Knowledge talk:WikiProject Video games/Archive 25

3395:. I can imagine it will go the way of many of these taskforces and projects: inactive. Sometimes I wonder why people want taskforces (or whole projects), then when it's made: it has activity for a bit, then nothing. In my opinion: just post the article issues here, and a much wider group of people can help out. Why seperate them, just because they have alot of articles of their own? The video games project is for everything. So it makes more sense just to post here, asking for help and so on. Much more people can help in one project, rather than just splitting into other projects and/or task forces. 161:. If it looks like a huge wall of text, it's because it's a combination of what I wrote, what other Knowledge users wrote, and material from other sources; I never organized it or weeded any of it out. There's probably also a lot of shorthand (such as reminders to myself about what to write) and other nonsense only I would understand. However, there are more than a few complete paragraphs in there that would really help the article (e.g., introduction, first paragraph of the plot, the first three paragraphs of the "gameplay" section, and others). Hope this helps out. -- 703:. I really would like to know, why exactly are download prices more notable than regular game prices? It should be both or none at all: I prefer none, seeing as how many older games prices will be hard to find, and it's just un-needed fan adding. If people really want to find prices: they can go to the official source, Knowledge shouldn't be the place for this. Since when did Knowledge become a guide to prices? I think a lot of this isn't needed, as this isn't a guide to prices (as I stated above). 2832: 31: 2991: 689:

but not game prices. If they are kept, then people might as welll list on every article the game cost $ 50 or whatever. A download shouldn't make it an exception to the rule, period. In other examples: movie articles don't have prices, nor do CD articles. In comparision to other actual downloads: I haven't checked that, but I'm sure a mass listing of prices doesn't exist on the articles. I've also posted this on the Nintendo project talk page, to get more responses.

1780:? It'd be simple to add a tag to the games where it is relevant, so the information wouldn't be lost, and I'd say it's roughly comparable to the Wi-Fi tag. Also, I don't think anybody noticed the numerous other video game lists that focus on functionality similar to using the microphone. I'm not even sure if that wouldn't be viable information for the list. Does every game use the Microphone, or just some in particular? 2212:

ideas on connections between various characters/monsters (such as "It's plausible that Pyramid Head was linked to...."). A while back there was a whole section on the SH movie page about symbolism which was pretty much an entire collection of fan theories and possible relations between certain game and movie elements unconfirmed by Konami. Anyway, I'll get working, glad to see that people are up for the task force. --

117:: the game isn't out, and the article is massive. I don't even want to think of how big the article will be when the game actually is released. Splitting into other articles is possible: but copyediting and other things to condense this should be done first. It shouldn't be a complete case of "it's too big, let's just split it". It's a massive game, but that certainly doesn't mean the article has to be massive. 1360:

tagged with that category. Though it is relatively early in the lifecycle, the list is relatively stable and is not undergoing any major edit war; nor is there new games added every day. Rather, every few dsys a couple of games are added to the list, and articles (stubs at the least) are crated for them relatively quickly. For these reasons I believe that the list can be submitted to FLC.

680:. But I thought I would get some extra input here. Basically to sum it up (if you didn't read my post on that talk page): how much Wii Points the Virtual Console games cost, doesn't needed to be listed. They are downloads, but look at just about any video game article: no prices are listed. I would've removed it, but I'm sure people would've reverted it. This same thing applies to the 1884:. These characters are simply not notable enough on their own. Our general trend is to try and collapse this information into one larger page, since this allows us to capture the information but avoids having to try and defend many small pages full of fan-cruft and unsourced junk. Since there are apparently already unified lists, there's no need to create anything additional. -- 1912:. Merging into one large article is better - lots of stubs are simply not useful and increase the amount of maintenance and work needed, plus it adds a ton of new pages to the already large backlog of stub class WP:VG articles. However, do create redirects to the list from all list items. I bolded the word oppose in the above two comments for clarity and continuity. -- 2844:" are not productive when all the reader wants is to read about a game. Infoboxes often extend well into the first or second section, and almost always below the table of contents. Reducing the size of the infobox is good. There is a lot of information that could be left out of the infobox, but for now I will only address the redundant release dates and ratings. 3477:. I wouldn't necessarily count the usefulness of the said project purely in terms of FAs. For instance, issues on the notability of some character comes up, and people from the WPFF argue about it until something comes out. It's a centralized discussion that can be much more easily followed on one WikiProject talk page instead of a few scattered talk pages. 1539:" is not really an issue. After all, every game needs to have the catagory added in the first place. Hell, certainly a bot could do the work if needed (not that there are THAT many in each system that three or four people couldn't run through in short order per list). The only problem with a list might be that there's no real good annotation for them... 2090:(which currently doesn't exist), and thought it would be better to create some of categories for handheld games with the option to play with the system held sideways, which includes games for PSP, Wonderswan, Game Boy Adance, and the Atari Lynx, and probably others. Any thoughts on the best way to approach this, such as naming or organization? 3564:. While it's not all video games, there is quite a few video game articles that need this change. I believe the category contains a few other misplaced templates: but overall it's for infobox needed. Also, you could just put in the infobox when you can, which would also help out this massive infobox task. 3511:

hbdragon88 was not advocating that every task force should have their own deletion noticeboard. He was trying to point out that within the context of the CVG community, there is a benefit to listing all relevant entries in one central place rather than expecting CVG contributors to go through the AFD

3429:

articles are in great shape, generally. But to be fair, how much of this shall we attribute to the WikiProject, and how much shall we dedicate to the zeal and skill of individual contributors? I'm inclined to think that the latter is by far the important factor here. Large projects like WPVG here are

2517:

That's the inherent problem with completely eliminating fair use for everything. Films, video games, albums, etc. usually have no free images, while other areas like the US military and the sciences have a wide range of pictures to choose from. In some cases we might be able to substitute something

1484:

I think the only categories are fine, and obviously a game shouldn't be in both the regular cat and "only" cat. Why overcategorize? If something is only for one system (or handheld): it should be categorized in the "only" cat, not the regular one. I don't see a list replacing the categories: because

1173:

You can't "make" the subject notable, what you do is "prove" that it's notable. The way you do this is find multiple reliable outside sources that mention it. Incidentally, GameRankings is not a reviewer, they pull various reviews together to get an average, so quoting them means nothing, you need

877:

I had been in discussion with another editor about at what point a description of in-game items (in the example, powerups) goes from 'description', worthy of inclusion, to 'game guide', and properly the province of a site devoted to them. I cannot say I have seen any articles that would violate this

285:

has agreed to leave the katakana in the leads as long as it is at the end. I think this is a reasonable enough compromise and so I've edited the remaining articles for consistency. Whether the entire thing should be moved to the bottom as a footnote is something else that might be considered. I've

3239:

should come under. There are templates for "Screenshot from a videogame" and "Music clip", but this isn't either of those. It is essentially the audio equivalent of a screenshot but I haven't been able to find any other examples of such clips. I've asked this on the helpdesk and Image Copyright Tags

2743:

I was thinking that might work, but the hard part is getting a free photo of one of them considering not many exist. The only shots of Masato Kato I've found are all from official SE publications. Maybe something could be found for a high profile guy, like Hironobu Sakaguchi. Or, we could just carve

2506:

Seems the board caved in to the paranoids, so we can no longer use copyrighted images on the main page. I'm really hoping that's not what holding any of my articles from the main page, but at any rate, I guess we might start exploring free alternatives. That's the issue, though -- I can't think of a

2276:

I was just discovering this project today, and I noticed that in the recomended lists, that it was mostly Nintendo. I'm not saying that Nintendo isn't that great. I am even planning on getting a Wii to go next to my Playstation 3. I just thought that there should be more diversity including Sony and

1454:

I've never rated the -only categories, they're redundant. You know that a game is a system exclusive if it's only in one Game system category. However, without any kind of Metadata searching, this can't be done, and the -only category system is purely a hack around this. I personally would prefer

758:

Game prices for direct downloads such as this are more notable because they're fixed by the distribution service. An MSRP is just that, a "suggested retail price", which declines over the life of the title until one can no longer find a non-used copy at all. In contrast, the games on services such

3112:

I firmly agree with what has been proposed here. Most game articles don't have that problem mainly due to the lack of editors collecting such information, but for more popular, widespread games this can lead to bloated infoboxes containing release dates from countries some people haven't even heard

1511:

should show up every available game for the DS in one category, not split into subcategories such as DS only. If you want to see if a game is DS exclusive, it'll be obvious in the article itself as there is only one Game system category. The List of exclusives could be prominently linked from the

175:

I'm pretty new here, but I've been looking around pages I know about to see if I can improve them (mostly typos :D) Anyway, looking at the SSX 3 page, there is LOADS of bad info and missing info, which I'll try to add within the next two weeks. If no-one minds, I'll also split each character's data

3574:

Fucksake, this is just a load of work for very little payoff and will make articles even uglier than they are. We have enough article banners already, and a ridiculously ugly "No photo here" image too. This is really going to ugly up a lot of articles for a long time. It's not a big deal either

3296:

It seems that the current task forces that are focused on a company, like the Capcom, Sega, and Konami taskforces, are pretty inactive. On the other hand, the Devil May Cry task force seems more focused and has been doing good things. The video game images task force has also a clear objective and

3182:

Thanks for this guide! My kitten was getting confused by the infobox and started batting at it. My kitten wonders if there should be an info box template with fields to fill in that would give a common look between game articles (also the reader would not become confused having to decode different

2122:

Actually, I think I want to keep this discussion separate. In my experience, in discussions concerning list pages, proposals to use categories as an alternative are usually ignored. Frankly, I don't want the decision over a list page to affect what I'm trying to do, which can happen independently.

712:

I agree with this. Aside from the fact that price listing for games isn't really encyclopedic material. There's the issue of upkeep. Prices of games change a lot and the effort spent up keeping prices could better be spent improving more important things. If someone is really caught up in listing

688:

article, and the other country lists for VC games as well. Maybe someone can think of a reason to keep it on: but I highly doubt listing prices is encyclopedic. It's helpful, but this is an encyclopedia: not a guide to prices. I can understand keeping the prices of the Wii points cards in general:

211:

Actually I've had a change of heart. Seeing as I have 3 of 5 games and a strong knowledge of the series, I will go back to my original idea of a page per character, And put in all the information from each game they appear in. I can do bio's and info from Tricky to On Tour, and the rest as well as

3408:

has demonstrated that a focused group of editors can achieve a great deal. The problem with this WikiProject is that it's almost too generic and therefore has little participation in spite of the large number of participants. Look at the GCOTW: usually less than 10 editors contribute in any given

2982:

The current practice ("include some") is a compromise - some argue for including every single country, because doing anything else would be geographical bias. It is true that Indian or Chinese ratings, together more than a third of the world population, are rarely included. However, is this a bad

2211:

Great. I'll work on setting up a task force page, along with checking around and getting what needs to be done in terms of Silent Hill related articles organized. One thing to look out for is symbolism, I've noticed in a lot of SH articles that people will give their own input on plot symbols and

1848:

I think this is better, as you can say all about the character in one page, and you can at least say if anything is unknown. I really think this is a better way of doing it, maybe not for the gangs, but for the people. I'm going to start creating a few pages (not many!!) to give an idea of what I

1687:

I really only started editing the wiki because I thought that the Tekken characters needed a navbar. They did, I made it, it's useful. However, recently I made on for the Virtua Fighter characters. Still useful, but I noticed one thing about their pages. They're god-awful. Many of them don't have

1612:

There's also the question of scope. Does a single game series have enough notability to mandate an entire WikiProject? Probably not; probably just an article for each game, one for the series, and maybe a few more for things related to the game. This falls firmly under the scope of the existing

1444:

Seems like a pretty clear case of that second condition, I think. It's a lot more notable that something is a DS game than it is to say that it's a DS-only game. I can only wonder why, besides the random argument about which system is best (yawn), one would look up DS-only games in any case. --

3044:

Ratings are even more redundant than the release dates, because they are never far apart, except in very special circumstances which would warrant multiple ratings. If every rating organisation rates a game as "Teen" or the local equivalent, why list it as "T" "Teen" "12+" "12+" "12-year" "K-11"

1691:

Needless to say, it was a shock after editing Tekken articles. Regardless, these articles are in desperate need of cleanup and further information. I know I can't do it by myself, so I decided to come here and ask for help. I'll do what I can, but it'd be nice to know I've got some help before I

1359:

A valid concern, to which I can only answer that we shall see. I have not been a contributor for very long, but I realize that a list such as this will be an interesting one to send to FLC. According to the FL Criteria, however, Dynamic Lists are allowed to be submitted, and as such this list is

661:

but didn't want to be too presumptuous and storm through your area. I am happy to do the work if I get a nod that this makes sense. Note: as of now, the categorization in this section has not been disturbed, I have just created a new layer of Video game people and copied artists, designers and

260:

Okay me and a group of users decided to organize a task force to keep the DMC articles in top shape, it was originally proposed as a WikiProject but we ultimately decided to be a task force and to work under this project, just letting you know, any comments you have please contact me or leave a

1994:

Uhhh, excuse me if it was out of place to do so, but I went ahead and just redirected them into the list of characters of the first game they appeared in. I did that before I was aware of this vote per, basically, everybody's arguments here. That being said, you all can do whatever you feel is

3202:

I've actually already seen release sections in articles which can be anything from comparing different versions of the game to talking about notbale updates (is that even possible?). Perhaps the specific release dates have a place in these sections. It would certainly be better than the

2839:

A clear infobox is paramount for a good article. The infobox is the first thing any reader will see and read, and a bad infobox could make a reader turn away from the article, whether by introducing new questions or getting in the way of reading. New questions such as "What the hell is

799:

something that people care about. As a counter-example, I don't personally think it's notable for every PS3 game article to say that the game "Media" is a "Blu-ray Disc", since this seems to go without saying, but people put it there, and it's not particularly problematic, so why not?

1485:

if it did happen, every exclusive game for DS (or any system) would probably need a link to the list. Otherwise, how would people even know an "exclusive" games list exists (besides searching the main cat of DS or whatever). As the old saying goes: if it's not broken, don't fix it.

641:. So, I created it and copied Video game designers and video game artists. Now I would like to propose some additional work that will make your category easier for the unfamiliar user (such as me). There are now a number of occupations, including occupations by nationality (e.g. 2720:

How is that "mind boggling"? They spent the money to buy the broadcasting equipment, they have the rights to whatever footage they air. Likewise, if you went to that same event and took your own picture, you have rights to that picture, too. Would you want that stripped away?

3297:

has been filling the relevant categories and finding images, and adding fair use. Perhaps we should retire some of the inactive task forces and from now on focus on creating task forces with a more limited scope. Any objections? If not I'll go ahead with removing them from the

3409:

week. Besides, academic studies in business schools have demonstrated that teamwork is usually most efficient in a groupd of 10-20 people. We have over 700 participants here, and those are only the people who have bothered to indicate their participation on their userpage.

3117:

section. The idea of summarising data like this makes for an easier reading experience instead of being flooded with lots of geographically exclusive data. Readers who are interested in specific pieces of data such as release dates can find out on specialist sites, such as

3487:

Looking at that noticeboard, there is no day with over three entries. Why would each task force need their own deletion noticeboard when they could simply look there? The driving force behind any WikiProject or task force (with the possible exception of projects like the

3492:

that do not focus on the article space) should be article improvement. In fact, one could make the argument that a project that shows no discernible impact on improving articles but has editors come out en masse in deletion discussions has an overall negative impact.

636:

Hello, I am a visitor from Wikiproject Categorization. I've been frustrated on a number of occasions in finding the proper category for a video game developer, programmer, artist, and I realized that this category lacks what most high level categories have which is

794:

The information is readily available, accurate (without requiring further maintenance), and in no way jeopardizes the informative content. Why not include it, at least in the Xbox Live Arcade / Wii Virtual Console game list, even if not in the article itself? It

2769: 542:

In my opinion it doesn't. What exactly defines a flop? A game that was hyped/advertising alot, then sold bad? A game in general that just sold bad? A game that failed to live up to expections? A CFD is in order (and if there is a list page: afd that as well).

3594:

Chill Rooster :) I tend to agree with you, but no need to get all worked up. Like you said, there hasn't been much discussion yet, so let's have the discussion before we take this to AN/I (in any case most admins who give a shit are watching this page anyway).

3113:

of. I agree that most release dates are more less the same if not a few weeks apart, with some uncommon exceptions that can easily be covered within the article itself, either in the Development section or, if the release dates are staggered enough, a separate

3575:

unlike say NPOV and unsourced (which readers should be warned about), but some backroom consistency worry. Do you guys really think it's a good idea? I don't, and there hasn't been much discussion either. I might take this to VP or AN or something. -

2136:

I agree, a lot of times suggestions like yours are ignored. I don't oppose the category, and I favor including the information on the main Nintendo DS page. In fact, I suggested that when I removed the prod, but it doesn't seem to even be considered.

2170:

I'm not that involved with the VG project right now, as far as this talk page is concerned, and I haven't played a lot of the Silent Hill games, but I'll help, if I can. Like I said, I ain't that involved but, if you wish, I can help however I can. ♣

2786:. The debate seems to be whether the games are the same or not, barring localization and platform factors. As both games have the same 'first' copyright date (2004) I hold the view that the games are the same and thus should have only one article. 2247:

Yes, feel free to cull anything you think would definitely be deleted anyway. If it turns out it was a notable game someone's bound to create it or add it again anyway. If you're unsure just leave it for someone else to assess. You can also check

1219:

that is radically different from what we've had for some time now. I think it's important that all CVG members contribute to that discussion so that perhaps we can finally settle this once and for all (wouldn't that be nice).. Please comment on

878:

rule in my opinion, but I would like to know what the main concensus is in this: what is the main defining difference between the two, as far as describing gameplay elements in general (scoring IF ATYPICAL FOR GENRE, powerups, basic controls)?

2304:

If you really want to and people will join it, I'd suggest making a task force. To do this, make a page and add it to the list of the other taskforces in our wikiproject box. If you are bound and determined to make a wikiproject, go

1498:. The sub-category can't even be seen because it begins with an "X" and so is on the next page. Perhaps, a standard needs to be adopted where "-only" subcategories are placed under "*" instead of under their respective letter. -- 3025:

releases the game in November. The specific dates should be in the article. It must be noted that when the release date itself is notable, an exception should be made. For example, if Chinese censors surprisingly agree to allow

2331:

Does anyone have any idea or is there any reliable place to get the statistics of number of units sold for games? Most of the games I work on are not extremely well known, and I've had considerable trouble finding any stats for

3561: 2744:"Chrono Trigger" into the side of a potato and get it featured status on the Wikimedia Commons. At any rate, I plan on improving FF Chronicles to Good status soon and submitting "Chrono Series" as a featured topic with Judg. -- 1346:, with new announcements and changed dates and cancelled games and all that. I'm not sure if it's stable enough for Featured list status (in comparsion other featured lists are are of defunct systems, like the N64 and VB). 901:. Keeping that in mind, I'd say the point starts where you start describing, in detail, how the item is used, why its used, and such. In general, I'd say it's when you start describing things that would only be relevant to 365: 1156:

notable, after it's been marked as not notable. Have added a couple of favourable reviews. Is this sufficient to make the game notable? Would be a shame to lose this article, it's a cracker of a game and its successor

3450:-specific style guidelines — anything of this nature should cover all video games, and thus come from this project. This, incidentally, is why I have not joined the Zelda project, despite it being my main VG interest. 500:

Did you make this from scratch? While I appreciate your efforts, it isn't quite the same. Personally I prefer the original as it has brighter colours and flatter buttons. Wikimedians can be very picky about SVGs being

892:

that I've thought are way too detailed for anyone but players of the game, but different people have different thresholds for what kind material is suited for a "game guide". The whole no game guide thing come from

834:

I believe that one comprehensive list is superior to 3 separate lists for both readers wanting to know more about Wii games as well as editors wanting to contribute and collaborate. As such I am proposing that the

654: 3430:

beneficial, in my opinion, in mostly cross-article tasks. We help standardize video game article elements such as the infobox, offer video game-specific style information, etc. Now consider a narrow project like

2790: 385: 772:) is the same regardless of region, so it's always accurate and doesn't require any sort of upkeep or maintenance. Merchants can't discount it, and one can't get the title at a higher or lower price at all. -- 2616:

If you focus on any screenshots shown, that'd be a no-no. If you don't, then the relevance of the picture wouldn't be immediately obvious unless it were in a section that specifically describes the concert. —

1016:. A list of weapons outlining their statistics won't help a gamer directly, but it would contain a lot of technical information that would be of no use to non-players. Does this fall within our guidelines? -- 763:

will continue to be there indefinitely at their original price, unless Microsoft does some sort of clean-up and retires old titles. Thus, the price is quite notable, since this is the price that one will

1047: 450:

Adding your name there is all you need to do, and even that is optional. Wikiprojects are informal collaborations, so if you want to improve video game articles, you're already a member of the project. -

2481: 2470: 1677: 1032: 646: 377: 369: 3001:

It is indeed good to know when a game will be released in one's country. However, I think a better place for details like that is in the article itself, perhaps in the Development section or in the

657:(yes, this is common). And then under these categories, move/copy all the profession related categories under them. I feel confident that others will need the video game people category, so I was 1657: 743:

Anyone else care to comment? As of now, not many have commented (at any of the talk pages I posted this at). The talk page at the list page has several responses: but only by a few people overall.

157:

article without actually submitting my results. I'm not active at Knowledge anymore, but I thought some of the material could be used to better the article. The material is located in my sandbox:

962:

Things which are relevant to how reviewers see the game (if you cite a reviewer for criticising features X, Y, and Z, it is certainly worthwhile to describe such features in the gameplay section)

3560:

Anyone care to help me tackle this big task? The Infobox needed tag is no longer for the talk page, and it belongs on the article (so people can see it, and fix it sooner). A full list is here:

3611:

Creating one infobox is better than moving ten templates, if you ask me. So if anyone wants to help out with this task, why not make a few infoboxes rather than moving a bunch of templates?

1797:

I'm thinking of creating several articles with the GTA characters on, one page for one character, as I feel it would be easier to get to. In effect, I would also propose the deletion of the

1187:

as, the way I understand it, Ultra is just an updated version as Gold was in turn an update of the original Marble Blast. By covering the series as a whole you decrease notability concerns.

677: 1456: 1196:

Just for the record, I think the notability guidelines are entirely overused. There's no reason that Knowledge can't support an article for every subject anyone would feasibly look up. --

611:

It's quite a bit of work for just one editor to work on, and as such this is a call for help. It's nothing really difficult, so if anyone can help out, even a little, that would be great. -

3045:"MA-13" "12" - if "Teen" would do? If one rating organisation rates the game differently (such as 14+ or 16, or even XXX), it should be explained in the Reception section. An article like 1433:"When an article is put into a subcategory based on an attribute that is not the first thing most people would think of to categorise it, it should be left in the parent category as well." 717:(the history of prices of games, how pricing changed based on different media formats, the pricing structure of PC games Vs. console games, etc.). I think that could make a good article. — 2471: 1707: 2199: 3532:

I know. The deletion noticeboard is useful for this WikiProject — I was explaining that such boards, if made more specific, would not be so useful for our subprojects or task forces.

1801:

page along with all the other character list pages assosiate with GTA. I think we coulsd delete the list of gangs page for GTA, and create individual pages for the gangs. Opinions?:-

693: 650: 514:

Same here, it's appreciated, but the svg one is flatter and duller. If we're going to replace an image used on 16000 talk pages, it needs to be the same/better than what we have. --

310: 123:: This (along with most other Harry Potter games) are cluttered lists, and not much else. I've asked at the Harry Potter project for help on this one (not many responses there yet). 3091:

This has become more of an essay than a small note — apologies for that. I propose changing the infobox description once there is consensus for a policy change on this subject.

1300: 1295: 671: 593: 221:

I'm afraid my project will be delayed a bit, I got Guitar Hero 2 yesterday and.... well, it's good. Very good. Very VERY good. You know :D I'll still try to do it... eventually

2256: 1191: 509: 1674: 1326: 1308: 1044: 856: 840: 625: 601: 553: 494: 247: 3236: 3512:

entries for every day. I agree that there are a lot of tasks that have very little to do with taking articles to FA that would benefit from more centralised discussion. The

3435: 2413:... This WikiProject owes a lot to his contributions but I'm sure others will step up to the plate.. I for one wish Thunderbrand all the best and hope he returns one day... 1784: 1270: 889: 277: 2237:

The list of requested articles is getting rather large. I'll make a stab at some of them, but quite a lot simply aren't going to be notable enough. Can we prune these out?

1094: 2812: 638: 471: 3187: 1733: 2783: 1898:. The only possible result of this would be an excessive amount of pages containing a minimal amount of information that could be considered encyclopedic and not cruft. 529: 3446:

featured article about Link also predates the project. A group with that narrow a focus cannot offer much beyond individual contributions. There is (and should not be)

3391:

In the case of Nintendo, it probably should just go (as it's pretty inactive). Some posts doesn't seem like much to keep it around. Also, if people can: keep on eye on

2141: 1987: 1819: 1607: 3255: 3216: 3143: 3106: 2495: 1768: 1759: 1749: 941: 3134: 2299: 2094: 1902: 1024: 3545: 3506: 1874: 1798: 1671: 1321: 1200: 1041: 848: 823: 585: 339: 244: 1714: 1644: 1631: 1397: 1364: 1350: 982:, a game guide is a strategy guide, a walkthrough or hint collection. Basically, discussing game mechanics does not make something a game guide, but telling people 445: 142: 3624: 3463: 3399: 3301: 3271: 2388: 2370: 2318: 2067: 1407: 1373: 831:. It allows for additional details to be listed that could not have been fit into the current list, such as Controllers used, Number of Players, and any features. 714: 225: 216: 206: 2725: 2543: 2530: 2224: 2206: 2193: 1969: 1863: 1530: 1502: 1473: 751: 738: 3589: 2138: 1781: 1724: 1593: 1543: 1449: 1439: 1414: 1178: 926: 707: 518: 401: 137: 2002: 1888: 1617: 1489: 967:

I think the above approach works particularly well when we talking about controls or other such sections that should discussed be in some games but not others.

804: 789: 776: 560: 547: 2797: 2779: 2759: 2748: 2738: 2678: 2658: 2649: 2478: 2127: 2117: 2108: 1924: 569: 158: 120: 3175: 2444: 2178: 2023: 1336: 995: 971: 3240:

pages, but there haven't been any responses. Does anyone know of any other game articles that have audio clips, so I could see what licenses have been used?

1934:— characters need to be merged into so-called "lists"; not only does it strengthen content by weeding out the excess, it allows notability to be established 1074: 329: 326: 3286: 2434: 1167: 2809: 2787: 2705: 2627: 2595: 2570: 1853: 1805: 1216: 949: 477: 262: 3377:

dead, still some talk page topics, but it's not nearly as active as PCP. Of course, when you become too specfiic, that's no good either. I remember the

1696: 3513: 3442:

game in the main series, yet only two of those are featured articles, both of which predate the project (I believe - correct me if I'm wrong). The third

1756: 615: 389: 2043: 536: 2523: 2410: 785:. Since when did Knowledge become a guide to prices? Knowledge certainly shouldn't be made into a download price guide, due to the price not changing. 250: 3481: 3385: 3341: 3152:

to reflect the highest (12) and lowest (10) ratings, linking to a table comparing to what ratings those ages have in different countries. The article

2077: 2821: 2511: 2266: 2241: 2164: 1579: 1561: 1387: 882: 97: 89: 84: 72: 67: 59: 2281: 2358:. For not well known games, it will be hard to find statistics, because games not selling well generally don't mention them in reviews and such. -- 1979:- As per above. The characters don't have enough notability by themselves and most likely lack third-party sources. Knowledge is not a GTA Wiki. -- 666: 323: 2465: 3241: 2082: 1850: 1802: 1590: 1221: 1206: 373: 2672: 2643: 2172: 1996: 1121: 1061: 1037: 879: 864: 439: 3568: 2341: 952:

states "if the content only has value to people actually playing the game, it's unsuitable." I've recently begun to think of it in two phases:

196: 1701: 2808:. Maybe trying a discussion on that page is a better idea since a consensus on whether OR applies in this case would probably be helpful. -- 2695:

My understanding is yes, given that there is no other feasible way to illustrate anything about a video game until its copyright expires. —

3244: 2942: 2931: 2920: 2909: 429: 2185:

I may be up for it; I've played through Silent Hill 2 and am interested in the general vibe of the whole series; have made a few edits to

1667: 2884: 1938:

by providing creation, merchandise, and criticism information, which is infinitely easier to do with the entire cast. Not to mention the

1776:

Since nobody seemed to notice my merge suggestion, I thought I'd ask here, is there some reason the information shouldn't be merged to

1745:

way of sorting information. I've prodded it. Would have warned the creator, but he's been blocked and the user talk page protected.

3014: 2827:

In infoboxes for various games, at least eight lines are always occupied by ratings and release dates. That is bad: avoid redundancy.

1584: 105: 1589:

Anybody here that has played Command & Conquer has to admit it was a great strategy game. It should be a wikiproject category.

933:

If I find myself reading something that outlines the item's statistics and/or how that item is used, that's game guide material. --

1402:

I find this category to be quite frustrating, if for no other reason than so many editors seem to see it as mutually exclusive to

645:), all of which fall under video game designers. I would suggest that now that there is a video game people category, you create 435: 2306: 1622:

I agree that this is too small of a scope, but a taskforce Westwood studios or Taskforce EA games would not surprise me at all.--

1557:-- there are subcatagories for Tetris and Puyo-Puyo, but most of the games in those series are also part of the main catagory. 642: 381: 47: 17: 3051:

could be made to explain the local ratings when a game is rated "Teen", or better - such information could be integrated into

2488: 202:

If they are one time characters, a page for each them isn't necessary. I'm no expert on SSX, so I can't be of much help here.

1276: 3009:, all dates are within one week. Are these few days of difference worth listing in the infobox? If changed to, for example, 3277: 2671:

Well, this only goes for the main page, right? I mean, we can still put pictures in the articles under fair use, right? ♣

2396: 1435:...so I dunno. I can KINDA see the use/need to the -only catagories, but then again it almost seems like so-called cruft... 1265: 466: 315: 145: 1640:'s article can offer anything one needs for soundtrack sections. There's also some in-universe stuff floating around... -- 3405: 2507:

single one. What could one use for Chrono Trigger? Everything's copyrighted, right down to a picture of the cartridge. --

1789: 1554: 1636:

Those articles certainly need it. There are a ton of great sources out there that could be used to polish them up, and

1316: 836: 483: 2804:

placing the plot and character info from the GS3 article into the the trials and tribulation artice is a violation of

1419:

Actually, I believe the rule is that you're in fact NOT supposed to have an article in both a subcatagory and parant.

1247: 3392: 3346:

I'll do that. BTW, I redesigned the sidebar the other day. Does anyone have any suggestions for further improvement?

2770:

Asking for outsite comments on Gyakuten Saiban 3/Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney - Trials and Tribulations merger debate

2458: 1682: 1145: 524: 3153: 2654:

For video games, not much, unfortunetly. Even a picture of a screenshot on a TV is bogglingly not considered free.

2348: 1957: 1215:

has gotten so pissed over the navboxes debate that he has decided to quit Knowledge altogether. Now some users are

579: 129:: Just about every game listed on the series page, suffers from massive, bad formatted and cluttered lists as well. 212:

unlockables I can find by walkthroughs. I think that'll be sufficient data :D I'll try to do it within a month :D

2147: 913: 725: 2501: 2477:

Just a note to direct you to the above discussion, as the article is part of your WikiProject. Best regards, --

1666:

Particularly, to have it be mentioned as one of the more notable video games to feature Sudoku. Please discuss

1393:

I never liked these "only" games categories. I guess since the other game systems have them, they all have to.

1372: 872: 3489: 3005:. One of those sections usually repeats the information in the infobox now anyway. In the above example from 388:. I would suggest that any new task forces must first be proposed on this talk page first, though. Also, the 2088: 3291: 3171: 3102: 3081: 3047: 2796:

Actually the main argument agianst merging states that states that since we cannont prove that the plot of

2366: 2295: 2063: 2031: 2019: 1920: 1312: 844: 316: 2754: 1811:

The gangs themselves don't have much much notability. Brief summaries in a list seems more appropriate. --

505:

to the images they are superseding, and I think there may even be some obscure rule about this somewhere.

322:

I'm starting a list for characters pertaining to the Rayman series of games. Any help is appreciated. —

2753:

Hiromichi Tanaka seems to be the easiest to find, but that would only work for Chrono Cross of course.

2232: 1513: 1508: 1403: 1380: 1052: 622: 38: 2253: 2252:; some will have been deleted before which means you can see the reason and/or the Afd and all that. 1777: 1566: 1188: 631: 506: 2883:), this makes for a maximum of seven ratings. Rating collectors might include all 12 ratings in the 2073:

Is this even necessary? I find it to be too detailed for the apparent role it plays in the series.

1261: 462: 1298:. Please take a moment to look over the article and add your suggestions/comments for improvement 3373:. PCP is well-focused and has much discussion, while Nintendo seems a bit dead. Okay, it's not 1495: 605: 2487:

In the future, you can just list the article according to the directions on the main page, seen

3555: 3212: 3160: 3157: 2384: 2337: 2314: 1627: 816: 268: 565:

Yeah... that needs to go (as soon as everything is properly categorized, if not already). ---

345: 2271: 1730: 1599:

WikiProject groups are formed by teams of committed editors, not by how great a series is. --

233: 126: 1729:

Not necessary at all, this could be put under DS functionality or something of that nature.

3618: 3539: 3500: 3457: 3335: 3265: 3251: 3127: 2847:

Currently, infoboxes can contain any number of release dates, though a number between two (

2522:

was featured, I imagine that we could use a general picture of a dog, kind of like how the

2462: 2430:

Damn, first AMIB now Thunderbrand. Two brilliant users (both admins, too) packing it in. –

2278: 2186: 2036: 1980: 1812: 1600: 1017: 934: 167: 3013:, no information is lost to most readers. When more than a few weeks apart, this could be 255: 8: 3602: 3523: 3416: 3353: 3314: 3228: 2452: 2420: 1965: 1755:

Just tom let you know. The Prod was removed so you should consider taking this to AFD. --

1688:

pictures, they say only a little bit about their story and nothing about their gameplay-

1251: 1231: 1212: 1133: 1107: 1080: 919: 905:

a player of the game: stuff that isn't useful for someone who will never play the game. —

731: 678:

Talk:List of Virtual Console games (North America)#Wii Points doesn.27t need to be listed

452: 411: 2409:(If I don't do as good a job as Thunderbrand feel free to lend me a hand :), which Dan 2326: 1899: 1184: 1159: 291: 290:

article. Thank you everyone for your assistance in the dispute. Articles in question:

114: 3325: 3208: 3149: 3006: 2801: 2775: 2405:

has decided to leave Knowledge for now... I will take up the task of maintaining the

2402: 2380: 2333: 2310: 2087:

I recently removed a link to a suggested list page for "book-style" Nintendo DS games

2040: 1942:

violation if any of that list content is merged into the individual articles, or the

1871: 1623: 1576: 1394: 1283: 1241:

For what it's worth, it wasn't that that caused me to lose my appetite for Knowledge.

1152: 1118: 828: 744: 589: 426: 3282:

I was thinking about creating a Grand Theft Auto task force. Is anyone interested?

3168: 3099: 2971: 2363: 2356: 2292: 2263: 2238: 2203: 2190: 2060: 2016: 1917: 1742: 1537:

every exclusive game for DS (or any system) would probably need a link to the list.

1428: 1164: 1084: 1067: 991: 894: 760: 700: 491: 487: 354: 336: 303: 239: 2198:

Okay, if we make the Task Force, one of the first things that needs looking at is

3613: 3534: 3495: 3478: 3474: 3452: 3431: 3382: 3330: 3260: 3184: 2722: 2557: 2527: 2441: 2406: 2074: 1765: 1746: 1347: 685: 663: 490:

I hope this is useful and I apologise if this topic has been incorrectly placed.

420: 222: 213: 193: 180: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

3597: 3518: 3411: 3365:

I honestly question the need for company-level WikiProjects/task forces. Like

3348: 3309: 3038: 2415: 2354: 1962: 1953: 1860: 1721: 1693: 1637: 1499: 1446: 1411: 1361: 1333: 1325:. Please take a moment to look at the comments and add in your thoughts at the 1226: 1197: 1128: 1102: 907: 861: 854:

I would really appreciate it if you could leave your comments and votes at the

719: 658: 612: 406: 307: 299: 282: 3328:}} and see if it stays. If so, I'd have no problem with removing their links. 3586: 3576: 3565: 3396: 3378: 3370: 3366: 3283: 3069: 3010: 2984: 2983:

thing? Sixteen million people from the Netherlands know no other rating than

2915: 2701: 2623: 2566: 2431: 2039:

needs serious clean-up to make it look something like a wikipedia article. --

1950: 1943: 1527: 1517: 1486: 1470: 1460: 1420: 786: 748: 704: 690: 544: 203: 134: 190:

P.S. Some tips would be appreciated, in my talk page is probably easiest :D

3140: 3002: 2990: 2805: 2756: 2745: 2735: 2655: 2592: 2540: 2508: 2492: 2124: 2114: 2105: 2091: 1946: 1885: 1711: 1641: 1614: 1558: 1540: 1436: 1384: 1289: 1071: 801: 773: 566: 557: 533: 162: 2831: 3164: 3095: 3028: 2995: 2937: 2926: 2359: 2352: 2288: 2277:

Microsoft stuff, even if I am not the biggist Microsoft fan in the world.

2249: 2213: 2153: 2056: 2012: 1913: 1720:

I dont think its nececary, and even if it is, the title is not very good.

987: 968: 295: 184: 3473:

One of the biggest uses of a WikiProject is like a noticeboard, such as

2519: 1425:

Articles should not usually be in both a category and its subcategory."

1304:. It would be really helpful and prepare the article for FL candidacy. 1175: 1058: 1009: 979: 681: 515: 425:

Hi i would like to join this wikiProject. Where do i sign up? Thanks -

177: 1000:

I don't think it's as clear cut as that. FAQs (such as those found on

3123: 1870:

terrible idea - minor characters do not need a seperate page each. --

335:

Done some tidying, mainly removing overlinking and fixing italics. --

287: 2472:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Counter-Strike maps (2nd nomination)

3204: 3119: 2696: 2618: 2561: 2457:

We have made a new project for Playstation products. To view click

1859:

I dont think the characters are notable enough to have a page each.

1001: 959:

A basic description, for context (no more than a couple paragraphs)

597: 1033:

Proposal to ammend video games to Naming conventions (use English)

662:

directors into it (and most occupations now fall under designers)

821:

Following the suggestions of various Wikipedians, I've created a

552:

I have to agree, seems pretty subjective, and on a similar note,

3235: 1516:

along with the other Lists of DS games which currently exist. -

3022: 2904: 1659: 2050: 1575:

as it falls under the remit of this special interest group? --

3041:

writes about it, the Chinese release date could be included.

3034: 2864: 2588: 781:

That's true, but it still brings up the matter of this is an

168: 110:

Here is a list of articles that are in serious need of work:

392:

is up and running, and can be tagged to an article by using

3579: 3156:

could use a lot of work - see my first edit summary there.

3018: 2961: 2956: 2880: 2876: 2872: 2868: 2856: 2848: 1939: 1572: 1520: 1463: 1093: 1342:

Does it have a chance? That page is going to be changing

1008:

explain the mechanics of games. Many editors have used to

2966: 2860: 2852: 2841: 1799:

List of characters in Grand Theft Auto: Vice City Stories

2890:

An example, from the article I am currently working on:

2642:

Well, what could be considered "free alternatives?" ♣

1553:

Also, this discussion makes me wonder about stuff like

1379:

Is this category really necessary when there's already

672:

A comment about Wii Points on several Nintendo articles

621:

I'll be happy to help! Exactly what do you need done?

3562:

Category:Talk pages with misplaced main page templates

2798:

Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney - Trials and Tribulations

2780:

Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney - Trials and Tribulations

133:

I think that's about it, but feel free to add others.

1613:

Video game WikiProject, and doesn't need its own. --

1494:

There are other problems, however. For instance see

1174:

to get the review that the quote was pulled from. --

278:

Compromise reached on Soul Calibur character articles

153:

Hi all. Months ago, I tried my hand at revamping the

121:

Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone (video game)

1706:

I'd like to report the creation of this new article

713:

prices, they should rather work on an article about

366:

Knowledge:WikiProject Video games/Name of task force

3037:three years after the release of the game, and the 1224:so that we don't get splintered discussions again. 600:of Wii Game Lists. I'm hoping to merge the current 3250:I didn't see a generic category tag, so I'd use {{ 1658:Discussion over the inclusion of Brain Age in the 1507:The whole -only thing is redundant. For example, 1100:I just noticed that we have our very own Qxz-ad.. 1246:There was some productive discussion going on at 1012:definition, which only covers - as you mention - 3148:I have edited the rating part of the infobox of 3139:Can you provide an example of this in action? -- 2152:Anyone interested in a Silent Hill task force?-- 2100:Isn't this already being discussed above, under 1222:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Video games/Navboxes 655:Video game people by occupation and nationality 2351:might be worth it - check these among others: 364:will indicate that an article is supported by 2987:, should it be included too because of that? 2782:should be merged to the latter. Dicussion is 2734:A photo of Mitsuda or one of the developers? 747:is what this leaning towards, in my opinion. 2875:) at minimum, and when including Australia ( 478:SVG version of Nuvola apps package games.png 1995:necessary, if what I did won't suffice. ♣ 584:Hey there--I've begun working on a list of 482:Hi, I've made an SVG designed to supercede 3307:and removing the links on the talk pages. 2855:) is most common. Ratings always include 2822:Regions, Ratings, and Release dates (RRR) 2113:My apologies. I should've checked first. 1764:Thanks for letting me know, sent to AFD. 1571:anyone want to take a run at cleaning up 1250:; someone may want to follow up on it. - 532:... does this have any value at all? --- 2989: 2830: 2556:Fan art would most likely be considered 2287:What prevents you from creating them? -- 1307:(Also, there is a proposal to Merge the 1248:Template talk:Tekken series#Expectations 1092: 647:Category:Video game people by occupation 3058:Concluding, a better infobox would be: 2774:There's a debate whether or not should 2083:new handheld video games sub-categories 1207:New navboxes proposal, AMiB out of here 1057:Who actually founded this Wikiproject? 14: 2994:Guitar Hero XXX surprisingly features 643:Category:Japanese video game designers 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 18:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Video games 1410:, don't erase the "DS games" tag. -- 3580: 1844:a page for each individual character 1521: 1464: 146:The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time 25: 3406:Knowledge:WikiProject Final Fantasy 2560:, and unauthorized ones at that. — 1555:Category:Falling block puzzle games 1457:List of Nintendo DS exclusive games 1217:trying to introduce a new guideline 1126:I've added it to the project page. 1070:created the main project page. --- 484:Image:Nuvola apps package games.png 23: 2800:will not be sufficently different 1838:all of the character lists for GTA 1317:List of Wii Wi-Fi Connection games 837:List of Wii Wi-Fi Connection games 24: 3640: 3393:Knowledge:WikiProject PlayStation 2200:Silent Hill influences and trivia 2055:I removed most of the article. -- 1585:What about Command & Conquer? 1004:) are often not game guides, but 857:Comparison of Wii Games Talk Page 699:Also there is the price lists at 106:A list of articles that need work 3234: 3154:Video game content rating system 2349:List of best-selling video games 1958:Characters of Final Fantasy VIII 651:Video game people by nationality 243:- Please give a hand, honeys! - 29: 3438:. That's over four editors per 2859:and a European agency (usually 2524:recently featured Scooby-Doo FA 1150:I'm trying to make the article 653:and if you really need it then 3436:around 60 listed participants 1294:and is currently undergoing a 588:which complements the current 556:seems pretty subjective too... 286:also reverted the name on the 13: 1: 3254:}}. You might also add it to 2440:Don't you two leave now. :-/ 1277:List of Wii games Peer Review 1163:was similarly outstanding. -- 768:pay, and in fact, the price ( 608:into one comprehensive list. 594:List of Untitled Wii Projects 3278:Grand Theft Auto task force? 3053:Motion picture rating system 3048:Motion picture rating system 2835:Kittens like clear infoboxes 2587:Then how about a photo of a 2397:Thunderbrand has left.... :( 1313:List of Wii games using Miis 1309:List of widescreen Wii games 845:List of Wii games using Miis 841:List of widescreen Wii games 602:List of widescreen Wii games 554:List of video games by genre 317:List of characters in Rayman 261:message at the Task Force's 7: 3516:is a good example of this. 3381:WikiProject, for instance. 2411:has done since October 2004 2347:Checking the references of 2309:to see if anyone else is.-- 2102:List of "Sideways DS" Games 2051:http://www.mjolnirarmor.com 1790:Grand Theft Auto characters 1708:List of "Sideways DS" Games 1702:List of "Sideways DS" Games 1183:This should be merged with 948:The threshold suggested on 10: 3645: 3625:06:07, 22 April 2007 (UTC) 3590:23:47, 20 April 2007 (UTC) 3569:18:41, 20 April 2007 (UTC) 3546:04:03, 24 April 2007 (UTC) 3507:23:53, 23 April 2007 (UTC) 3482:22:45, 23 April 2007 (UTC) 3464:05:12, 20 April 2007 (UTC) 3400:20:02, 19 April 2007 (UTC) 3386:19:40, 19 April 2007 (UTC) 3342:18:07, 19 April 2007 (UTC) 3324:You could tag them with {{ 3287:16:35, 19 April 2007 (UTC) 3272:18:03, 19 April 2007 (UTC) 3245:19:21, 18 April 2007 (UTC) 3233:I'm not sure what license 3217:23:05, 23 April 2007 (UTC) 3188:19:27, 23 April 2007 (UTC) 3176:21:18, 23 April 2007 (UTC) 3144:00:44, 20 April 2007 (UTC) 3135:15:20, 17 April 2007 (UTC) 3107:14:55, 17 April 2007 (UTC) 2813:01:49, 16 April 2007 (UTC) 2791:23:20, 15 April 2007 (UTC) 2760:16:40, 16 April 2007 (UTC) 2749:16:21, 16 April 2007 (UTC) 2739:07:39, 16 April 2007 (UTC) 2726:04:15, 16 April 2007 (UTC) 2706:01:17, 16 April 2007 (UTC) 2679:22:55, 15 April 2007 (UTC) 2659:22:48, 15 April 2007 (UTC) 2650:22:41, 15 April 2007 (UTC) 2628:01:16, 16 April 2007 (UTC) 2596:22:37, 15 April 2007 (UTC) 2571:20:14, 15 April 2007 (UTC) 2544:11:49, 15 April 2007 (UTC) 2531:04:12, 15 April 2007 (UTC) 2512:03:26, 15 April 2007 (UTC) 2496:15:37, 14 April 2007 (UTC) 2482:15:25, 14 April 2007 (UTC) 2466:02:04, 14 April 2007 (UTC) 2445:00:14, 14 April 2007 (UTC) 2435:23:40, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 2389:14:19, 14 April 2007 (UTC) 2371:22:38, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 2342:22:15, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 2319:21:45, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 2300:21:29, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 2282:21:03, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 2267:14:58, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 2257:10:18, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 2242:07:15, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 2225:14:37, 17 April 2007 (UTC) 2207:07:19, 14 April 2007 (UTC) 2194:07:13, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 2179:22:23, 12 April 2007 (UTC) 2165:22:09, 12 April 2007 (UTC) 2142:21:56, 14 April 2007 (UTC) 2128:19:20, 12 April 2007 (UTC) 2118:18:58, 12 April 2007 (UTC) 2109:18:50, 12 April 2007 (UTC) 2095:18:38, 12 April 2007 (UTC) 2078:23:01, 11 April 2007 (UTC) 2068:08:24, 11 April 2007 (UTC) 2044:17:37, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 2024:08:23, 11 April 2007 (UTC) 2003:06:27, 11 April 2007 (UTC) 1988:06:17, 11 April 2007 (UTC) 1970:02:32, 11 April 2007 (UTC) 1925:17:31, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 1903:17:26, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 1889:17:22, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 1875:14:54, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 1864:14:19, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 1854:13:37, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 1828:What I was thinking of is: 1820:11:02, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 1806:10:59, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 1785:16:05, 12 April 2007 (UTC) 1769:08:33, 12 April 2007 (UTC) 1760:04:12, 12 April 2007 (UTC) 1710:. Is it really necessary? 1514:Category:Nintendo DS games 1509:Category:Nintendo DS games 1404:Category:Nintendo DS games 1381:Category:Nintendo DS games 1117:Heh, that is pretty cool! 865:19:58, 31 March 2007 (UTC) 827:to complement the current 739:00:47, 31 March 2007 (UTC) 708:19:48, 30 March 2007 (UTC) 694:19:36, 30 March 2007 (UTC) 667:19:05, 30 March 2007 (UTC) 639:Category:Video game people 626:01:59, 31 March 2007 (UTC) 616:08:41, 30 March 2007 (UTC) 570:14:55, 30 March 2007 (UTC) 561:11:31, 30 March 2007 (UTC) 548:05:07, 30 March 2007 (UTC) 537:03:01, 30 March 2007 (UTC) 510:10:29, 29 March 2007 (UTC) 495:16:10, 28 March 2007 (UTC) 472:05:20, 28 March 2007 (UTC) 446:05:17, 28 March 2007 (UTC) 430:03:30, 28 March 2007 (UTC) 346:Change to cvgproj template 330:10:37, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 311:03:21, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 251:18:57, 26 March 2007 (UTC) 217:08:11, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 207:18:51, 26 March 2007 (UTC) 197:14:09, 26 March 2007 (UTC) 176:into seperate pages, like 138:00:04, 26 March 2007 (UTC) 1778:List of Nintendo DS games 1750:23:06, 9 April 2007 (UTC) 1734:00:09, 9 April 2007 (UTC) 1725:18:41, 8 April 2007 (UTC) 1715:09:52, 8 April 2007 (UTC) 1697:19:34, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 1683:Virtua Fighter Characters 1678:00:09, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 1645:16:15, 8 April 2007 (UTC) 1632:21:32, 4 April 2007 (UTC) 1618:17:23, 4 April 2007 (UTC) 1608:17:13, 4 April 2007 (UTC) 1594:17:03, 4 April 2007 (UTC) 1580:22:40, 3 April 2007 (UTC) 1562:11:39, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 1544:11:34, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 1531:09:48, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 1503:06:31, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 1490:05:01, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 1474:01:57, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 1450:00:44, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 1440:11:42, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 1415:00:52, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 1398:22:44, 3 April 2007 (UTC) 1388:21:04, 3 April 2007 (UTC) 1365:22:52, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 1351:01:02, 3 April 2007 (UTC) 1337:22:11, 2 April 2007 (UTC) 1271:05:35, 4 April 2007 (UTC) 1201:01:14, 4 April 2007 (UTC) 1192:00:48, 4 April 2007 (UTC) 1179:17:37, 2 April 2007 (UTC) 1168:17:12, 2 April 2007 (UTC) 1146:What makes a game notable 1122:13:19, 2 April 2007 (UTC) 1075:17:33, 1 April 2007 (UTC) 1062:14:26, 1 April 2007 (UTC) 1048:07:14, 1 April 2007 (UTC) 1025:11:00, 1 April 2007 (UTC) 996:09:09, 1 April 2007 (UTC) 972:09:06, 1 April 2007 (UTC) 942:08:26, 1 April 2007 (UTC) 927:07:52, 1 April 2007 (UTC) 883:07:07, 1 April 2007 (UTC) 805:18:42, 2 April 2007 (UTC) 790:18:35, 2 April 2007 (UTC) 777:18:27, 2 April 2007 (UTC) 752:17:55, 2 April 2007 (UTC) 530:Category:Video game flops 525:Category:Video game flops 519:03:51, 2 April 2007 (UTC) 350:Made some changes to the 340:10:10, 3 April 2007 (UTC) 226:13:02, 3 April 2007 (UTC) 3256:Category:Fair use sounds 2526:had a picture of a dog. 580:Any Help Is Appreciated! 404:for a full description. 368:, which currently means 360:template. The parameter 256:Devil May Cry Task Force 3404:Well, I think that the 2148:Silent Hill Task force? 2049:Copyright violation of 1496:Category:Xbox 360 games 1322:Comparison of Wii Games 849:Comparison of Wii Games 824:Comparison of Wii Games 676:I made a comment here: 606:List of Wii Wi-Fi games 596:to create some sort of 586:Comparison of Wii Games 438:. And welcome, sir! ♣ 3207:of info we have now.-- 2998: 2836: 2502:Free main page images? 2011:Thanks, good edits. -- 1408:Category:DS-only games 1406:. Please, if you add 1374:Category:DS-only games 1097: 873:Game Guide definitions 715:pricing in video games 362:|tf=Name of task force 3031:XXX: megapr0n version 2993: 2834: 2379:Thanks. I found it.-- 2189:over the past month. 1287:is getting ready for 1096: 623:NiGHTS into Dreams... 486:, which can be found 402:Template talk:Cvgproj 42:of past discussions. 3292:Scope of task forces 2656:♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫ 2187:Silent Hill: Origins 2037:MJOLNIR battle armor 2032:Mjolnir battle armor 1559:♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫ 1541:♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫ 1437:♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫ 1014:how to beat the game 984:how to beat the game 558:♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫ 159:User:Tristam/sandbox 127:Tony Hawk's (series) 3490:WikiProject Council 1213:User:A Man In Black 1211:Hmm, it seems that 899:instruction manuals 847:be merged into the 3607:• 2007-04-20 23:53 3528:• 2007-04-24 00:44 3421:• 2007-04-19 20:14 3358:• 2007-04-19 18:19 3319:• 2007-04-19 17:06 2999: 2837: 2425:• 2007-04-13 23:37 2233:Requested articles 1672:A Link to the Past 1185:Marble Blast Ultra 1160:Marble Blast Ultra 1098: 1053:Founder of Project 1042:A Link to the Past 416:• 2007-03-27 19:21 292:Hwang Seong-gyeong 245:A Link to the Past 115:Spore (video game) 3608: 3529: 3514:images task force 3422: 3359: 3320: 3150:Supreme Commander 3089: 3088: 3084: 3072: 3007:Supreme Commander 2980: 2979: 2975: 2948: 2885:relevant category 2802:Gyakuten Saiban 3 2776:Gyakuten Saiban 3 2426: 2202:; it's horrible. 1741:No, it is a very 1567:clean-up required 1284:List of Wii games 1269: 1237: 1236:• 2007-04-2 17:48 1153:Marble Blast Gold 1139: 1138:• 2007-04-2 13:49 1113: 1112:• 2007-04-2 09:49 994: 829:List of Wii games 632:Video game people 590:List of Wii games 470: 417: 390:images task force 143:Raw material for 103: 102: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 3636: 3621: 3616: 3605: 3600: 3596: 3584: 3583: 3542: 3537: 3526: 3521: 3517: 3503: 3498: 3460: 3455: 3419: 3414: 3410: 3356: 3351: 3347: 3338: 3333: 3317: 3312: 3308: 3306: 3300: 3268: 3263: 3238: 3183:layouts). Meow. 3131: 3080: 3068: 3061: 3060: 2972:OFLC (Australia) 2955: 2941: 2930: 2919: 2908: 2899: 2893: 2892: 2558:derivative works 2423: 2418: 2414: 2222: 2219: 2216: 2162: 2159: 2156: 2139:FrozenPurpleCube 1984: 1816: 1782:FrozenPurpleCube 1731:guitarhero777777 1604: 1525: 1524: 1468: 1467: 1259: 1257: 1234: 1229: 1225: 1136: 1131: 1127: 1110: 1105: 1101: 1089: 1083: 1021: 990: 938: 925: 922: 916: 910: 761:Xbox Live Arcade 737: 734: 728: 722: 701:Xbox Live Arcade 460: 458: 414: 409: 405: 359: 353: 304:Seong Han Myeong 240:Kirby Super Star 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 3644: 3643: 3639: 3638: 3637: 3635: 3634: 3633: 3619: 3614: 3603: 3598: 3581: 3558: 3540: 3535: 3524: 3519: 3501: 3496: 3458: 3453: 3417: 3412: 3354: 3349: 3336: 3331: 3315: 3310: 3304: 3298: 3294: 3280: 3266: 3261: 3231: 3130:Scottie_theNerd 3129: 3065:Release date(s) 2947: 2936: 2925: 2914: 2903: 2897:Release date(s) 2824: 2772: 2504: 2479:195.169.224.219 2475: 2463:Playstationdude 2455: 2421: 2416: 2399: 2329: 2279:Playstationdude 2274: 2235: 2220: 2217: 2214: 2160: 2157: 2154: 2150: 2085: 2034: 1983:Scottie_theNerd 1982: 1815:Scottie_theNerd 1814: 1792: 1704: 1685: 1664: 1603:Scottie_theNerd 1602: 1587: 1569: 1522: 1465: 1377: 1279: 1253: 1232: 1227: 1209: 1148: 1134: 1129: 1108: 1103: 1091: 1087: 1081: 1055: 1035: 1020:Scottie_theNerd 1019: 937:Scottie_theNerd 936: 924: 920: 914: 908: 906: 875: 819: 736: 732: 726: 720: 718: 686:Virtual Console 674: 634: 582: 527: 480: 454: 423: 412: 407: 394:|screenshot=yes 357: 351: 348: 320: 280: 258: 236: 181:Kaori Nishidake 173: 155:Ocarina of Time 151: 108: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3642: 3632: 3631: 3630: 3629: 3628: 3627: 3557: 3556:A new big task 3554: 3553: 3552: 3551: 3550: 3549: 3548: 3471: 3470: 3469: 3468: 3467: 3466: 3363: 3362: 3361: 3360: 3293: 3290: 3279: 3276: 3275: 3274: 3230: 3227: 3226: 3225: 3224: 3223: 3222: 3221: 3220: 3219: 3193: 3192: 3191: 3190: 3180: 3179: 3178: 3087: 3086: 3074: 3039:New York Times 2978: 2977: 2970: 2965: 2960: 2949: 2946: 2945: 2934: 2923: 2912: 2900: 2829: 2828: 2823: 2820: 2818: 2816: 2815: 2771: 2768: 2767: 2766: 2765: 2764: 2763: 2762: 2731: 2730: 2729: 2728: 2715: 2714: 2713: 2712: 2711: 2710: 2709: 2708: 2686: 2685: 2684: 2683: 2682: 2681: 2664: 2663: 2662: 2661: 2639: 2638: 2637: 2636: 2635: 2634: 2633: 2632: 2631: 2630: 2605: 2604: 2603: 2602: 2601: 2600: 2599: 2598: 2578: 2577: 2576: 2575: 2574: 2573: 2549: 2548: 2547: 2546: 2534: 2533: 2503: 2500: 2499: 2498: 2474: 2469: 2454: 2451: 2449: 2438: 2437: 2398: 2395: 2394: 2393: 2392: 2391: 2374: 2373: 2328: 2325: 2324: 2323: 2322: 2321: 2273: 2270: 2262:Okay, thanks. 2260: 2259: 2234: 2231: 2230: 2229: 2228: 2227: 2196: 2182: 2181: 2149: 2146: 2145: 2144: 2133: 2132: 2131: 2130: 2120: 2084: 2081: 2071: 2070: 2053: 2033: 2030: 2029: 2028: 2027: 2026: 2006: 2005: 1991: 1990: 1973: 1972: 1928: 1927: 1906: 1905: 1892: 1891: 1878: 1877: 1867: 1866: 1846: 1845: 1839: 1832: 1831: 1830: 1829: 1823: 1822: 1791: 1788: 1774: 1773: 1772: 1771: 1743:indiscriminate 1739: 1738: 1737: 1736: 1703: 1700: 1684: 1681: 1663: 1656: 1654: 1652: 1651: 1650: 1649: 1648: 1647: 1638:Frank Klepacki 1610: 1586: 1583: 1568: 1565: 1551: 1550: 1549: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1535:Furthurmore, " 1533: 1482: 1481: 1480: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1476: 1400: 1376: 1371: 1370: 1369: 1368: 1367: 1354: 1353: 1278: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1243: 1242: 1208: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1194: 1181: 1147: 1144: 1143: 1142: 1141: 1140: 1090: 1079: 1078: 1077: 1054: 1051: 1034: 1031: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1027: 975: 974: 965: 964: 963: 960: 954: 953: 950:our guidelines 945: 944: 930: 929: 912: 874: 871: 869: 818: 817:Merge Proposal 815: 814: 813: 812: 811: 810: 809: 808: 807: 756: 755: 754: 724: 673: 670: 633: 630: 629: 628: 581: 578: 577: 576: 575: 574: 573: 572: 526: 523: 522: 521: 512: 479: 476: 475: 474: 448: 422: 419: 347: 344: 343: 342: 319: 314: 300:Hong Yun-seong 279: 276: 257: 254: 235: 232: 231: 230: 229: 228: 219: 172: 166: 150: 141: 131: 130: 124: 118: 107: 104: 101: 100: 95: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3641: 3626: 3623: 3622: 3617: 3610: 3609: 3606: 3601: 3593: 3592: 3591: 3588: 3585: 3578: 3573: 3572: 3571: 3570: 3567: 3563: 3547: 3544: 3543: 3538: 3531: 3530: 3527: 3522: 3515: 3510: 3509: 3508: 3505: 3504: 3499: 3491: 3486: 3485: 3484: 3483: 3480: 3476: 3465: 3462: 3461: 3456: 3449: 3445: 3441: 3437: 3433: 3428: 3427:Final Fantasy 3424: 3423: 3420: 3415: 3407: 3403: 3402: 3401: 3398: 3394: 3390: 3389: 3388: 3387: 3384: 3380: 3379:Nintendo Wars 3376: 3372: 3368: 3357: 3352: 3345: 3344: 3343: 3340: 3339: 3334: 3327: 3323: 3322: 3321: 3318: 3313: 3303: 3302:WPCVG Sidebar 3289: 3288: 3285: 3273: 3270: 3269: 3264: 3257: 3253: 3249: 3248: 3247: 3246: 3243: 3237: 3218: 3214: 3210: 3206: 3201: 3200: 3199: 3198: 3197: 3196: 3195: 3194: 3189: 3186: 3181: 3177: 3173: 3170: 3166: 3162: 3159: 3155: 3151: 3147: 3146: 3145: 3142: 3138: 3137: 3136: 3133: 3132: 3125: 3121: 3116: 3111: 3110: 3109: 3108: 3104: 3101: 3097: 3092: 3085: 3083: 3078: 3075: 3073: 3071: 3070:February 2007 3066: 3063: 3062: 3059: 3056: 3054: 3050: 3049: 3042: 3040: 3036: 3032: 3030: 3024: 3020: 3016: 3012: 3011:February 2007 3008: 3004: 2997: 2992: 2988: 2986: 2976: 2973: 2968: 2963: 2958: 2953: 2950: 2944: 2939: 2935: 2933: 2928: 2924: 2922: 2917: 2913: 2911: 2906: 2902: 2901: 2898: 2895: 2894: 2891: 2888: 2886: 2882: 2879:) and Japan ( 2878: 2874: 2870: 2866: 2862: 2858: 2854: 2850: 2845: 2843: 2833: 2826: 2825: 2819: 2814: 2811: 2810:67.68.154.253 2807: 2803: 2799: 2795: 2794: 2793: 2792: 2789: 2788:216.80.38.172 2785: 2781: 2777: 2761: 2758: 2755: 2752: 2751: 2750: 2747: 2742: 2741: 2740: 2737: 2733: 2732: 2727: 2724: 2719: 2718: 2717: 2716: 2707: 2704: 2703: 2698: 2694: 2693: 2692: 2691: 2690: 2689: 2688: 2687: 2680: 2676: 2675: 2670: 2669: 2668: 2667: 2666: 2665: 2660: 2657: 2653: 2652: 2651: 2647: 2646: 2641: 2640: 2629: 2626: 2625: 2620: 2615: 2614: 2613: 2612: 2611: 2610: 2609: 2608: 2607: 2606: 2597: 2594: 2590: 2586: 2585: 2584: 2583: 2582: 2581: 2580: 2579: 2572: 2569: 2568: 2563: 2559: 2555: 2554: 2553: 2552: 2551: 2550: 2545: 2542: 2538: 2537: 2536: 2535: 2532: 2529: 2525: 2521: 2516: 2515: 2514: 2513: 2510: 2497: 2494: 2490: 2486: 2485: 2484: 2483: 2480: 2473: 2468: 2467: 2464: 2460: 2450: 2447: 2446: 2443: 2436: 2433: 2429: 2428: 2427: 2424: 2419: 2412: 2408: 2404: 2390: 2386: 2382: 2378: 2377: 2376: 2375: 2372: 2368: 2365: 2361: 2357: 2355: 2353: 2350: 2346: 2345: 2344: 2343: 2339: 2335: 2320: 2316: 2312: 2308: 2303: 2302: 2301: 2297: 2294: 2290: 2286: 2285: 2284: 2283: 2280: 2272:Equal Opinion 2269: 2268: 2265: 2258: 2255: 2251: 2246: 2245: 2244: 2243: 2240: 2226: 2223: 2210: 2209: 2208: 2205: 2201: 2197: 2195: 2192: 2188: 2184: 2183: 2180: 2176: 2175: 2169: 2168: 2167: 2166: 2163: 2143: 2140: 2135: 2134: 2129: 2126: 2121: 2119: 2116: 2112: 2111: 2110: 2107: 2103: 2099: 2098: 2097: 2096: 2093: 2089: 2080: 2079: 2076: 2069: 2065: 2062: 2058: 2054: 2052: 2048: 2047: 2046: 2045: 2042: 2038: 2025: 2021: 2018: 2014: 2010: 2009: 2008: 2007: 2004: 2000: 1999: 1993: 1992: 1989: 1986: 1985: 1978: 1975: 1974: 1971: 1968: 1967: 1964: 1959: 1955: 1952: 1948: 1945: 1941: 1937: 1933: 1932:Strong oppose 1930: 1929: 1926: 1922: 1919: 1915: 1911: 1908: 1907: 1904: 1901: 1900:The Kinslayer 1897: 1894: 1893: 1890: 1887: 1883: 1880: 1879: 1876: 1873: 1869: 1868: 1865: 1862: 1858: 1857: 1856: 1855: 1852: 1843: 1840: 1837: 1834: 1833: 1827: 1826: 1825: 1824: 1821: 1818: 1817: 1810: 1809: 1808: 1807: 1804: 1800: 1795: 1787: 1786: 1783: 1779: 1770: 1767: 1763: 1762: 1761: 1758: 1754: 1753: 1752: 1751: 1748: 1744: 1735: 1732: 1728: 1727: 1726: 1723: 1719: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1713: 1709: 1699: 1698: 1695: 1689: 1680: 1679: 1676: 1673: 1669: 1661: 1655: 1646: 1643: 1639: 1635: 1634: 1633: 1629: 1625: 1621: 1620: 1619: 1616: 1611: 1609: 1606: 1605: 1598: 1597: 1596: 1595: 1592: 1582: 1581: 1578: 1574: 1564: 1563: 1560: 1556: 1545: 1542: 1538: 1534: 1532: 1529: 1526: 1519: 1515: 1510: 1506: 1505: 1504: 1501: 1497: 1493: 1492: 1491: 1488: 1483: 1475: 1472: 1469: 1462: 1458: 1453: 1452: 1451: 1448: 1443: 1442: 1441: 1438: 1434: 1430: 1426: 1422: 1418: 1417: 1416: 1413: 1409: 1405: 1401: 1399: 1396: 1392: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1386: 1382: 1375: 1366: 1363: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1352: 1349: 1345: 1341: 1340: 1339: 1338: 1335: 1330: 1328: 1324: 1323: 1318: 1314: 1310: 1305: 1303: 1302: 1297: 1293: 1291: 1286: 1285: 1272: 1267: 1263: 1258: 1256: 1249: 1245: 1244: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1235: 1230: 1223: 1218: 1214: 1202: 1199: 1195: 1193: 1190: 1186: 1182: 1180: 1177: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1166: 1162: 1161: 1155: 1154: 1137: 1132: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1120: 1116: 1115: 1114: 1111: 1106: 1095: 1086: 1076: 1073: 1069: 1066: 1065: 1064: 1063: 1060: 1050: 1049: 1046: 1043: 1039: 1026: 1023: 1022: 1015: 1011: 1007: 1003: 999: 998: 997: 993: 989: 985: 981: 977: 976: 973: 970: 966: 961: 958: 957: 956: 955: 951: 947: 946: 943: 940: 939: 932: 931: 928: 923: 917: 911: 904: 900: 896: 891: 887: 886: 885: 884: 881: 870: 867: 866: 863: 859: 858: 852: 850: 846: 842: 838: 832: 830: 826: 825: 806: 803: 798: 793: 792: 791: 788: 784: 780: 779: 778: 775: 771: 767: 762: 757: 753: 750: 746: 742: 741: 740: 735: 729: 723: 716: 711: 710: 709: 706: 702: 698: 697: 696: 695: 692: 687: 683: 679: 669: 668: 665: 660: 656: 652: 648: 644: 640: 627: 624: 620: 619: 618: 617: 614: 609: 607: 603: 599: 595: 591: 587: 571: 568: 564: 563: 562: 559: 555: 551: 550: 549: 546: 541: 540: 539: 538: 535: 531: 520: 517: 513: 511: 508: 504: 499: 498: 497: 496: 493: 489: 485: 473: 468: 464: 459: 457: 449: 447: 443: 442: 437: 434: 433: 432: 431: 428: 418: 415: 410: 403: 399: 395: 391: 387: 383: 379: 375: 374:Devil May Cry 371: 367: 363: 356: 341: 338: 334: 333: 332: 331: 328: 325: 318: 313: 312: 309: 305: 301: 297: 293: 289: 284: 275: 274: 273: 272: 266: 265: 253: 252: 249: 246: 242: 241: 234:Current GCOTW 227: 224: 220: 218: 215: 210: 209: 208: 205: 201: 200: 199: 198: 195: 191: 188: 186: 182: 179: 170: 165: 164: 160: 156: 148: 147: 140: 139: 136: 128: 125: 122: 119: 116: 113: 112: 111: 99: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 3612: 3559: 3533: 3494: 3472: 3451: 3447: 3443: 3439: 3434:, which has 3426: 3374: 3364: 3329: 3295: 3281: 3259: 3232: 3128: 3114: 3093: 3090: 3079: 3076: 3067: 3064: 3057: 3052: 3046: 3043: 3027: 3003:Lead section 3000: 2981: 2954: 2951: 2896: 2889: 2851:) and five ( 2846: 2838: 2817: 2773: 2700: 2673: 2644: 2622: 2565: 2505: 2476: 2456: 2448: 2439: 2403:Thunderbrand 2400: 2330: 2275: 2261: 2236: 2173: 2151: 2101: 2086: 2072: 2041:Fredrick day 2035: 1997: 1981: 1976: 1961: 1936:on the whole 1935: 1931: 1909: 1895: 1881: 1872:Fredrick day 1847: 1841: 1835: 1813: 1796: 1793: 1775: 1757:67.68.155.18 1740: 1705: 1690: 1686: 1665: 1653: 1601: 1588: 1577:Fredrick day 1570: 1552: 1536: 1432: 1424: 1395:Thunderbrand 1378: 1343: 1331: 1320: 1306: 1299: 1288: 1282: 1280: 1254: 1210: 1158: 1151: 1149: 1119:Thunderbrand 1099: 1056: 1036: 1018: 1013: 1005: 983: 935: 902: 898: 895:WP:NOT#IINFO 876: 868: 855: 853: 833: 822: 820: 796: 783:encyclopedia 782: 769: 765: 675: 635: 610: 583: 528: 502: 481: 455: 440: 427:Cocopopz2005 424: 397: 393: 386:Tycoon games 361: 349: 321: 281: 270: 269: 263: 259: 238: 237: 192: 189: 174: 154: 152: 144: 132: 109: 78: 43: 37: 3252:Fair use in 3229:Audio clips 3165:User:Krator 3096:User:Krator 3029:Guitar Hero 2453:Wikiproject 2360:User:Krator 2289:User:Krator 2264:Marasmusine 2250:Special:Log 2239:Marasmusine 2204:Marasmusine 2191:Marasmusine 2057:User:Krator 2013:User:Krator 1914:User:Krator 1459:instead. - 1296:Peer Review 1165:Oscarthecat 1068:Greyengine5 903:instructing 492:Rubberkeith 337:Oscarthecat 296:Seong Mi-na 267:. Cheers! - 185:Elise Riggs 36:This is an 3479:hbdragon88 3425:True, our 3383:hbdragon88 3017:, or even 2985:Kijkwijzer 2943:2007-02-23 2932:2007-02-22 2921:2007-02-20 2910:2007-02-16 2723:hbdragon88 2528:hbdragon88 2520:Nintendogs 2518:- i.e. if 2442:hbdragon88 2327:Units Sold 2075:hbdragon88 1954:violations 1794:Hi there, 1766:hbdragon88 1747:hbdragon88 1431:says that 1348:hbdragon88 1010:game guide 980:game guide 888:I've read 843:, and the 745:WP:ILIKEIT 682:Wii Points 664:Scarykitty 398:|cover=yes 223:At0m1Ca 14 214:At0m1Ca 14 194:At0m1Ca 14 98:Archive 30 90:Archive 27 85:Archive 26 79:Archive 25 73:Archive 24 68:Archive 23 60:Archive 20 3185:DJ Barney 3124:MobyGames 3077:Rating(s) 2952:Rating(s) 2591:concert? 2539:Fan art? 1951:guideline 1861:Mattyatty 1722:Mattyatty 1694:Sharpevil 1692:start. - 1500:Exitmoose 1447:Exitmoose 1429:WP:SUBCAT 1427:, though 1412:Exitmoose 1362:Digiwrld1 1334:Digiwrld1 1327:Talk Page 1319:into the 1252:A Man In 1198:Exitmoose 909:Mitaphane 862:Digiwrld1 770:in points 721:Mitaphane 613:Digiwrld1 503:identical 453:A Man In 324:Canderous 308:Exitmoose 288:Mitsurugi 283:Bethereds 264:talk page 3566:RobJ1981 3475:WP:CVG/D 3432:WP:ZELDA 3397:RobJ1981 3326:Inactive 3284:.:Alex:. 3242:Arganoid 3205:mosh pit 3120:GameFAQs 2407:WP:GCOTW 1944:numerous 1851:Davnel03 1803:Davnel03 1662:article. 1591:Xsoldier 1487:RobJ1981 1332:Thanks! 1290:Featured 1266:past ops 1262:conspire 1002:GameFAQs 986:does. -- 890:articles 787:RobJ1981 749:RobJ1981 705:RobJ1981 691:RobJ1981 598:Triforce 545:RobJ1981 467:past ops 463:conspire 204:RobJ1981 178:Tricky's 135:RobJ1981 3141:Teggles 3115:Release 3015:Q1 2007 2757:Kariteh 2746:Zeality 2736:Kariteh 2674:Klptyzm 2645:Klptyzm 2593:Kariteh 2541:Kariteh 2509:Zeality 2493:Dancter 2401:OK, so 2332:them.-- 2254:Garrett 2174:Klptyzm 2125:Dancter 2115:Dancter 2106:Slordak 2092:Dancter 1998:Klptyzm 1963:Deckill 1886:Slordak 1712:Kariteh 1642:Zeality 1615:Slordak 1455:to see 1385:Kariteh 1189:Garrett 1085:Qxz-ads 1072:RockMFR 880:IL-Kuma 802:Slordak 774:Slordak 659:WP:BOLD 567:RockMFR 534:RockMFR 507:Garrett 441:Klptyzm 421:Joining 355:cvgproj 163:Tristam 149:article 39:archive 3577:hahnch 3371:WP:PCP 3367:WP:NES 3158:before 3023:Brunei 2959:: E10+ 1977:Oppose 1956:. See 1947:policy 1910:Oppose 1896:Oppose 1882:Oppose 1849:mean. 1842:CREATE 1836:DELETE 1675:(talk) 1660:Sudoku 1518:hahnch 1461:hahnch 1421:WP:CAT 1315:, and 1292:status 1045:(talk) 988:tjstrf 969:Nifboy 897:under 839:, the 766:always 400:. See 384:, and 378:Konami 370:Capcom 248:(talk) 171:Update 3620:shtak 3615:Pagra 3604:PLANE 3541:shtak 3536:Pagra 3525:PLANE 3502:shtak 3497:Pagra 3459:shtak 3454:Pagra 3448:Zelda 3444:Zelda 3440:Zelda 3418:PLANE 3355:PLANE 3337:shtak 3332:Pagra 3316:PLANE 3267:shtak 3262:Pagra 3209:Clyde 3161:after 3035:China 2964:: 12+ 2865:ELSPA 2806:WP:OR 2589:Play! 2432:Steel 2422:PLANE 2381:Clyde 2334:Clyde 2311:Clyde 2215:Neur0 2155:Neur0 1960:. — 1624:Clyde 1423:says 1344:a lot 1255:Bl♟ck 1233:PLANE 1176:PresN 1135:PLANE 1109:PLANE 1059:Bowsy 1038:here! 516:PresN 488:here. 456:Bl♟ck 413:PLANE 169:SSX 3 16:< 3599:JACO 3520:JACO 3413:JACO 3375:that 3369:vs. 3350:JACO 3311:JACO 3213:talk 3126:. -- 3019:2007 2996:Kiss 2969:: 12 2962:PEGI 2957:ESRB 2881:CERO 2877:OFLC 2873:PEGI 2869:BBFC 2857:ESRB 2849:AOE3 2784:here 2778:and 2702:Talk 2624:Talk 2567:Talk 2489:here 2459:here 2417:JACO 2385:talk 2338:talk 2315:talk 2307:here 2104:? -- 1949:and 1940:GFDL 1670:. - 1668:here 1628:talk 1573:this 1301:here 1281:The 1228:JACO 1130:JACO 1104:JACO 992:talk 978:Per 684:and 649:and 604:and 592:and 436:Here 408:JACO 396:and 382:Sega 327:Ordo 183:and 3122:or 3082:12+ 3033:in 3021:if 2974:: M 2967:USK 2927:KOR 2871:or 2861:USK 2853:FFX 2842:USK 2697:TKD 2619:TKD 2562:TKD 2218:tik 2158:tik 1329:.) 759:as 306:-- 271:DDF 187:. 3305:}} 3299:{{ 3258:. 3215:) 3174:) 3163:-- 3105:) 3094:-- 3055:. 2938:AU 2916:NA 2905:EU 2887:. 2867:, 2863:, 2699::: 2677:♣ 2648:♣ 2621::: 2564::: 2491:. 2387:) 2369:) 2340:) 2317:) 2298:) 2177:♣ 2066:) 2022:) 2001:♣ 1966:er 1923:) 1630:) 1383:? 1311:, 1264:| 1088:}} 1082:{{ 1040:- 1006:do 851:. 800:-- 797:is 465:| 444:♣ 380:, 376:, 372:, 358:}} 352:{{ 302:, 298:, 294:, 94:→ 64:← 3587:n 3582:e 3211:( 3172:c 3169:t 3167:( 3103:c 3100:t 3098:( 2940:: 2929:: 2918:: 2907:: 2461:. 2383:( 2367:c 2364:t 2362:( 2336:( 2313:( 2296:c 2293:t 2291:( 2221:X 2161:X 2064:c 2061:t 2059:( 2020:c 2017:t 2015:( 1921:c 1918:t 1916:( 1626:( 1528:n 1523:e 1471:n 1466:e 1268:) 1260:( 921:! 918:| 915:? 860:. 733:! 730:| 727:? 469:) 461:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

talk:WikiProject Video games/Archive 25 - Knowledge

Index