User talk:Casliber/Archive 2

2035:

on the day this all started. I shouldn't have edited on Knowledge afterwards, but I did. When I saw the situation with Riana's RfA, it kind of set off a build up of unvented anger at my situation & it was un needed. My whole tyraid had very little to do with the RfA, but I guess I took it out on that angle anyway. The way I was handled could have been better, but I wont go there in threat of making this sound like a back handed apology. My apologies go to Riana, who was also having a real life crisis at the time too. Basically the whole thing was a misunderstanding & venting process which I involved you all in. In regard to the whole sock puppetry thing, I had told my brother about my problems in due trust & he went & did something stupid on here. I don't really know what else to say but sorry. If that & a little bit of hard work repairing relationships on here doesn't change your current view point of me, then I don't think anything will. So again, sorry if I've inconvenienced you guys in any way & I hope that over time you'll think better of me. I'd love if you guys could forgive & hopefully forget & I wasn't really in control of myself these past few days. Hopefully things can get back to normal. :)

2070:

instead of voting on an article I would rather strive to improve one NRL club every fortnight and bring it up very close to featured status. Now it seems as though there'd be a lot of work involved, but there are also a lot of club fans out there who'd probably be willing to participate. Basically there are 30 weeks in the NRL season and there are 15 club pages that are not yet featured. I propose that we all have a schedule to work on one new article every second round, in alphabetical order. By the end of the season hopefully we will have 15 near-complete, if not complete articles. My only concern at this stage is the dedication of editors to help out other team pages that they are not interested in. Basically in order to get the support of editors like these, we need a few leaders in the project. If you are willing to dedicate a bit of your time every week into this and if you have any further suggestions, could you let me know at

1761:, but had a lot on my plate this past week (mostly Algebra). I apologize, because that put a lot of pressure on you and J to patch the article where needed. It's clear you felt quite a bit of stress, and I feel like I should have helped out more. Forgive me? I feel the two sentences in dispute (one from Spawn Man, one from RebSkii) are sort of quibbling, but I feel we should still be open to suggestions for their improvement (although I still don't understand what's wrong with "more erect horns"). I've left comments on both users' talk pages asking for input on what they think should replace these two disputed sentences. Two sentences should not be a bar to FA status, so we just have to find what works for everyone on these two bits. Thank you so much for your enormous amount of work. 982:

page? I would gladly accept such an offer if you really think we couild get one to FA status? As you know, although I'm better at writing dino articles, I have no problem deviating to others in the name of a better edit count. So if you are in fact suggesting we team up & write a FA, I'll gladly accept. Any idea of which to write up? I'm betting something like the toad stool or truffle will be by far the easiest. So post me when you want to begin, or if you just wanted my help with your collaboration. I would enjoy working with you though... :)

2218:

superbly with little to none on the task list for it, so I see no reason why you'd not be able to lend a hand. I was hoping for myself, Firsfron & you to be able to work on it at least to sorta suitable standard. I've made a start, but am nowhere near as capable as you guys. If the day ever did come to nominate, I'd love to do that as well & I will help out heaps to earn that right. I just don't think I have the right knowledge to do a techinical rewrite of the subject like you two do. Any help or responses will be much appreciated. :)

1411:

the chemical elements are of high importance - it is not necessary to rate between them. An article of the "History of mining of Potassium pyrites in Cornwall" might be lower importance. The bird species are the basics of ornithology as chemical elements are the basis of chemistry. Do you see what I mean? If there are any doubts, it would be best to ask for a consensus opinion on the talk page. I agree it is a bit subjective, but the wiki guideline can help to decide on a rating of an article.

1510: 1502: 1734:" Is unencyclopedic & generalistic. Since apparently we only need 2 books to be able to make this broad assumption, I will find 2 children's books which are about dinosaurs & see if they have at least 2 triceratops fighting a T. rex at the end. Likewise, if they even do have triceratops, I will see if they are fighting at the end. Scratch that, not only will I find 2 books, but I will raise you 2 more. Your comment - " 46: 1719:

wouldn't be so, but because the FAC's have a larger portion of support, you never seem to act on my requests. This is not what I think of when I picture a diplomatic editor. I fear now that my comments will go unheard & some of the sentences I pointed out at Triceratop's FAC will go un noticed now that it has been passed. I always tried to fix every opposition. Anyway, don't take this the wrong way.

270:(3-5 of us), and you have it with the Banksia wikiproject. If we can get enough people to work on the Kangaroo article, then I think we can get it featured, but it will take longer than a fortnight. I'm willing to help, I have a few books, but we need to rally up some help. Any idea who will help? If you want me to copyedit any of those articles you posted on my talk page, I'll be happy to. Thanks. -- 201: 2069:

Hey I've noticed you're a regular on rugby league articles, particulary NRL ones. I need your advice on something I'm thinking of starting up on the project. Many WikiProjects have Article Improvement Drives which have different levels of success. I'm thinking of starting one up for this one too, but

1804:

I feel like I do need to, because this process would have been much smoother with three people fixing problems, adjusting text, and responding to comments, instead of 2.5 people. I agree that the last-minute comments were surprising and disappointing (in the sense that we thought we were there) after

1718:

Although I may be mistaken, I find your way of dealing with my FAC remarks is a bit less than what I'd expect from you. On most of the FAC discussions where I have placed things to act on, you have either defended the article or done nothing. If the vote was more opposes than supports, I believe this

1610:

Well, you just created this article, and the fact it was off the top of your head would explain the lack of sources, but it would be nice if you would provide some. Also, the article does not completely assert the notability of the band- if you could cite two independent, non trivial sources, or cite

1410:

Yes; there is no bird or animal species page of low importance, in my opinion. An article about "Changes in the diet of the Blackbird in Cornwall through different seasons" might be of low importance. We are rating ornithology as a hole and not just the species pages. In Chemistry I guess that all

688:

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work.

2217:

for FAC. However, I know it is nowhere near the standard needed. I've done some reworking & thoguht that nothing would be better than a 3 person collaboration. The article is truly a mess. It is very important to all aspects of paleontolgy etc, & deserves a better article. Iguanodon is going

1399:

Hi, as a birdlover I hate to think of any bird as of low importance :), but wondered how you go interpreting the scale. If all individual species are of at least mid-importance or higher, have you ranked any bird articles as of low importance? I guess the way I have seen it done on Wikiproject fungi

1268:

Eric, I am not good at navigating my way round templates just yet. Will have a look later as I have to dash out the door to work. Please feel free to embellish beefsteak description. I never knew if it was eaten widely - if so, then bump up importnace to mid I'd guess.....Cas Liber 20:56, 17 January

2034:

I know this is probably going to do squat for my reputation now (Not that I ever really had one), but I thought I'd leave a note of apology to everyone involved in my recent actions. An explaination is in order too. First off, I had a bad real life situation, that I really don't want to talk about,

1292:

Actually it turns out it is one of the few fungi (that we know of) the aborigines ate, so theres' something to be said about its consumption. In Sydney Eastern Europeans go on bus tours to big pine plantations just outside Sydney every easter (autumn) to pick all teh european fungi that grow there.

852:

Hey Cas - Thanks for the BarnStar by the way - the mycomorphbox has been a bit of a trial by fire, and it's nice to have the encouragement! Could you do me the favor of listing the "list of species in genus X" pages you've started? I'll make it a point of expanding them from my Mushroom Demystified

837:

You wrote: "...will getsome aussie native garden pix soon.Cas Liber 19:53, 2 January 2007 (UTC) Love the flowering plant you added. More photos, please! We need to see other types of natural landscaping. My front yard is only typical of a woodland forest floor. Thanks and "cheers" as they say down

2230:

Wow! You work fast. I was just going to start on the inline citations. If you need a break, just say (I wouldn't mind the extra edits to my edit count) :) So I'll take this as a yes, I can help & Firsfron is on board too. Don't feel obliged to though, I just feel safer knowing there are great

981:

Of course it's all fine. However, if the Dinosaur collaboration has hit hard times of late, no doubt a less popular species, the fungus, will have less voters. But I assume you considered that. In any case, your message sounded like an offer for a collaborative effort to get a fungus to the main

1661:...I'm trying to figure out consensus - it doesn't really spell out the proportions of votes which will render and article successful (2/3rds? absolute? 100%?). Looks OK as there really isn't anything we can do except possibly open a can of worms with a section on posture of shoulder joints.... 1140:

Sigh. Yes, you're right that we shouldn't be claiming or even hinting at a dispute if there's no documentary evidence to back that up. But I don't want to kill off the entire paragraph dealing with the rather interesting story of how it was discovered. I have retreated to "Reports of who first

1272:

No, no--I was just busting you. I think you probably got the importance right, unless you take into account a possible chilling of American-"Soviet" relations due to the Red Menace coming down from Boston every fall and ravaging my little town's crop of that species. You can answer here.

420: 1843:

Talking to Gnangarra the other day I discovered for the first time that when you invited us to that Wildflower event you were actually in attendance yourself. Humblest apologies - if I'd know it was a chance for a meetup, I would certainly have rearranged my calendar to get there.

1739:" - is unclear & in my view wrong. I have not been negative, but have offered constructive critism. I was very diplomatic, saying great work so far, but it needs more work. I also kept a calm tone & only pointed out the as you call it, slobbish work ethic. I do not get " 1674:

It has to be pretty close to absolute. At this point, although the objections are very minor, I'm not sure it will pass. I'm going to see what I can fix tonight, in the hopes that the few remaining objections will be addressed. Any idea what is wrong with "horns more erect"?

1729:

Reply to your reply: If you checked the FAC, I stated a new section was not needed, but the text would be better suited to being placed in the opening section of Paleobiology. You have expanded a little & my only concern was that above & the children's book comment.

1786:" Then we could slot the text about that show "The truth about killer dinos" & how the guy found about the reality from this sort of fight? Sounds good to me, will post to you both as the current sentence just isn't working too well & could confuse people... 279: 1951: 1331:

Basically, those additions are coming up all over my watchlist – if they're tagged as minor edits, I can easily filter them out, which makes it easier to keep an eye on substantial changes or discussions I do want to keep an eye on.

2054:

article you gave me a link to needs the lest work done in other areas & I think it would be wise to work on that one. The other link, toadstool, is too far gone for an FA attempt right now. It needs a lot of work...

1189:

tagging talk pages; I vowed to work on articles about archosaurs, and as birds are archosaurs, I figured I could at least do some talk page tagging. But I really know little about birds, so I probably won't help out on

1736:

I also think you really need to take a look at your attitude, the negativity is really starting to get me down - if I or someone else were to write some of the things you've written I'm sure we'd never hear the end of

1743:" either. In any case, I was very civil with you & felt that you were only defending & not acting on what was a very reasonable request, most of which you fixed. Anyway, will be back with the books.... 186:

Hi - I think I have been autoblocked as I can't see any warnings on my userpage or contribs. I use a work computer sometimes (like now) and suspect this may be a computer someone has else has used. cheers.

1732:

Factual children's books about dinosaurs generally contain material on Triceratops, with at least two featuring it in combat with Tyrannosaurus, generally as a climactic episode toward the end of the book.

1251:

Hi Casliber- Hey, you wouldn't have rated that L. aurantiacum article as low importance if you'd had the steak I put my first ones on! But seriously, those templates are a good addition. What is it in the

1971: 1431: 362: 299: 763: 1876:

Saw your latest comments on the FAR - the deadlines aren't hard and fast. If you think you can improve it within a one or two-week extension, you can ask for more time by posting a note to the FAR.

1784:

A reoccuring theme in children's dinosaur books is a final showdown or battle between the Triceratops & T. rex. As such these two dinosaurs are often depicted & thoguht of as natural enemies.

992:

Hey, Cas- I'm fried and dumb and can't find the fungi collaboration page vote you mentioned on my talk page. You can answer here when I post here if you want--I'll have you on my watchlist. -

133:), and many other frogs we don't have photos of. Because this frog is so common in Perth, I have been able to find lots on Flickr which we could use. Thanks, and I'm glad your looking :). -- 2244:

Thanks man. As I said, don't feel obliged. Who knew fungi were so popular eh? ;) I'll finish off the cites (unless you want to). Just so you know in case we get too many edit conflicts. :)

1894:

Hi, I trimmed off some unnecessary information in the New Zealand Wildlife Service section. Please check it. This article should remain in FA, so I'll try to help with citations. Cheers. —

2024: 352: 445: 410: 1647:

Hi Casliber - I've done a bit of work on the above article since you commented - and was wondering if there was anything more you wanted to comment on. Any help would be great. Thanks.

1256:

that puts a hyphen between "low" and "importance" in the following line?: "This article is on a subject of low-importance within mycology." I found the page but couldn't see anything. -

923:

No, I don't expect you would pop over to take some pix. My invite was to an experienced editor with contibutions of substance and an interest in australian biota. Just what we need at

2071: 1824:

On the contrary Cas, I don't feel you are at fault for anything at all. I just wanted my comments to be better recepted. Other than that, I'm glad we can come to an agreement... :)

1805:

the work that was put in. If you had had less on your plate from the beginning, you probably wouldn't have seen Spawn Man's comments in such a negative light. So I do apologize.

2193:

Ahh, your comments about my block cracked me up & made me see the whole thing in a positive light. I do seem to use kerosene don't I? He he he... See you around... :)

1557:

I've got a couple more for you. These were taken a while ago, so they same mistakes apply. Will try to get more info when I take fungi photos in the future. Thanks. --

1611:

a source showing how high some of their hits came on the charts (If it was high enough to be considered notable) then the article would be out of notability trouble.

1589:. They can be other colours (apparntly violet, which would be pretty cool). The furry one is either too immature to ID or has a mold infection, irony I guess! :). -- 963: 473: 456: 1656: 1095:

But in the Banksia Study Group Newsletter, Kevin Collins tell a completely different story, about how it was first discovered by John Cullen in September 2000.

910:

Hi Casliber, I was bringing attention to WA amphibians when I saw your request for id of a frog at liquidghoul's page. Anything you can do to contribute to

464:

I made the merge discussed. No content was lost and what is not in the article is on the discussion page. I tried to weave toether all content to flow well.

1065: 1039: 715: 927:(please consider joining in there too). Any comment or contributions from you would be valuable, especially with some distance from the subject. Regards, 468: 441: 406: 1932:

Hi, Casliber; I'd certainly be interested in it, but not for a couple of weeks. I promised I'd see about expanding the Miscellaneous section, and I'm in

1668: 1640: 1354: 1038:

one way or another and perhaps expand this article just a little? Drop me a line as soon as you do and I will place it on the main page DYK. Thanks.

1998:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 1458:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 1400:

and Banksia is that low importance=specialised area (I rated alot of aussie birds like that) so that there ends up being a spread of articles. cheers

1362:

OK, I was doing so many - also when one starts a talk page the description is usually right there so I thought it was immdiately obvious what it was.

389:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 326:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 1216: 266:

article, it takes a lot to get a broad subject featured. And it usually only works if there are a few really dedicated contributors. I had that with

35: 1328:

When you add these to talk pages, could you be sure to check the "minor edit" box? You should probably do so when you add a grade to the box, too.

1323: 1561: 1548: 1366: 1052: 436: 401: 1415: 1404: 2248: 2235: 2164: 2151: 2142: 2103: 1747: 1633: 1262: 1158: 1149: 1135: 970: 251: 1905: 1862: 1828: 1811: 1767: 998: 928: 915: 805: 790: 781: 770: 1703: 1692: 1681: 1311: 1297: 1279: 1200: 826: 757: 743: 1792:

I think this could suit everyone & doesn't sound as generalistic. It also sounds more like what an encyclopedia would say... Thoughts?

1394: 1477: 1651: 1246: 1098:

Do you know anything about this. Is there an actual dispute over who discovered it, or is there some way to reconcile the two stories?

737:

Wow, thanks for the barnstar! Forgot to mention: the Banksia article looked really great on Knowledge's main page last week. Cheers!

1068: 1042: 165: 900: 1639: 1622: 1421: 911: 1946: 1194:; I did see your comment on the FA review; I hope you (or someone) will be able to fix it up before it gets the axe. Best wishes, 1852: 1338: 986: 274: 857: 842: 2039: 1796: 1723: 1350: 2222: 1888: 1615: 1389: 955: 877: 96: 1593: 1538: 1219: 1102: 948: 2093: 2059: 2099:

Yep -I had a brief look; there aren't too many words different. Will haev another but have been up against it a bit..

1022: 882: 632: 137: 1491: 1241: 731: 233: 191: 142: 2122: 1922: 2197: 2183: 2089:

article to use British spellings, and Firs suggested you as someone who could do this. Would you be interested?

1626: 1179: 931: 918: 564: 751:

what it looked like (just imagine the Knowledge logo above it, and some other junk on the right and below it).

822:

Ha - I alternate between Firefox and IE (wife likes the latter while I like the former). Great captured image

1927: 1838: 1741:

if I or someone else were to write some of the things you've written I'm sure we'd never hear the end of it

1027: 64:

If possible, we would appreciate your assistance in cleaning up this article to bring it up to Knowledge's

30: 976: 766:. (I like to capture an image of my featured articles on the main page - it is one of my many vanities). 519: 2050:

Although it is short, undercited & very bullet pointish (too many short stop start sentences), the

1999: 1459: 1253: 847: 390: 327: 118: 2064: 1453: 1142: 832: 775:

Sweet! But that's in Firefox; where's the same version in Internet Explorer, in case Cas uses IE? ;)

624: 1088:. In the Acknowledgements section of Olde and Marriott, they mention "Ann Pilkington who discovered 914:

would be appreciated by many readers, and me. I have been enjoying the pages on banksias. Regards,

1346: 1016:? Page four won't render or print for me. A problem with the image at the top of the page I think. 708: 257: 221: 1305:

So, did you notice what I mean about the above hyphen? Do you know where that template was born? -

1084:

a lot lately. There's a degree of contradiction in the various stories about who first discovered

748: 75:

If you do not want to receive bot-generated messages on your talk page, please consider using the

2029: 1713: 1520:

I was wondering whether you could ID these fungi I took photos of at Barrington Tops last year.

637: 606: 1093: 944: 161:. It has been selected, so please help to improve it towards featured article status. Thankyou. 2129: 1884: 1529: 1526: 1523: 1372: 862: 584: 244: 1970: 1430: 1048:

OK - merged two stubs but I am knackered and need to sleep. Will try to do a bit later cheers

796: 361: 298: 2202: 2157: 1986: 1603: 1446: 936: 891: 514: 377: 314: 178: 1686:

I've sent RebSkii a message asking for clarification, or suggestions for alternate wording.

2042:

P.S. I'm kind of embarassed that you saw me like that. Sorry Cas that I've let you down...

1096: 1034: 1013: 697: 650: 569: 434:

This barnstar is awarded to Casliber for his work in articles relating to flora and fauna.

321: 282: 88: 8: 2161: 2148: 2139: 2119: 2018: 1849: 1845: 1342: 1155: 1146: 1132: 1099: 1073: 1019: 952: 787: 767: 579: 458: 346: 248: 230: 217: 93: 2147:

Gosh this is exciting. I think tonight I'll just sit back and watch you add images. :-)

2045: 1993: 1954: 1868: 1858:

Nevermind - we'll be back over that way every 9 months or so I guess. Great nursery :)

1575: 1572: 1569: 1309: 1277: 1260: 1206: 996: 126: 17: 1487:

You might be interested to see how User:Guinnog has organised flags on his user page.

2077: 1877: 1496: 1488: 1473: 1412: 1224: 1004: 720: 678: 1590: 1558: 1545: 1535: 905: 614: 534: 504: 499: 271: 170: 134: 69: 53: 1911:

I still have some sources at hand for citations. I'll give some comments later. —

1755:

Actually, a lot of this is my fault. I really wanted to help out a little more on

868: 68:. If you are unsure what the nature of the problem is, please discuss this on the 2090: 1943: 1916: 1899: 1212: 712: 660: 601: 524: 478: 162: 158: 147: 101: 76: 65: 26:

Please post on my current page, not this one as it covers Dec 06-Feb 07 - cheers

1697:

Oh, I just saw you asked for clarification on the FAC page. Nevermind, then. :)

1175:

Hey I see you're doing stuff with birds - Kakapo's bout to get teh chop from FA

2245: 2232: 2219: 2194: 2180: 2109: 2056: 2036: 2010: 1825: 1793: 1744: 1720: 1630: 1612: 1168: 983: 967: 839: 701: 668: 559: 554: 465: 338: 110: 2179:

That wasn't anything to be worried about, she took the comment the wrong way.

2213: 2204: 2188: 2174: 2100: 2051: 1959: 1859: 1806: 1762: 1698: 1687: 1676: 1665: 1604: 1482: 1401: 1384: 1363: 1306: 1294: 1274: 1257: 1234: 1195: 1176: 1049: 993: 895: 872: 854: 823: 800: 776: 752: 738: 726: 673: 287: 188: 27: 1131:

and leave it at that, as any further "gossip" would be unverifiable anyhow.

1469: 1141:

discovered B. rosserae are somewhat contradictory." Can you have a look at

1060: 924: 539: 494: 384: 57: 1977: 1757: 1648: 1379: 574: 549: 544: 305: 1509: 1501: 481:

predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

1912: 1895: 1437: 596: 509: 368: 1934: 56:, to which you have helped contribute, has been flagged as requiring 707:

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on

655: 642: 619: 529: 154: 143: 45: 2072:

Knowledge talk:WikiProject Rugby league/Article improvement drive

1585:

Thanks for the IDs. I have asked others, and they say that it is

689:

Your contributions make Knowledge better -- thanks for helping.

263: 1092:

and who drew it to our attention through various third parties."

419: 1869: 1191: 1169: 262:

Sorry it took so long to reply. As you probably know with the

1211:

Hi Cas Liber. I've outlined my reasons for the merger on the

890:

As a member of WP:Dinosaurs, could you please take a look at

1530:

http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=368565923&size=l

1527:

http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=368565929&size=l

1524:

http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=368565935&size=l

1064:

in a major way. I'd say it's more than ready for DYK now.

200: 1981: 1441: 1377:

Looks like we celebrated milestones on the same article...

867:

Done! :) But we'll have to fix the double redirects listed

372: 309: 267: 2231:

editors backing me up incase I miss something. :) Thanks,

1952:

An article which you started, or significantly expanded,

280:

An article which you started, or significantly expanded,

1014:

http://farrer.csu.edu.au/ASGAP/banksSG/banksiasg-4-3.pdf

2156:

Discussion you might be interested in at the bottom of

711:. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- 1664:

PS: Jinx hahaha - my kids play that at school now.....

1629:

for instance? Someone there may be able to help you.

1621:

Why not post a message at the relevent Wikiprojects?

36:

Article in need of cleanup - please assist if you can

1576:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/52507572@N00/385373816/

1573:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/52507572@N00/385373818/

1570:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/52507572@N00/385373814/

696:

on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on

1782:

Well I don't see why a phrase can't be said like: "

1776:I'll post what I said on my talk page here too... 1302:

European? Were they cultivated there intentionally?

1938:mode right now. Once that's filled in, I'll give 243:Welcome. You might like to note the discussion at 1122:"There is some dispute over who first discovered 1111:"It is uncertain who first discovered B. rosserae 725:Happy 5,000th edit, Cas! :) Happy New Year, too! 2085:I was thinking that it would be fitting for the 1108:Thanks heaps for the perspective. I will change 474:Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot 1657:Consensus on FAC (Triceratops in this case...) 1032:Hi. Could you deal with the merger issue for 2128:...and has just claimed prime real estate at 786:"Internet Explorer"? Never heard of it. :-) 117:), closely related to the recently featured 2074:? Thanks, --15:09, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 43: 1990:was updated with a fact from the article 1848:10:45, 4 February 2007 (UTC) P.S. email. 1450:was updated with a fact from the article 381:was updated with a fact from the article 318:was updated with a fact from the article 1623:Knowledge:WikiProject Australian history 1508: 1500: 1324:Wikiproject Fungi Template on Talk Pages 912:Category:Amphibians of Western Australia 1544:I've uploaded it to commons. Thanks. -- 14: 1080:Sorry, I seem to be bugging you about 417: 224:lifted because of collateral damage. 1468:Thank you for your contributions. — 1395:Relative importance of bird articles 1247:Template:WikiProject Fungi question 23: 1143:Banksia rosserae#Taxonomic history 24: 2260: 1145:and let me know if this is okay? 633:Banksia Juvenile Detention Centre 483: 1969: 1429: 1422:Stropharia rugosoannulata on DYK 418: 360: 297: 199: 44: 2211:I'd very much like to nominate 2008:Thanks for your contributions! 1627:Knowledge:WikiProject Musicians 1012:Is it within your power to fix 853:book as I did for cortinarius. 762:No need to imagine - here's an 565:Banksia railway station, Sydney 336:Thanks for your contributions! 195: 153:Merry Christmas. You voted for 50: 2065:WPRL Article Improvement Drive 1233:the 17th of January (UTC) :) - 13: 1: 2249:04:12, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 2236:04:08, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 2223:03:18, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 2198:23:49, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 2184:07:04, 24 February 2007 (UTC) 2165:23:14, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 2152:11:11, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 2143:10:46, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 2123:10:44, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 2104:03:20, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 2094:03:07, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 2060:00:14, 14 February 2007 (UTC) 2040:06:25, 13 February 2007 (UTC) 2025:03:04, 12 February 2007 (UTC) 1947:15:59, 11 February 2007 (UTC) 1917: 1900: 1594:03:22, 11 February 2007 (UTC) 1562:11:22, 10 February 2007 (UTC) 1239: 353:21:16, 29 December 2006 (UTC) 275:05:54, 29 December 2006 (UTC) 252:10:40, 27 December 2006 (UTC) 234:04:23, 27 December 2006 (UTC) 214:for the following reason(s): 192:23:31, 26 December 2006 (UTC) 166:14:02, 25 December 2006 (UTC) 138:13:10, 22 December 2006 (UTC) 97:23:02, 19 December 2006 (UTC) 31:04:38, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 2114:Thanks heaps for those. The 1923:19:26, 5 February 2007 (UTC) 1906:16:34, 5 February 2007 (UTC) 1889:14:26, 4 February 2007 (UTC) 1863:10:48, 4 February 2007 (UTC) 1853:10:45, 4 February 2007 (UTC) 1829:00:26, 1 February 2007 (UTC) 1812:23:12, 31 January 2007 (UTC) 1797:22:52, 31 January 2007 (UTC) 1768:22:43, 31 January 2007 (UTC) 1748:22:24, 31 January 2007 (UTC) 1724:21:43, 31 January 2007 (UTC) 1704:03:26, 30 January 2007 (UTC) 1693:03:23, 30 January 2007 (UTC) 1682:02:56, 30 January 2007 (UTC) 1669:21:53, 29 January 2007 (UTC) 1652:01:47, 28 January 2007 (UTC) 1641:Eastern Suburbs Railway Line 1634:19:46, 27 January 2007 (UTC) 1616:10:48, 27 January 2007 (UTC) 1549:14:00, 3 February 2007 (UTC) 1539:02:49, 25 January 2007 (UTC) 1492:11:54, 22 January 2007 (UTC) 1478:15:38, 21 January 2007 (UTC) 1416:13:18, 21 January 2007 (UTC) 1405:12:53, 21 January 2007 (UTC) 1390:01:33, 20 January 2007 (UTC) 1367:18:22, 19 January 2007 (UTC) 1355:16:23, 19 January 2007 (UTC) 1312:04:13, 19 January 2007 (UTC) 1298:02:00, 18 January 2007 (UTC) 1280:21:49, 17 January 2007 (UTC) 1263:20:53, 17 January 2007 (UTC) 1242:04:45, 17 January 2007 (UTC) 1237: 1220:07:38, 13 January 2007 (UTC) 1201:02:39, 13 January 2007 (UTC) 1180:02:30, 13 January 2007 (UTC) 1159:11:18, 14 January 2007 (UTC) 1150:04:18, 13 January 2007 (UTC) 1136:11:03, 12 January 2007 (UTC) 1103:03:48, 12 January 2007 (UTC) 1069:16:33, 11 January 2007 (UTC) 1053:12:37, 11 January 2007 (UTC) 1043:10:00, 11 January 2007 (UTC) 1023:04:12, 11 January 2007 (UTC) 999:19:37, 19 January 2007 (UTC) 987:04:14, 10 January 2007 (UTC) 457:Native gardening merge with 446:06:04, 12 January 2007 (UTC) 411:06:05, 12 January 2007 (UTC) 399:Many thanks again Casliber. 208:Your request to be unblocked 7: 971:14:09, 8 January 2007 (UTC) 956:10:47, 8 January 2007 (UTC) 932:12:48, 7 January 2007 (UTC) 919:13:24, 6 January 2007 (UTC) 901:10:28, 6 January 2007 (UTC) 878:22:10, 5 January 2007 (UTC) 858:06:16, 5 January 2007 (UTC) 843:17:33, 3 January 2007 (UTC) 827:06:50, 3 January 2007 (UTC) 806:00:04, 3 January 2007 (UTC) 791:23:56, 2 January 2007 (UTC) 782:23:52, 2 January 2007 (UTC) 771:23:31, 2 January 2007 (UTC) 758:22:46, 2 January 2007 (UTC) 744:22:17, 2 January 2007 (UTC) 732:21:41, 2 January 2007 (UTC) 716:17:07, 2 January 2007 (UTC) 709:the SuggestBot request page 520:Greater white-toothed shrew 469:22:19, 1 January 2007 (UTC) 10: 2265: 704:, SuggestBot's caretaker. 486: 198: 119:Green and Golden Bell Frog 2000:"Did you know?" talk page 1460:"Did you know?" talk page 1454:Stropharia rugosoannulata 883:Dinosaur article deletion 625:Festival Mushroom Records 590: 424: 391:"Did you know?" talk page 328:"Did you know?" talk page 159:Australian collaboration 943:Hey Cas, Any ideas re: 638:Pulse detonation engine 607:List of marine reptiles 2118:image is magnificent. 1808:Firsfron of Ronchester 1764:Firsfron of Ronchester 1700:Firsfron of Ronchester 1689:Firsfron of Ronchester 1678:Firsfron of Ronchester 1514: 1506: 1386:Firsfron of Ronchester 1197:Firsfron of Ronchester 897:Firsfron of Ronchester 874:Firsfron of Ronchester 802:Firsfron of Ronchester 799:. But with more bugs. 778:Firsfron of Ronchester 754:Firsfron of Ronchester 740:Firsfron of Ronchester 728:Firsfron of Ronchester 698:SuggestBot's talk page 585:Panaeolus subbalteatus 245:User talk:Kelly Martin 79:on your user talk page 2158:Template talk:Taxobox 1928:Thescelosaurus for FA 1839:That wildflower event 1512: 1504: 1341:comment was added by 515:Psilocybe tampanensis 1213:Kookaburra talk page 1035:Chroogomphus rutilus 1028:Chroogomphus rutilus 651:Persona (video game) 570:Lactarius deliciosus 428:The Barnstar of Life 1958:, was selected for 1587:Cymatoderma elegans 1513:Cymatoderma elegans 1505:Cymatoderma elegans 977:Fungi collaboration 580:Dergholm State Park 459:Natural landscaping 286:, was selected for 228:Request handled by: 1994:Clitocybe dealbata 1955:Clitocybe dealbata 1515: 1507: 961:Some more imaages 848:fungus genus lists 322:Grevillea 'Superb' 283:Grevillea 'Superb' 131:Litoria raniformis 127:Southern Bell Frog 18:User talk:Casliber 2006: 2005: 1466: 1465: 1358: 892:Unicerosaurus AFD 833:Native landscping 686: 685: 679:Dahomey mythology 451: 450: 397: 396: 334: 333: 240: 239: 85: 84: 80: 66:quality standards 2256: 2021: 2016: 2013: 1973: 1966: 1965: 1919: 1902: 1881: 1809: 1765: 1701: 1690: 1679: 1433: 1426: 1425: 1387: 1336: 1240: 1238: 1198: 1090:Banksia rosserae 1066:House of Scandal 1040:House of Scandal 898: 875: 803: 779: 755: 741: 729: 615:Mushroom hunting 535:Wollongong Hawks 505:Gheorghe Popescu 500:Psilocybe weilii 484: 422: 415: 414: 364: 357: 356: 349: 344: 341: 301: 294: 293: 258:plant/animal FAs 203: 196: 183: 177: 74: 54:Amanita muscaria 48: 41: 40: 2264: 2263: 2259: 2258: 2257: 2255: 2254: 2253: 2209: 2191: 2177: 2112: 2080: 2067: 2048: 2032: 2030:Note of apology 2019: 2014: 2011: 1964: 1930: 1879: 1874: 1841: 1807: 1763: 1716: 1714:FAC goings ons: 1699: 1688: 1677: 1659: 1645: 1608: 1499: 1485: 1424: 1397: 1385: 1375: 1337:—The preceding 1326: 1249: 1227: 1209: 1196: 1173: 1078: 1030: 1007: 979: 941: 908: 896: 885: 873: 865: 850: 835: 801: 777: 753: 739: 727: 723: 700:. Thanks from 661:Substance abuse 602:List of parrots 525:Gill (mushroom) 476: 462: 347: 342: 339: 292: 260: 181: 175: 173: 151: 104: 91: 86: 77:nobots template 38: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2262: 2252: 2251: 2241: 2240: 2239: 2238: 2208: 2201: 2190: 2187: 2176: 2173: 2172: 2171: 2170: 2169: 2168: 2167: 2111: 2108: 2107: 2106: 2079: 2076: 2066: 2063: 2047: 2044: 2031: 2028: 2004: 2003: 1974: 1963: 1950: 1942:another look. 1940:Thescelosaurus 1929: 1926: 1909: 1908: 1873: 1867: 1866: 1865: 1840: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1834: 1833: 1832: 1831: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1814: 1790: 1789: 1788: 1787: 1775: 1773: 1772: 1771: 1770: 1753: 1715: 1712: 1711: 1710: 1709: 1708: 1707: 1706: 1658: 1655: 1644: 1638: 1637: 1636: 1607: 1602: 1601: 1600: 1599: 1598: 1597: 1596: 1567: 1566: 1565: 1564: 1552: 1551: 1498: 1495: 1484: 1481: 1464: 1463: 1434: 1423: 1420: 1419: 1418: 1396: 1393: 1374: 1373:Happy 6k, Cas! 1371: 1370: 1369: 1343:Peter G Werner 1335:Thanks, Peter 1325: 1322: 1321: 1320: 1319: 1318: 1317: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1303: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1248: 1245: 1226: 1223: 1208: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1172: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1129: 1128: 1127: 1117: 1116: 1115: 1077: 1072: 1056: 1055: 1029: 1026: 1006: 1003: 1002: 1001: 978: 975: 974: 973: 940: 935: 907: 904: 884: 881: 864: 863:Mushroom moves 861: 849: 846: 834: 831: 830: 829: 819: 818: 817: 816: 815: 814: 813: 812: 811: 810: 809: 808: 722: 719: 684: 683: 682: 681: 676: 671: 669:Basket weaving 666: 663: 658: 653: 648: 645: 640: 635: 630: 627: 622: 617: 612: 609: 604: 599: 594: 589: 588: 587: 582: 577: 572: 567: 562: 560:Hunter Pirates 557: 555:Universal veil 552: 547: 542: 537: 532: 527: 522: 517: 512: 507: 502: 497: 492: 490: 475: 472: 461: 455: 453: 449: 448: 431: 430: 425: 423: 395: 394: 365: 332: 331: 302: 291: 278: 259: 256: 255: 254: 238: 237: 222:203.166.99.229 216: 215: 204: 172: 169: 150: 141: 115:Litoria moorei 111:Motorbike Frog 103: 100: 90: 87: 83: 82: 73: 62: 49: 39: 37: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2261: 2250: 2247: 2243: 2242: 2237: 2234: 2229: 2228: 2227: 2226: 2225: 2224: 2221: 2216: 2215: 2214:Archaeopteryx 2207: 2206: 2205:Archaeopteryx 2200: 2199: 2196: 2186: 2185: 2182: 2166: 2163: 2159: 2155: 2154: 2153: 2150: 2146: 2145: 2144: 2141: 2137: 2136: 2132: 2127: 2126: 2125: 2124: 2121: 2117: 2105: 2102: 2098: 2097: 2096: 2095: 2092: 2088: 2083: 2075: 2073: 2062: 2061: 2058: 2053: 2052:Tuber (genus) 2043: 2041: 2038: 2027: 2026: 2023: 2022: 2017: 2001: 1997: 1996: 1995: 1989: 1988: 1987:Did you know? 1983: 1979: 1975: 1972: 1968: 1967: 1961: 1957: 1956: 1949: 1948: 1945: 1941: 1937: 1936: 1925: 1924: 1920: 1914: 1907: 1903: 1897: 1893: 1892: 1891: 1890: 1886: 1882: 1871: 1864: 1861: 1857: 1856: 1855: 1854: 1851: 1847: 1830: 1827: 1823: 1822: 1821: 1820: 1819: 1818: 1813: 1810: 1803: 1802: 1801: 1800: 1799: 1798: 1795: 1785: 1781: 1780: 1779: 1778: 1777: 1769: 1766: 1760: 1759: 1754: 1751: 1750: 1749: 1746: 1742: 1738: 1733: 1728: 1727: 1726: 1725: 1722: 1705: 1702: 1696: 1695: 1694: 1691: 1685: 1684: 1683: 1680: 1673: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1667: 1662: 1654: 1653: 1650: 1642: 1635: 1632: 1628: 1624: 1620: 1619: 1618: 1617: 1614: 1606: 1605:The Venetians 1595: 1592: 1588: 1584: 1583: 1582: 1581: 1580: 1579: 1578: 1577: 1574: 1571: 1563: 1560: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1550: 1547: 1543: 1542: 1541: 1540: 1537: 1532: 1531: 1528: 1525: 1521: 1518: 1511: 1503: 1494: 1493: 1490: 1480: 1479: 1475: 1471: 1461: 1457: 1456: 1455: 1449: 1448: 1447:Did you know? 1443: 1439: 1435: 1432: 1428: 1427: 1417: 1414: 1409: 1408: 1407: 1406: 1403: 1392: 1391: 1388: 1382: 1381: 1368: 1365: 1361: 1360: 1359: 1356: 1352: 1348: 1344: 1340: 1333: 1329: 1313: 1310: 1308: 1304: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1296: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1286: 1281: 1278: 1276: 1271: 1270: 1267: 1266: 1265: 1264: 1261: 1259: 1255: 1244: 1243: 1236: 1232: 1222: 1221: 1218: 1214: 1202: 1199: 1193: 1188: 1184: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1178: 1171: 1160: 1157: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1148: 1144: 1139: 1138: 1137: 1134: 1130: 1125: 1121: 1120: 1118: 1114: 1110: 1109: 1107: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1101: 1097: 1094: 1091: 1087: 1083: 1076: 1071: 1070: 1067: 1063: 1062: 1054: 1051: 1047: 1046: 1045: 1044: 1041: 1037: 1036: 1025: 1024: 1021: 1017: 1015: 1010: 1000: 997: 995: 991: 990: 989: 988: 985: 972: 969: 966: 965: 960: 959: 958: 957: 954: 950: 946: 945:this question 939: 938:B. telmatiaea 934: 933: 930: 926: 921: 920: 917: 913: 903: 902: 899: 893: 888: 880: 879: 876: 870: 860: 859: 856: 845: 844: 841: 828: 825: 821: 820: 807: 804: 798: 795:Kind of like 794: 793: 792: 789: 785: 784: 783: 780: 774: 773: 772: 769: 765: 761: 760: 759: 756: 750: 747: 746: 745: 742: 736: 735: 734: 733: 730: 718: 717: 714: 710: 705: 703: 699: 695: 690: 680: 677: 675: 674:Julian Morris 672: 670: 667: 664: 662: 659: 657: 654: 652: 649: 646: 644: 641: 639: 636: 634: 631: 628: 626: 623: 621: 618: 616: 613: 610: 608: 605: 603: 600: 598: 595: 592: 591: 586: 583: 581: 578: 576: 573: 571: 568: 566: 563: 561: 558: 556: 553: 551: 548: 546: 543: 541: 538: 536: 533: 531: 528: 526: 523: 521: 518: 516: 513: 511: 508: 506: 503: 501: 498: 496: 493: 491: 488: 487: 485: 482: 480: 471: 470: 467: 460: 454: 447: 443: 439: 438: 433: 432: 429: 426: 421: 416: 413: 412: 408: 404: 403: 392: 388: 387: 386: 380: 379: 378:Did you know? 374: 370: 366: 363: 359: 358: 355: 354: 351: 350: 345: 329: 325: 324: 323: 317: 316: 315:Did you know? 311: 307: 303: 300: 296: 295: 289: 285: 284: 277: 276: 273: 269: 265: 253: 250: 246: 242: 241: 236: 235: 232: 229: 225: 223: 219: 213: 209: 205: 202: 197: 194: 193: 190: 184: 180: 168: 167: 164: 160: 156: 149: 145: 140: 139: 136: 132: 128: 124: 123:Litoria aurea 120: 116: 112: 107: 99: 98: 95: 81: 78: 72:'s talk page. 71: 67: 61: 59: 55: 47: 42: 33: 32: 29: 19: 2212: 2210: 2203: 2192: 2178: 2134: 2130: 2116:B. pulchella 2115: 2113: 2086: 2084: 2081: 2068: 2049: 2033: 2009: 2007: 1992: 1991: 1985: 1953: 1939: 1933: 1931: 1910: 1875: 1842: 1791: 1783: 1774: 1756: 1740: 1735: 1731: 1717: 1663: 1660: 1646: 1609: 1586: 1568: 1533: 1522: 1519: 1516: 1486: 1467: 1452: 1451: 1445: 1398: 1378: 1376: 1334: 1330: 1327: 1250: 1230: 1228: 1210: 1186: 1174: 1123: 1112: 1089: 1085: 1081: 1079: 1074: 1061:Chroogomphus 1059: 1057: 1033: 1031: 1018: 1011: 1008: 980: 962: 942: 937: 922: 909: 889: 886: 866: 851: 836: 724: 706: 693: 692:If you have 691: 687: 540:Tooth fungus 495:Hymenomycete 477: 463: 452: 442:bananabucket 435: 427: 407:bananabucket 400: 398: 385:Chroogomphus 383: 382: 376: 337: 335: 320: 319: 313: 281: 261: 227: 226: 211: 207: 206: 185: 179:unblock-auto 174: 152: 130: 122: 114: 108: 105: 92: 89:Welcome back 63: 52:The article 51: 25: 1978:February 12 1758:Triceratops 1591:liquidGhoul 1559:liquidGhoul 1546:liquidGhoul 1536:liquidGhoul 1517:G'day Cas, 1383:! Jinx! ;) 1380:Triceratops 1269:2007 (UTC) 1124:B. rosserae 1086:B. rosserae 1075:B. rosserae 1058:I expanded 629:Add Sources 575:Agaricaceae 550:Hymenophore 545:Polyporales 306:December 29 272:liquidGhoul 163:Scott Davis 135:liquidGhoul 2091:J. Spencer 2046:Mushrooms: 1944:J. Spencer 1534:Thanks. -- 1438:21 January 1217:Just James 1207:Kookaburra 949:this image 713:SuggestBot 597:Agaricales 510:Russulales 479:SuggestBot 369:January 12 109:That is a 2246:Spawn Man 2233:Spawn Man 2220:Spawn Man 2195:Spawn Man 2181:Spawn Man 2162:Hesperian 2149:Hesperian 2140:Hesperian 2135:Abietinae 2120:Hesperian 2101:Cas Liber 2087:Iguanodon 2082:Hi, Cas; 2078:Iguanodon 2057:Spawn Man 2037:Spawn Man 1935:Iguanodon 1860:Cas Liber 1850:Hesperian 1846:Hesperian 1826:Spawn Man 1794:Spawn Man 1745:Spawn Man 1721:Spawn Man 1666:Cas Liber 1631:J Milburn 1613:J Milburn 1497:Fungi ID? 1402:Cas Liber 1364:Cas Liber 1295:Cas Liber 1225:17th Jan? 1177:Cas Liber 1156:Hesperian 1147:Hesperian 1133:Hesperian 1100:Hesperian 1050:Cas Liber 1020:Hesperian 1005:BSGN 4(3) 984:Spawn Man 968:Gnangarra 953:Hesperian 840:Noles1984 824:Cas Liber 797:Opera 2.0 788:Hesperian 768:Hesperian 721:Happy 5K! 702:ForteTuba 466:Noles1984 249:Hesperian 231:Hesperian 218:Autoblock 210:has been 189:Cas Liber 106:Hey Cas, 94:Hesperian 28:Cas Liber 1351:contribs 1339:unsigned 1254:template 1235:Painezor 1154:Thanks. 906:WA frogs 887:Hi Cas, 855:Debivort 694:feedback 656:Zothique 643:Karine A 620:Amatoxin 530:Eucalypt 437:Blnguyen 402:Blnguyen 171:Blocked? 155:kangaroo 148:WP:ACOTF 144:Kangaroo 2131:Banksia 1880:Georgia 1752:Hi Cas! 1489:Snowman 1470:ERcheck 1413:Snowman 1082:Banksia 838:under. 593:Cleanup 264:Banksia 212:granted 146:is new 125:), the 102:Frog ID 70:article 58:cleanup 2110:Images 1870:Kakapo 1649:JROBBO 1192:Kakapo 1170:Kakapo 947:about 749:Here's 665:Expand 647:Wikify 2189:Block 2175:Reply 2133:ser. 1918:reply 1913:Indon 1901:reply 1896:Indon 1878:Sandy 1483:Flags 1009:Cas, 925:WP:WA 764:image 611:Merge 489:Stubs 16:< 2012:Nish 1982:2007 1921:) — 1904:) — 1885:Talk 1625:and 1474:talk 1442:2007 1347:talk 1307:Eric 1275:Eric 1258:Eric 1187:only 1185:I'm 994:Eric 964:here 929:Fred 916:Fred 869:here 373:2007 340:Nish 310:2006 268:frog 2015:kid 1976:On 1960:DYK 1872:Far 1737:it. 1643:FAC 1436:On 1229:It 1215:.-- 1119:to 367:On 343:kid 304:On 288:DYK 220:of 157:as 2160:. 2138:. 2020:64 2002:. 1984:, 1980:, 1887:) 1476:) 1462:. 1444:, 1440:, 1353:) 1349:• 1231:is 1126:." 1113:." 951:? 894:? 871:. 444:) 409:) 393:. 375:, 371:, 348:64 330:. 312:, 308:, 247:. 182:}} 176:{{ 1962:! 1915:( 1898:( 1883:( 1730:" 1472:( 1357:. 1345:( 1273:- 440:( 405:( 290:! 129:( 121:( 113:( 60:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index