185:
Safire cites the example of George W. Bush's front-runner status in the 2000 Republican primary being threatened by John McCain's victory in the New
Hampshire primary. Another example he notes is Gary Hart's upset win in the New Hampshire primary, which challenged Walter Mondale's front-runner status in the 1984 Democratic primary. Safire quotes Peter Hart, a pollster "who advised" Walter Mondale, commenting on the 1984 race in 2007: "Inevitability is not a message ... there needs to be something to grab on to. Inevitability is not a tune that people can march to." Safire also cites journalist Adam Gourney's thoughts: "othing invites a teardown more than being perceived as the front-runner. Being on top makes you a big target for your opponents and the news media, and sets you up for buyer's remorse, a common phenomenon in the nomination process, even before the sale is done."
276:
experienced a negative effect on his image and lost all support he had from a sample of 91 viewers before the debate. Although reasons other than excessive attacking may have contributed to Forbes' decline, viewers had "a clear negative reaction to his constant attack of Bush." John McCain, who made no attacks, had his image improved and his support from the viewers increased. This suggests that a front-runner's opponent may be more successful if they "attack in moderation." It may also suggest that if the opponent is recognized by viewers as a "legitimate contender," they can benefit from refraining from attacks and "permitting the larger field of to do the dirty work of attacking a front-runner." This would allow the opponent to project "a more positive message" about their ideas.
251:
front-runners can also win if they are an "overwhelming favorite" in the race. He gives Ronald Reagan’s early front-runner status in 1979 before winning the 1980 Republican presidential nomination as an example. Greenberg notes that
William Mayer, a political scientist at Northeastern University, discovered that in contested primary races since 1980, of the eight front-runners who polled at 34 percent or higher in the September before the election, six won the nomination, and none of the five front-runners who polled below that percentage won.
210:
118:, a suffix frequently used informally to describe a tendency or mood that is comparable to a disease. The term was used by that time to describe "the condition of being a leading candidate." In particular it was used to characterize "a tendency to coast or to be under increased scrutiny by the press."
262:
Debate analysts and scholars recognize that the front-runner is often attacked more frequently by the other candidates. It is a common strategy of the front-runner's opponents, especially for long shot candidates. During the
December 2, 1999 Republican primary debate, almost all attacks were directed
184:
Safire states that front-runners often take advantage of the bandwagon effect by emphasizing their "inevitability factor." He says this is done by suggesting the futility of the front-runner's opponents. However Safire notes that a front-runner's "inevitability" can be vulnerable to their opponents.
180:
writing about his losing the 1940 Republican presidential nomination as an example: "When the balloting starts, every candidate wants to show enough strength to be one of the leaders on the first ballot. He also wants to have enough strength in reserve so he can gain on the psychologically important
231:
Greenberg suggests that the futility of most early front-runners reflects early polls' unreliability and in particular, their respondents' indifference to the candidates. He notes that indifference is especially justified for electorates whose state primary runs during the later stages of the race.
227:
David
Greenberg, associate professor of History and of Journalism and Media Studies at Rutgers University, states that front-runners decided by early polls often do not win the nomination. Greenberg notes that early polls decided Birch Bayh in the 1976 Democratic primary, Ted Kennedy in the 1980
250:
Greenberg acknowledges that some front-runners decided by early polls win the nomination. He states that this often occurs "in races with few competitors." He notes Al Gore’s early lead in 1999 before winning the 2000 Democratic presidential nomination as an example. Greenberg states that early
275:
However, excessively attacking the front-runner can hurt one's image and support from viewers. In the
December 2, 1999 Republican primary debate, all 10 of Steve Forbes' attacks were made against George W. Bush, contributing to over half of the total attacks that targeted Bush. Steve Forbes
247:, and notes that Jonathan Bernstein, a political scientist and columnist, shares this view. Greenberg cites the early front-runners Donald Trump in the 2016 Republican primary, Gary Hart in the 1984 Democratic primary and Howard Dean in the 2004 Democratic primary as examples of this.
130:
describes the front-runner as being able to leave "the starting gate well" and set the pace for the other contestants. He uses the racing term "shows early foot" to characterize this tendency. Safire says occasionally the front-runner's lead becomes "insurmountable." He cites
175:
The outcome of the second round of primaries is critical to a front-runner's success. Safire argues that the front-runner "must come thundering into the convention increasing his speed and with enough 'kick' left for a final spurt" to be successful. He quotes
228:
Democratic primary, Jesse
Jackson in the 1988 Democratic primary, Jerry Brown in the 1992 Democratic primary, Howard Dean in the 2004 Democratic primary and Herman Cain in the 2012 Republican primary as front-runners, all of whom lost the nomination.
271:
significantly contributed to the mass attack. In a debate featuring the 1988 Democratic primary candidates, long shot candidates "gang up" on the front-runner. Analysis on a 1992 primary debate showed that the front-runner received the most attacks.
159:
whose delegation won't be held out of the
Roosevelt column so long as there is a reasonable chance of getting something for that favorite son, even at your expense." Safire gives another example when he quotes
154:
about
Roosevelt's front-runner status early in his 1932 presidential campaign: "Herein lies the danger ... automatically you become the target of the other candidates, real and potential. There isn't a single
42:
process, is less so as a potential nominee may lead in the polls, have the most name recognition, the most funds raised, or a combination of these. The front-runner is most often declared by the
73:
was used by 1940. It also originated from racing. The meaning of the word was analogous to its nounal counterpart at that time. The term was used as a noun by 1970 in the United States to mean "
181:
second ballot. For example, in 1940, I led on the first three ballots out of six—the wrong three. I lost ground on the second ballot. That was the beginning of the end and everybody knew it."
38:) is a leader in an electoral race. While the front-runner in athletic events (the namesake of the political concept) is generally clear, a political front-runner, particularly in the
243:
in the 2004 Democratic primary and George W. Bush in the 2000 Republican primary as examples of this. He further states that early front-runners are established in part due to recent
520:
693:
664:
172:: "There were disadvantages in being the 'front runner.' The Senator's critics became more open and vocal and his every word was politically interpreted."
232:
He cites David Karol, a political scientist, who says that "he media don't always report the numbers that say 'not sure' or 'don't know enough.'"
650:
169:
192:
or a long shot because that position has a higher chance of winning. Front-runners often have a financial advantage over dark horses.
434:
560:
495:
465:
407:
373:
512:
685:
39:
81:
emerged from the commodities market in which the word was also used as a noun. The definition was used to describe "a
85:
in which a trader withholds a large customer order so that he can personally profit from its effect on the market."
342:
613:"Do Primary Voters Draw from a Stacked Deck? Presidential Nominations in an Era of Candidate‐Centered Campaigns"
612:
139:'s success in several convention states and early primaries in his 1976 presidential campaign as examples.
20:
58:
originated in the United States. The term emerged from foot racing. It was used by 1914. According to
724:"The Front-Runner, Contenders, and Also-Rans: Effects of Watching a 2000 Republican Primary Debate"
642:
213:
46:
who are following the race and is written about in a different style than his or her challengers.
723:
398:
Wentworth, Harold; Flexner, Stuart Berg (2007). Kipfer, Barbara Ann; Chapman, Robert L. (eds.).
304:
An "attack" is defined as "any negative explicit mention of another candidate and/or his ideas."
188:
Safire says that despite the risks in being the front-runner, candidates prefer it over being a
218:
147:
576:
Norrander, Barbara (November 2000). "The End Game in Post-Reform
Presidential Nominations".
77:
given to a person or team only when they are doing well." By the 1980s a new definition for
426:
8:
285:
146:
has "ominous overtones" of being likely to eventually lose. As an example he references
767:
743:
593:
62:
the term meant "a contestant who runs best when in the lead" by that time. However the
747:
628:
597:
556:
491:
461:
403:
369:
151:
89:
735:
624:
585:
236:
74:
259:
Primary debate participation may hinder a front-runner's chance to be nominated.
177:
165:
132:
490:(paperback ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press, Inc. p. 112.
127:
96:
739:
722:
McKinney, Mitchell S.; Kaid, Lynda Lee; Robertson, Terry A. (August 1, 2001).
103:. By that year it had a meaning that was analogous to its nounal counterpart.
761:
240:
82:
589:
460:(2nd ed.). Abingdon, England: Taylor & Francis Group. p. 312.
458:
The
Routledge Dictionary of Modern American Slang and Unconventional English
643:"The Front-Runner Fallacy: Does It Really Matter Who Takes The Early Lead?"
161:
156:
136:
263:
against the front-runner George W. Bush. Long shot candidates Gary Bauer,
239:. He cites the early lead of Donald Trump in the 2016 Republican primary,
264:
214:
The Front-Runner Fallacy: Does It Really Matter Who Takes The Early Lead?
334:
268:
235:
Greenberg states that the rise of early front-runners is partly due to
189:
43:
66:
says it meant "the leader in a contest, election, etc." by that year.
402:(4th ed.). New York, NY: HarperCollins Publishers. p. 188.
244:
126:
American author, columnist, journalist and presidential speechwriter
486:
Carville, James; Matalin, Mary (2006). Barrett, Grant (ed.).
555:. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, Inc. p. 267.
135:'s successful 1964 Republican presidential nomination and
721:
600:– via The University of Chicago Press Journals.
368:. Lincolnwood, IL: NTC Publishing Group. p. 55.
488:The Oxford Dictionary of American Political Slang
142:However Safire says the modern usage of the word
759:
397:
485:
341:. Oxford University Press, Inc. December 2019.
364:Palmatier, Robert A.; Ray, Harold L. (1993).
363:
683:
575:
110:was used by 1995. It is a combination of
510:
455:
760:
649:. Boston, MA: WBUR. December 2, 2015.
610:
550:
195:
95:emerged by 1950. It originated from a
717:
715:
713:
711:
679:
677:
675:
673:
667:from the original on April 21, 2020.
546:
544:
542:
540:
538:
481:
479:
477:
437:from the original on August 26, 2019
421:
419:
393:
391:
389:
387:
385:
329:
327:
325:
323:
321:
696:from the original on April 20, 2020
653:from the original on April 21, 2020
523:from the original on April 18, 2020
13:
708:
684:Greenberg, David (December 2015).
670:
611:Steger, Wayne P. (December 2000).
345:from the original on March 1, 2020
168:'s front-runner status during his
14:
779:
631:– via Wiley Online Library.
535:
504:
474:
416:
382:
318:
629:10.1111/j.0360-4918.2000.00141.x
519:. Macmillan Publishers Limited.
511:Maxwell, Kerry (November 2004).
208:
635:
604:
298:
692:. The Atlantic Monthly Group.
617:Presidential Studies Quarterly
569:
449:
431:Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary
357:
121:
1:
728:American Behavioral Scientist
553:Safire's Political Dictionary
311:
400:Dictionary of American Slang
64:Dictionary of American Slang
49:
21:Frontrunner (disambiguation)
7:
366:Dictionary of Sports Idioms
279:
150:'s receiving a letter from
16:Leader in an electoral race
10:
784:
750:– via SAGE Journals.
686:"The Front-Runner Fallacy"
456:Dalzell, Tom, ed. (2018).
254:
170:1960 presidential campaign
18:
740:10.1177/00027640121958294
207:
202:
551:Safire, William (2008).
291:
590:10.1111/0022-3816.00043
578:The Journal of Politics
513:"New word of the month"
335:"front, n. (and adj.)"
148:Franklin D. Roosevelt
40:presidential primary
19:For other uses, see
286:Presumptive nominee
196:Early front-runners
164:'s thoughts about
734:(12): 2232–2251.
562:978-0-19-534334-2
497:978-0-19-530447-3
467:978-1-138-77965-5
409:978-0-06-117646-3
375:978-0-84-429123-9
225:
224:
152:Robert W. Woolley
106:The related word
90:intransitive verb
775:
752:
751:
719:
706:
705:
703:
701:
681:
668:
662:
660:
658:
639:
633:
632:
608:
602:
601:
573:
567:
566:
548:
533:
532:
530:
528:
508:
502:
501:
483:
472:
471:
453:
447:
446:
444:
442:
423:
414:
413:
395:
380:
379:
361:
355:
354:
352:
350:
331:
305:
302:
237:name recognition
212:
211:
200:
199:
783:
782:
778:
777:
776:
774:
773:
772:
758:
757:
756:
755:
720:
709:
699:
697:
682:
671:
656:
654:
641:
640:
636:
609:
605:
584:(4): 999–1013.
574:
570:
563:
549:
536:
526:
524:
509:
505:
498:
484:
475:
468:
454:
450:
440:
438:
425:
424:
417:
410:
396:
383:
376:
362:
358:
348:
346:
333:
332:
319:
314:
309:
308:
303:
299:
294:
282:
257:
245:media attention
209:
198:
178:Thomas E. Dewey
166:John F. Kennedy
133:Barry Goldwater
124:
108:frontrunneritis
60:Merriam-Webster
52:
26:In politics, a
24:
17:
12:
11:
5:
781:
771:
770:
754:
753:
707:
669:
634:
623:(4): 727–753.
603:
568:
561:
534:
503:
496:
473:
466:
448:
427:"front-runner"
415:
408:
381:
374:
356:
316:
315:
313:
310:
307:
306:
296:
295:
293:
290:
289:
288:
281:
278:
256:
253:
223:
222:
205:
204:
203:External audio
197:
194:
128:William Safire
123:
120:
97:back formation
69:The adjective
51:
48:
30:(also spelled
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
780:
769:
766:
765:
763:
749:
745:
741:
737:
733:
729:
725:
718:
716:
714:
712:
695:
691:
687:
680:
678:
676:
674:
666:
652:
648:
644:
638:
630:
626:
622:
618:
614:
607:
599:
595:
591:
587:
583:
579:
572:
564:
558:
554:
547:
545:
543:
541:
539:
522:
518:
514:
507:
499:
493:
489:
482:
480:
478:
469:
463:
459:
452:
436:
432:
428:
422:
420:
411:
405:
401:
394:
392:
390:
388:
386:
377:
371:
367:
360:
344:
340:
336:
330:
328:
326:
324:
322:
317:
301:
297:
287:
284:
283:
277:
273:
270:
266:
260:
252:
248:
246:
242:
241:Joe Lieberman
238:
233:
229:
221:
220:
215:
206:
201:
193:
191:
186:
182:
179:
173:
171:
167:
163:
158:
153:
149:
145:
140:
138:
134:
129:
119:
117:
113:
109:
104:
102:
98:
94:
91:
86:
84:
83:type of fraud
80:
79:front-running
76:
72:
71:front-running
67:
65:
61:
57:
47:
45:
41:
37:
33:
29:
22:
731:
727:
698:. Retrieved
690:The Atlantic
689:
655:. Retrieved
646:
637:
620:
616:
606:
581:
577:
571:
552:
525:. Retrieved
517:MED Magazine
516:
506:
487:
457:
451:
439:. Retrieved
430:
399:
365:
359:
347:. Retrieved
338:
300:
274:
261:
258:
249:
234:
230:
226:
219:Here and Now
217:
187:
183:
174:
162:Ted Sorensen
157:favorite son
144:front-runner
143:
141:
137:Jimmy Carter
125:
115:
111:
107:
105:
101:front-runner
100:
92:
87:
78:
70:
68:
63:
59:
56:front-runner
55:
53:
36:front runner
35:
31:
28:front-runner
27:
25:
265:Orrin Hatch
122:Performance
112:frontrunner
32:frontrunner
339:OED Online
312:References
269:Alan Keyes
190:dark horse
768:Elections
748:144794512
700:April 20,
657:April 21,
598:153929713
527:April 18,
93:front-run
54:The word
50:Etymology
762:Category
694:Archived
665:archived
651:Archived
521:Archived
441:March 1,
435:Archived
349:March 1,
343:Archived
280:See also
255:Debates
75:support
746:
663:Audio
596:
559:
494:
464:
406:
372:
744:S2CID
594:S2CID
292:Notes
116:–itis
44:media
702:2020
659:2020
647:WBUR
557:ISBN
529:2020
492:ISBN
462:ISBN
443:2020
404:ISBN
370:ISBN
351:2020
267:and
114:and
88:The
736:doi
625:doi
586:doi
99:of
34:or
764::
742:.
732:44
730:.
726:.
710:^
688:.
672:^
645:.
621:30
619:.
615:.
592:.
582:62
580:.
537:^
515:.
476:^
433:.
429:.
418:^
384:^
337:.
320:^
216:,
738::
704:.
661:.
627::
588::
565:.
531:.
500:.
470:.
445:.
412:.
378:.
353:.
23:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.