Knowledge

Chandabhoy Galla Case

Source 📝

157: 152:, could not conceivably commit a criminal offence; but he was nevertheless subject to the criminal law, and this fact involved no slur. So, too, in theory the Mullaji Saheb was amenable to the criminal and civil law of this country, though it was unthinkable that he would commit any offence. But the existence of this civil restraint is no more a slur upon an honest trustee, than the existence of criminal restraint is upon an honest citizen. The test of a trust is not whether the alleged trustee can ever commit a breach of trust, which is what the defendants' contention in effect amounts to." 174:"Looking back on the proceedings, I think what impressed me the most, even more than the extravagance of the claims, was the personality of the Mullaji, a frail looking figure possessed nevertheless of an iron will, great determination, and organising capacity. At the time he assumed office the administration must have been extremely slack. Yet he managed in a very few years not only to pull the administration together but to obtain a hold upon his followers greater perhaps than that of any of his predecessors." 247:
to protract the case despite lack of mainstream recognition.On 23 April 2024, the Bombay high court dismissed the suit challenging Syedna Mufaddal Saifuddin's position as the 53rd Dai-al-Mutlaq of the Dawoodi Bohra Community. The court dismissed Taher Fakhruddin(son of
116:
that the case is remarkable not only for its length, but for the amazing claims put forward on behalf of the 'Mullaji' (Taher Saifuddin), the like of which have never been put forward in any Court of Law.
19:
set a significant precedent on the issue of a human's claim to being infallible, immaculate, executor of God's will, and trusteeship of God's funds. The case was filed in 1917, during the
519:
Waring, Kate (15 August 2014). "UK Charity Commission's View regarding The Dawat-e-Hadiyah Trust". Herbert Smith Freehills Solicitors and Nabarro Solicitors (Charity Commission).
200:, contains religious truths known to a very few. And an even higher class of knowledge which is with the Dai al-Mutlaq exclusively that they pass on only to their successors. 148:"...high-ranking people could be trusted not to commit criminal breach of trust; but that did not mean that they were beyond the pale of the law. For example, His Grace the 136:
based his judgement on religious texts to hold that all properties (in respect of which the declaration was sought) were devoted to charitable purposes, and that the
236: 464: 534: 414: 606: 497: 547: 446:
Hassanally, Yusuf Mamujee (2017). "The 27th Dai al-Mutlaq, Ad-Da'il Ajal Syedna Dawood Burhanuddin bin Qutubshah bin Khwaja bin Ali".
100:, who was revered as a miraculous Saint, was challenged on the plea of improper chain of succession from 47th Dai al-Mutlaq, 185: 428: 474: 313: 555: 561: 375: 129: 397: 352: 286: 156: 28: 607:"Bombay high court rejects Dawoodi Bohra succession suit, upholds Syedna Mufaddal Saifuddin's claim" 592: 626: 149: 631: 505: 125: 101: 401: 371: 212: 24: 140:(Taher Saifuddin) was sole trustee thereof, and also that, despite his infallibility, the 8: 469: 178:
During Taher Saifuddin's testimony, he clarified about existence of knowledge classes of
60: 56: 108:
raised during the case, however; were of greater importance than the trusteeship of the
580: 530: 249: 240: 208: 132:
could be questioned, and by extension, their trusteeship of all religious properties.
551: 309: 282: 244: 329: 204: 32: 465:"The Intricacies of Succession: Two Claimants Emerge for Dawoodi Bohra Leadership" 333: 303: 276: 40: 133: 44: 432: 620: 179: 65: 36: 305:
Modern History of the Ismailis: Continuity and Change in a Muslim Community
121: 272: 20: 379: 215:'s accession. After much deliberation, Akbar eventually issued a royal 160:
Transcript of testimony by the defendant in the Chandabhoy Galla Case
393:
The Advocate General Of Bombay vs Yusufalli Ebrahim on 19 March, 1921
367:
The Advocate General Of Bombay vs Yusufalli Ebrahim on 19 March, 1921
278:
Mullahs on the Mainframe: Islam and Modernity Among the Daudi Bohras
48: 70: 235:) in favor of Qutub Shah, instead. In another instance in 2014, 543: 191: 97: 43:. In 1921, Saifuddin won the case on basis of the belief that 52: 447: 203:
A similar case was brought to the court of Mughal emperor,
196:: First two of the three are known to many but the third, 536:
The Muslim 500: The World's 500 Most Influential Muslims
252:)'s claim and upheld Syedna Mufaddal as Dai-ul-Mutlaq.. 415:"Unique case: From Akbar's court in 1591 to Bombay HC" 104:'s appointment. Issues pertaining to the office of 452:. Colombo: Alvazaratus Saifiyah. pp. 110–115. 449:Gems of History: A Brief History of Doat Mutlaqeen 112:itself. Sir Thomas Strangman observes in his book 618: 353:"Mullaji Case (Chandabhoy Gulla Case)-19l8-19l9" 35:'s family against the 51st Dai al-Mutlaq of the 170:Upon conclusion of the case, Strangman noted: 281:. University of Chicago Press. p. 236. 239:was contested by an opposing faction led by 220: 81: 76:The trusteeship of the money donated via a 548:The Royal Islamic Strategic Studies Centre 445: 144:remained accountable to the Court of Law: 69:(and hence Saifuddin), in accordance with 529: 456: 429:"History of Duat Mutlakin's of Ahmedabad" 328: 243:, Taher Saifuddin's son, who moved the 155: 347: 345: 301: 619: 518: 495: 462: 96:) kept near the tomb of Chandabhoy in 51:and through him the representative of 496:Bhutia, Lhendup G (3 February 2020). 271: 523: 342: 512: 13: 463:Mawani, Rizwan (30 January 2014). 14: 643: 61:entrust someone to represent them 57:having withdrawn from public life 237:succession of Mufaddal Saifuddin 599: 489: 124:not upheld by the court in the 498:"Uncertainty Among the Bohras" 439: 421: 407: 385: 359: 322: 295: 265: 1: 338:– via books.google.com. 318:– via books.google.com. 302:Daftary, Farhad, ed. (2010). 291:– via books.google.com. 258: 161: 128:, validity of the subsequent 335:Indian Courts and Characters 120:Had Abdul Qadir Najmuddin's 114:Indian Courts and Characters 7: 47:, as representative of the 10: 648: 29:Advocate General of Bombay 17:The Chandabhoy Galla Case 150:Archbishop of Canterbury 167: 531:Schleifer, S Abdallah 398:52 Justice Marten 159: 126:Burhanpur Dargah Case 102:Abdul Qadir Najmuddin 21:British rule of India 477:on 27 September 2018 435:on 10 February 2001. 402:High Court of Bombay 378:, archived from 372:High Court of Bombay 213:Dawood Bin Qutubshah 25:Sir Thomas Strangman 502:openthemagazine.com 470:The Huffington Post 31:, at the behest of 250:Khuzaima Qutbuddin 241:Khuzaima Qutbuddin 209:Sulayman ibn Hasan 168: 73:religious belief. 330:Strangman, Thomas 245:Bombay High Court 130:Duat al-Mutlaqeen 639: 611: 610: 609:. 23 April 2024. 603: 597: 596: 590: 586: 584: 576: 574: 572: 566: 560:. Archived from 541: 527: 521: 520: 516: 510: 509: 508:on 2 March 2020. 504:. Archived from 493: 487: 486: 484: 482: 473:. Archived from 460: 454: 453: 443: 437: 436: 431:. Archived from 425: 419: 418: 411: 405: 395: 389: 383: 374: 1922), 369: 363: 357: 356: 349: 340: 339: 326: 320: 319: 299: 293: 292: 269: 234: 231: 228: 225: 222: 205:Jalaluddin Akbar 166: 163: 95: 92: 89: 86: 83: 33:Adamjee Peerbhoy 647: 646: 642: 641: 640: 638: 637: 636: 627:Indian case law 617: 616: 615: 614: 605: 604: 600: 588: 587: 578: 577: 570: 568: 567:on 12 June 2020 564: 558: 539: 528: 524: 517: 513: 494: 490: 480: 478: 461: 457: 444: 440: 427: 426: 422: 413: 412: 408: 400:, 280-284 ( 391: 390: 386: 365: 364: 360: 351: 350: 343: 327: 323: 316: 300: 296: 289: 270: 266: 261: 255: 232: 229: 226: 223: 164: 93: 90: 87: 84: 41:Taher Saifuddin 12: 11: 5: 645: 635: 634: 632:Dawoodi Bohras 629: 613: 612: 598: 589:|website= 556: 533:, ed. (2019). 522: 511: 488: 455: 438: 420: 406: 384: 358: 341: 321: 315:978-0857735263 314: 308:. Bloomsbury. 294: 287: 263: 262: 260: 257: 207:, in 1591, as 176: 175: 154: 153: 134:Justice Marten 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 644: 633: 630: 628: 625: 624: 622: 608: 602: 594: 582: 563: 559: 557:9789957635459 553: 549: 545: 538: 537: 532: 526: 515: 507: 503: 499: 492: 476: 472: 471: 466: 459: 451: 450: 442: 434: 430: 424: 416: 410: 403: 399: 394: 388: 381: 377: 373: 368: 362: 354: 348: 346: 337: 336: 331: 325: 317: 311: 307: 306: 298: 290: 284: 280: 279: 274: 268: 264: 256: 253: 251: 246: 242: 238: 218: 214: 210: 206: 201: 199: 195: 194: 189: 188: 183: 182: 173: 172: 171: 158: 151: 147: 146: 145: 143: 139: 135: 131: 127: 123: 118: 115: 111: 107: 106:Dai al-Mutlaq 103: 99: 79: 74: 72: 68: 67: 66:Dai al-Mutlaq 62: 58: 54: 50: 46: 42: 38: 37:Dawoodi Bohra 34: 30: 26: 22: 18: 601: 569:. Retrieved 562:the original 535: 525: 514: 506:the original 501: 491: 479:. Retrieved 475:the original 468: 458: 448: 441: 433:the original 423: 409: 392: 387: 380:the original 366: 361: 334: 324: 304: 297: 277: 273:Blank, Jonah 267: 254: 216: 202: 197: 192: 186: 180: 177: 169: 141: 137: 119: 113: 109: 105: 91:donation box 77: 75: 64: 16: 15: 481:11 February 404: 1922). 211:challenged 165: 1920 122:appointment 621:Categories 288:0226056767 259:References 591:ignored ( 581:cite book 332:(1931). 275:(2001). 571:12 June 355:. 1919. 224:  198:Haqiqat 193:Haqiqat 142:Mullaji 138:Mullaji 85:  71:Tayyibi 59:, must 49:Prophet 554:  544:Jordan 396:, 370: ( 312:  285:  230:decree 217:farman 190:, and 98:Bombay 27:, the 565:(PDF) 540:(PDF) 187:Tawil 181:Zahir 110:Galla 78:Galla 23:, by 593:help 573:2020 552:ISBN 483:2014 376:Text 310:ISBN 283:ISBN 221:lit. 82:lit. 63:the 45:Imam 53:God 623:: 585:: 583:}} 579:{{ 550:. 546:: 542:. 500:. 467:. 344:^ 184:, 162:c. 55:, 39:, 595:) 575:. 485:. 417:. 382:. 233:' 227:' 219:( 94:' 88:' 80:(

Index

British rule of India
Sir Thomas Strangman
Advocate General of Bombay
Adamjee Peerbhoy
Dawoodi Bohra
Taher Saifuddin
Imam
Prophet
God
having withdrawn from public life
entrust someone to represent them
Dai al-Mutlaq
Tayyibi
Bombay
Abdul Qadir Najmuddin
appointment
Burhanpur Dargah Case
Duat al-Mutlaqeen
Justice Marten
Archbishop of Canterbury

Zahir
Tawil
Haqiqat
Jalaluddin Akbar
Sulayman ibn Hasan
Dawood Bin Qutubshah
succession of Mufaddal Saifuddin
Khuzaima Qutbuddin
Bombay High Court

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.