Knowledge talk:Picture of the day/Archive 9

652: 4397: 3621:

gradually ended up that I was writing fewer and fewer of the blurbs as others stepped up to the plate and I found myself with less time on my hands. I fully agree with you on being forced to embrace that view about the state of the articles... it just doesn't seem to be practical to get the articles up to standard; in many cases I found it quite a full-on job just verifying enough of the text to form a blurb. I think IMHO the current status quo is probably better than unbolding the target or reducing the whole thing to just a glorified caption though. POTD does generate a significant hit for all the articles it bolds, and that's probably a good thing. Cheers —

4653:, but they are for the most part woefully out of date, and don't correspond at all to the de facto set of guidelines that's been in play for the past few years at least. In particular, that page talks about focusing on the image whereas in practice we treat POTD more like the TFA in that the picture is used to highlight the encyclopedic article. Or at least that's what I tried to do for the couple of years when I was POTD coordinator. I fully agree that we should rewrite and formalise the guidelines, because this has caused disagreement several times in recent months. My baseline set of guidelines would be something along the lines of: 3978: 4389: 3916:, and you find a very different story. Almost every blurb is about the linked article, not about the picture. And what's written is generally stated and cited in the article. When I took over, I maintained this status quo. Ultimately this fits with the purpose of FPs which is, as well as being high-quality images, that they must be used to enhance encyclopedia articles. The latter requirement is what separates our FPs from Commons FPs, and POTD should similarly use the image to illustrate an encyclopedic topic. Cheers — 646: 2767:. Now I notice that the general rule is that images that have appeared as POTD should not appear again because of the backlog of images that have not yet appeared, and this image appeared in 2006. I would like to make an exception for it because it has been nominated, and the caption written, by User:FEMSmatt, who has made no other edits to Knowledge. I would not like his only contribution to be rejected on a technicality, and as an electron micrograph of bacteria, this image adds interest and variety to POTD. 827:. So if a picture doesn't satisfy the last criterion, then it should either be delisted or added to an article, as C&C says, and should not appear on POTD until that's done. In most cases this happens because someone has replaced the image in its main target article at some point after featuring... sometimes with a "better" image, but more often with a less good image, which means reverting back to the featured one would be in order. In the case of the rosetta, it seems that it was featured as an image for 31: 3362:(which is linked to from the Main Page itself) functions as a transclusion of the current month's POTD archive subpage. This renders the page effectively redundant, and does not really serve as an "archive" at all, especially at the beginning of a month – I believe that readers' expectations would conceivably be that they would want to see the most recent POTD appearances, not necessarily all those scheduled for that month (including those that still require further cleanup). 5027:

case. There is literally no excuse for it. I'm not really following your odd example at all, one of the many problems with the example here was that the blurb contained claims not present in the target article (and hence not verified) and even contradictions with the target article. It's pretty basic, to check that what's in the blurb is (a) in the target article and (b) verifiable in the target article. It's not rocket science. Why is this even a debate?

663:. We usually skip these FPs until such time that an appropriate article is created to support POTD appearance". If we followed this rule, masses of featured pictures would be excluded from POTD, including most of the bank note images, coins, medals, engravings and many paintings. Even when a picture has a dedicated article, if it is a brief stub, an insufficiently referenced BLP, or an article with maintenance tags, I am told the picture is unsuitable. 5276: 3480: 4757:

previously, though, blurbs occasionally contain information that's more relevant to the selected image in particular than to the article; in such cases, I think that it's entirely reasonable to resort to the file description page as a source – although I agree that this should be restricted to text directly related to the image (e.g. in describing it) and its immediate context. —

3730:

paintings, or picking a few snippets from Encyclopedia Britannica, if it's a geographical entity. If one is short of time or the sources don't seem to be there, then a short 3 line caption can also do the job. I don't mind stepping up again and doing some of them if there's a need for it, but we should make sure we're all on the same page about how this should work. Cheers —

133:

bit about the picture, and I do try to adapt what they've written if possible, but I will normally flesh it out or copyedit it to conform to conventional POTD style. Normally, when I schedule POTDs in advance, I choose a date that's meaningful to the picture – especially anniversaries or birthdays associated with the event/person, e.g.

3912:. POTD has always unfortunately been something of a neglected backwater - for most of the 2010s it was run exclusively by Crisco, and presumably he didn't feel the need to update all the guidelines as he went along, it's just that the way he did it became the accepted norm. Fast-forward ten years from the "good caption", to 1832:, I think I got it. Please take a look and tell me what you think. I am not sure what we should do with the archiving. Since the unprotected version is the one that survives. Perhaps we should wait till after May 6 and overwrite the unprotected version with the version from the protected template before it is deleted. --- 3562:, which is an absolutely fundamental policy. Certainly when I was coordinating POTD, the need to source all text was the absolute first and foremost rule that I followed, and that still appeared to be followed even after I stepped away from the project in mid-2019. The last major discussion I recall around POTD was 3570:. And although we had somewhat differing views on what the underlying purpose of POTD was, I didn't see anyone question the central philosophy that the text must be verifiable. Anyway, I have added a couple of refs and pruned a couple of lines from the blurb, so hopefully today's issues are resolved. Cheers — 5559:

I thus propose adding a link to the caption that will point to a viewing method suitable for the numerous Knowledge visitors that lack cross-eyed viewing capability, but have acess to a viewing device suitable for parallel stereo viewing. This link would refer directly to the "parallel (L-R)" version

5470:

thanks for this fix. How very annoying - I arrived at the format after discussions with Cwmhiraeth about how to deal with this POTD a few weeks ago. Of course, it passed the "looks fine on my machine" test, and even ran it on Chrome in my Android phone, so I thought all was good. Apologies to all the

4665:

In terms of quality, the article doesn't have to conform to the same standards of sourcing and completion that we expect in ITN/DYK/OTD. (Although it must be more than just a stub). This one is regrettable, but probably has become accepted on the basis that the people who produce good pictures aren't

4205:

Inventing a title for the specific example chosen as picture of the day is actually less problematic than the bastardized name for stroboscopic discs, but I don't understand the need to do this. It can be simply described as depicting running rats, instead of suggesting that there is an authoritative

4185:

doesn't feature a pearl earring. I understand how it may be useful to keep the incorrect title that was attached to it long after the painter's death, because this title has become so well known. Something similar happened with "phenakistoscope" or "phenakistiscope"; these versions are too well known

4151:

is an ornamental gateway while a porch is a covered shelter projected in front of the entrance of a building. It has two surviving porches and one Torana. Your changes to POTD are OK but the nominated image depicts one surviving porch and few pillars so previous description was more relevant. You can

3704:

in the target article. When his lordship turned up, he used to do the job so well I only went into it sporadically and can't recall a time when there was an issue. Today I was amazed by the length of the POTD blurb so I checked, and, well, the rest is history. While it's nice to highlight a pretty

3620:

handle most of the workload, for which much kudos is given. I think there were some more editors around penning the blurbs during 2019-20 as well, though I could be wrong. I never formally stepped down from the role (and in fact I was never formally appointed to it in the first place either), it just

3584:

I do still think everything in the blurb absolutely must be verified somewhere readily accessible. I have (reluctantly) been forced to embrace the view that the rest of the linked article can be treated as akin to the linked-but-not-bolded links elsewhere on the main page -- should not be horrendous,

455:

and I have been working on a proposal to form a new usergroup whose members would be able to edit content on the main page or its fully protected subsidiaries. Since it directly affects this project, and is based in part on the shortage of administrators working here, we would like to invite feedback

109:

The reason I ask is that the blurb writing to me was the undaunting part of the process, and the straight writing of blurbs for images that have already been scheduled by someone else might be a way of luring in someone who is intimidated by the idea of figuring out that first step (which took me two

5043:

Well I see the "target" of the POTD as the picture, not the article to which the bolded link points in the blurb about the picture. Thus I don't see a big difference between supporting statements in the blurb with references in the bolded link or with those in the non-bolded links. Would it help not

3776:

exception to the sourcing rules, probably because the material is located on Commons not here, and featured pictures are sometimes not much better than average in this regard. I don't believe the caption material for featured pictures is generally reviewed in detail. Relying on someone who has taken

3514:

TFA spotlights a featured article, and it is reasonable to require all the information in the blurb to be present in the article and for it all to be well referenced there. POTD is different. You have to link the picture to an article in which the image is used, but the picture and articles may have

3306:

raises about today's POTD, I personally think it's fine to throw in fairly recent ones occasionally, as long as you're steadily working through the older ones as well. At the time I was heavily involved with this, there was quite a significant imbalance in material, with a lot of coins and notes and

2340:

I don't have a very strong preference. For most of us, POTD is relatively uncommon, so I'm not worried about taking up too much space on my user page. If viewing on my computer, I kind of like seeing the full blurb there, I guess? My one gripe would be that I first pulled up the example on my phone,

1207:

said there: "the image must appear in the bolded article for POTD, otherwise in what way is it illustrating that topic? Therefore I'd request those scheduling them to please check this before running. If the image has been removed, then we must either (1) reinsert it, (2) use a different article for

845:

On the FIFO question, I broadly sought to follow that, but with plenty of wriggle-room for exceptions, in order to keep the daily output balanced and varied. Often I'd feature recently-promoted FPs if they were on a topic that hadn't been covered so much... and trends have changed over time, meaning

3930:

The December 2016 captions are quite satisfactory, but I suggest that if you wish to repurpose POTD in this way, you need to rewrite the guidelines. It would be quicker and easier to write short captions like this and not mention the particular features of the picture, but it is more interesting to

3729:

Quite so, and it's not actually that onerous to keep it ticking along, as long as everyone writing the blurbs is aware of the two rules above and cites/writes accordingly. Most POTD topics have enough sources readily available online to generate a passable blurb. E.g. Using art gallery websites for

3244:

When I first saw you had posted here I thought you might be going to ask the question that I was asking myself, "Why did today's POTD (November 28) get scheduled when it had only become a featured picture a few weeks ago, and other featured pictures have to wait as long as five or more years before

3183:

Why was this two images, nominated in two nominations, in two different styles, showing two different people? I could see it if the images were part of a gallery, but these images were also used on the pages of the people they depict, and, because they were combined, the text didn't show the actual

2863:

will be the picture of the day for November 2nd. That's fine with me, but the name of the image isn't right. It does not show Saturn at equinox. The rings would not have been illuminated at equinox. As the text describes, it shows Saturn in July of 2008, about a year before the actual equinox of 12

2830:

Well, I'm not in charge of POTD, nobody is, as far as I know. I have just been filling a gap, with Ravenpuff improving my efforts. So I don't intend to remove this image, but somebody else can do so if they feel it should not appear. Incidentally, I have worked through quite a lot of the backlog of

2790:

However, if you feel that it adds variety, I do not think it would be outside your discretion to allow the re-appearance of an image that is more than 15 years old as an FP. I do point out that our FPC standards are much higher now, and the resolution of the image while still above the requirements

2613:

is an especially great picture to use for the Main Page. It's a perfectly nice photo in the technical sense, but the portrait of a high-profile Spanish library administrator and the associated article is of very little interest to the average reader. I'm not too familiar with POTD, but if there's a

2299:

I prefer the thumbnail size image and the opportunity for the nominator/uploader to participate in the blurb without overwhelming their talk page by giving a full version. The photographer is probably more interested in the fact that theire image is to be the POTD rather than what the caption says.

1951:

such that it should properly generate dual POTDs when substed, which should obviate the need to create the protected versions manually. We can just follow the syntax for the Cuban silver certificates; the templates should be able to handle the rest. Is there anything else that would be necessary to

132:

POTDs can be scheduled or written by anyone. When I go through upcoming POTDs, I find pictures that were scheduled a long time ago by other users, but there's no guarantee that they'll be around or willing to write a blurb for the picture that they scheduled. It's completely fine if they do write a

4803:

Yet in this situation that was far from the case. Text in the POTD blurb had just been made up, it would seem, as it appeared neither in the target article nor the image description. It's not good enough, and if people want to just focus on the pretty images, then Commons is the place for that.

4623:

Are there not some standards somewhere which POTDs need to meet? If so, perhaps we could ensure that potential POTDs are held to them, or amend them, as appropriate. If not, perhaps a discussion could be started to come up with some. As TRM points out, no other part of the main page would get away

837:

is a slightly different issue, in that the target articles which led to be its being featured are not actually about the painting itself, but the two artists. Historically, such pictures have still been used for POTD, but there should still be a bolded article, which means using one or both of the

206:

I was wondering how the POTD system worked, so the above explanation is useful. At one time pictures were chosen weeks ahead of time and I occasionally improved the connected articles in anticipation of their appearance on the main page. Maybe I could contribute to the image selection and/or blurb

5026:

The point here, which is obvious, is that claims made on the main page should be verifiable in the target articles, not some other article they may link to. That's fundamental. It applies to every target article on the main page except.... wait for it ..... POTD. And that shouldn't be the

5007:

Hang on, in that sense the whole Main Page uses Knowledge as a RS, since no references appear there, only wikilinks. Sure, it makes it easy for the reader to check a reference if they know that all can be found either by clicking on the bolded link or in the picture's own page; but it is also not

849:

As C&C says, sets of notes/coins/stamps etc. should generally be listed all at once, as they tend to be large sets, and there isn't that much value in having each individual one on a different day. Bear in mind, though, that unless the templates have changed this approach requires an admin to

3845:

I would like to register my dissatisfaction with the conclusions that two or three people seem to have come to, which go against the guidelines for Picture of the Day. Please look at the following statement from the guidelines, which is supposed to contrast a "bad" caption with a "good" caption.

2262:

I'd argue that this is probably a matter of taste, but I'm very much open to amending the wording or layout. In addition, I'd also note that you don't strictly have to use the pre-prepared templates to satisfy the POTD notification requirement. Out of curiosity, what aspects do you think are not

415:

image for Dec 10th, with the intention of improving the article and removing the referencing tag. In so doing I found there was a massive copyvio which I have now removed, and asked for a revdel. When that has been done, I will bring the article up to scratch in plenty of time for its scheduled

666:

Now the POTD guidelines state that pictures should appear on a first in, first out basis, but that the same "theme" should not be scheduled in close succession. The only exceptions mentioned refer to suitability of the image for main page display (not too wide, too salacious or too grotesque).

4893:

This is an encyclopedia. If the article isn't suitable, either make it suitable, or make the blurb shorter, or don't run the picture. This is a recurring problem, and it needs to be fixed. The only "problems related to POTD" are the selection of blurbs which are either not mentioned or not

3557:

No, TRM is correct. Every piece of text that appears *on the main page* must be fully referenced and verifiable. It's true that POTD has traditionally been given some extra leeway, in that the article itself may contain unreferenced text, which is less than ideal but has sort of emerged as a

834: 105:

There are images scheduled that don't have blurbs yet. Is that an indication to other editors that the editor who scheduled that image wants to write that blurb, or would just writing blurbs be helpful? Or would you not want someone coming in here and starting to write blurbs who didn't have

1769:

I recall that there was a plan to add the reverse sides of the banknotes to the POTD templates. While I'm not opposed to this, I think that it might be worthwhile that we create the protected versions early, so that we can see exactly how they'll look, considering that this would be a novel

4756:

I look at POTD blurbs regularly and copyedit them for grammar and consistent style. Admittedly I haven't really been thoroughly checking that facts presented are referenced in the article, but I do my best to make sure that is the case if I introduce new material to a blurb. As I mentioned

354:, which, in my opinion, makes it unsuitable to be bolded on the Main Page. While we don't require that the whole article be fully referenced, we should follow the typical Main Page convention that bolded articles be free of template messages indicating a lack of sufficient quality. — 5058:

What you see and what is the actual fact of the matter is clearly different in this case. What would suit everyone would be to (a) use facts from the target article and (b) ensure those facts are referenced in the target article. Just exactly the same quality threshold we apply to

4862:

do not understand the problems related to POTD. Every featured picture has the expectation that it will appear on the main page in due course, not like "on this day" when you can pick and choose and reject those that fail to pass muster. They also give the impression to people like

4602:

in ", e.g. "engraver Henry Mitchell in", e.g. "from fur trading". I don't know, perhaps I'm asking for too much to see material on the main page of Knowledge to be (a) mentioned in the main article and (b) verifiable with sources in that target article. After all, we hold

842:, which is about a painting but is bold-linked to the artist. I rarely listed POTDs of this nature myself, but precedent would suggest it's OK. All facts used in the blurb must be included in the target article and cited there though, so obviously make sure that's the case. 1880:, as that's under template protection (and, arguably, the archive / Main Page layout should really be the default). I've also tweaked the protected versions a little to provide some space between the two pages so that readers know they're actually two separate images. — 3669:

Personally I think it would be easier to write a concise caption, given how dreadful some of the target articles start out, but I agree there's encyclopedic value to be drawn from a longer one, if editors can be bothered to do the work writing and sourcing it properly.

2974:

When you have fixed this issue, please change the section title (e.g. append " - Fixed") or remove this section completely. I will repost the notice if the page is still broken or is re-broken. If you have any questions or comments that my operator should see, please

1488:

1423:

Thanks for notifying me. I know full well that the template should read "default", but often temporarily replace it with "row" when editing just to preview the layout once it goes on the Main Page; I've obviously forgotten to change it back on occasion. My apologies.

1353:

1257:

1118:

2644:

Did you notice the picture says "Oedant arma toga", not "Cedant arma toga"? I'm not sure how to fix it, because "oedant" doesn't seem to mean anything, and the "cedant" translation looks consistent with Google Translate. But I don't see how you can say "The motto is

760:

FP without a specific corresponding article are difficult but skipping them for now is acceptable. You could also create the article if there is enough material to be written to get us to almost start level. This is not DYK. So we do not have a page size requirement

3416:

According to official records and newspaper reports, the US Army's burial detail conducted its operations on 3 Jan 1891, securing the site from looters and preparing the mass grave and retrieving bodies. Published reports state that 16 photographs were taken that

3639:

blurb I have been working on today. Most of it comes from the descriptions of the items of clothing that accompany the uploaded files, but the information is not stated and referenced in the article in which these images appear. So should it be removed, as per

1875:

Sorry, I haven't gotten around to replying to this until now, but I presume you've noticed that I've managed to encode the reverse sides into the regular template and archive layout so that they display correctly in the archives. This hasn't been done for the

5445:

My hotfix was to add the first row and cell into the table with display none. The CSS accordingly finds it and then does nothing with that cell because it's set to display: none. Then the links in the now-second row are happy little clams who can go on being

5063:

bold link on the main page. And yes, the linked article at POTD is often crap, but at the very least, do (a) and (b). This is, after all, an encyclopedia, not a picture project (Commons is for that). Defending the indefensible is becoming a thing here.

4173: 1662:

Actually, that refimprove tag has been in the article since 2008, since when numerous sources have been added. I have removed one unsourced statement, and added a citation where there was a "citation needed" tag, so I reckon it is in good enough shape now.

4789:, writing as the mug currently coordinating the TFA blurbs I sympathise, and for what it is worth agree that text directly relating to the image - which I realise will get subjective at the margin - can be reasonably sourced to the image description page. 4058:

Thanks for changes. After commenting this, I checked article and other references. Even though the article is GA-class, it has poor quality references and littered with inaccuracies. after checking images and texts, I found following surviving structures:

2601: 5210:

Thank you for your comments. The actual contents of the video are beyond our control here at POTD. The thing we can alter is the text or caption that goes with the video, so if you think that needs alteration, please say so, or make the change yourself.

2815:

During my tenure as POTD coordinator I did sometimes schedule repeats, e.g. For the WW1 anniversary in 2018. Like C&C I'd say just use your discretion. It should be an exception, but if you want to grant such an exception in this case then go ahead.

3408:

Editor Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:38, 22 December 2020 (UTC), announced that the POTD for 29 Dec will include a photo of the Wounded Knee aftermath, while correcting the date of the image from 3 days after the 29 Dec 1890 battle to 3 weeks after the battle.

2610: 2603: 3558:

compromise around the fact that FP nominators are mainly graphics bods and not necessarily article writers. It's quite worrying that the need to reference the main page content isn't codified in any POTD guideline, but ultimately this falls back to

5553:- even if provided with a stereo viewer. And even fewer are able to focus on stereo images arranged for "cross-eyed (R-L)" viewing, as nominated (as a matter of fact I am married to one), despite the fact that it is the preferred method for 4922:... that is the process you are defending right now, Cwmhiraeth. You said it yourself, we've had seven years to tidy up the article, and yet there was no push to do so whatsoever. Kudos to everyone calling out the mindless rubber-stamping. 5145:

Regarding Template:POTD/2021-09-11: 20. Anniversary of the deadly attacks on the World Trade Center is not commemorated, why? Can this still be changed in remembrance of those who was lost? Proposed picture could be: Twin Towers-NYC.jpg.

2491:

I have made a small edit to the main article, changning "conception" to "pregnancy", for reasons explained in the the article's Talk page. I am mentioning it here because the edit will also show up in the text accompanying the POTD. --

4174: 4879:, which does not fit it well. The picture, as in this case, may be linked to a stub or poorly-referenced article, but there is no other option than to use that article. We really ought to discuss this matter in some other venue. 3427:

It is disputable that four bodies remained as depicted in the image after the burial detail operations on 3 Jan 1891. The 17 Jan 1891 date may reflect the date the photograph was published after film (or plate) transport and

3373:

to now provide a rolling 30-day archive of the most recent POTDs, e.g. the 30 days from December 8 to November 9 inclusive when viewing the page on December 9. Please let me know if there are any objections to this. Thanks.

2177:

I've improved the above two templates for consistency, and so that they use slightly better language and present the POTD blurbs in a more pleasing layout that mimics their future appearance on the Main Page. In particular,

3403: 5315:

Curious formatting on mobile (iOS 15, Safari). In mobile view, each Wikilinked item is centered on a new line, in portrait or landscape orientation. Desktop view is OK. Template version as I write this is also normal.

4936:

I do not disagree with what TRM says, but I am not sure that all information in the blurb needs to come from the linked page. For example, is it OK to state "This insect was first described by the American biologist

1552:

who had nominated it as a featured picture candidate. As we usually operate on a "first in, first out" basis, and there is a large backlog of FPs that have never appeared on the main page, I propose rescheduling the

4898:

has a divine right to appear on the main page. The main page is not a sandbox to feature sub-standard articles. If people want to feature pictures without clear encyclopedic value, Commons is the place for that.

3585:

but doesn't necessarily meet the highest standards. (Though if that's the case, perhaps not bolding it would be consistent with the rest of the main page?) By the way, I thought you were still co-ordinating PotD,

565:), because the former did not have an associated article for the bolded text to link to, as I stated in my edit summary. However, in doing so, I neglected to replace/update the day's protected version, which had 2942: 1456: 1321: 1225: 4871:

that there is a perennial problem with POTD, when there isn't (the last two blurbs were written long ago and are the first cause for complaint that TRM has made in several weeks). Take this particular image,

5431:

got started on it a while ago) and the main page works around that fact today by finding the first cell of the first row of the table (assuming a single image will be there) and styles it as a block element.

464:. In particular, we would like to hear it if you are opposed to the whole thing on principle, because in that case we would rather spend our time promoting queues than in organizing a large-scale RfC. Best, 307: 4369:

The last two "picture of the day" have been rather mediocre images of notable people, rather than (I would expect) notable pictures of random people/places/things. Shouldn't a POTD be a good example of an

765:. Any article about twice the size of the blurb will be enough in my opinion. As long as the reader can get a little more information by clicking through to the article, I personally can live with it. --- 2977: 1491: 1356: 1260: 1121: 4258: 3797:

Yes, I think we've had incidents of images actually not being what they purport to be. I have asked on occasion "how do you know it is what it says it is?" but that's normally just chuckled away. It

2737: 3777:

a decent photograph of, say, an insect to correctly identify it is also a problem, and one not limited to PotD. For example, to pick an example of mine that's appeared on the main page, I assert that

3440: 3635:

The guidelines say "The caption should be as specific as possible about the image itself. If there is not enough to fill the entire space, then you may take some text from the article." Consider the

3424:

state that it is captioned "[Big Foot's camp three weeks after the Wounded Knee Massacre (Dec. 29, 1890)", but the LOC file also states "This record contains unverified, old data from caption card."

2632: 1150: 581:

in response to replace the POTD on the Main Page with the butterfly, but it was hardly addressed and the painting thus remained the POTD for that day, with the butterfly returning to 15 December. —

106:

experience with the rest of the process? Or maybe you don't want people scheduling images without knowing they're going to have to write that blurb so they better take a look at the article first?

2116: 2995: 1509: 1374: 1278: 1086: 251:

I did a couple of blurbs and one whole process for 28 November 2019. The only step I omitted was step3 in the guidelines, because I wasn't clear about quite what was needed. Did I miss anything?

137:. I normally leave blurbs to be written at a later time, in case they become outdated, in case someone else wants to write it and/or because I just can't be bothered to craft one at that moment. 4718: 4656:

All prose mentioned in the blurb must be found in the target article (or possibly also in the description linked to the image itself, if it's a specific detail not relevant to the article topic)

667:

Nothing about appearing in articles or having its own specific page. So could we clarify what rules apply, which images qualify for POTD and which don't, and rewrite the guidelines accordingly.

4721:, not really a suitable place to hold a discussion impacting the content on the main page. My suggestion is that someone is bold and updates the criteria right now to fix this overt anomaly. 4186:

and I can only hope that one day enough people will learn to replace these misspellings of the brand name of a rip-off with the term "stroboscopic disc": one of the first terms used, coined by

3680:

can extend his checks to them? Hidden text? It's surprising quite how many errors turn out to be present in innocuous-looking OTDs, and I can't believe the PotDs are likely to be any better.

2486: 2501: 5345: 4956: 3064: 2969: 2952: 2112: 1483: 1466: 1348: 1331: 1252: 1235: 1139: 1113: 1096: 390:

Thanks. I have added the template to the file. I have found a source for the cathedral's history, so I will add some references to the article and remove the "more citations needed" tag.

5589: 5344:

Yes, it's very broken in Safari mobile. Looks fine on my desktop running Firefox. I can't see any reason why new lines are being generated for every link, nor why the MP is broken but

5149: 4430:

I'm sorry your post got missed, you can see that posts to this page are few and far between. The pictures used have all been selected for POTD because they are featured pictures. The

4434:

explain that featured pictures must be freely licensed or in the public domain, must be of a high technical quality, and must add significantly to at least one article on Knowledge.

934:

Thank you all. I have listed a coin for the 4th January 2020. If someone wants to change that one into the set of four, I would know how to deal with such sets on another occasion.

110:

fails and remedial instruction) but perfectly willing to try blurb writing, and then after writing a few blurbs, maybe they think, hey, I'd like to learn to choose the images! :)

5123: 2850: 2241:

and you can see a previous version of the notification and the present version. I think the previous version is quite adequate, and even preferable, as a courtesy notification.

2080: 1572:

Oh, I was the one who chose April 29 as the date; I was on a rush. You may go ahead about changing the date because I think the later date is more professionally done, I guess.

4739: 4181:

Maybe I'm just a little too sensitive about this, but I've always disliked the careless labelling of artifacts and artworks. For instance, it has always been clear to me that

2920:

for their content and need only dates of POTDs for input. I would very welcome feedback about these templates, especially their layout. Examples of their usage can be seen at

2873: 557: 5393: 5325: 5297: 5135: 5176: 4286:

Synchronizing the article and the caption seems a good way of dealing with this. I wrote the caption but I will leave it to others to wrangle over the numeral if they wish.

656: 3505: 3467: 5664:

There is no time limit, as far as I know, and it seems entirely reasonable to me for these featured pictures to be reserved by a POTD regular for these Good Friday slots.

5498:

It's a fairly niche issue... this is the first time I've ever seen an image set connected together by a scrolly bar, but feel free to archive it somewhere appropriate! —

2582: 3816: 3792: 3724: 3268:, and both pictures have been included in the POTD schedule since then. When I expanded the caption on 14 November 2020 I used the opera as the lead article. The article 2210: 2128: 5157: 5093: 4931: 4499:

Like almost every day now, where is all the text referenced in the target article? Why does POTD feel it can be exempt from this most basic quality control threshold?

4352: 4319: 2785:, we have made exceptions before and allowed FP's to appear twice for especial occasions. I am not sure we should make an exception for not knowing how the system works. 1849: 475: 5075: 5053: 5038: 5021: 1610: 1596: 5117: 4815: 4751: 4637: 1737: 1626:

The bolded article is prominently tagged with refimprove, though, so I'd suggest rescheduling or removing it from POTD for now until the article is in better shape. —

5419: 5372: 4988: 4910: 4888: 4544: 4528: 3960: 3897: 3855: 3552: 3528: 1182:

I sought advice on this and other points in the section above entitled "Clarification sought". POTD does not seem to have a strict set of rules in the way DYK does.

850:

protect all images in the set prior to go-live, as the cascading protection doesn't necessarily apply to images which keep being swapped in and out of the main page.

4618: 4356: 4342: 2810: 2380: 1863: 1062: 1040: 1007: 993: 811: 782: 613:, no worries on the delay, I just wanted to make sure there wasn't something I'd done (or neglected to do) that I needed to make sure I did/didn't do next time! :) 5618: 4968: 4950: 3302:- as I mentioned above, at that time I thought linking vaguely similar images with a common article was a good idea, but I now know better than that. On the point 3228: 2358: 2055: 2001: 1976: 1929: 1904: 1824: 739: 651: 3763: 3739: 3579: 3336: 5639: 5268: 4649:

We seem to come back to this topic with great regularity, so it definitely seems wise to try to nail it down properly. There are some guidelines written down at

3691: 3630: 3600: 3445: 3285: 2825: 2744: 2520: 2186:, and creates a default salutation of "Hi ," when the first parameter is passed as blank. Please let me know if you have any concerns regarding these changes. — 2164: 2140: 868: 5427:

Precisely the issue. The more fundamental issue is that the POTD template is crap (both generally and at mobile resolution -- it's on the to do list to fix it;

4798: 4781: 4732: 4510: 4295: 4222:

by Plateau). I doubt any title or specific description for any particular one of the animations was ever written down by designer Thomas Mann Baynes, publisher

3533:

Ok, when we finally got round to the idea that this was not Commons, there was a general drive to ensure that everything in the blurb was in the target article

2680: 2480: 2092: 5507: 5493: 5356: 5339: 5220: 4161: 4130: 4105: 4046: 2335: 2250: 2122: 718: 425: 5002: 4835: 4693: 4675: 4563: 4480: 4456:

IMO, and with appropriate respect to you and the subjects, I think the images at the following dates probably do not meet criterea #3: Among Knowledge's best.

4443: 2444: 2341:

and the fixed size of the thumbnail meant the whole blurb had to be displayed about 4 characters at a time, making for a very long (vertically) box. (Pinging

2309: 2287: 2225: 1708: 1672: 1650: 399: 378: 334: 139:

Also, having almost single-handedly maintained POTD for the past couple months at least, some help with scheduling or blurb-writing would be much appreciated.

5262: 5085: 4960: 4923: 4233:

is more or less correct and well written, I'd like to suggest some changes to the last line, for instance like this: "This animation shows such a disc, with

2731: 2713: 2541: 1315: 1217: 1191: 943: 535: 518: 260: 246: 216: 5549:

Due to my continued interest in stereo photography I am aware that a considerable fraction of fellow humans cannot fully perceive stereoscopic images - see

5458: 3944: 3925: 3657: 3563: 3316: 3021: 2840: 2158: 1798: 622: 605: 201: 165: 5673: 5442:. I don't know if Amakuru knew this would happen (I would suspect not; by luck, I surfed to the main page on mobile this morning and was myself surprised). 3164: 3146: 3096: 3058: 447: 2883:

First of all, thank you maintainers of POTD for their work. The POTD archive is a mother load of content, for which another use case has been introduced.

1807:, agreed. I experimented with it and I think it is relatively easy to make it happen. I was waiting till the date was closer. I will create them now. --- 1448: 1411: 4117:

I don't know about the quality of the article, but I have shortened the caption to be on the safe side. Is it incorrect to put "porch" in brackets after

929: 659:. I have now been told, in connection with another nomination, "It is highly irregular to create a POTD with no bold linked target article as you did in 4973:

The answer to Cwmhiraeth's question is: no, it is not ok to use Knowledge as a RS, that seems obvious to me and something an admin who selects material

3307:

artwork dominating the older entries, while the newer ones were much more varied. Thus it made sense to throw in some newer ones to give it balance. —

3118:

on a new line, nor with any intervening spaces. Otherwise, extra space will be inserted below the template when it is used, which is usually not wanted.

902: 888: 4593: 4198:

would also be fine, because its earlier inventor Plateau preferred it. But I can understand why the more common term "phenakistiscope" in the text for

3472: 573:

about 20 minutes prior. This discrepancy went unnoticed, until I realised my mistake when the painting was about to make its way onto the Main Page. I

5480: 2595: 4569:

What specifically do you think is unmentioned in the article? Some of the facts (e.g. the mottos) are directly verifiable by looking at the image. —

3904:

Those two examples presented date from 2005 and 2006, which was really a completely different era in Knowledge terms. The text you mention was added

3102: 2658: 2024: 4007:

who completed the temple complex is missing. It should be there in the caption because it was the most important figure associated with the temple.

2776: 2704:, but it doesn't seem quite enough. A better wording, describing how the translated meaning is assumed with misspelling in mind would be helpful. —⁠ 5044:

to bold any link in the POTD blurb? Since the bolded-link article in the POTD is often sub-par by your criteria, perhaps this would suit everyone.

3537:

referenced because, after all, this is an encyclopedia. But if that's not what we're doing any more, I'll just update my expectations. I thought

2937: 1566: 5651: 3030:

incorrectly expects a new line after the last closing brace. The first regex (and corresponding substitution) in subroutine "run" should not have

119: 5008:

dramatically more work to check also another of the links included in the blurb. In the example, it would be an obvious step to check the linked

3705:

picture, this is an encyclopedia and our readers should not have one section (just one!) where the claims being made are not verifiable using RS

1534: 4323: 3348: 3205: 676: 5604: 3123:

And indeed, such line breaks have caused some issues with POTD templates before. For example, when there is a line break, then every caller of

874: 825:"freely licensed or in the public domain, must be of a high technical quality, and must add significantly to at least one article on Knowledge" 5204: 2575: 1176: 5557:, i.e. without any technical assistance (stereo viewers, colour foils, fresnel lenses, polarizing filters, interlaced images, and the like). 4280: 3868: 3068: 3009: 2104: 3398: 4024: 2086: 828: 89: 84: 5247: 1912:, this is a solution we will need again and often. We should find a more permanent and reusable method. But this is beyond my skills. --- 496: 3864: 3332: 509:

I don't understand the sequence of events, but I have replaced the Marsh fritillary in the 15 December slot, from which it had vanished.

72: 67: 59: 3913: 3908:. The fact is, though, that this section of the main page has evolved over the years. As has our strictness when it comes to enforcing 3905: 3744:

I haven't looked at the POTD guidelines (heading there now) but my position is clear: captions for POTD should be (a) reflected in the

4405:

Wow, nothing in two days? With sufficient apathy and such humdrum offerings, should we consider removing the POTD from the front page?

846:

whereas older ones tend to be a lot of coins, notes and paintings, more recent ones feature space and technology more. Balance is key.

751:

There are two solutions for FPs that are not included on any article: (1) include the photo in a relevant article; or (2) nominate at

5439: 5408: 3515:

different main subjects. Perhaps you could direct me to a page discussing the issues you raise above, because the only one I know is

1753: 1523:

about creating a new usergroup for main page edits. This is the same proposal on which opinions were solicited here some months ago.

1154: 2831:

earlier images, by expanding stubs and adding references to tagged articles, and now the older unused images are mostly banknotes.

4650: 3999:

There is a series of shrines which was part of the temple on the west surviving and are being used as a mosque. Also the name of

180: 4418: 4383: 3700:

did the captions, I used to check that (a) the text in the POTD blurb was found in the target article and (b) that the text was

4490: 2028: 457: 5084:

article either. Why is this becoming a point when it's simply not true? Nevermind Wilson, we're talking about Wisconsin here.

3878:

Dissatisfaction registered. But what does that bring? The ultimate question: why should the blurb at POTD be different from

5153: 4348: 4315: 2798: 2414:

This is a little hard to incorporate into test cases, but you could try to preview them in a sandbox to check that they work.

2370: 1991: 1919: 1839: 1814: 1030: 983: 801: 772: 682:

With no response to my request for clarification, let's ping some people who have been active here recently for their views.

102:

Hey, PotD! As someone who has just done this for the first time, I was wondering about something from a noob point of view.

643:

on how it should be done, with the oldest featured images taking priority. The first image I nominated for 12 December 2019

5309:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

5140: 3370: 3359: 1201: 1162: 574: 5525:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

5485:

Thanks for the informative explanation! This probably deserves to be archived somewhere in case the issue crops up again.

951:, I have converted it into a multi-blurb. I could use your help in expanding each blurb seperately. There are located at: 5385: 5317: 5236: 4431: 4310:: What's with the "may be inverted"? If an image is sufficiently admired to become a Picture of the Day, shouldn't it be 1165: 552: 172: 4659:

All prose used in the blurb, be it from the article or the image description, must have a citation to a reliable source.

5626: 3083:) 22:51, 18 November 2020 (UTC) I've created it incorrectly (copy-pasted input instead of output from regex101.com)—it 2134: 1728: 1587: 730:

Many of the bank notes and coins were promoted at FPC as a set. We should feature them on the Main Page as a set as in

5642:

for being "too early". Is there a time limit on future nominations? Those are the next available Good Friday dates.

5588:

flowers is arranged as a stereo image pair; it can be viewed stereoscopically by using the cross-eyed viewing method (

5240: 3494:- much of the blurb is not even mentioned in the target article, let alone referenced. Is this a new turn for POTD? 2878: 461: 47: 17: 4959:: there is no link to any page there that verifies the information challenged by TRM with a citation to back it up. 3781:

shows the listed building that it says it does, but that's just my personal research, with no source to back it up.

649:

was disallowed because it did not appear in any article. Fair enough. The second image I nominated for the same day

3778: 2756: 2637: 2549: 1520: 97: 5166:

was listed in POTD on the 15th anniversary of the attacks in 2016. Images aren't usually featured more than once.

4820:

Aesthetically, it seems a poor choice from the scads of FP candidates that willy-nilly get through the process at

4218:

article for which I could link to a useful url - while an advertisement of 19 September still only mentioned the

3027: 2404:(the default) will display the Main Page version with blurb underneath the message as it does currently, whereas 1539: 998:

Very good! I will do a some blurb expansion. Presumably some of the text can be the same while other parts vary.

5080:

I fully agree, of course, but as I pointed out earlier as well, the information in this case was not present in

2740:) the phrase is correctly spelt "Cedant arma togæ", so the mistake in this image was apparently the engraver's. 566: 5361: 3326: 2860: 1722: 1581: 1020: 3935:

for example explains why the letters "HJK" appear on the star. You wouldn't get that from the linked article.

3455: 1208:

that image, or (3) request that it be removed or replaced as an FP at WP:FPC." That all seems sensible to me.

1164:

That seems somewhat unusual. It became a featured picture 4.5 years ago, but it wasn't there three years ago

2417: 2098: 292:

templates, for example. My standard POTD procedure is just (1) schedule an FP for a certain date, (2) attach

4269: 2671:

I did notice. Could we add "(misspelt here)" or somesuch? It is apparently part of a quotation from Cicero.

4084:

Apart from the mosque, the only surviving parts of the building are two toranas (porches) and four pillars.

3273: 1514: 1144: 634: 3676:

To come back to the point in hand, is there any easy way in which the sources can be highlighted so that

2400:

As a sort of compromise, I've rewritten the templates such that they can now display both alternatives –

2237:

On further thoughts, I don't like your changes to the notify nominator/uploader template. Have a look at

1544:

A featured picture that was promoted on 17 April 2020 is currently scheduled to appear on 29 April 2020,

820: 296: 3272:

could have been used as a lead for one of the pictures if they had appeared separately, but the article

2571: 5182: 5070: 5033: 4983: 4905: 4810: 4727: 4613: 4539: 4505: 3955: 3892: 3811: 3758: 3719: 3547: 3500: 3484: 3178: 1016: 969: 964: 959: 954: 487:

This was a PotD I worked on -- did I do something that caused the correct version not to be protected?

38: 816:

A few observations from me, having done most of the scheduling from August 2018 to earlier this year:

4519:

I think you will find all the facts are verifiable via the single reference at the foot of the page.

4396: 4182: 3787: 3686: 3595: 3353: 2804: 2792: 2364: 1985: 1913: 1854:

Thank you. I am glad it has been possible to incorporate the reverse sides into the day's templates.

1833: 1808: 1716: 1621: 1575: 1549: 1024: 977: 795: 766: 175:

I'm primarily a DYKer, but I'm definitely happy to help with PotD, too. 19:43, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

3949:

If the text is informative and relevant to the image, why wouldn't it appear in the target article?

5635: 5631: 5600: 5542: 5226: 5163: 5089: 4964: 4941:" when the insect's page does not mention Wilson's nationality, but you can verify it on his page? 4927: 4873: 4307: 4263: 3985: 3636: 3451: 3420:

While acknowledging that the image is currently publicly available from the Library of Congress at

3001: 2956: 2944: 2900: 2764: 2757: 2638: 2557: 2550: 2508: 2497: 2076: 1545: 1470: 1458: 1335: 1323: 1239: 1227: 1100: 1088: 839: 735: 731: 660: 480: 134: 4152:

go with my suggestion above which is accurate. Please do whatever you find more helpful. Regards,

5529: 5491: 5417: 5389: 5370: 5354: 5321: 5295: 5289:

I've copied this from WP:ERRORS - which isn't archived - so it's available for future reference.

5049: 5017: 4301: 3972: 3191:

This was badly handled, and I'd ask they be rescheduled sometime next year as individual images.

2611:

File:Ana Santos Aramburo en la sede de Recoletos de la Biblioteca Nacional de España (crop 2).jpg

2604:

File:Ana Santos Aramburo en la sede de Recoletos de la Biblioteca Nacional de España (crop 2).jpg

878: 4742:. I am not sure who now monitors it. Is there a designated editor keeping an eye on the blurbs? 4794: 4747: 4689: 4633: 3152: 3134: 3084: 2741: 2701: 1401: 1398: 1395: 1392: 3188:: Adolphe-Joseph-Louis Alizard is described on the picture of Gilbert Duprez, and vice-versa. 2719: 5550: 5065: 5028: 4978: 4900: 4853: 4805: 4722: 4608: 4534: 4500: 4276: 3950: 3887: 3806: 3753: 3714: 3677: 3643: 3542: 3495: 3463: 3101:

To clarify: the new line should not be used at the end of regex and substitution because per

3040:^\s*\Q{{POTD/$ date/{{#invoke:random|number|\E(\d+)\Q}}|{{{1|{{{style|default}}}}}}}}\E\s*\n 2893: 2654: 2166: 2017: 1877: 1529: 1158: 470: 286: 272:

Actually, the POTD guidelines seem to be a little outdated – we've hardly (if ever) used the

5253:

Thanks cityuser. I have listed her on her birthday, 29 March 2022. She has had a long wait.

4237:

rats scurrying over its surface and crawling out of sight over its edge. It was designed by

831:, and C&C has since added it back to that article, so it could be listed for POTD again. 5669: 5614: 5258: 5216: 5200: 5131: 4946: 4894:

verifiable in the target articles. I think Cwmhiraeth "do not understand" that absolutely

4884: 4524: 4439: 4338: 4291: 4175:

File:Animated phenakistiscope disc - Running rats Fantascope by Thomas Mann Baynes 1833.gif

4157: 4126: 4101: 4042: 4020: 4008: 4000: 3940: 3851: 3782: 3681: 3653: 3607: 3590: 3567: 3524: 3281: 2910: 2896:. To make addition of featured pictures to portals easier, two new templates were created: 2890: 2836: 2772: 2727: 2676: 2537: 2395: 2376: 2331: 2321: 2305: 2246: 2221: 2008: 1997: 1936: 1925: 1870: 1859: 1845: 1820: 1764: 1668: 1606: 1562: 1187: 1058: 1036: 1003: 989: 939: 807: 778: 714: 701: 672: 514: 421: 395: 256: 212: 8: 5596: 5584: 4955:

The difference is that we're dealing with a tangible issue here, not a hypothetical one.

4774: 4586: 4476: 4414: 4379: 4191: 3491: 3458:. I am especially looking for someone who is familiar with Hearst Corporation practices. 3436: 3391: 3127: 2990: 2982: 2527: 2493: 2461: 2437: 2391: 2351: 2317: 2280: 2203: 2170: 2048: 1969: 1897: 1791: 1713:

Now it seems like that the article is clear for the image's appearance on the main page.

1701: 1643: 1504: 1496: 1441: 1369: 1361: 1308: 1273: 1265: 1134: 1126: 655:

was queried because, although it appeared in two articles, there was no specific article

598: 371: 347: 327: 276: 158: 5124:

Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard#Protect Main Page images manually! KrinkleBot down

4607:

but I guess this is all about a pretty picture so the encyclopedia can just be ignored.

3977: 5486: 5425:

Knowledge:Main Page/styles.css does have some custom code for centring links in #mp-tfp

5412: 5365: 5349: 5290: 5045: 5013: 4388: 4254: 4238: 3344: 3262:

first listed these images together on 21 September 2018‎, with the single word caption

3160: 3142: 3092: 3080: 3054: 3017: 2933: 2718:

Cicero apparently stated "Cedant arma togae, concedat laurea laudi" which according to

2709: 2516: 2342: 2154: 1213: 1172: 923: 618: 531: 492: 240: 195: 115: 4077:

Mosque (Four complete and one partial shrines on the west, behind the central sanctum)

4074:

four pillars of central structure with two more pillars of upper storey on top of them

3450:

The POTD from 28 August 2020 is up for deletion at Commons. Here's the POTD template:

551:

Apologies for the tardiness of my reply, but I can answer what happened. I originally

5554: 5503: 5476: 5335: 4876: 4866: 4790: 4743: 4685: 4671: 4666:

necessarily good at writing articles, and they deserve to get their FPs featured. —

4644: 4629: 4246: 4223: 4012: 4004: 3931:

the observer if the caption provides some guidance on the significance of the image.

3921: 3735: 3626: 3575: 3312: 3299: 3239: 3217: 3194: 2886: 2821: 2469: 2466:

I'll be honest, I'm probably going to ping over to POTD, so I don't mind either way.

2346: 1945: 898: 864: 3990:

The only surviving parts of the building are two toranas (porches) and four pillars.

3612:

I'm not sure there is a dedicated lead coordinator any more, although it seems like

2532:

Thank you. That wording sounds better and I have altered the POTD caption to match.

1046: 5647: 5579: 5571: 5280: 5232: 4272: 3459: 2869: 2687: 2666: 2650: 1525: 1408: 1197: 885: 578: 562: 481: 466: 4495:

Copying a discussion from the Main page/Errors page for the POTD on 29 May 2021:-

3994:

Two torans (porches) and four pillars of the former central structure still stand

2363:

I think I like it. However, the mobile issue should be addressed if possible. ---

5665: 5610: 5536: 5254: 5212: 5196: 5127: 4942: 4880: 4717:

The problem is, a suitable location, like the POTD talk page, gets an average of

4520: 4435: 4334: 4287: 4215: 4153: 4122: 4112: 4097: 4088:

Apart from the mosque, the only surviving parts of the temple are two porches, a

4053: 4038: 4032: 4016: 3936: 3847: 3769: 3672:

I recall I wrote a few around then, then wandered off in my usual on–off fashion.

3649: 3613: 3520: 3516: 3303: 3277: 2856: 2832: 2782: 2768: 2723: 2691: 2672: 2533: 2387: 2327: 2301: 2257: 2242: 2217: 1855: 1760: 1679: 1664: 1617: 1602: 1558: 1183: 1054: 1012: 999: 948: 935: 908: 856: 789: 725: 710: 668: 640: 546: 523: 510: 417: 391: 341: 267: 252: 223: 208: 5434:

Because today's image was not a single image, it was moved outside the table by

4190:, who is regarded as one of its inventors and who was the first to describe the 3421: 645: 639:

I have recently begun selecting pictures for POTD and writing blurbs. There are

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

5454: 4786: 4760: 4572: 4472: 4425: 4410: 4375: 4210:

series published by Ackermann and Co. in London in October 1833 (advertised in

4187: 3867:– this caption just talks about child labor in general. Contrast this with its 3617: 3432: 3377: 3366: 3269: 3212: 3072: 2987: 2921: 2567: 2423: 2294: 2266: 2232: 2189: 2034: 1981: 1955: 1909: 1883: 1829: 1804: 1777: 1687: 1657: 1629: 1501: 1427: 1382: 1366: 1294: 1286: 1270: 1131: 697: 610: 584: 570: 406: 385: 357: 313: 144: 2349:, two people who come to mind that would see this more often than I would). — 2238: 308:

File:Lichfield Cathedral High Altar from choir, Staffordshire, UK - Diliff.jpg

5244: 4998: 4875:, it became a featured picture in 2014 and is included in a single article, 4831: 4821: 4559: 4364: 4330: 4250: 3802: 3404:

File:Wounded Knee aftermath5.jpg scheduled for POTD scheduled for 29 Dec 2020

3340: 3156: 3138: 3114:

begins immediately after the last character of the template code or text and

3088: 3076: 3050: 3013: 2929: 2925: 2917: 2705: 2512: 2408:

will omit the blurbed version and display a thumbnail floating on the right (

2150: 1771: 1209: 1168: 915: 752: 743: 705: 689: 685: 614: 542: 527: 504: 488: 452: 232: 187: 127: 111: 5364:

does have some custom code for centring links in #mp-tfp . Is that related?

5499: 5472: 5435: 5331: 5188: 5169: 5009: 4938: 4667: 4096:

What do you say? The article needs to be rewritten in my opinion. Regards,-

3917: 3731: 3697: 3664: 3622: 3586: 3571: 3538: 3308: 3257: 3223: 3200: 3006:{{POTD/2020-11-20/{{#invoke:random|number|9}}|{{{1|{{{style|default}}}}}}}} 2817: 2697: 2588: 2475: 1204: 894: 860: 693: 5012:

page if you needed a reference supporting the claim that he was American.

3264: 3008:, which fits the second variant, described by the bot, with N=9. All nine 1161:, a 1964 Italian romantic drama film. See my comment at Main Page errors. 302:

to the local file description page and (3) write the blurb. Regarding the

5659: 5643: 5566: 4915: 4533:

oh cool, where are all the facts mentioned in the target article please?

4194:- in his proper explanation of the principle of this type of animation). 3909: 3883: 3749: 3701: 3559: 2865: 1418: 1405: 1050: 976:

I will create the protected versions when the date is close at hand. ---

882: 412: 5575: 5428: 4234: 3996:

along with western part of the complex used as a congregational mosque.

1554: 5187:

I've made a couple of suggestions for POTD for 21 Oct 2021 (regarding

4598:

e.g. "Wisconsin's nickname as the "Badger State", while the cornucopia

4214:

of 19 October 1833 - I just added a slightly later ad as a ref in the

4082:

The article does not reflect this. It describes this inaccurately. So

1151:

File:Charles Maurice de Talleyrand-Périgord - Pierre-Paul Prud'hon.jpg

5465: 5450: 5402: 4605:

every single other targeted article to that minimum quality threshold

4469:

I mean, they're not BAD pictures, but they are NOT among the best. :)

2620: 2561: 1984:, it would be good if the "default" template also showed image2. --- 3298:

Ha, so it's all my fault then! In that case I offer my apologies to

3103:

Knowledge:Template documentation § Put documentation in the template

5192: 4994: 4857: 4827: 4555: 3932: 3047: 2614:

basic criterion of interestingness, this doesn't seem to meet it.

1387:

The POTD template is supposed to use "default" as the default for

4206:

title. This particular animated disc was one of six in the third

3245:

appearing on POTD?" However, that was not the question you asked.

4628:, or are supposed to be, checked against their target articles? 873:

The protection part is theoretically fixed with the creation of

794:

First in first out is not intended to be strictly enforced. ---

5348:

looks fine. It must be something in the custom CSS for the MP.

4684:

Can we move this to somewhere we can have a proper discussion?

4148: 4118: 4090: 4067: 5560:

which I simultaneously uploaded to Wiki Commons in June 2019.

3133:

must trim its output, before using the filename. That's why I

2487:

Prince James Francis Edward Stuart scheduled for June 10, 2020

4241:

and published in October 1833 as one of six discs in the 3rd

1684:

I've taken another look and it does seem fine now; thanks. —

306:

template, this goes on the local file description page, i.e.

2736:

In the Wyoming arms as depicted on a contemporary banknote (

2072:

For the record and convenience, subjects of the discussion:

3413:

I suggest verification of the corrected date of the image.

4037:

Thank you, I have made some alterations. Is that better?

2583:

c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Iapetus mosaic color.jpg

1157:. Indeed, it is only being used in the article space at 1015:, can you find a source to cite for the engraver of the 346:

One more thing I've realised with your POTD choice: the

2851:

Template:POTD/2020-11-02 (name of image is misleading.)

2111: 3882:

in terms of where the information is found and how to

1200:

but that is lost in the history now. Here is a link:

746:. I can show you how to create that if you would like. 4624:

with this sort of thing. I assume that POTDs' blurbs

3211:

Probably should do this as a broader discussion, so

2965:{{POTD/2020-11-20/{{#invoke:random|number|<N: --> 1479:{{POTD/2020-04-15/{{#invoke:random|number|<N: --> 1344:{{POTD/2020-02-22/{{#invoke:random|number|<N: --> 1248:{{POTD/2020-02-09/{{#invoke:random|number|<N: --> 1109:{{POTD/2020-01-24/{{#invoke:random|number|<N: --> 171:

RP, that's exactly what C&C said when they were

3768:There's a fundamental problem here, highlighted by 5118:Protect Main Page images manually! KrinkleBot down 2263:preferable as compared to the previous version? — 2027:to allow support of dual POTDs. You can check out 4062:two double-storied porches (eastern and southern) 2023:is under template protection, but I've submitted 1601:I propose we leave this to proceed as scheduled. 4329:I have left a query on the WikiProject Malaysia 3358:Something that's consistently bugged me is that 2182:now automatically creates a section header like 1519:Watchers of this talk page may be interested in 855:Anyway, other than all that, I'll say thanks to 526:, you clearly understand it better than I do :D 5269:Broken Main Page formatting with very wide POTD 3801:a general problem, but one would hope that the 3519:. This should probably be discussed elsewhere. 3446:1937 Shanghai crying baby image up for deletion 2722:meant that war was about to give way to peace. 4226:, any associates, or any contemporary writer. 875:Knowledge:Picture of the day/On the main pages 5570:is a technique for creating or enhancing the 5541:As the photographer of the image proposed as 5071:Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!! 5034:Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!! 4984:Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!! 4906:Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!! 4811:Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!! 4728:Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!! 4614:Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!! 4540:Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!! 4506:Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!! 3956:Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!! 3893:Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!! 3812:Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!! 3759:Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!! 3720:Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!! 3548:Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!! 3501:Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!! 3422:https://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/2007678212/ 3335:it's worth remembering that (at last report) 3046:Here's a test for regex without the newline: 2585:as it wasn't available under a free licence. 2216:I tried them out today and they seemed fine. 2075: 3186:describes the wrong performer for each image 2763:The POTD scheduled for 17 September 2020 is 2029:the testcase with an updated sandbox version 448:Workshopping a proposal for a new user group 3752:. That, probably, is all that is needed. 3331:As we are poised to celebrate her birthday 135:Jacinda Ardern on her 40th birthday in 2020 3772:'s British soldier, that file data is the 3473:ERRORS page discussion from 9 January 2021 3276:is quite unsuitable in its present state. 907:Nothing specific to add, except thank you 4314:whether part of it upside-down or not? -- 3992:It is inaccuarate. According to article, 859:for stepping up to work in this area. — 4395: 4387: 3976: 3541:might have some light to shed on this. 1023:but can find a good source to cite. --- 893:Oh, nice one, thanks for doing that. — 5562:My proposed addition, within brackets: 5411:, though I've no idea how that worked. 4651:Knowledge:Picture of the day/Guidelines 3981:Surviving series of shrines on the west 3337:Chelsea Manning hates her Knowledge bio 458:User talk:Vanamonde93/Main page editor‎ 14: 4147:No. Torana and porches are different. 2326:which notification they would prefer. 1952:make it more permanent or reusable? — 1155:Charles Maurice de Talleyrand-Périgord 1153:does not appear in the linked article 1045:I agree that it is B. Duvivier as per 881:to transclude all the random choices. 877:, which is cascade-protected and uses 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 4270:Talk:Palais Galliera#1er, Ier or I er 4094:(ornamental gateway) and few pillars. 5305:The following discussion is closed. 4662:The image must appear in the article 4015:has nice articles as well. Regards,- 3805:process would cover that. Surely? 3371:Knowledge:Picture of the day/Archive 3360:Knowledge:Picture of the day/Archive 25: 3880:all other sections of the main page 23: 5346:Template:POTD protected/2021-10-13 4086:should be changed. My suggestion: 3456:the deletion discussion at Commons 3065:Template:POTD protected/2020-11-20 2970:Template:POTD protected/2020-11-20 2961:{{POTD {{{1|{{{style|default}}}}}} 2953:Template:POTD protected/2020-11-20 2113:Template:POTD protected/2020-05-06 1484:Template:POTD protected/2020-04-15 1475:{{POTD {{{1|{{{style|default}}}}}} 1467:Template:POTD protected/2020-04-15 1349:Template:POTD protected/2020-02-22 1340:{{POTD {{{1|{{{style|default}}}}}} 1332:Template:POTD protected/2020-02-22 1253:Template:POTD protected/2020-02-09 1244:{{POTD {{{1|{{{style|default}}}}}} 1236:Template:POTD protected/2020-02-09 1114:Template:POTD protected/2020-01-24 1105:{{POTD {{{1|{{{style|default}}}}}} 1097:Template:POTD protected/2020-01-24 462:User:Vanamonde93/Main page editor‎ 24: 5685: 5545:I thank you for your nomination. 5241:File:Hayley McFarland cropped.jpg 4918:going out the window entirely on 3988:caption has few errors. It says: 2916:. Both templates use subpages of 2609:I have to say that I don't think 1754:May 6 (Cuban silver certificates) 1049:, and have added his name to the 228:That would be excellent. Thanks! 18:Knowledge talk:Picture of the day 5521:The discussion above is closed. 5274: 5231:I have improved the sourcing on 4347:Thanks for dealing with that. -- 3779:File:39 Welsh Row, Nantwich2.jpg 3478: 2966:}}|{{{1|{{{style|default}}}}}}}} 1480:}}|{{{1|{{{style|default}}}}}}}} 1345:}}|{{{1|{{{style|default}}}}}}}} 1249:}}|{{{1|{{{style|default}}}}}}}} 1167:so this is not a new situation. 1110:}}|{{{1|{{{style|default}}}}}}}} 650: 644: 181:WP:Picture of the day/Guidelines 29: 5551:Stereoscopy#Visual_requirements 4202:might better be left as it is. 2696:, for "misspelt here" there is 2416:I've set up some test cases at 5362:Knowledge:Main Page/styles.css 5248:00:24, 18 September 2021 (UTC) 4491:Discussion on Main page/Errors 4212:The Literary Gazette. No. 874. 2947:has unexpected content - Fixed 2861:File:Saturn during Equinox.jpg 2855:According to a comment on the 2420:to try and illustrate this. — 1461:has unexpected content - Fixed 1326:has unexpected content - Fixed 1230:has unexpected content - Fixed 1021:Pierre-Simon-Benjamin Duvivier 13: 1: 5674:08:42, 19 November 2021 (UTC) 5652:03:05, 19 November 2021 (UTC) 5177:16:34, 2 September 2021 (UTC) 5158:14:18, 2 September 2021 (UTC) 4296:14:10, 28 February 2021 (UTC) 4281:07:43, 28 February 2021 (UTC) 3709:. Why should POTD blurbs be 3441:11:53, 24 December 2020 (UTC) 3317:12:35, 28 November 2020 (UTC) 3286:11:20, 28 November 2020 (UTC) 3229:09:49, 28 November 2020 (UTC) 3206:09:05, 28 November 2020 (UTC) 3165:13:30, 21 November 2020 (UTC) 3147:22:59, 18 November 2020 (UTC) 3097:18:33, 19 November 2020 (UTC) 3059:22:44, 18 November 2020 (UTC) 3022:22:29, 18 November 2020 (UTC) 2996:22:00, 18 November 2020 (UTC) 2938:16:08, 13 November 2020 (UTC) 2841:19:19, 1 September 2020 (UTC) 2826:19:00, 1 September 2020 (UTC) 2811:18:36, 1 September 2020 (UTC) 2418:Template:NotifyPOTD/testcases 1449:13:35, 21 February 2020 (UTC) 1412:12:59, 21 February 2020 (UTC) 1375:22:01, 20 February 2020 (UTC) 1196:There was some discussion at 1063:06:20, 24 December 2019 (UTC) 1041:01:28, 24 December 2019 (UTC) 1008:06:13, 22 December 2019 (UTC) 994:05:39, 22 December 2019 (UTC) 944:19:19, 20 December 2019 (UTC) 930:16:25, 20 December 2019 (UTC) 903:13:51, 20 December 2019 (UTC) 889:12:35, 20 December 2019 (UTC) 869:11:40, 20 December 2019 (UTC) 812:10:55, 20 December 2019 (UTC) 783:10:52, 20 December 2019 (UTC) 719:10:33, 20 December 2019 (UTC) 677:14:18, 17 December 2019 (UTC) 623:21:35, 16 December 2019 (UTC) 606:21:21, 16 December 2019 (UTC) 536:21:03, 13 December 2019 (UTC) 519:20:54, 13 December 2019 (UTC) 497:18:26, 13 December 2019 (UTC) 426:11:16, 28 November 2019 (UTC) 400:18:42, 22 November 2019 (UTC) 379:15:32, 22 November 2019 (UTC) 335:15:26, 22 November 2019 (UTC) 261:13:40, 22 November 2019 (UTC) 247:16:39, 21 November 2019 (UTC) 217:09:40, 21 November 2019 (UTC) 202:07:10, 21 November 2019 (UTC) 166:17:03, 20 November 2019 (UTC) 120:13:41, 20 November 2019 (UTC) 5619:19:44, 18 October 2021 (UTC) 5605:19:32, 18 October 2021 (UTC) 5508:22:42, 13 October 2021 (UTC) 5494:18:04, 13 October 2021 (UTC) 5481:16:47, 13 October 2021 (UTC) 5459:16:32, 13 October 2021 (UTC) 5420:14:28, 13 October 2021 (UTC) 5394:13:40, 13 October 2021 (UTC) 5373:12:14, 13 October 2021 (UTC) 5357:11:57, 13 October 2021 (UTC) 5340:07:10, 13 October 2021 (UTC) 5326:07:03, 13 October 2021 (UTC) 5298:11:37, 14 October 2021 (UTC) 5263:19:00, 11 October 2021 (UTC) 5221:18:35, 11 October 2021 (UTC) 5205:17:46, 11 October 2021 (UTC) 5141:POTD/ 11th of September 2021 4259:10:24, 3 February 2021 (UTC) 4162:13:56, 26 January 2021 (UTC) 4131:10:14, 26 January 2021 (UTC) 4106:07:30, 26 January 2021 (UTC) 4047:07:00, 26 January 2021 (UTC) 4025:04:26, 26 January 2021 (UTC) 3961:14:22, 11 January 2021 (UTC) 3945:14:15, 11 January 2021 (UTC) 3926:11:51, 11 January 2021 (UTC) 3898:11:39, 11 January 2021 (UTC) 3856:11:33, 11 January 2021 (UTC) 3399:23:43, 9 December 2020 (UTC) 3349:15:02, 3 December 2020 (UTC) 3274:Adolphe-Joseph-Louis Alizard 2874:22:43, 11 October 2020 (UTC) 1316:02:08, 8 February 2020 (UTC) 1279:22:00, 7 February 2020 (UTC) 1218:02:43, 7 February 2020 (UTC) 1192:10:01, 2 February 2020 (UTC) 1177:01:32, 2 February 2020 (UTC) 1140:22:01, 22 January 2020 (UTC) 561:) with the 15 December one ( 558:Flowers in a Terracotta Vase 476:06:55, 8 December 2019 (UTC) 460:. The proposal itself is at 7: 5150:Frederik Glerup Christensen 3817:16:47, 9 January 2021 (UTC) 3793:16:37, 9 January 2021 (UTC) 3764:15:21, 9 January 2021 (UTC) 3740:15:18, 9 January 2021 (UTC) 3725:14:44, 9 January 2021 (UTC) 3692:14:15, 9 January 2021 (UTC) 3658:14:03, 9 January 2021 (UTC) 3631:13:34, 9 January 2021 (UTC) 3601:13:22, 9 January 2021 (UTC) 3580:12:49, 9 January 2021 (UTC) 3553:12:16, 9 January 2021 (UTC) 3529:10:38, 9 January 2021 (UTC) 3506:09:38, 9 January 2021 (UTC) 3468:01:00, 5 January 2021 (UTC) 3012:exist. Seems like a bug. —⁠ 2968:. Please fix it, or create 2951:While attempting to create 2777:13:20, 25 August 2020 (UTC) 2581:It was deleted in 2012 per 1482:. Please fix it, or create 1465:While attempting to create 1347:. Please fix it, or create 1330:While attempting to create 1251:. Please fix it, or create 1234:While attempting to create 1112:. Please fix it, or create 1095:While attempting to create 819:First of all, the rules of 657:Flowers in a Terracota Vase 10: 5690: 5627:Time limit on nominations? 5471:iPhone users for this! — 5272: 4481:09:06, 26 April 2021 (UTC) 4444:06:25, 25 April 2021 (UTC) 4419:10:47, 18 April 2021 (UTC) 4384:20:31, 16 April 2021 (UTC) 4357:06:00, 25 April 2021 (UTC) 3713:than DYK, OTD, ITN etc?? 3485:Knowledge:Main Page/Errors 3476: 2791:are on the lower end. --- 2226:12:57, 25 April 2020 (UTC) 2211:07:02, 25 April 2020 (UTC) 1738:15:05, 26 April 2020 (UTC) 1709:13:45, 26 April 2020 (UTC) 1673:13:35, 26 April 2020 (UTC) 1651:13:02, 26 April 2020 (UTC) 1611:10:11, 25 April 2020 (UTC) 1597:12:27, 20 April 2020 (UTC) 1567:10:42, 20 April 2020 (UTC) 1535:20:30, 23 April 2020 (UTC) 1510:22:00, 13 April 2020 (UTC) 970:Template:POTD/2020-01-04/4 965:Template:POTD/2020-01-04/3 960:Template:POTD/2020-01-04/2 955:Template:POTD/2020-01-04/1 5243:can now be used on POTD. 4804:This is an encyclopedia. 4432:featured picture criteria 4343:09:51, 7 April 2021 (UTC) 4324:07:29, 7 April 2021 (UTC) 4183:Girl with a Pearl Earring 2879:Usage of POTDs on portals 2859:talk page, it looks like 2633:07:33, 23 June 2020 (UTC) 1548:. It was listed there by 911:for taking on this task. 838:artists. See for example 740:all four coins in the set 352:{{more citations needed}} 5636:Template:POTD/2025-04-18 5632:Template:POTD/2024-03-29 5574:in an image by means of 5543:Template:POTD/2021-11-01 5523:Please do not modify it. 5399:Agreed. I think we have 5307:Please do not modify it. 5164:File:Twin Towers-NYC.jpg 5136:14:25, 9 June 2021 (UTC) 5094:02:13, 31 May 2021 (UTC) 5076:20:19, 30 May 2021 (UTC) 5054:20:04, 30 May 2021 (UTC) 5039:19:39, 30 May 2021 (UTC) 5022:18:03, 30 May 2021 (UTC) 5003:12:31, 30 May 2021 (UTC) 4989:10:27, 30 May 2021 (UTC) 4969:09:28, 30 May 2021 (UTC) 4951:09:21, 30 May 2021 (UTC) 4932:08:56, 30 May 2021 (UTC) 4911:07:45, 30 May 2021 (UTC) 4889:05:29, 30 May 2021 (UTC) 4836:22:36, 29 May 2021 (UTC) 4816:19:37, 29 May 2021 (UTC) 4799:18:42, 29 May 2021 (UTC) 4782:18:05, 29 May 2021 (UTC) 4752:17:31, 29 May 2021 (UTC) 4733:17:22, 29 May 2021 (UTC) 4694:16:52, 29 May 2021 (UTC) 4676:16:45, 29 May 2021 (UTC) 4638:15:39, 29 May 2021 (UTC) 4619:15:24, 29 May 2021 (UTC) 4594:13:38, 29 May 2021 (UTC) 4564:12:13, 29 May 2021 (UTC) 4545:09:16, 29 May 2021 (UTC) 4529:09:14, 29 May 2021 (UTC) 4511:06:32, 29 May 2021 (UTC) 4308:Template:POTD/2021-04-19 4065:one ornamental gateway ( 3986:Template:POTD/2021-02-08 3637:Template:POTD/2021-01-28 3589:? Who's doing that now? 3452:Template:POTD/2020-08-28 3002:Template:POTD/2020-11-20 2957:Template:POTD/2020-11-20 2945:Template:POTD/2020-11-20 2765:Template:POTD/2020-09-17 2758:Template:POTD/2020-09-17 2745:12:57, 3 July 2020 (UTC) 2732:09:07, 3 July 2020 (UTC) 2714:08:49, 3 July 2020 (UTC) 2681:06:38, 3 July 2020 (UTC) 2659:03:06, 3 July 2020 (UTC) 2639:Template:POTD/2020-07-10 2596:11:43, 7 June 2020 (UTC) 2576:10:58, 7 June 2020 (UTC) 2558:Template:POTD/2007-09-01 2551:Template:POTD/2007-09-01 2542:13:26, 28 May 2020 (UTC) 2521:13:04, 28 May 2020 (UTC) 2509:Template:POTD/2020-06-10 2502:12:57, 28 May 2020 (UTC) 2481:00:39, 28 May 2020 (UTC) 2445:16:24, 23 May 2020 (UTC) 2381:15:24, 23 May 2020 (UTC) 2359:14:07, 23 May 2020 (UTC) 2336:11:36, 23 May 2020 (UTC) 2310:11:10, 23 May 2020 (UTC) 2288:11:00, 23 May 2020 (UTC) 2251:10:51, 23 May 2020 (UTC) 2077:Template:POTD/2020-05-06 1546:Template:POTD/2020-04-29 1471:Template:POTD/2020-04-15 1459:Template:POTD/2020-04-15 1336:Template:POTD/2020-02-22 1324:Template:POTD/2020-02-22 1240:Template:POTD/2020-02-09 1228:Template:POTD/2020-02-09 1101:Template:POTD/2020-01-24 1089:Template:POTD/2020-01-24 840:Template:POTD/2018-03-02 823:state that they must be 736:Template:POTD/2020-01-04 732:Template:POTD/2017-07-01 661:Template:POTD/2019-12-31 98:Scheduling/writing blurb 4977:ought to be aware of. 4554:problem, to be sure. – 4400:Among Knowledge's best? 4392:Among Knowledge's best? 3369:amended the purpose of 2159:09:51, 6 May 2020 (UTC) 2056:17:38, 6 May 2020 (UTC) 2002:14:16, 6 May 2020 (UTC) 1977:13:45, 6 May 2020 (UTC) 1930:00:18, 6 May 2020 (UTC) 1905:10:33, 5 May 2020 (UTC) 1864:11:03, 4 May 2020 (UTC) 1850:18:32, 3 May 2020 (UTC) 1825:17:57, 3 May 2020 (UTC) 1799:16:01, 3 May 2020 (UTC) 1557:image to a later date. 1540:Recently promoted image 879:Module:POTD transcluder 350:article is tagged with 4401: 4393: 4229:Although the text for 3982: 3327:December 17, 2020 POTD 3222:Has about 7.7% of all 3199:Has about 7.7% of all 3153:Special:Diff/989440690 3120: 3110:Make sure the opening 2702:Special:Diff/965766532 2700:, which I've added in 2474:Has about 7.3% of all 1091:has unexpected content 575:posted an error report 555:the 13 December POTD ( 304:{{Picture of the day}} 5590:parallel version here 5191:, highly revelant to 4399: 4391: 3980: 3707:in the target article 3108: 2649:", because it isn't. 2570:) — If (reply) then ( 1878:"default" POTD layout 1774:to POTD. Thoughts? — 1159:Before the Revolution 42:of past discussions. 5582:. This image of two 4719:one pageview per day 4009:Jayasimha Siddharaja 4001:Jayasimha Siddharaja 3151:Bot has been fixed: 2959:does not begin with 2560:has been deleted. -- 1515:Proposal of interest 1473:does not begin with 1338:does not begin with 1242:does not begin with 1145:Unused image as POTD 1103:does not begin with 821:WP:Featured pictures 635:Clarification sought 567:already been created 5585:Passiflora caerulea 4192:stroboscopic effect 3492:Seal of Connecticut 3339:. So there's that. 2983:User talk:AnomieBOT 2031:in the meantime. — 1718:I'm Aya Syameimaru! 1622:I'm Aya Syameimaru! 1577:I'm Aya Syameimaru! 1550:I'm Aya Syameimaru! 1497:User talk:AnomieBOT 1362:User talk:AnomieBOT 1266:User talk:AnomieBOT 1127:User talk:AnomieBOT 456:on the proposal at 348:Lichfield Cathedral 5308: 5183:POTD / 21 Oct 2021 4402: 4394: 4239:Thomas Mann Baynes 4231:Picture of the Day 4200:Picture of the Day 4177:scheduled for POTD 3983: 3179:November 26th POTD 3112:<noinclude: --> 2412:can modify this). 835:The flower picture 297:Picture of the day 5572:illusion of depth 5306: 5074: 5037: 4987: 4975:for the main page 4909: 4877:Seal of Wisconsin 4814: 4731: 4617: 4566: 4543: 4509: 4247:Ackermann and Co. 4224:Rudolph Ackermann 4013:Chaulukya dynasty 4005:Chaulukya dynasty 3959: 3896: 3869:second appearance 3815: 3791: 3762: 3723: 3690: 3673: 3599: 3551: 3504: 3354:Main archive page 2986: 2943:POTDPageCreator: 2630: 2618: 1736: 1733: 1725: 1595: 1592: 1584: 1500: 1457:POTDPageCreator: 1365: 1322:POTDPageCreator: 1269: 1226:POTDPageCreator: 1149:The current POTD 1130: 1087:POTDPageCreator: 927: 742:randomized using 244: 199: 176: 140: 95: 94: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 5681: 5663: 5580:binocular vision 5540: 5469: 5406: 5384:Looks good now. 5278: 5277: 5235:, so I hope the 5233:Hayley McFarland 5227:Hayley McFarland 5172: 5122:Conversation at 5068: 5066:The Rambling Man 5031: 5029:The Rambling Man 4981: 4979:The Rambling Man 4957:See for yourself 4903: 4901:The Rambling Man 4870: 4861: 4854:The Rambling Man 4808: 4806:The Rambling Man 4769: 4766: 4763: 4740:I have done that 4725: 4723:The Rambling Man 4648: 4611: 4609:The Rambling Man 4581: 4578: 4575: 4549: 4537: 4535:The Rambling Man 4503: 4501:The Rambling Man 4429: 4264:1er, Ier or I er 4116: 4057: 4036: 3953: 3951:The Rambling Man 3890: 3888:The Rambling Man 3809: 3807:The Rambling Man 3785: 3756: 3754:The Rambling Man 3717: 3715:The Rambling Man 3684: 3678:The Rambling Man 3671: 3668: 3647: 3644:The Rambling Man 3611: 3593: 3545: 3543:The Rambling Man 3517:these guidelines 3498: 3496:The Rambling Man 3482: 3481: 3386: 3383: 3380: 3261: 3243: 3227: 3204: 3132: 3126: 3113: 3071:were created by 3033: 3007: 2993: 2980: 2973: 2967: 2962: 2915: 2909: 2905: 2899: 2894:hard to maintain 2807: 2801: 2795: 2695: 2670: 2647:Cedant Arma Toga 2631: 2628: 2627: 2625: 2616: 2591: 2531: 2479: 2465: 2432: 2429: 2426: 2411: 2407: 2403: 2399: 2373: 2367: 2356: 2354: 2325: 2298: 2275: 2272: 2269: 2261: 2236: 2198: 2195: 2192: 2185: 2184:{{UpcomingPOTD}} 2181: 2144: 2108: 2043: 2040: 2037: 2022: 2016: 2012: 1994: 1988: 1964: 1961: 1958: 1950: 1944: 1940: 1922: 1916: 1892: 1889: 1886: 1874: 1842: 1836: 1817: 1811: 1786: 1783: 1780: 1768: 1732: 1729: 1723: 1719: 1714: 1696: 1693: 1690: 1683: 1661: 1638: 1635: 1632: 1625: 1591: 1588: 1582: 1578: 1573: 1533: 1507: 1494: 1487: 1481: 1476: 1436: 1433: 1430: 1422: 1390: 1386: 1372: 1359: 1352: 1346: 1341: 1303: 1300: 1297: 1290: 1276: 1263: 1256: 1250: 1245: 1137: 1124: 1117: 1111: 1106: 1033: 1027: 1019:. I think it is 986: 980: 928: 921: 918: 826: 804: 798: 793: 775: 769: 729: 709: 654: 648: 593: 590: 587: 563:marsh fritillary 550: 508: 482:marsh fritillary 474: 410: 389: 366: 363: 360: 353: 345: 322: 319: 316: 305: 301: 295: 291: 285: 281: 275: 271: 245: 238: 235: 227: 200: 193: 190: 170: 153: 150: 147: 138: 131: 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 5689: 5688: 5684: 5683: 5682: 5680: 5679: 5678: 5657: 5629: 5534: 5532: 5530:POTD/2021-11-01 5527: 5526: 5463: 5400: 5311: 5302: 5301: 5300: 5284: 5283: 5275: 5271: 5229: 5185: 5170: 5143: 5120: 4864: 4851: 4764: 4761: 4758: 4642: 4576: 4573: 4570: 4493: 4423: 4367: 4349:184.147.181.129 4316:184.147.181.129 4304: 4302:POTD/2021-04-19 4266: 4216:Phenakistiscope 4179: 4110: 4051: 4030: 3975: 3973:POTD/2021-02-08 3783:Espresso Addict 3682:Espresso Addict 3662: 3641: 3608:Espresso Addict 3605: 3591:Espresso Addict 3568:Espresso Addict 3566:, initiated by 3488: 3487: 3479: 3475: 3448: 3406: 3381: 3378: 3375: 3356: 3329: 3255: 3237: 3226: 3215: 3203: 3192: 3181: 3137:the newline. —⁠ 3130: 3124: 3111: 3041: 3031: 3005: 2991: 2976: 2964: 2960: 2955:, I found that 2949: 2913: 2907: 2903: 2901:Portal pictures 2897: 2881: 2857:Cassini-Huygens 2853: 2806:Coffeeandcrumbs 2805: 2799: 2793: 2761: 2685: 2664: 2642: 2621: 2619: 2615: 2607: 2589: 2556:The picture in 2554: 2525: 2489: 2478: 2467: 2459: 2427: 2424: 2421: 2409: 2405: 2401: 2396:Coffeeandcrumbs 2385: 2377:Coffeeandcrumbs 2371: 2365: 2352: 2350: 2322:Coffeeandcrumbs 2315: 2292: 2270: 2267: 2264: 2255: 2230: 2193: 2190: 2187: 2183: 2179: 2175: 2038: 2035: 2032: 2025:an edit request 2020: 2014: 2009:Coffeeandcrumbs 2006: 1998:Coffeeandcrumbs 1992: 1986: 1959: 1956: 1953: 1948: 1942: 1937:Coffeeandcrumbs 1934: 1926:Coffeeandcrumbs 1920: 1914: 1887: 1884: 1881: 1871:Coffeeandcrumbs 1868: 1846:Coffeeandcrumbs 1840: 1834: 1821:Coffeeandcrumbs 1815: 1809: 1781: 1778: 1775: 1770:application of 1765:Coffeeandcrumbs 1758: 1756: 1730: 1717: 1691: 1688: 1685: 1677: 1655: 1633: 1630: 1627: 1615: 1589: 1576: 1542: 1524: 1517: 1505: 1490: 1478: 1474: 1469:, I found that 1463: 1431: 1428: 1425: 1416: 1388: 1380: 1370: 1355: 1343: 1339: 1334:, I found that 1328: 1298: 1295: 1292: 1284: 1274: 1259: 1247: 1243: 1238:, I found that 1232: 1147: 1135: 1120: 1108: 1104: 1099:, I found that 1093: 1037:Coffeeandcrumbs 1031: 1025: 990:Coffeeandcrumbs 984: 978: 916: 912: 824: 808:Coffeeandcrumbs 802: 796: 787: 779:Coffeeandcrumbs 773: 767: 755:to be delisted. 738:should feature 734:. For example, 723: 702:Coffeeandcrumbs 683: 637: 588: 585: 582: 540: 502: 485: 465: 450: 404: 383: 361: 358: 355: 351: 339: 317: 314: 311: 303: 299: 293: 289: 283: 279: 273: 265: 233: 229: 221: 188: 184: 148: 145: 142: 125: 100: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 5687: 5677: 5676: 5628: 5625: 5624: 5623: 5622: 5621: 5597:Franz van Duns 5594: 5593: 5564: 5563: 5561: 5558: 5531: 5528: 5520: 5519: 5518: 5517: 5516: 5515: 5514: 5513: 5512: 5511: 5510: 5449:Just FYI. :^) 5447: 5443: 5432: 5382: 5381: 5380: 5379: 5378: 5377: 5376: 5375: 5330:Same with me. 5312: 5303: 5288: 5287: 5286: 5285: 5273: 5270: 5267: 5266: 5265: 5228: 5225: 5224: 5223: 5184: 5181: 5180: 5179: 5142: 5139: 5119: 5116: 5115: 5114: 5113: 5112: 5111: 5110: 5109: 5108: 5107: 5106: 5105: 5104: 5103: 5102: 5101: 5100: 5099: 5098: 5097: 5096: 5086:AllegedlyHuman 5005: 4971: 4961:AllegedlyHuman 4924:AllegedlyHuman 4847: 4846: 4845: 4844: 4843: 4842: 4841: 4840: 4839: 4838: 4825: 4715: 4714: 4713: 4712: 4711: 4710: 4709: 4708: 4707: 4706: 4705: 4704: 4703: 4702: 4701: 4700: 4699: 4698: 4697: 4696: 4679: 4678: 4663: 4660: 4657: 4514: 4513: 4492: 4489: 4488: 4487: 4486: 4485: 4484: 4483: 4470: 4462: 4461: 4460: 4459: 4458: 4457: 4449: 4448: 4447: 4446: 4408: 4406: 4366: 4363: 4362: 4361: 4360: 4359: 4303: 4300: 4299: 4298: 4265: 4262: 4220:Phantasmascope 4188:Simon Stampfer 4178: 4172: 4171: 4170: 4169: 4168: 4167: 4166: 4165: 4164: 4138: 4137: 4136: 4135: 4134: 4133: 4080: 4079: 4078: 4075: 4072: 4071:) on southeast 4063: 3974: 3971: 3970: 3969: 3968: 3967: 3966: 3965: 3964: 3963: 3902: 3901: 3900: 3873: 3872: 3859: 3858: 3842: 3841: 3840: 3839: 3838: 3837: 3836: 3835: 3834: 3833: 3832: 3831: 3830: 3829: 3828: 3827: 3826: 3825: 3824: 3823: 3822: 3821: 3820: 3819: 3746:target article 3674: 3660: 3509: 3508: 3477: 3474: 3471: 3447: 3444: 3430: 3429: 3425: 3418: 3414: 3405: 3402: 3355: 3352: 3328: 3325: 3324: 3323: 3322: 3321: 3320: 3319: 3291: 3290: 3289: 3288: 3270:Gilbert Duprez 3249: 3248: 3247: 3246: 3232: 3231: 3221: 3213:Talk:Main Page 3198: 3180: 3177: 3176: 3175: 3174: 3173: 3172: 3171: 3170: 3169: 3168: 3167: 3121: 3106: 3085:has been fixed 3039: 3038: 3037: 3036: 3035: 3026:It seems that 2948: 2941: 2922:Portal:History 2880: 2877: 2852: 2849: 2848: 2847: 2846: 2845: 2844: 2843: 2788: 2786: 2760: 2755: 2754: 2753: 2752: 2751: 2750: 2749: 2748: 2747: 2641: 2636: 2606: 2600: 2599: 2598: 2553: 2548: 2547: 2546: 2545: 2544: 2528:Mike Marchmont 2494:Mike Marchmont 2488: 2485: 2484: 2483: 2473: 2462:Rhododendrites 2457: 2456: 2455: 2454: 2453: 2452: 2451: 2450: 2449: 2448: 2447: 2406:|display=thumb 2402:|display=blurb 2392:Rhododendrites 2383: 2361: 2353:Rhododendrites 2318:Rhododendrites 2180:{{NotifyPOTD}} 2174: 2163: 2162: 2161: 2147: 2146: 2145: 2109: 2070: 2069: 2068: 2067: 2066: 2065: 2064: 2063: 2062: 2061: 2060: 2059: 2058: 1866: 1755: 1752: 1751: 1750: 1749: 1748: 1747: 1746: 1745: 1744: 1743: 1742: 1741: 1740: 1541: 1538: 1516: 1513: 1462: 1455: 1454: 1453: 1452: 1451: 1327: 1320: 1319: 1318: 1231: 1224: 1223: 1222: 1221: 1220: 1203:To quote what 1146: 1143: 1092: 1085: 1084: 1083: 1082: 1081: 1080: 1079: 1078: 1077: 1076: 1075: 1074: 1073: 1072: 1071: 1070: 1069: 1068: 1067: 1066: 1065: 1017:Louis XVI coin 974: 973: 972: 967: 962: 957: 905: 853: 852: 851: 847: 843: 832: 785: 758: 756: 749: 747: 636: 633: 632: 631: 630: 629: 628: 627: 626: 625: 484: 479: 449: 446: 445: 444: 443: 442: 441: 440: 439: 438: 437: 436: 435: 434: 433: 432: 431: 430: 429: 428: 411:I have used a 337: 99: 96: 93: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5686: 5675: 5671: 5667: 5661: 5656: 5655: 5654: 5653: 5649: 5645: 5641: 5637: 5633: 5620: 5616: 5612: 5608: 5607: 5606: 5602: 5598: 5591: 5587: 5586: 5581: 5577: 5573: 5569: 5568: 5556: 5552: 5548: 5547: 5546: 5544: 5538: 5524: 5509: 5505: 5501: 5497: 5496: 5495: 5492: 5490: 5489: 5488:Modest Genius 5484: 5483: 5482: 5478: 5474: 5467: 5462: 5461: 5460: 5456: 5452: 5448: 5444: 5441: 5437: 5433: 5430: 5426: 5423: 5422: 5421: 5418: 5416: 5415: 5414:Modest Genius 5410: 5407:to thank for 5404: 5398: 5397: 5396: 5395: 5391: 5387: 5386:71.175.88.163 5374: 5371: 5369: 5368: 5367:Modest Genius 5363: 5360: 5359: 5358: 5355: 5353: 5352: 5351:Modest Genius 5347: 5343: 5342: 5341: 5337: 5333: 5329: 5328: 5327: 5323: 5319: 5318:71.175.88.163 5314: 5313: 5310: 5299: 5296: 5294: 5293: 5292:Modest Genius 5282: 5264: 5260: 5256: 5252: 5251: 5250: 5249: 5246: 5242: 5238: 5234: 5222: 5218: 5214: 5209: 5208: 5207: 5206: 5202: 5198: 5194: 5190: 5178: 5175: 5174: 5173: 5165: 5162: 5161: 5160: 5159: 5155: 5151: 5147: 5138: 5137: 5133: 5129: 5125: 5095: 5091: 5087: 5083: 5079: 5078: 5077: 5072: 5067: 5062: 5057: 5056: 5055: 5051: 5047: 5046:Jmchutchinson 5042: 5041: 5040: 5035: 5030: 5025: 5024: 5023: 5019: 5015: 5014:Jmchutchinson 5011: 5006: 5004: 5000: 4996: 4992: 4991: 4990: 4985: 4980: 4976: 4972: 4970: 4966: 4962: 4958: 4954: 4953: 4952: 4948: 4944: 4940: 4935: 4934: 4933: 4929: 4925: 4921: 4920:the Main Page 4917: 4914: 4913: 4912: 4907: 4902: 4897: 4892: 4891: 4890: 4886: 4882: 4878: 4874: 4868: 4859: 4855: 4849: 4848: 4837: 4833: 4829: 4823: 4819: 4818: 4817: 4812: 4807: 4802: 4801: 4800: 4796: 4792: 4788: 4785: 4784: 4783: 4780: 4777: 4776: 4772: 4768: 4767: 4755: 4754: 4753: 4749: 4745: 4741: 4737: 4736: 4735: 4734: 4729: 4724: 4720: 4695: 4691: 4687: 4683: 4682: 4681: 4680: 4677: 4673: 4669: 4664: 4661: 4658: 4655: 4654: 4652: 4646: 4641: 4640: 4639: 4635: 4631: 4627: 4622: 4621: 4620: 4615: 4610: 4606: 4601: 4597: 4596: 4595: 4592: 4589: 4588: 4584: 4580: 4579: 4568: 4567: 4565: 4561: 4557: 4553: 4548: 4547: 4546: 4541: 4536: 4532: 4531: 4530: 4526: 4522: 4518: 4517: 4516: 4515: 4512: 4507: 4502: 4498: 4497: 4496: 4482: 4478: 4474: 4471: 4468: 4467: 4466: 4465: 4464: 4463: 4455: 4454: 4453: 4452: 4451: 4450: 4445: 4441: 4437: 4433: 4427: 4422: 4421: 4420: 4416: 4412: 4409: 4407: 4404: 4403: 4398: 4390: 4386: 4385: 4381: 4377: 4373: 4358: 4354: 4350: 4346: 4345: 4344: 4340: 4336: 4332: 4328: 4327: 4326: 4325: 4321: 4317: 4313: 4309: 4297: 4293: 4289: 4285: 4284: 4283: 4282: 4278: 4274: 4271: 4261: 4260: 4256: 4252: 4248: 4244: 4240: 4236: 4232: 4227: 4225: 4221: 4217: 4213: 4209: 4203: 4201: 4197: 4193: 4189: 4184: 4176: 4163: 4159: 4155: 4150: 4146: 4145: 4144: 4143: 4142: 4141: 4140: 4139: 4132: 4128: 4124: 4120: 4114: 4109: 4108: 4107: 4103: 4099: 4095: 4093: 4092: 4085: 4081: 4076: 4073: 4070: 4069: 4064: 4061: 4060: 4055: 4050: 4049: 4048: 4044: 4040: 4034: 4029: 4028: 4027: 4026: 4022: 4018: 4014: 4010: 4006: 4002: 3998: 3997: 3991: 3987: 3979: 3962: 3957: 3952: 3948: 3947: 3946: 3942: 3938: 3934: 3929: 3928: 3927: 3923: 3919: 3915: 3914:December 2016 3911: 3907: 3903: 3899: 3894: 3889: 3885: 3881: 3877: 3876: 3875: 3874: 3870: 3866: 3863: 3862: 3861: 3860: 3857: 3853: 3849: 3844: 3843: 3818: 3813: 3808: 3804: 3800: 3796: 3795: 3794: 3789: 3784: 3780: 3775: 3771: 3767: 3766: 3765: 3760: 3755: 3751: 3747: 3743: 3742: 3741: 3737: 3733: 3728: 3727: 3726: 3721: 3716: 3712: 3708: 3703: 3699: 3695: 3694: 3693: 3688: 3683: 3679: 3675: 3666: 3661: 3659: 3655: 3651: 3645: 3638: 3634: 3633: 3632: 3628: 3624: 3619: 3615: 3609: 3604: 3603: 3602: 3597: 3592: 3588: 3583: 3582: 3581: 3577: 3573: 3569: 3565: 3561: 3556: 3555: 3554: 3549: 3544: 3540: 3536: 3532: 3531: 3530: 3526: 3522: 3518: 3513: 3512: 3511: 3510: 3507: 3502: 3497: 3493: 3490: 3489: 3486: 3470: 3469: 3465: 3461: 3457: 3453: 3443: 3442: 3438: 3434: 3426: 3423: 3419: 3415: 3412: 3411: 3410: 3401: 3400: 3397: 3394: 3393: 3389: 3385: 3384: 3372: 3368: 3363: 3361: 3351: 3350: 3346: 3342: 3338: 3334: 3318: 3314: 3310: 3305: 3301: 3297: 3296: 3295: 3294: 3293: 3292: 3287: 3283: 3279: 3275: 3271: 3267: 3266: 3259: 3253: 3252: 3251: 3250: 3241: 3236: 3235: 3234: 3233: 3230: 3225: 3220: 3219: 3214: 3210: 3209: 3208: 3207: 3202: 3197: 3196: 3189: 3187: 3184:subject - It 3166: 3162: 3158: 3154: 3150: 3149: 3148: 3144: 3140: 3136: 3129: 3122: 3119: 3117: 3107: 3104: 3100: 3099: 3098: 3094: 3090: 3087:by Anomie. —⁠ 3086: 3082: 3078: 3074: 3070: 3066: 3063:I've created 3062: 3061: 3060: 3056: 3052: 3048: 3045: 3044: 3043: 3042: 3029: 3025: 3024: 3023: 3019: 3015: 3011: 3003: 3000: 2999: 2998: 2997: 2994: 2989: 2984: 2979: 2978:post a notice 2971: 2958: 2954: 2946: 2940: 2939: 2935: 2931: 2927: 2926:Portal:Sports 2923: 2919: 2918:Template:POTD 2912: 2902: 2895: 2892: 2888: 2884: 2876: 2875: 2871: 2867: 2864:August 2009. 2862: 2858: 2842: 2838: 2834: 2829: 2828: 2827: 2823: 2819: 2814: 2813: 2812: 2808: 2803: 2796: 2789: 2787: 2784: 2781: 2780: 2779: 2778: 2774: 2770: 2766: 2759: 2746: 2743: 2739: 2735: 2734: 2733: 2729: 2725: 2721: 2717: 2716: 2715: 2711: 2707: 2703: 2699: 2693: 2689: 2684: 2683: 2682: 2678: 2674: 2668: 2663: 2662: 2661: 2660: 2656: 2652: 2648: 2640: 2635: 2634: 2626: 2624: 2612: 2605: 2597: 2594: 2593: 2592: 2584: 2580: 2579: 2578: 2577: 2573: 2569: 2565: 2564: 2559: 2552: 2543: 2539: 2535: 2529: 2524: 2523: 2522: 2518: 2514: 2510: 2506: 2505: 2504: 2503: 2499: 2495: 2482: 2477: 2472: 2471: 2463: 2458: 2446: 2443: 2440: 2439: 2435: 2431: 2430: 2419: 2415: 2397: 2393: 2389: 2384: 2382: 2378: 2375: 2368: 2362: 2360: 2355: 2348: 2344: 2343:Charlesjsharp 2339: 2338: 2337: 2333: 2329: 2323: 2319: 2313: 2312: 2311: 2307: 2303: 2296: 2291: 2290: 2289: 2286: 2283: 2282: 2278: 2274: 2273: 2259: 2254: 2253: 2252: 2248: 2244: 2240: 2234: 2229: 2228: 2227: 2223: 2219: 2215: 2214: 2213: 2212: 2209: 2206: 2205: 2201: 2197: 2196: 2172: 2168: 2160: 2156: 2152: 2148: 2142: 2139: 2136: 2133: 2130: 2129:transclusions 2127: 2124: 2121: 2118: 2114: 2110: 2106: 2103: 2100: 2097: 2094: 2093:transclusions 2091: 2088: 2085: 2082: 2078: 2074: 2073: 2071: 2057: 2054: 2051: 2050: 2046: 2042: 2041: 2030: 2026: 2019: 2010: 2005: 2004: 2003: 1999: 1996: 1989: 1983: 1980: 1979: 1978: 1975: 1972: 1971: 1967: 1963: 1962: 1947: 1941:I've tweaked 1938: 1933: 1932: 1931: 1927: 1924: 1917: 1911: 1908: 1907: 1906: 1903: 1900: 1899: 1895: 1891: 1890: 1879: 1872: 1867: 1865: 1861: 1857: 1853: 1852: 1851: 1847: 1844: 1837: 1831: 1828: 1827: 1826: 1822: 1819: 1812: 1806: 1803: 1802: 1801: 1800: 1797: 1794: 1793: 1789: 1785: 1784: 1773: 1766: 1762: 1739: 1734: 1726: 1720: 1712: 1711: 1710: 1707: 1704: 1703: 1699: 1695: 1694: 1681: 1676: 1675: 1674: 1670: 1666: 1659: 1654: 1653: 1652: 1649: 1646: 1645: 1641: 1637: 1636: 1623: 1619: 1614: 1613: 1612: 1608: 1604: 1600: 1599: 1598: 1593: 1585: 1579: 1571: 1570: 1569: 1568: 1564: 1560: 1556: 1551: 1547: 1537: 1536: 1531: 1527: 1522: 1521:this proposal 1512: 1511: 1508: 1503: 1498: 1493: 1492:post a notice 1485: 1472: 1468: 1460: 1450: 1447: 1444: 1443: 1439: 1435: 1434: 1420: 1415: 1414: 1413: 1410: 1407: 1403: 1400: 1397: 1394: 1391:. Why do you 1384: 1379: 1378: 1377: 1376: 1373: 1368: 1363: 1358: 1357:post a notice 1350: 1337: 1333: 1325: 1317: 1314: 1311: 1310: 1306: 1302: 1301: 1288: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1280: 1277: 1272: 1267: 1262: 1261:post a notice 1254: 1241: 1237: 1229: 1219: 1215: 1211: 1206: 1202: 1199: 1195: 1194: 1193: 1189: 1185: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1178: 1174: 1170: 1166: 1163: 1160: 1156: 1152: 1142: 1141: 1138: 1133: 1128: 1123: 1122:post a notice 1115: 1102: 1098: 1090: 1064: 1060: 1056: 1052: 1048: 1044: 1043: 1042: 1038: 1034: 1028: 1022: 1018: 1014: 1011: 1010: 1009: 1005: 1001: 997: 996: 995: 991: 987: 981: 975: 971: 968: 966: 963: 961: 958: 956: 953: 952: 950: 947: 946: 945: 941: 937: 933: 932: 931: 925: 920: 919: 910: 906: 904: 900: 896: 892: 891: 890: 887: 884: 880: 876: 872: 871: 870: 866: 862: 858: 854: 848: 844: 841: 836: 833: 830: 822: 818: 817: 815: 814: 813: 809: 805: 799: 791: 786: 784: 780: 776: 770: 764: 759: 757: 754: 750: 748: 745: 744:Module:Random 741: 737: 733: 727: 722: 721: 720: 716: 712: 707: 703: 699: 695: 691: 687: 681: 680: 679: 678: 674: 670: 664: 662: 658: 653: 647: 642: 624: 620: 616: 612: 609: 608: 607: 604: 601: 600: 596: 592: 591: 580: 576: 572: 568: 564: 560: 559: 554: 548: 544: 539: 538: 537: 533: 529: 525: 522: 521: 520: 516: 512: 506: 501: 500: 499: 498: 494: 490: 483: 478: 477: 472: 468: 463: 459: 454: 427: 423: 419: 414: 408: 403: 402: 401: 397: 393: 387: 382: 381: 380: 377: 374: 373: 369: 365: 364: 349: 343: 338: 336: 333: 330: 329: 325: 321: 320: 309: 298: 288: 278: 269: 264: 263: 262: 258: 254: 250: 249: 248: 242: 237: 236: 225: 220: 219: 218: 214: 210: 205: 204: 203: 197: 192: 191: 182: 178: 177: 174: 173:schooling me. 169: 168: 167: 164: 161: 160: 156: 152: 151: 136: 129: 124: 123: 122: 121: 117: 113: 107: 103: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 5630: 5609:OK, thanks. 5583: 5565: 5533: 5522: 5487: 5424: 5413: 5383: 5366: 5350: 5304: 5291: 5230: 5189:mRNA vaccine 5186: 5168: 5167: 5148: 5144: 5121: 5081: 5060: 5010:E. O. Wilson 4974: 4939:E. O. Wilson 4919: 4895: 4867:Gog the Mild 4791:Gog the Mild 4778: 4773: 4770: 4759: 4744:Gog the Mild 4716: 4686:Gog the Mild 4645:Gog the Mild 4630:Gog the Mild 4625: 4604: 4599: 4590: 4585: 4582: 4571: 4551: 4494: 4371: 4368: 4311: 4305: 4267: 4242: 4235:lithographed 4230: 4228: 4219: 4211: 4207: 4204: 4199: 4195: 4180: 4089: 4087: 4083: 4066: 3995: 3993: 3989: 3984: 3879: 3798: 3773: 3745: 3710: 3706: 3534: 3449: 3431: 3407: 3395: 3390: 3387: 3376: 3364: 3357: 3333:with a POTD, 3330: 3263: 3240:Adam Cuerden 3218:Adam Cuerden 3216: 3195:Adam Cuerden 3193: 3190: 3185: 3182: 3135:have removed 3115: 3109: 3004:begins with 2950: 2885: 2882: 2854: 2762: 2742:Andrew Dalby 2698:Template:Sic 2646: 2643: 2622: 2608: 2602:Feedback on 2587: 2586: 2562: 2555: 2490: 2470:Adam Cuerden 2468: 2441: 2436: 2433: 2422: 2413: 2347:Adam Cuerden 2284: 2279: 2276: 2265: 2207: 2202: 2199: 2188: 2176: 2167:UpcomingPOTD 2137: 2131: 2125: 2119: 2101: 2095: 2089: 2083: 2052: 2047: 2044: 2033: 2018:POTD default 1973: 1968: 1965: 1954: 1901: 1896: 1893: 1882: 1795: 1790: 1787: 1776: 1757: 1705: 1700: 1697: 1686: 1647: 1642: 1639: 1628: 1543: 1518: 1464: 1445: 1440: 1437: 1426: 1329: 1312: 1307: 1304: 1293: 1233: 1148: 1094: 914: 762: 665: 638: 602: 597: 594: 583: 556: 486: 451: 416:appearance. 375: 370: 367: 356: 331: 326: 323: 312: 287:UpcomingPOTD 231: 186: 162: 157: 154: 143: 108: 104: 101: 78: 43: 37: 5567:Stereoscopy 5555:freeviewing 5279:Moved from 5061:every other 4273:Art LaPella 3865:Child labor 3483:Moved from 3460:Binksternet 3428:processing. 3365:I've hence 3254:I see that 3034:at the end: 2911:Portal POTD 2891:notoriously 2720:this source 2688:Art LaPella 2667:Art LaPella 2651:Art LaPella 413:Snowy egret 36:This is an 5666:Cwmhiraeth 5611:Cwmhiraeth 5576:stereopsis 5537:Cwmhiraeth 5255:Cwmhiraeth 5213:Cwmhiraeth 5197:soupvector 5128:Shubinator 5082:any linked 4943:Cwmhiraeth 4881:Cwmhiraeth 4521:Cwmhiraeth 4436:Cwmhiraeth 4335:Cwmhiraeth 4306:Regarding 4288:Cwmhiraeth 4245:series by 4243:Fantascope 4208:Fantascope 4196:Fantascope 4123:Cwmhiraeth 4113:Nizil Shah 4054:Cwmhiraeth 4039:Cwmhiraeth 4033:Nizil Shah 3937:Cwmhiraeth 3848:Cwmhiraeth 3770:Cwmhiraeth 3750:verifiable 3702:verifiable 3650:Cwmhiraeth 3614:Cwmhiraeth 3521:Cwmhiraeth 3454:. Here's 3304:Cwmhiraeth 3278:Cwmhiraeth 3128:POTD image 3067:manually. 2972:manually. 2833:Cwmhiraeth 2783:Cwmhiraeth 2769:Cwmhiraeth 2738:shown here 2724:Cwmhiraeth 2692:Cwmhiraeth 2673:Cwmhiraeth 2534:Cwmhiraeth 2388:Cwmhiraeth 2328:Cwmhiraeth 2314:Let's ask 2302:Cwmhiraeth 2258:Cwmhiraeth 2243:Cwmhiraeth 2218:Cwmhiraeth 2171:NotifyPOTD 2165:Update to 2013:As above, 1856:Cwmhiraeth 1761:Cwmhiraeth 1680:Cwmhiraeth 1665:Cwmhiraeth 1618:Cwmhiraeth 1603:Cwmhiraeth 1559:Cwmhiraeth 1555:Neo Geo CD 1486:manually. 1351:manually. 1255:manually. 1184:Cwmhiraeth 1116:manually. 1055:Cwmhiraeth 1051:Louis d'or 1013:Cwmhiraeth 1000:Cwmhiraeth 949:Cwmhiraeth 936:Cwmhiraeth 909:Cwmhiraeth 857:Cwmhiraeth 829:Shah Japan 790:Cwmhiraeth 726:Cwmhiraeth 711:Cwmhiraeth 669:Cwmhiraeth 641:guidelines 615:--valereee 547:Cwmhiraeth 528:--valereee 524:Cwmhiraeth 511:Cwmhiraeth 489:--valereee 418:Cwmhiraeth 392:Cwmhiraeth 342:Cwmhiraeth 277:NotifyPOTD 268:Cwmhiraeth 253:Cwmhiraeth 224:Cwmhiraeth 209:Cwmhiraeth 112:--valereee 90:Archive 11 85:Archive 10 5440:this edit 5409:this edit 5281:WP:ERRORS 4993:Ditto. – 4787:Ravenpuff 4473:Riventree 4426:Riventree 4411:Riventree 4376:Riventree 4331:talk page 3618:Ravenpuff 3433:KVJackson 3265:Jérusalem 3073:Ravenpuff 2988:AnomieBOT 2985:. Thanks! 2507:Subject: 2295:Ravenpuff 2239:this page 2233:Ravenpuff 2173:templates 1982:Ravenpuff 1910:Ravenpuff 1830:Ravenpuff 1805:Ravenpuff 1658:Ravenpuff 1526:Vanamonde 1502:AnomieBOT 1499:. Thanks! 1383:Ravenpuff 1367:AnomieBOT 1364:. Thanks! 1291:Fixed. — 1287:AnomieBOT 1271:AnomieBOT 1268:. Thanks! 1198:WP:ERRORS 1132:AnomieBOT 1129:. Thanks! 1053:article. 1047:this site 698:Ravenpuff 611:Ravenpuff 579:WP:ERRORS 571:AnomieBOT 467:Vanamonde 407:Ravenpuff 386:Ravenpuff 207:writing. 79:Archive 9 73:Archive 8 68:Archive 7 60:Archive 5 5245:cityuser 5193:COVID-19 4850:I think 4552:de facto 4251:Joortje1 3933:This one 3871:as POTD. 3774:de-facto 3748:and (b) 3564:this one 3341:NedFausa 3157:andrybak 3139:andrybak 3089:andrybak 3077:andrybak 3069:Subpages 3051:andrybak 3014:andrybak 3010:subpages 2930:andrybak 2706:andrybak 2568:🗣️ Talk 2513:andrybak 2151:andrybak 2141:subpages 2105:subpages 1946:POTD row 1731:userbako 1590:userbako 1396:changing 1210:Theramin 1169:Theramin 917:howcheng 706:Valereee 690:Howcheng 686:Armbrust 553:replaced 543:Valereee 505:Valereee 453:Valereee 234:howcheng 189:howcheng 128:Valereee 5500:Amakuru 5473:Amakuru 5436:Amakuru 5332:Thriley 5171:Hut 8.5 4896:nothing 4668:Amakuru 3918:Amakuru 3906:in 2007 3732:Amakuru 3698:Amakuru 3696:Before 3665:Amakuru 3623:Amakuru 3587:Amakuru 3572:Amakuru 3539:Amakuru 3309:Amakuru 3258:Amakuru 3028:the bot 2887:Portals 2818:Amakuru 2590:Hut 8.5 2572:ping me 2394:, and 2123:history 2087:history 1389:|style= 1205:Amakuru 895:Amakuru 861:Amakuru 704:, and 694:Amakuru 39:archive 5660:Certes 5644:Certes 5640:at TfD 5446:linky. 5237:unused 5195:). — 4149:Torana 4119:torana 4091:torana 4068:Torana 3884:verify 3803:WP:FPC 3367:BOLDly 2866:Fcrary 2410:|size= 1772:WP:IAR 1419:Anomie 1406:Anomie 883:Anomie 763:per se 753:WP:FPC 5429:TheDJ 4762:RAVEN 4574:RAVEN 4372:image 4365:POTD? 4312:known 4154:Nizil 4098:Nizil 4017:Nizil 3886:it? 3711:worse 3379:RAVEN 2797:& 2425:RAVEN 2369:& 2268:RAVEN 2191:RAVEN 2036:RAVEN 1990:& 1957:RAVEN 1918:& 1885:RAVEN 1838:& 1813:& 1779:RAVEN 1724:文々。新聞 1689:RAVEN 1631:RAVEN 1583:文々。新聞 1429:RAVEN 1402:"row" 1399:it to 1296:RAVEN 1029:& 982:& 800:& 771:& 586:RAVEN 359:RAVEN 315:RAVEN 146:RAVEN 16:< 5670:talk 5648:talk 5638:are 5634:and 5615:talk 5601:talk 5578:for 5504:talk 5477:talk 5466:Izno 5455:talk 5451:Izno 5403:Izno 5390:talk 5336:talk 5322:talk 5259:talk 5217:talk 5201:talk 5154:talk 5132:talk 5090:talk 5050:talk 5018:talk 4999:talk 4965:talk 4947:talk 4928:talk 4916:WP:V 4885:talk 4856:and 4832:talk 4795:talk 4775:talk 4765:PVFF 4748:talk 4738:OK. 4690:talk 4672:talk 4634:talk 4587:talk 4577:PVFF 4560:talk 4525:talk 4477:talk 4440:talk 4415:talk 4380:talk 4353:talk 4339:talk 4320:talk 4292:talk 4277:talk 4268:See 4255:talk 4158:talk 4127:talk 4102:talk 4043:talk 4021:talk 4011:and 3941:talk 3922:talk 3910:WP:V 3852:talk 3788:talk 3736:talk 3687:talk 3654:talk 3627:talk 3616:and 3596:talk 3576:talk 3560:WP:V 3525:talk 3464:talk 3437:talk 3417:day. 3392:talk 3382:PVFF 3345:talk 3313:talk 3300:Adam 3282:talk 3161:talk 3155:. —⁠ 3143:talk 3093:talk 3081:talk 3075:. —⁠ 3055:talk 3049:. —⁠ 3018:talk 2934:talk 2928:. —⁠ 2924:and 2906:and 2889:are 2870:talk 2837:talk 2822:talk 2773:talk 2728:talk 2710:talk 2690:and 2677:talk 2655:talk 2623:Sdkb 2617:{{u| 2563:Tyw7 2538:talk 2517:talk 2511:. —⁠ 2498:talk 2438:talk 2428:PVFF 2345:and 2332:talk 2320:and 2306:talk 2281:talk 2271:PVFF 2247:talk 2222:talk 2204:talk 2194:PVFF 2169:and 2155:talk 2135:logs 2117:talk 2099:logs 2081:talk 2049:talk 2039:PVFF 1970:talk 1960:PVFF 1898:talk 1888:PVFF 1860:talk 1792:talk 1782:PVFF 1763:and 1702:talk 1692:PVFF 1669:talk 1644:talk 1634:PVFF 1620:and 1607:talk 1563:talk 1530:Talk 1442:talk 1432:PVFF 1393:keep 1309:talk 1299:PVFF 1214:talk 1188:talk 1173:talk 1059:talk 1004:talk 940:talk 924:chat 899:talk 865:talk 715:talk 673:talk 619:talk 599:talk 589:PVFF 545:and 532:talk 515:talk 493:talk 471:Talk 422:talk 396:talk 372:talk 362:PVFF 328:talk 318:PVFF 310:. — 282:and 257:talk 241:chat 213:talk 196:chat 179:See 159:talk 149:PVFF 116:talk 5592:). 5438:in 5239:FP 4995:Sca 4858:Sca 4828:Sca 4822:FPC 4626:are 4556:Sca 4249:." 4003:of 3535:and 3224:FPs 3201:FPs 3116:not 2981:to 2963:or 2816:— 2476:FPs 2357:\\ 1495:to 1477:or 1360:to 1342:or 1264:to 1246:or 1125:to 1107:or 577:at 569:by 5672:) 5650:) 5617:) 5603:) 5595:- 5506:) 5479:) 5457:) 5392:) 5338:) 5324:) 5261:) 5219:) 5203:) 5156:) 5134:) 5126:. 5092:) 5052:) 5020:) 5001:) 4967:) 4949:) 4930:) 4887:) 4834:) 4826:– 4824:. 4797:) 4750:) 4692:) 4674:) 4636:) 4562:) 4550:A 4527:) 4479:) 4442:) 4417:) 4382:) 4374:? 4355:) 4341:) 4333:. 4322:) 4294:) 4279:) 4257:) 4160:) 4129:) 4121:? 4104:) 4045:) 4023:) 3943:) 3924:) 3854:) 3799:is 3738:) 3656:) 3648:? 3629:) 3578:) 3527:) 3466:) 3439:) 3374:— 3347:) 3315:) 3284:) 3163:) 3145:) 3131:}} 3125:{{ 3095:) 3057:) 3032:\n 3020:) 2936:) 2914:}} 2908:{{ 2904:}} 2898:{{ 2872:) 2839:) 2824:) 2809:) 2775:) 2730:) 2712:) 2679:) 2657:) 2629:}} 2574:) 2540:) 2519:) 2500:) 2390:, 2379:) 2334:) 2308:) 2249:) 2224:) 2157:) 2149:—⁠ 2021:}} 2015:{{ 2000:) 1949:}} 1943:{{ 1928:) 1862:) 1848:) 1823:) 1671:) 1609:) 1565:) 1424:— 1404:? 1216:) 1190:) 1175:) 1061:) 1039:) 1006:) 992:) 942:) 901:) 867:) 810:) 781:) 717:) 700:, 696:, 692:, 688:, 675:) 621:) 534:) 517:) 495:) 424:) 398:) 300:}} 294:{{ 290:}} 284:{{ 280:}} 274:{{ 259:) 215:) 183:. 141:— 118:) 64:← 5668:( 5662:: 5658:@ 5646:( 5613:( 5599:( 5539:: 5535:@ 5502:( 5475:( 5468:: 5464:@ 5453:( 5405:: 5401:@ 5388:( 5334:( 5320:( 5257:( 5215:( 5199:( 5152:( 5130:( 5088:( 5073:) 5069:( 5048:( 5036:) 5032:( 5016:( 4997:( 4986:) 4982:( 4963:( 4945:( 4926:( 4908:) 4904:( 4883:( 4869:: 4865:@ 4860:: 4852:@ 4830:( 4813:) 4809:( 4793:( 4779:· 4771:· 4746:( 4730:) 4726:( 4688:( 4670:( 4647:: 4643:@ 4632:( 4616:) 4612:( 4600:s 4591:· 4583:· 4558:( 4542:) 4538:( 4523:( 4508:) 4504:( 4475:( 4438:( 4428:: 4424:@ 4413:( 4378:( 4351:( 4337:( 4318:( 4290:( 4275:( 4253:( 4156:( 4125:( 4115:: 4111:@ 4100:( 4056:: 4052:@ 4041:( 4035:: 4031:@ 4019:( 3958:) 3954:( 3939:( 3920:( 3895:) 3891:( 3850:( 3814:) 3810:( 3790:) 3786:( 3761:) 3757:( 3734:( 3722:) 3718:( 3689:) 3685:( 3667:: 3663:@ 3652:( 3646:: 3642:@ 3625:( 3610:: 3606:@ 3598:) 3594:( 3574:( 3550:) 3546:( 3523:( 3503:) 3499:( 3462:( 3435:( 3396:· 3388:· 3343:( 3311:( 3280:( 3260:: 3256:@ 3242:: 3238:@ 3159:( 3141:( 3105:: 3091:( 3079:( 3053:( 3016:( 2992:⚡ 2932:( 2868:( 2835:( 2820:( 2802:( 2800:C 2794:C 2771:( 2726:( 2708:( 2694:: 2686:@ 2675:( 2669:: 2665:@ 2653:( 2566:( 2536:( 2530:: 2526:@ 2515:( 2496:( 2464:: 2460:@ 2442:· 2434:· 2398:: 2386:@ 2374:( 2372:C 2366:C 2330:( 2324:: 2316:@ 2304:( 2297:: 2293:@ 2285:· 2277:· 2260:: 2256:@ 2245:( 2235:: 2231:@ 2220:( 2208:· 2200:· 2153:( 2143:) 2138:· 2132:· 2126:· 2120:· 2115:( 2107:) 2102:· 2096:· 2090:· 2084:· 2079:( 2053:· 2045:· 2011:: 2007:@ 1995:( 1993:C 1987:C 1974:· 1966:· 1939:: 1935:@ 1923:( 1921:C 1915:C 1902:· 1894:· 1873:: 1869:@ 1858:( 1843:( 1841:C 1835:C 1818:( 1816:C 1810:C 1796:· 1788:· 1767:: 1759:@ 1735:» 1727:I 1721:I 1715:« 1706:· 1698:· 1682:: 1678:@ 1667:( 1660:: 1656:@ 1648:· 1640:· 1624:: 1616:@ 1605:( 1594:» 1586:I 1580:I 1574:« 1561:( 1532:) 1528:( 1506:⚡ 1446:· 1438:· 1421:: 1417:@ 1409:⚔ 1385:: 1381:@ 1371:⚡ 1313:· 1305:· 1289:: 1285:@ 1275:⚡ 1212:( 1186:( 1171:( 1136:⚡ 1057:( 1035:( 1032:C 1026:C 1002:( 988:( 985:C 979:C 938:( 926:} 922:{ 913:— 897:( 886:⚔ 863:( 806:( 803:C 797:C 792:: 788:@ 777:( 774:C 768:C 728:: 724:@ 713:( 708:: 684:@ 671:( 617:( 603:· 595:· 549:: 541:@ 530:( 513:( 507:: 503:@ 491:( 473:) 469:( 420:( 409:: 405:@ 394:( 388:: 384:@ 376:· 368:· 344:: 340:@ 332:· 324:· 270:: 266:@ 255:( 243:} 239:{ 230:— 226:: 222:@ 211:( 198:} 194:{ 185:— 163:· 155:· 130:: 126:@ 114:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

talk:Picture of the day/Archive 9 - Knowledge

Index