1274:, where there were just as many arguments to keep, reliable sources actually do exist, and the last comment in the discussion was a note that the relevant wiki-project who may have been able to add such sources were notified long into the discussion? Two people arguing to delete something can somehow justify deletion under such circumstances? In that case you say it shouldn't be delayed, but delaying it could have resulted in the concerns being addressed, i.e. revising it into a clearly encyclopedic article. Why would we not want to allow editors to do so when they reasonably believe they can? If we don't, as in the project as a whole, have a deadline, isn't it not really respectful to not allow editors to have more than a mere five days when they are clearly making serious attempts to address the various concerns or even when some arguing to delete have merge suggestions within their statements? Best, --
1126:; also note that a number of those who initially said to delete did so before substantial revisions, but never re-commented in the discussion and some of the others I don't believe I have ever seen argue to keep (by contrast, I have even nominated to delete articles). Those editors who are relatively neutral (those whom I have seen argue both to keep and to delete articles), like Masem and DGG, argued to keep. Even some of those whom I more frequently see arguing to delete (A Man in Black and TTN) had merge suggestions in their posts, which if we did per the GFDL, would result in keeping the article's contribution history public and redirecting. My biggest concern though is that the revisions to the article in the attempt to address the concerns were not finished (for example, I hoped to move the article to
1319:, since you don't actually show anything wrong with either the process or the result. Meta-commenting on the people involved in the discussion and your observations on their commenting tendencies is completely irrelevant, and seems rather bizarre. We don't place more or less value on people's comments because of who made them, only the content itself matters. If you or anyone else wants to fix the problems identified in the discussion, just ask an admin to userfy it for you. -
1200:
time, know better then that. To argue that they had improved the article when even the late entrants to the discussion were voting delete is clearly unsustainable, disruptive and time-wasting. We give newbies a lot of slack but experienced editors should show more respect to other editor's time rather then creating groundless DRVs like this one.
1226:. This is firmly based in policy and grounded in precedent for previous deletions so your comment is, well, totally untrue. Please do not insult my intelligence by making nonsense statements like this that can easily be disproved by as little as 5 seconds checking. That's what is really disrespectful here.
181:
Why was this page deleted? This page was about one of the biggest ethnic groups in
Argentina. There are about a million people of Italian descent in Argentina, and they make up about 50% of the country. Why was a notable community in Argentina was deleted. This is an outrage! If Italian Argentine was
1384:
The problem with accounts who approach AfDs as only to argue delete is that it doesn't matter how many improvements one makes to the article in question and so it's not really a discussion when someone comes to it determined to argue to delete at all costs, even when the article has been improved.
1370:
they "always" opine for deletion are also selective about which articles they opine on it. You need to find a compromise or agreement with them - which will probably be when you come to accept the community norms published in existing policies and guidelines that are the basis for their opinions.
1182:
but of course one brings something to DRV when one doesn't likethe outcome. few people bring one when they do like the outcome. And when an article was deleted, this is the first step in getting DRV2. Deletion process is not symmetrical--after a keep one can nominate until it gets deleted, but one
1374:
is permitted, but not very comfortable. Don't expect to actually get anywhere unless you change your strategy and tactics. There are reasons behind the community consensus guidelines; until you understand those reasons you'll have no luck getting other editors to agree there should be a change.
981:
The deleted version said "A high school student in minnesota who loves his dinner. Also enjoys long walks on the beach." It appears this had been vandalised into an unacceptable stub. Kudos to Keeper76 for fixing it and a small trout for the deleting admin and the speedy nominator for not checking
762:
Deleted now a fourth time; the fourth is equivalent to the second and third. You are viewing the cached version of the first; that article had hung around for a couple years. I wouldn't object if that version was sent to AFD, but leave the newer versions deleted, they are definitely inferior and
269:
I deleted the article because it was listed under the batch of created redirects that were group-nommed in the debate corvus points to. The sheer number of redirects to be deleted there meant I couldn't scrutinize and poke around at every single one. Since there appears to be other content in this
1369:
Conensus is what the entire community of editors forms as a consensus; not just the subset that agrees with you. Badlydrawnjeff, who formerly was a DRV regular who opined to overturn some 90%+ of the time he spoke up was still selective about when he spoke up. Those you want disregarded because
1199:
Rightly we discourage editors from bringing stuff here because they don't like the outcome. We usually expect them to have a valid reason to explain why the outcome of the original deletion discussion should be discarded. A valid reason hasn't been provided and Le Grand Roi should, after all this
1243:
is what is really disrespectful here. The assertion of notability is that unlike the overwhelming majority of video games characters, these characters were also made into action figurs and thus we have sources for both the toys and the video games, which is notable compared to the overwhelming
504:
No deletion occurred. Whatever information you feel should be merged is still visible in the history of this page. What content should make it into the target article is a subject for the consensus of the editors of that article, guided by policies and guidelines. Merges are not deletions.
1355:
Which is why it's a problem as indicated, because several of those in the discussion have said elsewhere they will never argue to keep in AfDs or that their whole purpose is to delete articles. I and others who argued to keep in that disucssion, by contrast, have argued to delete elsewhere.
679:
college charts, and have their music available on iTunes, Amazon and eusic, yet the page was deleted because the article did not "assert notability". If the page is undeleted, I would be happy to edit the page so that it links to these reviews, establishing that they are very much notable.
1617:
Image previously deleted at
Commons for being a reproduction of a copyrighted statue. Image was kept here at en.wiki due to fair use. Someone re-uploaded it at Commons and the local version was deleted. Image should be restored here because the Commons version will be deleted.
213:. There was nothing there but a redirect, and the redirect was created by a banned user, therefore the deletion was within proper procedure. If you want to create a sourced article about the subject, then go ahead, but there was nothing there to undelete to.
1608:
1155:. This nomination comes down to either AFD2 or that you don't like the outcome. DRV is for where there is a substantive issue with the discussion. Arguing for more time when most of the editors who came late to the discussion voted delete it just perverse.
1183:
cant go the other way round. Hm.... maybe we need a rule that a delete can automatically be reopened on request after 6 months like a keep can, just to see if consensus has changed. Or else require DRV before bringing a second AfD after a keep decision.
1328:
The problem with the process is that it was closed while revisions were taking place to address the nominator's concerns. It does matter if those commenting have an uncompromising bias and singular purpose with regards to AfDs. Sincerely,
453:), he deleted nearly the entire text of the article. While I don't have a particular problem with the merger, per say, I think the deletion of all the content was rash and reckless. I think a warning from an administrator would be useful.
436:
172:
708:
Deleted three times in one day; the second and third smell like copyright violations. The first looks somewhat better, but appears to be a legitimate A7. I recommend rewriting according to the guidance at
933:
210:
1270:, which turned out to have been nominated by a now banned user who was operating multiple socks and evaded these blocks by returning as yet another account after being banned only to be ideffed again? Or
1062:
1224:
This article asserts zero notability through reliable sources, and is just a repetition of the character and plot sections of Dragon Quest VIII; it is therefore duplicative and should be deleted
781:, are the subject of the more recently deleted revisions that nobody is particularly impressed by. Then there is a new wave band from Washington DC with several albums and the songs in the film
1131:
1054:
1018:
740:
This, while not stellar, is enough of an assertion of importance for me to want a larger forum before deletion. Most likely listing at AfD after undeletion would be appropriate. Cheers. --
1463:
It would not be outrageous to close as "no consensus" when six editors argued to keep and another argued to merge and when the process of revising the article was still ongoing. Best, --
1114:
1311:
1209:
A valid reason hasn't been provided to delete the article and experienced editors should show more respect to other editor's time rather than creating groundless AfDs. Sincerely, --
684:
Boy that reads like it was copied from somewhere. It's also not an encyclopedia article and references specific time periods. It would be best if it were rewritten from scratch.
1492:
490:
I'm sorry, I thought this would be a rather appropriate place to discuss issues regarding article deletions in general. Where would the right place to make my complaints known be?
1386:
1390:
1127:
1471:
1458:
667:
CSD A7 The page for the band
Barcelona was deleted for some reason. Barcelona has had three albums released internationally, have had all three of their records reviewed by
1436:
1423:
1401:
1379:
1364:
1350:
1282:
1261:
1252:
1230:
1217:
1172:
1159:
1302:
Nakon correctly closed the debate as delete and this is not a second bite at the cherry, no matter how much mud is slung in my direction on the deleting admin's talk page.
1337:
1323:
561:– Overturn deletion of first version in history. Endorse latter deletions of likely copyright violations of a different subject. No prejudice against nomination at AfD. –
1267:
1194:
1594:
1071:
1066:
1075:
256:
230:
757:
1653:
1644:
1635:
805:
717:
1100:
1058:
499:
485:
280:
1146:
767:
1123:
247:. Both pages are deleted. And the article was sourced, and two other users contributed on that page, but now our work is gone. This is why I am angry.
986:
509:
270:
article that apparently none of the people that discussed this redirect caught, I'll look at this in more detail, it may have been a gaffe at my part.
974:
1271:
1204:
658:
777:: there are two different bands named "Barcelona" appearing in the history of this article. A rock band from Seattle who have released one album,
1622:
701:
1569:
570:
203:
51:
37:
300:
290:
Close this DRV. There was an article present, and as a result it should not have been in that RfD batch. I have restored the article.
449:
circumverted deletion policy by removing nearly all the content while merging with another article. With the design of merging (with
393:
388:
348:
1532:
1026:
845:
526:
84:
955:
786:
462:
397:
1080:
1631:, possibly speedily. This won't survive at Commons, and was deleted here solely because there is an identical image at commons.
46:
1601:
1560:
1524:
422:
380:
1107:
1092:
129:
124:
615:
610:
133:
1585:
1393:. And if I can argue to delete, surely some of these others can also argue to keep at least occasionally? Sincerely, --
619:
1342:
That could be a valid argument to relist or overturn an AFD except that users were still supporting deletion after the
158:
116:
1164:
It comes down to those coming late to the discussion always "voting" to delete these kinds of articles. Sincerely, --
1465:
1430:
1395:
1358:
1331:
1276:
1246:
1211:
1166:
1140:
1135:
644:
602:
42:
1235:
My comment is totally true, because reliable sources and assertions of notability were added. Please do not insult
1573:
1088:
402:
1581:
890:
885:
240:
1565:
1239:
intelligence by making nonsense statements that can easily be disproved by as little as 5 seconds of ehcking.
1084:
894:
752:
138:
1640:
I went ahead and undeleted as this is clearly uncontroversial. Nardman you need to fix the tags on it though.
624:
429:
414:
1307:
21:
919:
877:
336:
165:
150:
1138:, which apparently some others in the AfD support, I think the five day thing is premature in this case.
899:
651:
636:
410:
211:
Knowledge:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2008_June_4#Redirects_created_by_a_blocked_user_.E2.86.92_various
1577:
841:– Restored. Accidently speedy deleted after article was reduced to an unacceptable stub by a vandal. –
384:
1666:
1543:
1503:
1037:
997:
856:
816:
581:
536:
359:
310:
95:
17:
926:
911:
726:
one of them. Down in the
Discography section there's a subsection titled "Featured In", which says:
1487:
1303:
632:
239:
Umm, it was deleted. The original article that I created is gone. The original article was called
693:
477:
450:
222:
722:
If the deleted versions were anything like what's in the cache, I'm going to have to suggest we
406:
146:
710:
566:
120:
606:
376:
331:
142:
628:
252:
199:
63:
1134:
to their in order to increase the more prose elements of the article. Per the concept of
907:
8:
1482:
1481:. Consensus was interpreted correctly according to our current policies and guidelines.
1650:
1619:
1447:
946:) for this musician, a speedy deletion of this article was an error, to say the least.
748:
686:
470:
344:
215:
194:. And also, there was never any reason or explanation on why this article was deleted.
191:
1244:
majority of video game characters who don't also appear in other media. Sincerely, --
903:
1023:
801:
562:
244:
187:
112:
76:
970:
951:
881:
598:
557:
495:
458:
183:
1385:
It's not as if I think all game articles are notable. Please note my stances at
793:
672:
668:
248:
195:
446:
291:
271:
796:
but you could certainly argue that this article deserved an AfD discussion. --
445:
I don't really want to make a big deal out of this or show any animosity, but
1190:
962:
741:
340:
1641:
1632:
1529:
1420:
1376:
1347:
1258:
1227:
1201:
1156:
983:
842:
797:
764:
714:
523:
506:
81:
788:
for the most recent piece on them, if you're an admin. I don't think they
1371:
966:
947:
873:
837:
491:
454:
1320:
943:
942:
Given indication of numerous albums (with articles) and awards (e.g.
1446:
per GRBerry; given the AFD, any other result would be outrageous.
1185:
468:
This is a content dispute and there's nothing for DRV to do here.
335:– No deletion to review, discuss on the talk page first then use
1387:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Homosexuality in
Kingdom Hearts
1391:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/The Best of Sonic the
Hedgehog
1428:
The other possibility would be "no consensus". Sincerely, --
1268:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of fictional buildings
737:
are featured in Todd
Stephens' 2006 film Another Gay Movie.
785:, who were the subject of the revision deleted first. See
676:
982:
the article history. All is now well with Colin James.
1419:; that was the only possible closure of that AFD.
1272:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Shinnok's amulet
965:, the page was just restored a few minutes ago.
1542:The following is an archived debate of the
1036:The following is an archived debate of the
855:The following is an archived debate of the
580:The following is an archived debate of the
358:The following is an archived debate of the
94:The following is an archived debate of the
41:
1525:Image:Make way for ducklings statue.jpg
1124:Per reasons indicated to deleting admin
50:
14:
1561:File:Make way for ducklings statue.jpg
33:
1132:List of Dragon Quest VIII characters
1055:List of Dragon Quest VIII characters
1019:List of Dragon Quest VIII characters
763:smell like a copyright violation..
1669:of the page listed in the heading.
1506:of the page listed in the heading.
1266:What do you then make of ones like
1000:of the page listed in the heading.
819:of the page listed in the heading.
731:Everything Makes Me Think about Sex
729:Several Barcelona tracks including
539:of the page listed in the heading.
313:of the page listed in the heading.
243:, later on the name was changed to
27:
28:
1687:
1136:Knowledge talk:Postponed deletion
522:no deletion occurred to review.
1665:The above is an archive of the
1502:The above is an archive of the
996:The above is an archive of the
815:The above is an archive of the
535:The above is an archive of the
309:The above is an archive of the
241:Italian settlement in Argentina
80:– restored by deleting admin –
1528:– restored and tags updated –
1257:You just don't get it do you.
1222:The nomination statement said
13:
1:
30:
1467:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles
1432:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles
1397:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles
1360:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles
1333:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles
1278:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles
1248:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles
1213:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles
1168:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles
1142:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles
1128:Dragon Quest VIII characters
7:
10:
1692:
1654:23:53, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
1645:16:20, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
1636:03:36, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
1623:01:44, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
1533:04:27, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
1493:18:24, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
1472:16:56, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
1459:11:55, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
1437:16:56, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
1424:22:57, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
1402:16:56, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
1380:20:41, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
1365:19:28, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
1351:19:24, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
1338:19:01, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
1324:17:10, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
1312:16:32, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
1283:16:56, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
1262:21:26, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
1253:19:28, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
1231:19:21, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
1218:19:01, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
1205:16:58, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
1195:16:45, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
1173:19:01, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
1160:16:25, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
1147:15:58, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
1027:00:32, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
987:17:01, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
975:16:59, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
956:16:53, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
846:17:02, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
806:00:01, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
768:00:44, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
758:14:03, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
718:04:24, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
702:23:47, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
571:02:50, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
527:04:21, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
510:04:21, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
500:23:56, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
486:23:46, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
463:22:42, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
349:07:49, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
301:00:07, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
281:00:04, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
257:23:49, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
231:23:45, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
204:23:11, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
85:04:18, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
18:Knowledge:Deletion review
1672:Please do not modify it.
1549:Please do not modify it.
1509:Please do not modify it.
1417:Endorse deletion closure
1043:Please do not modify it.
1003:Please do not modify it.
862:Please do not modify it.
822:Please do not modify it.
587:Please do not modify it.
542:Please do not modify it.
365:Please do not modify it.
316:Please do not modify it.
101:Please do not modify it.
43:Deletion review archives
1153:Speedy Close as Endorse
1022:– Deletion endorsed – —
451:Linearity (video games)
1546:of the article above.
1040:of the article above.
859:of the article above.
739:
711:Knowledge:Amnesia test
584:of the article above.
362:of the article above.
98:of the article above.
1346:. Therefore it isn't
727:
377:Sandbox (video games)
332:Sandbox (video games)
1372:Tilting at windmills
1304:Tottering Blotspurs
182:deleted, so should
1649:Done. Thank you. -
337:dispute resolution
192:Italian Australian
1679:
1678:
1516:
1515:
1010:
1009:
829:
828:
783:Another Gay Movie
756:
549:
548:
323:
322:
245:Italian Argentine
188:Italian Brazilian
113:Italian Argentine
77:Italian Argentine
60:
59:
1683:
1674:
1604:
1590:
1589:
1551:
1518:
1517:
1511:
1490:
1485:
1470:
1468:
1455:
1450:
1435:
1433:
1400:
1398:
1363:
1361:
1336:
1334:
1300:Endorse deletion
1281:
1279:
1251:
1249:
1216:
1214:
1171:
1169:
1145:
1143:
1110:
1096:
1078:
1045:
1012:
1011:
1005:
929:
915:
897:
864:
831:
830:
824:
746:
700:
696:
689:
671:, have a bio in
654:
640:
622:
599:Barcelona (band)
589:
558:Barcelona (band)
551:
550:
544:
484:
480:
473:
432:
418:
400:
367:
325:
324:
318:
298:
278:
229:
225:
218:
184:Italian American
168:
154:
136:
103:
70:
69:
56:
36:
31:
1691:
1690:
1686:
1685:
1684:
1682:
1681:
1680:
1670:
1667:deletion review
1613:
1607:
1600:
1599:
1593:
1563:
1559:
1547:
1544:deletion review
1507:
1504:deletion review
1488:
1483:
1479:Endorse closure
1466:
1464:
1451:
1448:
1431:
1429:
1396:
1394:
1359:
1357:
1332:
1330:
1277:
1275:
1247:
1245:
1212:
1210:
1167:
1165:
1141:
1139:
1119:
1113:
1106:
1105:
1099:
1069:
1053:
1041:
1038:deletion review
1001:
998:deletion review
938:
932:
925:
924:
918:
888:
872:
860:
857:deletion review
820:
817:deletion review
735:Studio Hair Gel
699:
694:
687:
685:
673:All Music Guide
669:Pitchfork Media
663:
657:
650:
649:
643:
613:
597:
585:
582:deletion review
540:
537:deletion review
483:
478:
471:
469:
441:
435:
428:
427:
421:
391:
375:
363:
360:deletion review
339:if necessary –
314:
311:deletion review
292:
272:
228:
223:
216:
214:
177:
171:
164:
163:
157:
127:
111:
99:
96:deletion review
68:
61:
54:
34:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
1689:
1677:
1676:
1661:
1660:
1659:
1658:
1657:
1656:
1638:
1615:
1614:
1611:
1605:
1597:
1591:
1554:
1553:
1538:
1537:
1536:
1535:
1514:
1513:
1498:
1497:
1496:
1495:
1476:
1475:
1474:
1441:
1440:
1439:
1414:
1413:
1412:
1411:
1410:
1409:
1408:
1407:
1406:
1405:
1404:
1314:
1297:
1296:
1295:
1294:
1293:
1292:
1291:
1290:
1289:
1288:
1287:
1286:
1285:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1121:
1120:
1117:
1111:
1103:
1097:
1048:
1047:
1032:
1031:
1030:
1029:
1008:
1007:
992:
991:
990:
989:
978:
977:
940:
939:
936:
930:
922:
916:
867:
866:
851:
850:
849:
848:
827:
826:
811:
810:
809:
808:
772:
771:
770:
720:
705:
704:
691:
665:
664:
661:
655:
647:
641:
592:
591:
576:
575:
574:
573:
547:
546:
531:
530:
517:
516:
515:
514:
513:
512:
475:
447:User:Randomran
443:
442:
439:
433:
425:
419:
370:
369:
354:
353:
352:
351:
321:
320:
305:
304:
288:
287:
286:
285:
284:
283:
262:
261:
260:
259:
234:
233:
220:
179:
178:
175:
169:
161:
155:
106:
105:
90:
89:
88:
87:
67:
62:
58:
57:
49:
40:
29:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1688:
1675:
1673:
1668:
1663:
1662:
1655:
1652:
1648:
1647:
1646:
1643:
1639:
1637:
1634:
1630:
1627:
1626:
1625:
1624:
1621:
1610:
1603:
1596:
1587:
1583:
1579:
1575:
1571:
1567:
1562:
1558:
1557:
1556:
1555:
1552:
1550:
1545:
1540:
1539:
1534:
1531:
1527:
1526:
1522:
1521:
1520:
1519:
1512:
1510:
1505:
1500:
1499:
1494:
1491:
1486:
1480:
1477:
1473:
1469:
1462:
1461:
1460:
1456:
1454:
1445:
1444:Endorse close
1442:
1438:
1434:
1427:
1426:
1425:
1422:
1418:
1415:
1403:
1399:
1392:
1388:
1383:
1382:
1381:
1378:
1373:
1368:
1367:
1366:
1362:
1356:Sincerely, --
1354:
1353:
1352:
1349:
1345:
1341:
1340:
1339:
1335:
1327:
1326:
1325:
1322:
1318:
1315:
1313:
1309:
1305:
1301:
1298:
1284:
1280:
1273:
1269:
1265:
1264:
1263:
1260:
1256:
1255:
1254:
1250:
1242:
1238:
1234:
1233:
1232:
1229:
1225:
1221:
1220:
1219:
1215:
1208:
1207:
1206:
1203:
1198:
1197:
1196:
1192:
1188:
1187:
1181:
1178:
1174:
1170:
1163:
1162:
1161:
1158:
1154:
1151:
1150:
1149:
1148:
1144:
1137:
1133:
1130:and redirect
1129:
1125:
1116:
1109:
1102:
1094:
1090:
1086:
1082:
1077:
1073:
1068:
1064:
1060:
1056:
1052:
1051:
1050:
1049:
1046:
1044:
1039:
1034:
1033:
1028:
1025:
1021:
1020:
1016:
1015:
1014:
1013:
1006:
1004:
999:
994:
993:
988:
985:
980:
979:
976:
972:
968:
964:
963:User:Keeper76
960:
959:
958:
957:
953:
949:
945:
935:
928:
921:
913:
909:
905:
901:
896:
892:
887:
883:
879:
875:
871:
870:
869:
868:
865:
863:
858:
853:
852:
847:
844:
840:
839:
835:
834:
833:
832:
825:
823:
818:
813:
812:
807:
803:
799:
795:
791:
787:
784:
780:
776:
773:
769:
766:
761:
760:
759:
754:
750:
745:
744:
738:
736:
732:
725:
721:
719:
716:
712:
707:
706:
703:
698:
697:
690:
688:Corvus cornix
683:
682:
681:
678:
674:
670:
660:
653:
646:
638:
634:
630:
626:
621:
617:
612:
608:
604:
600:
596:
595:
594:
593:
590:
588:
583:
578:
577:
572:
568:
564:
560:
559:
555:
554:
553:
552:
545:
543:
538:
533:
532:
529:
528:
525:
521:
511:
508:
503:
502:
501:
497:
493:
489:
488:
487:
482:
481:
474:
472:Corvus cornix
467:
466:
465:
464:
460:
456:
452:
448:
438:
431:
424:
416:
412:
408:
404:
399:
395:
390:
386:
382:
378:
374:
373:
372:
371:
368:
366:
361:
356:
355:
350:
346:
342:
338:
334:
333:
329:
328:
327:
326:
319:
317:
312:
307:
306:
303:
302:
299:
297:
296:
282:
279:
277:
276:
268:
267:
266:
265:
264:
263:
258:
254:
250:
246:
242:
238:
237:
236:
235:
232:
227:
226:
219:
217:Corvus cornix
212:
208:
207:
206:
205:
201:
197:
193:
189:
185:
174:
167:
160:
152:
148:
144:
140:
135:
131:
126:
122:
118:
114:
110:
109:
108:
107:
104:
102:
97:
92:
91:
86:
83:
79:
78:
74:
73:
72:
71:
66:
53:
48:
44:
39:
32:
23:
19:
1671:
1664:
1628:
1616:
1548:
1541:
1523:
1508:
1501:
1478:
1452:
1443:
1416:
1344:improvements
1343:
1316:
1299:
1240:
1236:
1223:
1184:
1179:
1152:
1122:
1042:
1035:
1017:
1002:
995:
941:
861:
854:
836:
821:
814:
789:
782:
778:
774:
742:
734:
730:
728:
723:
692:
666:
586:
579:
563:IronGargoyle
556:
541:
534:
520:Speedy close
519:
518:
476:
444:
364:
357:
330:
315:
308:
294:
293:
289:
274:
273:
221:
180:
100:
93:
75:
65:21 June 2008
64:
874:Colin James
838:Colin James
675:, made the
961:Thanks to
944:Juno Award
249:Lehoiberri
196:Lehoiberri
1484:Seraphim♥
779:Absolutes
295:Wizardman
275:Wizardman
47:2008 June
794:WP:MUSIC
753:Contribs
743:lifebaka
724:overturn
341:Davewild
20: |
1642:Spartaz
1633:GRBerry
1629:Restore
1595:restore
1574:history
1530:GRBerry
1421:GRBerry
1377:GRBerry
1348:Spartaz
1317:Endorse
1259:Spartaz
1228:Spartaz
1202:Spartaz
1180:comment
1157:Spartaz
1101:restore
1072:protect
1067:history
1024:Cryptic
984:Spartaz
920:restore
891:protect
886:history
843:Spartaz
798:Stormie
775:Comment
765:GRBerry
715:GRBerry
645:restore
616:protect
611:history
524:GRBerry
507:GRBerry
423:restore
394:protect
389:history
159:restore
130:protect
125:history
82:GRBerry
52:June 22
38:June 20
1453:DrNick
1076:delete
967:Dl2000
948:Dl2000
895:delete
620:delete
492:SharkD
455:SharkD
398:delete
190:, and
134:delete
1602:cache
1582:watch
1578:links
1489:Whipp
1321:Bobet
1241:That'
1108:cache
1093:views
1085:watch
1081:links
927:cache
912:views
904:watch
900:links
792:meet
790:quite
652:cache
637:views
629:watch
625:links
430:cache
415:views
407:watch
403:links
166:cache
151:views
143:watch
139:links
55:: -->
16:<
1651:Nard
1620:Nard
1586:logs
1570:talk
1566:edit
1389:and
1308:talk
1191:talk
1089:logs
1063:talk
1059:edit
971:talk
952:talk
908:logs
882:talk
878:edit
802:talk
749:Talk
733:and
695:talk
633:logs
607:talk
603:edit
567:talk
496:talk
479:talk
459:talk
411:logs
385:talk
381:edit
345:talk
253:talk
224:talk
209:See
200:talk
147:logs
121:talk
117:edit
35:<
1609:AfD
1186:DGG
1115:AfD
934:AfD
713:.
677:CMJ
659:AfD
437:AfD
173:AfD
22:Log
1584:|
1580:|
1576:|
1572:|
1568:|
1457:!
1449:Hi
1329:--
1310:)
1237:my
1193:)
1091:|
1087:|
1083:|
1079:|
1074:|
1070:|
1065:|
1061:|
973:)
954:)
910:|
906:|
902:|
898:|
893:|
889:|
884:|
880:|
804:)
751:-
635:|
631:|
627:|
623:|
618:|
614:|
609:|
605:|
569:)
498:)
461:)
413:|
409:|
405:|
401:|
396:|
392:|
387:|
383:|
347:)
255:)
202:)
186:,
149:|
145:|
141:|
137:|
132:|
128:|
123:|
119:|
45::
1618:-
1612:)
1606:|
1598:|
1592:(
1588:)
1564:(
1306:(
1189:(
1118:)
1112:|
1104:|
1098:(
1095:)
1057:(
969:(
950:(
937:)
931:|
923:|
917:(
914:)
876:(
800:(
755:)
747:(
662:)
656:|
648:|
642:(
639:)
601:(
565:(
494:(
457:(
440:)
434:|
426:|
420:(
417:)
379:(
343:(
251:(
198:(
176:)
170:|
162:|
156:(
153:)
115:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.