Knowledge

talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Historical elections/Evidence - Knowledge

Source 📝

560:
respond calmly to allegations against you. Accusations of misbehaviour posted in this case must be proven with clear evidence (and otherwise not made at all). Editors who conduct themselves inappropriately during a case may be sanctioned by an arbitrator, clerk, or functionary, without further warning, by being banned from further participation in the case, or being blocked altogether. Personal attacks against other users, including arbitrators or the clerks, will be met with sanctions. Behavior during a case may also be considered by the committee in arriving at a final decision.
226: 45: 923: 817:
case. With four days to go in the evidence phase, there isn't any actual evidence at all and nearly all of the named parties have just remained silent. I see that at least one arb suggested just voting on some blocks instead of doing the full case, and I'm left wondering if that might've been a more practical course of action.
816:
To an outsider this a rather puzzling case. I get that there is a private aspect, but presumably the hybrid case was decided on because there was a public aspect. What that aspect is is as clear as mud. There's no detail either from the parties or the committee in the initial discussion to accept the
887:
private case, as the public evidence submissions are just statements, I don't see any actual evidence as it is normally understood in an ArbCom setting. In light of that, I don't see of what possible use the workshop phase could be. How can anyone publicly workshop solutions when the evidence is all
861:
While I initially did not think this should have been a full case, it was my hope that the named parties and perhaps others not party to the case would provide additional information through public and/or private evidence where applicable. Where that of course falls apart is that we have been vague
559:
Arbitration case pages exist to assist the Arbitration Committee in arriving at a fair, well-informed decision. You are required to act with appropriate decorum during this case. While grievances must often be aired during a case, you are expected to air them without being rude or hostile, and to
849:
I don't think most people expected they would publish redacted private evidence. Given the nature of it as far as can be gleaned, that would be near-impossible to do without violating the outing policy, unless all parties agreed to it. What I did expect was some evidence that there was or is an
916:
The evidence phase of this case will be closing within 24 hours. If you wish to submit evidence and have not done so, please do shortly. (If it involves non-public information, such as off-site accounts, then it should be directed to the Arbitration Committee by email to
835:. It appears that this will be an entirely private case, because they haven't published any of the private evidence in any redacted form. It is not at all like the Tropical Cyclones case, which was mostly public. Maybe they don't think that transparency is important. 99: 132: 94: 127: 121: 116: 105: 856: 844: 88: 29: 447: 936: 897: 875: 484: 316: 58: 823: 83: 850:
on-wiki aspect of this case. It does look like this is rapidly heading for a fully private case though, as there is still nothing one could call public evidence.
249: 478: 442: 474: 270: 262: 577: 416: 862:
on what the issues are, which makes it hard to provide context. The vagueness is not due to a lack of concern for transparency, but privacy/
141:
Opened 6 August 2024 • Evidence closes 20 August 2024 • Workshop closes 27 August 2024 • Proposed decision to be posted by 3 September 2024
266: 436: 281: 259: 72: 880:
Thanks for the reply. I understand, probably better than most, that sometimes a case does not go in the direction you thought it would.
517: 469: 407: 326: 254: 65: 432: 543: 412: 25: 422: 402: 285: 427: 340: 321: 390: 461: 352: 385: 311: 240: 21: 575:
and scroll down until you find the right list of arbitrators. If updates to this listing do not immediately show, try
653: 740: 669: 637: 377: 217: 911: 701: 685: 363: 306: 756: 298: 895: 854: 821: 804: 621: 536: 348: 246: 866:
issues that tie our hands with certain aspects and require us to be more vague than I would like to be. -
788: 717: 605: 358: 276: 563: 891:
It may be moot, but as it is currently unused I think it would make sense to just cancel the workshop.
772: 397: 17: 840: 892: 851: 832: 818: 529: 811: 933: 572: 170: 159: 647: 236: 836: 734: 663: 631: 184: 8: 695: 679: 930: 863: 750: 165: 154: 798: 643: 615: 871: 782: 730: 711: 659: 627: 599: 206: 195: 179: 766: 501: 691: 675: 505: 746: 794: 611: 57:
To request an amendment or clarification of an arbitration decision, see
52:
This case is now closed and pages relating to it may no longer be watched
867: 778: 707: 595: 201: 190: 762: 225: 503: 506: 507: 59:
Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment
71:
To request the assistance of an arbitration clerk, see
64:
To report a violation of an arbitration decision, see
147:: Conduct in the topic area of historical elections. 537: 73:Knowledge talk:Arbitration Committee/Clerks 544: 530: 66:Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement 883:However, it does seem like this is now a 888:private and only the arbs have seen it? 578: 14: 317:Clarification and Amendment requests 39: 35: 36: 947: 921: 224: 43: 564:Arbitrators active on this case 13: 1: 448:Conflict of interest reports 7: 937:00:23, 20 August 2024 (UTC) 912:Evidence phase closing soon 898:23:55, 21 August 2024 (UTC) 876:22:43, 20 August 2024 (UTC) 857:09:18, 20 August 2024 (UTC) 845:02:28, 20 August 2024 (UTC) 824:20:08, 16 August 2024 (UTC) 277:Search archived proceedings 10: 952: 322:Arbitrator motion requests 18:Knowledge talk:Arbitration 922: 571:To update this listing, 833:User:Just Step Sideways 557:Behaviour on this page: 95:Preliminary statements 518:Track related changes 378:Arbitration Committee 218:Knowledge Arbitration 327:Enforcement requests 255:Guide to arbitration 176:Drafting arbitrators 30:Historical elections 893:Just Step Sideways 852:Just Step Sideways 819:Just Step Sideways 573:edit this template 349:Contentious topics 247:Arbitration policy 812:where's the beef? 585: 579:purging the cache 554: 553: 521: 489: 359:General sanctions 307:All open requests 237:About arbitration 210: 199: 188: 174: 163: 136: 128:Proposed decision 125: 114: 103: 92: 81: 80: 943: 928: 926: 925: 924: 582: 580: 569: 546: 539: 532: 520: 515: 508: 487: 443:Clerk procedures 435: 393: 364:Editor sanctions 341:Active sanctions 299:Open proceedings 269: 228: 214: 213: 204: 193: 182: 168: 157: 130: 119: 108: 97: 86: 47: 46: 40: 951: 950: 946: 945: 944: 942: 941: 940: 920: 918: 914: 837:Robert McClenon 814: 576: 566: 550: 516: 510: 509: 504: 494: 493: 492: 481: 464: 454: 453: 452: 439: 431: 419: 394: 389: 380: 370: 369: 368: 343: 333: 332: 331: 301: 291: 288: 273: 265: 243: 212: 54: 44: 34: 33: 32: 12: 11: 5: 949: 913: 910: 909: 908: 907: 906: 905: 904: 903: 902: 901: 900: 889: 881: 813: 810: 809: 808: 792: 776: 760: 744: 722: 721: 705: 689: 673: 657: 641: 625: 609: 587: 586: 565: 562: 552: 551: 549: 548: 541: 534: 526: 523: 522: 512: 511: 502: 500: 499: 496: 495: 491: 490: 482: 477: 472: 466: 465: 460: 459: 456: 455: 451: 450: 445: 440: 430: 425: 420: 415: 410: 405: 400: 395: 388: 382: 381: 376: 375: 372: 371: 367: 366: 361: 356: 345: 344: 339: 338: 335: 334: 330: 329: 324: 319: 314: 309: 303: 302: 297: 296: 293: 292: 290: 289: 284: 279: 274: 264: 257: 252: 244: 239: 233: 230: 229: 221: 220: 84:Main case page 82: 79: 78: 77: 76: 69: 62: 50: 48: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 948: 939: 938: 935: 932: 927:wikimedia.org 899: 896: 894: 890: 886: 882: 879: 878: 877: 873: 869: 865: 860: 859: 858: 855: 853: 848: 847: 846: 842: 838: 834: 830: 829: 828: 827: 826: 825: 822: 820: 806: 803: 800: 796: 793: 790: 787: 784: 780: 777: 774: 771: 768: 764: 761: 758: 755: 752: 748: 745: 742: 739: 736: 732: 729: 728: 727: 726: 719: 716: 713: 709: 706: 703: 700: 697: 693: 690: 687: 684: 681: 677: 674: 671: 668: 665: 661: 658: 655: 652: 649: 645: 642: 639: 636: 633: 629: 626: 623: 620: 617: 613: 610: 607: 604: 601: 597: 594: 593: 592: 591: 584: 581: 574: 568: 567: 561: 558: 547: 542: 540: 535: 533: 528: 527: 525: 524: 519: 514: 513: 498: 497: 486: 483: 480: 476: 473: 471: 468: 467: 463: 458: 457: 449: 446: 444: 441: 438: 434: 429: 426: 424: 421: 418: 414: 411: 409: 406: 404: 401: 399: 396: 392: 387: 384: 383: 379: 374: 373: 365: 362: 360: 357: 354: 350: 347: 346: 342: 337: 336: 328: 325: 323: 320: 318: 315: 313: 312:Case requests 310: 308: 305: 304: 300: 295: 294: 287: 283: 280: 278: 275: 272: 268: 263: 261: 258: 256: 253: 251: 248: 245: 242: 238: 235: 234: 232: 231: 227: 223: 222: 219: 216: 215: 211: 208: 203: 197: 192: 186: 181: 177: 172: 167: 161: 156: 152: 148: 146: 142: 140: 139:Target dates: 134: 129: 123: 118: 112: 107: 101: 96: 90: 85: 74: 70: 67: 63: 60: 56: 55: 53: 49: 42: 41: 38: 31: 27: 23: 19: 931:SilverLocust 915: 884: 815: 801: 785: 769: 753: 737: 724: 723: 714: 698: 682: 666: 650: 634: 618: 602: 589: 588: 570: 556: 555: 175: 166:SilverLocust 155:HouseBlaster 150: 149: 144: 143: 138: 137: 110: 51: 37: 644:HJ Mitchell 282:Ban appeals 260:Noticeboard 151:Case clerks 864:WP:ARBCOND 731:CaptainEek 660:Moneytrees 628:Guerillero 488:(pre-2016) 475:Statistics 408:Procedures 180:Guerillero 919:Arbcom-en 725:Inactive: 413:Elections 805:contribs 789:contribs 773:contribs 757:contribs 741:contribs 718:contribs 702:contribs 692:ToBeFree 686:contribs 676:Primefac 670:contribs 654:contribs 638:contribs 622:contribs 606:contribs 117:Workshop 106:Evidence 28:‎ | 24:‎ | 22:Requests 20:‎ | 885:defacto 747:Firefly 590:Active: 485:Reports 423:History 403:Members 398:Contact 386:Discuss 250:(CU/OS) 795:Sdrqaz 612:Cabayi 428:Clerks 286:Report 200:& 189:& 164:& 868:Aoidh 831:Yes, 779:Maxim 708:Z1720 596:Aoidh 462:Audit 202:Z1720 191:Aoidh 145:Scope 16:< 872:talk 841:talk 799:talk 783:talk 767:talk 763:L235 751:talk 735:talk 712:talk 696:talk 680:talk 664:talk 648:talk 632:talk 616:talk 600:talk 479:Talk 470:Talk 437:Talk 417:Talk 271:Talk 241:Talk 207:Talk 196:Talk 185:Talk 171:Talk 160:Talk 133:Talk 122:Talk 111:Talk 100:Talk 89:Talk 26:Case 929:.) 353:Log 934:💬 874:) 843:) 178:: 153:: 126:— 115:— 104:— 93:— 870:( 839:( 807:) 802:· 797:( 791:) 786:· 781:( 775:) 770:· 765:( 759:) 754:· 749:( 743:) 738:· 733:( 720:) 715:· 710:( 704:) 699:· 694:( 688:) 683:· 678:( 672:) 667:· 662:( 656:) 651:· 646:( 640:) 635:· 630:( 624:) 619:· 614:( 608:) 603:· 598:( 583:. 545:e 538:t 531:v 433:+ 391:+ 355:) 351:( 267:+ 209:) 205:( 198:) 194:( 187:) 183:( 173:) 169:( 162:) 158:( 135:) 131:( 124:) 120:( 113:) 109:( 102:) 98:( 91:) 87:( 75:. 68:. 61:.

Index

Knowledge talk:Arbitration
Requests
Case
Historical elections
Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment
Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement
Knowledge talk:Arbitration Committee/Clerks
Main case page
Talk
Preliminary statements
Talk
Evidence
Talk
Workshop
Talk
Proposed decision
Talk
HouseBlaster
Talk
SilverLocust
Talk
Guerillero
Talk
Aoidh
Talk
Z1720
Talk
Knowledge Arbitration

About arbitration

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.