Knowledge

Four-field approach

Source 📝

47:, who developed the discipline of anthropology in the United States. A 2013 re-assessment of the evidence has indicated that the idea of four-field anthropology has a more complex 19th-century history in Europe and North America. It is most likely that the approach was being used simultaneously in different parts of the world, but was not widely discussed until it was being taught at the collegiate level in the United States, Germany, England, and France by 1902. For Boas, the four-field approach was motivated by his 238: 71:
The four-field approach is dependent on collaboration. However, collaboration in any field can get costly. To counter this, the four-field approach is often taught to students as they go through college courses. By teaching all four disciplines, the anthropological field is able to produce scholars
67:
came to be regarded largely as separate disciplines. Today, physical anthropologists often collaborate more closely with biology and medicine than with cultural anthropology. However, it is widely accepted that a complete four-field analysis is needed in order to accurately and fully explain an
59:, grammar and language use. For most of the 20th century, U.S. anthropology departments housed anthropologists specializing in all of the four branches, but with the increasing professionalization and specialization, elements such as 72:
that are knowledgeable of all subfields. However, it is common and often recommended for an anthropologist to have a specialization. The four-field approach also encourages scholars to look holistically at an artifact,
76:, data, etc. in almost an omnipotent way, meaning that having knowledge from all perspectives helps to eliminate bias and/or incorrect assumptions of past and present cultures. 43:(known jocularly to students as "stones", "tones", "bones", and "thrones"). The approach is conventionally understood as having been developed by 279: 51:
approach to the study of human behavior, which included integrated analytical attention to culture history, material culture,
272: 303: 265: 298: 253: 169: 73: 40: 36: 8: 146: 196: 136: 173: 125:"Four Field Anthropology: Charter Myths and Time Warps from St. Louis to Oxford" 249: 200: 150: 292: 245: 24: 187:
Borofsky, R. (2002). "The Four Subfields: Anthropologists as Mythmakers".
217:
Kelso, Jack (2003). "Teaching Anthropology and The Four-Field Approach".
64: 60: 32: 28: 166:
An Analysis of the Four-Field Approach in Anthropology and its Longevity
44: 141: 124: 56: 52: 237: 48: 27:
sees the discipline as composed of the four sub fields of
55:
and population history, customs and social organization,
93:Anderson, E. N. (2003). "Four-Field Anthropology". 110:Humans: An Introduction to Four-Field Anthropology 290: 273: 221:. Vol. 44, no. 8. pp. 24–25. 280: 266: 16:Anthropology as composed of four subfields 140: 186: 163: 92: 291: 216: 122: 107: 232: 212: 210: 13: 14: 315: 207: 236: 164:Pattison, Mary Burneice (2011). 168:(MA thesis). Prescott College. 180: 157: 116: 101: 86: 1: 79: 252:. You can help Knowledge by 123:Hicks, Dan (December 2013). 7: 10: 320: 231: 108:Kehoe, Alice Beck (1998). 97:. Vol. 44. p. 3. 244:This article relating to 201:10.1525/aa.2002.104.2.463 189:American Anthropologist 68:anthropological topic. 41:Cultural Anthropology 37:Physical Anthropology 129:Current Anthropology 112:. Psychology Press. 21:four-field approach 304:Anthropology stubs 261: 260: 219:Anthropology News 95:Anthropology News 311: 282: 275: 268: 240: 233: 223: 222: 214: 205: 204: 184: 178: 177: 161: 155: 154: 144: 120: 114: 113: 105: 99: 98: 90: 319: 318: 314: 313: 312: 310: 309: 308: 289: 288: 287: 286: 229: 227: 226: 215: 208: 185: 181: 162: 158: 121: 117: 106: 102: 91: 87: 82: 17: 12: 11: 5: 317: 307: 306: 301: 285: 284: 277: 270: 262: 259: 258: 241: 225: 224: 206: 195:(2): 463–480. 179: 156: 151:10.1086/673385 142:10.1086/673385 135:(6): 753–763. 115: 100: 84: 83: 81: 78: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 316: 305: 302: 300: 297: 296: 294: 283: 278: 276: 271: 269: 264: 263: 257: 255: 251: 247: 242: 239: 235: 234: 230: 220: 213: 211: 202: 198: 194: 190: 183: 175: 171: 167: 160: 152: 148: 143: 138: 134: 130: 126: 119: 111: 104: 96: 89: 85: 77: 75: 69: 66: 62: 58: 54: 50: 46: 42: 38: 34: 30: 26: 22: 299:Anthropology 254:expanding it 246:anthropology 243: 228: 218: 192: 188: 182: 165: 159: 132: 128: 118: 109: 103: 94: 88: 70: 25:anthropology 20: 18: 65:archaeology 61:linguistics 33:Linguistics 29:Archaeology 293:Categories 80:References 45:Franz Boas 174:928949115 170:ProQuest 57:folklore 49:holistic 74:ecofact 53:anatomy 172:  149:  39:, and 248:is a 147:JSTOR 250:stub 63:and 19:The 197:doi 193:104 137:doi 23:in 295:: 209:^ 191:. 145:. 133:54 131:. 127:. 35:, 31:, 281:e 274:t 267:v 256:. 203:. 199:: 176:. 153:. 139::

Index

anthropology
Archaeology
Linguistics
Physical Anthropology
Cultural Anthropology
Franz Boas
holistic
anatomy
folklore
linguistics
archaeology
ecofact
"Four Field Anthropology: Charter Myths and Time Warps from St. Louis to Oxford"
doi
10.1086/673385
JSTOR
10.1086/673385
ProQuest
928949115
doi
10.1525/aa.2002.104.2.463


Stub icon
anthropology
stub
expanding it
v
t
e

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.