congress on their support for military measures.
304: 238: 197: 842:
Nuclear Freeze in a Cold War: The Reagan Administration, Cultural Activism, and the End of the Arms Race
616:
Committee on International Security and Arms Control (1985). Nuclear Arms Control: Background and Issues
902: 242: 250: 959:
Lanham, Andrew (2017-03-14). "Lessons from the Nuclear Freeze." Boston Review. Retrieved 2018-04-04
525: 508: 311:(in Britain), the Interchurch Peace Council (in the Netherlands), church organizations and the new 1132:
Toward Nuclear Abolition: A History of the World Nuclear Disarmament Movement, 1971 to the Present
1104:
Toward Nuclear Abolition: A History of the World Nuclear Disarmament Movement, 1971 to the Present
1054:
Toward Nuclear Abolition: A History of the World Nuclear Disarmament Movement, 1971 to the Present
733:
Riches, David (1987), "Violence, Peace and War in 'Early' Human Society: The Case of the Eskimo",
366: 175: 32:
The idea of simply halting key aspects of the nuclear arms race arose in the early stages of the
468: 312: 134: 370:
a headline proclaiming:  “The Soviet Union Needs You! Support a U.S. `Nuclear Freeze.’”
36:.  Probably the first suggestion of this kind, discussed in letters between US President 354: 130: 467:. His "principled stand against nuclear weapons" had a big impact on a young Gorbachev. His 37: 916:
Hayes, Michael T. (1987). "Incrementalism as Dramaturgy: The Case of the Nuclear Freeze".
8: 429: 1007:
Congress and the nuclear freeze : an inside look at the politics of a mass movement
1295: 1287: 1219: 1032: 987: 941: 933: 896: 806: 713: 685: 661: 80: 1299: 1248: 1238: 1192: 1185: 1160: 1135: 1107: 1082: 1057: 1020: 1010: 991: 945: 884: 874: 871:
Transnational social movements and global politics : solidarity beyond the state
845: 822: 812: 780: 770: 746: 701: 691: 649: 639: 636:
Confronting the bomb : a short history of the world nuclear disarmament movement
460: 379: 296: 69: 1279: 979: 925: 738: 535: 491:
In the years that followed, Reagan and his successor, George H.W. Bush, signed the
485: 481: 464: 86: 41: 276: 164: 122: 742: 196:
placing Freeze referendums on town, city and state ballots around the country. "
767:
Way out there in the blue : Reagan, Star Wars, and the end of the Cold War
477: 398:
it!” Beginning in the spring of 1983, he placed full-page newspaper ads in the
387: 342: 149:
Two of the most prominent legislators backing the Freeze campaign, US Senators
138: 21: 983: 970:
Wittner, Lawrence S. (December 5, 2010). "The Nuclear Freeze and Its Impact".
600:
Wittner, Lawrence S. (December 5, 2010). "The Nuclear Freeze and Its Impact".
1313: 826: 653: 555: 530: 375: 338: 213: 184: 154: 61: 1252: 1024: 888: 784: 705: 161:, that provided tools for readers to influence public policy and elections. 125:, a prominent journalist, wrote a series of powerful antinuclear essays for 1211: 550: 545: 361: 209: 808:
The other eighties : a secret history of America in the age of Reagan
150: 1283: 1180: 937: 1291: 1267: 1106:. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press. pp. 188–189. 1056:. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press. pp. 130–168. 1235:
Unarmed forces : the transnational movement to end the Cold War
929: 520: 500: 266: 254: 33: 496: 65: 1134:. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press. p. 190. 1079:
A Winter of Discontent: The Nuclear Freeze and American Politics
75: 1157:
Radio Address to the Nation on Nuclear Weapons, April 17, 1982
844:. Amherst, Massachusetts: University of Massachusetts Press. 53:
arms control agreements between the two superpowers, such as
170:
Eight Minutes to Midnight: A Portrait of Dr. Helen Caldicott
865: 863: 861: 81:
Randall Forsberg and "Call to Halt the Nuclear Arms Race"
858: 1191:. New York: PublicAffairs. pp. 251, 255–256, 761. 1009:. Amherst, Mass.: University of Massachusetts Press. 129:
that, in 1982, were turned into a best-selling book,
1232: 484:, to form a new peace and disarmament organization, 348: 1159:. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. 804: 764: 1184: 119:Freeze campaign and were inspired by it in turn. 1311: 299:between the U.S./NATO and the Soviet Union, 1981 91:Stockholm International Peace Research Institute 1125: 1123: 690:. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press. 638:. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press. 595: 593: 591: 409: 286: 679: 677: 589: 587: 585: 583: 581: 579: 577: 575: 573: 571: 231:American Association of School Administrators 85:The Nuclear Freeze movement was initiated by 1120: 1037:: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( 800: 798: 796: 794: 718:: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( 666:: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( 482:National Committee for a Sane Nuclear Policy 159:Freeze! How You Can Help Prevent Nuclear War 76:Nuclear Freeze movement in the United States 1179: 674: 618:. The National Academies Press. p. 81. 568: 1320:Anti-nuclear movement in the United States 839: 811:(1st ed.). New York: Hill and Wang. 791: 737:, Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 17–36, 629: 627: 625: 437: 384:Armageddon and the Coming War with Russia 1330:Political movements in the United States 1237:. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. 1187:President Reagan: The Role of a Lifetime 290: 235:American Association of University Women 1129: 1101: 1051: 969: 683: 599: 305:Appeal for European Nuclear Disarmament 1312: 1154: 732: 622: 187:for Best Documentary (Short Subject). 98:, Clergy and Laity Concerned, and the 1265: 1076: 915: 454: 190: 89:, a young American who worked at the 684:S., Wittner, Lawrence (1993–2003). 267:Young Women's Christian Association 226:largest peace rally in U.S. history 13: 1259: 1004: 769:. New York: Simon & Schuster. 633: 247:American Public Health Association 219: 157:(R-OR), published their own book, 143:Nuclear War: What's in it For You? 96:American Friends Service Committee 14: 1341: 349:Resistance on the political right 295:Protest in Amsterdam against the 541:Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament 309:Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament 113: 1226: 1205: 1173: 1148: 1095: 1070: 1045: 998: 963: 952: 909: 840:Knoblauch, William M. (2017). 833: 758: 735:The Sociology of War and Peace 726: 634:S., Wittner, Lawrence (2009). 608: 259:National Education Association 1: 1233:Evangelista, Matthew (1999). 1130:Wittner, Lawrence S. (2003). 1102:Wittner, Lawrence S. (2003). 1052:Wittner, Lawrence S. (2003). 687:The struggle against the bomb 561: 202:Union of Concerned Scientists 27: 1005:C., Waller, Douglas (1987). 805:Martin, Bradford D. (2011). 765:FitzGerald, Frances (2000). 410:Ronald Reagan administration 326: 287:Parallels in global activism 100:Fellowship of Reconciliation 7: 743:10.1007/978-1-349-18640-2_2 514: 255:National Council of La Raza 239:American Nurses Association 198:Think globally, act locally 10: 1346: 1325:1980s in the United States 1216:"Where's the Rest of Him?" 331: 243:American Pediatric Society 984:10.1080/10402650600848423 263:U.S. Conference of Mayors 1266:Meyer, David S. (1993). 1081:. Praeger. p. 216. 509:Arms Control Association 1155:Reagan, Ronald (1982). 181:If You Love This Planet 176:If You Love This Planet 18:Nuclear Freeze campaign 901:: CS1 maint: others ( 438:Political developments 300: 224:On June 12, 1982, the 1077:Meyer, David (1990). 353:The neo-conservative 294: 131:The Fate of the Earth 526:Cold War (1979-1985) 382:in a 1980 pamphlet, 251:Friends of the Earth 38:Dwight D. Eisenhower 1223:, 18 November 1990. 367:Heritage Foundation 40:and Soviet Premier 1284:10.1007/BF01115488 1272:Sociological Forum 1220:The New York Times 972:Arms Control Today 602:Arms Control Today 455:Decline and legacy 376:Rev. Jerry Falwell 301: 191:Grassroots support 173:and Oscar winning 1198:978-1-891620-91-1 461:Mikhail Gorbachev 459:With the rise of 380:nuclear holocaust 297:nuclear arms race 70:Margaret Thatcher 1337: 1304: 1303: 1263: 1257: 1256: 1230: 1224: 1209: 1203: 1202: 1190: 1177: 1171: 1170: 1152: 1146: 1145: 1127: 1118: 1117: 1099: 1093: 1092: 1074: 1068: 1067: 1049: 1043: 1042: 1036: 1028: 1002: 996: 995: 967: 961: 956: 950: 949: 913: 907: 906: 900: 892: 867: 856: 855: 837: 831: 830: 802: 789: 788: 762: 756: 755: 730: 724: 723: 717: 709: 681: 672: 671: 665: 657: 631: 620: 619: 612: 606: 605: 597: 536:Randall Forsberg 465:Jawaharlal Nehru 434:public in 1983. 417:Robert McFarlane 87:Randall Forsberg 42:Nikolai Bulganin 1345: 1344: 1340: 1339: 1338: 1336: 1335: 1334: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1264: 1260: 1245: 1231: 1227: 1210: 1206: 1199: 1178: 1174: 1167: 1153: 1149: 1142: 1128: 1121: 1114: 1100: 1096: 1089: 1075: 1071: 1064: 1050: 1046: 1030: 1029: 1017: 1003: 999: 968: 964: 957: 953: 930:10.2307/3234798 914: 910: 894: 893: 881: 869: 868: 859: 852: 838: 834: 819: 803: 792: 777: 763: 759: 753: 731: 727: 711: 710: 698: 682: 675: 659: 658: 646: 632: 623: 614: 613: 609: 598: 569: 564: 517: 469:“New Thinking,” 457: 440: 430:Reader’s Digest 412: 404:Washington Post 351: 334: 329: 289: 277:Patrick Caddell 222: 220:National impact 193: 165:Helen Caldicott 141:wrote a novel, 123:Jonathan Schell 116: 83: 78: 30: 22:nuclear weapons 12: 11: 5: 1343: 1333: 1332: 1327: 1322: 1306: 1305: 1278:(2): 157–179. 1258: 1244:978-0801436284 1243: 1225: 1204: 1197: 1172: 1166:978-0160589416 1165: 1147: 1141:978-0804748629 1140: 1119: 1113:978-0804748629 1112: 1094: 1087: 1069: 1063:978-0804748629 1062: 1044: 1016:978-0585248202 1015: 997: 978:(3): 353–356. 962: 951: 924:(3): 443–463. 908: 880:978-0815627425 879: 857: 850: 832: 817: 790: 776:978-0684844169 775: 757: 751: 725: 697:978-0804721417 696: 673: 644: 621: 607: 566: 565: 563: 560: 559: 558: 553: 548: 543: 538: 533: 528: 523: 516: 513: 478:Walter Mondale 456: 453: 451:dying on me?" 439: 436: 411: 408: 400:New York Times 388:Moral Majority 350: 347: 343:McGeorge Bundy 333: 330: 328: 325: 288: 285: 221: 218: 192: 189: 139:Roger Molander 127:The New Yorker 115: 112: 82: 79: 77: 74: 29: 26: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1342: 1331: 1328: 1326: 1323: 1321: 1318: 1317: 1315: 1301: 1297: 1293: 1289: 1285: 1281: 1277: 1273: 1269: 1262: 1254: 1250: 1246: 1240: 1236: 1229: 1222: 1221: 1217: 1213: 1208: 1200: 1194: 1189: 1188: 1182: 1176: 1168: 1162: 1158: 1151: 1143: 1137: 1133: 1126: 1124: 1115: 1109: 1105: 1098: 1090: 1084: 1080: 1073: 1065: 1059: 1055: 1048: 1040: 1034: 1026: 1022: 1018: 1012: 1008: 1001: 993: 989: 985: 981: 977: 973: 966: 960: 955: 947: 943: 939: 935: 931: 927: 923: 919: 912: 904: 898: 890: 886: 882: 876: 872: 866: 864: 862: 853: 851:9781625342744 847: 843: 836: 828: 824: 820: 818:9780809074617 814: 810: 809: 801: 799: 797: 795: 786: 782: 778: 772: 768: 761: 754: 752:9780333418390 748: 744: 740: 736: 729: 721: 715: 707: 703: 699: 693: 689: 688: 680: 678: 669: 663: 655: 651: 647: 645:9780804771245 641: 637: 630: 628: 626: 617: 611: 603: 596: 594: 592: 590: 588: 586: 584: 582: 580: 578: 576: 574: 572: 567: 557: 556:The Day After 554: 552: 549: 547: 544: 542: 539: 537: 534: 532: 531:Ronald Reagan 529: 527: 524: 522: 519: 518: 512: 510: 505: 502: 498: 494: 489: 487: 483: 479: 473: 470: 466: 462: 452: 448: 444: 435: 432: 431: 424: 420: 418: 407: 405: 401: 395: 393: 392:James Robison 389: 385: 381: 377: 371: 368: 364: 363: 358: 357: 346: 344: 340: 324: 320: 316: 314: 310: 306: 298: 293: 284: 280: 278: 274: 270: 268: 264: 260: 256: 252: 248: 244: 240: 236: 232: 227: 217: 215: 214:Frances Crowe 211: 205: 203: 199: 188: 186: 185:Academy Award 182: 178: 177: 172: 171: 166: 162: 160: 156: 155:Mark Hatfield 152: 147: 144: 140: 136: 132: 128: 124: 120: 114:Popular media 111: 107: 103: 101: 97: 92: 88: 73: 71: 67: 63: 62:Ronald Reagan 58: 56: 50: 48: 47:SALT I treaty 43: 39: 35: 25: 23: 19: 1275: 1271: 1261: 1234: 1228: 1218: 1212:Maureen Dowd 1207: 1186: 1175: 1156: 1150: 1131: 1103: 1097: 1078: 1072: 1053: 1047: 1006: 1000: 975: 971: 965: 958: 954: 921: 917: 911: 870: 841: 835: 807: 766: 760: 734: 728: 686: 635: 615: 610: 601: 551:Randy Kehler 546:Peace Action 506: 490: 486:Peace Action 474: 458: 449: 445: 441: 428: 425: 421: 413: 403: 399: 396: 383: 372: 362:Human Events 360: 355: 352: 335: 321: 317: 302: 281: 275: 271: 223: 210:Randy Kehler 206: 194: 180: 174: 168: 163: 158: 148: 142: 126: 121: 117: 108: 104: 84: 59: 51: 31: 17: 15: 1181:Cannon, Lou 313:Green Party 153:(D-MA) and 151:Ted Kennedy 135:Ground Zero 1314:Categories 1088:0275933067 562:References 495:, and the 493:INF Treaty 476:Congress. 415:program.” 356:Commentary 265:, and the 28:Background 1300:143612472 1183:(2000) . 1033:cite book 992:143822130 946:157048227 897:cite book 827:640132143 714:cite book 662:cite book 654:469186910 327:Criticism 1253:40396370 1025:44962173 889:36798090 785:42935776 706:26350846 521:Cold War 515:See also 501:START II 137:founder 34:Cold War 938:3234798 497:START I 332:General 66:START I 55:SALT II 1298:  1292:684633 1290:  1251:  1241:  1195:  1163:  1138:  1110:  1085:  1060:  1023:  1013:  990:  944:  936:  918:Polity 887:  877:  848:  825:  815:  783:  773:  749:  704:  694:  652:  642:  402:, the 261:, the 257:, the 253:, the 245:, the 241:, the 237:, the 233:, the 183:won a 1296:S2CID 1288:JSTOR 988:S2CID 942:S2CID 934:JSTOR 1249:OCLC 1239:ISBN 1193:ISBN 1161:ISBN 1136:ISBN 1108:ISBN 1083:ISBN 1058:ISBN 1039:link 1021:OCLC 1011:ISBN 903:link 885:OCLC 875:ISBN 846:ISBN 823:OCLC 813:ISBN 781:OCLC 771:ISBN 747:ISBN 720:link 702:OCLC 692:ISBN 668:link 650:OCLC 640:ISBN 499:and 339:Time 16:The 1280:doi 980:doi 926:doi 739:doi 1316:: 1294:. 1286:. 1274:. 1270:. 1247:. 1214:, 1122:^ 1035:}} 1031:{{ 1019:. 986:. 976:18 974:. 940:. 932:. 922:19 920:. 899:}} 895:{{ 883:. 860:^ 821:. 793:^ 779:. 745:, 716:}} 712:{{ 700:. 676:^ 664:}} 660:{{ 648:. 624:^ 570:^ 488:. 269:. 249:, 212:, 179:. 49:. 24:. 1302:. 1282:: 1276:8 1255:. 1201:. 1169:. 1144:. 1116:. 1091:. 1066:. 1041:) 1027:. 994:. 982:: 948:. 928:: 905:) 891:. 854:. 829:. 787:. 741:: 722:) 708:. 670:) 656:. 604:.

Index

nuclear weapons
Cold War
Dwight D. Eisenhower
Nikolai Bulganin
SALT I treaty
SALT II
Ronald Reagan
START I
Margaret Thatcher
Randall Forsberg
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
American Friends Service Committee
Fellowship of Reconciliation
Jonathan Schell
The Fate of the Earth
Ground Zero
Roger Molander
Ted Kennedy
Mark Hatfield
Helen Caldicott
Eight Minutes to Midnight: A Portrait of Dr. Helen Caldicott
If You Love This Planet
Academy Award
Think globally, act locally
Union of Concerned Scientists
Randy Kehler
Frances Crowe
largest peace rally in U.S. history
American Association of School Administrators
American Association of University Women

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.