Knowledge

Martin v. Hunter's Lessee

Source đź“ť

437:
government with all the powers which they might deem proper and necessary; to extend or restrain these powers according to their own good pleasure, and to give them a paramount and supreme authority. As little doubt can there be, that the people had a right to prohibit to the states the exercise of any powers which were, in their judgment, incompatible with the objects of the general compact; to make the powers of the state governments, in given cases, subordinate to those of the nation, or to reserve to themselves those sovereign authorities which they might not choose to delegate to either. The constitution was not, therefore, necessarily carved out of existing state sovereignties, nor a surrender of powers already existing in state institutions, for the powers of the states depend upon their own constitutions; and the people of every state had the right to modify and restrain them, according to their own views of the policy or principle. On the other hand, it is perfectly clear that the sovereign powers vested in the state governments, by their respective constitutions, remained unaltered and unimpaired, except so far as they were granted to the government of the United States.
445:
this would be a perilous and difficult, if not an impracticable, task. The instrument was not intended to provide merely for the exigencies of a few years, but was to endure through a long lapse of ages, the events of which were locked up in the inscrutable purposes of Providence. It could not be foreseen what new changes and modifications of power might be indispensable to effectuate the general objects of the charter; and restrictions and specifications, which, at the present, might seem salutary, might, in the end, prove the overthrow of the system itself. Hence its powers are expressed in general terms, leaving to the legislature, from time to time, to adopt its own means to effectuate legitimate objects, and to mould and model the exercise of its powers, as its own wisdom, and the public interests, should require.
441:
states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.' The government, then, of the United States, can claim no powers which are not granted to it by the constitution, and the powers actually granted, must be such as are expressly given, or given by necessary implication. On the other hand, this instrument, like every other grant, is to have a reasonable construction, according to the import of its terms; and where a power is expressly given in general terms, it is not to be restrained to particular cases, unless that construction grow out of the context expressly, or by necessary implication. The words are to be taken in their natural and obvious sense, and not in a sense unreasonably restricted or enlarged.
426: 31: 579: 322:, 11 U.S. 603 (1813), the U.S. Supreme Court disagreed with this conclusion, ruling that the treaty did in fact cover the dispute, and remanded the case back to the Virginia Supreme Court. The Virginia court in turn decided that the U.S. Supreme Court did not have authority over cases originating in state court: 440:
These deductions do not rest upon general reasoning, plain and obvious as they seem to be. They have been positively recognised by one of the articles in amendment of the constitution, which declares, that 'the powers not delegated to the United States by the constitution, nor prohibited by it to the
327:
United States, as extends the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court to this Court, is not in pursuance of the Constitution of the United States; that the writ of error in this cause was improvidently allowed under the authority of that act; that the proceedings thereon in the Supreme Court were
444:
The constitution unavoidably deals in general language. It did not suit the purposes of the people, in framing this great charter of our liberties, to provide for minute specifications of its powers, or to declare the means by which those powers should be carried into execution. It was foreseen that
326:
The Court is unanimously of opinion, that the appellate power of the Supreme Court of the United States does not extend to this Court, under a sound construction of the Constitution of the United States; that so much of the 25th section of the act of Congress to establish the judicial courts of the
436:
The constitution of the United States was ordained and established, not by the states in their sovereign capacities, but emphatically, as the preamble of the constitution declares, by 'the people of the United States.' There can be no doubt that it was competent to the people to invest the general
374:
Story first confronted the argument that federal judicial power came from the states, and therefore that the Supreme Court had no right to overrule a state's interpretation of the treaty without its consent. Story found that it was clear from history and the preamble of the Constitution that the
390:
In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such
413:
Story then confronted the argument that state judges were bound to uphold the Constitution just as federal judges were, and so denying state interpretations presumed that the state judges would less than faithfully interpret the Constitution. Story countered that even if state judges were not
399:. Thus, because it was established that the states had the power to rule on federal issues it must be true that the Supreme Court can review the decision, or the Supreme Court would not have appellate jurisdiction in "all other cases" as stated by the Constitution. 875: 414:
biased, the issue was not bias but uniformity in federal law. Furthermore, the legislative power to remove a case to federal court would be inadequate for maintaining this uniformity. Finally, Story applied these principles of
1792: 410:, Section 10 of the Constitution specific limits are placed upon the "sovereignty" of state governments. The Supreme Court could already review state executive and legislative decisions and this case was no different. 1667: 1090: 1082: 1050: 1503: 1848: 1752: 2189: 1495: 602: 308:
between Great Britain and the United States nullified such confiscations, permitting Martin to sue for the return of the property. The trial court ruled in his favor, but the
1098: 783: 1455: 1447: 1074: 775: 2184: 1987: 1463: 891: 1880: 759: 1431: 1122: 594: 489: 468: 72: 1760: 743: 316:. The court did not rule that Virginia law was superior to U.S. treaties, but held that the treaty did not cover the dispute in question. On review in 1359: 936: 395:
If the Supreme Court could not review the decisions of the highest state court, state courts would be excluded from ever hearing a case involving a
1872: 1375: 928: 692: 379: 235: 1138: 1471: 1279: 407: 2214: 1479: 1106: 751: 2219: 2199: 1170: 953: 406:
declares that federal interpretation trumps the state's interpretation. Story rejected concerns over State judicial sovereignty. Under
318: 114: 1383: 653: 1952: 1864: 2194: 948: 249: 1651: 680: 1130: 899: 795: 1896: 1391: 1235: 970: 583: 478: (1821) (a parallel case raising the issue of federal judicial review of state criminal, as opposed to civil, matters) 2109: 1018: 814: 2204: 1784: 1186: 727: 689: 253: 35: 2042: 1146: 1351: 1487: 1343: 1178: 706: 1824: 1776: 1114: 1026: 293: 1856: 1585: 1210: 1194: 883: 354:
wrote most of the Supreme Court opinions during his tenure, he did not write this opinion. Marshall instead
1888: 1800: 994: 920: 627: 1569: 1010: 986: 911: 261: 175: 133: 2125: 1327: 1202: 806: 673: 344: 1936: 1295: 355: 132:
Article Three of the U.S. Constitution grants the U.S. Supreme Court jurisdiction and authority over
2157: 1928: 1577: 1367: 1335: 1042: 822: 2141: 2133: 2070: 1712: 1162: 859: 450: 171: 2209: 1904: 1622: 1319: 1058: 1002: 978: 735: 499: 494: 309: 305: 109: 2011: 1912: 1744: 1687: 1439: 1423: 1399: 1303: 1263: 876:
Black & White Taxicab & Transfer Co. v. Brown & Yellow Taxicab & Transfer Co.
666: 645: 598: 472: 425: 64: 359: 105: 658: 8: 1728: 1704: 1614: 1561: 1247: 1034: 718: 482: 277: 2117: 2003: 1960: 1816: 1793:
Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church & State
1696: 1597: 1415: 1255: 1154: 850: 609: 463: 163: 618: 475: 331:
in relation to this Court, and that obedience to its mandate be declined by the Court.
2149: 2017: 1995: 1979: 1944: 1920: 1675: 1511: 1407: 1311: 962: 830: 767: 560: 550: 2054: 1519: 1066: 838: 403: 396: 328: 256:
decided on March 20, 1816. It was the first case to assert ultimate Supreme Court
2101: 2062: 1808: 1768: 1720: 1287: 415: 383: 67: 1091:
C & L Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizen Band, Potawatomi Indian Tribe of Oklahoma
1832: 1736: 1668:
Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson City
1659: 1540: 867: 418:
to the decisions below and found that the state court's decision was in error.
187: 2178: 1643: 1606: 1083:
College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board
351: 301: 155: 1051:
Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Citizen Band, Potawatomi Indian Tribe of Oklahoma
1840: 535:
F. Thornton Miller, "John Marshall Versus Spencer Roane: A Reevaluation of
429: 382:, Section 2, Clause 2, showing a textual commitment to allow Supreme Court 363: 340: 313: 195: 289: 265: 183: 137: 523:
The reference to Hunter's lessee is due to a technicality in actions of
504: 281: 83: 1504:
Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & Mfg.
375:
federal power was given directly by the people and not by the states.
524: 257: 304:, was confiscated by the State and transferred to David Hunter. The 1634: 1552: 636: 297: 285: 225:
Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
1849:
Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services, Inc.
1753:
United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures
578: 391:
Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.
1496:
JPMorgan Chase Bank v. Traffic Stream (BVI) Infrastructure Ltd.
336: 79: 30: 1099:
Inyo County v. Paiute-Shoshone Indians of the Bishop Community
335:
The U.S. Supreme Court reversed the state court's decision on
212:
Story, joined by Washington, Johnson, Livingston, Todd, Duvall
784:
Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.
54:
Martin, Heir at law and devisee of Fairfax v. Hunter's Lessee
1456:
Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.
1448:
Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle
1075:
Kiowa Tribe of Oklahoma v. Manufacturing Technologies, Inc.
776:
Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United States
688: 343:, and thereby establishing its own supremacy in matters of 1988:
County of Oneida v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York State
892:
Hinderlider v. La Plata River & Cherry Creek Ditch Co.
362:
due to his relatives' interest in the property. Justice
2190:
United States Supreme Court cases of the Marshall Court
339:, ruling that questions of federal law were within its 654:
Case Brief for Martin v. Hunter's Lessee at Lawnix.com
1881:
Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v. Winn
760:
England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners
1432:
Oneida Indian Nation of New York v. County of Oneida
1123:
City of Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York
744:
Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. City of Thibodaux
490:
List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 14
1761:
Schlesinger v. Reservists Committee to Stop the War
1360:Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. v. Mottley 2185:United States Constitution Article Three case law 1376:American Well Works Co. v. Layne & Bowler Co. 937:Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp. 2176: 1873:Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency 929:District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman 300:. Land owned by a loyalist, Martin, part of the 1139:Permanent Mission of India v. City of New York 567:, St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Company, 1989. 1472:Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Schor 1280:American Insurance Co. v. 356 Bales of Cotton 674: 1480:Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson 1107:United States v. White Mountain Apache Tribe 752:United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Ideal Cement Co. 565:The Constitution And American Foreign Policy 557:, New York: Henry Holt & Company, 1996. 1384:Smith v. Kansas City Title & Trust Co. 1171:Republic of Argentina v. NML Capital, Ltd. 681: 667: 545:Virginia Magazine of History and Biography 421:Story said the following in his judgment: 366:wrote the decision for a unanimous court. 118:, 11 U.S. 603 (1813); on remand, sub nom. 1953:FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine 1865:Hein v. Freedom From Religion Foundation 424: 605:) 304 (1816) is available from: 248:, 14 U.S. (1 Wheat.) 304 (1816), was a 2177: 2089: 2040: 1538: 1233: 1131:Dolan v. United States Postal Service 900:Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States 704: 662: 18:1816 United States Supreme Court case 1897:Clapper v. Amnesty International USA 1392:Hartsville Oil Mill v. United States 319:Fairfax's Devisee v. Hunter's Lessee 115:Fairfax's Devisee v. Hunter's Lessee 2215:Virginia in the American Revolution 2110:Osborn v. Bank of the United States 1652:Toilet Goods Ass'n, Inc. v. Gardner 1019:Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino 815:Seneca Nation of Indians v. Christy 13: 1785:Pfizer Inc. v. Government of India 1539: 1187:Jam v. International Finance Corp. 728:Railroad Commission v. Pullman Co. 555:John Marshall: Definer Of A Nation 254:Supreme Court of the United States 36:Supreme Court of the United States 14: 2231: 2220:United States Supreme Court cases 2200:United States federalism case law 971:The Schooner Exchange v. M'Faddon 571: 1234: 1147:Ali v. Federal Bureau of Prisons 577: 449:The vote tally was 6 to 0, with 29: 1488:Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc. 1179:OBB Personenverkehr AG v. Sachs 112:218 (1810); reversed, sub nom. 2195:1816 in United States case law 1825:Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife 1777:Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois 1115:Republic of Austria v. Altmann 1027:Santa Clara Pueblo v. Martinez 705: 517: 292:that allowed it to confiscate 1: 1857:DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Cuno 1586:Acheson Hotels, LLC v. Laufer 1195:Republic of Sudan v. Harrison 884:Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins 510: 453:giving a concurring opinion. 1801:City of Los Angeles v. Lyons 995:Schillinger v. United States 921:Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co. 7: 2041: 1570:Campbell-Ewald Co. v. Gomez 1011:United States v. Wunderlich 456: 369: 102:Hunter v. Fairfax's Devisee 10: 2236: 2126:Mistretta v. United States 2090: 1352:Burton v. United States II 1328:City of St. Louis v. Myers 1203:Opati v. Republic of Sudan 807:Murdock v. City of Memphis 2205:Legal history of Virginia 2096: 2085: 2049: 2036: 1971: 1937:TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez 1686: 1633: 1596: 1551: 1547: 1534: 1344:Burton v. United States I 1296:United States v. Jackalow 1272:Martin v. Hunter's Lessee 1242: 1229: 947: 910: 849: 794: 717: 713: 700: 591:Martin v. Hunter's Lessee 584:Martin v. Hunter's Lessee 245:Martin v. Hunter's Lessee 234: 229: 224: 216: 208: 203: 149: 144: 131: 126: 106:Winchester District Court 96: 91: 59: 49: 42: 28: 24:Martin v. Hunter's Lessee 23: 2158:Bank Markazi v. Peterson 1929:Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski 1578:Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski 1368:Muskrat v. United States 1336:Barrett v. United States 1043:United States v. Stanley 823:Fox Film Corp. v. Muller 798:independent state ground 547:96 (July 1988): 297–314. 271: 176:H. Brockholst Livingston 100:Judgment for defendant, 2142:United States v. Hatter 2134:Peretz v. United States 2071:Cramer v. United States 1713:Massachusetts v. Mellon 1464:Thomas v. Union Carbide 1163:United States v. Bormes 912:Rooker–Feldman doctrine 860:United States v. Hudson 1905:Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins 1623:Nixon v. United States 1320:United States v. Klein 1211:Trump v. United States 1059:Saudi Arabia v. Nelson 1003:Feres v. United States 979:Mississippi v. Johnson 736:Burford v. Sun Oil Co. 500:Treaty of Paris (1783) 495:Jurisdiction stripping 447: 433: 393: 333: 310:Virginia Supreme Court 306:Treaty of Paris (1783) 302:Northern Neck Property 45:Decided March 20, 1816 2063:United States v. Burr 2012:Rucho v. Common Cause 1913:Texas v. Pennsylvania 1889:Bond v. United States 1745:Sierra Club v. Morton 1440:Arizona v. New Mexico 1424:Glidden Co. v. Zdanok 1400:Wisconsin v. Illinois 1304:Ex parte Vallandigham 1264:United States v. More 954:presidential immunity 428: 423: 388: 350:Though Chief Justice 324: 136:on matters involving 43:Argued March 12, 1816 987:United States v. Lee 386:of state decisions: 360:conflict of interest 264:in civil matters of 236:U.S. Const. art. III 1729:Altvater v. Freeman 1705:Fairchild v. Hughes 1615:Goldwater v. Carter 1562:DeFunis v. Odegaard 1248:Chisholm v. Georgia 1035:Nixon v. Fitzgerald 628:Library of Congress 483:Barron v. Baltimore 278:American Revolution 2118:Forrester v. White 2004:Vieth v. Jubelirer 1961:Murthy v. Missouri 1817:Diamond v. Charles 1697:Bailiff v. Tipping 1598:Political question 1416:Colegrove v. Green 1256:Marbury v. Madison 1155:Samantar v. Yousuf 949:Sovereign immunity 851:Federal common law 690:U.S. Supreme Court 464:Cohens v. Virginia 434: 358:himself, citing a 164:Bushrod Washington 160:Associate Justices 2172: 2171: 2168: 2167: 2150:Stern v. Marshall 2081: 2080: 2032: 2031: 2028: 2027: 2018:Benisek v. Lamone 1996:Davis v. Bandemer 1945:Biden v. Nebraska 1921:Trump v. New York 1676:Trump v. New York 1530: 1529: 1512:Bowles v. Russell 1408:Crowell v. Benson 1312:Ex parte McCardle 1225: 1224: 1221: 1220: 963:Little v. Barreme 831:Harrison v. NAACP 768:Younger v. Harris 582:Works related to 561:Jean Edward Smith 551:Jean Edward Smith 402:Furthermore, the 378:Story then cited 250:landmark decision 241: 240: 122:, 18 Va. 1 (1815) 2227: 2087: 2086: 2055:Ex parte Bollman 2038: 2037: 1549: 1548: 1536: 1535: 1520:Patchak v. Zinke 1231: 1230: 1067:Clinton v. Jones 839:Michigan v. Long 715: 714: 702: 701: 683: 676: 669: 660: 659: 650: 644: 641: 635: 632: 626: 623: 617: 614: 608: 581: 528: 521: 404:Supremacy Clause 397:federal question 347:interpretation. 329:coram non judice 145:Court membership 120:Hunter v. Martin 78:1 Wheat. 304; 4 33: 32: 21: 20: 2235: 2234: 2230: 2229: 2228: 2226: 2225: 2224: 2175: 2174: 2173: 2164: 2102:Stuart v. Laird 2092: 2077: 2045: 2024: 1967: 1809:Allen v. Wright 1769:Warth v. Seldin 1721:Ex parte Levitt 1682: 1629: 1592: 1543: 1526: 1288:Sheldon v. Sill 1238: 1217: 952: 943: 906: 845: 797: 790: 709: 696: 687: 648: 642: 639: 633: 630: 624: 621: 615: 612: 606: 574: 541:Hunter's Lessee 532: 531: 522: 518: 513: 459: 416:judicial review 384:judicial review 372: 274: 186: 174: 172:William Johnson 108:; reversed, 15 87: 44: 38: 19: 12: 11: 5: 2233: 2223: 2222: 2217: 2212: 2207: 2202: 2197: 2192: 2187: 2170: 2169: 2166: 2165: 2163: 2162: 2154: 2146: 2138: 2130: 2122: 2114: 2106: 2097: 2094: 2093: 2083: 2082: 2079: 2078: 2076: 2075: 2067: 2059: 2050: 2047: 2046: 2034: 2033: 2030: 2029: 2026: 2025: 2023: 2022: 2008: 2000: 1992: 1984: 1980:Hayburn's Case 1975: 1973: 1969: 1968: 1966: 1965: 1957: 1949: 1941: 1933: 1925: 1917: 1909: 1901: 1893: 1885: 1877: 1869: 1861: 1853: 1845: 1837: 1833:Raines v. Byrd 1829: 1821: 1813: 1805: 1797: 1789: 1781: 1773: 1765: 1757: 1749: 1741: 1737:Flast v. Cohen 1733: 1725: 1717: 1709: 1701: 1692: 1690: 1684: 1683: 1681: 1680: 1672: 1664: 1660:Laird v. Tatum 1656: 1648: 1639: 1637: 1631: 1630: 1628: 1627: 1619: 1611: 1602: 1600: 1594: 1593: 1591: 1590: 1582: 1574: 1566: 1557: 1555: 1545: 1544: 1541:Justiciability 1532: 1531: 1528: 1527: 1525: 1524: 1516: 1508: 1500: 1492: 1484: 1476: 1468: 1460: 1452: 1444: 1436: 1428: 1420: 1412: 1404: 1396: 1388: 1380: 1372: 1364: 1356: 1348: 1340: 1332: 1324: 1316: 1308: 1300: 1292: 1284: 1276: 1268: 1260: 1252: 1243: 1240: 1239: 1227: 1226: 1223: 1222: 1219: 1218: 1216: 1215: 1207: 1199: 1191: 1183: 1175: 1167: 1159: 1151: 1143: 1135: 1127: 1119: 1111: 1103: 1095: 1087: 1079: 1071: 1063: 1055: 1047: 1039: 1031: 1023: 1015: 1007: 999: 991: 983: 975: 967: 958: 956: 945: 944: 942: 941: 933: 925: 916: 914: 908: 907: 905: 904: 896: 888: 880: 872: 868:Swift v. Tyson 864: 855: 853: 847: 846: 844: 843: 835: 827: 819: 811: 802: 800: 792: 791: 789: 788: 780: 772: 764: 756: 748: 740: 732: 723: 721: 711: 710: 698: 697: 686: 685: 678: 671: 663: 657: 656: 651: 587: 573: 572:External links 570: 569: 568: 558: 548: 530: 529: 515: 514: 512: 509: 508: 507: 502: 497: 492: 487: 479: 458: 455: 371: 368: 345:constitutional 273: 270: 239: 238: 232: 231: 227: 226: 222: 221: 218: 214: 213: 210: 206: 205: 201: 200: 199: 198: 188:Gabriel Duvall 161: 158: 153: 147: 146: 142: 141: 129: 128: 124: 123: 98: 94: 93: 89: 88: 77: 61: 57: 56: 51: 50:Full case name 47: 46: 40: 39: 34: 26: 25: 17: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2232: 2221: 2218: 2216: 2213: 2211: 2210:Northern Neck 2208: 2206: 2203: 2201: 2198: 2196: 2193: 2191: 2188: 2186: 2183: 2182: 2180: 2160: 2159: 2155: 2152: 2151: 2147: 2144: 2143: 2139: 2136: 2135: 2131: 2128: 2127: 2123: 2120: 2119: 2115: 2112: 2111: 2107: 2104: 2103: 2099: 2098: 2095: 2088: 2084: 2073: 2072: 2068: 2065: 2064: 2060: 2057: 2056: 2052: 2051: 2048: 2044: 2039: 2035: 2020: 2019: 2014: 2013: 2009: 2006: 2005: 2001: 1998: 1997: 1993: 1990: 1989: 1985: 1982: 1981: 1977: 1976: 1974: 1970: 1963: 1962: 1958: 1955: 1954: 1950: 1947: 1946: 1942: 1939: 1938: 1934: 1931: 1930: 1926: 1923: 1922: 1918: 1915: 1914: 1910: 1907: 1906: 1902: 1899: 1898: 1894: 1891: 1890: 1886: 1883: 1882: 1878: 1875: 1874: 1870: 1867: 1866: 1862: 1859: 1858: 1854: 1851: 1850: 1846: 1843: 1842: 1838: 1835: 1834: 1830: 1827: 1826: 1822: 1819: 1818: 1814: 1811: 1810: 1806: 1803: 1802: 1798: 1795: 1794: 1790: 1787: 1786: 1782: 1779: 1778: 1774: 1771: 1770: 1766: 1763: 1762: 1758: 1755: 1754: 1750: 1747: 1746: 1742: 1739: 1738: 1734: 1731: 1730: 1726: 1723: 1722: 1718: 1715: 1714: 1710: 1707: 1706: 1702: 1699: 1698: 1694: 1693: 1691: 1689: 1685: 1678: 1677: 1673: 1670: 1669: 1665: 1662: 1661: 1657: 1654: 1653: 1649: 1646: 1645: 1644:Poe v. Ullman 1641: 1640: 1638: 1636: 1632: 1625: 1624: 1620: 1617: 1616: 1612: 1609: 1608: 1607:Baker v. Carr 1604: 1603: 1601: 1599: 1595: 1588: 1587: 1583: 1580: 1579: 1575: 1572: 1571: 1567: 1564: 1563: 1559: 1558: 1556: 1554: 1550: 1546: 1542: 1537: 1533: 1522: 1521: 1517: 1514: 1513: 1509: 1506: 1505: 1501: 1498: 1497: 1493: 1490: 1489: 1485: 1482: 1481: 1477: 1474: 1473: 1469: 1466: 1465: 1461: 1458: 1457: 1453: 1450: 1449: 1445: 1442: 1441: 1437: 1434: 1433: 1429: 1426: 1425: 1421: 1418: 1417: 1413: 1410: 1409: 1405: 1402: 1401: 1397: 1394: 1393: 1389: 1386: 1385: 1381: 1378: 1377: 1373: 1370: 1369: 1365: 1362: 1361: 1357: 1354: 1353: 1349: 1346: 1345: 1341: 1338: 1337: 1333: 1330: 1329: 1325: 1322: 1321: 1317: 1314: 1313: 1309: 1306: 1305: 1301: 1298: 1297: 1293: 1290: 1289: 1285: 1282: 1281: 1277: 1274: 1273: 1269: 1266: 1265: 1261: 1258: 1257: 1253: 1250: 1249: 1245: 1244: 1241: 1237: 1232: 1228: 1213: 1212: 1208: 1205: 1204: 1200: 1197: 1196: 1192: 1189: 1188: 1184: 1181: 1180: 1176: 1173: 1172: 1168: 1165: 1164: 1160: 1157: 1156: 1152: 1149: 1148: 1144: 1141: 1140: 1136: 1133: 1132: 1128: 1125: 1124: 1120: 1117: 1116: 1112: 1109: 1108: 1104: 1101: 1100: 1096: 1093: 1092: 1088: 1085: 1084: 1080: 1077: 1076: 1072: 1069: 1068: 1064: 1061: 1060: 1056: 1053: 1052: 1048: 1045: 1044: 1040: 1037: 1036: 1032: 1029: 1028: 1024: 1021: 1020: 1016: 1013: 1012: 1008: 1005: 1004: 1000: 997: 996: 992: 989: 988: 984: 981: 980: 976: 973: 972: 968: 965: 964: 960: 959: 957: 955: 950: 946: 939: 938: 934: 931: 930: 926: 923: 922: 918: 917: 915: 913: 909: 902: 901: 897: 894: 893: 889: 886: 885: 881: 878: 877: 873: 870: 869: 865: 862: 861: 857: 856: 854: 852: 848: 841: 840: 836: 833: 832: 828: 825: 824: 820: 817: 816: 812: 809: 808: 804: 803: 801: 799: 793: 786: 785: 781: 778: 777: 773: 770: 769: 765: 762: 761: 757: 754: 753: 749: 746: 745: 741: 738: 737: 733: 730: 729: 725: 724: 722: 720: 716: 712: 708: 703: 699: 694: 691: 684: 679: 677: 672: 670: 665: 664: 661: 655: 652: 647: 638: 629: 620: 611: 604: 600: 596: 592: 588: 586:at Wikisource 585: 580: 576: 575: 566: 562: 559: 556: 552: 549: 546: 542: 538: 534: 533: 526: 520: 516: 506: 503: 501: 498: 496: 493: 491: 488: 485: 484: 480: 477: 474: 470: 467: 465: 461: 460: 454: 452: 446: 442: 438: 431: 427: 422: 419: 417: 411: 409: 405: 400: 398: 392: 387: 385: 381: 376: 367: 365: 361: 357: 353: 352:John Marshall 348: 346: 342: 338: 332: 330: 323: 321: 320: 315: 311: 307: 303: 299: 295: 291: 287: 283: 279: 269: 267: 263: 259: 255: 251: 247: 246: 237: 233: 228: 223: 219: 215: 211: 207: 204:Case opinions 202: 197: 193: 189: 185: 181: 177: 173: 169: 165: 162: 159: 157: 156:John Marshall 154: 152:Chief Justice 151: 150: 148: 143: 139: 135: 130: 125: 121: 117: 116: 111: 107: 103: 99: 95: 90: 85: 81: 75: 74: 69: 66: 62: 58: 55: 52: 48: 41: 37: 27: 22: 16: 2156: 2148: 2140: 2132: 2124: 2116: 2108: 2100: 2069: 2061: 2053: 2016: 2010: 2002: 1994: 1986: 1978: 1959: 1951: 1943: 1935: 1927: 1919: 1911: 1903: 1895: 1887: 1879: 1871: 1863: 1855: 1847: 1841:FEC v. Akins 1839: 1831: 1823: 1815: 1807: 1799: 1791: 1783: 1775: 1767: 1759: 1751: 1743: 1735: 1727: 1719: 1711: 1703: 1695: 1674: 1666: 1658: 1650: 1642: 1621: 1613: 1605: 1584: 1576: 1568: 1560: 1518: 1510: 1502: 1494: 1486: 1478: 1470: 1462: 1454: 1446: 1438: 1430: 1422: 1414: 1406: 1398: 1390: 1382: 1374: 1366: 1358: 1350: 1342: 1334: 1326: 1318: 1310: 1302: 1294: 1286: 1278: 1271: 1270: 1262: 1254: 1246: 1236:Jurisdiction 1209: 1201: 1193: 1185: 1177: 1169: 1161: 1153: 1145: 1137: 1129: 1121: 1113: 1105: 1097: 1089: 1081: 1073: 1065: 1057: 1049: 1041: 1033: 1025: 1017: 1009: 1001: 993: 985: 977: 969: 961: 935: 927: 919: 898: 890: 882: 874: 866: 858: 837: 829: 821: 813: 805: 796:Adequate and 782: 774: 766: 758: 750: 742: 734: 726: 590: 564: 554: 544: 540: 536: 519: 481: 462: 448: 443: 439: 435: 430:Joseph Story 420: 412: 401: 394: 389: 377: 373: 364:Joseph Story 349: 341:jurisdiction 334: 325: 317: 314:confiscation 282:Commonwealth 275: 262:state courts 244: 243: 242: 230:Laws applied 196:Joseph Story 191: 179: 167: 134:state courts 119: 113: 101: 92:Case history 71: 53: 15: 693:Article III 380:Article III 312:upheld the 290:legislation 276:During the 266:federal law 217:Concurrence 184:Thomas Todd 138:federal law 2179:Categories 719:Abstention 707:Federalism 637:OpenJurist 511:References 505:Jay Treaty 84:U.S. LEXIS 525:ejectment 408:Article I 294:Loyalists 258:authority 82:97; 1816 60:Citations 1688:Standing 1635:Ripeness 1553:Mootness 695:case law 646:WorldLII 589:Text of 457:See also 370:Judgment 298:property 288:enacted 286:Virginia 209:Majority 2043:Treason 610:Cornell 451:Johnson 356:recused 252:of the 220:Johnson 127:Holding 2161:(2016) 2153:(2011) 2145:(2001) 2137:(1991) 2129:(1989) 2121:(1988) 2113:(1824) 2105:(1803) 2091:Others 2074:(1945) 2066:(1807) 2058:(1807) 2021:(2019) 2007:(2004) 1999:(1986) 1991:(1985) 1983:(1792) 1972:Others 1964:(2024) 1956:(2024) 1948:(2023) 1940:(2021) 1932:(2021) 1924:(2020) 1916:(2020) 1908:(2016) 1900:(2013) 1892:(2011) 1884:(2011) 1876:(2007) 1868:(2007) 1860:(2006) 1852:(2000) 1844:(1998) 1836:(1997) 1828:(1992) 1820:(1986) 1812:(1984) 1804:(1983) 1796:(1982) 1788:(1978) 1780:(1977) 1772:(1975) 1764:(1974) 1756:(1973) 1748:(1972) 1740:(1968) 1732:(1943) 1724:(1937) 1716:(1923) 1708:(1922) 1700:(1805) 1679:(2020) 1671:(1985) 1663:(1972) 1655:(1967) 1647:(1961) 1626:(1993) 1618:(1979) 1610:(1962) 1589:(2023) 1581:(2021) 1573:(2016) 1565:(1974) 1523:(2018) 1515:(2007) 1507:(2005) 1499:(2002) 1491:(1995) 1483:(1986) 1475:(1986) 1467:(1985) 1459:(1982) 1451:(1977) 1443:(1976) 1435:(1974) 1427:(1962) 1419:(1946) 1411:(1932) 1403:(1929) 1395:(1926) 1387:(1921) 1379:(1916) 1371:(1911) 1363:(1908) 1355:(1906) 1347:(1905) 1339:(1898) 1331:(1885) 1323:(1871) 1315:(1869) 1307:(1864) 1299:(1862) 1291:(1850) 1283:(1828) 1275:(1816) 1267:(1805) 1259:(1803) 1251:(1793) 1214:(2024) 1206:(2020) 1198:(2019) 1190:(2019) 1182:(2015) 1174:(2014) 1166:(2012) 1158:(2010) 1150:(2008) 1142:(2007) 1134:(2006) 1126:(2005) 1118:(2004) 1110:(2003) 1102:(2003) 1094:(2001) 1086:(1999) 1078:(1998) 1070:(1997) 1062:(1993) 1054:(1991) 1046:(1987) 1038:(1982) 1030:(1978) 1022:(1964) 1014:(1951) 1006:(1950) 998:(1894) 990:(1882) 982:(1867) 974:(1812) 966:(1804) 940:(2005) 932:(1983) 924:(1923) 903:(1943) 895:(1938) 887:(1938) 879:(1928) 871:(1842) 863:(1812) 842:(1983) 834:(1959) 826:(1935) 818:(1896) 810:(1875) 787:(1983) 779:(1976) 771:(1971) 763:(1964) 755:(1962) 747:(1959) 739:(1943) 731:(1941) 649:  643:  640:  634:  631:  625:  622:  619:Justia 616:  613:  607:  603:Wheat. 537:Martin 486:(1833) 337:appeal 280:, the 194: 192:· 190:  182: 180:· 178:  170: 168:· 166:  80:L. Ed. 597: 471: 272:Facts 260:over 97:Prior 599:U.S. 473:U.S. 73:more 65:U.S. 951:and 601:(1 543:," 539:v. 476:264 284:of 110:Va. 86:333 68:304 63:14 2181:: 2015:/ 595:14 593:, 563:, 553:, 469:19 296:' 268:. 104:, 682:e 675:t 668:v 527:. 466:, 432:. 140:. 76:) 70:(

Index

Supreme Court of the United States
U.S.
304
more
L. Ed.
U.S. LEXIS
Winchester District Court
Va.
Fairfax's Devisee v. Hunter's Lessee
state courts
federal law
John Marshall
Bushrod Washington
William Johnson
H. Brockholst Livingston
Thomas Todd
Gabriel Duvall
Joseph Story
U.S. Const. art. III
landmark decision
Supreme Court of the United States
authority
state courts
federal law
American Revolution
Commonwealth
Virginia
legislation
Loyalists
property

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑