106:. Working with Caren Levy, she expanded it into a methodology for gender policy and planning. The Moser framework follows the Gender and Development approach in emphasizing the importance of gender relations. As with the WID-based Harvard Framework, it includes a collection of quantitative empirical facts. Going further, it investigates the reasons and processes that lead to conventions of access and control. The Moser Framework includes gender roles identification, gender needs assessment, disaggregating control of resources and decision making within the household, planning for balancing the triple role, distinguishing between different aims in interventions and involving women and gender-aware organizations in planning.
186:. The approach centers on the interchange between patriarchy and social relations. Unlike the Harvard Framework and the Gender Analysis Matrix, it does not focus on roles, resources and activities, but instead looks at the relations between the State, market, community and family. Relationships between women may be relevant, such as the relationship between a female servant and her mistress. Discussing the players in the process, Naila Kabeer proposes that "planning for women's empowerment is most likely to succeed when the process is seen as the responsibility of those who are planned for; when social action groups and grassroots movements help to counter the top-down logic of the planning process..."
159:
levels of equality: welfare, access, "conscientization", participation and control. Empowerment is essential at each of these levels. Welfare addresses basic needs, and access addresses the ability to use resources such as credit, land and education. "Conscientization" is a key element of the framework: recognition that discrimination creates gender-related problems and that women may themselves contribute to this discrimination. With participation, women are equal to men in making decisions, and with control the balance of powers between the genders is equal.
158:
specializing in gender and development issues. The framework helps planners understand the practical meaning of women's empowerment and equality, and then evaluate whether a development initiative supports this empowerment. The basic premise is that women's development can be viewed in terms of five
28:
In many societies, although not in all, women have traditionally been disadvantaged compared to men. Until recently, studies of these societies for the purpose of planning development covered women narrowly in terms of population, health and family planning. Relatively little was known about other
40:
An example of the effect of skipping gender analysis is provided by a project that introduced handcarts to a village for use in collecting firewood. It was thought that the men would use the carts to collect wood, freeing up the women for other activities. In fact, the men collected the wood for
80:
and others. It was one of the earliest examples of such frameworks. The starting point for the framework was the assumption that it makes economic sense for development aid projects to allocate resources to women as well as men, which will make development more efficient – a position named the
19:
is a type of socio-economic analysis that uncovers how gender relations affect a development problem. The aim may just be to show that gender relations will probably affect the solution, or to show how they will affect the solution and what could be done. Gender analysis frameworks provide a
44:
Gender analysis has commonly been used as a tool for development and emergency relief projects. The socially constructed roles of men and women must be understood in project or program design, as must roles related to class, caste, ethnicity, and age. The techniques are also important in
118:(GAM) in collaboration with other development practitioners to support their grassroots work for a Middle Eastern NGO. Participatory planning is a basic theme of the framework, which is flexible enough to handle situations where data collection is severely handicapped.
45:
understanding the management of natural resources. Gender analysis is relevant to education, although the frameworks used for development projects must be adapted to meet the needs of educational projects.
127:
549:
29:
concerns such as domestic violence or involvement in economic activities. Gender analysis provides more information, bringing benefits to women and to society as a whole. The
115:
138:
responding to disaster situations, and is designed to help in emergency aid planning to meet immediate needs while considering longer-term development needs.
69:
556:
174:
philosophy to gender analysis, and has been used by various government department and NGOs as a planning framework. It was developed by
134:, with some of the authors having also worked on the Harvard Analystic Framework. The CVA is based on an analysis of 30 case studies of
517:
41:
sale, keeping the money. As they depleted supplies near the village, the women had to travel further to collect wood.
606:
585:
538:
496:
475:
454:
433:
33:(WID) approach emerged in the 1970s, calling for treatment of "women's issues" in development projects. Later, the
90:
135:
65:
59:
37:(GAD) approach proposed more emphasis on gender relations rather than seeing women's issues in isolation.
626:
598:
Social and gender analysis in natural resource management: learning studies and lessons from Asia
34:
575:
507:
528:
444:
147:
103:
30:
8:
131:
102:
for gender analysis in the 1980s while working at the
Development Planning Unit of the
77:
602:
581:
534:
513:
492:
471:
450:
429:
179:
596:
486:
465:
423:
99:
183:
95:
620:
175:
146:
The Women's
Empowerment Framework, or Longwe Framework, was developed by
267:
363:
168:
339:
327:
315:
121:
291:
171:
506:
Ochola, Washington O.; Sanginga, Pascal C.; Bekalo, Isaac (2010).
195:
485:
March, Candida; Smyth, Inés A.; Mukhopadhyay, Maitrayee (1999).
422:
Brouwer, Elizabeth C.; Harris, Bruce M.; Tanaka, Sonomi (1998).
207:
155:
151:
68:, also called the Gender Roles Framework, was developed by the
446:
Reversed realities: gender hierarchies in development thought
73:
141:
72:
in collaboration with the Women In
Development office of
20:
step-by-step methodology for conducting gender analysis.
303:
231:
219:
484:
369:
351:
345:
333:
321:
297:
399:
509:
Managing
Natural Resources for Development in Africa
505:
387:
273:
243:
201:
421:
375:
213:
577:Sex, gender, becoming: post-apartheid reflections
255:
122:Capacities and Vulnerabilities Analysis Framework
618:
530:Women and Empowerment: Approaches and Strategies
70:Harvard Institute for International Development
53:
130:(CVA) was developed in a research project at
279:
162:
573:
309:
237:
225:
109:
167:The Social Relations Approach applies a
594:
467:Practising gender analysis in education
249:
128:Capacities and Vulnerabilities Analysis
619:
442:
405:
393:
142:Longwe's Women's Empowerment Framework
526:
488:A guide to gender-analysis frameworks
463:
381:
357:
261:
76:, and was first described in 1984 by
370:March, Smyth & Mukhopadhyay 1999
346:March, Smyth & Mukhopadhyay 1999
334:March, Smyth & Mukhopadhyay 1999
322:March, Smyth & Mukhopadhyay 1999
298:March, Smyth & Mukhopadhyay 1999
425:Gender analysis in Papua New Guinea
13:
274:Ochola, Sanginga & Bekalo 2010
202:Ochola, Sanginga & Bekalo 2010
84:
14:
638:
547:
285:
214:Brouwer, Harris & Tanaka 1998
91:Moser Gender Planning Framework
533:. Discovery Publishing House.
1:
189:
48:
550:"Gender Analysis Frameworks"
66:Harvard Analytical Framework
60:Harvard Analytical Framework
54:Harvard Analytical Framework
7:
428:. World Bank Publications.
23:
10:
643:
414:
114:Rani Parker developed the
88:
57:
574:Van Marle, Karin (2006).
163:Social Relations Approach
595:Vernooy, Ronnie (2006).
464:Leach, Fiona E. (2003).
150:, a consultant based in
527:Sahay, Sushama (1998).
81:“efficiency approach".
443:Kabeer, Naila (1994).
116:Gender Analysis Matrix
110:Gender Analysis Matrix
35:Gender and Development
148:Sara Hlupekile Longwe
104:University of London
31:Women in Development
276:, pp. 238–239.
132:Harvard University
78:Catherine Overholt
519:978-9966-792-09-9
360:, pp. 39–40.
180:Sussex University
634:
612:
591:
570:
568:
567:
561:
555:. Archived from
554:
544:
523:
502:
481:
460:
439:
409:
403:
397:
391:
385:
379:
373:
367:
361:
355:
349:
343:
337:
331:
325:
319:
313:
307:
301:
295:
289:
283:
277:
271:
265:
259:
253:
247:
241:
235:
229:
223:
217:
211:
205:
199:
642:
641:
637:
636:
635:
633:
632:
631:
617:
616:
615:
609:
588:
565:
563:
559:
552:
541:
520:
499:
478:
457:
436:
417:
412:
408:, pp. 302.
404:
400:
392:
388:
380:
376:
372:, pp. 102.
368:
364:
356:
352:
344:
340:
332:
328:
320:
316:
312:, pp. 126.
308:
304:
296:
292:
284:
280:
272:
268:
260:
256:
248:
244:
240:, pp. 133.
236:
232:
228:, pp. 125.
224:
220:
212:
208:
204:, pp. 236.
200:
196:
192:
165:
144:
124:
112:
100:Moser Framework
93:
87:
85:Moser Framework
62:
56:
51:
26:
17:Gender analysis
12:
11:
5:
640:
630:
629:
627:Women's rights
614:
613:
607:
592:
586:
571:
548:USAID (2008).
545:
539:
524:
518:
503:
497:
482:
476:
461:
455:
440:
434:
418:
416:
413:
411:
410:
398:
396:, pp. 57.
386:
384:, pp. 86.
374:
362:
350:
348:, pp. 92.
338:
336:, pp. 78.
326:
324:, pp. 68.
314:
310:Van Marle 2006
302:
300:, pp. 55.
290:
278:
266:
254:
252:, pp. 21.
242:
238:Van Marle 2006
230:
226:Van Marle 2006
218:
206:
193:
191:
188:
184:United Kingdom
164:
161:
143:
140:
123:
120:
111:
108:
98:developed the
96:Caroline Moser
89:Main article:
86:
83:
58:Main article:
55:
52:
50:
47:
25:
22:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
639:
628:
625:
624:
622:
610:
608:0-7619-3463-4
604:
600:
599:
593:
589:
587:0-9585097-5-1
583:
579:
578:
572:
562:on 2010-05-13
558:
551:
546:
542:
540:81-7141-412-5
536:
532:
531:
525:
521:
515:
511:
510:
504:
500:
498:0-85598-403-1
494:
490:
489:
483:
479:
477:0-85598-493-7
473:
469:
468:
462:
458:
456:0-86091-584-0
452:
448:
447:
441:
437:
435:0-8213-4394-7
431:
427:
426:
420:
419:
407:
402:
395:
390:
383:
378:
371:
366:
359:
354:
347:
342:
335:
330:
323:
318:
311:
306:
299:
294:
287:
282:
275:
270:
264:, pp. 1.
263:
258:
251:
246:
239:
234:
227:
222:
216:, pp. 1.
215:
210:
203:
198:
194:
187:
185:
181:
177:
173:
170:
160:
157:
153:
149:
139:
137:
133:
129:
119:
117:
107:
105:
101:
97:
92:
82:
79:
75:
71:
67:
61:
46:
42:
38:
36:
32:
21:
18:
597:
576:
564:. Retrieved
557:the original
529:
508:
487:
466:
445:
424:
401:
389:
377:
365:
353:
341:
329:
317:
305:
293:
281:
269:
257:
250:Vernooy 2006
245:
233:
221:
209:
197:
176:Naila Kabeer
166:
145:
125:
113:
94:
63:
43:
39:
27:
16:
15:
406:Kabeer 1994
394:Kabeer 1994
566:2011-06-09
382:Leach 2003
358:Sahay 1998
262:Leach 2003
190:References
49:Frameworks
491:. Oxfam.
470:. Oxfam.
449:. Verso.
169:socialist
621:Category
601:. SAGE.
580:. PULP.
512:. IDRC.
172:feminist
24:Concepts
415:Sources
182:in the
605:
584:
537:
516:
495:
474:
453:
432:
156:Zambia
152:Lusaka
560:(PDF)
553:(PDF)
286:USAID
74:USAID
603:ISBN
582:ISBN
535:ISBN
514:ISBN
493:ISBN
472:ISBN
451:ISBN
430:ISBN
136:NGOs
126:The
64:The
178:at
623::
154:,
611:.
590:.
569:.
543:.
522:.
501:.
480:.
459:.
438:.
288:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.