Knowledge talk:WikiProject Video games/Archive 23

4234:

articles to reviews is frankly a little silly. Reviews by definition are supposed to be telling you about the game and specifically is it good or not in the context of deciding whether to purchase it. They are obviously not supposed to tell you the plot in too much detail because that would defeat the purpose of the review. Encyclopaedia articles are not reviews and their primary purpose is to sumarise the info about the game, including relevant history, background, plot details, review details, reception (including criticism) etc. A reader may be someone who has never played the game and therefore may want a resonable summary of what went on in the game or perhaps someone that played the game & wants to know remember it. A reader who is intending to play a game (I've done it before), may choose to read the article to get a basic understanding of what the game is about but they will of course avoid any likely spoilers (which is why proper tagging is important). I agree, it depends a lot on the game. Some games types, adventure games and RPGs obviously have more detailed plots. And of course the level of detail various between RPGs and adventures as well. Obviously there is no need to go into every nuance of what happened but on the other hand, it's not sufficient try and describe a detailed plot in 200 words either

3649:

documented and stresses unique facets of the game's structure. The game's very unique audio presentations and styles are emphasized, and samples are given. To summarize, there is a lot of good, out-of-universe information here which covers every part of the game. Let's move to the plot. Would some of you call that too much? It summarizes every major arc, from Oedo Town to Zazen Town to Kyushu and the North. I left out a lot of fetch quests, but major character interactions, appearances, and events are represented. Readers who have never played the game will still miss out an the larger experience, but will be able to completely understand the game's plot and drivers. The comprehensiveness of the summary also allows several connections to be made with references in the rest of the article, such as the appearance of "Gorgeous My Stage", the four special abilities, the quirky humor and stye, etc. Okay, I'm rambling, but does the plot section (not counting the out-of-universe information concerning the humor) seem too long?

4214:. Mystical Ninja, Chrono Trigger, Chrono Cross, and Final Fantasy IV are a little too long for my taste, despite them being RPGs. If it's a string of town hopping and fetch quests, then it needs to be brief (one sentence can cover 3-4 towns easily). However, if the game has significant character development and complicated resolutions, they will naturally take more space to succinctly describe. I've worked on plenty of fictional FAs - especially plot sections - and I can say for a fact that the 1,000 word synopsis for a 40 hour RPG is a fine balance, which does not result in objections; on the other hand, a 1,000 word synopsis for a 2 hour shooter will result in significant objection. I do agree with what SeizureDog is saying about items and bosses; this information is unnecessary. The 2424:

deleted. The reasoning behind this activity, as far as I can tell, is that since the character itself is not of Japanese nationality according to in-universe information, then the Katakana is irrelevant regardless of what the character's real-life origins are. Personally, I think that since the characters are properties of Japanese companies and presumably had their names written in Japanese in the original literature, then the Japanese name spellings at least deserve some brief mention within the related article. I have tried discussing this with the editor in question in the discussion page of one of the affected articles (

1672:: the title of it lists it as video games. Not everything is a video game itself. Video game content (such as characters and so on): should be labelled differently, rather than just a cluttered mess. A CD for Pikmin was listed: I removed it, but I can imagine Man in Black will re-add it for no reason. Not everyone is a video game expert, and there is absolutely no need to clutter anything and everything related to the subject in the template. Then labelling it just simply as "video games" isn't helping either. Man in Black needs to accept change from others more, instead of just reverting what he thinks is wrong. 3702:

immediately tried the idea on Final Fantasy VIII while Ryu and Silence worked on expanding the X article's summary appropriately, and I believe we met in the middle very nicely with both articles. This was followed by a series of FA pushes (including VIII and a retaining of X's featured status), which allowed us to publicize this concept without much resistance; this surprised us (heck, we got more resistance from the lack of spoiler warnings). However, I do believe there is a balance point that needs to be made, especially with the new emphasis on "reasonably short" plot summaries. With

3687:(though an overall Mortal Kombat franchise article might suffer this difficulty). As many of you can and probably will argue, however, role-playing games often have deep, complex plots. Comparing them to literature and such is something for another time, but if we can agree that the plots of RPGs can be just as engrossing and expansive as the plots of literary works, then perhaps we can agree that RPG plot summaries can, without harsh scrutiny and on the condition that out-of-universe information is represented, include major arcs in a comprehensive plot summary. -- 3641:

starting to get antsy about the summaries' possibly being too large, and I've personally encountered some resistance in the FAC process. So let's settle this with an argument and discussion. I am personally in favor of the large, complete summaries Ryu Kaze made precedent for. Featured Article criteria 1.b states that articles should not neglect major facts or details. The general style of writing has been to include major plot arcs with enough details that the reader may have a competent understanding of plot cause and resolution. To cite an example, I'll use

31: 3162:

basis, I think the reviews are toast for FFC and GGA, and I'll be wary of GamePro in the future. If someone can confirm that "UNCLEDUST" or "THED-PADDESTROYER" are accredited employees of GamePro and competent reviewers, we'll be getting somewhere. But if more eloquent reviews from less notable sites are going to be challenged in CVG articles, these abysmal one-shots by anonymous posters should be left out as well. I guess we need some insight here on how their review system works. --

3719:

character designs, etc. This allows us to explain the plot in that succinct manner while balancing in and out of universe information for the setting/characters/plot supersection. This might not make more sense, but it's basically saying that we carry on what we are doing with the RPG setting/character/story sections, but with an added emphasis on out of universe, developers inforation for the first two sections. This looks good in the eyes of reviewers. —

1827:

mentioned: confirmed games (not released yet) are being removed from templates by AMIB as well. If the game is notable enough for an article here, it certainly should be in the template. Why wait until later to add it? It does no harm at all to put it in the template. Templates deserve sections to actually be navigation tools. This standard appearance is clutter and not helping navigate much.

3131:

and horrible load times. Has anyone else encountered this, and can we write off reviews like this as...well, stupid? Looking back at Goemon's Great Adventure's GamePro review, the guy makes some vague, passing criticisms; it too seems to be user-submitted. His criticisms of the game are also way out of line with the general gaming press's. What gives? --

3744:

creature in Final Fantasy XII). Perhaps a short way of putting it is that "if the plot summary can provide the reader with a general idea of the major plot progression points from start to finish in the shortest manner, then it is comprehensive and focused". Focus is another big FA criterion being taken into account; for instance, the article

1438:

very short sections. Lists should be avoided at all costs. But with a proper link to the same section of the original game's article, it's not going to be a disaster if "Synopsis" and "Gameplay" are a tad short. Even a short article can be good, as long as it has a good amount of references, is well written and covers everything noteworthy.

927:, it's now a sortable table and looks, IMHO, much better than similar list of games that we have, so I propose to change the other lists to something similar. But before I start I'd rather ask if I'm the only one that thinks that this is a good idea or not, so here I go. Are there any objections or can the table be improved further? -- 4050:, especially since just scanning it gives me such trivial information like "Lily appears to ridicule the party, but is rudely interrupted by Dancin', who continues to call Goemon "Fernandez". Honestly, this article is like having an annoying friend trying to tell "all the funny" parts of a comedy film, and taking 30 minutes to do so. 3844:. That's right, easy. Why? Because you have so much easily accessable information to work with that you can just write as much as you want. It's harder to condense all that information while still remaining broad. You don't need 1000 pages to write a summary for a 1000 page book; you can do it in 1000 words. If you can't, you're not 2664:, which no indication as to what (if any) influence Taki has had beyond the game itself. If the rest of the articles are like this, I would recommend the in-game information be removed and they are merged into a list. (That all reads rather harshly, I'm aware. Please nobody take it personally; this would be a very good article for a 1026:"A video game console is an interactive entertainment computer. The term is used to distinguish a machine designed for consumers to buy and use solely for playing video games from a personal computer, which has many other functions, or arcade games, which are designed for businesses that buy and then charge others to play." 520: 1642:

more links from the templates. Individually, each of these changes might make sense, but as a whole, they are reducing the usefulness of these navigation templates. Apparently these collective changes have been deemed "standarized" by some. I don't see consensus anywhere for this illogical standard. ---

4233:

I don't edit video game articles much. However I do tend to like and play games with good stories, not generally Japanese RPGs, but more American & European RPGs as well as more tradional style adventure games. In my opinion we should have resonable detailed plot summaries. Comparing encylopaedia

4218:

article doesn't explain "First, Samus went into Brinstar to get the morph ball. Then, she traveled to where the large shaft was in the original metroid to get missiles. Then, she scaled Old Touria and went back to Crateria..."; that's gameguide. The Final Fantasy articles, with an exception being IV,

3027:

article be for the video game character. Fromwhat I have seen, at least one of the oppose voters is voting against it just because it's a video game character (one of his comments was something like "it's a video game character, no one will remember him in 15 years). Just thought some of you might be

1973:

Thanks. I was just using the Final Fantasy Pages as an example, since there's more albums for them than on any other particular series, and I certainly don't want to start sticking articles together if people had already decided it was a bad idea. It's just a solution I thought would cut down on the

1641:

I've said this before, but my message seems to have gotten lost in the shouting — why are all of these templates being changed to "SERIES_NAME video games"? I've seen certain users in this project change the header to say "video games" and remove the labels, and then they use that to justify removing

1466:

That would probably suffice, unless the expansion changes the feel or balance of gameplay significantly (e.g. an RTS expansion adding a new resource type). As for story, it should be possible to say something like "ABC continues the story of XYZ by adding the backstory of 123 and adding more missions

571:

For the record, I'm opposed to the change. I just saw many game developer bios changed to "Video game designer," but in my opinion this is not an appropriate category for them. MUD developers, casual game developers, MMORPG developers -- "video game" isn't right. In the game development community,

451:

Anyone care to comment? My Resident Evil template edit was reverted for no good reason. When the template is clearly called Resident Evil video games: movies and so on should NOT be listed or should have a clear note by it. Simply leaving it as it is now, isn't helping. I dont see why certain people

4121:

If it's necessary to cover a certain detail of the story, because someone who hasn't played the game yet wouldn't get the summary otherwise, it should be mentioned. If that requires a description of "This happened, so this guy goes and does this, and this, and this, and this, and this, and this...",

3752:

As an example, say a party travels from City A to City D. Along the way, they pass Cities B and C, where they rest and discuss their past. If part of that past has information relevant to the story later on, then it should be mentioned; otherwise, the entire situation can be left out to be descriped

3552:

I'm thinking that we should probably repeal that guideline for a little while and have some more discussion on it. I completely missed out on it the first time around and there seems to be multiple instances where A Man In Black's implimenting it is causing complaints. In my opinion, navboxes should

3130:

out. There's one just like it for Goemon's Great Adventure. They appear to be user-written, and seem to feature little evidence that the author had more than a passing interest or played the game more than a few minutes. The reviewer utterly and completely misses the fact that FFC has new cut scenes

1524:

Wow, there's a lot of ground to cover. I seem to recall there being controversy over some particularly erroneous guides; IIRC that's what made them start releasing their so-called "web updates" (which is in reality a way to satiate customers by providing pages with corrected information). I think it

1437:

I'm sure it's possible. It's simply too hard for some people to do, and expansion packs usually don't get as much attention as the original game. Still, as for "Reception" and "Development", they can have their own sections. Only "Gameplay" and "Synopsis" might have a chance of ending up in lists or

553:

I'm all for renaming the Wikiproject as well. It's bad form for us to not use the policy that we use in our articles and could confuse a lot of newcomers. All of the old redirects and such can still be used of course. Plus, those twelve extra characters do sort of make the project title kinda longer

510:

Well he is is predicting that the characters will be in the game which is a no no because with out sources to back it up it is just OR. once the person finds valid sources for his claims then he can add the data to the article however untill then, the data should be removed. If he continues to do so

113:

anyways i remember this game that was ganna come out i think for PS2 that had to do with dating and fighting. you took the girls on a date and then you had to fight a monster or something . think it was called white blade or something with the word blade in it for the PS2 i just cant remember it. it

3230:

I think that the real question here is whether we should make this an issue om GA/FA nominations. If the reception section uses sources that are not professional, that might be grounds to oppose the nomination. Perhaps we should as a WikiProject compile a list (and we shouldn't be nazis about this

2929:

I think arcade games, while of course most are still video games, have a bit of a different stigma attached in that the whole way you have to pay for them. And there are plenty of arcade games that aren't video games -- Ski Ball and Pinball for starters. You do have a good point though, and I agree

2423:

Hi, I have recently noticed that someone has been removing the Katakana renderings of various characters' names from Japanese-made video games from their respective articles. In most cases, only characters that are supposed to be of Korean nationality have had the Japanese renderings of their names

2344:

Just as the discussion suggests, these are definitely two different breeds of RPG's. The unfortunate problem is both of the articles lack sources (though they definitely exist out there). I'd look for sourcing covering the difference between the two types, rather then trying to merge the two to fit

1826:

A new discussion about templates needs to happen, in my opinion. A Man in Black is just going revert crazy on many of them. "Standard appearance" is a cluttered mess, and you can't even tell the differences between games, films, game characters and other things alot of the time. Also it needs to be

1235:

These are definitely AFD fodder. All of these should probably be changed to redirects or deleted altogether. At first glance I'm not sure whether any of the content should be merged. It is worth salvaging? I'm thinking not but maybe someone more familiar with the game could comment. For now, I

1002:

Wow, I'm glad that the impressions are positive, but I cannot take all the credit; there have been some very helpful people (ContiE, Telvin3D, just to name a couple) who have contributed greatly and given much input to make the list what it is now. So if anything I am indebted for all of their help

882:

Someone might disparage the Joystiq and Kotaku cites given the bloggish design of their sites, but it seems the RS clause discouraging blogs is as regards their generally self-publishing nature and their lack of editorial oversight, concerns which I don't really think apply here. That said, I'm all

4391:

I believe I've mentioned this article on here before. It just seems to be a dumping ground for terms and anything that doesn't fit in the other Xenosaga lists. I'm very tempted to AFD it, is there a good reason to keep it? It seems like cruft to me. Throwing together many things just because they

4060:

s plot. At least, that's what I'm guessing. I've seen longer story descriptions, also from FA articles (or sometimes, GA), that I didn't mind reading, while I just couldn't get through way shorter storyline descriptions of other articles, simply because I didn't care about them. I think MNSG has a

3648:

Firstly, what makes the article good? It covers everything available and relevant to readers outside of Konami or the development team. History on both sides of the Pacific is chronicled; critical and fan reception is deeply represented, with all aspects of the game critiqued. Play control is well

3640:

Back in late 2005, Ryu Kaze and his friends completed a slew of Featured Articles. All featured plot summaries that covered all major arcs of the plot, and all articles were supplemented by out of universe information which always outsized the fictional sections. However, recently a few people are

3359:

helpful enough for us to delete/not create them? I can understand for some series that might not have more than 5 or so character articles, but for games with large rosters, such as fighters, I think that seperate navboxes need to be created to help aid in navigation and that the responsibility of

3354:

So, is everyone against having character navboxes or something? Personally, I find it annoying as hell to try to browse through all of the characters in a series if I don't have a navbox to help. Lists and categories are ugly and require more steps. Is there any real reason that character navboxes

2826:

I would suggest changing all to (video game) considering our new rules unless there are multiple articles of the same name. From what I've seen this can be for different platforms, in which case the platform could be put in parentheses, but it could also be a different game with the same title, in

1767:

out-of-hand templates we had before, and I think it's hard to argue that a standardized appearance hasn't helped the overall quality of VG navboxes. Of course, things can always be improved, so I think if we're going to discuss any shortcomings of the current standard we ought to form a new set of

1262:

I personally use PC box art for most multi-platform games, basically because there isn't a really fuckugly banner across the top with the words XCubeStation written across it. It also means that there is more space for the actual box art. I have uploaded over previous versions of box art with PC

392:

Many templates already have lists to characters, creatures, villains, etc. It just so happens that Duke Nukem only has one majro character, and lacks a "list of" that would be put in place. Those are still within the video game context - they are relevent to the video games - and I don't see any

4520:. An absolute joke: the list was put in AFD with no consensus, and attempts to clean it aren't helping much. And now there is suggested splits for it? Knowledge is turning more and more into a crufty item guide. It's too soon to AFD it again, but I think that's what needs to happen in the future. 4076:

either. I kinda want to know what it's about, but if I read what it has I'll probably regret it. Which brings me to another good point: short summaries serves as a happy middle ground between people who like spoilers and people who hate them. If it's short, you can still spoil as much as you need

3714:

have the best balance between plot summary and game/script length, but it's not an exact science. These were the first two that the idea was tested out on, and based on percentages, it seemed to be the best balance. I'm not sure about the Chronos though, because I didn't take a look at the script

3660:

This one is laughable. An article can't be comprehensive if it castrates summaries into brief outlines with a link to Wikisource. You would not summarize Moby Dick with a bulleted list of ten or 15 bullets. On that note, this suggestion hilarious sounds like an admonition to use lists, which is a

3151:

A question and comment. First the question: what exactly does this have to do with articles on Knowledge? You didn't say anything such as "should we not list GamePro reviews in articles?" or so on. My comment is: just because GamePro's reviews aren't liked, doesn't mean they shouldn't be listed.

1631:

Let's see. The template says "video games" on the top. I believe the reader can sumrise that the template is about video games. Therefore, I assume that every listed article is about the video game series. I can see "film" labeled on the third line, which means that those are films, not video

1251:

Since these days, almost all of the games released are cross-platform, there should be some kind of consensus on which box art should be used in articles. Personally. I'd suggest that the "PC" box art be used for all games that have a PC(Windows/OS X/Linux) version. For all other games, I propose

3990:

No, Adventure games are not. Because you have the actual action (gameplay) and the significance of it (story). Adventure games tend to have a lot of text that backs up the gameplay, so no walkthrough-danger. Anyway, that's genre specific, but RPGs and good horror games also need (quite) big plot

2428:), but he/she seems unwilling to compromise. I bring this up because, despite searching through various Knowledge guidelines and naming convention articles, I could not find a specific guideline that applies to this situation. Any insights and advice on this subject would be greatly appreciated. 1224:

Please could someone with knowledge of the policy and subject matter merge, delete or cleanup these articles as appropriate? It is also worth noting that this user is still working on the articles. I have not made contact with them, because this isn't a side of Knowledge I am involved with much.

3733:

Okay, so really a case-by-case basis, then. That sounds good; I suppose we might have to get our hands dirty in the FAC process, but at least I've formed a case here for necessitating good RPG summaries. I need to revise Ryu Kaze's CVG Featured Article guide, as I've got a bunch of new tips for

3718:

I understand your point that we need to argue on the FACs that RPGs have deep stories (because most people who object on story length do not actually read the synopsis). The key is to discuss the setting and characters beforehand from an out of universe perspective; inspiration for the setting,

3701:

came up to Ryu and myself with the featured article review of Final Fantasy X, which is where this concept of comprehensive, full plot summaries came from. Initially, I will admit that I debated with Silence in IM over this issue, but we agreed that comprehensive summaries is the best choice. I

3161:

Yes, I'm wondering if we should use them; I'm currently writing a critical section for Final Fantasy Chronicles. I've no doubt that they pay certain people to review, but come on, "UNCLEDUST" and a one paragraph memorandum failing to note any new features of the game? At least on a case-by-case

2776:

I second removing the Character Analysis sections. I think CVG article guidelines state that overly detailed gameplay descriptions should be avoided, and the character analyses can be considered as such. And yes, the character entries have certainly gotten bloated and are probably due for heavy

1410:

are Good Articles, so you might want to start there. I don't think there have been any expansion packs. The reason for this is probably that they have less content and a smaller audience (not everyone buys them or, in the case of multi-platform games, can even get them) and thus there's less to

3743:

Indeed, it is a case by case basis; some games have large character backstories that mean nothing to the plot; other games have huge areas of fighting to get from point A to point B that don't really need to be mentioned outside of one sentence (the sandseas and the jungle/that big dragon boss

2457:

for example. The first sentence of the article states his name followed by the Katakana rendering of his name in parentheses despite Mario being ostensibly Italian. Is including the original Katakana rendering of a Japanese-made video game character in the article (even if the character is not

2287:

Didn't I already say it wasn't going to work for everything? Also, I said "best translation", meaning that it still doesn't have to be a good translation, just what comes closest. If it's possible, I'd say we follow that guideline. If it's not possible, we could use the name of the game in the

1029:

With the release of the seventh generation consoles this brings the definition into dispute. The current generation consoles (PS3 and Wii especially) have many more features than to play games, yet the definition claims that video game consoles are "solely" for playing video games. Technically

4136:

Granted, but what I'm saying is bad is stuff like: "First Jon gets the boots of speed, then he fights the forest boss, then he goes to the volcano level, where he mets Sally, who blah blah blah..." I haven't played MNSG, but it sure like it talks about every stage, item, character, boss, etc.

525:

I thought I would bring the close of a recent CfD for every "Computer and Video Games" category to be renamed to just "Video Games". The decision was apart from one or two editors, overwhelmingly supported by the community. This precedent may have implications for the title and naming of this

4455:

You AfD'd the article just over a month ago, and it was agreed by several users that a a few months should be given to see if work can be done. There is no rush; there is a lot of work to be done on Wikiepdia, and forcing editors to repriotirize their todo lists will only harm the project. —

2452:

I suppose what I'm wondering is wether or not the Katakana rendering of a Japanese-made (Japanese-made meaning being the original creation and property of a Japanese creator or company) character's name should appear somewhere on the article even if the character itself is not Japanese. Take

863:

Hello, all! I was just wondering where I could go to put information on the retraction, hubbub, and subsequent replacement of 1UP's NWN 2 review? I'd think it notable enough to merit some mention somewhere, given that there are enough sources to give an adequate outline of the events as they

3574:

I agree with Scottie. If an article SHOULD exist and a navbox exists for that series, it should be in the navbox. Navigational templates are meant to help the reader navigate to related articles (and help to bypass the terrible category system that is entirely useless to the reader). ---

368:

I reverted it because AMIB hates meta-data (i.e. clarifying "video game" or "sub series" or "characters") and has come down pretty hard on the Pac-Man and Silent Hill templates with editors who were adding it. I take AMIB's lead for metadata at least, as I agree with him on this aspect.

1945:

Merging would not only remove cruft, but take 2 or 3 articles that aren't even B-class and put them some place where they could get edited together. Plus, it cuts down on navbox size, AND all albums can be accessed from the main game's article and FFAlbums template with one clean link.

2438:

IMO it depends if the name itself has an origin. For instance, many Koei games are based on Chinese history, so in such cases Katakana are kind of irrelevent. Same with games where the characters names are already English - Sakura Wars 5 for instance. And of coruse, there's the case of

1314:

On a side note, speaking of that, you might want to move your striked out comment above onto the talk page. Someone is actively claiming that consensus for replacing the art with the American version is already adequatedly formed. I might actually move more of the conversation above

3677:

There's the stickler and the root of the argument. Reasonably short is up for interpretation, and I believe Ryu Kaze and several other WP:CVG editors who churned those FAs out chose to weigh reasonability in lieu of FA criteria 1.b. Reasonably is obeying what makes an article perfect

3786:

I like long but not unnecessarily so. I don't think that the plot summaries of the FF articles and CT articles are far too long. Also, on a semi-related note, I wish that people wouldn't be so anti-spoilers tags on Plot sections. I mean, really, what harm could possibly be done? -

1364:

or similar parameters (which more accurately categorises the boxart) and to mark the old one for deletion (if you didn't upload over it). If the old one had a fair use rationale or whatever you could copy that across too. As for which region is the "right" one, we're going to have

813:

I saw a citation on one article somewhere (unrelated to the CVG WikiProject) which used an Amazon review as a source, but you could also use them to describe the gameplay. I'm guessing that because these aren't professional reviews we're talking about, they don't count as sources?

3502:

I just don't quite understand why games are being allowed to have navboxes and characters are being objected against. The same logic applies to both groups, as both games and characters for a series usually have their own categories and/or lists. I mean are we supposed to delete

1903:

Forgive me if this discussion has already taken place, I haven't seen anything too conclusive on any of the individual gaming WikiProjects, but what policy, if any, exists on creating pages for video game soundtracks or official arranged albums? I say this because some articles

3682:

and stuff like that), and other conventions peripheral to main arcs of a story. I suppose this is what needs to be evaluated and have a conclusion reached upon. For many CVG editors, this is not a real problem -- you'd be hard pressed to write seven paragraphs about the plot of

1595:

I actually prefer the original with the separate sections. There was a general consensus on CVG that quite a lot of templates were becoming hulking messes (Mario series etc.) and we cut them down. But the Resident Evil one was quite readable, so I'd be OK with the original. -

3062:

Are you sure you don't mean ISBN numbers? I found two magazines for Sega Pro (Sega Pro Master Volume 1, Sega Pro Master Volume 2). It wasn't a monthly magazine, but rather a regular series of guides. So each one had a different ISBN number. I can't find anything on Mega Power.

1667:

I've had the same issues with Man in Black. He reverts templates: and doesn't always explain why. I asked him about the Pikmin template: he didn't reply. Templates should have sections to divide the things (in the case of video games/film templates such as Resident Evil).

3961:

articles. Reviews only mention the story's introduction and possibly praise the story for its greatness/awfulness in one of the last lines. Articles should describe the subject, with each aspect getting the attention it deserves. And story is ("almost") as important as

3470:. CVG and real-world will have different priorities, and we shouldn't use either to try to compare. Let's just narrow the scope down. I personally think that linking to lists of characters is far better than trying to cram every character in there; like AMIB said, 3678:(comprehensiveness; aiding the reader in understanding a major work, including its plot) while omitting details, detours, and other dalliance in fictional worlds and stories. In our arena, this includes side quests, minor characters (which are usually) relegated to 3538:

To me, if an article exists, it belongs in its respective series navbox. If the article doesn't have enough content, it should be put up for AfD first, then removed from the navbox if it's deleted rather than being removed first. I've yet to receive a response from

4086:

Again, what kind of idiot would read the plot section of a game he/she intends to play in the near future? If you don't want to know, don't read it!!! Summaries in wikipedia articles shouldn't protect people against themselves, that's their own job. I want to play

2617:(easiest found via that category). Since I don't see the problem with covering characters from fighting games in Knowledge, I removed a few of those templates, but was reverted with no further comment. Perhaps someone from the Wikiproject could look into it. 1540:

Google has been notoriously sucky. I did log onto my university's search engine and pulled up a USA Today article (the only hit) that mentioned Prima's collobration with the developers of Half-Life 2, which I added. But otherwise I'm not finding anything.

2795: 1705:

The first one should be used. I think that (or something similar) should be used for almost all game series. It's much neater to have sections, rather than it just being titled "video games" with movies and character articles just cluttered in anywhere.

4110:. Hell, they really even need to know much beyond what the back of the box or manual might tell them. A summary is "This happened, so this guy is on a quest to do this thing which causes stuff to happen (yes just "stuff", don't have to say too much on 2397:

Like I noted a few sections up, we're not the mainspace, we don't have to hold ourselves to the NC as strictly as they do. But it was argued that it would confuse newbies. the change is merely cosmetic, though, and it doesn't bother me that much.

1120:

Once again though, none of those cover early consoles which had no CPU or RAM (i.e. a "computer"). Likewise all games were built in to these systems, so "dedicated to playing games made specifically for that system" doesn't cover it fully either.

4219:

also don't go into that level of detail; it just takes more space to cover the major elements of a 40-60 hour game than a 5-10 hour shooter. There cannot be a true "golden standard" for plot summaries; it has to be taken on a case by case basis. —

2264:--the typo is Sega's, not mine). Otherwise those games would have definitely carried the original name. So yes, I'd say if it has the same name in Japan and Europe but a different one in North America the former is probably the one to stick with. 2808:. I think the majority of people agreed that computer games are still video games, so it seems we should make them consistant. However, this is unless we want to disambig title by platform (when they're only on one) instead. Take a look through 4445:

seems like a good example of listcruft as well. Pokemon has lots of items, but do they all need to be listed (or any for that matter)? It leans towards a game guide in my opinion. Not a guide on how to play: a guide on items which is crufty.

883:

for precedent. Whatever Wikiproject CVG; the afficionadoes over at WP:RS or WP:V or WP:FAC; or Jimbo by some magesterial editorial fiat, have declared, goes. I'm willing to drop this issue if the sources are put into any sort of question.

2987: 4517: 3465:

Well, as a counter-example, the Comics WikiProject decided to delete all of their naboxes (i.e. X-Men members, Avengers members) because the comics world corsses over too many worlds and they weren't the most useful navigating tool (see

1451:

In the case of gameplay or synopsis, is it good to add something like a {{Main}} or a further information of the orginal game to the expansion pack, or should I just add a link of the orginal game in the first sentence to gameplay or

3562:

I can't help but agree here. I don't see why game navboxes are ok, but character ones aren't. Either they should both exist or neither -- I don't have a problem with them being seperate, though, but they should both at least exist.

490:., it seems "source" to this person means "the character is in the anime, thus they will be in the game". I'm about to start issuing vandalism warning at this point, but I'd like some other suggestion on how to deal with this user. 1076:

How about something like "dedicated to playing games made specifically for that system". I do think the "primarily" is fine, myself. And incidently I believe all CD based systems had CD player functions. Certainly the Sega CD did.

211:

sounds very nn and so do some other web games on the list. Personally, I don't really bother with requested articles, they're usually obscure titles and I think there are more pressing articles that need addressing. For example,

547: 3334:

I say fine, but ask for him to at least split the characters out into a seperate navbox for the character articles, pointing out that every game series used as an example in that guideline also has a navbox for their characters:

3520:

is sure to be a highly looked for article, but if you check the navbox you'd think that we don't even have it. I mean seriously, it's like we're trying to hide these articles from people and make them check the category for the

2816:, are for a specific console and should stay, but many could do just fine at (video game). Of course on the flip-side, I wouldn't mind having those (video game) articles be at (Atari 2600), just so long as we have a standard. -- 1504:

I'm gonna do some on it tonight. But I didn't reckon on the total lack of information available for a publishing company as compared to a game. NPD actually track game guide sales, so it'd be good to hunt some of them down. -

677: 594: 3661:

cardinal sin! Also, check existing FAs on literary works. Whether Adventures of TinTin or Lord of the Rings, several paragraphs of in-universe information exist to provide a comprehensive understand of the plot and characters.

3152:

They have been around a while, and it's notable. All reviews are opinions, and just because their reviews are hated doesn't mean it's something to be left out of Knowledge articles (if that's the case you are trying to make).

1529:

that was the first, as two crucial secret-hunting maps were completely wrong. I'll dig that info up later if I remember to. Certainly I think they were the first to do that, unless you count that Final Fantasy web help thing.

1022:

page a while ago about the definition of a video game console as stated on the page. I checked back recently to find it still hasn’t been resolved so I have decided to come here for some input. The definition currently reads:

4193:(aside from being horribly in-universe) reads like it's trying to cramp in every punch-line it can. But yeah, anything that has a plot section that you actually have to scroll down really needs to start taking the ax to it.-- 3748:

is being reviewed due to a supposed "lack of focus" on the general concepts (it was 120 KB at one point). Like I said, the key is balancing focus and comprehensiveness by providing what is needed to understand the major plot

2659:

and should be either sourced or removed. "Trivia" sections should be avoided in general. In general, the article appears to be a datadump of information which is of little, if any interest to people not already familiar with

2091:

On any given day on Afd, it seems that we might fall into any one of these stages. Today it seems we are at stage 2. We should be at stage 4 (and usually are). Stage 5 is a pipe dream (as it is for Knowledge as a whole). ---

2820: 136:

on the common usage argument (SD is used only in Japan, while Mana is used in North America and Europe). SE has also referred to games in the Mana series as Mana games, implying that the series is "Mana". Please comment. -

4570:

A quick look at it brings up a knowledge bank of the game sufficient for its own Wiki. We need someone who has decent knowledge of the game to remove and/or rephrase information in a more palatable form in accordance with

530: 4642: 4126:

development in those segments though, it can be ignored. Readers do not need to understand everything as in "know every little detail that plays a minor-to-no role to the plot", but they have to be able to understand the

3141:

GamePro is not the best game magazine out there (I stopped reading a long time ago), but I can find bad reviews in every magazine and website. Sometimes it's the magazine/website, sometimes it's the individual reviewer.

3975:, the most extreme form of gameplayless adventure games? Adventure games are an even worse genre to explain in detail though, because doing that can completely ruin the game and can verge closely on being a game guide. 796: 3609:

by merging content from 14 separate articles (12 of which were up for deletion). I will perform as much cleanup and improvement as I can, but my knowledge of the game is at present limited to what I've read in the

2302: 2338: 762:

provides some guidelines for possibly leaving existing links in place. Presumably the concern here is that the way the name of the media format is inconsistent between articles and needs to be made consistent? --

4638: 3553:

be handled more on a case by case basis instead of these "standards" we have to follow. Hell, is there even a Wikipolicy/guideline for navboxes on the whole? or are we the only ones that have anything for them?--

2275:

Also bear in mind that often the North American/European names have nothing to do with the Japanese name, or even an NA/EU game being released as a different name. The Japan-focus rule doesn't apply well at all.

2766:

unlikely that a FAQ writer would just copy and paste what they've already written and put it on Knowledge. Of course, if the FAQ just copyed and pasted info from an official bio, then it would still need to be

2614: 687:

shortcut, and I for one am going to keep referring to this project as CVG, but it'll be fun... we'll have confused newbies asking "what's CVG"? But the move should be made now that the general article is at

757:

Are you asking about red links, or links to a redirect? If the latter, you should be able to visit "GameCube_Optical_Disc?redirect=no", and then click "What links here" on the left. However, do note that

2888: 3184:

With the game being a compilation of other games, publications may not have decided to give over their columns to it. As Spyke has mentioned, there are crap reviews in every publication, especially if

408:. When it clearly is a video game template: movies and other things shouldn't be listed (unless the template is called something else, or the template is divided into different named sections), period. 277:

I've noticed a number of categories that have still got rename requests on them but the actual link to the new category has already been created on the article page. When will the category renames take

3467: 3656:

WP:NOTE (making good use of wikibooks): "...an encyclopaedia article about the work of fiction on Knowledge giving a brief outline, [then chapters on Wikibooks, then full text on Wikisource, etc.)..."

4256: 2737:

I'm glad someone else is echoing my thoughts! I'd been uming and ahing about this pages for the past few days myself, and I agree if they are going to be kept, then they need substantial re-writing.

3072:

Thanks; I'd noticed/wondered about that too. Whomever created the articles, though, clearly thought they were journals. If no-one objects, I may edit the articles over to reflect their book status.

4189:

Pretty much. They seem about the right size for summarizing a commedy (since in reality, plot doesn't really matter to comedy). Those individual articles are quite bad though. The plot summary at

3276:. Elitism aside, GamePro is still a solid source and should be used for articles. It might not be as critical as other sources, but it is still a reflection of sentiment in the world of gaming. — 3618: 941:

Brilliant. Only thing I can suggest is narrowing of the Exclusive column to stop the dates breaking over two lines. Other than that it's great and will probably be much copied in the future. -

950:

Having recently finished overhauling the GameCube and Xbox 360 tables... I'm personally exhausted. Is the sorting really that important? Do people really sort on anything besides title? --

803: 1586:

It looks fine to me, better than the one it was reverted to. I dont see how it couldn't be understood by newbies either. It might be worth changing "Misc." to "Lists" or something like that.

1974:

ever-growing navboxes and the continuing controversy of their formatting. I tip my hat to whoever decided the Final Fantasy X albums should be on one page, it just seems better all around.

442:

It's misleading and obviously wrong just to throw in anything game related, and label the template "video games". Templates should be decent accurate navigation tools (like categories are).

4249:

People at the WP:CVG have barely been doing anything with this, and if a lot more people submitted more deserving articles and voting on them, a steady increase in quality could be seen. -

4244: 3600: 3489: 1748:. I really don't see wich is the problem. The only difference are the labels! I don't know why many users revert to the "standart" appearance (most of those can't be understood) Look this 1264: 1033:

I suggested to move to a definition that said that their "primary function" was to play games, but it was commented that this might make alienware PC's games consoles by this definition.

3384:

Categories are for linking large groups of homogenous, loosely-related things. When you try to cram lists of such things into templates, it becomes a mess. Does anyone remember the old

1411:

write. Certainly it should be possible if it's well written, thorough, and has lots of references. An expansion that significantly overhauls the original game content and balance (e.g.

791: 1862:

appearance (although I'm willing to argue strongly for several of its underpinning principles), but a series of slapdash design ideas, each different from the other, has zero support.

1086:

Change "solely" to primarily marketed for playing video games" and go on to explain how "since then, videogame consoles have gone on to add playback support for non-game media such as

515: 321:

is wrong. Smashing Live isn't a video game. I've changed the template a few times: and people change it back for no reason. Is there a reason people like to have incorrect templates?

4516:

I didn't afd the Xenosaga list, someone else did. As for the Pokemon list: I see no evidence it's been in AFD, I'm nominating it. Hopefully it doesn't turn into something like this:

3794: 3428:, so does it really matter how large it is (to an extent)? It's not as though it hinders the reading of the article itself, since you're not going to see them until you're through.-- 2024:

for unnannounced games that are likely to be announced some time in the future there was overwhelming consensus to delete. Was there a discussion about this that I missed somewhere?

505: 2827:

which case it should probably have the year released in parentheses. I think I've also seen the developer name used to differentiate, but the year would probably be more helpful. --

2577: 2975:

Except that doesn't take into account that the old, old school versions of arcade games such as skeeball were probably done without electricity or even perhaps mechanical parts. --

2216:

does not apply because it was moved becuase it was also used in Japan as well making it the most common name overall. That is not the case here so there is no reason to move it. --

486:), insists on adding characters to the article without showing any sources to prove those claims. I'm talking to this person on their talk, but they don't respond and judging from 4579: 3208:

In relation to pseudonyms like UNCLEDUST or whatever, GamePro has always used clown names for its staff. It's their attempt to be hip cool and irreverent, like a Disco Vicar. -

2754: 4741: 4726: 4530: 4499: 2894: 2527: 2508: 1471: 1419: 846: 308: 260: 3897: 1534: 4738: 4697: 4253: 3791: 2771: 2574: 2524: 2479: 2268: 1870: 1841: 1555: 141: 4166: 3827: 2901:. This however, will end up being a rather large task, as many articles have categories for the both the arcade year and a different category for their video game year. E.g. 2366: 2203:

I do wish video game companies would stop releasing games under different titles in UK and the States. It would certainly save a lot of meaningless squabbling over here. --

1115: 1098: 284: 4372: 1494:. It's been rather a poor show, to be honest, very little activity. Appreciate any help others can offer in improving what is currently a rather shabby article. Thanks, -- 1388:

Has an article about an expansion pack ever reached GA? Is it even possible? On the same note, is there a really good article about a series of games that is a good model?--

464: 170: 3934:

gameplay. If you read a 5-page review on a video game, you're highly unlikely to find much more than a paragraph or so (if any) on the storyline. An exception would be for

2586: 2432: 1377: 1125: 247: 4131: 4065: 4029: 3691: 2908: 2231:

I gotta say I find it funny. But my suggestion is: take the name that is the best translation of the original Japanese name. It may not be a solution for every case (like

154: 3557: 3547: 2280: 1256: 163: 4141: 4081: 3995: 3985: 3966: 3511: 3457: 3432: 3268:

IMO, GamePro has always been 2nd rate video game magazine. If we were to compare it to other journalistic standards, I'd say it is the equivalent of (or a little below)

1461: 1442: 383:. Duke Nukem character article shouldn't be listed at the bottom: again, not a game. If anything, the link at the top of the template should be to the character itself. 4511: 4323: 4298: 2220: 4493: 4450: 4436: 4150: 4095: 3991:

sections, not to mention the many examples from other genres. Also, what kind of idiot would read the plot section of a game he/she intends to play in the near future?

3915: 3906: 3588: 3579: 3013: 2296: 2239: 657: 648: 604: 600:

Well, its kind of late to be going back now. I don't think we can satisfy everyone. I supported it even though I like the CVG "moniker", but I think its for the best.

562: 526:

Wikiproject and some articles, so I just bring it here as an outsider to allow the members of this wikiproject to discuss and meet consensus as per the CfD precedent.

360: 351: 197: 4769:

and various interconnected talk pages. Even if only half of what TSA says is true it puts the reliability and trustworthiness of Land of the Legend in serious doubt.

4470: 4442: 3584:

Often I find that articles removed from a navbox aren't even tagged for deletion, yet the reason for removal is often the reason why it should be deleted outright. --

2979: 2970: 2741: 1653: 1305:, is which country's cover art to use. Personally, I'd go for whichever country had a interesting/imaginative cover, and not automatically choose the U.S. version. -- 256:'s contrib history tonight, especially on templates. Try to keep track of anything it breaks, as it is going to be editing pretty much every page in the project. --- 4735: 4694: 4672: 4250: 3788: 3529: 3222: 3203: 3113: 3102: 3076: 3067: 2728: 2607: 2571: 2521: 2476: 1268: 138: 4238: 4228: 3179: 2880: 2871: 2412: 2207: 2121: 1519: 1332: 2952: 2860: 2831: 2391: 2198: 2157: 1590: 1430: 1309: 730: 609:'m a bit attached to the WP:CVG moniker, but it'd be a bit silly to have all of the templates and categories be VG and the main project be CVG. So, change it. -- 412: 397: 387: 373: 4546: 4524: 4465: 3567: 2959: 2934: 1719: 1710: 1700: 1621: 1610: 1426:

Quite frankly, there aren't any good articles on expansion packs: Almost all of them are merely lists of new features. I wouldn't mind merging them on principle.

1240: 635: 613: 270: 190: 4621: 4197: 4184: 3776: 3762: 3738: 3728: 3156: 2853: 2781: 1081: 907: 582: 456: 424: 325: 241: 230: 159:

I dunno how I missed this. I disagree with the move, mainly because SD3 wasn't released here, and the first game in the series wasn't called anything Mana here.

4597:), but I can't find any the manual online anywhere. If anyone owns this game or knows of a good instruction manual database, please check this out. Thanks. --- 3635: 3166: 3146: 2762:

they are a copy and paste from GameFaqs, it should be checked to see if they were added by the writer of whatever it was on GameFaqs first. After all, it's not

2057: 1821: 1796: 1676: 1498: 1289: 1007: 828: 767: 446: 436: 3823:). But having only authored two GA articles (one being DNF), and no FAs, I can't really authoritatively state whether we should be short or have longer ones. 2418: 2107: 1865:

This is a big project, one where the first try is still underway. Rather than plugging in a single hand-made design idea into a single template, let us please

1848: 1831: 1545: 1345: 974: 963: 4773: 2672: 2462: 2447: 2096: 1728: 1660: 1054: 1040: 954: 4006:

There are two types of people who read video game articles. Those who have played the game, and those who haven't. Generally, the only editors are those who

2377:

I understand the reasons for re-naming many of the categories recently, but for the WikiProject itself I always liked "Computer and Video games" better.. --

2217: 2045:, writing an article about it can be tricky. In a good deal of cases, probably most, it's a good idea to just wait for the game/event/whatever to happen and 1354: 1229: 818: 4700: 3628: 1893: 1067: 3297: 3056: 945: 800: 180: 4631: 4601: 3953:

for each game individually if there's already a page covering its general use. RPGS tend to have huge (unique) stories, but often very traditional. Also,

3262: 2812:, and you'll notice just how inconsistant we are here. I see (arcade game), (video game), and (Atari 2600) about equally. Granted, some articles, such as 2053:

information about these things, and it is somewhat safe to have an article about it. It's all about sources and keeping speculation down and all that. --

1978: 1968: 622: 4562: 4396: 3767:

As for the Mystical Ninja article, the plot summary isn't too long; it could probably be trimmed by a paragraph or so, I don't feel it's a huge issue. —

3703: 3414: 3135: 1246: 294: 1636: 893: 2923: 1758: 1580: 853: 4750: 1763:

So, are people in the market for a discussion about a new standard template appearance? The current navbox standard was adopted to combat the frankly

144: 3893:

s story summary could be shorter. However, the article pays enough attention to the other aspects of the game AND is only 37KB long. So no harm done.

3496: 3372: 3085: 2966:

Well, and skeetball, ticket, gallery, and crane games, etc... should really be under something like Electro-mechanical games anyways, I would think.

2683: 2153:

I've seen no guideline about it. Maybe I missed it? The more popular name makes sense (as long as he has proof it is indeed the more popular name).

2017: 1646: 890: 779: 94: 86: 81: 69: 64: 59: 4760: 3350:

He says those kind of navboxes are being deleted at TFD and doesn't want to waste his time. Suggests I bring it up for discussion (and here we are).

1784: 673:

Can't we grandfather this name in? This isn't the mainspace, we don't have to adhere to the naming conventions as strictly as we have to do there.

4392:"don't fit in other lists" isn't a good reason to have a list page. Xenosaga is popular: but does it really need every detail listed on Knowledge? 4268:

Can I please have some help with this article? It's hopelessly in-universe, like a page from the Knowledge of the C&C Tiberian series world. -

3126:

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought GamePro was a respected publication with some decent features (like the Chrono Cross interviews). But check

2006: 118: 2147: 1942:

aren't in the same article? Is it a notoriaty thing, or is there some other specific reason why they should or should not be brought together?

1397: 786: 266:

Ahahahaha...Cydebot has already pretty much crowded out my watchlist, as a majority of it is video games and templates. I'll be checking though.

886:

Source concerns aside, it just feels like the material would be discursive anywhere I might like to put it—1UP, NWN 2, VG journalism, whereever.

185: 4328:

Even if it does not accomplish much it is good to let readers of Knowledge know that editors are not satisfied with the quality of the article.

3514:

also exists? Also, this whole removing of "under development" games from navboxes is really stupid. What exactly is the logic for this anyways?

1742:

So, now all the video games templates can use a smiliar structure? Look, this template (with the same structure of the RE template with labels)

1551:

You could try their old name (it was Prima Guides or Prima Publishing or something like that). Anyway, I'll see what I can find on the weekend.

1341:

Titles that aren't newly released should use the cover of the best-selling edition. If that isn't possible, the first edition should be used. --

3606: 2698: 1920: 1253: 1141: 473: 4288: 3248:

There's no real need for this, I think going on a case by case basis is fine. In this case, the GamePro review is obviously not that good. -

2402: 984:

soon, as that list isn't very pretty and not too long. If there are any objections, please scream now. :) Oh, and all the praise should go to

2513: 2482: 2381: 2110:

since you have by and large finished with the category renames. The one stub category that you didn't change over is also up for a rename.

1144:. I don't think that they are notable on their own, and should probably be merged into the article on the game or deleted. These pages are- 644:

is independent of anything Wikiepedia does. It is the name of the magazine and so the page name should be the same as that of the magazine.

4190: 2641: 2101: 2021: 996: 935: 193:. In the next few days, I plan to do some of the requests (and check to see if the articles are worth making or not). Anyone care to help? 3036: 2651:

at random. The first sentence is OK. After that, "Biography", "Weapons" and "Stages" need to be rewritten in an out-of-universe style per

751: 487: 466: 4077:

too, but it's not in detail enough to completely ruin it. Well, in theory at least. Still doesn't help with big things like "Jon dies."--

2016:

I thought that there was a clear consensus that we would not create articles for games that have not yet been announced. But apparently

3329: 1950: 1487: 759: 420:

is also wrong. I would fix them myself, but I don't feel like fighting over it again, and justifying something clearly isn't a game.

3109:

Understood, thanks; I'd seen that link in my travels too. All I need are the ISSNs ... (Does anyone have a copy of these magazines?)

313: 3706:, Axem and myself did a comparison of the script of each game versus the size of the plot summaries. Axem and myself concluded that 2162:

For some reason the CVG has suddenly broke out into the America vs. Europe war. There was recent edit warring on the cover art for

1998:

proposal that's currently going on. We touched on this topic a while back and took some less-active daughter-projects and made them

3516: 3361: 2261: 1752:...this is really a mess, all the games are mixed and I don't undertand why (what type of games are ones and what type are others). 4053:

Agreed, but I do disagree about one thing. The only reason why you don't want to read it, is because you couldn't care less about

874: 2387:

It also would have been nice to have had a little heads up on that for those of us that were not tracking the cat discussion. --

2011: 2002:

of CVG. This proposal might help us further strengthen our organized efforts when dealing with broad and narrow WikiProjects. --

1926: 2331: 2315: 631:

name changed? Anyways, I don't support this, and if I had been here when the CfD was on, I wouldn;t have supported that either.

1914: 47: 17: 3175:

I just don't use/mention reviews I can't use. Simple as that. I often times cannot use GamePro reviews, though I always check.

572:"video game" generally means console game. Perhaps we need to create subcategories to better reflect what these people do? -- 4173: 3799:

I favor shorter plots. My distaste for long plots has been cemented by seeing way too many in-universe ones (examples being

1806: 1481: 1013: 3437:

Wow, that's a train wreck. What an excellent argument to continue using categories instead of templates for these things. -

2939:

I considered that myself, but I checked some of the earlier years and if seems that all of the articles in those categories

2678:

Is it me, or do all character descriptions seem to be "copy & paste" work. In general, they're horribly written (for an

4721: 4488: 4431: 4367: 4318: 4283: 3452: 3409: 3365: 2503: 1888: 1133: 1103:

Oh, and it should also be clarified that, despite being referred to as "computer entertainment systems", consoles like the

808: 346: 3360:

creating such should rest on whomever is removing such information from the main navbox. I mean can one really argue that

2694:-material.... Do I need to say more? The character pages can stay (they are notable enough), but they should be rewritten. 903:

would be the most appropriate article to put that info. It's also quite a short article so it could use some expansion. --

521:

CfD precedent for "Computer and Video Games" → "Video Games" - change of title required for this WikiProject and articles?

150:

I agree with you. Mana is the name of the franchise outside of Japan, and I don't understand why anybody would oppose it.

4584: 3424:. Hell, any country, state, or even city generally has a huge section of navboxes at the end. And really, they're at the 1938: 641: 628: 169: 2475:

So let me get this straight - if an article has a title with computer and in it, it should be removed from the title? -

2067:

Include every piece of software ever imagined, including the text adventure game I made for my TI-82 about 10 years ago.

1063:

The other issue is that "entertainment computer" really doesn't adequately describe earlier, non-cpu based consoles. --

3911:

As long as you don't get the "this article is too long. Maybe it should be split" message, I don't think it's too long.

3652:

I received an objection on that count, and these Knowledge principles were invokved (listed with my counterarguments):

3121: 1873:

before replacing the standard design (which was the result of a previous, lengthy discussion) with a random design. -

1809:) so I think we ought to have a concensus on organinzation if we're going to alter the way templates are organized. ― 782:

for awhile and I just cannot find anything. And that's not the first time I can't find any info on a smaller company.

432:

If the problem lies in the template header saying "video games", then why not just remove the "video games" part? ---

4384: 4177: 1932: 318: 4593:

a while ago and noticed that the entire article seems like it might have been taken from an instruction manual (see

4106:

A "but we need all of that space so readers can understand everything" arguement sucks. Readers do not need to know

858: 531:

Knowledge:Categories for discussion/Log/2007 February 4#Category:Computer and video games and related sub-categories

4606: 2801: 2517: 2084:

Include only games that are verifiably real (or in development) and are of some (even slight) importance to gaming

1858:

appearance aside, there has previously been strong consensus to unify their appearance. I'm not really attached to

1003:

and time. I'll try to help update whatever lists need to be whenever I have the time. Thanks for everyone's input.

2687: 1801:

Which would be an alteration to the CVG navbox standard. There's different ways to add sections to templates (see

4413: 3284: 3041: 2353: 2235:), but it is a proper guideline for most. Also, technically, we would then be using the most commonly used name. 1574:

A guy called A Man in Black is reverting it to a version that can't be understood by newbie players of the game.

500: 207:

which is on the requested list. But it would also be a good idea to clear some not-so-good requests out, I mean

4146:

Yep, like I said, it's not perfect. If I had played it, I'd clean it up a little, but since I haven't, I can't.

4055: 4042: 3888: 3853: 3642: 3344: 2897:

exist? It is the only platform to get special treatment in this way, and seems like it needs to be merged into

2876:

Well yes, I think that we all like standardization, but do you have a preference as to which standard to use?--

2213: 2167: 1561: 1275:. Just go with whatever you think's best, consensus wouldn't really bring much and no one would enforce it. - 4014:

aren't looking for a plot summary detailed enough to replace their need to play the game. Face it, people are

2050: 4010:, and if they love the game they want to put in every little detail they can, but the fact is that those who 3808: 2805: 2535: 1526: 483: 405: 1030:

consoles as far back as the PS1 would not be games consoles by this definition, as the PS1 had a CD player.

4294:

Isn't there an 'in-universe' cleanup tag of some sort? That might help get some more eye on it, as well. --

3679: 3611: 2898: 1995: 1817: 1780: 1692: 1689: 1569: 1403: 1134: 871: 865: 579: 176:

This is in AFD currently, because it reads like a game guide. Anyone care to comment about it, in the AFD?

4533:, and one of its test subjects is going to be the Xenosaga lists and some of the Final Fantasy lists. The 3669:

The article's out-of-universe information dwarfs the plot summary, so this objection was a little errant.

356:

A soundtrack still isn't a game. My edits were just fine, but I guess people just can't deal with change.

4594: 3322: 3312: 3308: 3302: 1746: 1743: 1632:

games. And I can thus assume that the characters and creatures also refers to the video gameas as well.

981: 840: 778:

Does anyone know any sites that have good developer and publisher info? I've been looking for info about

3052:

The articles on these journals require a listing of an ISSN. Can someone help me find this information?

1790:

We're not trying to change everything. The only thing that is being added are the labels. Nothing else!

4680: 3504: 2750:!) a character's description grows without incorporating too much in-universe info it can be re-split. 2323: 2308: 1989: 1772:

already exists, so perhaps a discussion on changing VG navboxes would be discussed on its talk page. ―

1415:) would probably have more to write about than one that merely adds a few cars or missions or whatnot. 877: 380: 38: 4473:

is also a junkyard. I don't have any great desire to see it kept, despite being the primary author. -

3481: 4770: 4385: 4118:"This happened, so this guy goes and does this, and this, and this, and this, and this, and this..." 3804: 3474: 3388: 3336: 2916: 2912: 2809: 2751: 2335: 2304: 2265: 1552: 1531: 1468: 1416: 1374: 1112: 1095: 988:

by the way, and not to me, as he created that table. Me and a few others are just implementing it. --

3082: 1236:

will drop this user a line to let him know not to waste his time creating any more doomed articles.

4717: 4564: 4484: 4427: 4363: 4314: 4279: 3684: 3448: 3405: 3340: 2837: 2499: 2126: 1884: 1802: 342: 301: 105: 2570:

What I'd like to know is if I should remove all instances of "computer and video games" or not. -

1912:) group all game-specific soundtracks on one page, while others make seperate pages for each one ( 959:

I can very easily see myself sorting by developer or date for quick easy reference or comparison.

2425: 1769: 1749: 4686: 4662: 2930:

there should be a bit more consistency (like all films are tagged with (film) and not (movie) )

1905: 1669: 1457: 1393: 1383: 1148: 773: 744: 542: 417: 2800:

Should articles with (computer game) and (arcade game) in them be moved to (video game)? E.g.

4611:

I'd like to add some image request code into the project banner. I've posted the code on the

4210:, is perfect for a complicated RPG, but a 400-500 word summary is perfect for a shooter like 2948: 2849: 2106:

The various computer and video game stub templates are now up for discussion for renaming at

1302: 918: 868: 3127: 2330:. I'm bringing it up here so it can get wider visibility, as it's a fairly major issue. See 4689:

has been continuously adding this fan site to Knowledge as a source, despite that it fails

4669: 4628: 4576: 4088: 3585: 3544: 3328:

I revert him, he reverts me. He says that characters don't belong in vg navboxes. He cites

2813: 2372: 2277: 2136: 1272: 1046:

I think nailing it down to a single definition would be difficult. It may be easier to say

123: 3378: 3029: 2087:

Include games are verifiably real (or in development) and have reliable secondary sources

1252:

that the box art of most noted version should be used. Shall we have a consensus on this?

1140:

A very large number of articles about elements of this game have recently been created by

237:

There are alot of CVG stubs that need work, but requested articles are important as well.

8: 4707: 4652: 4542: 4507: 4474: 4461: 4417: 4407: 4353: 4335: 4304: 4269: 4224: 3772: 3758: 3724: 3540: 3438: 3395: 3318: 3290: 3238: 2648: 2598: 2561: 2545: 2489: 2359: 2031: 1999: 1898: 1874: 743:

Is there a place where you can list articles that need to have links fixes? For example,

699: 496: 332: 3525:

article not in the navbox. This sort of thing isn't helping people nagivate Knowledge.--

3421: 824:

It's like citing GameFAQs; there's a kind of editorial filter, but still don't cite it.

4349: 4207: 3945:, have far more story than gameplay. I mean, how long should it take me to explain the 3707: 3273: 3018: 2845: 2738: 2705: 2618: 2139:. He claims that it is more popular there and it also came out there first. Is there 2116: 1019: 738: 654: 632: 4753: 1844:. If anyone is interested, comment there. I really would like some changes to happen. 4147: 4128: 4092: 4062: 4026: 3992: 3963: 3912: 3894: 3627:

This issue was raised on February 24 in a discussion on this talk page (see above or

3615: 3231:

because of one bad review) of sources that we feel are reliable in the gaming press.

3176: 3110: 3073: 3053: 2955:. The number of non-video game arcade games in the year categories is slim to none.-- 2746:

Nah, it would be easier to redirect everything to a Characters in page. When and if (

2695: 2293: 2236: 1453: 1439: 1389: 924: 850: 783: 713: 601: 534: 477: 2070:

Include every game that has ever been discussed on an Internet forum or on a fansite

1318:

And rohith, I've just looked at your PC box art uploads, and I'd agree with them. -

4615: 4261: 4123: 3833: 3734:

getting that precious out of universe information that makes articles legendary. --

2257: 1909: 1814: 1777: 1495: 1306: 1271:, but I wouldn't do so with titles so ingrained within a particular system such as 993: 932: 576: 512: 115: 4757: 4666: 4625: 4194: 4163: 4138: 4078: 4072: 3982: 3946: 3903: 3824: 3711: 3554: 3526: 3493: 3429: 3369: 2976: 2956: 2920: 2903: 2877: 2857: 2817: 2768: 2399: 2232: 2195: 2144: 2132: 1994:

As one of the more active WikiProjects, I figure it might be good to mention the

1964:(or both) before you do it. They'll almost certainly agree with you, though. -- 1633: 1542: 674: 591: 559: 394: 370: 267: 129: 747:

has a ton of links that need to be fixed (like changing GameCube Optical Disc).

554:

that I'd like. Here's to Wikiproject Video games (Or maybe Wikiproject Video gam

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

4647: 4539: 4504: 4458: 4403: 4330: 4295: 4235: 4221: 4180:, cut down to a mere four sentences in the parent article) to dump plots into? 3942: 3840:. Here's the problem as I see it: you people are lazy. What do I mean by that? 3769: 3755: 3721: 3278: 3233: 3186: 3010: 2967: 2868: 2704:

If it's a copy/paste from gamefaqs, we need to delete it because of copyright.

2583: 2556: 2540: 2409: 2388: 2378: 2347: 2327: 2204: 2054: 2026: 2003: 1791: 1753: 1716: 1695: 1616: 1587: 1575: 1226: 1048:"originally consoles were X, but in more recent generations they can also do Y" 1037: 1004: 985: 835: 815: 694: 645: 491: 204: 2458:

strictly supposed to be Japanese) standard operating procedure for Knowledge?

4766: 4731:

Well, I assumed it was self-explanatory by the header, but I was in a hurry.

4690: 4572: 4521: 4447: 4393: 4345: 4215: 4211: 4091:

soon, so when I read its page, I made sure not to read the plot section yet.

3869: 3859: 3820: 3816: 3753:

in a character article or perhaps as an example in the characters section. —

3259: 3249: 3219: 3209: 3200: 3190: 3153: 3143: 3099: 3089: 3064: 3033: 2828: 2652: 2408:

Yeah, it's not a big deal, but just doesn't seem.. as snappy.. oh well :) --

2318:(not by me) that these two articles be merged, just like how the menu-driven 2154: 2112: 1845: 1828: 1707: 1673: 1607: 1597: 1516: 1506: 1329: 1319: 1286: 1276: 1237: 1108: 1104: 971: 748: 727: 717: 684: 453: 443: 421: 409: 384: 357: 322: 238: 227: 217: 194: 177: 151: 133: 3715:

word count. Unfortunately, Ryu is not around anymore to offer his arguments.

4598: 3972: 3958: 3935: 3735: 3698: 3688: 3576: 3564: 3163: 3132: 2931: 2679: 2656: 2444: 2093: 1961: 1957: 1854:

There are something like 350-400 video game navboxes, and, quibbling about

1643: 1407: 1370: 1342: 1122: 1078: 1064: 960: 951: 764: 709: 433: 305: 257: 253: 160: 2796:

More aftereffects of the "computer and video games" to "video games" moves

331:

It's the soundtrack for a video game, and it's no longer linked anyway. -

4181: 4019: 3812: 3488:. Also, the Mortal Kombat characters navbox was deleted a month ago via 2867:

Personally, I'd have to lean towards the standardization myself as well.

2778: 2470: 2459: 2440: 2429: 1810: 1773: 1657: 1491: 1427: 989: 928: 904: 825: 689: 573: 4590: 4344:

I think what would be more helpful at this point would be some help at

3800: 3046: 2841: 2669: 2603:

At present, just about every article on a Soulcalibur character has an

2253: 2249: 2073:

Include only games that are verifiably real (or in development) (i.e.

1965: 610: 2668:

guide, but isn't a good article for a general encyclopedia). Cheers --

4534: 4402:

This was originally a junkyard for some in-universe stuff, merged by

3878: 3269: 2944: 2078: 1975: 1947: 1745:

is being reverted by A Black Man to this (the "standart" appearance)

1725: 1615:

You mean the grey one? The template with a lot of characters listed?

1412: 1183: 1091: 1051: 942: 619: 472:

Can somebody help me out with this anime-licensed article? One user,

291: 281: 110:

sorry for dropping them at the same time but i got some freetime =)

4262: 3950: 3629:

Knowledge talk:WikiProject Video games#Total Annihilation: Kingdoms

3042: 2691: 2582:

Yes unless you are speaking of the magazine by that specific name.

2319: 2163: 2074: 1654:

Knowledge talk:WikiProject Video games/archive19#Navboxes yet again

1298: 1198: 1193: 1087: 213: 4732: 4665:

in there as well? I've modified the code snippet to reflect this.

618:

I prefer CVG but can see the common sense behind VG. Change it. -

3745: 1208: 1203: 1178: 1173: 900: 191:

Knowledge:WikiProject_Computer_and_video_games#Requested_articles

3848:; you're rewording. Let me give you some thoughts to think on: 627:

Question. Does the 'precedent' now mean we must petition to get

4061:

decent storyline description. Not perfect, no. But good enough.

3954: 3614:

article. So, any assistance would be appreciated. Thank you,

2915:. We'd have to check articles like these and replace both with 2248:

renamed for the North American region because of legal issues (

1956:

I'd say merge 'em, though you might want to mention it over at

1218: 1188: 1168: 1153: 847:

Knowledge:WikiProject Video games/Peer review/Star Fox (series)

304:

in Cydebot's template edit history. Will continue later... ---

208: 3673:

WP:FICT "...plot summaries should be kept reasonably short..."

849:. No one has replied since I posed it back on Sunday. Thanks. 4537:

lists, which are in an even worse state, will soon follow. —

4245:

Lack of participation in the Gaming Collaboration of the Week

3601:

List of places and characters in Total Annihilation: Kingdoms

3024: 2454: 1652:

There's a long discussion about the template change in here:

1213: 1163: 3930:

be longer than any other section of a video game's article,

3084:

If you want articles on the books, I suggest something like

4518:

Recurring weapons and items from The Legend of Zelda series

3977: 3252: 3212: 3193: 3092: 2289: 1600: 1509: 1322: 1279: 1158: 792:

Electronic sports in Article Creation and Improvement Drive

760:

Wp:redirect#Don't fix links to redirects that aren't broken

720: 220: 3883:'s plot summary, which you provided as a counter-example. 2777:

trimming. A little uniformity would also be a nice touch.

1724:

The first one. Much easier, both to use and on the eye. -

4693:. I ask for assistance in keeping it off of Knowledge. - 2836:

Yeah, there's been a bit of confusion on what to do with

2747: 2292:

ofcourse) or that best represents what the game is about.

797:

Article Creation and Improvement Drive: Electronic sports

3697:

My opinion constantly changes on this issue. Initially,

3645:, my last FA and my last FAC to be challenged for this. 970:

Wow @ the ability to sort by column. VERY impressive.

4752:. If it persists, ask for it to be blacklisted on the 4661:

Thanks for that, I forgot to specify. Also, can we put

4114:

stuff) and finally, he wins and the resolution is :D",

889:

Thoughts? Comments? Suggestions? I'm all ears. Thanks!

2554:

Nevermind, edit conflict, you answered that just now.

2538:

should be renamed. Is that what you're referring to?

2049:

make an article. However, sometimes we do have enough

529:

The discussion for the CfD is now closed and is here:

4765:

You can read about previous debates on this issue on

4529:

There is a bold solution to fancruft in the works at

3949:

system? Not to mention I hate explaining basic genre

2951:(none for the year) and pinball games have their own 2893:

Also, is there any real reason why the categories in

1768:

guidelines so we can acheive the same uniform look.

3081:

No, Sega Pro is very much an old UK games magazine.

1840:

I've created a discussion here about the templates:

3902:

Didn't 32 KB used to be the split warning point? --

4734:, and in numerous The Legend of Zelda articles. - 4303:There is. I've not known it to accomplish much. - 4046:fails me because the plot section is so long that 3926:There is no good reason why a plot summary should 2166:, for instance. Yoshi's Topsy-Turvy was moved to 1924:). In other words, is there any reason why, say, 716:for those newbs who can't handle the CVG truth. - 248:Extra set of eyes on Cydebot's cat changes, please 4637:Done. I've made it so articles are automatically 3492:, so that might be a useful debate to check out. 1094:." It's a little awkward, but you get the idea. 216:, which until not too long ago was a redlink. - 2332:Talk:Console role-playing game#Merge discussion 845:I was wondering if anyone could take a look at 590:CVG has a nice ring that VG just doesn't do... 3607:List of places in Total Annihilation: Kingdoms 2655:. "Character analysis" appears to be entirely 2419:Japanese transliteration of non-Japanese names 2326:are both covered by the wide definition of an 1921:FITHOS LUSEC WECOS VINOSEC: Final Fantasy VIII 923:Hi there. Have a look at what we've done with 4176:, only without individual sub-articles (like 2615:Category:Articles which may be unencyclopedic 2514:List of best-selling computer and video games 2143:guideline for this America-vs-Europe debate? 114:looked cool but i never heard from it again. 3636:Let's settle the plot thing once and for all 3028:interested in voicing your opinion. It's at 4191:The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy (book) 3971:Did you miss the part where I pipelined to 2844:. I previously tried moving the 2nd one to 1247:Which cover art should be used in articles? 203:I've just put in a translation request for 2848:, but it looks like they might need to be 2256:) or because of the marketing department ( 1488:Knowledge:Gaming Collaboration of the week 4502:that is applicable to this discussion. — 467:Naruto Shippūden: Gekitou Ninja Taisen EX 290:Forget that, they've been renamed now. - 3517:Metal Gear Solid 4: Guns of the Patriots 3362:Template:The King of Fighters characters 3004:Real-time tactical computer games -: --> 2288:continent it was first released in (not 2262:Lightening Force: Quest for the Darkstar 1685:Ok, well...Wich template should be used? 692:and all the categories have been moved. 4416:). Might be worth getting his input. - 4206:I feel that a 1,000 word summary, like 3936:a video game with virtually no gameplay 3665:WP:WAF (criticizing in-universe styles) 1927:Final Fantasy VII: Original Sound Track 1296:The other thing to consider, after the 186:Requested articles is getting a bit big 14: 4352:if you've got an appetite for more. - 3877:. On that note, it's also longer than 3001:Puzzle computer and video games -: --> 2988:Some categories that may need renaming 2443:with Chopin...just my opinion though. 1915:Final Fantasy VIII Original Soundtrack 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 18:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Video games 3873:isn't a FA or anything, but still it 2170:(the European name). Then there was 1807:Template:Dance Dance Revolution games 4174:The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy 4137:Somethings do need to be left out.-- 3366:Template:The King of Fighters series 3253: 3213: 3194: 3093: 3023:There is a move request to have the 2102:Stub templates up for renaimg at SFD 1601: 1510: 1323: 1280: 1018:There was a short discussion on the 721: 653:I know. I was in fact being ironic. 221: 25: 4706:Um. What fansite? What articles? - 3842:Writing long plot summaries is easy 2322:and the mouse interaction-centered 1939:Final Fantasy VII Piano Collections 1369:fun when people start arguing over 1350:You're doing well. Remember to use 1265:Image:Tomb_Raider_Legend_Boxart.jpg 252:Need an extra set of eyes watching 23: 4172:So you mean like the summaries in 4070:I never read the plot summary for 2488:Do you have an example in mind? - 683:We're not going to stop using the 24: 4784: 3981:sucks if you know what happens.-- 2995:Multiplayer computer games -: --> 2802:Black & White (computer game) 1933:Final Fantasy VII: Reunion Tracks 834:Right ho. Thanks for clarifying. 642:Computer and Video Games magazine 511:then we will have to take action 319:Template:Super Smash Bros. series 314:Issues with an incorrect template 4498:A new idea is being proposed at 4162:Hopefully, I've made my point.-- 2992:Animals in computer games -: --> 2518:List of best-selling video games 29: 4178:this familiarly lengthy summary 3857:has a longer plot summary than 2063:The stages of the CVG project: 2012:Articles on unnannounced games? 1715:I agree. This looks far neater 4056:Mystical Ninja Starring Goemon 4043:Mystical Ninja Starring Goemon 3938:, but this isn't one of them. 3889:Mystical Ninja Starring Goemon 3854:Mystical Ninja Starring Goemon 3838:a collection of plot summaries 3643:Mystical Ninja Starring Goemon 3345:Template:Metal Gear characters 3330:some new guideline on navboxes 3272:compared to other papers like 3007:Strategy computer games -: --> 3005:Real-time tactical video games 2806:Black & White (video game) 2131:A Link to the Past just moved 2041:With anything that has yet to 980:I think I'll start converting 13: 1: 4531:User:Seraphimblade/sandbox2/2 4500:User:Seraphimblade/sandbox2/2 4122:then so be it. If there's no 3809:Pokemon FireRed and LeafGreen 3030:Talk:Kirby#Requested move (2) 2998:Pinball computer games -: --> 2895:Category:Arcade games by year 2536:computer and video game music 2448:21:27, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 2433:19:49, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 2413:08:24, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 2403:08:11, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 2392:07:52, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 2382:07:51, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 2339:07:20, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 2269:07:19, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 2240:06:42, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 2214:Yoshi's Universal Gravitation 2208:01:06, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 2199:00:37, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 2168:Yoshi's Universal Gravitation 2158:23:14, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 2148:20:42, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 2122:19:37, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 2097:08:28, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 2058:21:45, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 2007:05:49, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 1979:05:02, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 1969:03:53, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 1951:20:42, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 1894:08:37, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 1849:06:17, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 1832:05:59, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 1822:01:57, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 1797:01:22, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 1785:23:38, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 1759:21:50, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 1729:13:34, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 1720:13:02, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 1711:05:45, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 1701:02:44, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 1677:01:35, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 1661:08:41, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 1647:01:01, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 1637:00:14, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 1622:21:48, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 1611:20:09, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 1591:18:50, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 1581:14:53, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 1556:08:08, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 1546:05:15, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 1535:10:18, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 1527:Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas 1520:10:05, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 1499:09:36, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 1482:GCOTW a big letdown this week 1472:19:00, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 1462:16:27, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 1443:10:07, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 1431:07:42, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 1420:07:31, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 1413:Gothic II: Night of the Raven 1398:05:30, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 1378:01:57, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 1346:01:30, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 1333:01:20, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 1310:23:17, 24 February 2007 (UTC) 1290:23:08, 24 February 2007 (UTC) 1257:20:34, 24 February 2007 (UTC) 1241:10:56, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 1230:12:57, 24 February 2007 (UTC) 1126:00:45, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 1116:04:57, 24 February 2007 (UTC) 1099:04:56, 24 February 2007 (UTC) 1082:23:31, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 1068:20:31, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 1055:19:08, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 1041:18:52, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 1036:Does anybody have any ideas? 1014:Video Game console definition 1008:00:17, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 997:23:29, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 975:10:58, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 964:17:20, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 955:17:06, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 946:15:43, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 936:15:36, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 908:12:21, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 894:07:40, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 854:01:19, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 829:06:56, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 819:06:47, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 804:09:51, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 787:08:49, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 768:19:50, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 752:01:52, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 731:19:27, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 678:21:41, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 658:09:36, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 649:19:23, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 636:11:02, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 623:10:55, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 614:02:59, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 605:21:28, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 595:21:07, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 583:18:07, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 563:17:07, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 548:11:29, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 516:15:04, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 506:07:10, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 457:04:59, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 447:04:59, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 437:18:59, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 425:18:19, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 413:18:15, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 406:Template:Resident Evil series 398:23:35, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 388:08:06, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 374:07:30, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 361:06:51, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 352:06:49, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 326:06:39, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 309:19:38, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 295:09:53, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 285:08:12, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 271:07:32, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 261:05:40, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 242:00:10, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 231:11:57, 17 February 2007 (UTC) 198:08:54, 17 February 2007 (UTC) 181:11:41, 16 February 2007 (UTC) 164:12:49, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 155:08:52, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 145:11:28, 16 February 2007 (UTC) 119:23:01, 15 February 2007 (UTC) 3680:List of Xenogears characters 3321:removes characters from the 2947:for instance, is just under 2899:Category:Video games by year 1871:Template talk:CVG Navigation 1842:Template talk:CVG Navigation 1404:The Legend of Zelda (series) 1135:Total Annihilation: Kingdoms 809:Amazon is a reliable source? 7: 4585:Copyvio check at TrickStyle 3941:No. Some games, especially 3379:Terry Bogard#External links 3323:Template:Guilty Gear series 982:List of PlayStation 3 games 912:This is really a non event. 171:List of Kirby magical items 10: 4789: 4774:19:51, 10 March 2007 (UTC) 4239:16:53, 17 March 2007 (UTC) 3505:Template:Metal Gear series 3364:is somehow not helpful if 3122:GamePro Reviews = Suckage? 2909:Category:2002 arcade games 2682:). Copy & Paste work, 2324:The Curse of Monkey Island 2309:computer role-playing game 381:Template:Duke Nukem series 4761:07:23, 9 March 2007 (UTC) 4742:05:45, 9 March 2007 (UTC) 4727:05:37, 9 March 2007 (UTC) 4701:05:35, 9 March 2007 (UTC) 4673:23:13, 8 March 2007 (UTC) 4632:01:06, 8 March 2007 (UTC) 4602:22:32, 7 March 2007 (UTC) 4580:22:21, 7 March 2007 (UTC) 4547:06:38, 9 March 2007 (UTC) 4525:15:33, 8 March 2007 (UTC) 4512:04:47, 8 March 2007 (UTC) 4494:04:46, 8 March 2007 (UTC) 4466:01:18, 8 March 2007 (UTC) 4451:22:16, 7 March 2007 (UTC) 4437:21:40, 7 March 2007 (UTC) 4397:21:36, 7 March 2007 (UTC) 4386:List of terms in Xenosaga 4373:05:07, 8 March 2007 (UTC) 4324:21:40, 7 March 2007 (UTC) 4299:06:50, 7 March 2007 (UTC) 4289:06:30, 7 March 2007 (UTC) 4257:00:58, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 4229:18:20, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 4198:10:32, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 4185:09:27, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 4167:07:56, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 4151:18:07, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 4142:15:42, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 4132:15:07, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 4096:18:04, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 4082:15:42, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 4066:15:07, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 4030:15:07, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 3996:17:58, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 3986:15:42, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 3967:15:07, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 3916:17:58, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 3907:15:42, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 3898:15:07, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 3828:02:26, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 3805:Pokemon Ruby and Sapphire 3795:00:51, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 3777:03:16, 5 March 2007 (UTC) 3763:03:12, 5 March 2007 (UTC) 3739:03:08, 5 March 2007 (UTC) 3729:02:58, 5 March 2007 (UTC) 3704:WikiProject Final Fantasy 3692:02:48, 5 March 2007 (UTC) 3619:00:21, 5 March 2007 (UTC) 3589:06:22, 5 March 2007 (UTC) 3580:23:00, 4 March 2007 (UTC) 3568:12:27, 4 March 2007 (UTC) 3558:12:14, 4 March 2007 (UTC) 3548:11:15, 4 March 2007 (UTC) 3530:10:29, 4 March 2007 (UTC) 3512:Category:Metal Gear games 3497:09:08, 4 March 2007 (UTC) 3458:07:29, 4 March 2007 (UTC) 3433:07:22, 4 March 2007 (UTC) 3415:07:02, 4 March 2007 (UTC) 3373:06:27, 4 March 2007 (UTC) 3337:Template:Mario characters 3298:04:38, 7 March 2007 (UTC) 3263:21:47, 4 March 2007 (UTC) 3223:17:07, 4 March 2007 (UTC) 3204:13:35, 4 March 2007 (UTC) 3180:10:20, 4 March 2007 (UTC) 3167:07:13, 4 March 2007 (UTC) 3157:06:59, 4 March 2007 (UTC) 3147:06:52, 4 March 2007 (UTC) 3136:06:22, 4 March 2007 (UTC) 3114:13:36, 4 March 2007 (UTC) 3103:13:13, 4 March 2007 (UTC) 3077:12:06, 4 March 2007 (UTC) 3068:04:48, 4 March 2007 (UTC) 3057:02:30, 4 March 2007 (UTC) 3037:11:08, 3 March 2007 (UTC) 3014:15:00, 4 March 2007 (UTC) 2980:06:00, 4 March 2007 (UTC) 2971:22:37, 3 March 2007 (UTC) 2960:15:55, 3 March 2007 (UTC) 2935:12:13, 3 March 2007 (UTC) 2924:09:18, 3 March 2007 (UTC) 2917:Category:2002 video games 2913:Category:2003 video games 2881:06:00, 4 March 2007 (UTC) 2872:22:37, 3 March 2007 (UTC) 2861:17:14, 3 March 2007 (UTC) 2832:16:39, 3 March 2007 (UTC) 2821:09:18, 3 March 2007 (UTC) 2810:Category:Atari 2600 games 2782:04:54, 3 March 2007 (UTC) 2772:03:33, 3 March 2007 (UTC) 2755:19:03, 2 March 2007 (UTC) 2742:10:53, 2 March 2007 (UTC) 2729:10:51, 2 March 2007 (UTC) 2699:10:49, 2 March 2007 (UTC) 2673:09:46, 2 March 2007 (UTC) 2642:09:39, 2 March 2007 (UTC) 2587:05:27, 2 March 2007 (UTC) 2578:00:22, 2 March 2007 (UTC) 2528:23:54, 1 March 2007 (UTC) 2509:23:51, 1 March 2007 (UTC) 2483:23:49, 1 March 2007 (UTC) 2463:05:14, 3 March 2007 (UTC) 2367:04:47, 7 March 2007 (UTC) 2345:one encompassing genre. — 2305:console role-playing game 2297:07:37, 2 March 2007 (UTC) 2281:09:04, 1 March 2007 (UTC) 2221:03:16, 1 March 2007 (UTC) 1803:Template: Mega Man series 1566:Hi, is this template OK? 1107:are not considered to be 4607:talk banner modification 4565:Vanguard: Saga of Heroes 3867:(~1424 pages). Granted, 3685:Ultimate Mortal Kombat 3 3422:United States#Navigation 3341:Template:Zelda character 2838:Air (1977 computer game) 2534:I guess an article like 1269:Image:Psychonautsbox.jpg 393:reason why to axe them. 302:Template:Mega Man series 4663:Image:Image-request.svg 4048:I don't want to read it 3957:can not be compared to 3543:regarding this move. -- 3420:And I'll direct you to 2996:Multiplayer video games 2426:Talk:Hwang_Seong-gyeong 1770:Template:CVG Navigation 1750:Template:Pac-Man series 1571:Resident Evil template 452:don't understand this. 4018:using Knowledge as a " 3605:I created the article 3309:Navbox with characters 2993:Animals in video games 2953:Category:Pinball games 2212:Actually, the move to 1906:Final Fantasy X albums 1670:Template:Pikmin_series 1562:Navgiation template RE 1149:Noble Houses of Veruna 859:1UP's NWN2 review saga 745:Nintendo GameCube Disc 418:Template:Pikmin series 4667:Dread Lord CyberSkull 4626:Dread Lord CyberSkull 4471:List of Pokémon items 4443:List of Pokémon items 4025:Couldn't agree more. 3468:2006 14 September TFD 2949:Category:Arcade games 2889:The arcade categories 2854:Air (2000 video game) 2850:Air (1977 video game) 2613:tag and is listed in 1467:to 456's storyline". 712:shortcut and created 42:of past discussions. 4089:Hotel Dusk: Room 215 3565:♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫ 3008:Strategy video games 2932:♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫ 2814:Pac-Man (Atari 2600) 2445:♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫ 2192:42 All-Time Classics 2137:42 All-Time Classics 1371:games like Gothic II 1273:Halo: Combat Evolved 1079:♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫ 961:♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫ 558:? Just a thought).-- 161:♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫ 4563:Cleanup requested: 3863:, the book that is 3541:User:A Man In Black 3377:I direct people to 3319:User:A Man In Black 3303:Character navboxes. 2999:Pinball video games 2649:Taki (Soul Calibur) 841:Peer review request 640:In one word, "no". 4736:A Link to the Past 4695:A Link to the Past 4681:Land of the Legend 4441:On a relate note: 4350:Talk:Cybran Nation 4251:A Link to the Past 4208:Final Fantasy VIII 4040:equal better. The 4022:for video games". 3789:A Link to the Past 3708:Final Fantasy VIII 3274:The New York Times 3002:Puzzle video games 2846:Air (visual novel) 2572:A Link to the Past 2522:A Link to the Past 2477:A Link to the Past 2303:Proposed merge of 2036:• 2007-02-27 17:36 1996:WikiProject reform 1990:WikiProject reform 1869:the discussion at 1020:video game console 708:I've hijacked the 704:• 2007-02-20 22:28 139:A Link to the Past 4725: 4687:JackSparrow Ninja 4658: 4657:• 2007-03-8 08:36 4492: 4435: 4371: 4341: 4340:• 2007-03-7 22:21 4322: 4287: 3875:does summarize it 3456: 3413: 3244: 3243:• 2007-03-4 20:44 2688:original research 2657:original research 2567: 2566:• 2007-03-1 23:56 2551: 2550:• 2007-03-1 23:55 2507: 2119: 2037: 1892: 1263:versions such as 925:List of Wii games 705: 546: 350: 300:I've got down to 128:I am arguing for 100: 99: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 4780: 4754:m:Spam blacklist 4715: 4713: 4655: 4650: 4646: 4620: 4614: 4482: 4480: 4425: 4423: 4361: 4359: 4338: 4333: 4329: 4312: 4310: 4277: 4275: 3480:was horrendous. 3479: 3475:Mario characters 3473: 3446: 3444: 3403: 3401: 3393: 3389:Mario characters 3387: 3296: 3293: 3287: 3281: 3257: 3256: 3241: 3236: 3232: 3217: 3216: 3198: 3197: 3097: 3096: 2725: 2723: 2721: 2719: 2717: 2638: 2636: 2634: 2632: 2630: 2612: 2606: 2564: 2559: 2555: 2548: 2543: 2539: 2497: 2495: 2365: 2362: 2356: 2350: 2334:for the debate. 2258:Thunder Force IV 2127:Page moves again 2117: 2115: 2034: 2029: 2025: 1910:Wild Arms albums 1882: 1880: 1794: 1756: 1698: 1619: 1605: 1604: 1578: 1514: 1513: 1363: 1359: 1353: 1327: 1326: 1284: 1283: 725: 724: 702: 697: 693: 540: 504: 379:What about this 340: 338: 225: 224: 106:Another question 78: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 4788: 4787: 4783: 4782: 4781: 4779: 4778: 4777: 4709: 4683: 4653: 4648: 4618: 4612: 4609: 4587: 4577:Scottie theNerd 4568: 4476: 4419: 4389: 4355: 4336: 4331: 4306: 4271: 4266: 4247: 4073:Final Fantasy X 3947:Point-and-click 3943:Adventure games 3712:Final Fantasy X 3638: 3603: 3586:Scottie theNerd 3545:Scottie theNerd 3484:is not helpful 3477: 3471: 3440: 3397: 3391: 3385: 3307:Quick summary: 3305: 3295: 3291: 3285: 3279: 3277: 3254: 3239: 3234: 3214: 3195: 3189:is involved. - 3124: 3094: 3086:Sega Pro Master 3050: 3021: 2990: 2904:Soul Calibur II 2891: 2856:respectively.-- 2798: 2715: 2713: 2711: 2709: 2707: 2628: 2626: 2624: 2622: 2620: 2610: 2604: 2601: 2562: 2557: 2546: 2541: 2491: 2473: 2421: 2375: 2364: 2360: 2354: 2348: 2346: 2312: 2278:Scottie theNerd 2233:Touch Detective 2188:Clubhouse Games 2186:, and now this 2133:Clubhouse Games 2129: 2111: 2104: 2043:actually happen 2032: 2027: 2014: 1992: 1901: 1876: 1792: 1754: 1696: 1617: 1602: 1576: 1564: 1511: 1484: 1386: 1361: 1357: 1351: 1324: 1281: 1249: 1138: 1016: 921: 861: 843: 811: 794: 780:RFX Interactive 776: 741: 722: 700: 695: 523: 494: 470: 334: 316: 279: 250: 222: 188: 174: 132:to be moved to 130:Seiken Densetsu 126: 108: 74: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 4786: 4749:Here's a list 4747: 4746: 4745: 4744: 4682: 4679: 4678: 4677: 4676: 4675: 4608: 4605: 4586: 4583: 4567: 4561: 4560: 4559: 4558: 4557: 4556: 4555: 4554: 4553: 4552: 4551: 4550: 4549: 4468: 4388: 4383: 4382: 4381: 4380: 4379: 4378: 4377: 4376: 4375: 4265: 4260: 4246: 4243: 4242: 4241: 4231: 4203: 4202: 4201: 4200: 4160: 4159: 4158: 4157: 4156: 4155: 4154: 4153: 4104: 4103: 4102: 4101: 4100: 4099: 4098: 4034: 4033: 4032: 4004: 4003: 4002: 4001: 4000: 3999: 3998: 3924: 3923: 3922: 3921: 3920: 3919: 3918: 3831: 3784: 3783: 3782: 3781: 3780: 3779: 3765: 3750: 3716: 3675: 3674: 3667: 3666: 3658: 3657: 3637: 3634: 3633: 3632: 3602: 3599: 3598: 3597: 3596: 3595: 3594: 3593: 3592: 3591: 3572: 3571: 3570: 3533: 3532: 3463: 3462: 3461: 3460: 3352: 3351: 3348: 3332: 3326: 3313:Navbox without 3304: 3301: 3283: 3266: 3265: 3228: 3227: 3226: 3225: 3206: 3187:Dave Halverson 3173: 3172: 3171: 3170: 3169: 3123: 3120: 3119: 3118: 3117: 3116: 3107: 3106: 3105: 3049: 3040: 3020: 3017: 3009: 3006: 3003: 3000: 2997: 2994: 2989: 2986: 2985: 2984: 2983: 2982: 2964: 2963: 2962: 2890: 2887: 2886: 2885: 2884: 2883: 2865: 2864: 2863: 2797: 2794: 2793: 2792: 2791: 2790: 2789: 2788: 2787: 2786: 2785: 2784: 2732: 2731: 2676: 2675: 2647:I just picked 2608:unencyclopedic 2600: 2597: 2596: 2595: 2594: 2593: 2592: 2591: 2590: 2589: 2532: 2531: 2530: 2472: 2469: 2468: 2467: 2466: 2465: 2420: 2417: 2416: 2415: 2395: 2394: 2374: 2371: 2370: 2369: 2352: 2328:adventure game 2311: 2301: 2300: 2299: 2284: 2283: 2272: 2271: 2242: 2229: 2228: 2227: 2226: 2225: 2224: 2223: 2218:69.156.206.121 2176:Brain Training 2128: 2125: 2103: 2100: 2089: 2088: 2085: 2082: 2071: 2068: 2061: 2060: 2013: 2010: 1991: 1988: 1986: 1984: 1983: 1982: 1981: 1900: 1897: 1852: 1851: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1834: 1740: 1739: 1738: 1737: 1736: 1735: 1734: 1733: 1732: 1731: 1686: 1680: 1679: 1664: 1663: 1629: 1628: 1627: 1626: 1625: 1624: 1563: 1560: 1559: 1558: 1538: 1537: 1522: 1483: 1480: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1474: 1446: 1445: 1434: 1433: 1423: 1422: 1385: 1384:Quick Question 1382: 1381: 1380: 1348: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1335: 1316: 1293: 1292: 1248: 1245: 1244: 1243: 1222: 1221: 1216: 1211: 1206: 1201: 1196: 1191: 1186: 1181: 1176: 1171: 1166: 1161: 1156: 1151: 1137: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1123:Marty Goldberg 1101: 1084: 1073: 1072: 1071: 1070: 1065:Marty Goldberg 1058: 1057: 1015: 1012: 1011: 1010: 986:User:Digiwrld1 978: 977: 968: 967: 966: 948: 920: 917: 916: 915: 914: 913: 860: 857: 842: 839: 832: 831: 810: 807: 793: 790: 775: 774:Developer info 772: 771: 770: 740: 737: 736: 735: 734: 733: 671: 670: 669: 668: 667: 666: 665: 664: 663: 662: 661: 660: 588: 587: 586: 585: 566: 565: 522: 519: 469: 463: 462: 461: 460: 459: 430: 429: 428: 427: 402: 401: 400: 366: 365: 364: 363: 315: 312: 298: 297: 276: 274: 273: 249: 246: 245: 244: 234: 233: 205:de:Painstation 187: 184: 173: 168: 167: 166: 157: 125: 122: 107: 104: 102: 98: 97: 92: 89: 84: 79: 72: 67: 62: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4785: 4776: 4775: 4772: 4768: 4767:User talk:TSA 4763: 4762: 4759: 4755: 4751: 4743: 4740: 4737: 4733: 4730: 4729: 4728: 4723: 4719: 4714: 4712: 4705: 4704: 4703: 4702: 4699: 4696: 4692: 4688: 4674: 4671: 4668: 4664: 4660: 4659: 4656: 4651: 4644: 4640: 4636: 4635: 4634: 4633: 4630: 4627: 4623: 4617: 4604: 4603: 4600: 4596: 4592: 4589:I ran across 4582: 4581: 4578: 4574: 4566: 4548: 4545: 4544: 4541: 4536: 4532: 4528: 4527: 4526: 4523: 4519: 4515: 4514: 4513: 4510: 4509: 4506: 4501: 4497: 4496: 4495: 4490: 4486: 4481: 4479: 4472: 4469: 4467: 4464: 4463: 4460: 4454: 4453: 4452: 4449: 4444: 4440: 4439: 4438: 4433: 4429: 4424: 4422: 4415: 4412: 4409: 4405: 4401: 4400: 4399: 4398: 4395: 4387: 4374: 4369: 4365: 4360: 4358: 4351: 4347: 4346:Talk:Tiberium 4343: 4342: 4339: 4334: 4327: 4326: 4325: 4320: 4316: 4311: 4309: 4302: 4301: 4300: 4297: 4293: 4292: 4291: 4290: 4285: 4281: 4276: 4274: 4264: 4259: 4258: 4255: 4252: 4240: 4237: 4232: 4230: 4227: 4226: 4223: 4217: 4216:Super Metroid 4213: 4212:Super Metroid 4209: 4205: 4204: 4199: 4196: 4192: 4188: 4187: 4186: 4183: 4179: 4175: 4171: 4170: 4169: 4168: 4165: 4152: 4149: 4145: 4144: 4143: 4140: 4135: 4134: 4133: 4130: 4125: 4120: 4119: 4117: 4113: 4109: 4105: 4097: 4094: 4090: 4085: 4084: 4083: 4080: 4075: 4074: 4069: 4068: 4067: 4064: 4059: 4057: 4052: 4051: 4049: 4045: 4044: 4039: 4035: 4031: 4028: 4024: 4023: 4021: 4017: 4013: 4009: 4005: 3997: 3994: 3989: 3988: 3987: 3984: 3980: 3979: 3974: 3970: 3969: 3968: 3965: 3960: 3956: 3952: 3948: 3944: 3940: 3939: 3937: 3933: 3929: 3925: 3917: 3914: 3910: 3909: 3908: 3905: 3901: 3900: 3899: 3896: 3892: 3890: 3886:I agree that 3885: 3884: 3882: 3881: 3876: 3872: 3871: 3870:War and Peace 3866: 3865:famously long 3862: 3861: 3860:War and Peace 3856: 3855: 3851: 3850: 3849: 3847: 3843: 3839: 3837: 3834:Knowledge is 3830: 3829: 3826: 3822: 3818: 3814: 3810: 3807:and Emerald, 3806: 3802: 3797: 3796: 3793: 3790: 3778: 3775: 3774: 3771: 3766: 3764: 3761: 3760: 3757: 3751: 3747: 3742: 3741: 3740: 3737: 3732: 3731: 3730: 3727: 3726: 3723: 3717: 3713: 3709: 3705: 3700: 3696: 3695: 3694: 3693: 3690: 3686: 3681: 3672: 3671: 3670: 3664: 3663: 3662: 3655: 3654: 3653: 3650: 3646: 3644: 3630: 3626: 3623: 3622: 3621: 3620: 3617: 3613: 3608: 3590: 3587: 3583: 3582: 3581: 3578: 3573: 3569: 3566: 3561: 3560: 3559: 3556: 3551: 3550: 3549: 3546: 3542: 3537: 3536: 3535: 3534: 3531: 3528: 3524: 3519: 3518: 3513: 3509: 3506: 3501: 3500: 3499: 3498: 3495: 3491: 3487: 3483: 3476: 3469: 3459: 3454: 3450: 3445: 3443: 3436: 3435: 3434: 3431: 3427: 3423: 3419: 3418: 3417: 3416: 3411: 3407: 3402: 3400: 3390: 3382: 3380: 3375: 3374: 3371: 3367: 3363: 3358: 3349: 3346: 3342: 3338: 3333: 3331: 3327: 3324: 3320: 3317: 3316: 3315: 3314: 3310: 3300: 3299: 3294: 3288: 3282: 3275: 3271: 3264: 3261: 3258: 3251: 3247: 3246: 3245: 3242: 3237: 3224: 3221: 3218: 3211: 3207: 3205: 3202: 3199: 3192: 3188: 3183: 3182: 3181: 3178: 3174: 3168: 3165: 3160: 3159: 3158: 3155: 3150: 3149: 3148: 3145: 3140: 3139: 3138: 3137: 3134: 3129: 3115: 3112: 3108: 3104: 3101: 3098: 3091: 3087: 3083: 3080: 3079: 3078: 3075: 3071: 3070: 3069: 3066: 3061: 3060: 3059: 3058: 3055: 3048: 3044: 3039: 3038: 3035: 3031: 3026: 3016: 3015: 3012: 2981: 2978: 2974: 2973: 2972: 2969: 2965: 2961: 2958: 2954: 2950: 2946: 2943:video games. 2942: 2938: 2937: 2936: 2933: 2928: 2927: 2926: 2925: 2922: 2918: 2914: 2910: 2906: 2905: 2900: 2896: 2882: 2879: 2875: 2874: 2873: 2870: 2866: 2862: 2859: 2855: 2851: 2847: 2843: 2839: 2835: 2834: 2833: 2830: 2825: 2824: 2823: 2822: 2819: 2815: 2811: 2807: 2803: 2783: 2780: 2775: 2774: 2773: 2770: 2765: 2761: 2758: 2757: 2756: 2753: 2749: 2745: 2744: 2743: 2740: 2739:The Kinslayer 2736: 2735: 2734: 2733: 2730: 2727: 2726: 2703: 2702: 2701: 2700: 2697: 2693: 2689: 2685: 2681: 2674: 2671: 2667: 2663: 2658: 2654: 2650: 2646: 2645: 2644: 2643: 2640: 2639: 2616: 2609: 2588: 2585: 2581: 2580: 2579: 2576: 2573: 2569: 2568: 2565: 2560: 2553: 2552: 2549: 2544: 2537: 2533: 2529: 2526: 2523: 2519: 2515: 2512: 2511: 2510: 2505: 2501: 2496: 2494: 2487: 2486: 2485: 2484: 2481: 2478: 2464: 2461: 2456: 2451: 2450: 2449: 2446: 2442: 2437: 2436: 2435: 2434: 2431: 2427: 2414: 2411: 2407: 2406: 2405: 2404: 2401: 2393: 2390: 2386: 2385: 2384: 2383: 2380: 2368: 2363: 2357: 2351: 2343: 2342: 2341: 2340: 2337: 2333: 2329: 2325: 2321: 2317: 2310: 2306: 2298: 2295: 2291: 2286: 2285: 2282: 2279: 2274: 2273: 2270: 2267: 2263: 2259: 2255: 2251: 2247: 2243: 2241: 2238: 2234: 2230: 2222: 2219: 2215: 2211: 2210: 2209: 2206: 2202: 2201: 2200: 2197: 2193: 2189: 2185: 2181: 2177: 2173: 2169: 2165: 2161: 2160: 2159: 2156: 2152: 2151: 2150: 2149: 2146: 2142: 2138: 2134: 2124: 2123: 2120: 2118:Caer’s whines 2114: 2109: 2099: 2098: 2095: 2086: 2083: 2080: 2076: 2072: 2069: 2066: 2065: 2064: 2059: 2056: 2052: 2048: 2044: 2040: 2039: 2038: 2035: 2030: 2023: 2022:previous AfDs 2019: 2009: 2008: 2005: 2001: 1997: 1987: 1980: 1977: 1972: 1971: 1970: 1967: 1963: 1959: 1955: 1954: 1953: 1952: 1949: 1943: 1941: 1940: 1935: 1934: 1929: 1928: 1923: 1922: 1917: 1916: 1911: 1907: 1896: 1895: 1890: 1886: 1881: 1879: 1872: 1868: 1863: 1861: 1857: 1850: 1847: 1843: 1839: 1833: 1830: 1825: 1824: 1823: 1820: 1819: 1816: 1812: 1808: 1804: 1800: 1799: 1798: 1795: 1789: 1788: 1787: 1786: 1783: 1782: 1779: 1775: 1771: 1766: 1761: 1760: 1757: 1751: 1747: 1744: 1730: 1727: 1723: 1722: 1721: 1718: 1714: 1713: 1712: 1709: 1704: 1703: 1702: 1699: 1693: 1690: 1687: 1684: 1683: 1682: 1681: 1678: 1675: 1671: 1666: 1665: 1662: 1659: 1655: 1651: 1650: 1649: 1648: 1645: 1639: 1638: 1635: 1623: 1620: 1614: 1613: 1612: 1609: 1606: 1599: 1594: 1593: 1592: 1589: 1585: 1584: 1583: 1582: 1579: 1572: 1570: 1567: 1557: 1554: 1550: 1549: 1548: 1547: 1544: 1536: 1533: 1528: 1523: 1521: 1518: 1515: 1508: 1503: 1502: 1501: 1500: 1497: 1493: 1489: 1473: 1470: 1465: 1464: 1463: 1459: 1455: 1450: 1449: 1448: 1447: 1444: 1441: 1436: 1435: 1432: 1429: 1425: 1424: 1421: 1418: 1414: 1409: 1405: 1402: 1401: 1400: 1399: 1395: 1391: 1379: 1376: 1372: 1368: 1356: 1349: 1347: 1344: 1340: 1339: 1334: 1331: 1328: 1321: 1317: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1308: 1304: 1301: 1300: 1295: 1294: 1291: 1288: 1285: 1278: 1274: 1270: 1266: 1261: 1260: 1259: 1258: 1255: 1242: 1239: 1234: 1233: 1232: 1231: 1228: 1220: 1217: 1215: 1212: 1210: 1207: 1205: 1202: 1200: 1197: 1195: 1192: 1190: 1187: 1185: 1182: 1180: 1177: 1175: 1172: 1170: 1167: 1165: 1162: 1160: 1157: 1155: 1152: 1150: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1143: 1136: 1127: 1124: 1119: 1118: 1117: 1114: 1110: 1109:computer game 1106: 1105:PlayStation 2 1102: 1100: 1097: 1093: 1089: 1085: 1083: 1080: 1075: 1074: 1069: 1066: 1062: 1061: 1060: 1059: 1056: 1053: 1049: 1045: 1044: 1043: 1042: 1039: 1034: 1031: 1027: 1024: 1021: 1009: 1006: 1001: 1000: 999: 998: 995: 991: 987: 983: 976: 973: 969: 965: 962: 958: 957: 956: 953: 949: 947: 944: 940: 939: 938: 937: 934: 930: 926: 919:List of games 911: 910: 909: 906: 902: 898: 897: 896: 895: 892: 887: 884: 880: 878: 875: 872: 869: 866: 856: 855: 852: 848: 838: 837: 830: 827: 823: 822: 821: 820: 817: 806: 805: 802: 801:141.24.43.104 798: 789: 788: 785: 781: 769: 766: 761: 756: 755: 754: 753: 750: 746: 732: 729: 726: 719: 715: 711: 707: 706: 703: 698: 691: 686: 682: 681: 680: 679: 676: 659: 656: 655:The Kinslayer 652: 651: 650: 647: 643: 639: 638: 637: 634: 633:The Kinslayer 630: 626: 625: 624: 621: 617: 616: 615: 612: 608: 607: 606: 603: 599: 598: 597: 596: 593: 584: 581: 578: 575: 570: 569: 568: 567: 564: 561: 557: 552: 551: 550: 549: 544: 539: 537: 532: 527: 518: 517: 514: 508: 507: 502: 498: 493: 489: 485: 482: 479: 475: 468: 458: 455: 450: 449: 448: 445: 441: 440: 439: 438: 435: 426: 423: 419: 416: 415: 414: 411: 407: 403: 399: 396: 391: 390: 389: 386: 382: 378: 377: 376: 375: 372: 362: 359: 355: 354: 353: 348: 344: 339: 337: 330: 329: 328: 327: 324: 320: 311: 310: 307: 303: 296: 293: 289: 288: 287: 286: 283: 272: 269: 265: 264: 263: 262: 259: 255: 243: 240: 236: 235: 232: 229: 226: 219: 215: 210: 206: 202: 201: 200: 199: 196: 192: 183: 182: 179: 172: 165: 162: 158: 156: 153: 149: 148: 147: 146: 143: 140: 135: 134:Mana (series) 131: 121: 120: 117: 111: 103: 96: 93: 90: 88: 85: 83: 80: 77: 73: 71: 68: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 4764: 4748: 4710: 4684: 4610: 4588: 4569: 4538: 4503: 4477: 4457: 4420: 4410: 4390: 4356: 4307: 4272: 4267: 4248: 4220: 4161: 4148:DreamingLady 4129:DreamingLady 4115: 4111: 4107: 4093:DreamingLady 4071: 4063:DreamingLady 4054: 4047: 4041: 4037: 4027:DreamingLady 4015: 4011: 4007: 3993:DreamingLady 3976: 3973:visual novel 3964:DreamingLady 3959:encyclopedia 3931: 3927: 3913:DreamingLady 3895:DreamingLady 3887: 3879: 3874: 3868: 3864: 3858: 3852: 3845: 3841: 3835: 3832: 3798: 3785: 3768: 3754: 3720: 3699:User:Silence 3676: 3668: 3659: 3651: 3647: 3639: 3624: 3616:Black Falcon 3604: 3522: 3515: 3507: 3485: 3464: 3441: 3425: 3398: 3383: 3376: 3356: 3353: 3306: 3267: 3229: 3177:DreamingLady 3125: 3111:Keesiewonder 3074:Keesiewonder 3054:Keesiewonder 3051: 3022: 2991: 2940: 2902: 2892: 2799: 2763: 2759: 2706: 2696:DreamingLady 2680:encyclopedia 2677: 2666:Soul Calibur 2665: 2662:Soul Calibur 2661: 2619: 2602: 2492: 2474: 2422: 2396: 2376: 2373:Project name 2314:It has been 2313: 2294:DreamingLady 2245: 2237:DreamingLady 2191: 2187: 2184:Another Code 2183: 2180:Trace Memory 2179: 2175: 2171: 2140: 2130: 2105: 2090: 2062: 2046: 2042: 2015: 1993: 1985: 1944: 1937: 1931: 1925: 1919: 1913: 1902: 1877: 1866: 1864: 1859: 1855: 1853: 1813: 1776: 1764: 1762: 1741: 1640: 1630: 1573: 1568: 1565: 1539: 1486:This week's 1485: 1440:DreamingLady 1408:Air (series) 1387: 1366: 1303:cover fiasco 1297: 1250: 1223: 1142:User:Avrillo 1139: 1047: 1035: 1032: 1028: 1025: 1017: 979: 922: 888: 885: 881: 862: 851:Thunderbrand 844: 833: 812: 795: 784:DreamingLady 777: 742: 672: 602:Thunderbrand 589: 555: 535: 528: 524: 509: 480: 471: 465:Issues with 431: 404:And another 367: 335: 317: 299: 275: 254:User:Cydebot 251: 189: 175: 127: 124:Move debate. 112: 109: 101: 75: 43: 37: 4020:Spark Notes 3846:summarizing 3813:Time Crisis 3128:this review 2684:in-universe 2599:Soulcalibur 2441:Trusty Bell 2018:I was wrong 2000:task forces 1899:Game albums 1496:Oscarthecat 1492:Prima Games 1307:Oscarthecat 1111:platforms. 690:video games 513:Maverick423 116:Maverick423 36:This is an 4758:Hbdragon88 4643:categories 4591:TrickStyle 4195:SeizureDog 4164:SeizureDog 4139:SeizureDog 4108:everything 4079:SeizureDog 3983:SeizureDog 3932:especially 3904:SeizureDog 3825:Hbdragon88 3801:Pokemon XD 3555:SeizureDog 3527:SeizureDog 3494:Hbdragon88 3430:SeizureDog 3370:SeizureDog 3047:Mega Power 3019:Kirby move 2977:SeizureDog 2957:SeizureDog 2921:SeizureDog 2878:SeizureDog 2858:SeizureDog 2842:Air (game) 2818:SeizureDog 2769:SeizureDog 2767:removed.-- 2400:Hbdragon88 2254:Lylat Wars 2250:Mega Drive 2244:Many were 2196:Hbdragon88 2145:Hbdragon88 2051:verifiable 1634:Hbdragon88 1543:Hbdragon88 1355:game-cover 1092:DVD movies 891:Geuiwogbil 864:happened: 739:Link fixes 675:Hbdragon88 592:Hbdragon88 560:SeizureDog 395:Hbdragon88 371:Hbdragon88 268:Hbdragon88 95:Archive 30 87:Archive 25 82:Archive 24 76:Archive 23 70:Archive 22 65:Archive 21 60:Archive 20 4708:A Man In 4685:The user 4622:talk page 4535:Xenogears 4475:A Man In 4418:A Man In 4404:Deckiller 4354:A Man In 4305:A Man In 4296:InShaneee 4270:A Man In 4236:Nil Einne 3962:gameplay. 3880:Moby Dick 3612:main TA:K 3439:A Man In 3396:A Man In 3280:Mitaphane 3270:USA Today 3011:WOSlinker 2968:BcRIPster 2945:Skee ball 2907:has both 2869:BcRIPster 2584:BcRIPster 2490:A Man In 2410:Ned Scott 2389:Ned Scott 2379:Ned Scott 2349:Mitaphane 2316:suggested 2205:Exitmoose 2172:Brain Age 2079:MobyGames 2055:Ned Scott 2004:Ned Scott 1875:A Man In 1793:Armando.O 1755:Armando.O 1717:Mattyatty 1697:Armando.O 1618:Armando.O 1588:Mattyatty 1577:Armando.O 1227:J Milburn 1184:Garacaius 1088:audio CDs 1038:Mattyatty 1005:Digiwrld1 836:UnaLaguna 816:UnaLaguna 646:BcRIPster 492:NeoChaosX 488:this edit 333:A Man In 4722:past ops 4718:conspire 4522:RobJ1981 4489:past ops 4485:conspire 4448:RobJ1981 4432:past ops 4428:conspire 4414:contribs 4394:RobJ1981 4368:past ops 4364:conspire 4319:past ops 4315:conspire 4284:past ops 4280:conspire 4263:Tiberium 4127:summary. 4038:does not 3951:gameplay 3510:because 3453:past ops 3449:conspire 3410:past ops 3406:conspire 3154:RobJ1981 3144:TJ Spyke 3065:TJ Spyke 3043:Sega Pro 3034:TJ Spyke 2829:ADeveria 2692:GameFaqs 2504:past ops 2500:conspire 2320:Snatcher 2164:Wii Play 2155:RobJ1981 2113:Caerwine 2075:GameFAQs 1889:past ops 1885:conspire 1846:RobJ1981 1829:RobJ1981 1708:RobJ1981 1674:RobJ1981 1452:story?-- 1299:Wii Play 1238:SubSeven 1199:Dernhest 1194:Aidenfel 972:SubSeven 899:I think 749:TJ Spyke 484:contribs 454:RobJ1981 444:RobJ1981 422:RobJ1981 410:RobJ1981 385:RobJ1981 358:RobJ1981 347:past ops 343:conspire 323:RobJ1981 239:RobJ1981 214:Dropzone 195:RobJ1981 178:RobJ1981 152:TJ Spyke 4771:Garrett 4616:cvgproj 4599:RockMFR 4540:Deckill 4505:Deckill 4459:Deckill 4222:Deckill 4036:Longer 4012:haven't 3955:reviews 3770:Deckill 3756:Deckill 3749:points. 3746:B Movie 3736:Zeality 3722:Deckill 3689:Zeality 3577:RockMFR 3325:navbox. 3164:Zeality 3133:Zeality 2752:Garrett 2686:style, 2336:Garrett 2266:Garrett 2260:became 2094:RockMFR 1691:or this 1644:RockMFR 1553:Garrett 1532:Garrett 1469:Garrett 1417:Garrett 1375:Garrett 1362:Windows 1343:Teggles 1315:across. 1209:Buriash 1204:Heldain 1179:Thirsha 1174:Kirenna 1113:Garrett 1096:Garrett 952:Slordak 901:1UP.com 765:Slordak 538:retford 474:Chill77 434:RockMFR 306:RockMFR 258:RockMFR 39:archive 4739:(talk) 4698:(talk) 4691:WP:ATT 4639:placed 4573:WP:NOT 4348:, and 4254:(talk) 4182:Nifboy 3819:, and 3792:(talk) 3486:at all 3343:, and 3250:hahnch 3210:hahnch 3191:hahnch 3090:hahnch 2779:Shabby 2653:WP:WAF 2575:(talk) 2525:(talk) 2480:(talk) 2460:Shabby 2430:Shabby 1936:, and 1867:finish 1811:El Cid 1774:El Cid 1765:really 1658:Mika1h 1598:hahnch 1507:hahnch 1428:Nifboy 1320:hahnch 1277:hahnch 1254:rohith 1219:Aramon 1189:Kaluen 1169:Lokken 1154:Ulasem 905:Mika1h 826:Nifboy 718:hahnch 685:WP:CVG 278:place? 218:hahnch 209:Galcon 142:(talk) 4711:Bl♟ck 4654:PLANE 4478:Bl♟ck 4421:Bl♟ck 4357:Bl♟ck 4337:PLANE 4308:Bl♟ck 4273:Bl♟ck 4112:which 3625:Note: 3442:Bl♟ck 3399:Bl♟ck 3368:is?-- 3240:PLANE 3025:Kirby 2708:: --> 2670:Pak21 2621:: --> 2563:PLANE 2547:PLANE 2520:). - 2516:(now 2493:Bl♟ck 2455:Mario 2033:PLANE 2020:. In 1966:PresN 1962:WP:SE 1958:WP:FF 1878:Bl♟ck 1688:This 1454:Clyde 1390:Clyde 1373:. :) 1214:Elsin 1164:Taros 990:Conti 929:Conti 714:WT:VG 710:WP:VG 701:PLANE 611:PresN 336:Bl♟ck 16:< 4649:JACO 4595:diff 4575:. -- 4408:talk 4332:JACO 4124:plot 4008:have 3978:Myst 3928:ever 3710:and 3508:just 3482:This 3394:? - 3355:are 3235:JACO 3088:. - 3045:and 2911:and 2852:and 2840:and 2804:vs. 2764:that 2724:< 2637:< 2558:JACO 2542:JACO 2307:and 2290:Asia 2246:only 2190:vs. 2182:vs. 2174:vs. 2047:then 2028:JACO 1976:Nall 1948:Nall 1918:and 1908:and 1860:this 1856:what 1726:X201 1525:was 1490:was 1458:talk 1406:and 1394:talk 1367:real 1267:and 1159:Zhon 1090:and 1052:X201 1050:. - 943:X201 696:JACO 629:THIS 620:X201 543:talk 536:tghe 533:. -- 501:walk 497:talk 478:talk 292:X201 282:X201 4641:in 4116:not 4016:not 3836:not 3523:one 3490:TFD 3426:end 2941:are 2748:iff 2471:CVG 2141:any 2135:to 2108:SFD 1960:or 1360:'s 873:, 556:ing 4756:. 4720:| 4670:✎☠ 4645:. 4629:✎☠ 4624:. 4619:}} 4613:{{ 4543:er 4508:er 4487:| 4462:er 4430:| 4366:| 4317:| 4282:| 4225:er 3815:, 3811:; 3803:, 3773:er 3759:er 3725:er 3478:}} 3472:{{ 3451:| 3408:| 3392:}} 3386:{{ 3381:. 3357:un 3339:, 3311:, 3032:. 2919:-- 2760:If 2690:, 2611:}} 2605:{{ 2502:| 2276:-- 2252:, 2194:. 2178:, 1930:, 1887:| 1805:, 1694:. 1656:-- 1460:) 1396:) 1358:}} 1352:{{ 1121:-- 879:. 876:, 870:, 867:, 799:-- 580:ka 577:on 574:El 499:, 345:| 280:- 91:→ 4724:) 4716:( 4491:) 4483:( 4434:) 4426:( 4411:· 4406:( 4370:) 4362:( 4321:) 4313:( 4286:) 4278:( 4058:' 3891:' 3821:4 3817:3 3631:. 3455:) 3447:( 3412:) 3404:( 3347:. 3292:! 3289:| 3286:? 3260:n 3255:e 3220:n 3215:e 3201:n 3196:e 3100:n 3095:e 2722:t 2720:n 2718:a 2716:i 2714:d 2712:a 2710:R 2635:t 2633:n 2631:a 2629:i 2627:d 2625:a 2623:R 2506:) 2498:( 2361:! 2358:| 2355:? 2081:) 2077:/ 1904:( 1891:) 1883:( 1818:∵ 1815:∴ 1781:∵ 1778:∴ 1608:n 1603:e 1517:n 1512:e 1456:( 1392:( 1330:n 1325:e 1287:n 1282:e 994:✉ 992:| 933:✉ 931:| 728:n 723:e 545:) 541:( 503:) 495:( 481:· 476:( 349:) 341:( 228:n 223:e 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

talk:WikiProject Video games/Archive 23 - Knowledge

Index