908:
278:
883:
345:
747:
1115:
1130:
913:
873:
918:
469:
405:
978:
1297:
375:
139:
533:
171:
767:
355:
585:
617:
273:
258:
518:
1204:
695:
320:
607:
863:
151:
447:
474:
427:
161:
133:
851:
789:
370:
340:
496:
938:
715:
801:
612:
1288:
464:
253:
1209:
757:
1177:
878:
248:
846:
1078:
784:
298:
988:
868:
268:
181:
1172:
923:
486:
1182:
678:
973:
898:
452:
1192:
1043:
390:
1229:
1073:
730:
634:
565:
223:
208:
1063:
1219:
1150:
1018:
310:
948:
523:
437:
196:
943:
1187:
725:
710:
400:
17:
1317:
1167:
191:
1249:
1155:
1109:
983:
325:
263:
1038:
1125:
213:
166:
1048:
1145:
575:
117:
114:
111:
108:
105:
102:
99:
96:
93:
90:
87:
84:
81:
78:
75:
72:
69:
66:
63:
60:
57:
54:
51:
48:
45:
42:
37:
1088:
998:
958:
1327:
1322:
826:
622:
186:
1008:
1003:
993:
422:
1312:
1023:
1013:
933:
350:
909:
R v
Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, ex parte World Development Movement Ltd
1103:
279:
British
Westinghouse Electric and Manufacturing Co Ltd v Underground Electric Rlys Co of London Ltd
1244:
1028:
903:
888:
555:
508:
432:
315:
238:
1224:
1120:
1058:
1053:
806:
752:
720:
666:
651:
513:
380:
953:
831:
580:
330:
156:
779:
595:
365:
8:
1214:
1140:
491:
1261:
1135:
884:
R v
District Auditor No 3 Audit District of West Yorkshire MCC, ex p West Yorkshire MCC
816:
570:
395:
283:
346:
City of Gotha and
Federal Republic of Germany v Sotheby's and Cobert Finance S.A.
1234:
1116:
Re West Sussex
Constabulary's Widows, Children and Benevolent (1930) Fund Trusts
963:
821:
700:
550:
293:
748:
Newport
Association Football Club Ltd and others v Football Association of Wales Ltd
1273:
1131:
Ready Mixed
Concrete (South East) Ltd v Minister of Pensions and National Insurance
1098:
928:
690:
385:
243:
233:
23:
1083:
914:
R v
Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, ex p Bancoult (No 1)
762:
705:
661:
656:
528:
228:
218:
176:
874:
R (on the application of
Farrakhan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
1278:
1239:
1093:
1033:
639:
538:
410:
360:
132:
The following 200 pages are in this category, out of approximately 205 total.
32:
1306:
590:
560:
335:
288:
919:
R v
Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, ex p Rees-Mogg
893:
841:
742:
470:
Equal Opportunities Commission v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry
811:
406:
Cumbrian Newspapers Group Ltd v Cumberland & Westmoreland Herald Ltd
836:
1283:
1068:
979:
Re Bucks Constabulary Widows and Orphans Fund Friendly Society (No 2)
442:
376:
Corporate Officer of the House of Commons v Information Commissioner
968:
534:
Government of Zanzibar v British Aerospace (Lancaster House) Ltd
172:
Arbuthnot Leasing International Ltd v Havelet Leasing Ltd (No 2)
586:
Hickman v Kent or Romney Marsh Sheep-Breeders' Association
356:
Colin Gwyer & Associates Ltd v London Wharf (Limehouse) Ltd
768:
North Ocean Shipping Co. Ltd. v Hyundai Construction Co., Ltd.
618:
Investment Trust Companies (in liq) v HM Revenue and Customs
274:
British Steel Corp v Cleveland Bridge and Engineering Co Ltd
259:
Breckland Group Holdings Ltd v London and Suffolk Properties
519:
Gillingham Borough Council v Medway (Chatham) Dock Co. Ltd.
1205:
Taylor Fashions Ltd v Liverpool Victoria Trustees Co Ltd
696:
Market Investigations Ltd v Minister for Social Security
321:
Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd
608:
Imperial Group Pension Trust Ltd v Imperial Tobacco Ltd
152:
Alexander v Standard Telephones & Cables Ltd (No 2)
864:
R (Amicus) v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry
448:
Dimmock v Secretary of State for Education and Skills
162:
Antiquesportfolio.com plc v Rodney Fitch & Co Ltd
475:
Estmanco (Kilner House) Ltd v Greater London Council
428:
Dafen Tinplate Co Ltd v Llanelly Steel Co (1907) Ltd
497:Filburn v People's Palace and Aquarium Co Ltd
939:Re Anglo-Austrian Printing & Publishing Union
852:Pyrrho Investments Limited v MWB Property Limited
790:Overbrooke Estates Ltd v Glencombe Properties Ltd
716:Morgan Grenfell & Co Ltd v Welwyn Hatfield DC
371:Cornhill Insurance plc v Improvement Services Ltd
341:City and Westminster Properties (1934) Ltd v Mudd
1304:
254:Borland's Trustee v Steel Bros & Co Ltd
802:Panayiotou v Sony Music Entertainment (UK) Ltd.
613:Industrial Development Consultants Ltd v Cooley
129:Pages in category "High Court of Justice cases"
25:
1289:Westminster City Council v Duke of Westminster
758:Nisshin Shipping Co Ltd v Cleaves & Co Ltd
465:EDO MBM Technology Ltd v Campaign to Smash EDO
1210:Terrell v Secretary of State for the Colonies
1178:Siebe Gorman & Co Ltd v Barclays Bank Ltd
879:R (Playfoot) v Millais School Governing Body
299:Byrne & Co v Leon Van Tienhoven & Co
249:Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee
847:Prince of Wales v Associated Newspapers Ltd
1079:Re Produce Marketing Consortium Ltd (No 2)
785:OLL Ltd v Secretary of State for Transport
989:Re Continental Assurance Co of London plc
869:R (March) v Secretary of State for Health
134:This list may not reflect recent changes
269:British India Steam Navigation Co v IRC
182:Assange v Swedish Prosecution Authority
1305:
1173:Shanklin Pier Ltd v Detel Products Ltd
924:R v Sussex Justices, ex parte McCarthy
487:F Goldsmith (Sicklesmere) Ltd v Baxter
1183:Sky Petroleum Ltd v VIP Petroleum Ltd
679:Lambert v Co-op Insurance Society Ltd
1193:Stevenson, Jacques & Co v McLean
974:Re Brian D Pierson (Contractors) Ltd
899:R v Registrar General, ex p Segerdal
453:Dorchester Finance Co Ltd v Stebbing
1064:Re Montagu's Settlement Trusts
1044:Re London School of Electronics Ltd
391:Cresswell v Board of Inland Revenue
13:
1230:Thomas Witter Ltd v TBP Industries
1074:Re Parkes Garage (Swadlincote) Ltd
731:Mosley v News Group Newspapers Ltd
635:James Roscoe (Bolton) Ltd v Winder
566:Harries v Church Comrs for England
224:BBC v HarperCollins Publishers Ltd
143:
126:
14:
1339:
1220:Thoburn v Sunderland City Council
1151:RJW v Guardian News and Media Ltd
1019:Re Harris Simons Construction Ltd
949:Re Augustus Barnett & Son Ltd
944:Re Astor's Settlement Trusts
311:Calvert v William Hill Credit Ltd
1188:Smith v Leech Brain & Co Ltd
524:Godfrey v Demon Internet Service
438:Depp v News Group Newspapers Ltd
197:Aveling Barford Ltd v Perion Ltd
726:Mosely v Koffyfontein Mines Ltd
711:MJN v News Group Newspapers Ltd
401:CTB v News Group Newspapers Ltd
18:High Court of England and Wales
1168:Scheps v Fine Art Logistic Ltd
1039:Re Lipinski's Will Trusts
192:Atlasview Ltd v Brightview Ltd
1:
1250:Trustor AB v Smallbone (No 2)
1156:Rowe v Vale of White Horse DC
1110:Re TransBus International Ltd
1049:Re Lucking's Will Trusts
984:Re Charnley Davies Ltd (No 2)
326:Chadwick v British Rlys Board
264:Brinks Ltd v Abu-Saleh (No 3)
1126:Read v Great Eastern Railway
1089:Re Recher's Will Trusts
999:Re Dolphin's Conveyance
959:Re Barlow's Will Trusts
576:Hartog v Colin & Shields
214:Barber v RJB Mining (UK) Ltd
167:Apple Corps v Apple Computer
127:
20:and other related articles.
7:
1146:Richardson v Schwarzenegger
1009:Re Grant's Will Trusts
1004:Re Golay's Will Trusts
994:Re Denley's Trust Deed
423:Re D'Jan of London Ltd
10:
1344:
827:Philip Collins Ltd v Davis
623:Irving v Penguin Books Ltd
187:Atlas Express Ltd. v Kafco
1245:Thwaytes v Sotheby's
1104:Re T&D Industries plc
1024:Re Harvard Securities Ltd
1014:Re Halt Garage (1964) Ltd
934:Re Agriplant Services Ltd
351:CMS Dolphin Ltd v Simonet
209:Baden v Société Générale
1029:Re Hydrodan (Corby) Ltd
904:R v Richards (Isabelle)
889:R v Dudley and Stephens
556:Hanchett-Stamford v A-G
509:Gallagher v Post Office
433:Re Darby, ex p Brougham
381:Coutts & Co v Stock
316:Re Cardiff Savings Bank
239:Berezovsky v Abramovich
1225:Thomas v Times Book Co
1121:Re Yeovil Glove Co Ltd
1059:Re MC Bacon Ltd (No 2)
1054:Re MC Bacon Ltd (No 1)
807:Partridge v Crittenden
753:Nielson-Jones v Fedden
721:Mortgage Corp v Shaire
667:Arthur Octavius Kitson
652:Keith-Smith v Williams
514:Gencor ACP Ltd v Dalby
1318:High Court of Justice
954:Re Barings plc (No 5)
832:Phillips v Brooks Ltd
581:Henderson v Henderson
331:Cheltenham BC v Laird
157:AMP v Persons Unknown
780:Ogilvy v Hope Davies
596:Hogg v Cramphorn Ltd
366:Copeland v Greenhalf
1215:Theakston v MGN Ltd
1141:Relfo Ltd v Varsani
492:Ferdinand v MGN Ltd
16:Cases heard in the
1262:Van Wees v Karkour
1136:Redmond-Bate v DPP
817:Twitter joke trial
571:Harris v Nickerson
396:Cresswell v Potter
284:Brooks v Armstrong
1328:Case law by court
1323:Trials in England
1296:(previous page) (
1235:Thompson v Arnold
964:Re Blue Arrow plc
822:Percival v Wright
701:McAlpine v Bercow
551:Halsall v Brizell
294:Buttle v Saunders
138:(previous page) (
1335:
1313:English case law
1274:Wagatha Christie
1112:
1099:Re Shoe Lace Ltd
929:Rayfield v Hands
691:Mann v Goldstein
386:Cowan v Scargill
244:Betts v Armstead
234:Bell v Tavistock
1343:
1342:
1338:
1337:
1336:
1334:
1333:
1332:
1303:
1302:
1301:
1295:
1294:
1293:
1266:
1254:
1197:
1160:
1108:
1084:Re Purpoint Ltd
856:
794:
772:
763:Norebo conflict
735:
706:McKennitt v Ash
683:
671:
662:Kirby v Wilkins
657:Kinch v Bullard
644:
627:
600:
543:
529:Goldsmith v BCD
501:
479:
457:
415:
303:
229:Adolf Beck case
219:Barron v Potter
201:
177:DPP v Armstrong
125:
124:
123:
122:
28:
12:
11:
5:
1341:
1331:
1330:
1325:
1320:
1315:
1292:
1291:
1286:
1281:
1279:Walker v Boyle
1276:
1270:
1267:
1265:
1264:
1258:
1255:
1253:
1252:
1247:
1242:
1240:Thompson v Foy
1237:
1232:
1227:
1222:
1217:
1212:
1207:
1201:
1198:
1196:
1195:
1190:
1185:
1180:
1175:
1170:
1164:
1161:
1159:
1158:
1153:
1148:
1143:
1138:
1133:
1128:
1123:
1118:
1113:
1106:
1101:
1096:
1094:Re Sarflax Ltd
1091:
1086:
1081:
1076:
1071:
1066:
1061:
1056:
1051:
1046:
1041:
1036:
1034:Re Kayford Ltd
1031:
1026:
1021:
1016:
1011:
1006:
1001:
996:
991:
986:
981:
976:
971:
966:
961:
956:
951:
946:
941:
936:
931:
926:
921:
916:
911:
906:
901:
896:
891:
886:
881:
876:
871:
866:
860:
857:
855:
854:
849:
844:
839:
834:
829:
824:
819:
814:
809:
804:
798:
795:
793:
792:
787:
782:
776:
773:
771:
770:
765:
760:
755:
750:
745:
739:
736:
734:
733:
728:
723:
718:
713:
708:
703:
698:
693:
687:
684:
682:
681:
675:
672:
670:
669:
664:
659:
654:
648:
645:
643:
642:
640:Jones v Lipman
637:
631:
628:
626:
625:
620:
615:
610:
604:
601:
599:
598:
593:
588:
583:
578:
573:
568:
563:
558:
553:
547:
544:
542:
541:
539:Gruban v Booth
536:
531:
526:
521:
516:
511:
505:
502:
500:
499:
494:
489:
483:
480:
478:
477:
472:
467:
461:
458:
456:
455:
450:
445:
440:
435:
430:
425:
419:
416:
414:
413:
411:Cummins v Bond
408:
403:
398:
393:
388:
383:
378:
373:
368:
363:
361:Connolly v DPP
358:
353:
348:
343:
338:
333:
328:
323:
318:
313:
307:
304:
302:
301:
296:
291:
286:
281:
276:
271:
266:
261:
256:
251:
246:
241:
236:
231:
226:
221:
216:
211:
205:
202:
200:
199:
194:
189:
184:
179:
174:
169:
164:
159:
154:
148:
145:
144:
130:
121:
120:
40:
35:
29:
27:
24:
22:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1340:
1329:
1326:
1324:
1321:
1319:
1316:
1314:
1311:
1310:
1308:
1299:
1290:
1287:
1285:
1282:
1280:
1277:
1275:
1272:
1271:
1268:
1263:
1260:
1259:
1256:
1251:
1248:
1246:
1243:
1241:
1238:
1236:
1233:
1231:
1228:
1226:
1223:
1221:
1218:
1216:
1213:
1211:
1208:
1206:
1203:
1202:
1199:
1194:
1191:
1189:
1186:
1184:
1181:
1179:
1176:
1174:
1171:
1169:
1166:
1165:
1162:
1157:
1154:
1152:
1149:
1147:
1144:
1142:
1139:
1137:
1134:
1132:
1129:
1127:
1124:
1122:
1119:
1117:
1114:
1111:
1107:
1105:
1102:
1100:
1097:
1095:
1092:
1090:
1087:
1085:
1082:
1080:
1077:
1075:
1072:
1070:
1067:
1065:
1062:
1060:
1057:
1055:
1052:
1050:
1047:
1045:
1042:
1040:
1037:
1035:
1032:
1030:
1027:
1025:
1022:
1020:
1017:
1015:
1012:
1010:
1007:
1005:
1002:
1000:
997:
995:
992:
990:
987:
985:
982:
980:
977:
975:
972:
970:
967:
965:
962:
960:
957:
955:
952:
950:
947:
945:
942:
940:
937:
935:
932:
930:
927:
925:
922:
920:
917:
915:
912:
910:
907:
905:
902:
900:
897:
895:
892:
890:
887:
885:
882:
880:
877:
875:
872:
870:
867:
865:
862:
861:
858:
853:
850:
848:
845:
843:
840:
838:
835:
833:
830:
828:
825:
823:
820:
818:
815:
813:
810:
808:
805:
803:
800:
799:
796:
791:
788:
786:
783:
781:
778:
777:
774:
769:
766:
764:
761:
759:
756:
754:
751:
749:
746:
744:
741:
740:
737:
732:
729:
727:
724:
722:
719:
717:
714:
712:
709:
707:
704:
702:
699:
697:
694:
692:
689:
688:
685:
680:
677:
676:
673:
668:
665:
663:
660:
658:
655:
653:
650:
649:
646:
641:
638:
636:
633:
632:
629:
624:
621:
619:
616:
614:
611:
609:
606:
605:
602:
597:
594:
592:
591:Hill v Baxter
589:
587:
584:
582:
579:
577:
574:
572:
569:
567:
564:
562:
561:Hannah v Peel
559:
557:
554:
552:
549:
548:
545:
540:
537:
535:
532:
530:
527:
525:
522:
520:
517:
515:
512:
510:
507:
506:
503:
498:
495:
493:
490:
488:
485:
484:
481:
476:
473:
471:
468:
466:
463:
462:
459:
454:
451:
449:
446:
444:
441:
439:
436:
434:
431:
429:
426:
424:
421:
420:
417:
412:
409:
407:
404:
402:
399:
397:
394:
392:
389:
387:
384:
382:
379:
377:
374:
372:
369:
367:
364:
362:
359:
357:
354:
352:
349:
347:
344:
342:
339:
337:
336:Cheney v Conn
334:
332:
329:
327:
324:
322:
319:
317:
314:
312:
309:
308:
305:
300:
297:
295:
292:
290:
289:Burlakov case
287:
285:
282:
280:
277:
275:
272:
270:
267:
265:
262:
260:
257:
255:
252:
250:
247:
245:
242:
240:
237:
235:
232:
230:
227:
225:
222:
220:
217:
215:
212:
210:
207:
206:
203:
198:
195:
193:
190:
188:
185:
183:
180:
178:
175:
173:
170:
168:
165:
163:
160:
158:
155:
153:
150:
149:
146:
141:
137:
135:
128:
119:
116:
113:
110:
107:
104:
101:
98:
95:
92:
89:
86:
83:
80:
77:
74:
71:
68:
65:
62:
59:
56:
53:
50:
47:
44:
41:
39:
36:
34:
31:
30:
21:
19:
894:R v Grantham
842:Powell v Lee
743:Nash v Inman
131:
15:
812:Patel v Ali
1307:Categories
837:POI v Lina
1298:next page
1284:WER v REW
1069:Re Oatway
443:DFT v TFD
140:next page
26:Contents
969:Re Bowes
38:0–9
33:Top
1309::
1300:)
136:.
1269:W
1257:V
1200:T
1163:S
859:R
797:P
775:O
738:N
686:M
674:L
647:K
630:J
603:I
546:H
504:G
482:F
460:E
418:D
306:C
204:B
147:A
142:)
118:Z
115:Y
112:X
109:W
106:V
103:U
100:T
97:S
94:R
91:Q
88:P
85:O
82:N
79:M
76:L
73:K
70:J
67:I
64:H
61:G
58:F
55:E
52:D
49:C
46:B
43:A
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.