Knowledge

Cognitive liberty

Source đź“ť

149:, are continuing to increase the ability to both monitor and directly influence human cognition. As a result, many theorists have emphasized the importance of recognizing cognitive liberty in order to protect individuals from the state using such technologies to alter those individuals' mental processes: "states must be barred from invading the inner sphere of persons, from accessing their thoughts, modulating their emotions or manipulating their personal preferences." These specific ethical concerns regarding the use of neuroscience technologies to interfere or invade the brain form the fields of 250:" is in fact a "war on mental states". The CCLE, as well as other cognitive liberty advocacy groups such as Cognitive Liberty UK, have lobbied for the re-examination and reform of prohibited drug law; one of the CCLE's key guiding principles is that "governments should not criminally prohibit cognitive enhancement or the experience of any mental state". Calls for reform of restrictions on the use of prescription cognitive-enhancement drugs (also called smart drugs or 205:
punishing "interventions severely interfering with another's mental integrity by undermining mental control or exploiting pre-existing mental weakness." Direct interventions that reduce or impair cognitive capacities such as memory, concentration, and willpower; alter preferences, beliefs, or behavioral dispositions; elicit inappropriate emotions; or inflict clinically identifiable mental injuries would all be
311:
liberty in previous human rights instruments was due to the relative lack of technology capable of directly interfering with mental autonomy at the time the core human rights treaties were created. As the human mind was considered invulnerable to direct manipulation, control or alteration, it was deemed unnecessary to expressly protect individuals from unwanted mental interference. With modern advances in
413:. Hardison argued that "individual sovereignty over one's interior environment constitutes the very core of what it means to be free", and that as psychotropic drugs are a potent method of altering an individual's mental process, prohibition of them under the MDA was in opposition to Article 9. The court however disagreed, calling Hardison's arguments a "portmanteau defense" and relying upon the 339:
among the most important legal and political freedoms…This freedom is not often regarded in its own right but should be recognized and more fully developed in face of emerging mind-altering technologies…Freedom of mind is the freedom of a person to use her mental capacities as she pleases, free from external interferences and internal impediments".
319:
some have instead argued that cognitive liberty is already an inherent part of the international human rights framework as the principle underlying the rights to freedom of thought, expression and religion. The freedom to think in whatever manner one chooses is a "necessary precondition to those guaranteed freedoms."
70:, the founders and directors of the non-profit Center for Cognitive Liberty and Ethics (CCLE). Sententia and Boire define cognitive liberty as "the right of each individual to think independently and autonomously, to use the full power of his or her mind, and to engage in multiple modes of thought." 196:
has also proposed legislative protection of cognitive liberty as a way of safeguarding the protection from self-incrimination found in the Fifth Amendment to the US Constitution, in the light of the increasing ability to access human memory. Her book 'The Battle for Your Brain: Defending the Right to
338:
At least one scholar and proponent of cognitive liberty, Christoph Bublitz, has used the term 'freedom of mind' to describe cognitive liberty: "mind altering interventions primary affect another sense of freedom, freedom of mind, a concept that has not received much attention although it should rank
277:
of human mental function. Wrye Sententia has emphasized the importance of cognitive liberty in ensuring the freedom to pursue human mental enhancement, as well as the freedom to choose against enhancement. Sententia argues that the recognition of a "right to (and not to) direct, modify, or enhance
120:
This first obligation, to refrain from non-consensually interfering with an individual's cognitive processes, seeks to protect individuals from having their mental processes altered or monitored without their consent or knowledge, "setting up a defensive wall against unwanted intrusions". Ongoing
327:
have argued that cognitive liberty is fundamental to Freedom of Thought because it encompasses the ability to have certain types of experiences, including the right to experience altered or non-ordinary states of consciousness. It has also been suggested that cognitive liberty can be seen to be a
318:
Cognitive liberty then can be seen as an extension of or an "update" to the right to freedom of thought as it has been traditionally understood. Freedom of thought should now be understood to include the right to determine one's own mental state as well as the content of one's thoughts. However,
310:
they want. Cognitive liberty seeks to protect an individual's right to determine their own state of mind and be free from external control over their state of mind, rather than just protecting the content of an individual's thoughts. It has been suggested that the lack of protection of cognitive
204:
interference with human cognition, Jan Christoph Bublitz and Reinhard Merkel among others suggest that cognitive liberty should also prevent other, non-state entities from interfering with an individual's mental "inner realm". Bublitz and Merkel propose the introduction of a new criminal offense
439:
The recent development of neurosciences is increasing the possibility of controlling and influence specific mental functions. The risks inherent in removing restrictions on controlled cognitive-enhancing drugs, including of widening the gap between those able to afford such treatments and those
218:
Where the first obligation seeks to protect individuals from interference with cognitive processes by the state, corporations or other individuals, this second obligation seeks to ensure that individuals have the freedom to alter or enhance their own consciousness. An individual who enjoys this
73:
The CCLE is a network of scholars dedicated to protecting freedom of thought in the modern world of accelerating neurotechnologies. They seek to develop public policies that will preserve and enhance freedom of thought, and offer guidance with regard to relevant developments in neurotechnology,
160:
This element of cognitive liberty has been raised in relation to a number of state-sanctioned interventions in individual cognition, from the mandatory psychiatric 'treatment' of homosexuals in the US before the 1970s, to the non-consensual administration of psychoactive drugs to unwitting US
77:
Sententia and Boire conceived of the concept of cognitive liberty as a response to the increasing ability of technology to monitor and manipulate cognitive function, and the corresponding increase in the need to ensure individual cognitive autonomy and privacy. Sententia divides the practical
111:
Supporters of cognitive liberty therefore seek to impose both a negative and a positive obligation on states: to refrain from non-consensually interfering with an individual's cognitive processes, and to allow individuals to self-determine their own "inner realm" and control their own mental
46:. Though a relatively recently defined concept, many theorists see cognitive liberty as being of increasing importance as technological advances in neuroscience allow for an ever-expanding ability to directly influence consciousness. Cognitive liberty is not a recognized right in any 456:, wrote that "some who worry about the ethics of cognitive enhancement point to the danger of creating two classes of human beings – those with access to enhancement technologies, and those who must make do with an unaltered memory that fades with age." 285:
to enhance human cognition and that something beyond the current conception of freedom of thought is needed. Sententia claims that "cognitive liberty's strength is that it protects those who do want to alter their brains, but also those who do not".
209:
impermissible and subject to criminal prosecution. Sententia and Boire have also expressed concern that corporations and other non-state entities might utilize emerging neurotechnologies to alter individuals' mental processes without their consent.
82:
As long as their behavior does not endanger others, individuals should not be compelled against their will to use technologies that directly interact with the brain or be forced to take certain psychoactive
335:
Most proponents of cognitive liberty agree, however, that cognitive liberty should be expressly recognized as a human right in order to properly provide protection for individual cognitive autonomy.
2774: 779: 2694: 86:
As long as they do not subsequently engage in behavior that harms others, individuals should not be prohibited from, or criminalized for, using new mind-enhancing drugs and technologies.
421:
to deny Hardison's right to appeal to a superior court. Hardison was convicted and given a 20-year prison sentence, though he was released on 29 May 2013 after nine years in prison.
2188: 2269: 2284: 2274: 2200: 2719: 2714: 2699: 2264: 410: 67: 2908: 2394: 302:(UDHR), freedom of thought can be distinguished from cognitive liberty in that the former is concerned with protecting an individual's freedom to think 743:
Bublitz, Jan Christoph; Merkel, Reinhard (2014). "Crime Against Minds: On Mental Manipulations, Harms and a Human Right to Mental Self-Determination".
2862: 2724: 2279: 320: 810: 2709: 2609: 2704: 2769: 177: 219:
aspect of cognitive liberty has the freedom to alter their mental processes in any way they wish to, whether through indirect methods such as
2654: 2644: 2639: 2369: 2674: 2659: 2594: 2584: 2414: 2289: 1528: 2744: 2529: 2514: 2344: 2329: 1927: 1467: 1465:"Brief Amicus Curiae Of The Center For Cognitive Liberty & Ethics In Support Of The Petition, in the case of Sell v United States" 1120: 242:
As psychotropic drugs are a powerful method of altering cognitive function, many advocates of cognitive liberty are also advocates of
2749: 2664: 2544: 2469: 2449: 2444: 2314: 315:
and in anticipation of its future development however, it is argued that such express protection is becoming increasingly necessary.
667:
Sententia, Wrye (2004). "Neuroethical Considerations: Cognitive Liberty and Converging Technologies for Improving Human Cognition".
2764: 2689: 2599: 2554: 2499: 2419: 2379: 2359: 1165: 2816: 2786: 2754: 2739: 2629: 2589: 2574: 2569: 2534: 2484: 2439: 2374: 2354: 2349: 2334: 2319: 2309: 2304: 2294: 134: 2734: 2729: 2684: 2634: 2619: 2604: 2564: 2549: 2524: 2489: 2424: 2384: 2364: 2299: 2239: 2000: 1917: 47: 2857: 2759: 2679: 2669: 2579: 2539: 2519: 2504: 2494: 2464: 2459: 2454: 2434: 2429: 2409: 2399: 2389: 1932: 1443: 299: 1227: 1028: 2624: 2614: 2479: 2474: 2404: 279: 2883: 2324: 1901: 894:
The Transhumanist Reader: Classical and Contemporary Essays on the Science, Technology and Philosophy of the Human Future
836:"What an International Declaration on Neurotechnologies and Human Rights Could Look like: Ideas, Suggestions, Desiderata" 414: 2339: 2141: 2852: 2146: 1609: 1576: 1101: 727: 126: 440:
unable to do so, have caused many to remain skeptical about the wisdom of recognizing cognitive liberty as a right.
2171: 2100: 2090: 2559: 2509: 988: 294:
Cognitive liberty is not currently recognized as a human right by any international human rights treaty. While
375:, in which the Supreme Court examined whether the court had the power to make an order to forcibly administer 168:, to the forcible administration of mind-altering drugs on individuals to make them competent to stand trial. 2195: 189: 2649: 2259: 2105: 1084:
Roskies, Adina L. (2015), "Mind Reading, Lie Detection, and Privacy", in Clausen, Jens; Levy, Neil (eds.),
2847: 2095: 1781: 2898: 1993: 1922: 1642: 1806: 398: 376: 306:
they want, whereas cognitive liberty is concerned with protecting an individual's freedom to think
2903: 2837: 2234: 1047: 2913: 2781: 2244: 2183: 2166: 2074: 1811: 1746: 1482: 1118:
Brief Amicus Curiae Of The Center For Cognitive Liberty & Ethics In Support Of The Petition
980: 974: 720:
Entheogens, Society & Law: Towards a Politics of Consciousness, Autonomy and Responsibility
392: 324: 181: 130: 907: 2893: 2888: 2842: 2030: 1986: 1891: 1866: 1821: 1771: 1720: 1602: 517: 501: 481: 471: 371: 353: 42:. It has been argued to be both an extension of, and the principle underlying, the right to 2176: 2025: 1967: 1947: 1831: 1776: 1766: 1710: 1637: 1464: 1117: 676: 529: 511: 466: 441: 200:
Though this element of cognitive liberty is often defined as an individual's freedom from
8: 2121: 1957: 1952: 1851: 1826: 1741: 1384: 892:
Sententia, Wrye (2013). "Freedom by Design: Transhumanist Values and Cognitive Liberty".
780:"Drugs and human rights: private palliatives, sacramental freedoms and cognitive liberty" 642: 476: 680: 619: 596: 573: 2229: 1886: 1871: 1565: 802: 760: 700: 445: 430: 402: 295: 232: 146: 43: 23: 1260: 1142: 1029:"Freedom of Thought for the Extended Mind: Cognitive Enhancement and the Constitution" 2035: 1881: 1841: 1756: 1725: 1572: 1536: 1439: 1404: 1097: 984: 865: 857: 806: 764: 723: 692: 449: 434: 379:
to an individual who had refused such treatment, for the sole purpose of making them
274: 27: 704: 2249: 1876: 1846: 1836: 1801: 1715: 1705: 1695: 1659: 1654: 1595: 1431: 1396: 1089: 847: 794: 752: 684: 486: 380: 366: 269:
This element of cognitive liberty is also of great importance to proponents of the
193: 1435: 1093: 852: 835: 197:
Think Freely in the Age of Neurotechnology' discusses the matter in great detail.
1861: 1856: 1796: 1751: 1700: 1471: 1239: 1124: 282: 243: 236: 185: 165: 122: 1527:
Sommaggio, Paolo; Mazzocca, Marco; Gerola, Alessio; Ferro, Fulvio (2017-11-01).
1423: 2224: 1962: 1896: 1674: 1669: 524: 173: 31: 798: 756: 180:
has identified this element of cognitive liberty as being of relevance to the
54:, and is argued to be the principle underlying a number of recognized rights. 2877: 1816: 1791: 1786: 1540: 1408: 861: 506: 359: 270: 91: 51: 39: 688: 2064: 2020: 2009: 1761: 869: 696: 534: 358:
Richard Glen Boire of the Center for Cognitive Liberty and Ethics filed an
312: 247: 154: 1529:"Cognitive liberty. A first step towards a human neuro-rights declaration" 1424:"Cognitive Liberty or the International Human Right to Freedom of Thought" 106:
Thou shalt not prevent thy fellow man from altering his own consciousness.
2796: 2069: 2059: 491: 150: 63: 1400: 453: 251: 220: 138: 2821: 1937: 1679: 1567:
The Case against Perfection: Ethics in the Age of Genetic Engineering
142: 35: 928: 2254: 1942: 1647: 496: 263: 169: 2811: 2806: 1618: 329: 259: 133:(or "brain fingerprinting"), and to pharmacology, in the form of 2791: 1978: 1664: 255: 228: 16:
Freedom of an individual to control their own mental processes
1422:
Bublitz, Christoph (2015), Clausen, Jens; Levy, Neil (eds.),
278:
one's thought processes" is vital to the free application of
94:"Two Commandments for the Molecular Age", from his 1968 book 1526: 289: 2801: 224: 1587: 1342: 1340: 1203: 1201: 1070: 1068: 1004: 1002: 1000: 406: 266:
have also been made on the grounds of cognitive liberty.
162: 90:
These two facets of cognitive liberty are reminiscent of
908:"FAQ - Center for Cognitive Liberty & Ethics (CCLE)" 718:
Waterman, Daniel (2013). Hardison, Casey William (ed.).
332:
of human beings as recognized by Article 1 of the UDHR.
103:
Thou shalt not alter the consciousness of thy fellow man
1430:, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 1309–1333, 910:. Center for Cognitive Liberty & Ethics. 2003-09-15 742: 50:, but has gained a limited level of recognition in the 1571:. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. 1337: 1291: 1289: 1287: 1198: 1065: 997: 950: 948: 78:
application of cognitive liberty into two principles:
397:, the defendant, charged with eight counts under the 411:
Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights
409:, claimed that cognitive liberty was safeguarded by 1284: 945: 231:, or through direct cognitive intervention through 2775:of the military dictatorship in Brazil (1964-1985) 1564: 979:. Berkeley, California: Ronin Publishing. p.  2863:United Nations Prize in the Field of Human Rights 1321: 1319: 643:"John Stuart Mill and the Liberty of Inebriation" 74:psychopharmacology, cognitive sciences and law. 2875: 1191: 1189: 1187: 1185: 1183: 1145:. Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 1143:"Cognitive liberty and the right to one's mind" 1316: 178:Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies 1994: 1603: 1513: 1511: 1180: 66:Wrye Sententia and legal theorist and lawyer 213: 115: 62:The term "cognitive liberty" was coined by 2909:Psychedelics, dissociatives and deliriants 2001: 1987: 1928:Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness 1610: 1596: 1508: 1088:, Springer Netherlands, pp. 679–695, 669:Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1263:. Center for Cognitive Liberty and Ethics 891: 851: 666: 290:Relationship with recognized human rights 1163: 717: 386: 2695:in the Democratic Republic of the Congo 1421: 1382: 1083: 833: 347: 135:selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors 2876: 2787:List of human rights abuses by country 2275:during the Battle of Mosul (2016-2017) 2240:Cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment 1562: 1533:BioLaw Journal - Rivista di BioDiritto 1385:"Moral Enhancement and Mental Freedom" 30:of an individual to control their own 2858:Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1982: 1933:Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1591: 1225: 1045: 1026: 972: 896:. John Wiley & Sons. p. 356. 834:Bublitz, Jan Christoph (2024-04-02). 787:International Journal of Human Rights 777: 640: 617: 594: 571: 300:Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1383:Bublitz, Christoph (February 2016). 567: 565: 553: 342: 1140: 401:(MDA), including the production of 298:is recognized by Article 18 of the 48:international human rights treaties 13: 2285:during the Libyan civil war (2011) 2147:National human rights institutions 2142:List of human rights organisations 14: 2925: 620:"On Cognitive Liberty (Part III)" 562: 452:, when examining the prospect of 127:transcranial magnetic stimulation 2270:at Guantánamo Bay detention camp 2008: 1164:Farahany, Nita (February 2012). 1046:Rosen, Jeffrey (11 March 2007). 597:"On Cognitive Liberty (Part II)" 2395:in Chile under Augusto Pinochet 2101:Natural rights and legal rights 2091:Claim rights and liberty rights 1556: 1547: 1520: 1499: 1496:R v Hardison 1 Cr App R (S) 37 1490: 1476: 1457: 1415: 1376: 1367: 1358: 1349: 1328: 1307: 1298: 1275: 1253: 1219: 1210: 1157: 1134: 1109: 1077: 1039: 1020: 1011: 966: 957: 921: 900: 885: 876: 827: 574:"On Cognitive Liberty (Part I)" 2265:against Palestinians by Israel 1918:Liberty, equality, brotherhood 1232:Journal of Cognitive Liberties 1228:"On Cognitive Liberty Part II" 771: 736: 711: 660: 634: 624:Journal of Cognitive Liberties 611: 601:Journal of Cognitive Liberties 588: 578:Journal of Cognitive Liberties 547: 273:, a key tenet of which is the 1: 1463:Boire, Richard Glen, (2002). 1436:10.1007/978-94-007-4707-4_166 1389:Journal of Applied Philosophy 1115:Boire, Richard Glen, (2002). 1094:10.1007/978-94-007-4707-4_123 1035:(1049): 1053–1055, 1058–1060. 1027:Blitz, Marc Jonathan (2010). 853:10.1080/21507740.2023.2270512 722:. Melrose Books. p. 18. 541: 190:Duke University School of Law 2106:Negative and positive rights 1226:Boire, Richard Glen (2000). 641:Boire, Richard Glen (2002). 618:Boire, Richard Glen (2000). 595:Boire, Richard Glen (2000). 572:Boire, Richard Glen (1999). 424: 176:, chair of the Board of the 7: 2848:List of human rights awards 2720:in the United Arab Emirates 2096:Individual and group rights 1782:Freedom from discrimination 1617: 1563:Sandel, Michael J. (2007). 929:"keeping freedom in mind -" 745:Criminal Law and Philosophy 459: 57: 10: 2930: 2884:Civil rights and liberties 2770:of the Marcos dictatorship 1643:Personification of Liberty 554:Mill, John Stuart (1859). 428: 351: 22:, or the "right to mental 2830: 2715:in the State of Palestine 2700:in the Dominican Republic 2280:during the Gaddafi regime 2217: 2162: 2155: 2134: 2114: 2083: 2055: 2044: 2016: 1923:All men are created equal 1910: 1734: 1688: 1625: 1261:"Keeping Freedom in Mind" 1216:Bublitz and Merkel, 68-70 1017:Sententia (2004), 223-224 799:10.1080/13642980802704270 778:Walsh, Charlotte (2010). 757:10.1007/s11572-012-9172-y 214:Freedom to self-determine 116:Freedom from interference 1166:"Incriminating Thoughts" 1048:"The Brain on the Stand" 933:www.cognitiveliberty.org 882:Bublitz and Merkel, 60-1 417:and the earlier case of 399:Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 377:antipsychotic medication 2838:History of human rights 2245:Enforced disappearances 2235:Crimes against humanity 1428:Handbook of Neuroethics 1373:Sententia (2004), 226-7 1304:Sententia (2013), 355-6 1086:Handbook of Neuroethics 1052:New York Times Magazine 976:The Politics of Ecstasy 973:Leary, Timothy (1968). 689:10.1196/annals.1305.014 96:The Politics of Ecstasy 2782:Incitement to genocide 2075:Universal jurisdiction 1346:Bublitz and Merkel, 63 1313:Bublitz and Merkel, 64 1207:Bublitz and Merkel, 68 1074:Bublitz and Merkel, 61 1008:Bublitz and Merkel, 60 650:The Independent Review 325:Casey William Hardison 271:transhumanist movement 131:electroencephalography 2843:List of global issues 1484:Sell v. United States 1295:Sententia (2013), 356 963:Sententia (2004), 227 954:Sententia (2004), 223 518:The Rhetoric of Drugs 502:Personalized medicine 482:Morphological freedom 472:Cosmetic pharmacology 442:Political philosopher 387:In the United Kingdom 372:Sell v. United States 354:Sell v. United States 328:part of the inherent 246:, claiming that the " 184:around the curing of 2725:in the United States 2500:in Jammu and Kashmir 2046:Fundamental concepts 1968:Right-libertarianism 1948:Civil libertarianism 1902:Water and sanitation 1638:Moral responsibility 1130:Sell v United States 1033:Wisconsin Law Review 530:Techno-progressivism 521:, by Jacques Derrida 512:Responsible drug use 467:Cognitive ergonomics 348:In the United States 2710:in the Soviet Union 2610:in Papua New Guinea 2260:Human rights abuses 2218:Human rights abuses 2122:Corporal punishment 1958:Left-libertarianism 1953:Drug liberalization 1486:539 U.S. 166 (2003) 1238:(2). Archived from 1170:Stanford Law Review 681:2004NYASA1013..221S 477:Drug liberalization 415:UN Drug Conventions 2705:in the Philippines 2230:Crime of apartheid 1470:2018-09-26 at the 1401:10.1111/japp.12108 1123:2018-09-26 at the 454:memory enhancement 446:Harvard University 431:Drug policy reform 296:freedom of thought 233:psychoactive drugs 147:psychoactive drugs 68:Richard Glen Boire 44:freedom of thought 24:self-determination 2899:Identity politics 2871: 2870: 2853:Three generations 2213: 2212: 2130: 2129: 1976: 1975: 1633:Cognitive liberty 1445:978-94-007-4707-4 1141:Dvorsky, George. 1128:, in the case of 840:AJOB Neuroscience 450:Michael J. Sandel 435:Human enhancement 343:Legal recognition 123:neurotechnologies 20:Cognitive liberty 2921: 2625:in Punjab, India 2250:Forced migration 2160: 2159: 2053: 2052: 2048:and philosophies 2003: 1996: 1989: 1980: 1979: 1660:Positive liberty 1655:Negative liberty 1612: 1605: 1598: 1589: 1588: 1583: 1582: 1570: 1560: 1554: 1551: 1545: 1544: 1524: 1518: 1515: 1506: 1503: 1497: 1494: 1488: 1480: 1474: 1461: 1455: 1454: 1453: 1452: 1419: 1413: 1412: 1380: 1374: 1371: 1365: 1362: 1356: 1353: 1347: 1344: 1335: 1332: 1326: 1323: 1314: 1311: 1305: 1302: 1296: 1293: 1282: 1281:Blitz, 1058-1060 1279: 1273: 1272: 1270: 1268: 1257: 1251: 1250: 1248: 1247: 1223: 1217: 1214: 1208: 1205: 1196: 1193: 1178: 1177: 1161: 1155: 1154: 1152: 1150: 1138: 1132: 1113: 1107: 1106: 1081: 1075: 1072: 1063: 1062: 1060: 1058: 1043: 1037: 1036: 1024: 1018: 1015: 1009: 1006: 995: 994: 970: 964: 961: 955: 952: 943: 942: 940: 939: 925: 919: 918: 916: 915: 904: 898: 897: 889: 883: 880: 874: 873: 855: 831: 825: 824: 822: 821: 815: 809:. Archived from 784: 775: 769: 768: 740: 734: 733: 715: 709: 708: 664: 658: 657: 647: 638: 632: 631: 615: 609: 608: 592: 586: 585: 569: 560: 559: 551: 487:Neuroenhancement 383:to stand trial. 367:US Supreme Court 194:Nita A. Farahany 172:and bioethicist 161:citizens during 121:improvements to 32:mental processes 2929: 2928: 2924: 2923: 2922: 2920: 2919: 2918: 2874: 2873: 2872: 2867: 2826: 2655:in South Africa 2645:in Sierra Leone 2640:in Saudi Arabia 2370:in Burkina Faso 2325:in Azad Kashmir 2209: 2151: 2126: 2110: 2079: 2049: 2047: 2040: 2031:Intersex people 2012: 2007: 1977: 1972: 1906: 1892:To be forgotten 1807:Internet access 1730: 1684: 1621: 1616: 1586: 1579: 1561: 1557: 1552: 1548: 1535:(3): 27–45–45. 1525: 1521: 1516: 1509: 1504: 1500: 1495: 1491: 1481: 1477: 1472:Wayback Machine 1462: 1458: 1450: 1448: 1446: 1420: 1416: 1381: 1377: 1372: 1368: 1364:Farahany, 405-6 1363: 1359: 1354: 1350: 1345: 1338: 1333: 1329: 1324: 1317: 1312: 1308: 1303: 1299: 1294: 1285: 1280: 1276: 1266: 1264: 1259: 1258: 1254: 1245: 1243: 1224: 1220: 1215: 1211: 1206: 1199: 1194: 1181: 1162: 1158: 1148: 1146: 1139: 1135: 1125:Wayback Machine 1114: 1110: 1104: 1082: 1078: 1073: 1066: 1056: 1054: 1044: 1040: 1025: 1021: 1016: 1012: 1007: 998: 991: 971: 967: 962: 958: 953: 946: 937: 935: 927: 926: 922: 913: 911: 906: 905: 901: 890: 886: 881: 877: 832: 828: 819: 817: 813: 782: 776: 772: 741: 737: 730: 716: 712: 665: 661: 645: 639: 635: 616: 612: 593: 589: 570: 563: 552: 548: 544: 539: 462: 437: 427: 391:In the case of 389: 369:in the case of 356: 350: 345: 321:Daniel Waterman 292: 283:neurotechnology 244:drug law reform 237:neurotechnology 216: 186:autism spectrum 166:Project MKUltra 118: 109: 92:Timothy Leary's 60: 17: 12: 11: 5: 2927: 2917: 2916: 2911: 2906: 2904:Medical ethics 2901: 2896: 2891: 2886: 2869: 2868: 2866: 2865: 2860: 2855: 2850: 2845: 2840: 2834: 2832: 2828: 2827: 2825: 2824: 2819: 2814: 2809: 2804: 2799: 2794: 2789: 2784: 2779: 2778: 2777: 2772: 2767: 2762: 2757: 2752: 2747: 2742: 2737: 2732: 2727: 2722: 2717: 2712: 2707: 2702: 2697: 2692: 2687: 2682: 2677: 2675:in Switzerland 2672: 2667: 2662: 2660:in South Korea 2657: 2652: 2647: 2642: 2637: 2632: 2627: 2622: 2617: 2612: 2607: 2602: 2597: 2595:in North Korea 2592: 2587: 2585:in New Zealand 2582: 2577: 2572: 2567: 2562: 2557: 2552: 2547: 2542: 2537: 2532: 2530:in Kyrgyzstan‎ 2527: 2522: 2517: 2512: 2507: 2502: 2497: 2492: 2487: 2482: 2477: 2472: 2467: 2462: 2457: 2452: 2447: 2442: 2437: 2432: 2427: 2422: 2417: 2415:in El Salvador 2412: 2407: 2402: 2397: 2392: 2387: 2382: 2377: 2372: 2367: 2362: 2357: 2352: 2347: 2342: 2340:in Balochistan 2337: 2332: 2327: 2322: 2317: 2312: 2307: 2302: 2297: 2292: 2290:in Afghanistan 2287: 2282: 2277: 2272: 2267: 2257: 2252: 2247: 2242: 2237: 2232: 2227: 2225:Atrocity crime 2221: 2219: 2215: 2214: 2211: 2210: 2208: 2207: 2205: 2203: 2198: 2193: 2191: 2186: 2181: 2179: 2174: 2169: 2163: 2157: 2153: 2152: 2150: 2149: 2144: 2138: 2136: 2132: 2131: 2128: 2127: 2125: 2124: 2118: 2116: 2112: 2111: 2109: 2108: 2103: 2098: 2093: 2087: 2085: 2081: 2080: 2078: 2077: 2072: 2067: 2062: 2056: 2050: 2045: 2042: 2041: 2039: 2038: 2033: 2028: 2023: 2017: 2014: 2013: 2006: 2005: 1998: 1991: 1983: 1974: 1973: 1971: 1970: 1965: 1963:Libertarianism 1960: 1955: 1950: 1945: 1940: 1935: 1930: 1925: 1920: 1914: 1912: 1908: 1907: 1905: 1904: 1899: 1894: 1889: 1884: 1879: 1874: 1869: 1864: 1859: 1854: 1849: 1844: 1839: 1834: 1829: 1824: 1819: 1814: 1809: 1804: 1799: 1794: 1789: 1784: 1779: 1774: 1769: 1764: 1759: 1754: 1749: 1744: 1738: 1736: 1732: 1731: 1729: 1728: 1723: 1718: 1713: 1708: 1703: 1698: 1692: 1690: 1686: 1685: 1683: 1682: 1677: 1675:Social liberty 1672: 1670:Self-ownership 1667: 1662: 1657: 1652: 1651: 1650: 1640: 1635: 1629: 1627: 1623: 1622: 1615: 1614: 1607: 1600: 1592: 1585: 1584: 1577: 1555: 1546: 1519: 1507: 1498: 1489: 1475: 1456: 1444: 1414: 1375: 1366: 1357: 1348: 1336: 1327: 1325:Boire, Part II 1315: 1306: 1297: 1283: 1274: 1252: 1218: 1209: 1197: 1179: 1156: 1133: 1108: 1102: 1076: 1064: 1038: 1019: 1010: 996: 989: 965: 956: 944: 920: 899: 884: 875: 826: 770: 735: 728: 710: 659: 633: 610: 587: 561: 545: 543: 540: 538: 537: 532: 527: 525:Self-ownership 522: 514: 509: 504: 499: 494: 489: 484: 479: 474: 469: 463: 461: 458: 426: 423: 388: 385: 352:Main article: 349: 346: 344: 341: 291: 288: 215: 212: 174:George Dvorsky 117: 114: 108: 107: 104: 100: 88: 87: 84: 59: 56: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2926: 2915: 2914:Transhumanism 2912: 2910: 2907: 2905: 2902: 2900: 2897: 2895: 2892: 2890: 2887: 2885: 2882: 2881: 2879: 2864: 2861: 2859: 2856: 2854: 2851: 2849: 2846: 2844: 2841: 2839: 2836: 2835: 2833: 2829: 2823: 2820: 2818: 2815: 2813: 2810: 2808: 2805: 2803: 2800: 2798: 2795: 2793: 2790: 2788: 2785: 2783: 2780: 2776: 2773: 2771: 2768: 2766: 2763: 2761: 2758: 2756: 2753: 2751: 2748: 2746: 2745:in Uzbekistan 2743: 2741: 2738: 2736: 2733: 2731: 2728: 2726: 2723: 2721: 2718: 2716: 2713: 2711: 2708: 2706: 2703: 2701: 2698: 2696: 2693: 2691: 2688: 2686: 2683: 2681: 2678: 2676: 2673: 2671: 2668: 2666: 2663: 2661: 2658: 2656: 2653: 2651: 2648: 2646: 2643: 2641: 2638: 2636: 2635:in the Russia 2633: 2631: 2628: 2626: 2623: 2621: 2618: 2616: 2613: 2611: 2608: 2606: 2603: 2601: 2598: 2596: 2593: 2591: 2588: 2586: 2583: 2581: 2578: 2576: 2573: 2571: 2568: 2566: 2563: 2561: 2558: 2556: 2553: 2551: 2548: 2546: 2543: 2541: 2538: 2536: 2533: 2531: 2528: 2526: 2523: 2521: 2518: 2516: 2515:in Kazakhstan 2513: 2511: 2508: 2506: 2503: 2501: 2498: 2496: 2493: 2491: 2488: 2486: 2483: 2481: 2478: 2476: 2473: 2471: 2468: 2466: 2463: 2461: 2458: 2456: 2453: 2451: 2448: 2446: 2443: 2441: 2438: 2436: 2433: 2431: 2428: 2426: 2423: 2421: 2418: 2416: 2413: 2411: 2408: 2406: 2403: 2401: 2398: 2396: 2393: 2391: 2388: 2386: 2383: 2381: 2378: 2376: 2373: 2371: 2368: 2366: 2363: 2361: 2358: 2356: 2353: 2351: 2348: 2346: 2345:in Bangladesh 2343: 2341: 2338: 2336: 2333: 2331: 2330:in Azerbaijan 2328: 2326: 2323: 2321: 2318: 2316: 2313: 2311: 2308: 2306: 2303: 2301: 2298: 2296: 2293: 2291: 2288: 2286: 2283: 2281: 2278: 2276: 2273: 2271: 2268: 2266: 2263: 2262: 2261: 2258: 2256: 2253: 2251: 2248: 2246: 2243: 2241: 2238: 2236: 2233: 2231: 2228: 2226: 2223: 2222: 2220: 2216: 2206: 2204: 2202: 2199: 2197: 2196:South America 2194: 2192: 2190: 2189:North America 2187: 2185: 2182: 2180: 2178: 2175: 2173: 2170: 2168: 2165: 2164: 2161: 2158: 2154: 2148: 2145: 2143: 2140: 2139: 2137: 2135:Organizations 2133: 2123: 2120: 2119: 2117: 2113: 2107: 2104: 2102: 2099: 2097: 2094: 2092: 2089: 2088: 2086: 2082: 2076: 2073: 2071: 2068: 2066: 2063: 2061: 2058: 2057: 2054: 2051: 2043: 2037: 2034: 2032: 2029: 2027: 2024: 2022: 2019: 2018: 2015: 2011: 2004: 1999: 1997: 1992: 1990: 1985: 1984: 1981: 1969: 1966: 1964: 1961: 1959: 1956: 1954: 1951: 1949: 1946: 1944: 1941: 1939: 1936: 1934: 1931: 1929: 1926: 1924: 1921: 1919: 1916: 1915: 1913: 1909: 1903: 1900: 1898: 1895: 1893: 1890: 1888: 1885: 1883: 1880: 1878: 1875: 1873: 1870: 1868: 1865: 1863: 1860: 1858: 1855: 1853: 1850: 1848: 1845: 1843: 1840: 1838: 1835: 1833: 1830: 1828: 1825: 1823: 1822:Morphological 1820: 1818: 1815: 1813: 1810: 1808: 1805: 1803: 1800: 1798: 1795: 1793: 1790: 1788: 1785: 1783: 1780: 1778: 1775: 1773: 1770: 1768: 1765: 1763: 1760: 1758: 1755: 1753: 1750: 1748: 1745: 1743: 1740: 1739: 1737: 1733: 1727: 1724: 1722: 1721:Morphological 1719: 1717: 1714: 1712: 1709: 1707: 1704: 1702: 1699: 1697: 1694: 1693: 1691: 1687: 1681: 1678: 1676: 1673: 1671: 1668: 1666: 1663: 1661: 1658: 1656: 1653: 1649: 1646: 1645: 1644: 1641: 1639: 1636: 1634: 1631: 1630: 1628: 1624: 1620: 1613: 1608: 1606: 1601: 1599: 1594: 1593: 1590: 1580: 1578:9780674036383 1574: 1569: 1568: 1559: 1550: 1542: 1538: 1534: 1530: 1523: 1514: 1512: 1502: 1493: 1487: 1485: 1479: 1473: 1469: 1466: 1460: 1447: 1441: 1437: 1433: 1429: 1425: 1418: 1410: 1406: 1402: 1398: 1395:(1): 88–106. 1394: 1390: 1386: 1379: 1370: 1361: 1355:Waterman, 345 1352: 1343: 1341: 1331: 1322: 1320: 1310: 1301: 1292: 1290: 1288: 1278: 1262: 1256: 1242:on 2017-02-10 1241: 1237: 1233: 1229: 1222: 1213: 1204: 1202: 1195:Boire, Part I 1192: 1190: 1188: 1186: 1184: 1175: 1171: 1167: 1160: 1144: 1137: 1131: 1127: 1126: 1122: 1119: 1112: 1105: 1103:9789400747074 1099: 1095: 1091: 1087: 1080: 1071: 1069: 1053: 1049: 1042: 1034: 1030: 1023: 1014: 1005: 1003: 1001: 992: 986: 982: 978: 977: 969: 960: 951: 949: 934: 930: 924: 909: 903: 895: 888: 879: 871: 867: 863: 859: 854: 849: 846:(2): 96–112. 845: 841: 837: 830: 816:on 2016-02-08 812: 808: 804: 800: 796: 792: 788: 781: 774: 766: 762: 758: 754: 750: 746: 739: 731: 729:9781908645616 725: 721: 714: 706: 702: 698: 694: 690: 686: 682: 678: 674: 670: 663: 656:(2): 253–258. 655: 651: 644: 637: 629: 625: 621: 614: 606: 602: 598: 591: 583: 579: 575: 568: 566: 557: 550: 546: 536: 533: 531: 528: 526: 523: 520: 519: 515: 513: 510: 508: 507:Psychonautics 505: 503: 500: 498: 495: 493: 490: 488: 485: 483: 480: 478: 475: 473: 470: 468: 465: 464: 457: 455: 451: 447: 443: 436: 432: 422: 420: 416: 412: 408: 404: 400: 396: 395: 384: 382: 378: 374: 373: 368: 364: 362: 355: 340: 336: 333: 331: 326: 322: 316: 314: 309: 305: 301: 297: 287: 284: 281: 276: 272: 267: 265: 261: 257: 253: 249: 245: 240: 238: 234: 230: 226: 222: 211: 208: 203: 198: 195: 191: 187: 183: 179: 175: 171: 167: 164: 158: 156: 152: 148: 144: 140: 136: 132: 128: 124: 113: 105: 102: 101: 99: 97: 93: 85: 81: 80: 79: 75: 71: 69: 65: 64:neuroethicist 55: 53: 52:United States 49: 45: 41: 40:consciousness 37: 33: 29: 25: 21: 2894:Human rights 2889:Drug culture 2750:in Venezuela 2665:in Sri Lanka 2545:in Lithuania 2470:in Indonesia 2450:in Hong Kong 2445:in Guatemala 2315:in Australia 2305:in Argentina 2156:By continent 2084:Distinctions 2065:Positive law 2010:Human rights 1867:Self-defense 1711:Intellectual 1632: 1566: 1558: 1549: 1532: 1522: 1501: 1492: 1483: 1478: 1459: 1449:, retrieved 1427: 1417: 1392: 1388: 1378: 1369: 1360: 1351: 1330: 1309: 1300: 1277: 1265:. Retrieved 1255: 1244:. Retrieved 1240:the original 1235: 1231: 1221: 1212: 1173: 1169: 1159: 1147:. Retrieved 1136: 1129: 1116: 1111: 1085: 1079: 1055:. Retrieved 1051: 1041: 1032: 1022: 1013: 975: 968: 959: 936:. Retrieved 932: 923: 912:. Retrieved 902: 893: 887: 878: 843: 839: 829: 818:. Retrieved 811:the original 790: 786: 773: 748: 744: 738: 719: 713: 675:(1): 221–8. 672: 668: 662: 653: 649: 636: 627: 623: 613: 604: 600: 590: 581: 577: 555: 549: 535:Thomas Szasz 516: 438: 418: 394:R v Hardison 393: 390: 370: 360: 357: 337: 334: 317: 313:neuroscience 307: 303: 293: 268: 248:war on drugs 241: 217: 206: 201: 199: 188:conditions. 159: 155:neuroprivacy 119: 110: 95: 89: 76: 72: 61: 19: 18: 2797:Persecution 2765:in Zimbabwe 2690:in Thailand 2600:in Pakistan 2555:in Malaysia 2420:in Ethiopia 2380:in Cambodia 2360:in Botswana 2172:Middle East 2070:Sovereignty 2060:Natural law 1812:Information 1777:Family life 1747:Association 1553:Blitz, 1063 492:Neuroethics 275:enhancement 207:prima facie 151:neuroethics 112:functions. 2878:Categories 2822:War crimes 2755:in Vietnam 2740:in Ukraine 2630:in Romania 2590:in Nigeria 2575:in Myanmar 2570:in Morocco 2560:in Manipur 2535:in Lebanon 2510:in Kashmir 2485:in Ireland 2440:in Germany 2375:in Burundi 2355:in Bolivia 2350:in Belarus 2335:in Bahrain 2320:in Austria 2310:in Armenia 2295:in Algeria 1772:Fair trial 1517:Walsh, 437 1505:Walsh, 433 1451:2024-06-07 1246:2015-05-16 1176:: 405–406. 990:1579510310 938:2024-06-07 914:2020-06-07 820:2015-05-16 793:(3): 433. 556:On Liberty 542:References 448:professor 429:See also: 419:R v Taylor 254:) such as 252:nootropics 221:meditation 192:Professor 145:and other 139:nootropics 125:, such as 26:", is the 2735:in Uganda 2730:in Turkey 2685:in Taiwan 2620:in Poland 2605:in Panama 2565:in Mexico 2550:in Malawi 2525:in Kuwait 2490:in Israel 2425:in France 2385:in Canada 2365:in Brazil 2300:in Angola 1938:Anarchism 1872:Sexuality 1767:Education 1726:Political 1680:Free will 1541:2284-4503 1409:0264-3758 1334:Walsh 433 862:2150-7740 807:143908075 765:144449130 425:Criticism 381:competent 365:with the 143:modafinil 137:(SSRIs), 36:cognition 2760:in Yemen 2680:in Syria 2670:in Sudan 2650:in Sindh 2580:in Nepal 2540:in Libya 2520:in Kenya 2505:in Japan 2495:in Italy 2465:in India 2460:in Haiti 2455:in Egypt 2435:in Ghana 2430:in Gabon 2410:in Egypt 2400:in China 2390:in Chile 2255:Genocide 2026:Children 1943:Autonomy 1911:See also 1852:Religion 1842:Property 1827:Movement 1742:Assembly 1735:By right 1716:Internet 1706:Economic 1696:Academic 1648:Libertas 1626:Concepts 1468:Archived 1121:Archived 870:37921859 705:44354219 697:15194617 497:Neurolaw 460:See also 304:whatever 280:emerging 264:Adderall 170:Futurist 58:Overview 2831:Related 2817:Victims 2812:Torture 2807:Slavery 2615:in Peru 2480:in Iraq 2475:in Iran 2405:in Cuba 2201:Oceania 2115:Aspects 1887:Thought 1877:Silence 1847:Protest 1837:Privacy 1802:Housing 1689:By type 1619:Liberty 677:Bibcode 330:dignity 308:however 260:Ritalin 28:freedom 2792:Murder 2184:Europe 2167:Africa 2021:Humans 1882:Speech 1862:Resist 1857:Repair 1797:Health 1757:Choice 1752:Asylum 1665:Rights 1575:  1539:  1442:  1407:  1267:7 June 1100:  987:  868:  860:  805:  763:  751:: 61. 726:  703:  695:  361:amicus 256:Prozac 229:prayer 182:debate 83:drugs. 38:, and 2036:Women 1897:Truth 1832:Press 1762:Death 1701:Civil 1149:3 May 1057:3 May 814:(PDF) 803:S2CID 783:(PDF) 761:S2CID 701:S2CID 646:(PDF) 363:brief 202:state 2802:Rape 2177:Asia 1817:Life 1787:Food 1573:ISBN 1537:ISSN 1440:ISBN 1405:ISSN 1269:2024 1151:2014 1098:ISBN 1059:2014 985:ISBN 866:PMID 858:ISSN 724:ISBN 693:PMID 673:1013 630:(1). 607:(1). 584:(1). 444:and 433:and 405:and 323:and 262:and 225:yoga 153:and 129:and 1792:Gun 1432:doi 1397:doi 1090:doi 848:doi 795:doi 753:doi 685:doi 407:LSD 403:DMT 235:or 227:or 163:CIA 2880:: 1531:. 1510:^ 1438:, 1426:, 1403:. 1393:33 1391:. 1387:. 1339:^ 1318:^ 1286:^ 1234:. 1230:. 1200:^ 1182:^ 1174:64 1172:. 1168:. 1096:, 1067:^ 1050:. 1031:. 999:^ 983:. 981:95 947:^ 931:. 864:. 856:. 844:15 842:. 838:. 801:. 791:14 789:. 785:. 759:. 747:. 699:. 691:. 683:. 671:. 652:. 648:. 626:. 622:. 603:. 599:. 580:. 576:. 564:^ 258:, 239:. 223:, 157:. 141:, 98:: 34:, 2002:e 1995:t 1988:v 1611:e 1604:t 1597:v 1581:. 1543:. 1434:: 1411:. 1399:: 1271:. 1249:. 1236:1 1153:. 1092:: 1061:. 993:. 941:. 917:. 872:. 850:: 823:. 797:: 767:. 755:: 749:8 732:. 707:. 687:: 679:: 654:7 628:2 605:2 582:1 558:.

Index

self-determination
freedom
mental processes
cognition
consciousness
freedom of thought
international human rights treaties
United States
neuroethicist
Richard Glen Boire
Timothy Leary's
neurotechnologies
transcranial magnetic stimulation
electroencephalography
selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors
nootropics
modafinil
psychoactive drugs
neuroethics
neuroprivacy
CIA
Project MKUltra
Futurist
George Dvorsky
Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies
debate
autism spectrum
Duke University School of Law
Nita A. Farahany
meditation

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑