Knowledge

Classified information in the United Kingdom

Source 📝

84:(GSCP) in 2013; it came into effect in 2014. It replaced the old Government Protective Marking Scheme (GPMS). Classifications must be capitalised and centrally noted at top and bottom of each document page, save at OFFICIAL where the document marking is optional. All material produced by a public body in the UK must be presumed to be OFFICIAL unless it is otherwise marked. Like the GPMS, which it superseded, the GSCP classifications are applied only to the confidentiality of the data under classification. 215:
member of, or associated with, any organisation which has advocated such activities or has demonstrated a lack of reliability through dishonesty, lack of integrity or behaviour. Finally, the process assures the department that the individual will not be subject to pressure or improper influence through past behaviour or personal circumstances.
214:
Vetting is intended to assure the department that the individual has not been involved in espionage, terrorism, sabotage or actions intended to overthrow or undermine Parliamentary democracy by political, industrial or violent means. It also assures the department that the individual has not been a
137:
The older system used five levels of classification, supplemented with caveat keywords. The keyword was placed in all capital letters in the centre of the top and bottom of each page of a classified document and described the foreseeable consequence of an unauthorised release of the data (a ‘breach
185:
Such information will cause distress to individuals; cause financial loss or improper gain; prejudice the investigation of, or facilitate the commission of, a crime; or disadvantage government in commercial or policy negotiations with others. PROTECT should always be used with a descript such as
125:
At the OFFICIAL classification there is a general presumption that data may be shared across Government, however where a need to know principle is identified data may be marked as "OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE"; "OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE COMMERCIAL"; "OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE LOCSEN" or "OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE PERSONAL".
59:(SPF) superseded the Manual of Protective Security and contains the primary internal protective security policy and guidance on security and risk management for His Majesty's Government (HMG) Departments and associated bodies. It is the source on which all localised security policies are based. 121:
It is quite possible, and not uncommon, for data within an OFFICIAL classification to have serious impacts including serious injury in the event of unauthorised disclosure. This is one of the characteristics of the GSCP which differs significantly from the Protective Marking Scheme which it
117:
It is often incorrectly assumed that the OFFICIAL classification replaces the GPMS markings of PROTECT, RESTRICTED and CONFIDENTIAL, however this is not the case, since the criteria on which GPMS markings were applied bear no relationship to the criteria used for GSCP classifications.
95:
is that whose release is liable to cause considerable loss of life, international diplomatic incidents, or severely impact ongoing intelligence operations. Disclosure of such information is assumed to be above the threshold for prosecution under the
218:
Protectively marked material must be accounted for in a manner appropriate to its classification level and disposal must be in accordance with the SPF. The act of destruction or disposal is included in the accounting process.
106:
This marking is used for information which needs protection against serious threats, and which could cause serious harm if compromised—such as threats to life, compromising major crime investigations, or harming international
196:
Documents classified under the Protective Marking Scheme still exist and need correct handling. After 100 years all the classifications will have run out but the procedures may still be of interest to historians.
563: 179:
is at a level where the release of the material will have effects such as significant distress to individuals, adversely affecting the effectiveness of military operations, or to compromise law enforcement.
66:(MPS) which specified the impact of release and protection level required for each classification. Departments issued localised versions of the content of the MPS as appropriate to their operational needs. 273:, a descriptor defining to which nationality groups it may be released. By default, material in the UK is not caveated by nationality, the classification being sufficient protection. 452: 129:
All OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE data must be marked and contain handling instructions identifying why the data is deemed sensitive, how it must be held, processed and transferred.
159:
This marking is used for information whose side-effects may be life-threatening, disruptive to public order or detrimental to diplomatic relations with friendly nations.
149:
is that whose release is liable to cause considerable loss of life, international diplomatic incidents, or severely impact ongoing intelligence operations. Prior to the
570: 43:, replaced the old Government Protective Marking Scheme in 2014. Since classifications can last for 100 years many documents are still covered by the old scheme. 676: 192:
The term "UNCLASSIFIED" or "NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED" may be used in UK Government documents to indicate positively that a protective marking is not needed.
169:
include considerable infringement on personal liberties, material damage to diplomatic relations, or to seriously disrupt day-to-day life in the country.
227:
Protectively marked material may also be marked with a descriptor, or privacy marking, which identifies sensitivities around distribution and handling.
113:
All routine public sector business, operations and services is treated as OFFICIAL. Many departments and agencies operate exclusively at this level.
691: 681: 603: 686: 28:
is a system used to protect information from intentional or inadvertent release to unauthorised readers. The system is organised by the
81: 75: 40: 620: 332:
using compartmentalisation by use of codewords. Examples of compartmented material would include information about nuclear warheads,
635: 625: 556: 645: 542: 206: 650: 615: 610: 593: 397: 655: 598: 496: 153:, the highest level was "Most Secret"; it was renamed so that both the UK and U.S. operated to a consistent system. 211:
Access to protectively marked material is defined according to a vetting level which the individual has achieved.
640: 436: 328:
Dissemination of already protectively marked material may be further limited only to those with a legitimate
454:
Government Security Classifications FAQ Sheet 1: Working with OFFICIAL Information April 2013, Version 1.2
315:
and France). in particular the restricted format of “Heads of Government Representatives” initiated by Mr
630: 474: 97: 56: 530: 33: 382: 343:. In some cases, the existence of a compartment identified by a codeword is itself classified. 36:. The system is also used by private sector bodies that provide services to the public sector. 20: 517: 8: 316: 340: 402: 16:
Protect information from intentional or inadvertent release to unauthorised readers
548: 305: 422: 333: 52: 29: 24: 670: 301: 150: 438:
Government Security Classifications April 2014, Version 1.0 - October 2013
392: 269: 387: 281: 509: 312: 276:
Examples of nationality caveats include, but are not limited to:
138:
of confidentiality’). In descending order of secrecy, these are:
32:
and is implemented throughout central and local government and
311:
BURNING BUSH: Quadripartite discussions (between the US, UK,
69: 230:
Examples of descriptors include, but are not restricted to:
372:
DEDIP, DESDEN: may not be shown to certain named officials.
337: 186:“Commercial”, “Management”, “Personal”, or a similar term. 423:"Security policy framework: Protecting government assets" 543:
Los Alamos table of equivalent US and UK classifications
346:
Examples of codewords include, but are not limited to:
132: 62:
The classification system was formerly included in the
445: 267:
Protectively marked material may bear a nationality
578: 358:sitivity, and may not be shown to local officials. 304:: Australia, New Zealand, Canada, UK and USA (the 258:Visits (domestic or foreign royalty and ministers) 429: 668: 165:The effects of releasing information marked as 564: 677:Classified information in the United Kingdom 571: 557: 82:Government Security Classifications Policy 76:Government Security Classifications Policy 70:Government Security Classifications Policy 41:Government Security Classifications Policy 469: 467: 692:National security of the United Kingdom 39:The current classification system, the 669: 207:Security vetting in the United Kingdom 682:United Kingdom government information 552: 495:Hansard, Written answers 15 Dec 1994 464: 262: 133:Government Protective Marking Scheme 687:Public policy in the United Kingdom 507: 441:. HMG Cabinet Office. October 2013. 13: 398:Official Secrets Acts 1911 to 1989 14: 703: 460:. HMG Cabinet Office. April 2013. 308:, also known as the "Five-Eyes"). 477:. V8. Cabinet Office. April 2012 34:critical national infrastructure 475:"HMG Security Policy Framework" 579:Policies of the United Kingdom 501: 489: 415: 222: 80:The Cabinet Office issued the 1: 589:Classified information policy 512:– via www.academia.edu. 408: 64:Manual of Protective Security 323: 7: 376: 200: 10: 708: 204: 73: 584: 98:Official Secrets Act 1989 57:Security Policy Framework 46: 646:Security vetting policy 604:Cannabis classification 510:"Quadripartite Meeting" 525:Cite journal requires 383:Classified information 175:Information marked as 145:Information marked as 91:Information marked as 21:Classified information 51:Policy is set by the 594:Conscription policy 286:CANUKUS EYES ONLY: 636:Immigration policy 425:. 2 December 2022. 341:nuclear propulsion 263:Nationality caveat 664: 663: 508:Disdero, Michel. 699: 641:Rationing policy 573: 566: 559: 550: 549: 535: 534: 528: 523: 521: 513: 505: 499: 493: 487: 486: 484: 482: 471: 462: 461: 459: 449: 443: 442: 433: 427: 426: 419: 403:Thirty year rule 319:in January 1980. 151:Second World War 707: 706: 702: 701: 700: 698: 697: 696: 667: 666: 665: 660: 621:Firearms policy 580: 577: 539: 538: 526: 524: 515: 514: 506: 502: 494: 490: 480: 478: 473: 472: 465: 457: 451: 450: 446: 435: 434: 430: 421: 420: 416: 411: 379: 326: 306:UKUSA Community 265: 225: 209: 203: 135: 78: 72: 49: 17: 12: 11: 5: 705: 695: 694: 689: 684: 679: 662: 661: 659: 658: 653: 651:Welfare policy 648: 643: 638: 633: 628: 626:Foreign policy 623: 618: 613: 608: 607: 606: 596: 591: 585: 582: 581: 576: 575: 568: 561: 553: 547: 546: 537: 536: 527:|journal= 500: 497:Hansard online 488: 463: 444: 428: 413: 412: 410: 407: 406: 405: 400: 395: 390: 385: 378: 375: 374: 373: 370: 359: 325: 322: 321: 320: 309: 299: 284: 264: 261: 260: 259: 256: 253: 250: 247: 244: 241: 238: 235: 224: 221: 205:Main article: 202: 199: 194: 193: 190: 187: 183: 180: 173: 170: 163: 160: 157: 154: 143: 134: 131: 115: 114: 111: 108: 104: 101: 89: 74:Main article: 71: 68: 53:Cabinet Office 48: 45: 30:Cabinet Office 25:United Kingdom 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 704: 693: 690: 688: 685: 683: 680: 678: 675: 674: 672: 657: 654: 652: 649: 647: 644: 642: 639: 637: 634: 632: 629: 627: 624: 622: 619: 617: 616:Family policy 614: 612: 611:Energy policy 609: 605: 602: 601: 600: 597: 595: 592: 590: 587: 586: 583: 574: 569: 567: 562: 560: 555: 554: 551: 544: 541: 540: 532: 519: 511: 504: 498: 492: 476: 470: 468: 456: 455: 448: 440: 439: 432: 424: 418: 414: 404: 401: 399: 396: 394: 391: 389: 386: 384: 381: 380: 371: 368: 364: 360: 357: 353: 349: 348: 347: 344: 342: 339: 335: 331: 318: 314: 310: 307: 303: 300: 297: 293: 289: 285: 283: 279: 278: 277: 274: 272: 271: 257: 254: 251: 248: 245: 242: 239: 236: 233: 232: 231: 228: 220: 216: 212: 208: 198: 191: 188: 184: 181: 178: 174: 171: 168: 164: 161: 158: 155: 152: 148: 144: 141: 140: 139: 130: 127: 123: 119: 112: 109: 105: 102: 99: 94: 90: 87: 86: 85: 83: 77: 67: 65: 60: 58: 54: 44: 42: 37: 35: 31: 27: 26: 22: 588: 518:cite journal 503: 491: 479:. Retrieved 453: 447: 437: 431: 417: 366: 362: 361:NATSEN: has 355: 351: 350:LOCSEN: has 345: 330:need to know 329: 327: 302:AUSCANNZUKUS 295: 291: 287: 275: 268: 266: 229: 226: 217: 213: 210: 195: 189:UNCLASSIFIED 176: 167:CONFIDENTIAL 166: 162:CONFIDENTIAL 146: 136: 128: 124: 120: 116: 92: 79: 63: 61: 50: 38: 19: 18: 656:Visa policy 631:Euro policy 599:Drug policy 393:List X site 223:Descriptors 671:Categories 409:References 317:Brzezinski 243:Management 237:Commercial 177:RESTRICTED 172:RESTRICTED 147:TOP SECRET 142:TOP SECRET 107:relations. 93:TOP SECRET 88:TOP SECRET 481:April 29, 388:DA-Notice 369:sitivity. 324:Codewords 298:citizens. 282:EYES ONLY 122:replaced. 377:See also 249:Personal 201:Handling 110:OFFICIAL 545:(dated) 290:adian, 246:Medical 240:Honours 182:PROTECT 23:in the 365:ional 336:, and 334:fusion 270:caveat 252:Policy 234:Budget 156:SECRET 103:SECRET 55:. The 47:Policy 458:(PDF) 338:naval 255:Staff 531:help 483:2013 367:sen 363:nat 356:sen 354:al 352:loc 313:FRG 294:or 288:Can 280:UK 673:: 522:: 520:}} 516:{{ 466:^ 296:US 292:UK 572:e 565:t 558:v 533:) 529:( 485:. 100:.

Index

Classified information
United Kingdom
Cabinet Office
critical national infrastructure
Government Security Classifications Policy
Cabinet Office
Security Policy Framework
Government Security Classifications Policy
Government Security Classifications Policy
Official Secrets Act 1989
Second World War
Security vetting in the United Kingdom
caveat
EYES ONLY
AUSCANNZUKUS
UKUSA Community
FRG
Brzezinski
fusion
naval
nuclear propulsion
Classified information
DA-Notice
List X site
Official Secrets Acts 1911 to 1989
Thirty year rule
"Security policy framework: Protecting government assets"
Government Security Classifications April 2014, Version 1.0 - October 2013
Government Security Classifications FAQ Sheet 1: Working with OFFICIAL Information April 2013, Version 1.2

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑