31:
270:. His conviction was challenged because during his trial he had been placed in shackles. His wrists, waist, and ankles were all restrained, but there was a curtain to prevent the jury from seeing the shackles. The state said that although the shackles were unconstitutional, they did not effect the jury's verdict.
282:. The lower court again determined that the shackles did not affect the verdict, and the appellate court agreed with the state once again, and the Michigan Supreme Court denied an appeal.
299:: "shackling is inherently prejudicial". The court found that the state had not met the burden of proof necessary to show that the jury was not influenced by the shackling, and provided
583:
578:
428:
254:. The court held that federal courts can not grant habeas relief when state courts have already ruled on a prisoner's claim, unless the situation satisfies the test laid out in
103:
When a state court has ruled on the merits of a state prisoner’s claim, a federal court cannot grant habeas relief without applying both the test this Court outlined in
105:
512:
251:
219:
110:
79:
286:
489:
413:
353:
454:
573:
285:
Davenport then challenged his conviction in the federal courts. The district court refused to hear the case. He then petitioned the
568:
113:; the Sixth Circuit erred in granting habeas relief to Mr. Davenport based solely on its assessment that he could satisfy the
481:
405:
278:
disagreed, however, after several jurors testified that they had seen the shackles or heard comments about them, and then
233:
35:
390:
429:"An important right-to-carry case, and another close look at a Sixth Circuit decision granting habeas relief"
63:
271:
523:
279:
328:
275:
550:
516:
482:"ERVINE LEE DAVENPORT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. DUNCAN MACLAREN, Warden, Respondent-Appellee"
246:
74:
532:
8:
308:
267:
184:
291:
176:
160:
140:
455:"Kalamazoo murder conviction set aside; Ervine Davenport was shackled at trial"
148:
562:
300:
237:
304:
172:
152:
132:
354:"Court to take up case on "harmless error" standard in habeas proceedings"
541:
382:
164:
91:
289:, which agreed the hear the case. This appeals court cited the
30:
201:
Gorsuch, joined by
Roberts, Thomas, Alito, Kavanaugh, Barrett
109:, 507 U.S. 619, and the one Congress prescribed in the
584:
Antiterrorism and
Effective Death Penalty Act case law
579:
United States
Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court
220:
Antiterrorism and
Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996
111:
Antiterrorism and
Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996
250:
by the state courts was unreasonable because of the
490:United States Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit
414:United States Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit
244:test alone is satisfied, or if the application of
232:, 596 U.S. 118 (2022), was a case decided by the
560:
54:Mike Brown, Acting Warden v. Ervine Davenport
307:. The state attempted to have the decision
266:In 2008, Ervine Davenport was convicted of
287:U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit
493:. 17–2267: 1–2 – via govinfo.gov.
479:
403:
561:
461:. Associated Press. September 19, 2020
280:sent the case back to the lower courts
417:. 17–2267: 2 – via govinfo.gov.
406:"Ervine Davenport v. Duncan MacLaren"
18:2022 United States Supreme Court case
377:
375:
393:from the original on July 20, 2021.
13:
258:, and the test laid out in AEDPA.
209:Kagan, joined by Breyer, Sotomayor
36:Supreme Court of the United States
14:
595:
574:United States Supreme Court cases
519:___ (2022) is available from:
501:
372:
29:
404:Stranch, Jane (June 30, 2020).
569:2022 in United States case law
473:
447:
421:
397:
346:
321:
1:
480:Stranch (November 24, 2020).
314:
261:
236:. The case concerned whether
551:Supreme Court (slip opinion)
303:, over the dissent of Judge
7:
274:agreed with the state. The
272:Michigan's Court of Appeals
234:United States Supreme Court
10:
600:
542:Oyez (oral argument audio)
311:, but the court declined.
295:decision, and quoted from
218:
213:
205:
197:
192:
126:
121:
102:
97:
87:
69:
59:
49:
42:
28:
23:
276:Michigan Supreme Court
240:may be granted if the
45:Decided April 21, 2022
43:Argued October 5, 2021
247:Chapman v. California
383:"Brown v. Davenport"
329:"Brown v. Davenport"
256:Brecht v. Abrahamson
242:Brecht v. Abrahamson
106:Brecht v. Abrahamson
268:first-degree murder
511:, No. 20-826,
509:Brown v. Davenport
229:Brown v. Davenport
137:Associate Justices
24:Brown v. Davenport
297:Holbrook v. Flynn
225:
224:
185:Amy Coney Barrett
591:
555:
549:
546:
540:
537:
531:
528:
522:
495:
494:
486:
477:
471:
470:
468:
466:
451:
445:
444:
442:
440:
435:. March 31, 2021
425:
419:
418:
410:
401:
395:
394:
379:
370:
369:
367:
365:
350:
344:
343:
341:
339:
325:
292:Deck v. Missouri
122:Court membership
33:
32:
21:
20:
599:
598:
594:
593:
592:
590:
589:
588:
559:
558:
553:
547:
544:
538:
535:
529:
526:
520:
504:
499:
498:
484:
478:
474:
464:
462:
453:
452:
448:
438:
436:
427:
426:
422:
408:
402:
398:
381:
380:
373:
363:
361:
360:. April 5, 2021
352:
351:
347:
337:
335:
327:
326:
322:
317:
264:
177:Brett Kavanaugh
175:
163:
161:Sonia Sotomayor
151:
141:Clarence Thomas
44:
38:
19:
12:
11:
5:
597:
587:
586:
581:
576:
571:
557:
556:
524:Google Scholar
503:
502:External links
500:
497:
496:
472:
446:
420:
396:
371:
345:
319:
318:
316:
313:
263:
260:
223:
222:
216:
215:
211:
210:
207:
203:
202:
199:
195:
194:
190:
189:
188:
187:
149:Stephen Breyer
138:
135:
130:
124:
123:
119:
118:
100:
99:
95:
94:
89:
85:
84:
71:
67:
66:
61:
57:
56:
51:
50:Full case name
47:
46:
40:
39:
34:
26:
25:
17:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
596:
585:
582:
580:
577:
575:
572:
570:
567:
566:
564:
552:
543:
534:
525:
518:
514:
510:
506:
505:
492:
491:
483:
476:
460:
456:
450:
434:
430:
424:
416:
415:
407:
400:
392:
388:
384:
378:
376:
359:
355:
349:
334:
330:
324:
320:
312:
310:
306:
302:
301:habeas relief
298:
294:
293:
288:
283:
281:
277:
273:
269:
259:
257:
253:
249:
248:
243:
239:
238:habeas relief
235:
231:
230:
221:
217:
212:
208:
204:
200:
196:
193:Case opinions
191:
186:
182:
178:
174:
170:
166:
162:
158:
154:
150:
146:
142:
139:
136:
134:
131:
129:Chief Justice
128:
127:
125:
120:
116:
112:
108:
107:
101:
96:
93:
92:Oral argument
90:
86:
82:
81:
76:
72:
68:
65:
62:
58:
55:
52:
48:
41:
37:
27:
22:
16:
508:
488:
475:
463:. Retrieved
458:
449:
437:. Retrieved
432:
423:
412:
399:
386:
362:. Retrieved
357:
348:
336:. Retrieved
332:
323:
305:Chad Readler
296:
290:
284:
265:
255:
245:
241:
228:
227:
226:
214:Laws applied
180:
173:Neil Gorsuch
168:
156:
153:Samuel Alito
144:
133:John Roberts
114:
104:
78:
53:
15:
165:Elena Kagan
563:Categories
433:SCOTUSblog
358:SCOTUSblog
333:SCOTUSblog
315:References
262:Background
60:Docket no.
117:standard.
70:Citations
507:Text of
465:July 23,
439:July 21,
391:Archived
364:July 21,
338:July 20,
198:Majority
88:Argument
206:Dissent
98:Holding
554:
548:
545:
539:
536:
533:Justia
530:
527:
521:
309:stayed
183:
181:·
179:
171:
169:·
167:
159:
157:·
155:
147:
145:·
143:
115:Brecht
64:20-826
515:
485:(PDF)
409:(PDF)
252:AEDPA
77:118 (
517:U.S.
467:2021
459:WWMT
441:2021
387:Oyez
366:2021
340:2021
80:more
75:U.S.
73:596
513:596
565::
487:.
457:.
431:.
411:.
389:.
385:.
374:^
356:.
331:.
469:.
443:.
368:.
342:.
83:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.