Knowledge

Intellectual honesty

Source 📝

374: 75:
builds upon previous insights, advancements rely on the collaborative efforts of contributors. In scholarly systems, these contributions undergo rigorous evaluation before becoming a basis for further exploration. Upholding intellectual honesty is thought to be crucial to guarantee the transparency and openness of intellectual contributions in order to foster constructive criticism.
74:
In academia, intellectual honesty necessitates that students, academics, and researchers openly disclose the origins of their ideas and give due credit to others in their writing. This fundamental principle serves as a cornerstone for the acquisition and progression of knowledge. As knowledge usually
108:
Within the realm of business, intellectual honesty entails basing decisions on factual evidence, consistently pursuing truth in problem-solving, and setting aside personal aspirations. The adoption of intellectual honesty by organizations is thought to foster a culture of ongoing learning and
113:
is sometimes understood a key to business innovation through fostering social cohesion and aiding learning, research has also shown that it can inadvertently hinder intellectual honesty instead of fostering it.
109:
receptiveness to novel ideas. This mindset frequently catalyzes enhancements across the entire organization, particularly when intellectual honesty becomes an integral part of the corporate culture. While
93:
being forthright about conflicts of interest or potential conflicts of interest; prioritizing the welfare and safeguarding the rights of human subjects involved in research endeavors
90:
upholding impartiality in the process of peer review; fostering a collaborative and supportive atmosphere in scientific interactions, encompassing communication and resource sharing
272: 66:
Louis M. Guenin describes the "kernel" of intellectual honesty to be "a virtuous disposition to eschew deception when given an incentive for deception".
246:
Environments, National Research Council (US) and Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Assessing Integrity in Research (2002),
17: 378: 51:
Facts are presented in an unbiased manner and not twisted to give misleading impressions or to support one view over another;
399: 404: 37:
characterised by a nonpartisan and honest attitude, which can be demonstrated in a number of different ways:
44:
Relevant facts and information are not purposefully omitted, even when such things may contradict one's
99:
adhering to the reciprocal responsibilities existing between investigators and their research teams.
394: 83:
Intellectual honesty has been described as part of integrity in scientific research and includes:
232: 252:
Integrity in Scientific Research: Creating an Environment That Promotes Responsible Conduct
128: 110: 8: 354: 325: 213: 133: 358: 317: 205: 153: 148: 87:
ensuring precision in depicting one's contributions to research proposals and reports
329: 217: 346: 309: 197: 123: 34: 247: 350: 337:
Wiener, Norbert (1964). "Intellectual Honesty and the Contemporary Scientist".
313: 201: 41:
One's personal beliefs or politics do not interfere with the pursuit of truth;
388: 209: 163: 96:
practicing ethical treatment of animals in the course of research activities
321: 188:
Guenin, Louis M. (1 June 2005). "Candor in Science: Intellectual Honesty".
143: 373: 138: 55: 45: 63: 273:"The Most Effective CFOs Apply Intellectual Honesty—To Themselves" 54:
References, or earlier work, are acknowledged where possible, and
158: 300:
Toledo-Pereyra, Luis H. (2002). "Intellectual Honesty".
386: 233:"Professional Writing in the Health Disciplines" 299: 245: 230: 14: 387: 336: 187: 270: 231:Collins, Sandra (January 29, 2024). 24: 25: 416: 366: 27:Applied method of problem solving 372: 302:Journal of Investigative Surgery 254:, National Academies Press (US) 377:Learning materials related to 264: 239: 224: 181: 13: 1: 339:American Behavioral Scientist 169: 7: 117: 103: 69: 10: 421: 351:10.1177/000276426400800304 78: 400:Philosophical methodology 314:10.1080/08941930290085868 202:10.1007/s11229-005-3746-3 33:is an applied method of 248:"Integrity in Research" 18:Intellectual dishonesty 405:Anti-intellectualism 379:Intellectual honesty 129:Conflict of interest 111:psychological safety 31:Intellectual honesty 134:Epistemic feedback 154:Scientific method 149:List of fallacies 16:(Redirected from 412: 376: 362: 333: 287: 286: 284: 283: 271:McDonald, Paul. 268: 262: 261: 260: 259: 243: 237: 236: 228: 222: 221: 185: 124:Academic honesty 21: 420: 419: 415: 414: 413: 411: 410: 409: 395:Research ethics 385: 384: 369: 294:Further reading 291: 290: 281: 279: 269: 265: 257: 255: 244: 240: 229: 225: 186: 182: 172: 120: 106: 81: 72: 35:problem solving 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 418: 408: 407: 402: 397: 383: 382: 381:at Wikiversity 368: 367:External links 365: 364: 363: 334: 308:(3): 113–114. 289: 288: 263: 238: 223: 179: 178: 171: 168: 167: 166: 161: 156: 151: 146: 141: 136: 131: 126: 119: 116: 105: 102: 101: 100: 97: 94: 91: 88: 80: 77: 71: 68: 60: 59: 52: 49: 42: 26: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 417: 406: 403: 401: 398: 396: 393: 392: 390: 380: 375: 371: 370: 360: 356: 352: 348: 344: 340: 335: 331: 327: 323: 319: 315: 311: 307: 303: 298: 297: 296: 295: 278: 274: 267: 253: 249: 242: 234: 227: 219: 215: 211: 207: 203: 199: 195: 191: 184: 180: 177: 176: 165: 164:Systemic bias 162: 160: 157: 155: 152: 150: 147: 145: 142: 140: 137: 135: 132: 130: 127: 125: 122: 121: 115: 112: 98: 95: 92: 89: 86: 85: 84: 76: 67: 65: 57: 53: 50: 47: 43: 40: 39: 38: 36: 32: 19: 342: 338: 305: 301: 293: 292: 280:. Retrieved 276: 266: 256:, retrieved 251: 241: 226: 193: 189: 183: 174: 173: 144:Intellectual 107: 82: 73: 61: 30: 29: 58:is avoided. 389:Categories 282:2024-01-25 258:2024-01-25 196:(2): 179. 170:References 139:Good faith 56:plagiarism 46:hypothesis 359:144572884 345:(3): 15. 210:0039-7857 330:42946467 322:12139782 218:18683879 190:Synthese 118:See also 104:Business 70:Academia 64:ethicist 62:Harvard 159:Sophism 79:Science 357:  328:  320:  277:Forbes 216:  208:  355:S2CID 326:S2CID 214:S2CID 175:Notes 318:PMID 206:ISSN 347:doi 310:doi 198:doi 194:145 391:: 353:. 341:. 324:. 316:. 306:15 304:. 275:. 250:, 212:. 204:. 192:. 361:. 349:: 343:8 332:. 312:: 285:. 235:. 220:. 200:: 48:; 20:)

Index

Intellectual dishonesty
problem solving
hypothesis
plagiarism
ethicist
psychological safety
Academic honesty
Conflict of interest
Epistemic feedback
Good faith
Intellectual
List of fallacies
Scientific method
Sophism
Systemic bias
doi
10.1007/s11229-005-3746-3
ISSN
0039-7857
S2CID
18683879
"Professional Writing in the Health Disciplines"
"Integrity in Research"
"The Most Effective CFOs Apply Intellectual Honesty—To Themselves"
doi
10.1080/08941930290085868
PMID
12139782
S2CID
42946467

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.