251:
operating in
Manchester in 1795, using free children drawn from the local population. The great advantage parish apprentices had had was that they were tied to the mill, no matter how remote the mill had to be to avail itself of water power. If the mill no longer had to be remote, it became a problem that the mill was tied to the apprentices. Apprentices had to be housed clothed and fed whether or not the mill could sell what they produced; they were in competition with free children whose wages would fall if the mill went on short time ( and might not reflect the full cost of housing clothing and feeding them, since that was incurred whether they were working or not) and who could be discharged if sick, injured or otherwise incapable of work. Consequently, the use of free children came to predominate: the Act became largely a dead letter within its limited scope, and inapplicable to most factory children.
271:
bills were given similar 'advance notice' First
Readings at the end of the 1815 session). In the 1816 session Peel chaired a Commons Committee collecting evidence intended to show the necessity for legislation. Peel did not bring forward a Bill in the 1817 session (because - he explained later - he was ill; he certainly withdrew from business in January 1817). In 1818 he did: the Bill got as far as the House of Lords, but lapsed when a General Election was called. In 1819, he again presented a Bill; the Lords felt it necessary to set up a Committee of their own to hear evidence on the issue; nonetheless in 1819 an Act was finally passed to regulate the working conditions of children working in cotton mills and factories.
342:. c. 5) was passed in December 1819. It was introduced by Sir Robert Peel, who explained that "the object of the amendment was, when any accident by fire or otherwise took place in a factory, to allow the people thrown out of employment by such accident, to work by night, in such part of the works as were not destroyed, till the accident was made good. If this was not allowed, the worst consequences must arise, from letting loose on society a number of people without employment." (Contemporary newspaper reports indicate that this followed a fire at one of the mills at New Lanark, and that Peel indicated that unless the Act was passed by the start of January, many of the workers there would become unemployed.)
259:
conditions; some even worked a 12-hour day or less (the Grant brothers' mill at
Tottington worked an 11.5-hour day: "This establishment has perfect ventilation; all the apprentices, and in fact all the children, are healthy, happy, clean, and well clothed ; proper and daily attention is paid to their instruction ; and they regularly attend divine worship on Sundays."): in other mills children worked up to 15 hours a day in bad conditions (e.g. Gortons and Roberts' Elton mill: "Most filthy; no ventilation; the apprentices and other children ragged, puny, not half clothed, and seemingly not half fed; no instruction of any sort; no human beings can be more wretched").
48:
247:
widely used as a cheap and captive workforce. The Act required that cotton mills and factories be properly ventilated and basic requirements on cleanliness be met. Apprentices in these premises were to be given a basic education and to attend a religious service at least once a month. They were to be provided with clothing and their working hours were limited to no more than twelve hours a day (excluding meal breaks); they were not to work at night.
351:
inspectors 1833 Act; ten-hour day 1847 Act, minimum age ten 1874 Act) do not suggest that if passed it would have been regarded as a definitive settlement. Objections to the much weaker 1819 bill were still strong and varied; a contemporary pro-bill pamphlet listed (and to its own satisfaction rebutted) eight different arguments against the bill, most of which were to continue to be urged against subsequent factory legislation for many years:
119:
765:"The property which every man has in his own labour, as it is the original foundation of all other property, so it is the most sacred and inviolable. The patrimony of a poor man lies in the strength and dexterity of his hands; and to hinder him from employing this strength and dexterity in what manner he thinks proper, without injury to his neighbour, is a plain violation of his most sacred property."
206:, but the Act as passed was much weaker than the 1815 bill; the Act forbade the employment of children under 9; children aged 9–16 years were limited to 12 hours' work per day and could not work at night. There was no effective means of its enforcement, but it established the precedent for Parliamentary intervention on conditions of employment which was followed by subsequent
270:
approached Peel with a draft Bill to regulate the use of children in the textile industry. Peel agreed to steer the Bill through
Parliament. Owen's draft was given a First Reading late in the 1815 session (so that copies could be printed and sent out for consultation before the 1816 session; other
246:
apprentices working in his mills (which he blamed on 'gross mismanagement' by his subordinates) and in cotton mills in general. Early mills had been water-powered, and hence sited where there was a useful fall of water, rather than where there was an available workforce. Child apprentices had been
299:
hours a day, with two hours for mealtimes and half an hour for schooling this made a 12.5 hour day; Magistrates were to be empowered to appoint paid inspectors (to be independent of the mills and factories they inspected); and
Inspectors were to be able to demand admission to mills at any time of
258:
magistrate who had investigated 29 local cotton mills; 20 had no apprentices but employed a total of 550 children under 14; the other nine mills employed a total of 98 apprentices, and a total of 350 children under 14. Apprentices were mostly found in the larger mills, which had somewhat better
250:
The Act was not effectively enforced, and did not address the working conditions of 'free children' (children working in mills who were not apprentices). Improvements in the generation of rotary motion by steam engines made steam-powered cotton mills a practical proposition; they were already
350:
Robert Owen blamed the failure to get an Act closely matching his bill passed on Peel's failure to move swiftly before opposition had a chance to get organised. However, the 1815 bill was extremely ambitious and the dates at which subsequent factory legislation matched its provisions (paid
332:; if two witnesses gave information upon oath that a mill was breaking the Act, local magistrates could send their clerk (or a paid deputy) to inspect the mill. If the mill was indeed breaking the Act, then it was liable to further inspections without fresh informations being laid.
323:
hours a day (not including mealtimes or schooling); the twelve hours to be worked between 5 a.m. and 9 p.m.; at least half an hour to be allowed for breakfast, and a dinner break of at least an hour to be taken between 11 a.m. and 2 p.m. (an amending Act in the next session
802:
Both in the obvious sense that one hour less in the mill would be one hour more drinking time and in a more political sense that it was the discipline of the cotton industry that kept the lower classes of the cotton towns under control (1819 was the year of the
762:'Inquisitorial' because agents of government could demand access to a man's property, 'interfering with free labour (sic)' because the orthodoxy of the age was that man and master should reach an agreement on pay and conditions without outside interference
521:
Reasons in favour of Sir Robert Peel's bill, for ameliorating the condition of children employed in cotton factories; comprehending a summary view of the evidence in support of the bill, taken before the Lords' committees in the present session of
811:
supporters of the 1819 bill also had to defend themselves from the claim that the talk about the bill had unsettled the millworkers and was therefore responsible for recent strikes (then particularly alarming because illegal under the
360:
the bill is inquisitorial, interferes with free labour, with parental authority, and in effect with the labour of adults, because the adults cannot work without the children
380:
that restricting the hours of children would mean millowners would employ men rather than children – rather than benefitting children the bill would make them unemployable
753:
The act is described as 'of a retrograde tendency' by
Hutchins and Harrison, who fail to indicate its connection with New Lanark and their progressive hero Robert Owen
335:
The Act therefore did little more than establish the principle of government intervention and set forth a relatively unambitious and virtually unenforceable standard.
404:
139:
905:
900:
369:
If eleven hours actual labour be fixed as a maximum in Cotton Mills, how can
Parliament refuse to impose a similar maximum for all other trades?
374:
that there was no need for legislation; enlightened millowners already saw the need for good working conditions; given time the rest would also
910:
17:
793:
Not because water flowed past the mill 24 hours a day, but because it didn't; flow was irregular and should be used whenever available
705:
547:
219:
784:
Book I Chapter 10, part ii) was originally aimed against artificial restrictions (such as apprenticeships) on men entering a trade)
60:
279:
The Act passed in 1819 was only a pale shadow of Owen's draft of 1815. The bill presented in 1815, applied to all children in
647:
461:
Answers to the objections to sir R. Peel's bill, for ameliorating the condition of children employed in cotton factories
660:
486:
161:
408:
187:
52:
128:
98:
872:
744:
In some cases this is more than a figure of speech: apprentices were not allowed to leave the mill at any time
223:
199:
851:
602:
255:
383:
that reducing the hours mills were operated would have a bad effect on the morals of the millworkers
339:
325:
617:
183:
132:
556:
202:, who had first introduced a bill on the matter in 1815. The 1815 bill had been instigated by
459:
516:
813:
615:
Statutes at Large, 59 Geo. 3. c. 66, LXXIII, pp. 418-419 ;relevant excerpts reproduced at
143:
8:
808:
832:
589:
355:
that nothing in the working conditions of mill children showed any need for legislation
868:
804:
777:
643:
884:
A History of the
Lancashire cotton industry and the Amalgamated Weavers' Association
862:
421:
195:
76:
190:, which was its first attempt to regulate the hours and conditions of work of
894:
364:
that the bill would make
British industry uncompetitive on the world market
207:
773:
263:
231:
227:
203:
267:
179:
65:
191:
377:
that restricting working hours was unfair to water-powered mills
235:
642:
since reprinted with same pagination by
Psychology Press (1996,
517:"Section II: Extracts from the Evidence of James Watkins Esq…."
303:
Meanwhile, the Act passed in 1819, only applied to children in
239:
93:
437:
435:
433:
328:. c. 5) amended these limits to 11 a.m. to 4 p.m.); There was
243:
423:
Statutes at Large: Statutes of the United Kingdom, 1801–1806
430:
635:
860:
549:
Robert Owen : Social Reformer (Fabian Tract 166)
780:(a Tory) endorsed those sentiments (Smith's quote (
254:In 1819, a Lords Committee heard evidence from a
892:
830:
441:
861:Hobbs, S.; McKechnie, J.; Lavalette, M (1999).
622:Aspects of the Industrial Revolution in Britain
307:mills and factories; with only children under
481:
479:
367:that the bill created a dangerous precedent "
330:no provision for routine inspection of mills
234:. Peel was one of the richest millowners in
80:
398:
640:. Oxford University Press. pp. 734–5.
476:
454:
452:
450:
287:were not to be employed; children between
142:. Please do not remove this message until
541:
539:
283:mills and factories; with children under
220:Health and Morals of Apprentices Act 1802
162:Learn how and when to remove this message
555:. London: Fabian Society. Archived from
545:
138:Relevant discussion may be found on the
906:Health and safety in the United Kingdom
881:
864:Child Labour: A World History Companion
849:
638:English Historical Documents, 1783-1832
609:
509:
447:
414:
238:, and had become concerned at the poor
27:Act of Parliament regulating child work
14:
901:United Kingdom Acts of Parliament 1819
893:
831:Hutchins, B. L.; Harrison, A. (1911).
536:
706:"ARTIZANS—MACHINERY—COMBINATION LAWS"
311:to not be employed; children between
112:
636:A. Aspinall; Anthony Smith (1959).
176:Cotton Mills and Factories Act 1819
36:Cotton Mills and Factories Act 1819
24:
911:Occupational safety and health law
886:. Amalgamated Weavers Association.
843:
464:. Manchester: R & W Dean. 1819
25:
922:
853:The Industrial History of England
524:. W. Clowes. 1819. pp. 41–46
834:A History of Factory Legislation
710:Hansard House of Commons Debates
665:Hansard House of Commons Debates
491:Hansard House of Commons Debates
266:, owner of a prosperous mill at
188:Parliament of the United Kingdom
117:
53:Parliament of the United Kingdom
46:
823:
796:
787:
756:
747:
698:
683:
653:
99:Labour in Cotton Mills Act 1831
738:
574:
442:Hutchins & Harrison (1911)
13:
1:
387:
345:
213:
716:(cc141-51). 12 February 1824
624:. University ofMassachusetts
497:(cc559-66). 19 February 1818
392:
7:
144:conditions to do so are met
18:Cotton Mills, etc. Act 1819
10:
927:
671:: cc815-6. 7 December 1819
411:. Accessed 1 August 2014.
274:
226:to improve conditions for
32:United Kingdom legislation
618:"The Factory Act of 1819"
405:Early factory legislation
104:
92:
87:
72:
59:
45:
40:
731:
340:60 Geo. 3 & 1 Geo. 4
326:60 Geo. 3 & 1 Geo. 4
319:could work no more than
295:could work no more than
882:Hopwood, Edwin (1969).
837:. P. S. King & Son.
661:"COTTON FACTORIES BILL"
487:"COTTON FACTORIES BILL"
222:had been introduced by
198:. It was introduced by
767:
546:Hutchins, B L (1912).
763:
690:"House of Commons".
856:. Methuen & Co.
850:Gibbins, H (1897).
694:. 14 December 1819.
131:of this article is
37:
582:Manchester Mercury
35:
805:Peterloo Massacre
782:Wealth of Nations
778:William Huskisson
770:Wealth of Nations
648:978-0-415-14373-8
597:Missing or empty
338:An amending Act (
172:
171:
164:
111:
110:
88:Other legislation
41:Act of Parliament
16:(Redirected from
918:
887:
878:
857:
838:
817:
800:
794:
791:
785:
760:
754:
751:
745:
742:
726:
725:
723:
721:
702:
696:
695:
687:
681:
680:
678:
676:
657:
651:
641:
633:
631:
629:
613:
607:
606:
600:
595:
593:
585:
584:. 11 March 1817.
578:
572:
571:
569:
567:
561:
554:
543:
534:
533:
531:
529:
513:
507:
506:
504:
502:
483:
474:
473:
471:
469:
456:
445:
439:
428:
427:
418:
412:
402:
182:. c. 66) was an
167:
160:
156:
153:
147:
121:
120:
113:
106:Status: Repealed
82:
50:
49:
38:
34:
21:
926:
925:
921:
920:
919:
917:
916:
915:
891:
890:
875:
846:
844:Further reading
841:
826:
821:
820:
814:Combination Act
801:
797:
792:
788:
761:
757:
752:
748:
743:
739:
734:
729:
719:
717:
704:
703:
699:
692:Chester Courant
689:
688:
684:
674:
672:
659:
658:
654:
627:
625:
616:
614:
610:
598:
596:
587:
586:
580:
579:
575:
565:
563:
562:on 28 July 2011
559:
552:
544:
537:
527:
525:
515:
514:
510:
500:
498:
485:
484:
477:
467:
465:
458:
457:
448:
440:
431:
420:
419:
415:
403:
399:
395:
390:
348:
277:
224:Sir Robert Peel
216:
200:Sir Robert Peel
196:cotton industry
168:
157:
151:
148:
137:
122:
118:
107:
77:Sir Robert Peel
55:
47:
33:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
924:
914:
913:
908:
903:
889:
888:
879:
873:
858:
845:
842:
840:
839:
827:
825:
822:
819:
818:
795:
786:
755:
746:
736:
735:
733:
730:
728:
727:
697:
682:
652:
608:
573:
535:
508:
475:
446:
429:
413:
396:
394:
391:
389:
386:
385:
384:
381:
378:
375:
372:
365:
362:
356:
347:
344:
276:
273:
215:
212:
170:
169:
125:
123:
116:
109:
108:
105:
102:
101:
96:
90:
89:
85:
84:
74:
70:
69:
63:
57:
56:
51:
43:
42:
31:
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
923:
912:
909:
907:
904:
902:
899:
898:
896:
885:
880:
876:
870:
866:
865:
859:
855:
854:
848:
847:
836:
835:
829:
828:
815:
810:
806:
799:
790:
783:
779:
775:
771:
766:
759:
750:
741:
737:
715:
711:
707:
701:
693:
686:
670:
666:
662:
656:
649:
645:
639:
623:
619:
612:
604:
591:
583:
577:
558:
551:
550:
542:
540:
523:
518:
512:
496:
492:
488:
482:
480:
463:
462:
455:
453:
451:
443:
438:
436:
434:
425:
424:
417:
410:
409:Parliament.uk
406:
401:
397:
382:
379:
376:
373:
370:
366:
363:
361:
357:
354:
353:
352:
343:
341:
336:
333:
331:
327:
322:
318:
314:
310:
306:
301:
298:
294:
290:
286:
282:
272:
269:
265:
260:
257:
252:
248:
245:
241:
237:
233:
229:
225:
221:
211:
209:
205:
201:
197:
193:
189:
185:
181:
177:
166:
163:
155:
152:November 2022
145:
141:
135:
134:
130:
124:
115:
114:
103:
100:
97:
95:
91:
86:
78:
75:
73:Introduced by
71:
67:
64:
62:
58:
54:
44:
39:
30:
19:
883:
867:. ABC-CLIO.
863:
852:
833:
824:Bibliography
798:
789:
781:
772:, quoted by
769:
764:
758:
749:
740:
718:. Retrieved
713:
709:
700:
691:
685:
673:. Retrieved
668:
664:
655:
637:
626:. Retrieved
621:
611:
599:|title=
581:
576:
564:. Retrieved
557:the original
548:
526:. Retrieved
520:
511:
499:. Retrieved
494:
490:
466:. Retrieved
460:
422:
416:
400:
368:
359:
349:
337:
334:
329:
320:
316:
312:
308:
304:
302:
296:
292:
288:
284:
280:
278:
261:
253:
249:
232:cotton mills
217:
208:Factory Acts
175:
173:
158:
149:
127:
29:
774:Joseph Hume
768:Adam Smith
675:19 December
264:Robert Owen
230:working in
228:apprentices
204:Robert Owen
94:Repealed by
895:Categories
874:0874369568
776:(a Whig):
522:parliament
388:References
346:Objections
268:New Lanark
214:Background
129:neutrality
809:Mancunian
590:cite news
393:Citations
262:In 1815,
180:59 Geo. 3
140:talk page
66:59 Geo. 3
634:quoting
293:eighteen
192:children
133:disputed
61:Citation
720:29 July
628:28 July
566:25 July
528:23 July
501:22 July
468:23 July
426:. 1822.
317:sixteen
300:day.
281:textile
275:The Act
236:England
194:in the
186:of the
81:Commons
68:. c. 66
871:
646:
321:twelve
305:cotton
256:Bolton
240:health
732:Notes
560:(PDF)
553:(PDF)
358:that
244:child
869:ISBN
722:2014
677:2015
644:ISBN
630:2014
603:help
568:2014
530:2014
503:2014
470:2014
315:and
313:nine
309:nine
291:and
218:The
174:The
126:The
807:).
297:ten
289:ten
285:ten
242:of
184:Act
897::
714:10
712:.
708:.
669:41
667:.
663:.
620:.
594::
592:}}
588:{{
538:^
519:.
495:37
493:.
489:.
478:^
449:^
432:^
407:.
210:.
877:.
816:)
724:.
679:.
650:)
632:.
605:)
601:(
570:.
532:.
505:.
472:.
444:.
371:"
324:(
178:(
165:)
159:(
154:)
150:(
146:.
136:.
83:)
79:(
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.