Knowledge

Living tree doctrine

Source đź“ť

1601: 1562: 317: 1607: 1574: 245:
planted in Canada a living tree capable of growth and expansion within its natural limits." This is known as the doctrine of progressive interpretation. This means that the Constitution cannot be interpreted in the same way as an ordinary statute. Rather, it must be read within the context of society
298:, "If the newly planted 'living tree' which is the Charter is to have the possibility of growth and adjustment over time, care must be taken to ensure that historical materials, such as the Minutes of Proceedings and Evidence of the Special Joint Committee, do not stunt its growth." 254:
The "frozen concepts" reasoning runs contrary to one of the most fundamental principles of Canadian constitutional interpretation: that our Constitution is a living tree which, by way of progressive interpretation, accommodates and addresses the realities of modern life.
360:. The idea of the living constitution is similar to the living tree doctrine; both philosophies assert that the constitution of their respective countries should reflect the current mores and values of society. This view point is in contrast with 1248: 912: 554: 1126: 219:
of constitutional interpretation that says that a constitution is organic and must be read in a broad and progressive manner so as to adapt it to the changing times.
1269: 1216: 1211: 1206: 1201: 1196: 1191: 1186: 1181: 1176: 1171: 1166: 1161: 1156: 1151: 1146: 1141: 1136: 1131: 1121: 1116: 1111: 1106: 1101: 1096: 1091: 258:
Lord Sankey LC’s reference to "natural limits" did not impose an obligation to determine, in the abstract and absolutely, the core meaning of constitutional terms.
1428: 1086: 1081: 1076: 1071: 1066: 1061: 1056: 1051: 1046: 907: 887: 1041: 441: 186: 653: 1264: 1296: 902: 897: 892: 869: 864: 859: 739: 1650: 836: 831: 673: 1232: 678: 1674: 1033: 284: 1317: 826: 377: 227:
The living tree doctrine has been deeply entrenched into Canadian constitutional law since the seminal constitutional case of
1344: 179: 474: 1458: 646: 609: 250:
and remains rooted in the past, the Constitution would not be reflective of society and would eventually fall into disuse.
1541: 385: 229: 1312: 854: 365: 698: 403: 238: 172: 388:, describing it as a more "vivid image" than the "living instrument" doctrine used in relation to the Convention. 1669: 1578: 1397: 719: 639: 501: 1643: 155: 145: 1493: 1307: 540: 328: 263: 1679: 1447: 969: 714: 1004: 948: 724: 397: 100: 1366: 1349: 798: 535: 522: 506: 294: 246:
to ensure that it adapts and reflects changes. If constitutional interpretation adheres only to the
1636: 803: 781: 479: 50: 1531: 1473: 1361: 786: 734: 683: 420: 45: 31: 1536: 1488: 1322: 1024: 813: 770: 662: 242: 130: 1624: 1478: 1418: 1014: 8: 1423: 821: 357: 307: 124: 92: 1503: 1498: 1463: 1332: 954: 791: 709: 140: 120: 66: 368:
is to be interpreted in a way that reflects the original meaning when it was written.
1413: 1376: 751: 588: 562: 271: 76: 1327: 1009: 974: 964: 453: 109: 274:
power, as there had been no shift in how a bill of exchange is defined in Canada.
1408: 1354: 408: 247: 208: 160: 115: 1620: 1339: 216: 19:"Living tree" redirects here. For the biological sense of the living tree, see 1663: 1566: 1468: 1371: 745: 566: 353: 289: 262:
However, "natural limits" cannot be granted too elastic a definition. In the
150: 71: 458: 1616: 1600: 938: 200: 959: 631: 555:"We need to control the spread of human rights, Supreme Court judge says" 361: 267: 105: 610:"Lady Hale: Beanstalk or living instrument, how tall can the ECHR grow?" 316: 993: 729: 135: 442:"The Charter of Rights and American Theories of Interpretation" 697: 589:"Beanstalk or Living Instrument? How tall can the ECHR grow?" 20: 288:
also makes use of the living tree doctrine. Chief Justice
939:
Amendments and other constitutional documents 1867–1982
519:
Marcotte v. Fédération des caisses Desjardins du Québec
1521: 1446: 1023: 812: 509: at par. 22, 28, 3 SCR 698 (9 December 2004) 1226:
Part II – Rights of the Aboriginal peoples of Canada
270:could not be considered to fall within the federal 543: at par. 53, 2 SCR 486 (17 December 1985) 16:Canadian doctrine of constitutional interpretation 1661: 1242:Part III – Equalization and regional disparities 1034:Part I – Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms 746:Report on the Affairs of British North America 384:in a somewhat controversial discussion of the 1644: 647: 180: 400:, used by the European Court of Human Rights 740:Declaration of Independence of Lower Canada 327: with: more countries. You can help by 1651: 1637: 699:Pre-Confederation constitutional documents 661: 654: 640: 187: 173: 1396: 457: 421:The Canadian Doctrine of the Living Tree 1015:Kitchen Accord/Night of the Long Knives 908:Fines and penalties for provincial laws 525: at par. 21 (19 September 2014) 285:Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms 1662: 472: 378:Brenda Hale, Baroness Hale of Richmond 1520: 1445: 1395: 1345:Individual ministerial responsibility 1294: 991: 937: 768: 696: 635: 1594: 913:Matters of a local or private nature 586: 552: 473:Taylor, Jennifer (18 October 2019). 439: 311: 1542:Constitution Act (British Columbia) 386:European Convention of Human Rights 230:Edwards v Canada (Attorney General) 13: 1522:Provincial constitutions of Canada 1448:Interpretation of the Constitution 553:Hope, Christopher (16 June 2011). 241:stated in the 1929 decision: "The 85:General theories of interpretation 14: 1691: 1313:Cabinet collective responsibility 855:Peace, order, and good government 769: 414: 371: 366:constitution of the United States 301: 1605: 1599: 1573: 1572: 1560: 674:List of constitutional documents 404:Constitutional history of Canada 356:there is also a philosophy of a 347: 315: 1295: 475:"The Persons Case then and now" 364:, which is the belief that the 266:, it was held that payments by 59:General rules of interpretation 1675:Legal doctrines and principles 992: 782:Charlottetown Conference, 1864 679:Amendments to the Constitution 602: 580: 546: 528: 512: 502:Reference re Same-Sex Marriage 494: 466: 433: 1: 1429:Other unsuccessful amendments 587:Hale, Brenda (16 June 2011). 426: 146:Common good constitutionalism 46:Constitutional interpretation 1623:. You can help Knowledge by 1494:Interjurisdictional immunity 1318:Disallowance and reservation 970:Statute of Westminster, 1931 380:used the terminology of the 7: 870:Matters excepted from s. 92 391: 233:, also widely known as the 10: 1696: 1593: 1459:Indigenous self-government 949:British North America Acts 735:Constitutional Act of 1791 725:Royal Proclamation of 1763 720:Constitution of New France 398:Living instrument doctrine 362:constitutional originalism 305: 282:The interpretation of the 277: 222: 18: 1554: 1527: 1516: 1454: 1441: 1404: 1391: 1367:Parliamentary sovereignty 1308:At His Majesty's pleasure 1303: 1290: 1257: 1241: 1225: 1032: 1000: 987: 944: 933: 903:Administration of justice 898:Property and civil rights 878: 845: 777: 764: 705: 692: 669: 536:Re B.C. Motor Vehicle Act 295:Re B.C. Motor Vehicle Act 243:British North America Act 213:thĂ©orie de l'arbre vivant 804:Fathers of Confederation 684:Quasi-constitutional law 446:Osgoode Hall Law Journal 51:Statutory interpretation 1532:Constitution of Alberta 1474:Equal authenticity rule 1362:Parliamentary privilege 799:London Conference, 1866 787:Quebec Conference, 1864 459:10.60082/2817-5069.1846 440:Hogg, Peter W. (1987). 32:Judicial interpretation 1670:Constitution of Canada 1537:Constitution of Quebec 1489:Implied Bill of Rights 1323:Responsible government 1025:Constitution Act, 1982 1005:Fulton–Favreau formula 975:Newfoundland Act, 1949 965:Saskatchewan Act, 1905 893:Works and undertakings 814:Constitution Act, 1867 663:Constitution of Canada 260: 212: 131:Strict constructionism 1398:Constitutional debate 710:Iroquois constitution 252: 1419:Charlottetown Accord 715:Mi'kmaq constitution 205:living tree doctrine 1615:This article about 1424:Calgary Declaration 822:Canadian federalism 559:The Daily Telegraph 358:living constitution 308:Living Constitution 125:legislative history 93:Living Constitution 1680:Canadian law stubs 1504:Dialogue principle 1464:Pith and substance 1333:King-in-Parliament 1258:Part VII – General 955:Manitoba Act, 1870 860:Trade and commerce 792:Quebec Resolutions 730:Quebec Act of 1774 376:In a 2011 speech, 141:Purposive approach 121:legislative intent 67:Plain meaning rule 1632: 1631: 1588: 1587: 1567:Canada portal 1550: 1549: 1512: 1511: 1437: 1436: 1414:Meech Lake Accord 1387: 1386: 1377:Royal prerogative 1286: 1285: 1282: 1281: 1278: 1277: 983: 982: 960:Alberta Act, 1905 929: 928: 925: 924: 921: 920: 760: 759: 752:Act of Union 1840 345: 344: 272:bills of exchange 197: 196: 101:Living instrument 1687: 1653: 1646: 1639: 1611: 1610: 1609: 1608: 1603: 1595: 1576: 1575: 1565: 1564: 1563: 1518: 1517: 1499:Purposive theory 1443: 1442: 1393: 1392: 1328:Fusion of powers 1292: 1291: 1030: 1029: 1021: 1020: 1010:Victoria Charter 989: 988: 935: 934: 843: 842: 810: 809: 766: 765: 694: 693: 656: 649: 642: 633: 632: 626: 625: 623: 621: 606: 600: 599: 596:UK Supreme Court 593: 584: 578: 577: 575: 573: 550: 544: 532: 526: 516: 510: 498: 492: 491: 489: 487: 470: 464: 463: 461: 437: 340: 337: 319: 312: 264:Marcotte trilogy 189: 182: 175: 110:original meaning 28: 27: 1695: 1694: 1690: 1689: 1688: 1686: 1685: 1684: 1660: 1659: 1658: 1657: 1606: 1604: 1598: 1591: 1589: 1584: 1561: 1559: 1546: 1523: 1508: 1450: 1433: 1409:Triple-E Senate 1400: 1383: 1355:Question Period 1299: 1274: 1253: 1237: 1221: 1019: 996: 979: 940: 917: 880: 874: 847: 841: 808: 773: 756: 701: 688: 665: 660: 630: 629: 619: 617: 608: 607: 603: 591: 585: 581: 571: 569: 551: 547: 533: 529: 517: 513: 499: 495: 485: 483: 471: 467: 438: 434: 429: 417: 409:Original intent 394: 374: 350: 341: 335: 332: 325:needs expansion 310: 304: 280: 248:framers' intent 239:Viscount Sankey 225: 193: 161:Legal formalism 118: 116:Original intent 24: 17: 12: 11: 5: 1693: 1683: 1682: 1677: 1672: 1656: 1655: 1648: 1641: 1633: 1630: 1629: 1612: 1586: 1585: 1583: 1582: 1570: 1555: 1552: 1551: 1548: 1547: 1545: 1544: 1539: 1534: 1528: 1525: 1524: 1514: 1513: 1510: 1509: 1507: 1506: 1501: 1496: 1491: 1486: 1481: 1476: 1471: 1466: 1461: 1455: 1452: 1451: 1439: 1438: 1435: 1434: 1432: 1431: 1426: 1421: 1416: 1411: 1405: 1402: 1401: 1389: 1388: 1385: 1384: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1379: 1369: 1364: 1359: 1358: 1357: 1350:Interpellation 1347: 1342: 1340:Implied repeal 1337: 1336: 1335: 1325: 1320: 1315: 1310: 1304: 1301: 1300: 1288: 1287: 1284: 1283: 1280: 1279: 1276: 1275: 1273: 1272: 1267: 1261: 1259: 1255: 1254: 1252: 1251: 1245: 1243: 1239: 1238: 1236: 1235: 1229: 1227: 1223: 1222: 1220: 1219: 1214: 1209: 1204: 1199: 1194: 1189: 1184: 1179: 1174: 1169: 1164: 1159: 1154: 1149: 1144: 1139: 1134: 1129: 1124: 1119: 1114: 1109: 1104: 1099: 1094: 1089: 1084: 1079: 1074: 1069: 1064: 1059: 1054: 1049: 1044: 1038: 1036: 1027: 1018: 1017: 1012: 1007: 1001: 998: 997: 985: 984: 981: 980: 978: 977: 972: 967: 962: 957: 952: 945: 942: 941: 931: 930: 927: 926: 923: 922: 919: 918: 916: 915: 910: 905: 900: 895: 890: 884: 882: 876: 875: 873: 872: 867: 862: 857: 851: 849: 840: 839: 834: 829: 824: 818: 816: 807: 806: 801: 796: 795: 794: 784: 778: 775: 774: 762: 761: 758: 757: 755: 754: 749: 743: 737: 732: 727: 722: 717: 712: 706: 703: 702: 690: 689: 687: 686: 681: 676: 670: 667: 666: 659: 658: 651: 644: 636: 628: 627: 616:. 17 June 2011 601: 579: 545: 541:1985 CanLII 81 527: 511: 493: 465: 431: 430: 428: 425: 424: 423: 416: 415:External links 413: 412: 411: 406: 401: 393: 390: 373: 372:United Kingdom 370: 349: 346: 343: 342: 336:September 2021 322: 320: 306:Main article: 303: 302:Outside Canada 300: 279: 276: 224: 221: 195: 194: 192: 191: 184: 177: 169: 166: 165: 164: 163: 158: 153: 148: 143: 138: 133: 128: 113: 103: 87: 86: 82: 81: 80: 79: 74: 69: 61: 60: 56: 55: 54: 53: 48: 40: 39: 35: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1692: 1681: 1678: 1676: 1673: 1671: 1668: 1667: 1665: 1654: 1649: 1647: 1642: 1640: 1635: 1634: 1628: 1626: 1622: 1618: 1613: 1602: 1597: 1596: 1592: 1581: 1580: 1571: 1569: 1568: 1557: 1556: 1553: 1543: 1540: 1538: 1535: 1533: 1530: 1529: 1526: 1519: 1515: 1505: 1502: 1500: 1497: 1495: 1492: 1490: 1487: 1485: 1482: 1480: 1477: 1475: 1472: 1470: 1469:Double aspect 1467: 1465: 1462: 1460: 1457: 1456: 1453: 1449: 1444: 1440: 1430: 1427: 1425: 1422: 1420: 1417: 1415: 1412: 1410: 1407: 1406: 1403: 1399: 1394: 1390: 1378: 1375: 1374: 1373: 1372:Reserve power 1370: 1368: 1365: 1363: 1360: 1356: 1353: 1352: 1351: 1348: 1346: 1343: 1341: 1338: 1334: 1331: 1330: 1329: 1326: 1324: 1321: 1319: 1316: 1314: 1311: 1309: 1306: 1305: 1302: 1298: 1293: 1289: 1271: 1268: 1266: 1263: 1262: 1260: 1256: 1250: 1247: 1246: 1244: 1240: 1234: 1231: 1230: 1228: 1224: 1218: 1215: 1213: 1210: 1208: 1205: 1203: 1200: 1198: 1195: 1193: 1190: 1188: 1185: 1183: 1180: 1178: 1175: 1173: 1170: 1168: 1165: 1163: 1160: 1158: 1155: 1153: 1150: 1148: 1145: 1143: 1140: 1138: 1135: 1133: 1130: 1128: 1125: 1123: 1120: 1118: 1115: 1113: 1110: 1108: 1105: 1103: 1100: 1098: 1095: 1093: 1090: 1088: 1085: 1083: 1080: 1078: 1075: 1073: 1070: 1068: 1065: 1063: 1060: 1058: 1055: 1053: 1050: 1048: 1045: 1043: 1040: 1039: 1037: 1035: 1031: 1028: 1026: 1022: 1016: 1013: 1011: 1008: 1006: 1003: 1002: 999: 995: 990: 986: 976: 973: 971: 968: 966: 963: 961: 958: 956: 953: 950: 947: 946: 943: 936: 932: 914: 911: 909: 906: 904: 901: 899: 896: 894: 891: 889: 886: 885: 883: 879:Powers under 877: 871: 868: 866: 863: 861: 858: 856: 853: 852: 850: 844: 838: 835: 833: 830: 828: 825: 823: 820: 819: 817: 815: 811: 805: 802: 800: 797: 793: 790: 789: 788: 785: 783: 780: 779: 776: 772: 771:Confederation 767: 763: 753: 750: 747: 744: 741: 738: 736: 733: 731: 728: 726: 723: 721: 718: 716: 713: 711: 708: 707: 704: 700: 695: 691: 685: 682: 680: 677: 675: 672: 671: 668: 664: 657: 652: 650: 645: 643: 638: 637: 634: 615: 611: 605: 597: 590: 583: 568: 564: 560: 556: 549: 542: 538: 537: 531: 524: 520: 515: 508: 504: 503: 497: 482: 481: 476: 469: 460: 455: 451: 447: 443: 436: 432: 422: 419: 418: 410: 407: 405: 402: 399: 396: 395: 389: 387: 383: 379: 369: 367: 363: 359: 355: 354:United States 348:United States 339: 330: 326: 323:This section 321: 318: 314: 313: 309: 299: 297: 296: 291: 290:Antonio Lamer 287: 286: 275: 273: 269: 265: 259: 256: 251: 249: 244: 240: 236: 232: 231: 220: 218: 214: 210: 206: 202: 190: 185: 183: 178: 176: 171: 170: 168: 167: 162: 159: 157: 156:Legal process 154: 152: 151:Legal realism 149: 147: 144: 142: 139: 137: 134: 132: 129: 126: 122: 117: 114: 111: 107: 104: 102: 98: 94: 91: 90: 89: 88: 84: 83: 78: 75: 73: 72:Mischief rule 70: 68: 65: 64: 63: 62: 58: 57: 52: 49: 47: 44: 43: 42: 41: 37: 36: 33: 30: 29: 26: 22: 1625:expanding it 1617:Canadian law 1614: 1590: 1577: 1558: 1483: 865:Criminal law 846:Powers under 618:. Retrieved 613: 604: 595: 582: 570:. Retrieved 558: 548: 534: 530: 518: 514: 500: 496: 484:. Retrieved 480:CBA National 478: 468: 449: 445: 435: 381: 375: 351: 333: 329:adding to it 324: 293: 283: 281: 261: 257: 253: 235:Persons Case 234: 228: 226: 204: 201:Canadian law 198: 96: 25: 1484:Living tree 1479:Paramountcy 1297:Conventions 951:, 1867–1982 837:Section 125 832:Section 121 523:2014 SCC 57 507:2004 SCC 79 382:living tree 268:credit card 106:Originalism 97:Living tree 77:Golden rule 1664:Categories 994:Patriation 881:Section 92 848:Section 91 620:30 January 572:30 January 427:References 292:stated in 237:, wherein 136:Textualism 888:Licensing 567:0307-1235 452:(1): 98. 1579:Category 1042:Preamble 827:Preamble 614:UKSCBlog 392:See also 217:doctrine 539:, 521:, 505:, 486:11 June 352:In the 278:Charter 223:Concept 215:) is a 748:(1839) 742:(1838) 565:  209:French 203:, the 1619:is a 592:(PDF) 38:Forms 1621:stub 1127:16.1 622:2019 574:2019 563:ISSN 488:2024 21:Tree 454:doi 331:. 199:In 1666:: 1270:59 1265:52 1249:36 1233:35 1217:34 1212:33 1207:32 1202:31 1197:30 1192:29 1187:28 1182:27 1177:26 1172:25 1167:24 1162:23 1157:22 1152:21 1147:20 1142:19 1137:18 1132:17 1122:16 1117:15 1112:14 1107:13 1102:12 1097:11 1092:10 612:. 594:. 561:. 557:. 477:. 450:25 448:. 444:. 211:: 123:, 99:/ 95:/ 1652:e 1645:t 1638:v 1627:. 1087:9 1082:8 1077:7 1072:6 1067:5 1062:4 1057:3 1052:2 1047:1 655:e 648:t 641:v 624:. 598:. 576:. 490:. 462:. 456:: 338:) 334:( 207:( 188:e 181:t 174:v 127:) 119:( 112:) 108:( 23:.

Index

Tree
Judicial interpretation
Constitutional interpretation
Statutory interpretation
Plain meaning rule
Mischief rule
Golden rule
Living Constitution
Living tree
Living instrument
Originalism
original meaning
Original intent
legislative intent
legislative history
Strict constructionism
Textualism
Purposive approach
Common good constitutionalism
Legal realism
Legal process
Legal formalism
v
t
e
Canadian law
French
doctrine
Edwards v Canada (Attorney General)
Viscount Sankey

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑