User talk:Casliber: Difference between revisions

1540:

The problem in previous edits is the confusion with Alpha Centauri the star and Alpha Centauri as a system. There was much about alpha centauri, especially its brightness compared to Arcturus as well as the relationship with Proxima Centauri. (See the Discussion with the associated page to this article.) It was thought best to avoid complexity by giving the basic information, and add complexity in sections so information could be understood at various levels of knowledge. Also as there is much interest in Alpha Centauri from children to amateur astronomers, it was best to give the introduction as brief as possible and explain the complexities as we go. As to modifications of articles as drastically as you have done to complex article, it might be better to do so with some discussion in the discussion section before doing so. Although I note that you have much experience in doing wiki edits, much better than me, it is better to make small changes in complex articles paragraph by paragraph than carte blanche changes. (I am very happy to discuss any issues on the article with you in the alpha centauri discussion to improve the article.)

3552:. It states as follows: "A New Science? Perhaps there is a tendency to draw pejorative contrasts between PBS and ABA in order to bolster claims about the status of PBS as a new and distinct science or discipline (e.g., Bambara et al., 1994; E. Carr, 1997; E. Carr et al., 2002; Knoster et al., 2003; Sisson, 1992). There may be disagreement among PBS leaders on this point. On the one hand, for example, Horner (2000) stated that 'Positive behavior support is not a new approach. … the application of behavior analysis to the social problems created by such behaviors as self-injury' (p. 97). He further stated, 'There is no difference in theory or science between positive behavior support and behavior modification. These are the same approach with different names. If any difference exists, it is in the acceptance of much larger outcomes and the need to deliver the global technology that will deliver these outcomes' (p. 99). Other writers have referred to PBS as an 'extension' of applied behavior analysis (e.g., Turnbull et al., 2002, p. 377). 5367:

with the fact that more articles are now awarded bonus points, in addition to more competitive play. Reaching the final has, in the past, required 573 points (2012, a 135% increase on the score needed to reach round 4), 150 points (2011, a 97% increase) and 417 points (2010, a 72% increase). This round has seen over a third of participants claiming points for featured articles (with seven users claiming for multiple featured articles) and most users have also gained bonus points. However, the majority of points continue to come from good articles, followed by did you know articles. In this round, every content type was utilised by at least one user, proving that the WikiCup brings together content contributors from all corners of the project.

2051: 13853:. In case you didn't know, the backstage pass is in the morning and the editathon afterwards. The Library's curators are offering their expertise and looking forward to meeting us and since you are such an extraordinary Wikipedian, it would be great if you could come. It is the first time that an Australian cultural institution has opened its doors to us in this way and it means we can look at rare and usually unavailable material. The topic is broad enough and the articles needing improvement are numerous enough, that there is bound to be something that you can get your fangs into, such as perhaps: "reactions of soldiers' wives to funnel web spiders". No? 1476:. vii. 23). But also in these cases the doubt is not justified. For pork contains more moisture than necessary , and too much of superfluous matter. The principal reason why the Law forbids swine's flesh is to be found in the circumstance that its habits and its food are very dirty and loathsome. It has already been pointed out how emphatically the Law enjoins the removal of the sight of loathsome objects, even in the field and in the camp; how much more objectionable is such a sight in towns. But if it were allowed to eat swine's flesh, the streets and houses would be more dirty than any cesspool, as may be seen at present in the country of the Franks. 11023:

with care. Second, i don't think the current para on the greek myth is a model of clarity. It needs to be slightly longer, because at the moment a lot of characters are involved without much explanation: in three sentences we have Argus, Io, Mercury, Jupiter, and Juno. Juno set the story in motion, judging by the content of the third sentence, yet is not introduced in the first sentence. And that first sentence is inexplicably weird really: for an unknown reason, someone is guarding a pregnant person who has been turned into a heifer?? It should be included, it just needs to make more sense...

1744: 1752: 2058: 8081: 11424: 7445: 5424: 11642: 2889:, I'll gladly have a look into rewriting it if you want me to. The huge list of synonym suggest there is significant variation in the plant, possibly infraspecific taxa? I agree the Reproduction section is possibly too detailed. It can probably be reduced to a 2-paragraph primer and merged into "Ecology", though I have a hard time identifying what is species (or could be!) species-specific and what is not, as I have no familiarity with the plants in question (not to mention I am not an actual plant scientist even compared to you). 328:|text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ''... that in the constellation ''']''' there is a star with a possible nine ]?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ]. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page <small>(], )</small> and it will be added to ] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ]. 11479: 7330: 5477: 11441: 5462: 9406: 11657: 1544:

colonization of imagined planetary systems. These themes are common to many video games and works of science fiction." has little to do with the basic facts on alpha centauri. I.e. Nearest star, third brightest star, binary star, etc. As for "Kinematics" as a title, this is irrelevant (Sirius article also has it wrong). (Also see Discussion page for Alpha Centauri with SpacePotato) Note: I have contributed much to this page - 713 edits according to the statistics. (27th April 2008 to today)

6592: 11537: 7359: 4715: 2595: 9658:, but to take another example, there is very little out there about Abeles' co-worker George D. Cody). Anyway, when I noticed someone else create the Abeles article, I then weighed in with what I had. I'm not sure the article can go any further than that unless more sources become available, so I'm largely moving on from that one now. But it is surprising what other people find sometimes (there were very helpful additions to the Chang article by another editor for example). 11966: 4516: 1581: 8627: 4399: 3665:(OBM)), and has spoken at various press conferences. He said anyone who still uses the term "behavior modification" is using "outdated termonoligy" and that no one has called ABA "behavior modification" in years if they kept up with the literature. In addition, he said Cognitive Behavior Therapy commonly used ABA in the old days which is why they use to call it "Cognitive-Behavior Modification". He said some forms of CBT still incorporate ABA which is known as 11500: 11323: 11195: 7345: 11559: 4785: 11627: 14263: 13762: 13624: 13468: 13195: 12114: 10631: 9848: 9163: 9047: 8939: 8848: 8763: 8522: 8432: 8338: 8188: 7945: 7853: 7219: 6977: 6887: 5812: 5172: 4435: 11372: 11252: 11521: 7400: 5393: 11672: 2670:(Sommerville & May, 2006). Commonly known as banksia discs, they have all been found on eastern Australian Banksias and one is also known in Western Australia. They are discomycete fungi, growing on the fruit and appearing as small, shallow dark cups on the follicles (Fuhrer, 2005). When dry they fold inwards and look like narrow slits. Their effect is unkown but it seems unlikely that they are responsible for degradation of the seeds." 11151: 10227: 9610: 7076: 1600:

Similarly, you could argue for two pattern lines (dextral and sinistral spiral) or four (dextral, sinistral, vertical and horizontal), but there is no way you could argue for 3, because there is no reason to include vertical whilst excluding horizontal). On top of that there is a beautiful symmetry in the way each common bract is surrounded by its own floral bracts and those of its neighbours. But George's diagrams destroy that symmetry.

362: 11597: 5374: 11458: 7373: 4725: 11687: 353: 11612: 11582: 7430: 5439: 7369:), with 274 points, would be the lowest-scoring participant to make it through. This indicates that participants will need a score comparable to last year's (573, the highest ever) to qualify for the final. The high scores this year are a testament both to the quality of participants and to the increased focus on significant content (eligible for bonus points) in this year's competition. So far this round, both Sasata and 71: 5051: 11735:, with two featured and four good articles. ThaddeusB contributed significantly to over 20 articles which appeared on the main page's "in the news" section. Adam Cuerden continued to restore a large number of historical images, resulting in over a dozen FP credits this round alone. The WikiCup is not just about top-importance featured articles, and the work of all of these users is worthy of commendation. 11715:—two highly important, highly viewed pages—made it to featured article status. It would be all too easy to focus solely on these stunning achievements at the expense of those participants working in lower-scoring areas, when in fact all WikiCup participants are doing excellent work. A mention of everything done is impossible, but here are a few: Last round saw the completion of several good topics (on the 14060: 9938: 7731: 5929: 2173:), or, alternatively, maybe enough for a GA on the genus. What are the chances of images? Apparently these fungi make small but visible apothecia on the seed capsules. Berkeley and Broome first wrote about the fungus in 1887, so maybe there's a sketch from the protologue that's useable. Anyway, I'll start adding text in a day or two and maybe we can have the first Banksia/Fungi wikiproject collaboration? 6306:

When folks prattle about how important it is that we be inclusive and accepting of others, it always amazes me that what they really mean is that we should be inclusive and accepting of people who act like we want them to, not people who occasionally get fed up with things and lose their temper. It's a lot easier to not lose your temper or get cranky when you don't have hours of hard work to defend.

12626: 12564: 4987: 14223: 10733: 9808: 9261: 6847: 2158: 10908:"The name of the brightest star Alpha Pavonis—Peacock—was assigned by Her Majesty's Nautical Almanac Office in the late 1930s; the RAF insisted that all of the stars must have names, the star hitherto having lacked a proper name." - does this mean the other stars in the constellationhave names from this time, or are there missing words that should clarify it's stars above a certain magnitude? 1067:) was the first to elevate the tribe to a genus. Basically, Psalliota was the tribe containing the type of Agaricus, so when separated, it should have caused the rest of the genus to be renamed, not what happened. It seems to be currently not considered valid, or a junior homotypic synonym, anyway the explanation is that it was raised by (in retrospect) erroneously maintaining the tribe name. 6345:. Since we started running drives three years ago, we've cut the backlog down by about two thirds, but we have stalled out a bit now. We need more help to keep pushing down the number of articles that still need copy editing. The current drive is already halfway over! Please consider joining it and chipping in a few articles if you have the time. I hope to see you there. Cheers. — 6184:

boards than contributing content. If I were feeling less jaded at present, I'd point out that our first pillar is that we're an encyclopedia which is at least as important as our civility pillar. I am interested in the end product. I would say that the numbers of encyclopedia-building editors who have benefitted from his copyediting and had a pleasant time

8141:? It isn't my nom, I was just a reviewer, but it's almost at the bottom of the list, only two people have looked at it, and being entirely selfish it disappoints me when i do a review and then the nom gets archived for lack of eyes rather than actual problems. Great effort on Australia's banksias as always. How many have you taken to FA now?! Cheers, 10819: 11452:), another WikiCup veteran who reached the finals in 2012, 2011 and 2010. He writes on a variety of topics including botany, mycology and astronomy, and has claimed the highest or joint highest number of featured articles every round so far this year. He has the third highest score overall, with just under 3000 points accumulated. 1847:

so tightly that their dense coverings of hairs form the fibrous brown material that comprises a typical flower spike, and the common bracts at their apex will form the bract pattern on the surface of the spike. At that point, they will no longer be distinguishable as individual peduncles, but will simply be part of the spike.

380: 4944:

messed up to deduce what they should have been, so I've restored from an earlier version of the page (just before your edits with Visual Editor). If you had edited any of the captions, those edits will have been lost; apologies if so, but I couldn't see how to avoid it. I haven't edited anything outside the file calls. --

11435:), a WikiCup newcomer who has contributed on topics of military history and physics, including a number of high-importance topics. Good articles have made up the bulk of his points, but he has also scored a great deal of bonus points. He has the second highest score overall so far, with more than 3000 points accumulated. 11022:

Two comments on the same issue. First, I had a problem with the Staal reference in the recently closed FAC on Perseus, where it didn't square with other sources on the subject of chinese constellations. Given that the library catalogue i checked classified Staal as "juvenile nonficiton", i'd treat it

6264:

And just to make things more fun - wikipedia is at a crossroads - no editor is an island and it takes a concerted and collaborative effort to keep producing the top material that we've started to produce. If wikipedia wants to be taken seriously it needs all hands (of expeirenced content editors) on

1850:

When the flowers start to develop, they get squeezed together even more. At this point, sometimes, a peduncle may break off the axis and be squeezed right out of the spike as the flowers around it develop. Thus you may see one or two of these furry things sitting at random positions on the surface of

1846:

In very young spikes like the one pictured here, they are not yet very densely packed together, so they can be perceived as individual peduncles. Given time, they will continue to grow, and as they do so they will become more and more densely packed together, until eventually they are jammed together

1622:(I'm not just being a pretentious wanker here. I thought the diagram was interesting and informative enough for me to whip up an SVG version for Knowledge. But since copying George's diagram isn't really on, and it is much better to go straight from nature if possible, I was basing my version on this 1591:

flower spike. Both diagrams clearly show a hexagonal layout; i.e. every common bract is surrounded by six equidistant common bracts, thus forming little hexagons. In support of this, George (1981) states "The unit inflorescences are so arranged on the axis that there are three pattern lines—vertical,

1480:

So, Maimonides argues "pork contains more moisture than necessary , and too much of superfluous matter", whatever that means! More importantly, the "principal reason" is that if you keep pigs, you end up with a dirty and unhealthy environment. Important note: Maimonides was writing from Islamic Egypt

6086:

I've pulled out of there due to some recent tasteless comments. Regarding, "Anthony, have you scrolled up through Eric's talk page and looked through the history? Before the last kerfuffle there are loads of constructive article-related discussion, help with writing and copyediting articles all over

5366:

We are down to our final 16: the 2013 semi-finals are upon us. A score of 321 was required to survive round 3, further cementing this as the most competitive WikiCup yet; round 3 was survived in 2012 with 243 points, in 2011 with 76 points and in 2010 with 250 points. The change may in part be to do

1407:

lesson to be learned there, apparently, that the pig is immodestly and falsely proclaiming its religious cleanliness, when it is not. Anyway, that said, I'll look into the M comment - he was quite ahead of his time in terms of medical knowledge (check his biog). And NB my OR/POV antennae buzzed when

1313:

LOL, I love your sense of humour. Maimonedes is a good reference. The reality is that Islam takes food restrictions from Judaism; and Christianity doesn't have any restriction (courtesy of three references in the New Testament). The reason why pork should be restricted (along with many other things)

13417:

for FA review (it's a GA article now). Sadly I've only had one editor provide input, and while I think I've responded to all the feedback, they don't have time to continue reviewing. I'm looking to get a few more people involved so we can make a decision on the article, and I saw you've been active

9649:

Following up on your comment on Ironholds talk page. I'm still trying to get my head around the etiquette involved in using that notifications system. I suppose pinging everyone who copy-edited an article isn't quite what it was intended for, but it was nice to see you stop by and bump that article

6305:

Personally, I try as hard as possible to ignore the dramah boards and the folks who inhabit them. While I don't always buy into the "evil admins vs. the virtuous content creators", like all memes, there is a grain of truth to them. Those content creators are the folks actually building the website.

3920:

I note that the Core Contest micro-grant has been approved - congrats; looking forward to seeing what comes of it! I am currently putting together the April newsletter (it will go out on the 26th) and would like to put something in the section on micro-grants about the core contest last time, using

3766:

Okay. I spoke to a psychology college professor about it and his wife is a behaviorist. He said, ABA, Behavior Mod., and PBS are all the same thing. And some people still use the word "behavior mod.", as I saw in some scientific journals (from about a year ago). Most of the time PBS, a form of ABA,

1539:

I have unfortunately had to revert much of the changes you have made to the Alpha Centauri page - mainly to the structure revisions that you have done. While I agree it is best to standardise between bright star pages (i.e. Sirius), there is significant problems doing so to the Alpha Centauri page.

1326:

pastor. Her theory is excellent, based on her cultural anthropological observations, with a decent feel for how Biblical text works. It's rather an abstract theory though. Anyway, I'll see if I can manage a literature review of dietry restrictions in the ANE, especially if there's anything explicit

11016:

It's one of those interesting situations where (I guess) well meaning but mistaken writers have perpetuated some possibly spurious connections, and we do better by dropping it...but does that fall into OR territory or we conisder it just obvious. I will double check some more sources to see how we

11001:

That would work. It'd help if you dated the alternate name as well. That said, I can't help but feel the claimed honouring by putting a constellation near Argo Navis - written, as it is, to imply it appears in the original myth - is spurious and should be dropped. I also suspect that two different

6139:

In an ideal world Eric would realise how offensive and hurtful his insults are, and you would recognise that that matters on a simple human level - that the feelings of the people he gratuitously, petulantly, capriciously insults matter. Characterising the problem simply as giving folks ammunition

2354:

Am working on the article behind-the-scenes now... that picture you uploaded is excellent, and thanks Hesp for finding the protologue. Too bad the scan resolution is so crappy; I can upload a screen capture/crop to Commons, but will first investigate to see if there's a copy of the original around

1402:

etc). The pig (NB pig, not pork - an important distinction which is relevant for the Maimonides comment too, I note) is "singled out" because it alone of the animals that have one of the two "signs" (it has split hooves but doesn't chew the cud) lies down with its legs sticking out. Most quarapeds

13844:

I see you have moved into arachnids of the kind that give tourists the heebie-jeebies and make the rest of us go into denial. Oh well, better they are here in the encyclopedia than in my garden. Do you think that people waiting for the soldiers to come home from WWI noticed any funnel webs? I ask

11278:

If I've made any error in this listing, please don't hesitate to correct it; if for any reason you don't feel you deserve it, please don't hesitate to remove it; if you know of any other editor who merits one of these awards, please don't hesitate to give it; if you yourself deserve another award

6183:

No point pinging Eric as he can't respond at present. More often than not, there is a slippery slope happening and fraying tempers. I do feel sorry for targets but not bystanders who take it upon themselves to be indignant, especially some who seem to spend more time arguing at various discussion

5323:

What's important here, though, is that the VisualEditor features an interactive template inspector; you click an icon on a template and it shows you the parameters, the contents of those fields, and human-readable parameter names, along with descriptions of what each parameter does. Personally, I

4082:

Hi, in terms of what we're looking for, it wouldn't actually be necessary to wait for the results of the latest contest. Rather than "this is the result", we were hoping for a short piece that can certainly look back at the results of the previous contest, but also personally how you've found the

3943:

Hi, I have taken over the newsletter from Katherine. Would you be able to write something on this for this month's newsletter? I will be looking for something by 24th. If you are pressed for time, you can write a bullet list of points and we can put it into paragraphs. Let me know soon. Thanks --

13954: 4943:

Hi. Thanks for all the work you're doing. I've fixed about half a dozen places where editing caused file invocations to be munged. I'm guessing it was Visual Editor, but haven't been able to figure out what upsets it, except that all the ones it munged have wikilinks in them. They were too badly

1599:

cone. Look at that pattern. There's no way you could call it hexagonal. It is a rectangular (or rather diamond, since the lines are diagonal) grid. Depending on how you define a neighbourhood, you could argue that each common bract has 4 or 8 neighbours, but there's no way you could argue for 6.

1543:

As to the introduction, much of the additions you have made are actually speculative, and are not necessary on fact. I.e. "This makes it a logical choice as "first port of call" in speculative fiction about interstellar travel, which assumes eventual human exploration, and even the discovery and

5331:

data structure, loaded through an extension called TemplateData. I'm reaching out to you in the hopes that you'd be willing and able to put some time into adding TemplateData to high-profile templates. It's pretty easy to understand (heck, if I can write it, anyone can) and you can find a guide

4083:

microgrant process, whether application for it are simple enough etc. If you look at Katherine original request above, that should clarify somewhat. If you are busy, I am always happy to do a quick IRC chat where I can ask you some questions and then write up a piece based on your responses. --

1827:

If you snap a spike axis in half, they are just that brown colour, and essentially made of closely packed fuzz. I wonder if there is initially no gap in the axis for the flower to grow, so the developing flower literally has to shove some of the axis out in front of it as it extends. This would

3775:

only uses the terms "ABA" (including PBS) and "Experimental Analysis of Behavior" (for research studies), the two are subtypes of Behavior Analysis. If you search the website, they don't even use the word "behavior modification". The only other popular ABA sub terms - excluding education - are

3434:

Thank you. At least some help. I reported the edit-warrior (who had already received blockings for his behavior), but I received only could shoulders by admnistrators. As if I could know where to beg for help and report such behavior elsewhere! The problem is that GOP knows about the project´s

10389:

is in the process of being de-bureaucrated for trolling Jimbo with this article. There is no way this would get through the DYK process if it had been brought to the attention of large numbers of Wikipedians. In short this is a pretty "good" example of what's wrong with Knowledge/Commons

6090:

I know. It's because of his helpful collaboration and excellent hard content work that I've resolutely supported him until now. And even now it's not an easy call. But at this stage, yes. I think it's time he stopped that. Especially given the situation and target of some of those insults.

5505:

the round before. The case in point is content promoted on the 29/30 June, which may be claimed in this round. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on

8033: 3784:(CBA). *(Note this is just an update of what I learned, heard about, and discovered. I don't think most people understand it. In everyday conversation though, people using the term "ABA" are referring to the early intervention used for autism including "Discrete Trial Teaching" (DTT)) 11473:. She has also contributed to high-importance topics, seeing huge numbers of bonus points for high-importance featured and good articles. Previous rounds have seen her scoring the most bonus points, with scoring spread across did you knows, good articles and featured articles. 1672:: I had a look at the pages in question in the banksia book(s), there is a little bit more in the 1981 monograph but not much. I meant to ring Alex George about this and should do so in the next few days...I guess the photos look sort of like hexagons stretched vertically :P 9331:

on August 21, 2013. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask featured article director

5340:, although I suspect we can all hazard a guess as to high-profile templates that would benefit from this. Hopefully you're willing to give it a try; the more TemplateData sections get added, the better the interface can be. If you run into any problems, drop a note on the 1327:

about pork. Don't think I'll find a reference for "why" the pork taboo is in place, though, if it's documented, I'd have read about that in commentaries. Perhaps a clay tablet with the answer has been destroyed in only the last few years during the "troubles" in Iraq. :(

11002:

Arguses are getting combined in the first myth told - Argus Panoptes being turned into a peacock makes sense. Peacocks have eyes on their tails. Argus the ship builder who made the Argo? I don't think so. It's cited, I know, but I'd question the reliability of the cite.

5312:

I'm sending you this because you've made quite a few edits to the template namespace in the past couple of months. If I've got this wrong, or if I haven't but you're not interested in my request, don't worry; this is the only notice I'm sending out on the subject :).

3660:

I see...Actually I spoke to someone I know who has a Ph.D. in Behavior Analysis and Clinical Psychology. He is also an author and works with autistic children as well as people with sexual disorders and to help some people organize themselves in business (See here:

1861:"Furry things" may occasionally be found partly out of the spike, but partly in, in which cases the white tip is quite obviously the common bract. In such cases removal of the "furry thing" leaves behind a visible hole in the spike where a common bract ought to be. 4271:

I doubt we can get it to 5x expanded, but here's a possible hook: "Did you know that... floury bakers with very distinctive male genitalia and anti-reflective camouflage are brought into class to startle Australian schoolchildren with their “strident shrieking”"

2892:

One of the greater-scale problem I see, which you might want to work on if you're going to take aim at several of these articles, is that information on the peculiar reproduction suystem in figs as a whole is spread across multiple articles (the genus article,

161: 11532:), who is competing in the WikiCup for the second time, though this will be her first time in the final. A regular at FAC, she is mostly interested in British medieval history, and has scored very highly for some top-importance featured articles on the topic. 7284:

of the project gives HBW as the de facto standard. HBW follows (or is about to follow) BirdLife International taxonomy (which appears to be more conservative – or maybe just lags behind IOC). Any problem if I update the guide to replace HBW with IOC on this?

14009: 6114:

Yeah, well in an ideal world I'd wish Eric weren't so colourful in replies as it gives folks ammunition. But we're all human. Anyway, I have too much on my plate to devote much energy to it or anything else that I don't find enjoyable at present. Sigh.

2885:, since I'm not clear what you are actually asking. The description, I must say, is a particularly lacking part of the article under any evaluation criterion. Even as one who appreciates the topic, I'm finding the taxonomy section very confusing. As in 1842:

I have today taken a long lunch and gone bushwalking with Gnangarra. While he took happy-snaps, I did some OR on this question. My diagnosis is: these are peduncles that have developed common bracts, but have not yet developed floral bracts or flowers.

1638:

Thanks for reminding me on this one - I think it was Alex (or Kevin??) who told me that every bract pattern was unique to a species and hence diagnostic, but as far as I know not much if anything has been published on this area. The similarity between

996:

S.F.Gray. It was only described, without species, and covered an earlier mentioned, but unnamed group of ringed, non-volvate species, regardless of spore color. Fries restricted the genus to white-spored species, and made into a tribe, which was, like

643:

titled "the genera of fungi" (or was it agaricaceae?). It's filled to the brink with mind-numbing nomenclatural discussions of all the genera ever described (I think, anyway). Would it be any use if I looked up the specific ref or any specific genera?

13860:, they have connected this editathon with their own work. They have already set out a wide range of resources to make things easier for us and have much more. We are hoping to strengthen the relationship between Wm-Au and SLNSW. Please sign up on the 6201:

Also - none of us are angels - I'd rather people who lose it with someone, get annoyed but get over it quickly rather than folks who are outwardly polite but bear secret ill-will or antipathy. The latter phenomenon I would say directly is a factor to

63: 12650: 12588: 5011: 3460:

Hi Casliber - thanks for your note. Yes there's quite a bit more out there which Duane Hamacher and I are slowly trying to get written up. You can find some more stuff on www.emudreaming.com and you may find some papers you havent come across on

4809:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

1232:. This tribe became a subgenus, than genus via various authors, Quélet, altough not the first, often being attributed the change. Sometimes it was used in a Persoonian sense (whether that is a correct use according to ICBN is not clear to me). 4900:

Hmm, definitely looks like it's time for an update there. Unfortunately the code I have to do that is old and creaky and I'm not sure it's compatible with the current database dumps. I'll try and take a look at it in the next few weeks. --

3921:

it as both an opportunity to plug the micro-grants scheme generally and flag up the contest and getting involved. Would you be happy to put together a couple of paragraphs (200 words or so) to this effect? You can see past newsletters here -

13957:. On it, I've included a description of the project and a list of species we're hoping to tackle. Given your interests in both medicine and mycology, I thought I'd give you a heads-up on our project and hopefully have you drop in and visit! 4735:

The Knowledge Library gets Knowledge editors free access to reliable sources that are behind paywalls. Because you are signed on as a medical editor, I thought you'd want to know about our most recent donation from Cochrane Collaboration.

6506:

created an article on me, which you (properly) deleted because it had been created by a blocked user. I was wondering if you'd mind un-deleting it (or object if I un-deleted it) - it's basically an OK article - one or two minor errors. It

1989:

But that does not affect the new paper much, since they remain refreshingly noncommitted on the things they cannot reliably assess from their data. And data they have a lot. Also always nice to see geography mapped on phylogenetic trees.

11791:

Any interest in this? The article uses one of my pics, we have them in our garden, and it gets an awful lot of page hits (~1000/day), so I'd probably pitch in. Plenty of good sources available make it easier than the cicadas I think.

2069:

with persistent florets. Not just a bit late to fall: there were old cones from previous seasons with the florets still bolted on. In fact, there wasn't a single bald cone on the whole tree. I've never seen anything like it. Have you?

1975:

is not finalized, but the preprint is ready and formatted. It may well be one of the most comprehensive and beautiful papers on the topic of Psittaciformes evolution. Only gripe: it still does not consider the fossil record fully. Is

4370:

shouldn't be rewarded. As to what is correct, there is evidence that both names are in common use (Google searches come out fairly even, and results are mixed), though I’d favour the present title for the practical reasons outlined

4506: 5510:. We are currently seeing concern about the amount of time people have to wait for reviews, especially at GAC- if you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on 13948:

I'm a prof at University of Toronto teaching a 4th year undergraduate course on medical and veterinary mycology. I have begun a class assignment to improve upon WP articles on biomedically important fungi. This is part of WP's

2229: 4256:

If you can find data on time underground, that would be good. The "over a year" was from a generic Australian cicada's article. I have a 1930's children's poem that says it's 3 years... but I'm hesitant to rely on that :).

2064:

While I was out a-walking in the bush one day last week, I spied a banksia with an unfamiliar jizz. Even on closer inspection I was bamboozled for half a minute until the pieces fell together and I realised I was looking at a

7459:

Other than that, there is not much to report! If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on

2393:(2):73-75? I think once those two are located and added, that'll be it from journals (but you may find stuff to add from your Banksia books?). I could start stubs for the species, but it would be a shame to have to leave out 6441:

Hi Casliber! I was wondering if there's any status update on awarding prizes for the Core Contest held this spring? It's been two months since the contest closed, so I am hoping the results will be announced soon. Best, --

11238:

The Million Award is a new initiative to recognize the editors of Knowledge's most-read content; you can read more about the award and its possible tiers (Quarter Million Award, Half Million Award, and Million Award) at

2125:

It's quite near my place; about ten minutes drive. Even closer to where Alex lives (assuming he still lives at the address he has been publishing under lately): only five minutes drive from there I would guess. If it's

13548:

that I think you might have forgotten about; you opened it eight days ago and since then nothing seems to have happened. No rush of course, just a quick reminder. I hope you're well and having a pleasant week. Thanks,

2713:

From the abstract of Somerville and May 2006: "Apothecia of these crops are of different macroscopic appearance, with lighter apothecia being mostly immature, and darker apothecia producing spores." ... so who knows?

1762:

What is going on in the lower image? Clearly this is an inflorescence in very early bud, but those furry white things are apparently not developing flower pairs. Are they some kind of protective bract or something?

12507:

I must admit I am surprised there isn't an amalgam map somewhere - am a bit worried someone would see constructing a map such as this as synthesis. Might be worth discussing first.....21:29, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

4813:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

8051: 6342: 2493:

Sorry, forgot again. I've just scanned it now. Cas: I'll forward shortly; if you have Sasata's email address, can you forward it on please? Otherwise, Sasata: send me an email so I know where to send this scan.

1647:

was noted (the bract pattern remaining in the fossils). I seem to recall feeling bamboozled as well by the description when I read it some time ago. I will have to refresh myself with some bedtime reading....

11738:

Finally, the usual notices: If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on

5783: 6678: 727:

Generally, that's pretty arcane and only relevant to genus articles, or species that were tightly involving in defining them (for example, there seems to be an odd debate over the multiple type species for

11932:

Hey! I'd love to help out. I'll need about a week to get on top of the topic before I start making some contributions. I'll check out the article and talk page, too. Anywhere else I should have a look at?

6755:

With a fatter lead and a final c/e, I think this is about ready for GAN. I'll eventually have some more details to add from Alessio 1985 and perhaps other bits from elsewhere, but that can wait for FAC...

11060:

Yes indeed. I had altercations with the editor inserting this ship material in all manner of star, figures from mythology and constellation etc articles, without success. Good luck finding that ref, Cas.

10278:

so as to keep people from expressing meaningful opinions. The second, by me, is claimed to be less than neutral by proponents of the first. Please look at the second one, which I think is much better.--

6149:

If you want to consider secondary consequences of his oafishness, then on top of the "ammunition" he delivers up to others please also consider the amount of time it consumes and division it causes here

4118:

The taxobox image from this article will hit the front page next week - if you've got time, I'd appreciate any further contributions to the article. In particular could you see if you can figure out if

7224:

Did you know ... that since you expressed an opinion on the GA/DYK proposal last year, we invite you to contribute to a formal Request for Comment on the matter? Please see the proposal on its subpage

2084:

hybrid - how far is the tree from you? I'd compare the newgrowth/leaf dimensions/trunk all for comparison. Did it have any new flowers? Some of these old cones have an aura of prionotes about them...

2378:

Yeah, it'll do the trick. I gave the article a good push towards GA. Hesp, do you have easy access to Beaton 1984, or maybe Fuhrer, B,; May, T. (1993). "Host specificity of disc-fungi in the genus

352: 7515:, you are invited to contribute to a formal Request for Comment on the question of whether Good Articles should appear in the Did You Know? slot in future. Please see the proposal on its subpage 2473:

Thanks for finding that, wonder why it didn't show up in my database search. Cas, if it's too mush hassle for you to get these, let me know and I can order them, would take 1-2 weeks to get here.

1472:

I maintain that the food which is forbidden by the Law is unwholesome. There is nothing among the forbidden kinds of food whose injurious character is doubted, except pork (Lev. xi. 7), and fat (

6210:

from main page appearance to pending changes to whatever. Anyway, we both have our views and neither is going to convince the other, but I do acknowledge your point of view as having vailidity.

3512:

I wanted to know if you could reply to my comment on the talk page to merge the Behavior modification article into the Applied behavior analysis article, as ABA is the new term for Behavior mod.

12706:

Yes - I am really enjoying these big furry spiders (look at my contributions) - I've never seen one but they alll live around where I live, so am also doing it in case I see one or get bitten.

3298:

I know the book but don't have it. This was written by Queensland authors so different view which is good. I can get it from library either today or thursday (next door to work on these days).

9128: 4745:

is an independent medical nonprofit organization that conducts systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of health-care interventions, which it then publishes in the Cochrane Library.

1947:

Gosh, would it really?! I was quite proud of it but a bit unsure whether it had enough depth of field. But if I'll take anyone's word that it would probably pass, I'll take Noodle snacks. :-)

15: 3153:(which was one of the yummiest mushrooms I've eaten), and we really should be improving the other mass-eaten edibles. Also I buffed the sickener for DYK so would be good to finish the job.... 13344:

scheduling discussions, I feel it is appropriate to inform you that you have supported a 2-point article for September 28th and now a 5-point article has been nominated for the same date at

5007: 3186:

closer to the top of "the list". I agree the popular edibles would be good to do as well, but they're hard ... we'll see how free time & motivation plays out over the next few months.

9124: 7550: 13107:

What will be interesting is if subsequent DYKs also have the same linking spike, which would show that different people read DYKs and not the same ones. I have 5x expanded some others.

12584: 4020:

I'm sorry, I'm a bit confused here. Do you mean you are waiting for a decision on the approval or otherwise of the microgrant? If so, I was of the understanding that it was approved by

3213: 710:

would be a good one to check too. let me know if anything interesting pops up. I'll see ifd I can think of any other taxonomic quagmires later today. Work just got real busy :( cheers,

11515:, and he has scored a very large number of points for good articles and good article reviews in every round. He is the highest scorer overall this year, with over 3500 points in total. 3515: 12837:

I generally intend FA to be a finishing point of anything I work on, though sometimes I might leave it for a while, either to take stock of it, or because something is missing - e.g.

1986:

really so hard to get? 2 cites in 3 years for what is essentially the baseline review is far too little... even Mayr does not cite it - granted, most is not Paleogene, but still...).

1595:

I haven't dissected an inflorescence, but in some species the pattern persists right through flowering and can be seen on the infructescence. You won't get a better example than this

6729: 3869:

points to a gene study you may be interested in.... Likely people from the Indian sub-continent mixed with Australian aboriginies 4xxxx years ago. An maybe brought dingos. Regards,

12646: 11731:, on which he has been working for several years, through to featured article status on its tenth try. Figureskatingfan continued towards her goal of a broad featured/good topic on 7280:

Hi Cas – I note that you have just stated on the Birds Project talk page that we have agreed to use IOC taxonomy in bird articles. Now, I am happy with this, but also note that the

11704:

for the 2014 WikiCup, which will begin on 1 January. All Wikipedians, whatever their interest or level of experience, are warmly invited to participate in next year's competition.

6024: 1801:

Now I have looked at the books and bract architecture, question is are they common bracts or are they something which falls off (don't think so but..). Something else to ask Alex.

13419: 2963: 2934:

Sounds good. Don't worry about rewriting anything yet. I was looking at overall meta-article structure WRT reproduction, which you've given me a good idea to work with. Cheers,

1775:

You certainly see those thingies on the developing buds of alot of banksias. I'd be intrigued what the Nikulinsky book, which is essentially a series of plates of a developing

1108:

per modern standard, so Persoon gave it a new life unrelated to its previous incarnations, and that is finally published after a starting date by Hooker (the citation is Pers.

10951:, the constellation representing the Argo." - how is this consistent with the constellation being created in the 16th century? Likewise, is the Argus myth actually relevant? 9436:. The colour of the inflorescences, short leaves, and flattened follicles which are sticky when young, help identify this species from others in the field. It is found in low 5268:

to ensure it is not deleted and also to improve the article to a higher assessment class. Would you be willing to take a look at the article and provide feedback? Thank you.

4768: 9396:. If it needs tweaking, or if it needs rewording to match improvements to the article between now and its main page appearance, please edit it, following the instructions at 7568:

We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

14178:, which is about a Singaporean celebrity blogger. The article is very short and should not take long to review. Hope you enjoy reviewing it as much as I enjoyed writing it. 9548: 5745:...and some input might spur me to resume interest in pushing them to GA. Not hugely enthused to work on them but they are pretty small and I like GA as a stable way-point. 6741: 6717: 1587:

You know what I don't get? On page 245 of George (1981), and again on page 40 of Collins (2007), George gives a diagram showing the arrangement of unit inflorescences on a

4833: 2695:

Hmmm, that's what I initially thought when I read the description and sketches in Beaton 1982, but after seeing B&B's 1872 sketches, I was pretty sure Cas's pic was a

2318:@Sasata - I'll leave it up to you whether a solid GA and one DYK for the whole shebang, or 4 species articles - you've got the material and I am happy either way. cheers, 13993: 3811:

and I included what you said about delirium. I've clarified my intent at that page and I wondered if you intended to try to get the article up to GA status or not. Best!

1858:

Wherever one of those "furry things" is found loose on the surface of a spike, you will also find a gap in the bract pattern beneath it, where the common bract is absent;

14005: 14001: 11605: 5382: 5320:

on Monday, 1 July, as the default editor. For those of us who prefer markup editing, fear not; we'll still be able to use the markup editor, which isn't going anywhere.

1398:

comment. The normal teaching is that pork is no more or less offensive to Jews than any other forbidden meat (dog, horse etc) or forbidden part of kosher animal (blood,

13923:

must be able to create an article about the patriotic efforts of our funnel webs. Or red-backs? Surely they knew which side their bread was buttered on during the war?

9673:

Pinging people is always good - the more collaborative the editing the better. I am always happy to be pinged as I am often busy and juggling lots and forget stuff.....

12023: 4829: 4806: 3866: 14149: 9885: 9397: 12212:, so it should be okay now to reduce or remove the protection. Semi-protection might still be a good idea, if you're willing, because he was editing with IPs too. 11508: 10380: 7353: 5264:

I saw your name listed as a volunteer for peer review - particularly for articles related to sports. We are working on expanding the article on Swedish footballer

4557: 211: 144: 6598: 6591: 3686:

ATC I don't doubt you and am appreciative of the steps you've taken to investigate. Thanks for the update. Still waiting for folks to get back to work....cheers,

11567: 9587: 8801: 5850: 5064: 3850: 13994: 13722:) and you seemed to measure its size in some other way and said the article in question was fine. Please could you consider whether you think Sea is too long? 13557: 12160: 11635: 10430: 9301: 8678: 7392:

earning Cwmhiraeth a total of 216 points (from a multiplier of 7.2). Other articles on important topics submitted this round include a featured article on the

2627:

As OZtrylia has a notoriously under described rang of and field of mycology study - any signs of further fungi or algae work is to be encouraged at all points

10483: 10448: 5778:

article back in 2009; it was my first featured article and I was glad to see it go up on the main page. I have submitted another article for featured status:

1713:

Haha yeah. Not a bad comparison at all. a diamond pattern it is there as well. You sorta let your eyes go a little out of focus and see two diagonal lines....

13799: 11466: 9234: 9016: 7381: 1488:

Vayikra Rabba (ch 13) where it is mentioned as part of an elaborate metaphor, but not in connection with any reason for particularly abhorring the creature.

11553:. Good articles make up the bulk of his points, and he had the most good articles back in round 2; he was also the highest scorer for DYK in rounds 1 and 2. 13502: 13229: 12724:

and I am helping, but not as much as I should be really. I am buffing quite a few for DYK, just to get a bit of a "feel" for them - think the one might be

11695: 11680: 11620: 11128: 10857: 7013: 6383: 5109: 3746:

The senior psychologist on our ward thought it was only to do with specific therapy for autism, but she conceded she wasn't hugely familiar with the area.

1372: 10444: 6401: 3953: 1344:

This is the great thing about uncertainty. Lacking an answer, the reports of Maimonides, Mary Douglas and the other guy mentioned are fascinating.Cheers,

11544: 11529: 11449: 11432: 10905:

The article looks pretty good. It's short, but the Southern constellations have less history behind them than the northern, so not horribly surprising.

9393: 7453: 7408: 7366: 5470: 5432: 5401: 4469: 4323: 11698:). Having made it to this stage is still an excellent achievement, and you can leave with your heads held high. We hope to see you all again next year. 3007:

All of the following species are worth 2x points; let me know if you'd be interested in collaborating in one or more for bonus points in a later round.

2955: 13402: 11590: 10706: 8892: 8737: 7826: 7438: 6921: 5447: 14039: 8696: 6397: 1204:

The name has been republished three times in 1821: in Hooker, Roques and Gray (in that order). Roques maintained Persoon's circumscription, including

13552: 13016:

Hmm, that sounds interesting. But I'll need some resources to start with; a book on spiders that detail the different infraorders. Any suggestions?

11650: 11487: 9639: 9432:). It generally grows as a small shrub to 1.5 m (5 ft) high with fine narrow leaves, and is best known for its unusually coloured dark purple-violet 9389: 9197: 7338: 6503: 5485: 2042: 1424: 14191: 11978:

For helping a random IP who asked questions about dinosaurs on the Dinosaur Portal talk page back in November, 2010. You made Knowledge look good!

11871:

I'd happily help out! Interesting fact: Only 10% of redback spiders have venomous bites. I was "lucky" enough to have been bitten by one of them :P

10319:? I put in for an upgrade a while back, someone else just did recently, and there's a pileup of several people pending... anyone home over there? 9718:

It does look like a moth, do we know where it was taken? Once we have that, asking a local entomologist might be good and we can figure that out...

9699:

Hi Casliber. I don't know if this is quite up your alley, but I was wondering if you could identify an insect (I think it might be a moth)? I found

8748: 6338:

Hi, Casliber. I know you're incredibly busy pretty much all the time, but I wanted to drop you a note to see if you'd be interested in joining the

1314:

is not given explicitly in the Hebrew Bible, hence Bible commentators have been offering guesses since ancient times. My own favourite, however, is

10403: 9286: 9081: 8580: 5216: 2460: 1779:

inflorescence, says (not sure, I don't recall whether it had commentary...). Another thing to look up. Was about to look up the patterns just now.

13972:

Looks interesting - my free time will be patchy for the next week but will try to keep an eye on it. Don't hesitate to drop by and ask questions.

8692: 5127: 13857: 12209: 11180: 10204: 9032: 8277: 8234: 7053: 5565: 5044: 4694: 12796:

and review it when it is nominated at GA, and be as tough/nitpicky as possible, to help get more of a "feel" for some of these spider articles.

11665: 10758: 9318: 7898: 6242:

The ping was just a matter of politeness. I've got his talk page watchlisted if he wants to respond. Yes to all the above. This is not easy. --

5104: 4572: 10478: 8726: 6188:

encyclopedia-building editors who have personally been discouraged by his outbursts. Note some of the former were once in the latter category.

5123: 2355:

here so I might rescan at higher resolution. Four DYKs and 1 GA doesn't sound unreasonable for the lot, but I'll see what I can come up with.

13940: 13668: 10514: 9781: 9654:) but not quite sure about starting an article (I have less reservations about starting articles on people where more sources exist, such as 9017: 6820: 5718: 3771:). Although they are all the same thing, ABA/PBS usually refer to education; although, technically speaking they are all the same thing. The 6431: 5157: 14196: 11070: 11032: 10847: 8381: 7209: 5333: 4092: 4053: 4033: 4015: 3995: 3973: 2074: 1086:

65. 1797 is cited as devalidated: "Introduced to cover three groups already previously distinguished by Persoon (in Tent. 18. 1797) under

156: 93: 1903:: clear evidence of the common and floral bracts forming one of those little furry upside-down pyramids, with the flower arising from it. 7356:) is second. Both leaders are WikiCup veterans, and both have already scored over 600 points this month. If the round were to end today, 7105: 5665: 3204: 2975: 1384: 1359: 31: 28: 13932: 13914: 13431: 12381: 11547:), a finalist in 2012 and 2011. He writes on a broad variety of topics, with many of this year's points coming from good articles about 9504: 8156:

I'll take a look now. Don't feel obliged to review mine as I've generally been pretty lucky with getting timely reviews. Yes it is : -->

4158:

Nevermind, it looks like Altria perulata = Arunta perulata = White Drummer. Nice of the Town and Country author to give us a binomial!--

1922: 72: 11096: 10669: 9581: 8172: 6872: 6799:

as a comparator but am mindful that this article is less that half the word count of that one, so left the lead proportionally smaller

6672: 5458:, both recently promoted to good article status. Collaborative efforts between WikiCup participants have continued, with, for example, 3937: 2014: 1942: 13746: 13396: 11918:, I appreciated your "thanks", do you want to join an effort to get it up to GA? It would be great to have WP_Medicine eyes on it. -- 11010: 10996: 7270: 7247: 6280: 6259: 6225: 6170: 6130: 5614: 2161:

you had asked about a couple of weeks ago. There's enough info there to make DYK-worthy stubs on the genus, and three of the species (

13966: 13892: 13321: 13138: 13045: 13025: 13011: 12987: 12969: 12903: 12883: 12825: 12811: 12777: 12757: 12743: 12547: 12527: 12349: 12335: 12315: 12301: 10458: 8744: 8706: 6411: 5712: 5137: 4796: 3444: 3425: 2333: 1569: 1120:

has been considered validly published on different occasions, depending on various considerations." Proposed types include (given as

13584: 12254: 12239: 11490:), a WikiCup veteran who finished in second place in 2012, and competed as early as 2009. He writes articles on biology, especially 10824: 10613: 10564: 10424: 10256: 10183:(despite the fact they're made to improve the article). Could you may please stop this user at once? He's being highly disruptive. 10023: 9688: 6014: 5653: 5634: 4173: 3878: 3867:

http://www.economist.com/news/science-and-technology/21569688-genetic-evidence-suggests-four-millennia-ago-group-adventurous-indians

3841: 2498: 1825:

Having found nothing in George, I've been reading Douglas's stuff on ontogeny of Proteaceae flowers, and found nothing there either.

14301: 14248: 10584: 10535: 10346: 8285: 6494: 6377: 5685: 5324:

find this pretty awesome, and from Monday it's going to be heavily used, since, as said, the VisualEditor will become the default.

4592: 3497: 3384: 2468: 2297: 2280: 2236: 2224: 2138: 2099: 1951: 1891: 1832: 1816: 1794: 1687: 1662: 14145: 13163: 12062: 10778: 9989: 9833: 9771: 9751: 9733: 6314: 5980: 5589: 5389:, the noted American author and poet. We have also continued to see high-importance articles improved as part of the competition: 5298: 3906: 2996: 2870: 2681:. They look like little light grey maggots on the follicles. Based on the photo and textual description, I would suggest that the 841: 13987: 12011: 11309: 9918: 9838: 7816: 7516: 7225: 6486: 6472: 5766: 5706: 5551: 3768: 3247: 2949: 2708: 2539: 2525: 2512: 2488: 2406: 2373: 2200: 1460: 1442: 1298: 807: 769: 752: 722: 14226:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

14111: 10736:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

10198: 9811:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

9264:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

8672: 8508: 8123: 7203: 6850:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

6814: 6786: 5760: 5731: 4930: 4910: 4656: 3359: 3339: 3313: 3195: 2803: 2783: 2761: 2650:"Many kinds of fungi are associated with Banksias. There is even a genus of fungi named for their association with these plants— 2621: 2565: 2426: 2364: 2034: 1278: 13545: 13452: 13122: 13102: 13088: 13065: 12099: 11942: 11858: 11836: 11779: 11412: 8834: 8322: 7782: 7315: 7281: 6734: 6733:. Those that don't opt-in won't receive this message again. Also, a revised notification template has been created, located at 5886: 5386: 4317: 4303: 4239: 4225: 4205: 4191: 4167: 4153: 4038:

I am waiting for the 3rd judge to give me his rankings for the articles in the competition we ran, then I can write a summary.

3503: 3268: 1728: 1708: 1616: 13861: 10829: 10451:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 10154: 10121: 10101: 10076: 8998:

if it got over 5,000. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the

8911:

if it got over 5,000. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the

8699:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 7150: 6404:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 6075: 5797: 5130:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 4974: 2723: 1876:

Interesting - Gah! Forgot to ring Alex - evening is a crazy time with little availability for me, but will see what I can do.

14320: