Knowledge

Hitchens's razor

Source ๐Ÿ“

182: 146:, namely that "belief in God can be reasonable even if the believer has no arguments or propositional evidence on which the belief is based". The idea is that all beliefs are based on other beliefs, and some "foundational" or "basic beliefs" just need to be assumed to be true in order to start somewhere, and it is fine to pick God as one of those basic beliefs. 552:
Hitchens is attracted repeatedly to the principle of Occam's razor: that simple explanations are more likely to be correct than complicated ones. (E.g., Earth makes a circle around the Sun; the Sun doesn't do a complex roller coaster ride around Earth.) You might think that Occam's razor would favor
376:
And remember, miracles are supposed to occur at the behest of a being who is omnipotent as well as omniscient and omnipresent. One might hope for more magnificent performances than ever seem to occur. The 'evidence' for faith, then, seems to leave faith looking even weaker than it would if it stood,
113:
Academic philosopher Michael V. Antony argued that despite the use of Hitchens's razor to reject religious belief and to support atheism, applying the razor to atheism itself would seem to imply that atheism is epistemically unjustified. According to Antony, the New Atheists (to whom Hitchens also
520:
devised a 'principle of economy', popularly known as 'Ockham's razor,' which relied for its effect on disposing of unnecessary assumptions and accepting the first sufficient explanation or cause. 'Do not multiply entities beyond necessity.' This principle extends itself. 'Everything which is
38:
regarding the truthfulness of a claim lies with the one who makes the claim; if this burden is not met, then the claim is unfounded, and its opponents need not argue further in order to dismiss it. Hitchens used this phrase specifically in the context of refuting religious belief.
553:
religion; the biblical creation story certainly seems simpler than evolution. But Hitchens argues effectively again and again that attaching the religious myth to what we know from science to be true adds nothing but needless complication.
29:
that serves as a general rule for rejecting certain knowledge claims. It states "what can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence". The razor was created by and later named after author and journalist
92:
Jillian Melchior in 2017, the phrase "What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence" was "Christopher Hitchens's variation of Occam's razor". Hitchens's razor has been presented alongside the
377:
alone and unsupported, all by itself. What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence. This is even more true when the 'evidence' eventually offered is so shoddy and self-interested.
172: 170: 130:, and the other New Atheists that if religious belief is not based on evidence, it is not reasonable and can thus be dismissed without evidence. Characterising the New Atheists as 728: 171: 798: 584:
Mr. Coffman cited Christopher Hitchens's variation of Occam's razor: 'What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without'
521:
explained through positing something different from the act of understanding', he wrote, 'can be explained without positing such a distinct thing.'
672: 868: 697: 292: 791: 114:
belonged) invoke a number of special arguments purporting to show that atheism can in fact be asserted without evidence.
481: 665: 409: 341: 692: 631: 306: 452: 61:
blogger Rixaeton in December 2010, and popularised by, among others, evolutionary biologist and atheist activist
567: 938: 874: 953: 881: 756: 658: 948: 763: 187: 35: 721: 749: 206: 135: 535: 298: 220: 85: 784: 735: 249: 401: 83:
that Hitchens was rather fond of applying Occam's razor to religious claims, and according to
923: 742: 621: 534: 426: 913: 851: 681: 389: 202: 31: 600: 8: 958: 933: 928: 844: 270: 264: 26: 770: 228: 126:
outlined some common Christian theological responses to the argument made by Hitchens,
79: 943: 627: 511: 405: 394: 367: 337: 302: 243: 963: 826: 805: 777: 214: 123: 70: 49: 918: 714: 143: 139: 127: 74: 887: 605: 255: 237: 94: 907: 320:
What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence.
131: 98: 623:
Why Christian Faith Still Makes Sense: A Response to Contemporary Challenges
190:
was created from a revision of this article dated 25 October 2019
23: 477: 102: 97:("Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence") as an example of 62: 334:
The Politics of Trauma and Peace-Building: Lessons from Northern Ireland
650: 515: 371: 273: โ€“ Principle that allows one to eliminate unlikely explanations 819: 812: 240: โ€“ Property of a statement that can be logically contradicted 58: 57:
Razor") in an online forum in October, 2007, and was used by
65:
after Hitchens died in December 2011. Some pages earlier in
626:. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Academic. pp. 16โ€“17. 482:"Readers' tributes to Hitchens: The final day, with music" 53:. The term "Hitchens's razor" itself first appeared (as " 260:
Pages displaying short descriptions of redirect targets
233:
Pages displaying short descriptions of redirect targets
457:
Rixaeton's Space Adventures in Space and Other Places
431:
Rixaeton's Space Adventures in Space and Other Places
258: โ€“ Evidentiary standard for extraordinary claims 217: โ€“ A philosophical razor devised by Mike Alder 16:
General rule rejecting claims made without evidence
566: 393: 47:The dictum appears in Hitchens's 2007 book titled 508:God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything 396:God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything 364:God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything 50:God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything 905: 453:"Correcting Hitchens' Razor to Hitchens's Razor" 252: โ€“ Adages and sayings named after a person 510:(Kindle ed.). Twelve Books. p. 119. 366:(Kindle ed.). Twelve Books. p. 258. 666: 594: 592: 246: โ€“ Adage to assume stupidity over malice 799:Thomas Paine's "Rights of Man": A Biography 476: 267: โ€“ Analogy devised by Bertrand Russell 108: 673: 659: 589: 331: 290: 680: 564: 505: 450: 424: 388: 361: 231: โ€“ Thought experiment in philosophy 198:, and does not reflect subsequent edits. 181: 568:"Inside the Madness at Evergreen State" 565:Melchior, Jillian (21 September 2017). 532: 906: 598: 506:Hitchens, Christopher (6 April 2009). 400:. New York, NY: Twelve Books. p.  362:Hitchens, Christopher (6 April 2009). 654: 619: 357: 355: 353: 134:, Evans counted himself amongst the 792:Thomas Jefferson: Author of America 13: 382: 350: 336:. Abingdon: Routledge. p. 2. 294:Oxford Essential Quotations: Facts 168: 14: 975: 533:Kinsley, Michael (13 May 2007). 180: 613: 558: 225: โ€“ 1995 book by Carl Sagan 609:. No. 78. pp. 18โ€“21. 526: 499: 470: 444: 418: 325: 291:Ratcliffe, Susan, ed. (2016). 284: 142:, who argued for a version of 1: 882:The Trials of Henry Kissinger 757:Letters to a Young Contrarian 277: 764:The Trial of Henry Kissinger 425:Rixaeton (1 December 2010). 117: 7: 722:Blood, Class, and Nostalgia 599:Antony, Michael V. (2010). 451:Rixaeton (2 January 2012). 332:McGrattan, Cillian (2016). 149: 42: 10: 980: 750:Unacknowledged Legislation 620:Evans, C. Stephen (2015). 861: 836: 706: 688: 136:Reformed epistemologists 109:Use in atheism criticism 69:, Hitchens also invoked 729:The Missionary Position 601:"Where's The Evidence?" 573:The Wall Street Journal 299:Oxford University Press 222:The Demon-Haunted World 86:The Wall Street Journal 785:Love, Poverty, and War 736:Prepared for the Worst 250:List of eponymous laws 176: 156:Listen to this article 34:. It implies that the 939:Philosophy of science 743:No One Left to Lie To 486:Why Evolution Is True 390:Hitchens, Christopher 175: 954:Christopher Hitchens 852:The Portable Atheist 682:Christopher Hitchens 480:(25 December 2011). 207:More spoken articles 32:Christopher Hitchens 949:Razors (philosophy) 845:Blaming the Victims 271:Philosophical razor 771:Why Orwell Matters 541:The New York Times 536:"In God, Distrust" 229:Evil God Challenge 177: 80:The New York Times 901: 900: 427:"Hitchens' Razor" 173: 971: 893:Hitchens's razor 806:God Is Not Great 778:A Long Short War 675: 668: 661: 652: 651: 645: 644: 642: 640: 617: 611: 610: 596: 587: 586: 581: 579: 570: 562: 556: 555: 549: 547: 538: 530: 524: 523: 503: 497: 496: 494: 492: 474: 468: 467: 465: 463: 448: 442: 441: 439: 437: 422: 416: 415: 399: 386: 380: 379: 359: 348: 347: 329: 323: 322: 317: 315: 288: 265:Russell's teapot 261: 234: 197: 195: 184: 183: 174: 164: 162: 157: 124:C. Stephen Evans 91: 67:God Is Not Great 20:Hitchens's razor 979: 978: 974: 973: 972: 970: 969: 968: 904: 903: 902: 897: 857: 832: 715:Imperial Spoils 702: 698:Political views 684: 679: 649: 648: 638: 636: 634: 618: 614: 597: 590: 577: 575: 563: 559: 545: 543: 531: 527: 504: 500: 490: 488: 475: 471: 461: 459: 449: 445: 435: 433: 423: 419: 412: 387: 383: 360: 351: 344: 330: 326: 313: 311: 309: 289: 285: 280: 259: 232: 211: 210: 199: 193: 191: 188:This audio file 185: 178: 169: 166: 160: 159: 155: 152: 144:foundationalism 140:Alvin Plantinga 128:Richard Dawkins 120: 111: 89: 75:Michael Kinsley 45: 36:burden of proof 24:epistemological 17: 12: 11: 5: 977: 967: 966: 961: 956: 951: 946: 941: 936: 931: 926: 921: 916: 899: 898: 896: 895: 890: 888:Peter Hitchens 885: 878: 871: 869:57901 Hitchens 865: 863: 859: 858: 856: 855: 848: 840: 838: 834: 833: 831: 830: 823: 816: 809: 802: 795: 788: 781: 774: 767: 760: 753: 746: 739: 732: 725: 718: 710: 708: 704: 703: 701: 700: 695: 689: 686: 685: 678: 677: 670: 663: 655: 647: 646: 632: 612: 606:Philosophy Now 588: 557: 525: 498: 469: 443: 417: 411:978-1843545743 410: 381: 349: 343:978-1138775183 342: 324: 307: 297:(4 ed.). 282: 281: 279: 276: 275: 274: 268: 262: 256:Sagan standard 253: 247: 244:Hanlon's razor 241: 238:Falsifiability 235: 226: 218: 200: 186: 179: 167: 154: 153: 151: 148: 138:together with 132:evidentialists 119: 116: 110: 107: 95:Sagan standard 44: 41: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 976: 965: 962: 960: 957: 955: 952: 950: 947: 945: 942: 940: 937: 935: 932: 930: 927: 925: 922: 920: 917: 915: 912: 911: 909: 894: 891: 889: 886: 884: 883: 879: 877: 876: 872: 870: 867: 866: 864: 860: 854: 853: 849: 847: 846: 842: 841: 839: 835: 829: 828: 824: 822: 821: 817: 815: 814: 810: 808: 807: 803: 801: 800: 796: 794: 793: 789: 787: 786: 782: 780: 779: 775: 773: 772: 768: 766: 765: 761: 759: 758: 754: 752: 751: 747: 745: 744: 740: 738: 737: 733: 731: 730: 726: 724: 723: 719: 717: 716: 712: 711: 709: 707:Works written 705: 699: 696: 694: 691: 690: 687: 683: 676: 671: 669: 664: 662: 657: 656: 653: 635: 633:9781493400225 629: 625: 624: 616: 608: 607: 602: 595: 593: 585: 574: 569: 561: 554: 542: 537: 529: 522: 517: 513: 509: 502: 487: 483: 479: 473: 458: 454: 447: 432: 428: 421: 413: 407: 403: 398: 397: 391: 385: 378: 373: 369: 365: 358: 356: 354: 345: 339: 335: 328: 321: 310: 308:9780191826719 304: 300: 296: 295: 287: 283: 272: 269: 266: 263: 257: 254: 251: 248: 245: 242: 239: 236: 230: 227: 224: 223: 219: 216: 215:Alder's razor 213: 212: 208: 204: 189: 147: 145: 141: 137: 133: 129: 125: 115: 106: 104: 100: 99:evidentialism 96: 88: 87: 82: 81: 76: 72: 71:Occam's razor 68: 64: 60: 56: 52: 51: 40: 37: 33: 28: 25: 21: 924:Reductionism 892: 880: 875:Hell's Angel 873: 850: 843: 837:Works edited 825: 818: 811: 804: 797: 790: 783: 776: 769: 762: 755: 748: 741: 734: 727: 720: 713: 693:Bibliography 637:. Retrieved 622: 615: 604: 583: 576:. Retrieved 572: 560: 551: 544:. Retrieved 540: 528: 519: 507: 501: 489:. Retrieved 485: 472: 460:. Retrieved 456: 446: 434:. Retrieved 430: 420: 395: 384: 375: 363: 333: 327: 319: 312:. Retrieved 293: 286: 221: 122:Philosopher 121: 112: 84: 78: 77:observed in 66: 54: 48: 46: 19: 18: 914:Agnosticism 478:Jerry Coyne 103:New Atheism 101:within the 73:. In 2007, 63:Jerry Coyne 959:Skepticism 934:Principles 929:Heuristics 908:Categories 516:B00287KD4Q 372:B00287KD4Q 314:4 November 278:References 203:Audio help 194:2019-10-25 105:movement. 827:Mortality 639:21 August 546:21 August 491:20 August 462:20 August 436:20 August 118:Criticism 55:Hitchens' 944:Ontology 820:Arguably 813:Hitch-22 392:(2007). 205: ยท 150:See also 43:Analysis 964:Eponyms 578:19 June 192: ( 59:atheist 919:Adages 630:  514:  408:  370:  340:  305:  163:minute 90:'s 22:is an 862:Other 27:razor 641:2021 628:ISBN 580:2019 548:2021 512:ASIN 493:2021 464:2021 438:2021 406:ISBN 368:ASIN 338:ISBN 316:2020 303:ISBN 402:150 910:: 603:. 591:^ 582:. 571:. 550:. 539:. 518:. 484:. 455:. 429:. 404:. 374:. 352:^ 318:. 301:. 674:e 667:t 660:v 643:. 495:. 466:. 440:. 414:. 346:. 209:) 201:( 196:) 165:) 161:1 158:(

Index

epistemological
razor
Christopher Hitchens
burden of proof
God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything
atheist
Jerry Coyne
Occam's razor
Michael Kinsley
The New York Times
The Wall Street Journal
Sagan standard
evidentialism
New Atheism
C. Stephen Evans
Richard Dawkins
evidentialists
Reformed epistemologists
Alvin Plantinga
foundationalism
This audio file
Audio help
More spoken articles
Alder's razor
The Demon-Haunted World
Evil God Challenge
Falsifiability
Hanlon's razor
List of eponymous laws
Sagan standard

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

โ†‘