Knowledge

Access to Information and Protection of Privacy Act (Zimbabwe)

Source đź“ť

301:
reduce the Commission’s neutrality and independence which is one of the Declaration of Principles on Freedom of Expression in Africa principles. The Zimbabwe Lawyers for Human Rights and The Legal Resources Foundation versus The President of the Republic of Zimbabwe and the Attorney-General case indicates that the decision on whether to disclose publicly held information is rather a policy decision made by politicians and not by the courts and set a wrong precedent to those that might think of appealing against refusals by heads of public offices.
26: 256:. Regarding the access of information, it is up to the Commission to decide about appeals against refusals regarding requests on access of information and to authorise public bodies to disregard requests that might interfere with the operation of the respective body. Its other main functions are to ensure the access of Zimbabweans to 309:“Imposing special registration requirements on the print media is unnecessary and may be abused and should be avoided. Registration systems which allow for discretion to refuse registration (…) which are overseen by bodies which are not independent of government are particularly problematical (p. 31). 202:
stating that everyone should have the right to access information held by public bodies Declaration of Principles on Freedom of Expression in Africa. After the request is made, a response on behalf of the public office regarding the applicability should be sent within 30 days. However, these 30 days
300:
In this context, terms such as public morality are not further defined. Critics of the Media and Information Commission span from its comprehensive authority and competences to its organisation. The organisation structure is subject to concern for critics suggesting that the strong government ties
296:
operating without a certificate and abuse of journalistic privileges are penalised with a fine and up two years of imprisonment. Abuse of journalistic privileges is further defined by intentional and unintentional false information or statements threatening the interests of defence, public safety,
53:
An Act to provide members of the public with a right of access to records and information held by public bodies; to make public bodies accountable by giving the public a right to request correction of misrepresented personal information; to prevent the unauthorised collection, use or disclosure of
146:
Amendments were made in 2003 concerning the definition of mass media services, journalistic abuses and heads of offices (Media Institute of Southern Africa, 2003) and 2005 with regard to the imprisonment of journalists According to the official Zimbabwean government position, Canada’s information
313:
Remarkably, the provision on registering are rather broad, covering even the smallest and irregular forms as well as all forms of digital and electronic publications. According to ARTICLE 19, there are also serious concerns regarding the sanctioning of breaches of the AIPPA granting considerate
322:
Due to the non-transparent nature of the Information and Media Commission it is rather difficult to gather reliable data regarding the number of people who were granted access to information under AIPPA. However, it is worth noting that as of 2006, there could be just one successful case be
304:
Furthermore, the outlined process of registering does not correspond to the UN Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Opinion and Expression, the OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media and the OAS Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Expression as stated in a Declaration of 18/12/2003:
339:
that were banned in 2002 until the ban was lifted in 2009. The government made use of AIPPA and the 2004 Criminal Law to prosecute critical journalists and activists during the 2008 election crisis. More recently, AIPPA enabled the detainment of seventeen journalists in 2013.
314:
discretion to political actors such as the minister. Furthermore, it is feared that the deterring effect of this strict, normally “last resort” sanctions such as termination and suspension will have a negative impact of the freedom of expression.
54:
personal information by public bodies; to protect personal privacy; to provide for the regulation of the mass media; to establish a Media and Information Commission and to provide for matters connected therewith or incidental to the foregoing.
260:
information on the grounds of ethical and professional standards by exercising control on respective services. Therefore, the commission is entitled to conduct investigations, decide upon journalists’ accreditation as well as to regulate
239:, the right of information can be considered largely “illusory” due to the extensive list of exemptions as well as due to the fact that appeals against refusals procedure rely on the government dependent Media and Information Commission. 326:
Information gathering difficulties and small numbers of successful requests can be contrasted with high numbers of independent newspapers being shut down and journalists arrested in the aftermaths of AIPPA. According to
247:
The establishment and functions of the Media and Information Commission are laid out in Part IV of AIPPA. The Media and Information Commission is organised by a board where all members are appointed by the
174:
on Freedom of Opinion and Expression because of severe media restrictions. Following the massive critique, David Banisar stated that AIPPA is a rather cynic name for a media suppressing law.
170:
by the establishment of a Media and Information Commission. Especially the latter is subject to harsh critique from various governments, non-governmental organisations and the
203:
can be extended on the grounds of various reasons with the agreement of the Media and Information Commission. One possible reason might be that the request is not in the
249: 194:
or holders of temporary employment, residence permit or students permit are eligible to make a request. Foreign nationals and agencies as well as unregistered
187: 152: 133: 403:
AFRICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN AND PEOPLES’ RIGHTS, 'SEVENTEENTH ANNUAL ACTIVITY REPORT OF THE AFRICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN AND PEOPLES’ RIGHTS 2003 - 2004' (
199: 391: 215:
There is a variety of exemptions where information can always be withheld ranging from deliberation of the cabinet, details of policy advice to
610:
Zimbabwe Lawyers for Human Rights and The Legal Resources Foundation versus The President of the Republic of Zimbabwe and the Attorney-General
292:
services have to register with the commission in order to obtain a certificate and to reapply for its renewal after two years.
408: 162:
The AIPPA shall provide a legal framework for the access and conduct of requesting information from public bodies and
171: 528: 425: 360: 280:. Similar provisions can be found within the matter of journalists’ accreditation, also just limited to Zimbabwean 151:
suggests, it was rather the context of the growing opposition party and the nearly electoral defeat of the ruling
696: 253: 227:
and governmental relations should be disclosed, is subject to the public office’s discretion This reverses the
137: 392:
http://www.humanrightsinitiative.org/programs/ai/rti/international/laws_papers/intl/global_foi_survey_2006.pdf
235:
is considered being a driving factor for disclosing documents. According to the non-governmental organisation
621:'Joint Declarations Of The Representatives Of Intergovernmental Bodies To Protect Free Media And Expression' 477: 523:
MISA-Zimbabwe and ARTICLE 19, 'The Access To Information And Protection Of Privacy Act: Two Years On' (
420:
MISA-Zimbabwe and ARTICLE 19, 'The Access To Information And Protection Of Privacy Act: Two Years On' (
355:
MISA-Zimbabwe and ARTICLE 19, 'The Access To Information And Protection Of Privacy Act: Two Years On' (
701: 656: 673: 691: 156: 220: 74: 33: 147:
legislation served as an inspiration for the AIPPA However, the non-governmental organisation
640:
Controlling Knowledge: Freedom of information and privacy protection in a networked world. (
706: 8: 285: 277: 191: 409:
http://www.achpr.org/files/activity-reports/17/achpr34and35_actrep17_20032004_eng.pdf
216: 132:(AIPPA) was passed in 2002 by the Zimbabwean Parliament under the majority of the 232: 224: 204: 529:
https://www.article19.org/data/files/pdfs/publications/zimbabwe-aippa-report.pdf
426:
https://www.article19.org/data/files/pdfs/publications/zimbabwe-aippa-report.pdf
361:
https://www.article19.org/data/files/pdfs/publications/zimbabwe-aippa-report.pdf
626: 685: 328: 140: 25: 281: 273: 268:
In terms of regulation, AIPPA restricts the ownership or shareholding of
183: 478:
https://www.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit/research/foi/countries/zimbabwe
458:
Declaration of Principles on Freedom of Expression in Africa 2002, c. 7
293: 289: 269: 262: 257: 236: 195: 167: 159:
pushing for more restrictive laws on independent and government media.
148: 44: 657:
https://freedomhouse.org/report/countries-crossroads/2010/zimbabwe
651:'Zimbabwe | Country Report | Countries At The Crossroads | 2010' ( 323:
identified where the opposition party was granted access to data.
674:
https://cpj.org/2014/02/attacks-on-the-press-in-2013-zimbabwe.php
163: 612:
Supreme Court of Zimbabwe, SC 12/03 (Supreme Court of Zimbabwe).
386:
David Banisar, 'FREEDOM OF INFORMATION AROUND THE WORLD 2006' (
120: 591:
The Access to Information and Privacy Act 2002, s. 72, s. 80
336: 332: 507:
The Access to Information and Privacy Act 2002, s. 19-21
242: 600:
The Access to Information and Privacy Act 2002, s. 80
573:
The Access to Information and Privacy Act 2002, s. 65
561:
The Access to Information and Privacy Act 2002, s. 50
552:
The Access to Information and Privacy Act 2002, s. 39
540:
The Access to Information and Privacy Act 2002, s. 40
498:
The Access of Information and Privacy Act 2002, s. 14
489:
The Access to Information and Privacy Act 2002, s. 11
446:
The Access of Information and Privacy Act 2002, s. 5
437:
The Access To Information and Privacy Act 2002, c. 5
200:
the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights
130:
Access to Information and Protection of Privacy Act
19:
Access to Information and Protection of Privacy Act
198:are excluded. This contrasts with chapter four of 134:Zimbabwe African National Union – Patriotic Front 683: 582:The Access to Information and Privacy Act, s. 79 372:The Access to Information and Privacy Act 2002 569: 567: 627:https://www.osce.org/fom/99558?download=true 668:'Attacks On The Press In 2013: Zimbabwe' ( 564: 24: 272:services to anyone other than Zimbabwean 219:. However, whether information regarding 177: 297:public morality or economic interests. 684: 333:British Broadcasting Cooperation (BBC) 548: 546: 519: 517: 515: 513: 382: 380: 378: 468: 466: 464: 454: 452: 250:Minister responsible for information 243:The Media and Information Commission 13: 543: 510: 375: 349: 14: 718: 461: 449: 331:, more prominent example are the 166:as well as for the regulation of 112:Freedom of Information Act, 2020 662: 645: 632: 615: 603: 594: 585: 576: 555: 534: 501: 492: 483: 642:Athabasca University Press) 75 440: 431: 414: 397: 366: 317: 182:In terms of entitlement, only 1: 388:www.humanrightsinitiative.org 343: 252:, after having consulted the 210: 7: 10: 723: 116: 111: 106: 101: 96: 88: 80: 70: 62: 39: 32: 23: 18: 337:Cable News Network (CNN) 676:accessed 18 March 2017. 659:accessed 18 March 2017. 629:accessed 18 March 2017. 531:accessed 18 March 2017. 480:accessed 18 March 2017. 428:accessed 18 March 2017. 411:accessed 18 March 2017. 394:accessed 18 March 2017. 363:accessed 18 March 2017. 697:Zimbabwean legislation 223:, economic interests, 75:Parliament of Zimbabwe 34:Parliament of Zimbabwe 192:permanently residents 178:Access to Information 172:UN Special Rapporteur 102:Official Secrets Act 288:. Furthermore, all 286:permanent residents 278:permanent residents 638:Lorna Stefanick, 525:www.article19.org 422:www.article19.org 357:www.article19.org 217:national security 126: 125: 714: 702:2002 in Zimbabwe 677: 666: 660: 653:Freedomhouse.org 649: 643: 636: 630: 619: 613: 607: 601: 598: 592: 589: 583: 580: 574: 571: 562: 559: 553: 550: 541: 538: 532: 521: 508: 505: 499: 496: 490: 487: 481: 470: 459: 456: 447: 444: 438: 435: 429: 418: 412: 401: 395: 384: 373: 370: 364: 353: 225:public interests 138:Former President 28: 16: 15: 722: 721: 717: 716: 715: 713: 712: 711: 692:Law of Zimbabwe 682: 681: 680: 667: 663: 650: 646: 637: 633: 620: 616: 608: 604: 599: 595: 590: 586: 581: 577: 572: 565: 560: 556: 551: 544: 539: 535: 522: 511: 506: 502: 497: 493: 488: 484: 471: 462: 457: 450: 445: 441: 436: 432: 419: 415: 402: 398: 385: 376: 371: 367: 354: 350: 346: 320: 311: 245: 233:public interest 231:approach where 213: 205:public interest 180: 71:Enacted by 58: 55: 49: 48: 12: 11: 5: 720: 710: 709: 704: 699: 694: 679: 678: 661: 644: 631: 614: 602: 593: 584: 575: 563: 554: 542: 533: 509: 500: 491: 482: 460: 448: 439: 430: 413: 396: 374: 365: 347: 345: 342: 319: 316: 307: 244: 241: 221:heritage sites 212: 209: 179: 176: 136:(ZANU–PF) and 124: 123: 114: 113: 109: 108: 104: 103: 99: 98: 94: 93: 90: 86: 85: 82: 78: 77: 72: 68: 67: 64: 60: 59: 57: 56: 52: 42: 41: 40: 37: 36: 30: 29: 21: 20: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 719: 708: 705: 703: 700: 698: 695: 693: 690: 689: 687: 675: 671: 665: 658: 654: 648: 641: 635: 628: 624: 618: 611: 606: 597: 588: 579: 570: 568: 558: 549: 547: 537: 530: 526: 520: 518: 516: 514: 504: 495: 486: 479: 475: 469: 467: 465: 455: 453: 443: 434: 427: 423: 417: 410: 406: 405:www.achpr.org 400: 393: 389: 383: 381: 379: 369: 362: 358: 352: 348: 341: 338: 334: 330: 329:Freedom House 324: 315: 310: 306: 302: 298: 295: 291: 287: 283: 279: 275: 271: 266: 264: 259: 255: 251: 240: 238: 234: 230: 226: 222: 218: 208: 206: 201: 197: 193: 189: 185: 175: 173: 169: 165: 160: 158: 154: 150: 144: 142: 141:Robert Mugabe 139: 135: 131: 122: 119: 115: 110: 105: 100: 95: 91: 87: 84:15 March 2002 83: 79: 76: 73: 69: 66:Chapter 10:27 65: 61: 51: 50: 47: 46: 38: 35: 31: 27: 22: 17: 669: 664: 652: 647: 639: 634: 623:www.Osce.org 622: 617: 609: 605: 596: 587: 578: 557: 536: 524: 503: 494: 485: 473: 472:'Zimbabwe' ( 442: 433: 421: 416: 404: 399: 387: 368: 356: 351: 325: 321: 312: 308: 303: 299: 267: 246: 228: 214: 181: 161: 145: 129: 127: 117: 43: 707:2002 in law 318:Application 107:Repealed by 92:1 July 2020 686:Categories 344:References 294:Mass media 290:mass media 270:mass media 265:services. 263:mass media 258:mass media 237:ARTICLE 19 211:Exemptions 196:mass media 168:mass media 149:ARTICLE 19 45:Long title 474:Ucl.ac.uk 254:President 81:Commenced 672:, 2013) 655:, 2010) 625:, 2013) 527:, 2004) 424:, 2004) 407:, 2004) 390:, 2006) 359:, 2004) 335:and the 282:citizens 274:citizens 229:openness 188:Zimbabwe 184:citizens 121:Repealed 89:Repealed 63:Citation 670:Cpj.org 164:privacy 153:ZANU-PF 118:Status: 97:Amends 157:2000 128:The 284:or 276:or 186:of 155:in 688:: 566:^ 545:^ 512:^ 476:) 463:^ 451:^ 377:^ 207:. 190:, 143:.

Index


Parliament of Zimbabwe
Long title
Parliament of Zimbabwe
Repealed
Zimbabwe African National Union – Patriotic Front
Former President
Robert Mugabe
ARTICLE 19
ZANU-PF
2000
privacy
mass media
UN Special Rapporteur
citizens
Zimbabwe
permanently residents
mass media
the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights
public interest
national security
heritage sites
public interests
public interest
ARTICLE 19
Minister responsible for information
President
mass media
mass media
mass media

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑