101:, as well as at deletion review, demonstrate a good knowledge of the speedy criteria. He is always civil and has an excellant edit summary usage. Lifebaka is very helpful with new users often welcoming them and his talk page has numerous thank you's from users who have appreciated his assistance. He may not be the most prolific article writer but is always willing to assist those who are. In short Lifebaka is a helpful, civil user with good knowledge of policy who will put the tools to good use in areas where more admins are always needed.
2419:"Really? Why not?" "The GFDL, which our content is licensed under, says we have to preserve the original article's edit history." "Oh, okay." Bang, problem solved. It would seem to me that situations like this would be excellent opportunities to educate the candidate in the deeper workings of Knowledge, which are, quite honestly, pretty esoteric (especially when it comes to GFDL issues). -
430:. Also like I said, I did not at the time know who Giano was so I could not have thought that he was part of the cause. Had it been any other editor I would have responded the same way. I appologize if that's the way it appeared from the first two sentences of my answer, I was merely expressing that I hadn't known who the run-in had been with previously.
88:. He always makes thoughtful and considered contributions there based on a good knowledge of policy. He also often helps out by notifying the deleting admin of deletion reviews where this has not already been done. Lifebaka often has to use the cached version to base his sensible contributions such as
378:
Woah, I didn't even know that was Giano until just now. At the time I wasn't aware of who he is. It was an error in judgement to add the tag, but I removed the talk page message because I felt he was being overly hostile and I didn't want to see it every time I went to my talk page. I instead let
311:
back to the project through private emails, but he expressed that he didn't want to as he believed that there are problems with
Knowledge that prevent academics from contributing. Because of this I became privy to his real world identity. A few weeks later, the article was nominated a for deletion
926:
Edit count seems somewhat inflated due to use of some automated tools, and the high number of welcomes, but edit counts don't matter, and editor seems nice and relaxed. Some slight concerns elsewhere, but they aren't important currently, and are not enough to withhold my support. Besides, adminship
1824:
Only voting because I've already said something on this RfA. As I said on my talk page, I wasn't feeling convinced... I could vaguely recall the name alongside something that made me go "bleh" at DRV at some stage, but I couldn't recall any details. Maybe he was replying to some crap as opposed to
2434:
now and these issues would not happen again, but it's not the first or last time I had made statements that have shown my ignorance of certain policies. Beyond the "preserve hitories" portions, I tend to try not to worry to much about the GFDL, as it's horribly confusing and for the most part is
346:
for me because I wasn't going to have internet access for a day or two and I didn't want it to wait. I also notified R_Physicist of this privately through email. In the future if I encounter these sorts of privacy issues as an admin I would immediately indef block the editor making personally
2418:
No disrespect intended, Le Grand, but all it takes to address your concern about the Epic Movie AfD (and I guess the Hardy Boys one, too, although I agree with macca regarding the nature of the !vote there) is the following conversation: "Hey, Lifebaka, we can't merge-and-delete on
Knowledge."
2315:
200:, which I do currently. Mostly now I do the latter, making sure that all the speedy candidates are tagged properly and according to the best possible CSD available; I also frequently decline speedies which I feel are inaccurate (two examples of which from today are
266:
block articles). I will be the first to admit, however, that I am not a major content contributor. I have not written any featured anythings, or any good anythings, nor have I significanly contributed to any to my knowledge. Mostly my contributions have been to
1475:
Good, honest answers to the questions, no glaring red flags - room for improvement, but nothing to stop me from supporting. The issue raised by question four doesn't concern me too much; looks like an honest mistake, and
Lifebaka admits as much. Should be okay.
451:
Yes, I would have. Now I wouldn't. I'm fine when people disagree with me, and while it can sometimes be stressful if they chose to use strong language, a better solution is always to simply reply in a calm and measured way, and sometimes to mention
509:
for bad/wrong/improper speedy taggings, I do sometimes switch them to PROD without notifying the author, trusing that the previous speedy-tagger did put up a notification. And, of course, sometimes I just forget to (in fact, thanks for jogging my
2314:, I am somewhat concerned that the candidate did not return to the discussion to comment one way or the other on the various revisions that resulted in a redirect rather than deletion. Now, with that said, the candidate made a strong case at
483:
I ask this because as a new contributor I created a couple stubs which I had planned on working on. They were promptly deleted and I was not notified. Needless to say, I don't think it is good etiquette, and I'd like to hear your thoughts.
939:
I really see no issues to suggest that you will abuse the tools and you are a great editor, but after looking over what JulianColton had to say, and the link he added made me wonder. Anyway, you look like a great editor. Good luck!!!
340:, and nothing has come of it since, but it put a very bad taste in my mouth and I didn't edit much for about a week afterwards. I've been involved in a few other dramas tangentially, but this was the only one that really hit me hard.
271:, to the new pages patrol, and to quite a few AfDs (which I haven't contributed heavily to since April, again, see below). I'm not sure these would qualify, but these areas are where I have the most experience and the most knowledge.
2457:
Of course he is, and I respect it 100%. My point was simply that RfAs are often a wasted opportunity for a learning experience. I learned things during both of my RfAs. If you hadn't been aware of M&D, you would be now. -
516:
where users ask for deletions to be overturned because they were notified. It's very bad form not to, and sometimes ends up with users getting the wrong impression about the processes. The most recent example of this is
2322:
where the candidate changed the initial stance based on civil discussion and acknowledgment of the discovery of sources. Thus, I can't really oppose or support at this point as I'm somewhat conflicted here. Sincerely,
2299:
1153:
This DRV regular was starting to become visible on my "I should look into nominating them at RFA" list. As is becoming a pattern, the nomination occurred before I did so. I am comfortable with his judgment.
648:
642:
2023:
Has an intuitive and reasoned grasp of
Knowledge policy. On DRV I've always found lifebaka to be civil and helpful, so much so that I had assumed he was already an admin with years of experience :) ˉˉ
313:
287:
I haven't had any major edit wars ever, and only a few minor ones with vandals which I barely even remember anymore. The only major thing that has caused me stress is my experience with the article
1680:. Input at AfD always seems well thought out, communication on this editor's talk page is excellent. No one has brought up any serious (to me) problems, so I doubt there will be any in the future.--
2256:
He corrected the error when it was pointed out... in my experience there are admins who just never reply or reply in buzzwords and don't do anything when you go to them with a similar problem. --
681:, for those who would like to read it. I realize this is late in the RFA, but I didn't want to make my answers there until late so I'd have more time to think about them. Cheers everyone! --
296:
292:
231:
227:
178:
is a great example of where it would have been useful, though I trust the admins who usually participate there to correct me and other non-admins when we make such mistakes. Another is
2036:
A review of DRV contributions show a solid knowledge of policy and good communication abilities. Meets my two biggest requirements for adminship, so a support is definitely in order.--
2425:
2319:
153:
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve
Knowledge as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
2311:
2214:. While it's not the worst, I don't want admins running around making quick decisions without investigating the situation fully. I'm just going to sit back and watch for now.
1535:
475:
Non-pointless question from
ImperfectlyInformed: do you notify creators when you put up a PROD message, especially when it is a newbie, or do you "leave it to the watchlist"?
300:
2240:
An error rate of 1% or so is better than most of us people working on speedy manage. I don't get bothered until someone gets to 10%, or is clearly using incorrect criteria.
1101:
I generally support making all regulars at DRV admins as it makes the work much easier if you can see the deleted content. Demonstrates a thorough understanding of policy.
957:- a couple of minor concerns raised but none really give me pause. I see a mature and thoughtful editor who knows what he's doing and how he'll use the additional tools. ~
2303:
2407:
2394:
2371:
2358:
1825:
stirring it. So I just looked over the current version of DRV and saw some good thoughtful commentary. Take it easy if you ever step outside your clear comfort zone, eh?
1424:
This user has demonstrated a clear need for the tools, has indicated he grasps the policies he'll be working with as an admin, and his attitude seems "fit for the job".--
175:
788:
Nominator made his/her case, and it's as solid as it gets. Unless someone finds evidence of unruly behaviour, which I doubt will happen, it's impossible to not support.
2286:
2089:
1311:
312:
at AfD again, but this time with some strange "rules" regarding how editors were supposed to do threaded comments, i.e. actual discussion. All that fun is located at
281:
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
2464:
2452:
433:
You would have reacted the same way - you'd have removed the message from your talk page regardless of who it was? How do you think a newbie would react to this?
1373:, I've seen this editor numerous times in deletion debates and the contributions there show familiarity with policy and procedure. Looks to be an easy support.
497:
2482:
288:
456:
as well. A newbie would react badly if I did something similar, I'm well aware, as they view admins as having a higher status than normal users (even though
2282:
2265:
2004:- excellent AfD / deletion review participation, and extremely throughful answers to the questions which show plenty of Knowledge-knowledge. Good candidate.
2078:. Good participation throught Knowledge, especially in the deletion/undeletion processes. Good answers to questions and seen this user around quite a lot. ~
2048:
1305:
I too have seen lifebaka around DRV and AfD and think s/he makes well-reasoned arguments on both sides of discussions (obviously not at the same time) and
351:. In less extreme cases (hopefully meaning any I'll actually come across) I'd simply make the notification on ANI and let another admin perform the block.
321:
420:
Not at all. This was an issue because I ran into a template I hadn't encountered before and as such didn't notice it. Like I said, I had thought it was
1463:
139:
2251:
1937:
618:
179:
801:
325:
308:
304:
174:
would be a great boon to me there, as the Google cache is quite often lacking and it is therefore very difficult to properly judge speedy deletions.
1892:. One of the most thoughtful and articulate of the regular DRV contributors. Truly a classic case of the "I-thought-he-was-already-an-admin" cliche.
518:
329:
2331:
758:
446:
505:
Usually. Whenever I tag something for PROD or speedy "out of the blue" without previous warnings, I notify the creator. However, when patroling
2376:
My bad, I noticed the AfD that concerned me and wanted to reply quickly before I dashed off to work! Should have re-read the section I was in. ~
1044:
207:
415:
2505:
1459:
578:
336:
indef blocked her. A few days after this, Barstaw e-mailed me and again attempted to get the real life identity of R_Physicist out of me. I
1965:
1338:
1491:
2340:
object to - it doesn't sound like he's asking for a merge-and-delete, but rather a "delete, or merge instead if this condition is true". ~
553:
from April 2007 to April 2008, but I've mostly stopped playing recently and haven't taken the time to renew it. Besides, I still get the
1932:
1926:
While there might not be as much edits as some users like, this user has half of his edits mainspace. He also has months of experience.--
98:
2094:
1526:
1001:
850:
698:
2523:
2070:
1148:
2153:
1609:
1306:
89:
2290:
2127:
1655:
1315:
1035:
493:
324:
and signed comments as "Ngn") made some wild and baseless accusations of users who had contributed to both of the AfDs (particularly
92:
822:
2234:
1901:
1802:
1507:
1183:
731:
2194:
1790:
1692:
904:
148:
2115:
1859:
1365:
1278:
995:
867:
210:
65:
2162:
1555:
1348:
1120:
1093:
1018:
949:
780:
110:
2015:
1927:
1918:
1884:
1731:
1450:
1329:
1241:
1211:
1069:
805:
748:
574:
460:). If such a situation came up now I would try to explain to the user why I did what I did and why policy supports what I did.
402:
Your answer concerns me because it seems you only think this was an issue because it was Giano you were dealing with. Discuss.
204:
2027:
1996:
1708:
1630:
1587:
1572:
1467:
1416:
1384:
1257:
1158:
1105:
1979:
1819:
1775:
1595:
1078:
605:
303:. I then didn't pay the matter more attention until it was nearly closed, and most of the drama there had already happened (
1838:
1400:
975:
931:
883:
2123:
and barely squeaked it in at that. :) I've observed this contributor around and been very impressed with the work I see. --
1752:
1672:
1580:
Another asset to
Knowledge. I'm sure your work will be even better when you have the tools! Well done and good luck! = ) --
921:
1433:
1297:
367:
299:
during the perusals of the AfD daily logs I used to do. It was early in the AfD itself, you can find my first addition
212:,though in the case of the latter the speedy tag had already been removed by an anon twice) or which aren't included in
2232:
2220:
1505:
1191:. I've seen you at DRV (and honestly, I just assumed you were an admin). You meet my criteria for adminship easily.
1175:
2401:
2365:
2325:
370:
97:
Lifebaka has been on wikipedia for over a year now and has made over four thousand great edits. His contributions to
612:
33:
17:
2210:
for now. You seem like an excellent editor, and I was going to support, but looking through your talk page, I saw
521:. It usually doesn't ammount to anything, but it's horrible to have people so disenchanted with the whole 'pedia.
1484:
2447:
1727:
1239:
1063:
693:
665:
598:
134:
81:
636:
489:
226:
and some other deletion discussions. I have, for the most part, kept out of these since my participation in
2435:
ignored when people reuse
Knowledge content (at least so they keep saying on the mailing list). Cheers. --
563:
192:
whenever I feel it necessary. Most of my work with the CSD, however, have to do with the time I spent as a
2052:
Sorry for the double !vote. Senility is obviously setting in, or else I must really like this candidate! :)
1770:
550:
540:
2211:
1521:
990:
838:
2504:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either
2431:
2307:
2063:
1477:
1140:
424:
393:
2147:
1646:
the reporter, and then gets on with editing the encyclopedia? What on earth is this place coming to?
1601:
85:
1204:
2179:
He always makes thoughtful and considered contributions there based on a good knowledge of policy.
2079:
1951:
1909:
A consistently insightful and well-reasoned contributor to DRV who would use the adminship wisely.
1651:
1286:
I was still composing my suggestion that you stand for admin when I found I was too slow about it.
1031:
678:
485:
379:
the issue drop, since I was aware I was in the wrong. It was the first time I had encountered the
1867:
as the user can easily be trusted with the tools and that is the only important and fair criterion
630:
2469:
Am I detecting cynicism relating to the grudge mentality of RfA, Bugbear? We can't have that :-)
1815:
818:
704:
2459:
2420:
2230:
2218:
2190:
2084:
1897:
1799:
1516:
1503:
1168:
985:
831:
726:
2043:
1785:
1687:
1129:
898:
722:
Looks good. A review of a selection of your last 500 edits uncovered no problems. Good luck,
2200:
713:
512:
I do understand exactly where you're coming from on this one. I've seen plenty of cases at
2137:
2110:
1855:
1598:
1361:
1272:
863:
255:
2168:
1309:
politely. I see the issue JulianColton raises in the neutral but we're human, it happens.
94:
on - the tools would be a definite help here in enabling him to see the deleted versions.
8:
2124:
1647:
1547:
1345:
1027:
1014:
945:
777:
337:
60:
2443:
2430:
Regardless, he is entitled to his opinion in this matter. In truth, I'm well aware of
2316:
Knowledge:Artigcles for deletion/List of Magic: The
Gathering keywords (2nd nomination)
2261:
2011:
1914:
1879:
1760:
The candidate is thoughtful and the project would benefit if he had the extra buttons.
1721:
1446:
1234:
1198:
1053:
814:
793:
744:
689:
661:
624:
592:
189:
130:
106:
75:
2278:
2227:
2215:
2186:
2024:
1992:
1893:
1796:
1624:
1584:
1568:
1500:
1499:
The only issue I saw doesn't seem to be a major problem, so I'll support. Good luck,
1379:
1009:
Trustworthy, friendly editor. Quickly, easily acknowledges and learns from mistakes.
723:
554:
1219:
Nothing seriousley worrying. You've got the coveted "KojiDude's Thumbs Up!" trophy.
2320:
Knowledge:Deletion review/Log/2008 June 14#Alien and
Predator timeline .28closed.29
2300:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of characters from Epic Movie (2nd nomination)
2037:
1782:
1766:
1681:
1563:
with you new position as Admin, I'm confident you'll get it! Keep up the good work!
894:
674:
333:
171:
45:
332:) and appeared to attempted to solicit help outing these users. Because of this,
2477:
2103:
1851:
1833:
1397:
1357:
1266:
1249:
Per K76's cmts above and the fact I think you'll make a great admin. Good luck!--
879:
859:
453:
441:
410:
2336:
Fair enough on the Epic Movie one, but the Hardy Boys one seems a little odd to
1086:, seems fine. The point outlined by Julian doesn't concern me; mistakes happen.
2159:
1946:
1745:
1668:
1604:
1539:
1342:
1111:
1089:
1010:
941:
917:
797:
457:
383:
234:, which I will cover in question 3 below. I have quite a bit of experience at
217:
55:
1638:
A candidate who makes the occasional mistake, responds politely when advised,
2517:
2498:
The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
2436:
2257:
2247:
2182:
2006:
1910:
1870:
1847:
1717:
1442:
1429:
1325:
1293:
1224:
1192:
1128:. I see every reason to expect this user to do good work with the tools. ⇔
789:
740:
682:
588:
570:
513:
506:
348:
343:
268:
235:
223:
213:
197:
193:
185:
167:
123:
102:
71:
1988:
1701:
1619:
1581:
1564:
1410:
1374:
1250:
1229:
1155:
1102:
317:
314:
Knowledge talk:Articles for deletion/Myrzakulov equations (3rd nomination)
2181:, I am not convinced of that per my latest contact with him/her input at
1811:
1761:
1356:-- Because everyone is saying "support" and it is getting monotonous. :)
1075:
928:
529:
259:
201:
2471:
2378:
2342:
1827:
1393:
959:
875:
435:
404:
307:
left because of his bad experiences at the AfD). I attempted to bring
2310:
per the GFDL, so the arguments really needed to just be "merge"). In
238:
evaluating consensus in XfDs and plan to do some work in closing them.
2508:
or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
1740:
1664:
913:
369:, and then deleted Giano's complaint against this from your talkpage.
297:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Myrzakulov equations (2nd nomination)
293:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Myrzakulov equations (3rd nomination)
232:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Myrzakulov equations (3rd nomination)
228:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Myrzakulov equations (2nd nomination)
1441:
Reasonable person that I've seen around contributing productively.--
170:, where I started working in December of 2007. The ability to view
84:) - Lifebaka is a user who I have noticed around for a long time at
2242:
1425:
1288:
912:- seems eminently trustworthy, and has a clear need for the tools.
664:. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review
263:
1458:. A great asset to DRV and would be a great asset with the tools.
1026:
Good editor who would be a valuable addition as an administrator.
1973:
366:
In October, you added a PROD tag to an article that was "in use,"
295:. I first was introduced to the article when I stumbled accross
1642:
checks the diffs, makes any necessary correction, apologises to
1169:
1166:.Clearly knows what it takes and has the experience for the job.
1176:
1043:- Solid experience. Wants to work in deletion area. Go for it.
983:
I think Lifebaka is trustworthy, and would make a great admin.
222:
I also believe that I would once again become more involved in
2312:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Absent Mothers in Disney films
813:
Contribs look solid, seems to have good attitude about them.--
117:
Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
2304:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Laura Hardy (The Hardy Boys)
927:
isn't a big deal, so why the hell not? Mahalo and cheers! --
830:
I see no reason why not to, and your contribs look good. --
342:
In this case I asked another editor to take the issues to
2135:, I saw all these supports, and I thought it looked fun!
1700:. If you can stomach DRV, adminship should be a breeze.
29:
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a
248:
What are your best contributions to Knowledge, and why?
1987:- meets my standards, this is an interesting WikiElf.
1933:
2281:
point, but think that you are an excellent editor. --
2038:
1682:
1193:
1928:
254:My most major content contributions have been at
2515:
1110:He's not an admin? I'm falling down on the job.
160:What admin work do you intend to take part in?
2044:
1688:
1341:shrink!) and will have good uses for them. —
1199:
399:instead. I should have instead appologized.
184:I would also continue the work I do with the
891:. I've seen the editor around. Good luck,
188:. As Davewild said, I make myself known at
99:Knowledge talk:Criteria for speedy deletion
2363:I'm not opposing, I'm "neutral". Best, --
358:Additional question from AnotherSolipsist:
1323:experienced user, (s)he needs the tools.
262:forward, though I've taken a look at the
198:Cyde's list of speedy deletion candidates
756:Looks like he will use the tools great.
673:I just filled out the questionnaire for
660:Please keep discussion constructive and
320:(who contributed to the previous AfD as
196:and reviewing the current candidates at
220:instead, if the reason is a valid one).
14:
2516:
2400:
2364:
2324:
1337:- knows what the tools are for (watch
1074:This is the last time I'll forget you
316:, and it was quite crazy. Over there
757:
557:(and the test is pretty darn hard).
528:Additional Pointless Question from
23:
1392:- Can't find any reason not too --
389:template, and has mistaken it for
53:(74/1/2); Closed as successful by
24:
2535:
2524:Successful requests for adminship
1716:. shows can be trusted. Cheers,
1617:, looks like a solid candidate.
18:Knowledge:Requests for adminship
2379:
2377:
2343:
2341:
2064:
1702:
1205:
1056:
1046:
960:
958:
772:
769:
766:
763:
760:
372:Was this an error in judgment?
2460:
2421:
1273:
1267:
1251:
1235:
1225:
666:Special:Contributions/Lifebaka
577:. For the edit count, see the
347:threats and then note this at
166:I plan to continue my work at
13:
1:
2104:
1781:
1704:weburiedoursecretsinthegarden
845:
839:
216:(these I usually change into
2403:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles
2367:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles
2327:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles
1230:
338:put up a message on WikiEn-l
291:, which was deleted through
186:criteria for speedy deletion
7:
1846:. No concerns. His work at
1221:I better not see it on eBay
842:
832:
573:'s edit summary usage with
258:and the set articles (from
149:Questions for the candidate
10:
2540:
2308:Knowledge:Merge and delete
2483:09:22, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
2465:19:11, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
2453:18:15, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
2426:16:59, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
2408:18:17, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
2395:12:42, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
2372:07:57, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
2359:06:51, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
2332:04:09, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
2291:01:43, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
2266:13:06, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
2252:23:43, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
2235:15:53, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
2222:19:51, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
2095:23:13, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
2071:20:50, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
2060:. Excellent candidate. —
2049:17:57, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
2028:03:53, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
2016:20:30, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
1997:17:48, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
1980:10:43, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
1962:08:20, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
1938:02:59, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
1919:01:46, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
1902:01:02, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
1885:22:26, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
1860:20:04, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
1839:09:21, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
1820:08:44, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
1803:01:52, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
1791:20:01, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
1776:14:23, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
1753:12:01, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
1732:11:10, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
1709:22:34, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
1693:20:43, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
1673:20:00, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
1656:19:53, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
1631:19:44, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
1610:19:32, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
1588:19:21, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
1573:19:03, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
1556:18:10, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
1527:16:32, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
1508:15:53, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
1492:13:38, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
1468:12:57, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
1451:08:16, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
1434:07:37, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
1417:07:25, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
1401:03:18, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
1385:02:13, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
1366:02:01, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
1349:02:00, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
1330:01:52, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
1316:00:49, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
1298:23:44, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
1279:23:22, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
1258:23:11, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
1242:22:43, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
1212:22:33, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
1184:22:27, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
1159:22:13, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
1149:22:12, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
1121:22:03, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
1106:21:54, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
1094:21:45, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
1079:21:29, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
1070:21:12, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
1036:20:50, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
1019:20:49, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
1002:20:46, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
976:20:45, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
950:20:04, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
932:20:00, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
922:20:00, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
905:19:59, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
884:19:56, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
868:19:29, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
851:19:26, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
823:19:23, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
806:19:02, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
781:18:57, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
749:18:48, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
732:18:46, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
699:21:17, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
498:00:46, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
447:00:51, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
416:00:04, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
140:18:41, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
111:17:49, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
2501:Please do not modify it.
2298:as I am concerned about
2195:18:51, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
2163:16:09, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
2154:13:53, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
2128:13:30, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
2116:12:05, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
1263:Thought-you-were Support
66:19:03, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
2318:and was open-minded at
120:I accept the nomination
38:Please do not modify it
858:- trustworthy editor.
2399:No problem. Best, --
1408:Solid contributions.
34:request for adminship
1810:, seems fine to me.
586:Links for Lifebaka:
289:Myrzakulov equations
256:Magic: The Gathering
2432:WP:Merge and delete
2121:Superfluous support
1307:discusses decisions
786:Very strong support
677:. It can be found
2339:
2226:Change to support
668:before commenting.
322:User:89.218.75.202
194:new page patroller
39:
2461:Revolving Bugbear
2451:
2422:Revolving Bugbear
2337:
2279:User:Juliancolton
2069:
1978:
1961:
1882:
1774:
1489:
1328:
1222:
1208:
1144:
1137:
1065:
1060:
833:Mizu onna sango15
729:
697:
425:underconstruction
394:underconstruction
138:
37:
2531:
2503:
2462:
2441:
2423:
2406:
2404:
2393:
2391:
2370:
2368:
2357:
2355:
2330:
2328:
2150:
2146:
2142:
2113:
2108:
2092:
2087:
2082:
2066:
2061:
2046:
2040:
2014:
2009:
1976:
1970:
1968:
1960:
1957:
1949:
1935:
1930:
1883:
1878:
1788:
1764:
1706:
1690:
1684:
1627:
1622:
1552:
1544:
1524:
1519:
1488:
1485:
1482:
1413:
1324:
1275:
1269:
1255:
1237:
1232:
1227:
1220:
1209:
1206:
1201:
1195:
1180:
1173:
1142:
1133:
1118:
1092:
1064:
1058:
1054:
1048:
974:
972:
903:
847:
844:
841:
834:
779:
774:
771:
768:
765:
762:
727:
687:
652:
611:
564:General comments
549:No, but I was a
429:
423:
398:
392:
388:
382:
334:User:Jimbo Wales
326:User:R_Physicist
309:User:R_Physicist
305:User:R_Physicist
172:Special:Undelete
128:
63:
2539:
2538:
2534:
2533:
2532:
2530:
2529:
2528:
2514:
2513:
2512:
2506:this nomination
2499:
2481:
2402:
2366:
2326:
2237:
2203:
2171:
2148:
2144:
2138:
2111:
2090:
2085:
2080:
2068:
2007:
2005:
1972:
1966:
1953:
1950:
1868:
1837:
1625:
1620:
1548:
1540:
1522:
1517:
1486:
1478:
1411:
1339:the AfD backlog
1314:
1136:
1112:
1087:
1068:
1059:
892:
716:
707:
604:
587:
566:
445:
427:
421:
414:
396:
390:
386:
380:
330:User:Proscience
168:deletion review
151:
86:Deletion Review
54:
50:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2537:
2527:
2526:
2511:
2510:
2494:
2493:
2492:
2491:
2490:
2489:
2488:
2487:
2486:
2485:
2475:
2416:
2415:
2414:
2413:
2412:
2411:
2410:
2293:
2271:
2270:
2269:
2268:
2254:
2225:
2202:
2199:
2198:
2197:
2170:
2167:
2166:
2165:
2156:
2130:
2125:Moonriddengirl
2118:
2097:
2073:
2062:
2055:
2054:
2053:
2018:
1999:
1982:
1963:
1940:
1921:
1904:
1890:Strong support
1887:
1874:
1862:
1841:
1831:
1822:
1805:
1793:
1778:
1755:
1734:
1711:
1695:
1675:
1658:
1648:LessHeard vanU
1633:
1612:
1590:
1578:Strong support
1575:
1558:
1529:
1510:
1494:
1470:
1453:
1436:
1419:
1403:
1387:
1368:
1351:
1332:
1318:
1312:TravellingCari
1310:
1300:
1281:
1260:
1244:
1214:
1186:
1164:Strong Support
1161:
1151:
1134:
1123:
1108:
1096:
1081:
1072:
1055:
1051:
1038:
1028:Wildthing61476
1021:
1004:
998:
993:
988:
978:
952:
934:
924:
907:
886:
870:
853:
825:
808:
783:
751:
739:As nominator.
734:
715:
712:
711:
710:
706:
703:
702:
701:
657:
656:
655:
653:
583:
582:
575:mathbot's tool
565:
562:
561:
560:
559:
558:
525:
524:
523:
522:
511:
472:
471:
470:
469:
468:
467:
466:
465:
464:
463:
462:
461:
439:
408:
355:
354:
353:
352:
341:
275:
274:
273:
272:
242:
241:
240:
239:
221:
183:
150:
147:
145:
143:
142:
49:
44:
43:
42:
25:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2536:
2525:
2522:
2521:
2519:
2509:
2507:
2502:
2496:
2495:
2484:
2479:
2474:
2473:
2468:
2467:
2466:
2463:
2456:
2455:
2454:
2449:
2445:
2440:
2439:
2433:
2429:
2428:
2427:
2424:
2417:
2409:
2405:
2398:
2397:
2396:
2392:
2390:
2386:
2382:
2375:
2374:
2373:
2369:
2362:
2361:
2360:
2356:
2354:
2350:
2346:
2335:
2334:
2333:
2329:
2321:
2317:
2313:
2309:
2305:
2301:
2297:
2294:
2292:
2288:
2284:
2280:
2276:
2273:
2272:
2267:
2263:
2259:
2255:
2253:
2249:
2245:
2244:
2239:
2238:
2236:
2233:
2231:
2229:
2223:
2221:
2219:
2217:
2213:
2209:
2205:
2204:
2196:
2192:
2188:
2184:
2180:
2176:
2173:
2172:
2164:
2161:
2157:
2155:
2152:
2151:
2143:
2141:
2140:Corn.u.co.pia
2134:
2131:
2129:
2126:
2122:
2119:
2117:
2114:
2109:
2107:
2102:Very nice. --
2101:
2098:
2096:
2093:
2088:
2083:
2077:
2074:
2072:
2067:
2059:
2056:
2051:
2050:
2047:
2041:
2035:
2031:
2030:
2029:
2026:
2022:
2019:
2017:
2013:
2010:
2003:
2000:
1998:
1994:
1990:
1986:
1983:
1981:
1975:
1969:
1964:
1959:
1958:
1956:
1948:
1944:
1941:
1939:
1936:
1931:
1925:
1922:
1920:
1916:
1912:
1908:
1905:
1903:
1899:
1895:
1891:
1888:
1886:
1881:
1876:
1875:
1872:
1866:
1863:
1861:
1857:
1853:
1849:
1845:
1842:
1840:
1835:
1830:
1829:
1823:
1821:
1817:
1813:
1809:
1806:
1804:
1801:
1798:
1794:
1792:
1789:
1787:
1784:
1779:
1777:
1772:
1768:
1763:
1759:
1756:
1754:
1751:
1750:
1749:
1744:
1743:
1738:
1735:
1733:
1729:
1726:
1723:
1719:
1715:
1712:
1710:
1707:
1705:
1699:
1696:
1694:
1691:
1685:
1679:
1676:
1674:
1670:
1666:
1662:
1659:
1657:
1653:
1649:
1645:
1641:
1637:
1634:
1632:
1629:
1628:
1623:
1616:
1613:
1611:
1608:
1607:
1606:
1603:
1600:
1597:
1591:
1589:
1586:
1583:
1579:
1576:
1574:
1570:
1566:
1562:
1559:
1557:
1553:
1551:
1545:
1543:
1537:
1533:
1530:
1528:
1525:
1520:
1514:
1511:
1509:
1506:
1504:
1502:
1498:
1495:
1493:
1490:
1483:
1481:
1474:
1471:
1469:
1465:
1461:
1457:
1454:
1452:
1448:
1444:
1440:
1437:
1435:
1431:
1427:
1423:
1420:
1418:
1415:
1414:
1407:
1404:
1402:
1399:
1395:
1391:
1388:
1386:
1383:
1382:
1378:
1377:
1372:
1369:
1367:
1363:
1359:
1355:
1352:
1350:
1347:
1344:
1340:
1336:
1333:
1331:
1327:
1322:
1319:
1317:
1313:
1308:
1304:
1301:
1299:
1295:
1291:
1290:
1285:
1282:
1280:
1277:
1276:
1270:
1264:
1261:
1259:
1256:
1254:
1248:
1245:
1243:
1240:
1238:
1233:
1228:
1218:
1215:
1213:
1210:
1202:
1196:
1190:
1187:
1185:
1182:
1181:
1179:
1174:
1172:
1165:
1162:
1160:
1157:
1152:
1150:
1146:
1145:
1139:
1138:
1127:
1124:
1122:
1119:
1117:
1116:
1109:
1107:
1104:
1100:
1097:
1095:
1091:
1085:
1082:
1080:
1077:
1073:
1071:
1066:
1061:
1050:
1049:
1042:
1039:
1037:
1033:
1029:
1025:
1022:
1020:
1016:
1012:
1008:
1005:
1003:
1000:
999:
996:
994:
991:
989:
986:
982:
979:
977:
973:
971:
967:
963:
956:
953:
951:
947:
943:
938:
935:
933:
930:
925:
923:
919:
915:
911:
908:
906:
902:
900:
896:
890:
887:
885:
881:
877:
874:
871:
869:
865:
861:
857:
854:
852:
849:
848:
835:
829:
826:
824:
820:
816:
815:SarekOfVulcan
812:
809:
807:
803:
799:
795:
791:
787:
784:
782:
778:
776:
775:
755:
752:
750:
746:
742:
738:
735:
733:
730:
725:
721:
718:
717:
709:
708:
700:
695:
691:
686:
685:
680:
676:
672:
671:
670:
669:
667:
663:
654:
650:
647:
644:
641:
638:
635:
632:
629:
626:
623:
620:
617:
614:
610:
607:
603:
600:
597:
594:
590:
585:
584:
580:
576:
572:
568:
567:
556:
552:
551:rules advisor
548:
545:
544:
542:
538:
535:
534:
533:
532:
531:
520:
515:
508:
504:
501:
500:
499:
495:
491:
487:
482:
479:
478:
477:
476:
459:
455:
450:
449:
448:
443:
438:
437:
432:
431:
426:
419:
418:
417:
412:
407:
406:
401:
400:
395:
385:
377:
374:
373:
371:
368:
365:
362:
361:
360:
359:
350:
345:
339:
335:
331:
327:
323:
319:
315:
310:
306:
302:
298:
294:
290:
286:
283:
282:
280:
277:
276:
270:
265:
261:
257:
253:
250:
249:
247:
244:
243:
237:
233:
229:
225:
219:
215:
211:
209:
208:Anderson Biro
205:
203:
199:
195:
191:
187:
181:
177:
173:
169:
165:
162:
161:
159:
156:
155:
154:
146:
141:
136:
132:
127:
126:
121:
118:
115:
114:
113:
112:
108:
104:
100:
95:
93:
90:
87:
83:
80:
77:
73:
69:
68:
67:
62:
59:
58:
48:
41:
35:
32:
27:
26:
19:
2500:
2497:
2470:
2437:
2388:
2384:
2380:
2352:
2348:
2344:
2295:
2274:
2241:
2228:Juliancolton
2216:Juliancolton
2207:
2206:
2187:Caspian blue
2178:
2174:
2149:Disc.us.sion
2139:
2136:
2132:
2120:
2105:
2099:
2075:
2057:
2033:
2032:
2020:
2001:
1984:
1954:
1952:
1943:Weak support
1942:
1923:
1906:
1894:IronGargoyle
1889:
1871:
1864:
1850:looks good.
1843:
1826:
1807:
1797:cremepuff222
1780:
1757:
1747:
1746:
1741:
1736:
1724:
1713:
1703:
1697:
1677:
1660:
1643:
1639:
1635:
1618:
1614:
1594:
1593:
1577:
1560:
1549:
1541:
1531:
1512:
1501:Juliancolton
1496:
1479:
1472:
1455:
1438:
1421:
1409:
1405:
1389:
1380:
1375:
1370:
1353:
1334:
1320:
1302:
1287:
1283:
1271:
1262:
1252:
1246:
1216:
1188:
1177:
1170:
1167:
1163:
1141:
1131:
1125:
1114:
1113:
1098:
1083:
1045:
1040:
1023:
1006:
984:
980:
969:
965:
961:
954:
937:Weak Support
936:
909:
893:
888:
872:
855:
837:
827:
810:
785:
759:
753:
736:
724:PeterSymonds
719:
683:
659:
658:
645:
639:
633:
627:
621:
615:
608:
601:
595:
546:
536:
527:
526:
502:
480:
474:
473:
434:
403:
375:
363:
357:
356:
318:User:Barstaw
284:
278:
251:
245:
163:
157:
152:
144:
124:
119:
116:
96:
78:
70:
56:
52:
51:
46:
30:
28:
2277:Agree with
2158:Good user.
2039:Fabrictramp
1683:Fabrictramp
1536:my criteria
1265:Good luck.
895:Malinaccier
530:User:Stifle
260:Time Spiral
202:Elikkattoor
2338:oppose for
2306:(we can't
2106:Meldshal42
2045:talk to me
1852:EdJohnston
1689:talk to me
1644:and thanks
1358:Ecoleetage
1207:Disclaimer
860:PhilKnight
798:WP Physics
705:Discussion
555:MTGRULES-L
539:Are you a
458:they don't
31:successful
2160:Acalamari
1561:Good Luck
1542:Chetblong
1518:Christian
1480:faithless
1354:Thumbs Up
1343:Athaenara
1115:Wizardman
1090:paranomia
1011:Gwen Gale
942:America69
675:WP:RREV/Q
631:block log
579:talk page
2518:Category
2448:Contribs
2438:lifebaka
2258:Rividian
1955:Asenine
1911:Townlake
1873:Dendodge
1771:contribs
1728:contribs
1718:Casliber
1640:and then
1443:Tikiwont
1047:Wisdom89
992:Mountain
790:Headbomb
741:Davewild
694:Contribs
684:lifebaka
599:contribs
589:Lifebaka
571:Lifebaka
510:memory).
454:WP:CIVIL
264:Mirrodin
218:WP:PRODs
176:This DRV
135:Contribs
125:lifebaka
103:Davewild
82:contribs
72:Lifebaka
47:Lifebaka
2296:Neutral
2275:Neutral
2208:Neutral
2201:Neutral
2133:Support
2100:Support
2076:Support
2058:Support
2034:Support
2021:Support
2002:Support
1989:Bearian
1985:Support
1924:Support
1907:Support
1865:Support
1844:Support
1808:Support
1783:M♠ssing
1758:Support
1737:Support
1714:Support
1698:Support
1678:Support
1661:Support
1636:Support
1621:krimpet
1615:Support
1592:I'm an
1582:Cameron
1565:Bigvinu
1532:Support
1513:Support
1497:Support
1473:Support
1460:MrPrada
1456:Support
1439:Support
1422:Support
1412:MBisanz
1406:Support
1390:Support
1371:Support
1335:Support
1321:Support
1303:Support
1284:Support
1253:Xp54321
1247:Support
1217:Support
1189:Support
1156:GRBerry
1126:Support
1103:Spartaz
1099:Support
1084:Support
1041:Support
1024:Support
1007:Support
981:Support
955:Support
910:Support
889:Support
873:Support
856:Support
828:Support
811:Support
754:Support
737:Support
720:Support
714:Support
606:deleted
2283:Kaaveh
2183:WP:DRV
2175:Oppose
2169:Oppose
2112:(talk)
2065:Maggot
1967:Rudget
1869:......
1848:WP:DRV
1812:Stifle
1800:(talk)
1762:SWik78
1596:Editor
1534:- per
1194:Keeper
1178:Of War
1076:Naerii
987:Little
728:(talk)
514:WP:DRV
507:WP:LSD
349:WP:ANI
344:WP:ANI
269:WP:DRV
236:WP:DRV
224:WP:AfD
214:WP:CSD
190:WT:CSD
61:scribe
2472:giggy
2012:drama
1947:WTHN?
1828:giggy
1274:Cobra
1268:Glass
1171:Gears
929:Ali'i
876:RMHED
662:civil
613:count
541:judge
486:ImpIn
436:giggy
405:giggy
384:inuse
122:. --
16:<
2444:Talk
2302:and
2287:talk
2262:talk
2248:talk
2212:this
2191:talk
2185:. --
1993:talk
1974:logs
1915:talk
1898:talk
1880:Talk
1856:talk
1816:talk
1767:talk
1742:Neıl
1722:talk
1669:talk
1665:Bwrs
1652:talk
1605:wiki
1569:talk
1550:talk
1538:. --
1464:talk
1447:talk
1430:talk
1376:Sher
1362:talk
1326:macy
1294:talk
1236:Dude
1226:Koji
1032:talk
1015:talk
946:talk
918:talk
914:Scog
899:talk
880:talk
864:talk
846:珊瑚15
819:talk
802:PotW
794:ταλκ
745:talk
690:Talk
679:here
643:rfar
625:logs
593:talk
569:See
519:here
328:and
301:here
230:and
206:and
180:here
131:Talk
107:talk
91:and
76:talk
2243:DGG
2008:Lra
1934:Fan
1929:LAA
1877:..
1786:Ace
1602:the
1426:SJP
1398:rex
1381:eth
1289:DGG
1203:|
1197:|
649:spi
619:AfD
488:| (
64:at
57:WjB
2520::
2478::O
2446:-
2323:--
2289:)
2264:)
2250:)
2224:—
2193:)
2177:.
2042:|
2025:╦╩
1995:)
1945:-
1917:)
1900:)
1858:)
1834::O
1818:)
1795:--
1769:•
1739:.
1730:)
1686:|
1671:)
1663:.
1654:)
1599:of
1571:)
1554:)
1523:.И
1487:()
1466:)
1449:)
1432:)
1364:)
1346:✉
1296:)
1223:--
1200:76
1147:@
1143:dt
1062:/
1034:)
1017:)
948:)
920:)
882:)
866:)
821:)
804:}
800::
796:–
747:)
692:-
637:lu
547:A.
543:?
537:6.
503:A:
496:)
492:-
481:5.
442::O
428:}}
422:{{
411::O
397:}}
391:{{
387:}}
381:{{
376:A:
364:4.
285:A:
279:3.
252:A:
246:2.
164:A:
158:1.
133:-
109:)
36:.
2480:)
2476:(
2450:)
2442:(
2389:a
2387:c
2385:z
2383:a
2381:m
2353:a
2351:c
2349:z
2347:a
2345:m
2285:(
2260:(
2246:(
2189:(
2145:♥
2091:1
2086:H
2081:A
1991:(
1977:)
1971:(
1913:(
1896:(
1854:(
1836:)
1832:(
1814:(
1773:)
1765:(
1748:龱
1725:·
1720:(
1667:(
1650:(
1626:✽
1585:*
1567:(
1546:(
1515:→
1462:(
1445:(
1428:(
1396:-
1394:T
1360:(
1292:(
1231:†
1135:S
1132:Æ
1130:∫
1088:—
1067:)
1057:T
1052:(
1030:(
1013:(
997:5
970:a
968:c
966:z
964:a
962:m
944:(
916:(
901:)
897:(
878:(
862:(
843:女
840:水
836:/
817:(
792:{
773:i
770:t
767:s
764:u
761:D
743:(
696:)
688:(
651:)
646:·
640:·
634:·
628:·
622:·
616:·
609:·
602:·
596:·
591:(
581:.
494:c
490:t
444:)
440:(
413:)
409:(
182:.
137:)
129:(
105:(
79:·
74:(
40:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.