Knowledge

ATF fictional sting operations

Source đź“ť

1610: 1624: 146:. He found that by fabricating every aspect of the supposed circumstances in a manner calculated to entice the subjects' involvement, the government acted "repugnant to the Constitution" by creating a crime "cut from whole cloth" that was intended not to fail to entice involvement, and was not related to any actual or existent criminal enterprise, but was calculated to produce a sentence of around 15 years. 109:", stating that it had neither prevented nor detected crime, but cost the taxpayer dearly, and that the overwhelming extent of ATF direction of the purported crime, and the level of ATF involvement, made the ATF operative more of a participant rather than an observer, the sentence a reflection of ATF whim rather than defendant's own conduct, and the case into one that lacked 121:
In legal proceedings filed in Chicago, attorneys sought dismissal of charges against 40 defendants. One study that was unsealed had concluded that the ATF showed racial bias in target selection for the sting operations. The study concluded that the disparity between white and black defendants was so
208:
after two years of being cajoled by material created by postal inspectors. The Court held that the government must show that predisposition existed before the government became involved, and prior behavior when an activity was legal does not constitute evidence of predisposition to break the law if
80:
rather than actual criminal acts, by presenting them with deliberately hard to resist fabricated inducements and goading them to become a participant, or to engage in more extreme criminal activities, up to an extent chosen almost completely by ATF.
92:
determined that lawyers had made "a strong showing of potential bias" relating to the operation of robbery stings conducted by the ATF, and ordered prosecutors to identify everyone that the government had charged in similar cases in the
157:, ". . . In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself." 133:
The case was one of many US Government cases where a situation was presented to members of the public, who were tempted into committing a crime related to drugs, theft, or firearms, on the basis of a fabricated situation
280:
The U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, the agency in charge of enforcing the nation's gun laws, has locked up more than 1,000 people by enticing them to rob drug stash houses that did not
267: 390: 215:, where predisposition did exist, even though the drugs and drug-related activity of the defendant in that case wholly coincided with the encouragement of law enforcement agents.) 344: 68:
for lengthy periods since 2011 for such fake crimes, and that the strategy has become a key part of the Bureau's enforcement practice. ATF officials stated that the strategy
72:
targeted people likely to commit serious crime rather than waiting for them to do so; opponents and critics, and later, judges, expressed concerns that it was tantamount to
1709: 1719: 1714: 186: 365: 1669: 20: 1724: 1679: 261: 47:
targets for which they were then arrested and convicted. The made-up crimes were in fact entirely the creation of ATF, and as described by two
1684: 44: 338: 1664: 174: 408: 318: 1591: 1674: 1689: 24: 1694: 197: 1017: 575: 474: 1699: 1131: 1000: 299: 1586: 933: 834: 1093: 727: 1704: 446: 143: 94: 1253: 732: 1248: 1223: 722: 1306: 366:"ATF sting operation accused of using racial bias in finding targets, with majority being minorities" 181: 89: 1101: 1083: 224: 211: 122:
large that the chances of it being explained by any reason other than racial bias was around zero.
1435: 1476: 1263: 752: 737: 200:
considered an entrapment case from outside drug enforcement, and overturned the conviction of a
1531: 1516: 52: 51:, carried severe sentences (typically 15 years), but were likely to cause grave unfairness and 391:"Judge Otis Wright Slams 'Made Up' Government 'Plot' Designed To Ensnare Gullible Poor People" 1635: 1228: 906: 717: 190: 1356: 702: 8: 1511: 651: 568: 235: 1326: 985: 839: 824: 802: 546: 526: 479: 469: 193: 1311: 1233: 1071: 814: 809: 762: 687: 681: 521: 439: 205: 154: 139: 98: 1316: 1283: 782: 646: 641: 606: 106: 1565: 1538: 1526: 1506: 1440: 1418: 1398: 1393: 1373: 1238: 1218: 1213: 1116: 1076: 787: 712: 636: 621: 541: 370: 170: 135: 28: 1642: 1450: 1368: 957: 923: 874: 859: 631: 536: 516: 506: 1658: 1496: 1455: 1341: 1321: 1293: 1243: 1208: 1182: 1177: 1170: 1121: 1061: 901: 891: 849: 772: 767: 697: 656: 580: 150: 77: 65: 48: 1628: 1378: 1346: 1301: 1039: 1034: 1005: 918: 896: 864: 797: 777: 671: 611: 601: 553: 511: 489: 432: 32: 1550: 1491: 1481: 1278: 1273: 1111: 1012: 928: 887: 854: 819: 742: 666: 616: 531: 110: 125: 1614: 1543: 1423: 1361: 1106: 1027: 1022: 980: 962: 950: 911: 757: 747: 707: 692: 676: 626: 563: 558: 166: 73: 40: 1521: 1486: 1428: 1403: 1268: 1165: 1153: 1138: 1126: 1054: 972: 945: 829: 413: 323: 229: 69: 60: 36: 1609: 1570: 1555: 1258: 1143: 940: 484: 201: 64:
investigation in 2013 showed that over 1000 individuals have been
1460: 1408: 1388: 1336: 1148: 1066: 882: 844: 792: 1560: 1413: 1158: 1049: 1044: 990: 661: 232:—criminal justice system approaches to crimes not yet committed 149:
In his order dismissing the charges, Wright cited the words of
1501: 1445: 1351: 1192: 995: 494: 1383: 1331: 1187: 585: 501: 455: 424: 209:
the conduct is subsequently made illegal. (Contrast
1710:
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
21:
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
303:ruling, case 2:13-cr-00126-ODW-3, dated 2014-03-10 1656: 385: 383: 381: 263:ATF uses fake drugs, big bucks to snare suspects 1720:Law enforcement operations in the United States 78:punishing people for thoughts and possibilities 295: 293: 291: 289: 101:went further and dismissed another such case ( 440: 378: 340:Judge: ATF stings may be targeting minorities 1715:History of drug control in the United States 314: 312: 310: 116: 1670:United States criminal due process case law 286: 255: 253: 251: 447: 433: 175:Category:United States entrapment case law 105:) as "outrageous" government conduct and " 307: 160: 1592:History of the American legal profession 330: 248: 1725:2014 controversies in the United States 1680:Illegal drug trade in the United States 301:U.S.A. vs. Hudson, Whitfield and Dunlap 1657: 127:U.S. v. Hudson, Whitfield & Dunlap 428: 336: 259: 1685:Law enforcement in the United States 347:from the original on August 2, 2013 25:United States Department of Justice 13: 43:related crimes against fictitious 14: 1736: 1665:United States entrapment case law 576:Restitution and unjust enrichment 409:"Federal judge blasts ATF stings" 319:"Federal judge blasts ATF stings" 270:from the original on July 4, 2013 236:Solicitation § United States 1623: 1622: 1608: 1587:History of the legal profession 401: 358: 337:Heath, Brad (August 1, 2013), 1: 1675:Illegal drug trade techniques 260:Heath, Brad (June 27, 2013), 241: 144:outrageous government conduct 95:Northern District of Illinois 16:Campaign of sting operations 7: 218: 138:". In this case, the judge 97:. In 2014 California judge 27:, engaged in a campaign of 19:Between 2011 and 2014, the 10: 1741: 1690:Law enforcement techniques 1254:International legal theory 733:International slavery laws 728:International human rights 723:International criminal law 164: 31:in which individuals were 1695:Abuse of the legal system 1602: 1579: 1469: 1307:Administration of justice 1292: 1201: 1092: 971: 873: 594: 462: 182:Jacobson v. United States 117:Accusation of racial bias 1084:Basic structure doctrine 934:Natural and legal rights 815:Public international law 225:Intention (criminal law) 212:Hampton v. United States 88:), district court judge 84:In a 2013 federal case ( 1700:Criminal justice ethics 1264:Principle of typicality 738:International trade law 454: 161:US entrapment case law 53:miscarriage of justice 1259:Principle of legality 1018:Delegated legislation 718:Intellectual property 1705:2014 in American law 1477:Barristers' chambers 1419:Legal representation 1357:Justice of the peace 703:Financial regulation 1512:Election commission 1224:Expressive function 753:Landlord–tenant law 652:Consumer protection 23:(ATF), part of the 1470:Legal institutions 1337:Lawsuit/Litigation 1327:Dispute resolution 1132:Catholic canon law 840:State of emergency 803:Will and testament 527:Law of obligations 480:Constitutional law 470:Administrative law 35:to participate in 1652: 1651: 1312:Constitutionalism 1234:Law and economics 1072:Act of parliament 810:Product liability 763:Legal archaeology 688:Environmental law 682:Entertainment law 522:International law 397:. March 20, 2014. 206:child pornography 204:man for ordering 196: (1990)) the 155:Federalist No. 51 142:dismissed citing 140:Otis D. Wright II 1732: 1627: 1626: 1625: 1613: 1612: 1436:Question of fact 1317:Criminal justice 647:Construction law 642:Conflict of laws 607:Agricultural law 449: 442: 435: 426: 425: 419: 418: 405: 399: 398: 387: 376: 375: 374:. March 3, 2017. 362: 356: 355: 354: 352: 334: 328: 316: 305: 297: 284: 283: 277: 275: 257: 107:unconstitutional 29:sting operations 1740: 1739: 1735: 1734: 1733: 1731: 1730: 1729: 1655: 1654: 1653: 1648: 1621: 1607: 1598: 1575: 1566:Political party 1539:Legal education 1527:Law enforcement 1507:Court of equity 1465: 1441:Question of law 1394:Practice of law 1374:Judicial review 1288: 1239:Legal formalism 1219:Comparative law 1214:Contract theory 1197: 1117:Legal pluralism 1088: 1077:Act of Congress 1001:Executive order 967: 869: 788:Nationality law 713:Immigration law 637:Competition law 590: 458: 453: 423: 422: 407: 406: 402: 389: 388: 379: 371:Chicago Tribune 364: 363: 359: 350: 348: 335: 331: 317: 308: 298: 287: 273: 271: 258: 249: 244: 221: 177: 171:Sting operation 163: 136:sting operation 131: 119: 17: 12: 11: 5: 1738: 1728: 1727: 1722: 1717: 1712: 1707: 1702: 1697: 1692: 1687: 1682: 1677: 1672: 1667: 1650: 1649: 1647: 1646: 1639: 1632: 1618: 1615:Law portal 1603: 1600: 1599: 1597: 1596: 1595: 1594: 1583: 1581: 1577: 1576: 1574: 1573: 1568: 1563: 1558: 1553: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1536: 1535: 1534: 1524: 1519: 1514: 1509: 1504: 1499: 1494: 1489: 1484: 1479: 1473: 1471: 1467: 1466: 1464: 1463: 1458: 1453: 1451:Trial advocacy 1448: 1443: 1438: 1433: 1432: 1431: 1426: 1421: 1416: 1411: 1406: 1401: 1391: 1386: 1381: 1376: 1371: 1366: 1365: 1364: 1359: 1349: 1344: 1339: 1334: 1329: 1324: 1319: 1314: 1309: 1304: 1298: 1296: 1290: 1289: 1287: 1286: 1281: 1276: 1271: 1266: 1261: 1256: 1251: 1246: 1241: 1236: 1231: 1226: 1221: 1216: 1211: 1205: 1203: 1199: 1198: 1196: 1195: 1190: 1185: 1180: 1175: 1174: 1173: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1156: 1151: 1146: 1141: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1119: 1114: 1109: 1104: 1098: 1096: 1090: 1089: 1087: 1086: 1081: 1080: 1079: 1074: 1069: 1059: 1058: 1057: 1047: 1042: 1037: 1032: 1031: 1030: 1025: 1020: 1010: 1009: 1008: 1003: 998: 988: 983: 981:Ballot measure 977: 975: 969: 968: 966: 965: 960: 958:Legal treatise 955: 954: 953: 948: 938: 937: 936: 926: 924:Letters patent 921: 916: 915: 914: 904: 899: 894: 885: 879: 877: 875:Sources of law 871: 870: 868: 867: 862: 860:Unenforced law 857: 852: 847: 842: 837: 832: 827: 822: 817: 812: 807: 806: 805: 800: 790: 785: 780: 775: 770: 765: 760: 755: 750: 745: 740: 735: 730: 725: 720: 715: 710: 705: 700: 695: 690: 685: 679: 674: 669: 664: 659: 654: 649: 644: 639: 634: 632:Commercial law 629: 624: 619: 614: 609: 604: 598: 596: 592: 591: 589: 588: 583: 578: 573: 572: 571: 561: 556: 551: 550: 549: 544: 534: 529: 524: 519: 514: 509: 504: 499: 498: 497: 487: 482: 477: 472: 466: 464: 460: 459: 452: 451: 444: 437: 429: 421: 420: 400: 377: 357: 329: 306: 285: 246: 245: 243: 240: 239: 238: 233: 227: 220: 217: 162: 159: 130: 129:(decided 2014) 124: 118: 115: 90:RubĂ©n Castillo 49:federal judges 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1737: 1726: 1723: 1721: 1718: 1716: 1713: 1711: 1708: 1706: 1703: 1701: 1698: 1696: 1693: 1691: 1688: 1686: 1683: 1681: 1678: 1676: 1673: 1671: 1668: 1666: 1663: 1662: 1660: 1645: 1644: 1640: 1638: 1637: 1633: 1631: 1630: 1619: 1617: 1616: 1611: 1605: 1604: 1601: 1593: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1585: 1584: 1582: 1578: 1572: 1569: 1567: 1564: 1562: 1559: 1557: 1554: 1552: 1549: 1545: 1542: 1541: 1540: 1537: 1533: 1530: 1529: 1528: 1525: 1523: 1520: 1518: 1515: 1513: 1510: 1508: 1505: 1503: 1500: 1498: 1497:Civil society 1495: 1493: 1490: 1488: 1485: 1483: 1480: 1478: 1475: 1474: 1472: 1468: 1462: 1459: 1457: 1456:Trier of fact 1454: 1452: 1449: 1447: 1444: 1442: 1439: 1437: 1434: 1430: 1427: 1425: 1422: 1420: 1417: 1415: 1412: 1410: 1407: 1405: 1402: 1400: 1397: 1396: 1395: 1392: 1390: 1387: 1385: 1382: 1380: 1377: 1375: 1372: 1370: 1367: 1363: 1360: 1358: 1355: 1354: 1353: 1350: 1348: 1345: 1343: 1342:Legal opinion 1340: 1338: 1335: 1333: 1330: 1328: 1325: 1323: 1322:Court-martial 1320: 1318: 1315: 1313: 1310: 1308: 1305: 1303: 1300: 1299: 1297: 1295: 1294:Jurisprudence 1291: 1285: 1282: 1280: 1277: 1275: 1272: 1270: 1267: 1265: 1262: 1260: 1257: 1255: 1252: 1250: 1247: 1245: 1242: 1240: 1237: 1235: 1232: 1230: 1227: 1225: 1222: 1220: 1217: 1215: 1212: 1210: 1207: 1206: 1204: 1200: 1194: 1191: 1189: 1186: 1184: 1183:Statutory law 1181: 1179: 1178:Socialist law 1176: 1172: 1171:Byzantine law 1169: 1168: 1167: 1164: 1160: 1157: 1155: 1152: 1150: 1147: 1145: 1142: 1140: 1137: 1133: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1122:Religious law 1120: 1118: 1115: 1113: 1110: 1108: 1105: 1103: 1100: 1099: 1097: 1095: 1094:Legal systems 1091: 1085: 1082: 1078: 1075: 1073: 1070: 1068: 1065: 1064: 1063: 1062:Statutory law 1060: 1056: 1053: 1052: 1051: 1048: 1046: 1043: 1041: 1038: 1036: 1033: 1029: 1026: 1024: 1021: 1019: 1016: 1015: 1014: 1011: 1007: 1004: 1002: 999: 997: 994: 993: 992: 989: 987: 984: 982: 979: 978: 976: 974: 970: 964: 961: 959: 956: 952: 949: 947: 944: 943: 942: 939: 935: 932: 931: 930: 927: 925: 922: 920: 917: 913: 910: 909: 908: 905: 903: 900: 898: 895: 893: 892:Statutory law 889: 886: 884: 881: 880: 878: 876: 872: 866: 863: 861: 858: 856: 853: 851: 850:Transport law 848: 846: 843: 841: 838: 836: 833: 831: 828: 826: 823: 821: 818: 816: 813: 811: 808: 804: 801: 799: 796: 795: 794: 791: 789: 786: 784: 781: 779: 776: 774: 771: 769: 768:Legal fiction 766: 764: 761: 759: 756: 754: 751: 749: 746: 744: 741: 739: 736: 734: 731: 729: 726: 724: 721: 719: 716: 714: 711: 709: 706: 704: 701: 699: 698:Financial law 696: 694: 691: 689: 686: 683: 680: 678: 675: 673: 670: 668: 665: 663: 660: 658: 657:Corporate law 655: 653: 650: 648: 645: 643: 640: 638: 635: 633: 630: 628: 625: 623: 620: 618: 615: 613: 610: 608: 605: 603: 600: 599: 597: 593: 587: 584: 582: 581:Statutory law 579: 577: 574: 570: 567: 566: 565: 562: 560: 557: 555: 552: 548: 545: 543: 540: 539: 538: 535: 533: 530: 528: 525: 523: 520: 518: 515: 513: 510: 508: 505: 503: 500: 496: 493: 492: 491: 488: 486: 483: 481: 478: 476: 473: 471: 468: 467: 465: 463:Core subjects 461: 457: 450: 445: 443: 438: 436: 431: 430: 427: 416: 415: 410: 404: 396: 392: 386: 384: 382: 373: 372: 367: 361: 346: 342: 341: 333: 326: 325: 320: 315: 313: 311: 304: 302: 296: 294: 292: 290: 282: 269: 265: 264: 256: 254: 252: 247: 237: 234: 231: 228: 226: 223: 222: 216: 214: 213: 207: 203: 199: 198:Supreme Court 195: 192: 188: 184: 183: 176: 172: 168: 158: 156: 152: 151:James Madison 147: 145: 141: 137: 128: 123: 114: 112: 108: 104: 100: 96: 91: 87: 82: 79: 75: 71: 70:pre-emptively 67: 63: 62: 56: 54: 50: 46: 42: 38: 34: 30: 26: 22: 1641: 1634: 1620: 1606: 1379:Jurisdiction 1347:Legal remedy 1302:Adjudication 1202:Legal theory 1040:Ratification 1035:Promulgation 1006:Proclamation 986:Codification 919:Human rights 907:Divine right 897:Constitution 865:Women in law 783:Military law 778:Marriage law 773:Maritime law 672:Election law 612:Aviation law 602:Abortion law 554:Property law 490:Criminal law 412: 403: 394: 369: 360: 349:, retrieved 339: 332: 327:, 2014-03-18 322: 300: 279: 272:, retrieved 262: 210: 180: 178: 165:Main pages: 148: 132: 126: 120: 102: 86:Brown et al. 85: 83: 66:incarcerated 59: 57: 18: 1551:Legislature 1482:Bureaucracy 1279:Rule of man 1274:Rule of law 1249:Libertarian 1112:Chinese law 1013:Legislation 963:Regulations 951:Law reports 929:Natural law 825:Reparations 820:Refugee law 743:Jurimetrics 684:(Media law) 622:Banking law 617:Amnesty law 595:Disciplines 532:Private law 111:due process 99:Otis Wright 45:stash house 1659:Categories 1544:Law school 1424:Prosecutor 1362:Magistrate 1149:Jewish law 1107:Common law 1028:Rulemaking 1023:Regulation 973:Law making 912:Divine law 888:Legal code 835:Sports law 758:Law of war 708:Health law 693:Family law 677:Energy law 627:Bankruptcy 564:Punishment 559:Public law 351:August 21, 274:August 21, 242:References 167:Entrapment 74:entrapment 1522:Judiciary 1517:Executive 1492:The bench 1429:Solicitor 1404:Barrister 1284:Sociology 1269:Pseudolaw 1209:Anarchist 1166:Roman law 1154:Parsi law 1139:Hindu law 1127:Canon law 1102:Civil law 1055:Concordat 946:Precedent 855:Trust law 830:Space law 667:Drugs law 537:Procedure 475:Civil law 414:USA Today 324:USA Today 230:Pre-crime 61:USA Today 1629:Category 1571:Tribunal 1556:Military 1399:Attorney 1369:Judgment 1229:Feminist 1144:Jain law 941:Case law 662:Cyberlaw 569:Corporal 547:Criminal 517:Evidence 507:Doctrine 485:Contract 395:Techdirt 345:archived 268:archived 219:See also 202:Nebraska 1643:Outline 1580:History 1487:The bar 1461:Verdict 1409:Counsel 1389:Justice 1244:History 1067:Statute 883:Charter 845:Tax law 793:Probate 33:enticed 1561:Police 1532:Agency 1414:Lawyer 1159:Sharia 1050:Treaty 1045:Repeal 991:Decree 902:Custom 798:Estate 748:Labour 512:Equity 281:exist. 173:, and 103:Hudson 1636:Index 1502:Court 1446:Trial 1352:Judge 1193:Yassa 996:Edict 542:Civil 495:Crime 189: 153:from 1384:Jury 1332:Fiqh 1188:Xeer 586:Tort 502:Deed 353:2022 276:2022 191:U.S. 76:and 41:drug 39:and 456:Law 194:540 187:503 179:In 37:gun 1661:: 890:/ 411:. 393:. 380:^ 368:. 343:, 321:, 309:^ 288:^ 278:, 266:, 250:^ 169:, 113:. 58:A 55:. 448:e 441:t 434:v 417:. 185:( 134:"

Index

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
United States Department of Justice
sting operations
enticed
gun
drug
stash house
federal judges
miscarriage of justice
USA Today
incarcerated
pre-emptively
entrapment
punishing people for thoughts and possibilities
Rubén Castillo
Northern District of Illinois
Otis Wright
unconstitutional
due process
sting operation
Otis D. Wright II
outrageous government conduct
James Madison
Federalist No. 51
Entrapment
Sting operation
Category:United States entrapment case law
Jacobson v. United States
503
U.S.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑