290:'s national parliamentary elections from 1919 to 2003 the system could be said to have existed in a two-tier form, until it was replaced by a single-tier PR system. First, the Hare rather than Hagenbach-Bischoff quota was applied in the constituencies of provinces, and second, any seats remaining after quota allocation were aggregated, along with parties' provincial vote totals, at the provincial level where the D'Hondt method was then applied, including in the divisors for each party the number of seats it had won in the constituencies. Slovakia uses a variant of Hagenbach-Bischoff system.
25:
205:
101:
for allocating seats, and for any seats remaining the D'Hondt method is then applied so that the first and subsequent divisors (number of seats won plus 1) for each party list's vote total includes the number of seats that have been allocated by the quota. The system gives results identical to the
134:
251:
200:{\displaystyle {\text{number of Seats}}=\left\lfloor {\frac {\text{number of Votes}}{\left\lfloor {\frac {\text{Total number of Votes}}{{\text{Total number of Seats}}+1}}+1\right\rfloor }}\right\rfloor }
278:. Hagenbach-Bischoff's contribution, in addition to popularizing it, was to suggest a quota that allocates the greatest possible number of seats before the D'Hondt method is used.
117:
The total number of valid votes cast in the election is divided by the number of seats to be allocated + 1. The result, rounded up to the next whole number, forms the
217:
351:
54:
325:
76:
47:
274:(1833–1910), it was originated by the D'Hondt method's inventor Victor D'Hondt (1841–1901), using the simple or
102:
D'Hondt method and it is often referred to as such in countries using the system e.g. Switzerland and
Belgium.
253:
is calculated, and the next seat is allocated to the party with the largest quotient (highest number).
331:
271:
37:
98:
41:
33:
306:
246:{\displaystyle \textstyle {\frac {\text{number of Votes}}{{\text{already allocated seats}}+1}}}
58:
97:, used for allocating seats in party-list proportional representation. It usually uses the
8:
107:
321:
94:
125:). Each party or list is allocated as many seats as the distribution number is
345:
275:
103:
129:
contained in its vote count. Thus, the number of seats for a party is:
258:
Step: If there is still a seat to be allocated, step 2 is repeated.
287:
270:
While named after the Swiss physicist and electoral reformer
106:
uses the
Hagenbach-Bischoff method to allocate seats in its
318:
A Short
History of Electoral Systems in Western Europe
221:
220:
137:
245:
199:
343:
211:Step: If there is still a seat to be allocated:
46:but its sources remain unclear because it lacks
16:Method of allocating seats in a parliament
77:Learn how and when to remove this message
352:Party-list proportional representation
344:
320:. London: George Allen & Unwin.
18:
13:
316:Carstairs, Andrew McLaren (1980):
14:
363:
23:
300:
1:
293:
281:
214:For each party, the quotient
7:
336:Proportional Representation
330:Hoag, Clarence Gilbert and
10:
368:
265:
272:Eduard Hagenbach-Bischoff
114:Step: Basic Distribution
91:Hagenbach-Bischoff system
307:Slovak law 180/2014 § 68
99:Hagenbach-Bischoff quota
32:This article includes a
230:already allocated seats
61:more precise citations.
338:. New York: Macmillan.
247:
201:
332:George Hervey Hallett
248:
202:
168:Total number of Seats
163:Total number of Votes
218:
135:
93:is a variant of the
119:distribution number
108:European Parliament
243:
242:
197:
34:list of references
240:
231:
226:
191:
178:
169:
164:
154:
141:
87:
86:
79:
359:
309:
304:
252:
250:
249:
244:
241:
239:
232:
229:
224:
223:
206:
204:
203:
198:
196:
192:
190:
186:
179:
177:
170:
167:
162:
161:
152:
151:
142:
139:
82:
75:
71:
68:
62:
57:this article by
48:inline citations
27:
26:
19:
367:
366:
362:
361:
360:
358:
357:
356:
342:
341:
313:
312:
305:
301:
296:
284:
268:
228:
227:
225:number of Votes
222:
219:
216:
215:
166:
165:
160:
159:
155:
153:number of Votes
150:
146:
140:number of Seats
138:
136:
133:
132:
123:election number
83:
72:
66:
63:
52:
38:related reading
28:
24:
17:
12:
11:
5:
365:
355:
354:
340:
339:
328:
311:
310:
298:
297:
295:
292:
283:
280:
267:
264:
260:
259:
256:
255:
254:
238:
235:
209:
208:
207:
195:
189:
185:
182:
176:
173:
158:
149:
145:
130:
95:D'Hondt method
85:
84:
42:external links
31:
29:
22:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
364:
353:
350:
349:
347:
337:
333:
329:
327:
326:0-04-324006-2
323:
319:
315:
314:
308:
303:
299:
291:
289:
279:
277:
273:
263:
257:
236:
233:
213:
212:
210:
193:
187:
183:
180:
174:
171:
156:
147:
143:
131:
128:
124:
120:
116:
115:
113:
112:
111:
109:
105:
100:
96:
92:
81:
78:
70:
60:
56:
50:
49:
43:
39:
35:
30:
21:
20:
335:
317:
302:
285:
269:
261:
126:
122:
118:
90:
88:
73:
67:January 2013
64:
53:Please help
45:
286:As used in
262:and so on.
110:elections.
59:introducing
294:References
282:Variations
276:Hare quota
127:completely
104:Luxembourg
346:Category
334:(1926):
194:⌋
188:⌋
157:⌊
148:⌊
288:Belgium
266:History
55:improve
324:
121:(also
40:, or
322:ISBN
89:The
348::
44:,
36:,
237:1
234:+
184:1
181:+
175:1
172:+
144:=
80:)
74:(
69:)
65:(
51:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.