Forensic dentistry

1115:

individuals. Most of these studies have focused on sexual dimorphism in crown-size dimensions. This research has established that human teeth are sexually dimorphic and, although males and females exhibit overlapping dimensions, there are significant differences in mean values. Sexual dimorphism has been observed in both deciduous and permanent dentition, although it is much less in deciduous teeth. On average, male teeth are slightly larger than female teeth, with the greatest difference observed in the canine teeth. Research using microtomographic scans to look at internal dental tissues has also shown that male teeth consist of significantly greater quantities of dentine than female teeth. This results in female teeth having thicker enamel, on average. Researchers have attempted to use statistical techniques such as discriminant functions or logistic regression equations based on these sex differences to estimate the usefulness of such formulae is uncertain because sexual dimorphism in teeth may vary between populations. The advanced methods which amplify the DNA by using Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) give 100% success in sex determination. Sex estimation based on dentition remains experimental and has yet to gain widespread acceptance. Nevertheless, it offers potentially useful additional techniques that could be used alongside more established methods.

1032:

recorded in the injury. However, there is very little reliable research to support these assumptions. A study performed by MacFarlane et al. supported the notion of dental uniqueness, but the study revolved around the visual assessment of a cast as opposed to the bite mark that could have been produced by the cast. In another study conducted by Sognnaes et al., the group tried to find uniqueness between the dental profiles of identical twins in an attempt to prove dental uniqueness in the general population. However, this study suffered from a small sample size (n=5), with the intent to extrapolate the data to the general population. They also used plaster of Paris as the substrate to simulate skin, yet the two materials have very different properties. In a review conducted by Strom, he references a study conducted by Berg and Schaidt which suggested that at least four to five teeth need to be present in the mark to ensure its uniqueness and make an identification. However, this study was done long before many of the current evaluation methods, and this sheds doubt on how applicable these conclusions are today.

1111:

correctly classified with over 90% accuracy. However, these skeletal elements are sometimes recovered in a fragmentary state, rendering sex estimation difficult. Moreover, there is currently no reliable method of sex determination of juvenile or sub-adult remains from cranial or post-cranial skeletal elements since dimorphic traits only become apparent after puberty, and this represents a fundamental problem in forensic investigations. In such situations, teeth are potentially useful in sex determination. Due to their hardness, they are highly resistant to taphonomic processes and are much more likely to be recovered than other parts of the fact, the enamel present on teeth is the hardest biological substance in the human body; therefore making them extremely sustainable analytical evidence in a forensic context. Moreover, teeth may be particularly useful for sexing immature skeletal remains since both primary and permanent sets of teeth develop before puberty.

1020:

liable to several of irregularities present before the imprint that could cause distortion. Also, bite marks can be altered through stretching, movement, or a changing environment during and after the actual bite. Furthermore, the level of distortion tends to increase after the bite mark was made. Both studies suggest that for the bite mark to be accurately analyzed, the body must be examined in the same position it was in when the bite occurred, which can be a difficult if the not impossible task to accomplish. Bite mark distortion can rarely be quantified. Therefore, bite marks found at the scene are often analyzed under the assumption that they have undergone minimal distortion. Only limited research has been done in trying to quantify the level of distortion of a bite mark on human skin since the 1970s. The lack of research may largely be because such studies are difficult to organize and are very expensive.

965:

polyline method entails drawing straight lines between two fixed points in the arch and between incisal edges to indicate the tooth width. The use of the painting method entails coating the incisal edges of a dental model with red glossy paint and then photographing the model. Adobe Photoshop is then used to make measurements on the image. A total of 13 variables were used in the analysis. Identification for both methods was based on canine-to-canine distance (one variable), incisor width (four variables), and rotational angles of the incisors (eight variables). The 2D polyline method relies heavily on accurate measurements, while the painting method depends on the precise overlaying of the images. Although both methods were reliable, the 2D polyline method gave efficient and more objective results.

115: 961:. Indirect methods involve the use of transparent overlays to record a suspect's biting edges. Transparent overlays are made by free-hand tracing the occlusal surfaces of a dental model onto an acetate sheet. When comparing the “fingerprint powder lift” technique against the photographs, the use of photographs resulted in higher scores determined by a modified version of the ABFO scoring guidelines. The use of transparent overlays is considered subjective and irreproducible because the tracing can be easily manipulated. On the other hand, photocopier-generated overlays where no tracing is used are considered to be the best method in matching the correct bite mark to the correct set of models without the use of computer imaging. 904:

comparisons. A numerical score was assigned to represent the degree of similarity between the bite mark and model/overlay. The higher the score, the greater the similarity. In order to simplify the model, some features that were individually scored in the ABFO guidelines such as arch size and shape were assessed together while certain distinctive features such as spacing between teeth were treated as a separate variable. The authors believe that a simplified version would increase the strength of the comparison process. In an attempt to improve guidelines used to collect dental evidence, IOFOS developed one of the most recognized systems for the collection of forensic dental evidence

940:

give investigators clues as to the mental state of the offender. Bite marks may be found on the flesh of victims of a violent attack, particularly on the stomach or buttocks. Bite mark evidence may be the only form of physical evidence found on a body. Alternatively, they may be found on the suspect, left by the victim during self-defense. Bite marks can be altered through stretching, movement, or change in environment after the bite. Skin is not ideal for holding the shape of a bite mark as it can become distorted due to the viscoelasticity of the skin. There is also no set standard by which to analyze and compare bite marks.

802:, which occurred in California in 1975. A woman was murdered by strangulation after being sexually assaulted. She was bitten several times on her nose. Walter Marx was identified as a suspect and dental impressions were made of his teeth. Impressions and photographs were also taken of the woman's injured nose. These samples along with other models and casts were evaluated using a variety of techniques, including two-dimensional and three-dimensional comparisons, and acetate overlays. Three experts testified that the bite marks on the woman's nose were indeed made by Marx and he was convicted of voluntary manslaughter. 873: 900:

advice on how to effectively collect and preserve evidence. For example, they recommend that the collection of DNA evidence and detailed photographs of bites be taken together at the crime scene. The guidelines also outline how and what a forensic odontologist should record, such as the location, contours, shape, and size of a bite mark. They also provide a system of scoring to assess the degree to which a suspect's dental profile and bite mark match. According to the ABFO, the guidelines are not a mandate of methods to be used, but a list of generally accepted methods.

1028:

to compare bite marks ranging from life-sized photographs to computer-enhanced three-dimensional imaging. These methods vary in precision and accuracy, and there is no set standard by which to compare or analyze them. The lack of analytical standards leads to a wide array of interpretations with any bite mark evidence. Some odontologists even disagree on whether or not a mark on the body is the result of a bite. Therefore, the interpretation of evidence lies largely on the expertise of the forensic odontologist handling the case.

754:

checklist of accomplishments which will be reviewed. This checklist may include fellowships, working with recognized medicolegal death investigation agencies, completing a minimum level of casework and research, and providing testimony in court cases. The ABFO and the AAFS often hold scientific sessions which offer workshops including identification, civil litigation, age determination, and bite-mark analysis. These are beneficial in helping prospective forensic practitioners move towards board-eligible status.

892:

called BC Forensic Odontology Response Team (BC_FORT) which is led by six dentists. They focus on disaster-victim identification work. Ontario has a team of ten forensic dentists called the Province of Ontario Dental Identification Team (PODIT). Quebec has a team that is run out of McGill University and they offer a well-established forensic dentistry online course that focuses on human bite-mark evidence. These teams are kept small in order to maintain a relationship between forensic dentists and casework.

1227:

denture that belonged to the deceased, or on a plaster model for dental purposes, and in an object containing the palatal rugae of the missing person during their lifetime (such as an old complete upper denture in possession of the family). Once the two plaster models are created, they should be scanned/photographed, and a computerized delineation of the palatal rugae should be performed, analyzing each individual ruga and comparing their location, shape, and pattern in each of the photos (of the models).

784:, with biting his victims supposedly being evidence of his crimes. His bite marks and the bite marks of other people were compared to the victim's marks. The judges readily accepted the bite marks as evidence and this was the first time in what would become the United States that bite marks were used as evidence to solve a crime. He was later convicted and hanged. About two decades later, he was exonerated by the State, and his children were compensated for the wrongful execution. 795:, which occurred in Texas in 1954. The bite mark, in this case, was on a piece of cheese found at the crime scene of a burglary. The defendant was later asked to bite another piece of cheese for comparison. A firearms examiner and a dentist evaluated the bite marks independently and both concluded that the marks were made by the same set of teeth. The conviction, in this case, set the stage for bite marks found on objects and skin to be used as evidence in future cases. 948:

technique of using simulated pressures to create bite marks. Although similar histologically, pigskin and human skin behave in dynamically different ways due to differences in elasticity. Furthermore, postmortem bites on nonhuman skin, such as those used in the experiments of Martin-de-las Heras et al., display different patterns to those seen in antemortem bite injuries. In recognition of the limitations of their study, Kouble and Craig suggest using a

927:

one another and with suspects' teeth. There are two important notions when it comes to bite mark analysis: every individual has unique dentition that can be identifiable and this uniqueness can be found in a bite mark left in human skin. The theory behind bite mark analysis has been called into doubt in recent years, with many observers considering the entire field unscientific and invalid and calling for bite mark evidence to be inadmissible in court.

1040:

conflicting results. One found the mark to come from suspect A and the other said it was from suspect B. This disagreement resulted from the fact that even though the two suspects had dental features making them unique, the bite mark itself was not detailed enough to reflect them. Therefore, the mark could have reasonably come from either of the men. The equivocal outcome demonstrated in the case emphasizes the difficulty in proving uniqueness.

87: 896:

may bias the resulting outcome. Using multiple dental impressions in a lineup may enable forensic odontologists to significantly decrease the current bias in matching bite marks to the teeth of a suspect. The organization BOLD also supports the creation of a database of dental records, which could help in verifying dental uniqueness. This database could be created using criminal records or possibly all dental patients.

27: 995:

an ABFO meeting which many members did not consider a valid scientific setting. In February 2016, the Texas Forensic Science Commission recommended that bite mark evidence not be used in criminal prosecutions until it had a more firm scientific basis. That same year, the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology declared that bite mark analysis had no scientific validity.

884:, the International Organization for Forensic Odonto-Stomatology (IOFOS) and the Association Forensic Odontology For Human Rights (AFOHR). Countries have their own forensic Odontological societies, including the British Association for Forensic Odontology (BAFO) and the Australian Society of Forensic Odontology (AuSFO). In 1996, BOLD was created at the 1044:

1980s, only 8% came from well designedd experimentation providing empirical data. The lack of research has led to the continued use of a few outdated and limited studies to support the validity of bite mark analysis. This brings into question whether or not there is enough scientific support for bite mark analysis to be employed in court.

1016:, an Arizona man convicted of murder on bite mark evidence left on a woman's breast. DNA evidence later implicated another man and Krone was released from prison. Similarly, Roy Brown was convicted of murder due in part to bite-mark evidence, and freed after DNA testing of the saliva left in the bite wounds matched someone else. 644:. However, this latter application of forensic dentistry has proven highly controversial, as no scientific studies or evidence substantiate that bite marks can demonstrate sufficient detail for positive identification and numerous instances where experts diverge widely in their evaluations of the same bite mark evidence. 1052:, the DNA of a suspect excluded them from the crime after a dentist claimed the bite marks on the victim matched the defendant's teeth. DNA sampling has been included as a task for a forensic odontologist. For a crime scene investigator, taking DNA samples is as common as taking pictures of the scene. In the case of 1230:

If there is a match, the victim can be identified. It is important to note that the use of dentures for this identification can be done if the palatal rugae are clearly visible. The impression of palatal rugae in dental prostheses is formed over several years of use by the individual. This method has

1086:

The estimation of subject age is crucial in various forensic contexts; such as crime scenes, accidents, mass disasters, and the potential identification of an unknown individual. Age is estimated by forensic odonatologists using a number of well established methods. Methods measure tooth development,

1023:

Bite mark analysis is also controversial because dental profiles are subject to change. The loss of teeth or the alteration of arch configuration through a variety of procedures is common in human populations. The onset of oral diseases such as dental caries has been shown to alter the arch and tooth

939:

are used as a weapon by the aggressor and in self-defense by the victim. Although they are only a small portion of most forensic dentists' caseload, bite marks represent the most challenging aspect of the discipline. In addition to the location of the bite mark, the type of severity of the injury may

926:

A bite mark is defined as a change in a surface's appearance due to the teeth coming into contact with it, leaving behind a dental pattern of the bite. Studies have been performed in an attempt to find the simplest, most efficient, and most reliable way of analyzing bite marks and comparing them with

899:

In 1984, the ABFO attempted to diminish the discrepancies and increase the validity of bite mark analysis by creating bite mark methodology guidelines. The guidelines attempt to establish standard terminology in describing bite marks and that reduces the risk of biased results. The ABFO also provides

895:

The Bureau of Legal Dentistry encourages the use of multiple dental impressions to create a “dental lineup”, similar to a suspect lineup used to identify alleged perpetrators of crime. Currently, dental impressions collected as evidence are compared only to those collected from a given suspect, which

676:

In India, certificate courses offered include a modular course by D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, and some other private entities. The Indian Dental Association offers a fellowship program in FO which can be either a classroom program or an online program. Master's degree programs in different forensic

994:

Recently, the scientific foundation of forensic odontology, and especially bite mark comparison, has been called into question. A 1999 study by a member of the American Board of Forensic Odontology found a 63% rate of false identifications. However, the study was based on an informal workshop during

964:

While the photocopier-generated technique is sensitive, reliable, and inexpensive, new methods involving digital overlays have proven to be more accurate. Two recent technological developments include the 2D polyline method and the painting method. Both methods use Adobe Photoshop. The use of the 2D

947:

Most bite mark analysis studies use porcine skin (pigskin), because it is comparable to the skin of a human, and it is considered unethical to bite a human for study in the United States. Limitations to the bite mark studies include differences in properties of pigskin compared to human skin and the

943:

Factors that may affect the accuracy of bite mark identification include time-dependent changes of the bite mark on living bodies, effects of where the bite mark was found, damage on soft tissue, and similarities in dentition among individuals. Other factors include poor photography, impressions, or

1027:

While the methods behind collecting bite mark evidence at the scene are leading toward greater standardization, the methodology behind analyzing bite marks is extremely variable because it depends upon the preference of the specific odontologist. As discussed earlier, there are several methods used

903:

The guidelines are intended to prevent potentially useful evidence from being thrown out simply because the forensic odontologist's collection methods were not standardized. Kouble and Craig used a simplified version of the ABFO scoring guidelines in order to retain accuracy with a larger sample of

1182:

The most common means used for ante-mortem comparison are X-rays, dental models, and dental records. However, there are cases where the presumed victim never visited a dentist or the family cannot obtain the aforementioned sources, complicating the odontolegal identification of the victim. Another

1031:

One possible issue facing bite mark analysis is a lack of bite mark uniqueness in any given population. Bite mark analysis is based on the assumption that the dental characteristics of anterior teeth involved in biting are unique amongst individuals, and this asserted uniqueness is transferred and

1019:

Although bite mark analysis has been used in legal proceedings since 1870, it remains a controversial topic due to a variety of factors. DeVore and Barbenel and Evans have shown that the accuracy of a bite mark on the skin is limited at best. Skin is not a good medium for dental impressions; it is

1186:

However, it is important to pay attention to details that are important in the process, such as the techniques that will be used for the comparison. Two main techniques are generally employed (both of which require the forensic dentist to take photographs of the deceased person's smile, which can

1047:

There have been several instances when forensic dentists have made claims, accusations, and guarantees supported by bite mark evaluation that have been proven incorrect through other forensic sciences. DNA analysis has shed some light on the limitations of bite mark analysis because often the DNA

1039:

One particular case that highlighted the lack of uniqueness in bite marks involved two suspects accused of attacking a man who had sustained a bite mark injury. Two separate forensic dentists, one representing the prosecution and one the defense, were brought in to analyze the mark. They reported

1035:

Rawson et al. determined that if five teeth marks can be matched to five teeth, it can be said with confidence that only one person could have caused the bite, and if eight teeth were matched to marks this would be a certainty. However, in this study, the probabilities used to make this claim are

891:

In Canada, The Royal College of Dentists has not recognized forensic odontology therefore there is no organization for Canada, however, there are three well-developed and trained groups for forensic dentistry. These groups include British Columbia, Ontario, and Quebec. British Columbia has a team

733:

There are two odontology training programs available in the US. One is a Fellowship program at The University of Texas Health Science at San Antonio Center Dental School, and the other is a master's degree program through the University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture College of Veterinary

1226:

This method of identification involves the analysis and comparison of palatal rugae from the deceased with the palatal rugae of the potential victim. One way to perform this comparison is by creating a mold of the upper arch of the deceased (capturing the palatal rugae) or using a complete upper

1161:

in order to identify unknown deceased individuals. Dentin and enamel provide a resistant and protective surface that houses the dental pulp which is located under the enamel and dentin layers in the center of the tooth, which contains the nerves and blood supply as well. Within the pulp is where

1043:

Most of the controversies facing bite mark analysis are due to the lack of empirical supporting evidence. When searching the entire MedLine database from 1960 to 1999, only 50 papers in English were found that related to bite mark analysis. Of these 50 papers, most of which were published in the

1004:

entitled "Forensics under the Microscope" examined many forensic science disciplines to see if they truly deserve the air of infallibility that has come to surround them. The investigators concluded that bite mark comparison is always subjective and no standards for comparison have been accepted

1178:

In cases where the body is in an advanced stage of decomposition, such as in cases of skeletal remains and charring, and considering the difficulties or impossibility of using fingerprint analysis and the high cost of DNA testing, forensic dentistry can play an important role in identification.

742:

For undergraduate studies, dental school candidates in Canada are required to complete a BA or at least three years of study in a BA program before completing a dental degree. BA Programs often involve science or biomedical but can include much more, as long as students have completed the basic

753:

There is no professional certification process for forensic odontologists in Canada currently. It is possible for Canadians to certify for the ABFO, a section of the American Academy of Forensic Science. This process also includes an examination as well as the candidates must complete a career

1110:

The determination of sex is important in the identification of unknown individuals in both forensic and archaeological contexts. The preferred anatomical methods for sex determination are based on pelvic and cranio-facial morphology. Using these parts of the skeleton, males and females can be

746:

There are no graduate study programs for forensic odontology specifically in Canada. Some universities have offered some involvement in forensic science disciples during clinical dental specialty projects, however, they will not graduate with credibility in the forensic odontology discipline.

1101:

In 2023 Murray et al. developed an deep learning architecture which was able to automatically determine whether subjects were adults or juveniles under the law. Their team are currently developing similar architectures which can perform anatomic matching and determination of subject sex from

1036:

based on the assumption that the position of each tooth was independent of all the others. This is probably unrealistic because there are several ways that the dental profile can be changed. For example, braces apply force to specific teeth, in order to shift the placement of multiple teeth.

1114:

For several decades research has been conducted into human dental sexual dimorphism, looking at different tooth classes, and using various techniques and measurements, to try to establish the extent of any dimorphism and find criteria or patterns that might enable accurate sexing of unknown

956:

Kouble and Craig compared direct methods and indirect methods of bite mark analysis. In the past, the direct method compared a model of the suspect's teeth to a life-size photograph of the actual bite mark. In these experiments, direct comparisons were made between dental models and either

1357: 1217:

It is important to emphasize that each person's smile is unique, just like fingerprints, palatal rugae, and DNA. Therefore, when properly applied with the necessary scientific rigor, identification through photographs of the smile becomes a reliable method to establish an identification

1191:

Direct comparison of the characteristics presents in the ante-mortem photograph with the observed characteristics in the deceased person. In this technique, the ante-mortem and post-mortem photographs must be paired, and the dental characteristics found should be compared, described, and

1056:, the defendant was sentenced to death, which was overturned. Then Krone was later reconvicted and given life in prison. Both convictions were based largely on bite mark evidence, but ten years later DNA evidence surfaced that identified the real killer and Krone was set free. 911:, called AFOHR. It was inaugurated in 2015 by a group of experts in Lyon during the Interpol DVI annual meeting, following the inspiration of Emilio Nuzzolese, forensic odontologist from Italy. In 2019 the group evolved into Association adopting a by Laws and an elected Board. 977:(PCAST). The PCAST has identified that bite mark analysis is an area which lacks clear standards in regards to the features needed to identify a particular set of dentition as having created a particular mark. The analysis of bite marks is subjective and is highly criticized. 1358:

Committee on Identifying the Needs of the Forensic Sciences Community, Technology, and Law Committee on Science, Committee on Applied and Theoretical Statistics, Policy and Global Affairs, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, National Research Council (2009-07-29).

952:

on an articulator in future studies to standardize the amount of pressure used to produce experimental bite marks instead of applying manual pressure to models on pigskin. Future research and technological developments may help reduce the occurrence of such limitations.

1183:

source of comparison can be photographs of the presumed victim's smile (ante-mortem) compared to photographs of the deceased person's smile (post-mortem), which can highlight the dental characteristics present and, if consistent, confirm the victim's identification.

1156:

Teeth contain a great source of DNA since they are very chemically and physically resistant to extreme conditions. This method is especially useful in cases where other DNA sources are not accessible, for example in burned victims. Teeth can be used to create a

677:

disciplines along with M.Sc. Forensic Odontology is offered by National Forensic Sciences University which is the world's only university dedicated to forensic sciences. It is a 2‑year full‑time course offered at the university's campus at Gandhinagar.

1144:

The antemortem and post-mortem radiographs will both be analyzed and transcribed onto Victim Identification forms and loaded into a computer database in order to compare many different antemortem records to the post-mortem in order to obtain a match.

4121:

Valente-Aguiar MS, Castro-Espicalsky TL, Magalhães T, Dinis-Oliveira RJ (September 2021). "Computerized delineation of the teeth and comparison with a smiling photograph: identification of a body skeletonized by cadaverous ichthyofauna action".

1133:

can present dental restorations as well as unique morphology for each individual. Dental patterns are unique due to the variety of treatments as well as growth for each individual, which creates a benefit in using them for human identification

613:, particularly in cases when identifying information is otherwise scarce or nonexistent—for instance, identifying burn victims by consulting the victim's dental records. Forensic dentists may also be asked to assist in determining the age, 1137:

Post-mortem radiographs can be taken at the scene or in a laboratory, the antemortem records are collected from dentists existing files and are used for comparison with the radiographs taken from the deceased unknown individual.

1195:

Computerized outlining of the incisal edges of the teeth in the ante-mortem and post-mortem photographs. In this technique, the expert analyzes the morphology of the smile line, delineating the incisal edges and comparing

957:

photographs or "fingerprint powder lift models." The "fingerprint powder lift" technique involves dusting the bitten skin with black fingerprint powder and using fingerprint tape to transfer the bite marks onto a sheet of

1087:

eruption rate and degradative changes For example, the abrasions manufactured from attrition can lead to a proximate age range of the individual. Not only can the age of a human be narrowed by evaluating the patterns of

3171:

Gonçalves D, Granja R, Cardoso FA, de Carvalho AF (2014). "Sample-specific sex estimation in archaeological contexts with commingled human remains: a case study from the Middle Neolithic cave of Bom Santo in Portugal".

1128:

The comparison of antemortem and post-mortem radiographic records can be done to attain a positive identification of an individual. Teeth are used since they are a very durable and resistant to extreme conditions. The

3596:

Pereira C, Bernardo M, Pestana D, Santos JC, Mendonça MC (February 2010). "Contribution of teeth in human forensic identification--discriminant function sexing odontometrical techniques in Portuguese population".

881: 2037:

Martin-de-las-Heras S, Tafur D (September 2009). "Comparison of simulated human dermal bitemarks possessing three-dimensional attributes to suspected biters using a proprietary three-dimensional comparison".

2289:

Martin-de las Heras S, Valenzuela A, Javier Valverde A, Torres JC, Luna-del-Castillo JD (January 2007). "Effectiveness of comparison overlays generated with DentalPrint software in bite mark analysis".

1213:

The use of software to annotate the characteristics present in the ante-mortem and post-mortem photographs, facilitating the visualization of comparative elements for everyone, including laypeople.

888:

to develop new technology and techniques in forensic odontology. The University of British Columbia program is the only one in North America that provides graduate training in forensic odontology.

640:

analysis. Another type of evidence that may be analyzed is bite marks, whether left on the victim (by the attacker), the perpetrator (from the victim of an attack), or on an object found at the

880:

Several organizations are dedicated to the field of forensic odontology. These organizations include the Bureau of Legal Dentistry (BOLD), the American Board of Forensic Odontology (ABFO),

51: 2417: 1971:"Dental Team DVI Italia – Associazione di operatori tecnici delle scienze forensi esperti nella identificazione delle vittime di disastri (D.V.I. Disaster Victim Identification, D.V.I)" 1170:

can be extracted. The teeth should not be completely destroyed using DNA analysis alone, it should be compared with other techniques as well before damaging techniques are used.

1659: 974: 656: 3465:

Martins Filho IE, Lopez-Capp TT, Biazevic MG, Michel-Crosato E (November 2016). "Sexual dimorphism using odontometric indexes: Analysis of three statistical techniques".

2166:

Franco A, Willems G, Souza P, Coucke W, Thevissen P (February 2017). "Uniqueness of the anterior dentition three-dimensionally assessed for forensic bitemark analysis".

1005:

across the field. The journalists discovered that no rigorous experimentation has been conducted to determine error rates for bite mark comparison, a key part of the

1024:

configuration and must be taken into account when comparing a dental profile to the bite mark after a significant amount of time has passed since the mark was made.

990:"It has not been shown that defining characteristics of those patterns can be accurately analyzed to exclude or not exclude individuals as the source of a bitemark" 2201:

Bush MA, Bush PJ, Sheets HD (September 2011). "A study of multiple bitemarks inflicted in human skin by a single dentition using geometric morphometric analysis".

3336:

López-Lázaro S, Alemán I, Viciano J, Irurita J, Botella MC (September 2018). "Sexual dimorphism of the first deciduous molar: A geometric morphometric approach".

2917: 3379:

Cardoso H (2008). "Sample-specific (universal) metric approaches for determining the sex of immature human skeletal remains using permanent tooth dimensions".

2934:

Murray J, Heng D, Lygate A, Abade A, Manica S, Franco A. "Applying artificial intelligence to determination of legal age of majority from radiographic data".

3759: 1060: 3858:

Manjunath BC, Chandrashekar BR, Mahesh M, Vatchala Rani RM (July 2011). "DNA profiling and forensic dentistry--a review of the recent concepts and trends".

1393: 791:

used bite marks on the breast of the victim to seal a murder conviction against Robert Gorringe for the murder of his wife Phyllis. Another early case was

2241:

Al-Talabani N, Al-Moussawy ND, Baker FA, Mohammed HA (November 2006). "Digital analysis of experimental human bitemarks: application of two new methods".

4419: 1421: 3225:

Viciano J, López-Lázaro S, Alemán I (September 2013). "Sex estimation based on deciduous and permanent dentition in a contemporary Spanish population".

1095:, the mineralized tissue that lines the surface of tooth roots, exhibits annual patterns of deposition. Aggrawal has presented a comprehensive account. 4069: 1098:

It is important that age estimation methods are optimally accurate, as potential over- or underestimation of age might lead to a failure of justice.

3553:

Sorenti M, Martinón-Torres M, Martín-Francés L, Perea-Pérez B (June 2019). "Sexual dimorphism of dental tissues in modern human mandibular molars".

757:

In Ontario, there is a group of 10 forensic dentists that are known as the Province of Ontario Dental Identification Team or better known as PODIT.

1064: 787:

One of the first published accounts involving a conviction based on bite marks as evidence was the “Gorringe case”, in 1948, in which pathologist

4216:"Forensic dental identification using two-dimensional photographs of a smile and three-dimensional dental models: A 2D-3D superimposition method" 3039: 721:, one can receive either an MSc in Forensic Dentistry (a one-year programme) or a Masters in Forensic Odontology (a two-year programme) from the 918:, in order to offer pro bono services in the field of human identification and DVI Disaster Victim Identification to support Italian DVI teams. 2425: 1398: 1231:

a significant impact on the identification process, particularly when other methodologies and identification techniques cannot be implemented.

1068: 648: 4292:

Silva RF, Franco A, Souza JB, Picoli FF, Mendes SD, Nunes FG (June 2015). "Human identification through the analysis of smile photographs".

1102:

radiographs with significant accuracy. With these advancements forensic dentistry may be moving towards more automated systems of analysis.

1141:

It is important that dentists keep all radiographs stored properly since the original dental records will be used during this comparison.

4086:

Miranda GE, Freitas SG, Maia LV, Melani RF (June 2016). "An unusual method of forensic human identification: use of selfie photographs".

2746:

Rawson RD, Ommen RK, Kinard G, Johnson J, Yfantis A (January 1984). "Statistical evidence for the individuality of the human dentition".

1461:

Gawali RA. Education, training, and practice of forensic odontology: An Indian perspective. J Dent Res Rev 2020 ;7:3–4. Available from:

2140: 3997:"Identifying a victim of alligator attack and scavenger fish in the Brazilian Amazon rainforest using smile photographs: a case report" 570: 3500:

García-Campos C, Martinón-Torres M, Martín-Francés L, Martínez de Pinillos M, Modesto-Mata M, Perea-Pérez B, et al. (June 2018).

4882: 4039:

A qualitative and quantitative analysis of the anterior dentition visible in photographs and its application to forensic odontology

1892: 609:

context. Forensic dentistry is used in both criminal and civil law. Forensic dentists assist investigative agencies in identifying

3501: 1676: 1312:

Andersen L, Juhl M, Solheim T, Borrman H (1995). "Odontological identification of fire victims--potentialities and limitations".

1240: 1210:

The more visible teeth in the ante-mortem photograph, the better. Therefore, selecting the best photograph obtained is important.

2847: 1857:

Kouble RF, Craig GT (January 2004). "A comparison between direct and indirect methods available for human bite mark analysis".

2339:

Report to the President, forensic science in criminal courts : ensuring scientific validity of feature-comparison methods

1148:

Radiograph comparison is often a method used in mass fatalities for example natural disasters but It can be used in any case.

4810: 4790: 3152: 3111: 2403: 1376: 4887: 750:

Dental degrees given by universities in Canada include DDS (doctor of dental science) and DMD (doctor of dental medicine).

114: 4606: 690: 55: 4420:"Identificación positiva por medio del uso de la rugoscopia en un municipio de Cundinamarca (Colombia): Reporte de caso" 3263:(November 2011). "Technical note: estimating sex using cervical canine odontometrics: a test using a known sex sample". 4215: 2418:"Bloodstain Analysis Convinced a Jury She Stabbed Her 10-Year-Old Son. Now, Even Freedom Can't Give Her Back Her Life" 1048:

from saliva surrounding the area of the bite mark proves to be a more reliable form of identification. In the case of

4536: 4371:"Palate shape and size and palatal rugae morphology of children with anterior open bite and normal vertical overbite" 2342:. Executive Office of the President of the United States, President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. 660: 522: 73: 4960: 4815: 4800: 4641: 4636: 2642: 471: 4418:

Aparicio Castellanos DC, Higuera LF, Hurtado Avella AM, Pedraza Gutiérrez Ad, Casas Martínez JA (September 2007).

2903: 2875: 2467: 2378: 1495: 1474: 4861: 4564: 426: 324: 162: 4866: 4646: 4579: 2447: 1752: 1438: 885: 563: 456: 284: 4522: 1204:

Both the ante-mortem and post-mortem photographs need to be as clear as possible, with good/excellent quality.

980:

So called bite mark analysis has been criticized as largely unscientific based on three pillars of critique:

4955: 441: 4907: 4851: 3055:"The effect of o-salicylate upon pentose phosphate pathway activity in normal and G6PD-deficient red cells" 652: 461: 294: 3422:

Garn SM, Lewis AB, Swindler DR, Kerewsky RS (1967). "Genetic control of sexual dimorphism in tooth size".

4950: 4805: 2606:

MacFarlane TW, MacDonald DG, Sutherland DA (July 1974). "Statistical problems in dental identification".

1255: 788: 686: 614: 539: 142: 1765: 1207:

The post-mortem photograph should be taken at the same angle of incidence as the ante-mortem photograph.

4795: 694: 299: 3774: 3301:

Zorba E, Moraitis K, Manolis SK (July 2011). "Sexual dimorphism in permanent teeth of modern Greeks".

4912: 4825: 806: 556: 544: 98: 42: 3135:

Loomis PW, Reid JS, Tabor MP, Weems RA (2018). "Dental Identification & Radiographic Pitfalls".

2786:

Pretty IA, Turnbull MD (November 2001). "Lack of dental uniqueness between two bite mark suspects".

4744: 1645: 1496:"Graduate Diploma in Forensic Odontology: School of Dentistry: The University of Western Australia" 4530: – a military sponsored venue for education in forensic odontology (annual courses) 3775:"Post-Mortem Forensic Dental Radiography – a review of current techniques and future developments" 2571:

Pretty IA, Sweet D (2001). "The scientific basis for human bitemark analyses--a critical review".

4830: 4599: 1422:"Forensic Science in Criminal Courts: Ensuring Scientific Validity of Feature-Comparison Methods" 718: 606: 401: 386: 344: 3949:"Personal identification through digital photo superimposition of dental profile: a pilot study" 2364: 1700:

Bowers CM (May 2006). "Problem-based analysis of bitemark misidentifications: the role of DNA".

1562: 1515: 4965: 4919: 4820: 4555: 1667: 371: 235: 3499: 2833: 4691: 4623: 3753: 3033: 2335: 184: 174: 132: 1528: 872: 4671: 4339: 4063: 3821: 3388: 3181: 722: 622: 501: 451: 431: 396: 274: 240: 4417: 4370: 4042:(Master of Philosophy thesis). Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong SAR: The University of Hong Kong. 1277:

Pretty IA (May 2006). "The barriers to achieving an evidence base for bitemark analysis".

8: 4856: 4846: 4769: 4686: 4656: 3812:

Jain AK, Chen H (2004-07-01). "Matching of dental X-ray images for human identificatio".

3008:

Aggrawal A (May 2009). "Estimation of age in the living: in matters civil and criminal".

2861: 1076: 984:"Human anterior dental patterns have not been shown to be unique at the individual level" 914:

In 2016, an association of civil protection called Dental Team DVI Italia was founded in

860: 826: 466: 334: 264: 259: 230: 225: 204: 189: 169: 4368: 4338:

Castro-Espicalsky TL, Freitas P, Tinoco RL, Calmon M, Júnior ED, Rossi AC (2020-10-06).

3825: 3392: 3185: 2073:

Saks MJ, Albright T, Bohan TL, Bierer BE, Bowers CM, Bush MA, et al. (2016-12-01).

1896: 4897: 4734: 4706: 4676: 4592: 4508: – a certifying body for North American and other forensic odontologists 4481: 4454: 4395: 4317: 4243: 4191: 4166: 4147: 4013: 3996: 3965: 3948: 3921: 3894: 3736: 3709: 3655: 3578: 3532: 3447: 3361: 3144: 3079: 3070: 3054: 2889: 2709: 2505: 2315: 2266: 2107: 2074: 2019: 1814: 1337: 830: 769: 436: 376: 366: 309: 279: 269: 194: 179: 4120: 3686: 3673:

Kahana T, Hiss J (March 1997). "Identification of human remains: forensic radiology".

2619: 2584: 2536: 1394:"Forensic Bitemark Analysis Not Supported by Sufficient Data, NIST Draft Review Finds" 4724: 4486: 4431: 4400: 4382: 4369:

Alvarez-Solarte H, Sierra-Alzate V, Sanchez-Garzon J, Botero-Mariaca P (2018-06-01).

4351: 4309: 4274: 4247: 4235: 4196: 4151: 4139: 4103: 4018: 3970: 3926: 3875: 3837: 3794: 3741: 3690: 3659: 3614: 3570: 3524: 3482: 3439: 3404: 3353: 3318: 3280: 3242: 3207: 3148: 3117: 3107: 3084: 3021: 3017: 2990: 2973:(2006). "Incremental lines in root cementum of human teeth--a reliable age marker?". 2970: 2951: 2803: 2763: 2701: 2662: 2623: 2588: 2540: 2497: 2343: 2307: 2303: 2258: 2254: 2218: 2183: 2112: 2094: 2055: 2023: 2011: 1934: 1874: 1748: 1717: 1586: 1372: 1329: 1294: 1250: 1167: 1006: 391: 358: 199: 37: 4340:"Human identification by the analysis of palatal rugae printed in complete dentures" 4321: 4231: 4099: 3582: 3451: 3365: 3349: 3314: 2713: 2658: 2509: 2319: 2270: 2214: 2051: 1930: 1713: 1290: 4924: 4739: 4476: 4466: 4390: 4301: 4227: 4186: 4178: 4131: 4095: 4051: 4043: 4008: 3960: 3916: 3906: 3867: 3829: 3786: 3731: 3721: 3682: 3645: 3606: 3562: 3536: 3516: 3474: 3431: 3396: 3345: 3310: 3272: 3234: 3197: 3189: 3140: 3074: 3066: 3013: 2982: 2943: 2795: 2755: 2693: 2654: 2615: 2580: 2532: 2489: 2299: 2250: 2210: 2175: 2102: 2086: 2047: 2001: 1926: 1866: 1790: 1709: 1635:. University of Toronto: Center of Forensic Science & Medicine. pp. 31–40. 1364: 1321: 1286: 817: 773: 381: 339: 137: 106: 4263:"Forensic odontology identification using smile photograph analysis--case reports" 4182: 3995:

Custodio LR, Valente-Aguiar MS, Ramos RP, Rossato G, Espicalsky TL (August 2022).

3650: 3633: 2288: 1341: 4902: 4764: 4759: 4540: 4305: 3833: 3502:"Contribution of dental tissues to sex determination in modern human populations" 3435: 2947: 2820: 2697: 2383: 1462: 1000: 506: 406: 152: 4545: 3790: 3634:"Envisioning forensic odontology under a new light: A pedodontist's perspective" 647:

Bite mark analysis has been condemned by several scientific bodies, such as the

4774: 4754: 4749: 4716: 4681: 4666: 4549:

no. 40, "RepliSet: High Resolution Impressions of the Teeth of Human Ancestors"

4135: 3871: 3610: 3552: 3478: 3260: 2986: 2727:

Berg S, Schaidt G (1954). "Methodik und Beweiswert des Bissspurenvergleiches".

2493: 2179: 1088: 845: 834: 516: 218: 3400: 3193: 2670: 2480:

DeVore DT (July 1971). "Bite marks for identification? A preliminary report".

1893:"International Organization of Forensic Odonto-Stomatology Regulations (1987)" 4944: 4729: 4701: 4514: – a society for all persons interested in forensic odontology 4435: 4386: 4355: 3911: 3841: 3798: 3464: 3408: 3211: 2523:

Barbenel JC, Evans JH (July 1974). "Bite marks in skin--mechanical factors".

2347: 2098: 2015: 2006: 1989: 1245: 1158: 329: 304: 157: 4471: 3121: 1059:

Bite marks were a primary source of evidence in the wrongful convictions of

4929: 4661: 4651: 4490: 4404: 4313: 4278: 4262: 4239: 4200: 4143: 4107: 4022: 3974: 3930: 3879: 3745: 3726: 3694: 3618: 3574: 3528: 3486: 3357: 3322: 3284: 3246: 3025: 2994: 2955: 2807: 2705: 2592: 2311: 2262: 2222: 2187: 2116: 2059: 1938: 1917:

Vermylen Y (May 2006). "Guidelines in forensic odontology: legal aspects".

1878: 1721: 1298: 446: 314: 4533: 3443: 2918:"The Innocence Files: Who is Levon Brooks? What happened to Levon Brooks?" 2767: 2666: 2627: 2544: 2501: 1333: 987:"Those patterns are not accurately transferred to human skin consistently" 4892: 4631: 3857: 3781:. Special Issue: Papers from the joint ISFRI & IAFR Conference 2016. 2090: 1163: 1130: 915: 811: 641: 491: 289: 47:

this article is poorly organized and needs to be condensed and reordered.

4047: 3001: 2141:"Federal Report Adds to the Evidence That Bitemark Analysis Is Nonsense" 2075:"Forensic bitemark identification: weak foundations, exaggerated claims" 1475:"Graduate Diploma in Forensic Odontology : Melbourne Dental School" 1200:

To achieve this, attention must be given to important details, such as:

86: 4055: 3566: 3520: 3276: 3238: 3202: 1870: 1325: 841: 777: 633: 629: 595: 591: 496: 319: 124: 2799: 2759: 4615: 4559: 4037: 3088: 2337: 2134: 2132: 2130: 2128: 2126: 1013: 856: 821: 706: 599: 511: 4337: 765:

Forensic odontology has played a key role in famous criminal cases:

2240: 1368: 1092: 602: 4167:"Forensic odontology in DVI: current practice and recent advances" 3994: 3159:

tooth enamel is the hardest biological substance in the human body

2336:

President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (2016).

2123: 4214:

Reesu GV, Mânica S, Revie GF, Brown NL, Mossey PA (August 2020).

3170: 1990:"A Comparison Between Manual and Computerized Bite-Mark Analysis" 1072: 958: 949: 852: 610: 4261:

Silva RF, Pereira SD, Prado FB, Daruge E, Daruge E (June 2008).

3335: 4455:"Practical aspects of DNA-based forensic studies in dentistry" 2641:

Sognnaes RF, Rawson RD, Gratt BM, Nguyen NB (September 1982).

1970: 1791:"BC-Fort – British Columbia Forensic Odontology Response Team" 1439:"TJB | FSC | Discipline Specific Reviews | Bite Mark Analysis" 1091:

and tooth wear, but recent studies also provide evidence that

2643:"Computer comparison of bitemark patterns in identical twins" 2605: 936: 781: 4584: 3595: 2365:

Evidence From Bite Marks, It Turns Out, Is Not So Elementary

685:

Postgraduate diploma programs for dentists are available at

90:

X-Ray of an unidentified murder victim's teeth found in 1976

4517: 3892: 2848:"Innocent man released from Virginia prison after 33 years" 1071:. The role of bite marks in their convictions is told in a 3947:

Santoro V, Mele F, Introna F, De Donno A (December 2019).

3946: 3893:

Sakari SL, Jimson S, Masthan KM, Jacobina J (April 2015).

2406:. The Texas Tribune (2016-02-12). Retrieved on 2016-12-19. 1311: 3421: 3224: 2640: 1769: 975:

President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology

657:

President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology

637: 628:

Forensic dentists may make their determinations by using

618: 4085: 3631: 2745: 2165: 2036: 1518:. Adelaide.edu.au (2016-12-13). Retrieved on 2016-12-19. 725:

in Scotland, which currently has a very limited intake.

4527: 4511: 4505: 4294:

The American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology

4260: 3548: 3546: 2440: 2072: 1952: 4452: 4291: 1612:"ABFO :: American Board of Forensic Odontology |" 907:

There is only one international association promoting

4213: 3853: 3851: 3543: 3300: 3134: 2876:"Kennedy Brewer – National Registry of Exonerations" 1611: 935:

Bites can occur on both the victim and the suspect;

3296: 3294: 1361:

Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States

3052: 2904:"Levon Brooks – National Registry of Exonerations" 2834:"Keith Allen Harward | the Innocence Project" 2404:Commission Wants Restriction of Bite-Mark Evidence 1837: 1187:then be compared to the ante-mortem photographs): 968: 4551:by Debbie Guatelli-Steinberg and John C. Mitchell 4375:The Journal of Forensic Odonto-Stomatology - JFOS 4344:The Journal of Forensic Odonto-Stomatology - JFOS 3848: 3758:: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of September 2024 ( 2933: 1012:Critics of bite mark comparison cite the case of 4942: 3707: 3291: 1563:"Forensic Science in Canada - PDF Free Download" 4523:The British Association for Forensic Odontology 3632:Shirolkar S, Gayen K, Sarkar S, Saha S (2021). 2684:Strom F (1963). "Investigation of bite-marks". 1221: 1173: 717:Following the closure of the MSc course at the 4528:The Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP) 3895:"Role of DNA profiling in forensic odontology" 2929: 2927: 2785: 2236: 2234: 2232: 2200: 1463:http://www.jdrr.org/text.asp?2020/7/1/3/281503 1399:National Institute of Standards and Technology 973:Bite mark analysis has been criticized by the 882:American Society of Forensic Odontology (ASFO) 760: 649:National Institute of Standards and Technology 4600: 4518:The Australian Society of Forensic Odontology 4453:Muruganandhan J, Sivakumar G (January 2011). 4068:: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of April 2024 ( 2968: 2862:"Kennedy Brewer | the Innocence Project" 2522: 930: 564: 3899:Journal of Pharmacy & Bioallied Sciences 4512:The American Society of Forensic Odontology 3772: 3038:: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of May 2024 ( 2924: 2890:"Levon Brooks | the Innocence Project" 2726: 2570: 2229: 1987: 1856: 4607: 4593: 4560:"Skeptoid #821: Forensic (Pseudo) Science" 4267:The Journal of Forensic Odonto-Stomatology 4001:The Journal of Forensic Odonto-Stomatology 3953:The Journal of Forensic Odonto-Stomatology 3672: 3638:SRM Journal of Research in Dental Sciences 2781: 2779: 2777: 2647:Journal of the American Dental Association 944:measurement of dentition characteristics. 709:offers a master's in Forensic Odontology. 571: 557: 4506:The American Board of Forensic Odontology 4480: 4470: 4394: 4190: 4124:Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology 4012: 3964: 3920: 3910: 3779:Journal of Forensic Radiology and Imaging 3735: 3725: 3649: 3555:American Journal of Physical Anthropology 3509:American Journal of Physical Anthropology 3265:American Journal of Physical Anthropology 3227:American Journal of Physical Anthropology 3201: 3078: 2566: 2564: 2562: 2560: 2558: 2556: 2554: 2376: 2359: 2357: 2284: 2282: 2280: 2106: 2005: 1988:Patil S, Rao RS, Raj T (September 2013). 1739: 1737: 1735: 1733: 1731: 1695: 1693: 1691: 1689: 1648:. Law2.umkc.edu. Retrieved on 2016-12-19. 1118: 844:v. Marx, the 1975 case which established 74:Learn how and when to remove this message 4883:Index of oral health and dental articles 4652:Orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics 3811: 3007: 2516: 2138: 1916: 1852: 1850: 1848: 1846: 1630: 1123: 871: 85: 50:Relevant discussion may be found on the 4554: 4164: 4035: 3710:"Current trends in forensic odontology" 3378: 3259: 3053:Worathumrong N, Grimes AJ (June 1975). 2774: 2608:Journal of the Forensic Science Society 2525:Journal of the Forensic Science Society 2415: 1516:Graduate Diploma in Forensic Odontology 1314:International Journal of Legal Medicine 1241:American Society of Forensic Odontology 4943: 4580:Forensic Oral Pathology Journal – FOPJ 3860:Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine 3599:Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine 3467:Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine 2739: 2551: 2479: 2473: 2354: 2277: 2168:Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine 1728: 1699: 1686: 1657: 1557: 1555: 1553: 1551: 1549: 1276: 4811:Canadian Association of Orthodontists 4791:American Association of Orthodontists 4588: 4333: 4331: 4081: 4079: 3990: 3988: 3986: 3984: 3942: 3940: 3675:Journal of Clinical Forensic Medicine 3101: 2683: 2468:Bite-mark verdict faces new scrutiny. 2331: 2329: 1885: 1843: 1838:American Board of Forensic Odontology 1391: 921: 814:– an early case of Forensic Dentistry 4888:Outline of dentistry and oral health 2363:Santos, Fernanda (January 28, 2007) 1910: 1840:. Abfo.org. Retrieved on 2016-12-19. 1758: 1353: 1351: 1272: 1270: 876:Forensic dentist examining specimens 20: 4459:Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences 3714:Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences 3708:Jeddy N, Ravi S, Radhika T (2017). 2823:. ITSGOV: CSI and Forensics Science 1831: 1546: 691:The University of Western Australia 13: 4445: 4328: 4076: 3981: 3937: 3145:10.1016/B978-0-12-805198-6.00003-7 3071:10.1111/j.1365-2141.1975.tb00536.x 2470:Chicago Tribune; November 29, 2004 2450:. Chicago Tribune. 19 October 2004 2448:"From the start, a faulty science" 2379:"From the start, a faulty science" 2326: 2079:Journal of Law and the Biosciences 1587:"List of Dental Schools in Canada" 1498:. Dentistry.uwa.edu.au. 2012-08-10 14: 4977: 4499: 3773:Viner MD, Robson J (2017-03-01). 3381:Journal of Archaeological Science 3174:Journal of Archaeological Science 1994:Journal of Advanced Oral Research 1348: 1267: 1151: 1105: 1081: 848:standards for forensic odontology 712: 661:Texas Forensic Science Commission 4816:Dental Technologists Association 4801:British Dental Health Foundation 4642:Oral and maxillofacial radiology 4637:Oral and maxillofacial pathology 3018:10.1111/j.1469-7580.2009.01048.x 2304:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00321.x 2255:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00265.x 1768:. boldlab.ubc.ca. Archived from 909:humanitarian forensic odontology 867: 728: 472:Traffic collision reconstruction 113: 25: 16:Aspect of criminal investigation 4411: 4362: 4285: 4254: 4232:10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110361 4207: 4158: 4114: 4100:10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.04.028 4029: 3886: 3805: 3766: 3701: 3666: 3625: 3589: 3493: 3458: 3415: 3372: 3350:10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.06.036 3329: 3315:10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.02.001 3253: 3218: 3164: 3128: 3095: 3046: 2962: 2910: 2896: 2882: 2868: 2854: 2840: 2826: 2814: 2720: 2677: 2659:10.14219/jada.archive.1982.0338 2634: 2599: 2461: 2409: 2397: 2370: 2215:10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.03.028 2194: 2159: 2139:Tuccille JD (19 October 2022). 2066: 2052:10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.05.007 2030: 1981: 1963: 1945: 1931:10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.02.002 1807: 1783: 1714:10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.02.032 1651: 1639: 1624: 1604: 1579: 1521: 1509: 1291:10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.02.033 998:An investigative series by the 969:Criticism of bite mark analysis 621:, previous dental history, and 325:Questioned document examination 4647:Oral and maxillofacial surgery 4220:Forensic Science International 4088:Forensic Science International 3338:Forensic Science International 3303:Forensic Science International 3059:British Journal of Haematology 2482:Medicine, Science, and the Law 2416:Colloff P (20 December 2018). 2203:Forensic Science International 2040:Forensic Science International 1919:Forensic Science International 1702:Forensic Science International 1488: 1467: 1455: 1431: 1414: 1385: 1305: 1279:Forensic Science International 886:University of British Columbia 859:, bite mark evidence led to a 625:of unidentified human beings. 1: 4614: 4183:10.1080/20961790.2019.1678710 3687:10.1016/S1353-1131(97)90002-X 3651:10.4103/srmjrds.srmjrds_91_20 2821:Forensic Odontology explained 2620:10.1016/s0015-7368(74)70911-2 2585:10.1016/S1355-0306(01)71859-X 2537:10.1016/S0015-7368(74)70908-2 1529:"Forensic Odontology MFOdont" 1261: 4908:History of dental treatments 4424:Acta Odontológica Venezolana 4306:10.1097/PAF.0000000000000148 3834:10.1016/j.patcog.2003.12.016 3436:10.1177/00220345670460055801 2948:10.1016/j.morpho.2023.100723 2788:Journal of Forensic Sciences 2748:Journal of Forensic Sciences 2698:10.1177/00220345630420013301 2424:. ProPublica. Archived from 2292:Journal of Forensic Sciences 2243:Journal of Forensic Sciences 1895:. 2009-02-09. Archived from 1859:Journal of Forensic Sciences 1392:Press R (October 11, 2022). 1222:Palatal rugoscopy comparison 1174:Smile photographs comparison 680: 653:National Academy of Sciences 7: 4806:British Orthodontic Society 3791:10.1016/j.jofri.2017.03.007 1795:www.bcfort.dentistry.ubc.ca 1766:"Bureau of Legal Dentistry" 1747:. NY: Marcel Dekker, 2005. 1256:Comparative dental analysis 1234: 761:High-profile criminal cases 687:The University of Melbourne 666: 143:Bloodstain pattern analysis 45:. The specific problem is: 10: 4982: 4796:British Dental Association 4171:Forensic Sciences Research 4136:10.1007/s12024-021-00384-y 3872:10.1016/j.jflm.2011.02.005 3611:10.1016/j.jflm.2009.09.001 3479:10.1016/j.jflm.2016.08.010 3424:Journal of Dental Research 2987:10.1016/j.jchb.2005.09.002 2686:Journal of Dental Research 2494:10.1177/002580247101100309 2377:McRoberts F (2004-10-19). 2180:10.1016/j.jflm.2017.01.005 1633:Forensic Science in Canada 931:Proposed theoretical basis 798:Another landmark case was 700: 695:The University of Adelaide 4875: 4839: 4826:Indian Dental Association 4783: 4715: 4622: 4534:Forensic dentistry online 3401:10.1016/j.jas.2007.02.013 3194:10.1016/j.jas.2014.05.011 1675:: 389–393. Archived from 1660:"The Law and the Dentist" 807:Fredrik Fasting Torgersen 737: 442:Fire accelerant detection 4745:Scaling and root planing 4165:Forrest A (2019-10-02). 3912:10.4103/0975-7406.155863 2007:10.1177/2229411220130301 780:and conspiring with the 671: 632:, ante- and post-mortem 4961:Personal identification 4831:National Health Service 4472:10.4103/0975-1475.85295 4050:(inactive 2024-04-12). 3730:(inactive 2024-09-12). 3020:(inactive 2024-05-12). 719:University of Glamorgan 705:The Belgian university 590:involves the handling, 345:Social network analysis 4920:Infant oral mutilation 4821:General Dental Council 3905:(Suppl 1): S138–S141. 3727:10.4103/jfo.jfds_85_16 1708:(Suppl 1): S104–S109. 1668:British Dental Journal 1285:(Suppl 1): S110–S120. 1119:Identification methods 1050:Mississippi vs. Bourne 877: 743:prerequisites needed. 427:Electrical engineering 91: 4692:Restorative dentistry 3106:. Elsevier Academic. 3104:The human bone manual 2573:Science & Justice 1477:. Dent.unimelb.edu.au 1124:Radiograph comparison 875: 457:Materials engineering 285:Facial reconstruction 89: 4956:Forensic disciplines 4672:Dental public health 1975:www.dentalteamdvi.it 1815:"Course Information" 768:In 1692, during the 723:University of Dundee 623:socioeconomic status 502:Perry Mason syndrome 290:Fingerprint analysis 56:improve this article 41:to meet Knowledge's 4770:Socket preservation 4702:Dental traumatology 4697:Forensic odontology 4687:Geriatric dentistry 4682:Dental implantology 4657:Pediatric dentistry 4048:10.5353/th_b3120784 4036:McKenna JJ (1986). 3826:2004PatRe..37.1519J 3814:Pattern Recognition 3393:2008JArSc..35..158C 3186:2014JArSc..49..185G 3137:Forensic Odontology 2692:(1 Pt 2): 312–316. 2428:on January 16, 2020 1743:Dorion, Robert BJ. 1631:Pollanen M (2013). 1077:The Innocence Files 1061:Keith Allen Harward 861:wrongful conviction 827:State of New Jersey 588:forensic odontology 525:forensic entomology 462:Polymer engineering 420:Related disciplines 335:Forensic geophysics 315:Gloveprint analysis 295:Firearm examination 265:Body identification 4951:Dentistry branches 4898:Dental instruments 4735:Root canal therapy 4707:Holistic dentistry 4677:Cosmetic dentistry 4547:Structure Magazine 4539:2019-09-29 at the 3567:10.1002/ajpa.23822 3521:10.1002/ajpa.23447 3277:10.1002/ajpa.21584 3239:10.1002/ajpa.22324 3139:. pp. 25–46. 3010:Journal of Anatomy 2091:10.1093/jlb/lsw045 1925:(Suppl 1): S6–S8. 1871:10.1520/JFS2001252 1658:Taylor DV (1963). 1326:10.1007/BF01245479 922:Bite mark analysis 878: 831:Jesse Timmendequas 770:Salem Witch Trials 584:Forensic dentistry 437:Fire investigation 320:Palmprint analysis 280:Election forensics 163:Forensic genealogy 92: 4938: 4937: 4725:Dental extraction 3154:978-0-12-805198-6 3113:978-0-12-088467-4 3102:White TD (2005). 2800:10.1520/JFS15177J 2760:10.1520/JFS11656J 2367:. New York Times. 1745:Bitemark Evidence 1378:978-0-309-13130-8 1251:Innocence Project 1168:mitochondrial DNA 1007:scientific method 659:(PCAST), and the 581: 580: 359:Digital forensics 300:Footwear evidence 84: 83: 76: 43:quality standards 34:This article may 4973: 4925:Mouth assessment 4740:Root end surgery 4609: 4602: 4595: 4586: 4585: 4576: 4574: 4572: 4558:(1 March 2022). 4494: 4484: 4474: 4440: 4439: 4415: 4409: 4408: 4398: 4366: 4360: 4359: 4335: 4326: 4325: 4289: 4283: 4282: 4258: 4252: 4251: 4211: 4205: 4204: 4194: 4162: 4156: 4155: 4118: 4112: 4111: 4083: 4074: 4073: 4067: 4059: 4033: 4027: 4026: 4016: 3992: 3979: 3978: 3968: 3944: 3935: 3934: 3924: 3914: 3890: 3884: 3883: 3855: 3846: 3845: 3820:(7): 1519–1532. 3809: 3803: 3802: 3770: 3764: 3763: 3757: 3749: 3739: 3729: 3705: 3699: 3698: 3670: 3664: 3663: 3653: 3629: 3623: 3622: 3593: 3587: 3586: 3550: 3541: 3540: 3506: 3497: 3491: 3490: 3462: 3456: 3455: 3419: 3413: 3412: 3376: 3370: 3369: 3333: 3327: 3326: 3298: 3289: 3288: 3257: 3251: 3250: 3222: 3216: 3215: 3205: 3168: 3162: 3161: 3132: 3126: 3125: 3099: 3093: 3092: 3082: 3050: 3044: 3043: 3037: 3029: 3005: 2999: 2998: 2966: 2960: 2959: 2931: 2922: 2921: 2920:. 20 April 2020. 2914: 2908: 2907: 2900: 2894: 2893: 2886: 2880: 2879: 2872: 2866: 2865: 2858: 2852: 2851: 2844: 2838: 2837: 2830: 2824: 2818: 2812: 2811: 2794:(6): 1487–1491. 2783: 2772: 2771: 2743: 2737: 2736: 2724: 2718: 2717: 2681: 2675: 2674: 2669:. Archived from 2638: 2632: 2631: 2603: 2597: 2596: 2568: 2549: 2548: 2520: 2514: 2513: 2477: 2471: 2465: 2459: 2458: 2456: 2455: 2444: 2438: 2437: 2435: 2433: 2413: 2407: 2401: 2395: 2394: 2392: 2391: 2374: 2368: 2361: 2352: 2351: 2333: 2324: 2323: 2286: 2275: 2274: 2249:(6): 1372–1375. 2238: 2227: 2226: 2198: 2192: 2191: 2163: 2157: 2156: 2154: 2152: 2136: 2121: 2120: 2110: 2070: 2064: 2063: 2034: 2028: 2027: 2009: 1985: 1979: 1978: 1967: 1961: 1960: 1949: 1943: 1942: 1914: 1908: 1907: 1905: 1904: 1889: 1883: 1882: 1854: 1841: 1835: 1829: 1828: 1826: 1825: 1811: 1805: 1804: 1802: 1801: 1787: 1781: 1780: 1778: 1777: 1762: 1756: 1741: 1726: 1725: 1697: 1684: 1683: 1681: 1664: 1655: 1649: 1646:George Burroughs 1643: 1637: 1636: 1628: 1622: 1621: 1619: 1618: 1608: 1602: 1601: 1599: 1598: 1583: 1577: 1576: 1574: 1573: 1559: 1544: 1543: 1541: 1539: 1533:www.dundee.ac.uk 1525: 1519: 1513: 1507: 1506: 1504: 1503: 1492: 1486: 1485: 1483: 1482: 1471: 1465: 1459: 1453: 1452: 1450: 1449: 1443:www.txcourts.gov 1435: 1429: 1428: 1426: 1418: 1412: 1411: 1409: 1407: 1389: 1383: 1382: 1355: 1346: 1345: 1309: 1303: 1302: 1274: 818:State of Florida 774:George Burroughs 607:criminal justice 573: 566: 559: 485:Related articles 392:Network analysis 382:Malware analysis 340:Forensic geology 117: 107:Forensic science 94: 93: 79: 72: 68: 65: 59: 29: 28: 21: 4981: 4980: 4976: 4975: 4974: 4972: 4971: 4970: 4941: 4940: 4939: 4934: 4903:Dental material 4871: 4835: 4779: 4765:Tooth bleaching 4760:Tooth polishing 4711: 4618: 4613: 4570: 4568: 4541:Wayback Machine 4502: 4497: 4448: 4446:Further reading 4443: 4416: 4412: 4367: 4363: 4336: 4329: 4290: 4286: 4259: 4255: 4212: 4208: 4163: 4159: 4119: 4115: 4084: 4077: 4061: 4060: 4034: 4030: 3993: 3982: 3945: 3938: 3891: 3887: 3856: 3849: 3810: 3806: 3771: 3767: 3751: 3750: 3706: 3702: 3671: 3667: 3630: 3626: 3594: 3590: 3551: 3544: 3504: 3498: 3494: 3463: 3459: 3420: 3416: 3377: 3373: 3334: 3330: 3299: 3292: 3258: 3254: 3223: 3219: 3169: 3165: 3155: 3133: 3129: 3114: 3100: 3096: 3051: 3047: 3031: 3030: 3006: 3002: 2967: 2963: 2942:(360): 100723. 2932: 2925: 2916: 2915: 2911: 2902: 2901: 2897: 2888: 2887: 2883: 2874: 2873: 2869: 2860: 2859: 2855: 2846: 2845: 2841: 2832: 2831: 2827: 2819: 2815: 2784: 2775: 2744: 2740: 2725: 2721: 2682: 2678: 2639: 2635: 2604: 2600: 2569: 2552: 2521: 2517: 2478: 2474: 2466: 2462: 2453: 2451: 2446: 2445: 2441: 2431: 2429: 2414: 2410: 2402: 2398: 2389: 2387: 2384:Chicago Tribune 2375: 2371: 2362: 2355: 2334: 2327: 2287: 2278: 2239: 2230: 2199: 2195: 2164: 2160: 2150: 2148: 2137: 2124: 2071: 2067: 2035: 2031: 1986: 1982: 1969: 1968: 1964: 1951: 1950: 1946: 1915: 1911: 1902: 1900: 1891: 1890: 1886: 1855: 1844: 1836: 1832: 1823: 1821: 1813: 1812: 1808: 1799: 1797: 1789: 1788: 1784: 1775: 1773: 1764: 1763: 1759: 1742: 1729: 1698: 1687: 1679: 1662: 1656: 1652: 1644: 1640: 1629: 1625: 1616: 1614: 1610: 1609: 1605: 1596: 1594: 1585: 1584: 1580: 1571: 1569: 1561: 1560: 1547: 1537: 1535: 1527: 1526: 1522: 1514: 1510: 1501: 1499: 1494: 1493: 1489: 1480: 1478: 1473: 1472: 1468: 1460: 1456: 1447: 1445: 1437: 1436: 1432: 1424: 1420: 1419: 1415: 1405: 1403: 1402:(Press release) 1390: 1386: 1379: 1356: 1349: 1310: 1306: 1275: 1268: 1264: 1237: 1224: 1176: 1154: 1126: 1121: 1108: 1084: 1054:State vs. Krone 1001:Chicago Tribune 971: 933: 924: 870: 776:was accused of 763: 740: 731: 715: 703: 683: 674: 669: 577: 532: 531: 530: 527: 524: 507:Pollen calendar 486: 478: 477: 476: 421: 413: 412: 411: 361: 351: 350: 349: 254: 246: 245: 221: 211: 210: 209: 153:DNA phenotyping 127: 80: 69: 63: 60: 49: 30: 26: 17: 12: 11: 5: 4979: 4969: 4968: 4963: 4958: 4953: 4936: 4935: 4933: 4932: 4927: 4922: 4917: 4916: 4915: 4905: 4900: 4895: 4890: 4885: 4879: 4877: 4873: 4872: 4870: 4869: 4864: 4862:United Kingdom 4859: 4854: 4849: 4843: 4841: 4837: 4836: 4834: 4833: 4828: 4823: 4818: 4813: 4808: 4803: 4798: 4793: 4787: 4785: 4781: 4780: 4778: 4777: 4775:Dental implant 4772: 4767: 4762: 4757: 4755:Dental bonding 4752: 4750:Teeth cleaning 4747: 4742: 4737: 4732: 4727: 4721: 4719: 4717:Dental surgery 4713: 4712: 4710: 4709: 4704: 4699: 4694: 4689: 4684: 4679: 4674: 4669: 4667:Prosthodontics 4664: 4659: 4654: 4649: 4644: 4639: 4634: 4628: 4626: 4620: 4619: 4612: 4611: 4604: 4597: 4589: 4583: 4582: 4577: 4552: 4543: 4531: 4525: 4520: 4515: 4509: 4501: 4500:External links 4498: 4496: 4495: 4449: 4447: 4444: 4442: 4441: 4430:(3): 446–449. 4426:(in Spanish). 4410: 4361: 4327: 4284: 4253: 4206: 4177:(4): 316–330. 4157: 4130:(3): 517–521. 4113: 4075: 4028: 3980: 3936: 3885: 3866:(5): 191–197. 3847: 3804: 3765: 3720:(3): 115–119. 3700: 3665: 3624: 3605:(2): 105–110. 3588: 3561:(2): 332–340. 3542: 3515:(2): 459–472. 3492: 3457: 3430:(5): 963–972. 3414: 3387:(1): 158–168. 3371: 3328: 3309:(1–3): 74–81. 3290: 3271:(3): 486–489. 3252: 3217: 3163: 3153: 3127: 3112: 3094: 3065:(2): 225–231. 3045: 3000: 2961: 2923: 2909: 2895: 2881: 2867: 2853: 2839: 2825: 2813: 2773: 2754:(1): 245–253. 2738: 2719: 2676: 2673:on 2012-08-01. 2653:(3): 449–451. 2633: 2614:(3): 247–252. 2598: 2550: 2531:(3): 235–238. 2515: 2488:(3): 144–145. 2472: 2460: 2439: 2422:propublica.org 2408: 2396: 2369: 2353: 2325: 2298:(1): 151–156. 2276: 2228: 2193: 2158: 2122: 2085:(3): 538–575. 2065: 2046:(1–3): 33–37. 2029: 1980: 1962: 1944: 1909: 1884: 1865:(1): 111–118. 1842: 1830: 1806: 1782: 1757: 1727: 1685: 1682:on 2012-03-28. 1650: 1638: 1623: 1603: 1591:Master Student 1578: 1545: 1520: 1508: 1487: 1466: 1454: 1430: 1413: 1384: 1377: 1369:10.17226/12589 1347: 1320:(5): 229–234. 1304: 1265: 1263: 1260: 1259: 1258: 1253: 1248: 1243: 1236: 1233: 1223: 1220: 1215: 1214: 1211: 1208: 1205: 1198: 1197: 1193: 1175: 1172: 1153: 1152:DNA extraction 1150: 1125: 1122: 1120: 1117: 1107: 1106:Sex estimation 1104: 1089:tooth eruption 1083: 1082:Age estimation 1080: 1075:series titled 1065:Kennedy Brewer 992: 991: 988: 985: 970: 967: 932: 929: 923: 920: 869: 866: 865: 864: 849: 838: 824: 815: 809: 800:People v. Marx 793:Doyle v. State 762: 759: 739: 736: 730: 727: 714: 713:United Kingdom 711: 702: 699: 682: 679: 673: 670: 668: 665: 579: 578: 576: 575: 568: 561: 553: 550: 549: 548: 547: 542: 534: 533: 529: 528: 521: 519: 517:Trace evidence 514: 509: 504: 499: 494: 488: 487: 484: 483: 480: 479: 475: 474: 469: 464: 459: 454: 449: 444: 439: 434: 429: 423: 422: 419: 418: 415: 414: 410: 409: 407:Audio analysis 404: 402:Video analysis 399: 394: 389: 387:Mobile devices 384: 379: 377:Database study 374: 369: 367:Computer exams 363: 362: 357: 356: 353: 352: 348: 347: 342: 337: 332: 327: 322: 317: 312: 307: 302: 297: 292: 287: 282: 277: 272: 267: 262: 256: 255: 253:Criminalistics 252: 251: 248: 247: 244: 243: 238: 233: 228: 222: 217: 216: 213: 212: 208: 207: 202: 197: 192: 187: 182: 177: 172: 167: 166: 165: 155: 150: 145: 140: 135: 129: 128: 123: 122: 119: 118: 110: 109: 103: 102: 82: 81: 54:. Please help 33: 31: 24: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4978: 4967: 4966:Pseudoscience 4964: 4962: 4959: 4957: 4954: 4952: 4949: 4948: 4946: 4931: 4928: 4926: 4923: 4921: 4918: 4914: 4911: 4910: 4909: 4906: 4904: 4901: 4899: 4896: 4894: 4891: 4889: 4886: 4884: 4881: 4880: 4878: 4874: 4868: 4867:United States 4865: 4863: 4860: 4858: 4855: 4853: 4850: 4848: 4845: 4844: 4842: 4838: 4832: 4829: 4827: 4824: 4822: 4819: 4817: 4814: 4812: 4809: 4807: 4804: 4802: 4799: 4797: 4794: 4792: 4789: 4788: 4786: 4784:Organisations 4782: 4776: 4773: 4771: 4768: 4766: 4763: 4761: 4758: 4756: 4753: 4751: 4748: 4746: 4743: 4741: 4738: 4736: 4733: 4731: 4730:Tooth filling 4728: 4726: 4723: 4722: 4720: 4718: 4714: 4708: 4705: 4703: 4700: 4698: 4695: 4693: 4690: 4688: 4685: 4683: 4680: 4678: 4675: 4673: 4670: 4668: 4665: 4663: 4660: 4658: 4655: 4653: 4650: 4648: 4645: 4643: 4640: 4638: 4635: 4633: 4630: 4629: 4627: 4625: 4621: 4617: 4610: 4605: 4603: 4598: 4596: 4591: 4590: 4587: 4581: 4578: 4567: 4566: 4561: 4557: 4553: 4550: 4548: 4544: 4542: 4538: 4535: 4532: 4529: 4526: 4524: 4521: 4519: 4516: 4513: 4510: 4507: 4504: 4503: 4492: 4488: 4483: 4478: 4473: 4468: 4464: 4460: 4456: 4451: 4450: 4437: 4433: 4429: 4425: 4421: 4414: 4406: 4402: 4397: 4392: 4388: 4384: 4380: 4376: 4372: 4365: 4357: 4353: 4350:(2): 57: 62. 4349: 4345: 4341: 4334: 4332: 4323: 4319: 4315: 4311: 4307: 4303: 4299: 4295: 4288: 4280: 4276: 4272: 4268: 4264: 4257: 4249: 4245: 4241: 4237: 4233: 4229: 4225: 4221: 4217: 4210: 4202: 4198: 4193: 4188: 4184: 4180: 4176: 4172: 4168: 4161: 4153: 4149: 4145: 4141: 4137: 4133: 4129: 4125: 4117: 4109: 4105: 4101: 4097: 4093: 4089: 4082: 4080: 4071: 4065: 4057: 4053: 4049: 4045: 4041: 4040: 4032: 4024: 4020: 4015: 4010: 4006: 4002: 3998: 3991: 3989: 3987: 3985: 3976: 3972: 3967: 3962: 3958: 3954: 3950: 3943: 3941: 3932: 3928: 3923: 3918: 3913: 3908: 3904: 3900: 3896: 3889: 3881: 3877: 3873: 3869: 3865: 3861: 3854: 3852: 3843: 3839: 3835: 3831: 3827: 3823: 3819: 3815: 3808: 3800: 3796: 3792: 3788: 3784: 3780: 3776: 3769: 3761: 3755: 3747: 3743: 3738: 3733: 3728: 3723: 3719: 3715: 3711: 3704: 3696: 3692: 3688: 3684: 3680: 3676: 3669: 3661: 3657: 3652: 3647: 3643: 3639: 3635: 3628: 3620: 3616: 3612: 3608: 3604: 3600: 3592: 3584: 3580: 3576: 3572: 3568: 3564: 3560: 3556: 3549: 3547: 3538: 3534: 3530: 3526: 3522: 3518: 3514: 3510: 3503: 3496: 3488: 3484: 3480: 3476: 3472: 3468: 3461: 3453: 3449: 3445: 3441: 3437: 3433: 3429: 3425: 3418: 3410: 3406: 3402: 3398: 3394: 3390: 3386: 3382: 3375: 3367: 3363: 3359: 3355: 3351: 3347: 3343: 3339: 3332: 3324: 3320: 3316: 3312: 3308: 3304: 3297: 3295: 3286: 3282: 3278: 3274: 3270: 3266: 3262: 3256: 3248: 3244: 3240: 3236: 3232: 3228: 3221: 3213: 3209: 3204: 3199: 3195: 3191: 3187: 3183: 3179: 3175: 3167: 3160: 3156: 3150: 3146: 3142: 3138: 3131: 3123: 3119: 3115: 3109: 3105: 3098: 3090: 3086: 3081: 3076: 3072: 3068: 3064: 3060: 3056: 3049: 3041: 3035: 3027: 3023: 3019: 3015: 3011: 3004: 2996: 2992: 2988: 2984: 2980: 2976: 2972: 2965: 2957: 2953: 2949: 2945: 2941: 2937: 2930: 2928: 2919: 2913: 2905: 2899: 2891: 2885: 2877: 2871: 2863: 2857: 2849: 2843: 2835: 2829: 2822: 2817: 2809: 2805: 2801: 2797: 2793: 2789: 2782: 2780: 2778: 2769: 2765: 2761: 2757: 2753: 2749: 2742: 2734: 2730: 2723: 2715: 2711: 2707: 2703: 2699: 2695: 2691: 2687: 2680: 2672: 2668: 2664: 2660: 2656: 2652: 2648: 2644: 2637: 2629: 2625: 2621: 2617: 2613: 2609: 2602: 2594: 2590: 2586: 2582: 2578: 2574: 2567: 2565: 2563: 2561: 2559: 2557: 2555: 2546: 2542: 2538: 2534: 2530: 2526: 2519: 2511: 2507: 2503: 2499: 2495: 2491: 2487: 2483: 2476: 2469: 2464: 2449: 2443: 2427: 2423: 2419: 2412: 2405: 2400: 2386: 2385: 2380: 2373: 2366: 2360: 2358: 2349: 2345: 2341: 2340: 2332: 2330: 2321: 2317: 2313: 2309: 2305: 2301: 2297: 2293: 2285: 2283: 2281: 2272: 2268: 2264: 2260: 2256: 2252: 2248: 2244: 2237: 2235: 2233: 2224: 2220: 2216: 2212: 2208: 2204: 2197: 2189: 2185: 2181: 2177: 2173: 2169: 2162: 2146: 2142: 2135: 2133: 2131: 2129: 2127: 2118: 2114: 2109: 2104: 2100: 2096: 2092: 2088: 2084: 2080: 2076: 2069: 2061: 2057: 2053: 2049: 2045: 2041: 2033: 2025: 2021: 2017: 2013: 2008: 2003: 1999: 1995: 1991: 1984: 1976: 1972: 1966: 1958: 1957:www.afohr.org 1954: 1948: 1940: 1936: 1932: 1928: 1924: 1920: 1913: 1899:on 2009-02-09 1898: 1894: 1888: 1880: 1876: 1872: 1868: 1864: 1860: 1853: 1851: 1849: 1847: 1839: 1834: 1820: 1816: 1810: 1796: 1792: 1786: 1772:on 2013-08-29 1771: 1767: 1761: 1754: 1750: 1746: 1740: 1738: 1736: 1734: 1732: 1723: 1719: 1715: 1711: 1707: 1703: 1696: 1694: 1692: 1690: 1678: 1674: 1670: 1669: 1661: 1654: 1647: 1642: 1634: 1627: 1613: 1607: 1592: 1588: 1582: 1568: 1567:docplayer.net 1564: 1558: 1556: 1554: 1552: 1550: 1534: 1530: 1524: 1517: 1512: 1497: 1491: 1476: 1470: 1464: 1458: 1444: 1440: 1434: 1423: 1417: 1401: 1400: 1395: 1388: 1380: 1374: 1370: 1366: 1362: 1354: 1352: 1343: 1339: 1335: 1331: 1327: 1323: 1319: 1315: 1308: 1300: 1296: 1292: 1288: 1284: 1280: 1273: 1271: 1266: 1257: 1254: 1252: 1249: 1247: 1246:Hair analysis 1244: 1242: 1239: 1238: 1232: 1228: 1219: 1212: 1209: 1206: 1203: 1202: 1201: 1194: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1184: 1180: 1171: 1169: 1165: 1160: 1149: 1146: 1142: 1139: 1135: 1132: 1116: 1112: 1103: 1099: 1096: 1094: 1090: 1079: 1078: 1074: 1070: 1066: 1062: 1057: 1055: 1051: 1045: 1041: 1037: 1033: 1029: 1025: 1021: 1017: 1015: 1010: 1008: 1003: 1002: 996: 989: 986: 983: 982: 981: 978: 976: 966: 962: 960: 954: 951: 945: 941: 938: 928: 919: 917: 912: 910: 905: 901: 897: 893: 889: 887: 883: 874: 868:Organizations 862: 858: 854: 850: 847: 843: 839: 836: 832: 828: 825: 823: 819: 816: 813: 810: 808: 805: 804: 803: 801: 796: 794: 790: 789:Keith Simpson 785: 783: 779: 775: 771: 766: 758: 755: 751: 748: 744: 735: 729:United States 726: 724: 720: 710: 708: 698: 696: 692: 688: 678: 664: 662: 658: 654: 650: 645: 643: 639: 635: 631: 626: 624: 620: 616: 612: 611:human remains 608: 604: 601: 597: 593: 589: 585: 574: 569: 567: 562: 560: 555: 554: 552: 551: 546: 543: 541: 538: 537: 536: 535: 526: 523:Use of DNA in 520: 518: 515: 513: 510: 508: 505: 503: 500: 498: 495: 493: 490: 489: 482: 481: 473: 470: 468: 465: 463: 460: 458: 455: 453: 450: 448: 445: 443: 440: 438: 435: 433: 430: 428: 425: 424: 417: 416: 408: 405: 403: 400: 398: 395: 393: 390: 388: 385: 383: 380: 378: 375: 373: 372:Data analysis 370: 368: 365: 364: 360: 355: 354: 346: 343: 341: 338: 336: 333: 331: 330:Vein matching 328: 326: 323: 321: 318: 316: 313: 311: 308: 306: 305:Forensic arts 303: 301: 298: 296: 293: 291: 288: 286: 283: 281: 278: 276: 273: 271: 268: 266: 263: 261: 258: 257: 250: 249: 242: 239: 237: 236:Psychotherapy 234: 232: 229: 227: 224: 223: 220: 215: 214: 206: 203: 201: 198: 196: 193: 191: 188: 186: 183: 181: 178: 176: 173: 171: 168: 164: 161: 160: 159: 158:DNA profiling 156: 154: 151: 149: 146: 144: 141: 139: 136: 134: 131: 130: 126: 125:Physiological 121: 120: 116: 112: 111: 108: 105: 104: 100: 96: 95: 88: 78: 75: 67: 64:December 2022 57: 53: 48: 44: 40: 39: 32: 23: 22: 19: 4930:Oral hygiene 4913:Ancient Rome 4696: 4662:Periodontics 4569:. Retrieved 4563: 4546: 4465:(1): 38–45. 4462: 4458: 4427: 4423: 4413: 4381:(1): 34–43. 4378: 4374: 4364: 4347: 4343: 4300:(2): 71–74. 4297: 4293: 4287: 4273:(1): 12–17. 4270: 4266: 4256: 4223: 4219: 4209: 4174: 4170: 4160: 4127: 4123: 4116: 4091: 4087: 4038: 4031: 4007:(2): 31–37. 4004: 4000: 3959:(3): 21–26. 3956: 3952: 3902: 3898: 3888: 3863: 3859: 3817: 3813: 3807: 3782: 3778: 3768: 3754:cite journal 3717: 3713: 3703: 3678: 3674: 3668: 3641: 3637: 3627: 3602: 3598: 3591: 3558: 3554: 3512: 3508: 3495: 3470: 3466: 3460: 3427: 3423: 3417: 3384: 3380: 3374: 3341: 3337: 3331: 3306: 3302: 3268: 3264: 3255: 3233:(1): 31–43. 3230: 3226: 3220: 3177: 3173: 3166: 3158: 3136: 3130: 3103: 3097: 3062: 3058: 3048: 3034:cite journal 3009: 3003: 2981:(1): 29–50. 2978: 2974: 2971:Radlanski RJ 2964: 2939: 2935: 2912: 2898: 2884: 2870: 2856: 2842: 2828: 2816: 2791: 2787: 2751: 2747: 2741: 2732: 2729:Kriminalwiss 2728: 2722: 2689: 2685: 2679: 2671:the original 2650: 2646: 2636: 2611: 2607: 2601: 2579:(2): 85–92. 2576: 2572: 2528: 2524: 2518: 2485: 2481: 2475: 2463: 2452:. Retrieved 2442: 2430:. Retrieved 2426:the original 2421: 2411: 2399: 2388:. Retrieved 2382: 2372: 2338: 2295: 2291: 2246: 2242: 2209:(1–3): 1–8. 2206: 2202: 2196: 2171: 2167: 2161: 2149:. Retrieved 2144: 2082: 2078: 2068: 2043: 2039: 2032: 1997: 1993: 1983: 1974: 1965: 1956: 1947: 1922: 1918: 1912: 1901:. Retrieved 1897:the original 1887: 1862: 1858: 1833: 1822:. Retrieved 1818: 1809: 1798:. Retrieved 1794: 1785: 1774:. Retrieved 1770:the original 1760: 1744: 1705: 1701: 1677:the original 1672: 1666: 1653: 1641: 1632: 1626: 1615:. Retrieved 1606: 1595:. Retrieved 1593:. 2021-02-20 1590: 1581: 1570:. Retrieved 1566: 1538:25 September 1536:. Retrieved 1532: 1523: 1511: 1500:. Retrieved 1490: 1479:. Retrieved 1469: 1457: 1446:. Retrieved 1442: 1433: 1416: 1404:. Retrieved 1397: 1387: 1360: 1317: 1313: 1307: 1282: 1278: 1229: 1225: 1216: 1199: 1185: 1181: 1177: 1155: 1147: 1143: 1140: 1136: 1127: 1113: 1109: 1100: 1097: 1085: 1069:Levon Brooks 1058: 1053: 1049: 1046: 1042: 1038: 1034: 1030: 1026: 1022: 1018: 1011: 999: 997: 993: 979: 972: 963: 955: 946: 942: 934: 925: 913: 908: 906: 902: 898: 894: 890: 879: 799: 797: 792: 786: 767: 764: 756: 752: 749: 745: 741: 732: 716: 704: 684: 675: 646: 627: 587: 583: 582: 447:Fractography 175:Epidemiology 147: 133:Anthropology 70: 61: 46: 35: 18: 4893:Dental fear 4852:Philippines 4632:Endodontics 4624:Specialties 4094:: e14–e17. 4064:cite thesis 4056:10722/33005 3681:(1): 7–15. 3203:10316/44447 3180:: 185–191. 2936:Morphologie 1159:DNA profile 1131:radiographs 916:Bari, Italy 846:evidentiary 835:Megan's Law 812:Wayne Boden 655:(NAS), the 642:crime scene 634:photographs 630:radiographs 592:examination 492:Crime scene 452:Linguistics 432:Engineering 397:Photography 275:Colorimetry 241:Social work 58:if you can. 4945:Categories 4840:By country 4226:: 110361. 3644:(2): 101. 3344:: 94–102. 2735:: 128–130. 2454:2021-05-26 2432:16 January 2390:2008-07-13 2151:21 October 2145:reason.com 2000:(3): 1–5. 1903:2013-09-06 1824:2022-04-04 1819:McGill CDE 1800:2022-04-04 1776:2013-09-06 1753:082475414X 1617:2022-03-29 1597:2022-03-29 1572:2022-03-29 1502:2013-09-06 1481:2013-09-06 1448:2020-10-20 1406:30 January 1262:References 851:People of 842:California 840:People of 778:witchcraft 734:Medicine. 619:occupation 596:evaluation 497:CSI effect 467:Statistics 260:Accounting 231:Psychology 226:Psychiatry 205:Toxicology 190:Palynology 170:Entomology 4616:Dentistry 4556:Dunning B 4436:0001-6365 4387:2219-6749 4356:2219-6749 4248:219959812 4152:235373990 3842:0031-3203 3799:2212-4780 3785:: 22–37. 3660:235751103 3473:: 37–42. 3409:0305-4403 3261:Hassett B 3212:0305-4403 2348:973513434 2174:: 58–65. 2099:2053-9711 2024:141634762 2016:2320-2068 1014:Ray Krone 857:Ray Krone 822:Ted Bundy 707:KU Leuven 681:Australia 512:Skid mark 310:Profiling 270:Chemistry 195:Pathology 180:Limnology 148:Dentistry 52:talk page 4876:See also 4565:Skeptoid 4537:Archived 4491:22022138 4405:29864028 4322:32109143 4314:25860881 4279:22689352 4240:32563136 4201:32002490 4144:34106426 4108:27138238 4023:36027896 3975:31894134 3931:26015692 3880:21663865 3746:29657486 3695:15335591 3619:20129433 3583:76662620 3575:30866041 3529:29460327 3487:27592445 3452:27573899 3366:51660524 3358:30015284 3323:21371836 3285:21953490 3247:23907722 3122:59223984 3026:19470083 2995:16458729 2969:Renz H, 2956:37897941 2808:11714165 2714:72751423 2706:13978931 2593:11393946 2510:28559168 2320:27808790 2312:17209928 2271:24815157 2263:17199623 2223:21514079 2188:28131012 2147:. Reason 2117:28852538 2060:19505780 1939:16563684 1879:14979355 1722:16600549 1299:16540273 1235:See also 1093:cementum 667:Training 651:(NIST), 603:evidence 545:Category 200:Podiatry 185:Medicine 99:a series 97:Part of 36:require 4482:3190439 4396:6195941 4192:6968523 4014:9942798 3966:7442964 3922:4439652 3822:Bibcode 3737:5887632 3537:4585225 3444:5234039 3389:Bibcode 3182:Bibcode 3080:9221987 2768:6699595 2667:6957451 2628:4613797 2545:4443779 2502:5136610 2108:5570687 1427:. 2016. 1334:7632598 1164:genomic 1073:Netflix 959:acetate 950:G-clamp 853:Arizona 772:, Rev. 701:Belgium 540:Outline 138:Biology 38:cleanup 4857:Israel 4847:Canada 4571:15 May 4489: 4479: 4434: 4403: 4393: 4385: 4354: 4320: 4312: 4277: 4246: 4238: 4199: 4189: 4150: 4142: 4106: 4021: 4011: 3973: 3963: 3929: 3919: 3878: 3840: 3797: 3744: 3734: 3693: 3658: 3617: 3581: 3573: 3535: 3527: 3485: 3450: 3442: 3407: 3364: 3356: 3321: 3283: 3245: 3210: 3151: 3120: 3110: 3087: 3077: 3024: 2993: 2954: 2806: 2766: 2712: 2704: 2665: 2626: 2591: 2543: 2508: 2500: 2346: 2318: 2310: 2269: 2261: 2221: 2186: 2115: 2105: 2097: 2058: 2022: 2014: 1953:"Home" 1937: 1877: 1751: 1720: 1375: 1342:969604 1340: 1332: 1297: 1192:noted. 738:Canada 693:, and 636:, and 600:dental 594:, and 219:Social 4318:S2CID 4244:S2CID 4148:S2CID 3656:S2CID 3579:S2CID 3533:S2CID 3505:(PDF) 3448:S2CID 3362:S2CID 2710:S2CID 2506:S2CID 2316:S2CID 2267:S2CID 2020:S2CID 1680:(PDF) 1663:(PDF) 1425:(PDF) 1338:S2CID 1196:them. 937:teeth 837:case) 782:Devil 672:India 605:in a 4573:2022 4487:PMID 4432:ISSN 4401:PMID 4383:ISSN 4352:ISSN 4310:PMID 4275:PMID 4236:PMID 4197:PMID 4140:PMID 4104:PMID 4070:link 4019:PMID 3971:PMID 3927:PMID 3876:PMID 3838:ISSN 3795:ISSN 3760:link 3742:PMID 3691:PMID 3615:PMID 3571:PMID 3525:PMID 3483:PMID 3440:PMID 3405:ISSN 3354:PMID 3319:PMID 3281:PMID 3243:PMID 3208:ISSN 3149:ISBN 3118:OCLC 3108:ISBN 3085:PMID 3040:link 3022:PMID 2991:PMID 2975:Homo 2952:PMID 2804:PMID 2764:PMID 2702:PMID 2663:PMID 2624:PMID 2589:PMID 2541:PMID 2498:PMID 2434:2020 2344:OCLC 2308:PMID 2259:PMID 2219:PMID 2184:PMID 2153:2022 2113:PMID 2095:ISSN 2056:PMID 2012:ISSN 1935:PMID 1875:PMID 1749:ISBN 1718:PMID 1540:2014 1408:2023 1373:ISBN 1330:PMID 1295:PMID 1166:and 1067:and 615:race 4477:PMC 4467:doi 4391:PMC 4302:doi 4228:doi 4224:313 4187:PMC 4179:doi 4132:doi 4096:doi 4092:263 4052:hdl 4044:doi 4009:PMC 3961:PMC 3917:PMC 3907:doi 3868:doi 3830:doi 3787:doi 3732:PMC 3722:doi 3683:doi 3646:doi 3607:doi 3563:doi 3559:169 3517:doi 3513:166 3475:doi 3432:doi 3397:doi 3346:doi 3342:290 3311:doi 3307:210 3273:doi 3269:146 3235:doi 3231:152 3198:hdl 3190:doi 3141:doi 3075:PMC 3067:doi 3014:doi 2983:doi 2944:doi 2940:108 2796:doi 2756:doi 2694:doi 2655:doi 2651:105 2616:doi 2581:doi 2533:doi 2490:doi 2300:doi 2251:doi 2211:doi 2207:211 2176:doi 2103:PMC 2087:doi 2048:doi 2044:190 2002:doi 1927:doi 1923:159 1867:doi 1710:doi 1706:159 1673:114 1365:doi 1322:doi 1318:107 1287:doi 1283:159 855:v. 829:v. 820:v. 638:DNA 598:of 586:or 4947:: 4562:. 4485:. 4475:. 4461:. 4457:. 4428:45 4422:. 4399:. 4389:. 4379:36 4377:. 4373:. 4348:38 4346:. 4342:. 4330:^ 4316:. 4308:. 4298:36 4296:. 4271:26 4269:. 4265:. 4242:. 4234:. 4222:. 4218:. 4195:. 4185:. 4173:. 4169:. 4146:. 4138:. 4128:17 4126:. 4102:. 4090:. 4078:^ 4066:}} 4062:{{ 4017:. 4005:40 4003:. 3999:. 3983:^ 3969:. 3957:37 3955:. 3951:. 3939:^ 3925:. 3915:. 3901:. 3897:. 3874:. 3864:18 3862:. 3850:^ 3836:. 3828:. 3818:37 3816:. 3793:. 3777:. 3756:}} 3752:{{ 3740:. 3716:. 3712:. 3689:. 3677:. 3654:. 3642:12 3640:. 3636:. 3613:. 3603:17 3601:. 3577:. 3569:. 3557:. 3545:^ 3531:. 3523:. 3511:. 3507:. 3481:. 3471:44 3469:. 3446:. 3438:. 3428:46 3426:. 3403:. 3395:. 3385:35 3383:. 3360:. 3352:. 3340:. 3317:. 3305:. 3293:^ 3279:. 3267:. 3241:. 3229:. 3206:. 3196:. 3188:. 3178:49 3176:. 3157:. 3147:. 3116:. 3089:35 3083:. 3073:. 3063:30 3061:. 3057:. 3036:}} 3032:{{ 3012:. 2989:. 2979:57 2977:. 2950:. 2938:. 2926:^ 2802:. 2792:46 2790:. 2776:^ 2762:. 2752:29 2750:. 2731:. 2708:. 2700:. 2690:42 2688:. 2661:. 2649:. 2645:. 2622:. 2612:14 2610:. 2587:. 2577:41 2575:. 2553:^ 2539:. 2529:14 2527:. 2504:. 2496:. 2486:11 2484:. 2420:. 2381:. 2356:^ 2328:^ 2314:. 2306:. 2296:52 2294:. 2279:^ 2265:. 2257:. 2247:51 2245:. 2231:^ 2217:. 2205:. 2182:. 2172:46 2170:. 2143:. 2125:^ 2111:. 2101:. 2093:. 2081:. 2077:. 2054:. 2042:. 2018:. 2010:. 1996:. 1992:. 1973:. 1955:. 1933:. 1921:. 1873:. 1863:49 1861:. 1845:^ 1817:. 1793:. 1730:^ 1716:. 1704:. 1688:^ 1671:. 1665:. 1589:. 1565:. 1548:^ 1531:. 1441:. 1396:. 1371:. 1363:. 1350:^ 1336:. 1328:. 1316:. 1293:. 1281:. 1269:^ 1063:, 1009:. 697:. 689:, 663:. 617:, 101:on 4608:e 4601:t 4594:v 4575:. 4493:. 4469:: 4463:3 4438:. 4407:. 4358:. 4324:. 4304:: 4281:. 4250:. 4230:: 4203:. 4181:: 4175:4 4154:. 4134:: 4110:. 4098:: 4072:) 4058:. 4054:: 4046:: 4025:. 3977:. 3933:. 3909:: 3903:7 3882:. 3870:: 3844:. 3832:: 3824:: 3801:. 3789:: 3783:8 3762:) 3748:. 3724:: 3718:9 3697:. 3685:: 3679:4 3662:. 3648:: 3621:. 3609:: 3585:. 3565:: 3539:. 3519:: 3489:. 3477:: 3454:. 3434:: 3411:. 3399:: 3391:: 3368:. 3348:: 3325:. 3313:: 3287:. 3275:: 3249:. 3237:: 3214:. 3200:: 3192:: 3184:: 3143:: 3124:. 3091:. 3069:: 3042:) 3028:. 3016:: 2997:. 2985:: 2958:. 2946:: 2906:. 2892:. 2878:. 2864:. 2850:. 2836:. 2810:. 2798:: 2770:. 2758:: 2733:8 2716:. 2696:: 2657:: 2630:. 2618:: 2595:. 2583:: 2547:. 2535:: 2512:. 2492:: 2457:. 2436:. 2393:. 2350:. 2322:. 2302:: 2273:. 2253:: 2225:. 2213:: 2190:. 2178:: 2155:. 2119:. 2089:: 2083:3 2062:. 2050:: 2026:. 2004:: 1998:4 1977:. 1959:. 1941:. 1929:: 1906:. 1881:. 1869:: 1827:. 1803:. 1779:. 1755:. 1724:. 1712:: 1620:. 1600:. 1575:. 1542:. 1505:. 1484:. 1451:. 1410:. 1381:. 1367:: 1344:. 1324:: 1301:. 1289:: 863:. 833:( 572:e 565:t 558:v 77:) 71:( 66:) 62:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.