342:, the Supreme Court held that Spain's grant to Austin, even if incomplete, was recognized by the United States, thus supporting the claim of Deane's successors in title, who took possession of the land due to Austin's mortgage and subsequent default. In so holding, the Court reaffirmed its position, as set forth in previous cases, that "in that treaty by which Louisiana was acquired, the United States stipulated that the inhabitants of the ceded territory should be protected in the free enjoyment of their property; that the term 'property,' as applied to lands comprehends every species of title, inchoate or complete, and embraces rights which lie in contract, executory as well as executed, and that in this respect the relation of the inhabitants to their government was not changed, the new government taking the place of that which had passed away."
31:
366:
in
Congress from Missouri, whose avowed purpose was to protect the interests of their immediate constituents. The necessity of this act arose from a then recent opinion of the Commissioner of the General Land Office that the legal title to the land within the Austin claim was still in the United States. In order to quiet the fears of those 'who have been in possession for half a century, claiming the land adversely against everybody, as well as the United States,' the act of 1874 was passed. It had no other object."
346:
also have taken all the necessary steps to legally complete the grant. The Court noted that at the time of the
Purchase, there were very few "complete grants", that "nineteen-twentieths" of the grants were incomplete and that "ost of the inhabitants were too poor to defray the expenses attending the completion of their titles, but they had faith in their government" that the title would be recognized. In making this ruling on the property issue, the Court cited its previous opinions in
326:" of the disputed land for more than thirty years prior to the start of the current action, and had paid taxes due on the land; the plaintiffs and those from whom they claimed had not been in possession for any period of time exceeding thirty years or paid taxes. They further contended that equitable title came from the United States starting in 1803, that the United States had made no attempt to claim the land itself, and that the previous holding in the 1836 equity suit by John Deane
220:. A question later arose as to whether Austin had received sufficient property rights from Spain to allow him to mortgage his land in 1818, or whether necessary rights had somehow passed back to the United States government, making the mortgage invalid and voiding subsequent land transfers that occurred pursuant to Austin's defaulting on the mortgage. Under the Court's holding, the incomplete grant to Austin was valid and sufficient to permit the mortgage.
314:) "to the heirs, legal representatives, or assigns of said Moses Austin, according to their respective interests therein, provided however that this act shall not affect nor impair the title which any settler or other person may have acquired adverse to the title of said Moses Austin to any portion of said land." Bryan's heirs now brought an action for
365:
The Court concluded its opinion by stating that "the sole object of ... was to assure those who thus acquired possession, whether by contract or by operation of law, that they would not be disturbed by any assertion of claim upon the part of the United States. It originated with the representatives
345:
The Court further clarified that the United States government intended to broadly recognize the claims of property owners to property they were granted or otherwise had a presumed right based on the actions of Spain or France prior to the
Louisiana Purchase, without requiring that the property owner
361:
The Court also held that the plaintiffs were estopped from asserting in the current "collateral proceeding" any interest in the property by the 1836 decision on Deane's bill of equity, because the court making that decision had jurisdiction, the decision was conclusive, and had not been reversed or
318:
of Deane's successors in title, alleging (among other things) that Austin had not received complete title to his land from the
Spanish government and thus he could not have mortgaged the land, which reverted to the possession of the United States and then passed to Bryan's heirs by operation of the
255:
In 1797, the
Spanish governor directed that Austin be placed in possession of land "one league square" (approximately 4,428 acres). Austin subsequently took possession of the land, moved his family onto it and built a house, blacksmith shop, and other improvements. In 1799, Spanish officials
283:
to pay his creditors. Following the sheriff's sale, Austin's land changed hands several more times and ended up in the possession of John Deane by 1835. However, Austin, perhaps in an effort to protect some of his assets, had also conveyed the land himself in 1820 to his son-in-law
248:, an area then controlled by Spain (which later became the U.S. state of Missouri), due to rich lead deposits in the region. Austin arranged with the Spanish government to receive a large tract of land in return for his swearing allegiance to the
448:
Bryan attained significance when the United States
Supreme Court recognized details of a land transfer from Bryan's father-in-law Moses Austin to Bryan in Bryan v. Kennett, which was the Court's ratification of the Louisiana
226:
is sometimes referenced as the
Supreme Court's "ratification" of the Louisiana Purchase. However, the Court had already discussed and confirmed the legality of the Louisiana Purchase much earlier in
228:
358:, 51 U.S. 348 (1850) in support. The Court also noted that the Act of Congress was stated to also apply to "legal representatives or assigns" of Austin and not just to his heirs.
279:, causing Austin to lose his entire fortune and resulting in judgments being entered against him for approximately $ 14,500. Austin's land was subsequently seized and sold via
272:. The land granted to Austin by the Spanish governor was therefore owned by France at the time of the 1802 grant and came under the jurisdiction of the United States in 1803.
244:
and become known as the "Lead King". However, the business failed and Austin decided to leave the United States in order to avoid imprisonment for debt. He relocated to upper
189:, the United States would recognize property interests granted by the previous sovereign governments prior to the Purchase, even if the grant had been inchoate or incomplete.
240:
During the 1790s, Moses Austin, a former dry goods merchant who had married into an affluent iron mining family, had been one of the operators of a lead mine in southwestern
614:
322:
Deane's successors in title, who were currently in possession of the land, contended that they and those from whom they claimed the land had been in "open, continuous
562:
375:
72:
275:
Austin founded the Bank of St. Louis and was its principal stockholder. In 1818, he mortgaged his land to the bank for $ 15,000, but the bank failed in the
303:
and failed to appear. Deane was awarded the right, title and interest to the land. Deane and his successors in title continued to occupy the land.
268:
in 1800, although
Louisiana remained nominally under Spanish control until 1803, just before France sold it to the United States in the
609:
436:
310:
was approved stating that "the United States hereby release whatever title they have" regarding Austin's former land (now located in
619:
280:
629:
182:
35:
511:
482:
285:
265:
591:
624:
311:
470:
138:
573:
261:
566:
245:
130:
114:
106:
64:
462:
428:
528:
339:
126:
8:
296:
582:
323:
269:
186:
507:
478:
300:
150:
118:
67:
307:
204:
before being acquired by the United States. In the late 1700s, the government of
98:
603:
276:
249:
217:
209:
315:
299:
in
Missouri against the heirs of James Bryan, who by then were living in
292:
257:
142:
411:
185:
case in which the Court held that, under the treaty providing for the
503:
260:
granted Austin the surveyed land. However, in the meantime Spain had
256:
conducted a survey of the land and in 1802, the
Spanish governor at
208:
had made a possibly incomplete grant of the land to a U.S. citizen,
474:
327:
241:
193:
467:
The Louisiana Purchase: A Historical and Geographical Encyclopedia
192:
The case involved a disputed title to land in the U.S. state of
213:
201:
79:
30:
205:
197:
288:
and other grantees. Austin died in 1821, and Bryan in 1822.
362:
modified on appeal, or otherwise set aside or annulled.
376:
List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 113
615:
United States Supreme Court cases of the Waite Court
330:the plaintiffs from now trying to claim the land.
252:and agreeing to settle some families in the area.
500:The Alamo Story-From History to Current Conflicts
196:, which had previously been under the control of
601:
414:, 113 U.S. 179 (1885). Retrieved 2016-01-04 via
306:Almost 40 years later, on February 14, 1874, an
429:"A Guide to the James Bryan Papers, 1799-1822"
54:Bryan & Others v. Kennett & Others
497:
463:"American Insurance Co. v. Canter (1828)"
460:
437:Dolph Briscoe Center for American History
407:
405:
403:
401:
399:
397:
395:
393:
391:
212:. Spain then lost control of the land to
506:: Republic of Texas Press. p. 56.
333:
602:
421:
388:
18:1885 United States Supreme Court case
535:. Texas State Historical Association
526:
216:in 1800, who in turn sold it to the
13:
36:Supreme Court of the United States
14:
641:
610:United States Supreme Court cases
569:179 (1885) is available from:
551:
465:. In Rodriguez, Junius P. (ed.).
232:, 1 Peters (26 U.S.) 511 (1828).
229:American Insurance Co. v. Canter
29:
620:1885 in United States case law
520:
491:
454:
1:
461:Rodriguez, Junius P. (2002).
381:
266:Third Treaty of San Ildefonso
235:
181:, 113 U.S. 179 (1885), was a
262:returned Louisiana to France
7:
630:Washington County, Missouri
369:
312:Washington County, Missouri
183:United States Supreme Court
10:
646:
354:, 29 U.S. 511 (1830), and
471:Santa Barbara, California
291:In 1835, Deane brought a
163:
158:
92:
87:
59:
49:
42:
28:
23:
533:Handbook of Texas Online
498:Edmondson, J.R. (2000).
352:Soulard v. United States
43:Argued December 12, 1884
45:Decided January 5, 1885
350:, 31 U.S. 763 (1832),
340:Justice John M. Harlan
334:Opinion of the Court
264:by operation of the
592:Library of Congress
527:Gracy II, David B.
625:Louisiana Purchase
433:www.lib.utexas.edu
324:adverse possession
270:Louisiana Purchase
187:Louisiana Purchase
167:Harlan, joined by
103:Associate Justices
348:Strother v. Lucas
338:In an opinion by
319:Act of Congress.
246:Spanish Louisiana
174:
173:
151:Samuel Blatchford
119:Joseph P. Bradley
78:5 S. Ct. 407; 28
637:
596:
590:
587:
581:
578:
572:
559:Bryan v. Kennett
545:
544:
542:
540:
524:
518:
517:
495:
489:
488:
458:
452:
451:
445:
443:
425:
419:
412:Bryan v. Kennett
409:
224:Bryan v. Kennett
178:Bryan v. Kennett
139:Stanley Matthews
131:William B. Woods
115:Stephen J. Field
107:Samuel F. Miller
88:Court membership
33:
32:
24:Bryan v. Kennett
21:
20:
645:
644:
640:
639:
638:
636:
635:
634:
600:
599:
594:
588:
585:
579:
576:
570:
554:
549:
548:
538:
536:
525:
521:
514:
496:
492:
485:
459:
455:
441:
439:
427:
426:
422:
410:
389:
384:
372:
356:Landes v. Brant
336:
308:Act of Congress
238:
141:
129:
117:
83:
44:
38:
19:
12:
11:
5:
643:
633:
632:
627:
622:
617:
612:
598:
597:
574:Google Scholar
553:
552:External links
550:
547:
546:
529:"Moses Austin"
519:
512:
490:
483:
453:
420:
386:
385:
383:
380:
379:
378:
371:
368:
335:
332:
281:sheriff's sale
237:
234:
172:
171:
165:
161:
160:
156:
155:
154:
153:
127:John M. Harlan
104:
101:
99:Morrison Waite
96:
90:
89:
85:
84:
77:
61:
57:
56:
51:
50:Full case name
47:
46:
40:
39:
34:
26:
25:
17:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
642:
631:
628:
626:
623:
621:
618:
616:
613:
611:
608:
607:
605:
593:
584:
575:
568:
564:
560:
556:
555:
534:
530:
523:
515:
513:1-55622-678-0
509:
505:
501:
494:
486:
484:1-57607-188-X
480:
477:. p. 7.
476:
472:
468:
464:
457:
450:
438:
434:
430:
424:
417:
413:
408:
406:
404:
402:
400:
398:
396:
394:
392:
387:
377:
374:
373:
367:
363:
359:
357:
353:
349:
343:
341:
331:
329:
325:
320:
317:
313:
309:
304:
302:
298:
294:
289:
287:
282:
278:
277:Panic of 1819
273:
271:
267:
263:
259:
253:
251:
250:Spanish Crown
247:
243:
233:
231:
230:
225:
221:
219:
218:United States
215:
211:
207:
203:
199:
195:
190:
188:
184:
180:
179:
170:
166:
162:
157:
152:
148:
144:
140:
136:
132:
128:
124:
120:
116:
112:
108:
105:
102:
100:
97:
95:Chief Justice
94:
93:
91:
86:
81:
75:
74:
69:
66:
62:
58:
55:
52:
48:
41:
37:
27:
22:
16:
558:
539:November 13,
537:. Retrieved
532:
522:
499:
493:
466:
456:
447:
440:. Retrieved
432:
423:
415:
364:
360:
355:
351:
347:
344:
337:
321:
305:
290:
274:
254:
239:
227:
223:
222:
210:Moses Austin
191:
177:
176:
175:
168:
159:Case opinion
146:
134:
122:
110:
71:
53:
15:
293:quiet title
286:James Bryan
258:New Orleans
143:Horace Gray
604:Categories
442:January 4,
416:Justia.com
382:References
295:action in
236:Background
504:Plano, TX
449:Purchase.
316:ejectment
169:unanimous
60:Citations
557:Text of
475:ABC-CLIO
370:See also
328:estopped
242:Virginia
194:Missouri
164:Majority
595:
589:
586:
583:Justia
580:
577:
571:
510:
481:
297:equity
214:France
202:France
149:
147:·
145:
137:
135:·
133:
125:
123:·
121:
113:
111:·
109:
80:L. Ed.
565:
301:Texas
206:Spain
198:Spain
567:U.S.
541:2013
508:ISBN
479:ISBN
444:2016
200:and
73:more
65:U.S.
63:113
563:113
82:908
68:179
606::
561:,
531:.
502:.
473::
469:.
446:.
435:.
431:.
390:^
543:.
516:.
487:.
418:.
76:)
70:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.