912:
282:
887:
349:
1305:
751:
143:
1119:
1134:
917:
877:
922:
473:
1301:
139:
409:
982:
379:
537:
175:
771:
359:
589:
621:
277:
262:
522:
1208:
699:
324:
611:
867:
155:
451:
478:
431:
165:
133:
855:
793:
374:
344:
500:
942:
719:
805:
616:
1292:
468:
257:
1213:
761:
1181:
882:
252:
850:
1082:
788:
302:
992:
872:
272:
185:
1176:
927:
490:
1186:
682:
977:
902:
456:
1196:
1047:
394:
1233:
1077:
734:
638:
569:
227:
212:
1067:
1223:
1154:
1022:
314:
952:
527:
441:
200:
947:
1191:
729:
714:
404:
17:
1325:
1171:
195:
1253:
1159:
1113:
987:
329:
267:
1042:
1129:
217:
170:
1052:
1149:
579:
117:
114:
111:
108:
105:
102:
99:
96:
93:
90:
87:
84:
81:
78:
75:
72:
69:
66:
63:
60:
57:
54:
51:
48:
45:
42:
37:
1092:
1002:
962:
1335:
1330:
830:
626:
190:
1012:
1007:
997:
426:
1320:
1027:
1017:
937:
354:
913:
R v
Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, ex parte World Development Movement Ltd
1107:
283:
British
Westinghouse Electric and Manufacturing Co Ltd v Underground Electric Rlys Co of London Ltd
1248:
1032:
907:
892:
559:
512:
436:
319:
242:
1228:
1124:
1062:
1057:
810:
756:
724:
670:
655:
517:
384:
957:
835:
584:
334:
160:
783:
599:
369:
8:
1218:
1144:
495:
1265:
1139:
888:
R v
District Auditor No 3 Audit District of West Yorkshire MCC, ex p West Yorkshire MCC
820:
574:
399:
287:
350:
City of Gotha and
Federal Republic of Germany v Sotheby's and Cobert Finance S.A.
1238:
1120:
Re West Sussex
Constabulary's Widows, Children and Benevolent (1930) Fund Trusts
967:
825:
704:
554:
297:
752:
Newport
Association Football Club Ltd and others v Football Association of Wales Ltd
1277:
1135:
Ready Mixed
Concrete (South East) Ltd v Minister of Pensions and National Insurance
1102:
932:
694:
389:
247:
237:
23:
1087:
918:
R v
Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, ex p Bancoult (No 1)
766:
709:
665:
660:
532:
232:
222:
180:
878:
R (on the application of
Farrakhan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
1282:
1243:
1097:
1037:
643:
542:
414:
364:
132:
The following 200 pages are in this category, out of approximately 205 total.
32:
1314:
594:
564:
339:
292:
923:
R v
Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, ex p Rees-Mogg
897:
845:
746:
474:
Equal Opportunities Commission v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry
815:
410:
Cumbrian Newspapers Group Ltd v Cumberland & Westmoreland Herald Ltd
840:
1287:
1072:
983:
Re Bucks Constabulary Widows and Orphans Fund Friendly Society (No 2)
446:
380:
Corporate Officer of the House of Commons v Information Commissioner
972:
538:
Government of Zanzibar v British Aerospace (Lancaster House) Ltd
176:
Arbuthnot Leasing International Ltd v Havelet Leasing Ltd (No 2)
590:
Hickman v Kent or Romney Marsh Sheep-Breeders' Association
360:
Colin Gwyer & Associates Ltd v London Wharf (Limehouse) Ltd
772:
North Ocean Shipping Co. Ltd. v Hyundai Construction Co., Ltd.
622:
Investment Trust Companies (in liq) v HM Revenue and Customs
278:
British Steel Corp v Cleveland Bridge and Engineering Co Ltd
263:
Breckland Group Holdings Ltd v London and Suffolk Properties
523:
Gillingham Borough Council v Medway (Chatham) Dock Co. Ltd.
1209:
Taylor Fashions Ltd v Liverpool Victoria Trustees Co Ltd
700:
Market Investigations Ltd v Minister for Social Security
325:
Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd
612:
Imperial Group Pension Trust Ltd v Imperial Tobacco Ltd
156:
Alexander v Standard Telephones & Cables Ltd (No 2)
868:
R (Amicus) v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry
452:
Dimmock v Secretary of State for Education and Skills
166:
Antiquesportfolio.com plc v Rodney Fitch & Co Ltd
479:
Estmanco (Kilner House) Ltd v Greater London Council
432:
Dafen Tinplate Co Ltd v Llanelly Steel Co (1907) Ltd
501:Filburn v People's Palace and Aquarium Co Ltd
943:Re Anglo-Austrian Printing & Publishing Union
856:Pyrrho Investments Limited v MWB Property Limited
794:Overbrooke Estates Ltd v Glencombe Properties Ltd
720:Morgan Grenfell & Co Ltd v Welwyn Hatfield DC
375:Cornhill Insurance plc v Improvement Services Ltd
345:City and Westminster Properties (1934) Ltd v Mudd
1312:
258:Borland's Trustee v Steel Bros & Co Ltd
806:Panayiotou v Sony Music Entertainment (UK) Ltd.
617:Industrial Development Consultants Ltd v Cooley
129:Pages in category "High Court of Justice cases"
25:
1293:Westminster City Council v Duke of Westminster
762:Nisshin Shipping Co Ltd v Cleaves & Co Ltd
469:EDO MBM Technology Ltd v Campaign to Smash EDO
1214:Terrell v Secretary of State for the Colonies
1182:Siebe Gorman & Co Ltd v Barclays Bank Ltd
883:R (Playfoot) v Millais School Governing Body
303:Byrne & Co v Leon Van Tienhoven & Co
253:Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee
851:Prince of Wales v Associated Newspapers Ltd
1083:Re Produce Marketing Consortium Ltd (No 2)
789:OLL Ltd v Secretary of State for Transport
993:Re Continental Assurance Co of London plc
873:R (March) v Secretary of State for Health
134:This list may not reflect recent changes
273:British India Steam Navigation Co v IRC
186:Assange v Swedish Prosecution Authority
1313:
1177:Shanklin Pier Ltd v Detel Products Ltd
928:R v Sussex Justices, ex parte McCarthy
491:F Goldsmith (Sicklesmere) Ltd v Baxter
1187:Sky Petroleum Ltd v VIP Petroleum Ltd
683:Lambert v Co-op Insurance Society Ltd
1197:Stevenson, Jacques & Co v McLean
978:Re Brian D Pierson (Contractors) Ltd
903:R v Registrar General, ex p Segerdal
457:Dorchester Finance Co Ltd v Stebbing
1068:Re Montagu's Settlement Trusts
1048:Re London School of Electronics Ltd
395:Cresswell v Board of Inland Revenue
13:
1234:Thomas Witter Ltd v TBP Industries
1078:Re Parkes Garage (Swadlincote) Ltd
735:Mosley v News Group Newspapers Ltd
639:James Roscoe (Bolton) Ltd v Winder
570:Harries v Church Comrs for England
228:BBC v HarperCollins Publishers Ltd
147:
126:
14:
1347:
1224:Thoburn v Sunderland City Council
1155:RJW v Guardian News and Media Ltd
1023:Re Harris Simons Construction Ltd
953:Re Augustus Barnett & Son Ltd
948:Re Astor's Settlement Trusts
315:Calvert v William Hill Credit Ltd
1192:Smith v Leech Brain & Co Ltd
528:Godfrey v Demon Internet Service
442:Depp v News Group Newspapers Ltd
201:Aveling Barford Ltd v Perion Ltd
730:Mosely v Koffyfontein Mines Ltd
715:MJN v News Group Newspapers Ltd
405:CTB v News Group Newspapers Ltd
18:High Court of England and Wales
1172:Scheps v Fine Art Logistic Ltd
1043:Re Lipinski's Will Trusts
196:Atlasview Ltd v Brightview Ltd
1:
1254:Trustor AB v Smallbone (No 2)
1160:Rowe v Vale of White Horse DC
1114:Re TransBus International Ltd
1053:Re Lucking's Will Trusts
988:Re Charnley Davies Ltd (No 2)
330:Chadwick v British Rlys Board
268:Brinks Ltd v Abu-Saleh (No 3)
1130:Read v Great Eastern Railway
1093:Re Recher's Will Trusts
1003:Re Dolphin's Conveyance
963:Re Barlow's Will Trusts
580:Hartog v Colin & Shields
218:Barber v RJB Mining (UK) Ltd
171:Apple Corps v Apple Computer
127:
20:and other related articles.
7:
1150:Richardson v Schwarzenegger
1013:Re Grant's Will Trusts
1008:Re Golay's Will Trusts
998:Re Denley's Trust Deed
427:Re D'Jan of London Ltd
10:
1352:
831:Philip Collins Ltd v Davis
627:Irving v Penguin Books Ltd
191:Atlas Express Ltd. v Kafco
1249:Thwaytes v Sotheby's
1108:Re T&D Industries plc
1028:Re Harvard Securities Ltd
1018:Re Halt Garage (1964) Ltd
938:Re Agriplant Services Ltd
355:CMS Dolphin Ltd v Simonet
213:Baden v Société Générale
1033:Re Hydrodan (Corby) Ltd
908:R v Richards (Isabelle)
893:R v Dudley and Stephens
560:Hanchett-Stamford v A-G
513:Gallagher v Post Office
437:Re Darby, ex p Brougham
385:Coutts & Co v Stock
320:Re Cardiff Savings Bank
243:Berezovsky v Abramovich
1229:Thomas v Times Book Co
1125:Re Yeovil Glove Co Ltd
1063:Re MC Bacon Ltd (No 2)
1058:Re MC Bacon Ltd (No 1)
811:Partridge v Crittenden
757:Nielson-Jones v Fedden
725:Mortgage Corp v Shaire
671:Arthur Octavius Kitson
656:Keith-Smith v Williams
518:Gencor ACP Ltd v Dalby
1326:High Court of Justice
958:Re Barings plc (No 5)
836:Phillips v Brooks Ltd
585:Henderson v Henderson
335:Cheltenham BC v Laird
161:AMP v Persons Unknown
784:Ogilvy v Hope Davies
600:Hogg v Cramphorn Ltd
370:Copeland v Greenhalf
1219:Theakston v MGN Ltd
1145:Relfo Ltd v Varsani
496:Ferdinand v MGN Ltd
16:Cases heard in the
1266:Van Wees v Karkour
1140:Redmond-Bate v DPP
821:Twitter joke trial
575:Harris v Nickerson
400:Cresswell v Potter
288:Brooks v Armstrong
1336:Case law by court
1331:Trials in England
1239:Thompson v Arnold
968:Re Blue Arrow plc
826:Percival v Wright
705:McAlpine v Bercow
555:Halsall v Brizell
298:Buttle v Saunders
1343:
1321:English case law
1278:Wagatha Christie
1116:
1103:Re Shoe Lace Ltd
933:Rayfield v Hands
695:Mann v Goldstein
390:Cowan v Scargill
248:Betts v Armstead
238:Bell v Tavistock
1351:
1350:
1346:
1345:
1344:
1342:
1341:
1340:
1311:
1310:
1309:
1299:
1298:
1297:
1270:
1258:
1201:
1164:
1112:
1088:Re Purpoint Ltd
860:
798:
776:
767:Norebo conflict
739:
710:McKennitt v Ash
687:
675:
666:Kirby v Wilkins
661:Kinch v Bullard
648:
631:
604:
547:
533:Goldsmith v BCD
505:
483:
461:
419:
307:
233:Adolf Beck case
223:Barron v Potter
205:
181:DPP v Armstrong
125:
124:
123:
122:
28:
12:
11:
5:
1349:
1339:
1338:
1333:
1328:
1323:
1296:
1295:
1290:
1285:
1283:Walker v Boyle
1280:
1274:
1271:
1269:
1268:
1262:
1259:
1257:
1256:
1251:
1246:
1244:Thompson v Foy
1241:
1236:
1231:
1226:
1221:
1216:
1211:
1205:
1202:
1200:
1199:
1194:
1189:
1184:
1179:
1174:
1168:
1165:
1163:
1162:
1157:
1152:
1147:
1142:
1137:
1132:
1127:
1122:
1117:
1110:
1105:
1100:
1098:Re Sarflax Ltd
1095:
1090:
1085:
1080:
1075:
1070:
1065:
1060:
1055:
1050:
1045:
1040:
1038:Re Kayford Ltd
1035:
1030:
1025:
1020:
1015:
1010:
1005:
1000:
995:
990:
985:
980:
975:
970:
965:
960:
955:
950:
945:
940:
935:
930:
925:
920:
915:
910:
905:
900:
895:
890:
885:
880:
875:
870:
864:
861:
859:
858:
853:
848:
843:
838:
833:
828:
823:
818:
813:
808:
802:
799:
797:
796:
791:
786:
780:
777:
775:
774:
769:
764:
759:
754:
749:
743:
740:
738:
737:
732:
727:
722:
717:
712:
707:
702:
697:
691:
688:
686:
685:
679:
676:
674:
673:
668:
663:
658:
652:
649:
647:
646:
644:Jones v Lipman
641:
635:
632:
630:
629:
624:
619:
614:
608:
605:
603:
602:
597:
592:
587:
582:
577:
572:
567:
562:
557:
551:
548:
546:
545:
543:Gruban v Booth
540:
535:
530:
525:
520:
515:
509:
506:
504:
503:
498:
493:
487:
484:
482:
481:
476:
471:
465:
462:
460:
459:
454:
449:
444:
439:
434:
429:
423:
420:
418:
417:
415:Cummins v Bond
412:
407:
402:
397:
392:
387:
382:
377:
372:
367:
365:Connolly v DPP
362:
357:
352:
347:
342:
337:
332:
327:
322:
317:
311:
308:
306:
305:
300:
295:
290:
285:
280:
275:
270:
265:
260:
255:
250:
245:
240:
235:
230:
225:
220:
215:
209:
206:
204:
203:
198:
193:
188:
183:
178:
173:
168:
163:
158:
152:
149:
148:
130:
121:
120:
40:
35:
29:
27:
24:
22:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1348:
1337:
1334:
1332:
1329:
1327:
1324:
1322:
1319:
1318:
1316:
1307:
1303:
1302:previous page
1294:
1291:
1289:
1286:
1284:
1281:
1279:
1276:
1275:
1272:
1267:
1264:
1263:
1260:
1255:
1252:
1250:
1247:
1245:
1242:
1240:
1237:
1235:
1232:
1230:
1227:
1225:
1222:
1220:
1217:
1215:
1212:
1210:
1207:
1206:
1203:
1198:
1195:
1193:
1190:
1188:
1185:
1183:
1180:
1178:
1175:
1173:
1170:
1169:
1166:
1161:
1158:
1156:
1153:
1151:
1148:
1146:
1143:
1141:
1138:
1136:
1133:
1131:
1128:
1126:
1123:
1121:
1118:
1115:
1111:
1109:
1106:
1104:
1101:
1099:
1096:
1094:
1091:
1089:
1086:
1084:
1081:
1079:
1076:
1074:
1071:
1069:
1066:
1064:
1061:
1059:
1056:
1054:
1051:
1049:
1046:
1044:
1041:
1039:
1036:
1034:
1031:
1029:
1026:
1024:
1021:
1019:
1016:
1014:
1011:
1009:
1006:
1004:
1001:
999:
996:
994:
991:
989:
986:
984:
981:
979:
976:
974:
971:
969:
966:
964:
961:
959:
956:
954:
951:
949:
946:
944:
941:
939:
936:
934:
931:
929:
926:
924:
921:
919:
916:
914:
911:
909:
906:
904:
901:
899:
896:
894:
891:
889:
886:
884:
881:
879:
876:
874:
871:
869:
866:
865:
862:
857:
854:
852:
849:
847:
844:
842:
839:
837:
834:
832:
829:
827:
824:
822:
819:
817:
814:
812:
809:
807:
804:
803:
800:
795:
792:
790:
787:
785:
782:
781:
778:
773:
770:
768:
765:
763:
760:
758:
755:
753:
750:
748:
745:
744:
741:
736:
733:
731:
728:
726:
723:
721:
718:
716:
713:
711:
708:
706:
703:
701:
698:
696:
693:
692:
689:
684:
681:
680:
677:
672:
669:
667:
664:
662:
659:
657:
654:
653:
650:
645:
642:
640:
637:
636:
633:
628:
625:
623:
620:
618:
615:
613:
610:
609:
606:
601:
598:
596:
595:Hill v Baxter
593:
591:
588:
586:
583:
581:
578:
576:
573:
571:
568:
566:
565:Hannah v Peel
563:
561:
558:
556:
553:
552:
549:
544:
541:
539:
536:
534:
531:
529:
526:
524:
521:
519:
516:
514:
511:
510:
507:
502:
499:
497:
494:
492:
489:
488:
485:
480:
477:
475:
472:
470:
467:
466:
463:
458:
455:
453:
450:
448:
445:
443:
440:
438:
435:
433:
430:
428:
425:
424:
421:
416:
413:
411:
408:
406:
403:
401:
398:
396:
393:
391:
388:
386:
383:
381:
378:
376:
373:
371:
368:
366:
363:
361:
358:
356:
353:
351:
348:
346:
343:
341:
340:Cheney v Conn
338:
336:
333:
331:
328:
326:
323:
321:
318:
316:
313:
312:
309:
304:
301:
299:
296:
294:
293:Burlakov case
291:
289:
286:
284:
281:
279:
276:
274:
271:
269:
266:
264:
261:
259:
256:
254:
251:
249:
246:
244:
241:
239:
236:
234:
231:
229:
226:
224:
221:
219:
216:
214:
211:
210:
207:
202:
199:
197:
194:
192:
189:
187:
184:
182:
179:
177:
174:
172:
169:
167:
164:
162:
159:
157:
154:
153:
150:
145:
141:
140:previous page
137:
135:
128:
119:
116:
113:
110:
107:
104:
101:
98:
95:
92:
89:
86:
83:
80:
77:
74:
71:
68:
65:
62:
59:
56:
53:
50:
47:
44:
41:
39:
36:
34:
31:
30:
21:
19:
898:R v Grantham
846:Powell v Lee
747:Nash v Inman
131:
15:
816:Patel v Ali
1315:Categories
841:POI v Lina
1306:next page
1288:WER v REW
1073:Re Oatway
447:DFT v TFD
144:next page
26:Contents
973:Re Bowes
1304:) (
142:) (
38:0–9
33:Top
1317::
1308:)
136:.
1300:(
1273:W
1261:V
1204:T
1167:S
863:R
801:P
779:O
742:N
690:M
678:L
651:K
634:J
607:I
550:H
508:G
486:F
464:E
422:D
310:C
208:B
151:A
146:)
138:(
118:Z
115:Y
112:X
109:W
106:V
103:U
100:T
97:S
94:R
91:Q
88:P
85:O
82:N
79:M
76:L
73:K
70:J
67:I
64:H
61:G
58:F
55:E
52:D
49:C
46:B
43:A
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.