1979:
quality score of the article gradualy improves! If being assesed, and a GA article in example still fall short of the FA status, but yet has been improved compared to the last time it was assessed. Then it would help to encourage editors to show a score, that the article actualy has improved from 85p to 92p. So eventhough it still falls short of the 100p requirement for FA articles (due to perhaps 8 quality issues still remain to be solved), the quality has been visibly improved and recognized. Thus encouraging editors to continue the process with further improvements (despite of the first failed attempt to improve it to FA status). :-)
1975:
parameters in the standard. In example, its possible to define 100 general quality parameters for a perfect article. In case some of them are more important than others, the international standard should then allocate in example 2p instead of 1p, for this specific "quality parameter". After having assesed the article according with the descriped standard in use, the reviewer can then in a very objective way calculate the overall "quality score" of the article. Of course with the quality category then showing and relating to this "quality score", so that articles with 100p are rated FA and articles with 80p-90p are rated GA.
1983:
implemented, there would perhaps also be a call to create a specific "scoreboard standard" for some of the general type of articles. Perhaps a special "scoreboard rating system" should be applied for the assesment of all "sports" articles, while all "scientific" articles would need their own special "scoreboard rating system", etc. Would this be possible and a good idea? If yes, then perhaps someone of the more experienced
Wikipedians here at the Wikiproject Football community, could make it a priority task to create the first example of this new "Quality scoreboard system" for all Football related articles?
1927:
inappropriate for an encyclopedia. I gave an example recently in an edit summary...it is not 'American Navy,' it is 'United States Navy.' The proper name of the teams include the proper name of the country, as this is always used in scores, standings, etc. (check UEFA's website, for example). A news article or broadcaster may say 'the French' informally, but the team is 'France.' It seems as I participated in a short discussion on this before somewhere. 'The French national team' might sound more natural to a casual reader and cause them to edit it to read so, but it is incorrect.
2292:
2072:
527:
483:
32:
3243:. The table says that C-class articles are "weak in many areas". What are those areas in this case? It appears to be thoroughly cited, it uses a standard layout and formatting, and the prose looks fine. The article is short. There could be content gaps - but then again, maybe the content that's there is basically all of the relevant information that's been printed about him in RS (as of 2012). If that were the case, then I can't even think of any
2620:
568:
2554:
81:
63:
1865:
100 Bundesliga appearance in 12 years for VfL Bochum, Energie
Cottbus, and 1. FC Saarbrücken is probably not that notable. Anyway, these are my rules of thumbs for evaluation. I don't think strict rules should be established here. There are just too many ways for a player to become notable. By the way the player to be of Top importance has yet to be born, though I would not rule out, that there could be one.
91:
1819:(AC Milan third-choice keeper for years, 1 presence in 8 seasons at the club) is not a "high-level player". If you're talking about continental-level players, you are just wrong in involving domestic leagues in the matter, because they have mostly a nationwide notability, with a few exception for major leagues (I'd say England, Italy, Spain and, in a lesser extent, Germany, Portugal and France). --
334:
article gets moved to the appropriate category. While the same happens if you set an importance, articles ought to have no importance (aka non-articles) stay in the unevaluated category, cluttering that one. For a small project like German football that is not too bad, but if you want to evaluate articles from the
General project on football it becomes annoying.
1311:, and various others, have achieved international notability, they are known across the whole world, and therefore are deserving of a place in the Top category. While I am not suggesting a mass migration of teams to that category, I feel that a few teams are as notable as the sport itself, certainly more so than say the article on
1864:
Probably I'm a bit strict here, but my rule of thumb is to give mid-importance to players with 10 caps for major national teams. 300 top level league appearances also suffice. This sounds hard, but if you add put this debate into historical perspective you'll probably agree, that a player who amassed
1630:
On what grounds are Real Madrid more notable than Bayern Munich? Both are multiple
European champions, both have won their national championship more times than any other club, both occupy the upper echelons of football club rich lists. Their memberships are of similar size. In essence, an example of
3225:
The examples are listed above for consideration as replacements (C-class and above, excluding A-class since there is no current football-related article listed. If someone could recall a A-class version of an article, that would be very helpful indeed.). Emphasis was given to more recent assessments
1719:
High = High achiever: World Cup Final players (match not tournament) international team and tournament record holders, multiple top flight top scorers and top flight title holders, multiple international title holders, league record holders and high importance club record holders (most apps or goals
1854:
I'm not sure I like all "international or top league player" be titled as mid-importance. Brazil for example had a qualifying season, in which their coach gave about 100 different players a cap. So if someone has played for the most successful team in the world is not necessarily notable. Same goes
1657:
No matter how much money they have, how much they have achieved, or what kind of "smoke" they sell, clubs are simply that: clubs. No club in the world is that important in the world of football in the sense that it would be crucial to rate it so. Their national associations, which they are part of,
1294:
I feel that some teams should be allowed in the Top
Importance category. The base criteria for top says "Reserved for articles that have achieved international notability within its subject or field.", for high it says "Article is extremely notable, but has not achieved international notability, or
1974:
My proposal is, that we need to write down a world wide
Knowledge standard for a perfect FA article, and to ensure objective ratings are applied in the assesment process, this standard should contain a scoreboard system, where 1 point is awarded each time the article comply with one of the defined
1978:
With the proposed
Quality scoreboard system in use, the assesment process would be far more objective, compared to the more subjective standard we currently use at Knowledge. Moreover it would also help to encourage editors in the process of improving a certain article, if they can follow how the
333:
I'd like to pick up this discussion as I'm currently evaluating a lot of German football articles and encountering the same problem. The actual solution is unsatisfying in my opinion. That is because I sometimes browse through the unevaluated articles and rate them. If you do that for class, the
1653:
Many people here are forgetting that this is an encyclopedia, not a popularity contest. The articles are rated based on the importance of the subject at hand. The
Oceania Football Confederation is far more important than any club in the world as it represents a football confederation made up of
1982:
If some of you agree with the idea/proposal of creating a "Quality scoreboard system", I guess it might be a matter to also be further discussed at the main page of
Wikipedia_talk for "article assesment" in general. For sure, I am curious to learn, just for a start, if you support the idea? If
1970:
As a relatively new
Wikipedian, I was rather surprised to find, that Knowledge apparently still struggle to find a perfect solution and answer to this question. The fact that I managed to find several examples of inaccurate "subjective ratings", and different assesment standards applied when
1926:
I don't know where else to bring this up; if there is another place, please direct me. I see a lot of articles being changed to say, for instance, 'English national team' rather than 'England national team.' Others state the name of the teams properly. I see the former as informal, and
2581:. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a
155:
namespaces? Is it necessary to add NA to importance? For example a template talk page would look like this; {{Football|class=Template|importance=NA|}} and a category talk page would look like this; {{Football| class=Cat|importance=NA}} Any comments about this is greatly welcomed.
1364:. As the most successful (internationally), and probably most notable club, I would suggest they are of far more interest to the reader than an article on the least successful confederation. I am not suggesting all major clubs should be top, but the very few most notable teams.
1640:
Maybe Bayern wasn't the best example, though I would suggest (without any evidence) that Real have a far bigger fanbase, and are better known outside of Europe. For example you would be likely to find (though Beckham) many more articles on Real in the US, then on Bayern.
3098:
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or
1829:
Very tricky isn't it! I like "international or top league player" as criteria for Mid, it's relatively straightforward to check on each player's page. For High, I don't think ALL players who have played in a World Cup final would get this, winners of
1698:
The main problems I have with this is that "Top-rated" and "world-class" can be seen as subjective terms, on who's authority does a player become top-rated or world class. Mid importance is far too wide ranging, from multi-award winning players such as
1971:
comparing each national version of Knowledge (ie. articles rated as FA in Sweden/Germany, would not stand a chance of reaching the FA rating by the English wikipedia), in my point of view really call for the Knowledge assessment system to be improved.
1269:
Looks like you did everything correctly already, King of the East. You just need to wait for the bot to run automatically (every 3 days or so - I've kicked it off for the first time for you,looks like only Maradona is tagged) the data can be found at
1259:
I can run through the steps necessary (basically create categories and assign them into the WP1.0 Assessment scheme - don't need admin permissions) and perhaps make it into a 'how-to' page somewhere? (Bit late now but I'll get on it tomorrow)
3182:
Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is
2359:(a) It comprehensively covers the defined scope, providing at least all of the major items and, where practical, a complete set of items; where appropriate, it has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about the items.
1346:
However I don't really thing major football clubs are "extremely important, even crucial" to football. Crucial football articles are definitely offered by the confederations, rules, positions and so on. I feel we should make it distinct.
1755:
I'm sure that there will be a number of editors who would prefer to stick to the vaguely worlded and loosley applied assessment criteria we have, but I feel that in order to get some consistency we need better defined criteria. Regards
1271:
182:
As above, I don't think it's necessary. The "class" parameter is meant for a quality rating rather than for a "article/category/template" rating. I think "NA" in the "class" parameter is sufficient for all the non-article pages.
1232:
I have now added Argentina into the template successfully (I Hope), could someone please give me a hand setting up the Statistics table, I have created the neccessary categories, but cant go any further as I am not an admin.
3087:
The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial
3062:
A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the
1606:
True, I want somehow to be able to distinguish between top teams who are notable outside of traditional football areas, for example through their large fanbase in areas such as south-east Asia, or say in the case of
1930:
Can we come to a consensus on this? I really don't know of the need for debate, as I think it's clear that the proper name for the country ought to be used, but didn't know if I had missed a previous discussion. -
3178:
Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are
1731:
Mid =Decorated players (top level title winners), international footballers, league topscorers, 100+ top flight games, club record holders (most apps or goals for teams rated as mid importance) (example
2013:
examples from C-class and above. We should list football-specific articles as examples, as we did for the importance scale, so that editors may find it more relevant and useful for grading purposes.
1222:. If someone could do this for me I would be extremely grateful and I will avoid destroying the template with my efforts. Could you let me know if it can be done on my talk page please? Kind regards
2537:
Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items.
1482:
Teams with nationwide notability. Players, managers or officials that have participated at international level or in a top-level league. Mid-level leagues. Internationally recognised stadia.
1410:
Articles strictly related to the game: rules of the game, positions, confederations. Teams and who are notable through-out or outside of the football world. Competitions notable worldwide.
263:
and the corresponding Task Force category. However importance CANNOT currently take Template, NA or anything other than Top,High,Mid,Low. Anything other than Top, High,Mid,Low gets put in
260:
2749:, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose);
2563:
The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class.
1237:
3001:
2586:
236:
I this would be unnecessary, to be honest. Class is for a rating of an article's quality, N/A articles show those those that are non-articles, which is sufficient in my opinion.
1246:
3159:
should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use.
1798:
1623:
1577:
2505:
1590:
1226:
1845:
1407:
Article is extremely important, even crucial, to its specific field. Reserved for articles that have achieved international notability within its subject or field.
396:
1368:
468:
173:
Surely talk pages don't need to be assessed at all? Especially since the assessment template relating to the article itself will be on the talk page already.....
1994:
1959:
1351:
177:
1940:
1277:
1264:
1645:
1635:
315:
302:
207:
187:
1807:
1599:
282:
231:
2746:
1874:
1556:
I would say that "Teams and who are notable through-out or outside of the football world" and "Teams with international notability" are virtually the same.
1341:
448:
250:
1777:
3280:
3256:
999:
968:
844:
813:
458:
453:
443:
337:
Proposal: An elegant and pretty simple (I guess) solution to that problem would be to create a NA-importance category and have all templates/categories/NA-
1517:
Subject is not particularly notable or significant even within its field of study. It may only be included to cover a specific part of a notable article.
2107:
exemplifies Knowledge's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the
937:
463:
2540:
No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible.
2277:
No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible.
906:
1678:
1120:
690:
1667:
3043:
2667:
1999:
1916:
1823:
1147:
1135:
875:
776:
733:
1100:
718:
2915:
Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication.
2695:
2478:
1804:
1795:
1642:
1620:
1547:
1365:
1316:
1110:
1105:
1095:
798:
761:
275:
1550:
1319:
1115:
1013:
982:
858:
827:
1029:
951:
698:
573:
532:
488:
920:
741:
708:
703:
2943:
2571:
1069:
791:
786:
751:
746:
713:
650:
610:
287:
So, I feel that it would be a good idea to follow the official version of assessment. This would in fact promote consistency with regards to
264:
1815:
Sincerely I fail to imagine a Sanmarinese multiple top-flight title holder as "extremely notable within a particular continent". And surely
1074:
889:
756:
581:
496:
220:
is added in the class parameter, the assessment template would be more accurate. Of course NA could be added to the importance parameter. --
1834:
would be the sort of thing, unfortunately it only goes back 15 years! Maybe someone (else!) could dig through the useful stuff found here
1773:
1573:
661:
621:
591:
586:
547:
542:
506:
501:
377:
1042:
671:
666:
656:
631:
626:
616:
1677:
I would say that a much more crucial factor to consider is the way that importance is determined in relation to players. This is all the
3233:
3133:
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following:
2881:
2578:
2501:
2004:
2594:
Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting.
167:
3311:
3306:
2699:
2691:
2039:
1965:
268:
354:
2493:
1921:
3048:
It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. The article should not assume unnecessary technical background and
3316:
3011:
2960:
2683:
2254:
2198:
1582:
I've changed "well-known stadia" to "Internationally recognised stadia" above. For European stadia, this could be specified as
1441:
Article is extremely notable, but has not achieved international notability, or is only notable within a particular continent.
402:
2543:
2393:, does not largely duplicate material from another article, and could not reasonably be included as part of a related article.
2582:
2509:
2086:
1444:
Teams with international notability. Top-level leagues, awards and competitions. Top-rated world-class players and managers.
3207:, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area.
368:
page. It is listed as a Start page and I believe should have a higher rating as a result of it's recently improved content.
1479:
Article is only notable within its particular field or subject and has achieved notability in a particular place or area.
1206:
1157:
3068:
3059:
Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher.
3035:
3021:
2474:
2250:
2097:
113:
17:
1126:
1021:
990:
866:
835:
410:
I am about to launch Wikiproject:Argentine football, I need some help with setting up the Argentina=yes section in the
2901:
2638:
2306:
2234:
1178:
959:
2165:
and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured article process; and
1192:
1185:
1171:
928:
2974:
1436:
1199:
724:
384:
1082:
897:
804:
767:
3262:
2687:
2317:
1904:
1769:
1569:
1512:
1474:
1402:
2138:
1658:
are a step higher; then their continental associations, FIFA, and the sport itself and more...it's a long ladder.
1050:
601:
557:
516:
3240:
2947:
2821:
2634:
2152:
681:
641:
3114:
2769:
2757:
2528:
and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured list process.
2280:
1619:
who while notable in Europe and internationally in footballing areas don't have the same notability elsewhere.
1357:
1312:
104:
68:
3285:
2108:
3122:
2873:
1831:
1455:
364:
I'm sorry I don't know where to post this - but I was wondering if an assessment review could be done on the
1520:
Any other player, manager, team or other football-related article. Football-related lists, season articles.
3204:
3194:
3170:
3127:
An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources.
2983:
2179:
2032:
1912:
1882:
1539:
43:
2238:
3200:
3104:
Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study.
2919:
2104:
2082:
1757:
1557:
1289:
1234:
1223:
96:
3216:
3156:
2970:
2885:
2738:
2624:
2470:
2462:
2371:
2296:
2246:
2242:
2076:
1908:
3082:
3064:
3025:
2964:
2933:
2742:
2679:
2558:
2424:
2390:
2188:
1672:
1595:
The list is probably correct - UEFA only issue ratings once a year IIRC so Wembley is not yet on it.
1586:
or 4 and 5 star, although I notice Wembley isn't on the 5-star list. Presume the list is outdated? --
373:
3276:
3210:
There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader.
2302:
2218:
2946:. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach
1485:
112:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
2877:
2808:
2712:
2648:
2605:
2264:
2134:
2071:
2025:
2010:
1990:
1936:
1213:
482:
2998:
The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies.
1785:
though possibly not every single title holder, for example should every member of last season's
3162:
2836:
2796:
2340:
2162:
2142:
1663:
308:
2291:
2217:: where required by criterion 1c, consistently formatted inline citations using footnotes—see
526:
3213:
Lists should be lists of live links to Knowledge articles, appropriately named and organized.
2598:
49:
2925:
2727:
it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
2201:
that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections;
1841:
being the best player ever) and come up with something covering the 20th century at least...
1715:. My suggestion would be to bring in much more specific criteria maybe something like this:
3074:
3020:
The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but does not need to be
3004:, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing.
2773:
2410:
2175:
2170:
1947:
1900:
369:
109:
2597:
Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving.
2274:
Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information.
8:
3272:
2553:
1356:
This is true, but in that case the criteria are conflicting, though I would dispute that
1295:
is only notable within a particular continent." I would argue that certain teams such as
1272:
Knowledge:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team/Football_in_Argentina_articles_by_quality_statistics
2825:: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
3291:
3145:
Multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article
2897:
2525:
2466:
1986:
1932:
1820:
1733:
1501:
1417:
1348:
365:
3186:
2577:
Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in
3252:
3108:
3089:
2989:
2497:
2443:
2133:: it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature; claims are
1955:
1786:
1721:
1659:
1413:
1308:
414:
392:
274:
The use of 'unofficial' options varies from Wikiproject to Wikiproject; the official
256:
244:
174:
1691:
Mid: Players that have participated at international level or in a top-level league.
3230:
2858:
2854:
2458:
2375:
2367:
2230:
1870:
1835:
1737:
1583:
350:
259:
currently accepts NA, Template or List, for class, but they all put the article in
2918:
Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing
2585:. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g.
2263:
It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail and uses
1743:
Low = Players undecorated at top level, fewer than 100 apps at top level (example
2862:
1896:
1790:
1700:
359:
146:
3244:
3014:
and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind.
2978:
2728:
1842:
1632:
1596:
1523:
1463:
1429:
1300:
1274:
1261:
1243:
312:
279:
184:
3175:
A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria.
2221:
for suggestions on formatting references. Citation templates are not required.
3300:
2386:
1816:
1748:
1744:
1712:
1708:
1616:
1612:
1531:
1527:
1467:
1447:
1334:
298:
227:
203:
163:
3248:
2406:
2208:
1951:
1892:
1631:
how putting some clubs as "top" importance is an exercise in subjectivity.
1587:
1489:
1338:
388:
345:
category. Any opinions to that? Anyone like to do that, if nobody opposes?
293:
237:
222:
198:
158:
3038:
etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content.
2127:: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context;
3010:
Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a
2835:: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
2807:
it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see
2343:
that introduces the subject and defines the scope and inclusion criteria.
1866:
1725:
1704:
1608:
1535:
1497:
1493:
1425:
1361:
1330:
1326:
1296:
346:
2922:
on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing.
3049:
2439:
212:
Making NA for all the category and namespaces would be too general. If
2461:
and other media, if appropriate to the topic, that follow Knowledge's
2305:
status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from
2085:
status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from
1304:
267:, which can be a bit of a pain, so I'd support the use of a category
3268:
1459:
420:
template and set up the facility to collect statistics like these
3152:
Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more.
3107:
Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve
2977:
is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of
1707:
to players who have played a handfull of top flight games such as
1315:. Currently the top Category does not allow for any teams at all.
3229:
Opinions are appreciated, including proposal of better examples.
2385:(c) In length and/or topic, it meets all of the requirements for
1505:
1451:
1325:
I'd also like to see more comprehensive guidance given. Where do
3034:
Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams, an
3000:
It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an
2637:, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from
3239:
I don't have a suggested replacement, but I'm surprised by the
1888:
90:
80:
62:
2508:
are structured correctly. Visual media, if included, utilize
2111:
for all Knowledge articles, it has the following attributes.
3032:
The article contains supporting materials where appropriate.
2376:
four kinds of material absolutely required to have citations
2207:: a substantial but not overwhelming system of hierarchical
1838:
1421:
3139:
Multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic
278:
does not make use of Cat/Category, Template, List or NA
2973:, and any important or controversial material which is
2121:: its prose is engaging and of a professional standard;
426:
Football in England articles by quality and importance
3142:
A subheading that fully treats an element of the topic
2405:
It is easy to navigate and includes, where helpful,
108:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
86:
2009:The quality scale table currently uses the default
2446:; and a minimal proportion of items are redlinked.
2438:It makes suitable use of text layout, formatting,
2233:and other media, where appropriate, with succinct
2668:understandable to an appropriately broad audience
3298:
2544:List of Ipswich Town F.C. statistics and records
1380:
192:Oh! sorry! I meant template AND category pages;
3294:be reassessed as it does not look like a stub.
3271:be reassessed as it does not look like a stub.
3050:technical terms should be explained or avoided
2475:criteria for the inclusion of non-free content
2329:It features professional standards of writing.
1378:I would suggest something like the following:
1337:fit into the importance scale, for example? --
2033:
1803:Sorry my mistake, I didn't see the multiple.
1720:for teams rated as high importance) (example
265:Category:Unknown-importance football articles
307:Some related changes have been proposed at
2251:criteria for inclusion of non-free content
2040:
2026:
2020:WikiProject article quality grading scheme
42:does not require a rating on Knowledge's
3028:does not need to be followed rigorously.
2069:
2000:Listed examples for quality scale scheme
480:
269:Category:NA-importance football articles
3042:The article presents its content in an
3018:The article is reasonably well-written.
2551:
14:
3299:
2141:and are supported by inline citations
341:entities automatically move to the NA-
2289:
1396:
524:
3226:provided they are properly graded.
3022:of the standard of featured articles
3008:The article has a defined structure.
2619:
2617:
1688:High: Top-rated world-class players.
567:
565:
31:
29:
25:
2670:; spelling and grammar are correct;
2473:images and other media satisfy the
261:Category:Non-article football pages
48:It is of interest to the following
23:
18:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Football
3286:Reassessment of Abdul Ghani Shahad
1946:I suggest asking this question at
24:
3328:
2666:the prose is clear, concise, and
2524:It is not the subject of ongoing
2249:images or media must satisfy the
1654:different national associations.
102:This page is within the scope of
3044:appropriately understandable way
2618:
2552:
2290:
2191:, including the provision of:
2070:
1966:How to avoid subjective ratings?
1242:What exactly do you need doing?
566:
525:
481:
151:What about template or category
89:
79:
61:
30:
3312:NA-importance football articles
3307:Project-Class football articles
2161:: it is not subject to ongoing
1922:Phrasing of national team names
1783:I pretty much agree with that,
1615:, from other top teams such as
3234:04:39, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
2747:could reasonably be challenged
2087:WP:Featured article candidates
1895:rank in the importance scale?
1358:Oceania Football Confederation
1313:Oceania Football Confederation
403:Wikiproject:Argentine football
122:Knowledge:WikiProject Football
13:
1:
3317:WikiProject Football articles
3281:20:17, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
2882:valid non-free use rationales
2579:Knowledge:Article development
2502:Bulleted and unbulleted lists
1995:20:20, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
1960:20:04, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
1941:19:42, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
1917:16:52, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
1832:FIFA World Player of the Year
1456:FIFA World Player of the Year
397:20:13, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
378:18:52, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
276:version 1.0 Assessment scheme
125:Template:WikiProject Football
116:and see a list of open tasks.
3115:Women's association football
2587:WikiProject Military history
2427:and its supplementary pages.
2171:Knowledge's copyright policy
1846:15:27, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
1824:17:38, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
1808:12:46, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
1799:12:44, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
1778:12:38, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
1646:14:33, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
1636:14:26, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
1624:14:06, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
1600:12:51, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
1591:12:45, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
1578:12:43, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
1551:12:29, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
1540:List of Arsenal F.C. players
1369:11:59, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
1352:11:46, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
1342:11:25, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
1320:10:40, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
7:
3257:16:37, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
3136:A useful picture or graphic
2639:WP:Good article nominations
2374:if they contain any of the
2307:WP:Featured list candidates
2281:Peru national football team
2239:acceptable copyright status
1875:17:03, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
355:17:14, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
97:Association football portal
10:
3333:
2729:the layout style guideline
2583:featured article candidate
2109:policies regarding content
1394:Football-related criteria
3217:List of A.S. Roma players
2498:accessible to all readers
2391:content-forking guideline
2368:sourced where they appear
2301:The article has attained
2098:featured article criteria
2081:The article has attained
2063:
2060:
2057:
2054:
2051:
1668:20:09, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
1393:
1390:
1387:
1360:is more crucial than say
1278:20:18, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
1265:23:47, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
1247:21:02, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
1238:20:46, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
1227:19:08, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
435:
430:
425:
316:10:00, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
303:08:21, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
283:22:58, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
251:18:20, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
232:13:13, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
208:13:07, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
188:13:06, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
178:13:03, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
168:12:55, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
74:
56:
3263:Reassessment of FC Tosno
3199:Meets the criteria of a
3155:Providing references to
383:I've left some comments
2975:likely to be challenged
2900:to the topic, and have
2479:are labeled accordingly
2389:; does not violate the
2153:fairly and without bias
2011:grading scheme template
1887:Where would games like
1855:for league appearances.
3130:More detailed criteria
3095:More detailed criteria
2953:More detailed criteria
2948:good article standards
2644:More detailed criteria
2569:The article meets the
2566:More detailed criteria
2510:alternative (alt) text
2318:featured list criteria
2315:The article meets the
2312:More detailed criteria
2255:be labeled accordingly
2180:too-close paraphrasing
2095:The article meets the
2092:More detailed criteria
1694:Low: Any other player.
1235:King of the North East
1224:King of the North East
309:Template_talk:Football
3290:I suggest an article
3267:I suggest an article
3219:(as of February 2008)
3117:(as of November 2013)
3040:
3030:
3016:
3006:
2996:
2957:
2786:Broad in its coverage
2678:it complies with the
2635:good article criteria
2546:(as of February 2008)
2494:uses proper formating
2423:It complies with the
2213:
2205:appropriate structure
2203:
2193:
2167:
2157:
2147:
2137:against high-quality
2129:
2123:
2117:
1789:team be in high, say
1486:U.S. Città di Palermo
3247:that it would fail.
3189:(as of January 2012)
2928:(as of January 2014)
2770:copyright violations
2758:no original research
2718:no original research
2259:
2241:. Images follow the
2225:
2215:consistent citations
2186:
2151:: it presents views
2114:
1883:Variants on Football
110:Association football
105:WikiProject Football
2961:suitably referenced
2839:or content dispute.
2745:. All content that
2606:Battle of Nam River
2370:, and they provide
2366:(b) statements are
2339:It has an engaging
2061:Editing suggestions
2058:Reader's experience
1290:Top/High Importance
3292:Abdul Ghani Shahad
3165:(as of March 2012)
3077:(as of April 2014)
2984:citation templates
2938:The article meets
2878:copyright statuses
2849:, if possible, by
2700:list incorporation
2629:The article meets
2351:Comprehensiveness.
2284:(as of April 2014)
2267:where appropriate.
1734:Fabricio Coloccini
1681:we seem to have:
1502:Swiss Super League
1418:Offside (football)
366:Coventry City F.C.
44:content assessment
3223:
3222:
3205:set index article
3163:Steven Kinniburgh
2902:suitable captions
2884:are provided for
2795:it addresses the
2611:(as of June 2014)
2387:stand-alone lists
2283:<font=80%: -->
2143:where appropriate
1787:Manchester United
1722:Daniel Passarella
1673:Player assessment
1545:
1544:
1414:Football (soccer)
1309:Manchester United
1220:
1219:
257:Football template
249:
144:
143:
140:
139:
136:
135:
128:football articles
3324:
3201:stand-alone list
3157:reliable sources
3069:style guidelines
2993:
2971:reliable sources
2965:inline citations
2944:B-Class criteria
2920:featured article
2906:
2905:
2890:
2889:
2886:non-free content
2867:
2866:
2841:
2840:
2827:
2826:
2813:
2812:
2801:
2800:
2790:
2789:
2778:
2777:
2762:
2761:
2751:
2750:
2739:reliable sources
2733:
2732:
2722:
2721:
2704:
2703:
2672:
2671:
2661:
2660:
2623:
2622:
2621:
2612:
2608:
2572:A-Class criteria
2557:
2556:
2530:
2529:
2514:
2513:
2483:
2482:
2465:, with succinct
2448:
2447:
2429:
2428:
2415:
2414:
2395:
2394:
2380:
2379:
2372:inline citations
2361:
2360:
2354:
2353:
2345:
2344:
2331:
2330:
2295:
2294:
2243:image use policy
2209:section headings
2189:style guidelines
2139:reliable sources
2105:featured article
2083:featured article
2075:
2074:
2049:
2048:
2042:
2035:
2028:
1766:
1763:
1760:
1738:Gareth Southgate
1566:
1563:
1560:
1381:
1307:, possibly also
571:
570:
569:
530:
529:
486:
485:
423:
422:
419:
413:
301:
296:
291:WikiProjects. --
242:
230:
225:
206:
201:
166:
161:
130:
129:
126:
123:
120:
99:
94:
93:
83:
76:
75:
65:
58:
57:
35:
34:
33:
26:
3332:
3331:
3327:
3326:
3325:
3323:
3322:
3321:
3297:
3296:
3288:
3265:
3241:C-class example
3149:
3148:
3131:
3101:
3100:
3096:
3065:Manual of Style
3056:
3055:
3052:where possible.
3026:Manual of Style
3002:A-Class article
2987:
2959:The article is
2954:
2912:
2911:
2895:
2894:
2871:
2870:
2845:
2844:
2831:
2830:
2819:
2818:
2806:
2805:
2794:
2793:
2784:
2783:
2768:it contains no
2767:
2766:
2755:
2754:
2737:
2736:
2726:
2725:
2710:
2709:
2682:guidelines for
2680:Manual of Style
2677:
2676:
2665:
2664:
2655:
2654:
2645:
2610:
2604:
2591:
2590:
2567:
2534:
2533:
2520:
2519:
2487:
2486:
2452:
2451:
2433:
2432:
2425:Manual of Style
2419:
2418:
2401:
2400:
2384:
2383:
2365:
2364:
2358:
2357:
2349:
2348:
2335:
2334:
2325:
2324:
2313:
2271:
2270:
2187:It follows the
2169:compliant with
2131:well-researched
2093:
2047:
2046:
2007:
2002:
1968:
1924:
1915:
1885:
1837:(reference for
1791:Tomasz Kuszczak
1764:
1761:
1758:
1701:Rolando Schiavi
1675:
1564:
1561:
1558:
1292:
417:
411:
405:
370:Officially Mr X
362:
294:
292:
223:
221:
199:
197:
159:
157:
149:
127:
124:
121:
118:
117:
95:
88:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
3330:
3320:
3319:
3314:
3309:
3287:
3284:
3273:Oldstone James
3264:
3261:
3260:
3259:
3221:
3220:
3214:
3211:
3208:
3197:
3191:
3190:
3184:
3180:
3176:
3173:
3167:
3166:
3160:
3153:
3150:
3147:
3146:
3143:
3140:
3137:
3132:
3129:
3128:
3125:
3119:
3118:
3112:
3105:
3102:
3097:
3094:
3093:
3085:
3079:
3078:
3072:
3060:
3057:
3054:
3053:
3039:
3029:
3015:
3005:
2995:
2955:
2952:
2951:
2936:
2930:
2929:
2923:
2916:
2913:
2910:
2909:
2908:
2907:
2892:
2842:
2828:
2816:
2815:
2814:
2803:
2781:
2780:
2779:
2764:
2752:
2734:
2707:
2706:
2705:
2692:words to watch
2674:
2646:
2643:
2642:
2627:
2614:
2613:
2609:
2602:
2599:WP:Peer review
2595:
2592:
2576:
2568:
2565:
2564:
2561:
2548:
2547:
2541:
2538:
2535:
2532:
2531:
2517:
2516:
2515:
2484:
2463:usage policies
2449:
2436:Visual appeal.
2416:
2398:
2397:
2396:
2381:
2362:
2346:
2332:
2314:
2311:
2310:
2299:
2286:
2285:
2278:
2275:
2272:
2269:
2268:
2258:
2224:
2223:
2222:
2219:citing sources
2212:
2202:
2185:
2184:
2183:
2166:
2156:
2146:
2128:
2122:
2094:
2091:
2090:
2079:
2066:
2065:
2062:
2059:
2056:
2053:
2045:
2044:
2037:
2030:
2022:
2018:
2016:
2006:
2003:
2001:
1998:
1967:
1964:
1963:
1962:
1923:
1920:
1899:
1884:
1881:
1880:
1879:
1878:
1877:
1859:
1858:
1857:
1856:
1849:
1848:
1813:
1812:
1811:
1810:
1753:
1752:
1741:
1729:
1696:
1695:
1692:
1689:
1686:
1674:
1671:
1651:
1650:
1649:
1648:
1628:
1627:
1626:
1604:
1603:
1602:
1543:
1542:
1538:
1534:
1530:
1526:
1524:Leek Town F.C.
1521:
1518:
1515:
1509:
1508:
1504:
1500:
1496:
1492:
1488:
1483:
1480:
1477:
1471:
1470:
1466:
1464:Roberto Baggio
1462:
1458:
1454:
1450:
1445:
1442:
1439:
1433:
1432:
1430:FIFA World Cup
1428:
1424:
1420:
1416:
1411:
1408:
1405:
1399:
1398:
1395:
1392:
1391:Base criteria
1389:
1385:
1384:
1376:
1375:
1374:
1373:
1372:
1371:
1301:Liverpool F.C.
1291:
1288:
1287:
1286:
1285:
1284:
1283:
1282:
1281:
1280:
1252:
1251:
1250:
1249:
1218:
1217:
1210:
1203:
1196:
1189:
1182:
1175:
1168:
1162:
1161:
1154:
1152:
1150:
1145:
1143:
1141:
1139:
1131:
1130:
1123:
1118:
1113:
1108:
1103:
1098:
1093:
1087:
1086:
1079:
1077:
1072:
1067:
1065:
1063:
1061:
1055:
1054:
1047:
1045:
1040:
1038:
1036:
1034:
1032:
1026:
1025:
1018:
1016:
1011:
1009:
1007:
1005:
1003:
995:
994:
987:
985:
980:
978:
976:
974:
972:
964:
963:
956:
954:
949:
947:
945:
943:
941:
933:
932:
925:
923:
918:
916:
914:
912:
910:
902:
901:
894:
892:
887:
885:
883:
881:
879:
871:
870:
863:
861:
856:
854:
852:
850:
848:
840:
839:
832:
830:
825:
823:
821:
819:
817:
809:
808:
801:
796:
794:
789:
784:
782:
780:
772:
771:
764:
759:
754:
749:
744:
739:
737:
729:
728:
721:
716:
711:
706:
701:
696:
694:
686:
685:
678:
676:
674:
669:
664:
659:
654:
646:
645:
638:
636:
634:
629:
624:
619:
614:
606:
605:
598:
596:
594:
589:
584:
579:
577:
562:
561:
554:
552:
550:
545:
540:
538:
536:
521:
520:
513:
511:
509:
504:
499:
494:
492:
477:
476:
471:
466:
461:
456:
451:
446:
440:
439:
434:
428:
427:
404:
401:
400:
399:
361:
358:
331:
330:
329:
328:
327:
326:
325:
324:
323:
322:
321:
320:
319:
318:
272:
196:talk pages. --
180:
148:
145:
142:
141:
138:
137:
134:
133:
131:
114:the discussion
101:
100:
84:
72:
71:
66:
54:
53:
47:
36:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3329:
3318:
3315:
3313:
3310:
3308:
3305:
3304:
3302:
3295:
3293:
3283:
3282:
3278:
3274:
3270:
3258:
3254:
3250:
3246:
3242:
3238:
3237:
3236:
3235:
3232:
3227:
3218:
3215:
3212:
3209:
3206:
3202:
3198:
3196:
3193:
3192:
3188:
3185:
3181:
3177:
3174:
3172:
3169:
3168:
3164:
3161:
3158:
3154:
3151:
3144:
3141:
3138:
3135:
3134:
3126:
3124:
3121:
3120:
3116:
3113:
3110:
3106:
3103:
3091:
3086:
3084:
3081:
3080:
3076:
3073:
3070:
3066:
3061:
3058:
3051:
3047:
3045:
3037:
3033:
3027:
3023:
3019:
3013:
3009:
3003:
2999:
2991:
2985:
2981:
2976:
2972:
2968:
2966:
2962:
2956:
2949:
2945:
2941:
2937:
2935:
2932:
2931:
2927:
2924:
2921:
2917:
2914:
2903:
2899:
2893:
2887:
2883:
2879:
2875:
2869:
2868:
2864:
2860:
2856:
2852:
2848:
2843:
2838:
2834:
2829:
2824:
2823:
2817:
2810:
2809:summary style
2804:
2799:of the topic;
2798:
2792:
2791:
2787:
2782:
2775:
2771:
2765:
2759:
2753:
2748:
2744:
2740:
2735:
2730:
2724:
2723:
2719:
2715:
2714:
2708:
2701:
2697:
2693:
2689:
2685:
2684:lead sections
2681:
2675:
2669:
2663:
2662:
2658:
2653:
2652:
2650:
2640:
2636:
2632:
2628:
2626:
2616:
2615:
2607:
2603:
2600:
2596:
2593:
2588:
2584:
2580:
2574:
2573:
2562:
2560:
2555:
2550:
2549:
2545:
2542:
2539:
2536:
2527:
2523:
2518:
2511:
2507:
2503:
2499:
2495:
2491:
2490:Accessibility
2485:
2480:
2476:
2472:
2468:
2464:
2460:
2456:
2450:
2445:
2441:
2437:
2431:
2430:
2426:
2422:
2417:
2412:
2409:headings and
2408:
2404:
2399:
2392:
2388:
2382:
2377:
2373:
2369:
2363:
2356:
2355:
2352:
2347:
2342:
2338:
2333:
2328:
2323:
2322:
2320:
2319:
2308:
2304:
2303:featured list
2300:
2298:
2293:
2288:
2287:
2282:
2279:
2276:
2273:
2266:
2265:summary style
2262:
2256:
2252:
2248:
2244:
2240:
2236:
2232:
2228:
2220:
2216:
2210:
2206:
2200:
2196:
2192:
2190:
2181:
2177:
2173:
2172:
2164:
2160:
2154:
2150:
2144:
2140:
2136:
2132:
2126:
2125:comprehensive
2120:
2116:
2113:
2112:
2110:
2106:
2100:
2099:
2088:
2084:
2080:
2078:
2073:
2068:
2067:
2050:
2043:
2038:
2036:
2031:
2029:
2024:
2023:
2021:
2017:
2014:
2012:
2005:Quality scale
1997:
1996:
1992:
1988:
1987:Danish Expert
1984:
1980:
1976:
1972:
1961:
1957:
1953:
1949:
1945:
1944:
1943:
1942:
1938:
1934:
1933:Slow Graffiti
1928:
1919:
1918:
1914:
1910:
1906:
1902:
1898:
1894:
1890:
1876:
1872:
1868:
1863:
1862:
1861:
1860:
1853:
1852:
1851:
1850:
1847:
1844:
1840:
1836:
1833:
1828:
1827:
1826:
1825:
1822:
1818:
1817:Valerio Fiori
1809:
1806:
1802:
1801:
1800:
1797:
1794:
1792:
1788:
1782:
1781:
1780:
1779:
1775:
1771:
1767:
1750:
1749:Sergio Romero
1746:
1745:Matthew Bates
1742:
1739:
1735:
1730:
1727:
1723:
1718:
1717:
1716:
1714:
1713:Matthew Bates
1710:
1709:Sergio Romero
1706:
1702:
1693:
1690:
1687:
1684:
1683:
1682:
1680:
1670:
1669:
1665:
1661:
1655:
1647:
1644:
1639:
1638:
1637:
1634:
1629:
1625:
1622:
1618:
1617:Bayern Munich
1614:
1613:David Beckham
1610:
1605:
1601:
1598:
1594:
1593:
1592:
1589:
1585:
1581:
1580:
1579:
1575:
1571:
1567:
1555:
1554:
1553:
1552:
1549:
1541:
1537:
1533:
1532:Goodison Park
1529:
1528:Roberto Biffi
1525:
1522:
1519:
1516:
1514:
1511:
1510:
1507:
1503:
1499:
1495:
1491:
1487:
1484:
1481:
1478:
1476:
1473:
1472:
1469:
1468:Alex Ferguson
1465:
1461:
1457:
1453:
1449:
1448:Bayern Munich
1446:
1443:
1440:
1438:
1435:
1434:
1431:
1427:
1423:
1419:
1415:
1412:
1409:
1406:
1404:
1401:
1400:
1386:
1383:
1382:
1379:
1370:
1367:
1363:
1359:
1355:
1354:
1353:
1350:
1345:
1344:
1343:
1340:
1336:
1335:Goodison Park
1332:
1328:
1324:
1323:
1322:
1321:
1318:
1314:
1310:
1306:
1302:
1298:
1279:
1276:
1273:
1268:
1267:
1266:
1263:
1258:
1257:
1256:
1255:
1254:
1253:
1248:
1245:
1241:
1240:
1239:
1236:
1231:
1230:
1229:
1228:
1225:
1216:
1215:
1211:
1209:
1208:
1204:
1202:
1201:
1197:
1195:
1194:
1190:
1188:
1187:
1183:
1181:
1180:
1176:
1174:
1173:
1169:
1167:
1164:
1163:
1160:
1159:
1155:
1153:
1151:
1149:
1146:
1144:
1142:
1140:
1138:
1137:
1133:
1132:
1129:
1128:
1124:
1122:
1119:
1117:
1114:
1112:
1109:
1107:
1104:
1102:
1099:
1097:
1094:
1092:
1089:
1088:
1085:
1084:
1080:
1078:
1076:
1073:
1071:
1068:
1066:
1064:
1062:
1060:
1057:
1056:
1053:
1052:
1048:
1046:
1044:
1041:
1039:
1037:
1035:
1033:
1031:
1028:
1027:
1024:
1023:
1019:
1017:
1015:
1012:
1010:
1008:
1006:
1004:
1002:
1001:
997:
996:
993:
992:
988:
986:
984:
981:
979:
977:
975:
973:
971:
970:
966:
965:
962:
961:
957:
955:
953:
950:
948:
946:
944:
942:
940:
939:
935:
934:
931:
930:
926:
924:
922:
919:
917:
915:
913:
911:
909:
908:
904:
903:
900:
899:
895:
893:
891:
888:
886:
884:
882:
880:
878:
877:
873:
872:
869:
868:
864:
862:
860:
857:
855:
853:
851:
849:
847:
846:
842:
841:
838:
837:
833:
831:
829:
826:
824:
822:
820:
818:
816:
815:
811:
810:
807:
806:
802:
800:
797:
795:
793:
790:
788:
785:
783:
781:
779:
778:
774:
773:
770:
769:
765:
763:
760:
758:
755:
753:
750:
748:
745:
743:
740:
738:
736:
735:
731:
730:
727:
726:
722:
720:
717:
715:
712:
710:
707:
705:
702:
700:
697:
695:
693:
692:
688:
687:
684:
683:
679:
677:
675:
673:
670:
668:
665:
663:
660:
658:
655:
653:
652:
648:
647:
644:
643:
639:
637:
635:
633:
630:
628:
625:
623:
620:
618:
615:
613:
612:
608:
607:
604:
603:
599:
597:
595:
593:
590:
588:
585:
583:
580:
578:
576:
575:
564:
563:
560:
559:
555:
553:
551:
549:
546:
544:
541:
539:
537:
535:
534:
528:
523:
522:
519:
518:
514:
512:
510:
508:
505:
503:
500:
498:
495:
493:
491:
490:
484:
479:
478:
475:
472:
470:
467:
465:
462:
460:
457:
455:
452:
450:
447:
445:
442:
441:
438:
433:
429:
424:
421:
416:
408:
398:
394:
390:
386:
382:
381:
380:
379:
375:
371:
367:
357:
356:
352:
348:
344:
340:
335:
317:
314:
310:
306:
305:
304:
300:
297:
290:
286:
285:
284:
281:
277:
273:
270:
266:
262:
258:
254:
253:
252:
248:
247:
241:
240:
235:
234:
233:
229:
226:
219:
215:
211:
210:
209:
205:
202:
195:
191:
190:
189:
186:
181:
179:
176:
172:
171:
170:
169:
165:
162:
154:
132:
115:
111:
107:
106:
98:
92:
87:
85:
82:
78:
77:
73:
70:
67:
64:
60:
59:
55:
51:
45:
41:
37:
28:
27:
19:
3289:
3266:
3228:
3224:
3183:significant.
3179:significant.
3067:and related
3041:
3031:
3017:
3012:lead section
3007:
2997:
2994:is optional.
2979:<ref: -->
2958:
2939:
2926:Abby Wambach
2850:
2846:
2832:
2820:
2797:main aspects
2785:
2756:it contains
2743:cited inline
2717:
2711:
2657:Well-written
2656:
2649:good article
2630:
2570:
2521:
2489:
2455:Media files.
2454:
2435:
2420:
2402:
2350:
2336:
2326:
2316:
2260:
2226:
2214:
2204:
2199:lead section
2197:: a concise
2194:
2174:and free of
2168:
2158:
2148:
2130:
2124:
2119:well-written
2118:
2102:
2096:
2019:
2015:
2008:
1985:
1981:
1977:
1973:
1969:
1929:
1925:
1893:Beach Soccer
1886:
1814:
1784:
1754:
1697:
1676:
1660:Jamen Somasu
1656:
1652:
1546:
1490:Gareth Barry
1377:
1293:
1221:
1212:
1205:
1198:
1191:
1184:
1177:
1170:
1165:
1156:
1134:
1125:
1090:
1081:
1058:
1049:
1020:
998:
989:
967:
958:
936:
927:
905:
896:
874:
865:
843:
834:
812:
803:
775:
766:
732:
723:
689:
680:
649:
640:
609:
600:
572:
556:
531:
515:
487:
473:
436:
431:
409:
406:
363:
342:
338:
336:
332:
288:
245:
238:
217:
213:
193:
175:ChrisTheDude
152:
150:
103:
50:WikiProjects
40:project page
39:
3245:GA criteria
3075:Gareth Bale
2876:with their
2847:Illustrated
2413:facilities.
1897:2o-DeMoN-o8
1759:King of the
1726:Bobby Moore
1705:Ashley Cole
1609:Real Madrid
1559:King of the
1536:John Motson
1498:Graham Poll
1494:David Moyes
1426:Real Madrid
1362:Real Madrid
1331:Graham Poll
1327:John Motson
1297:Real Madrid
3301:Categories
2896:media are
2872:media are
2774:plagiarism
2713:Verifiable
2522:Stability.
2411:table sort
2403:Structure.
2176:plagiarism
2135:verifiable
1805:John Hayes
1796:John Hayes
1643:John Hayes
1621:John Hayes
1548:John Hayes
1366:John Hayes
1317:John Hayes
1136:Unassessed
437:Importance
343:importance
3111:problems.
2601:may help.
2526:edit wars
2163:edit wars
2115:It is:
1843:Paulbrock
1633:Oldelpaso
1597:Oldelpaso
1397:Examples
1305:Barcelona
1275:Paulbrock
1262:Paulbrock
1244:Oldelpaso
313:Paulbrock
280:Paulbrock
185:DrKiernan
3269:FC Tosno
3187:Ji Xiang
2990:cite web
2986:such as
2898:relevant
2853:such as
2837:edit war
2471:Non-free
2467:captions
2247:Non-free
2235:captions
2064:Example
2055:Criteria
1948:WT:FOOTY
1685:Top: N/A
1679:guidance
1611:through
1460:UEFA Cup
1091:Assessed
1000:Template
969:Redirect
845:Disambig
814:Category
415:football
271:instead.
218:category
214:template
119:Football
69:Football
3249:Colin M
3109:cleanup
3090:cleanup
3036:infobox
2969:It has
2963:, with
2942:of the
2822:Neutral
2696:fiction
2633:of the
2457:It has
2407:section
2261:Length.
2229:It has
2149:neutral
1952:Peanut4
1588:Jameboy
1506:Wembley
1452:La Liga
1339:Jameboy
938:Project
432:Quality
389:Jameboy
360:Request
299:iva1979
239:Dave101
228:iva1979
204:iva1979
164:iva1979
147:Inquiry
3024:. The
2880:, and
2874:tagged
2855:images
2833:Stable
2698:, and
2688:layout
2506:tables
2496:to be
2459:images
2444:colour
2442:, and
2440:tables
2421:Style.
2327:Prose.
2231:images
2227:Media.
2195:a lead
2159:stable
1889:Futsal
1867:OdinFK
1821:Angelo
1584:5-star
1388:Label
1349:Angelo
1233:Cheers
1214:56,041
1193:40,131
1127:56,040
1111:40,130
907:Portal
768:23,540
752:20,939
725:19,935
709:16,082
347:OdinFK
46:scale.
3123:Start
3099:flow.
2863:audio
2861:, or
2859:video
2851:media
2716:with
2492:. It
2337:Lead.
2211:; and
2052:Class
1762:North
1562:North
1200:7,579
1186:7,405
1166:Total
1116:7,579
1106:7,405
1059:Other
1022:1,184
1014:1,184
836:5,563
828:5,563
747:1,951
704:3,724
691:Start
682:2,796
672:1,615
667:1,135
474:Total
339:class
153:talk,
38:This
16:<
3277:talk
3253:talk
3195:List
3171:Stub
2982:and
2980:tags
2741:are
2651:is:
2504:and
2488:(c)
2477:and
2453:(b)
2434:(a)
2341:lead
2253:and
2237:and
1991:talk
1956:talk
1937:talk
1891:and
1871:talk
1839:Pele
1765:East
1664:talk
1565:East
1437:High
1422:UEFA
1333:and
876:File
777:List
734:Stub
449:High
407:Hi,
393:talk
387:. --
385:here
374:talk
351:talk
255:The
246:talk
3231:LRD
3203:or
2940:all
2891:and
2802:and
2772:or
2763:and
2673:and
2631:all
2178:or
1747:or
1736:or
1724:or
1711:or
1703:or
1513:Low
1475:Mid
1403:Top
1207:742
1179:181
1121:742
1101:181
991:394
983:394
898:373
890:373
805:615
792:595
762:648
642:637
632:256
627:319
602:660
592:419
587:219
558:135
548:132
517:142
469:???
459:Low
454:Mid
444:Top
289:ALL
216:or
194:NOT
3303::
3279:)
3255:)
2992:}}
2988:{{
2857:,
2811:).
2694:,
2690:,
2686:,
2647:A
2625:GA
2589:).
2500:.
2469:.
2321::
2297:FL
2245:.
2103:A
2101::
2077:FA
1993:)
1958:)
1950:.
1939:)
1913:wp
1873:)
1776:)
1666:)
1576:)
1347:--
1329:,
1303:,
1299:,
1051:11
1043:11
1030:NA
960:33
952:33
867:11
859:11
787:11
719:85
699:43
662:44
622:61
582:22
574:GA
533:FL
507:89
502:43
497:10
489:FA
464:NA
418:}}
412:{{
395:)
376:)
353:)
311:.
156:--
3275:(
3251:(
3092:.
3083:C
3071:.
3046:.
2967:.
2950:.
2934:B
2904:.
2888:;
2865::
2788::
2776:.
2760:;
2731:;
2720::
2702:.
2659::
2641:.
2575::
2559:A
2512:.
2481:.
2378:.
2309:.
2257:.
2182:.
2155:;
2145:;
2089:.
2041:e
2034:t
2027:v
1989:(
1954:(
1935:(
1911:*
1909:a
1907:*
1905:c
1903:*
1901:t
1869:(
1793:?
1774:C
1772:/
1770:T
1768:(
1751:)
1740:)
1728:)
1662:(
1574:C
1572:/
1570:T
1568:(
1172:3
1158:1
1148:1
1096:3
1083:9
1075:6
1070:3
929:2
921:2
799:9
757:1
742:1
714:1
657:2
651:C
617:1
611:B
543:3
391:(
372:(
349:(
295:S
243:→
224:S
200:S
160:S
52::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
